The Spring BBSCFP › Topic 10
Help!

Privacy Law in France - Peters, Carblanc, Vrayance, Reidenberg

Topic 10 · 1 response · archived october 2000
» This is an archived thread from 2000. Want to pick up where they left off? post in the live CFP conference →
~terry seed
France has a tradition of centralization and state intervention in many areas. It also has a strong tradition of protecting civil liberties and individual rights. This panel will explain the French perspective on balancing protection of civil rights, promotion of economic development, and protection of public safety. The presentations will demonstrate these features by looking at two areas of law: protection of privacy (secrecy of correspondence and protection of personal data) and cryptography.
~terry #1
Danielle Gallo: Although many ideas and issues were raised in the panel on 'Privacy and Encryption Law in France', there are only a few I would like to touch on. Professor Joel Reidenberg of the Fordham University School of Law (http://www.fordham.edu/law/faculty/reidenberg/main.htm) cited the territorial impact of data protection. He suggested trans-border data flows enable data passing to places with inferior protection. This is of utmost concern to the French, who hold strong views on privacy. The French position on data protection issues prevents sensitive data such as political or religious beliefs to be transmitted without consent. Reidenberg concedes that there is not full respect for data privacy laws; therefore, organizations have been created to supervise enforcement -- for example, the CNIL (Commission Nationale Informatique et Libertes) in France. This part of the discussion relates to Brian Kahin's keynote address, which cited the need for international agreements and well-defined principles. I think that compromise on these issues will be difficult because the French are very stringent on privacy issues and may not agree with the rest of the world.
Help!
The Spring · spring.net · CFP / Topic 10 · AustinSpring.com