The Spring BBSDrool! › Topic 129
Help!

Colin Firth (Part 7)

Topic 129 · 1971 responses · archived october 2000
» This is an archived thread from 2000. Want to pick up where they left off? post in the live Drool! conference →
~heide seed
~lafn #1
(Karen)What attracts you all to Joe Prince. So he's a nice guy who falls in love with a looney. What attracts you to that slob Paul Ashford?;-) At least the looney has a better voice than Ruth Gemell
~Lizza #2
Leather jacket ? Reddish hair? Or a cannon where it matters?!!
~Lizza #3
BTW Karen, thanks for setting up yet another Cf part for us droolies.
~EileenG #4
(Ashworth Lizza) Or a cannon where it matters?!! *Heeheehee* (Evelyn) What attracts you to that slob Paul Ashford?;-) (Ashworth, for the picky). Hmm, thought-provoking question, Evelyn. JOE VS. PAUL *Let's get ready to ruuuuummmmmmbbllleeeee* JOE drives a clunky truck adorned with cute little animal cutouts. PAUL drives a girly compact car (a Nissan Cherry? ;-P). JOE loves to grocery shop, though he tends to get impatient after snogging. PAUL thinks only about Arsenal while shopping. JOE has adorable pets. PAUL has an adorable football lamp next to his bed. JOE looks great in a sweater. PAUL looks great in a leather coat. JOE looks dorky in his Ranger Rick uniform (hat, at least) PAUL's hair is mangy and he's frequently unshaven. JOE likes the great northwest. PAUL likes the great north bank. JOE has a loyal friend who cares about his well-being ('what do you know about this girl? How does she chew?'). PAUL has a loyal friend who cares about his well-being ('you need medical help'). JOE gets beaten up. PAUL gets pushed around by the crowd during a match. JOE seems to have on blue underwear when he shouldn't. PAUL wears cute red boxers adorned with cannons. JOE's great at vertical shagging. PAUL's...well, we don't know, do we? I say it's a dead heat. Who's got more?
~CherylB #5
Personally I really go for Richard Courtois -- he looked great in tights and out of them, plus he had a social consience in the Middle Ages. Yes, the Renaissance had gotten to Paris, but Richard had left Paris behind. I also am fascinated by Adrian LeDuc. Okay, so he's an Oedipus Wrecked repressed lunatic with a corpse in his apartment. Judging by my ex-boyfriends, I've always been attracted by mental illness in a man. So Adrian's nuts, no problem; however, he is gay. Well, we could be girlfriends -- we both love movies. Donovan Quick might be my sort. He does tilt at windmills, metaphorically speaking.
~lizbeth54 #6
LOL Eileen! Thanks for the info on DQ, Tracy! Disappointing and puzzling though. Why another six months delay? And then "late summer"...the graveyard period for scheduling, usually sport and repeats. Hmmmm!!!
~lizbeth54 #7
Tracy, I meant to ask you, where did you get your SLOW info (�50 retail). Highfliers (Tel 0181-7422023), who are bringing out the video, said it would be available for rental (yes!) on March 6, but wouldn't retail until the end of the year, (Patience is a virtue!)
~amw #8
We certainly have to have patience being CF fans, SLOW, goodness knows how many years, MLSF, a year after the US, (and fingers still crossed) DQ 9 months after Australia, if we are lucky, (late summer, could mean early September, which is the beginning of the winter schedules), Londinium, this year next year sometime never, only TTOTS was within months of finishing and that was a 4min cameo, okay I'll end on an optimistic note RV if it is released on the 19th May, will be relatively! quick, but do I really want to see a gay DB!! (before anyone says I have seen DQ, I am thinking of behalf of other fans who have not).
~KarenR #9
(Lizza) Or a cannon where it matters?!! You are bad, v. bad. ;-) And Eileen...you *must* publish! ;-) I'm sure there are more comparisons. Will put my thinking cap on. (AnnW) I really want to see a gay DB!! (before anyone says I have seen DQ, I am thinking of behalf of other fans who have not). Was that a spoiler-type slip, Ann? *slap slap* Bethan, SLOW shoes up at Blackstar: http://www.blackstar.co.uk/video/item/7000000055030 And here's the video jacket from that site: That pricing is for the rental market; a retail price should be in the �13 range for you, I expect. (AnnW) I'll end on an optimistic note RV if it is released on the 19th May Things look as certain as I've ever seen. Besides, word I had is that they're taking it to Cannes. Doubt that means competition, but just for screening and lots of hoopla.
~KarenR #10
And here's the long-awaited video cover for TTOTS. Surprise surprise...bet no one thought they'd use Colin to sell this one! ;-)
~heide #11
I may never watch it but once but I'll get the TOTS tape for the cover. No need to mention that SLOW will be as worn out as my Fever Pitch in no time. (Lizza) Or a cannon where it matters?!! That's worthy of Mae West, Lizza. Look like we need say no more about Paul Ashworth over Joe Prince though Eileen has plenty to say and in her inimitable style, as always. (Eileen) JOE's great at vertical shagging. PAUL's...well, we don't know, do we? No (darn it) but I can get woozy over that coffee cup kissing scene. And!! he did manage to impregnate Sarah. Okay, any fifteen year old can do that. (Cheryl) I also am fascinated by Adrian LeDuc. Okay, so he's an Oedipus Wrecked repressed lunatic with a corpse in his apartment. Snicker... Still he'd have breakfast on the table and your clothing laundered for you. Judging by my ex-boyfriends, I've always been attracted by mental illness in a man. And I by vulnerable, sensitive men. Hence Joe Prince's appeal.
~lafn #12
(Eileen) JOE's great at vertical shagging. PAUL's...well, we don't know, do we? (Heide)No (darn it) but I can get woozy over that coffee cup kissing scene. You ALL can have all the coffee and Ash...(what-ever-it-is)-cannon-shorts you want....I'll take Joe by the freezer and the vertical shag any day...besides, as Winter used to say: "You could be sure he'd be there in the mornin'" Paul might,unless there's an early Arsenal game;-)
~lizbeth54 #13
RV at Cannes? Good! I'm all for hoopla....movies need some hype. And By then perhaps Julie will have been to see the Queen to collect her Damedom! All good publicity.. BTW how gay is Peter? There's charming, well mannered, deep-voiced, Is he or isn't he, sort of Noel Coward suurrogate...that's ok by me! Or have you spotted a limp wrist? :-)
~lizbeth54 #14
Keep on losing the Internet connection. Have to be short and snappy. Ann, if "late summer" for DQ is ealy Sept, that's a good scheduling time. It's just the month of August that's a no-hoper, Although I think "Mrs Brown" was shown on late August Bank Holiday and got an audience of 12 million.
~KarenR #15
Well, no sooner than I say that RV is a lock for May...grrr OK, RV's release has been pushed back to the beginning of June. That makes more sense, as the Cannes FF is May 10-21. However, they wouldn't confirm that as the reason, but said it was just a scheduling thing. Sure!!
~mari #16
Speaking of RV, here's something to cheer Ann up: Murph has just put up a new pic of Colin and Sophie Thompson. Go to her news page and scroll about a third of the way down. He's saying, "Shhhh." ;-) Karen, is the June release for the UK? Good to hear about Cannes; CF will have to put his schmoozing cap back on, but it won't kill him.;-) Eileen, I loved your Joe/Paul comparison!
~KarenR #17
Yes, the June release date for RV is for the UK.
~amw #18
That really doesn't surprise me, still it means that the forthcoming films are now nicely spread out, Sunshine in April, MLSF in May and now RV in June. Bethan, going back to DQ, I am really surprised that the BBC haven't rushed to air DQ, it is a wonderful involving drama, that realy has you routing for the whole family and there is a to-die-for shot of Colin in the closing scene.
~Tracy #19
Bethan - Re SLOW, yes I did get the info from Blackstar have since asked WH Smiths who could not give a release date (and hadn't even heard of it...heresy!)but reckon on a "normal retail price" so that'll be around about the �13-�15 mark like Karen says. "CherylB - Personally I really go for Richard Courtois -- he looked great in tights and out of them" I'm right with you there girlie, the "stay in me" (don't think I misheard - apologies if I did) scene is just wonderfully played and putting the "social consience" to one side for a moment you can give me a good dose of cockerel scene any day...no pun intended honest:-D Joe Vs Paul - great comparisons Eileen LOL! (For the picky (and at the risk of raising the car subject again) Paul drives a maroon Ford Escort!) Adrian LeDuc's definately odd - I just can't summon up any empathy for him I'm afraid and no matter how many times I see it (and I don't want to be drummed out of the droolies) I cannot see what all the noise is about Birkin (it must be the moustache I think, Simon Westward has a similar non-effect). Strangely that said I find Charlie Gould extremely droolable in a power-crazed, blinkered kind of way..who can forget the mine/ garotte experiences! Haven't we been here before?? Someone was asking a while back about a Nia Long quote re ODB, I have it here (from Empire Magazine Jan 2000): "(SLOW) gave her the chance....to get hot and heavy with British heart-throb Colin Firth. "He's great. There's something about him that's very innocent, childlike. I think he's shy." " well thanks for your input Nia!
~lafn #20
LOL...everyone has a fave Colin role. I was about to say...no one likes Charlie Gould and along comes Tracy. At least we all agree on Mr D.!
~heide #21
no one likes Charlie Gould and along comes Tracy. At least we all agree on Mr D.! Heheheh. I kinda like Charlie myself - those sunbleached locks of hair, eh Tracy? Now is there anyone who will say they like Simon Westward?
~baine #22
(Heide) Now is there anyone who will say they like Simon Westward? Only as a comic role--the qualified Dutchman scene makes me realize how good ODB would have been as a Python if born a generation earlier. And in the book Simon is a fuller and actually more likeable character--too bad they didn't do more with him in the movie. I agree with you, Tracy, about Birkin's mustache--does nothing for him except make him look like Tommy Judd trying to look grownup. I like the film which makes the stache even more frustrating and perhaps explains why Natasha rejected him in the end.
~KarenR #23
Hmmm, I've always like Charlie in that dinner party scene toward the end when they try to thank Nostromo, but only Emilia know how to do it. Doncha just love how Colin looks in that waistcoast (no jacket) and isn't his shirt open at the top? Delish. Gotta think some more about Simon and whether there's anything to love about him. He does sit a horse awfully well at the beginning. And we both share an interest in books. ;-)
~aishling #24
From Baz B in today's Daily Mail: A Dark time for Mr Darcy Colin Firth has signed up to work with the woman who helped make him a heart-throb. The actor, whose portrayal of the dangerously handsome Mr Darcy in P&P made him a household name, will collaborate with its award winning producer Sue Birtwhistle, on as new TW dama. No tight breeches or coy glimpses of bare shoulder in this one though. This time Firth will play author William Boyd's modern-day literary here, Lorimer Black, an insurance adjuster from his novel Armadillo. The story begins with Black arriving for a meeting in Central London and finding a hanged man. His day - and his life - soon begins to unravel in the most darkly comic way. Colin agreed to do this at a very early stage and it's pefect for him, Ms Birtwhislte told me. Boyd is adapting his tale for the screen with filming beginning in the summer. Firth and Birtwhistle initially met several years ago on Dutch Girls, which Boyd also wrote.
~Elena #25
in the most darkly comic way. So, he�s STILL not retiring! And not "leaving the country" for good either! Wow, thanks for the great news Aishling, that does sound like Colin�s stuff, I mean that Most Darkly Comic part. And with Sue B, that�s a very good sign.
~amw #26
Aishling -filming beginning in the summer Great news, well done Aishling and BB, and it still gives him time to do BJD, TM of B or even Flashman, or all three!!
~Elena #27
(Karen)And we both share an interest in books. Re: Simon Westward. I admire his taste in literature too. Maybe I�m a pervert but I could never resist that terrible scene where says "what about....this one"! :-D Also, I love it how totally irresposible and hatable Colin manages to look like when Simon learns about the unwanted pregnancy.
~NitaE #28
Well done, Aishling, that's very good news. (Ann)and it still gives him time to do BJD,TM of B or even Flashman, or all three!! You never give up hope, do you? Re: Simon Westward. I admire his taste in literature too. Maybe I�m a pervert but I could never resist that terrible scene where says "what about....this one"! :-D I have always wondered what "this one " could be! :)
~EileenG #29
Here's Aishling with a scoop! Woohoo, news at last. Biz has broken a few CF and JE projects, hasn't he? And he's always accurate. His day - and his life - soon begins to unravel in the most darkly comic way. Have to admit, I was glad to see the word 'comic' in this sentence. It's great to see Colin back with Susie (now, where's Andy?). (Karen) Yes, the June release date for RV is for the UK So there's no release date for the US, then (will be a big girl and go check your page. Interesting bit about Cannes. Doubt CF will be there, though. No Harvey. Unless, of course, C&L really got into the hobnobbing and goobersmooching when they were there last year. In which case, get out the dark glasses and pop open the orangina! Re: Simon Character aside, Simon's one of CF's better performances, IMO. He's very nuanced. Look at his face when Nan tells him it's her first time and she's waited for someone special. And you have to love him sitting crosslegged on the bed, pants off, shirt, undies and socks intact. Agree with Cymbeline about book Simon. A very different, fuller character (and short in stature, so CF would never do). I'd go for him, but Simon's got this little thing about Catholics.... (Nita) You [Ann] never give up hope, do you? Just ask Bethan about SLOW. She hung in there after most of us jumped ship on that one. Sometimes it pays to hope.
~KarenR #30
Wow, Aishling!! This sounds v. good. Boyd (since his Dutch Girls days) has become quite a respected novelist, with that Brazzaville thing. Not a two-bitter at all. But this is for television again! :-( Here are some reviews from amazon.com: Lorimer Black may suffer from a serious sleep disorder and an obsession with the labyrinths of the British class system, but Armadillo's peculiar protagonist is the star insurance adjuster of London's Fortress Sure PLC, unaffectionately known as the Fort. At the very start of William Boyd's noir-ish seventh novel, however, things take a decided swerve for the worse. On a bleak January morning one of his cases has apparently chosen to kill himself rather than talk: "Mr. Dupree was simultaneously the first dead person he had encountered in his life, his first suicide and his first hanged man and Lorimer found this congruence of firsts deceptively troubling." Soon our hero, who himself has a lot to hide, finds himself threatened by a dodgy type whose loss he has adjusted way down and embroiled with the beautiful married actress Flavia Malinverno. "People who've lost something, they call on you to adjust it, make the loss less hard to bear? As if their lives are broken in some way and they call on you to fix it," Flavia dippily wonders. Lorimer also has his car torched and instantly goes from an object of affection to one of deep suspicion at the Fort. Then there is another case, the small matter of the rock star who may or may not be faking the Devil he says is sitting on his left shoulder. Needless to say, Lorimer is "becoming fed up with this role of fall guy for other people's woes." Boyd adds a deep layer of psychological heft and a lighter level of humor to this thinking-person's thriller by exploring Lorimer's manifold personal and social fears. This is a man who desperately collects ancient helmets even though he knows they offer only "the illusion of protection." Another of Armadillo's many pleasures: its dose of delicious argot. Should Lorimer "oil" the apparent perpetrator of the Fedora Palace arson before he's oiled himself? Or perhaps he just needs to "put the frighteners" on him. Boyd definitely puts the frighteners on his readers more than once in this cinematically seedy and dazzling literary display. --Kerry Fried From Booklist , September 1, 1998 As a loss adjuster, Lorimer Black represents the unstable element in the supposedly safe world of insurance, as he negotiates down arrangements already agreed to. And he's a star at what he does in his London office. Varying his appearance and dress ever so subtly to suit each situation, he gains the confidence that serves as his invisible armor, a parallel to his expensive avocation of collecting antique armor. But events begin to buffet him: a perplexing case raises the level of danger in his already dangerous business, an actress married to a jealous juggler increasingly occupies his thoughts and the lucid dreams of his sleep therapy, and an odd relationship upsets his well-ordered life. Boyd, a deft craftsman, continues to explore his frequent themes of identity, insecurity, and the fragility of life as he turns the examination of an intriguing vocation into a darkly comic tale full of substance as well as tips for the well-dressed gentleman. Michele Leber ~~~~~~~~~~~~ Sounds delicious, though. Remember seeing the book on the shelves last March in London. Involved with a "beautiful married actress" Ooo wee!! I think we can rely on Sue B to know how to *package* Colin to his best advantage. ;-) (Elena) I love it how totally irresposible and hatable Colin manages to look like when Simon learns about the unwanted pregnancy. You're so right. Colin's looks are great in every scene. Love the frustration in the car too - the infamous "oh, Nan, oh" ;-) (Nita) I have always wondered what "this one " could be! :) Haven't we all. Join the club. ;-) (Eileen) goobersmooching What the heck is that? Only thing that come to mind is kissing peanuts or Jimmy Carter. RV seems tailormade for the Cannes crowd: the resurrection of Julie Andrews is sure to make a splash with all the paparazzi and you know they'll be entertained by Jeanne Tripplehorn and Billy B. Colin might attend. Livia probably would want to go again.
~KarenR #31
Just another thought: Was there a picture with Baz's article?
~aishling #32
Yes, just head shot, semi-smile
~KarenR #33
Did it look new?
~amw #34
Yes, I have not seen it before, am sending it to Murph.
~EileenG #35
(Eileen) goobersmooching (Karen) What the heck is that? Only thing that come to mind is kissing peanuts or Jimmy Carter. Not to mention those little chocolate candies made by the Raisinette folks...it's a term, common in these parts, for sucking up to the big boys. (Karen) Sounds delicious, though. Sounds better and better after reading those reviews (thanks for posting). At last, a thriller! *Eileen does dance of joy* With comedic undertones, to boot! But this is for television again! :-( At least it spares us from wondering if it will be picked up by a distributor, which part of the world will get to see it on the big screen, etc. And BBC Scotland's not involved (don't they seem to be asleep at the DQ wheel?). Yes, just head shot, semi-smile Have we seen this one before, Aishling?
~EileenG #36
Never mind my last line.
~Brown32 #37
Thanks SO much, Ann and Aishling. Quick like a bunny I have the news and the Amazon link for the book plus a bit of the plot on my news page. News Page Murph As a person who loves thrillers, this looks like a winner. Now, sleuths, find out who is producing this, and whether it is TV or Film. I am assuming TV.
~mari #38
Thanks for this news, Aishling! It's funny, but I had a premonition that we'd be reading about a new project today. Will consult the crystal ball to see if I can ascertain broadcast dates.;-) Baz's info is always reliable, and if Sue B. is involved, it's sure to be a winner. I'm very encouraged by those Amazon reviews (thanks, Karen). I also wasn't thrilled to see that it's TV, Karen, but it looks like the book received good reviews in the U.S. as well, so maybe there's a glimmer of hope that we'll see it here too. Ann, we'll look forward to seeing the new pic--thanks. Off to read tea leaves . . .;-)
~lafn #39
Thanks Aishling for the scoop. Baz should be made an honorary Colin/Jennifer publicist. And Sue Colin's agent. Karen, I hope you are posting those reviews on The Bucket so we can read them again. Now I'll buy the book.Anybody have the ISBN number?
~lafn #40
I also wasn't thrilled to see that it's TV, Why? His movies go no where, unless he's in a supporting role. I'd rather have good starring roles on TV. Besides, he doesn't have to promote them;-)
~SusanMC #41
Wow! Aishling, Karen, Murph, thanks for the news, book info, etc. At last, a confirmed project for ODB -- and with Sue B., no less;-) ...and embroiled with the beautiful married actress Flavia Malinverno Anyone care to venture casting suggestions for this part? Sounds like she's dark and sultry and... Italian? ...a darkly comic tale full of substance as well as tips for the well-dressed gentleman. LOL! Colin could sure use these;-)
~KarenR #42
On my return from second chaffeuring run of the morn, I stopped at Borders and B&N--*hee hee* doing my suburban drive from one corner parking lot to the next--Armadillo probably won't be in anybody's stock, as it is scheduled to come out in paperback in April. There might be leftovers around, but what's the hurry. Will check if the library has it.
~lizbeth54 #43
Now this sounds like a good one (Thanks Aishling!) SB and William Boyd...an excellent combination. WB has an excellent reputation as a writer, and he's just directed (and wrote the screenplay for) his first movie "The Trench" which got v.good reviews. And could it could be a drama series, not a 2 hour film?
~lizbeth54 #44
Have to post in installments! Bear with me! Like Ann, I still hope he'll do "Maid of Buttermere"...(it's a very strong serious dramatic role, and there are a few more months to fill in before the summer!) and BJD. No slacking! It's good to mix TV and film work. But quality TV attracts a lot of attention in the UK.
~KarenR #45
Chicago Public Library isn't answering its phone. Forgot, is Honest Abe's Bday and are closed. :-( More info on Armadillo (betcha Evelyn knows a few of those!) Description from The Reader's Catalog Boyd's social satire centers around Lorimer Black, the scion of a gypsy clan who has transformed himself into a dashing and cultivated insurance adjuster. One day, instead of meeting with the business associate he expects, Lorimer is greeted by a hanged man. From then on the hapless hero is swept into a web of intrigue involving rock musicians, beautiful women, ominous job firings, and something called the Institute of Lucid Dreams From The Publisher One cold winter's morning, Lorimer Black -- insurance adjuster, young, good-looking, on the rise -- goes out on a perfectly ordinary business appointment, finds a hanged man and realizes that his life is about to be turned upside down. The elements at play: a beautiful actress glimpsed in a passing taxi . . . an odd new business associate whose hiring, firing and rehiring make little sense. . . a rock musician who is losing his mind -- and a web of fraud in which virtually everyone Lorimer Black knows has been caught and in which he finds himself increasingly entangled. Reviews From Charles Taylor (MAJOR SPOILERS) In the midst of the dully compelling puzzle that is William Boyd's Armadillo is a minor character named David Watts, a hugely successful rock singer. Someone has to tell Boyd's protagonist, an insurance adjuster named Lorimer Black, that Watts has named himself after a song by the Kinks. Hearing "David Watts" for the first time, Lorimer describes it as "a song about someone who could do no wrong, someone who was revered and worshipped by his peers, someone who, to all intents and purposes, was perfect." Well, no."David Watts" is a song about someone "revered and worshipped by his peers," but it's sung by someone who will never be David Watts' peer. Ray Davies sings it in the voice of a self-described "dull and simple lad," one whose heart is green as much from bile as from envy. What does William Boyd's mishearing of a 30-year-old rock song have to do with the rest of Armadillo? It sums up his imprecision. There are ample reasons why the singer who chooses to call himself David Watts would hear Ray Davies' song as being about hero worship. But there's nothing to indicate that Boyd himself knows it's about something more. This inability (unwillingness?) is indicative of the haze that hangs over the entire novel. Haze is different from ambiguity, which still implies some sureness of purpose, and which might suit the subject. Armadillo is a book about people who've taken pains to conceal their motives and identities. Many of its characters have abandoned their birth names as if they were unflattering clothes. Lorimer, whose real name is Milomre Blocj, has escaped his ethnic roots and reinvented himself as a young London professional of rarefied tastes. His business, trying to keep insurance companies from paying out the money they've promised, is a con game run with the protection of he law, but Lorimer does his best not to let its unsavory nature rub off on him. His genteel lifestyle is his armadillo's shell. Trouble is, what's beneath it isn't very compelling. Neither are the plot complications Boyd puts Lorimer through. We can see that the various pieces (the suicide Lorimer stumbles upon; the co-worker who takes a shine to him; the arson case Lorimer is investigating) will eventually fit together, and that keeps us reading. But you never feel like there's anything much at stake. Boyd's atmospheric vagueness can be exotically entertaining in his short fiction, as it was in his last collection, The Destiny of Nathalie X, but here he doesn't seem to be possessed by the subject or his story. Armadillo is like an exceptionally literate and halfhearted thriller. Boyd doesn't even seem to have fully taken in the current moment. Lorimer is the sort of self-absorbed materialistic protagonist you'd expect in a novel about acquisitive '80s yuppies. Like everything else about Armadillo, his purchased sophistication feels half-right and terribly, terribly vague. -- Salon From Michael Shelden Witty and exquisitely complicated. . .The tale combines a touch of Dickensian realistic comedy with a Kafkaesque sense of modern urban terror. -- The Baltimore Sun
~lafn #46
Thanks Karen....I take it back...this sounds like it would be a better movie than anything else he's been in lately.Rock musicians, beautiful women.... au courant(sounding like Ben ;-)).The multi-plex crowd would go for it. Along way from Mr. Darcy
~Brown32 #47
...and embroiled with the beautiful married actress Flavia Malinverno Anyone care to venture casting suggestions for this part? Sounds like she's dark and sultry and... Italian? ************** Susan: I have already begun to think on this, and I have a perfect choice. Did anyone see Sopranos last Sunday? If you did, you know EXACTLY who I am talking about, right? Her real name is Sofia Milos, and she was an absolutely gob smacking lady! I still don't know how Tony resisted her in the goddess's temple! I bet teaming her with Colin would get him past all those closed mouth kisses he prefers on screen. [I'm already ducking the missives] She was also Richard's Italian wife in Caroline In The City. Murph
~EileenG #48
(Murph) [I'm already ducking the missives] We don't do that here (well, not like other places). I know who you mean. Very Sophia Loren-like. Mama mia! BTW, did you notice the bit set in the Party City on Route 17 in Hasbrouck Hts?
~lafn #49
(Murph) [I'm already ducking the missives] (Eileen)We don't do that here (well, not like other places). ~~~~~ OT True, Murph. You know us better than that. Which is why I only belong to Spring. What's more everyone is welcomed here...no one is vetted.
~Tracy #50
Aishling and everyone elso...great scoop re Armadillo. Now I know what I'm doing tomorrow, hot footing it down the library to hand in Maid of Buttermere and get Armadillo out...that's always assuming there are no other Firthlettes in town! Will post a book report when I get through it! "Evelyn- no one likes Charlie Gould and along comes Tracy. " Gould isn't my absolute favourite, mind you with such a smorgesbord to select from I have great difficulty in deciding. No there's nothing for it I'll just have to sit through my collection again. What a chore ;-D
~Brown32 #51
Eileen says: BTW, did you notice the bit set in the Party City on Route 17 in Hasbrouck Hts? ******** Was that where it was? I've never been in there, but have passed it many times. Used to go to the Crow's Nest nearby when it was owned by a friend of a friend. Murph I was only kidding about the missives. I know all here are gentle and kind. I hope this graphic works..."I SHALL conquer this, I shall!"
~Maureen #52
Armadillo mmmmmmm, sounds like really good stuff. Now if my beloved ABC plays its cards right, we might just be one of the first to see it. Sorry to rub it in folks, I do not get much of a chance to brag but we have already seen DQ here and us convicts deserve a break every now and then. I have a confession to make, I watched A Circle of Friends's 3 times before I realised it was Colin playing SW (shame on me). Why doesn't she read the credits I hear you ask???? I did eventually when it kept bugging me trying to figure out where I had seen this guy before. It took me ages to come to terms with it being him in that role at all. I was quite disillusioned by him after my discovery, as he played a dirty old man type character. Hope I have not offeneded anyone. I had to watch P&P a number of times after COF to fall in love with him all over again. Not that I rely entirely on a fix of P&P to get the adrenalin going but it does help to soothe the way until the next dangling carrot comes along. As for Nostromo, I can safely say that I did recognise Colin in this role. Aired again on my beloved ABC, I thought Colin looked absolutely delectable and played a strong yet vulnerable character. However, the overall presentation of the series reminded me of a Clint Eatwood spagehetti western. Again hope I have not offended anyone!!!!!!
~Maureen #53
BTW Murph, love the picture it works just fine. Maybe you can conquer it with a hairdryer and the heat turned up to the highest level??????
~lizbeth54 #54
I bet teaming her with Colin would get him past all those closed mouth kisses he prefers on screen. (Murph) Ah, so you've noticed (except, possibly in P&P!) There was a nice little interview with Ruth Gemmel in which she mentioned she was a bit nervous about the love scenes in FP, but it was easy about this to Colin because he was very sympathetic. She did mention that he didn't kiss "properly" and that her boyfriend was very relieved and said "Oh, Mr Darcy's a crap kisser". You can guess what the headline was!
~amw #55
It gets worse - just received a reply to my letter to BBC Scotland, from Sharon Dempsey - "Thankyou for your letter.... We do not have a confirmed transmission date for this programme yet, but anticipate that it will be towards the end of this year." Why, why, why its been ready for ages. Just days ago Tracy was told the end of the summer.
~lizbeth54 #56
DQ....end of summer/September-ish/October...perhaps? What geniuinely puzzles me is the lack of a confirmed transmission date. It's been in the can since September, and by all accounts it's very good, it's produced by a BAFTA winning team, and it stars Colin Firth!! No reason to delay it. One thing I can predict...Colin will be 40 by the time it's shown! One good thing about the Armadillo project is that I'm sure SB will fight to protect Colin's best interests...somehow this hasn't happened in his recent projects !!
~Elena #57
(Murph)I was quite disillusioned by him after my discovery, as he played a dirty old man type character. Hope I have not offeneded anyone This just goes to show what a great actor he is, he could fool even you. Well, maybe he should do some more dirty old man roles because he�s so good at it!! One thing yet about Simon, he�s disgusting but there�s more to him than that. I also feel a little sorry for him. I think Colin gives away that Simon has a bad conscience and that Simon is aware of his own creepish character but can�t do anything about it. (Bethan)She did mention that he didn't kiss "properly" So what is that supposed to mean, "not properly"?! :) This seems to be typical of all the greatest screen lovers. Wasn�t Clark Gable reputed to be a lousy kisser too.
~lizbeth54 #58
I guess kising is very intimate, and if he's a shy (and married!) man he would definitely prefer the "aim left of centre, mouth closed" approach! :-)
~Brown32 #59
(Murph)I was quite disillusioned by him after my discovery, as he played a dirty old man type character. Hope I have not offeneded anyone ********** Elena: I don't remember saying that, but then I don't remember saying a lot of things! To whom was I referring? Murph
~amw #60
re Elena's posting - Murph, I belive it was Maureen, not you, apologies if I am wrong.
~heide #61
Maureen, you're welcome to crow all you like about DQ and this fantastic sounding new project if it plays on ABC first. Just remember, we'll be demanding the video. Shall we call him Lorie? Aishling, thanks so much for sniffing out the news for us. I love the Internet - there's always someone awake somewhere in the world. Karen, can always count on you to get us the details. I shall be a good girl and go to my library today as well. (Bethan) I guess kising is very intimate, and if he's a shy (and married!) man he would definitely prefer the "aim left of centre, mouth closed" approach! :-) I don't think he's that shy. Guess he's just being polite. Little does he know how much his female costars admire him and wouldn't mind a little less professionalism. )(Maureen on Nostromo) However, the overall presentation of the series reminded me of a Clint Eatwood spagehetti western. Again hope I have not offended anyone!!!!!! Oh heavens no. Thin skin won't work here at all. Besides, I agree with you on this one - it is like a spaghetti western right down to the music. But those Sergio Leone/Eastwood films are pretty good so I take it as a compliment to the production, warranted or not. (Karen) Charlie in that dinner party scene toward the end when they try to thank Nostromo, but only Emilia know how to do it. Doncha just love how Colin looks in that waistcoast (no jacket) and isn't his shirt open at the top? Delish. Ummm yes, Karen. Looking good. He's just a little bit drunk in this scene, I think, but not enough to miss what's happening between his wife and N. I'm afraid though that I can't think of one COF scene where I find him appealing, though I can always make up excuses for his actions. (Eileen) Re: Simon Westward. I admire his taste in literature too. Maybe I�m a pervert but I could never resist that terrible scene where says "what about....this one"! :-D (Nita) I have always wondered what "this one " could be! :) Nita, have you ever seen The Hour of the Pig? ;-)
~KarenR #62
(Maureen) Sorry to rub it in folks, I do not get much of a chance to brag but we have already seen DQ here That's OK, we'll be seeing it shortly. I expect by the middle of the week. ;-) However, the overall presentation of the series reminded me of a Clint Eatwood spagehetti western How very apt! ;-) It was an Italian co-production, but I'd have to lay the blame on the supporting characters. So many of them look as though their dialogue had been dubbed and, of course, those pygmy horses. (Bethan quoting Ruth Gemmel) he didn't kiss "properly" Argh! Maybe that's why I focus on that shoulder-grinding action? Less-than-satisfactory liplocks. (Elena) Colin gives away that Simon has a bad conscience and that Simon is aware of his own creepish character but can�t do anything about it. I definitely agree with you, Elena. But I'm always defending Colin's characters. To me, he appears as though he'd really like to go on with Nan, but that responsibility to his family/estate won't let him. There is that one scene with his sister(?) when she's proposing "suitable" matches for him, where he looks disgusted and semi-rebellious. I think he would like to make his own choices, but feels he cannot.
~lafn #63
it's produced by a BAFTA winning team, and it stars Colin Firth!! No reason to delay it. If UK shows it, the sooner we'll get it in the US.But telling our A&E, Bravo and PBS that it got rave review in Australia, will fall on deaf ears. Bethan, I'm sure there are enough copies of DQ floating around in the UK that you should be able to see it. ~~~~~~~ (Heide)I don't think he's that shy. Guess he's just being polite. Oh yeah? Didn't you see him with Catherine Zeta-Jones in "Out of the Blue" with the tongues going?Not exactly a chaste kiss.
~lizbeth54 #64
Just noticed that next week the BBC are airing the BBC Scotland drama "Monarch of the Glen" which is listed after DQ in the forthcoming productions on the BBC Scotland website. Obviously no problem with setting a transmission date here! I've got a suspicious mind, I know, but there has to be a reason for the delay in showing DQ...there's not even a provisional date. But I'm blowed if I can think why! Any Sherlocks out there?
~lizbeth54 #65
Oh, and yes, Catherine Z-J, I quite forgot. Certainly no chaste kiss here! Bethan, I'm sure there are enough copies of DQ floating around in the UK that you should be able to see it. I'm sure now that I'll give in to the temptation, but I was holding out for the pleasure and anticipation of seeing it "live"!
~amw #66
I wonder if perhaps it is "politically corret", you know David & Goliath scenario, just a thought.
~Elena #67
(Murph)Elena: I don't remember saying that, but then I don't remember saying a lot of things! To whom was I referring? Sorry Murph, obviously I meant Maureen!! And sorry Maureen, didn�t mean to slight you. (Heide):(Eileen) Re: Simon Westward. I admire his taste in literature too. Maybe I�m a pervert but I could never resist that terrible scene where says "what about....this one"! :-D Heide, it really was not Eileen who thought she was a pervert, it was me!! :-D
~CherylB #68
Colin Firth with (as suggested) Sofia Milos. Does this mean CF will have to get a gladiator outfit? I could go for Charles Gould. He looks good on a horse, has the most wonderful sun lightened hair, and I thought CF looked good with a full beard. Gould is also a terrific character, idealistic, dynamic, but ultimately corrupted. Although Charles Gould is English, he does have some characteristics of an American archetype, which may explain why the American Holroyd is willing to invest money in Gould's enterprise. The archetype to which I refer is the man who starts with little or nothing becomes a powerful capitalist, but loses something of his basic humanity in his basic ascent. That could someone of any nationality, but it reminds of those Taylor Caldwell novels, and she was American. RE: Open mouth kissing with Catherine Zeta-Jones, maybe it was her tongue that pryed his lips apart, and he was to polite to pull away. I wouldn't blame CZ-T if that's what she did. Who can blame her?
~heide #69
(Elena) Heide, it really was not Eileen who thought she was a pervert, it was me!! :-D Thanks, Elena. Did I get it right this time? ;-) (CherylB) Although Charles Gould is English, he does have some characteristics of an American archetype, which may explain why the American Holroyd is willing to invest money in Gould's enterprise. Interesting. Though a product of English imperialism, I do think Charlie had good intentions at the start. Just needed that filthy euchre to realize his dreams. Reminds me of one scene when Holroyd and Gould first come to the silver mine and Holroyd grabs Charlie by his lapels. CG looks at him with this blank expression but promptly dusts off his jacket after he's released. You know he's thinking "crass American" but he knows where his money's coming from.
~Elena #70
(Heide)I don't think he's that shy. Guess he's just being polite. As a private person he may be shy but as an actor, NEVER. He�s also a very polite person in private but as an actor he�s only what is needed for the role. If he wasn�t kissing RuthG "properly" then it wasn�t needed in FP, and it really wasn�t, only RG was needing a proper kiss from him it seems (no wonder!). Anyway I�m sure he�d be quite ready to kiss one�s head off if it was necessary for the part he�s playing. (Heide)have you ever seen The Hour of the Pig? ;-) He wasn�t exactly shy there either.
~NitaE #71
(Heide) Nita, have you ever seen The Hour of the Pig? ;-) Yes, but only once. Why?
~Maureen #72
Who cares whether he can kiss properly or not???? Just the lip to lip contact would be enough, which is an opportunity that I doubt, I would ever have the chance to experience. If the truth be known it is probably Ruth Gemmel who cannot kiss. Karen pygmey horses and dubbing thats excatly what Nostromo looked and sounded like. Well at least the parts Colin did not appear in. Heidi, no compliments to the Clint Eastwood spahetti westren makers, sorry. The dubbing in those movies was of a particularly poor quality. You could almost duck out to the loo after the characters move their lips and be back in time hear what they were saying. What did he appear in with Cathrine Zetta Jones???????
~lizbeth54 #73
I think Ruth Gemmel's comment about not kissing "properly" just meant that for on-screen kissing he preferred the simulated kiss approach, ie closed lips etc, head slightly turned away, which most professional actors use, rather than the real thing which is generally inappropriate. Of his off-screen kissing abilities, I'm sure she's have no knowledge!
~lizbeth54 #74
BTW, from what I remember of the article, RG seemed to like him a lot!
~Tracy #75
Evelyn - the ISBN for Armadillo is0-14-027944-x "Elena - I�m sure he�d be quite ready to kiss one�s head off if it was necessary for the part he�s playing." LOL! You're quite right, unfortunately for us the majority of the parts ODB has played over the years have not called for excessive bouts of tonsil-hockey and in FP it's the comparisons in the two relationships that are the issue and not...shall we say the mechanics. That's not to say that I prefer it that way...I'm all for a bit of gratuitous bed/freezer/mine/cottage-floor-in-front-of-roaring-fire action myself ;-~~~~
~KarenR #76
(Maureen) What did he appear in with Cathrine Zeta Jones? A television drama called Out of the Blue. It wasn't particularly good, but it had that good line about the mouse. ;-) Anyone remember? About the poor-form kissing, let's take a closer look at Valmont's whirling and twirling scene with Meg. How did he perform there?
~heide #77
(Bethan)Of his off-screen kissing abilities, I'm sure she's have no knowledge! LOL!! The girl can only dream. BTW, from what I remember of the article, RG seemed to like him a lot! Don't they all? :-) Anyone know of any instance where a leading lady/costar did not care for him? Hmmm..... (Karen) About the poor-form kissing, let's take a closer look at Valmont's whirling and twirling scene with Meg. How did he perform there? Is there much kissing going on in that scene? I just remember little pecks. Perhaps his upraised shoulder is blocking the more passionate ones. (Heide) Nita, have you ever seen The Hour of the Pig? ;-) (Nita) Yes, but only once. Why? Goes back to our COF question...what sexual position was Simon showing to Nan? There are a variety of ones to choose from in HOTPIG. Alas, Richard shows poor form in the kissing scenes with Samira in this film. Much more energy with Maria. (Tracy) unfortunately for us the majority of the parts ODB has played over the years have not called for excessive bouts of tonsil-hockey Yes, 'tis unfortunate. Seems he did put a lot more work into those scenes in his earlier films. Inexperience? That's not to say that I prefer it that way...I'm all for a bit of gratuitous bed/freezer/mine/cottage-floor-in-front-of-roaring-fire action myself ;-~~~~ Amen!
~lafn #78
(Tracy)That's not to say that I prefer it that way...I'm all for a bit of gratuitous bed/freezer/mine/cottage-floor-in-front-of-roaring-fire action myself ;-~~~~ . Hear, hear.
~baine #79
RE: Open mouth kissing with Catherine Zeta-Jones, maybe it was her tongue that pryed his lips apart, and he was to polite to pull away. I wouldn't blame CZ-T if that's what she did. Who can blame her? Am I stupidly ignorant and naive? (All right, not everyone has to agree so fast!) I thought these things were controlled by the director.
~lafn #80
This probably belongs on Darcy Drool board, but since we were talking about kissing....I was looking (Okay, drooling)at one of my favorite pics of P&P and" me thinks" I see Mr. Darcy's lips parting just a wee bit before they kiss. Waddaya think? (DVD courtesy of Meluchie)
~KarenR #81
LOL!! (IAN) I thought these things were controlled by the director. Mmmm, so maybe Colin needed to rehearse more with the director? Huh? just kidding I suppose if the actors only wanted to do closed-mouth, slightly-to-right/left-of-center kissing with lots of burrowing in the neck region, could a director say "Cut!! I want to see some *real* action here. Get those mouths open. Get those tongue jousting. I want to see your tonsils." Don't know. Would hate to think that Colin's a lousy kisser, IRL or on screen. But on a fun note, do read today's Times review of The End of the Affair. I'd post some comments on 127 but am not in the mood for Rafe butt jokes right now. Maybe later. ;-)
~catheyp #82
Colin Firth has signed up Yippee, this is music to my ears. I go away from my computer for the weekend and look what happens! Think I'll go away more often ;-). Thanks for this news Aishling, its brightened my day, and I just know I'll be in a good mood now no matter what.
~Lizza #83
Lovely Evelyn thank you for such a drooly pic. Wasn't this the "supposed" scene that had to be reshot time and time again to get right (too much tongue or not enough?) and gave away to crew etc an inkling of their affair? Thanks for your scoop too Aishling. Just been cheered by lovely a review for Valmont ("film of the fortnight") saying ODB more than gives John Malkovich a run for his money etc etc Probably written by a woman!
~Elena #84
(Karen)Would hate to think that Colin's a lousy kisser, IRL or on screen. Hehe, THANK GOD Livia isn�t going to tell us the facts about his IRL abilities, I�m sure that such information would make us just *explode* with envy.(Just an innocent guess....;-)
~lizbeth54 #85
Karen, I saw the Rafe review. O-uch! Made some of the Avengers reviews seem quite flattering! :-)
~lizbeth54 #86
Still having posting problems...have to be short or lose the connection. Thoughts on "Armadillo"...SB said that Colin agreed to do this some time ago. I wonder if this means that all those other projects are just queueing up waiting for his signature! And on the subject of kissing, all those projects require some demonstrable action/expertise in this area! Scope for future study! :-) Wonder if "Armadillo" will be a mini-series...most thriller-type dramas adapted for television tend to be two-parters at least, not a 100 minute film.
~Lizza #87
STOP PRESS******* Just watching Sam Mendes on "South Bank Show", he is being interviewed on a bare 3DOR set by Melvyn (Maid of Buttermere) Bragg. The bed etc is gone but the taps and sink unit is there and plenty of views of our favourite seats Ladies. Sadly it is TOO MUCH to expect ODB to walk casually by but it is so familiar a setting tyo see on TV for me that there is a palpable sense of anticipation!! Will keep you posted. :))
~Lizza #88
Some lovely shots of outside the Donmar showing 3DOR posters (but not up close) and then the foyer and the audience going up the stairs for a performance. Guess it must have been filmed towards the end of the run but midweek as the foyer is looking more empty than we would be used to!! Heady Stuff.
~byebar #89
HI All, I know some of you here and I have always had a very hard time trying to post. So I am giving it another shot. I was at the Amazon site to order Armadillo and there are 2 books. One is not due for release until April. The jacket of that one looked like it could be Colin. Not sure but it made me think it could be a companion book for the production. The URL http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/query/%28keyword%20%3D%20%22armadillo%22%29/book/bq=1/102-8696833-4703213. I was wondering what you might think? Thanks Mickie Boylan
~KarenR #90
Mickie, thanks, but that is for the trade paperback which is coming out in April, as I reported a couple of days ago.
~Lizza #91
Have finished watching the programme. Interview with Alan Cumming at the Donmar so guess it was filmed on the day that (Tracy? Cathey?) reported seeing AC come down with Colin after a matinee. Do we have a date for that? Loads more Foyer shots and also outside with a crowd bunched on the pavement. For a split second I thought they were going to be clustered around O DB, but no such luck. 3DOR of course did not feature (unlike the Blue Room) because it was not directed by Sam Mendes, interestingly enough the credits thanked another Firth "Tim"? "Ian?" any ideas? I think Maria should do a deal with producers of SBS to cut in some of her lovely shots of ODB and his dimples. Now THAT would be Oscar material!!
~Moon #92
Boyd's social satire centers around Lorimer Black, the scion of a gypsy clan who has transformed himself into a dashing and cultivated insurance adjuster. One day, instead of meeting with the business associate he expects, Lorimer is greeted by a hanged man. From then on the hapless hero is swept into a web of intrigue involving rock musicians, beautiful women, ominous job firings, and something called the Institute of Lucid Dreams Yes, yes, but does he get to dance??? I am back from Spain and would like to thank Aishling for the scoop, Karen for all the reviews and everyone else for some good laughs. As far as favourite parts, I will go with Lord Wessex, loved the hair, the singing, the dancing, the kiss and he gets to ride. And, my man Geoffrey is tops as well. :-D
~lafn #93
(Lizza)....Interview with Alan Cumming at the Donmar Thanks Lizza for the "live" report. But why Alan Cummings? "Cabaret" was a Donmar production. But , I believe, he played it only on Broadway...with Natasha R. Both got Tony's. What did they talk about?
~KarenR #94
Oh yes, meant to comment that I agree with you, Bethan. It would seem likely to be a two-parter. Most thrillers need that break for a cliffhanger to get people excited about them.
~Lizza #95
Evelyn "Cabaret" was featured and N.T and A.C. were interviewed about it and clips shown from the Donmar production and Broadway , indeed "The Blue Room" featured in the same way. What I really want to know is .....did Melvyn Bragg and ODB get to have a discussion off camera about TMOB? Just off to check my video worked, it has been playing up lately so I am not hopeful :(
~byebar #96
Oh My goodness it went through. Eileen and Heide and Karen -I am so shocked that it went through. I did not think I could get through so please forgive that first post if it sounded too pushy. I don't know everyone here so I will introduce myself-(which I should have done from the beginning) My name is Mickie I teach 2nd grade upstate NY. I have a web site for Jonathan Firth but I like Colin Firth as well. I am in my late 40's and have enjoyed reading the posts here for years. I just had such a hard time posting. Every time I tried it was rejected so I was a lurk only person. I am still in shock that after all this time it took my post. Well I hope it will take this one too. Thanks and nice to finally be able to "speak" over here. Mickie
~heide #97
Congratulations, Mickie. Posting here is a breeze once you get started. I met Mickie in October at the Fever Pitch showing in Montclair, NJ. Would be oh so nice to have Colin on the cover of a book again but I wouldn't count on it. Heck, I'm pessimistic enough to not even feel confident this project is a go though everyone assures me Baz is never wrong. Well, there's always a first time! :-P Am reading the book anyway and it's quite good. (Lizza) Have finished watching the programme. Interview with Alan Cumming ... Loads more Foyer shots and also outside with a crowd bunched on the pavement. For a split second I thought they were going to be clustered around O DB, but no such luck. I feel so nostalgic already and it was just a month ago for you girls. What a great find for you, Lizza, to catch this programme. Have seen some photos recently of Sam Mendes since he's being touted for Best Director Oscar. Kind of reminds me of Paul McCartney when he was very young though not as cute as Paul. Something in the eyes. Welcome back Moon. And, my man Geoffrey is tops as well. :-D Ah, but can he kiss? ;-)
~baine #98
(Moon)And, my man Geoffrey is tops as well. :-D Ah, but can he kiss? ;-) Apparently not since KST leaves him for that stick as soon as she gets a moment out of his sight. Maybe Santa suits don't do anything for her, or maybe there was greater significance to yes, we have no banahnahs than we realized. To return to my question about directors--since I've seen a pic of Milos in the bed with Colin and Meg and since Davies and Colin talked about when Colin was supposed to be thinking that Darcy was supposed to be having an erection, it seems not unlikely that directors would have something to say about the kissing mechanics. Just wondering. Maybe it's unfair to pin it all on the actors. And since we agree that ODB is one of the greatest and most professionally accomplished actors now working, it seems logical to assume that can hold his own in matters osculatory as well. As for the P&P pic, looks as though JE is at chin level. And I recall that the carriage ride was so bumpy they had trouble making contact.
~Arami #99
(Maureen)As for Nostromo [...] the overall presentation of the series reminded me of a Clint Eatwood spagehetti western. LOL! My sentiments exactly. When I saw poor Colin in a wide-brimmed hat riding one of those tiny skeletal ponies, his long legs dangling on both sides and nearly touching the ground, I started whistling "The Good, The Bad And The Ugly" theme and burst out laughing. It looked so farsical. (Bethan)She did mention that he didn't kiss "properly" (Elena)So what is that supposed to mean, "not properly"?! :) This seems to be typical of all the greatest screen lovers. Training for actors includes the correct technique of "make-believe" kissing, since obviously not every stage/screen partner is keen to do it "properly"... Apparently some male actors attempt "proper" kissing without their partners' approval and this is sometimes the cause of great rifts behind the scenes - even though it may look terrifically realistic in action. Colin chooses to behave with professional integrity - I wonder if that (among other things) could be why Nia Long said of him: "I think he's shy..." Also could he be employing the shoulder grinding action to deflect the attention from his lips? (Evelyn)Didn't you see him with Catherine Zeta-Jones in "Out of the Blue" with the tongues going?Not exactly a chaste kiss. When the script/director stipulates that something is clearly visible, there is no way around it. (Bethan)Just noticed that next week the BBC are airing the BBC Scotland drama "Monarch of the Glen" which is listed after DQ in the forthcoming productions on the BBC Scotland website. Obviously no problem with setting a transmission date here! Why don't we bombard the BBC with queries? (Evelyn)" me thinks" I see Mr. Darcy's lips parting just a wee bit before they kiss. Yes, but observe where her lips land after that: very low on his chin, missing his oral orifice altogether... He was sucking on her upper lip while she was engrossed in aiming for his lower one. A classic professional stage kiss and don't even try to allow any amount of clever publicity to force you into imagining anything else. Wasn't this the "supposed" scene that had to be reshot [...] and gave away to crew etc an inkling of their affair? See what I mean? ;-) (Lizza) lovely a review for Valmont ("film of the fortnight") saying ODB more than gives John Malkovich a run for his money etc etc Who, where? Lizza, and everyone, I beg of you yet again, please do remember to give your sources when quoting! Ta very muchly! :-) Firth "Tim"? "Ian?" any ideas? There's a playwright by the name of Tim Firth, I believe: no relation as far as is known. As far as favourite parts, I will go with Lord Wessex Have another look... ;-) http://www.geocities.com/threedeers/Wessex/Wessex.htm
~lafn #100
Re: The Kiss He was sucking on her upper lip while she was engrossed in aiming for his lower one. That'll do in a pinch,I guess. *sigh* (Beats just the "grinding shoulder".)
~Arami #101
maybe there was greater significance to yes, we have no banahnahs than we realized. LOL! So what was it, a bunch of keys or a crumpled hankie? Btw, a warm welcome to all newbies, including delurkers. Some people may have problems with posting as the way in is not always very obvious. One must register/log in as a poster, but once you overcome that hurdle, you become a fully fledged drooler-Firther/Firthian/Firthette/Firthist (choose your own rank) and everything else here is sheer joy (I think...;-p).
~mari #102
Mickie, welcome aboard! I know you'll like it here. Mickie is a terrific lady and a long-time friend. Check out her Jonathan site, which has JF's full blessing and that of his agent's. RE: the Nostromo ponies. That smallish breed of horse is indigenous to that area of South America, and so is technically accurate. But stupid-looking.;-) The P&P kiss--Colin said in an interview that the "we couldn't get it right" business was not true. "A chaste matrimonial kiss," and no big deal according to him.
~Arami #103
That smallish breed of horse is indigenous to that area of South America, and so is technically accurate. But stupid-looking.;-) LOL - I can think of quite a few other things in life which are technically accurate and stupid looking... ;-) Colin said in an interview... Uh-oh... I adore that man, but can't always believe all he's saying... especially that he himself once said (in an interview ;-P) that his views may change fom day to day...
~Arami #104
If there's one way to get Colin to have a look at the Internet, it'll be with Jonathan's encouragement and because of Mickie's JF site. Hopefully. Maybe.
~Maureen #105
That picture just sends tingles right up and down my spine. Thankyou for the picture Evelyn and thanks for the tingles CF and JE, well mainly CF.
~Moon #106
Welcome Mickie! I have visited your site on several occasions and congratulate you on having the bene placido of both Jon and his agent. Thanks for another look at Lord Wessex Arami, he still looks mighty fine to me. I was also struck with the ridiculous vision of Colin the fantastic horseman riding that small horse. He should have brought his own horse from England.
~baine #107
(Arami)It looked so farsical. If you mean the housemaster, kindly use his proper name. It looked so Mr. Farquharson.
~EileenG #108
Welcome home, Moon! (Elena) Heide, it really was not Eileen who thought she was a pervert, it was me!! :-D Well...*this* time. (Tracy) excessive bouts of tonsil-hockey LOL--love that term. (Karen) About the poor-form kissing, let's take a closer look at Valmont's whirling and twirling scene with Meg. How did he perform there? Heide's right. There's not too much kissing in the whirly-twirly scene. However, there's a rather deep smooch when Tourvel returns to Paris and finds Valmont waiting for her. Not that I'm paying close attention to the kissing, mind you. (Heide) Alas, Richard shows poor form in the kissing scenes with Samira in this film I seem to recall a doozy between them during one of Courtois' dreams (just before Maria finds him having a 'good dream.' Again, not that I'm paying attention or anything ;-P How about my favorite 'taht' kiss in FF? There seems to be some action there (but don't know for sure as am not paying *any* attention). (Lizza) Wasn't this the "supposed" scene that had to be reshot time and time again to get right (too much tongue or not enough?) and gave away to crew etc an inkling of their affair? C'mon, everyone knows poor Jen couldn't keep a straight face when she saw that giant hat approaching (although it's alot smaller than the tall hat he wore in Camille, which resembles an inverted hot tub). All kidding aside, he does seem to keeps his mouth shut if given the option. Then he does the 'I'll move my head in the way' maneuver so you can't see (if you were paying attention, that is). Welcome, Mickie. It's nice to see you here. Pull up a chair and make yourself at home. Hope you're feeling well again.
~luvvy #109
(Lizza)....Interview with Alan Cumming at the Donmar Thanks Lizza for the "live" report. But why Alan Cummings? "Cabaret" was a Donmar production. But , I believe, he played it only on Broadway...with Natasha R. Both got Tonys. Alan Cumming was in the original revival of "Cabaret" at the Donmar (1993/94). He was incredible then and when they moved to NYC in 1998. Jane Horrocks played Sally Bowles in the London production. I saw it in London in January 1994 and was knocked out. It took several years to effect the transfer, because Sam Mendes was not prepared to give up the club atmosphere he had created in exchange for a Broadway run. They had a hell of a time finding a suitable venue. Chris
~lafn #110
Thank you Chris (luvy)....and what other London news do you have for us re: Colin. For all newbies: Chris is the Firth fan that we are indebted to for alerting us to 3 DOR in Jan. 99 before it was announced .Without her, we never wuld have been able to buy up all those tickets for March!!.
~byebar #111
(Karen)- Did Colin do his usual kissing style in SLOW? (Chris L)-Do you think that they will ever do 3DOR with a London cast in NYC? In case anyone is interested Some Jonathan Info. His latest projects: http://www.geocities.com/Hollywood/Theater/3782/news.html Also a new picture. Jonathan in a tux. You must scroll down the page. Thank you Meluchie. http://www.geocities.com/Hollywood/Theater/3782/madding1.html Thank you Murph for getting everything up so quickly. The picture was taken at the Northern T.V.awards. Does anyone know anything about these awards? Thanks Mickie
~Brown32 #112
Evelyn: Thanks for the JE/CF smooching pictures. Just to prove that JE knows how to do it... Murph Mickie is one of my dearest internet friends. Glad you figured posting out, pal!
~Brown32 #113
Trying again...on JE: Murph
~KarenR #114
Just a friendly reminder: We have other topics at Drool, such as: Odds & Ends - for TRT, Ehle items and other things http://www.spring.net/yapp-bin/restricted/read/drool/127/new Jonathan Firth http://www.spring.net/yapp-bin/restricted/read/drool/102/new Please check the main Drool board for already created topics. This one gets filled up so quickly. ;-)
~lafn #115
(Karen) We have other topics at Drool, such as: Odds & Ends - for TRT, Ehle items and other things To include:Bridget (casting),Donmar Productions,& Donmar News, baseball, football, soccer...(Arsenal), cricket.... Question for the Drool gods:....." kissing"too? :-D
~KarenR #116
What! Have you forgotten? Bridget is at #80. ;-)
~EileenG #117
Just in case you thought no one noticed, Karen, I like the new 'title' for Colin's picture on the main page. Very Valentine-ish. And musical, of course.
~Lizza #118
thanks Chris and Murph for your news and pics.
~Tracy #119
Lizza J - The date that Alan Cumming came down the stairs at the Donmar (after the matinee) was 20th January.
~Tracy #120
Hi again.. don't know what happened there - fat finger syndrome I think. Just thought I'd up date you on Armadillo progress.. I'm about half way through the book having started it on Saturday evening..unputdownable as you can tell. I won't go giving the plot away but I will give you a few highlights which, assuming that they are included in the screenplay will delight us all I am sure. * There is kilt action in a true Scotsman stylee i.e. no knicks! * Black is something of a chameleon so lots of scope for different looks including I'm afraid to say probably in the IRL sad pants area. * Haven't come across LOL yet but there are light moments. * Ditto re "action", but I'm only half way through as I say and he hasn't really got to know Flavia yet! There is a girlfriend and a past lover in flashback - but nothing too juicy. There is a lot to Lorimer Black and so I think he will prove the perfect vehicle for DB as it will enable him to display the versatility we all know he is capable of. The story moves quite quickly too and I feel that it could be a winner provided that the screenplay stays true to the book.
~Moon #121
Mickie is the girl with him in that picture Paloma? Thanks Tracy, keep us posted on that kilt action. :-D
~CherylB #122
Welcome Mickie. As Arami noted you are able to choose your rank Firther/Firthian/Firthette/Firhist, although some people consider themseleves Firthfans. Personally, I'm a Sloberer, but I'm not completely uncouth, I do always post wearing a clean bib. (Figuratively speaking.) Will somebody please elucidate on what exactly are "pygmy horses"? I know that there are horses, ponies, and miniature horses. The last are really tiny, being slightly bigger than large dogs. No doubt only small children could ride them. So was CF galloping around on a pony in "Nostromo"? Cymbeline, you appear from your posts to be neither stupidly ignorant nor naive. I was being flippant in my statement about CZ-J forcing a bout of tongue wrestling upon CF, and his being too polite to fend her off. You wondered how much input the director has in the type of kiss between actors in a particular scene. That depends on the specific director. Many are very controlling, although some directors prefer to deal with actors as little as possible. They believe actors should know their jobs and do them with a minimum of coddling. Interestingly, some film directors who are very definite about what sort of kiss they want, aren't particularly interested in the emotion of the kiss, but rather the look of the scene. A screen kiss is very often dictated by the lighting and the camera angles. Dealing with actors is only a fraction of directing a film, and to some directors the least important part. The screen kiss of the classic American cinema was not so much a kiss as it was the suggestion of a kiss. The were several reasons for this, ranging from the Hollywood Production Code to the type of make-up used in film then. The kisses were so choreographed, big clinches, swooning gestures, and both parties lips chastely closed, but the actors faces were shot to best effect, none of the facial distortion involved in an actual kiss. However, they looked great, better than real life, which is exactly how they were supposed to look.
~Arami #123
choose your rank Firther/Firthian/Firthette/Firhist, although some people consider themseleves Firthfans Correction: we are all Firthfans, of course. Special ranks are extra and not compulsory. We were called Firthers by the Pemberley site people and Firthettes is a recent addition cultivated by Ben and Mark as I recall. Myself, I have always been a Firthist from the Department of Firthology. ;-)
~KarenR #124
(Cheryl) Will somebody please elucidate on what exactly are "pygmy horses"? That's just our *affectionate* term for the breed of horse that was used in Nostromo. They are actually Paso Finos (fine step). We make fun of them (although their authenticity cannot be disputed), but they are a noble breed. Unfortunately, Colin's legs are too long for these miniature horses and somebody should've figured that out. ;-) Read here: http://www.pasobeat.com/pasoinfo/history.html
~Maureen #125
I watched DQ again today, I was paying particular attention to a kissing scene and I do not think he opened his mouth at all. Now this may sound really perverted but I had the remote on slow-mo, backwards, forwards but no sign of an open mouth. Now there could be a number of reasons for this; 1, techincal but if I explained this further I may give too much away. 2, Lack of chemistry between him and his co-star. 3, Her mouth practically covered half his face obscuring the view of his mouth, and 4, you might have to diregard all of the above as I think I saw what may have been drops of saliva, who it belonged to is any ones guess but we have a 50/50 chance of getting it right when trying to determine who it might belong to. Apologies too for an earlier posting where I mentioned some of the characters names in DQ. I recollect I wrote that there was a John but its Jim. Guess I fell victim to the heavy celtic accent. The word/term bollocks or (bowlorrrx) is prevalent throughout DQ, which reminded me a bit of FP.
~KarenR #126
The Bucket now has its Armadillo page, with Aishling's scoop and the background info on the book. http://www.spring.net/karenr/mdbro/dillo.html
~EileenG #127
(Tracy) Black is something of a chameleon so lots of scope for different looks including I'm afraid to say probably in the IRL sad pants area. Hee hee! Thanks for the info, Tracy, especially for not giving away the entire book. I believe many are reading it right now. My library has it but I haven't decided whether to read it now or wait until after Armadillo is broadcast (thereby avoiding what I have come to call 'ATA syndrome'). Armadillo's author (Wm. Boyd) is writing the screenplay. That's no guarantee that it will stay true to the book, but it's a step in the right direction. (Maureen) Her mouth practically covered half his face obscuring the view of his mouth Ye gods. What a mental picture that conjures.
~lafn #128
Great Armadillo page, Karen... Her mouth practically covered half his face obscuring the view of his mouth I think I saw what may have been drops of saliva, who it belonged to is any ones guess but we have a 50/50 chance of getting it right when trying to determine who it might belong to. Gross.
~amw #129
To UK fans, don't forget Valmont is on BBC1 tonight, 11.50pm - 2am approx.
~amw #130
and sorry, yes great page, Karen.
~KarenR #131
Here's the link to the Nia Long interview in the Evening Standard that we couldn't find the other day. No mention of childish or childlike. So the Empire article would appear to be the only one. http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/dynamic/hottx/film/top_film.html?in_review_id=226565
~luvvy #132
The only Colin news I have is in fact old news (thank goodness!). As UK surfers may know, there is a commercial address directory on the web that sources its information from the UK electoral rolls (among other public info). As a result it has every registered voter's home address in it, unless the person has pro-actively requested deletion from the database. Very, very scary stuff. CF's Hackney flat address is up there. And since I consider this site to be a horrendous and dangerous invasion of privacy, no, I won't post the URL here! As for the Donmar, there doesn't seem to be any activity on a 3DoR transfer. Honestly, since it's a 100% American play (author, setting, characters), I can't see Equity allowing a transfer with a British cast. They'd lose DM and CF. Chris
~KarenR #133
Chris, what are the Equity rules? A majority of the cast? A certain percentage? With three actors, a majority does mean that two must go. (of course, I would replace the one American and leave the two British cast members.) Surely however there must be exceptions for small productions.
~Moon #134
CF's Hackney flat address is up there. Chris, you are such a tease! Don't they forward mail to the new address in England? ;-) Well!!! Great Armadillo page, Karen. Loved all those covers. (Maureen) Her mouth practically covered half his face obscuring the view of his mouth (Eileen), Ye gods. What a mental picture that conjures. My thoughts exactly!
~Tracy #135
Chris - not that I was looking specifically you understand but I found the address too - but didn't want to be the first to admit it! For any other UK fans just a reminder that the Larries (Oliver Awards) are to be broadcast on BBC2 at 8 pm Sunday 20th..I'll be there cheering 3DOR on to victory...do I cheer in vain? Have now finished Armadillo! Sorry Moon No more kilt action I'm afraid! Am still not going to reveal the plot but I definately think this one could be a good move for ODB.
~EileenG #136
CF's address (even former) and other very personal data fits my definition of TMI (too much information). Feel free to keep it to yourself. Karen, I read a big NYT spread last year about the number of British stage actors working in the US. Am trying in vain to recall the details, but I think it works on an exchange, not majority, basis.
~Elena #137
(Maureen)I watched DQ again today, I was paying particular attention to a kissing scene....Lack of chemistry between him and his co-star. Certainly no lack, on the contrary I think there�s a very good chemistry between them. And I don�t see it really as a *kiss* in the usual sense but just as an act of mutual understanding and sympathy between the characters. CF's Hackney flat address is up there. So? Somebody else lives there now I suppose. The main thing is: his new home address isn�t and won�t be there, I hope.
~luvvy #138
(Karen) Chris, what are the Equity rules? A majority of the cast? A certain percentage? With three actors, a majority does mean that two must go. (of course, I would replace the one American and leave the two British cast members.) Surely however there must be exceptions for small productions. US union rules are just like the UK. Everytime you want to bring in a non-union member it takes an act of god(dess). And of course you have to prove to the immigration folks that you aren't taking the bread out of the mouth of some starving actor (which you undoubtedly are). Case in point: the aggro around bringing the Almeida production of "Iceman Cometh" to Broadway. A substantial proportion of the cast had to be left home and replaced by US members. There are no hard and fast rules. There is a definite tit-for-tat attempted, but I don't believe there are any specific quotas. FWIW, there seem to be a lot more UK companies coming in this direction than the reverse, although a great many never see the lights of Broadway. They wind up as part of an "international Arts Festival" in Connecticut (Max Stafford-Clark's Out of Joint) or at the Brooklyn Academy of Music (the RSC). (Elena) CF's Hackney flat address is up there. So? Somebody else lives there now I suppose. The main thing is: his new home address isn�t and won�t be there, I hope. Oh please. Someone asked for "news" and I shared what I had. Let's not pretend that we are more interested in his shoe size than where he lives. On the other hand, his shoe size HAS gotten more analysis.
~Lizza #139
So we had "better act our shoe size , not our age" tee hee :) Tracy, the Larries will be announced before they are televised so you will know whether to cheer or not!
~KarenR #140
On the other hand, his shoe size HAS gotten more analysis. Shoe fetishes are more common and with proper counseling are treatable. ;-) Thanks Chris for the theater info. So there are no hard and fast Equity rules and basic immigration law kicks in. It's the same in most countries if you try to work elsewhere. Have to prove no one else can do the job. That being the case, then there's no point in bringing the Donmar production back to the US. The entire production essentially consists of 3 actors, a director (not even Sam the Man) and a set design. If you had to replace the actors, then IMO it's not the Donmar's production really anymore. A big white, stark set with a staircase is not going to sell any tickets.
~Elena #141
(Luvvy)Oh please. Someone asked for "news" and I shared what I had. Let's not pretend that we are more interested in his shoe size than where he lives. Thanks for the "news" and also thanks for not posting the url here. Very interesting that this sort of a thing can happen. Suppose he actually lives in Hackney in that address?! Then it really is scary. I do not pretend one bit when I tell you that I don�t want to know where he lives and I hope that none of us does.
~lafn #142
(Chris)Someone asked for "news" and I shared what I had. I was the one who asked...and I thank you for giving us news, and for not posting the address on a public board CF, unfortunately, has some over zealous fans...trust me...I saw them in action last November.I would not wish to inflict them on ODB. ~~~~~~ Interesting stuff about bringing UK casts to B'way. But when the cast of Cabaret came , they replaced Jane Horrocks with Natasha Richardson...who I'm sure holds British citizenship even though she lives in Connecticut.Closer and Amy's view were all Brit casts. TRT is coming with the whole cast (alas I wish they would replace three supportings actors....)Of course, Jennifer has dual. (sorry this is OT...I know better.)
~Arami #143
(Chris L) there is a commercial address directory on the web that sources its information from the UK electoral rolls (among other public info)... Very, very scary stuff. UK electoral registration rolls are open to public inspection in every town hall and public library.
~ommin #144
Yes indeed they are - its the same here in Australia. Everyone is listed in the electoral roll who lives in a certain area. I am sure as has already been said - the address can be omitted - I sincerely hope C.F. has now done that. Its far to scary as you say, there are some crazy people out there. Sean Connery used to live not far away from where my brother lives in Surrey and I believe he suffered some of that madness that occurs when you live in an ordinary street and an ordinary house not security controlled and that was back in the sixties when he was married to Diane Cilento.
~winter #145
Calling all Firthettes... I am FINALLY going to London, for a much needed break. I'll be there from 29 MArch to 7 April, and wanted all your advice on nice places to visit, eat, walk, etc.. Am also trying to get together with people for lunch/tea/dinner, if anyone's in the area. Good to see you all in full Spring -action... I've missed you guys.
~Moon #146
Have a great Winter! I will not be there till Summer. (Karen), A big white, stark set with a staircase is not going to sell any tickets. ART seems to be selling out everywhere and that also has a a big white set with everyone fussing over a big white canvas. :-)
~lafn #147
(Winter)... and wanted all your advice on nice places to visit, eat, walk, etc.. Have a good time, Winter....Say hello to The Donmar ...and Starbucks in the lower level ;-) And oh, the Penne Pesto at the Luna Nuova isn't bad.
~Brown32 #148
Everyone: I received this e-mail today. Can anyone help this poor woman? I have no idea where to tell her to get CF in Italian. Murph ************************* please please please help me! I need film vhs about Colin in italian language!! I have "Shakespeare in love", "un mese in campagna"(a mouth in the country)and "il paziente inglese"(the english patient)only can you help me? my name is Roberta Rubegni, ciao ciao da Roma Italy my e-mail is: Roru72@freemail.it
~kolin #149
"can you help me? my name is Roberta Rubegni, ciao ciao da Roma Italy " Would be nice if we could ask Livia(bg)
~KarenR #150
isn't she your penpal, Renate? ;-) Roberta with mucho amore por Colin and wanted to marry him.
~Arami #151
Winter, try exploring www.thisislondon.co.uk for replies to some of your questions.
~mari #152
Maybe tell Roberta to consult the Roma electoral registration rolls?;-)
~Brown32 #153
Gee, thanks, guys, for all your well-meaning suggestions!!!! If she is the one that wanted to marry CF, I'm not answering her note! Murph
~catheyp #154
(Murph) If she is the one that wanted to marry CF You mean I wasn't the only one who wanted to marry him!!! I'm all amazement ;-)
~Brown32 #155
Cathey: I'd marry him too, if I wasn't old enough to be his mother. I don't think the age difference of 28 years would work. I really meant that the letter writer from Italy, did, I think, write some over-the-top-stuff to someone else around here. I'm sorry I forget who. Murph
~Moon #156
Murph, I too think it is the same person who wrote that overtop wish for Colin. In Italian there must be Fever Pitch somewhere. I know it played there but I do not recall the title in Italian. (Mari), Maybe tell Roberta to consult the Roma electoral registration rolls?;-) ROTFLOL! Nothing is that easy in Rome.
~baine #157
(Murph) I'd marry him too, if I wasn't old enough to be his mother. I don't think the age difference of 28 years would work. Nonsense! Haven't you ever seen Harold and Maude? The real problem is the polygamy issue. How about we all become Mormons?
~Renata #158
Where are you, Bethan? I miss your regular reports ;-) Winter (hope this is not too late): Little Venice is a nice walk when the weather is fine, and I vaguely remember that parts of Londinium where shot there. Can anyone help here? And don't forget your camera, the boats are very colourful. The underground was Warwick Avenue if I remember correctly (Bakerloo line?), next to Paddington. (Karen) isn't she your penpal, Renate? ;-) No, that was Gi ;-). But she actually contacted us via cf.com's guestbook. (Cathey) You mean I wasn't the only one who wanted to marry him!!! Oh, Cathey, don't write such things when I'm drinking my tea! It's now vaporized (expr?) all over the screen ....... ;-) Moon, I think the FP title is "Febbre a 90�" or something. Murph, as I recall she speaks almost no English, somebody who speaks Italian should talk to her. (Cymbeline) How about we all become Mormons? Oh goody. Rhymes with hormon(e)s. ;-P
~Brown32 #159
Ann and all: I have your picture from Biz's article in the Daily Mail. It came today. Thanks! It is small and tough to make very clear, but it is a nice one, I think. Ann W's Picture Murph
~Tracy #160
Winter - I certainly hope the weather brightens up for you when you arrive. There have been freezing cold winds howling about the City of London over the last couple of days but very clear skies...all the better for getting a view from the London Eye which is the huge ferris wheel on the banks of the Thames. I've not been myself but it's fantastic apparently.. Just going back briefly on this address business. I agree with Chris that it is very, very scary to know that my own address, telephone number etc etc is there for all and sundry to see let alone anybody elses. You never know who is going to do what with that kind of information. You can have your details removed (under the Data Protection Act 1984) which I'm going to do and I hope that others (!) do the same. Anybody catch Valmont on Tuesday... well done BBC screening it in "widescreen" Hmmmm excellent choice...NOT. I don't know what they had done but for a vast percentage of the time the sides of the picture were missing (and I DO have a widescreen TV before anyone offers a "smart" suggestion) so you only got to see half DB, MT or ABs face. Still that aside it was great to see it again and I was quite encouraged to notethat it had been awarded **** out of 5 (perhaps opinions have changed over the years - I seem to recall that it was looked on unfavourably in the past).
~Lizza #161
Tracy, I also saw it, but encountered no problems. Ironically "The Times" (even naming my source, whatever next!!!:)) has a picture and article of Clive Wood today ("London's Burning" etc) who is currently starring as Valmont, touring production. Having seen ODB in the role so recently, I can't imagine that THIS Valmont could set hearts racing not worth peeling off all those undergarments for Ladies. (Apologies to Clive, he was an excellent Henry at the RSC some years ago) I'll stick to Colin's version of powder blue brocade. It is irritating that only John Malkovich's film role gets mentioned in comparison, but we are used to CF being left out by now.
~Tracy #162
Lizza - I didn't get to see Valmont "live" and had someone tape it for me - they have Digital CableTV so perhaps something went awry here. Anyway it didn't really spoil the enjoyment - I could watch DB twirling about in his fancy embroidered duds and strangely metamorphosing hairstyles (punting scene animated fringe LOL!) forever. Pah John Malkovich ...horrid, horrid yeuuch! Clive Wood (can't place him) as Valmont....nobody could do the role justice surely.
~Tracy #163
Lizza- have just found the Times pic of Clive Wood! DB has nothing, but NOTHING to worry about...It looks as if he's going for the ugly, old, letch Valmont in a Malkovitch stylee ;-D
~Arami #164
(Murph)I'd marry him too, if I wasn't old enough to be his mother. It doesn't seem to worry "Rafe" Fiennes and Francesca Annis... (Cymbeline) How about we all become Mormons? Won't work. What if Colin is a RC now?
~Moon #165
(Renate), I think the FP title is "Febbre a 90�" or something. as I recall she speaks almost no English, somebody who speaks Italian should talk to her. You are right about the title, Renate, I remember it now. If it is the same person who wrote that Christmas wish in Italian for Colin on Murph's site, she sounded very over the top. Murph, what a great picture, such a sultry look. BTW, you left Rupert Everett out of your 1960's page. He was born September 11, 1960. The day after ODB.
~lizbeth54 #166
Renate, Thanks for your kind words! I've lots to say, but am struggling with problems with my Internet connection. I can browse, but have difficulties posting. Watch this space!
~lizbeth54 #167
I'll see if this works...or whether I lose the entire posting. :-( Random comments.. Tracy, I agree with you that "Armadillo" will be a very good project...and Eileen, I wouldn't have any reservations about reading the book...this won't be another ATA. CF's character, Lorimer/Milo, is on every page..the story follows him...and will, I'm sure, be in every frame of the film (or mini-series?) And with Sue Birtwistle at the helm, his best interests will be protected. I can see why SB says he's perfect for the role. There seem to be many similarities with DQ....successful but idealisic, caring man, ultimately at odds with the world in which he works, attractive to women but pursuing some seemingly unattainable romantic ideal. Also there are shades of John Hatfield (Maid of Buttermere), more flawed, but also pursuing some romantic/spiritual ideal. SPOILERS..he has to say "I'm passionately in love with you" (shades of Mr Darcy) and, by my reckoning, there are four kisses, two "chaste" and two decidedly unchaste (although it's the women who take the initiative!)' It will be interesting to see if he follows the text! BTW some great characters in "Armadillo"...I'd love to see Timothy Spall play Torquil. On Television re Movies. Now that the Oscar hype is again engulfing us, I'm personally rather fed up with the whole hoopla, self-promotion, awards, Hollywood glamour scene. There's a lot to be said for producing a quality product for TV transmission, which will probably be seen worldwide without any hype. But for some reason being a "movie actor" seems to carry more kudos. On kissing...quoting from memory (and, Arami, the source was a tabloid!) the gist of Ruth Gemmel's comments were...she was rather nervous about the love scenes, but said that it was very easy to talk to Colin about this because he was sympathetic and "wasn't the kind of man who would find this funny". She then said he had obviously had a lot of experience of on-screen kissing, and unlike in the theatre, he didn't kiss "properly" (ie he used the professional technique which actors are taught). She then said her boyfriend was very relieved about this. The theatre comment puzzles me!! What goes on in the theatre? IMHO I think he'll always go for the professional approach (on screen!) Finally, DQ. Karen, why did they show it at the Cork Festival? It obviously can be shown on the Big Screen even though it's filmed in Super16. The only reason I can think for delaying the transmission for 12 months is that perhaps they want to show it at other UK festivals (Edinburgh, London). Ironically, it sounds better than many Brit movies that do get a nationwide release. Do you still have any leads on this, Karen? It genuinely puzzles me... a 100 minute film can be fitted into the schedules at 2 weeks notice...there's a lot of flexibility. And most commissioned programmes have a transmission date assigned before completion. A year long delay is very "unusual", to say the least! Will try to post...fingers crossed!
~EileenG #168
(Bethan) I wouldn't have any reservations about reading the book...this won't be another ATA. One would hope so! Thanks, but I was speaking in general. When I see any standard length movie based on a book I've enjoyed, I'm usually a bit disappointed because dialogue and scenes I thought would be in were left out or the storyline was markedly altered. Not so with a miniseries, which has time to delve into a book's finer points. So I think I'll wait (and wait and wait, probably) to see Armadillo through 'fresh eyes.' Since you bring up the kissing thing again, I'll mention a snippet in this week's Newsweek about Leonardo DiCaprio: seems he suffers from bad kissing disease. Sharon Stone, his costar in The Quick and the Dead, was quoted as saying "kissing him was like kissing my arm," or words to that effect. They had similar unflattering comments from several other female costars. Ruth's comments aside, let's hope we never anything like this written about ODB!
~KJArt #169
...you left Rupert Everett out of your 1960's page. He was born September 11, 1960. The day after ODB. Did anyone notice that Meg Tilly became 40 on Feb. 14 of this year? No wonder he was attracted -- she's a real Valentines girl!
~Tracy #170
Looks like 3DOR lucked out again chaps! So I shan't be bothering to watch! Bethan.."BTW some great characters in "Armadillo"...I'd love to see Timothy Spall play Torquil" I agree, there are some excellently drawn principles. Tim Spall could make a Torquil - but I think a better Lobby, what about John (Fast Show/ Cold Feet) Thompson for Oliver Rollo? John Thaw for Hogg? Hey lets just wheel all those sure fire BAFTA winners in there. Any room for David Jason..Dame Judi ;-) What I particularly like about Armadillo are the "Book of Transformation" and dream sequences which punctuate the book which offer stark contrast to "reality" and most of the comedic elements.
~Arami #171
unlike in the theatre, he didn't kiss "properly" Poppycock. The same technique applies in the theatre.
~Maureen #172
Arami I have not heard the term Poppycock for years LOL, thankyou for bringing back some very fond and funny memories.
~lafn #173
A great BIG THANKS to all those involved in "Operation DQ & Donmar Lobby". You know who you are.... Thunderous applause:*clap*, *clap*.Take a well-deserved bow :-)
~KarenR #174
For those who haven't seen Colin's Lifeline appeal for the Bushmen of the Kalahari, the entire video can be seen at the Survival organization's website. It does require use of Real Media's G2 player, which you can download for free using a button on the site. I'll give you two urls: Survival webpage Or direct to the clip (if you have G2): Click to View Clip I'll put the links up at The Bucket shortly.
~KarenR #175
Note: on the index page, the video is under the first drop-down menu, entitled Campaign News. Viewed without frames, you can get right to the Lifeline page via this url: Lifeline page Sorry for the confusion.
~lafn #176
I wonder if a certain "Super Sleuth" talked Survival Appeal into uploading Colin's infomercial....Hmmmmm?
~bamitchel #177
Mickie - you're here! I met Mickie in NY at a Firth gathering a couple of years ago. She's terrific, had me laughing the whole time. Posting to Spring - I've had the same problem, but I really think it's my PC memory or something because my server usually shuts down right in the middle of loading. But it worked tonight and I am so glad. Trying to catch up right now. Another friend told me about the Survival video being up. Just watched it. Thanks, Karen. Bye, Barbara
~Tracy #178
Despite my previous posting I decided to watch the Olivier Awards after all. There was a v short interview with SD & JE re TRT but I think somebody up there has definitely got it in for 3DOR..of all of the nominated plays it got the shortest mention of all!
~amw #179
Tracy -somebody up there has definitely got it in for 3DOR.., and yet there was quite a lot on "Good" and a short interview with Charles Dance and an excerpt from the play, it is too bad. OT I am afraid there weren't any shots of JE & SD in the audience Evelyn, just the short interview that Tracy mentioned.
~lizbeth54 #180
Tracy -somebody up there has definitely got it in for 3DOR.., and yet there was quite a lot on "Good" and a short interview with Charles Dance and an excerpt from the play, it is too bad Must admit I sort of watched it too, although I hate award ceremonies. Why all the fuss about "Good" and Charles Dance?. And barely a mention of 3DOR...very puzzling (although predictable, says she cynically). 3DOR certainly got better much, much reviews than the other new plays nominated (along with Lady in the Van).
~KarenR #181
Could it be that none of the stars of 3DOR were going to be at the Awards Show?
~Brown32 #182
Karen, thanks for this scoop (Survival film). I bought and had Real Player Plus on my system, but it messed up my DVD player. I will try with the basic version. I can't miss watching this! Murph
~amw #183
Karen, but Charles Dance was not there, at the Awards, I mean, just him up on a big screen.
~KarenR #184
Hmmm, I thought I'd read he was going to be a presenter. Shoots that theory! ;-)
~Tracy #185
I have a theory about this non-award! Call me a cynic if you like, but I notice from my 3DOR programmme that Carlton (an Independent TV company over here) appears to have an affiliation with the Donmar. I also note that it was the BBC Award for new drama...and the animosity between Auntie Beeb and ITV is well known! Aha.....elementary my dear Firthies...shame 3DOR has to suffer;-(
~Arami #186
Tracy, you may have a point there... ;-) (Btw, who says Stephen Dillane wasn't at the Awards? He was there and shook hands with Henry Goodman.)
~amw #187
No one said SD wasn't at the Awards, I was there and said Charles Dance was not at the Awards.
~Brown32 #188
Hi all: I'm reading Armadillo, and love it. You are introduced and led deeply into Lorimer Black's mind -- how he lives, what he dresses like, what he likes, what his family is like, why he cannot sleep. He is a marvelous fully realized character. The following is from his book of thoughts, which he calls the Book of Transfiguration. He is an avid armor collector. All these great unknown words led me to find some web sites and to do a page on armor. ************************* "270. The Current Collection: a German black sallet; a burgonet (possibly French, somewhat corroded), and, my special favorite, a barbute, Italian, marred only by the absence of the rosette rivets, and so ringed with holes. It was the strange music of this lost vocabulary that drew me first to armor, to see what things these magical words actually described, to discover what was a pauldron, a couter, a vambrace and fauld, or tasser, poleyn and greave, beavor, solleret, gorget and besague. I derive a genuine thrill when Ivan says to me: "I've an interesting basinet with letten flourens, and with, astonishingly, the original aventail�though of course the vervelles are missing," and I know exactly�exactly�what he means. To own an armor, a suit entire, is an impossible fantasy (though I once bought a vambrace and couter of a child's armor, and a shaffron from a German horse armor), so I settle instead for armor of the head, of helms and helmets, developing a particular taste for visorless helmets, the sallets and kettle hats, basinets, casques, spangenhelms and morions, burgonets, barbutes and another dream, this�the frogmouthed and great helms. - The Book of Transfiguration" Ivan HAS to be played by Timothy Spall! Murph A quick OT, because I think we talked about it here. Four Feathers will star Jude Law in the old John Clements role of the man who gets the four feathers from his friends. It was on Teletext the other day. The "Elizabeth" director will be doing this.
~lafn #189
I'm reading "Armadillo" too, Murph. Actually, I'm more interested in Lucid Dreams, and the relationship to the story.
~KarenR #190
~KarenR #191
I've started a gallery of pictures from Donovan Quick. When finished you'll be able to click and move to the larger images as you've seen on Renate's or Elena's pages. Take a first look: Donovan Quick Gallery
~amw #192
Thanks Karen, they are great, but where is the cheeky grin and the two dear old ladies?
~KarenR #193
Isn't it the one on the far right in the second row? I also posted the full-size one on Topic 126.
~amw #194
Thanks!
~Brown32 #195
Great pictures, Karen. Can't wait for the larger versions. Thanks! Murph
~KarenR #196
Thanks, Murph, they're not great quality, but beggars can't be choosers. ;-) Just need to rotate an arrow gif and then I can start. Tracy asked: Anybody know the title of the music was playing when the freezer-fondling was going on in Femme Fatale? Anybody know? Maybe I'll try fast forwarding my tape to the end credits later.
~Moon #197
Looks great, Karen! That is just like me, always fast-forwarding to the next CF image. ;-D
~lizbeth54 #198
Just realised that the BBC are showing "Femme Fatale" again tonight (he'll be pleased :-) )...part of a CF season? I'm wondering if there are quite a few people out there who are asking why we never see CF on screen. One of my work colleagues brought up the subject of TOTS (quite without prompting from me!) and said how much he'd enjoyed it...very true to the novella...but that his girlfriend was furious because she's a great CF fan and he was only in it for 5 minutes! Definitely the right time for screening DQ! Has anyone actually contacted the Head of Drama for BBC Scotland re this (Barbara McKissack). I just rang up general enquiries. BTW the conact name for BBC Worldwide (Americas) is Peter Phippen. There's a website at http://www.bbcworldwide.com Lots of jobs for CF in the paper! :-) The Refugee Council have advertised several adviser posts (�20,000 pa) in London, working with asylum seekers, especially orphaned children/young adolescents, of whom, sadly there are many. Thanks for the pics, Karen! BTW, does anyone know for sure that MLSF opens in May in the UK? Is it listed anywhere? (Doubting Thomas) Tracy, love your casting suggestions for "Armadillo"...Tim Spall for Lobby, I definitely agree. Do you think it will be a series? William Boyd usually writes single dram screenplays.
~lafn #199
Quick & Pannick Bus pics, brilliant. Esp. like the flashback ones and the ending shot. Those have the best subtle facial expressions that say so much . CF at his best, folks.IMO
~amw #200
Bethan, I too thought it might just possibly be a CF season, so I checked next Tuesday late, but no CF film this time, oh well, it would probably have have been Playmaker ! BTW I forgot to mention that I got a reply from BBC Information re DQ, and here is an excerpt from their reply "Thankyou for your letter regarding DQ. I regret that I am unable to provide a date of transmission for the programme. Our future schedules are only confirmed two weeks in advance which means it is not possible to give details for programmes beyond this period......." So there we are but at least they no there are a few people very interested in DQ.
~KarenR #201
CAMILLE REMINDER Camille will be shown on the Romance Classics channel tomorrow, February 23, at 11:00 a.m. Eastern Time. I can't tell if it will be shown again in March, as that month's calendar is not yet available at the website.
~patas #202
Back from Canada and the cold (and my pretty niece)it's a pleasure to read all the 200 plus posts (not counting other topics and email ;-)). Please bear with me if I comment on a few old ones. (Evelyn)Re: The Kiss He was sucking on her upper lip while she was engrossed in aiming for his lower one. That'll do in a pinch,I guess. *sigh* Shall I be the only one to say how different kisses can be great? Including closed lipped ones? The Kama Sutra also suggests kissing your partner's lower or upper lip (upper is best, it says). Most men are lousy kissers, IMHO, especially those that think all there is to kissing is sticking a big tongue in their partner's mouth, or getting her face full of blubber (sp?) (Arami)If there's one way to get Colin to have a look at the Internet, it'll be with Jonathan's encouragement and because of Mickie's JF site. Hopefully. Maybe. Not true. Livia told me they had already visited the Internet when I talked to her last year. Welcome, Mickey :-)
~kolin #203
(GI)"Not true. Livia told me they had already visited the Internet when I talked to her last year." Gi, I wasn't around here last year/ Would you mind telling all the newbies here when and where did you have a chance to talk to Livia and what did she have to say?Any detail would be welcome. Thanks
~patas #204
Vera, I talked to her in London, last March at the Donmar, after the show. She was outside with some friends and I told her how much I admired her husband, and that many fans had come from all over the world to watch him play that night; I mentioned we had a site on the web that was dedicated to him and where we chatted sometimes, and invited her/them to join us if she wished. She was very gracious, and said they had connected to the Internet once before and done some surfing, and that she would try it again. I don't remember all the details but I posted them at the time, so if you like, search for the March posts. We all posted our comments then.
~kolin #205
Thanks Gi Where were you in Canada?
~KarenR #206
The Donovan Quick gallery is open: Gallery
~catheyp #207
Karen, I've just visited the DQ gallery. It is wonderful. Thanks very much.
~patas #208
(Vera)Where were you in Canada? In Toronto, and in Collingwood for the weekend. If I had planned this more carefully (and more in advance) I'd have called for you ladies living in the area to meet me for tea or something. As it was, I was Springless, but had my time quite full with my family. A week is so short!
~Moon #209
Great job, Karen! Thank you!
~EileenG #210
Yes, great job with your DQ gallery, O Karen, Queen of Snappies. I see you included the rear view mirror view. No hair wranglers on this set, obviously :-(. CAMILLE REMINDER VCRs are at the ready. Bethan, I believe it's May 5th for MLSF in the UK. You're going to love it.
~KarenR #211
~KarenR #212
~lafn #213
From the London Theatre Guide Newsletter: 15 Years Ago: " Anthony Hopkins and Colin Firth had just opened in Schnitzler's The Lonely Road at the Old Vic." Did anybody see it?
~ommin #214
No to my everlasting regret - I lived near London then and often went to the theatre - I believe it was even played at a local theatre - The Yvonne Arnaud in Guildford - I do remember seeing Anthony Andrews. But apart from watching him play soccer in a charity match and watching a couple of his early t.v. shows I didn't realise who he was - although I always liked his acting ability. But I do vaguely remember a long lanky player with a particular run playing in the soccer match. Anne H
~Moon #215
This Sunday's Mobile Masterpiece Theatre on PBS Turn of the Screw. Finally! I saw this posted on RoP.
~amw #216
NEWSFLASH, Renee Zelwegger to play Bridget!!! see topic #80
~EileenG #217
(Moon) This Sunday's Mobile Masterpiece Theatre on PBS Turn of the Screw. Finally! Yes, Moon, TTOTS will be broadcast this Sunday at 9 p.m. It seems to be receiving favorable press (surprising, given how it was pretty much picked over by the British press, but that's happened before). TV Guide says "Jodhi May shines..."
~EileenG #218
Having just posted that, I see in my NY Times a not-so-favorable review that is more in tune with the British reviews.
~lafn #219
I taped "Camille" yesterday on the Romance Channel...and viewed it last night...I take it all back....it's a lousy production,alright.Esp. the script. But he looks gorgeous.I guess I have a thing for Joe Prince and Armand...the kind of a guy that sticks by you "in sickness and in health".
~lafn #220
Thanks Eileen...just read the NY times review...no mention of CF at all..but "Jodhi May, as the poor governess, spends most of the 90 minutes looking furtive, suspicious and slightly demented, as well as scared of her own shadow." That slightly better than the London Times which said she spent the whole 90 minutes with "mouth ajar". Ouch.They don't recommend.
~Moon #221
I will add the few minutes Colin appears to my Camille tape. I can see Milos Forman casting him as Valmont after having viewed Camille. He does debauch� and sweet very well. He cetainly did get starring roles back then, on film and in the theatre. He probably thought he was on the road to major stardom until Dangerous Liasons sent him hiding in the woods of Canada. Now he does not get a mention in the NYT for TOTS and we are still debating whether he will play Mark Darcy.
~Allison2 #222
Come on! He still gets starring roles in the theatre and I am sure would get more if he could afford it. He may well be being offered starring roles on film. Okay, not Hollywood. Valmont saw to that and it was not his fault. But the Maid of Buttermere is obviously an offer whether he accepts or not. And on TV he is obviously considered very bankable. He is a British star and is a household name here, at least to television audiences. That may not make him millions but it is where he lives and chooses to base himself. He may never be Anthony Hopkins. But he is a niche player who is never out of work. Think if he did land a multimillion paycheck for a role, I suspect he would flee to the Umbrian Hills and never appear again.
~EileenG #223
(Moon) Now he does not get a mention in the NYT for TOTS I'm OK with this--it was a lousy review, after all. Besides, his picture is there (the one we've all seen before, except they cropped the top of his head, puffy h**r and all).
~Moon #224
3DOR was really a co-starring role, it was an ensemble cast. We hope he is offered a starring role in the theatre soon. Allison, it was just an observation, I agree with you. He is never out of work.
~patas #225
I'm curious to know what you think of TTOTS.
~lizbeth54 #226
TTOTS seems a long time ago now, and excepting one bad review (the Times?) got uniformly very good reviews and 5 star ratings in the UK. I think reading the novella (which most critics had) does help. It's out on vodeo here soon as the "acclaimed" production!
~patas #227
(Bethan)I think reading the novella (which most critics had) does help. Probably. I side with the "mouth ajar" critics :-(
~Xian #228
Hi, ladies ;-) I can't wait to see ODB in The Turn of the Screw although he only has a few minutes of show. Here is local PBS' introdution of it: This adaptation of Henry James' gothic tale -- which many believe to be one of the all-time great ghost stories -- is a psychological portrait of a new governess who attempts to exorcise the ghosts menacing the two small children in her care. Colin Firth, Pam Ferris and Jodhi May star. -------- They do list DB's name first on the main cast (for his few precious moment in the film ;-))
~Elena #229
Karen, thanks so much for the DQ gallery, I only now had some time to look it through and enjoy it. Great work. (Allison)Think if he did land a multimillion paycheck for a role, I suspect he would flee to the Umbrian Hills and never appear again. Agreed! That�s what he would do I�m sure, and that�s what I have secretly feared, as much as I�d enjoy seeing him in a major role in a major film.
~Jana2 #230
(Allison)Think if he did land a multimillion paycheck for a role, I suspect he would flee to the Umbrian Hills and never appear again. (Elena) Agreed! That�s what he would do I�m sure, and that�s what I have secretly feared, as much as I�d enjoy seeing him in a major role in a major film. Eek! That's a frightening thought, but it does sound reasonable. Therefore we must hope that ODB does lots more of that personally satisfying, but low paying stage work :-).
~Allison2 #231
paycheck That should read paycheque of course! See what a bad influence you all are:-)
~lizbeth54 #232
Mini newsflash! MLSF will be screened at the Bradford Film Festival on Wednesday 8 March at 8.15pm as part of "Focus America", sponsored by American Airlines, along with "The Insider", "The Hurricanne", Cradle will Rock", "Lake Placid", "Any given Sunday" "boys Don't Cry" and "Galaxy Quest". Good company, I think! The bad news (and I'm no longer finding this funny)is that in the comprehensive programme, they manage to completely miss out CF's name. MLSF is listed as starring Rosemary Harris, Malcolm McDowell, Tcheky Karyo and Robert Norman. The opening blurb also says "British talent is evident as always with Hugh Hudson as director of MLSF, rising star Emily Watson joining the stellar cast of "Cradle will Rock" and Alan Rickman in "Galaxy Quest". How come it's always his name? I actually read the credits for the other movies...no-one else is "overlooked". There are pics of Russell Crowe, Aln Rickman etc, but for MLSF there's a sweeping shot of a young boy on a beach, not the usual promotional shots which we've seen. The programme has gone out to half a million people, some of whom may be CF fans. I'm beginning to subscribe to a conspiracy theory!! Shall complain!
~lizbeth54 #233
Firing my last indignant salvo.... Reading the blurb on MLSF they seem to be promoting it entirely on the David Puttnam/Hugh Hudson connection (which won't mean much to younger movie goers). It's as though "Colin Firth in a starring role" isn't worth a mention...and this is really what they should be stressing, not DP!! Puzzled as ever...
~amw #234
Please do complain, Bethan, this is too much.
~lizbeth54 #235
In more positive mode!.. This is a terrific festival held at the National Museum of Photography, Film and Television, and MLSF is in great company... "special previews of acclaimed new films from the world's dominant film-making country". All the Oscar-nominated films are here ("Cider House Rules" opens). Lord Puttnam hosts the opening night on March 3. I'm sure he'll promote MLSF!
~amw #236
Bethan, do you have a telephone number so that we can all complain at the disgraceful ommission of the star of the film, again. Hope this doesn't repeat when it opens for general release.
~lizbeth54 #237
Ann, on reflection (have simmered down now! :-)), I think it may be a genuine (but unfortunate) typographic error, as MEM and IJ are also omitted. But I'll ring up about it! Have to say that MLSF features very prominently in the programme...large accompanying photo (of the curling rink, not the beach) CF omission aside, I'm actually very pleased about this, and think it bodes well for the release of MLSF in the UK. It's been given a good slot..."The Insider" shows on Tuesday evening, then MLSF on Wed. evening, and "Being John Malkovich" on Thursday evening...no 1.00pm showings! I know this is a regional Film Festival, but they are showing some firtst-rate films, and i think it's a compliment to MLSF to see it included. Murph...do you want to include this in your News (for UK fans obviously). It's the first time MLSF has been screened in the UK. I think I've given all the details in my other postings. To recap, MLSF is being shown for the first time in the UK on Wednesday 8 March at 8.15pm at the Bradford Film Festival 2000 at the National Museum of Photography Film and Television, as part of "Focus America", bringing special previews of acclaimed new films from the US ("The Insider", "Hurricane", "Being John Malkovich" "The Cider House Rules" etc) BTW the date for MLSF is given as 2000 (1999 for all other movies). Has it been re-edited, again?
~amw #238
Fair enough Bethan, but I do think it would be a good idea for someone to point out the omission. Good for you.
~EileenG #239
(Bethan) I think it may be a genuine (but unfortunate) typographic error, as MEM and IJ are also omitted. I agree--must be a mistake. I find it hard to believe the star's name would be omitted in the same country where his 5 minute cameo provided the entire promotional approach for a TV movie. *scratching my head* I'm also surprised to see Any Given Sunday on the list. The sheer irony of Lawrence Taylor's or Jim Brown's role would be lost on the audience. Well, you do get to see Al Pacino yell and scream alot... It is a wide variety of films, most of which did/are doing well either critically or in the BO (except Lake Placid), so you're right, Bethan, MLSF finds itself in good company.
~luvvy #240
OT followup to the earlier discussion of transatlantic casting changes: (from What's On News http://www.whatson.com/wos/news/ ) Hit Plays do a Transatlantic Swap -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: 25 February 2000 Stringent rules imposed by American Equity, the actor's union, have been bypassed in a deal that enables the West End hit The Real Thing to transfer to Broadway in March with its English cast in tact. Perhaps because it feels threatened by the worldwide reputation of English actors for excellence, American Equity has for many years blocked the wholesale transfer of London casts to Broadway. But in a conciliatory move this week, it has reached an agreement with UK Equity to allow The Real Thing to cross the Atlantic next month in exchange for Warren Leight's award-winning play Side Man, just opened at the Apollo, which consists of the entire Broadway cast, plus one new member of the cast, Jason Priestley, also an American, well known from the long-running soap, Beverly Hills 90210. One reason for the settlement was that both plays have exactly the same number of actors in the cast - seven - thus avoiding quota wrangles. Ron Kastner, the American producer of The Real Thing, admitted that American Equity are more intransigent on the subject of exchanges than British Equity. "They simply don't want English actors to take roles that could go to Americans," he said. Top producer Cameron Mackintosh has had a number of clashes with American Equity, notably over the casting of Jonathan Pryce as the Eurasian pimp in his US production of Miss Saigon in 1990. When he threatened to cancel the whole thing, Equity relented and after finally opening in April 1991, it recouped its $10.9m investment in 39 weeks. Trevor Nunn also had a run-in with the union last year after they refused to allow the leading players in his award-winning revival of Oklahoma to transfer, insisting on an indigenous cast. For Jennifer Ehle and Stephen Dillane, the stars of The Real Thing, a high profile Broadway run is bound to open up other career opportunities. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
~KarenR #241
(Eileen) Well, you do get to see Al Pacino yell and scream alot. Are you referring to Any Given Sunday or The Insider? Or doesn't it matter. ;-) Thanks, Chris. Equity's rules are quota-driven. Now, what 3 actor show is currently on or off-Broadway that could transfer to London? ;-)
~lafn #242
MLSF is being shown for the first time in the UK on Wednesday 8 March at 8.15pm at the Bradford Film Festival 2000 at the National Museum of Photography Film and Television, Well that shoots down my theory of a big splashy Charity Benefit London Premiere.I have never heard of the Bradford FF...is that the museum on the South Bank in London? ~~~~ Thanks Chris.TRT for Sideman? I saw the latter on B'way. We got a better deal;-)
~MarkG #243
Don't deny us Brits Any Given Sunday because we won't get all the ironies; otherwise we might have to retaliate by making a film focusing on soccer and giving it incredibly limited release in the US (oh, no, done that already). Will America or Canada be more upset by "Jason Priestley, also an American"?
~Moon #244
(Eileen) Well, you do get to see Al Pacino yell and scream alot. (Karen),Are you referring to Any Given Sunday or The Insider? Or doesn't it matter. ;-) Hard to tell with that Method actor. ;-) Thanks Chris!
~mari #245
(Karen) Now, what 3 actor show is currently on or off-Broadway that could transfer to London? ;-) Easy. Bash is already in London, and has gotten outstanding reviews. Wit, with Kathleen Chalfont, is going to London in April, I believe. I still say 3DOR ain't coming back to NYC, no matter who would be in the cast. It's played/is playing in cities across the country with local actors; nothing exclusive about it anymore. (Mark) Will America or Canada be more upset by "Jason Priestley, also an American"? Hee, hee. I think we Yanks definitely got the raw deal on that one, Mark, just as we get blamed for Jim Carrey (who I actually like, BTW). On the other hand, it *is* a rather loose border; maybe "What's On Stage" figures we all sound alike, so what's the diff?;-) And how come JP gets a US union card, when they count JE against the Brit quota? It's all smoke and mirrors, if you ask me;-)
~CherylB #246
Nobody chews scenery with quite the aplomb of Al Pacino. I never thought of Colin Firth as being a method actor, although he probably touched on the technique in some of his drama school classes. Stanislavsky never called it the Method; he called it the System. Lee Strasberg is responsible for the name "Method". When Stella Adler travelled to the then USSR to visit with Stanislavsky a few years before he died, she found that Stanislavsky didn't really approve of the changes Strasberg had made to the technique. Adler went back to New York and taught the real Stanislavsky method, er system. Many actors considered Adler a better drama coach than Strasberg. Then again, it is all relative.
~Brown32 #247
To All: Bethan, I'll get the news up now on MLSF. Thanks. Al Pacino, who I grant can chew up the scenery better than anyone else I know, is restrained (for him) in The Insider. I was pleasantly surprised at how his role and Russell's blended and worked so well together. Plummer is terrific too. I can't believe they left him off the Oscar noms. Murph
~ekelley #248
Hello everyone. This is actually my first time posting on this board. But I have VERY important CF info for those of you who live in the US. On your local PBS station, Master Piece Theatre will be showing "The Turning of the Screw" on this Sunday at 9pm (at least they are here in NY on channel 13). CF is one of the main characters. So check out your local listings for your PBS station! Good luck finding it, and happy viewing!!! ~Liz K
~lafn #249
WELCOME LIZ Thank you for posting your news. We all are looking forward to viewing all of TTOTS. Some of us who were in London in mid -January got a peak at the tape....but CF only has a 4 minute appearance. But hey, that's two minutes more than The Secret Garden. Stick around, we love newbies on Drool.
~Brown32 #250
An FOFer found this yesterday: From The Independent: Rumours that Colin Firth, aka Mr Darcy in Pride and Prejudice and the object of Bridget's slavering affections, will play the love interest Mark Darcy remained unconfirmed yesterday. His agent said simply: "I have no idea." Murph
~heide #251
(Murph) From The Independent: Rumours that Colin Firth, aka Mr Darcy in Pride and Prejudice and the object of Bridget's slavering affections, will play the love interest Mark Darcy remained unconfirmed yesterday. His agent said simply: "I have no idea." Isn't that a hoot? Saw that posted over on the Bridget topic. Attention, Colin's agent: If you don't want to know what we think of you, don't read Topic 80. Welcome Liz! (Temporarily lost my Welcome gif but Karen's got a bunch.) Thanks for the news of TOTS. Keep on coming back if you want to know more about his other projects. Hope you keep posting too. I haven't decided which of my CF tapes I'll tag those four TOTS minutes onto. Perhaps I'll make up a special Cameo Tape and include those four minutes at the end of The Secret Garden. ;-) Let's see, what else can we include?
~EileenG #252
Thanks, Murph, Karen has already posted that on our BJD topic (#80). We've already roasted and toasted *hee hee* CF's agent. Welcome, Liz, from your neighbor in channel 13 country *waving to you from Jersey*
~Renata #253
(Bethan) To recap, MLSF is being shown for the first time in the UK ................... as part of "Focus America", bringing special previews of acclaimed new films from the US Pardon me, MLSF and "Focus AMERICA"??? Obviously I missed something substantial. =8-o Has Scotland recently joined the US of A?
~KarenR #254
Evelyn, you asked where Bradford is. It is in West Yorkshire, about 7 miles from Leeds airport. Looks as though it mae be kind of close for someone. ;-)
~Brown32 #255
Everyone: Sorry about posting the old news re BJD and CF's agent. I should have checked first. I'll hide over to #80 to see what is being said! Murph
~Arami #256
Pardon me, MLSF and "Focus AMERICA"??? LOL! Renate, the sad truth is, American money funds the British talent... TEP, SIL - even P&P2 - can be easily claimed as American funded.
~Arami #257
Hey, I didn't mean sad as in tragic, OK? American co-production normally guarantees American release, so that's not sad. And in view of the common language (of sorts...;-)) it makes perfect sense. What is sad, however, is the fact that the UK film industry cannot seem to manage anything above "small budget".
~lafn #258
(Bethan)Looks as though it may be kind of close for someone. ;-) Do you plan to go, Bethan? (Arami)TEP, SIL - even P&P2- can be easily claimed as American funded. But SIL was poached as being the British Film of 1999 by ...was it Evening Standard award? Pretty cheeky;-)
~Arami #259
Well, there must be some balance preserved here... some compromise is obviously inevitable on occasions... ;-P
~ekelley #260
Thank you for the welcome everyone. *Wave back to you Eileen!* I had no idea that his part was to be so short. Oh well...I am actually recovering from having all 4 of my wisdom teeth pulled (I look like a chipmunk who got away with grapefruits rather than acorns)...any glimpse of CF will be a welcome sight on the road to recovery. :) Thank you again for the welcome.
~KarenR #261
Grrr Have finished reading Armadillo. Another ambiguous ending, although this should be great. Lorimer is a man of 1000 faces and clothing styles. Colin is going to be delectable in this. Sort of reminds me of The Prisoner.
~Renata #262
New pic of Jess on Ulrike's page: http://hometown.aol.com/fitzwilliamdarcy/index.htm
~KarenR #263
Neat picture. Where is it from? Sort of looks like a cornfield behind him. He never wears that outfit in the movie to my recollection.
~Renata #264
Where is it from? From a German TV magazine, TV Spielfilm. And it is stampsize in print.
~heide #265
Wow! Girls, if you were thinking about skipping this picture, don't. Delicious. That movie was good for something.
~Arami #266
Never ever skip anything to do with ODB.
~KarenR #267
Counting the minutes for Colin's four-minute cameo ;-)
~sprin5 #268
Firth is now on the http://www.spring.net webcam.
~ekelley #269
Well...I saw it! I must say, despite the lack of...exposure (for lack of a better word)...that CF had, I thought it was a good old gothic tale of good and evil. But, as for CF, himself...what did you all make of the character? My mother and I thought that perhaps it was he (the master..aka CF) that was the evil one, and not the red headed man..whatever his name was..Peter Quint, was it? Anyway. I thought that CF's character was very fwd towards the girl...especially for an interview...But I do not believe that I have seen him smile so much in a period piece as I did in this one! My mother and I were oogling over him, and my father (who was watching it as well) was berating us for acting as such. He said "Elizabeth! You are 22 y/o, and you are acting like a love-sick teenager!" I replied, "He's only the best actor and the most handsome to ever act!!! So what if I am love sick over him!??!!" Anyway! :) enough of my rambling! what did you all think of it? either how he looked, acted or if you thought he was really the evil one, etc...
~mari #270
My TOTS Cliff's notes: The story focuses on Miss, played by Jodhi May. Miss, having heard that the governess union's dental plan now covers orthodontics, eagerly applies for a position in the household of The Master, played by Colin Firth. Firth, having more sense than the rest of us, leaves after 4 1/2 minutes. Having realized that she's failed the interview to appear on Who Wants To Marry An Irresponsible Millionaire, Miss nonetheless receives a lovely parting gift in the form of the home version of the game. Upon her arrival at The Master's country estate, she takes charge of his young niece and nephew. The children, caught in a dreadful 35-year time warp since their appearance in Mary Poppins, seem to be keeping mysterious secrets. Miss quickly assumes that they have been corrupted by the estate's former employees and subjected to unspeakable cruelties, like being forced to watch WWF Smackdown on Thursday nights. Quint, The Master's late valet, speaks not, but furtively and angrily peeks inside the home, perhaps looking for his agent. Tortured by apparitions and sadly lacking the fortitude of, say, Maria Von Trapp, Miss finally takes charge and decides to show the kids who's boss by issuing the ultimate disciplinary admonition, "I'll wring your neck." The End
~Allison2 #271
Miss finally takes charge and decides to show the kids who's boss by issuing the ultimate disciplinary admonition, "I'll wring your neck." LOL, Mari! Your notes are a must for all students:-) BTW I have been experimenting with the UK's latest and most popular search engine *Ask Jeeves* http://www.ask.co.uk Yesterday I asked it an obscure question abour a little known medieval cleric and it came back with fabulously relevant hits. Today I asked *Who is Colin Firth?* and it could not tell me! What is going on????
~patas #272
Allison, Jeeves has answers to your question. It knows his bio, filmography, and can even direct you to some of Colin's webpages. Try again.
~Moon #273
The Master's late valet, speaks not, but furtively and angrily peeks inside the home, perhaps looking for his agent. ROTFLOL! Mari! I tapped and will watch it tonight. I will keep your review in mind.
~KarenR #274
LOL Mari!! having heard that the governess union's dental plan now covers orthodontics If that was the case, why had they not started on Miles? ;-) I found his buck teeth more annoying than Jodhi's open-mouthed performance. Sorry, Liz, but I am more in Mari's camp on this one. I thought the production really lacked in the suspense department, among others. IMO Miss came off as a sicko (using the clinical term) and the whole thing was in her mind caused by some vague combination of sexual hysteria, compounded by her deeply religious upbringing. The children were not treacly sweet enough to suit me. I think the ones in the old movie "The Innocents" were far more creepy. Also, were you aware that Miss caused Flora to go mad? That was not explained. Miss ruined both children's lives. As to Master, he obviously didn't have the time to do wardrobe fittings. Ack, that collar. And the hair! Sorry, but that pouffy do wasn't at all flattering. Yes, he smiled alot.
~Moon #275
As to Master, he obviously didn't have the time to do wardrobe fittings. Ack, that collar. I remember commenting on his collar back when his TOTS picture was posted here. Why doesn't Colin tell them? The only answer is that he is not aware of it himself! He does not have a taylor on Saville Row. :-(
~amw #276
...and there's still that wonderful voice!
~KarenR #277
BTW, Teletext has another mention of Relative Values, on a listing of upcoming films. Says to be released May 19, even though I'm told that's not the case anymore. Relative Values This star-packed film adaption of Noel Coward's play sees the return of Julie Andrews, ably supported by Colin Firth and Stephen Fry among others. The characteristic tippy-toed ennui of the stage play comes to the screen. Released May 19 tippy-toed ennui Eowww :-(
~EileenG #278
LOL, Mari! (Allison) Today I asked *Who is Colin Firth?* and it could not tell me! What is going on???? Jeeves is really Colin's agent. (Karen) Ack, that collar. And the hair! Sorry, but that pouffy do wasn't at all flattering. I found the hair alot less distracting than those 'Lee Press On' sideburns. He was very charming, though. Our satellite-feed MPT isn't broadcast until tonight. I managed to sneak away and watch CF's 4 minutes on a spare TV, but skipped the rest. Am undecided about watching the whole thing tonight. Evelyn is right--Jodhi looks *ahem* somewhat less than attractive, shall we say?
~KarenR #279
(Eileen) Evelyn is right--Jodhi looks *ahem* somewhat less than attractive, shall we say? You mean you found Mrs. Grose's comment that the Master likes "pretty young things" unrealistic? Miss Jessel looked like the woman who played the crazy Mrs. Rochester in Jane Eyre over 15 years ago.
~EileenG #280
(Karen) You mean you found Mrs. Grose's comment that the Master likes "pretty young things" unrealistic? Sorry, only saw the first 4 minutes.
~Brown32 #281
Mari: You have outdone yourself! May I add a short review of the first 4 minutes? "Mr Firth, who played the Master very briefly, was apparently wardrobed in an outfit for a much larger actor left over from a road company of Wuthering Heights. His hair was done by Greg, of Greg's Hair Mania, Lodi, New Jersey. Mr. Greg, as he likes to be called, is hair stylist for The Sopranos." Seriously, it wasn't that good aside from his glorious voice, very boring actually. After the first 15 minutes or so, I switched to the 10th Kingdom for awhile which was kind of fun, and finally to a new book. The sound was great though! I'm asking Clive about that portrait you glimpsed when Miss first entered the house and climbed the stairs. CF really looked great in it. Murph Yes, Eileen, those stick on sideburns were unfortunate. They looked like temporary attachments. It gets me mad that the wardrobe and hair people didn't take better care of him.
~Brown32 #282
Karen and all: I just finished Armadillo too. It is an odd kind of book. Poor Lorimer Black reminded me, by the end, of Griffin Dunne in After Hours. One sort of nightmarish, puzzling meeting after another. The party at his boss's palatial home is the example that best fits my analogy. I liked it though, and it will be a great part for CF. He is the voice and the centerpiece of the whole book. There isn't a scene in it where he hasn't a role. Ambiguous ending too leaves a lot for thought....or a sequel? Murph And if you ever had kinky dreams about CF in armor, this is for you (LOL)
~lafn #283
LOL Mari...I don't want anybody making fun of Camille after this one;-) BTW saw that Susie Clegg was the script supervisor...didn't she do same for P&P. "You missed this time, Susie" As to Master, he obviously didn't have the time to do wardrobe fittings. Ack, that collar. Hey they put all the money into renting the house....the tailor at Oxfam missed out on that coat too. The former owner had a broader back. Nicky Dear took lots of liberties from the book. Do you realize that Quint was supposed to resemble the master? Are you really gonna buy this tape, Karen.? The jacket isn't the same as the ad.You musta liked Quint, he's featured on the front...not Colin. Don't get me started on Jodhi May...not just mouth ajar, but permanent scowl too. Who wouldn't have gone mad in that place...even without the ghosts? Did anyone notice the first painting on the staircase wall ? Much resembled "you know who";-) Must agree with London and NY Times...."skip it."
~KarenR #284
(Murph) Master very briefly, was apparently wardrobed in an outfit for a much larger actor left over from a road company of Wuthering Heights....After the first 15 minutes or so, I switched to the 10th Kingdom Isn't that the show that NBC used to recycle costumes from Leprechauns? After Hours. One sort of nightmarish, puzzling meeting after another. The party at his boss's palatial home is the example Good analogy. My most eagerly awaited segment has to be THE KISS. Even though Flavia is the initiator, Colin cannot do his usual pathetic excuse for a kiss in this one. (Evelyn) Do you realize that Quint was supposed to resemble the master? Does it say that in the book? Can't remember, but it would make sense, although that red-headed mean-looking guy didn't look like the smiling sweetie at the beginning. ;-) (Evelyn) Are you really gonna buy this tape, Karen.? The jacket isn't the same as the ad. *rant rant* Those dummies! Those marketing dummies at PBS!! Can you believe those *marketing dummies* at PBS thought they could come up with a better cover!! Am livid. Having Colin on the cover was the only chance anyone would buy this video. *moderately calmed down, but still out of my mind* Well, could still buy the PAL version from blackstar.com just for the box. Is only 12.99 and shipping is free; about the same as if I bought the PBS version. ;-) (Evelyn) Did anyone notice the first painting on the staircase wall? They shot past it so quickly. But looked like a better portrait than of Fitzwiliam Darcy.
~KarenR #285
I just had to copy this here. A comment from a guy at ROP who watched TTOTS. Amazing what people notice: "My two biggest complaints here were that the "ghosts" were too, um, corporeal. The original story makes them completely ambiguous, IIRC. But as clever as the jumpcuts were, that ambiguity slipped a bit as the program went on. One scene in particular--the camera draws back to show the two governesses descending the staircase; a light throws the shadow of the "ghost" against the wall. Unavoidable, but the wrong effect--the other times we've seen the "ghosts", it's been directly from the POV of one of the characters. Here, the 3rd person POV of the camera implies the ghost is real.
~mari #286
(Eileen) 'Lee Press On' sideburns. PFFT! (Good thing E-Z Wipe monitor cover is firmly in place this morning.;-) (Murph) His hair was done by Greg, of Greg's Hair Mania, Lodi, New Jersey. Mr. Greg, as he likes to be called, is hair stylist for The Sopranos." Too funny, Murph. Poor Mr. Greg is so accustomed to hearing "Greggie, I needa litta maw height in da crown" that he just caves I'm afraid.;-) Let us know what you find out about that delicious portrait. (Evelyn) Nicky Dear took lots of liberties from the book. Do you realize that Quint was supposed to resemble the master? Is that right? The guy last night was a cross between Red Buttons and Martin van Buren.;-) Is the book less ambiguous than this adaptation? Clearly, it pointed to Miss being the nutty one, yet she was able to describe people that she otherwise wouldn't have known the appearance of. And that housekeeper certainly didn't help things, adding fuel to the fire. Does the housekeeper realize she's nuts at the end, and if so, why did she leave Miles behind? And when Miles starts "speaking" to Quint at the very end, is he just trying to humor Miss, having realized that she's out of it? A belated welcome to Liz! Don't worry, honey, I'm sure there are others who liked the show. I'm actually going to give it a second chance tonight.
~KarenR #287
(Mari) The guy last night was a cross between Red Buttons and Martin van Buren.;-) Ha! Or do you mean Nigel Hawthorne playing Martin Van Buren. I think everyone looked like Martin Van Buren at that time... even Colin! Is the book less ambiguous than this adaptation? Yes. Does the housekeeper realize she's nuts at the end, and if so, why did she leave Miles behind? Mrs. Grose should not be taken as an authority on anything. She's a good-hearted, although ignorant country woman (remember, she couldn't read). She was easily influenced and probably believed in ghosts herself. She took Flora away because Flora was driven insane. And when Miles starts "speaking" to Quint at the very end, is he just trying to humor Miss, having realized that she's out of it? Am going to have to rewind to hear what he says, but thought he was questioning rather than speaking to Quint, like "is he there? do you see him" In the book, Miss sees "him" but Miles asks her, "is it Miss Jessel." He sees nothing.
~jcjc #288
LOL!!! Thanks Mari and others for making an otherwise mundane Monday morning more bearable. I think Henry James is turning over in his grave� didn�t the host of MPT say something to the effect that some of his writings before this had been disasters�something about a play being laughed off the stage�can�t quite recall. If he only knew�what they�ve done to the screenplay adaptation of his book. The only interesting thing about this movie was the one shot of the lady ghost standing on the bank (looked like she was missing her eyes) and seeing how they could best cover up Jodhi May�s bad skin.
~patas #289
It seems to me that Colin was driven to this project by reading the book only... I can't believe he is happy with the result.
~Tracy #290
Just before Christmas I was watching Richard & Judy (yes, very sad I know) when they were previewing the forthcoming Christmas Televisual Feast. They (or rather a journalist woman -name escapes me- but clearly a woman of taste) made a big hoohar about TOTS and specifically CFs performance, showed a clip ..basically most of ODBs performance and then rolled about on the floor it fits of hysteria at his wonderfully earnest line. "Let me place my confidence in you!" Cant think what they found so hilarious ;-D *tongue firmly lodged in cheek* (Eileen) 'Lee Press On' sideburns. He seemed to be trying his best to do an Elvis! Murph - And if you ever had kinky dreams about CF in armor, this is for you You can just imagine the puzzled look on Jupiter's face as this strange being bumbles about with the helmet firmly wedged ROTFLOL
~catheyp #291
Renate, thanks for the new photo of Jess ~ WOW!!
~lizbeth54 #292
Am I the only one who thought TTOTS was okay? Plus the majority of the critics in the UK, plus a colleague at work who did his MA thesis on Henry James? He thought the adaptation mirrored the ambiguities of the book, and that it wasn't a ghost story but a study of sexual hysteria, with the relationship with Miles and infatuation with the Master being particularly relevant. He also commented on the ending...there's something significant about the actual direction in which the Governess is looking. I'll have to watch it again. And surely Jodhi May wasn't supposed to be beautiful? But if viewers found CF's performance funny...that really would be the worst thing for him, especially after all the quite unjustified hype. Viewers can be very fickle. I personally don't think he'll ever do another costume drama. I also think that he also would have expected DQ (completed in April) to be shown before TTOTS (completed in August and not intended originally for a Christmas slot) As it is, I think TTOTS may have been one cameo too many for him....after Darcy, viewers would expect to see him in a starring role. No more cameos, please...EVER!!!!
~byebar #293
Well not much to add to the TOTS review except to agree on the Liberace big hair on Colin and those sideburns by Sally Hansen. I also hated way the director had him use the "thin grin" throughout his microwave performance. I think that gives him a weak look as though he has no lips. Good grief they had him in and out so fast I am surprised he wasn't conducting the interview during the opening credits. All I could hear in my head was the Darcy proposal in P&P- I could not even see this character. Too Deja Vu.
~amw #294
Actually, Mickie, I have to disagree, I don't think he was at all like Darcy, too much smiling and although I didn't like the hair the sideburns or the clothes I thought he was fine in his portrayal of the Master, too bad about the rest of it. CF is the only actor I know who is so different in every part, he can look so different and if it weren't for his voice or his familiar gait, helf you wouldn't know it was him, I guess that is his problem he is too good for his own good, and people don't recognise him, unlike RF, or Rufus Sewell or KB or R. Everett and many many more who just play themselves. Apologies for any fans of the aforementioned, only my humble opinion.
~Brown32 #295
Everyone: The newest issue of Premiere (with Luscious Law on the cover) is dedicated to "Screen Lust," and they have a page on the best, the worst, the kinkiest, etc. One of the categories is "The Moment DVD Was Invented For." In it are listed moments like Gere bottomless in American Gigolo, Sharon Stone's flash in Basic Instinct. Why did I immediately think of Playmaker???? It's actually a neat page, running the gamit from Beauty and the Beast (Gene Wilder and sheep in "Everything You Always Wanted..,") to sexiest entrance in a film (Marlon Brando in "Streetcar" and Marilyn in "Some Like It Hot.") TEP outside the Christmas party won for "Best Quickie," and Joan Allen and Jamie Sheridan for worst quickie in The Ice Storm. We could do a whole Firth Lust Thing on this: 1. Sexiest Entrance 2. The Funniest 3. In Praise of Older Women 4. Sexiest Scene That Didn't Involve Sex 5. Gourmet Sex 6. Best Kiss 7. Great Moments in Voyeurism 8. The Moment DVD Was Invented For Wanna Try? Murph
~CherylB #296
Hello and welcome Liz. Your mother also like Colin Firth, my mother has no idea who he is and couldn't possibly care less. The sideburns, well they weren't really correct to period. They should have been larger, great honking muttonchop whiskers. Sorry ladies, it was the fashion -- or lack thereof. The costuming for the entire cast overall was exceptionally good -- upholding the reputation for British television drama period costume design and research. The film was not comparable to "The Innocents"; I hadn't expected it to be. "The Innocents" is still one of the most frightening movies I have ever seen. It is a very intelligent and psychological horror film. However, I had hoped this new production of "The Turn of the Screw" would have been better, since I do like the Henry James novella so much. I'm going to duck for cover after making this statement. We should have never seen the Master at all. His presence should be implied, in essence his presence is emphasized by his absence. Spoken of, but never seen, if you will. We should still percieve his implied presence as acutely as if it were a physical presence. But should never see him. Aside from that gaff the script was very good, actually quite accurate to Henry James. And I have read the story. The real problem with this production was the direction. The director appears to have spent all the time working with the children. They and their scenes were the high points of this production. Flora and Miles were innocents, they give the impression of possibly being in the thrall of evil, yet they could simply be nothing more than spirited children. Innocent in the sense of lacking the experience and knowlege to comprehend the extent of the corruption the may carry. Again it is implication. That was something the production did right. What was wrong with it? The tone. The film lacked a sense of ambuguity, or of psychological complexity. The characterizations were off. Mrs. Grose was physically a formidable women, but she lacked strength of personality and that was wrong. The performance was one of hand-wringing. The housekeeper was unlettered, but she was a country woman who was certain what she knew, and she was tough. As for Miss -- yeee -- well where to I start. Wrong, wrong, wrong. The Miss's sexual hysteria is an important component of this story, but it should have been repressed. No High Victorian household would have employed a young woman for any appreciable length of time to be in charge of children, when she was just so -- flighty. She should have had the outward demeanor of being sensible and controlled, but inwardly seething with religious conviction and sexual repression. The strength of "The Turn of the Screw" is its dichotomy. We should never be sure if there are ghosts afoot, or if the governess's own obsessions are the evil in question. Or both. In short, it was an oversimplification of one the most stunningly, pschycologically complex stories ever written.
~KarenR #297
I have to agree with AnnW, the Master did not remind me at all of Darcy. He was smiling way too much and trying to charm her. Darcy never tried to charm anybody. He never practiced enough. ;-) Bethan, as I recall, the reviews were very mixed in the UK on TTOTS and I have them up on The Bucket's page: http://www.spring.net/karenr/mdbro/tots.html#Reviews Most of the early December ones were very much based on the publicity materials sent around. The others nearer to the broadcast date seem to have really seen the program. How else do you explain such dead-on critiques as: (Paul Hogart, The Times) Perhaps it was because Jodhi May as the Governess went through the film with her mouth ajar and was clearly bonkers, but the hairs on the back of my neck refused to stand up. Her anguish was plain. Was she really seeing ghosts? Were the children possessed? "For heaven's sake, woman," I shouted at her, "phone a friend!" (Tom Howard, TimeOut) Sexual tension between the Governess and the Master is hinted at in the opening scene, yet this is then virtually ignored. Her increasingly unhinged behaviour seems absurdly melodramatic. The background to her character and the motivations for her behaviour are thin on the ground, and Jodhi May is not a good enough actress to suggest any. Ultimately, her blank bewilderment becomes increasingly irritating. (I won't do the ones about gaping jaws or cetaceans.) But there were quite a few positives, in their defense.
~lizbeth54 #298
I have to disagree, I don't think he was at all like Darcy, too much smiling and although I didn't like the hair the sideburns or the clothes I thought he was fine in his portrayal of the Master I agree with you, Ann. He's first and foremost character actor, who looks different in every role, and is often not recognised until the credits roll. Which is why he'll never be promoted as a Hollywood movie star a la the pretty boys Jude Law, Rupert Everett, Joe Fiennes etc. I can't say I liked his hair, but that sort of extravagant bouffant style was very much in style in the late Victorian era (check out photos of Disraeli and Prince Albert), and certainly would have been appropriate for a rich and irresponsible bachelor, charming but very superficial.(Nice smile at the end though!) It was costume drama but it wasn't romantic and he wasn't Darcy. I guess what irked me most about TTOTS was the way it was promoted in the media, expressly to boost viewing figures to gain ITV executives their annual bonus. CF was "used". He must have seen it as just a reasonably well-paid one day's work, to offset the fact that post-August he wouldn't be earning anything (or just enough to pay his taxi fare!) But unfortunately something in which he is incidental was given more publicity than, for example, his role in 3DOR. And the public's perception (at least those who don't have the Internet!) may be that he's not getting offers of leading roles. Right, I've had my say! Not too serious, I hope! :-)
~lizbeth54 #299
(I won't do the ones about gaping jaws or cetaceans.) That was Paul Hoggart of the Times, again,...he shot it down twice! Most of the early December ones were very much based on the publicity materials sent around. The others nearer to the broadcast date seem to have really seen the program. No, all TV previews are based on seeing the complete programme, not just publicity material. Reviewers get advance showings. Enough, I'll bow out of the discussion!
~lafn #300
.basically most of ODBs performance and then rolled about on the floor it fits of hysteria at his wonderfully earnest line. "Let me place my confidence in you!" Closer to a seduction...as some reviewer put it. Did master's interview a governess in that manner?He lunged for her hands...I bet considered groping in that era. He must have seen it as just a reasonably well-paid one day's work, to offset the fact that post-August he wouldn't be earning anything (or just enough to pay his taxi fare!) Half day's work he said in his interview , Bethan. He shouldn't take cameo roles like this...it weakens his CV. And Bethan, I have a soft spot in my heart for the TIMES who panned TOTS..aside from being the only UK newspaper that has a world-wide reputation...they gave SLOW a very good review, when all the others were pretty disparaging. Jodi May was a caricature. But the house and grounds were gorgeous. As some one on RoP said, Henry James should be read ( I read it twice)not filmed.(I have the same feeling about BJD) Have to agree with Cheryl, the master never should have been shown...but then who would have looked at TOTS on Boxing Day without CF.They exploited him.
~CherylB #301
You're right Evelyn, they did exploit CF. He was used! The ignonomy of it. Seriously, he does deserve better. Well "Donovan Quick" was better. It was a terrific role, very dramatic -- which is his greatest strength. Possibly the best part he's had to demonstrate his ability as an actor since "Apartment Zero".
~lafn #302
Well "Donovan Quick" was better. It was a terrific role, very dramatic -- which is his greatest strength. Possibly the best part he's had to demonstrate his ability as an actor since "Apartment Zero". Hooray for our side , Cheryl.Thanks to DQ, I will no longer have to say:"He did his best work ten years ago".
~lizbeth54 #303
Did I start all these italics? Oops!! He shouldn't take cameo roles like this...it weakens his CV. Agree! They exploited him. Agree! (Hope he learns from this experience! Or his agent bins all offers of cameos!) It was a terrific role, very dramatic -- which is his greatest strength. Agree.... strong dramatic roles suit him. As some one on RoP said, Henry James should be read ( I read it twice)not filmed.(I have the same feeling about BJD) Rather reluctantly, I think I might agree with you about BJD. Sometimes, I'm very, very enthusiatic, and then I have my doubts.
~amw #304
What I like about CF is that he is completely modest, if the story calls for him to look gorgeous(P&P & SLOW) then he can looked gorgeous but if he has to have pouffy hair then pouffy hair it is even if it does him no justice, if he has to look scruffy and like an unmade bed(FP) then so be it, scared and war weary (Tumbledown), heavy and bumptious (SIL) and so on, he cares not for his personal looks as he has said in many interviews his face can be improved or not depending on the role, sorry to go on but I have so much admiration for this man and he is so under-rated.
~KarenR #305
The same scene between the Master and Miss was shown in The Innocents. Michael Redgrave played the Master. There was no sexual tension or seduction in that scene. He was as a reserved, disinterested type. Personally, I didn't like The Innocents. Deborah Kerr was much too old to be believable in that role. I replayed the ending and watched it again with closed captioning. Miles saw absolutely nothing. He even asked "if it was Miss Jessel because Flora told him that the Miss had said she'd seen her." Then Miss says, "Who is He?" Then Miles starts yelling "Quint, Where are you" But the best part of the closed captioning is how they categorize the noises. It is Miss is "panting" and "groaning" and "moaning." There are more sexual references in the closed captioning than by Jodhi.
~CherylB #306
As much as I personally like "The Innocents", it was still a flaw in that film to show the Master. It still is one of the smartest scary films I've ever seen. But as Karen noted it does have its faults. Yes, Deborah Kerr would never see 40 again and was too old for the part of woman Henry James describes as being 20, but she played the role beautifully. Those are the only things I find fault with in "The Innocents": Kerr's age and actually seeing the Master. Overall, I felt that adaptation mantained the aura of ambuquity.
~heide #307
Hey, I liked TOTS. Yeah, I know, there's always one. It's doubtful I'll watch again but for the first few minutes and I sure won't buy the video but it was beautiful to look at. Unfortunately can't say the same for dear Colin. He had one golden moment at the window, I thought, and that was that. I had a better time with the rest of the story. Having just finished reading it a few days before, I have no trouble saying that the Miss became mad as Miss Ferris had before her and the children were innocents - they saw no ghosts. But all is best to be left to your own interpretation. The program allowed the same interpretation but with a little more mercy than James's story.
~Moon #308
(Heide), I have no trouble saying that the Miss became mad as Miss Ferris had before her and the children were innocents - they saw no ghosts. But all is best to be left to your own interpretation. The program allowed the same interpretation but with a little more mercy than James's story. Agreed. Another script error was that we did not get to feel anything for the characters and that lessens the impact at the end. Unfortunately can't say the same for dear Colin. He had one golden moment at the window, I thought, and that was that. I found his performance rather awkward, as if he were unsure of it himself, those smiles? Even that part by the window were he goes and smells a flower was like, "I am here by the window and the flowers are here, I should smell one." Not happy with this one. :-(
~patas #309
(Bethan)it wasn't a ghost story but a study of sexual hysteria, with the relationship with Miles and infatuation with the Master being particularly relevant. I found it lacking, especially in the infatuation department. (CherylB)We should have never seen the Master at all. His presence should be implied... (KarenR)(Tom Howard, TimeOut) Sexual tension between the Governess and the Master is hinted at in the opening scene, yet this is then virtually ignored. (Not having read the story) I'm okay with the Master appearing in the beginning, and think we should have had flashbacks all through - Miss's fantasies, shall we say. (Heide)the children were innocents - they saw no ghosts They saw no ghosts, but were they innocents? Aren't we supposed to wonder about this. There's a scene where Miles appears as not innocent at all but aware of some power he has. Unfortunately, I think he was not convincing. (Moon)I found his performance rather awkward, as if he were unsure of it himself, those smiles? Perhaps Colin was, but the Mastwer wasn't. I think he laid the charm rather heavily (well, he didn't have very long to do it...). It would have put me off, but then I'm not a 20 year-old 19th century children's teacher.
~lizbeth54 #310
I had to spend this afternoon waiting for the Gas engineer to come to service our central heating...and so I thought I'd use the time to check up on a few things! 1. DQ (am still resisting the temptation to watch it! I hope to experience it "live") On the assumption that when it is shown on TV, it will receive some advance publicity, I phoned the BBC Drama Publicity Department (yes, they do have one!). Conversation went as follows: Could you tell me when DQ, produced by BBC Scotland, will be shown? Reply- How did you hear about it? Are you from the Press? No, I'm a member of the public. I read about it on the Internet. It's already been shown in Australia, so I was wondering whether we'd see it in the UK. Reply (annoyed) In Australia? How did that happen? Yes, it will be shown here, in the Summer. When in the Summer? Reply - June, July Make of this what you will. I wish I'd asked why they are not showing it now (just before the BAFTAs!) rather than the holiday period. 2. SLOW..... I rang my nice helpful independent video shop to ask about SLOW, and yes, they are getting it and they'll reserve a copy for me on Monday. But Blockbusters hadn't heard of it and said it wasn't listed. 3. BJD. I rang Working Title to ask when they were atarting filming , and was given the number of the BJD production office which is now in operation. When I rang the office, they couldn't/wouldn't give any info...just said that production was in the "very early stage". And then the Gas engineer arrived! Mixed bag of "news". But I'm looking forward to seeing SLOW again (which I genuinely liked!!). Particularly want to look at the so-called "amateurish" acting by the Nigerian cast...I thought that they were just as I remember from my days in Nigeria...their delivery and intonation is much more emphatic.
~patas #311
(Bethan)so-called "amateurish" acting by the Nigerian cast... They were pretty good IMHO... And Evelyn said they were not Nigerian (but for the actress playing Nimi's mother)...
~patas #312
Good luck with the Gas engineer. Don't let him open holes in your walls ;-) I swear this is to be taken only in a BJD-like context
~lizbeth54 #313
Re: Sniffing the flowers in TTOTS......they're white lilies, I think. The Governess is subsequently shown looking at the same flowers on the country estate, and then (by association - thinking of the Master?) has her first "vision" of Quint. One reviewer described the vision of Quint as "representing the Master paying the wages of sin". (I couldn't follow this one) Also, why did Miss Jessel commit suicide? Was she pregnant? Was that such a dreadful crime? Wouldn't her erstwhile employer have helped her?
~patas #314
(Bethan)Also, why did Miss Jessel commit suicide? Was she pregnant? Was that such a dreadful crime? Wouldn't her erstwhile employer have helped her? I don't think he would have. Getting pregnant while in his employment and taking care of two children? She would have been dismissed in disgrace, and even if Quint would have married her she would have had to go.
~KarenR #315
(Gi) Unfortunately, I think he was not convincing. I didn't think the children in this version to be creepy enough. The ones in The Innocents were more phonily sweet and acted as though they had lots to hide. These didn't. I remember the other Flora did seem like she might have been possessed, and Miles was more charismatic and creepy. Bethan, busy day at the telephone. :-) Isn't BBC's reaction (where did you hear about it?) amazing! Did you try the Drama Department? (Bethan) the so-called "amateurish" acting by the Nigerian cast Only the mother is a Nigerian actress. The rest are British actors.
~EileenG #316
At least your afternoon was productive, Bethan. Reply (annoyed) In Australia? How did that happen? This is the second time I've read that someone at the BBC was 'annoyed' because the film has been aired in Oz. Since BBC Scotland sold its international broadcast rights (correct, Karen?), how come 'big BBC' is annoyed? Anyone know? Or are these folks too far down the food chain to have an adequate understanding of the situation? Re: BJD--sounds like a reasonable answer, since they've only cast one part and they're moving at the speed of fossilization.
~amw #317
Bethan - reply June,July these are nothing months, what a waste, I think I'd rather wait another couple of months and have it in the winter schedules, nobody is going to see it in June/July - but why aren't I surprised!
~KarenR #318
*slapping Ann's wrist* Since BBC Scotland sold its international broadcast rights (correct, Karen?), how come 'big BBC' is annoyed? Yes, broadcast rights are being sold on a country-by-country basis. And we've all received responses via email from BBC or BBC Scotland to the same effect: surprise that the show has already been shown in Australia and that BBC Worldwide (what they have to do with anything) was going to be checking into things. I'm going to make a call tomorrow to see what I can find out.
~amw #319
ouch!!
~lafn #320
Particularly want to look at the so-called "amateurish" acting by the Nigerian cast...I thought that they were just as I remember from my days in Nigeria...their delivery and intonation is much more emphatic. No one in this group said they were "amateurish".The portrayals were done v. well and should have been.... two are from the RSC .Sammy lives in Sussex. All are British actors, except for Nimis' mother..And I'm still bitter about the poor reception that the British public gave that film. So much for UK CF fans who do a lot of grandstanding and don't go to the Box Office.
~KarenR #321
ouch!! Sorry, had a bad case of the Italics. Am walking around all slanted. ;-)
~Tracy #322
(Moon)where he goes and smells a flower was like, "I am here by the window and the flowers are here, I should smell one." Very iffy I thought and to be honest the lines didn't help, they weren't great were they, that wonderful voice tried its best with the shoddy material but I thought (and I'm ducking under the duvet to avoid the stones being thrown) that at times the delivery was a little too deliberate. Perhaps he was dragging it out to get a bit more of an earner, they do say time is money:-D
~lizbeth54 #323
I found it lacking, especially in the infatuation department. Not having read the story) I'm okay with the Master appearing in the beginning, and think we should have had flashbacks all through - Miss's fantasies, shall we say. (Gi) I thought the opening scene should have been shot at a much more leisurely pace, perhaps showing the gauche young girl entering the palatial house, waiting in an entrance hall, being taken by a servant to see the Master in a more formal setting , and then a longer conversation, with pauses, and finally the Master accompanying her back to the entrance hall, taking her hand and smiling...that's how I would have directed it! Also, if I had been the director, the minute CF appeared on set, I would have smacked his bottom and sent him home to change...well, at least back to the Wardrobe Dept! Change the frockcoat, the loose fitting collar and shirt, the floppy tie, the trousers...well fortunately (unfortunately?) we didn't really see them, but I'll bet they were baggy! :-) I don't think he is at all aware of how he looks (this is not a criticism!!)
~Tracy #324
Now Karen - don't you go blaming me for this slanty business. It was Ok when I looked at my posting honest (if you don't believe me check out Wordpad!) (Bethan) - SLOW..... I rang my nice helpful independent video shop I wish I had a pet independent vid shop near me. Nobody I've asked Woolies WHSmith Blockbuster OurPrice etc etc etc seem to ahve heard of it...I may as well have been speaking Tharg-ish if you had seen the gormless expressions I got in response
~lizbeth54 #325
No one in this group said they were "amateurish".The portrayals were done v. well and should have been.... two are from the RSC .Sammy lives in Sussex. No, it wasn't comments from the group, it was from a couple of the hostile youthful "reviewers"...quite uncalled for, I thought. I liked the performances, and, as you say, they were all professional actors. Aryon Bakaye (?) received a BAFTA nomination a couple of years ago.
~lafn #326
..I don't think he is at all aware of how he looks (this is not a criticism!!) In the book Making of P&P ; "Colin Firth had a genuine interest in getting the wardrobe for Darcy right, which was a tremendous help." They had all color coats for him."...half way through the filming he told me 'I think I would now like a black coat'..." p.52
~lafn #327
I didn't start the italics...but I'll close them now.
~lizbeth54 #328
I may as well have been speaking Tharg-ish if you had seen the gormless expressions I got in response I had to spell "laughter" for the assistant at Blockbusters! SLOW may not be easy to track down. If you have problems, ring Hiflighers, who are distributing the video. Phone 0181 7422023
~amw #329
There has to be an exception to every rule, and boy was P&P exceptional!!, and so was CF as was the entire cast, nothing has quite lived up to it since, but generally speaking I think Colin is not too aware of his appearance, if only he knew how good he looked in period costume, oh well.
~EileenG #330
I will remember to close all my tags. I will remember to close all my tags. I will remember to close all my tags. I will remember to close all my tags. I will remember to close all my tags. You can tell I went to catholic school, can't you?
~Moon #331
Bethan, good try at directing, but the script would be the first to be worked on IMO. Colin should really start to get a clue on wardrobe and give them some helpful hints such as: the shirt is too big for this jacket, the cut is all wrong on this coat etc.
~lafn #332
Well the costume designer in TOTS should have been sacked for letting him go on looking as if he were wearing someone else's clothes. IMO he was miscast, anyway, he can't do swarmy and that's what the director seems to have wanted.Greg Wise would have been better.
~Tracy #333
"(bethan) I had to spell "laughter" for the assistant at Blockbusters! " ROTFLOL - I suppose they thought it was larf-ter.. in a 70's CarryOn stylee *grin* Oh the yoof of today, they weren't brung up and skuled like wot we wuz, guv'nor. Thanks for the 'phone number, I may have to use it as I think procurement of said item for me is going to be way beyond the capabilities of stores on Planet KentBackwater aka Sittingbourne. ;-(
~lafn #334
Thanks for the 'phone number, I may have to use it as I think procurement of said item for me is going to be way beyond the capabilities of stores on Planet KentBackwater aka Sittingbourne. ;-( Poor guys at Optimum, they won't even get their money back on the videos at this rate.
~Moon #335
"Colin Firth had a genuine interest in getting the wardrobe for Darcy right, which was a tremendous help." Evelyn, I was posting at the same time. Interesting. I can not believe that he is still taking an eager interest in his wardrobe. And that goes for his wedding day as well. Otherwise, I must assume he needs glasses.
~lizbeth54 #336
Oh dear, all these italics, was it me? Poor guys at Optimum, they won't even get their money back on the videos at this rate. We are a nation of video renters. SLOW has an attractive cover and it should do well, provided it's available! ATA, believe it or not, is still going strong at our local Blockbusters! I think there could be some other light at the end of the tunnel for SLOW. I noticed the other day that the BBC were screening "The James Gang" which, along with SLOW, was part of the final slate of movies produced by Handmade Films. Like SLOW, it was part funded by the Arts Council and the BBC. It was picked up by Miramax (huh!), got a nationwide 200 print distribution (huh again!) and flopped totally (hah!). But any film with some funding from the BBC should be sreened at some point by the BBC and could reach an audience of several millions. (BTW I watched part of "The James Gang" and found it shallow and feckless...I guess Miramax thought it had yoof appeal!). I wish I had a pet independent vid shop near me. Nobody I've asked Woolies WHSmith Blockbuster OurPrice etc etc etc seem to heard of it. According to dim assistant at Blockbusters, they only get advance notice of mutiple copy-type videos, but if there are only one or two copies provided, the title isn't listed. SLOW may fall into this category.
~lafn #337
Like SLOW, it was part funded by the Arts Council and the BBC. Art council, yes.Like you I thought BBC had funded it too, but when I saw it at Mr. Young's Theatre,neither Karen or I saw any BBC credit.Nor was it listed in the production notes.Though I swore Missan said that Saturday night in Brixton that it was BBC who had first wanted Whitney Houston.
~alyeska #338
Why when Colin was speaking did they keep the camera on her. It would have been much better if the had been on him. She just sat there with her mouth open for the most part. They showed very little of him. I love his voice but would like to have seen his expressions when he was talking.
~Brown32 #339
Hi All: Re TOTS: I asked Clive about the painting on the staircase, and here is his reply: ************************* I'm pretty certain the picture of Colin on the wall of the Bly staircase was a real oil-painting painted specially for the film, either by the Graphic Designer or by one of the people who specialise in such work. As it was there before we shot Colin's scene. I'd guess the artist used a photo as a model. If I can find out any solid facts about the portrait I'll let you know, of course. ************************* Clive has been chosen to be on one of the juries for the BAFTAs. It is a big honor and I am so proud of him. I'll have to ask how it works as opposed to the Oscars. Or can one of you tell me? Murph
~mari #340
(Murph) As it was there before we shot Colin's scene. I'd guess the artist used a photo as a model. Thanks for the insider info, Murph. To me, the portrait in TOTS is a dead ringer for the photo we've seen from P&P in which Darcy is standing on the steps, outside Pemberley I assume. Does anyone know which one I'm referring to? I recall it clearly as it was the first pic I saw of him in People mag the week after P&P aired here, when I was on a desperate hunt for anything about this man!;-) Nice news for Clive re the BAFTAs. It looks like the BAFTA noms were announced today, with American Beauty picking up a ton of them. If anyone can find the full list of noms, please post on 127. Thanks.
~KarenR #341
Donovan Quick: For those who bought the rights to DQ, it was permissible after November 1999. Emails, letters or calls to HBO, WGBH, Bravo, and A&E would help as they are currently reviewing it. Make sure you tell them you wish you could see more Scottish productions, have no problems with the accent (think it's cute) and admire all the films coming out of that area. ;-)
~patas #342
(Evelyn)IMO he was miscast, anyway, he can't do swarmy and that's what the director seems to have wanted. What do you mean, he can't do? Can he not do anything? Heresy! ;-) (Moon)I must assume he needs glasses Yeah, rose-tinted ones. I'm glad he has some ;-b (Murph)I asked Clive about the painting on the staircase Does he think they would sell it? :-)
~mari #343
(Karen) Emails, letters or calls to HBO, WGBH, Bravo, and A&E would help as they are currently reviewing it. I wonder if they're referring to the American Film Market (which ends today), though I don't see DQ or any of CF's films listed on the schedule. (You'll like this, Karen: Binder is there with The Sex Monster--I guess he's trying to find a foreign distributor.) Interesting article in today's L.A. Times about a guy who has organized an auction for 15 films that haven't found a distributor. Sobering stat: of the 2,500 indie films made each year, only 50 get a distributor--anywhere. I'll post it at 127.
~lizbeth54 #344
Like you I thought BBC had funded it too, but when I saw it at Mr. Young's Theatre,neither Karen or I saw any BBC credit.Nor was it listed in the production notes.Though I swore Missan said that Saturday night in Brixton that it was BBC who had first wanted Whitney Houston. (Evelyn) Actually, in retrospect, I don't remember seeing the BBC listed in the credits either, although I wasn't specifically looking out for it at the time. Shame! So it looks as though SLOW will only be seen via video rentals/purchases. I'm hoping to persuade the owner of my nice little corner video shop to put a poster of SLOW up in one of the windows! The shop is a veritable treasure trove...not your conventional blockbusters only store. Donovan Quick: For those who bought the rights to DQ, it was permissible after November 1999. Thanks for checking Karen, but now I'm even more puzzled by the BBC's failure to screen DQ. Any time January-March would be fine, especially with the BATFAs in April. The Drama publicity person I spoke to said that DQ would be shown "June, July" but that it hadn't actually been scheduled as yet. June/July is a graveyard for creative programming...lots of sport, people on holiday, no-one really watches TV etc. And normally programmes are automatically scheduled on completion (or before completion) and shown within a few months. It's a very straightforward process, unlike movie distribution. Nothing adds up here!!! IMO he was miscast, anyway, he can't do swarmy and that's what the director seems to have wanted. (Evelyn) He's more ideal husband material....it's surpring how many times he's married, about to get married, or actually gets married (on screen, of course!) I can not believe that he is still taking an eager interest in his wardrobe. And that goes for his wedding day as well. Otherwise, I must assume he needs glasses. (Moon) LOL! Although didn't he say that Joe Fiennes was the lucky one because he got to wear "dignified" trousers and an open-necked shirt. Now if Wessex had been slightly less buttoned up, it would have been a different movie!
~lizbeth54 #345
RE. the Scottish accent in DQ...didn't the mega successful "Trainspotting" have subtitles?
~KarenR #346
(Mari) I wonder if they're referring to the American Film Market No, they weren't selling it the AFM. Besides, they had told me a month ago that they'd contacted WGBH and A&E. Yeah, I saw Sex Monster listed for viewings. :-( It's also on the shelf at Blockbuster in case you want to see it again. (Bethan) RE. the Scottish accent in DQ...didn't the mega successful "Trainspotting" have subtitles? Only during one scene in a club. DQ is not going theatrical and to arthouses - it was a financial decision. Therefore, television is a whole different thing. They have to play to the masses, who think MLSF is hard to understand. Right, Evelyn? ;-) Correct me if I'm wrong, but Bravo and the Independent Film Channel might be the only ones who show subtitled films on cable. Trainspotting will be on Bravo this month for the first time. Not sure about other "premium" channels like Cinemax, TMC, etc. Bethan, maybe the next time you call BBC you can remind them of this article in today's Hollywood Reporter: LONDON -- The government has warned the BBC that it must make more original programming and show fewer repeats if it is to justify the annual �200 million ($324 million) in additional annual funding pledged last week (HR 2/22). Culture Secretary Chris Smith said Tuesday that BBC chiefs were told the practice of showing endless reruns of classic comedies and rebroadcasting recently aired shows must end and the pubcaster must instead invest in new programming for both its main channels. Smith said the improvements were expected in return for the pubcaster's 10% increase in annual funding, which is designed to boost the BBC's presence in the digital era. The new financial settlement will give the BBC about �2.4 billion ($3.6 billion) a year and is guaranteed until fiscal 2006-07. ~~~~ Tell them to stop sitting on the original programming they have already funded and to show it!! ;-)
~mari #347
(Bethan) RE. the Scottish accent in DQ...didn't the mega successful "Trainspotting" have subtitles? (Karen) Only during one scene in a club. I don't recall any, but will bow to Karen's memory. In any event, you might be interested to know that Ken Loach's films get subtitled here--at Ken's insistence.
~amw #348
Bethan, did you tell whoever at the BBC Drama Department, that DQ was very well received by both the critics and fans in Australia. I agree I just don't understand the BBC not screening DQ, it is a sure-fired hit and would make many more CF fans in the UK, very hard to fathom their thinking.
~KarenR #349
One scene was subtitled in Lock Stock & 2 Smoking Barrels, but all of Ratcatcher was. None of The Big Tease was subtitled, yet the audience laughed.
~Tracy #350
A little piece of good fortune came my way this weekend, although when I relate the circumstances I'm sure that it will send shockwaves in the Firthdom about the perception of ODBs work. Always with an eye for a bargain I went into a store which is in the throes of closing down - [The chain (John Menzies)has recently been taken over by a larger one (WHSmith) and we already have a Smiths in town. Imagine my glee when I noticed that they were selling all CDs for �1 yes �1 and videos �3 ...baaaargain! Inspecting the CDs made me realise that all the good stuff had already been taken to the other store and the dross was left behinbd (with the coverless, caseless, broken residue of the good stuff) and so I assumed the same would be true of the videos..and it was but for one shining exception. There amongst the -1001 things to do with parsnips and Bobby Charlton on Hairstyling efforts was.......Nostromo. Seemingly in perfect condition, I opened the box..2 sealed cassettes part 1 & 2 present. Odd. Priced at �19-99 but selling for �3. I had half a mind to stop an assistant and demand it be taken to the other store and sold full price immediately *grin* but I didn't I profferred my 3 quid and gambolled away with my prize. Courage dear ones I'm sure it was an oversight - surely no-one could fail to see that they'd be turning up in droves to purchase this meisterwork ;-D
~KarenR #351
LOL! I am sure it was in the leftover/reduced bin mainly because of the BBC label on the box. You have hit "silver."
~Tracy #352
Karen -LOL! I am sure it was in the leftover/reduced bin mainly because of the BBC label on the box LOL also! You could well be right. Not that we have a downer on dear old Auntie at the moment noo,noo,noo,noo,noo *Scots accent* perish the thought!
~lafn #353
(Evelyn)IMO he was miscast, anyway, he can't do swarmy and that's what the directorseems to have wanted. (Gi)What do you mean, he can't do? Can he not do anything? Heresy! ;-) (Bethan)..He's more ideal husband material Agree with Bethan. Even in SLOW when you know he's looking for a chick to have an affair with, he never comes across as a sleaze ball. Ya sorta' side with him.In SIL he was not swarmy..ambitious, yes. But one never disliked him. (Sorry to disappoint you kids, I've never believed he could do "Heinz 57". But what does best is unparalleled.) ~~~~~~~~~~ (Karen)Make sure you tell them you wish you could see more Scottish productions, have no problems with the accent (think it's cute) and admire all the films coming out of that area. ;-) OK, OK, for you and Colin...anything. But God forgive me for lieing
~lizbeth54 #354
Bethan, did you tell whoever at the BBC Drama Department, that DQ was very well received by both the critics and fans in Australia. I agree I just don't understand the BBC not screening DQ, it is a sure-fired hit and would make many more CF fans in the UK, very hard to fathom their thinking. Ann, I'll ring back again in a couple of weeks and ask specifically why they're delaying until "the summer", when we're all watching Wimbledon or heading off for two weeks in Lanzarote! I agree it's a puzzler. I always thought that because of the track record of the director and screenwriter, DQ would have an excellent chance of a BAFTA (TV) nomination for Best Single Drama, if it was up to standard (which by all accounts it is!!) And that's what really puzzles me...the BAFTA run-in season (for movies and TV) is October thru' February. DQ has been in the can since September....all they had to do was show it!! (Like, tonight...there was absolutely nothing on the BEEB tonight! Is there ever?) It's a mystery! (Sorry to disappoint you kids, I've never believed he could do "Heinz 57". (Evelyn) Me neither! What was that Anthony Minghella word..."uxorious"? Seems more appropriate!
~CherylB #355
As for CF not being able to do swarmy, or was that smarmy? Well he can do a lowlife; let us not forget Ross in "Playmaker". And although well-born, the Vicomte de Valmont was pretty sleazy, in an upscale sort of way.
~Brown32 #356
And don't forget that Master of Sleeze, Simon Westward! Murph
~CherylB #357
Absolutely. He was a low form of life -- like cyanobacteria, better known as pond scum.
~mari #358
Alan in Out Of The Blue was rather smarmy, as was CF's character in The Deep Blue Sea. And who could forget good ole Charlie Holroyd.;-) RE: the BBC's scheduling (or lack therof) of DQ. Maybe a stupid question (but hey, if I don't know, I ask;-)--would the average English viewer have any difficulty with the Glaswegian accent? Certainly, you'd have more occasion to be exposed to it than we in the U.S., but I was just wondering . . .
~lafn #359
(Cheryl)As for CF not being able to do swarmy, or was that smarmy? Well he can do a lowlife; let us not forget Ross in "Playmaker". And although well-born, the Vicomte de Valmont was pretty sleazy,in an upscale sort of way. (Murph)...Master of Sleeze, Simon Westward! Yes, I know all those roles were supposedly smarmy(thank you Cheryl) in the script, but he never convinced me.He always played these characters in such a plausible way,that I commiserated with them."I felt their pain";-) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ (Bethan)What was that Anthony Minghella word..."uxorious"? I think it's "unctuous".("Uxorious" has to do with being submissive to a wife!) Let's use that word...it sounds so erudite!Just like Mr. Minghella:-)
~NitaE #360
(Evelyn)he never comes across as a sleaze ball. Ya sorta' side with him.In SIL he was not swarmy..ambitious, yes. But one never disliked him. Don't you think that's because we are just a tiny little bit prejudiced in his favour?
~MarkG #361
Mari: would the average English viewer have any difficulty with the Glaswegian accent? Generally English viewers can handle all UK accents: bear in mind that sometimes scripts are written to ensure that local dialects aren't used to the extent that other UK viewers wouldn't follow them. Occasionally, an accent is used deliberately to confuse; a whole BBC series was based around the filthy Rab C Nesbitt, a comic character with a Scottish accent so impenetrable that some viewers would only catch about 20% of the words/sentences. And a recent ad I saw in Geordie was obviously pitched beyond the understanding of Southerners.
~EileenG #362
(Nita) Don't you think that's because we are just a tiny little bit prejudiced in his favour? I agree, Nita. To the world at large (excepting us loyal Firthfans ;-P), Wessex was your requisite bad guy. I saw SiL in the theater several times and that's how he was perceived by those around me. I think that's why the US critics ignored him, too. I enjoyed the performance. Despite some familiar moments, it was "fresh" and of course there's my favorite line, "now, pay attention, nursey..."
~Tracy #363
SIL had some classic moments - CF as Wessex ran the gamut of film styles, a bit of swash buckling (never was a swash so ably buckled or should that be buckle being swashed), musical -who can forget the exceptional vocal talent (strange warbling sound like David Bowie on horseback!)and even a bit of stapstick...moment after wedding when playbill blows into Wessex's face - all of which were played to great effect. Despite casting him obviously as "the Baddie" I believe that SIL was a better showcase than FP (which has its moments) for his comedic talents - what say you?
~EileenG #364
Interesting question, Tracy. SiL was a better showcase in terms of worldwide audience, that's for sure. I thought one of the funniest parts was when Viola starts to greet Wessex with the mustache still on, but the laughs were appropriately hers. It's hard to beat the scene in FP in which Paul sets the napkin on fire. He played it so perfectly!
~Arami #365
SLOW on video in UK This month, SLOW is released on video for rental. (That's why to buy it now would cost over the odds at the moment: the price will go down in due course.) The fact was greeted in a number of magazines: I had a quick look through some of them and can report as follows: Total Film, April 2000 (btw, why are those magazines dated well over a month ahead of the actual sale time?): no review, the title is just listed among "other releases". Time Out (London weekly, current edition): A tiny pic of Matthew and Sammy on the wall accompanies a short so-so summary and the names of the stars. Empire, April 2000: again, a so-so rating due to script weaknesses - despite of the colourful community interest and beautiful scenery - however, "Firth is charismatic (and Long believable)". Radio Times (a radio and TV weekly owned by the BBC), current edition: the film gets the prominent top place on the "Video" page, the main headline: "Love lessons: Emma Norman enjoys seeing Colin Firth in a romantic role", a large photo of Matthew and Nimi smiling at each other in bed: three stars rating and the following encouraging conclusion: "Firth leaves the rest of the cast at the starting gate in the acting stakes, but with such great vibrancy, colourful costumes and humour, it pays to overlook the film's shortcomings."
~ommin #366
talking of accents. I once went out with a boy from Glasgow - I am from Surrey, Southern England it was disastrous, neither or I understood a word each one said! But then I got to know some others and gradually got used to the accent. As for Geordies, I worked in Immigration in Aust. and was one day at the counter - a man came in and asked something or other - I understood not a word. I called one of the others over who could speak various languages and when he came back to the inner office came over to me laughing himself silly. But your a pom, he said, the man came from Newcastle and you didn't understand him!!!!!!
~mari #367
(Mark) Generally English viewers can handle all UK accents: bear in mind that sometimes scripts are written to ensure that local dialects aren't used to the extent that other UK viewers wouldn't follow them. Thanks, Mark--that makes sense. Anne, I enjoyed your anecdotes also; reminds me of the saying about "countries separated by a common language." :-)
~lizbeth54 #368
Arami, thanks for scanning the SLOW video reviews. The "Radio Times" review is very heartening....obviously Emma Norman likes Colin (and why not?)! But I'm sure a lot of CF fans read the "Radio Times", more so than any of the other film and TV mags, and will be keen to see CF in a romantic role. (Blockbusters, take note!!) Re DQ and the accents...I agree with Mark. And also we are accustomed to seeing Glasgow-based drama on our screens. The Clyde accent can be difficult, but once you're tuned in, it's okay. SIL... I enjoyed the performance. Despite some familiar moments, it was "fresh" (Eileen) I saw SIL when it first came out, but have only recently acquired the video. And after "studying" the video, I really appreciated his performance...he makes the most of the material. Have to say that I'm also prejudiced in favour of Wessex. Okay, he was rather cash-strapped and regarded marriage as a business contract (which it was in those days). But he was understandably annoyed when his fiance started dallying with another man and was also anxious that she made a good impression on the all-powerful Queen of England. Otherwise he seemed enterprising (sound business interests in Virginia),wasn't entirely humourless "Bless me, and I thought that was a horse", didn't have a wife tucked away somewhere, and seemed genuinely perturbed at the end.. "what is to be done?". Even Viola seemed quite pragmatic about it all "If not you, why not Wessex?" If he hadn't drowned, I think they would have been quite happy together! Hardly an A-list Baddie!
~lafn #369
If he hadn't drowned, I think they would have been quite happy together! Recalls Murph's sequel. Do you still have that one tucked away somewhere, Murph? ~~~~~~~~~~~ Re: Films with Glasgow accents...they are made obviously for UK audiences. I only watched DQ because of you-know-who.Otherwise, I steer clear of them like the plague.
~KarenR #370
Carrie must be starting up a new website. There's a pic on her main page of Colin I've never seen before. Anybody? http://www.firthfrenzy.com/
~mari #371
Karen, that's the photo from the infamous Tatler interview. September of '96, I think. RE: Wessex. He didn't actually drown, just in Will's imagination.
~amw #372
Just a little snippet from the Baz Bamigboye column today,with the lack of Firth news at the moment, any little bit is welcome. "Watch out for... Julie Andrews, who displays marvellous comic timing in the film of Noel Coward's Relative Values. That's the one about a title oaf (EA) who brings home a Hollywood starlet (JT) to meet mummy (Ms. Andrews), at the family pile. Director Eric Styles gives the film which opens in the summer, a glossy lustre and peppers it with Fifties songs. Sophie Thompson, Colin Firth and Stephen Fry are also spiffing. ...." Hopefully we will get some news soon as to future projects.
~CherylB #373
I think that CF can do very well at playing villains. Remember the baddy very often gets all the best lines. It's just that we, as his loyal fans, give his character the benefit of the doubt. He's not bad, he's just misunderstood. We may even entertain the fantasy of reforming the bad boy.
~lafn #374
There's a pic on her main page of Colin I've never seen before. Anybody? (mari) that's the photo from the infamous Tatler interview. September of '96, I think. You like that pic? Looks like something out of Madam Tussaud's .
~Arami #375
The pic at Firthfrenzy: Oh, yes, the famous Byronic/Hamletic pose, with lots of make-up ("Im a real queen about this", surely you must remember?) and modelling some expensive garb. Lower down, one of the huge, brand new, shiny Gucci boots is showing the sole and I was the firth ever in the world of Firth frenzied to decipher the shoe size therefrom. It has been since confirmed, not least from nearly pressing one's face against his boots during the opening scene of Three Days of Rain at the Donmar... ;-D
~Brown32 #376
Mari: Karen, that's the photo from the infamous Tatler interview. September of '96, I think. ********** People either love that one or hate it. There was discussion I remember about how hostile the interviewer was to CF. It must be up somewhere - perhaps on Meluchie's articles pages. I personaly liked the picture. It made him look, as Arami says, byronic and brooding -- so totally unlike the real man. I always want to put an Edna St. Vincent Millay sonnet next to it. Today, it would be Jude Law instead of Colin in a pose like that. Talk about press!! Law deserves it though, IMO. Murph
~lafn #377
If I were a website editor, I would feature the pic of Colin on the beach in Santa Monica..the one barefoot,with the biiiiggg grin (Harper's?) right on the front page... With the caption.."Hold on to your hat, you ain't seen nothin' yet...."
~KarenR #378
The article is up on Meluchie's site, but the picture isn't there. http://members.xoom.com/firthfiles/articles/96TatlerUK09.html BTW, I don't think the interviewer was at all hostile. Harriet was in "deep drool" The woman was falling apart: He laughs, devastatingly. Odd. My legs appear to be turning to jelly.
~lizbeth54 #379
Director Eric Styles gives the film which opens in the summer, a glossy lustre and peppers it with Fifties songs. Sophie Thompson, Colin Firth and Stephen Fry are also spiffing. ...." (Ann) RV is getting a reasonable amount of pre-publicity. I wonder what sort of release it will get? Selected nationwide perhaps? I've not seen any mentions of MLSF...from what I can make out this will be a strictly art house release. I had a final shot at getting some info about a release date fot DQ. Quite bizarre, really. I phoned the Drama dept of BBC Scotland. Was told initially that it had no transmission date as it was in post-production but we'd probably see it in the summer or "sometime this year" (thanks a bunch!). I asked "why 'the summer' as this is normally the dumping ground for material that isn't very good." Reply: "Oh, it's still being edited, so we don't know how good it is. I'm sure it will be good". A-aargh!! I'm not an investigative reporter, or I suppose I should have gone for the jugular..." You lie, madam!" But why they can't set a date is beyond me. There has to be something more to this. David Blair, the director, has won two BAFTAs in the last three years in the Best Drama category. The closing date for this years BAFTAs (TV awards) is mid-April. DQ should be shown now. But surely the director, producer, the BBC itself, should be promoting it? Not me!
~lizbeth54 #380
Sorry! Have I closed the italics?
~amw #381
Good try, Bethan, and why does it still need editing, if it can be shwon in Australia why not here?
~KarenR #382
(BBC stooge) Reply: "Oh, it's still being edited, so we don't know how good it is. I'm sure it will be good". (Bethan) I suppose I should have gone for the jugular..." You lie, madam!" The polite response should have been: "Would you like me to send you the review from the Irish Times or those from the Australian papers, when it was broadcast there in January? Now give me somebody who knows their !@#$ from a hole in the ground! ;-) About RV, it looks like there will be huge publicity for this film. Julie Andrews is really being showcased and will be trotted out to appear everywhere. While the Teletext said it will be released in May, I've been told it's been pushed back to June because of Cannes.
~Brown32 #383
Evelyn asked if I still had my version of what happened to Wessex and Viola. I do, and you can start the tale here. It begins down toward the bottom of the page. There are several parts: Viola and Wessex In The New World Murph
~lafn #384
Thanks Murph. It's a lovely story ,and I wish it were archived someplace.
~Moon #385
I like that picture too, Murph. He did come of a bit conceited in that interview. Did anyone else think so? And, he put his feet up on the table at the chintzy St. James. What was that about? the Lady in me was a bit put off
~Tracy #386
(Moon) He did come of a bit conceited in that interview. Did anyone else think so? I didn't think so...a lot was made about his demeanour, it is well documented - his hatred of being interviewed so perhaps he had had just one interview too many that day! It was probably all a reaction to the woman interviewing who seemed so be somewhat schizophrenic in her approach. She seemed to alter her stance from outright hostility to fawning in the extreme. If this was "deep drool" then what stage are we in then....drowned I think! Has anyone caught the wavfiles on firthfrenzy? There were a few I'd not heared before and one in particular which is taken from the A&E interview where he is talking about P&P he comes across as so amiable - a stark contrast to the "posing, stuffy reserve" portrayed by Tatler. (I would attempt a link here Karen-- but I'd probably end up attaching the entire web ;-D ..I know my limitations).
~Tracy #387
Heres the full Empire (April) write up on SLOW: "Its the old Romeo and Juliet scenario - boy meets girl, they fall in love, but their families think it's an unsuitable match � but this time set in the South of France. Garden designer Nimi (Nia Long), a member of a claustrophobic Nigerian community falls for Colin Firth�s British (and married) comic book writer. While It�s hard to fault either of the leads � Firth is charismatic, Long is thoroughly believable � what�s missing is chemistry, coherent plot and a reason to have shifted the action to such an unusual location. Not bad, just a bit dull. ** (Fair)"
~lizbeth54 #388
DQ...The polite response should have been: "Would you like me to send you the review from the Irish Times or those from the Australian papers, when it was broadcast there in January? Now give me somebody who knows their !@#$ from a hole in the ground! ;-) (Karen) Next time, I promise! All I want is a date!!! Just tell me September 2001 and I'll be happy! Seriously though, I just can't understand why "no transmission date" has been set and why they need to lie about it. Very "iffy". Programmes are always given a transmission date, normally within two or three momths of completion, For example, Channel 4's "Anna Karenina", completed January, is being shown in May. Normal procedure. All I can suggest is e-mailing the BBC at regular intervals..."Show us DQ...made with tax payers'(ie our) money!! I'll stop going on about this (bo-o-ring, I know), but I thought that after the blips of MLSF and SLOW, DQ was one hundred percent, cast iron, foolproof,"let's get it in to screen". Perhaps they want to promote the video sales, by putting it to video first before screening?? (This has happened in one or two rare instances) Thanks Murph for your romantic sequel.... beats the original! About RV, it looks like there will be huge publicity for this film. Julie Andrews is really being showcased (Karen) Goody!! There are so many movies around that publicity and hype do matter! Moon) He did come of a bit conceited in that interview. Did anyone else think so? More tense and ill at ease, I think. There was some comment about him lighting up a cigarette and then becoming more relaxed. The power of nicotine (hopefully no longer needed)! This was the first article about CF that I'd ever seen. I remember it well, because we were on holiday in Dublin and browsing in the newsagents I spotted his name on the cover of the Tatler. Eureka! And the very next day I discovered the Internet. We were staying on the UCD campus and my sons went to a half day "Fun on the Net" course. I joined them at the end, and typed in "Jane Austen", and then, (greatly daring!!) "Colin Firth". And WOW! The man existed! :-)
~lizbeth54 #389
Question...if Firth is "charismatic" and Long is "thoroughly believable" what chemistry is missing? And, as I've said before, there is a strong West African community in Marseilles and the Southern France seaports.
~Arami #390
if Firth is "charismatic" and Long is "thoroughly believable" what chemistry is missing? The one needed to make the reviewer's brain work, obviously.
~lafn #391
(Tracy)A&E interview where he is talking about P&P he comes across as so amiable - a stark contrast to the "posing, stuffy reserve" portrayed by Tatler. The Tatler interview was in Sept. 96 and the A&E TV interview was in Nov.'98. We all know that he changes his views often.Particularly about P&P.
~Tracy #392
(Arami) The one needed to make the reviewer's brain work, obviously. LOL. I have yet to see the piece sp can't really pass comment..tomorrow is THE day it gets released over here to rent so perhaps, if I badger Blockbusters enough, by Christmas I may have seen it ;-)
~EileenG #393
(Bethan) Have to say that I'm also prejudiced in favour of Wessex/.../wasn't entirely humourless "Bless me, and I thought that was a horse", didn't have a wife tucked away somewhere, and seemed genuinely perturbed at the end.. "what is to be done?"/.../Hardly an A-list Baddie! (Cheryl) It's just that we, as his loyal fans, give his character the benefit of the doubt. He's not bad, he's just misunderstood. Have to agree with Cheryl here. We're prejudiced toward Wessex but to the audience-at-large, he was a) trying to kill the hero and b) taking Viola away from her true love--A-list baddie all the way, right or wrong. As was pointed out, Wessex did have some great lines. Unfortunately, 'bless me...' is so hard to hear the effect is diluted. There are plenty of other laughs, though. 'That dog!' Re: The Mystery of BBC and DQ--sounds to me as though the staffer Bethan spoke with was working with old information. Either that, or they're editing (dubbing) some of the dialogue?! (Tracy)A&E interview where he is talking about P&P he comes across as so amiable - a stark contrast to the "posing, stuffy reserve" portrayed by Tatler. (Evelyn) The Tatler interview was in Sept. 96 and the A&E TV interview was in Nov.'98. We all know that he changes his views often. Particularly about P&P. Very true. Colin was quite charming in the A&E interview (nose pulling aside). Two years after the fury, who wouldn't have developed a clearer perspective (and a consistent, pleasing answer to the inevitible question)? When I first read that Tatler article, I thought the author had an ax to grind. It was so different than the scads of other stuff written about him at the time, which was surely the objective.
~Tracy #394
Just thought I'd let you know the Career Timeline site has a new DB pic and link to Dolores' TOTS page. Lots of bouffanty hair, Elvis sideburns and outsize suiting going on here and a shot of the portrait referred to in response 281 (Murph). If you can discount the apalling costumery there are some really nice smiley pix of the Master here (and unfortunately one or to of JM - who is displaying her full range of expressions here i.e. mouth closed and mouth open ;-D)
~lafn #395
Someone should tell that webmaster how to spell "Persuasion".
~lizbeth54 #396
SLOW is in Blockbusters - no problem. I like it! Lots of dialogue I missed first time round. CF and Nia both charming. Sammy very sweet and innocent. Supporting cast good. My second-time round impressions more favourable (and I enjoyed it the first time). Only problem...the video tape label came off and my VCR jammed and now, most annoyingly, won'tplay any tape. GRRRR!!
~lafn #397
(Bethan)Lots of dialogue I missed first time round. I bet it didn't improve.(I've seen it 3 times) ~~~~~~~~~~~~ Bethan, can we hope to get a report of the MLSF UK premiere at the Bradford FF tomorrow night?Since it's taking place in your own backyard? How lucky can you be!!
~KarenR #398
I've been meaning to ask, what was the name of the town where the family traveled to in East is East? The town where the father took the family to arrange his son's marriages? For some reason Bradford sounded familiar...and there was that sign. Bradistan or something like that?
~Moon #399
My second-time round impressions more favourable (and I enjoyed it the first time). Only problem...the video tape label came off and my VCR jammed and now, most annoyingly, won'tplay any tape. GRRRR!! LOL, Bethan! To think how much you suffered for SLOW before you finally saw it, and now this! Exchange that tape!
~winter #400
Karen, I'd answer your qustion but East is East hasn;t come out here yet. GAAAH! Tracy, I've been trying to get a hold of you, but your email address doesn't seem to take the messages I send. Email me at jesperan@ucla.edu Thanks!
~MarkG #401
I confess I haven't seen East is East yet, but Bradford is almost certain to be the town you mention, as it has the highest percentage Asian population of any town in the UK.
~KarenR #402
The No. 1 boxoffice British movie of last year, sort of, and you haven't seen it? Bad! ;-) Thanks, I knew it sounded familiar.
~KarenR #403
Colin mention in an Independent article about the influence of actors, called "Are Thespians the Rulers of the Modern World?" Not worth reproducing in its entirety, but here's the paragraph (hardly worth doing): There are, presumably, a few bright actors, but, on the evidence of television chat shows, most of them are fearfully second-rate when required to talk without the help of a writer. According to a recent book, Fame: The Psychology of Stardom, by Glenn Wilson and Andy Evans, some of them are even so vulnerable that they fall victim to what is known as "possession syndrome". So Charlton Heston found that he became rather odd while playing the mad Captain Queeg in The Caine Mutiny. Daniel Day-Lewis confused the ghost and his real father in Hamlet. And ever since Fever Pitch, Colin Firth has been an avid Arsenal fan.
~heide #404
There are, presumably, a few bright actors, Darn, I thought they were going to use Colin as an example of one of those few. Instead he gets branded as an Arsenal supporter which somehow seems to mean having a lesser IQ. Am amazed they didn't trot out the old Mr. Darcy connection but then Colin's never confused himself with a Regency buck. That's only for film reviewers and a fair number of tunnel vision fans. ;-)
~lafn #405
MLSF Premieres tonight in UK All those phone calls to Miramax really paid off,Bethan. Buena Vista put it within your proximity. http://www.nmpft.org.uk/whatson/bradfilmfest/america/life.asp ~~~~~~~~ That Museum looks interesting too. Pity it's so for tourists. Wonder if they have any of CF productions in their holdings. The Museum for Film and TV in New York City has LE.
~patas #406
(KarenR)And ever since Fever Pitch, Colin Firth has been an avid Arsenal fan. Wot? You tellin' me I missed my chance to go to the Donmar in full Arsenal regalia, as I meant to but thought better (worse) of? Gaaah!
~Tracy #407
(Bethan) SLOW is in Blockbusters - no problem. I like it! Me too..I couldn't believe it I went in and asked and .......the tape was handed over. *faint* I have to say that from the reviews and sundry other comments I was sure that I wouldn't like it. But I was glad to be proved wrong. I suppose the story was a little thin but it was positively obese in comparison with some of the other stuff that CF has done. There were some good scenes between Sammy and Matthew, the rapport here was wonderful, I particularly enjoyed the fact that Matthew was speaking to Sammy as an equal ..all lads together. Those scenes had some great lines: "a bad sign, Clarks sandals - always followed by a father with a shotgun" and "rabbits" (!?). Of course Colin was fab in it but then he always is, NL's performance was OK but her accent did wander a bit. The only sad thing is, I've got to hand it back tomorrow ;-(
~CherylB #408
He's now an Arsenal fan. Everybody needs a hobby.
~mari #409
Hey, gang, we're in the big time now: Colin was an answer on Jeopardy (U.S. game show) tonight. Clue was: Actor Colin, or a narrow body of water, something, something . . . The contestant (male) got it right--$500 and on a Daily Double, no less! (Tracy) I suppose the story was a little thin but it was positively obese in comparison . . . LOL! Tracy, I love how you turn a phrase.
~winter #410
The contestant (male) got it right--$500 and on a Daily Double, no less! Now that's a new standard for greatness if I ever heard one... Being famous means... you're a Daily Double answer on Jeopardy! LOL! And why shouldn't he be?! ;-)
~KarenR #411
Tracy, ask your Blockbusters if you can buy a "frequent renters" ticket for SLOW? Let's hear some of your favorite scenes, lines, clothes, scalp shots, whatever. ;-) (Mari) Colin was an answer on Jeopardy (U.S. game show) tonight...$500 and on a Daily Double, no less! Grrr!! What was the name of the category? *Breech* that Geographical Gap?
~Moon #412
Grrr!! What was the name of the category? *Breech* that Geographical Gap? LOL, Karen! I bet Colin prefers to be in the geographical category to the Austen one. ;-) (Tracy) I suppose the story was a little thin but it was positively obese in comparison . . . (Mari),LOL! Tracy, I love how you turn a phrase. Quite true, Tracy. We have been denied long enough! That is one reason I look forward to SLOW. :-)
~KarenR #413
I have just remembered! Anything from Bradford? Did no one go? Any news in the local papers?
~Brown32 #414
Karen and All: Alberta from the FOF list sent this today. "I have just arrived home after the seeing MLSF at the Bradford Film Festival, What a wonderful film. The Film festival really was fantastic, films from far and wide all shown in one city and a Northern city at that. Bradford is set among the Yorkshire Moors, a far cry from London. We battled a severe gale to get over the moors, but it was really worth the effort. Colin was wonderful and even my husband who is not a CF fan laughed all the way through it. Now for the video. Best wishes. Alberta." I wonder if they saw Stephen W in their scary trip over the moors? Murph
~lafn #415
...Anything from Bradford? Did no one go? Any news in the local papers? I could not find a Bradford newspaper on line.Would Bradford have a Chamber of Commerce? I'm about to call American Airlines....they sponsored the FF;-)
~lafn #416
Three Cheers for Alberta!Wonder how far she had to go to brave the gales over the moors. Now there's a fan...right up there with Susan! Pl ask her Murph, what the audience reaction was.I'm banking on UK on making this a big hit.
~Allison2 #417
I wonder if they saw Stephen W in their scary trip over the moors? Wrong moor, I think, Murph. SW was in the west country so it would have been Dartmoor or Exmoor. .(Evelyn)I'm banking on UK on making this a big hit. Don't hold your breath! I have not heard a word about it in the press. (Karen).I'm banking on UK on making this a big hit. The only paper I know anything about (I am an ignorant southerner, sorry Bethan;-))is the Yorkshire Post. I shall go and check if that is online.
~Allison2 #418
Ooops! What went wrong there? That should have been: Something from Karen about Bradford newspapers The only paper I know anything about (I am an ignorant southerner, sorry Bethan;-))is the Yorkshire Post. I shall go and check if that is online.
~lafn #419
Thanks Allison...see if you can find out anything of a review...we're all eager to hear. I have not heard a word about it in the press I have great faith in Lord Puttnam;-)
~mari #420
Just to add to Murph's report. More from our FoF on the scene: The theater was less than half full (BUT that may have been due to the weather--will ask). They handed out audience rating cards and of course she wrote "wonderful" all over it. The guy collecting them said that was the reaction from all the cards he had seen. (Evelyn) I have great faith in Lord Puttnam;-) I do too. The guy was over here giving interviews and promoting it as best he could. You have to support your own work; the squeaky hinge gets the grease these days.
~KarenR #421
she wrote "wonderful" all over it Pfft! Unprepared ;-)
~KarenR #422
The Yorkshire Post is "sort of" online. Nothing about cultural activities or reviews. Have read interesting article about a liposuction malpractice case though! ;-)
~lafn #423
Thanks Murph and Mari for relating MLSF report from Bradford FF.. Mari...pl.ask Alberta about the demographics of the audience.Impt. for young people to like this. They go to the movies in UK.Did they all laugh at the right places?
~amw #424
re MLSF at The Bradford Film Festival - Apparently Colin's name was hardly mentioned in the publicity just a small mention in the programme. RH was the main star. Hope this isn't how it is going to be when it goes on general release. BTW please remember that it was Bethan who alerted us to the fact that MLSF was showing at the Bradford F.F. in the first place and that not everyone is a free agent, thankyou Bethan for alerting us to the fact that MLSF was showing at the Festival and please let us know if you read any reviews from the Festival for MLSF.
~lafn #425
Apparently Colin's name was hardly mentioned in the publicity just a small mention in the programme. RH was the main star WOT?Is this the way it is going to be publicized in the UK? With Malcolm Mc Dowell probably getting second billing? Those of us who viewed it in the US clearly saw "starring Colin Firth" in the opening credits.(With an accompanying rush!)What's going on here? Are you just going to stand by and watch them publicize it that way? Steal the film right under him? Hang the reviews! Get moving on reversing that publicity.
~Passionata #426
How do you suggest it be done, Evelyn?
~lafn #427
Call Buena Vista International (they are the distributors) and ask them who is handling the MLSF publicity. Then talk to the Marketing director and tell them what you heard re: the cast billing of MLSF at the Bradford FF. (Of course, it is all hearsay, since we do not know anything concrete!)
~ommin #428
David Puttnam is a minister in the Blair Government - Colin is not considered to be politically reliable!! Could be you know - but it is pretty stupid not to name him the star which he was. Also he is so popular with so many women in the U.K. that they would flock to see them. It'll be interesting to see what Buena Vista have to say.
~amw #429
I believe Bethan has already been in touch with the Bradford Film Festival people and pointed out the error of their ways, we shall see. I
~lizbeth54 #430
Okay, some facts about the FF and MLSF, as it's in my neck of the woods. One. CF, MM and IJ were were all omitted from the cast list in the main programme, which was sent out to all enqurers and also included free in the Yorkshire Post and Bradford Telegraph and Argus. I phoned up the FF Programme organisers to complain, and they said it was a typographic error..the cast list took up two lines and they'd "lost" one line. But it did mean that the casting of MLSF was de-emphasised, but promoted for most other movies. Two. The Pictureville at Bradford has a seating capacity of over 300 (unlike the two other venues used in the FF which only seat 100). If it was half full, this was a good turnout for a badly promoted film (I've been there with an audience of about 20!). It was a very cold and blustery evening, and mid-week. Three. I phoned yesterday to ask whether MLSF will be screened again at the Pictureville, and it will, when MLSF opens officially in May. I asked if it had a good audience reaction and was told "Yes, very good indeed!" Four. I wouldn't call opening at the Bradford FF a "premiere"...more a preview. The Pictureville is not the Curzon in London. The Curzon has the second largest seating capacity after the mega Odeon Leicester Square. It's currently showing "Topsy Turvy" and has shown "Onegin" and "The Winslow BOy". All of these were heavily promoted in the UK, especially "Onegin", and included talk show appearances by cast members, clips on TV, and interviews with directors, plus the usual magazine coverage. If MLSF's opening was put back to secure an opening at the Curzon, I would expect them to promote it. And David Puttnam really does promote! I can't see CF doing "Parkinson", but he'll *have* to do press interviews. Five. The main paper for Bradford is the Telegraph and Argus, which is sort of online, (search thru Yahoo). Six. The screening of MLSF was on the same night as an important Parents' Evening re my son's GCSE progress and A level choices (both landmark exams in the UK education system). My husbabd actually agreed that if we got away in time we'd go straight to Bradford as he didn't mind seeing MLSF with me (we usually try to catch a movie at the local FFs). But we didn't finish til well after eight, and even I couldn't justify going to see the second half of a film!! Sorry, for once, it seemed as though there was "no problem"! But we will go in May. Seven. Got a refund on SLOW as it janmed my VCR (Now thankfully working again) and have rented a copy from Blockbusters. Will post at 98 over the weekend, butthe more I see of SLOW the more I like it. I missed a lot at the screening. I like the performances and (would you believe!) most of the dialogue, especially between Nimi and her mother, and, surprisingly, Matthew and his wife.
~amw #431
Thanks for all the above, Bethan.
~KarenR #432
Eight. Thank you, Bethan, for all the additional information. Shame that everything associated with the film's promotion got screwed up and that you weren't able to see it. (AnneH) Also he is so popular with so many women in the U.K. that they would flock to see them. Unfortunatley, that remains to be seen. Back to something Allison mentioned yesterday, was Master of the Moor really supposed to be set in the West Country? I assumed it was Yorkshire as well.
~lafn #433
Also he is so popular with so many women in the U.K. that they would flock to see them. They sure didn't flock to see him in SLOW.....which bombed at the box office.
~lafn #434
. I wouldn't call opening at the Bradford FF a "premiere"...more a preview. My dictionary says "Premiere= First public performance".(It does not mention Pictureville excluded). Preview would have been at Mr. Young's.....IMO
~KarenR #435
Mention of Colin in the Guardian's section on World Book Day and an article on Britain's Top 50 Authors: But the most remarkable coup was by Jane Austen as the only classic writer to reach the top 10. She came eighth, ahead of Dick Francis, the world's bestselling horror writer Stephen King, Danielle Steele, Tolkien, Wilbur Smith and John Grisham. The poll was carried out at 4,000 bookshops and libraries, in schools and on the web. Its results were heavily slewed towards parental and children's book purchases and the book-buying tastes of young people. If only adult votes had been counted, Austen - helped by television adaptations including a shot of Colin Firth in wet, semi-transparent underclothes - would have come fourth.
~Allison2 #436
Back to something Allison mentioned yesterday, was Master of the Moor really supposed to be set in the West Country? I assumed it was Yorkshire as well. They (not Colin) had, what sounded to me like west counrty accents eg his wife and his old childhood friend (forgot his name, the one who roams on the moor).
~EileenG #437
Austen - helped by television adaptations including a shot of Colin Firth in wet, semi-transparent underclothes Aargh, here we go again. Thanks to all for the MLSF updates. What a shame about the billing. Too bad you couldn't get there, Bethan, since CF's so rarely in your backyard.
~KarenR #438
Naulls was the friend. Tried researching any clues from the story but got very nowhere. Couldn't find Vangmoor (even in a database of Dartmoor locations), anything to do with "foin," Knamber, Whalby, etc. Only thing was Naulls family references in Grimsby. No Cornish names or place names.
~patas #439
Thank you all for the reports. (Evelyn) I have great faith in Lord Puttnam;-) (Mari) I do too. The guy was over here giving interviews and promoting it as best he could. Why do I seem to recall him not doing that? At some point were we not complaining that, when he said he was giving up his career in the movies, he did not think of mentioning MLSF, and all everybody was connecting him with was Chariots of Fire? Mind you, it may be my memory failing. But where Colin is concerned, I almost believe in conspiracy theories.
~EileenG #440
(Gi) Why do I seem to recall him not doing that? Hmm, that's what I was thinking also. I recall at least one article in which Puttnam went on (and on and on) about politics, with a teensy-weensie little mention of MLSF. (Gi) I almost believe in conspiracy theories Hee hee! Sideways reference to your *other* favorite movie star... ;-D
~KarenR #441
Most of Puttnam's interviews talk about "horrible Hollywood" (get over it) and politics and education. Usually MLSF is tossed in as "his last film." I think he likes to use the opportunity to promote this film to discuss *his* favorite topics.
~mari #442
Well, Puttnam did give some interviews to the papers here; a couple of them ran "sidebars" featuring him with the film's review. I also remember a brief one in Parade (nationwide Sunday newspaper supplement). He was also featured in a Roger Ebert column when the film screened at Cannes. True, they were often about his pet subjects, but at least the film's name was still getting out there. Ok, I give up, he's an opportunist.;-)
~mari #443
One more thought on Puttnam: producers are not generally the ones expected to be out there beating the bushes for their films. That falls to the directors/stars.;-)
~KarenR #444
Absolutely, it's not a producer's job. MEM and McDowell were the only ones to do any promoting here in the flesh or in print. Aside from Puttnam using this opportunity--his Last Hurrah--there was probably a little "if you liked Chariots of Fire, give this a shot" mentality given the Puttnam/Hudson pairing. And who didn't like Chariots of Fire?
~Arami #445
Colin is not considered to be politically reliable!! Excuse me - utter nonsense. they said it was a typographic error..the cast list took up two lines and they'd "lost" one line Sack the stupid illiterate typist/printer/proofreader! seriously, the standard of printed media in this country makes me wanna weep. My dictionary says "Premiere= First public performance"... Preview would have been at Mr. Young's.....IMO And IMO, at Mr Young's it was a private screening; preview is an unofficial first public performance; and premiere is an official first public performance.
~lizbeth54 #446
On Box Office success....I think, with rare exceptions, the only movies that make it here are those that appeal to the 14-23 age group. Films are often much more successful through video rentals, Sky movie channels, and screenings on terrestial TV. And this sort of success is recognised..alomg with critical success. Box office returns aren't the only measure. BTW I noticed in the opening credits to SLOW that it's a BSkyB co-production. Does this mean it will be shown on Sky? I managed to watch SLOW again ( thank goodness we have a VCR upstairs!) before returning it tomorrow. Again, I have to say I really do like it very much. It's made for video watching (and re-winding!) and infact I appreciate it more on the small than Big screen. CF has never looked more handsome...it's so nice to see him with his natural colouring. The love scenes are played with great tenderness. And there are some lovely performances from all the cast. The women are great! Good photography as well. And now I understand all the dialogue, I like the screenplay. Am I the only one to enthuse about this? I hope everyone gets a chance to see it on video soon. One little thing I noticed...he wears a wedding ring in the opening scene, but never again.
~Brown32 #447
Karen (and all): Right next to the article on World Book day (and thanks for the tip) there is one on Rupert Brooke, and a new tell all book just discovered written by a former lover. It is interesting, and for those who have heard "One Before Last," that pool is mentioned in the story! Does everyone know that CF did an audio tape in 1987 where he played Brooke? I have a link on my news page. NEWS Murph
~Brown32 #448
The link does not seem to work, but if you follow Karen's, you will get to the Brooke article, or try the revised one below. Murph - again I typed the wrong URL. Here is the right one: News
~ommin #449
I am sorry to have to disagree with you - why I will not discuss on an open line. E-mail at ommin@icenet.com.au.
~Tracy #450
(Bethan) Am I the only one to enthuse about this? Perhaps enthuse is not the word, but I did thoroughly enjoy SLOW. The photography is great and the setting, simply gorgeous - that house, the view...wonderful!! The other items on view weren't half bad either? I was a little surprised (as it has a 12 rating over here) that a single F word was kept in, not that I'm prudish or anything, but I suppose apart from that there was nothing else in the film to warrant a higher rating. I don't recall ever hearing the word in films I watched at the cinema when I was 12 and no I'm not that old! Necessary? Not totally, although it did illustrate Matt's frustration with the Nimi-Fola situation and struck a chord with Nimi's brother(?) who vehemently agreed with Matthew's "f*** Fola!" outburst. The colourful supporting cast were well drawn I thought and I had no problem with the dialogue. Rev Fola's mother - LOL! There was one scene between the two mothers which was so polite and deliberate but deep down you just knew that wanted nothing else than to slap the living daylights out of each other. Brilliant! I've just seen it the once ... I'm just going to have to rent it again, and agin most probably.
~Tracy #451
ODB gets a brief mention on the Editors comment on the Letters page of this weeks Radio Times (11-17 Mar)..(that's two weeks running guys - steady). Blink and you'd miss it: "For RT readers Pride and Prejudice (the Colin Firth wet shirt version) is the yardstick by which all dramas are measured." - and it goes on about another drama of no consequence. But hey, it was a mention!
~amw #452
Does this perhaps explain why DQ is to be shown in the "summer months - from today's TIMES Culture TV pages about a series starting today:- "Dirty Work. BBC1 9.30pm. The low ratings achieved last year by both Life Support and Jack of Hearts has increased the pressure on the drama departments of BBC Scotland and BBC Wales, already accused of only getting high-profile commissions because the corporation feels obliged to broadcast a quota of non-English work on BBC1. So this new Welsh series is a key test of Celtic credibility: if even a show starring Neil Pearson and written by Laurence Marks and Maurice Gran flops, future series from the so-called "national regions" face the likelihood of being banished to the summer months. ....."
~KarenR #453
future series from the so-called "national regions" face the likelihood of being banished to the summer months. ....." Argh! To make all decisions on the basis on two programs' ratings? Puh-leez! ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Speaking of BBC, here's its review of the SLOW video: Strapline: 'How to find the right man, at the right price' Writer Matthew Field (Colin Firth) retreats to the South of France where he's befriended by seven-year-old Sammy. Confusing the new arrival with his comic book hero Saracen, Sammy sets out to get Matthew partnered-up with his unmarried mother Nimi (Nia Long). Nimi isn't entirely unreceptive to the gruff Matthew but neither of them has reckoned to the desires of Nimi's Nigerian community that wish for her to marry the local priest. This sets the scene for some vague comic moments amongst some feather-light drama. Shot in stunning French locations with some beautiful costumes this film does have considerable charm. The young Sammy adds to the warm glow with an enthusiastic performance that won't cause tooth decay unlike some other child actors. The one niggling problem is Colin Firth who plays essentially a rather miserable old grump. Granted he's a good-looking grump but why the feisty Nimi should be drawn to him takes some persuading. This is a light and enjoyable confection that could do with a tighter scr pt but is nonetheless quite good. *** Best line: 'A Beautiful girl is like a banana leaf'
~fitzwd #454
That review must have been written by a man. Hey, we feisty women are always drawn to good looking grumps . But I always wondered why Matthew was initially drawn to Nimi. That part of the story was unconvincing to me, unless he was just looking for a place to park his salami. With Lizzie, he saw someone intelligent and spunky. With Heloise, he saw someone gorgeous and talented. With Nimi, she wasn't shown in a particularly good scene when he first saw her. So I didn't see that initial attraction.
~heide #455
So girls, was Matthew a miserable old(!) grump? Would it make a whit of difference? (Tracy) "For RT readers Pride and Prejudice (the Colin Firth wet shirt version).. Bad, bad. ..is the yardstick by which all dramas are measured." Good, good. I'll never fault Radio Times for their promotion of P&P - love those photos they published - but this is always fodder for the Janeites when they grumble about this production. As if the whole thing was about that white shirt. I mean we did get to see him get out of the bathtub too. ;-)
~KarenR #456
It probably started off as "trying to get what you can't have."
~fitzwd #457
hmm, maybe I should try that :-)
~KarenR #458
Your study materials should be old Doris Day movies. SLOW is nothing more than a rehash of that old classic Pillow Talk. ;-)
~lizbeth54 #459
The one niggling problem is Colin Firth who plays essentially a rather miserable old grump. Granted he's a good-looking grump but why the feisty Nimi should be drawn to him takes some persuading. I cannot believe this!! "Miserable old grump"...excuse me, please, but are we watching the same video? One of Colin's major problems (and it is a problem) is that most reviews are written by men, who just can't/won't understand why he appeals to women! SLOW has really grown on me (I returned the video, reluctantly, yesterday). I liked it when I saw it in London but thought perhaps I wasn't looking at it critically enough. I mean, the Gurdian thought it was a "mess"! But the more I looked at it, the more I liked it. I love the scene when Matthew tells Nimi that he is frightened because he needs her (stammering, tears in his eyes...he does this so well) No "miserable grump" here! And the scene when Matt and Sami are playing at "being men" and Sami "shoots" Matthew and he falls backwards off the wall (just look at the look of pure delight on Sami's face!) The film has great charm, the dialogue is frequently amusing ( I liked Matt's line to Sami "Stop looking like an Oxfam poster", also the exhange when Matt asks Sami what his mother is like "She likes you to keep your room tidy" "Oh, it's that bad is it" "And to wear a uniform" "Hmmm, that'll come later". Anyway, at least the reviewer acknowledges that CF is good looking. To be honest, he is so outstandingly good looking in this, that he could be as miserable as sin and still be attractive! future series from the so-called "national regions" face the likelihood of being banished to the summer months. Reinforces my disbelief that the BBC were even thinking of showing DQ in the summer..it truly is the dumping ground for programming. So if Neil Pearson flops in the ratings, a film starring the actor voted the most popular on the history of the BBC, scripted by a BAFTA winner and directed by a two-time BAFTA winner, and already shown in Australia to good reviews will be shown in July, when everyone is on holiday or in the pub! The logic of this defeats me!!! There's a lot about DQ I don't understand...the BBC must know it's a surefire winner...why aren't they treating it as such? I'm almost subscribing to Gi's Conspiracy Theory (Bury this movie!!) :-)
~mari #460
Lottery movies: 9 hits, 121 misses Vanessa Thorpe and Antony Barnett examine why lottery-funded films have become a byword for mediocrity Film Unlimited Sunday March 12, 2000 The Observer It sounded promising. Colin Firth was on board. The screenplay had a glamorous location in the south of France and the central plot had all the right credentials, concerning, as it did, an imperilled and steamy love affair across the racial divide. But if you have not yet seen the feature film The Secret Laughter of Women , if you have not even heard of it, then you are not alone. Although the film won a lottery grant of just under �1m, its box-office takings last year came to only �2,832 in this country. The critics were not ecstatic either. A typical review in the British magazine Total Film commented: 'The fairytale relationship follows a disappointingly predictable trajectory, with Firth giving an anaemic performance in a poorly written role.' Government figures released to The Observer this weekend reveal that this unpleasant twist to the end of what should have been a lovely story is not an isolated incident. A lottery grant is starting to look more like a blight on a film's chances of audience popularity than a boost. Of around 130 feature films that have received backing since lottery money came on stream in 1996, only nine could be counted as any sort of success. Many have faltered at the final hurdle and are still awaiting distribution deals, others are permanently on hold. Perhaps the most painful figures to read, though, are the large sums that went into films that have won big cinema releases and which were far from enjoyable to watch: this year's critically panned Fanny and Elvis , for example, with a grant of more than �1m, or the upcoming Kevin Spacey film, Ordinary Decent Criminal , which also had a �1m grant. For many within the industry the sad roll call of silver screen turkeys is directly attributable to the cosy clique of producers and financiers who are in charge of handing out the grant money in Britain. They may well have been keen to support the constantly threatened, home grown production business with a windfall of lottery money, but in doing this, it sometimes seems large amounts have gone to projects on little more than the recommendation of a friend. Rupert Preston of the independent film distributor Metrodome sees lottery funding as a force for mediocrity, not excellence. He also thinks it is ultimately a business irrelevance. 'Good films, like our own Human Traffic , for example, tend to emerge anyway, without any lottery help. We did ask for a grant for that one but we were told, no, because it was all about nasty drugs.' Even the more obviously commercial bets, such as last spring's romantic comedy This Year's Love , can make it through without calling upon public funds. 'It is a scandal, to be frank. Many of the lottery-funded films don't even get a distributor,' says Preston. 'All this money is spent and then no one actually sees them, whether they are any good or not. A vast amount of money has been spent; I would say around �30m for each of the three big film franchises that were set up to hand out production cash, and then another �70m at least which has gone direct into production itself.' Most lottery money was granted through the film panel at the Arts Council, a now disbanded collection of appointed producers and film finance experts who inevitably had connections with several of the production deals that they funded. Colin Levanthal of Hal Productions, for example, was a member of the Arts Council panel and his film Mansfield Park , a joint BBC Films venture with US giant Miramax, was one of those to benefit. It received a �1m grant and, while it has been welcomed by some critics, it is hard to see why a commercial project with such big backers should receive public funds. Premila Hoon, the doyenne of British film finance, was also an Arts Council panelist at the time she was orchestrating the film investments made by Guinness Mahon. This company put money into two fairly successful recent projects, Wilde and Shooting Fish , which had also received big lottery grants. Both Leventhal and Hoon declared their financial interests at the time. The producer of the Oscar-nominated documentary film One Day in September , John Battsek, is critical of the funding structure. He believes it is helping from the wrong end. 'It is first-time, independent producers who have the hardest time breaking through. These are the people that would like to keep the British business going and who are prepared to risk money on a good script. The scripts themselves, to be honest, will always come through if they are good enough - although it might also be worth making grants to young screenwriters,' he said. Battsek, whose brother Daniel runs British distribution for Disney, believes the common complaint about distribution is a red herring. The wider deals, he argues, will come to the best movies. 'On the other hand, it is hellish becoming a producer unless you already have a private income. If you are in the established producers' loop you can just continue to make films without any of them being any good. I don't actually like to think about that.' Yet it may all be about to change. The British public film funding bureaucracy is on the brink of the biggest reshuffle ever. Following the report of the government advisory committee, The Bigger Picture, the various commercial and public funding routes for films are to be combined in the Film Council. Rather less radically, many of the personnel will remain the same. The body will be chaired by Alan Parker, the film director who chaired the government advisory panel, and Stewart Till, his vice chair and former business associate, will be a council member. Other council members, including Colin Leventhal, will transfer directly from the dissolved Arts Council film panel. Tina MacFarling of the Film Council emphasises that many of the strategies for organising funding may be changed, but she defended the history of the lottery awards. 'When this money was given to the industry it was not thought it should be given direct to film projects, it was just for capital projects. This was because they wanted to create some sort of continuity, so that producers did not have to keep starting afresh,' MacFarling says. The industry analyst, Mark Smith of Film Digest , sees the problem with inter-connecting deals as intractable. 'It is a very, very small industry in this country,' he says. 'The companies making these films employ four or five people only, so everyone always knows everyone else. Having said that, there is no shortage of people who want to break into it and can't.' The low takings in British cinemas for many of these films do not reflect the total income since, as Smith points out, recently British films have made more in France than they have here. The sums also exclude eventual returns for TV screenings and video and DVD sales. The low taking figures simply show that British audiences did not come to see these lottery-funded films. Why? Well, Smith suspects that the old industry rule of thumb that if you made 10 films, one of them would pay for the other nine has now been distorted. Public money has brought dodgy projects forward and lengthened the odds still further in a risky business. Smith's colleague, David Hancock, adds that across Europe, public film funding is being withdrawn. 'I would like to see the method of repaying public investors improved here, too. The problem is that they are often the last in the chain to recoup when a film goes into profit.' And of course there have been relative box-office successes. The acclaimed Mike Leigh film Topsy Turvy had a grant, so did The Ideal Husband , Hilary and Jackie , Hideous Kinky , The Land Girls and Plunkett and Macleane. There have been true critical successes too. Films like Sara Sugarman's Ratcatcher of last year, which would not have been made without the lottery. But Ratcatcher is the exception. It might have been better if The Secret Laughter of Women had remained a secret -and the same can be said for many others on the lottery funding list. Remember these? The Lost Son Starring Daniel Auteuil and Katrin Cartlidge, 1999 Summary: A French detective (Daniel Auteuil) working in London is hired to find the missing 30-year-old son of a wealthy couple. The film was based on Eric Leclere's 1995 original screenplay written in collaboration with his wife, Margaret.Directed by: Chris Menges, Scala Productions. Review: The Observer Peter Preston: 'This, in essence, is a stylish French film noir translated to NW5.' The Guardian Peter Bradshaw: 'It ends with absurd violence and melodrama, and the paedophilia motif looks tacky and dubious.' Lottery grant: �2,300,000 UK takings: �49,302 Downtime Starring Paul McGann, 1998 Summary: A thriller set in a lift shaft in rain-lashed tower block in Newcastle. While the cops and crowds congregate below, former police psychologist Rob tries to coax a potential suicide in from the ledge. Directed by Bharat Nalluri, in his second feature Review: Variety 'If the script had remained centred on the apartment block through to the end -- and developed loose ends like the roaming gang members, the character of Kevin and the poorly written Jimmy (which squanders Georgeson's talents) -- the movie could have laid claim to being a successful genre-bender. As it is, it's a game try...' Lottery grant: �768, 898 UK takings: �28,135 Amy Foster Starring Rachel Weisz and Ian McKellen, 1998 Summary: Set amid the craggy cliffs of nineteenth-century Cornwall, Amy Foster charts the passionate affair of a young servant girl (Rachel Weisz) and her immigrant lover, Yanko (Vincent Perez), the sole survivor of a capsized ship bound for America. Based on the powerful short story by Joseph Conrad, the film is an epic, passionate and tragic tale about courage, individuality and the resiliency of the human heart. Director Beeban Kidron. Writers Tim Willocks. Review: On the net 'As a love story it has all the ingredients of a girls' dorm fantasy.' Lottery grant: �2,000,000 UK takings: �48,711 Beautiful people Starring Charlotte Coleman, 1998 Summary: A manic comedy set in 1993 London as the Bosnian war rages, the film features the entwined lives of a motley assembly of Brits and Bosnian refugees. Trimark Pictures. Directed by Jasmin Dizdar, first-time director and screenwriter Review: The Observer Philip French: 'Most of the characters (particularly a Tory backbencher and a band of skinheads) border on caricature, but the picture is cleverly patterned and fairly amusing.' Lottery grant: �553,823 UK takings: �116,966 � Copyright Guardian Media Group plc. 2000
~lizbeth54 #461
Hmmm! Shame, just when I think SLOW has a chance, it gets kicked in the teeth again. And just when it's out on video release. And how typical that they have to pick a review calling CF's performance "anaemic"...which it emphatically wasn't. Why not pick "charismatic" or "charming?" The video cover quotes a favourable comment from "Sight and Sound" magazine, which is a serious movie magazine, and should outweigh the rather crass "Total Film". Also, from what I recall, (and I do read about movie distribution) most of the films listed above had a select nationwide release, which means that they would open in 40 plus cinemas, not 2. But quoting the Box Office figures don't help SLOW, or Colin for that matter, especially in a world where bankablity matters. Doesn't enhance his leading romantic man credentials. Anyway hardly anyone reads The Observer!
~Arami #462
Speaking of BBC, here's its review of the SLOW video: Where and when exactly was it published (broadcast?), please?
~Tracy #463
miserable old grump Miserable Old Grump...what are they talking about? The character was dismissive on occasions but never a grump.. And even if he were a little out of sorts I put it down to the fact that the hair-wranglers were not doing their job properly ;-)! That performance was anaemic was it? Mmm, heaven knows what wonders the man could do with a few iron tablets in him then.
~KarenR #464
It was published here...exactly...although it's difficult to determine a date. My guess is March 8 or 2 ;-) http://www.bbc.co.uk/movies/stayingin/top5-video.shtml
~KarenR #465
Not terribly keen that the Observer's reporter chose to make Colin the poster boy for loser Lottery-funded films. :-( its box-office takings last year came to only �2,832 That's gross? Argh, how could anything only take in that much if it played for several weeks in London and Peckham, then two weeks in Manchester and sort of one week in Bristol?
~lafn #466
its box-office takings last year came to only �2,832 It was a full house at the BFI on Friday and even the dumpy Ritzy on Saturday night had most of the seats taken. Ya think they factored in the 300UKP Spring paid to see it at Mr. Young's?
~KarenR #467
Hardly, and they wouldn't count the London FF either.
~lizbeth54 #468
I'm very dubious about those figures...my maths isn't very strong, but with four/five screenings daily at each of those venues, that works out at an average of one person per screening. ABC Panton Street seats about 150 for each screen, and when I saw SLOW I certainly wasn't the only one there!!! I think SLOW and Colin are the whipping boys for the Lottery Fund inadequacies, and it makes for better reading if the facts are wrong! As a matter of interest, "An Ideal Husband" and "Plunket and Macleane" each took about �1million at the Box Office, mainly over 2 weeks, before being withdrawn. But they showed at 300 screens, which works out at about �1600 per screen per week. Not an impressive average. (�3000-ish in 2weeks) They also got big ads in the press, interviews with the leading actors in glossy magazines, trailers on Sky TV and (I presume) trailers in the theatres. Unfair to compare with SLOW, which got nothing!! BTW, the secret of major movie success....look like Matthew Field, speak like Matthew Field, dress like Matthew Field....but in a Universal backed Hollywood movie that automatically shows in multiplexes worldwide and gets vigorously promoted (ie Mark Darcy in BJD!) And, bite the bullet, and do just one chat show! Can't fail! :-)
~EileenG #469
(Ann) from today's TIMES Culture TV pages about a series starting today... So this new Welsh series is a key test of Celtic credibility: if even a show starring Neil Pearson and written by Laurence Marks and Maurice Gran flops, future series from the so-called "national regions" face the likelihood of being banished to the summer months. ....." Though according to what Bethan's been told, DQ has *already* been banished to the summer months--so much for the article's reference to 'future.' Perhaps if this series does well, DQ will be moved to a more amenable time? (Bethan) And how typical that they have to pick a review calling CF's performance "anaemic" Aargh, that was my reaction as well. But I suppose the author couldn't have pushed his point (movie was a waste of money) if he praised CF's performance. Ha! We know better. It is disappointing to read about the BO take, however, accurate or not. BTW, how did TTOTS fare in the ratings? The reviews were mixed; I'm wondering if the CF-focused advertising campaign made any difference.
~Brown32 #470
To All: I just checked the RV site, and there is less info there now than before, plus a new kind of boring look. Just the words. Nothing else to click on for more info. http://www.relative-values.com/ Murph
~KarenR #471
How bizarre! For about a week now, I was getting: Not Found The requested URL /rv.css was not found on this server. But I just tried to go there with IE and it went through. How very bizarre that Netscape hasn't been able to open it. See what you mean about just a title page. Could be soon.
~Brown32 #472
Karen: You are right. I just tried in Netscape too, and got your message. Bad web design on the part of the company doing it. Hope you are right about the "soon" part. Murph
~mari #473
It looks like they're in the process of overhauling the RV site. Here's a note I got from them today (and I wonder what the "competition" prizes will be;-) ****** The waiting is nearly over! The Official Relative Values website will be launched shortly. Features of the website will include: - In-depth information on the film, the story, cast and crew. - Trailer and Video Interviews with cast and crew. - The chance to get your own @relative-values.net email address. - A Relative Values Community area. - Competitions, News and lots, lots more. You will be among the first to be informed of the launch of the Relative Values website - we hope you enjoy visiting what we have created for you! Till the launch, The Relative Values design-team.
~KarenR #474
I'll see your email and raise you one!! They wanted to know where I got my images and the trailer. Nah nah nah nah ;-)
~Moon #475
You are one up on them, Karen. The chance to get your own @relative-values.net email address. How about: the-martini-set@relative-values.net
~Brown32 #476
I didn't get one! I must be in RV limbo. Murph
~KarenR #477
Hoorah!! Videoflicks, a Canadian videoseller, will have Fever Pitch at a sell-through price ($29.99), beginning April 4. This is down from the $90 price it came out at last year and is NTSC. Does not say anything about DVD. Here's the site: http://www.videoflicks.com/VF2/9996/9996141.ihtml
~Ming #478
Thank you very much, Karen. I found Hostages over that that site!!!
~fitzwd #479
Thanks Karen and Ming, it was helpful for me too! Big grin.
~mari #480
Thanks for the video flicks info on FP, Karen. Time to replace my conversion. Do you or anyone else know where to order the SLOW video? I know it's still high priced, but if split among enough people . . .
~KarenR #481
SLOW can be ordered from blackstar.co.uk or choicesdirect.co.uk. There's free shipping anywhere in the world for both.
~lizbeth54 #482
I've enthused a lot about SLOW...I guess it won't be available in the US, and so I would definitely say "Go for it" and order. It's made to watch on video....I appreciated it far more, and liked it more. CF is, IMHO, better looking in this than in anything he's done (though haven't seen DQ or MLSF). And, remembering our discussion, re kissing, he kisses his wife (CG) ve-r-y enthusiastically...heads for the chin as usual, and then actually changes direction... :-)
~Arami #483
heads for the chin as usual, and then actually changes direction... :-) Ah, that's an improvement in his acting technique: makes you believe (and not just imagine) he actually does it... :-) As he's getting older, he's also more relaxed about these things.
~Tracy #484
(Bethan) he kisses his wife (CG) ve-r-y enthusiastically I noticed that too...very encouraging this change of style :-)
~Arami #485
Meaning perhaps that he may one day play an old lecher convincingly? ;-)
~Tracy #486
Meaning that he's definitely showing signs of loosening up in the osculation department ;-P I don't think he could ever play the old lech convincingly, marvellous actor though he is..far too handsome, you don't see many handsome lechers about these parts :-D
~KarenR #487
Romance Classics will show Camille again, Wednesday, March 22, at 5:30pm. *cough cough*
~lizbeth54 #488
News? I'm afraid I'm a bit of a movie anorak, which means that I actually like reading what's on where type listings, epecially independent cinemas. Anyway, I spooted that SLOW will be screened again at the Ritzy Cinema in Coldharbour Lane EC2 (I'm sure you remember it well, Evelyn!) at 3.45pm this Sunday 19 March, followed by a Q&A session(presumably with the director/producer).(Phone 0171-737 2121) But it may be the last opportunity for anyone to see it on the Big Screen...interesting that they're re-screening it...to promote the video? If you've got a moment Murph, perhaps you could put it on your news page, just incase anyone is interested? Chance for a fairly intimate chat with the producer/to ask if it will be shown anywhere else? :-)
~CherylB #489
I wouldn't be adverse to seeing CF play a moderately young lecher now. Okay, so there aren't really any handsome lechers, this would be the movies -- not reality. About CF's improved film kissing technique, maybe coasting into 40 is making him more relaxed. You're as young as you feel. Maybe he feels younger now than he did 15 years ago. Since I don't get Romance Classics, I can't get choked up "Camille" being shown.
~Arami #490
coasting into 40 is making him more relaxed. You're as young as you feel. Well, I can only judge from personal experience... Hands up those who feel almost as young as you were 40 years ago - but not quite so silly! ;-)
~mari #491
(Arami) Hands up those who feel almost as young as you were 40 years ago - but not quite so silly!;-) Hey, Arami, 40 years ago I was still in my crib. But, I'm happy to report that I'm no longer incontinent, can now chew solid foods, and as this very note indicates . . .am still a *very* silly girl!;-) ;-)
~Arami #492
LOL! (Or should that be no comment...? ;-P ;-))
~lafn #493
Ritzy Cinema in Coldharbour Lane EC2 (I'm sure you remember it well, Evelyn!) at 3.45pm this Sunday 19 March, followed by a Q&A session(presumably with the director/producer) A Ritzy Experience is not to be missed esp with those two clowns! Awwww...wish I could make it;-)
~Brown32 #494
If you've got a moment Murph, perhaps you could put it on your news page. (The SLOW screening) ******************** Thanks for the scoop, Bethan. It is on the page now. I pray this is OK to go here ---I also have the interview on my new BJD page where Fielding talks about Zellweger's casting. It is not as negative as the media made it sound. You can read it here: http://www.geocities.com/firthfan/jones/bjjones.html Murph Murph
~Brown32 #495
Sorry - too many "js" in the URL. Here is the right one. http://www.geocities.com/firthfan/jones/bjones.html Murph
~lafn #496
If you've got a moment Murph, perhaps you could put it on your news page. (The SLOW screening) ******************** Thanks for the scoop, Bethan. It is on the page now. Psst, Murph...tell 'em to bring paper for the loo
~KarenR #497
Murph, if you'll check the Bridget topic (#80), you'll see that the negative comments came from an online chat and were taken out of context. The link and all the other articles are posted there.
~KarenR #498
The BBC has announced its spring/summer programming. No Donovan Quick mentioned.On the drama front, former Ballykissangel star Dervla Kirwan heads a strong ensemble cast in Hearts and Bones - the story of a group of friends from the Midlands who are trying to make lives for themselves in London. The investigative genre is given several new twists as Robert Lindsay, last seen as Fagin in ITV's Oliver Twist, stars as a lecturer with a double life in Hawk. Ex-EastEnder Patsy Palmer lights some family fireworks in McCready and Daughter, while Paul McGann stars as Fish, a civil rights lawyer trying to balance life and work.You can read the rest of the "highlights" at: http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/entertainment/newsid_683000/683763.stm
~lizbeth54 #499
Thanks for this Karen! So it's not the summer (which is good in a way), but I shall defintely phone again about this. I've been told that we'd "definitely" see DQ in the summer, that it's "still being edited", and that they only have details of schedules about two weeks before transmission. Infact, the BBC schedules its programmes on a seasonal basis, and whilst they may not be able to give an exact date, they would normally be able to reliably indicate which season. DQ hasn't even been given an approximate scheduling...it's just listed as "not scheduled". I shall pursue this!! Seriously, I don't like being fobbed off with obvious lies!! I want to know why it has not been scheduled nearly six months after completion. Shall assert my rights as a tax payer (we pay for the BBC!)
~KarenR #500
nearly six months after completion More than.
~amw #501
how can it not have been edited if it has already been shown on Australian TV. Go to it Bethan, we are with you in spirit!!
~ommin #502
Not finished editing!! We saw the film in January and there was no way it needed editing (expect the Glaswegian accents!) If they mess it about they will ruin it. The BBC want their heads read. Please continue to complain - it was such a well made and well acted film I cannot believe they are holding up on this. Interesting the recent head of BBC Scotland has just become head of the ABC - I wonder if it had anything to do with us seeing DQ.
~Arami #503
I have emailed BBC Feedback twice already asking about it. The first time about a fortnight ago. No response. An acknowledgement, yes, but no reply. Next I think we should email all known UK showbiz gossip columnists with the bare facts.
~lizbeth54 #504
Well, I 've had a shot at getting info on DQ (and BJD see #80). I have to say that my job (or at least part of it) involves getting information, sometimes media related...and compared to everyone/thing else, CF is brickwall territory. Breaking into the Pentagon would be easier. I tried BBC Productions who first of all just gave me the General Information number (useful for fobbing off enquiries). I said that Information couldn't help me, and surely they had up to date info on their drama productions. Nope, they didn't, not on DQ anyway. She then gave me another number which turned out to be BBC radio (!) and then I got the number for BBC Scotland Drama. I asked about DQ's scheduling (didn't have to explain what DQ was) and was told it was listed as pre-transmission. Why hadn't they scheduled it "oh they must be looking for a suitable slot for it" (Absolute rubbish...it's just a one off programme...they can find slots for everything else apparently). I turned a bit bolshy then and said something about unnecessary delays and it looked as though it was being dumped. Reply "there is nothing sinister about this". Again asked if I was from the Press. Finally I tried BBC Drama (Publicity)...I asked about the scheduling of Donovan Quick. Obvious instant recognition. Curt response "Mmm, it's moved to the Autumn" "Any date?" "No". End of call. Not exactly customer friendly.
~amw #505
Oh well, you tried Bethan. If it were Robson Green or John Thaw, it would be shown within weeks of being completed, oh well, I guess that's the fun of being a CF fan, we really have to wrok at it, but it's worth the wait in the end.
~KarenR #506
In addition to Bethan's information, I've been told that it will definitely not be on during the next three months and that they are hoping it too will be slotted into the fall schedule. Working on a couple of other DQ-ish things. ;-)
~Arami #507
At least autumn is the right time for quality drama - but what a ridiculously long wait! And why?
~KarenR #508
No one can answer the "why" question. But you're not going to get a lot out of BBC now. Didn't I just read a day or so ago that a reorg is in the works and pinks slips are going out? Can you really expect people waiting for word on their jobs to even care or be civil to you on the phone? Hardly.
~catheyp #509
Bethan, British Telecom should recognise you, even if the BBC doesn't ;-) I know many have pondered over why we (Australia) got DQ and nobody else, but it really is a mystery. We usually get BBC programs, but well after they have aired in UK. If you change your mind about wanting a copy, I can help.
~Arami #510
No one can answer the "why" question It was rhetorical. :-) many have pondered over why we (Australia) got DQ and nobody else, but it really is a mystery. We usually get BBC programs, but well after they have aired in UK. Could it have been some monumental slip-up or some such thing?
~ommin #511
Monumental slip up! Perhaps our new head of the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (late of BBC Scotland) brought it out surriptiously for the joy of C.F. fans in Australia!!!!!
~CherylB #512
I like Ann's assertion. Perhaps the head of ABC, when he was at BBC Scotland viewed DQ as a project he for which he was very proud. Since DQ was getting such a runaround from the BBC; he felt that since he'd had a connection to the film, he'd now use his position at ABC to get it aired.
~Brown32 #513
The info below is from Pam of the FOF. She called CF's agent. This means, I think, that we have no idea right now what project he is going to do, including Armadillo. The End of April makes a May 1 start to the filming of BJD a little tight! - Murph ******************************* 3/22/00 - According to Colin's Agent: There are 3 projects being considered at the moment, but NO contracts are signed at this time. They do not expect to be able to announce anything until roughly the end of April. As to Armadillo, and the reports in the press, the reply was "what is Armadillo? I've never heard of it !!" and when I asked if the press were wrong about this, the answer was "yes ", as....NO CONTRACTS ARE SIGNED.
~Moon #514
What? No lucid dreaming, no man in armour, no swashbuckler? This is not to be borne! I thought Armadillo was an official announcement! What happened? :-( Thanks again, Murph.
~Ming #515
All I want to say is that the first contract he should sign right now is with a new agent!
~lizbeth54 #516
From what I recall about the report on "Armadillo" it said that Wiilliam Boyd was writing the screenplay at the moment. Baz B. is usually reliable. It could mean that Colin has agreed informally with Sue B. to do it (I mean, there was a report 2 years ago that HF was deloghted because CF had "agreed" to do MD. Having the actual contact on the table means there must be three projects with the completed scripts..and just the business side that needs tying up. I don't think CF's agency release info until he is actually on the set!
~patas #517
Perhaps CF is supersticious... Doesn't like to talk about things before they really happen - contracts signed, schedules agreed, ecc. I know I am like that.
~KarenR #518
Sorry, but it's not Colin's agent's job to announce his signing onto a new project and then naming it. That belongs to the company producing the project.
~mari #519
(Karen) it's not Colin's agent's job to announce his signing onto a new project and then naming it. Very true. They're not going to give a caller info before a project is announced to the press. But I do think their info on timing is credible. So, if they say we're not going to hear of a project announcement for at least another month, I'd tend to believe it. And if that's the case, it does make for a tight BJD schedule, as Murph said.
~KarenR #520
"until roughly the end of April." When on your calendar does "roughly" begin? ;-)
~Moon #521
When on your calendar does "roughly" begin? ;-) Depends what kind of week I am having. ;-) it's not Colin's agent's job to announce his signing onto a new project and then naming it. That belongs to the company producing the project. True. But he can always be informative and say please contact the company for the details or confirmation. The agent benefits when an important role for one of his actors is announced because it very often leads to more roles. He could call another company and say Colin has been signed to do this film (name), which should do very well and he is interested in working on your future project (name), etc.
~luvvy #522
It is not unheard of for contracts to get signed AFTER all the shooting is incomplete (see the South Bank Show profile of Ian McKellen). c
~luvvy #523
Sorry, let me try that again: It is not unheard of for contracts to get signed AFTER all the shooting is COMPLETE (see the South Bank Show profile of Ian McKellen).
~lizbeth54 #524
In addition to Bethan's information, I've been told that it will definitely not be on during the next three months and that they are hoping it too will be slotted into the fall schedule.....Working on a couple of other DQ-ish things. ;-) (Karen) Sounds promising! Do let me know. I've given up on this (at least until October, when I shall return to the attack!} But several things puzzle me. Even at pre-production stage, the BBC must have known they had a good project on their hands...BAFTA winning team plus CF. Why didn't they automatically slot it into the Autumn 99 schedules? And what is all this problem about "slotting it in"! ("hoping" sounds very tentative). It's a 100 minute drama, for goodness sake, not a 20 episode version of "War and Peace"!! I've also wondered how it was shown (and why it was shown) at the Cork Film Festival. Was there a special print? Are they showing it at London and Edinburgh FFs? Have to say I'm very disappointed with the BBC over this. Keeping DQ on the backburner for 18 months is ridiculous. TOTS was made in August and scheduled almost immediately for a prime time slot on Boxing Day. Absolutely no problem. Keep on emailing, Arami! True. But he can always be informative and say please contact the company for the details or confirmation. The agent benefits when an important role for one of his actors is announced because it very often leads to more roles. He could call another company and say Colin has been signed to do this film (name), which should do very well and he is interested in working on your future project name), etc. (Moon) I do so agree, but this is Colin's agent we're talking about!! I think that information on CF's projects is always last minute (for some reason). But it's good that he's got three projects which he must consider worth doing. I'd also be pretty sure that "Armadillo" is a distinct possibility. It may just be at the "chatting with friends" stage, and SB and WB are both mates of CF. Saw WB on TV the other day..he's a very nice bloke. Very articulate and pleasant. Sometimes writers like to have an actor in mind when they work on a script. (Didn't Andrew Davies say that CF would be a marvellous MD...let's hope his screenplay prevails over RC's!) Finally, spotted a good (but brief) review of MLSF after its Bradford FF showing. Praised for its insight, warmth and humour, and as proof that the British film industry is isn't dead yet. Several of the bigger movies got less favourable reviews. Actually the British film industry is almost dead...a company set up by the Government to raise �150 million for film finance collapsed after 4 months, causing a lot of projects to grind to a standstill. If CF has three on the go, he'a a lucky bunny. (Sign for all three, Colin!)
~lizbeth54 #525
Carrying on briefly in news reporter mode, but more on the the "real" world. There's been a lot in the press recently about refugees in the UK, and some distinctly hostile reporting ( "send 'em "home") on occasions. The problems faced by most of the refugees are undoubtably real...they're not freeloaders...but apparently in some areas of London there is a growing hostility towards them. A volunteer aid worker has been beaten unconscious in South Hackney, and, increasingly, refugees are being threatened with violence.
~lafn #526
....Actually the British film industry is almost dead.... ...If CF has three on the go, he'a a lucky bunny.(Sign for all three, Colin!) I don't mean to rejoice in the demise of an industry , but this might mean that he'll do more stage work in the West End (which pays more than the Donmar) along with TV.
~Arami #527
Keep on emailing, Arami! I've still had no reply. I'm seriously considering giving the details to the "gossip" editors: Bethan, if you agree, could you help me with the relevant e-mail addresses? Baz? Who else? The might just feel like making enquiries or at leat public comments about this "mystery". There's been a lot in the press recently about refugees in the UK, and some distinctly hostile reporting Someone has been assaulted by a foreign beggar who was annoyed by a refusal to contribute... TV reporters have filmed organized gangs of cheats operating as beggars... Some other refugees have been caught selling contents of their comfortably equipped flats provided by local councils. There are also reports of groups and individuals specializing in smuggling illegal immigrants for money. These cases make headlines and there is an inevitable backlash. It must be a great worry for the Refugee Council and their volunteers.
~mari #528
Not sure if this has ever been posted here. Thanks to Kay and to Carrie: From Big Issue, Sept '99, 8th anniversary issue. 8 of Colin's favorites: Album: 'Return of The Grevious Angel' - by Gram Parsons CF says: "Emotional laxative for an Englishman" Film: ' Goodfellas' CF: "Banal characters made riveting, a real achievement" Book: 'The Sound and The Fury' - by William Faulkner CF: "The spell of this story is partly in the way it reveals itself so slowly. You start out totally confused and end up completely captivated by its beauty." Holiday: Loch Fyne in Scotland CF: "It's impossible to get uptight there. Friendly people and fantastic Kippers" Politician: CF: "Nelson Mandella" TV Show: 'The Larry Sanders Show' CF: "Retort to anyone who thinks Americans lack irony" Food: Moulakhie CF: "It was cooked for me by a Palestinian friend. I don't know what it is but it's green and I can't get enough of it." Football Team: CF: "Arsenal"
~mari #529
NEWSFLASH Colin is Mark Darcy! According to The Observer, CF is Mark and Hughie is Daniel. Will post the article at #80.
~patas #530
(mari)Not sure if this has ever been posted here(...) From Big Issue, Sept '99, 8th anniversary issue. 8 of Colin's favorites I at least had never read it, great fun, must try some of those ;-) And thanks for the newsflash, it helped make my day! :-)
~KJArt #531
It made my week! 8-D
~Arami #532
Is anyone planning to go anywhere near this place between June and the end of August? You may want to pop in to ogle Colin's Darcy pants. ;-) Period Costume from Film and Television at Paxton House Northumberland, Scottish Borders, Berwick-Upon-Tweed http://www.paxtonhouse.com 28 May 2000 - 28 Aug 2000 A stunning display of costume worn by Kate Winslet, Nicole Kidman, Emma Thompson, Alan Rickman, Colin Firth and others in the most popular period films and television drama of the past decade. On display for the first time in the north.
~KarenR #533
Bridget page is up at the Bucket: http://www.spring.net/karenr/mdbro/bjd.html
~Brown32 #534
Terrific page, Karen!! Murph
~KarenR #535
Thanks, Murph. Now, if we only had a little more info. ;-)
~lafn #536
(Arami)Is anyone planning to go anywhere near this place between June and the end of August? You may want to pop in to ogle Colin's Darcy pants. ;-) Thanks Arami... Did I read it right? Is the exhibit called....."Hidden Assets"? ;-)
~Arami #537
I thought they were quite apparent.
~Maureen #538
Hi all, does anyone know what has happened to topic 126??? It appears to be missing, or I need my eyes testing. Thanks for the info on BJ Karen, isn't is exciting that we will actually get to see him as a modern day Darcy???? Wish I lived in Notting Hill!!!!!
~patas #539
(Maureen)Hi all, does anyone know what has happened to topic 126??? It appears to be missing, or I need my eyes testing. As far as I know, it is still there, only no one has posted in it in the last few days.
~heide #540
It's there, Maureen. Go to your address at the top of this screen and just change the number from 129 to 126. Hit Enter and then go post something there. I like to see a lot of action.
~KarenR #541
You might think this item from The Times has nothing to do with Colin. Think again. ;-) ANTHONY POWELL, acclaimed as one of the greatest English writers of the 20th century, died yesterday at his home in Somerset. He was 94. Powell wrote more than 20 novels, but his fame rested principally on his 12-volume sequence, A Dance to the Music of Time, published between 1951 and 1975. It told the story of an English aristocratic family from the First World War to the 1970s, centring on the character of the ruthlessly ambitious antihero, Kenneth Widmerpool. Powell's death removes the last link with a generation of writers born the decade before the First World War and sometimes referred to as the Brideshead Generation. [...] [about A Dance the Music of Time] With its witty covers by Mark Boxer it was a special work about a special world - the world where Bohemia met Society. But this was a real and richly comprehensive English world, full of soldiers and musicians, mad socialist peers and arts dealers, girls, girls and girls. The two Powells of which this universe spun were the narrator, Nick, a man of loves and sensibilities, and the other extreme of human character the utterly unselfconscious bully Widmerpool driven by the grotesque force of will but of all the characters the most wordly successful. ********* So, has everyone figured it out?
~catheyp #542
No. I'll come back tomorrow when I'm sure someone will be able to tell me. I'm not very good at thinking ;-)
~Allison2 #543
So, has everyone figured it out? Not a clue, though I loved DTTMOT. Wildmerpool was one of literature's great creations but what has he or it to do with ODB?
~ommin #544
I watched that series, and thought it brilliant - but to do with Colin - no idea, I have pondered long and often during the day and have to admit to being flummoxed.
~Moon #545
It would not have something to do with an old thing he did for television, would it?
~Allison2 #546
The only link that I can see - in the Television version Stringer, I think it was, was played by Paul Rhys who was with CF in Tumbledown.
~lizbeth54 #547
Wasn't Anthony Powell at Eton with the spies Burgess and Maclean (sp?) on whom the main character in "Another Country" was based? You've really got us thinking!
~KarenR #548
Yes, it's pretty obscure, but I don't think more so than your connection, Allison! *hee hee* Anthony Powell's name was actually posted here at Drool. I will go find the actual message and post it at 98. Old Eagle Eyes herself should know this one. ;-)
~luvvy #549
The only link that I can see - in the Television version Stringer, I think it was, was played by Paul Rhys who was with CF in Tumbledown It can't be that. Everybody and his dog was in the television production of DTTMOT! I'm sure I could come up with 3 names without breaking a sweat. That list would begin, of course, with Julian Wadham (TEP). Looking at the IMDB I also see Joanna David (P&P), Harriet Walter (HoTP), Carmen du Sautoy (LE), and Rupert Vansittart (P&P). But since that's not the answer, what is?? c
~luvvy #550
~Allison2 #551
Ah! But I did it without looking up IMDb:-) Karen, I now have to go away for almost two weeks not knowing for sure if CF will be MD or what is the CF link with Anthony Powell.
~KarenR #552
Ok, I've posted the link on #98.
~KarenR #553
Review of My Life So Far at the British Shadows on the Wall website. Not so hot. Only 2 stars. Reviewer cannot relate to that lifestyle or life. :-( http://www.users.zetnet.co.uk/rcline/swmylife.htm However, great review of the Blackadder Back and Forth film (3-1/2 stars), which I've had linked from my Bucket site in case you hadn't seen. http://www.users.zetnet.co.uk/rcline/swblabac.htm
~Moon #554
Review of My Life So Far at the British Shadows on the Wall website. Not so hot. Only 2 stars. Reviewer cannot relate to that lifestyle or life. Really? What a sad life he/she leads. I am sure they will have no problems relating to all that "trailer trash" the UK seems so keen on lately. ;-)
~Arami #555
From me to the BBC: "About a couple of weeks ago I emailed BBC Feedback asking about BBC Scotland feature film "Donovan Quick". I'd like to know when this film is going to be shown in the UK - since it has already had the world premiere on the Australian TV. I had a brief acknowledgement from you and a promise of a reply to follow soon, but I have not heard from you further." From info@bbc.co.uk to me on Wed, 29 Mar 2000: Dear Ms [NAME MISSPELLED!] "Thank you for your e-mail regarding 'Donovan Quick'. Please accept our apologies for the delay in replying. We know our correspondents appreciate a quick response and we are sorry you have had to wait on this occasion. This drama was made in conjunction with Pandora Pictures who also have the distributing rights for the programme and that is why your friends have had the opportunity to view it. There are no plans to broadcast the programme within our current schedules. However, please be assured I have registered your interest. Thank you once again for taking the time to write. Regards Damian Whyte BBC Information
~amw #556
Thanks for trying Arami, about as helpful and informative as the reply I received, I just wish they would tell us WHY it is not scheduled to be shown in the near future!!+
~lafn #557
This drama was made in conjunction with Pandora Pictures who also have the distributing rights for the programme But what about BBC rights.....if that was my tax money, I'd be hopping mad. Don't you have a representative"congressman"....have them call BBC for you...I guarantee you'll get an answer.
~Arami #558
The reply was obviously prepared (inexpertly) by an office junior using a standard reply form. Representatives of the people in UK (members of Parliament) would not consider such a complaint as particularly serious or important compared with other, more pressing matters. There are various other consumer/viewer/taxpayer bodies, associations, committees, which are more appropriate for such enquiries. I might perhaps continue this game for a little longer if I had nothing else to do, but as it is, I don't think this particular approach is worth the trouble.
~lafn #559
Representatives of the people in UK (members of Parliament) would not consider such a complaint as particularly serious or important compared with other, more pressing matters Ours have big staffs who sit around doing nothing...some of them interns who would be v. eager to give PBS (our BBC) a call.They like causes;-)
~lizbeth54 #560
I'm pretty sure we'll see DQ in the Autumn (that's what BBC Drama Publicity told me). To be honest, that's the *only* time for good drama, especially the 9pm slot on Sunday. I'd much rather it was shown then and made an impact. Arami, you're very favoured to receive a reply to your email! I think I'll email the Beeb (again) and suggest that they show DQ on the 5th anniversary of the first showing of P&P. (Not a bad idea, actually!) Doesn't time fly!! I'm hoping that CF may lift his head above the parapet in the UK in April. If MLSF opens early May, it should be getting some promotion soon (and he's the one to do it!). BJD and MD would be an added PR bonus, plus RV in Cannes.
~amw #561
Bethan, Perhaps they have had another look at DQ and realise that they have a "hit" on their hands and having delayed it for so long have now decided to air in the Autumn months which as you say are the best for good drama and I like your idea of suggesting they show it on the 5th Anniversay of P&P. (What an impact that series has had that people are still loving it and discussing it 5 years later).
~Tracy #562
But what about BBC rights.....if that was my tax money, I'd be hopping mad It is! Well It's my licence fee...and I am quietly seething in a very British stiff-upper-lippy kind of way! Bethan - I do agree, Autumn would be a better time for scheduling it especially that 9.00 Sunday slot! Has it really been five years! It just shows you how quality lasts!
~Brown32 #563
Hi All: Go to #80 for some NEW news on BJD. Murph
~Arami #564
Arami, you're very favoured to receive a reply to your email! I actually emailed them twice: the second time to the complaints dept! quietly seething in a very British stiff-upper-lippy kind of way Yes, most Brits aren't very good at banging their fists on the table... Has it really been five years! It just shows you how quality lasts! Yes, and still the one thing they remember best is that wet shirt and breeches... A few days ago I found another reference to Colin/Darcy's wet garments in a paper - we must accept now that this particular image has irreversibly become a yardstick of well deserved popularity every time there's a reference to TV costume drama.
~KarenR #565
The wet shirt and breeches have shown up quite a bit in articles about the BBC's forthcoming broadcast of Madame Bovary, i.e., the Frances O'Connor and Greg Wise outdoor romp.
~ommin #566
Thats an interesting thought - re they have got a hit on their hands. I have talked to quite a few people re - D.Q. and have not yet heard an adverse criticism of it. Perhaps the BBC got a good report from our ABC!!
~lafn #567
we must accept now that this particular image has irreversibly become a yardstick of well deserved popularity every time there's a reference to TV costume drama. P&P as a costume drama has become the epitome and yardstick to which every other one is compared. The Dallas Morning News in their TV reviews about forthcoming costume dramas (The Aristocrats, VF,Madame Bovary...)...invariably says: "..don't expect this to be another Pride and Prejudice."
~EileenG #568
(Bethan) I'm hoping that CF may lift his head above the parapet in the UK in April. Hee hee! It's been a long few months, hasn't it? I selfishly hope he's well-rested and ready to work, work, work for the rest of the year!
~Brown32 #569
Hi: That photo I mentioned a week or so ago - the one the new FOF took of the P&P Darcy portrait? Well, I received and scanned it today. It is up here: http://www.geocities.com/firthfan/portrait.html Arrow down to the last two pictures. Murph
~lafn #570
Thanks Murph...think Colin posed for it?Hardly resembles him. The crotch looks padded....
~lizbeth54 #571
Kept an eye on the papers last week....no real news, but a few tidbits. Sam Mendez has turned down an offer to direct a mega million Dreamworks production, as he wants to work with his "family", the Donmar. Instead Dreamworks are investing in the Donmar theatre and in a new production company Donmar Films. Mendez' next production is "Twelfth Night", with a "homegrown" British cast. Also, a lot in the press about how the globalisation of the movies means that Brit actors are very unlikely to be cast in lead roles, even when the role is English, or Scottish. I'm really keeping my fingers crossed for MD and BJD (although I'm sure he's got it). I think, without being too cynical, that they may have brought HG in as "insurance" because CF doesn't have a big enough "name" for the global market or to head the billing. I wonder what CF's other projects are. Despite the delays over DQ, I still think there's a lot to be said for quality primetime TV. There are just far too many movies out there, and, (in the UK) too small an audience.
~KarenR #572
Bethan, are you no longer reading #127. The Mendes info was posted there.
~heide #573
Thanks, Murph, for showing us that portrait (and need I add that lovely fellow in the damp white shirt). I agree, Evelyn, the more I look at it, it looks less and less like Colin. Definitely not painted by Reynolds. ;-) I still think it would be fun to search out. It's not a bad idea to post Colin-related news here as well. Not everyone goes to 127. Keep digging up the news, Bethan, et al. One of these days it might actually be good.
~Moon #574
Thanks Murph! Imagine her surprise to see the portrait in a shop window?
~Arami #575
The portrait of Darcy - the actual prop used in the BBC TV adaptation - was acquired by Sue Birtwistle at the end of the filming. So now the mystery has finally been unravelled. Contrary to various surmisings, Sue did not hang it over her own mantelpiece... but obviously gave it to Colin's mum.
~lizbeth54 #576
Article in the Sunday Telegraph...The BBC is to set up a new Film unit, so that the BBC can become a world player in making successful movies. The unit is to be headed by Alan Yentob, will have a large budget, and will harness the talents of Sam Mendes and Anthony Minghella. The Telegraph mentions that Alan Yentob is a friend of Richard Curtis and that he (AY, that is) will have full creative control. As Alan Yentob went to see CF in 3DOR, and CF has worked/is friendly with all the other names mentioned, maybe there will be something in it for him. In the next month or so, we'll have the chance to see CF in two movies in the UK, which hopefully will both get some publicity (absolutely crucial these days...unsung is unheard) and remind people that he has a movie career!! The BBC have apparently made two films recently, "Mansfield Park" which has not had good reviews, and "Love Honour and Obey" with Jude Law. I've seen a couple of reviews for "Love Honour and Obey" and they're absolute stinkers (SLOW looks good by comparison) but no doubt it will get a lot of promo and a national release. I'm coming to the conclusion that in the UK it's not the quality of the film that matters but the amount of publicity it and the "stars" receive. Some blowing of one's trumpet is a "must"!!!
~lizbeth54 #577
The Telegraph also says that Alan Yentob will have authority over the BBC's drama and entertainment programme (and for the first time will have a seat on the BBC's Executive Committee, which gives him a direct say in running the BBC.) This means that DQ will be on his "slate". By all accounts he's a very likeable and accessible man (unlike some others in the BBC hierarchy), rather disorganised (wears odd socks and jumpers inside out!) It might be worthwhile emailing him (presumably ayentob@bbc.co.uk) to ask about DQ (UK and USA) and perhaps mention that you'd seen CF in 3DOR, were impressed by the performance and how pleasant he was etc, and it's about time we saw more of him on the BBC. The article mentioned collaboration with the US, so the US and other overseas markets are important. There may well be no response, but it can't do any harm. I just feel that UK drama is being hi-jacked by yob trailer-trash culture/Hello magazine "celebrities" at the moment!!
~patas #578
(Bethan)(wears odd socks and jumpers inside out!) That makes Colin look positively dandy by comparison ;-)
~KarenR #579
Sunday Times' article about the BBC reorg (to be announced tomorrow) has a pic of Lizzy and Darcy at the top. The Telegraph must have a scoop on the film unit, as the Times' mention of Yentob is more in keeping with what's been written for the past few weeks, i.e., being moved out of the day-to-day running, while he contemplates outside offers. ;-)
~lafn #580
I'm coming to the conclusion that in the UK it's not the quality of the film that matters but the amount of publicity it and the "stars" receive. Not just the UK, Bethan,All Over!!No matter who is the star...he/she has to get out and plug it(at least go to the premiere;-)).Lots of good films never even get seen....ask SD...he's got several we've recently discovered.(He's another one who hides behind the "privacy mask".)
~Arami #581
I'm coming to the conclusion that [...] it's not the quality of the film that matters but the amount of publicity it and the "stars" receive. Where have you been all your life, Sleeping Beauty??? ;-) ;-) ;-)
~Brown32 #582
The New YorK Times today has this story on its front page. I have only excerpted part of it. I bet Colin is up in arms! See the last quoted paragraph - The Refugee Council's Nick Hardwick. - Murph ********************************** April 3, 2000 Britain Raises the Barriers High Against the Asylum Seekers By SARAH LYALL LONDON, April 2 _ In the latest effort by a West European government to stem the tide of immigrants flowing into the region, many of them from war-ravaged, post-Communist Eastern Europe, a sweeping law takes effect in Britain on Monday that aims to make the country far less attractive to asylum seekers. Last year, more than 70,000 people applied for asylum here, compared with about 5,000 just before the Berlin Wall fell in 1989. And with a backlog of more than 100,000 people and their families waiting to hear whether they qualify for asylum, the Labor government has been under intense pressure to act decisively, even to the point of including provisions in the new law that many of its members might well have criticized as draconian a decade ago. Under the law, asylum seekers will be given vouchers redeemable for goods worth about $58 per person per week, instead of cash welfare benefits. Instead of being able to settle where they want, asylum seekers with nowhere to go will be sent to one of 13 designated areas around Britain, some far away from refugee support networks. The government has also pledged to speed up the asylum process, and to close most avenues of appeal for rejected applicants. And it is imposing steep penalties, of about $3,300 per passenger, on drivers caught with foreign stowaways on their cargo trucks.... ....Although the Conservative opposition has continually attributed the increase to what it contends is a too-soft immigration policy, proposing that many illegal immigrants should be automatically detained and deported, refugee groups point out that the reality is far more complicated. "The figures are higher than last year but so are the instances of human rights abuse, political persecution, internal conflict and turmoil raging around the world," Nick Hardwick, chairman of the Refugee Council, a London group that works on behalf of refugees, said recently. "This period also contains a European war described as the greatest humanitarian disaster since the end of the Second World War by the NATO spokesman, Jamie Shea," he added, referring to last year's conflict over Kosovo. The full story is here: http://www.nytimes.com/library/world/europe/040300britain-immigrate.html
~lafn #583
Hey...the Okies from Fenokies will take'em...we need people;-)
~KarenR #584
The BAFTA craft award shortlist was announced. I can understand why the costumers and hair stylists from TTOTS were not nominated. ;-)
~CherylB #585
Do you think it was the press-on sideburns which had the unfortunate look of being some kind of pair of matched millipedes? Or could it have been that ill-fitting frock coat, that no man of the Master's social class would have taken out of the tailor's shop?
~lafn #586
Perhaps the costume designer was striving for the category: Best Designer for the "One Size Fits all Costume";-)
~KarenR #587
Since things have been pretty quiet, here's a publicity pic that I ran across just recently and it's for Fatal Woman (really, that's what is printed on it): Yummy though. ;-)
~Arami #588
He looks a bit grey-green here.
~KarenR #589
Don't ask me how I know this, but Playmaker will be on television in New Zealand on Thursday at 1.30 a.m. on TV2. Here's the description: Made-for-TV erotic thriller about a struggling actress (Jennifer Rubin) under the influence of her acting coach's (Colin Firth) bizarre training methods. Gets more interesting as it goes along. (1hr 50min)
~heide #590
That's a pretty pic. His chest does look a little mossy but the face is just fine. Don't ask me how I know this Why? Too embarrassing to admit typing PLAYMAKER in the Search box? Made-for-TV It was? Surely not for USA TV. Gets more interesting as it goes along. Oh yeah. I was hooked by the time she donned that lousy disguise.;-)
~mari #591
(Heide) I was hooked by the time she donned that lousy disguise.;-) That was a disguise? I thought she had been accosted by a crazed milliner.;-) Sorry, I like this flick. It's so bad that it's wonderful in a campy way, and CF does a good job despite the story's shortcomings. He gives great shower.;-) ;-)
~LauraMM #592
Playmaker was made for tv. Cable TV (as no major studio would pick it up?) I thought it was better in the beginning, tanked towards the end. (but then again, I always watch it drunk!)
~lafn #593
(Laura)(but then again, I always watch it drunk!) So it's you who has been in the Chat Room under a pseudonym;-) Actually, I thought Playmaker had been released as a film in the US ...limited, I am sure.I met the producers at the "Wilde" Premiere.... Did not mention..."Oh, I've seen a previous production of yours....";-)
~EileenG #594
(Mari) He gives great shower.;-) ;-) LOL! Wasn't it you who said Ross had "nice auburn curls. Nice head hair too"? (Evelyn) I met the producers at the "Wilde" Premiere.... Did they have paper bags over their heads? Did not mention... You didn't ask about stand-ins, stunt doubles (in the riveting mountain bike scene) and so forth? Shucks. P has its moments, though, doesn't it? ;-) I like it better than coughcoughCamille.
~mari #595
(Eileen) LOL! Wasn't it you who said Ross had "nice auburn curls. Nice head hair too"? Yup. Busted again!;-)
~CherylB #596
On the topic of hair in "Playmaker", I'd describe the hair on his head as being auburn. As for the other curls in question, they were more of a chestnut color. Oh nuts -- I just couldn't resist the bad pun.
~Tracy #597
ROTFLOL, Cheryl - methinks you've been watching this movie far too much ;-D
~lafn #598
You didn't ask about stand-ins, stunt doubles (in the riveting mountain bike scene) and so forth? Shucks. Am I glad this crowd wasn't around at that time....you guys would have drawn up a set of questions and had me bring the P. discussion folder!!
~KarenR #599
hee hee, at least it would prove to him that we aren't just fixated on Darcy. ;-)
~patas #600
(Evelyn)you guys would have drawn up a set of questions and had me bring the P. discussion folder!! You betcha!:-D
~KarenR #601
From BBC News (5/4/00) Colin's on permament public display!! [btw, why didn't we know about this? would've been better than the Dome's exhibits!] [caption: Colin Firth set a standard for period drama heart=throbs] BBC magic moments showcased Morecambe and Wise: One of many classic BBC moments Doctor Who, Bill and Ben, Rowan Atkinson and Morecambe and Wise are among dozens of stars highlighted in a new exhibition from the BBC. The BBC Sight and Sound 1950-2000 takes visitors through 50 years of BBC radio and TV programmes and news events. It focuses around four specially-compiled films featuring many of the best-loved names and programmes in the corporation's history. The films also highlight some of the key news and sporting events covered by half a century of BBC News. Matthew Bannister, Director of Marketing and Communications, opened BBC Sight and Sound as part of BBC Experience - the permanent public display at Broadcasting House. He said: "With such a wealth of outstanding material from the BBC's past and present archives, this is a great new BBC experience for every age and interest. "As well as renowned comedy, drama, factual, sport and children's classics, visitors will recapture some of the most memorable events of the past 50 years, as recorded by the BBC." The four films - one for radio and three for television - are shown in four "rooms". Each room reflects different decades through the use of period television sets, radios and artefacts from each era. Other classic BBC programmes revisited by BBC Sight and Sound include comedy favourites Hancock's Half Hour from 1956 and Dad's Army, which started in 1968. From the 1980s and 1990s, Absolutely Fabulous, Blackadder and Goodness Gracious Me are highlighted. Recent memorable drama series selected for the exhibition include the 1995 adaptation of Jane Austen's Pride and Prejudice. The 1966 World Cup is one of the jewels of the BBC's sporting back catalogue. While news events from the Queen's Coronation to the millennium celebrations are also featured. BBC Experience was opened by the Queen in 1997 and currently attracts more than 100,000 visitors a year. It was recently voted best small attraction of the Year by readers of top travel trade magazine, Group Travel Organiser. Consumer magazine Holiday Which? ranked it top in its group of indoor visitor attractions, awarding it four stars.
~lafn #602
... [btw, why didn't we know about this? would've been better than the Dome's exhibits!] It shouldbe a Dome exhibit.The Best of Britain! LOL about BBC still touting P&P even after all these years and countless period dramas since....and yet it was not deemed worthy of a BAFTA.Shocking!
~mari #603
[caption: Colin Firth set a standard for period drama heart=throbs] (Karen) would've been better than the Dome's exhibits!] Mmmm . . .and that photo could have gone nicely with the "things that have washed up on Britain's beaches" display.;-)
~heide #604
Whoo! Definitely on the agenda for the next visit. that photo could have gone nicely with the "things that have washed up on Britain's beaches" display.;-) LOL, Mari. Would indeed look lovely next to the driftwood and old tyres.
~EileenG #605
(Mari) "things that have washed up on Britain's beaches" display.;-) (Heide) Would indeed look lovely next to the driftwood and old tyres. ...and reels of MLSF, due to wash up in a few weeks. Am not surprised to see BBC exhibit featuring P&P2. On sale here in the US is "50 Years of the BBC" (or something to that effect) which features Darcy on the cover.
~mari #606
Screen Daily has posted a likely list of Cannes films at their site. Official announcement is in another week or so. Relative Values is not there.:-( Do we know who is distributing RV in the U.S.?
~KarenR #607
Yeah, I read that too. Argh. Doesn't look like it's going to be there. Also read detaied article in either Variety or THR (actual paper paper) about all the submissions. Didn't see it listed there either. No one has picked up US distribution yet, and the company that has it hasn't decided whether to do it themselves or not. Waiting to see how it does in UK, which will be btw June 9th or 16th.
~Brown32 #608
If there are any Simon fans out there, I have new pages on COF - Mickie sent me a bunch of DVD captures. Thanks, Mick! http://www.geocities.com/firthfan/cof/cof1.html Murph
~KarenR #609
Oooh, DVD captures are wonderful. Thanks, Mickie and Murph.
~mari #610
(Karen) No one has picked up US distribution yet, and the company that has it hasn't decided whether to do it themselves or not. Darn. I thought with Julie in the lead, this one would be a slam dunk. I don't know why but I thought for sure I'd be seeing a new CF film on the big screen this summer. Let's hope for a good reception in the UK. There's always Londinium, a sure thing for wide distribution if there ever was one.;-) Murph and Mickie, the COF captures are great! Thanks. But would it have killed you to superimpose my pic over Saffron's face in The Car scenes?;-)
~Brown32 #611
Karen says re RV: No one has picked up US distribution yet, and the company that has it hasn't decided whether to do it themselves or not. Waiting to see how it does in UK, which will be btw June 9th or 16th. ******** I thought too that this would be pretty big, but not to even be sure it will be picked up here in the US? UGGHHHHH! Murph
~lafn #612
Thanks Murph...how clear those DVD's are. The hotel is my fave....I know he has to be a cad...but why is it I don't dislike him?
~katemcq #613
I know that several months ago there was talk of Fever pitch being released in the US and that it ended up in New York, at least. Has it been released on video here yet? I keep on searching at my local, but to no avail. Help! Thanks - I know that the women (and men) here will have the answer to my question. I always enjoying lurking and reading the latest. KateMcQ
~lizbeth54 #614
The films for the Cannes FF are announced on the 18th, but RV, to me, doesn't seem to be a typical FF candidate. Perhaps it will be shown out of competition, or at a special Charity preview. Although there's a lot of hype about Cannes, very few films shown there do anything at the Box Office. I think that RV will get a very select release in the UK. But I do expect to see some promotion, interviews with JA etc. I'm not being defeatist here, but any movie that isn't aimed at the 16-25, predomonantly male, market, has zero chance of box Office success. RV would do well on video, and extremely well if shown on terrestial TV. Mansfield Park, despite being promoted as raunchy, has bombed completely, and has been withdrawn after one week.(had poor reviews though)
~heide #615
Kate, you can order Fever Pitch in North American format (NTSC) from Videoflicks in Canada for $29.99 US dollars. Has anyone checked US sites yet for availabilty? No matter, Canada's close enough.
~KarenR #616
(Bethan) Perhaps it will be shown out of competition, or at a special Charity preview Since I was told it was "submitted," that would not mean a charity preview. But it never meant "in competition," which I agree RV is not typical Cannes FF fare. Remember there are other categories for screening: Directors Fortnight and Un Certain Regard. Among the films tipped to be in the Miramax-Ethan Hawke Hamlet, Merchant-Ivory The Golden Bowl, and The House of Mirth. (Bethan) Although there's a lot of hype about Cannes, very few films shown there do anything at the Box Office. That's particularly true of the films "in competition." Most are the epitome of "art house" films and you really have to seek them out. I just saw Ghost Dog: Way of the Samurai, which was shown last year at Cannes. Re: Fever Pitch This release can't be sold by US sites; would be illegal. So you have to buy from Videoflicks or other Canadian sellers.
~lafn #617
I'm not being defeatist here, but any movie that isn't aimed at the 16-25, predomonantly male, market, has zero chance of box Office success. I keep telling you...that's the only group that Pays Money..like$$$..at the Box Office.The rest are "renters". If you were a producer would you risk your money on a film no one was gonna pay to see?Only Miramax does that...and makes it up with "Deuce Bigalow." ~~~~~ Even without the sex and recycling Fanny Price and making her like Lizzie, or throwing in the slave trade to make it relevant, "Mansfield Park" , IMO was a dog. Further more I didn't even like the book.Poor Austen choice. Andrew Davies is writing the screen play to "Northanger Abbey".Good luck.
~ommin #618
The more I read the more depressed I get re: quality film. In my opinion T.V. is the only way to go for people like Colin and of course Jane Austen, Charles Dickens etc. Eventually maybe the rest of the populace will return to the cinema but I doubt it. Not with video's and dvd's to be seen in the safety of ones home. It amazes me how well MLSF has done in Australia. Apparently it is still showing in two cinemas in Adelaide and was on for nine weeks here in Perth. Fever Pitch was in three cinemas, two of which were blockbuster ones. The other a main cinema in the centre of Perth. Perhaps it is safer here than in the U.K. to visit the cinema - also we have many more. A question for you in the U.K. is it the critics that damn a film, are they young and only give a good write up for their particular choice? Our main critics are well into middle age and films are considered for all ages and they are just in all genre of films, and I have yet to see one of Colin's films get less than 3 and one half sta s.
~katemcq #619
Ladies - Thanks for the information. I don't understand the US distributors - there's definitely a market for the movie - albeit small. I'll try vieoflicks.
~KarenR #620
Very long article in The Observer - all about Colin!!! Mentions BJD, DQ, MLSF and RV! Hoorah!! Some press for the poor boy. ;-) http://www.newsunlimited.co.uk/observer/life/story/0,3879,157249,00.html
~KarenR #621
Here's the article: True Romance Fame has come full circle for Colin Firth. He won the heart of very woman in the country as Darcy in Pride and Prejudice. Now he's set to play Mark Darcy in Bridget Jones's Diary. A case of art imitating art� but without the sideburns William Leith Sunday April 9, 2000 The Observer Colin Firth! Mr Darcy! You cannot mention one of these names without the other following immediately. Both have been changed immeasurably, in the public eye, by their relationship with the other. Before the Firth treatment, Mr Darcy was seen as a dour, mildly unpleasant, if misunderstood character in Jane Austen's Pride and Prejudice. Before he was Darcy, Colin Firth was a tall, well-built English actor with an expressive face and a string of smouldering, half-forgotten characters behind him. He'd been Robert Lawrence, the wounded Falklands veteran; he'd been Valmont in the Milos Forman film of the same name; he'd been a nutcase in a Ruth Rendell crime drama. And then, in 1994, he was cast as Mr Darcy. What was so special about Mr Darcy? Women loved him. For a great part of the BBC's version in the story, he hung around in the background, not saying much. Firth did a lot of his acting with his eyes. Other characters talked a great deal about him while he was absent. Unlike a lot of male heroes, he was a mystery. He was in no way a feminised wimp. Late in the day, burning with passion and unfulfilled sexual desire, he jumped off his horse into a pond and emerged, his shirt dripping. What people remember is those mutton-chop sideburns flying through the air. For the entire Bridget Jones generation, this was a superb antidote to the dull, whining, noncommittal New Man of the 90s - and he didn't drink lager and go on about football all the time. Since then, Firth has become part of the zeitgeist. He has entered the language. After Darcy, of course, he was playing a 90s football fan - the Nick Hornby character in Fever Pitch. Next, rumour has it, he will play Mark Darcy in the film version of Bridget Jones's Diary. The official status of the rumour, according to a spokesperson from Working Title, the film's production company, is 'unconfirmed'. Still, it's pretty exciting. Bridget has already interviewed a fictional version of Firth himself in the second Bridget Jones book, The Edge of Reason. In the world of Colin Firth, art is beginning to copy art. At the moment of Darcy, Firth, who was 34, was wondering how much time he had left as a romantic lead. Having accepted the part, he said, 'I don't know how much longer that sort of character will be available to me.' Afterwards, he was stunned at the way people identified him with the character. 'I felt as if I'd lost my whole personality,' he says. He tells me: 'It's been very strange, this idea of Mr Darcy appealing so much to women. Because obviously, as you can see, I don't carry that around with me. I'm not so Mr Darcy every day of my life. If people expect to see a saturnine, dark, smouldering tall aristocrat, they are going to be disappointed.' At rest, Firth's face is set in a sort of handsome grimace, he looks easily haunted. The mouth turns slightly down; the bones of the face cast shadows. But his expressions change with almost no effort; as an acting tool, this is a highly strung face. One slight touch on the happy pedal and he beams; an iota of misery and he glowers. 'I never saw myself as Mr Ugly, but I'm not that handsome,' he told me. 'I can sort of be made to look quite a lot better or quite a lot worse.' I first meet Colin Firth, now 39, on the set of Donovan Quick, a forthcoming BBC television film in which, as usual, he plays an intense, edgy fellow who hides behind a mask of English reticence. He is genial and welcoming, and speaks in that unusual, slightly old-fashioned voice which is perfect for costume drama. That's his actual voice. In person, Firth is not at all like Darcy. There is no sense of menace. Firth's character, obsessed with the tyranny of a national bus company, starts his own. Firth spends the day patiently approaching the bus, and entering the bus, and entering the bus, over and over. He takes instructions from the director, David Blair, with absolute humility. Before we meet again, I catch him several times on TV. He's prolific, having made more than 30 films, and you can often get a glimpse of him late at night, in a youthful guise. Sometimes he has a caddish moustache. Early Firth looked jittery and worried. The mature, smouldering Firth came later. Firth is very English; he plays people who hide their emotions. He often appears melancholic. Firth himself had an unhappy childhood. He once said: 'I'm very suspicious of people who romanticise their childhood.' Firth is married to Livia Guiggioli, an Italian documentary maker. Nick Hornby describes her as 'joke-perfect: PhD, beautiful in that sultry Italian way, funny and vivacious'. She is also, he says, 'very good for Firth, because she's absolutely not in any thrall to him'. She 'affects to be completely mystified' by the Mr Darcy situation. For three years in the 90s, Firth lived with the actress Meg Tilly, whom he fell in love with on the set of Milos Forman's Valmont. They have a son, Will, who is now nine. We met again, recently, in a film production office in London's West End. Again, Firth is impeccably warm and charming. He wears neutral clothes; his hair is on the short side of bouffant. Firth's hair is either quite short or quite long, never very short or very long. His characters are always outwardly respectable. He tells me he is about to go to Los Angeles to spend time with his son. He says, 'Los Angeles can actually be quite a relaxing place, but the minute you try to invest anything in it, it grabs you and starts to play games with you.' He already sounds like a character in a film. Another reason he is going to California, Firth says, is for 'my own personal relaxation, which is doing very little indeed'. He lived in Canada with Tilly, three hours inland from Vancouver. 'I'm too much of a lightweight for it,' he says. 'It's wilderness. Serious wilderness. It's not a trip to Wimbledon Common. And I rather fancied the quaint idea of the wilderness. It's really the middle of nowhere.' The move, he says, had been Tilly's decision. 'She found the place. I had a kind of reclusive impulse at the time, but not that reclusive. It was too wild. If you go north from where we were, there'd be nothing but woods and grizzly bears, until you get to the Arctic Circle. I found that oppressive. You couldn't even go for walks. There were instructions about going for walks. You take a flare and a map and a blanket and a bell, because within 20 minutes you can get lost by going round in circles.' Firth is gentlemanly, affable. With his deep, old-fashioned voice, he talks as if he were in a smoking room, holding a brandy bubble. We were quickly on to the subject of his childhood. Having been born in Africa, where his parents were teachers, he came to England at the age of four. Then, after stints in Billericay and Brentwood, the family moved to St Louis, Missouri, for a year. Firth was 12. When they came back to England, it was to another town, just outside Winchester. The young Firth felt unsettled. The year in America, he says, 'didn't feel like a very good thing at the time. It was probably a very good thing. I had a very bad time there.' The year abroad had done something to him. 'American kids,' he says, 'were a hell of a lot more sophisticated. I was barely out of grey shorts. I'd come out of primary school, where my classmates had grass-stained knees and collected football cards.' The American kids, on the other hand, 'were more like something out of Woodstock. I was like something out of Just William. They had slogans on their backs that were to do with the Vietnam war. I felt like a geek. I made up for it with a false cockiness. Before I got rejected, I would tell someone to fuck off. Someone would say, "What's your name?" and I'd say, "Mind your own business."' This was how he started: the first serious acting he did was to pretend he was tough, when he was not. Looking at his facial expressions, at the layers of stoicism and reserve, one gets a sense of somebody deeply, quintessentially English. Firth's face was once described in The New York Times as 'strangely neutral'. Unlike Jude Law, or Ralph Fiennes, he does not easily slip into American; being in America as a child only made him more English. The English actors he likes are Albert Finney, Donald Pleasance and Sir Anthony Hopkins - men of elusive emotions and inner struggle. He tells me he went back to his American school in the 90s, and found, to his relief, that it was 'pretty nasty. The place was horrible and had the atmosphere of a reform school. It made me realise that it wasn't all me.' He had acted in pantomimes and school plays since the age of five. 'School plays,' he says, 'were always something where I was definitely praised and in demand; that wasn't true of most aspects of school life for me.' He wasn't the first to be picked for the football team, or particularly academic. When he was 14, he made 'an official announcement to myself' that he wanted to be an actor. After the unsettled childhood, he didn't have a pleasant adolescence. Firth saw the Winchester of the 70s, full of squaddies, Hampshire lads and public schoolboys, as a place seething with menace. 'People will laugh at this, this is going to sound hilarious to some people, but I've felt more threatened in a town in Hampshire than I've felt in central Los Angeles,' he tells me. At school in Winchester, and later at drama school, he resented the fact that people thought of him as posh. He felt conflicted; at school he roughened his accent. Talking about his school clearly makes him uncomfortable. He says, 'Every time I mention school, the headmaster writes to my parents.' This is odd. Here is Colin Firth, the man who played Valmont and Mr Darcy, still under the spell of his old headmaster. Here, perhaps, is a clue to other Firth characters - the evasive, squirming Geoffrey Clifton in The English Patient, the walled-in schoolboy Communist Tommy Judd in Another Country. Was Firth a bad boy at school? Referring to his old headmaster, he says, 'If ever I've suggested that I was, that's what he takes issue with. I was just quietly resistant, in a way. He had a lack of respect for me because I was neither an identifiable wild rebel nor someone who toed the line in a meaningful way.' Firth saw himself as a 'loner', a 'quiet opter-out'. He 'didn't really like the system, I didn't like the education. I didn't fight it very courageously. I just didn't go along with it very much.' As a teenager, he got into some fights, which 'tended to be with close friends, rather than strangers in the street'. He grew his hair long, wore beads and listened to progressive rock. He 'went the hippie route', and felt, he says, like a freak. Nick Hornby says that when Firth was preparing for his role in Fever Pitch, which is about a guy who uses football as an emotional crutch, he 'found the things that were about him... I know he really identified with all that rootless Home Counties stuff, the suburban need to belong.' Firth tells me plainly: 'I didn't like my life while I was at school. I can honestly say I don't feel that I was very happy at school ever.' At 16, the long-haired Yes and King Crimson fan found his feet; he went to sixth-form college. Suddenly, with his flares, his interest in books and rock music, he 'slotted in very nicely with the in-crowd'. But 'academically, it all went to pot'. When punk came along, Firth was not a convert. 'Progressive rock,' he says, 'had become so pompous, and that pompousness suited me, because I had become so well acquainted with it. There was so much snobbery. It was my sanctuary from the laddishness that I didn't fit in with.' He stuck to flares, too - the grandiosity of the late hippie period had become his identity. Once again, he was an outsider. Not feeling like a future heartthrob, Firth moved to London in 1978 to 'get near theatres'. He was miserable. This must have seemed like a last chance, a shot in the dark. He took a job answering the phone for the National Youth Theatre. He had no friends, enjoyed reading Kafka. He 'made tea' at the National Theatre's wardrobe department. He auditioned for a place at the Drama Centre, and got it. Christopher Fettes, who taught Firth there, says that 'as a boy and a young man, Colin was a person of conspicuous intelligence. Real intelligence. It is very rare to have the privilege of training people for the theatre who are by nature poets. And Colin is.' At the Drama Centre, Fettes explains, 'there is an insistence on the Stanislavsky Method'. The approach, which is Russian, is based on using your inner demons to express the emotions of your character; you turn your own frustration into someone else's. Fettes explains that while this approach 'simply doesn't suit the Anglo-Saxon temperament in many, many cases', Firth 'responded to the training on every level, right from the early stages'. Firth was taught the Laban theory of psychological types, and put through the paces of 'Russian emotional freedom and Jewish introspection'. He came to know the 'reality of the inner world'. Fettes says that 'when he was a boy, one saw a potential Paul Schofield in him'. The Drama Centre mounted a production of Hamlet, something they had not done before, and have not done since. Firth played the title role, and was immediately cast as Guy Bennett, the role eventually played in the film by Rupert Everett, in the West End production of Julian Mitchell's Another Country. Firth works best as an old-fashioned Englishman; he's harder to imagine as a foreigner or a contemporary type with an estuary accent. You can't quite see him as Ralph Fiennes's Nazi in Schindler's List, or a Tim Roth druggie. Nor can you see him as a wimp in a romantic comedy, as played by Hugh Grant. He is deeply English; he has managed to use his own troubles and frustrations to play unsettled, seething Englishmen. 'I've not been a peaceful person,' he tells me. Sometimes, he says, while acting on stage, he feels 'waves of loathing' emanating from the audience. Firth is happier to talk about his family background. He has a brother, Jonathan, who is six years younger and also an actor. Jonathan, he says, is 'a real gentleman. I'm much more of a talker. I find him a much more stable and self-contained person.' Whereas Jonathan is 'wry', Colin says of himself: 'A lot of things hit me without me seeing them coming. Disappointments would take me by surprise.' Colin, says Nick Hornby, 'laughs a lot, and likes to make people laugh'. He listens to a lot of music, including opera, and reads a lot. He loves Faulkner, which I wouldn't have expected. His parents met in India; his mother was three and his father was five. His mother's parents were missionaries, although 'they weren't the sort of missionaries who went around converting the natives and bashing people over the head with Christianity'. His father's father was also an ordained minister. You can see where his accent comes from; it's not the cut-glass Sloane accent, but something older, with a whiff of the Raj. Talking to him, you can sometimes see his Imperial cad in The Turn of the Screw; all it took was a pair of mutton-chop sideburns, and the transition was complete. After leaving the Drama Centre, Firth has never been out of work. After Another Country, he had, he says, 'cornered the market in wet, sensitive, naive young chaps'. He was still worried about what he thought of as his 'neutral face' - with such a face, he told one interviewer, he would do better in intense roles. In 1987, there was a breakthrough of sorts - he landed the role of Robert Lawrence, a disabled Falklands veteran, in Tumbledown. This was a chance to be madly intense, and Firth revelled in it. 'I lived with him,' he says of Lawrence. 'And he was a goldmine. An articulate soldier who will talk.' Firth began to identify with Lawrence. He poured himself into the role. He even began to have nightmares about the Falklands war. When he looked at the camera as Lawrence, Firth says, 'his face was in my mind's eye. His face on me.' Firth pauses, and his expression changes. Sometimes his demeanour can appear to change instantly, without apparent effort. He said, 'At the time, I loved to think I was making this incredibly reckless sacrifice for my craft. If I was screwed up at the end, so be it. Now I can see that that was glamorous to me. I wasn't really suffering at all.' There was more intensity. In 1989, Firth was Adrian LeDuc in Apartment Zero, a psychological thriller set in Argentina; Firth studied Argentina, becoming fascinated with the place. He told one interviewer about how he saw tango as a metaphor for Argentina's political situation. Playing neurotics, he said, was 'a laugh'. By the mid-90s, he was a respected leading man, but not quite a star. He'd approached the title role in Valmont as 'the claw in the velvet glove'. Valmont flopped. In 1994, he played a nutcase in Master of the Moor, the Ruth Rendell mystery. And then came Darcy. Firth was offered the part of Mr Darcy in the television production of Pride and Prejudice; it changed the pattern of his career. The role, in which he spends most of the story glowering in the background, and then jumps fully clothed into a pond, made him into a star, and an official heartthrob. After Darcy, Christopher Fettes says, 'there was hardly a woman in England who wouldn't crawl on her knees to Moscow for a touch of his nether lip'. I ask him about Darcy jumping into the pond. Firth says, 'Originally I was supposed to take all my clothes off and jump into the pool naked. The moment where the man... is a man. Instead of a stuffed shirt. He's riding on a sweaty horse, and then he's at one with the elements. But the BBC wasn't going to allow nudity, so an alternative had to be found.' There were meetings. What could Darcy do with the pond, fully clothed? 'The alternative,' Firth says, 'went via underpants, which, actually, were not historical. He would never have worn underpants. They would have looked ridiculous anyway.' In the end, the inevitable decision was reached. As Firth put it, 'If you can't take them all off, just jump in.' The trouble was that Firth himself, as Bridget Jones was to discover, was not allowed to jump into the pond. Firth tells me, 'There's a thing called Wiles disease, which means you can't be insured to jump into a pond, because you can get sick from rat's piss. So we got a stuntman to do the actual dive.' A stuntman did the dive? So those mutton-chop sideburns flying through the air were not Firth. 'Everything is me, except there's a very, very brief shot of the stuntman in midair. Everything else is me.' Darcy, of course, is not a confused, post-feminist wimp. He is not remotely noncommittal. He was the best televisual real man for ages, and appealed directly to the growing constituency of lonely thirtysomething women. In Bridget Jones: The Edge of Reason, the heroine manages to get an interview with him, and asks him about the 'wet-shirt shots'. Then she asks about his next film, which, he tells her, is 'about moss'. I go to see the film about moss, My Life So Far, in which Firth plays a quaint Scottish aristocrat who has invented some new uses for sphagnum moss. He starts off nutty, and begins to smoulder as soon as Ir�ne Jacob appears on the scene. There are some great Firth moments, with the camera closing in on the hyper-expressive face as the tormented eyes slide around. He's also in a film called Londinium, as a man who is 'terribly gentlemanly but suddenly violently irascible' - a touch of the John Cleeses - and has a camp part in Relative Values, a film based on the No�l Coward play, alongside Julie Andrews and Stephen Fry. Firth says he is going to go off on holiday and read some books. 'I'm going through a big Graham Greene phase,' he says. He is an admirer of Ralph Fiennes, and would have loved Fiennes's part in The End of the Affair. 'He's got it covered,' says Firth. It could get quite exasperating, actually. He keeps eating up the things I'd like to do.' Firth twinkles again and laughs. Five years later, it is clear that Firth's tenure as a romantic lead is far from over. It might not be long before we see him in the clutches of Bridget Jones herself. Is that too much to ask? � My Life So Far opens on 12 May nationwide and Relative Values is released in June ~~~~~~ "camp" part in Relative Values? Should've asked him the infamous Peter question. ;-)
~lizbeth54 #622
Many, many thanks, Karen! Well spotted!! Am off to buy a copy of the Observer, to see if there are any pics. Sounds like a magazine article. Some new stuff there. So Livia is a documentary maker and has a PhD (and beautiful!) And his granfathers were ordained ministers. Have wondered about that. Missionaries were not always ordained. Love the comment about his old headmaster writing to his parents ...probably thought CF was a model student! Interesting cooment on RF as well...I've often wondered if Colin wanted those roles (who wouldn't?)
~Elena #623
Thanks, Karen!! This story made my day. It�s been such a long time since the last big interview. Btw ain�t it great that Colin loves Faulkner, I could�ve bet on it. Funny though that all the old stuff about Darcy & the pond, Lawrence, Meg & grizzly bears, bad boy at school, Drama Centre etc. was again recycled but there was nothing about his latest success, 3DOR. rumour has it, he will play Mark Darcy in the film version of Bridget Jones's Diary. The official status of the rumour...is 'unconfirmed'. Aha! This means: he�s IN!
~Brown32 #624
Thanks, Karen. Such a great article. It really captures a lot of the personality of the man himself, and seems to be completely updated. One of the best I have read about him. A great find, and so needed right now. Perhaps (we hope) it is a prelude to the official news about Mark Darcy. xx Murph I have it on my pages now, if anyone misses it for some reason.
~Renata #625
Ohhh! Wonderful! Thank you, Karen, for finding this. I've also put it up the link on cf.com. Perhaps the best article about him ever, and for sure the longest. This author (can't believe it is a man) has studied his subject almost as thoroughly as any Firthologist around here, but obviously had better access to the sources ;-) PS: Meet you in Moscow.
~lafn #626
Sorry I posted in the wrong topic: Thank you Karen...what a super interview. Sad when he talks about Ralph Fiennes doing all the thing he wants to do. When I saw The End of the Affair, I could have wept thinking of Colin in that role. ~~~~~ Would someone pl. explain this to me...: "Firth was taught the Laban theory of psychological types, and put through the paces of 'Russian emotional freedom and Jewish introspection'. He came to know the 'reality of the inner world'. ~~~~~ He likes opera..(Livia?) He sounds v. happy :-)
~Lizza #627
Did anyone catch Stephen Fry on Parkinson on Friday? RV was discussed, apparently JA has particular skills in "farting" as disclosed on air! Luckily given that vein of humour, SF declined to mention our DB.... luckily for us? Also read an article in current Radio Times on Jack Dee, he is 38 and spent an unhappy time at a comprehensive in Winchester. Just wondered if he and CF had come across each other before Londinium? Typically the article mentioned all JD' acting roles/recent projects, except the one I wanted to hear about!! Anyway the Observer has more than made up for that, thanks Karen for breaking the news. Had a scoop of my own today... blockbuster's single copy of SLOW was actually available to rent, it's normally out. So I am off to enjoy some Matthew close ups.
~heide #628
Luxuriously long article. Loved it and that it provoked so many long time droolers to respond. We back a winner, even if he doesn't get those Ralph Fiennes parts. How many of us cringed at this from the author..."Darcy appealing to the growing constituency of lonely thirty something women.: Ouch!! (Renate) Meet you in Moscow. I'll be there in kneepads. ;-) (Elena) but there was nothing about his latest success, 3DOR. Unless this was a veiled reference to it...."Sometimes, he says, while acting on stage, he feels 'waves of loathing' emanating from the audience." LOL! Surely, not. (Lizza) RV was discussed, apparently JA has particular skills in "farting" as disclosed on air! Luckily given that vein of humour, SF declined to mention our DB.... luckily for us? Dear God, yes. Some things are better left unsaid. Not that it would make a whiff of difference. Any photos to the article, Bethan?
~lizbeth54 #629
Blockbuster only has one copy?! Tut! My local has three copies...last time I checked, they were all out. Which is good news.:-) I'm very partial to Matthew. I just hope that when CF plays Mark Darcy (see, I'm no longer saying "if"), they'll let him appear with his natural coloring, and not dunk him in black. He looks years younger...and I like auburn! I've got the original Observer article....it's in the Magazine, a four page spread, with about ten pix of CF, most of which I'd seen before. But there are new shots. There's a large colour photo of CF and Sophie Thompson from RV, and a B&W shot of CF standing in front of scenery boards. There are also two photos next to each other, of CF with Meg Tilly, and with Livia. The Meg Tilly shot is the one in which she wears glasses and he looks like (IMHO) Kurt Russell. The Colin/Livia shot is the best I've seen of them together...he has his arm round her and they're both smiling. And I can't scan! But if these photos don't appear soon via some other more IT literate source, I'll have a go!! I think that male journalists produce better interviews with CF. He seems more at ease with them. I like the bit about his parents meeting when they were aged three and five. Real childhood sweethearts! And the comment that "a lot of things hit me without me seeing them coming. Disappointments would take me by surprise". He's had his fair share of ups and downs. And , reading the small print at the end, I'm glad to see that MLSF opens "nationwide"...May 12 though, not May 5!
~lizbeth54 #630
Meant to add...copydates for newspaper colour mags are normally about 2 months before print date, so I guess he must have gone to LA immediately after 3DOR ended, and should be back in London now. Also, the interview seems to have been conducted in 2 stages...the first, when he was filming DQ about 12 months ago. The interview must be linked to the release of MLSF....my guess is that MLSF was originally scheduled for release last summer in the UK.
~Renata #631
This can't compete with the Observer article, but I post it nevertheless ;-) http://www.d.umn.edu/~molson2/mst3k/unitedse.html "The United Servo Academy Men's Chorus Hymn" from The Starfighters Music & Lyrics: Kevin Murphy Transcribed by Matthew Olson and Alana Olson [On the Satellite: A choir of uniformed Tom Servos stand in formation behind Tom, the director.] MIKE: Welcome, my friends. We are very fortunate to have with us today the United Servo Academy Men's Chorus, directed by the United Servo Academy Men's Choral Director, Vice Brigadier Sir Thomas Bullhead Servo, conducting them in the United Servo Academy Men's Chorus, um, Hymn. TOM: [to the chorus] Alright, eyes front, three and... CHORUS: Here's to the guys and gals who like to fly, Flying so high with some guy in the sky. Skyrockets in flight, Afternoon delight, Captain High at your ser--vice. TOM: Would you like to fly in my beautiful balloon? Take these broken wings and learn to fly me to the moon. Sail on silver bird, Have you ever heard that the bird is the word? CHORUS: In a big country Dreams say with you, "Come along with me Lucille, In my merry Oldsmobile. We are kids for saving Earth, We are fans of Colin Firth. Off we go to yonder blue, We really move our tails for you. TOM: [Chorus "ahhs" harmony] 'Cross the wide Missouri! [music ends] MIKE: Ah! Ah, fantastic! Absolutely fantastic! That was the United Servo Academy Men's Chorus. And that sonorous tone you heard has to be due in large part to the fantastic conduc-- [chorus, under direction of Servo, begins singing "Hinky Dinky Parlez Vous"] What are you doing? What are you doing? Please Stop that music. Please, please do not, do not continue with this Vice Brigadier Sir Thomas Bullhead, I implore you, stop the music! Stop I say! Stop the music! Uh, Sylvester, can you get an engineer in here please, in Studio A? I apologize ladies and gentlemen. I want you out of my studio! Stop this music right now! Out, Out! Raus, Raus!
~mari #632
Thanks for the article, Karen! I'm going to start calling you "Scoop";-) Bethan, we'll anxiously await word of any new photos. I guess I'm being picky about this article but . . .they couldn't even get his place of birth right! Not even the right continent--sheesh! Spelled his wife's name wrong, too, and the dates on the Tilly relationship are not quite right. Speaking of which . . .the part about the Canada "wilderness" is waaaay exaggerated. Probably recycled from old stuff; CF seems to have a wicked sense of humor and I wouldn't be a bit surprised if he fed this "living in the wilds" stuff to some city slicker journalist way back when just to see if they'd be gullible enough to print it and they've been repeating it ever since. Lots of nice new quotes, though, but do they have to keep rehashing the school stuff? I *never* read this type of thing ad nauseum about other actors. Odd, as others have said, that there's no mention of 3DOR--but that would have been at odds with this writer's apparent agenda in presenting him as an actor who is limited in his ability to do anything but "repressed Englishmen." Not sure Colin would agree with that; I sure wouldn't. Less versatile than Fiennes? No, no , no. Rafe has had the breaks and the opportunities--and to his credit, he's made the most of them. Not surprised to hear that he's longed for the Fiennes-type roles. Keep at it, Colin, it may happen for you yet. And he's studied The Method, Moon!;-) "Sometimes, he says, while acting on stage, he feels 'waves of loathing' emanating from the audience." His perception is so sad--the truth is so much to the contrary. Well, I think I've learned moe about Wiles disease than I've ever wanted to know.;-) And Faulkner again? 'Fess up, Colin: that's a copy of "Tuesdays With Morrie" I see tucked under your arm.;-) Glad to hear he's been spending the past months with his boy. Now back to work, Colin!;-) Very interesting stuff--thanks again, Scoop.;-)
~KarenR #633
~KarenR #634
Nice to see you back again, Lizza. Watch our darling Matthew a few times for me. (Renate) PS: Meet you in Moscow. *hee hee* I'll be taking a breather in Glasgow enroute to Moscow, looking for my little nutcase Donovan, if you please. (Evelyn) When I saw The End of the Affair, I could have wept thinking of Colin in that role. pass the Kleenex. At the Drama Centre, Fettes explains, 'there is an insistence on the Stanislavsky Method'. The approach, which is Russian, is based on using your inner demons to express the emotions of your character; you turn your own frustration into someone else's. Fettes explains that while this approach 'simply doesn't suit the Anglo-Saxon temperament in many, many cases', Firth 'responded to the training on every level, right from the early stages'. Think this pretty much *nails* the discussion of whether Colin is a "Method" actor. As it was pointed out, that terms (capitalized) usually refers to the Actors Studio technique associated with Lee Strasberg and others, but it was based on Stanislavky's methods of "inside out acting." Here are the links to additional info on it, but can't find any mention of the Laban theory of pschological types. Will keep hunting. http://www.theatrgroup.com/Method/ Nice to see that Livia now has a profession. And we all snickered when one article referred to her as a "producer." Am amazed however at all this space (emphasis) being given to his childhood and the overall characterization of its being "unhappy." That's seems so unusually open. Hmmm BTW, there are tons of color photos with the magazine spread and Ann's DH has scanned in a page with the one we haven't seen yet. I'll put it up in a tad. I should be able to scan in the others tomorrow myself. :-)
~KarenR #635
I've put up the Colin and Sophie T pic on my Relative Values page: http://www.spring.net/karenr/mdbro/rv2.html Hmmm, that "campy" definitely has me worried.
~Moon #636
Thanks, Karen! I will thank you everywhere you post this article. ;-) And he's studied The Method, Moon!;-) It is official! Mari, loved your comments, I see just like you. ;-) Can you imagine Colin going around the house singing Ridi Pagliaccio ?
~Moon #637
Hmmm, that "campy" definitely has me worried. Yes, we will probably hate it. ;-) Then again, he may end up taking away some roles form Rupi. ;-) Thanks for the quick scan Ann and Karen.
~lafn #638
Thanks Scoop, Ann 'n James. Moxie looks glam...Peter looks 'different'...and the shirt collar doesn't fit again. ~~~~~~ My dictionary says: "camp"..[Oh No]...exaggerated effeminate mannerisms exhibited esp. by homosexuals. Exaggerated, affected, outrageously artificial, or out of date as to be considered amusing. Also..."loose-limbed sensuality which was sometimes macho and sometimes ..." We'll love Peter anyway...and we know IRL he" isn't"..So..who cares...
~lizbeth54 #639
Adrian in AZ was slightly camp...reminded me at times of Felix Unger (The Odd Couple). But it's one of his best performances. In the brief clip I saw of RV, CF's voice was reassuringly deep....all three or four words!
~Lizza #640
I thought it was really refreshing to find an indepth article that for once didn't mention Jennifer in connection with Darcy, maybe the next one will spare us Meg in all her silver lame^ glory. (ouch!) Bethan, the one of him with Livia has been shown before. IMO I think it was just when he had given up smoking because his face appears much fuller. It was so much leaner and more boyish on stage. I agree it is most curious that 3DOR is not all mentioned, given its Olivier nom. At least we can all rest easy in our beds---------- the "wave of hate etc" was not emanating from any audiences we were in! Maybe hate and longing became confused in Walker's mind!!
~KarenR #641
~EileenG #642
Thanks a million for that article, Karen. At last, something new to dissect! ;-) (Moon) Mari, loved your comments, I see just like you. ;-) Me three. Refreshing as it was to read new material, I must admit it always irks me when some of the details are wrong. Then again, maybe everything else we've read is wrong and this is right (as was mentioned, the author had direct access to a rather credible source--ODB himself). Sooo, Livia's a documentary maker, then?! And did indeed finish the elusive PhD (perhaps accounting for that year in Umbria)!? And CF as MD is still an 'uncomfirmed rumour'?! (Karen) Am amazed however at all this space (emphasis) being given to his childhood and the overall characterization of its being "unhappy." That's seems so unusually open. Hmmm You think (or are you being ironic)? Seems this is a recurring theme which dominates every one of his in-depth interviews. There was that piece early last year--can't remember where, but it was British--in which Colin discussed his St. Louis experience, how rough his classmates were compared to him and the 'swagger' he developed. (Lizza) maybe the next one will spare us Meg in all her silver lame^ glory. (ouch!) Hee hee! Welcome back dearie (you too, Renate). I remember this pic from another site. Fugly outfit! At least we can all rest easy in our beds---------- the "wave of hate etc" was not emanating from any audiences we were in! Yeah, what's up with that? Loathing, Colin? Hardly! (Evelyn) My dictionary says: "camp"..[Oh No]...exaggerated effeminate mannerisms exhibited esp. by homosexuals. Ohno, indeed! It's Jack from Will and Grace! Ahhhhhh! It'll be a scream to see CF play a part like this (*if* we get to see RV here in the US). Oh, well. Off to read some Graham Greene. ;-P
~Tracy #643
Bethan - I've got the original article too and have just been reading it again so that I will have something vaguley interesting to contribute. Here goes! I especially like the quote "After Darcy...Christopher Fettes says (Fettes taught CF at The Drama Centre BTW.."there was hardly a woman in England who wouldn't crawl on her knees to Moscow for a touch of his nether lip"" Obviously Mr Fettes underestimates the power of the man - methinks he is blissfully unaware of the cosmopolitan nature of the Firthbase and I am sure that if knees were not an option that we'd get there somehow ;-D
~Elena #644
(Evelyn)We'll love Peter anyway...and we know IRL he" isn't".. Unfortunately, we do not know what he is or isn�t IRL, to be quite honest. Anyway, I don�t mind seeing him in a campy role, on the contrary, I�m very curious to see it. (Lizza)the "wave of hate etc" was not emanating from any audiences we were in! I think Colin is talking about Walker here and the negative feelings that Walker was supposed to stir, among other things. In other words, he is hoping to have made such an impact.
~CherylB #645
(Karen) True Romance(Article) by William Leith ...(CF quote)'But the BBC wasn't going to allow nudity, so an alternative had to be found.' Thank goodness for that, or there would have been a small earthquake in the vacinity of Winchester from Miss Austen doing 360's in her grave. Nudity -- in "Pride and Prejudice"! How crass and obvious. Jane Austen wrote comedies of manners; she was an astute and ironic observer of social conventions. The whole idea of nudity is just so -- untoward. Some decorum, please. I don't even want to talk about the film version of "Mansfield Park". I enjoy the book greatly. Some Janeites consider it to be her finest novel. That is their take on the book. I found Christopher Fettes a bit disconcerting, from the tone of his comments I felt CF might be dead or dying. They sound like something from a eulogy. Okay, that is rather harsh. Revision: Fettes's comments come across like a speech from a testamonial dinner. All that's missing is the rubber chicken and the gold watch. Maybe he's pitching for a job as CF's publicist. So CF is something of a Method actor. What form of the System does the Drama Centre teach? Is the truncated form made famous by Lee Strasberg? Or the more fully developed Stanislavsky System taught by Stella Adler? Perhaps the Drama Centre offers its own take on Stanislavsky? (These are just rhetorical questions.) CF doesn't seem as fraught and intense as the general idea of a Method actor. Perhaps it's his Englishness. Has CF ever done Chekov? MLSF did have Chekovian qualities, but has he ever actually done Chekov? It would be interesting, as Stanislavsky originally started his methodology for application to the Chekov plays presented at the Moscow Art Theatre. I'm flummoxed by Nick Hornby's quote concerning Ms. Giuggioli, what does he mean that she's "joke-perfect"? It seems a very strange way to describe someone. Is it British slang? (Mari) Probably recycled from old stuff;...Lots of nice new quotes, though, but do they have to keep rehashing the school stuff? I *never* read this type of thing ad nauseum about other actors. It may be that CF doesn't like tallking about his life in detail. He may prefer to keep his private life private. (Part of his charm.) The journalist, William Leith, may well have had to write an article which was, more or less, a certain number of words and had to resort to padding the piece. Or the old information may have been his editor's idea. (Lizza) RV was discussed, apparently JA has particular skills in "farting" as disclosed on air! Luckily given that vein of humour, SF declined to mention our DB.... luckily for us? (Heide) Dear God, yes. Some things are better left unsaid. Not that it would make a whiff of difference. Snicker, snicker. Puns -- I love 'em.
~lizbeth54 #646
"Joke-perfect" means, I think, absolutely perfect, perfect beyond belief. (Karen) True Romance(Article) by William Leith ...(CF quote)'But the BBC wasn't going to allow nudity, so an alternative had to be found.' I'm not very sure about the BBC not allowing nudity. They seem to show little else but nudity at the moment (having just seen "Madame Bovary. Most bizarre!) Andrew Davies was quoted as saying that he wanted Darcy to jump in naked, but that Colin Firth "wasn't up for it" (ie wouldn't do it). Sensible fellow...clothes on can be far more erotic than clothes off!
~lyndaw #647
(bethan)I'm not very sure about the BBC not allowing nudity. They seem to show little else but nudity at the moment (having just seen "Madame Bovary. Most bizarre!) Nudity in Madame Bovary is apropos to the story. Obviously Emma didn't like making love with her clothes on (as with the good but uptight doctor), thus her infidelity. Darcy diving into the lake was not even a part of Pride and Prejudice, so his doing so naked would have been merely salacious...and inappropriate . Personally, I find that scene more emotionally appealing than sexually so - more about Darcy's emotional suffering than his sexual deprivation (IMHO). I like Fettes' comment about Colin being a poet. Wonder if it's true.
~Arami #648
Andrew Davies was quoted as saying that he wanted Darcy to jump in naked, but that Colin Firth "wasn't up for it" (ie wouldn't do it). It wouldn't have been Colin Firth, but a stuntman doing it, anyway. *** An uplifting start to the chorus of the hymn of the Firth-faithful, (thanks for the find, Renate!): "We are here to save the Earth we are fans of Colin Firth..." Anyone care to contribute? ;-)
~heide #649
(Mari, Moon, Elaine, more or less) Me three. Refreshing as it was to read new material, I must admit it always irks me when some of the details are wrong. Hey, he gets points from me for getting Will's age right (I think). Thank God, your questions on the System were rhetorical, Cheryl. I'd hate to get into another one of those discussions where we all show off how very little we really know. Nice picture of Peter, I think.;-) Karen, thanks for finding this article so early.
~Maureen #650
Great article Karen, hope he does play Mark Darcy, I received BJsD Saturday and I love it.
~mari #651
Ok, Variety is reporting it! ***** Tuesday April 11 3:18 AM ET Colin Firth may get lead entry in ``Diary'' By Adam Dawtrey LONDON (Variety) - Colin Firth is being lined up to play the romantic lead opposite Renee Zellweger in Working Title's film adaptation of ``Bridget Jones' Diary,'' with Hugh Grant as his rival. The casting of Firth, who played supporting roles in ''The English Patient'' and ``Shakespeare in Love,'' is peculiarly apt. His character, Mark Darcy, is based on Mr. Darcy from Jane Austen's ``Pride and Prejudice,'' whom Firth played in a BBC television adaptation. Firth's smoldering incarnation of Austen's hero obsessed the Bridget Jones character in Helen Fielding's original novel. The film, directed by Sharon Maguire, starts shooting May 1. Financing and distribution is split among Universal Pictures, Miramax Films and Canal Plus. Reuters/Variety
~EileenG #652
"We are here to save the Earth we are fans of Colin Firth..." Wasn't this heard on Mystery Science Theater 3000? (Maureen) I received BJsD Saturday and I love it. Make sure you get your hands on Edge of Reason as well. Even if it wasn't so funny, one has to love a book in which the words "Colin Firth" are used so frequently. Talk about free publicity!
~lafn #653
Thanks Mari....is this pretty official?..I mean, can we start the party?
~patas #654
(Evelyn)"Mansfield Park" , IMO was a dog. Further more I didn't even like the book.Poor Austen choice. Andrew Davies is writing the screen play to "Northanger Abbey".Good luck. I didn�t like it either. These are my two least favourite JA books. (KarenR)He is an admirer of Ralph Fiennes, and would have loved Fiennes's part in The End of the Affair. 'He's got it covered,' says Firth. It could get quite exasperating, actually. He keeps eating up the things I'd like to do.' Well! We thought so and have been exasperated accordingly ;-) Firth studied Argentina, becoming fascinated with the place. He told one interviewer about how he saw tango as a metaphor for Argentina's political situation. Perhaps I should have danced on the sidewalk ;-) (Evelyn)He likes opera..(Livia?) Why Livia? Perhaps he liked opera first, and then Livia. He sounds v. happy :-) Does he? (Renate)"The United Servo Academy Men's Chorus Hymn" Renate, that was so funny, what *is* it all about? :-) (Moon)Can you imagine Colin going around the house singing Ridi Pagliaccio? Yes I can! Especially when he finds that Ralph had nicked another role he wanted. (Elena)Unfortunately, we do not know what he is or isn�t IRL, to be quite honest. So? You don't believe after Meg, Jennifer, Livia and little Will, he is definitely hetero? Skeptic lady, you! ;-) I think Colin is talking about Walker here and the negative feelings that Walker was supposed to stir, among other things. In other words, he is hoping to have made such an impact. I hope not, because he hasn't... I expect he was talking about some other play...
~SusanMC #655
(Evelyn)...is this pretty official?..I mean, can we start the party? Break out the hats and noise-makers, I say:-) Don't think there's any turning back for him at this point. (KarenR)He is an admirer of Ralph Fiennes, and would have loved Fiennes's part in The End of the Affair. 'He's got it covered,' says Firth. It could get quite exasperating, actually. He keeps eating up the things I'd like to do.' (Gi) Well! We thought so and have been exasperated accordingly ;-) Sorry, but I refuse to blame Rafe for this state of affairs. If Colin really wants to start being in the running for these types of parts, he knows what he needs to do.
~SusanMC #656
Gaah, sorry for messing up the tags. I've gotten out of practice:-(
~Elena #657
You don't believe after Meg, Jennifer, Livia and little Will, he is definitely hetero? I�m not suggesting or believing that he is or isn�t, just idly pointing out the fact that we don�t really know anything about this or any other private things or feelings of his, we only know what we�re shown and told. He sounds v. happy :-) Does he? I also think he sounds v. balanced and sound. Only a very balanced and secure person would analyze his past the way he does, or talk in public about being exasperated because a colleague of his keeps eating up everything he�d like to do. It�s an amazingly candid confession.
~Elena #658
darn
~lafn #659
Only a very balanced and secure person would analyze his past the way he does, .. And on'n on'n on.... (Psst...you're almost 40..."Get Over It")
~lafn #660
Forgot...IMHO ;-)
~heide #661
Agree with Susan. 'Tain't Rafe's fault Colin doesn't get those roles. Besides, I think this quote 'He's got it covered,' says Firth. It could get quite exasperating, actually. He keeps eating up the things I'd like to do.' was said with tongue firmly planted in cheek. Sounds to me like he knows just what he wants to do and is moving very securely into (sob) middle age.
~Arami #662
(Evelyn)He likes opera..(Livia?) Why Livia? This is the first time I've seen opera mentioned as one of his choices of music (though I'm not surprised as the chap is obviously very eclectic). I guess Evelyn wonders whether this may be Livia's influence. Well, we know absolutely nothing at all about Livia's likes. I expect he was talking about some other play... Possibly "Chatsky", his previous theatre work. The actors were praised, but the play was not very well received and he played an unsympathetic character. I also think he sounds v. balanced and sound. Only a very balanced and secure person would analyze his past the way he does, or talk in public about being exasperated because a colleague of his keeps eating up everything he�d like to do. It�s an amazingly candid confession. On the other hand, maybe that's the effect he hoped to achieve: you (we) think he is what he appears to be: balanced, secure, philosophical, analytical, poking fun at himself... More at peace with himself and more confident... beginning to act mature. Less scatty perhaps (he used to be known for that). Or in other words, he has a better control of himself. But whether he really is so vastly different - I wouldn't know. Elena is right on this point. We only see what is shown to us. :-)
~Arami #663
Oh, b.........!
~Brown32 #664
I get an error message when I try to post at Topic 80, so excuse this for being in the wrong place. I thought you would like to read it. - Murph 4/12/00 - From Popcorn.com - Colin Firth Makes 'Diary' Date Mr Darcy to play Mark Darcy. Confused? Read on. In a bizarre case of art imitating art, Colin Firth is set to play the romantic lead in 'Bridget Jones' Diary'. The quirk is that Firth's character in the film, Mark Darcy, is based on Jane Austen's Mr Darcy - the character Firth himself played in 'Pride And Prejudice'. So post-modern. 'Bridget Jones' Diary' is set to begin production on May 1, with Firth starring alongside alongside Renee Zellweger (currently working on her - yikes! - English accent) and Hugh Grant. Grant will play Firth's love rival in the film, which has been adapted for the big screen by Grant's writing buddy Richard Curtis - the two previously collaborated on 'Four Weddings And A Funeral' and 'Notting Hill'.
~mari #665
Thanks, Murph. Looks like Topic 80 went on tilt when we got to 2000 messages. Try the new Bridget topic # 131.
~KarenR #666
From This is London (11/4/00) - has a mention of Colin and SD (BTW, for those interested in RF's Shakespearean productions, check out The Times and an article about Linus Roache) Stage fight for theatres by Alison Roberts London's theatrical chatterati have a big fortnight ahead of them. On Wednesday, the first-night crowd will traipse to the Gainsborough Studios in Shoreditch to witness an Almeida Theatre production of Richard II, starring Ralph Fiennes. (Handy tip: don't wear your Manolo Blahniks: it's very muddy and the Portakabin loos are distinctly unglamorous.) The following week, a revival of Peter Nichols's Passion Play opens at the Donmar Warehouse - and, yes, Sam Mendes will be there, fresh from Oscar triumph, if a little bored with shaking people's hands and pretending, poor boy, he's known them all his life. Still, anyone who's anyone in London's theatre world will fight for tickets to these two events, if only to rub shoulders with the other anyones, and thus prove that they're definitely a somebody. Between them, the Almeida and the Donmar have got London's fashionable theatrical set sewn up. This is largely because they're both quality venues, each of them with a track record of fine, accessible and innovative productions. And it's also because they're natural expansionists, run by determined directors (Mendes at the Donmar in Covent Garden; Jonathan Kent and Ian McDiarmid at the Almeida in Islington) intent on colonising the West End and beyond. Success is undeniably sexy. They are, however, quite different beasts. Should you wish, for example, you could divide them by average audience member. At the Almeida, the clientele is older and smarter. They might be celebrity academics or Left-leaning lawyers, arthouse types who'll eat, post-play, at one of those cosy little restaurants opposite the King's Head on Upper Street or head south to St Johns in Clerkenwell - the kind of people who can't quite bring themselves to throw out their old black polo neck. What they like about the Almeida is its intelligence, its casual - if somewhat uncomfortable - atmosphere and its proximity to their Islington town house. At the Donmar, meanwhile, the audience is much more student-like, a mixture of late twentysomething postgrads (who'll sit in a Soho coffee bar afterwards) and media-based culture vultures (who'll eat pretheatre dinner at The Ivy). They wear Levi's, liked the idea of Sam Mendes commissioning a musical from Alex James of Blur - sadly, it never materialised - and, rightly, worshipped Alan Cumming in Cabaret. Oddly, given these (admittedly broad-brush) audience profiles, the Almeida is the more artistically daring of the two venues. While the Donmar generally sticks to Anglo-American plays and musicals, the Almeida isn't afraid to stage an international repertoire. At the same time, both venues have big plans for the future - both are light on their feet and, thanks to long-term success, can afford to take the risks they might have baulked at before. If you can divide the two theatres by audience-member, you can equally divide them in terms of ambition. Fundamentally, both theatres want to run their own customised version of the National Theatre (that is, to stage more than one production at the same time, to run a mini-empire). They can do this by producing one show at headquarters and another couple at outposts in the West End. This isn't a case of simply transferring a successful play from original venue to West-End house - it means doing it all yourself, without the services of an intermediate producer. This way lies world domination. Can they both pull it off? First of all, they need to attract the box office-busting playwrights and actors who'll pay the rent, leaving respective artistic directors free to plot the next push into Lloyd Webber territory. Both venues have glamour on their side, though the Almeida is still the heavyweight in this respect, supported by the big guns of British theatre, including Diana Rigg, Harold Pinter, Michael Gambon (with whom McDiarmid, who's also an actor, recently starred in Tim Burton's spooky thriller Sleepy Hollow). The Islington duo can also count on their network of Hollywood friends: Fiennes, of course, Juliette Binoche (who adores the Almeida), Cate Blanchett, Liam Neeson, and Kevin Spacey, whose appearance in The Iceman Cometh proved how star-struck we really are. Spacey has since taken a place on the Old Vic's board. It's perhaps no coincidence that the Almeida will move there early next year while the Islington base undergoes minor refurbishment, adding a south London outpost to its existing network of venues. But Spacey, of course, is equally devoted to Sam Mendes. Together they made a movie, American Beauty, which won five Oscars. Mendes doesn't need to work at attracting Hollywood stars to his theatre (should he desire it), since they're lining up to work with him. And given the sensation caused by Nicole Kidman in The Blue Room, who can blame them? On the home front, the Donmar's best friends include playwrights Patrick Marber and David Hare, actors Colin Firth and Natasha Richardson, and increasingly impressive director David Leveaux. Mendes's theatre relies less upon the really big stars of British theatre (though Helen Mirren and Nicholas Hytner both feature this season), often preferring sparky young actors whose work shows potential - Stephen Dillane, for example, gave his best performance yet in the Donmar's revival of Stoppard's The Real Thing. The Almeida has the greater experience, having already run a second home at the Albery Theatre and having redeveloped the Gainsborough Studios. Indeed, the Donmar is pretty open about studying the battle plans already drawn up by its Islington cousin: staff talk about following the Almeida blueprint in a downsized form. Significantly, though, the Donmar has money on its side, thanks to what Sam Mendes calls "quite small" gifts from Steven Spielberg's DreamWorks film company and a New York theatre producer who wants first-look rights for Broadway transfers. The Almeida, meanwhile, is still wholly reliant on Arts Council funding. But it's not really a competition. There's lots of room in London theatre for rampant ambition: we're lucky like that. In any case, the more fashionable first nights the better - someone's got to keep the theatrical chatterati off the streets of an evening.
~KarenR #667
~KarenR #668
From The Scotsman (11/04/00): Sphagnum opus COMING shortly to a cinema near you, My Life So Far, starring Colin Firth, who is struggling to avoid being typecast as Mr Darcy. Having played him to acclaim in Pride and Prejudice, Firth is expected to sally forth to play Darcy's modern-day namesake in Bridget Jones's Diary. In his latest movie he is cast as a Scottish aristocrat who has invented some new uses for sphagnum moss, which must have had Hollywood's moguls drooling at the thought of mega box-office returns. Apparently, the aristo starts off nutty then smoulders, which must be difficult if there is a lot of moss involved. Sphagnum should not be confused with his elder brother Stirling, not to mention Moss Bros or Mossad.
~lafn #669
Is this Scottish humor? It sucks...
~patas #670
(SusanMC)Sorry, but I refuse to blame Rafe for this state of affairs. If Colin really wants to start being in the running for these types of parts, he knows what he needs to do. Not that I blame Rafe either (nor do I believe Colin does), but things may not be as easy as they seem...
~Moon #671
Sphagnum should not be confused with his elder brother Stirling, not to mention Moss Bros or Mossad. (Evelyn), Is this Scottish humor? It sucks... I thought it was pretty funny, Evelyn. Strange, yes, but funny. I wonder if Colin wanted Rafe's part in the Avengers? ;-)
~lafn #672
I am waiting for one of our theatre "litterati"...Arami, Cheryl, Chris(Luvvy) to pl. give us the scoop on the following from Sunday's Observer interview: "Firth was taught the Laban theory of psychological types, and put through the paces of Russian emotional freedom and Jewish introspection. He came to know the 'reality of the inner world'...." It could give us a good insight into his style of acting. Thank you.
~luvvy #673
Rudolf Laban (1879-1958). Hungarian creator of movement training theory as applied to dance, acting, etc. The Russian/Jewish reference is to Stanislavski, I would assume. The two get paired based as they are on the exploration of "the discovery and control of the actor's sensations, feelings and emotions".
~Arami #674
Chris has given us a good link to the discussion of Stanislavski's Method, as I recall. It's a rather elaborate and exhausting technique based on the actor attempting to "become" the person portrayed, to the point of living, thinking and feeling as if the actor were that other person. Colin's description of his experiences while (and after) playing Lawrence in Tumbledown made it obvious to me that The Method has had a profound influence on his approach. By his own admission, his efforts have on occasion caused him to suffer, sometimes more than he expected, which scared him. That's what he meant when he was quoted questioning himself: "Is acting really worth it?" I think that he has since revised the intensity of his personal input and attempted to put a sensible distance (yet without any discernible detriment) between his own emotions and those necessary for creating a convincing and satisfying (as opposed to merely satisfactory) illusion on stage or screen. (Stop me, someone, I could go on like this for ever... ;-))
~patas #675
We know you can, dear, but you've controlled yourself admirably :-)
~Arami #676
:-P ;-)
~heide #677
From that This is London article you posted the other day, Karen... At the Donmar, meanwhile, the audience is much more student-like, a mixture of late twentysomething postgrads (who'll sit in a Soho coffee bar afterwards)... Whad'ya think, ladies. Better than the Lab-owning, Volvo-driving women of a certain age typecast?
~lafn #678
(Arami)(Stop me, someone, I could go on like this for ever... ;-)) No, no, go on. I like to know about this stuff. Thank you Chris & Arami. And Karen who emailed some interesting sites on the Laban Method. Next time I see him on stage, I'll have a greater appreciation of his portrayal.
~patas #679
(Evelyn)And Karen who emailed some interesting sites on the Laban Method. Are those un-postable, Karen? I'd be interested...:-)
~KarenR #680
Sure, Gi, happy to provide here as well, but first a bit of info about the Drama Centre, where Colin was trained:Drama Centre London was founded in 1962 and it is of historical interest that in those turbulent years it was one of the very few examples of a successful student revolt. It represented a response to the creation of a National Theatre that was to make demands on the actor hitherto without precedent. It was and is a true example of conservatoire training since it made available to students in the UK a selection of the work of major innovators in theatre practice from both sides of the Atlantic. These include * The Moscow Arts Theatre * The Actors Studio of New York - Lee Strasberg * The H.B. Studio New York * German Expressionism - the work of Rudolf Laban and the traditions of the European Modern Dance * The work of Louis Jouvet at the Conservatoire de Paris For all this its character reflects the traditions of the English theatre and it bears in substance a striking resemblance to the approach of Joan Littlewood at Theatre Workshop.Here are some of the things I've found on Rudolf Laban: The description of a Ph.D research project entitled, "Applications of Laban Movement Studies to Actor Training: Designing an experiential and theoretical course for training actors in physical awareness and expressivity." http://www.towson.edu/theatre/tcphd.html A Guide to Labanotation: http://www.rz.uni-frankfurt.de/~griesbec/LABANE.HTML The Laban/Bartenieff Institute of Movement Studies - I liked the motto at the top "move observe understand evolve: and the quote from Laban on the index page, "We need an authentic symbol of the inner vision to effect contact...we need...to think in terms of movement." http://www.limsonline.org/index2.html There is also this place, which has lots of links: http://www.laban.org/ If I've left out any good ones, Evelyn, that were in my email, feel free to post them.
~CherylB #681
HISTORIC ASPECTS OF MOTION AND SPACE Biography of Rudolph Laban RUDOLPH LABAN was born in 1879 in Bratislava, Hungary, which is now part of Czechoslovakia, (now the capital of the Sovak Republic). Even in his earliest years he was facsinated by observing people�s movements. His desire to understand physical and mental effort led him on a long course of study, experiment and research. Architecture first attracted him, but did not hold his interest. He went to Paris, Berlin, Vienna and other centres of learning to seek further knowledge of the arts and sciences essential to the student of movement. He was led from the academic to the practical in search of indigenous and cultivated activity - to the American Indians , the natives of Africa, the peoples of the Near East, and the Chinese - in order to study at first hand their national habits and the manifestations of their power. Ballet naturally claimed his major attention and in time he became Director of Movement in the Berlin State Opera and one of Europe�s most famous choreographers . Reacting against the artificiality of the theatre, however, he sought expression of his art and philosophy amongst the ordinary people, and all over Europe centres were established in his name for the craftsmen who came to seek advice on their own working problems and on the strains and stresses involved in their various occupations. In these centres they found the bodily awareness, understanding and relief in courses of movement that were provided especially to meet their needs. Unable to work under the Nazi regime, which looked upon his teachings of harmony and fulfilment through re-educating the sense of rhythm and movement as a threat to its own discordant philosophy, Laban and some of his pupils sought sanctuary in the U.K. Remarkable developments followed in that country, where previously very little awareness existed of the common basis which movement provides to both dance and work. During the war Laban turned to industry and established the Laban-Lawrence Industrial Rhythm, which comprised new approaches to selection, training, placing, investigation of working processes and assessing job capacities based on his researches into the natural rhythm of man�s movement. This development was made in association with F. C. Lawrence, who as a management consultant included in his practice these new methodes which offered a vital contribution to the solution of the difficult problems that constantly arise in the management of men and women in industry. Early in this century, at the beginning of his career, Laban began to develop a system of movement notation for the purpose of his investigations which he called "Kinetography" (known as "Labanotation" in the U.S.A.) and published in 1928. This found world-wide recognition and is now practised in connection with a variety of human activities by scientists and artists alike. In 1959 the International Council of Kinetography Laban was founded by the leading experts from both western and eastern countries. Important in Laban�s concepts and development of movement principles are his examinations of spatial relationships occuring in static and dynamic space-forms. He presented an introduction to his subjekt in his book Choreographie, which was published in 1926 in Germany but has been out of print for many years. During his later years he developed conciderably his studies of space harmony and left a manuscript on the subject called "Choreutics". This was published posthumously in 1964. In connection with investigations of human capacity in industry during the 1940's, Laban envolved the effort graph explained as a means of recording kinetic quality of performance (as opposed to spatial forms). In the further development of its use it has become an essential tool for recognising personality traits through observation and analysis of effort phrases in a person�s movements. In the field of therapy the application of his effort analysis has produced remarkable results. Through his study of mind-body relationships and the psychological effects of certain movement patterns, he was able to achieve improvements in many emotionally disturbed people as was as in those with physical limitations. Significant of fast-growing interest in Laban�s concepts was the forming in 1942 of the Laban Art Movement Guild, today flourishing association of international repute. After the war Laban devoted much of his energy and time to dance as an educational force. In 1946 Lisa Ullman, who had been his close associate for a number of years, founded the Art Movement Studio in Manchester, which became the trainingcentre for movement study and educational dance baced on Laban�s concepts and findings. Laban lectured regularly at the Studio, at the same time visiting various universities and educational establishments as guest lecturer. He was also for many years co-director with Esme�Church of the Northern Theatre School at Bradford and contributed to the training of many people who are today well known and successful in the world of drama. In 1953 Laban moved to an estate in the Thames Valley at Addlestone Surrey, where there were facilities for housing not only his work and archives but also the Art of Movement Studio. In 1954 the Laban Art of Movement Centre was formed as an educational trust to perpetuate his work and to promote and provide education in the art of movement in accordance with his theories and practice. Laban put his collection of materials at the disposal of the Trust to make accessible to the public the wealth of charts, manuscripts and models which resulted from his explorations and discoveries. After the publication of Effort in 1947, Laban wrote and published Dance and Movement Notation. Laban continued working at Addlestone Modern Educational Dance, The Mastery of Movement and Principles of until his death 1958. With the wide facilities at Addlestone, the practical application of Laban�s findings to the many fields of human activity in which movement plays an important part have been carried on extensively, and his principles are today recognised as an important basis for the movement education of children and adults. Macdonald and Evans, September 1972
~mari #682
Brief mention in 5th paragraph. Indie drives soccer club documentary to goal By Adam Dawtrey LONDON (Variety) - The independent film company Icon Entertainment Intl. is backing a feature documentary about Manchester United, the world's richest soccer club. American sports documentary filmmaker Bob Potter is directing the movie, which follows England's most successful team through the current season, which runs from last August to May. The film is scheduled for world premiere in October in Manchester. Potter's company, Bombo Sports & Entertainment, will co-produce the film with Icon. It marks another attempt by the film industry to cash in on the huge global following for soccer, and for Manchester United in particular. `Best,'' Mary McGuckian's biographical film about the club's most famous past player, George Best, will be released in British theaters this summer. Working Title Films is preparing ``Busby's Babes,'' about the airplane crash that wiped out the exceptional Manchester United squad of the 1950s, and other versions of that same story are also in the works. Yet soccer has a vexed track record at the box office -- recent British films such as ``Fever Pitch'' and ``The Match'' died on their theatrical release. Such is the box office stigma attached to the game that FilmFour is changing the title of its upcoming Mark Herman comedy, ``Season Ticket,'' to avoid any soccer connotations. Nonetheless, Manchester United, the current European champions and the world's richest club, has a huge global fan base. It is also a club that stirs passionate aversion in supporters of rival teams. The documentary, provisionally titled ``Manchester United the Movie,'' will follow the team to the world club championships in Tokyo and Rio De Janeiro, as well as tracking its performance in the English and European competitions. Reuters/Variety
~lafn #683
Yet soccer has a vexed track record at the box office -- recent British films such as ``Fever Pitch''and ``The Match'' died on their theatrical release. Oh....but I thought FP was not a film about soccer, but a romantic comedy about relationships and obsessions... ;-) *winkie* *winkie* smallAnd it didn't die in the UK...but was poorly released in the US
~mari #684
Looks like E! Online expanded and updated its Firth file after the BJD announcement. We knew most of this, but check out his son's name *sigh of relief for those who may have thought it was Willy Tilly* ;-) Also, I didn't know about the Apt. Zero award. Colin Firth Birthdate: September 10, 1960 Birthplace: Grayshot, Hampshire, England Occupation: Actor Quote: "I don't think a great many things are achieved by crudely exerting yourself upon them. Still, I'd love to do cartwheels and the fireworks and the pyrotechnics. I would love to dazzle. I just don't have a great capacity for it." --Harper's Bazaar, May 1996 Claim to Fame: Played Tommy Judd in Another Country (1984) Significant Other(s): Wife: Livia Giuggioli; born 1970; married June 21, 1997 Jennifer Ehle, actress; born 1970 Meg Tilly, actress; born 1960; together 1989-94 Family: Grandparents: missionaries; worked in India Father: David Firth, history teacher; born 1934; traveled to various locations to teach; became history lecturer at King Alfred's College, Winchester Mother: Shirley Firth, teacher; born 1936; lecturer on comparative literature at Open University Sister: Kate Firth, voice coach; born 1961 Brother: Jonathan Firth, actor; born April 6, 1967 Son: William Firth; born 1990; mother, Meg Tilly Awards: 1988: Seattle Film Festival: Best Actor, Apartment Zero 1989: Royal Television Society: Best Actor, Tumbledown 1998: Screen Actors Guild: Cast in a Theatrical Motion Picture, Shakespeare in Love"; shared with cast mates Factoids: Had nomadic childhood, living in England, Nigeria and St. Louis, Missouri Education: The Drama Centre, London, England
~patas #685
Many thanks to Karen for the links and to CherylB for the text on Laban.It looks like a very complete system supported by a very complex annotation method. To me it's like the card game, bridge: I'm glad to know what it is about but would not dream of pursuing the subject in depth ;-)
~lafn #686
Significant Other(s): Jennifer Ehle, actress; born 1970 Can't they forget her? Meg's relationship is different..several years and produced an off-spring. Poor Jennifer has to go around like "the scarlet letter" . Fergodsake they were only together for less than a year. I don't see other stars where they enumerate girl friends.
~heide #687
(Evelyn) Fergodsake they were only together for less than a year. Hey, we were together for less than a minute and I'm telling everyone DB was my significant other. ;-) Thank God for those Donmar pictures. I'm scratching my head over this: Claim to Fame: Played Tommy Judd in Another Country (1984) They couldn't think of anything else? Neat find, Mari.
~CherylB #688
(Evelyn)...And it didn't die in the UK...but was poorly released in the US It was barely released in the US. It would be more accurate to say that it played in a few theatres within the international boundaries of the United States. It had no American release to speak of, not at all. (Mari) ... (from Firth entry) Claim to Fame: Played Tommy Judd in Another Country (1984) (Heide) They couldn't think of anything else? Maybe it was a favorite film of one the compilers. I once read a review of "Another Country" in a video guide which described CF of then being "at his most luscious."
~lyndaw #689
Well, for once Darcy wasn't mentioned (though that role is certainly his claim to fame - so far). Odd considering BJD.
~Arami #690
I don't see other stars where they enumerate girl friends. They have so very little on his personal life that they obviously tried to pad it up a bit. (Mari) ... (from Firth entry) Claim to Fame: Played Tommy Judd in Another Country (1984) (Heide) They couldn't think of anything else? Pathetic. Hey, we were together for less than a minute and I'm telling everyone DB was my significant other. ;-) LOL! Was? Was? ;-)
~mari #691
Ok, in comparing other actors' summaries on the E! Online listings, it seems there's a method to their madness. "Claim To Fame" appears to be the actor's first major film role, not the one for which he or she is best known. For example, Tom Cruise's "Claim to Fame" is "Taps" from '81, and Julia Roberts' is "Mystic Pizza" form '88. Also, I should have mentioned that in addition to the bio info I posted above, there are other links there for Colin; one is called "Credits," which takes you to a semi-complete list of his film work (through MLSF). "Video" links you to the movie trailers for ATA, MLSF, SIL, and TEP. "Goods" links you to posters on sale for SIL and TEP. So all in all, it's a nice page. Just go to www.eonline.com and search on Colin Firth. Evelyn, I do agree that it's weird to list Jennifer, but there again, they've done it to all of them and some of the lists are, ahem, rather lengthy. You should see the list of Significant Others for Julia Roberts--guys are lined up like dominoes, going all the way back to Liam Neeson in '88.;-)
~KarenR #692
OK, checked at the Cannes sites and seached through the press release (which is in French) for Relative Values. Not there. So I think the June 9th opening should be the one.
~lizbeth54 #693
What about premieres? I should think there should definitely be something for both MLSF and RV in London.....fairly soon for MLSF, perhaps the end of April? They have so very little on his personal life that they obviously tried to pad it up a bit. (Arami) I've always wondered about the (anonymous) girlfriend who irritated him by watching too much television, and who took the television with her when she left (his own words!). Obviously a live-in relationship! Looks like E! Online expanded and updated its Firth file after the BJD announcement. We knew most of this, but check out his son's name *sigh of relief for those who may have thought it was Willy Tilly* ;-) (Mari) The start of each decade seems particularly significant in his biodata...1960, 1970, 1990.... what of 2000, I wonder?? William Firth sounds like a very solid sort of name!
~lizbeth54 #694
Am perhaps being greedy, but I'd like to know about the other two projects CF was considering. He's got the whole of July thru' September free! BJD is a great project in terms of exposure....everyone will know about it and (hopefully) see it. But I was impressed with the potential of "Maid of Buttermere"...great leading (dramatic) role, and "Armadillo". Hope there's more to come. BTW what happened to Pat O'Connor's "The Lion in Winter"? An ideal role for CF (not Anthony Hopkins!)
~Arami #695
(Bethan)I've always wondered about the (anonymous) girlfriend who irritated him by watching too much television, and who took the television with her when she left (his own words!). Obviously a live-in relationship! All we know for certain is that she wasn't an actress.
~lafn #696
(Bethan)I've always wondered about the (anonymous) girlfriend who irritated him by watching too much television That wasn't Jennifer ...she doesn't watch TV either.... Has a TV, though, ... enjoys "Playstation"...pays her license.
~KarenR #697
(Arami) but I'd like to know about the other two projects CF was considering. You are putting far too much stock in what the person at the agency said. Armadillo seemed the most likely to be a "real" project and it was supposed to be done during the summer. Even though I absolutely *hate* the idea that The Prisoner is being made into a movie, No. 6 is a role for Colin.
~KarenR #698
Sorry, that quote should've been attributed to Bethan.
~amw #699
Evelyn or Karen, do you know who we should telephone regarding the Premiere for MLSF, then perhaps Bethan and I could try and find out a few details.
~Arami #700
the (anonymous) girlfriend who irritated him by watching too much television That wasn't Jennifer ... No, it wasn't. It wasn't an actress.
~lafn #701
(Ann)do you know who we should telephone regarding the Premiere for MLSF, then perhaps Bethan and I could try and find out a few details. Bethan going to a Premiere in London?? You gotta be kidding.... Watch your email....
~luvvy #702
Newport Film Festival (6-11 June 2000) is taking volunteers. No other info at their web site www.newportfilmfestival.com at this time.
~lizbeth54 #703
You are putting far too much stock in what the person at the agency said. Armadillo seemed the most likely to be a "real" project and it was supposed to be done during the summer. (Karen) Oh I dunno, call me an optimist but I think that both "Armadillo" and "Maid of Buttermere" will eventually happen. We just seem to work to more unpredictable timescales in the UK...just look how long it's taken for BJD to be up and running...they were going to start shooting last summer. Postponements and blips are the norm. Both are ideal projects for CF, and good projects are ve-r-y thin on the ground for Brittish actors who like to work in the UK!! Just watch this space...:-)
~lizbeth54 #704
British...I can spell, can't type!
~KarenR #705
(Bethan) Just watch this space...:-) For what? What do you know that you aren't telling us? ;-)
~lafn #706
....and good projects are ve-r-y thin on the ground for Brittish actors who like to work in the UK Is that another limitation?..Does he have to work justin the UK?
~CherylB #707
(Evelyn)Does he have to work just in the UK? No, he doesn't have to -- it would seem that lately he prefers to do so.
~Arami #708
Just watch this space...:-) Yes, I've been watching this space - getting smaller and smaller. CF will be extremely pleased, his ears must be burning much less these days.
~KarenR #709
From today's Hollywood Reporter (last paragraph): Lola Films U.K. on an Endeavor By Cathy Dunkley Endeavor has signed Lola Films U.K., Spanish producer Andres Vicente Gomez's ("Belle Epoque") London-based sales and production company, to represent the North American distribution rights to its first four English-language films and act as a general consultant for the company. Sergio Aguero, the Endeavor agent who specializes in international affairs and indie financing for the company, said the deal was indicative of the company's desire to grow its international division and called its business plan "the most ambitious film program ever by a Spanish company." Lola Films U.K. was set up last May to produce bigger-budgeted, more commercial English-language films. Lola Films is Spain's leading independent production company. Endeavor will rep domestic distribution rights for Lola Films U.K.'s "Girl From Rio," directed by Christopher Monger and starring Hugh Laurie; "Off Key," the $10 million-budgeted parody of the three tenors to be directed by Spanish director Manuel Gomez Pereira and starring Joe Mantegna and Danny Aiello; "The Dancer Upstairs," to be directed by John Malkovich and starring Spanish heartthrob Javier Bardem in an 800 million-peseta ($5 million) production based on a script by Nicholas Shakespeare; and "Gaudi Afternoon," a 900 million-peseta ($5.6 million) comedy long in the works, with Susan Seidelman at the helm starring Judy Davis, Lili Taylor, Marcia Gay Harden and possibly Juliette Lewis. Other English-language films in the works include Carlos Saura's "The Maid of Buttermere," a romantic period piece set in England at the turn of the 19th century, written by Raymond Khoury and starring Colin Firth.
~Moon #710
Now who will call his agent for a confirmation? ;-)))
~amw #711
Oh goodie, I love the sound of this movie. What does "in the works" mean Karne, has he signed do you think?
~amw #712
sorry about the spelling of your name, Karen, I am all excitement!
~KarenR #713
(Ann) What does "in the works" mean You won't be seeing it shortly. ;-)
~KarenR #714
Probably means that he's read the script and indicated an "interest." Nothing more.
~lafn #715
I hope they don't pay him in "pesetas" ...he'll have to bring a duffel bag!
~EileenG #716
~patas #717
(Evelyn)I hope they don't pay him in "pesetas" ...he'll have to bring a duffel bag! Hahaha :-( As long as they pay him, why should he care?
~Brown32 #718
I'm agog at that line about The Maid! I took the page off, believing it would never happen. To me Armadillo has more of a chance - Sue Birdwhistle and all. Thanks again for the scoop, Karen. HAPPY Passover and Easter to all here. You are all the greatest! Murph
~amw #719
and to you too Murph, and all fellow droolers.
~lizbeth54 #720
There's a very good website for Lola films at http://www.lolafilms.com Check out Projectos y rodayes, Internationale and Email. The Hugh Laurie film "Girl from Rio" seems to have already been shot/or will shoot from November. There are contact emails for the London office....why not ask them if CF is indeed starring in MOB? If they get a few email enquiries, someone may strike lucky and get a response! And Lola films will know that there's some enthusiasm for the project. I think this is a terrific leading role...if I had to chose between Mark Darcy and John Hadley/Hope, I'd go for Hadley...but I hope to see both!
~KarenR #721
Bethan, the Lola site is also in English. BTW, Maid has been listed there since December 1999 as a future film in preproduction.
~KarenR #722
(Murph) I took the page off, believing it would never happen. This is no more information than was available before. So let's not get too excited.
~lizbeth54 #723
Confirmation of CF's actual involvement in projects seems to happen about a week before filming starts! I think the signs are very positive for MOB, but, as with BJD, maybe a little patience will be required. :-)
~lafn #724
(Bethan)if I had to chose between Mark Darcy and John Hadley/Hope, I'd go for Hadley...but I hope to see both! There's a better chance of your seeing MD (and he getting paid!). Lola Films??Might be a little problem in distribution.! I hope this is a television film (like DQ)...better chance of people seeing it. Ole!
~ommin #725
happy easter to all. Lets hope its a good one, and the Maid of Buttermere will happen.
~KarenR #726
From The Times: Lottery cash fails to lift British films MORE than 200 British films, including Mansfield Park, Love and Death on Long Island and Metroland, have been made with the help of National Lottery finance. But less than five per cent of these have been hits, an official analysis of UK box office returns suggests. One of the worst performers has been Stephen Poliakoff's Food of Love, released last October by Film Four Distributors. The film cost �2.1 million to make and had an �800,000 grant from the Arts Council. So far the film has taken �1,507 at the box office. ~~~~~~~ Phew!! *wiping forehead in relief*
~ommin #727
Yes, I agree, at least it wasn't Slow. I wonder why so many have failed. We havn't done so well in Oz. either. I suppose nothing about them appeals to the 18-25 male. And yet apparently MLSF is still showing in Adelaide and it was here in Perth for nine weeks with a good attendance. Its a mystery!
~CherylB #728
(Bethan) I think this is a terrific leading role...if I had to chose between Mark Darcy and John Hadley/Hope, I'd go for Hadley...but I hope to see both! Agreed. I love CF in really dramatic parts; I think that they allow him to display his greatest strengths as an actor. That's just my view though. Yet the chance to see him in both projects would be even better. More of CF in the movies is always a good thing.
~KarenR #729
Have reproduced the Observer article from April 9, 2000, complete with pics. It's a beaut. As Bethan said, there are a couple of new pictures aside from the one from Relative Values. I'd say that first one was shot when the reporter visited him on the set of Donovan Quick and we know how incredible he looked in that one. Haven't got a clue about the b&w serious pose though. Observer article
~lizbeth54 #730
Agreed. I love CF in really dramatic parts; I think that they allow him to display his greatest strengths as an actor. Yep! Definitely! Thanks for reproducing the Observer article, Karen! I'm hoping there'll be something about MLSF in the monthly magazines and daily papers in the next two weeks (but why are all magazines all "wrapped up" these days...can't browse!) There was a preview of new films on Radio 5...they actually mentioned MLSF, gave it a good review..."excellent performances from Robbie Norman, and from the cast of adults MEM, MMcD, RH and IJ". But NO MENTION of CF!!! He is the lead, right, and it's a good performance, yes? Why do the reviewers keep on doing this? I honestly think it's irresponsible and prejudiced reporting. I remember one (tabloid, male) reviewer described CF's performance in SLOW as "the most insipid peformance ever seen on screen" and then made some crack about how without his wet shirt, "Mr Darcy's" attractiveness was nil. I don't see this kind of malicious "reviewing" in the US or Australia!
~heide #731
Whew!! Sorry, I'm still fanning myself. Those pictures are...well, I thought I'd died and gone to heaven. He looks like an angel in the first one and that Darcy photo? Shows damp Mr. Darcy at his finest. Thank you, Karen, for lifting my spirits on this dreary Saturday.
~lafn #732
WOWThat's some pic. Thank you Karen, Thank you Observer!! What a nice surprise from the Easter Bunny! Two of those pics are new. Livia's isn't...SIL premiere in NY?It's his premiere suit, anyway. What's with the 3/4 coat? Moda Italiana? Maybe he's been modeling for Gucci;-) I looked all over The Bucket for it. Are you going to post it there too?
~lizbeth54 #733
Maybe our male reviewers resent his good looks!! Would explain their apparent reluctance to even mention His Name! Although I think that many male actors get a very bad press in the UK....Ken Branagh, Hugh Grant (pre-Notting Hill) and Rupert Everett (better press recently) have all been regularly savaged by the reviewers. One nice thing I heard on the radio (good source of info these days!) was part of an interview with Richard Curtis, in which he said that he thought that BJD was going to be even more successful than 4 Weddings and NH...said it had all the right ingredients and was delightfully entertaining. Something to look forward to!
~mari #734
Thanks for The Observer spread, Karen. The top pic is actually from another Observer article (by Andrew Billen) that ran in March '97, around Fever Pitch time. The black and white one with the longish jacket is yummy--looks to me like it may be from the same photo shoot as the Italian L'Uomo spread; I call it The Hard Day's Night photo shoot as it's all black and white and in some of the pics it looks like he's being chased down the street!;-) Do you know the one I mean? He looks very boyish in RV. The SIL premiere pic with Livia looks like a slightly different pose from one I've seen; very sweet pic of the two of them.
~lafn #735
.Ken Branagh, Hugh Grant (pre-Notting Hill) and Rupert Everett (better press recently)have all been regularly savaged by the reviewers. Add Rafe Fiennes and the High Fidelity director.
~KarenR #736
I bow to your vastly superior skills in photo identification, Mari. However, was said picture 13-1/4" x 14-1/2"? Mmmmmmm L'Uomo? Looks right. The SiL premiere one is a different pose. In some cases (DQ, TEP, wetshirt, and the Meg one), I didn't need to scan them, but the SiL one was slightly different from the one I had. Evelyn, I will put a link in from the Bucket. Have been working on some stuff.
~lizbeth54 #737
And Joe Fiennes, and Alan Rickman, and Stephen Fry, and Anthony Hopkins...well, the list could go on and on! I think a lot of British actors prefer the US because they don't receive needlessly destructive criticism and that's why they leave the UK. Several Brit actors won't do theatre any more because of the severity of the reviews. I actually hope that CF really succeeds in the US, maybe through BJD, and perhaps does some theatre over there if he can get a work permit. I'm sure he'd get a much warmer reception...it pains me to sound unpatriotic, but critics and the press in the UK really do seem to enjoy putting the boot in. Strangely enough, actresses get much more civilised tratment!
~KarenR #738
From The Sunday Times: Greg Dyke really does intend that the BBC eschews classic adaptations and opts for the new. The self-styled queen of the bonnets, Sue Birtwistle, who made television dramas of Pride and Prejudice, Emma and Wives and Daughters, is to produce a drama based on William Boyd's novel Armadillo. Boyd himself will adapt his darkly comic contemporary book about London for the BBC. I hope Dyke gets to see it. He recently told me that his kids controlled the zapper in his house and were forever changing what dad was watching. Don't they know he's the director-general?
~lizbeth54 #739
Ah! Thanks a million, Karen! How come you spot all the good news, and whenever I hear/see anything relating to CF, I always get so-o-o annoyed (he's been left out again, he's not appreciated, etcetera, etcetera.) In future, I shall close my eyes and ears, and check only The Bucket!!! Seriously, despite Colin's agent ("Armadillo...never heard of it"), it seems to be definitely on, and I'm sure that SB and WB will have been chatting to Colin. He's an Ideal Lovely Lorimer! And it is a strong dramatic role...very funny too. Can we hope for a series...or at least a 3-4 hour adaptation! Good for the Beeb! Happy Easter everyone...I've a busy few days ahead, and hope that everyone has a very nice break!
~Brown32 #740
Thanks Karen, for the Observer treat. Great presentation, and the clearest RV picture I've seen so far. Here is another L'Uomo pic - the smoking one: Happy Easter! Murph
~KarenR #741
Mari and Murph, I've been looking at the L'Uomo pics and I don't think the one in the Observer is from that shoot (backdrop, shirt, hair all different). Interestingly, most of the articles in the Life magazine identify the source of the photos, but Colin's article does not. (Bethan) He's an Ideal Lovely Lorimer! Agreed, this part is perfect for him and I'm positive that he has committed to appear in it for SB.
~heide #742
(Bethan) Although I think that many male actors get a very bad press in the UK....Ken Branagh, Hugh Grant (pre-Notting Hill) and Rupert Everett...And Joe Fiennes, and Alan Rickman, and Stephen Fry, and Anthony Hopkins. So many of these names you mention have been in films with Colin. Does anyone else play the Degrees of Separation to Colin game when watching a film? As I was (barely) watching Dunston Checks In yesterday on TV and saw Rupert Everett make a fool of himself, I was also busily counting how many diverse performers have just a one degree separation from Colin...Jason Alexander, PeeWee Herman and Faye Dunaway to name just a few. Anyway, a fun way to spend time while watching a bad movie.
~lafn #743
Thanks Karen....I too think "Armadillo" will be a great role for him ..perfect casting. And I'm glad it's not another costume drama ..get outta that stuff, Colin nobody goes to see them! ~~~~~~ (Bethan) In future, I shall close my eyes and ears, and check only The Bucket!!! Good luck. She posts the stuff here and then I can't find it later;-) What happened to that NEW button you had, Karen? ~~~~ I too don't think the new pic is from L'Uomo.Sideburns longer in old one. Nor the first pic either.He looked younger in FP ones...hair curlier. New one more mature...yum:-)
~KarenR #744
(Evelyn) then I can't find it later;-) What happened to that NEW button you had, Karen? What can't you find? Anyway, I've added the New button to the main page that links to a summary type page of additions, which is still a work in progress... Isn't everything?
~lafn #745
Thank you ..I like the table of contents by projects,the "New" button on front page and the separate News Page. Now, I'm all set :-D
~KJArt #746
Mari ..Looks like E!Online expanded and updated its Firth file after the BJD announcemnet. It's times like this that I really miss Helen's FAQ. I went back to an old printout from maybe late 1998 and she had listed 2 more personal awards for CF not mentioned by E!Online, plus 19 awards for the productions he had been in. Had even mentioned & quoted the hymn in the host segment of "Starfighter's" as episode # 612, shown in 1994. (and that Stephan Dellane had played with Colin in 'Hostages" and "Widowing of Mrs. Holroyd"!) What a resource that was! Wish there was a way to revive it! (did Helen go to London by any chance?)
~Moon #747
Great job, Karen! I too don't think the new pic is from L'Uomo. I agree. I think it is a later picture. The one with Livia is from the LA SIL premiere. Looking forward to RV. Have they confirmed the opening date? Is Armadillo confirmed for CF? I love that picture, Murph, very sexy. :-) KJ), It's times like this that I really miss Helen's FAQ. She was my first source of CF info years ago. Helen, if you are reading, you did a great job. It is thanks to you that so many of us were able to search out his other films and become such afirthionados.
~EileenG #748
Thanks for reproducing the Observer article, Karen. (Evelyn) Nor the first pic either.He looked younger in FP ones...hair curlier. I agree with Mari. This pic's [the first one] been around for awhile. I've definitely seen it before. It's from his brown phase. ;-) Is Armadillo confirmed for CF? No. (KJ)(Moon) It's times like this that I really miss Helen's FAQ. Wasn't it Ellen's FAQ?
~Moon #749
Wasn't it Ellen's FAQ? Quite right, Eileen. We become so good at copy/paste, that we sometimes overlook major details. (Evelyn) Nor the first pic either.He looked younger in FP ones...hair curlier. (Eileen), I agree with Mari. This pic's [the first one] been around for awhile. I've definitely seen it before. It's from his brown phase. ;-) Wow! He had brown phase! I liked his open white-shirt phase best. ;-)
~KarenR #750
Sorry, we appear to be a little late. :-( FILM NOTES; Film Footy Fetish The Washington Post; Washington; Apr 14, 2000; Desson Howe MOVIES AND SOCCER are, let's face it, two of the greatest pastimes in life. All right, fine, in my life. So imagine my bliss--and hopefully yours--at the prospect of watching a film festival about soccer this weekend. I refer to the Footy Film Festival, a Sunday night (showtimes always at 7) series through May 14, which will be held at the two best soccer-watching bar havens in the Washington area: the Rock in Chinatown (717 Sixth St. NW) and Lucky Bar, just south of Dupont Circle (1221 Connecticut Ave. NW). Soccer aficionados congregate regularly at these bars--festooned with wall-to-wall video screens-- to watch live soccer from around the world. Footy kicks off this Sunday at Lucky Bar with 1997's "Fever Pitch," an adaptation of Nick Hornby's other cult novel (you've heard of "High Fidelity," I trust). In David Evans's English-made movie, yet to be released in the United States (for shame!), Paul (Colin Firth) is obsessed with his favorite soccer team, the London club of Arsenal. But when Paul meets Sarah (Ruth Gemmell) he discovers that, unlike soccer, relationships aren't played out in seasons. Also showing with the movie: "Goal: The Story of the 1966 World Cup," a compilation of the highlights leading to England's ultimate World Cup victory. I don't think I'm giving anything away there. April 23 at 7 at the Rock, it's Mary Giese's "When Saturday Comes" (1997, 94 minutes), in which a working class lad (Sean Bean) from Sheffield, England, gets the chance to fulfill his lifelong dream of becoming a professional footballer. But he's beset by a cynical, unsupportive father (Pete Postlethwaite), hard-drinking friends and a lifetime of bad habits. The movie's shown with "Gole! Story of the 1982 World Cup." (England didn't win that one.) The rest of the schedule: April 30 at the Rock: John Huston's "A Minor Miracle" (1982, 87 minutes), which stars Brazilian soccer star Pele in a sad tale about an orphanage threatened with closure. The movie is shown with "The Boys From Brazil: Brazil World Cup teams 1930-1986." (Come to think of it, England didn't win that one either.) May 7 at Lucky Bar: Bill Forsyth's "Gregory's Girl" (1980, 88 minutes). In this Scottish charmer, teenage footballer Gregory (John Gordon Sinclair) loses his star position in the school soccer team, and his heart, to Dorothy (Dee Hepburn). He is demoted to goalie. The movie's shown with "Argentina Campeones: The World Cup 1978." (Okay, fine, rub it in: England fell a bit short.) May 14 at the Rock: A cult classic! In John Huston's "Victory" (1982, 94 minutes), set in a POW camp inside Nazi Germany, the new camp commandant (Max Von Sydow) challenges Michael Caine's allied prisoners team to a soccer match. The captives see the game as an opportunity to hatch a daring escape plan. Team members for the Allies, include real soccer stars Pele, Bobby Moore and Osvaldo Ardiles. And keep your eyes peeled for Sylvester Stallone. Also shown: "The World at Their Feet: The World Cup 1970, Mexico." (Um, you know.) A festival pass is $10, which includes snacks and admission to one or all movies. Only a limited number of passes will be available. Seating is first-come, first-served. For more information, check www.soccer-nation.com, which not only gives you festival times and film descriptions, but also provides a whole world of information about international and domestic soccer league and cup games. Calling busboys or bartenders at the Rock (202/ 842-7625) and Lucky Bar (202/331-3733) will only be useful for directions. ~~~~~~~~ Can you imagine watching Fever Pitch at a bar! Would be fun. :-)
~Moon #751
Fever Pitch and Gregory s Girl together would be fun.
~KJArt #752
KJ)(Moon) It's times like this that I really miss Helen's FAQ. (Eileen)Wasn't it Ellen's FAQ? Sorry, my memory for names has always been bad, but in the past few years, it's become atrocious ... Ellen Armstrong, of course. Thanks, Eileen. There is still a useful site with her name on it, but now consists mostly of links to other CF pages. I always just wondered how she got such widespread info. Rivaled your fantastic skills, Slouth Karen. Hey, how about a *Karen's FAQ?* (Kidding ... just keeping that thing updated must have taken enormous amounts of time!!!)
~amw #753
"Karen's FAQ" -Still its a very good thought, KJ!!
~KJArt #754
(Eileen) This pic's [the first one] been around for awhile. I've definitely seen it before. It's from his brown phase. ;-) I printed it down from the FoF Scrapbook last Sept. Meluchie lists it as from The Independent on Sunday but with no date. (The URL image name implies it's from the Observer, though) Brown-phase Colin It's source is labeled on the second page of the offscreen images collection: Offscreen Images, p.2
~lafn #755
Are you sure you people didn't work for the CIA?? ;-) ~~~~~
~Brown32 #756
Just to update you all, Ellen Armstrong is battling cancer at the moment, so keep her in your prayers. She took down FAQs when Colin had been quoted in a paper about the intrusions of fans - Something about someone even knowing where he lived, I think. Someone else refesh my memory here. Anyway, Ellen felt he would not have approved of her site, and so removed it, much to our sorrow. She still has a Faq page for Steven MacIntosh. Murph
~KJArt #757
CIA??;-) Noooo... Like Eileen, the image rang a bell. You people will only find out about it if I have the time [and consciousness] to: a) search my own files b) check to see things are still there c) compose a post and d) have access to an online computer. (obviously, today, I had all 4). ButIgottagetsomeworkdone. ;-) (Ann W)"Karen's FAQ" -Still it's a very good thought, KJ!! It may be a very good thought to you and me, but more importantly it would have to be a good one to Karen herself -- and I am NOT making a request; only selfishly expressing some wishful thinking which logically led to comparing their skills and usefulness! [Neck and neck, I think] **Heehee** KJ
~KJArt #758
I am so sorry to hear she is so seriously ill. She had done so much for Colin in her time. I'll think of her. Thank you for letting us know, Mary. Mary Murphy ... Ellen felt he would not have approved of her site, and so removed it, much to our sorrow. For the longest time, the site contained only the quote to which she was reacting (it still does...), but she later refurbished it with an excellent list of hotlinks to other sites: Ellen Armstrong's Colin Firth FAQ   Colin.Firth.Com links to Ellen's FAQ on their own links page: Firth.com Links:
~KarenR #759
Have run across a really interesting (and funny) article from last March (pre-Oscars) about the making of SiL, going back to its inception and through its Julia Roberts phase. Perhaps some have already read it, but I don't recall it. The article mentions Colin during the first go around in casting for the lead and really reinforces who wrote it (the Norman vs. Stoppard thing). http://www.spring.net/karenr/articles/newsday31499.html
~lafn #760
I have never read this article.Wonder where it appeared originally? Thanks Sleuth. LOL at Joe Fiennes quote:"Wonder who will see this movie"? We all wondered the same thing before it opened...remember?
~KarenR #761
It was in Newday on March 14, 1999. Ran across a writeup of Colin's appearance in Winchester on behalf of asylum-seekers in 1999. Not sure if it's been posted before. Since it is shorter, I'll put it up here, but here's the link: Asylum article Colin Firth highlights asylum-seekers' plight Colin Firth, the actor who played Mr Darcy, in the TV adaptation of Pride and Prejudice, was in Winchester on Saturday to highlight the plight of asylum-seekers. He took a high-profile role in Voices in a Strange Land, an event organised by the Winchester Action Group On Asylum Seekers, (WAGAS) at King Alfred's College. WAGAS has successfully campaigned for the release of 20 asylum-seekers from Winchester Prison. The Winchester actor became passionate about the subject seven months ago after reading an article in a national newspaper about a 19-year-old asylum-seeker who had fled torture in Nigeria. He was then held in a British detention centre where he alleges he was tortured by Group Four. Said Firth: "It is disgusting that we have a gap in our system where this kind of thing is possible, where the authorities can do this with impunity," he said. "These people are not all freeloaders. If you have an Iraqi dissident who's had the guts to get out of Iraq and come over here, does that sound like a sponging freeloader to you?" The three-hour event was packed, with latecomers turned away. They were treated to poetry readings by Yugoslav writer Miroslav Jancic and former Nobel Prize nominee Esmail Kho'i, as well as dance from the Congo and Kurdistan, and singers from Somalia and Iraq. "It is a drop in the ocean," said Firth, "But we are just trying to raise awareness."
~lafn #762
.....19-year-old asylum-seeker who had fled torture in Nigeria. He was then held in a British detention centre where he alleges he was tortured by Group Four. Who is "Group Four"? They sound violent...
~Tracy #763
Evelyn- Who is "Group Four"? They sound violent... Far from it Evelyn, they're a private security firm who used to be content with driving about in armoured trucks delivering cash to banks, more recently they've gone into the "detention" business over here in the UK and I believe are responsible for our first privately run prison. They are especially well know for their ineptitude..having lost (as in letting escape!!) a few potential inmates on the way to jail! I've not heard any torture allegations before..but that doesn't necessarily mean it didn't happen!
~lizbeth54 #764
Is Armadillo confirmed for CF? (Eileen) No. Depends what you mean by "confirmed". If you mean "confirmed" as by his very cautious agent, then no , but Baz B. in the Daily Mail is always very accurate, and if he says that Colin has agreed, and SB wants him, I think it's a cert. And it is an ideal role for him....the narrative focuses entirely on him (so we'll see a lot of him!), it's funny, poignant and there's an abundance of interesting character parts....ideal for a TV series. IMHO, CF has got a very good trio of projects lined up....BJD which will be popular/entertaining multiplex fare and will be released worldwide, MOB will will give him the opportunity (long overdue) for a strong dramatic role ( the sort of role that normally goes to RF!) which could get critical attention and awards, and then "Armadillo", which will reach a huge TV audience, especially if it's advertised as re-uniting the P&P team of SB and CF. Thanks for the account of the Refugee event in Winchester, Karen. Wasn't it organised by Colin's mum?...I'm sure I read that somewhere!
~EileenG #765
As you can tell by my original response, I don't use the term 'confirmed' as it relates to the author of a gossip column (accurate or not). Of course, everyone is free to believe what they want. After Flashman (we were told TV Times was also very accurate), I've become skeptical about any of CF's projects until they are reported by parties more directly connected to the project. Once burned... Thanks for these articles, Karen. Too bad the Winchester Asylum article didn't mention what CF did--only that he took a high profile role. Hmmm--could he have read from the phone book? ;-D (Tracy) more recently they've gone into the "detention" business over here in the UK and I believe are responsible for our first privately run prison. Uh-oh, the trials and tribulations of privatization. If the allegations are true, perhaps Group Four staff were trained by the NYPD.
~lafn #766
(Bethan)IMHO, CF has got a very good trio of projects lined up.... BJD,A,MOB... (Certainly more impressive than the last batch....TOTS, BL,RV, L.) I'm proud of you Bethan...on the strength of your optimism I've ordered MOB.
~lizbeth54 #767
As you can tell by my original response, I don't use the term 'confirmed' as it relates to the author of a gossip column (accurate or not). Of course, everyone is free to believe what they want. After Flashman (we were told TV Times was also very accurate), I've become skeptical about any of CF's projects until they are reported by parties more directly connected to the project. Once burned... (Eileen) I wouldn't describe Baz B. as a gossip columnist...he's a well respected journalist who writes about entertainment, and he normally gets his information straight from the horse's mouth. So if he quotes Sue Birtwistle, I'd be pretty sure he's spoken to her and it's an accurate report. I firmly believe CF will do "Armadillo"...no prospect of burning here! :-) Now, even "Flashman"....I'm not holding my breath over this, but the reports had to be more than just conjecture. There was definitely an ongoing "Flashman" project, although I read somewhere that it had been "shelved". The production company mentioned - Carlton - had produced "Sharpe", also 19th century military history, and the locations cited seemed feasible - Wales (Snowdonia often doubles for Afghanistan) and across Europe. Joanna Lumley would be great casting. It's obviously a hugely expensive project for television, and sometimes projects do take years to get off the ground! I'm stretching my optimism here, but it could still happen...2001? I'm proud of you Bethan...on the strength of your optimism I've ordered MOB. (Evelyn) Ah! Optimism is infectious! One reason I feel very hopeful about this, is that it's completely right for CF, and there are so few roles like this. And anyway MOB is a very good read, whatever the outcome! (Certainly more impressive than the last batch....TOTS, BL,RV, L.) What's BL? :-) I think "Londinium" was definitely a "hey, I want to stay at home and put up some more shelves for Livia" choice. But (perhaps?) it may be better than we think ...and I definitely want to see CF and the beautiful IJ falling for each other (compare MLSF!) RV will be lightweight, but I'm sure the cast will put a lot of gusto into the performances...it has to be very watchable!
~EileenG #768
(Bethan) I wouldn't describe Baz B. as a gossip columnist Then one of your fellow countrypersons did. I read that term here--I don't know Baz from a hole in the ground. Whatever, believe what you will. Different strokes for different folks.
~lafn #769
(Bethan)What's BL? :-) 1.BL is my term for Blackadder. Have you seen it? 2 L: Putting up shelves for Livia should not be a criteria for a serious actor to select a project.And I have seen "The Sex Monster"...have you seen it? I have seen MLSF...and L. will not be MLSF...have you seen it? 3.RV will be good , but he will not have the billing stature as in the new projects. evelyn*who travels far and wide to see his films*...even the bad ones;-)
~mari #770
Any word on a London premiere for MLSF?
~lizbeth54 #771
I've not read anything about MLSF...but I don't see the same range of papers that I used to see. The promotion (and premiere, if there is one) normally seems to occur a couple of weeks before the opening. So perhaps there may be some interviews/articles this weekend. Or maybe the Observer article was "it". 2 L: Putting up shelves for Livia should not be a criteria for a serious actor to select a project.And I have seen "The Sex Monster"...have you seen it? No..the title is rather offputting! But I did see a series (on BBC2) that Mike Binder directed (didn't write though), and liked it..."American Gothic". I'm joking about the shelves...I hope he really liked the script...but the chance to be home-based may have tipped the balance!
~Arami #772
Been briefly in touch with Nan over Easter. She sends her love to all droolers. Hope you still remember Nan, oldtimers? For newbies, Nan is/was one of our hosts (moderators) and a ferocious drooler herself. She is nearing the end of an extremely tough computer technology course at the NYU, for which she has given up drooling for two years... Hopefully she'll be back among us later in the year.
~lizbeth54 #773
Does anyone know what's happening to MLSF in the UK? I received the May programme today for the Bradford NM of Film & Photography (where they held the Film Festival). No mention of any showing of MLSF, although I had been assured that it would show in May. So, showing initiative, I phoned the Curzon Mayfair (thought I'd ask about a premiere and confim the opening date) I was told that they "had thought that they were getting MLSF" but there's "a question mark" over it. It's not listed, and the Curzon are showing "Sunshine" and something else throughout May. Huh! I thought the Miramax spokesman said the reason they postponed the release of MLSF for nearly a year was to secure an opening at the Curzon Mayfair!!!! Thoroughly downhearted, I phoned two other independent cinemas in Leeds and Manchester, which normally get all the art house releases...and MLSF is not being shown in May or June. So what's happened?? If anyone can confirm it is opening on the 12th and where, I'd be eternally grateful! :-)This is one disappointment too far!!! Glad to hear news of Nan...I hope all's going well with the course!
~KarenR #774
Has anybody called Miramax or Buena Vista Intl (the UK distributors)?
~lizbeth54 #775
I'll give BVI a ring tomorrow.....:-) It was too late to contact them today. Hopefully, all will be resolved!
~patas #776
Sorry to hear about Ellen's illness, I hope she wins this fight. And glad to have news of Nan, please tell her, Arami, how happy we'll be to have her back :-)
~ommin #777
I cannot believe they have postponed MLSF yet again - it has been shown all over Asia and has been popular here in Australia - in fact I heard it was still showing in Adelaide. It is coming out on video here in a couple of weeks - it just does not make sense. I watched SLOW last night - I have converted my sister-in-law!!
~amw #778
According to popcorn.co.uk it is still scheduled to be released on the 12th May, fingers crossed.
~lizbeth54 #779
From the horse's mouth... I've just phoned BVI and asked about MLSF.(Better to find out than to jump to conclusions and get irritated, which is what I normally do!) It does open on May 12th, but it's London only and Scotland. I asked which cinemas and was told that "one hasn't been booked yet (only one!!!)..check your local listings." I said I thought it was the Curzon (although I don't think it can be) and the reply was "well, it may be". I asked about a nationwide release....reply was "no" but "after 2 or 3 weeks perhaps some rep theatres may be interested in booking it...it's up to them". Now the good bit...I asked where it was opening in Scotland...reply "everywhere". Perhaps to a Londoner, Glasow and Edinburgh is "everywhere", but hopefully MLSF may get more exposure north of the border! There's no premiere, and no money budgeted for promotion. But I'm wondering if it may have an informal gala type/charity opening in Glasgow...it's a possibility, yes? Anyway, there you have it! Could be worse. But I'm surprised that BVI aren't trying for the rep theatres...perhaps there aren't enough prints!
~Brown32 #780
Hi All: Mickie called Colin's agent yesterday, and was told that though he hadn't yet signed on the dotted line, Armadillo is still very much under consideration. Murph
~KarenR #781
Murph, as there isn't a script yet, Colin wouldn't have signed anything. However, Baz's info would likely still be accurate about Colin committing early on to the project. That's done without a formal contract and gets the higher-ups interested in a project, gets it funding, etc. Bethan, that's the crummiest news yet. (putting it nicely) What is going on? They don't even have the confidence to give this movie a decent opening. I'm... speechless... :-(
~amw #782
so am I, looks as if I will be meeting up with Aishling again in London, seeing Sunshine tomorrow.
~patas #783
(Bethan)...perhaps there aren't enough prints! How many did we think were doing the US tour? ;-)
~Allison2 #784
There is an ad in today's Evening Standard to win free tickets to the premiere of MLSF to be held at the ABC Shaftesbury Avenue on Monday 2nd May!!! Phone 0901 111 0152 if you want to win a free ticket. "CF in wet shirt will be attending" !!!!!
~Allison2 #785
That should be Tuesday 2nd May!!!
~lizbeth54 #786
Wot! And just after I'd had that miserable conversation with BVI..."no premiere, no promotion, no money, haven't booked a cinema, etcerea" Well, that was totally accurate, wasn't it? And the ABC Shaftesbury Avenue...that's an excellent venue. In the heart of the West End and bigger than the Curzon, I believe. This can't compare with Allison's news, but the National Museum of Film and Photography in Bradford are showing a special screening of "Lost Empires" in TV heaven, a special theatre (seating about 40) for viewing archived TV drama. It's on June 15 and free. I'll check if it's the CF version...I don't think there's been any other adaptation.
~lizbeth54 #787
"CF in a wet shirt!" LOL! He should be in Mark Darcy mode though, as they'll just have started shooting BJD!
~KarenR #788
Wonderful news, Allison! So who has phoned and gotten their tickets? :-) Special screening of Lost Empires? My oh my. Must be an all-day event with a break for lunch/dinner. It runs... what... 6 hours??? There couldn't possibly be another version. Has to be Colin's.
~Moon #789
"CF in wet shirt will be attending" Is this your quotation Allison, or was this part of the Ad? LOL! I hope you go even if you do not win the tickets. It is worth it.
~KarenR #790
Go to Empire Online. At the upper left is an ad for asking questions of Stephen Fry. When you click on it, this is what you will see (also a pic from Londinium. The next subject of Empire's Public Access interview - the one where you the readers get to ask the questions - is none other than the prince of the withering one-liner, Stephen Fry. Fry, the star of stage, small and big screen, raconteur, renaissance man and web head, has accepted the challenge to answer questions from Empire readers. So if you've ever wanted to know what he thinks of Hugh Laurie's Hollywood success, whether his most recent co-star, Julie Andrews, has any deep dark secrets or how he knows so much about the internet then this is your chance. The best questions will be put to the man himself when we interview him in a couple of weeks time and Fry's answers will feature in an upcoming issue of the magazine, as well as here at Empire Online. Send your questions to: empire@ecm.emap.com OK, ladies, this is where we will shine. Julie Andrews' deepest darkest secrets? Who cares! Moon, your prayers have been answered. Let's get this rolling... ;-)
~KarenR #791
Here's the url for Empire Online, but you need to send the questions to the email address above. http://www.empireonline.co.uk/
~Tracy #792
(Karen) Wonderful news, Allison! So who has phoned and gotten their tickets? :-) I'll be phoning as soon as I've stopped typing this! ;-D *fingers crossed*
~Tracy #793
(Karen) Wonderful news, Allison! So who has phoned and gotten their tickets? :-) I'll be phoning as soon as I've stopped typing this! ;-D *fingers crossed*
~Tracy #794
Arggghhhh! "I'm sorry all lines are now closed" ;-(
~amw #795
Good for you Tracy, I am afraid I can't make the Premiere but if it is only playing in London,and who knows Bethan, even that may be wrong (incidentally I think it was disgraceful that BVI misinformed you so badly, obviously the right hand doesn't know what the left hand is doing), then I will certianly go to London to see it, in the first week just in case it disappears after the first week!!
~Arami #796
Well - time for me to think about a trip to London again... :-)
~KarenR #797
"I'm sorry all lines are now closed" Are you sure you dialed the right code? ;-)
~KarenR #798
From the weekend Financial Times, "Unmissable Events" Tuesday, May 2 I do not pretend to be an oracular source of information on the novels of Jane Austen. However, I do not recall her having written many novels set in Bermuda. Nevertheless, her sailor brothers did make it over to this pleasant island; so what better, or sunnier, place to hold a Jane Austen summit? Today is the start of a week-long, mid-Atlantic meeting of US and UK Jane Austen fanatics. Indeed, if the heritage TV mob run out of Jane Austen novels in which to cast Colin Firth and Jennifer Ehle, they might like to look at the life of Jane's brother, Charles, who married the governor of Bermuda's daughter. This should offer plenty of scope for smouldering glances beneath the swaying palms. UK Jane Austen Society, 01420-562469. Talking of Colin Firth, you might catch him at the premiere tonight of My Life So Far. It is the first film by David Putnam and Hugh Hudson since Chariots of Fire, and is a poignant period drama set in Scotland during the first world war. My Life So Far premiere, ABC Shaftesbury Avenue
~heide #799
(Arami) time for me to think about a trip to London again... :-) Yes, yes. Go, go. Colin at the premier? Even if he's in a dry shirt what an event! What possessed him to finally do something regarding this film, d'ye think? Good luck ladies. (Ann) (incidentally I think it was disgraceful that BVI misinformed you so badly, obviously the right hand doesn't know what the left hand is doing) Yes, and his agents, located in the brain that's in the tail we all sit on, don't know anything at all. I'm sorry but after reading Mary's report from Mickie, they're even easier targets than before. ;-) Thinking of my question for Mr. Fry that doesn't have anything (or very little) to do with Julie Andrews. Thanks, Karen, for the url.
~KarenR #800
(Heide) Thinking of my question for Mr. Fry that doesn't have anything (or very little) to do with Julie Andrews. Don't think we should ask, "is Peter gay?" Right? ;-)
~Moon #801
(Karen), Moon, your prayers have been answered. Let's get this rolling... ;-) My prayers will be answered when Colin agrees to do this, not Stephen. We can not just ask him questions about Colin. I do not think Empire will use them. We could suggest to Empire to do the same with Colin--at the insistance of sooo many who basically ignored SF and wanted to know all about CF. ;-) Don't you think? :-D
~Allison2 #802
I was in such a rush yesterday to give you news of the MLSF premier that I did not have time to fill in all the details (or read them). In the small print at the bottom of the ad it says "The winners will be the first 50 enries drawn at random after the competition closes at 2.30pm today, Friday 28th April". That is ridiculous! The Evening Standard is only available in most shops from 1pm, though it can be bought at central London tube stations before that. But Who would have got round to reading the back pages and have put in their call by 2.30pm. Typical. Tracey, I think you should phone them on Tuesday when they open again and complain and demand a ticket! I think I might send them an e-mail of complaint. About that wet shirt....it says: "Colin Firth, Mary Elizabeth Mastroantonio, Malcom McDowell and David Puttnam amongst others will be attending this charity premier in aid of RADA.
~amw #803
Have just got back from seeing "Sunshine" at The Curzon Mayfair, and there was a preview of MLSF, (he looks so cute in that knitted swimsuit!), which opens there on the 12th May. Incidentally so far the reviews have not been good for the film or Colin, Film Review gave it 2 stars out of 5 and said of Colin "Firth has made a career ot of playing somewhat stoical, reserved young men, but the role of Edward stretches him beyond his limits" what rot! Empire gave it 2 stars out of 5 and spoke of "Firth being stilted" or something like that. However, I will be going back to the Curzon in two weeks time whatever the critics say.
~lizbeth54 #804
I don't think somehow that the reviews for MLSF or CF are going to be good...I saw one in Total Film (2 stars) which said that the movie had been on the shelf for three years (not true,) that the young actors were unattractive (cruel), described it as a "weary wallow in nostalgia" and then picked on CF for special criticism. I just thought "oh, stuff you" (or something ruder!) I've no intention of paying any attention to the reviews. As I've commented before, British film "reviewers" seem to relish savaging British films and actors...which is probably why we barely have a film industry!
~lizbeth54 #805
Ann, did you say that MLSF showing at the Curzon in two weeks? I'm confused....why did they tell me it wasn't showing there?!! Talk about being on the receiving end of wrong information! BTW I can think of quite a long list of roles in which CF isn't a "stoical, reserved young man"!!
~amw #806
Bethan, yes it opens there on the 12th May, there is a lovely poster outside the cinema, MLSF, "Coming Soon". A good area for Colin Firth & RF fans I would think, from what I saw today. (Ladies in Volvo's!)
~KarenR #807
Oh you poor things! I think MLSF was better received here by most critics than yours. They are a pathetic lot. How are the reviews for The Last September, another similar film which just opened this past Friday? Anyone to crucify in that one? Having read a review of Hugh Hudson's "I Dreamed of Africa," there appear to be many of the same criticisms ("meandering pointlessly although beautifully shot"). in aid of RADA. That is who you call for tickets!!
~ommin #808
Ann it is quite miserable what British reviewers do to films made there. It is beginning to look like filmmakers are afraid of showing any films there that are not in the 18-25 male venue. I am sure I would be. I will if the Telegraph, Guardian or Times trash it write to the reviewers and suggest they are lacking in finesse and education! Here in Australia it was well received as it was mostly by American reviewers who I sense do not pander to the young male element. Perhaps one day they will realise what they have done when they grow up!
~lizbeth54 #809
These initial reviews are all in the monthly movie magazines which, to be honest, I wouldn't normally look at even if you gave me a copy. The reviews in the quality press may be more perceptive, but a lot depends on the individual reviewer. I like reading reviews (goodness knows why!) but a couple of years ago there seemed to be a major shakeout, and the Telegraph, Guardian and Times all replaced their "older" reviewers. There's been a marked sea change since then, and I find, almost invariably, that the films I think I'll like always get trashed. The Daily Mail (Chris Tookey!) is okay. The worst is Ann Bilson in the Sunday Telegraph. "Mrs Dalloway" with Vanessa Redgrave is a case in point...got poor reviews, no-one went to see it, but it was shown recently on TV and I thought it was beautiful...and so did quite a few of my colleaues at work. I think that in the UK, television is the better medium for more thoughtful, slower paced drama...audiences do tune in, and TV critics are much more supportive (and ver 25!)
~Tracy #810
Typical. Tracey, I think you should phone them on Tuesday when they open again and complain and demand a ticket! It's definately worth a try! 12th May is not so long to wait though - I think I can just about bear it! *teeth gritted* I would agree with all of the above comments re the reviewing tactics in our movie mags - I sometimes wonder whether they've actually seen some of the films they're pulling to bits. It seems as if only a certain type of British film ever gets the thumbs up - anything with a 'Ewan' in, and/or one which portrays 'real people' in the inner cities beating the s*** out of each other. Not typical Colin fare! Like Bethan, I'm waiting hopefully for sensible comments from the quality press to redress the balance. But IMHO the only opinions that count are those of my dear co-droolers who can always be relied upon to speak their minds - in a totally unbiased way of course ;-))
~ommin #811
Of course we are discerning, sane people! But honestly the reviewers in the U.K. do not seem able to see good acting if it's put in front of them and pointed out. It is so in the junior pages in the main newspapers here in Oz! The good reviewers liked MLSF and perhaps the only way is to point out to these juniors they have appointed that they have no discernment and are incapable of observing a good film when they see one, I too loved Mrs. Dalloway and thus should rely totally on us in regard to anyting to do with C.F. I have seen MLSF thought it was brilliant, his acting supurb but my D.H. did not see what I could see, the eyes, the lips, the expressions! But as for D.Q. he thought it was one of the best films he had seen in a long time. Interesting eh.
~patas #812
My sister saw MLSF on video, said she didn't like it much (her husband did) and that "CF again plays a loser"... For what it's worth...
~mari #813
I agree that the newspaper reviews for MLSF will likely be much better and much more perceptive. I have to wonder if these film mag reviewers, no doubt geared to the youth market, have even seen the film, based on their comments. Edward is *not* a stoical reserved young man, the child actors are *not* unattractive, and the film is *not* a weary wallow in nostalgia--quite the contrary. Edward is a real paradox, an outgoing child-man who leaps before he looks, caught between his impulses and his adult responsibilities; there is real growth in his character by the end of the film, and CF gets it just right. I can't say enough for Robert Norman, who is absolutely convincing as Fraser--he has real talent. And to think that the film is just misty nostalgia really misses the point--there is a real poignancy and bite here as the characters, unbenownst to them, are coming to the end of an era; the incidents shown in the film are all illustrative of the larger encroachment of the outside world during this time period. Can you tell I love this film?;-) I'm very happy to hear they're having a premiere and are doing something to promote it.
~Moon #814
Of course the young reviewers do not like nostalgia in the UK. They want to get rid of the monarchy! MLSF deserves good reviews because it is a good film. The acting is also top notch. (Tracy), It seems as if only a certain type of British film ever gets the thumbs up - anything with a 'Ewan' in, and/or one which portrays 'real people' in the inner cities beating the s*** out of each other. I am so sick of those films! Refresh my memory please, what does RADA stand for?
~KarenR #815
Royal Academy of Dramatic Art Telephone: 020-7636 7076 Couldn't find a number for their Friends of RADA
~heide #816
(Tracy), It seems as if only a certain type of British film ever gets the thumbs up - anything with a 'Ewan' in, and/or one which portrays 'real people' in the inner cities beating the s*** out of each other. Ah, then perhaps those reviewers will enjoy Armadillo. ;-) A bit of violence though perhaps not enough to suit. Certainly a gritty role and I hope we are lucky enough to see Colin play it. The kilt scene alone should attract comment. (Gi) My sister saw MLSF on video, said she didn't like it much (her husband did) and that "CF again plays a loser"... LOL! You know she'd get an argument here. ;-) This won't turn you off from judging yourself, I trust. Need I mention another kilt scene?
~lafn #817
Wonderful to hear that there is going to be a premiere...(Thank you Harvey.) And RADA is a prestigious benefit. Should get lots of stars and good press. Who is going to the London Premiere from Drool?
~patas #818
(Heide) This won't turn you off from judging yourself, I trust. Surely not! As long as I get to see it sometime...
~EileenG #819
(Mari) I'm very happy to hear they're having a premiere and are doing something to promote it [MLSF]. Ditto. I was mystified by BVI's "information" (shades of the BBC's handling of DQ). Am sure CF was quite delighted to read that he'd be attending the premiere in a wet shirt. ;-P (Bethan) I don't think somehow that the reviews for MLSF or CF are going to be good... MLSF reviews weren't good in the US, but most were good for CF's performance in it (except the one which said he looked like Tim Robbins). Some reviews improved when the film was released on video. British film "reviewers" seem to relish savaging British films and actors Oh, yes. I still chuckle when I think about that flaming "celluloid toilet paper" commentary. (Evelyn) Wonderful to hear that there is going to be a premiere...(Thank you Harvey.) D'ya think the 'long arm of Harvey' is involved here? I was under the impression that Miramax handed everything over to BVI and that was that. However, considering Miramax now has a vested interest in BJD...hmmm.
~mari #820
(Eileen) MLSF reviews weren't good in the US, but most were good for CF's performance in it Think back, Eileen, the film had great reviews here from most of the major city papers--NY Times, LA Times, Wall Street Journal, Boston Globe, Chicago Sun-Times (Roger Ebert), Philadelphia Inquirer, Houston Chronicle, Hollywood Reporter, etc., and lots of the mid-size cities too. Trust me on this, I had over two dozen of 'em all lovingly packaged into that scrapbook which CF said he never received, and which I told him must have gone into that industrial strength shredder at his fan-friendly agent's office.:-( Oh, now I'm ticked off all over again.:-( (Heide) Ah, then perhaps those reviewers will enjoy Armadillo. ;-) . . .The kilt scene alone should attract comment. Personally, I'm all anticipation over the LSD/toss the TV scene.;-)
~KarenR #821
(Mari) Personally, I'm all anticipation over the LSD/toss the TV scene.;-) You're a baaad girl. I suspect it will be very dark.
~EileenG #822
(Mari) Think back, Eileen You're right, of course. I was thinking about Time and Entertainment Weekly. Those reviews were unfavorable and those publications have national circulations. The local, favorable reviews you mention were undoubtedly responsible for bringing in the audience since the film was afforded no publicity.
~lizbeth54 #823
(Mari) Personally, I'm all anticipation over the LSD/toss the TV scene.;-) How about the scene when he's searching in the fridge for something to eat late at night? Potentially much more revealing! I suspect he'll wear pyjamas!
~mari #824
(Eileen) The local, favorable reviews you mention were undoubtedly responsible for bringing in the audience since the film was afforded no publicity. Agreed. Too bad the cast didn't pull a Patrick Stewart (will post on 127). Basically, he denounced the Ride Down Mt. Morgan producers after the curtain calls at the Saturday shows, for not promoting the play. (Bethan) How about the scene when he's searching in the fridge for something to eat late at night? Potentially much more revealing! I suspect he'll wear pyjamas! Yes, thereby scandalizing poor Berbuda! Poor, lucky Berbuda.;-) The second time I think he wears Stella's terry-cloth robe, which should be a sight. I finished the book over the weekend, and enjoyed it very much. I like Boyd's writing style--very descriptive, witty, and with vivid characters that pop off the page. With him adapting his own screenplay and Sue B. at the helm, this should be a terrific project. Am feeling just a bit concerned over the gel-haired look, though.;-)
~KarenR #825
I'm guessing that no one called Rada and offered to become a "friend." OK, so is anyone going to *happen* to walk by the ABC Shaftesbury tomorrow evening and *happen* to have his/her camera in hand and *happen* to get a photo of...erm... anybody who might *happen* to show up for the premiere? ;-)
~lafn #826
(Evelyn) Wonderful to hear that there is going to be a premiere...(Thank you Harvey.) (Eileen)D'ya think the 'long arm of Harvey' is involved here? I was under the impression that Miramax handed everything over to BVI and that was that. However, considering Miramax now has a vested interest in BJD...hmmm. I don't think BVI was deceiving Bethan....they might only be doing the distributing and Miramax the Premiere...like they did SIL.
~Arami #827
is anyone going to *happen* to walk by the ABC Shaftesbury tomorrow evening and *happen* to have his/her camera in hand... Well, don't look at me! I'd love to do it (and I'm famous for my camera work ;-)), but the prospect of two-and-a-half hour train journey there and back for the sake of a few glimpses - or not, as the case may be, depending on the position of various barriers, bodyguards, the limo halting place and all the associated angles, and it also might rain... I'm afraid the Donmar experience made us all a little blas�...
~lafn #828
(Arami) I'm afraid the Donmar experience made us all a little blas�... You are so right....those West End stage doors in the dark side alleys...in the cold and rain :-( Let's pray he keeps going back to the Donmar:-)
~KarenR #829
From Tuesday's Independent: `MY LIFE SO FAR' IS PUTTNAM'S FAREWELL TO FILM INDUSTRY DAVID PUTTNAM will bring down the curtain on an era in British film making with tonight's London premiere of My Life So Far. The opening of Lord Puttnam's last film will be attended by a celebrity audience, including a heavily pregnant Cherie Blair and the stars of the film, Colin Firth and Malcolm McDowell. The movie reunites Puttnam as producer with the director Hugh Hudson, the Oscar-winning team that made Chariots of Fire in 1981. Hudson said yesterday: "David insists this is his last film. He is busy and content as a working peer. I feel very sad about it. David has been seminal to the British film industry over the last 25 years. He gave me, Alan Parker, Ridley Scott and Adrian Lyne our first films. So he can spot 'em. "I will do my utmost to persuade him to change his mind, though I don't think I will succeed. Making this film with him was the most joyful working experience of my life. In Hollywood, now, you're just a product supplier. You don't have fun any more. But this was a very British film, and a very personal film for us." My Life So Far is the tale of a young boy's coming of age in an eccentric Scottish household in the 1920s. It reveals the comedy and poignancy under the surface of an entire family in crisis as established relationships are threatened by the arrival of an enchanting outsider. The spell of childhood is broken for 10-year-old Fraser Pettigrew when he is forced to look at this family, particularly his father, through newly adult eyes. The film's screenplay, by Simon Donald, is based on part of Sir Denis Forman's autobiography, Son of Adam. Sir Denis, who became head of Granada, approved the concept for the film. Filmed entirely on location in the west Highlands of Scotland, the film was financed by Miramax Films and the Scottish Arts Council National Lottery Fund.
~KarenR #830
...and there's another mention of SLOW, the poster child of ill-placed public monies, in the Guardian...a not-so-subtle reminder for the new Film Council being launched today. "Although the deluge of cash sparked a boom in filmmaking, the lottery will be more remembered for turkeys like Rancid Aluminium and The Secret Laughter of Women. � The Secret Laughter of Women, starring Colin Firth, cost �3.3m but took just �2,832 after getting a lottery of grant of just less than �1m."
~ommin #831
How did they expect SLOW to make any money if they didn't show it anywhere - it wasn't that bad.
~lizbeth54 #832
I am really cheesed off with the Guardian quoting SLOW as the all time turkey....and they always say "starring Colin Firth"! Grrrrr!!!! Do they say "Rancid Aluminium" starring Rhys Ivans (?) and Joe Fiennes. Bet they don't. Also Rancid Aluminium opened in 200 cinemas, SLOW in two, and I really wonder at the accuracy of those figures...on the day I saw it I'm sure the cinema was half full. And SLOW is a rather nice little film...beautiful cinematography, charming principals, and well acted by the supporting cast. And a little boy who is sweet and polite. One thing I can guarantee is that the new Film Council won't make movies like this (or MLSF) any more! Good for Cherie! (Didn't someone spot her in the audience of 3DOR?) Maybe there'll be photos of her in tomorrow's papers amd a mention for MLSF!
~lizbeth54 #833
Grrrr!! Again. To answer my own question...today's issue of the Guardian has just popped through the letterbox. Six turkeys are listed, but the only actor mentioned is "Colin Firth" ( although all the others starred well known actors.) And to drive their point home, there's a colour photo of CF and Nia Long (the bed picture) with a caption about it being the all time loser! Someone at the Guardian really has the knives out. I hope BJD makes millions!!!
~Allison2 #834
is anyone going to *happen* to walk by the ABC Shaftesbury tomorrow evening and *happen* to have his/her camera in hand... I am tantalisingly close tonight! I have a meeting in Covent Garden at around that time. I'll walk past the cinema on my way but I shall not be able to hang around. Great publicity that Cherie Blair will be there. The only problem is that the only photographs in the paper tomorrow will be of her not ODB.
~ommin #835
Have tried to contact Guardian from Oz. No luck, I object strongly to their knocking down of Colin as a tall poppy - Secret Laughter of Women was not that bad - in fact I thoroughly enjoyed the film. Perhaps some of the U.K. ladies could send in a complaint using me too as someone who objects to an obviously biased criticism. I don't understand what is going on in the U.K. and why Colin Firth is a whipping boy. Must be jealousy.
~lizbeth54 #836
I may email the letters page, although I'm very busy for the rest of today, and it would have to be succinct and witty ...and there are other points I'd like to make about the new policy for the Film Council. On a brighter note, RADA and Cherie Blair will make the MLSF premiere very high profile. Should be well attended by celebrities and those in the arts world. And the papers should pick up on it.
~amw #837
I can quite understand why CF keeps such a low profile in this country, I am dreading the Guardian review for MLSF. It also makes me so mad when Journalists distort the facts or fail to mention certain facts such as SLOW only being shown in a very limited number of cinemas and cities. I guess its best to ignore these people, at least we know the facts, unfortunately there is not much we CF fans can do, we are a very small number in the UK.
~mari #838
Well, how do you like that? Colin goes to a premiere only once every year and a half or so, but each time he does, the wife of a head of state shows up! You pick your spots well, Colin!;-) Very nice send-off for the film with Mrs. Blair coming. Yes, I do recall that someone spotted her at 3DOR--she must be a Firth fan, which shows good taste. And didn't her father come to one of the protests that CF took part in? RE: the Guardian--granted, SLOW is not a great film, but there is nothing offensive about it, which I gather is not the case with some of the other films mentioned. It certainly doesn't deserve to be continuously singled out. For what it's worth, I am sending them an e-mail protesting their distortion of the facts and calling into question their racial motivation.:-(
~EileenG #839
(Allison) I'll walk past the cinema on my way but I shall not be able to hang around. No matter, so long as you keep your eyes peeled. Look for the brown suit--no, maybe he'll bring out the ensemble he wore at the SiL premiere (black, dark shirt, yellow tie). Looking forward to whatever details you can furnish, Allison. Thanks. (Mari) And didn't her father come to one of the protests that CF took part in? Was it the Sainsbury's shopping spree (aka toilet brush pic ;-)) or the chain wrap in front of Parliament? See, Ev, the steel trap's getting rusty!
~lizbeth54 #840
I guess its best to ignore these people, at least we know the facts, unfortunately there is not much we CF fans can do, we are a very small number in the UK. Actually, I think there are still a very large number of women who like him in the UK, but it's not easy to be a "fan" as such...he's not like a soap star and his work isn't always very accessible and of course, he's very private! Am supposed to be "working at home" but have drafted a mental email amd shall send it!
~lizbeth54 #841
Pushing the Guardian to one side and focusing on the positive!....Cherie's presence at the Premiere is really quite complimentary. Her baby is apparently due late May and I read somewhere that she's given up all public engagements. This must be a one-off.
~mari #842
From Excite: Cherie in star turn at charity premiere Cherie Blair, with just weeks to go before the birth of her fourth child, has made a public appearance in London at the premiere of a British film featuring a Scottish family. A beaming and relaxed Mrs Blair mingled with Hollywood stars at the charity premiere of My Life So Far, at central London's ABC Shaftesbury Avenue cinema. She arrived with the film's director-producer team of Hugh Hudson and Lord Puttnam, whose collaboration on the project is their first since they made the 1981 Oscar-winning Chariots of Fire. Mrs Blair, dressed in a cream dress topped off with a matching wool frock coat, smiled at the waiting crowd and signed autographs before watching the premiere which is in aid of the Royal Academy of Dramatic Arts. Colin Firth, Mary Elizabeth Mastrantonio and Malcolm McDowell, who star in the film based on the autobiography of television executive Sir Denis Forman about a young boy's coming of age in an eccentric Scottish 1920s household, also attended. Neil and Glenys Kinnock plus model Luciana Morad, mother of Mick Jagger's child, and American actor Billy Zane were also among the guests. The film opens in the UK on May 12.
~KarenR #843
Who were the Hollywood stars...aside from Billy Z? :-o Hmmm, maybe I should turn on the BBC or ITN news here.
~KarenR #844
From The Times (pic was of Cherie and Puttnam: Puttnam's latest is for the whole family LORD PUTTNAM was accompanied last night by Cherie Blair, the wife of the Prime Minister, to the British charity premiere of My Life So Far, his latest film. The film reunites the director-producer team of Hugh Hudson and David Puttnam for the first time since they won the Best Picture Oscar for Chariots of Fire in 1981. It is based on the autobiography of Sir Denis Forman, the television executive, and is the tale of a young boy's coming of age in an eccentric Scottish household in the 1920s. Lord Puttnam, 59, said he was inspired by its message about the importance of families, "which is not a popular subject these days". He said: "For anyone who has been in a relationship, it is very powerful." He added that it is not "a Sound of Music celebration of the family". While he expected it to be his last film, he said that he has "never said never". Among the celebrities who attended the premiere were Colin Firth, one of the film's leading actors, and Claudia Schiffer, the supermodel.
~catheyp #845
From The Times (pic was of Cherie and Puttnam: Naturally, why would you photograph the star and the best looking man there :-(
~patas #846
At least they mentioned him! End of the Invisible Man syndrome?
~MarkG #847
Sorry - was on holiday for a week and did not get through enough posts yesterday to find out about the premiere so I did not go along for a gawp. Cherie and Claudia are a couple of surprisingly A-list female celebs to be attending a somewhat low-key premiere, IMO. Bewitched by the leading man, I wonder? (remember Cherie loves BJD - I once posted a titbit about Cherie buttonholing HF to say how the book had been a major bedroom distraction)
~Moon #848
(Mark), Cherie loves BJD - I once posted a titbit about Cherie buttonholing HF to say how the book had been a major bedroom distraction) Except for that one night. ;-)) You would have been our perfect rep./spy last night Mark. Thanks, Karen and Mari for such quick reporting! Is Billy Z a Hollywood Star? In any case, that FF matching and no picture? :-(
~Allison2 #849
'Fraid I have little to report. I went to the cinema just before 7pm. There were some camera men and a few (very few) fans waiting. Nobody famous or unfamous seemed to be going in and they were not expecting celebs for a while. I could not stay as had to get to a meeting. Will go and buy ES today and see if it has any more pictures. We may have to wait a few weeks for the ES magazine. These things are often shown there. Sorry no more exciting news.
~amw #850
A friend told me that Cherie Blair and DP were on GMTV this morning at the Premiere, pictures of Colin & MMcD, Colin wore grey apparently and looked very happy, can't believe I missed it, sorry.
~aishling #851
I did see them on GMTV news. Reporter was talking to Cherie Blair and MMcD with Colin in the background talking to another reporter. MMcD was being very complimentary to CF, great British actor etc. and speaking loudly over his shoulder to where Colin stood. Colin then chipped in and laughing said "Is Malcolm boring you with how it all started". Right Ann, he was wearing a grey suit. I did set the video for the next news but news reader talked over a very short clip although they did manage a very nice close up of CF.
~KarenR #852
Excellent! Thanks, Aishling. Anything notable about his appearance? Hair color? (It is rather early in the BJD shoot for anything definitive.) Thanks, Allison and Mark, for reporting in.
~aishling #853
I did mean to mention his hair. Looked natural colour but a bit longer than when we saw him in Jan.
~Allison2 #854
Ah! What time was the GMTV news? I actually recorded GMTV from about 7 to 8.! I looked at a bit and assumed there was nothing there. I shall have another look. The man from Sky is crawling over my equipment at the moment so I will not be able to view just yet!
~aishling #855
7.30am. There was a much shorter report at 8.30 when I had set my video.
~EileenG #856
Woohoo! News, news! It looks like a small reprieve from the Invisible Man Syndrome, Gi (but he's gonna have to get used to this when BJD publicity drive starts). Hmmm...has the grey LA premiere suit emigrated from the condo closet? Did he wear a black shirt? Thanks for your reports, ladies.
~lafn #857
The Grey Suit has seen several premieres....TEP,SIL in NY...where else? Aishling, could you see Livia? Was there a crowd In the lobby? Thanks Allison and Mark ..(I just knew Mark would have been there...)
~LauraMM #858
(remember Cherie loves BJD - I once posted a titbit about Cherie buttonholing HF to say how the book had been a major bedroom distraction) } Obviously not too much of a distraction if she's due to deliver in a few weeks time... I still haven't seen MLSF. And if I recall, I don't think the Boston Globe gave it favorable reviews. I believe they called it mundane.
~Allison2 #859
I have it all on tape! 7.30 and 8.30. I have had a quick look and he seems to be wearing dark grey suit, darkish grey shirt and silver tie. Looking very smart. No sign of Livia but he was only shown being interviewed.
~aishling #860
There didn't seem to be many people in the lobby. I didn't see Livia. But it was a very short report.
~mari #861
Thanks Aishling and Allison for the reports! (Allison)dark grey suit, darkish grey shirt and silver tie. Looking very smart. Mmmmm, the Regis Philbin monochromatic look--very elegant. Wouldn't mind seeing some snappies if someone can manage it.:-) I wonder if Billy Z. wore his hair for the occasion?;-) And how's this for a dubious claim to fame: "Luciana Morad, mother of Mick Jagger's child." Gee, I thought Jerry Hall did all the premiere work in the family; she was at the Cannes shindig last year for MLSF/AMFAR. Oh, I get it now, she probably told Luciana that it was a good movie.;-) Sorry to be rude, but some of these people just make it so darn easy!;-) Laura, for shame, not seeing MLSF! The Boston Globe review was absolutely glowing--Jay Carr wrote it--Karen posted it here I believe. Trust me, I know 'em by heart.;-)
~patas #862
Thanks for the reports, ladies! Mark, good to see you back, hope your holiday was great. (Mari)Wouldn't mind seeing some snappies if someone can manage it.:-) Ditto here :-)
~lizbeth54 #863
There was a report in the Daily Telegraph...big pic of Cherie and David Puttnam. Can't remember the exact wording, but it said that the stars of the film (CF etc)attended. You could sort of see a crowd of onlookers in the background, and I think the report said that Cherie chatted to the crowd. It's not mega publicity, but for a small British film it's pretty good! And I would think that many attending might be well known in the arts world (perhaps people like Sue Birtwistle?) but not the "celebrities" (soap stars, Posh Spice, Madonna etc) who get the press coverage. There was also quite a lot on the news about the plans for the new Film Council (thankfully no mention of SLOW!) They'll be supporting populist commercial films that draw the crowds in on Friday night, and not the sort of dramas that belong more to television. Well, good luck to them!
~KarenR #864
Also had to compete with another premiere of sorts. The Sex Pistols documentary (The Filth and the Fury) preemed at a theatre in Islington last night too. Probably not going to attract the same crowd. ;-D (Mari) Mmmmm, the Regis Philbin monochromatic look Thought I'd just read that Rege's look is actually Chris Tarrant's and is a program spec.
~Lizza #865
Thanks for all your exciting and up to the minute reports Ladies, not quite the vanishing man--- yet!! Billy Zane, am I right in thinking he was in Femme Fatale and also his sister Lisa Zane? Or am I suffering from "reading too much totally irrelevant gossip in the dentist's waiting room" syndrome? Johnathan Firth is on the front of next week's Radio Times, I didn't recognise him. His hair seems much lighter. It is to publicise the Summer series/programmes on offer. I am afraid I didn't note what he is in, vainly looking for some DQ mention!! No prizes for guessing the outcome of that one.
~Lizza #866
Naturally I meant Jonathan! Something about his appearance in FMTMC demolishing with "one rapier" thrust the "only Colin Firth's younger brother syndrome." Or something akin to that (sorry Arami :)) You will have to go and check your local newsagents too!
~KarenR #867
Yes, Lizza, both Billy and Lisa Zane were in FF with Colin. Billy's claim to fame however is Titanic and the recent, and deservedly maligned, made-for-TV movie Cleopatra (Marc Anthony). ;-)
~EileenG #868
(Mari) I wonder if Billy Z. wore his hair for the occasion?;-) *snort* (Lizza) Billy Zane, am I right in thinking he was in Femme Fatale and also his sister Lisa Zane? 'course. Bet FF is listed on top of each of their resumes...(not!)
~Moon #869
Yes, Lizza Billy and Colin were in FF. Thanks for your reports! I am not crazy about a grey suit with a silver tie, very bland. Then again, I do not like suits with black shirts either. I hope we will more news on this premiere, and photos, snappies, anything! Also had to compete with another premiere of sorts. The Sex Pistols documentary (The Filth and the Fury) preemed at a theatre in Islington last night too. Probably not going to attract the same crowd. ;-D I confess I would go to both. Saw them live in San Francisco, have spoken to John Lydon aka Johnny Rotten. They were bang-on! ;-D
~mari #870
I wonder if Billy Z. and CF and buds. (They *did* spend some quality time together in that FF wading pool.;-) You generally don't see BZ's name on the list of premiere regulars. Lisa Z. still acts, but I understand she has a pretty good singing career going, mostly club dates. Lizza, good to hear from you. Bethan, I think this is very good coverage. Except for the very biggest films, most premieres don't rate a mention in the mainstream press here. Seems like there was good coverage last evening. Very smart to have Cherie Blair there--all these mentions are good exposure for the film.
~lizbeth54 #871
Yes, I agree...premieres rarely rate a mention, so this is good coverage. May also be something in my fave magazines....OK and Hello! :-) Lizza, I'm sure DQ is a dead cert for the Autumn. I hope it heads the BBC drama line-up for Autumn. I had time over Easter to watch it properly...IMHO it's very good indeed...excellent ensemble acting. And I understood every word!
~Tracy #872
Well done Aishling and Alison! I bought the London ES this evening, sure that there would be something of note therein...but no..it's only THE London paper after all! Will scour around for the colour supplements this week and post if any pics appear! Anyway decent pix or not and ES excepted, all this publicity for MLSF can only be good for ODB..no more wandering about in the darkness...it's limelight time!!
~catheyp #873
Thanks for all the news everyone. Wish I lived in London, I had no previous engagements on Tuesday night and could have easily attended. I thought Lisa Zane was Billy's wife at the time of FF and that they are no longer together??? Although now "sister" has been mentioned, they do look similar.
~KarenR #874
They are brother and sister.
~Arami #875
Lizza - why are you sorry about that Jonathan Firth remark? I don't get it... UK chums, please remind me when ES publishes its weekly magazine? Would you believe: I've had a copy of today's ES specially hunted for me - and all for nothing!!! Grrrrr!
~Brown32 #876
This fun bit thanks to an FOF, Martine: From the news clip at the MLSF premiere: Malcolm McDowell and Colin standing right next to each other pretending to be answering different reporters at the same time. Colin laughing and enjoying himself immensely. Commentary: The film's two male stars Colin and Malcolm McDowell enjoy working together: Malcolm: 'Except for Colin Firth who's a bit of a ... oh, no sorry ... Colin butts in: 'Yes. Malcolm McDowell is very very difficult to work with ... (They "see" each other) M : 'Oh Colin ... C : 'Daarling, how are you? M : '...brilliant actor ... one of the greatest actors of the moment - Colin Firth. C : 'Is he boring you about how it all started out?' CUT ************ Murph Actor of the moment... LOL!
~Brown32 #877
Mickie has the Radio Times Jon Firth cover at her web site: http://www.geocities.com/~byebar/radiot2.html Murph
~lafn #878
Radio Times Jon Firth cover at her web site: Thanks Murph...but which one is JF...the one standing with the high cheek-bones and straight bangs on his face or the one squatting with the soccer ball? I don't see any remote resemblance in either one to Colin.Sorry.
~Moon #879
Thanks Murph! Evelyn Jon is standing. In the smaller picture he looks very much like Marco Van Basten, one of the greatest soccer players ever. His comment on stage acting was very funny. I hope it does not rub off on big brother. one of the greatest actors of the moment - Colin Firth. V. cute!
~KJArt #880
Nice reporting of the preview (I hope they got the charity funds they wanted.) Now to await the more wiespread reviews. I seemed to recall a mixed batch when MLSF first came out so went back for a quick reviews of the late July entries reporting MLSF reviews. 10 were strongly for. 7 Strongly against 3 had mixed feelings. So Don't be surprised if you see some awful ones in the UK. Seems you either "get it" or you don't.
~patas #881
(Karen)the recent, and deservedly maligned, made-for-TV movie Cleopatra (Marc Anthony). ;-) With Penelope Cruz as Cleopatra, yes I saw it... Aaaarrgh! Terrible. Also saw Eyes Wide Shut on video this week... I confess mine were quite shut after about 1h45m... I saw nothing to warrant all the fuss. No story, do acting, no photography... The scenarios perhaps? :-(
~patas #882
I tried to use the url from your post, Murph, and was "forbidden entry"... What was that about?
~KarenR #883
Leonor Varela (Brazilian I think) was Cleo.
~Brown32 #884
Gi: Try this: http://www.geocities.com/jonfirthfan/radiot2.html Murph
~lizbeth54 #885
There's a small item on Colin in today's Daily Telegraph (in the Peterborough column) Interviewed at the premiere of "My Life So Far" Colin Firth had this to say about the first day of filming of "Bridget Jones' Diary": "Day 1 : 12 stone (reportedly), no cigarettes, alcohol units 2, no arguments or hitches, filming going well (fingers crossed)" 12 stone is 168 pounds, which I think is about 73 kg. He's still off the ciggies, but must have had a beer! I like the account of the premiere...you never see CF goofing around!
~lizbeth54 #886
Sorry-o. Karen's beaten me to it, and I've posted at the wrong place anyway. BTW no pic.
~patas #887
(KarenR)Leonor Varela (Brazilian I think) was Cleo. Oooops! Wrong actress. Thanks for the correction, Karen :-)
~KarenR #888
BTW no pic Good to know. I was going to ask before I went in search of the paper tomorrow.
~Tracy #889
(Arami) UK chums, please remind me when ES publishes its weekly magazine There are two main mags Arami, 'Hot Tickets' guide to Films, Theatre, Arts etc.etc... is free with the Evening Standard on Thursdays and the glossy ES (I think that's what it's called) which comes out each Friday. Todays HT has nothing in it but as MLSF is released 12th May it's probably worth seeking out next weeks. I'll be grabbing my ES copy tomorrow evening and will post anything of note! Hope this helps.
~Tracy #890
BTW have just accessed Liz's News & Updates page at http://hem.passagen.se/lmw/news.html Some nice snappies (courtesy Dolores) from SLOW there ...feast your eyes! Mmmmm :)~~~ Must rent that out...again, that guy at Blockbusters will be getting ideas!
~lizbeth54 #891
Good to see a few mentions for CF and MLSF!! I'm quite hopeful about the publicity for RV as well...probably more so than MLSF. There'll be a premiere, and I think JA's first film in, what, ten years? will attract quite a lot of attention. Also it's distributed by Atlantic Alliance, who distributed "Sunshine" and, I think, did well...they got ten theatres in London, and ten independents nationwide. Plus advertising. I'm sure they'll do the same for RV...maybe another premiere for CF by the end of May? And maybe a showing at the Curzon again? Most Brit film get zero publicity (nothing at all for "The Last September" with Michael Gambon (I think Mari asked about this) which opens this week) so Colin's doing okay. Tracy, Matthew *is* a feast for the eyes...SLOW needed a few female reviewers!!
~Lizza #892
Arami, just a wicked reminder that I was doing my best to quote my source :} Tracy, thanks for SLOW tip.BTW I went into Virgin the other day to enquire about SLOW retail release, but they had no date as yet. Anyone else further on with that? Look forward to ES providing some scrumptious pics for us to feast our eyes on. I had an email from a friend today commenting on the fact CF was on TV and expecting I had seen it (I hadn't) do we know if the clips were on BBC as well as GMTV?
~Arami #893
Thanks, Tracy. Hee-hee, Lizza: absolute accuracy is required only when quoting materials about ODB... :-)
~heide #894
(Bethan) 12 stone is 168 pounds, which I think is about 73 kg Yikes! He's a twig! Come on over to my house, honey, and I'll fatten you up. Seriously, that's a very good weight but I don't think another 5 or 6 pounds would hurt him a bit. I've posted at the wrong place anyway. I always come here first anyway. Please don't stop posting Colin stuff here too.
~patas #895
(Bethan) 12 stone is 168 pounds, which I think is about 73 kg (Heide)Yikes! He's a twig! Not really... He's not that much taller than my DH who weighs 68 kg at present :-)
~Allison2 #896
At last! A Colin is featured in the Times Saturday magazine. I am rushing off for the weekend so will probably not have an opportunity to scan anything but I am sure others will be able to. It is by Jasper Rees(ce?)again. Interesting points: they are living in Barnsbury, a smart part of Islington (I drive through there at least twice a week), replying to whether they will have children Colin says "it'll happen",they spend July and August in Umbria with Will. The featured quote is "I want to be well thought of. I want to be prosperous. I want to be respected. Lots of other stuff which I am afraid I don't have time to type. I am sure some one else in the UK will be able to!
~patas #897
Thanks, Allison, have a good weekend! UK ladies, you are warned :-)
~amw #898
Too late, Allison beat met to it. Have not seen it yet, my hubby just rang to tell me about the interview with masses and masses of photos so he says, will see it lunchtime. Will be pleased to scan it Karen. Apparently RV opens on the 23rd June. James says there are pictures he hasn't seen before. Will post more later. Good ole' Jasper.
~lizbeth54 #899
Allison has already alerted you all....he's on the front of the Times magazine, which was lying on the doormat this morning. I actually recognised the legs!! It's by Jasper Rees, who has interviewed him several times (must definitely be a buddy) and is very long, very perceptive...haven't had time to take it all in. One interesting story is how he and Livia went to see JE in TRT at the Donmar and found themselves sitting next to the Blairs. And he says that interviewers have focused too much on the so-called "misery" of his schooldays. He seems to spend a lot of time in LA with Will. Yes, please scan it, Ann....there's a lot to absorb! And the legs are great!
~lizbeth54 #900
Is it accessible online....or perhaps the magazine content isn't available?
~lizbeth54 #901
On MLSF ...."It's been quite a while since I've seen MLSF in any of its forms. I was attached to it because I enjoyed making it so much and I don't understand why people (harvey?0 felt it had to be repeatedly corrected. I don't mind saying that it wasn't broke in the first place. Partly what it suffers from is the randomness of a true story, because that's what it is" (Well said!) He apparently rents a house quite far out of LA when he sees Will and doesn't like the fear and insecurity of Hollywood..."you're better out of it really". Okay, over to you Ann....there's just too much in this article!
~Tracy #902
thanks for the Times tip, I don't usually buy it but as I live next door to the newsagent I'm nipping out now .....quite literally....Bye!
~Tracy #903
Ok chaps I'm back. I'm not promising anything spectacular here but here's one (hopefully) of the shots from the Times magazine! Hopefully if this works I'll post some more
~Brown32 #904
If any kind soul would mail me a copy of the magazine I would be forever in your debt! I will gladly pay for mailing costs. Murph
~Lizza #905
Gorgeous treat in store Ladies. His photo is actually above the TIMES logo on the front page. Will reach millions that way!! What can I add that is new? he is mentioned as being "scruffy", not a fur trimmed parka in sight either! Also the problems he and Livia experienced prior to their wedding and being pursued by press at high speed thro' an underpass in Rome, which he likens to the Diana experience. Poor man. Sadly not much on the quality of his recent stage work, only a mention in brackets. And in the final paragraph he is said to have a "wintry" smile. Luckily we know DIFFERENT!!! And first hand. Jasper has obviously never been in the front row of the Donmar when ODB takes a curtain call. Thank you Ann for your scanning offer. Mine continues to be terminally ill. Go to it everyone.
~Lizza #906
You may all have seen this already but another snippet was that ODB was recognised thro' his living room window while reading at home and the passer by said "Look there's Colin Firth". ODB then comments that incident could never have taken place in Hackney because awareness of P&P hadn't penetrated etc. Personally I would be straight off to buy some nets Colin!
~KarenR #907
Ann: Please do scan in any pictures we haven't seen; I'll post them. Tracy: Saw your test message on 61 and here. You can't post from your hard drive. Send pic to me and I'll post. they spend July and August in Umbria with Will. Someone had better keep her eyes open. "I want to be well thought of. I want to be prosperous. I want to be respected. He wants it all. Sounds like he wants to be Ralph Fiennes. ;-) And he says that interviewers have focused too much on the so-called "misery" of his schooldays Didn't I just say this? ;-) Keep it coming, ladies. This is fantastic! Thank you all.
~amw #908
Karen, James says it will be easier to scan the whole article, pictures and text, is that alright and Murph I shall be pleased to send you the hard copy.
~lizbeth54 #909
Tracy, I think his "wintry" smile is in response to Jasper's suggestion that if there's a sequel to BJD and they shoot the scene where Bridget interviews Colin Firth in Rome, then his brother Jonathan could play him. "There's a thought" he says with a wintry smile. Another tidbit...Jasper asks if he and Livia will be having children. He says "it will happen". "You don't want to be too old" I say. CF "No, I know. There does seem to be very little in between. You finally reach adulthood and you go through a time of being too young for everything - I'm notthinking about acting here. 'Oh, you've got plenty of time, it's all infront of you, you'll find that out later in life.' And then suddenly on a dime, you're past it, you're not young any more. There does seem to be a missing middle bit". Lots more like this....
~KarenR #910
How ever James wants to do it, Ann, is fine with me. then his brother Jonathan could play him. "There's a thought" he says with a wintry smile. Oooh, that doesn't sound good And then suddenly on a dime, you're past it, you're not young any more Melancholy kind of thought. Too old to play Shakespeare, too old to play other parts that he's wanted perhaps.
~amw #911
Another interesting bit about his age - "Agents have a way of reminding their clients of their age. Last year a fellow actor with whom he shares an agent told him about a casting he, too, would have espected to be up for. His agent told him it was for people in their twenties. Firth mentioned his actor friend was 35. "You're 38" the agent replied. "Suddenly I realised that it wasn't a lot between us, but I was on the other side of a fairly important barrier as far as casting is concerned." says Firth. "Then just to rub it in, my agent phoned me back about five minjutes later and said "They've offered it to your brother (Jonathan- 6years younger)". Wonder what role that was!
~heide #912
These tidbits are lovely, ladies, and most welcome since the Times Magazine has yet to be found online. Hope James didn't have any plans this Saturday. '-) (AnnW) James says there are pictures he hasn't seen before. What a love...even he is familiar with all of Colin's pics by now. (Bethan) he's on the front of the Times magazine, which was lying on the doormat this morning. I actually recognised the legs!! LOL!! Is he wearing fawn breeches? Good eye! As usual, Colin seems to be responding in his usual, wry, self effacing way. He sounds amused by the whole age thing. Healthy, happy and sound. Yeah!! Bring on more, please.
~Tracy #913
Here's another snippet: On the CF's determination to "wrong foot the audience to the extent that he sometimes even wrong-foots himself"..... 'One of my theories is that he actually courts anonymity in a project: that given a choice between two scripts, he will go for the one that makes it easier to cross Upper Street unrecognised. He does admit to a "tendency to withdraw". After P&P, big-time American TV beckoned, but he chose to do Fever Pitch. "There's a big part of this which is uncomplicated," he (CF) says. "I want to be well thought of. I want to make moneyfrom this. I want to be prosperous. Iwant to be respected. Like everybody else I want to have jobs that are inspiring and enjoyable amnd fun. With something as extraordinary as P&P and as unexpected as a cult attached to a character you've played, it is so diffucult to understand what it was that you did that wa apparently effective. But then you don't want to be percieved to be trying to catch lightning in a bottle twice. So I think I probably did consciously go in all sorts of different directions." '
~amw #914
Bethan, how on earth did you recognise the legs, they are covered in a greenish ill-fitting baggy pair of trousers, rounded off with an old pair of trainers (sneekers?).
~KarenR #915
Cult? :-(
~Tracy #916
Karen - I've had a very tentative stab at an impromptu web page at http://website.lineone.net/~turnip/ but if this doesn't work (and I'm sure I'll soon know about it) I'll send you the pics. BTW anyone else want a copy ofthe Times mag before I go out shopping?
~Lizza #917
Not that ill fitting Ann!!! They are combat style, Islington's urban chic? Also blue retro trainers. Go well with that parka! In the largest picture I thought he really looked a tad tired, around the eyes. That's where he differs from other "hearthrobs", no doubt they would have been calling in make-up to touch them up and cover any imperfections or dark circles. That's what I like about ODB, I am glad his kohl photoshoot days are over.
~Lizza #918
Nice one Tracy, thanks for doing that.
~KarenR #919
Tracy, I can only see two pics. The upper right and lower left. The other two have c:\ addresses. You need to upload those. But I sure do like that sexy, hand behind the back of head one, on the lower left. That is such a fashion shot type. *not complaining*
~Tracy #920
Any better now??
~Brown32 #921
~KarenR #922
Yes, much better. *yum yum* Now that I see the cover of the magazine, it's mind-boggling. Definitely think Colin has woken up and smelled the coffee insofar as his career is concerned. *thank goodness* :-) and thank you, Tracy!!
~kolin #923
Thank you all for all the snippets, this seems the best article we have seen in a long time. Can't wait for the whole thing. I can still see only two pictures Tracy. How do you get all four Karen? Vera
~Tracy #924
Glad I could help! Have managed to lay my hands (if only *sigh*) on two spare copies of THE MAG so if anyone wants a copy email me and it's first come first served! Must sign off now as am off out but will check back tomorrow
~KarenR #925
They are all there now. I have linked Tracy's page from The Bucket's What's New page and will reproduce the entire article when it is in my hot little hands. Try again, Vera, and hit Reload or Refresh as your cache memory thinks it already knows what is being displayed. Here's Tracy's page again: http://website.lineone.net/~turnip/
~CherylB #926
I could see all four photos! Thank you Tracy.
~kolin #927
Thank you Karen, I can see them all now. He is as gorgeous as ever.
~Lizza #928
The Times also lists MLSF in its Metro section as one of next week's releases, so they should give it plenty of (favourable) cover. I am hoping that tomorrow's Independent or Telegraph might feature Colin in view of today and the earlier Observer article. Yeah Karen, he's certainly caffeine bound now!
~heide #929
Marvelous speed, Tracy. Thank you and all of you ladies who are pulling all these pieces together for us. Love the cover shot! (Karen) Cult? :-( Surely not us! ;-) Cults never struck me as having much of a sense of humor. anyway I took that statement as more of a recognition that he had done something right with that role. (Lizza) That's what I like about ODB, I am glad his kohl photoshoot days are over. LOL, Lizza. Now it's wrinkles and all and still so delicious.
~lafn #930
I SAW them too. Thanks Tracy, Ann , Jasper.... everybody.. Who said ..."nothing ever happens on a weekend!!"
~lizbeth54 #931
Bethan, how on earth did you recognise the legs, they are covered in a greenish ill-fitting baggy pair of trousers, rounded off with an old pair of trainers (sneekers?). (Ann) It's the way he's standing! And as Lizza says, I don't think the trousers aare all that ill-fitting! Well done Tracy...you've got the photos up very quickly. That's where he differs from other "hearthrobs", no doubt they would have been calling in make-up to touch them up and cover any imperfections or dark circles. That's what I like about ODB, I am glad his kohl photoshoot days are over. No touch ups here...or even make up. No vanity. Another quote "There's an enormous cult of personal archaeology into our own misery now. They want to know where all the wounds lie. And increasingly I realise that I don't think all the explanations lie in unhappy things. Some of the explanations are not to be found at all, You are just as likely to be formed by the positive things, the peaceful things....." He also confirms that he and Helen acted out CF meets Bridget in Rome interview in "The Edge of Reason". "Helen stuck the recorder on and went into Bridget and I did Mr Darcy, a rather serious actor who just wants to get on with the interview". Must go do some gardening. Brilliant weather again for shooting BJD!!
~mari #932
Thanks everyone for the wonderful news and article quotes. This sounds like a wonderful interview, one of his best. And Tracy, many thanks for getting the pics up--great! Ann, how cute is it that your hubby knew which pics were new? LOL! Will look forward to reading the full article. The "cult" will have plenty to dissect.;-) Off to shave my head and burn incense.;-) ;-)
~Moon #933
Wonderful news at last! (Karen, my prayers have been answered!) Thanks Tracy for those pix, is he wearing balck shoes with light coloured laces? they spend July and August in Umbria with Will. Someone had better keep her eyes open. I am happy to hear this and will be looking out. ;-)
~CherylB #934
Is Will roughly the age of your litte Indiana Jones, Moon?
~Moon #935
My little Nicky turns 9 in July. They would be excellent playmates and Nicky could even teach Will some Italian, to his father's content. ;-) I also have an 11 year old so Will could have two playmates. (I wish!)
~CherylB #936
It could happen, Moon, remember one of your boys once played with Bette Midler's daughter.
~patas #937
(Bethan)Jasper's suggestion that if there's a sequel to BJD and they shoot the scene where Bridget interviews Colin Firth in Rome, then his brother Jonathan could play him. "There's a thought" he says with a wintry smile. Wintry, was he? I'd have been arctic! Ann, as Evelyn would say, your husband is a prince :-) Tracy, good work! Love those pics (even though I hate trainers). Outlived Darcymania, has he? Little do they know!;-)
~EileenG #938
Hurrah! Newsnewsnews! Thank you Allison, Bethan, Ann and Lizza for your timely reporting. Special thanks to Tracy for the prezzie! *samooch* (Karen) Now that I see the cover of the magazine, it's mind-boggling. Definitely think Colin has woken up and smelled the coffee insofar as his career is concerned. *thank goodness* :-) I couldn't agree more. IMO signing on for BJD is evidence of this line of thinking. He's also more relaxed about revealing personal details such as in which part of Islington he lives, his plans for more kiddies, etc. they spend July and August in Umbria with Will. (Karen) Someone had better keep her eyes open. *hee hee* Our Moonsleuth is on top of things. Looking forward to more reports this year!
~Lizza #939
We are counting on you Moon for some Umbrian anecdotes!
~Lizza #940
Agree with your comments on his relaxed attitude Eileen. It's great he can admit to feeling that it's "healthy" for him to be doing Mark Darcy. Is it something to do with approaching 40 do you think? You will see there is quite a bit on the subject of age in the interview, don't want too many spoilers!
~KarenR #941
Murph, I've deleted your address from this very public board. email would be better.
~Brown32 #942
Thanks, Karen. I should have thought. I will send it via e-mail. Two pals, Gill from the UK and Rai from the USA, have sent me scans and the copy of the Times article. Enjoy. I am still looking forward to the hard copy, Ann. It's a keeper! http://www.geocities.com/firthfan/timesmag.html Murph
~lafn #943
(Karen) Cult? :-( (Heide)Surely not us! ;-) Cults never struck me as having much of a sense of humor. Anyway I took that statement as more of a recognition that he had done something right with that role. Nope...it's a cult...and I am happy to be counted amongst them;-) (Mari)Off to shave my head and burn incense.;-) ;-) And bring on the saffron robes;-)
~KarenR #944
Have reproduced the article from Ann and James' scans. Here you go: http://www.spring.net/karenr/articles/times060500.html
~Elena #945
Thanks Murph, Karen, Tracy. Great Work! I really like this article, it�s one of the very few good ones I�ve read about him. Treats Colin normally, with no special attitude. And Colin responds to this by sounding very relaxed, even commenting the top private child question!! That�s surprising. "It�ll happen".....sounds almost like it was already happening. Candid looking pics too, carefully designed as candid of course but very well done. Colin is a Star again, almost feels strange.
~KarenR #946
Another newish pic that most of us (outside the UK) haven't seen from the SLOW video back cover:
~Arami #947
Hmmm... I am happy to see a great new interview and pics, of course... and yet there's something bugging me... Why is he worried about crossing a crowded street (what happened to the neutral face?) and at the same time pinpoints the area of his London residence to virtually a handful of streets...? He is very open about the fact that (apparently) he lives in a house the front room of which can be easily seen from the pavement (sidewalk) - and then almost naively ponders the "oh, look, there's Colin Firth" syndrome... he's private and yet sort of defiantly (flippantly?) challenging... teasing... as if inviting those paparazzi to take their positions outside yet again?
~KarenR #948
Nasty piece from Richard Brooks' Biteback column in The Sunday Times: David Puttnam's final movie, My Life So Far (not his life, but the childhood of the former Granada bigwig Sir Denis Forman), opens this week. I saw it in Cannes a year ago. It was then released in America, where it disappointed critics and audiences. [huh???] Puttnam has done a lot for the British film industry over the years, but he must also take his share of the blame for being one of the key figures in setting up the now discredited Arts Council film lottery. My Life So Far, directed by Hugh Hudson, was made with cash from the giant Miramax and lottery support from the Scottish Arts Council. Puttnam, I hasten to add, was no longer connected with the lottery when he got his film dosh. Yet I doubt very much if the new Film Council, which is taking over the distribution of lottery loot to film-makers, would give anything to My Life So Far. The movie is unlikely to be commercially successful nor does it fit the criteria for the New Cinema fund. Puttnam's old mate Alan Parker, the Film Council chairman, has rightly laid down much stricter guidelines. "No money for movies which really are made for television," says Parker.
~KarenR #949
From the Sunday Herald by Wendy Ide: An altogether more rewarding (and certainly less shrill) picture is Hugh Hudson's gentle coming-of-age drama My Life So Far. Set in the 1920s and narrated by 10-year-old Fraser Pettigrew, the film tells of a charmed childhood in an idyllic ancestral Scottish estate. Along with numerous brothers and sisters (including Kelly MacDonald battling against a very unflattering wig), Fraser shares his home with his beautiful mother (Mary Elizabeth Mastrantonio), his indomitable grandma (Rosemary Harris) and his charismatic, jazz-hating inventor father Edward (Colin Firth), the pioneer who discovered the many and varied uses for spagnum moss. Their lives are disrupted when Fraser's wealthy uncle (Malcolm McDowell) comes to stay, bringing with him an exotic stranger who captivates the entire family, particularly Fraser and his father. The film is based on a memoir by television executive Sir Dennis Forman and, perhaps because of this, has a tendency to be a little episodic - an inconclusive string of events rather than a linear story. However, it is an engaging enough picture, if rather twee, and could be recommended with impunity to mothers, grandmothers and elderly female relatives with delicate nerves.
~NitaE #950
Thanks, Karen, for that wonderfull article. There are some very funny parts in it. I like that bit where HF followed him on the set of Fever Pitch!
~lizbeth54 #951
I saw it in Cannes a year ago. It was then released in America, where it disappointed critics and audiences. I thought American audiences liked it and some of the reviews were very good, but that's the sort of inaccurate comment that kills success. Ditto, the sort of comments that are unfairly attached to SLOW. The movie is unlikely to be commercially successful nor does it fit the criteria for the New Cinema It's difficult to be commercially successful when the movie is only shown in one theatre in London! MLSF is going to have a very very mixed reception...love it, hate it.(Also opens the same week as "Gladiator" which will get all the raves) Infact "mothers and grandmothers " form about 40% of the population, but in movie making terms it's the 40% that's always ignored and no longer matter. MLSF is also, in British terms, unfashionable. It's not about low-life junkies, gang wars, it doesn't feature puerile humour or explicit sex. I'm also giving up on how you measure "commercial success"!...My 16 year old son went to see (peer group pressure) "Kevin and Perry go large" which has taken �2.5 million at the weekend, is dubbed a success and a sequel is already planned. He left in the middle and said it was boring and embarassingly stupid. But he'd already boosted the Box Office takings! I was also reading about the new version of "Anna Karenina"...we're again promised a very modern take on this- "will offend purists" "deliberately perverse casting"- which will include very explicit sex ecenes and full frontal nudity. Yippee!! I think it's difficult for someone like Colin...maybe that's why he's conscious about the age thing...he must have very little in common with twenty something film makers. Bur increasingly it's their agenda we're seeing. Maybe it's time the ignored 40% started fighting back! Enough of this ranting!!! I just hope CF goes on doing the sort of work he's doing...a good mix of theatre, quality TV and "non-commercial" film!! As do most good actors. Why is he worried about crossing a crowded street (what happened to the neutral face?) and at the same time pinpoints the area of his London residence to virtually a handful of streets...? He is very open about the fact that (apparently) he lives in a house the frontroom of which can be easily seen from the pavement (sidewalk) (Arami) Yes, that struck me too! Barnsbury is a very small area, and if he lives in a house that literally opens onto the pavement, he must live in one of those high early Victorian/Georgian terraces. But I don't think he'll be tabloid fodder any more...they don't go for boringly happily married men who practice good works!
~Arami #952
one of those high early Victorian/Georgian terraces Some of those houses are really nice. The ground (is it called first in America?) floors can be quite high, sometimes built over a basement, but you can still take a peek into the front room. A net curtain would definitely be advisable. You may remember from a previous interview last year, just after he bought the house, that there is another reception room upstairs - which Colin described as "the room where the music is" (where he was hurt putting up the speakers). That points to a typical Georgian-early Victorian style of living accomodation. I don't think he'll be tabloid fodder any more...they don't go for boringly happily married men LOL, do you think he may have got married just to get them off his back? They go for scandalous gossip, though. Paul McGann is said to have been a victim of such maliciously generated gossip accusing him of leaving his wife to live with Catherine Zeta Jones after they (having worked together) have been spotted exchanging a friendly peck. The McGanns followed this up with an official complaint of harrassment. There is always a gossip-monger waiting to catch a "celebrity" put his or her foot wrong, whether inadvertently or for real. And what about mentally imbalanced, manic-obssessive stalkers? They tend to attempt stupid and sometimes criminal things - and that is most worrying.
~lafn #953
That's where he differs from other "hearthrobs", no doubt they would have been calling in make-up to touch them up and cover any imperfections or dark circles. That's what I like about ODB, I am glad his kohl photoshoot days are over. No touch ups here...or even make up. No vanity. I have to agree that slouched in his chair in scruffy attire indicative of this "ordinary Joe" lifestyle he looks gorgeous...and we all love him lack of vanity. But I wonder if a female (like, say Jennifer) were to appear uncoiffed, with disheveled hair , non-posh attire, no make-up leaning on on a table...if we would be as complimentary(a regular Josephine?)...nay even uncritical. Sexism lives! Of course, in actuality this never happened;-) ;-)
~KarenR #954
(Evelyn) But I wonder if a female (like, say Jennifer) were to appear uncoiffed, with disheveled hair , non-posh attire, no make-up leaning on on a table...if we would be as complimentary...nay even uncritical...Ofcourse, in actuality this never happened;-) ;-) Touche (imagine there's an accent). LOL, Evelyn, of course something like this never happened! But that's life in our sexist world. Gwynnie wears something totally hideous and inappropriate to the Golden Globes, the world comes down on her. Angelina Jolie decides she wants to look like Morticia Addams the Oscars, same thing. How many people remember that Mr. So & So didn't wear a tie? That's life. BTW, the Herald is a Scottish paper and if its critic thinks the movie is for boring old ladies, then what hope is there?
~mari #955
I, too, am surprised that they revealed his neighborhood. Maybe he didn't know the writer was going to put that in the article? It's not the tabloids that cause concern for a conservative-living guy such as him, it's the nut cases. Was also surprised at his answer to having a baby--could be one is already on the way, as I doubt he would have answered the way he did otherwise. (Bethan) MLSF is going to have a very very mixed reception...love it, hate it.(Also opens the same week as "Gladiator" which will get all the raves) It's interesting that a lot of the critics here who liked MLSF (NY and LA Times, Roger Ebert) have slammed Gladiator, and vice versa (People, EW). The comment about it disappointing critics and audiences here is innaccurate, as Bethan and Karen have said. My advice is resign youself to the fact that the reviews will be mixed, and just go out and have a good time watching the film!:-) BTW, I saw Gladiator last night--very mediocre--over-hyped, overwrought, and overlong. Also, Hugh Hudson's latest, I Dreamed Of Africa, just opened here as well and the reviews have been universally bad. Thank goodness the ones for MLSF were much better.
~patas #956
I never thought anybody would think of making a "Roman" film nowadays... Does anyone still watch Ben Hur over the holidays? Guess it shows how wrong I can be... (And I'm a fan of Julius Caesar...)
~KarenR #957
(Mari) a lot of the critics here who liked MLSF (NY and LA Times, Roger Ebert) have slammed Gladiator No kidding!! Watched Roger go ballistic yesterday as Joyce Kulhawik (from Boston TV) pronounced Gladiator one of the year's best and stated that she expected it to receive numerous Oscar nominations. I think, out of camera range, the entire crew was holding Roger back. ;-)
~Moon #958
Gladiator was my DHs must see film ever since he knew about it. Saw it opening day and he did not like it at all, he agrees with Ebert. Cheryl posted a fantastically funny review of it on the Russell Crowe topic. I invite everyone to read it. But I wonder if a female (like, say Jennifer) were to appear uncoiffed, with disheveled hair , non-posh attire, no make-up leaning on on a table...if we would be as complimentary(a regular Josephine?)...nay even uncritical. Sexism lives! Of course, in actuality this never happened;-) ;-) LOL, Evelyn! I may be alone here, but I do not like what he is wearing. I am not a fan of the Ordinary Joe (or Josephine) look and black sneakers (or worse shoes), with white laces is a total affectation. I remain consistent. I am glad he is finally smelling the coffee, as Karen has said. :-) CF is not known in Italy, and I was surprised to hear that they were chased by paparazzi in Rome. As far as I know, there are no pictures of them in Rome before their marriage. So where are those pictures?
~lizbeth54 #959
The movie mags that slated MLSF all gave "Gladiator" a 5 stars rating... and Anne Billson of the Sunday Telegraph (whose reviews I dread reading) has picked it out as the main event of next week. But then reviews are very subjective, as we know!
~Brown32 #960
I too saw Gladiator yesterday, and agree with Mari's assessment. Russell is great in the part, but the film disappointed me. I reviewed it for a few friends, Mari among them. I'll have to find that Crowe place at Spring. On CF's picturs and garb. There is probably a double standard as far as men and women's clothes are concerned, but I haven't seen him look as sexy as he does in that cover shot for a long time - legs long and lean and apart, trainers on feet, hand on face. I like the slightly weathered face in the closeups too. 40 was a great year for me, and it will be for him too. I guarantee it. Murph
~patas #961
(from the interview)...If he�s Mark Darcy, he can�t be Colin Firth too. They could get his brother to play him, I suggest. �There's a thought,� he says with a wintry smile. �Or you might have to change the character of the actor. Someone the Americans believe is a credible sex symbol.� Ridiculous! Doesn't he know? ;-)
~KarenR #962
(Moon) I am glad he is finally smelling the coffee I just hope it isn't too late. I for one am not resigned to watch Colin move into roles usually associated with Robert Young yet! ;-) That last comment in the article was particularly painful:"Or you might have to change the character of the actor. Someone the Americans believe is a credible sex symbol."This tells me that Colin has heard this quite a bit in Hollywood from agents, casting directors, whoever. The word in Hollywood is that Colin is not a sex symbol. All we can hope for is that BJD reverses that impression. That Colin will be viewed as not only a viable English leading man (to compete for roles with the only other two - HG and RF). This role can get him the recognition for being both a sexy leading man type and more importantly a fine actor on a par with that other guy. ;-)
~LisaJH #963
Dear Fellow Defenders of the Firth, Like the swallows returning to San Juan Capistrano in the spring, I find myself with an instinctual need to return to Drool (of The Spring). I fear you may not remember me, or worse, do not want to remember me. I hope neither is the case, and that I may roost here from time to time. I left Drool early last year due to the fact that my migraines had worsened to the point that I could not take the glare of my PC's screen. The recent warmer weather has given me a reprieve of sorts, so here I am. Since I last posted, I have entered a second, deeper level of Firthaholism. Having dissected and memorized P&P2, and the more readily available movies (COF, TEP, SIL, etc.), I decided it was time to move into the realm of collector. I found an out of print video purveyor in the Midwest and have purchased AC (newly minted, fresh-faced Firth) and AITC (Am I crazy, or did I see that years ago on Masterpiece Theater?). I am working on obtaining WOF (this is my idea of heaven: POT and CF in the same movie) and a few others. I have also acquired FP (loved it and cannot get that La's song out of my mind-I fear I need to be deprogrammed), AZ (very unnerving: CF as Norman Bates), FF (see, I am loyal) and rented MLSF (wonderful film, but terribly expensive). Since I already have TD (thanks to the previous Drool film discussion) and V (courtesy of Encore) as well, I can now watch hours of ODB, and have my own CF film festival. The only problem is no one in my immediate circle gets it and I watch these films a one. Sound familiar? Having familiarized myself now with a larger portion of his body of work (and a larger portion of his body :)), I am reminded of a CF quote: "We all need stories. They take us into what seems to be a completely foreign and alien universe and then at the end, we find it's not as foreign as we thought. We've opened up something new about ourselves. I love stories," he adds. "Always have." I am currently re-reading (for a creative writing course I am taking this summer) Joseph Campbell's The Hero With a Thousand Faces, and realized that this is Colin the actor! It occurred to me that the stories/roles he selects (the hero/antihero: two sides of the same coin) are mythic in their appeal (no matter how obscure they may appear to others) as they reveal truths about one's self and the human condition. No wonder his movies are so satisfying to watch. Hollywood will never understand this, as it is driven by box office more than quality or creativity. Whoops, got a little too serious! Sorry-he stirs up all sorts of passion in me. As I told someone recently, I am absolutely over the moon that CF accepted the role of MD in BJD, and that he saw the humor in it. And those wonderful pictures of him accompanying the new article-is it my imagination or is his hair Darcy black (a new Clairol hair color?)again? Well, now that I have blathered on, let me add that I have missed you all and am thrilled there is so much news.
~LisaJH #964
Oops, was trying to say that I watch these films alone, not "a one."
~Lizza #965
Welcome back Lisa. Good to have you "roosting" here. A perch more friendly could not be found for any Firthfan. You have timed your migration perfectly, lots going on. What did you think of The Times interview yesterday?
~Brown32 #966
"When he has Will in the summer hols, they go to Umbria, ruling out those British films shot on location at the height of July and August." *************** Does this rule out Armadillo, do you think? And I never knew he lived in New Orleans as a child. Is that a missprint? Murph
~KarenR #967
Always good to seeing a returning swallow ;-) As ever, we are here. Hopefully, migraines won't take you away again. BTW, WOF shows up all the time on eBay and doesn't go for an arm and a leg anymore. Like you, Lisa, I too read something new and see if I think it's a Colin role. Some fit; some don't. Like Flashman...it didn't fit. Having read about 6 of the novels thus far because they are v. well done and entertaining for a history major (so far the one about the Indian Mutiny is the best IMO), I wouldn't want Colin to play the role for anything. Am going to read that Butterball book in the off chance that this project goes anywhere during months Colin has the time to work. ;-) Armadillo (by William Boyd) is a perfect fit. Lisa, go check that one out. I feel certain it will be made...once there is a script. I expect New Orleans is a misprint. BTW, does anyone know if Jasper Rees is American or went to school in the US? Several things popped out at me. First, he kept referring to Colin's sweater (not jumper). While there were the "ou" and "s" spellings, I've never seen The Times do American punctuation.
~Arami #968
(Moon) I was surprised to hear that they were chased by paparazzi in Rome. As far as I know, there are no pictures of them in Rome before their marriage. There was at least one published in England: they were snapped through the windscreen of Livia's tiny car, Livia wearing glasses, getting ready to drive, Colin struggling to fit his long legs under his chin (well, almost), both gloomy and pretending nothing was happening. Looks like an evening. I guess they were then followed by the same reporter trying to see where they were going (for a pasta and mineral water meal, apparently, and then back to her parents' home before 11 p.m.) - and to him it must have seemed like being chased by paparazzi. Fair enough: I would be very annoyed, too.
~KJArt #969
cult: (L. cultus, care, adoration) 5.b) a usu. small circle of persons united by devotion or allegiance to an artistic or intellectual movement or figure. Seen Topic 112 lately??
~KarenR #970
The problem with dictionary definitions is that they rarely reflect current usage. Tell me where you've heard *cult* used recently to mean something other than extremists or loonies? ;-)
~KarenR #971
Well...Relative Values did make it to Cannes, except only for the film market. This little mention in Variety/Reuters: While the current market lineup may lack high-gloss, high-anticipation entries, there are still plenty of titles to fill acquisition execs' shopping lists. Among them are Franchise Pictures' ``Auggie Rose,'' starring Jeff Goldblum and Anne Heche; Lakeshore Intl.'s ``Delivering Milo,'' starring Bridget Fonda; Nu Image/Millennium Films' ``How to Kill Your Neighbor's Dog,'' starring Robin Wright Penn and Kenneth Branagh; and ``Anasazi Moon,'' starring Gary Oldman and Skeet Ulrich. Also on the docket are ``Luckytown,'' starring James Caan and Kirsten Dunst, from A-Plus Entertainment; IAC Film's ''Shiner,'' starring Michael Caine; and Overseas Filmgroup's ''Relative Values,'' starring Julie Andrews and Jeanne Tripplehorn.
~Elena #972
(Karen)Tell me where you've heard *cult* used recently to mean something other than extremists or loonies? The word cult is a perfectly neutral and often even a positive definition in Finnish, just meaning what KJ pointed out, small circle of persons united by devotion or allegiance to an artistic or intellectual movement or figure. I guess in America the word tends to be more negatively associated but I don�t think Colin used the word in the loonie sense :-) (Karen)That last comment in the article was particularly painful: "Or you might have to change the character of the actor. Someone the Americans believe is a credible sex symbol." Funnily I understood this just as typical humour and irony of his. And I wonder if Colin would really want to be a "credible sex symbol" anyway.
~mari #973
(Karen) Well...Relative Values did make it to Cannes, except only for the film market. That's ok, at least they're marketing it for the rest of the world. I'm sure it will be picked up (she says confidently). This is from the UK site Teletext: Relative Values This star-packed film adaption of Noel Coward's play sees the return of Julie Andrews, ably supported by Colin Firth and Stephen Fry among others. The characteristic tippy-toed ennui of the stage play comes to the screen. Released June 9
~KarenR #974
You're right, Elena, cult may not have the fanatical meaning in England as it typically does in the US, and someone from England would have to comment on that. However, I didn't read anything humorous into that last line. Colin may have been sarcastically reiterating what's been told to him.
~MarkG #975
To agree with Elena ... although "cult" here can mean a loony quasi-religious group, it is more commonly used in the media for something that commands a devoted minority following, e.g. BBC2 recently ran a series of "cult films", which may well have included (I forget) The Rocky Horror Show, Planet of the Apes, Pulp Fiction etc. Withnail & I was recently voted Cult Film of the Century by (wait for it) readers of the Times Saturday Magazine. So I think it wasn't a rueful description, just accurate. If anybody wants my copy of the magazine, e-mail me your address. Otherwise it goes in the trash.
~lafn #976
You know what they say: "If it walks like a cult and talks like a cult....." evelyn Charter Member Colin-Cult 1996
~KarenR #977
From an article on Kevin McKidd in the May 6 Express about Anna Karenina: The costume drama sex scene has become such a clich. We were determined not to be... I'm not sure. Tasteful?" I nod. Wait. McKidd finally crumbles: "What are people saying?" I tell him that people are saying he's the new Colin Firth. The moan is immediate: "Oh God. Look at me. I was out of work for six months last year. I worked as a bicycle courier. Hell, I had my agent beg me a role on an American mini-series called Leprechauns. There was rent to pay... Do I resemble Colin Firth in any way?" Actually, no. Firth is an impeccably smooth and English presence; McKidd is rougher-grained. If Firth had played Vronsky he'd have been a dreamboat. McKidd makes him a compelling bastard who betrays himself in the very moment he betrays his beloved. One is RADA, the other is... radar.[...] This modern and relevant Anna Karenina may confound purists who like their classic novels semi-comatose, but the production will undoubtedly raise his profile. "Really? Now that I'm the new Colin Firth? I'm not falling for that build-up. There are far more important things." Name one. "Easy. I'll be a father in a few weeks' time. Mind you, a rave review is never anything to be casual about."
~lafn #978
"Really? Now that I'm the new Colin Firth?" LOL...I've seen Kevin McKidd...Colin doesn't have to worry....
~lafn #979
Sorry
~Allison2 #980
There is an article on Hugh Hudson in today's Evening Standard. I can't find it in the online version, so after supper I'll try and scan it to somebody - Karen?
~EileenG #981
I agree with Mark, who agrees with Elena. ... although "cult" here can mean a loony quasi-religious group, it is more commonly used in the media for something that commands a devoted minority following C'mon, Darcymania *is* a cult. You don't hear of too many children, pets, etc. named 'Courtois', do you? ;-D You're right about the MLSF reviews, Bethan. It's best not to pay any attention and see it yourself at least twice. You'll love it.
~patas #982
~mari #983
They must have just put it up, Allison. Thanks for the alert. So far, so good for Hudson -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- My Life So Far Dir: Hugh Hudson. --------------------------------------------------------- by Jasper Rees Is Hugh Hudson on the comeback trail? He has two movies opening this month, one in America called I Dreamed of Africa, and one over here, which may as well be called I Dreamed of Scotland. In fact it's trading as My Life So Far, and is based on Son of Adam, Denis Forman's memoir of a Scottish childhood before the First World War. Like all Hudson's best films, it has tartan blood coursing through its veins. Remember those young chaps in their singlets in Chariots of Fire, jogging slow-mo through the surf to the synth of Vangelis? That was shot on the sands of St Andrews, although it was meant to be Broadstairs. And how about Greystoke? The bit with the female acrobats and dancers in monkey suits was filmed in Africa, but the bit with Ralph Richardson and Elgar at their hammiest was shot in Floors Castle in the Borders, near where, as a child, Hudson summered with an aunt. My Life So Far, a gentle child's eye view comedy, is set in a rambling house large enough for Colin Firth, as batty inventor Fraser Pettigrew, to shelter his innumerable brood of ginger kiddies. "There's something about Scotland which is very very calming," Hudson states. "Each film I've made there has worked. This film works, I think. I don't know if it will work in a financial sense. It's not the greatest measure of longevity. Chariots is a film which has lasted. Greystoke seems to have lasted. And I think this will. It's got a lot of joy in it." Which may be more than can be said for Hudson, whose two new films are a reminder that his career has not turned out quite as it might have done. They found the house at the top end of Loch Fyne, near the famous oyster emporium, where cast and crew ate often. "It was too far away for everybody to come and annoy us," says Hudson. "Money people. Obviously David came." David is Lord Puttnam, who got Hudson his first gig as a film director, after a long apprenticeship in documentaries, with Chariots of Fire. Somehow they never worked together again. Hudson went on to make Greystoke, where he discovered Christopher Lambert ("God knows what's happened to him. Threw it away. It's easy to do that") and famously used Glenn Close to mask Andie Macdowell's Southern drawl ("it jolted her into doing something about her acting. She's not bad now. She's no longer, I think, a movie star but she did quite well.") Puttnam, meanwhile, stayed in Scotland to make Local Hero with Bill Forsyth. I wonder whether there's a touch of the spurned wife in Hudson's little tirade against Forsyth, who he says tried to thwart My Life So Far's bid for Scottish funding. "This film was up for Lottery money and Bill Forsyth was on the board and he tried to divert money away from it. He's a mean-spirited man, I discovered on this film. He hangs himself by his own rope, Mr Forsyth, saying stupid things, like he has a monopoly on the Scottish film industry. Scotland is a free country. Anyone can go and film there." On Chariots' wings, producer and director both went to America and came unstuck: Puttnam as studio head of Columbia, Hudson with the epic catastrophe Revolution. He didn't make another movie for eight years, although he still thinks Revolution was unjustly treated. "I think it's my most daring film, I have to say. I think it's got a real quality about it. It's a very imperfect film. The script wasn't good enough, and I should have had longer to finish the film off. It could have been better structured. But it's a really unusual film. I was made a scapegoat. Unfairly, I would say. We begged Goldcrest to give us more time to make it more cohesive. We weren't allowed to." He'd love a shot at a director's cut. "Not going to, though. If I make an enormous blockbuster film then I could." A propos, he lives in hope that one day someone will finance Nostromo, the adaptation of Joseph Conrad's novel that he wanted to direct after David Lean's death. (He thought the BBC version awful - even the BBC directors branded it an expensive flop). After Revolution, he threw himself into ads and party political broadcasts. The commercial he shot for BA, at the time the most expensive ever made, is his most bombastic work, with the Hudson signature of a brilliant musical soundtrack. Then there was "Kinnock: The Movie", plus its several sequels, which were derided by the Right-wing Press. "Of course they would. Why wouldn't they? They were jealous. Thatcher was jealous. She wanted one of those films. They made a difference. They were attacked as meretricious and manipulative, but what is film-making anyway but that?" Despite the thin white beard and Trotskyite specs, Hudson bears a passing resemblance to Denis Law. You'd never guess that he was born four years before the war. Realistically, though, at his age opportunities to make blockbusters are few and far between. My Life So Far has been and gone without setting America on fire. I Dreamed of Africa, otherwise known as Into Africa, is about a woman overcoming troubles in Kenya starring Kim Basinger in a nonfemme fatale role. "It's a women's movie," he says. It augurs ill that My Life So Far was ready for release a year ago. But then it augurs well that Chariots also kicked its heels for 18 months before release, and it won four Oscars. Hudson was nominated as best director. As he listened to Colin Welland make his famous "The British are coming" speech he thought: "Oh Christ, Colin, why do you say these things? You talk too much. You're too verbose, Colin, too verbose!" But Hudson never got the chance to make his own speech. Warren Beatty won, although no one watches Reds any more. Did he mind not winning? "Well yeah, in a way. I felt it was unjustified. I suppose they don't like to give a first-time director the thing, but they did this year to Mr Mendes. Times have changed."
~Brown32 #984
An FOF spotted a new RV trailer at Empire OnLine. They say it is an exclusive. Colin is in it, but the quality is poor on my computer. http://www.virtuetv.com/film/empiretrailers/comingsoon.html Murph
~EileenG #985
Psst, Jasper! Love your wonderful CF interviews, but it's time to brush up the accuracy a bit. 1. It was St. Louis, not New Orleans. 2. Edward Pettigrew, not Fraser. Fraser's the kid.
~lizbeth54 #986
Psst, psst Jasper ....thought you were Colin's mate! My Life So Far has been and gone without setting America on fire Difficult with 20 prints It augurs ill that My Life So Far was ready for release a year ago. Blame Miramax/BVI! Hugh Hudson sounds rather curmudgeonly (is that the word?) If Firth had played Vronsky he'd have been a dreamboat. Oh, too true! But alas , this we will never see. The trend now seems to deglamourise "costume drama", also to emphasise the sexually explicit. I'm not sure if this works though. Apparently, when "Madame Bovary" was shown here, it started with an audience of 3 million and this dropped to 2 million after the explicit encounter was shown. Either a large proportion were only watching it for the raunchy bit and then lost interest, or the more conservative "costume drama" audience didn't like the adaptation. Or a mix of the two! Directors don't seem to realise the difference between erotic (P&P was erotic) and so-called "sexy" (can be an audience turn off).
~EileenG #987
Thanks for the link to the updated RV trailer, Murph. I found the picture quality of this one to be better than the first, but the sound is not the greatest (couldn't understand most of CF's lines). Was that ODB with the ciggie 'tween his lips (unlit, perhaps ;-))? Ladies, there is no doubt in my mind--Peter's as you-know-what as a three dollar bill. Watch his mannerisms, the way he moves his hands. June 9th's just around the corner--lucky British Firthfans!
~mari #988
MLSF review from Popcorn--not too bad. It appears it's showing in one cinema already (might be Scotland). Good things very rarely come from films that have sat on shelves for several years gathering dust. The strange thing about the delay in releasing 'My Life So Far', though, is that there's nothing seriously wrong with it and the film's already been released in America. Robbie Norman makes a fantastic screen debut as the ten-year-old Fraser Pettigrew. Fraser's 1920s life has been nothing but idyllic thanks to the gorgeous Scottish estate where his parents - inventor Edward (Colin Firth) and loving mum Moira (Mary Elizabeth Mastrantonio) - live and the hero-worship status he affords his father. Things change, however, when Fraser's uncle (Malcolm McDowell) comes to stay, bringing his much younger French fianc�e (Irene Jacob) with him. Both Fraser and his father fall for Heloise, but while son tries to interpret his feelings by going to the attic and reading his late grandfather's secret stash of Victorian porn, father tries a more direct approach. In this insular world, it doesn't take a genius to guess Edward's feelings and slowly the family find themselves teetering on the brink of collapse. It's Norman's performance that prevents this film from becoming utterly mundane. The youngster's innocent questions about prostitution and fellatio (which he pronounces with a hard t) are stand-out moments in this memoir, based on the childhood memories of TV executive Denis Forman. Forgiving the fact that Firth and Mastrantonio can't decide if they're Scottish or not - and that McDowell doesn't even bother trying - 'My Life So Far' is essentially a gentle, slightly whimsical look at the dangers of outsiders intruding on family life in a picture-postcard land. review by Lisa Andrews
~Moon #989
Forgiving the fact that Firth and Mastrantonio can't decide if they're Scottish or not - and that McDowell doesn't even bother trying There is something none of the other reviewers picked up on. ;-) Thanks, Murph! I still have a hard time understanding everyone but Julie and SF. Can not wait to see it. I hope it is still playing when I am in London in July.
~lafn #990
Forgiving the fact that Firth and Mastrantonio can't decide if they're Scottish or not - and that McDowell doesn't even bother trying - Are they talking about the Scottish accents? I thought they were authentic. Hey, I could understand them.I thought it was charming. Waddaya want accents like DQ? Definitely, not charming...
~lizbeth54 #991
MLSF review from Popcorn--not too bad. It appears it's showing in one cinema already (might be Scotland). One cinema? I have a very suspicious mind but I can't help wondering if this is what the BVI rep meant by "opening all over Scotland". (Well, he got everything else wrong!) Good things very rarely come from films that have sat on shelves for several years gathering dust. The strange thing about the delay in releasing 'My Life So Far', though, is that there's nothing seriously wrong with it.... Very strange...almost deliberately trying to stack the cards against the film's success. Any film that's been on the shelf tends to get hostile reviews (if it was good, it would have been released etc) This film could easily have been released a year ago...especially if it's only being shown on two screens (hope I'm wrong about this!). The premiere was great news, and very high profile, and I think the quality press reviews may be kindly....but there's something that doesn't quite add up here. Suspicious mind at work!
~KJArt #992
Don't get me wrong...I think Jasper Rees produces better articles on CF than anyone, but... (Jasper Rees) ' at a certain point he will have to cross Upper Street at its most pell-mell. He doesn't seem to welcome the prospect.' (Arami) Why is he worried about crossing a crowded street (what happened to the neutral face?) and at the same time pinpoints the area of his London residence to virtually a handful of streets...? Arami, I think Jasper's weaknesses are beginning to show...Colin never declared that he was worried. I think the worry is in Jasper's imagination... (Jasper) 'Again I could be guessing. I've interviewed Firth more times than he probably cares to remember, and a frequent theme of the conversation is his disputatiousness.I posit some theory about him, and the next time we meet he (politely) remembers disagreeing with it when he read it'. Jasper is enamoured of "positing" and it really shows in his language, as he hedges when he's simply inventing what he wants to believe about Colin. (Jasper) I guess that Firth's fear of Upper Street in rush hour is based ... Firth says that, before the lights went down, he could just feel the eyes of the entire audience waiting for the two parties to acknowledge each other. You sense that he would happily have curled up and died. He hedges, and then proceeds to make bold expository statements as if these things were absolutely true ... and the reader tends to absolutely believe this. (Jasper)One of my theories is that he actually courts anonymity in a project; that given a choice between two scripts, he will go for the one that makes it easier to cross Upper Street unrecognised. Does this jibe with the Colin you met at the Donmar? Frightened of getting into a crowd, worried how to deal with someone who might recognize him? That his fear of becoming recognized is a genuine criterion in the projects he chooses ... That doesn't sound like the reports that you sent of him to us. Sometimes Jasper doesn't even bother to hedge ... (Jasper) One of the features of Firth's career is his restless determination to wrongfoot his audience (...whatever that means...) Is it a surety that CF is perverse for the sake of being perverse ...? So Jasper gets particularly smug when one of his shots is admitted to hit home: (Jasper) But he agrees with my hunch that interviewers have picked up this particular ball and run a bit too far with it... I'd rather hear it from the horse's mouth: (Colin) "But then you don't want to be perceived to be trying to catch lightning in a bottle twice. So I think I probably did consciously go in all sorts of different directions." ...But that isn't being perverse. He's just as subject to peer pressure as the rest of us. ;-) I was so pleased to hear from CF's mouth about playing Mark Darcy: "There's a certain inevitability about it," he says. "I think it's healthy for me to do it." Oh Yesss, he's come to terms with it, the Dear Boy! But I resent another implication that slipped from Jasper, to whit:(Jasper)' If he's Mark Darcy, he can't be Colin Firth too. They could get his brother to play him, I suggest' What does he mean he couldn't ? If CF can be a Walker and then a Ned within a few minutes of one another, is it so beyond his powers to play both, with Fitzwilliam Darcy thrown in for good luck? Icy smile indeed! ~~~~~ (Karen)That last comment in the article was particularly painful: "Or you might have to change the character of the actor. Someone the Americans believe is a credible sex symbol." (Elena) Funnily I understood this just as typical humour and irony of his. And I wonder if Colin would really want to be a "credible sex symbol" anyway. Oh, yes, Elena, I agree. He is being VERY sardonic here. I sometimes think he's toying with poor Jasper's head half the time, just to see if he'll bite... ..."a credible sex symbol.� (Gi) Ridiculous! Doesn't he know? ;-) He knows. And he'll be whatever he d**n well chooses to be! As always! (**Heehee**) ... Otherwise, I thought the article was tremendously good... ;- ) KJ
~heide #993
Yikes! Someone..anyone...stop Mark before he puts that Times article into the trash. I don't need it but surely someone will claim it before it finds its final resting place in the bottom of Mark's dustbin. (I know you that was just an idle threat, Mark dear, in order to find a worthy recipient.) Cult? What cult? I'm no raving lunatic. ;-) Lisa! Welcome home, dear.
~heide #994
Just saw your response, KJ. You picked out some interesting points. Frankly, I don't think it takes too many hunches or theories on our part to agree with you and conclude from the article that Colin is healthy, happy and sound. (I think I said that posts and posts ago so forgive the redundancy.)
~KJArt #995
Ah, but you said that from snippets were out and before the entire argument was spread before you. Congrats on your continuing perceptivity (is that a word?)! As a former science writer, I'm always on the lookout for hedges, though, so as not to take everything I read at face value. (Heheheh)
~LisaJH #996
Thank you Lizza, Karen, and Heide for your warm words. They are appreciated. (Lizza) What did you think of The Times interview yesterday? I don�t know that I can add too much about the article. I think KJArt is dead on about how easily JR's take on CF might be perceived as reality, when in truth, Jasper is only speculating�. Maddening. Sort of like a negative spin doctor. Wonder how that made CF feel when he read the article? Sadly, he must be used to it by now. IMO, CF is very wise�he refuses to get sucked into the vortex of egos and paranoia in Hollywood and is mature enough to stay on the periphery. This is a man who knows himself. BTW, does anyone know where this rented house outside of LA is located? I remember reading about Santa Monica a long time ago. Isn�t that part of greater LA or did I lose the $32,000 geography question? I also enjoyed his musings on middle age (since I am now there myself), and found them to be a little wistful. Maybe the parts for young men in there 20s are behind him, but imagine the vast riches of exploring more mature parts. He has only begun to scratch the service. Thank God he is not just another pretty (and neutral) face. And as for the cult following of P&P2, I hope that the Attack of the Killer Tomatoes (AOTKT) is not considered to be in the same league as P&P2! Colin supposes that it is the character Darcy who is the sex symbol. Little does he know that we, too, are way past that transference!� Okay, maybe I can drool over CF AND CF as Darcy. (Karen) Armadillo (by William Boyd) is a perfect fit. Lisa, go check that one out. I feel certain it will be made...once there is a script. I will check out Armadillo. In one of my former lives, I was an insurance broker. (KJArt) What does he mean he couldn't ? If CF can be a Walker and then a Ned within a few minutes of one another, is it so beyond his powers to play both, with Fitzwilliam Darcy thrown in for good luck? Exactly. Hello, he is an A-C-T-O-R! Why can�t he be MD, FD, and himself. Sheesh! Sounds to me like this journalist was stirring the pot a bit.
~LisaJH #997
Oops, meant to say, young men in "their" 20s. One of these days I will catch my erors before I hit "submit." And make that "surface" instead of service. Maybe I need to go to bed.
~patas #998
KJ; like your criticism of the interview, very accurate, IMO. Welcome back, Lisa!
~lizbeth54 #999
The soundtrack (or parts of) to RV can be dowloaded at http://www.rpofilmmusic.com/relativevalues.html Lots of info about RV. The score was performed by the London Philamonic Orchestra and a specially commissioned jazz group. I don't have Real Player so I can't download...would be interested to hear any opinionn of the music, though.
~lizbeth54 #1000
Royal Philharmonic Orchestra....sorry, can't spell!
~Moon #1001
Welcome back, Lisa! Good points, KJart! (Not)Frightened of getting into a crowd, worried how to deal with someone who might recognize him? That his fear of becoming recognized is a genuine criterion in the projects he chooses ... Anyone who wears black shoes with white laces has no fear of being recognized. ;-)
~EileenG #1002
Agree, good points, KJArt. Jasper does use words such as 'seems to' or 'appears'; you hit the nail on the head when you said 'the reader tends to believe...'. We've been doing the same thing as Jasper--projecting our own interpretations into CF's words (i.e., "it'll happen" might mean baby's already on the way). It's human nature to do this. Personally, I think Jasper used our comments over at the BJD topic to form his questions about MD. ;-) Regarding CF's revelation about where he lives: remember the spread in People Magazine last year? After reading that piece, if one didn't know better, one would think he lived in Umbria. There was no mention of London, period. I think CF knows exactly what he's doing when he reveals these personal details. Welcome back, Lisa. Glad you're feeling better.
~lizbeth54 #1003
I also agree with the points made by KJ....but it all makes for interesting reading! Now, I actually have some good news! Usually I'm predicting doom and gloom, but I rang up the National Museum for Photography, Film & TV in Bradford, and asked, yet again, if they had plans to show MLSF, and yes they are showing it, from June 2nd, for one week at least. So it is going nationwide, of a kind! Might be worthwhile checking out your nearest art house/independent cinema to ask about their June programming. Shall take my mother to see it! (Well, it's suitable for mothers and grandmothers and maiden aunts! :-) )
~lafn #1004
(Bethan)Shall take my mother to see it! (Well, it's suitable for mothers and grandmothers and maiden aunts! :-) ) Actually, that is the focus audience for MLSF. They'll love it.
~amw #1005
To UK fans, I have just heard that Malcolm McDowell will be on The Steve Wright in the Afternoon Show tomorrow, Wednesday, perhaps he will say something about MLSF.
~KJArt #1006
(Colin, Re: HF's visit to the FP set): "She then wrote up a Bridget Jones version of the visit to the set, which is very funny, but didn't echo my recollection, although Nick said it was very close to what had happened. She wrote a thing about having followed me inadvertently everywhere around the set until eventually I said, 'I am going to have to go on alone from here because it's the men's toilet.' I don't remember that. Nick says it's true." CF said "wrote up" ... was this then published in a column? Does anyone recollect seeing it?. I wonder if it would be retrievable. Probably dates from late '96 or early '97. Murph: I loved the rapidity with which you got the Times article up, but you really ought to give Jasper some credit, you know ... ;-)
~KarenR #1007
(KJ) CF said "wrote up" ... was this then published in a column? Does anyone recollect seeing it?. I wonder if it would be retrievable. Probably dates from late '96 or early '97. That would be from The Independent (as was the Rome interview) and they didn't archive their stories on line at that time. Hmmm, now have time to read all the messages from yesterday...
~KarenR #1008
About that Independent column (*the researcher in me kicks in*), it might not be all that difficult to find. HF would've written it right after she was on the set. Since FP only took a short time to make and I know there are people here who know the dates, it really take much to look up her weekly columns at a library on microfilm. Any takers? ;-) (Jasper Rees in ES) ...is set in a rambling house large enough for Colin Firth, as batty inventor Fraser Pettigrew My guess is that Jasper is trying to console Colin that he isn't that old. Wouldn't you agree, KJ? ;-) Doesn't it seem odd that Rees first writes for The Times and now the Evening Standard? Or are they part of the same media empire? (Rees) Is Hugh Hudson on the comeback trail? He has two movies opening this month, one in America called I Dreamed of Africa Trail closed; take a detour to Dogsville. (Eileen) Ladies, there is no doubt in my mind--Peter's as you-know-what as a three dollar bill. *hee hee* Do I know how to call'em or what!? And it is a different trailer than the one we saw before. Still poor quality streaming stuff. (Mari) It appears it's showing in one cinema already (might be Scotland). Why do you think that? Is it in the boxoffice Top 10 already? Just kidding, but have checked The Scotsman, which lists all the theaters there, and it's not there. (Lisa) Santa Monica...Isn�t that part of greater LA or did I lose the $32,000 geography question? Do you want to use a lifeline? I'll give you my friend's number, who lives in Santa Monica and thus outside the reach of the LA Unified School District. *enough of a hint* Santa Monica likes being a little renegade city and not LA. (Lisa) Colin supposes that it is the character Darcy who is the sex symbol. Little does he know that we, too, are way past that transference! Some are and a lot aren't. You'd be amazed at the Darcy worship that was in evidence in the Donmar lobby. Bethan, thanks for the link on the Relatives Values score. I haven't listened to any of it yet, but will do so as soon as I can. What an interesting find. Evelyn, are you ordering the CD yet? ;-) (Eileen) Personally, I think Jasper used our comments over at the BJD topic to form his questions about MD. ;-) LOL!! Who knows. Life is stranger than fiction.
~CherylB #1009
Hello Lisa. I only know you from reading the old posts. Nice to be "virtually" introduced. Many thanks to Elena (great to see you back) and Mark for bringing some sanity to the discussion of the word "cult". As someone who as had a lifelong attraction to cult novels, cult films, and cult musicians; the word does not offend me. In some ways being a devotee of a cult of an artistic enterprise is comparable to being an elitist. Some people may be offended by that. Some may just think it shows good taste. Personally, I'm quirky and generally uninterested in the mainstream. In regard to the comment on the accents in MLSF not being sufficiently Scottish enough. The characters played by MEM and CF were upper-class and may well have been educated in England. Also, people of higher social classes tend not to have heavy regional accents. As for MM character, well he had been away in England for years, leading his own life and running his business. It would not have been unusual for him to sound English; and he, as well, belonged to a privileged class. The interview: overall quite good. I found the question as to wether CF and LG would have children rather rude. It is between the two of them, and really no one else's business, particularly the interviewer or especially us. I'm a fan, but CF does have the right not to have his private life become public domain.
~lafn #1010
(Karen)Bethan, thanks for the link on the Relatives Values score. I haven't listened to any of it yet, but will do so as soon as I can. What an interesting find. Evelyn, are you ordering the CD yet? ;-) Well, I'll try.But I suspect the trailers put on the best music in the score.And there isn't going to be a soundtrack CD.I vividly remember the MLSF trailer music. Beethoven, by the Birmingham Symphony, Simon Rattle , conducting and Satchmo.I haunted Virgin Records for months....it was never recorded. Given their foresight,it's a miracle that P&P was. And isn't it glorious!!
~Lizza #1011
A small step forward---- MLSF made it on to Film 2000 tonight!! Johnathan Ross just gave the storyline, mentioned CF and there were a few short clips. Including ODB in his swimming costume. Heady late night stuff, if like me you have never seen MLSF. No judgement was passed on the film but I guess JR considers it to have some merit or he wouldn't have featured it. A start at least! Sorry, for using "I guess" in that sentence, been spending too much time with Jasper lately, it's kinda rubbed off on me.
~Lizza #1012
Looking forward to the MLSF score Evelyn, th day of listening comes ever nearer. Is anyone really sure of RV 's release date? Earlier on this topic 9th June was mentioned but the end of Times article gave 23rd June for release. Anyone put me right?
~KarenR #1013
The June 9th date has been posted at Teletext for ages. (Sorry, Mari.) I'd go with the 23rd, even though I was told it was also the date of some big football match (I think).
~Jana2 #1014
(Lisa) BTW, does anyone know where this rented house outside of LA is located? I remember reading about Santa Monica a long time ago. Santa Monica...Isn�t that part of greater LA or did I lose the $32,000 geography question? (Karen) Do you want to use a lifeline? I'll give you my friend's number, who lives in Santa Monica and thus outside the reach of the LA Unified School District. *enough of a hint* Santa Monica likes being a little renegade city and not LA. Welcome back Lisa and very true, Karen ;-). Santa Monica is a self-incorporated city and definitely marches to its own drummer. But from a geographical perspective I can see why it would seem like S.M. is part of greater L.A. Santa Monica is completely surrounded by Los Angeles, is very densely populated and the only way you can really distinguish the fact that you're in S.M. and not L.A. is the different color on the city buses :-). Therefore I'm wondering about CF's comment that he lives "outside of L.A." when he visits the area. I wouldn't consider S.M. to fit that description, but most of the places that I would consider outside LA are boring suburbs with identical tract houses. Somehow I find it hard to imagine that a London-lover would enjoy that! Hmmm, perhaps Malibu? I think that's where the Tilly/Calley's live and it's far enough from L.A. to be considered outside. It's a ritzy area, but the population is awfully sparse. It's great if you're an outdoors lover but not if you like any shops or restaurants closer than a 20 minute drive. I suppose I should stop myself before leaping to any more wild speculations. Wouldn't want to be classified with Mr. Rees ;-).
~mari #1015
(Karen) Why do you think that? Is it in the boxoffice Top 10 already? Not yet.;-) With the Popcorn review, it said it was showing at one theater, the Greenock Waterfront Cinema in . . .Greenock. Ring a bell with anyone? RE: Santa Monica. It took me an hour to drive from the ocean (borders SM on the west) to downtown L.A. in the infamous rush-hour traffic, so I could see where someone might think that it's far from L.A., even though distance-wise, it's not. I recall Colin being interviewed in Pasadena once--maybe that's it? Just me Jasper-ing away here . . .;-)
~lafn #1016
(Mari) ...it said it was showing at one theater, the Greenock Waterfront Cinema in . . .Greenock. Ring a bell with anyone? No,...but it beats the Ritzy in Brixton. Pasadena is inland...wasn't that interview near the waterfront?
~KJArt #1017
(JR)Colin Firth, as batty inventor Fraser Pettigrew .. (Karen) My guess is that Jasper is trying to console Colin that he isn't that old. Wouldn't you agree, KJ? ;-) ... Ummmm. Interesting theory. But one feels it very possibly would have been a simple slip, although perhaps a Freudian one... ;-) (Lisa) Santa Monica...Isn�t that part of greater LA or did I lose the $32,000 geography question? (Karen) ... who lives in Santa Monica and thus outside the reach of the LA Unified School District. *enough of a hint* Santa Monica likes being a little renegade city and not LA. There are lots of little independently incorporated cities within and at the edges of L.A. (like beautiful downtown Burbank) Now certain regions (like Hollywood) act as if they are separate entities (well, they have different zip codes, don't they?) even though still officially within L.A. city limits. There has been a San Fernando Valley secession movement for many years (LAUSD being a big reason for it). Re: Colin's CA condo or apt. I have heard Malibu and I have heard Brentwood (which isn't outside L.A. proper), but I suspect nobody but his hairdresser knows for sure (and since it's sort of apparent he doesn't HAVE a hairdresser, that means no one ... and knowing him, he's probably moved anyway...)(not that I admit to "knowing him" *Heehee*) Go figure... ;-) (Karen) You'd be amazed at the Darcy worship that was in evidence in the Donmar lobby. I'm sure he's perfectly aware of it, has finally come to terms with it, and just philosophically absorbs the adoration in lieu of the character. I've had otherwise- perfectly- sane correspondants slip up and say 'Mr. Darcy' when they meant CF. They are, I suspect, like Bridget ..."but Mr. Darcy couldn't POSSIBLY be an actor! ... and yet he IS an actor. ...So confusing..." (forgive the paraphrasing)... But I suspect (hedging again) it's one reason why he apologizes for disappointing people all the time (because he's not Darcy) ;-) KJ
~Jana2 #1018
(Evelyn) Pasadena is inland...wasn't that interview near the waterfront? I definitely remember one taking place a few years ago in Santa Monica at the 3rd Street Promenade. I have a copy of it tucked away somewhere. I wonder if Colin and the interviewer met up at the stegosauras ;-)? Come to think of it, maybe that's where the speculation about a possible Santa Monica address grew from. Was there also an interview in Pasadena, Mari?
~KJArt #1019
I think someone mentioned last year that he was STAYING in Pasadena (hotel or something; maybe for one of the premieres??) He might have been interviewed there.
~KarenR #1020
(Jana2) different color on the city buses :-) Yeah! The Big Blue buses!! Took two to get to the Getty. Best deal in town. Greenock Waterfront Cinema In Greenock, in Inverclyde (home of Loch Eck); around where MLSF was filmed. Phone number 01475 732201 Can't see Colin in Pasadena...unless Livia likes wearing hats and little white gloves. ;-) How does Pacific Palisades strike you, Jana? (although I'm still pulling for SM, with all its antique shops)
~MarkG #1021
Karen: I'd go with the 23rd, even though I was told it was also the date of some big football match (I think). Nah, Euro 2000 final not till July 2. England might play in the QFs on the 24th or 25th, though. Karen: Doesn't it seem odd that Rees first writes for The Times and now the Evening Standard? Or are they part of the same media empire? No, but I think most magazines (including those with weekend newspapers) commission freelances for their main features.
~Moon #1022
I agree with Jana2 about SM. It is not considered outside the LA area. Malibu is a possibility or the canyon road where Neil Young lives. Who knows for sure where the Callys live? It could also be in Pasadena. There are some very beautiful homes there and the town has changed for the better. (Karen), Can't see Colin in Pasadena...unless Livia likes wearing hats and little white gloves. ;-) Doesn't Jana2 live in Pasadena? BTW, I love hats and long white gloves. ;-)
~Moon #1023
Pacific Palisades would be my guess. Mark, looking forward to EURO 2000?
~KarenR #1024
Thanks, Mark. Seemed like I'd seen Jasper Rees' name in the paper too frequently to be a freelancer and just assumed (how appropriate) that he worked for one of them. (Mark) England might play in the QFs on the 24th or 25th, though. But that affects the weekend opening gross...not that MLSF would appeal to necesssarily the same audience as football... ;-)
~KarenR #1025
Yeah!! We're back!!! (Moon) Pasadena. There are some very beautiful homes there No disagreement on this. ;-)
~KarenR #1026
(KJ) I'm sure he's perfectly aware of it My comment that "You'd be amazed at the Darcy worship that was in evidence in the Donmar lobby" referred to Lisa's comment that: Colin supposes that it is the character Darcy who is the sex symbol. Little does he know that we, too, are way past that transference! I wasn't referring to anything Colin might be thinking. As I observed in the lobby and on these boards, not everyone has gotten past the Darcy thing. (is my writing that incomprehensible?
~lafn #1027
I had an email from Rachel Weinstein yesterday in response to my congratulatory one to the Donmar for the 5 Tony Nominations for TRT. She said: "Make sure and say 'Hi' to everybody....we have fingers crossed too."
~MarkG #1028
Karen: England might play in the QFs on the 24th or 25th, though. But that affects the weekend opening gross Different audience as you say, and I don't hold out high hopes for a stunning opening gross ... even if England don't qualify. Scotland didn't reach the tournament, so that reduces any slight audience overlap further. Moon: Mark, looking forward to EURO 2000? I have a major relegation issue to contend with Sunday before I even start to think about international football, but I'd say your DH has little to worry about if Italy meet England. Sorry, I promise no more soccer talk.
~EileenG #1029
Regarding the opening date for RV (not MLSF): I read June 9th at the Empire site at which the new trailer is available (see Murph's link). Suffice to say it'll open some time in June. (Jana2) I definitely remember one taking place a few years ago in Santa Monica at the 3rd Street Promenade I remember this one also. He was wearing flip-flop sandals and sent Livia off shopping (funny what sticks in one's memory, isn't it?). (Karen) As I observed in the lobby and on these boards, not everyone has gotten past the Darcy thing I wasn't in the Donmar lobby but from what I've read here and there, your observations are very much on target. ;-)
~KJArt #1030
Lisbeth has the account of the first meeting between "Bridget" and CF on the set of FP at: Bridget meets Darcy '96
~KJArt #1031
(KJ) I'm sure he's perfectly aware of it. (Karen)I wasn't referring to anything Colin might be thinking. \...\ (is my writing that incomprehensible? Ummmm. No. I was agreeing with your observation that: ... not everyone has gotten past the Darcy thing. And adding that I was sure CF ,too, knows very well that a lot of them haven't gotten over it . (It appears that it's my writing that is incomprehensible. Sorry) ;-) Karen: Doesn't it seem odd that Rees first writes for The Times and now the Evening Standard? Or are they part of the same media empire? (Mark) No, but I think most magazines (including those with weekend newspapers) commission freelances for their main features. Yes, I've seen Jasper do this before (Fever Pitch articles, I believe). The smart freelancer gets as long an interview and as many quotes on tape as he/she can, and then draws from that to write more than one article. These are offered to several markets.. As long as each article (usu. w. different quotes) is unique, the publications can have exclusive rights to it -- so they don't mind if they all came from the same encounter. Jasper is good at drawing a lot of material from his subjects, evidently, and has done this often. I suspect he uses all those conjectures to pad them all out to increase his output (*heheheheh*). No fool he. ;-D
~lafn #1032
I had a dead armadillo in my backyard this morning, and I hope it's not an omen:-(
~LauraMM #1033
I read that as a dead armadillo in your mailbox!
~EileenG #1034
(Evie from Okie) I had a dead armadillo in my backyard this morning, and I hope it's not an omen:-( Quick! Throw some salt over your shoulder and knock on wood. Stay away from mirrors and ladders then all will be well again. ;-D
~KarenR #1035
20:19 Wednesday 10th May 2000 Puttnam announces retirement at film premiere Film producer David Puttnam has announced that his film My Life So Far will be his last. Lord Puttnam cited other commitments, not least his work for the Government at the premiere of the film in Glasgow for its Bafta Scotland screening. He said: "I tried for a year after the General Election to juggle the jobs I'm doing with the Government work and it was just impossible. "I found I was spending my time apologising for not being at things. "But it wasn't pressure of work that made up my mind for me, it was the feeling of letting people down that decided it." Lord Puttnam, 59, sits on the Labour benches in the House of Lords and also sits on the Schools Standards Task Force. He has produced 34 films during a 30 year career in the industry, including five set in or filmed in Scotland.
~heide #1036
Good find, KJ. ... must practise what to say to Mr. Darcy or rather Colin Firth as he is known. Tom says on no account mention Mr. Darcy but just chat like normal person not tedious fan. Was Bridget in the Donmar lobby?
~mari #1037
(Jana) Was there also an interview in Pasadena, Mari? Yes, it was a couple of years ago; they interviewed him at the hotel lounge--I think the Ritz-Carlton. Might have just been a convenient meeting place for the reporter; no indication CF was actually staying there. In fact, I'd imagine (ghost of Jasper here;-) that he wasn't or else they'd have done the interview in his room (KJART) I have heard Malibu and I have heard Brentwood (which isn't outside L.A. proper), but I suspect nobody but his hairdresser knows for sure (and since it's sort of apparent he doesn't HAVE a hairdresser, that means no one. KJ, you're not gonna believe this, but a couple of years ago, someone (Murph, I think it might have been you!) found a website for a hair salon in SM (I think) that listed its celeb customers, and CF was among them. RE: Brentwood--I've heard Meg had a house there while they also lived at the place in the wilderness.;-) Murph, do you recall the hair salon thing?
~Arami #1038
Still on the subject of hair... :-) I have examined the MLSF London premiere TV snippets and, for the sake of accuracy, I think that CF's hair is almost exactly as it was in the Donmar. It may be a little longer - but not much - and he appears to have used some kind of dressing like hair gel: the locks falling over his forehead appear damp. Moreover, I find no evidence of any deliberate hair parting. Persons of nervous disposition are advised to leave or at least close their eyes now: it is just the balding crown shining through. (I make no apologies for stating the above, in the same way as CF makes no effort to hide it. To me as a true fan the state of his hair, apart from noting the obvious and natural fact, is of no consequence.)
~LisaJH #1039
Hi CherylB, nice to "meet" you, too. Aren't you the lucky soul who was involved with the production of Valmont? I thought I had read old posts of yours before I originally came on board in 1998. Guess we have been like ships in the night, eh? To everyone else, many thanks for the welcome. (Karen) Some are and a lot aren't. You'd be amazed at the Darcy worship that was in evidence in the Donmar lobby. I am surprised. I would have thought enough time had lapsed (since the airing of P&P2) for Darcy delirium to have developed into full-fledged Firth fever. But these diseases are not linear, are they? And as I admitted, they also can occur concurrently. (Karen)Do you want to use a lifeline? I guess I should use my audience life line! Didn't know it was such a trick question. I must admit, I made a mental list of Santa Monica, the Desert, the Canyon, and Pasedena. Maybe I should ask for the 50-50 lifeline. :) (CherylB ) I found the question as to whether CF and LG would have children rather rude. It is between the two of them, and really no one else's business I agreee the press should keep its nose out of the family info, but ODB could have said "pass" again. Maybe CF thought these comments were off the record. His candor surprised me. First there was "doing a Harvey;" now we have "pulling a Jasper." Too funny... Hey, whatever happened to Ben? Did he ever return?
~Moon #1040
(Mari),Might have just been a convenient meeting place for the reporter; no indication CF was actually staying there. In fact, I'd imagine (ghost of Jasper here;-) that he wasn't or else they'd have done the interview in his room Or a convenient place because the house he rents is there. :-) Arami, we should really put a stop to these non-hairy thoughts! ;-) (Murph, I think it might have been you!) found a website for a hair salon in SM (I think) that listed its celeb customers, and CF was among them. Mari, you are amazing, you remembered that! Which salon was it? Lisa, Ben is living in London now and has not posted for a while.
~LisaJH #1041
(Arami) Persons of nervous disposition are advised to leave or at least close their eyes now: it is just the balding crown shining through. As long as ODB doesn�t resort to a comb-over or Ron Popeil�s spray can of dye for bald spots, he�ll always be my main man. (As TS would say: Colin, who loves ya, baby?) At least his career and appeal have not been based on hair alone. Does the name Hugh Grant ring a bell? (Oops, guess my opinion of Hughie is out of the closest.)
~Arami #1042
we should really put a stop to these non-hairy thoughts! ;-) It doesn't really bother you, does it? ;-)
~Moon #1043
It doesn't really bother you, does it? ;-) Carissima! Neanche per sogno. ;-) Do continue...
~KarenR #1044
James Christopher's mini-review of MLSF in The Times: Hugh Hudson's My Life So Far is a modest memoir about sexual awakening. It's as misty-eyed about 1920s Scotland as the musical Brigadoon. The screenplay by Simon Donald is based on Sir Denis Forman's childhood memoir, Son of Adam, about a chirpy adolescent, Fraser (Robert Norman), who grows up in a Highland pile to become (we're told at the end) a member on the board of English National Opera. How scintillating. It aspires to, but doesn't have that gristly adult(erous) chemistry that shocked an impressionable young boy into lonely middle-age in Joseph Losey's masterpiece, The Go-Between. In fact it's much more Upstairs Downstairs in its dinner-table squabbles and gossipy maids. The sultry love interest is Irene Jacob, who is engaged to the dastardly smoothie, Uncle Morris (Malcolm McDowell). Colin Firth is Fraser's crackpot father who invents all sorts of uses for moss, and who lusts secretly after Heloise. Mary Elizabeth Mastrantonio is his jealous wife. It's all very twitchy, repressed and stilted. In oth r words, perfect for family outings.
~winter #1045
I'm going to have to delurk and express my "ROTFLOL" over this thread re: ODB's LA digs... Too funny! BTW the interview WAS at the Pasadena Ritz Carlton. It's not unusual to do interviews here, because they use the hotel often for press junkets (the other one is the 4 Seasons in Beverly Hills) I have several guesses as to where ODB may reside-- Venice: Borders SaMo, yet is less pretentious. The 'Hackney' of the Westside set. Juliana Marguiles from ER lives there, as well as other low-key celebs The Valley (Jana! You may be neighbors!): It's accessible to Malibu and Brentwood, which allows less commute time to see his son. Silverlake/Loz Feliz: It's still in LA proper, but I'd say that even though CF says he lives outside of LA, he may not know where the borders begin/end. Heck- I've been here 10 years, almost, and still have no clue! West Hollywood: because it's MY neighborhood and it would be such fun to have him live here!
~Brown32 #1046
KJ, you're not gonna believe this, but a couple of years ago, someone (Murph, I think it might have been you!) found a website for a hair salon in SM (I think) that listed its celeb customers, and CF was among them. RE: Brentwood--I've heard Meg had a house there while they also lived at the place in the wilderness.;-) ************ Mari, I DO remember it. I had forgotten. I did a search and found it. It was a couple of years ago. Good memory. At that Pasadena interview CF was dressed in shorts and sandals, as I recall, and Livia, who had been shopping, came by toward the end. Murph
~mari #1047
Thanks to FOF Francoise, for this update--the RV website is now open. Go to: www.relative-values.com Looks like they've done a superb job with this site! New CF pic, plus quotes, and seems like there's more to come.
~mari #1048
RV London premiere info is there as well.
~KarenR #1049
Neat! So much for "they'll let me know ahead of time" and that software spy thing. Argh, should've put up the quotes as they didn't bother to hold up their end.
~Moon #1050
Thanks, Mari! From Relative Values. He does look like his brother here.
~mari #1051
From the Standard: My Life So Far (12) Colin Firth, Rosemary Harris, Irene Jacob, Mary Elizabeth Mastrantonio. Dir: Hugh Hudson. UK. 2000. 99mins. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- by Alexander Walker Read Alexander Walker on the latest films every Thursday in the Evening Standard David Puttnam's last production (so far) has been awaiting a release for two years or more. Hard to see why. Directed by Hugh Hudson, it's a satisfying essay in boyhood nostalgia in the 1920s, Scottish to be precise, Sir Denis Forman's to individualise it further. Seen through the eyes of precocious young Denis, aka Fraser for the purpose of the semi-fictional period coat of varnish, it's a portrait of privilege that would delight the Scottish Tory party. The Scottish Arts Council has forked out �1 million of National Lottery cash to make up the �5.12 million budget: a high-risk sum to recoup, but better value than most of the Lottery's misspent millions south of the border. Pubescent Fraser (Robert Norman) grows up with a feckless but idolised dad (Colin Firth) who harvests sphagnum moss and invents dotty planes and automobiles; a loving Mumsy (Mary Elizabeth Mastrantonio); a rakish, cosmopolitan millionaire uncle (Malcolm McDowell) with a French wife (Ir�ne Jacob) half his age; and a bossy but gold-standard granny (Rosemary Harris). The lad's awakening coincides with his dad's infidelity, but no great harm is done save a scrap twixt uncle and dad on the carpet. Its charm would be suffocating were the acting not needle sharp and it's a treat for toffs and buffs alike to see kindly servants knowing their place, the gentry at dinner or ice curling, enough Fair Isle sweaters to make moths drunk, fly-casting taught to the beat of Beethoven's Fifth and sex safely and amusingly misinterpreted by the lad. Coming from an Irish Presbyterian family not unlike this, but considerably farther down the money ladder, I surrendered easily to the seductive picture of life as it once was (for some). Lord Puttnam's present patrons may be harder to persuade.
~KarenR #1052
From the Financial Times today: In My Life so Far a perky international cast (Mary Elizabeth Mastrantonio, Irene Jacob, Tcheky Karyo, Rosemary Harris, Malcolm McDowell) adds needed lustre to Hugh Chariots of Fire Hudson's adaptation of Sir Denis Forman's boyhood memoir of life with eccentric dad (Colin Firth) in a Scottish castle. Thin but goodhearted. The jolly music will tell you are enjoying yourself whether you are or not. -Nigel Andrews
~lafn #1053
Terrific RV website Mari, thanks.V. impressive. Congratulations Murph, your Appreciation Page is featured prominently in the links. ....from the Online Store... Signed items related to Relative Values and its stars Makes one think Colin might sell autographed items....hmmmmm. Hey.... a dollar here...a dollar there.... Interactive Chat....Let's request that they get Colin into the Chat Room:-)) definitely, a Favorite bookmark.... The CD soundtrack sounds like a "go":-) So, who's going to the premiere?
~mari #1054
Here's Barry Norman's review from Sky news: MY LIFE SO FAR My Life So Far is the last film produced by David - beg his pardon, Lord - Puttnam before he went off to do loftier things on behalf of the government's education programme. It was directed by Hugh Hudson, with whom Puttnam made the Oscar-winning Chariots Of Fire, and is based on the autobiography of Sir Denis Forman, director of the Royal Opera House. I mean, blimey, all the toffs connected with this film - you feel like tugging your forelock, don't you? What it all amounts to, however, is a nostalgic and gently entertaining tale of an unconventional childhood in the Scottish Highlands. The child, very well played by Robbie Norman - no relation of mine, incidentally - has an erratic father, Colin Firth, and a gorgeous mum, Mary Elizabeth Mastrantonio. All of these are threatened in some way by a possibly wicked uncle, Malcolm McDowell, and his introduction into their midst of his enchanting French fiancee, Irene Jacob. It's all very anecdotal and episodic and doesn't really amount to much. But it's rather charming and, not surprisingly given the cast, very well played.
~lafn #1055
IMO All the reviews hve been excellent. This film has all the ingredients and reviews to succeed in the UK.I shall be v. disappointed if it doesn't attract a large audience.
~Allison2 #1056
I shall be v. disappointed if it doesn't attract a large audience. But it is only showing in a few cinemas. I haven't been able to check completely but it seems that it is only showing in London at the Curzon in Mayfair, ABC Hampstead and the Odeon Kensington. They obviously figure that a film about the upper classes will only be watched by them!
~mari #1057
I think "excellent" might be stretching it a bit for these reviews. But not bad, if a bit dismissive and brief. Will be lots more to come (and hopefully more in-depth). Thanks for posting Peter, Moon. Definitely a Geoffrey Clifton look--maybe it's the tux.;-) And if this role is based somewhat on Coward himself, well, I suppose that answers the question on Peter's proclivities.;-) (Evelyn) Interactive Chat....Let's request that they get Colin into the Chat Room:-)) Hey, let's try! If it's sanctioned by the website/producers, he just might surprise us. Or not.;-)
~Tracy #1058
There's also a little piece in the Evening Standard's 'hot tickets' in addition to the (one star = good) review, with pic of CF & MEM, in the main paper (thanks Mari you saved me a job!)which goes as follows: 'MY LIFE SO FAR (12) Colin Firth....... Based on the childhood memories of former TV magnate Sir Denis Forman and set in the Twenties, Hugh Hudson's movie views an eccentric and talented family through the eyes of Forman's ten year-old alter ego who discovers the joys of jazz and the lesser ones of his grandfathers cigars. The household is a bit tense over the appearance of his uncle's beautiful French fiancee, yearned for by the boy, but alsoby his papa. It's cosy and anecdotal, the Scottish equivalent of many a French or Italian rites of passage nostalgia comedy.' who's set her sights on this mysterious pilot who drops from the sky on to their lawn.
~Tracy #1059
Whoops forget the bit about the pilot.....Dur!
~Moon #1060
it is only showing in London at the Curzon in Mayfair, ABC Hampstead and the Odeon Kensington. They obviously figure that a film about the upper classes will only be watched by them! I would not imagine the Trainspotting crowd rushing to see this. Those cinemas are exactly where this film should be playing, and I that goes for RV as well. Evelyn, I am happy to say it looks like the shirt fits! ;-) I am most meticulous about these matters. Colin in the Chat room!? A dream.
~KarenR #1061
~lafn #1062
(Allison)it is only showing in London at the Curzon in Mayfair, ABC Hampstead and the Odeon Kensington. They obviously figure that a film about the upper classes will only be watched by them! (Moon)I would not imagine the Trainspotting crowd rushing to see this. Those cinemas are exactly where this film should be playing, and I that goes for RV as well. Ditto. Notice they kept it out of Leicester Sq. But the older crowd are the ones who keep screaming that" they don't make films like they used to"...well here it is, folks.
~Allison2 #1063
Trouble is in Mayfair, Hampstead and Kensington they go to live theatre...
~lizbeth54 #1064
I think "excellent" might be stretching it a bit for these reviews. But not bad, if a bit dismissive and brief. Will be lots more to come (and hopefully more in-depth). (Mari) In the UK context, I think these are very good reviews for a British film....I'm quite relieved to read them! Reviews are often extremely dismissive and are rarely very long...except for the big opener. For example, if you want to read a bad review...how about these snippets from the Times, about other films reviewed along with MLSF. "Snow Falling on Cedars"...."what doesn't move is the film itself. Puffed up with a sense of its own uimportance, it floats on hot blasts of artistic pretension..if you stuck a pin it it, it would burst." "Best" (Brit movie about famous footballer" "An arrant piece of mythmaking which backfires with all the grace of a bull passing wind. John Lynch's Best looks guilty of homicide." "Hanging up" (Diane Keaton et al) ...."Nora Ephron's latest slush fest should be injected into a reinforced block a nd dumped into one of those unfathomable Pacific trenches that eluded Jacques Cousteau" Ouch!! MLSF got off lightly by comparison. "Perfect for family outings" is high praise!! I think three theatres for MLSF is okay, especially as it's showing at the Curzon. I'm glad that Alexander Walker (Evening Standard) liked it...that review really matters. I think the Daily Mail will like it, the Telegraph and Express 50/50 and I'm not reading the Guardian, Independent or Times Metro (different reviewer from the Times!) BTW Irene Jacob is advertised on the front of Saturday's Times Metro...promoting MLSF? Londinium??!! (What's happening to Mike Binder's opus?) Great to see the RV website....I've got a good feelinng about RV. I think it could be a winner. And premiering in the Odeon Leicester Square is very good news indeed...that's where all the Bond movies etc premiere, the biggest single theatre in London, I think...2000 plus seats. This will be well promoted!!
~lafn #1065
Don't think RV will be in the Bond category...but I think it will be a cute movie. Julie Andrews,& Alec Baldwin will promote it.And try and stop Stephen Fry from being on every talk show. But the same target audience as MLSF....the folks who go to the theatre.
~CherylB #1066
(Moon Dreams) ...I love hats and long white gloves. ;-) "Bella Luna". I always suspected you as being a woman of elegance. You're no doubt a person of style who can pull off that look no matter where you are. (LisaJH) Hi CherylB, nice to "meet" you, too. Aren't you the lucky soul who was involved with the production of Valmont? I thought I had read old posts of yours before I originally came on board in 1998. Guess we have been like ships in the night, eh? Alas no, that was not I. That would have been CherylE, and I know her only from old posts, as well. She was also more astute and articulate than I. Her spelling was better, too. Regarding my statement: I found the question as to whether CF and LG would have children rather rude. It is between the two of them, and really no one else's business...(LisaJH) I agreee the press should keep its nose out of the family info, but ODB could have said "pass" again. Maybe CF thought these comments were off the record. His candor surprised me. You do have a point. My comment came off more sharply than intended. Also, my reaction was colored by feelings I have toward what some friends of mine are going through. Basically as a fan I don't want to be too prying. I don't mean that to sound judgemental about any other fan's behavior. I pretty much think that everyone posting on this board is respectful toward Mr. Firth. I just feel it's such a personal issue. You are, however, right; CF did choose to answer the question.
~Brown32 #1067
I found the old article set in Santa Monica. Here is the beginning of it. Will run now and look at RV. - Murph ***************************** By BART MILLS (Sunday Mail, 11/10/96) The shambling figure with a week's growth of beard and ginger hair in wild ringlets weanng sandals and non-descnpt T-shirts and jeans attracts no glances on the busy street in sunny Santa Monica, two blocks from the Pacific The olive-skinned woman with him turns some heads though as she glides away to go window shopping, while the beach bum who is Colin Firth behind those dark glasses, sits down at a pavement cafe and explains why Los Angeles is his uncomfortable second home. Sub]ect: Firth Article in Sunday Mail 10th November 1996 MR DARCY WHERE HAVE YOV BEEN? BART MILLS The shambling figure with a week's growth of beard and ginger hair in wild ringlets wearing sandals and non-descript T-shirts and jeans attracts no glances on the busy street in sunny Santa Monica, two blocks from the Pacific. The olive-skinned woman with him turns some heads though as she glides away to go window-shopping. While the beach bum who is Colin Firth behind those dark glasses sits down at a pavement cafe and explains why Los Angeles is his uncomfortable second home. Firth has dealt with Darcy fever by being elsewhere, doing otherwise. As he always has when faced with success, after Pride and Prejudice he sought to muffle the fanfare that greeted his most romantic portrayal His escape route into new personae was via Columbia and Tunisia to play tragic obsessives in two doom laden dramas. Nostromo and The English Patient. And he flew, every chance he had to LA. He's here not to seek roles in Hollywood action movies but to spend time with his six-year-old son Will. Long range fatherhood, encouraged by the boy's mother actress Meg Tilly, who lives there now, is a measure of Firth's maturity: he's here "almost all of the time I'm not working", he says. His relationship with 26 year old Livia Guiggioli, the Italian beauty accompanying him in Santa Monica is a measure of his continued boyishness: he's with her in Rome "a lot." And when she is not studying for her doctorate in English literature at Rome University, she, in turn, is with Colin at his L150.000 flat in Hackney, ast London "a lot". Darcy fever never really hit home. By the time Pride and Prejudice was screened Firth was already well into filming The English Patient with Ralph Fiennes in Tunisia and completely oblivious of the nationwide fluttering of hearts in Britain. "I had to take my mother's word for it, that people liked it. When your mother tells you something like that you take it with a grain of salt. Anyway you can't walk around feeling thrilled indefinitely about even the biggest success," he says "Things get old. I've done four jobs since then. Let's be realistic. I dyed my hair and put on a costume. Darcy has been a sex symbol far nearly 200 years now without my help."
~Brown32 #1068
Please excuse the repeats in this Mills thing. I scanned it, and not too carfully either! Murph
~EileenG #1069
(Bethan) "Best" (Brit movie about famous footballer) "An arrant piece of mythmaking which backfires with all the grace of a bull passing wind. ROTFLMAO! (Evelyn) Julie Andrews,& Alec Baldwin will promote it. It's not Alec, it's little brother Billy (though I suppose Alec could promote it if he wanted to).
~KarenR #1070
(Bethan) For example, if you want to read a bad review...how about these snippets from the Times, about other films reviewed along with MLSF. "Snow Falling on Cedars" and "Hanging Up" But those were huge bombs, especially SFOC (had gorgeous cinematography though). I saw that with Scott Hicks and Ethan Hawke in attendance, taking Q&A afterward. You've never seen such a large audience struggling to say complimentary thing. It so obviously sucked. MLSF got off lightly by comparison. "Perfect for family outings" is high praise!! Yes, we so frequently forget the nature of your reviewers. :-(
~Moon #1071
"Bella Luna" thanks you Cheryl. I have always said it is better to be overdressed than underdressed. And I am particular about the fit of a man's shirt when he is suited up. I'll take the Geoffrey look anyday over sandals, a non-descript T-shirt and jeans. ;-)
~mari #1072
Here's the BBC's review: My Life So Far Reviewed by Michael Thomson Director: Hugh Hudson Cast: Robbie Norman, Colin Firth, Rosemary Harris, Irene Jacob, Mary Elizabeth Mastrantonio, Malcolm McDowell, Tcheky Karyo Running-time: 96 mins Certificate: 12 Distributor: Buena Vista Release Date:12th May 2000 "My Life So Far" has the feel of a beginner's enterprise, not the work of established heavyweights Hugh Hudson (director) and David Puttnam (producer). Yet both chaps, once regarded as the very foundations - and saviours - of the British film industry ("Chariots of Fire" was theirs), haven't exactly been an overwhelming presence in recent years so perhaps they thought it best to creep back with a small, unpretentious project. This is, by the way, the first time they've worked together since Chariots. Like their famous film, "My Life So Far" has Puttnam's hallmarks of decency, morality and the independent spirit, and a love of a period long since gone. The film - set in the 20s - concerns a wee Scottish boy, Fraser (Robbie Norman), living a privileged, rural life, doted on by an eccentric inventor dad determined to make a go of moss-processing (Colin Firth) and his wise, patient mum (Mary Elizabeth Mastrantonio). The sensitive Fraser absorbs ideas and influences from all around him and so, after the arrival of his colourful, free-spirited uncle (Malcolm McDowell) and his gorgeous, exotic fiancee (Irene Jacob), he finally begins to grow up. After an embarrassing row involving his parents, Fraser realises that adulthood will be complex, less certain, but probably equally enjoyable. Despite the twin entertainments of a crisply judgemental Malcolm McDowell and an oddball Colin Firth, not to mention the cheerful curiosity of newcomer Robbie Norman, the picture is too lazy to exert much emotional pull, and the need for it to be reshaped is matched by a requirement for more fully-realised characters. A more surprising script would have also lent more weight. Still, "My Life So Far" is often jolly, amusing, charming and always good to look at. The Scottish Tourist Board will be somersaulting with delight. �
~Brown32 #1073
Still hoping for The Maid of Buttermere, here is Bragg news from the British Press Association: Melvyn Bragg wins prize for novel inspired by father Lord Bragg today won a �10,000 literary prize for a novel inspired by his father and said: "I wish he was here today." The broadcaster and writer took the W H Smith Literary Award 2000 for his acclaimed book The Soldier's Return. The novel tells the tale of a soldier who returns to Britain after the Second World War and his struggles to adjust to his experiences in a town which has changed little while he has been through traumatic experiences. Lord Bragg was presented with his prize by Arts Minister Alan Howarth at an award lunch in London. The shocked South Bank Show presenter said: "Well, this wasn't in the script. I'm very surprised, I was surprised to even be on the shortlist. "More than that I'm delighted. This book was triggered by the death of my father. Like millions in this country he spent six years of his young life abroad then came back to find a young child, in my case nearly seven, who had grown." Professor John Carey, chair of the judging panel, said: "This restrained but compelling novel is both an intimate social documentary and a moving human story." Murph
~lafn #1074
The novel tells the tale of a soldier who returns to Britain after the Second World War and his struggles to adjust to his experiences in a town which has changed little while he has been through traumatic experiences. Shades of AMITC....perfect for ODB.We'll take it:-)
~Brown32 #1075
I agree, Evelyn, and thanks for the RV plug. I am honored, and told them so. They should see Karen's great pages too, and add them. I love your 50's look, Karen. I found an old interview with CF by Rees, scanned it, and have it on my site. After reading it a few years ago, I even wrote an T.S. Eliot parody poem about it. Here is the article URL: http://www.geocities.com/firthfan/independ.html Murph
~KarenR #1076
Long interview with David Puttnam as he "struggles to promote his last ever movie" http://www.independent.co.uk/enjoyment/Film/Interviews/puttnam120500.shtml Says this about the movie: With its rather charming mixture of old-fashioned narrative values and a slight water-wash of indefinable melancholy, it is classic Puttnam fare. It won't shake the world: no, it's far more likely to give it a jolly good hug. Haven't posted Anthony Quinn's review of the film yet
~KarenR #1077
Here's a two-and-a-half star review from something called The Wolf (no relation to my relations I assure you) at inside out film (a UK film site): GROWING up with a herd of brothers and sisters in a vast pile on the west coast of Scotland sounds wild and exciting. Judging by the way director Hugh Hudson and scriptwriter Simon Donald have tackled the early life of Sir Denis Forman, you wouldn't know it. Despite brave efforts by Colin Firth as the unpredictable inventor father, Malcolm McDowell as Uncle Maurice, and Rosemary Harris as the matriarchal grandmother, no-one feels comfortable. It is supposed to be eight-year-old Fraser's story, but seems to be a boy's eye view of adult behavior. Robert Norman, as Fraser, does not act like a child who has spent his whole life in the country. The Edwardian household, choking with servants, both indoor and out, revolves around the eccentric behaviour of Dad, whether he is blowing up bits of moor for his moss factory, or having Fraser launch a model airplane from the roof. What is missing is kiddies' fun. There are about seven of them and they never do anything together that doesn't involve a parent. You would expect that behind the green baize door a whole world of mischief, games and devilish plots exists, like a parallel universe. But no. Even their kilts are clean and their knees unscuffed. Other details are misplaced. It is only in movies that posh folk go shooting with their 12-bores broken under their arms. Fraser is seen fishing in the loch and returns with his rod in two parts, which means he would have untied the cast from the line, taken the rod to pieces, pocketed the reel, just to walk a few hundred yards home. Also, there is a grouse plucking scene in the kitchen, in which the cook and two scullery maids are tearing at the birds as if they have lost their minds. The only sniff of drama is when Dad makes a pass at Uncle Maurice's "exotic child fianc�e", the 24-year-old Eloise (Irene Jacob - so far out of her depth she disappears). Nothing comes of it, except an absurd scene when Mumsy (Mary Elizabeth Mastrantonio) gives him a tongue lashing a few months later in front of the children and assorted guests. One thing the upper classes are good at is not making a fuss in public. ~~~~~~~ Will go check if Wolf was so critical of, say, Gladiator? ;-)
~KarenR #1078
Murph, they have seen my pages and asked where I got my material, especially the trailer. ~~~~~~ The Guardian's Peter Bradshaw: The early life of the arts grandee Sir Denis Forman furnishes the material for My Life So Far, an amiable piece of whimsy about a young boy's magical, enchanted boyhood in 30s Scotland, directed by Hugh Hudson and co-produced by David Puttnam in the mould of the pre-Cool Britannia British film: gently charming, with a sense of period. Colin Firth plays Edward, an eccentric inventor idolised by his 10-year-old son Fraser (Robert Norman). With the semi-comprehending eyes of a child, he witnesses the tensions that arise when his Uncle Morris (Malcolm McDowell) brings home his beautiful young fianc�e, Heloise (Ir�ne Jacob). I found the movie's darker moments did not carry much conviction and Firth seemed a little too impassive, and maybe just a little too young in the role of the exotic paterfamilias. But Hudson's direction carries the film's fey and ingenuous qualities well, and the locations by Loch Fyne in the Highlands are a delight.
~lizbeth54 #1079
Just glanced through the "reviews" in the other papers. Jonathon Ross in the Mirror likes it! But I was wrong about the Daily Mail... Chris Tookey doesn't like it (2stars) and says that CF is miscast...that he is boring,stiff and patronising instead of entertaining and fun. (I thought that Edward was supposed to be severely flawed?) Matthew Bond in The Telegraph is very dismissive... says that it has no plot and is suitable only for a ten year old boy, no mention of the cast. Pity about the Telegraph because it's the worst review (very unperceptive and brief) and their readership is the potential MLSF audience. But apart from the Mail and Telegraph, I think the reviews are okay. BTW "Wolf" will like "Gladiator"..... "Wolf" is the name of one of the hosts of the TV show "Gladiators!"
~aishling #1080
Daily Mail's Christopher Tookey - two stars. Director Hugh Hudson and producer David Puttnam haven't had a hit since COF, almost 20 years ago. MLSF won't change that. It's a nostalgic account of the hugely privileged, mostly enviable but remarkably uneventful early life of the former Granada TV chief Sir Denis Forman. Shown on Sunday night television, it might pass muster for its attractive Scottish scenery and good performance by Robert Norman as the young Sir Dennis, here renamed Fraser, and MES as his mother. But Colin Firth is stiff, uneasy nd miscast as Forman's father. He is intended to be a lovable eccentric with a roving eye. Instead, he comes across as a prejudiced, patronising bore. This film passes the time amiably enough, but it lacks the insights or universality which made an arthouse hit of its obvious model, My Life As A Dog. Small pic of CF as Edward.
~Moon #1081
details are misplaced This is a major problem in films today. My husband always sees them too. Still, those reviews posted above missed the point. And because they are the papers that the MLSF audience read, it is terrible luck. :-(
~amw #1082
Review from the Independent: "Hugh Hudson's My Life So Far is one of those "magic of childhood" movies that tries to compensate for its shortage of drama by piling on the pictorial charm. Set during the 1920s, it concerns a 10year-old boy's getting of wisdom one summer on his family's beautiful estate in the Scottish Highlands, where his madcap father (CF) pioneers not-so-great inventions and becomes dizzily infatuated with another man's wife (IJ). A first-rate cast - MEM, KMcD and MMcD - provide a pleasant distraction as the film meanders through a minor crisis and then to a les-than-rousing conclusion. You won't be alone in wondering why the hell you bothered with it." ouch! I really think that on the whole MLSF was much better received in the US than here, and some reviews were very enthusiatic compared to the rather bland ones here, oh well.
~KarenR #1083
At the BBC Online news, there's an item about Malcolm MacDowell and there are audio links (on left side), where he talks about MLSF: http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/entertainment/newsid_743000/743880.stm
~KarenR #1084
According to the popcorn site, MLSF is playing at 17 cinemas nationwide. One additional in London area (Richmond), but rest are in Scotland: ABC Hampstead Location: London North Dominion, Edinburgh Location: Edinburgh Mayfair Curzon Location: London West End Odeon Glasgow The Quay Multiplex Location: Glasgow Odeon Kensington Location: London West End Odeon Kilmarnock Location: Kilmarnock Odeon Studio Richmond Location: London South UCI Kinnaird Park, Edinburgh Location: Edinburgh UCI Olympia Centre, East Kilbride Location: East Kilbride UGC Cinema Edinburgh Location: Edinburgh
~lafn #1085
....MLSF is playing at 17 cinemas nationwide. That's v. encouraging.With the exception of the DM which is just plain mean, I think the reivews are better than expected. Some of the criticisms are on target: ...an absurd scene when Mumsy (Mary Elizabeth Mastrantonio) gives him a tongue lashing a few months later in front of the children and assorted guests. One thing the upper classes are good at is not making a fuss in public. We all brought that up last summer. ~~~~~~~~ the film meanders through a minor crisis and then to a less-than-rousing conclusion. Waltzing in the rain would have been a better ending. ~~~~~ At least no one has brought up the fact of how old this film is. And MEM hasn't told us her newborn-then is now in kindergarten...sheech.
~fitzwd #1086
How does MLSF end in the UK release? In the US release it ends with the scene of Frasier swirling the milk in the brandy snifter and Edward's gorgeous face closing the door.
~lizbeth54 #1087
Browsing at the newstand...there's a mention of MLSF in this week's "Hello" (a pic of Cherie Blair at the premiere of "Colin Firth's new movie". And there's a good review of MLSF in the Financial Times (must be available online..?) All very positive comments. The FT is definitely the top person's newspaper (good penetration in Mayfair and Kensington!)!...and has the same circulation as the Telegraph. Also the Telegraph review is now online (sorry, have forgotten the link). It's not as bad as I thought, I suppose. Bad if you compare it with "Gladiator" which is "brilliant", but par for the course compared with the other reviews. "Director HH needed bucketfuls of charm to make this lightweight piece work. He failed to find them. Instead we have a nice setting, potentially interesting characters,but no plot at all....a rites of passage story of a young boy smitten with his new auntie and his grandfather's collection of pornography. May be enough for a ten year old but not the rest of us". Hmmm! But overall, MLSF has fared well...and it's had a good review from the FT and also the Daily Mirror's reviewer liked it (largest circulation tabloid!). Both ends of the spectrum.
~EileenG #1088
Agree with Evelyn; aside from that ridiculous Wolf review (who gives a flying f*** if the fishing rod is in two pieces, I ask you), the reviews aren't bad. This isn't a perfect movie but all who frequent these hallowed halls of Drool should love it. ;-)
~mari #1089
The reviews I'm most interested in are from the people here. If anyone catches it this weekend, please report in with your thoughts. I love this film and never get tired of hearing or talking about it.:-)
~amw #1090
I am seeing it tomorrow Mari, will let you know what I think of it, can't wait.
~lafn #1091
(Donna)How does MLSF end in the UK release? In the US release it ends with the scene of Frasier swirling the milk in the brandy snifter and Edward's gorgeous face closing the door. I don't know what country you saw it in, Donna;-) In the US, when I saw it, Edward and Moira are waltzing in the rain in "nightclothes attire". In Australia, it was shown with Frasier going off to school and some remark from Edward about 'fellatio'...."I wouldn't do that at school..." I dunno...do you think they thought that would make it more appealing to the British? (Going off to boarding school, that is;-) ;-)
~EileenG #1092
(Evelyn) In the US, when I saw it, Edward and Moira are waltzing in the rain in "nightclothes attire". Really? They didn't show the end bit in Dallas (and any of the other states to which you had to travel in order to see it)? I remember the ending as Donna described (it came after the rain waltz). Same on the video I saw in January.
~lafn #1093
Sorry..apologies all around. I thought the rain-bit came at the Very End. Yeah...we got the kid and the cigar too. Not going away to school though.
~KarenR #1094
The Times Metro section has a short blurb by Kathleen Wyatt that doesn't even mention Colin's name: FRASER PETTIGREW (Robert Norman) is a ten year-old who leads an idyllic life in the Scottish Highlands. Into the tranquil scenario intrudes money-minded Uncle Morris (Malcolm McDowell), and other distractions such as his mother (Mary Elizabeth Mastrantonio). Never riveting, but a charming film nonetheless. Then there's a long interview with Irene Jacob; here's some of it: A few bits of Hollywood fluff clogged her enviable early CV. But My Life so Far offers Ir�ne Jacob a role worthy of her powers - and her sultry presence. Jerome Boyd Maunsell meets her in Paris Her latest film, My Life so Far, is something altogether different. It may boast an impressive cast, with Colin Firth, Mary Elizabeth Mastrantonio, and ex-droog Malcolm McDowell. But the overall feel of the movie doesn't lay claims to great sophistication. Seen through the eyes of Fraser (Robbie Norman), a precocious ten-year-old boy, My Life so Far is a light-hearted family portrait set on an estate in the Scottish Highlands. Fraser relates his childhood in this idyllic setting, a life dominated by the pranks of his eccentric father (Firth), until reality arrives in the form of his hard-headed millionaire uncle (McDowell) and his French fianc�e, Heloise (Jacob). It's not long, though, before the vivacious Heloise stirs up all kinds of trouble. Asked about her role in the film, Jacob's hazel-brown eyes widen mischievously: "It was fun for me to find this part, because I've played a lot of tormented roles in the past. It was very spontaneous, despite the costumes and being a period film. I think it was a very unpretentious story, about this boy growing up and discovering his sensuality. It's wonderful that the film talks about that - at ten or 11 boys are already full of desire. It's not something that wakes up at 18. Now when I see young boys like my nephews I can see it bursting out, like spring, they want to know, to love, already they are sensitive to beauty." Jacob initially met the director Hugh Hudson to discuss a part in his planned adaptation of Joseph Conrad's Nostromo. The project never transpired, and the director famed for Chariots of Fire ended up making My Life so Far instead. The troubles he encountered with the failed big-budget adaptation go some way to explaining this film's charm and slightness. "Hugh decided to do something simple, that he could relate to. He told us this film was an appetiser. It's not a big meal, just something which gives you a taste, enough to want more," says Jacob.
~lizbeth54 #1095
There's a colour photo of CF though, after the review, and a small B&W one of CF and IJ in the article on IJ. Metro reviews are capsule reviews - no space. But MLSF gets 3 stars, which is good, as Metro is definitely aimed at a younger audience. I like the interview with IJ..she's currently doing theatre in paris...she sounds very nice and unpretentious. Has a 3 year relationship with a mysterious Englishman "not an actor".
~Arami #1096
The troubles he encountered with the failed big-budget adaptation go some way to explaining this film's charm and slightness. Failed big-budget? Meaning what, exactly? There weren't decent script and film editors available for that sort of money? They should've asked me! *** Here's something to brighten your weekend everywhere across the world... A present from Allison and Three Deers. (Well, only One Deer in fact: that's because the other Deers are having time off at the moment.) http://www.geocities.com/threedeers/gmtv/imagesgmtv.html
~Allison2 #1097
A full page feature on Sir Denis Forman in this week's "Hampstead and Highgate Express" (the Ham and High, as it is known, takes itself very seriously as the weekly local newspaper, it is widely read locally). Sir Denis is a local resident apparently. It's a long article which I am afraid I cannot type in full but the interesting bits are: "My Life So Far could not have come from a better stable. Produced by David Puttnam, directed by Hugh Hudson of Chariots of Fire fame, it stars Colin Firth as Sir Denis's father, the Adam of the original title. For the Firth portrayal, Sir Denis has nothing but praise. "He is my father to a T - the way he walked, the way he talked. I did send them some old hime movies, which I assume he saw, but it really is almost uncanny. A wonderful performance." BTW MLSF is showing at a cinema in Hampstead, so this is good publicity for it. Also the Ham And High has wide readership locally and as the area is stuffed with movers and shakers, that is good for CF's reputation too.
~Brown32 #1098
To all moms and grandmoms and moms of feathered and four legged children too! UKer's, enjoy MLSF, and Maria, thanks for the pictures. Whatta smile the man has got. Murph P.S. I have the long legged look from The Times on my main page now, plus some quotes toward the bottom of the page.
~KarenR #1099
Love the captures from the premiere, Arami and Allison. Colin looks awfully good when he cleans up and puts on suit. Thanks, ladies. Interesting quotes and high priase for CF from Sir Denis. Was thinking that he had dissociated himself from the project because this is the first we've heard from him. Also thought the same for Hugh Hudson because he was noticeably absent during last year's promotion...obviously he was busy making another masterpiece like I Dreamed of Africa. ;-)
~mari #1100
(Arami) Failed big-budget? Meaning what, exactly? They're referring to Hudson's Nostromo which, thankfully, never got off the ground. Admittedly, a very awkwardly written paragraph.;-) I absolutely love the captures from the premiere! He doesn't look uncomfortable at all, at least from these stills. Was it something in his manner which made you feel otherwise? He is gorgeous, oh my, I'm drooling here . . .;-) He is just as handsome and appealing offscreen as on (if not more so). Looking at these candids, and remembering the wonderful ones taken by Elena at 3DOR . . .mmmmmmm . . . need a bucket.;-) Many thanks for these, Arami and Allison. Well done, ladies. Nice quotes from Denis Forman, too.
~Brown32 #1101
There is a long article in tomorrow's NY Times about the popularity of the new young Brit stars. Everyone is mentioned, including Daniel Craig, a favorite of mine, EXCEPT --- Clive Owen, Rufus Sewell, and, of course, CF, who is still unfairly ignored in this country. (There is an opening paragraph about the earlier bunches, including Ralph F and Kenny B.). I could post it tomorrow if anyone is interested. Murph Going to see Croupier today.
~Brown32 #1102
Sorry about the OTs. I should have posted at 127. (Still getting used to getting around this great place.) Murph
~lafn #1103
Thanks Allison and Arami for the premiere pics...he looks better than Regis in the matching (grey?) shirt and tie... ~~~~~ How do you get the Sunday NY Times on Sat., Murph? ~~~~~ Eager to get first-hand reports of MLSF from our UKers.
~Moon #1104
Thanks, Arami and Allison! I like his MD look, and am relieved that his hair is not parted in the middle. Happy to see that the shirt and jacket fit! Hooray! ;-) Happy Mother's to all the Firthettes.
~Arami #1105
(Karen) Colin looks awfully good when he cleans up and puts on suit. He doesn't have to bother for me...
~KarenR #1106
Didn't say it was necessary. Just a statement of fact. ;-)
~Arami #1107
(Mari) He doesn't look uncomfortable at all, at least from these stills. Was it something in his manner which made you feel otherwise? Sort of. Hard to put a finger on it, really, but it's the way he just doesn't go for "Bbbbbhhhwah-ha-ha! Slap yer thigh!" sort of merriment. Reserved. Watchful. You have seen him in the Donmar and he was exactly the same there.
~KarenR #1108
Review from The Scotsman on Sunday: Adapted from the 1990 autobiography of Sir Denis Forman and reuniting the Chariots Of Fire team of producer David Puttnam and director Hugh Hudson,My Life So Far (12) probably carries an unfair burden of expectations. It was filmed some three years ago and has become the subject of much speculation and delay, now emerging as a modest, unassuming portrait of a privileged Scottish childhood in the years between the two world wars. Beautiful scenery provides the visual allure and gentle nostalgia sets the tone as we follow the ebb and flow of family life on a vast country estate owned by young Fraser�s grandfather and run by his eccentric inventor father Edward (Colin Firth). Isolated from the concerns of the wider world, the estate is an adventure playground in which the curious lad gains a wide-ranging education in everything from fly-fishing to the temptations of the flesh and the hypocrisies of the adult mind. Family gatherings, exotic guests, the annual curling championship and other rituals provide snapshots of a lost age. What little drama the film possesses comes in the form of Irene Jacob�s Heloise, Fraser�s new aunt and an object of forbidden desire for his smitten father. Although there is potential here for a childhood memoir in the manner of My Life As A Dog or Hope And Glory, My Life So Far has too genteel and fragmentary a narrative to merit a mention in the same breath. Always pleasant, it lacks those extremes of light and dark that distinguish a great drama from a merely decent one. ~~~~~ Note: the only review to mention curling I think. ;-)
~amw #1109
Well, and you are going to hate me for this but I have seen MLSF, and although it is charming, the photography wonderful, the acting very good, and many wonderful slow-mo moments, I have to agree with many of the reviews and the one above and also with Barry Norman who said that it didn't amount to much. In fact Aishling and I had inteded to see it twice before we came home, in case we had missed something the first time around , but really we felt that there was not need so saw it only the once. It was a very hot sunny day in London yesterday and there were only about 10 of us in the cinema. There were some very amusing moments and the small audience laughed in all the right places but not enough happened. I felt it would have suited television better than the big screen but then we wouldn't have had the full benefit of those wonderful close-ups of CF. Sorry but I just feel it needed something more. Also I don't think anything happened in the hay-loft, I am sure Heloise would have been much more upset f it had. I would still love to own the video, if only to fast-forward and to slow-mo. Sorry to sound so negative and I am sure that any CF fan here will love it, but also I think the only reason to go to this film would be if you are a CF fan.
~amw #1110
BTW I though young Robert Norman was very good and I thought he played the scene at the dining table so well, he really couldn't understand why what he had said was so wrong "what, why what's wrong!" he says when his father tells himto go to his study.
~amw #1111
Well, and you are going to hate me for this but I have seen MLSF, and although it is charming, the photography wonderful, the acting very good, and many wonderful slow-mo moments, I have to agree with many of the reviews and the one above and also with Barry Norman who said that it didn't amount to much. In fact Aishling and I had inteded to see it twice before we came home, in case we had missed something the first time around , but really we felt that there was not need so saw it only the once. It was a very hot sunny day in London yesterday and there were only about 10 of us in the cinema. There were some very amusing moments and the small audience laughed in all the right places but not enough happened. I felt it would have suited television better than the big screen but then we wouldn't have had the full benefit of those wonderful close-ups of CF. Sorry but I just feel it needed something more. Also I don't think anything happened in the hay-loft, I am sure Heloise would have been much more upset f it had. I would still love to own the video, if only to fast-forward and to slow-mo. Sorry to sound so negative and I am sure that any CF fan here will love it, but also I think the only reason to go to this film would be if you are a CF fan.
~fitzwd #1112
(Ann) Well, and you are going to hate me for this but I have seen MLSF No we're not! :-)
~KarenR #1113
Ann, you know no one gets lambasted for their opinions here! ;-) If you and Aishling thought it was mediocre, that's fine. I will disagree that it was not better suited for television, at least not our television. To me, MLSF is representative of many period British films that look extraordinarily good, have wonderful acting, but don't have a lot going on. For me, they are "slice of life" portraits and very satisfying. Having Colin up on the screen for so much of the time is an even bigger plus.
~heide #1114
That's right. Your review isn't negative at all and I agree with you that the film is a lightweight. It still has its charms (and we know who they belong to). I do think it's worth seeing a second time simply because it often takes a second viewing for me to catch everything and with our DB, you don't want to miss a thing. IMO it's better than SLOW though they're both choppily edited which makes you wonder what you're missing. Glad you saw it ladies and hope to hear more.
~lafn #1115
Ann) Well, and you are going to hate me for this but I have seen MLSF ... (Donna)No we're not! :-) Speak for yourselve.;-);-)(Only kidding, of course) Seriously, I think we spoiled it for you. First of all , the film is three years old.And you've had to hear us talk about it for a year now...so it's old hat. The film is such an improvement on the book, that frankly I was elated.The book was a yawner of the first order.IMO the film is a charmer...but agree that one would not wish to see it except for Colin....but truly, isn't that the reason one sees any of his starring films? The films on their own merit are never riveting.The TV ones are, however. You didn't think he looked gorgeous in those outfits...the navy blue dinner suit ? LOL ...You must think I'm an obsessed nut to have flown down to Dallas to see it...
~Tracy #1116
AnnW - I'm deeply envious that you got to see MLSF. I'm just going to have to have yet another night out in London town to see it, as it is unlikely that it will reach me here in deepest Kent ;-( Allison many thanks and ditto all the comments about the GMTV pics. He does scrub up well doesn't he? But I have to agree with Arami - I rather go for the unkempt look a la Donmar (ah memories, memories!) It is v. encouraging to read so much about MLSF (good or bad) I was quite surprised at the sheer volume of the stuff given that it's not a huge film..but I suppose the Hudson/Puttnam connection and (no doubt) publicity machine didn't do any harm!
~lizbeth54 #1117
I'll see MLSF in about a month, when it wends its way up north. I don't mind if not much happens....I quite like a gentle pace! Just caught the end of the oh so boring BAFTA awards ceremony....Sue Birtwistle's "Wives and Daughters" had quite a few nominations. Michael Gambon got Best Actor, so SB has an excellent track record for her productions...JE was Best Actress for P&P. If CF does "Armadillo" (and I'm sure he will), maybe it will be three in a row! Although I don't think that BAFTA like CF....what was the unofficial reason quoted for his not winning for Darcy?..."that he just stood around and didn't do much". Very unfair really!!! But I'd like to see him get something...I still think it was a shame he didn't get an Olivier nomination!
~lafn #1118
Just caught the end of the oh so boring BAFTA awards ceremony. What???They ignored Jodi "Mouth-Ajar" May in TTOTS?. In fact....they ignored TTOTS,period? ;-) ~~~~~~ Michael Gambon got Best Actor Saw him recently in "The Insider"played a tobacco company executive...sporting an almost flawless Kentucky accent....barely southern.
~Arami #1119
I imagine that CF may be like MG (in status) in his later years: modest, shy and respected. what was the unofficial reason quoted for his not winning for Darcy?..."that he just stood around and didn't do much". That reminds me of what he once said in an interview: (I quote from memory) "I'd love to do cartwheels and dazzle, but I have no capacity for it..."
~Allison2 #1120
(Tracy)I rather go for the unkempt look a la Donmar Okay you can have that version, I'll take the suit, I thought he looked fabulooous.
~Allison2 #1121
(Tracy)I rather go for the unkempt look a la Donmar Okay you can have that version, I'll take the suit. I thought he looked fabulooous.
~Allison2 #1122
Sorry about the double post. I think fabulooous is just the right word.
~aishling #1123
I go along with Ann's comments of MLSF. It was charming but not enough to tempt me to watch it a second time 45 minutes later at the prices we have to pay. It was very comical in parts and we laughed along with the other eight people in the cinema. I also don't think anything much happened in the hay loft. I think Heloise would have had far more to say than "Don't you ever do that again". I did enjoy the film and would see it a second time in a couple of weeks if it was released locally. No chance of that.
~ommin #1124
Its sad so few attend in U.K. it did so well in Aust. Nine weeks in Perth. I saw it twice and second, third time round on DVD really came to appreciate it. Don't give up in the U.K. it grows on you.
~Moon #1125
I'll take the suit, I thought he looked fabulooous. I am with you, Allison. :-) I really enjoyed MLSF. It is a CF treat and that big smile of his at the end is worth the ticket price. I can not imagine preferring SLOW to MLSF.
~lafn #1126
Ditto the suit. I can not imagine preferring SLOW to MLSF. Who said that? Surely, not anybody I know...
~EileenG #1127
Murph, that NYT article was about British actors who have taken Hollywood by storm. Although I also searched for mention of CF, I wasn't surprised at the omission. CF really hasn't taken H'wood by storm (yet?!). Though I don't think CF needs to clean up alot (as opposed to the likes of Tom 'won't you pleaasssee cut that skanky hair' Cruise), I agree with Karen and Allison, he does look fabulooous in a suit. I'm disappointed that you're disappointed in MLSF, Ann. It is a flawed film. Yet IMO it has more going on than Eyes Wide Shut (my eyes were wide shut during that yawner. And all that hype! ZZZZZZZ).
~patas #1128
Thanks for the pics, Allison and Arami. His smile is always so good to see.
~lizbeth54 #1129
A few tidbits in the papers.. Sam Mendes is to direct a new play at the Donmar , opening end of September, a poignant story of World War 1, focusing on a group of soldiers on the eve of battle. Good vehicle for CF if he's free! The Telegraph lists as one of its events of the week the start for the shooting of BJD (they must have been just rehearsing last week?). "British cast - HG and CF - excellent". Also there's another news item on RZ, and all the Cannes reports give her raves for "Nurse Betty". There's a lot of pre-shoot buzz about BJD, which is good. The same applied to "Notting Hill"...everyone knew about it.
~lizbeth54 #1130
I imagine that CF may be like MG (in status) in his later years: modest, shy and respected. (Arami) It's a good comparison. One thing that struck me about Michael Gambon is that in the week that he wins Best Actor for a major TV drama, he is also starring in a film "The Last September" that opened to minimal attention in one theatre, and the couple of reviews I saw barely mentioned him. I think that for certain actors (over 40!)and types of acting and types of drama, television is often (not always) the better medium....I'm looking forward to seeing CF in another quality 5 hour adaptation (hopefully!). Also the "British" film industry is changing rapidly. The new Film Commission say that they will only support movies which cast actors who are global in their appeal and can put bums on seats. For example in a new gangster movie (spare me, please!) set in Liverpool (can hardly wait), Samuel H Jackson will co-star with Robert Carlyle. I can see why they are doing it...you gotta make money...but a certain type of film will die. However, if talent is diverted into good television, I don't see any problem.
~mari #1131
Ann and Aishling, thanks for your reports. Sorry you didn't enjoy the film more, but we can't all like the same things. I'd still like to hear what you thought of the cast, which I thought was uniformly good. (Bethan) The new Film Commission say that they will only support movies which cast actors who are global in their appeal and can put bums on seats. Maybe (hopefully) they will use the profitable films to subsidize production of the more discriminating fare. That's pretty much what happens here, where Scream 3 helps pay the freight for a SIL, and Godzilla pays for The Winslow Boy. And face it, it is a global marketplace; I know most U.S. films don't turn a profit until they are distributed overseas. RE: shooting on BJD. It's nice they've had the luxury of a two-week rehearsal; seems like they're trying to do it right. Hughie is in the U.S. this week, as I see him listed for some of the talk shows, to promote his new Woody Allen film. (God forbid WA would ever condescend to sell his own films!) ***** Is anyone here watching the Jesus miniseries? It's on-topic, since John The Baptist is being played by none other than our pal Clive from DQ--David O'Hara. Didn't recognize him at first under all that facial hair, and he's lost the Glaswegian accent (as well as his head at the end of Part 1;-) The show is well done, BTW, and I very much like Jeremy Sisto, a newcomer who is playing the title role.
~amw #1132
Eileen, MLSF is a million, billion, trillion times better than EWS!! and actually I didn't say I didn't like MLSF, I just felt it lacked something, I know not what. The cast were uniformly excellent as Mari says, and again I was very impressed by RH. The scenery was stunning and makes me what to book a holiday in the Highlands, what a lovely location. I just felt it didn't go anywhere or amount to much but it was charming, the acting excellent but some things just didn't ring true, for instance I can't really believe that Moira? would really have created such a fuss in fronrt of all the staff, she would have done it privately and I really think Heloise behaved really oddly with the boy and with Edward, throwing moss all over the boy, I don't think so. Anyway minor details, I did love it and will buy the video and add it to my collection.
~KarenR #1133
(Mari) God forbid WA would ever condescend to sell his own films! Ah, fooled you this time. Woody just did a whirlwind, nationwide promotional tour for the film; he took the film to three college campuses: Stanford, U of Chicago and can't remember if it was NYU or Harvard. Of course, he just might be looking for someone to replace Soon-Yi. ;-)
~lafn #1134
(Ann)Anyway minor details, I did love it and will buy the video and add it to my collection. Whew....for a minute there I thought you didn't like it...and that you liked SLOW more.We all brought up those same details..and sadly so did the critics. Those coming -of-age films never have a real story...little vignettes in Fraser's life.But to see ODB in a starring role on a large screen is always an event....Moreover, one never knows when the next one will occur.
~lizbeth54 #1135
I can not imagine preferring SLOW to MLSF. Who said that? Surely, not anybody I know... Haven't seen MLSF yet, so can't make any comparison...but, although I'll be in a minority, I must confess to actually liking SLOW. And (to make matters worse!) I thought most of the dialogue was fine. I actually (and most unusually for me) watched the video with my DH. We lived in Nigeria for several years, and I thought he might enjoy it. And he did. Particularly the exchanges between the women,and some of the supporting performances (Nimi's mother), in addition to the main roles. Costumes and highlife music were a pleasant bonus. Call us odd! But there it is. :-)
~KarenR #1136
The option called Chat (even though it is just a message board) is operational at the Relative Values site. People have posted to ask whether Julie Andrews will be at the premiere (duh!) and when it will open in the US, Canada and Australia. The webmaster answered, saying they would attempt to find out within the next couple of days. http://community.relative-values.net/community/scripts/directory.pl
~KarenR #1137
A few news items From The Sunday Observer, an article about Irene Jacob:Her latest role in My Life So Far, starring Colin Firth and Mary Elizabeth Mastrantonio, is definitely Jacob post-Kieslowski. In this amiable yet hardly substantive family drama set in the inter-war years, Jacob plays the elegant, spirited Gallic fiancee who sets pulses racing amid a mildly eccentric Scottish gentry family. 'I thought the character was very inspiring and liked the way she interacted very honestly with all the children,' she says. 'It reminded me of Au Revoir Les Enfants when I was the piano teacher and all the boys were inspired by me as the only woman in the place.'but then ends with:it's clear Jacob still hankers for those 'big, probing parts'. At 34 she is well respected, works around the world and is undoubtedly a directors' favourite. But she is unwilling to make the choices and calculations that would lead to greater fame. Post-Kieslowski, kudos counts, but having fun is important too. She likes to play with her image and confound audiences. 'If I choose a part, it's because I'm moved by it and I like the director. It's only for that reason now. I have to be curious about the part whether it's nice, not nice, mean, jealous, generous, aggressive. Who cares? If it moves me, I'll do it.'What in there explains Londinium? ;-) From The Scotsman on May 12: NORMAN'S CONQUEST BY GARETH MCLEAN Robert Norman doesn't want to talk about his new movie. It's not that he's a fickle film star, reluctant to speak to the press lest his personality overshadow his character's motivation. Rather he's a 14-year-old boy whose big-screen appearance in My Life So Far, which is released tomorrow, makes him ever-so-slightly embarrassed in that awkward, teenage kind of way. Not that it shows all that much. Sitting in his living-room discussing his co-stars - Colin Firth, Mary Elizabeth Mastrantonio and Malcolm McDowell - and the film-making process, Norman has composure and maturity beyond his years, yet isn't a bit precocious. "I knew the others were someone but I didn't recognise them, I didn't actually know who they were," he says. Last week's London premiere, it transpires, was one of Norman's favourite experiences so far. "The best bit was driving up in the Mercedes with the blacked-out windows and the guy opening the door to the red carpet and all the press being there. That was so cool." Norman's down to earth attitude is the result of an otherwise normal life full of exams, sport and a happy family life. His candour about the hype surrounding the surreal world of the movies is refreshing. "At the premiers, I met about 80 Lords. And Cherie Blair and her children. They were all bowing to me, which was a bit weird." Based on the autobiography of former Granada chairman Denis Forman, My Life So Far charts the lives of a family growing up on a post-World War One Highland estate. Firth and Mastrantonio play Edward and Moira, the unconventional parents of Norman's character, Fraser, and his older sister, Elspeth, played by Kelly MacDonald. Their pastoral idyll is thrown into disarray when suitors begin to approach Elspeth and Moira's brother Morris returns with his nubile wife, Heloise. Norman got the part after the casting director took an exhaustive look round schools in Edinburgh. Eventually, she turned up at George Watson's College. "It was through drama club that we heard about it. We had a chat and she asked me to go along and audition, which I did, and it resulted in me getting the part." Screen tests and meetings with the director Hugh Hudson, who also directed Chariots of Fire and Greystoke - Legend of Tarzan, followed and it wasn't long before Norman and his family were ensconced by Loch Fyne waiting for filming to start. Once filming began, getting into the spirit of things meant hard work and more than a bit of mischief. "There's a picnic scene we did - which isn't in the film now - of me on a raft and I kept accidentally-on-purpose falling into the water. I got in trouble for that because they only had a limited amount of kilts for me to wear," he guffaws. "And kilts take ages to dry. Maybe that's why they cut the scene." Yet appearing in a film is not an experience he would like to repeat. "It was great and the acting thing is glamorous, but I don't think I'd like to do it all the time." But now that the film is set to pass before the public eye, how does Norman feel about the inevitable interest? "My friends have all been really cool about it. I don't get teased at school or anything like that. In a couple of weeks, everyone will forget about it and things will get back to normal." However, Norman maintains his brush with fame hasn't changed him. "I think I'm a bit more confident. At the time, it didn't seem so special, though now I realise how lucky I was. Apart from that, I'm exactly the same." The best experience Norman has had as a result of filming My Life So Far was a sheer fluke which occurred the night after the London screening in the hotel's breakfast room. "We were sitting and there was one other family there, and there was this Australian girl who we thought was a supemodel because she was so nice. But then we realised it was Anne from Neighbours. That was really weird because she looks a bit ugly on the TV. That was the most exciting thing that happened. She is so pretty." So far, Robert Norman's life has been one less ordinary. You get the feeling whatever he does, he'll always be a bit of a star. And what would he say if he was approached to be in another film? "I'd say after school. Not now," he says firmly. ~~~~~~~~~` Finally, a short but cute item from The Herald (May 12): Ask a silly question ACTOR Colin Firth had been in Argyll filming My Life So Far, which goes on release today, when he was approached by a local who had a small part in the film asking for an autograph. Happy to do so, Colin took the proffered book, wrote the word 'To' then asked the local 'What name?' The puzzled Argyll man told him: 'Yours.' At the end of the four-month shoot in Scotland, the actors and crew got together for an impromptu talent show, with the child performers acting as judges. High Road stalwart Eileen McCallum, who plays the cook in the film, sang a searing jazz number about being a red hot momma. As she finished her turn, one of the 14-year-old boy judges turned to his mate and said: 'I don't know about you, but she still does it for me.'
~Allison2 #1138
Well it was a first for me....the first time I have been the only person in a cinema! It was however a blisteringly hot Monday afternoon and in a country like hours you don't spend a precious sunny day sitting in a cinema. My DH flatly refused to go with me to our local cinema on Sunday - that was also a beautiful day! So off I went to the Curzon all alone. I am with Ann W. There was something unsatisfactory about the whole thing. One of the problems was that it was meant to be seen through the eyes of Fraser but that wasn't carried through cinematically. The editing had obviously been severe and meant the whole thing was disjointed rather than episodic. It was so obviously twee. All those rosy cheeked servants sitting around going ee and arghh or whatever the Scottish equivalent is. But ODB was to die for as usual. Loved the clothes.
~patas #1139
(Bethan)The new Film Commission say that they will only support movies which cast actors who are global in their appeal and can put bums on seats. I can see why they are doing it...you gotta make money... I should think that movies that can make money by themselves would not need the Film Commission's support... (Ann)Anyway minor details, I did love it and will buy the video and add it to my collection. Will you let me know when you do (and SLOW too), please, Ann? ;-)I liked SLOW too, Bethan :-)
~KarenR #1140
Gi) I should think that movies that can make money by themselves would not need the Film Commission's support... Quite ;-)
~amw #1141
I have been thinking about MLSF and another thing that just didn't ring true was when Heloise told Fraser not to listen to his father, surely not, not in that day and age and I could quite understand Edward being annoyed at that. Gi, I will certainly let you know when I get the video.
~lafn #1142
I should think that movies that can make money by themselves would not need the Film Commission's support... Well, it's their tax money..and they obviously don't care. I'm just a wee-bit disappointed in the UKers so far missing the charm of MLSF. Maybe, I'm odd;-)
~amw #1143
I really thought it was charming Evelyn, but to be honest I like something with a beginning, a middle and an ending and actually I think I could have sat through Sunshine again rather than MLSF, it's just that I had seen everything the first time around because that's all it took, whereas something like Sunshine, and I don't mean because it was 3hours long, had much more to it and it was possible that one could have missed something the first trime around, I just didn't feel this with MLSF. Sorry. It was more like a pictorial diary, not really a story with a plot. Hope that makes sense.
~Allison2 #1144
I also think that perhaps for us in the UK we have been brought up on a diet of stories which take place in big houses with eccentric people and quaint servants. It really didn't have any extra dimension for me...sorry...again. On another note I managed a very quick peek at OK magazine on the stands. They seem to be putting stars into various categories with big glossy pictures. Colin came in the category of those who are still wowing them in spite of getting older. There is then a small picture of him in a goatee looking quite lined and tired so that it completely belied what they were saying. Grhhh.
~mari #1145
Wasn't Saura supposedly going to be the director for Maid Of Buttermere? Looks like it may not happen any time soon. This is from AICN: - Carlos Saura will direct a biography of Luis Bunuel; BUNUEL AND THE KING'S SALOMON TABLE will look at some episodes in the life of the surrealist film-maker. And Gran Wyoming , comic star from Spain has been contacted to play Bunuel young while Francesco Rabal will play him older. Catherine Deneuve, who was in different movie from Don Luis (BELLE DE JOUR, TRISTANA) might also take part in this film that will be shot in Tol�de and Aragon from next October.
~KarenR #1146
small picture of him in a goatee looking quite lined and tired Did it look like one of the pics from Londinium?
~Allison2 #1147
Did it look like one of the pics from Londinium? Certainly nothing I had seen before. It did not look as if he was in character. It could have been during the SIL filming or perhaps Londinium. Do you think he grew his own whiskers for SIL? I would have bought the magazine but it was such an awful photograph that I didn't bother.
~Moon #1148
(Allison), I also think that perhaps for us in the UK we have been brought up on a diet of stories which take place in big houses with eccentric people and quaint servants. I subscribed to BBC/Amarica thinking this is what I was gping to get, instead they show all those riff-raff shows that are so popular in the UK. (Ann), It was more like a pictorial diary, not really a story with a plot. Do biographies really have a plot? It seems to me it accomplished its purpose quite well.
~Moon #1149
Typing quickly, excuse spelling.
~fitzwd #1150
(Moon) I subscribed to BBC/Amarica thinking this is what I was gping to get, instead they show all those riff-raff shows that are so popular in the UK. Oh dear, I've been bemoaning the fact that I can't get the channel. I'm not missing anything? Were you able to watch something like the Baftas?
~Arami #1151
Do biographies really have a plot? If they don't, they should be given one when they are adapted fot the screen, as it makes things more interesting. If there's no plot, there's obviously nothing to tell - so why bother? In any case, MLSF seems to be just an episode from Forman's childhood and not a whole life - therefore not a biography. It's a sketchy story, a misty recollection of a few incidents: mildly amusing in places, but not very exciting. Perhaps it looked better on paper?
~Moon #1152
If there's no plot, there's obviously nothing to tell - so why bother? There is a very long list of films in the history of Cinema that have no plot and are highly acclaimed. Resnais, Bunuel and most recently, Time Code. MLSF is much more terra/terra than those films and it worked for me. MLSF seems to be just an episode from Forman's childhood and not a whole life - therefore not a biography. True. It is a short story, a small part of his life. I am not sure how far the book it is based on gets to because I have not read it. (Donna), Were you able to watch something like the Baftas? No BAFTAS. You are not missing anything. I have e-mailed them several times requesting better types of programs which to me would be the ones that Allison had mentioned above, but to no avail.
~Arami #1153
films in the history of Cinema that have no plot and are highly acclaimed. Resnais, Bunuel But these films have a strong imagery content. The difference, in crude and simple terms, can be compared to the difference between traditional, "realistic" paintings and, say, impressionism. You may think there's no plot in the traditional sense, but in fact there is something going on. There must be. It all boils down to the quality of the contents and the ultimate impact.
~lafn #1154
...mildly amusing in places, but not very exciting. No one ever said it was exciting...or even mean't to be. But there was a lot of family warmth, bonding,and as Harvey said..."forgiveness"...it's an old-fashioned film that people keep saying they want to see. Perhaps it looked better on paper? If you mean the book...it was dreadfully boring. Thank God they were not faithful to it.Yes...there are lots of holes in this film...it isn't perfect.Perhaps due to editing or directing. But it's a film he can be proud of ....And as I've said many times, he can't afford to have another film tank. Wait til you see it,Arami...or have you?
~EAGrace #1155
Hi, I'm new around here. Just noticed all the discussion about My Life So Far. I guess it's been messed around with a lot. I saw it last year, so I was surprised to learn there is a new big release date. I don't know what the latest version is like, but I have to be honest about the one that I saw. I was disappointed. It almost worked for me, and yet somehow didn't quite. Like others, I'm not sure I can put my finger on the reasons. I'm not bothered by lack of plot. I've loved many movies that were not dependent on plot. I plead 'muddled'--- the film, not me. I'm merely confused. But that's another story. . . I would say it was a film that couldn't decide about itself. In the version I saw, there was an element of darkness to the partially onstage/partially offstage encounter between the Colin Firth and Irene Jacob characters that didn't fit with an otherwise fond nostalgic tale from the point of view of the guy's son. I didn't think the implied rape was intentional, nor did I believe that that's what happened. But, my partner really thought it did. And I do believe there was enough ambiguity around the incident to support his interpretation. So, either the movie was muddled, or I was experiencing a weird flashback to the 1920s --- underlying attitudes embedded in the film's ideology, as much as the story setting! But that would be too creepy, so I'll settle for muddled. You know, I believe the version I saw would have been better if they'd dropped the pretence of a child's point-of-view altogether, and allowed the adults to play it as an emotionally and morally ambiguous piece. (Although I think they'd still need to make it clear that no rape occured.) With so many talented actors, what a shame to restrict the performances through an unfocused camera eye. How does the newest version compare to what I've described here? I'm curious, how does the film's 'coveting thy brother's wife' theme compare to the book?
~KarenR #1156
Welcome Elizabeth. Glad you joined in. Many of us saw MLSF last year as well, when it played here in the US. We discussed it on another topic (#121, which was setup just for spoiler discussions of MLSF). Also just FYI, there's nothing in the book about the father (Adam) lusting after any other woman; he has a very healthy relationship with his wife. So this is totally fabricated. Perhaps having read the book (*yawn*), I really appreciated the movie more. ;-) I too wasn't bothered by lack of plot. I thought it was charming and enjoyable. When I compare MLSF to other costume pieces I've seen recently, it comes out on top. Take Tea with Mussolini. Could you put together a bunch of more stereotypical people in a situation we've seen umpteen times before. Egad!! Worthless. MLSF wasn't perfect by any stretch of the imagination, had lots of holes due to many factors, but the performances were wonderful and I guess we don't see many kilts as you do. ;-)
~mari #1157
Welcome, Elizabeth! What you described is what the rest of us have seen. Are you in the U.S.? Anyway, I'm a big fan of this film. Just looking over some of the comments here, I have to add that I'm not a particulaly big fan of costume drama or period pieces. I like a lot of those "dark underbelly of life" films (maybe I should get BBC America, eh, Moon?;-) But MLSF totally drew me in, and not merely on charm. I was drawn to the parallel themes of Fraser growing up and losing his childlike innocence and the Pettigrews' world as they knew it coming to an end, in effect losing their innocence as well. Shots such as Edward's kite not getting off the ground juxtaposed with the Emporer Of The Sky's soaring plane, drove home the inevitable intrusion of the outside world, later evidenced further by Heloise's arrival. Just as Fraser would struggle in his march toward adulthood, the Pettigrews would struggle to leave their safe, insular emotional place but hopefully fashion more realistic adult relationships. The film is definitely not plot driven, but the anecdotes did a good job in revealing the characters. For example, I think of the scene where Fraser sees his mother gazing wistfully into the mirror, whispering in French and comparing herself to Heloise. She made my heart want to break. Well, enough outta me for now:-) To each her own.
~EAGrace #1158
Thanks for the welcomes. Help. How do I log off? I can't find it anywhere!
~KarenR #1159
You don't need to log off. When you close down your browser, you are off.
~EAGrace #1160
Thanks! I could have sworn that initiation rite included a logging-off ritual! It's an entirely different experience than merely reading responses. So many more buttons, and topics I've never seen before. . .I appreciated hearing about the book. It's surprising that they completely fabricated the father's obsession for his brother's wife. But you've probably discussed and reconciled this point long ago. Now that you mention it, I remember liking the parallel theme of innocence to experience. I'm north of the US Mari! And west of Scotland, although there are lots of kilts. :)
~KarenR #1161
Oh boy, I can see Evelyn shaking her head at this one. BTW, Overseas owns Relative Values. Certainly explains why it wants someone else to purchase the rights to distribute in the US (needs cash): Overseas crosses into negative A decrease in the sale of film and video materials pushed Overseas Film Group into the red Tuesday, as the indie film distributor posted a first-quarter net loss of about $104,000. The loss compares with a profit of $100,400 in first-quarter 1999. Revenue dropped to $6 million from $6.7 million a year earlier. The Los Angeles-based company, distributor of such films as "Titus," "A Map of the World" and "Waking Ned Devine," said the declines were partially offset by improved direct-to-video sales and an increase in service-fee revenue related to First Look Pictures theatrical releases.
~LauraMM #1162
I liked Tea w/ Mussolini
~lafn #1163
(Laura)I liked Tea w/ Mussolini That's because you have yet to see MLSF ;-)
~lafn #1164
(Karen)I can see Evelyn shaking her head at this one. BTW, Overseas owns Relative Values. Certainly explains why it wants someone else to purchase the rights to distribute in the US (needs cash): Wrong!Evelyn is on her knees (again) praying RV doesn't end up on a bank shelf. Maybe I should alert Imperial Bank that "Overseas Film Group" is coming... "Make room on the shelf"...they already have SLOW;-) But, hey,...I'm saving the hair- shirt for "Londinium."
~Allison2 #1165
But, hey,...I'm saving the hair- shirt for "Londinium." LOL! But that reminded me. All this talk by Jasper about Colin not filming in July and August is so much tosh. He filmed Londinium in London in August didn't he? But then it was probably too good a project to pass up;-)
~EileenG #1166
(Allison) He filmed Londinium in London in August didn't he? *tapping the ol' memory bank* I think he filmed Londinium and Blackadder in June-July and RV in August, on the Isle of Man. All this talk by Jasper about Colin not filming in July and August is so much tosh. Makes you wonder about the rest of the article's content, doesn't it? Not that things are untrue, but perhaps not *always* true. Agree with Moon about BBC America. I have it and never watch it. Nick at Nite is better ;-D As regards the 'plot vs. plotless' MLSF discussion--I may not be the brightest bulb on the Christmas tree, but *I* thought there was a plot. I've seen better films and I've seen far worse. I am truly surprised at the overall disappointment expressed by those who have just seen it. It sounds like those of us who saw it last year liked it better (I liked it the first time I saw it but liked it much more on second viewing). Oh, well, each to his own. Welcome, EAG (from EHG)!
~mari #1167
(Elizabeth) I'm north of the US Mari! And west of Scotland, although there are lots of kilts. :) Hmmm . . .unfurling ye olde atlas here . . . found you! Greenland, right?;-) (Evelyn) Maybe I should alert Imperial Bank that "Overseas Film Group" is coming... LOL! Oh, too funny, Evelyn. Sad, but funny.;-) I'll bet those sharpie distributors at the Cannes market will now try to get RV for, like, a buck ninety eight.;-) In real estate parlance, Overseas Film Group would be known as a "motivated seller." MARSHWOOD HOUSE--Mrs. Clean lives here! *Bring your toothbrush* Not sure about the Londinium filming, Allison. I thought he had pretty much wrapped that up by the end of June/early July, but I could be mistaken. Does anyone recall? I'd love to hear that there's more flexibility in his work schedule.:-) (Karen) Take Tea with Mussolini. Could you put together a bunch of more stereotypical people in a situation we've seen umpteen times before. Egad!! Worthless. I thought it was even worse than worthless. Bunch of clueless, self-absorbed, incredibly naive ex-pats fiddling while Rome (and much of the rest of Europe) burned. Ugh.
~EAGrace #1168
Actually Mari, true confessions. I live in Canada. Lots of kilts. Lots of celtic music, that certain something found in the French sensibility . . . shame about our politicians. I liked Tea with Mussolini, although I agree that the 'English Abroad'or 'English Broads Abroad'theme wears a little thin after awhile. Maybe that's what really drove the fascist movement in Italy --- just kidding. Although the movie does reflect the historical. What I like about this film was Cher.
~Moon #1169
the 'English Abroad'or 'English Broads Abroad'theme wears a little thin after awhile. Maybe that's what really drove the fascist movement in Italy LOL! Welcome/Bienvenue EAG! While on the subject of the English in Italy, I saw "Up at the Villa" and liked it. Better than "End of the Affair." I believe Londinium was filmed in June. In any case, Colin was in LA quite often last year because of SIL and probably saw a lot of Will, so he can be forgiven for filming RV in August.
~Arami #1170
Two more photos of Colin published recently: http://www.geocities.com/threedeers/Archives/tatok.html
~lafn #1171
Thanks Arami. In the first one he looks like the guy in "What me worry?" Second one is yummmmy.
~catheyp #1172
Thanks Arami. I use to say that I wasn't fond of goatie beards, but I've just changed my mind :-)
~EAGrace #1173
You know, with the beard, Colin Firth kinda looks like a friend of mine --- although my friend is older. As explained on BJD board, I go by Liz. I'm not an idiot normally, but I lost track of which name I was entering for which purpose, and then was too tired to change what I ended up with yesterday. I hope this doesn't cause confusion if there are other Lizs, but it's too weird to keep staring at my initials.
~KarenR #1174
Do we have any other Liz's? I don't think so. Thanks for the pictures. Am trying to decide if that second one was probably taken last summer when he did Londinium and that the facial hair was his, instead of paste-on:
~patas #1175
(LizG) I hope this doesn't cause confusion if there are other Lizs No. You are very welcome under your own name :-)
~patas #1176
(KarenR)Do we have any other Liz's? I don't think so. They have other aliases, I think. You are probably right, Karen, about the facial hair.
~Brown32 #1177
According to a fan who was there, the second picture was taken outside the Jongleurs in Battersea (South London) where Colin took part in a charity evening last year. The facial hair is definitely his. I have the picture too, thanks to a Firth/Rufus S. fan. I cleaned it up a bit.
~Brown32 #1178
oops again...
~KarenR #1179
From The Telegraph's article on Julie Andrews...nice to see Colin's name first in the list of co-stars, although we know that's not how it will be billed: This is rather a different look from the glossy one she reveals in her new film, Relative Values, based on the No�l Coward play. "Being a woman and being my age now, these kind of parts don't come rushing past my nose every second. It was marvellous," she says. Starring alongside Colin Firth, Stephen Fry and Alec Baldwin, Andrews is cast strictly to type as the Countess of Marshwood; crying "Oh, bother!" and billowing around a country house in a selection of big frocks. "Oh, my! How flattered can a lady get," she says at this, her fastidious English enunciation - how fleh-ta-d! - making her sound as if her throat is hosed down with rose water before each sentence. "Being glamorous is a huge effort. It takes at least two hours to get really glammed up for a movie, it is not an easy thing for me to do. But, sometimes," she says, slapping her thigh appreciatively, "it's just great to think that the old bod can still get it together."
~EAGrace #1180
~EAGrace #1181
oops, wrong box!
~KarenR #1182
Update on Overseas Filmgroup: Its situation has not yet advanced to that experienced by HandMade. According to business reports, OFG has received an infusion of capital (and new majority ownership) from an investment group (Rosemary Street Productions) and has commitments for new credit lines from Chase. Still doesn't mean they will release Relative Values here. Would still prefer someone to buy it off of them, rather than sinking more money into it.
~LisaJH #1183
(CherylB) Alas no, that was not I. That would have been CherylE, and I know her only from old posts, as well. She was also more astute and articulate than I. Her spelling was better, too. Sorry about the mix-up. Don�t sell yourself short, CherylB. Nice to �meet� you, too. Have read the thread on MLSF with great interest. I really loved the film, and could easily overlook its imperfections. I enjoyed the leisurely, slice-of life feel of the MLSF, as well as the engaging quirkiness of some of the characters. Really liked the father-son �woof-woofing� for some reason. Would I have enjoyed the movie as much if ODB had not played the lead? Perhaps not, although the rest of the cast was strong. Loved seeing that big CF smile and ODB nicely suited-up. Am v. depressed about the potential US distribution problems for RV. Surely we have not turned into such a nation of philistines that would not appreciate a bit of NC?
~lafn #1184
(Karen)Update on Overseas Filmgroup: Its situation has not yet advanced to that experienced by HandMade. According to business reports, OFG has received an infusion of capital (and new majority ownership) from an investment group (Rosemary Street Productions) and has commitments for new credit lines from Chase. *getting off my knees*... "Well, that worked....so far so good...";-) But I would rather have Imperial Bank, I have contacts there;-) Anybody know Rosemary St. Productions?
~KJArt #1185
Whoof!! All this trouble over the UK's collective reaction to MLSF! It just shows to go you that it's all in the eye of the beholder. To those closest to the project (psychologically or professionally), it seemed a very enjoyable experience. What Sir Denis, the guy whose story was being told, had to say reflected his evident satisfaction, at least with some aspects of the final result: (Sir Denis Forman on ODB's Edward:) For the Firth portrayal, Sir Denis has nothing but praise. "He is my father to a T - the way he walked, the way he talked. I did send them some old home movies, which I assume he saw, but it really is almost uncanny. A wonderful performance." He saw his father in it and also had nothing to say to the bends made in the tale to satisfy those who felt it necessary to invent some intense conflict source in order to spice up the story a bit. But even this amount of spice didn't seem to satisfy some plot afficionados ... ( Ann) Well, and you are going to hate me for this but I have seen MLSF ... (Donna)No we're not! :-) (Evelyn) Speak for yourselves.;-);-)(Only kidding, of course) ...Seriously, I think we spoiled it for you. First of all , the film is three years old. And you've had to hear us talk about it for a year now...so it's old hat. I think Evelyn has something here, but in more ways than one. Not only were you introduced to every little detail ahead of time (not only pre-revealed, but handily pre-explained [Viola! Instant Opinion...]), but as someone pointed out, you've had a plethora of films about big houses, kilts, quirky servants, and eccentric characters, etc. (I want to make an announcement at this point: The following is pure theorizing on my part and may be taken with a grain of salt for those inclined...) Just as a computer cache, having already accessed a site cannot, by itself, detect any change in it (It is sort of set to that first glance, i.e.: "I've already seen this page so I won't bother to look again because I already know what's there.."), I think some of the UK people are suffering from the same cache-like pre-set ... they feel they already seen this before, and needn't bother to look for anything especial, because they've already seen what's there -- the "Been There, Done That" - syndrome, I uess. Maybe they need to go back, hit their internal "Reload" button, and try to look at things through fresh eyes. ;-) (AnnW) ..actually I didn't say I didn't like MLSF, I just felt it lacked something, I know not what. When I saw it upon it's release, I came away with a reaction similar to Ann's too. I was touched and charmed, but felt a frustration at missing something ... Part of it was an awareness that a lot of the subtle details had gone right over my head because I hadn't understood the some of the dialogue at first, or caught some of the quick cuts, or the details within them. I knew I needed more watch time just to understand what was there. But to add to that feeling of missing things because they were slipping by me, was a deeper frustration: (Allison) I am with Ann W. There was something unsatisfactory about the whole thing. \...\ The editing had obviously been severe and meant the whole thing was disjointed rather than episodic. We already knew t at the movie had lost nearly 30 minutes of the original footage due to really brutal editing to make the thing "move better". It showed. ...And I felt cheated. (Irene Jacob): "Hugh [Hudson] decided to do something simple, that he could relate to. He told us this film was an appetiser. It's not a big meal, just something which gives you a taste, enough to want more." That is it in a nutshell, for me. The trouble was IMO that we DID like it, were charmed by it, moved enough to be truly interested in these characters and what might happen to them in their various and several situations ...moved enough to want more. But no more was to be forthcoming. And I truly resented it. I didn't want it to be an appetiser -- I wanted at the least a brunch. Instead, I am only allowed to pick over the intriguing details of the story still remaining, but I can never know the answers to a lot of my questions. Consciously or unconsciously, I believe the audience and the critics all came away feeling more or less cheated. It all depended on their ability and willingness to forgive what was taken away, (Mari, LisaJH and I can forgive a lot "apparently";-D) and their level of appreciation of what was left, that determined their final judgment of it . That and pressing the "Reload" button. **Heehee**)   8-D   KJ
~CherylB #1186
Hello Liz (EAGrace). You have impressed me in two comments you've posted. (Actually, the post in question is on the Odds and Ends board.) They are: 1. You can't spell very well and wish this board had spellcheck. Me too. 2. You really enjoyed "The Advocate/Hour of the Pig". That's one of my all time CF favorites. Another is "Apartment Zero", one of his best films, I think. I'm also developing a great appreciation for "Donovan Quick", a really good showcase for him as an actor. It is nice to meet you, virtually speaking.
~KarenR #1187
From Pandora's column/chest in The Independent on May 15: Absolutely anybody who is anybody is, apparently, off for a haircut in thecoming few days. Top people's coiffure (one is not allowed to say crimper), John Barrett, is making his annual pilgrimage from New York to London to shear the great and good ladies who lunch, and all for a good cause. Informed folk will know that Irish Johnney is such a whiz with the scissors that devotees will especially fly to his salon, overlooking Central Park, for the once over, deserting the much dischuffed Nicky Clarke. But for the next week, for a mere pounds 500, they can avoid the trip and have it done here. A special party tonight to mark his state visit is only the prelude to a stint of manic activity, which will raise funds for Rapt, the charity devoted to rehabilitating those in the stir who have problems with drink and drugs. Organised by Emma Soames and Amanda de Cadenet, the Knightsbridge bash will be attended by Alan Rickman, Colin Firth, Joley Richardson and, to continue the theatrical theme, former left-wing firebrand Vanessa Redgrave. It seems that getting involved in celebrity snipping turf wars is all that is left to a girl once the end of the Cold War has rather done away with her causes celebres.
~lafn #1188
From my morning newspaper column reviewing videos: VIEWERS CAN 'COME OF AGE'WATCHING "MY LIFE SO FAR" In today's weird, twisted world, a "coming of age" film has come to describe movies that include a teen's weird use of an apple pie. [For those who don't know..the teen in the movie shags an apple pie..] This genre actually includes some less raunchy , quality flicks that include last year's "My Life So Far". {Reviewer gives synopsis of story]. "My Life So Far" has some hilarious moments and is beautifully filmed in Argyll, Scotland. I strongly recommend it for parents with children 12 and older. ~~~~~ My bold,BTW. But it looks like this film has found a new target audience...a film for a family to watch together... and possibly could become a classic in that genre.
~EAGrace #1189
Hi Cheryl B, thanks to you and everyone else for the welcome. In addition to spelling, I'm also terrible at remembering names of people and things --- I call it noun burnout. Apartment Zero is an old favourite of mine --- saw it back in the days when I'd say "hey wasn't that the actor who was in ---? He looks so different in this other film". I'm always impressed with actors who are chameleons. Favorite CF scenes in Apartment Zero: when CF character (you see, I've forgotten his name) is kneeling, hugging his mother. Really creepy, yet not Norman Batesish quite. The use of his hands really made it chilling somehow. And I love the final scene. Goulishly humourous. CF looks like he's really enjoying himself, relishing the madness. Scenes like that must be the most fun to do. I liked the tone of this film, and think its one of the more intelligently done thrillers. Had me on the edge of my seat without insulting my intellect (my complaint about Fatal Attraction, for example).
~Moon #1190
Liz, do save these comments for ou AZ film disc. which is slated for this autumn. I hope you join us. It is also one of my favourites. :-)
~KarenR #1191
Uh oh... can only find MLSF playing at 3 theatres: Mayfair Curzon and two in Scotland (Edinburgh's Dominion and the Perth Playhouse) From 17 to 3?
~amw #1192
Oh, I am glad it is still playing at the Curzon, because I meant to say that there were some MLSF posters on sale there. At least its still playing somewhere!
~lizbeth54 #1193
MLSF is just showing at 4.00pm and 6.30pm at the Curzon, no evening showing (not suitable for grown-ups?) It seems to have disappeared completely from London after one week. Am very, very disappointed by this. Infact, I don't want to express my thoughts. Too depressing. The reviews were okay, more than okay....oh, well. I'll see it in a couple of weeks and am looking forward to it. I'm not sure whether any other provincial cinemas in the UK will be showing it...maybe just Bradford because of the Film Festival? Strangely enough, I don't think box office success/failure matters particularly for a British actor or for CF. They can always move between live theatre,TV and film. Reasonably good critical reviews are a must. Excepting comedies, most British films "flop" at the box office, and it doesn't matter who's in them. For example Ewan McGregor's latest film "Nora", based on the life of James Joyce is showing in just one cinema in London.(it's not Star Wars!) But fortunately, CF is doing "Bridget Jones", which is guaranteed to be a nationwide hit. And "Armadillo"(must be!) which I think is perfect...exactly the right blend of contemporary drama/humour. And should be very successful. And DQ will also be a success...have no doubts about this. You win some, lose some. I don't know what will happen to "Relative Values" in the UK. Probably the same reception as MLSF, polite reviews, no-one goes to see it, will do well in video rentals (this is a most important market in the UK) and very well on TV if shown!! Thus ends my thought for the day!
~ommin #1194
But it is so sad. As I said before it was on for 9 weeks in Perth, Australia (which is considered Philistine) and indeed was showing for some time longer in Adelaide - each major city showed it and was showing in major cinema chains in some cities. The audiences were good - when I went two times the cinema was more than half full. Once in an evening and once midday on a Sunday. Good films are not favoured! What have the Brits come too. But as you say video rentals and sales will do well. People stay at home I suppose because it is not always safe to go out. But the theatres seem to attract an audience - strange isn't it.
~lizbeth54 #1195
Meant to ask, Ann, what poster were they using for MLSF (there were several versions)? Thanks, Anne, for the above. Cheered me up!
~heide #1196
(Anne) The audiences were good - when I went two times the cinema was more than half full. Goes to show that Oceania always shows their good taste when a Firth production opens. Liz, let me add my welcome too. As Moon says, hang onto those AZ comments for our long-delayed film discussion but don't ever think that means you can't mention it here either. We LOVE discussing all aspects of his films - inside, outside, upside down. Favorite CF scenes in Apartment Zero: when CF character...is kneeling, hugging his mother. Really creepy, yet not Norman Batesish quite. The use of his hands really made it chilling somehow. Hands fluttering all over her. Good eye! And I love the final scene. Goulishly humourous. Now that is Norman Batesish. ;-) But of course the final final scene was Adrian coming out of his adult cinema and lighting up that cigarette ala James Dean. What Adrian has become should turn into a good discussion...one of these days. So Colin's going to get a hair cut? I want pictures. ;-) And I refuse to believe that Vanessa Redgrave's become redundant.
~lafn #1197
May I give you my thoughts for the day.... Strangely enough, I don't think box office success/failure matters particularly for a British actor or for CF Strange indeed...and I hope you are correct.... But producers do look at what an actor's bankability is at the box office. When CF says: "I want to be well thought of. I want to make money from this. I want to be prosperous. I want to be respected..."I wonder how he feels to have the starring films tank.Oh, he can always do TV, but he's not going to be v. prosperous or respected in that media alone.And time limitations prohibit his stage career except at the Donmar.Most West End theatres want a play to run more than just a few weeks. I am heartsick over this film...you might as well know it.This is quality stuff whether you think so or not. RV and BJD are not his films. He's in a supporting role, other people are carrying them. MLSF was hisfilm.DQ And Armadillo are TV roles..sure they're bound to be stellar. But it's TV. Frankly, I think it's a disgrace that the British public let him down. You should feel depressed . I'm not sure whether any other provincial cinemas in the UK will be showing it...maybe just Bradford because of the Film Festival? Good luck....and I really mean it.
~Arami #1198
These boards are not working properly today!!! Internal server error shows on all internal links and one has to hit reload repeatedly to get through and not many visitors know that... I'm not even sure if I can post...
~Arami #1199
I can - but only by hitting Reload repeatedly!
~Moon #1200
I can - but only by hitting Reload repeatedly! Where there is a will, there is a way. ;-) I had the same problem.
~lizbeth54 #1201
Testing
~lizbeth54 #1202
Evelyn, I actually agree with you, although I'm trying to convince myself otherwise. I don't understand what has happened to MLSF in London, but in my region it will show in Bradford and York, June 9-15, and I hope that it will reach other independent cinemas nationally. Bradford booked it because the audience response forms from the Festival screening were very favourable. I sometimes wonder if it would have been better if MLSF had been left in its original form, without all the subsequent edits. CF himself said that it his view it wasn't broke and didn't need fixing...."what it suffers from is the randomness of true story, because that's what it is" Those who liked it would have liked it more, and those who disliked it would have disliked it more. I doubt if the severe editing made any converts. As to Box office success for British films, well, in the UK that would make Harry Enfield the greatest actor who ever lived, and Michael Gambon a non-starter. And we are a TV nation...a lot of British films are now been made for direct transmission to SKY. Colin's got some good things coming up that will be seen by millions. And BJD will be a major boost internationally (and a romantic hero role!). Swings and roundabouts!
~amw #1203
According to The Sunday Times Culture magazine, it's not even playing at The Curzon, Mayfair, they have "Being John Malkovich" listed, I would have hoped it would have lasted two weeks as Sunshine did. BTW Bethan, the poster is different from the American one which I have, thanks to Evelyn, it has a picture of Frazer superimposed in the centre of the poster with CF & MEM to one side, sitting together with his arm around her and scenery in the background, very nice.
~lizbeth54 #1204
I don't know how I missed it...I glanced at the paper when I got up... but there's an extraordinary interview with Colin in today's Sunday Telegraph, in the Review section. Small picture on the front, huge pic inside. Too long to quote, but will do if it's not available online. But for once, he really shows emotion...the interviewer quotes some bad reviews of his performance in MLSF and he gets angry and reels off examples of critics who get their facts wrong... I just think "Do. Your. F...ing. Homework". The female interviewer doesn't find him all that attractive on screen ("as the camp nephew in RV he looks suave and clean cut, but not drop dead gorgeous").He asked to play the camp,wry, pithy role because he hadn't done it before. "But in the flesh he looks everything the most smitten Darcymaniac could hope for ..and more. He appears a younger slimmer version of Mr Darcy and is all good natured charm". All he seems to want is to be known as a good character actor. Comments on anarticle which says (re Mark Darcy role) "Thank God, he's finally smelling the coffee"..as though "I should own up to the fact that this is all my life will ever amount to." Interviwer said that judging fom the reactions of anyone (female) who heard that I was going to interview CF, "he still has their hearts", but men said he was a prat. He sounds quite emotional ...obviously wants to defend MLSF..it's not bland stuff.
~Allison2 #1205
Big full page article in the Sunday Telegraph review section. Fabulous photograph of Colin on that page and another smaller one on the front page of the review section. I am short of time today, so I shall try and scan the pictures though my scanner is playing up so may not succeed. Perhaps other UKers can go out and buy a few copies!
~Allison2 #1206
Oops Bethan we overlapped!
~lizbeth54 #1207
"Being John Malkovich" is showing in the evening. MLSF shows at the earlier times of 2.00 and 6.30. Judging from his reaction to some criticism in the Telegraph interview, he's already hurting over MLSF, and I guess (doing a Jasper Rees!) he'll be hurting more at the general response, or lack of it.
~Tracy #1208
Allison re Sunday Telegraph - "Perhaps other UKers can go out and buy a few copies!" I am always impressed when people can tell me what's in the papers before I even get to the newsagent - I really have no excuse as I live next door to one (other than it's Sunday and I've had a v.v.v. long lie-in)! Thanks for the info - I'll be hot footing it to the shop shortly so I'll pick up a copy ..or two...or.........
~Tracy #1209
BTW - Apparently (according to the Radio) today is the Feast Day of St. Colin Patron saint of.....?
~KarenR #1210
Morning, ladies. Thanks for the tantalizing tidbits. We'd definitely like to read more of what appears to be a very strange interview and if there are extra copies...
~KarenR #1211
If anyone wants to email me the article and/or scans, I can put it up at The Bucket, which isn't suffering from the Internal Server Error situation, and everyone will be able to read it. [Just go to the What's New button and down to articles]
~Arami #1212
Damn! I had various problems getting here today and just got the info about the Sunday Telegraph... DH is at the moment touring the region petrol stations hoping to find a copy, but it could be too late now... Why can't there be an early warning email system in operation among the UK Firthers on discovery of new material? As it happens, I don't have anyone to thank for it at the moment... am planning to rip off the modem and sell the computer... what's the bloody point...? ...Can you sense I'm seriously disappointed? :-(
~KarenR #1213
I am copying and posting today's messages over at the Temporary Drool Board, where you can read and comment. Please do not post here anymore today. It is way too difficult to manage. Here's the url for the board: http://www.insidetheweb.com/messageboard/mbs.cgi/mb49898 Also remember we have the Springfolks mailing list for messages and/or updates.
~patas #1214
Monday today... Was busy all weekend so am late with comments, please forgive me. (Evelyn)For those who don't know..the teen in the movie shags an apple pie.. I gathered as much from the trailer... definitely put me off seeing the movie, although not off eating apple pie :-P (Anne Hale)But it is so sad. As I said before it was on for 9 weeks in Perth, Australia (which is considered Philistine) and indeed was showing for some time longer in Adelaide Hummm... Methinks there's good reasons for one to emigrate to Australia...;-) And now must go read the emergency board and, hopefully, the Bucket :-)
~EileenG #1215
Have just read the Sunday Telegraph article. Thanks Mari, Karen, Ann, et. al for supplying and posting so quickly. My first impression was, although there's new content, the author appears to have borrowed liberally from Jasper's recent article: born in Africa (?), Livia's a documentary maker, etc. Didn't the author do. her. effing. homework? ;-) I was glad to read CF's defense of MLSF--I was proud of his work in that film, too. IMO he was talking about Rafie in his reference to the unnamed character actor who's been taking leading man roles. As regards his parting comment "but I took it to mean that I should just go back to being Mr Darcy all the time for ever, that I should just own up to the fact that this is all my life will ever amount to"...wonder where he read that. I, for one, say bring on those stuttering masturbatory village pervert roles! ;-) Am glad to see this board up and running again. Hope I haven't spoken too soon. About to hit 'submit' button...here goes...
~Tineke #1216
(Eileen)IMO he was talking about Rafie in his reference to the unnamed character actor who's been taking leading man roles. I was thinking the same thing. It has got to be RF.
~mari #1217
I didn't think of Ralph at all. I thought of John Cusack. Think of it: the nose and the greasy hair he mentions--describes JC to a tee in Being John Malkovich. I think of JC as much more of a character actor than RF, and he's certainly done a lot more of the "odd and grotesque" stuff than RF.
~lizbeth54 #1218
Are we back up? I hope so. I was glad to read CF's defense of MLSF--I was proud of his work in that film, too. (Eileen) I felt really sorry for him when I read this. Did anyone else react this way, or am I being super-sensitive on his behalf? I'm not sure why he gave this interview (to promote MLSF? RV? BJD?)...he must have given it within the last couple of days, after the reviews for MLSF came out. He looks absolutely gorgeous in the pic BTW...must be the Mark Darcy look! But the interviewer has done MLSF and Colin absolutely no favours here. She's picked on probably the worst critical comment made about him, and given the impression that the reviews for MLSF were all bad. She's also put him in the humiliating position of having to say "well, I thought I was good". What struck me here was that, in his defence, the poor chap wouldn't have been able to quote a single UK review that said he gave a good performance. When he *was* singled out, it was only for criticism. The end product of the Sunday Telegraph interview as a public relations exercise is pretty disastrous..... another 2million people will think that Colin was stiff and miscast, and gave a poor performance. Sorry to sound stroppy about this, but I can see why he would be happy if five people said he was a good actor. And to be in the frame for leading roles, you do need critical recognition!! Back to tittle tattle...has he only had two girlfriends or two named girlfriends? :-)
~patas #1219
(Bethan)Sorry to sound stroppy about this, but I can see why he would be happy if five people said he was a good actor. Shall we start counting to five? Evelyn, Karen, KJ, Bethan, Allison, AnnW, Winter, Esbee, Arami, Tracy, Tineke, CCherylB, AnneH, Marcia, Gi... Oops! What do you mean, I've exceeded my quota? ;-) You know I'd only started...
~EileenG #1220
(Bethan) I felt really sorry for him when I read this. I don't share your reaction. In the past Colin's been quite critical of his performances; it was refreshing to see him happy with this one. The end product of the Sunday Telegraph interview as a public relations exercise is pretty disastrous..... another 2million people will think that Colin was stiff and miscast, and gave a poor performance. Now, now, stop the gloom and doom. Let's have the optimist back. C'mon, where's all your exclamation points? ;-)
~Arami #1221
I felt really sorry for him when I read this. Did anyone else react this way, or am I being super-sensitive on his behalf? I'm not sure why he gave this interview Oh, dear, oh, dear... ;-) the poor chap wouldn't have been able to quote a single UK review that said he gave a good performance. I think that most UK reviews praised all the cast, even though they didn't think much of the film as a whole. He was expressly (and undeservedly) criticized maybe in about two of them. another 2million people will think that Colin was stiff and miscast, and gave a poor performance. Assuming that Telegraph readers are all prats and unable to think for themselves... :-) has he only had two girlfriends or two named girlfriends? :-) The latter, I think. We know of at least one more: the one who took the TV set with her when she moved out and he didn't have TV at home for a long time as a result. :-)
~KarenR #1222
Time to talk coffee... No where, no ways did anyone imply that Colin should be playing Mr Darcy for until the end of time. Here's the exact comment from #922: Definitely think Colin has woken up and smelled the coffee insofar as his career is concerned. *thank goodness* :-) Then in #962, the following was added: I just hope it isn't too late. I for one am not resigned to watch Colin move into roles usually associated with Robert Young yet! ;-) That last comment in the article was particularly painful:"Or you might have to change the character of the actor. Someone the Americans believe is a credible sex symbol."This tells me that Colin has heard this quite a bit in Hollywood from agents, casting directors, whoever. The word in Hollywood is that Colin is not a sex symbol. All we can hope for is that BJD reverses that impression. That Colin will be viewed as not only a viable English leading man (to compete for roles with the only other two - HG and RF). This role can get him the recognition for being both a sexy leading man type and more importantly a fine actor on a par with that other guy. ;-)
~KarenR #1223
Think it's RF too. Yes, the greasy hair goes with Cusack, but I can't see Colin in most of Cusack's roles (character though they may be). Am positive there's a greasy-haired Fiennes movie out there... ;-) Hmmm, hair looked pretty yucky in Onegin.
~Lizza #1224
Received my Donmar magazine in the post today. Double page spread on Gala 3DOR evening. Only one pic of ODB chatting to two ladies (sans volvos!), two pics of DM and my thoughts on E.MG's lipstick, in the informal shot might lead us all to the conclusion that her Act 2 painted lips was no act of a Southern Belle at all! Karen I wish you could see it teehee!! Maybe someone else (Luvvie?) will scan them.
~mari #1225
Karen, you don't think CF could have played Rob in High Fidelity? (Not to mention Will in About A Boy, which went to Hugh Grant)--yeah, keep "haunting those margins", Colin :-( :-( Besides, the quote as I'm reading it is *not* about coveting this other actor's roles (in which case I too might think it's RF). It's about other character actors who sometimes play leading man type roles but whose talent lies more in the offbeat. Liked your coffee talk, Karen . . .you're a regular Linda Richman.:-) Bethan, it's too bad he didn't retort that his Edward Pettigrew reviews here were good, though I'm not sure how much sway that holds in Britain. Good that RV is coming out soon; that's one advantage of having work released back-to-back. If they don't like one, they might like the other, and the public has a short memory.
~lizbeth54 #1226
Now, now, stop the gloom and doom. Let's have the optimist back. C'mon, where's all your exclamation points? ;-) (Eileen) S-o-rry!!!!!!!! I think I'm a thwarted PR type...I'd love to be sitting in on these interviews, shoving my oar in! Have you noticed he's grown half an inch...six foot, one and a half! Definitely think Colin has woken up and smelled the coffee insofar as his career is concerned. *thank goodness* :-) Now, does he lurk? Or have we "smelling the coffee" articles in abundance? He's still missed the point though. Mr Darcy isn't a life-time sentence....we just need the occasional alpha male who kisses the girl and doesn't lose out to a Fiennes brother. More Cary Grant, not Charles Laughton! Good that RV is coming out soon; that's one advantage of having work released back-to-back. If they don't like one, they might like the other, and the public has a short memory. Very true....not every one's a winner.And I don't think the public has any memory. RV might be ideal lightweight summer entertainment. And we've got DQ in the wings. it's too bad he didn't retort that his Edward Pettigrew reviews here were good, though I'm not sure how much sway that at holds in Britain. Normally a lot. British movies that open first in the US and get good reviews are usually marketed on the basis ..."warmly received in the US" etc....which then pre-disposes our critics to be favourable. Seems they, like,er,forgot.
~Moon #1227
Think it's RF too. Me three. Ever since End of the Affair, a role he wanted. I think RFs hair was greasy in S. List. When he mentioned the greasy hair pervert role, Mr. Collins came to mind! Flash into the future older CF gets Mr. Cs role in another remake. ;-) About the coffee, how could he have misunderstood?
~CherylB #1228
I hope CF was basing his desire for the role in "The End of the Affair" on the book, or even the old version of the film, and not the mess Neil Jordan made. I just caught it on video -- that movie was lousy. What's more, CF being in it wouldn't have made it a better film. It would have been the same rotten movie with a different good actor, that's all.
~Moon #1229
I agree with everything you've said, Cheryl. Now the role that Sean Penn had at "Up at the Villa", would have been great for Colin.
~fitzwd #1230
(Moon Dreams) I think RFs hair was greasy in S. List. Greasy and dirty as Heathcliff in Wuthering Heights :-)
~mari #1231
(Bethan) More Cary Grant, not Charles Laughton! Well put, Bethan! That would work for me. (Bethan) British movies that open first in the US and get good reviews are usually marketed on the basis ..."warmly received in the US" etc....which then pre-disposes our critics to be favourable. Seems they, like,er,forgot. I'm not surprised. They forgot to market it here, too--it seems they just absolutely gave up on it long before the reviews came out and then had no plan (or budget) in place to take any advantage of them. Very poor on Miramax's part. I'm glad CF didn't put his tail between his legs when the writer mentioned that one review. He should be proud of his work in this. He did seem pleased when people mentioned the film to him at the Donmar. ****** Looks like I'm in the minority, but I liked The End Of The Affair and thought Ralph and Julianne did a good job in it.:-)
~KarenR #1232
Thanks, Lizza, for the info about the Donmar magazine. I'm sure the picture will be scanned in by one of our Donmar darlings. Might take awhile to get to this side of the Atlantic though. (have no doubt that little pouty, bee-stung lips are her own) (Mari) you don't think CF could have played Rob in High Fidelity? Of course, he could but only if they kept it set in London. (Same re: About a Boy.) And he needs to work on his American accent with a professional. (Donna) Greasy and dirty as Heathcliff in Wuthering Heights :-) *hee hee* (Mari) He did seem pleased when people mentioned the film to him at the Donmar. What was he going to do? He does have manners and has shown himself to be courteous at all times. BTW, not having read TEOTA or seen the older version, I thought this was one was OK and made sense to me. So you're not alone. ;-)
~EileenG #1233
(Mari) Liked your coffee talk, Karen *hee hee* You mean cawfee tawk, right? ;-D I am all curiosity about the article containing that coffee-smelling remark Colin references in his interview. How come we've never seen it? Was it published in some third world country? If it wasn't a published article at all, but a reference to or excerpt from our discussion, it's too bad that he misinterpreted the remark. I think it's fair to say that none of us want Mr. Darcy forever. (Mari) it seems they just absolutely gave up on it [MLSF] long before the reviews came out Yup. Miramax put their eggs in the Ideal Husband basket. I thought MLSF was more interesting and entertaining (but I'm biased ;-)).
~SusanMC #1234
(Bethan) I felt really sorry for him when I read this. Did anyone else react this way, or am I being super-sensitive on his behalf? I felt this way too, Bethan. The comment from the unnamed former co-worker about "totally transparent mock modesty" and the quoting of the one negative criticism about his performance in MLSF seemed to me to be unfair and unnecessary. I mean, there are so many actors out there with totally overinflated egos who really deserve to be taken down a peg in this fashion, but Colin is not one of them.
~EAGrace #1235
Just back after the long weekend, and reading over the MLSF discussion. Very disappointing! (The events, not the discussion!) Despite my criticisms of the film, it was still a good film, and deserved a chance to be seen! I think there aren't enough independent film houses. The larger problem is the cultural invasion of Hollywood. Same in Canada -- not much pride in Canadian talent (unless Hollywood sanctions it first). But I had heard that Britain had an impressive media studies program in their schools, a la Noam Chompsky. So, greater mental resistance might be hoped for! Difficult though, when they yank a film before you can say popcorn. Oh dear, nothing as likely to strike up the political ire as a disappointed affectionado :-) Does anyone understand why some 'independent'films get as much backing as a regular formula film, and others get zilch? Just how independent ARE films like Being John Malkovich? And how does MLSF fit into this scenario? I read the Telegraph article. I'm annoyed. Ironic statement to make on Drool Board maybe, but, she totally focused on his portrayal of Darcy, mentioned some other films in passing, and for the most part, ignored his entire body of work. "Shades of an angry Mr. Darcy here" --- give me a break, and they say fans engage in projection! Sure doesn't help his career to have a 'journalist' imposing the identity on him. Sad to read him saying "my type" as though he is a 'type'. I've always thought that his acting defied being a 'type' and that's what makes him so interesting. The media/political cr*p in the business must be wearing him down. I really hope he gets to play MORE "odd and grotesque stuff" because he's good at it. Surely his career cannot honestly be reduced to a repetition of "handsome hero" roles! This is a long post, but I feel much better now!
~KarenR #1236
(Liz) I think there aren't enough independent film houses. Wasn't it the Odeon chain that committed to showing more art house films? Just how independent ARE films like Being John Malkovich? The one you mentioned WAS an indie. Had financial backing by Michael Stipe's production company and was then picked up by October Films, shown at the NYC FF and Venice. Just remember that Indie and Art House are not synonymous.
~EAGrace #1237
(Karen) Just remember that Indie and Art House are not synonymous. True, except to extent that they both often get ignored. But the whole behind- the-scenes of film-financing makes me dizzy with confusion. I'm a little suspicious of Odeon's commitment, because they're in it for $$ and I doubt art house films will ever bring big $$. We're worried here (where I live) about our local independent theatre being pushed out by the chains mega-theatres soon to be built right next to it. Kind of like the way big box bookstores have pushed out the little ones, only to have the public's range of available material greatly reduced in the long run. Well, not exactly like that, but there's a point in this fuzzy analogy somewhere.
~KarenR #1238
Actually, we're having growth in art house theaters here. Big fantastic one (7 screens, I think) built by Landmark chain and another will be in a suburb later this year. They have shown smaller mainstream films like High Fidelity, but mainly films without big-time distributors. Even showed one from Phaedra!! Also heard that Redford's Sundance group is going to build here too.
~patas #1239
(LizG)Surely his career cannot honestly be reduced to a repetition of "handsome hero" roles! In fact, haven't we been complaining of a dearth of such roles?
~Elena #1240
(Susan)The comment from the unnamed former co-worker about "totally transparent mock modesty" and the quoting of the one negative criticism about his performance in MLSF seemed to me to be unfair and unnecessary Hi guys, I�ve been a bit unwell and still am but of course I can�t keep off from Drool for too long :-) Just want to say that I don�t think there�s really nothing to worry about in the style of that Telegraph interview. Only the existence of a big story like this about him conveys the essential message to the readers which is: here is an actor who is worth making a large article about. Most people won�t read it anyway but they see who it is about and see the gorgeous picture, and that�s all in his favour (ah, that pic!!!). I personally like a bit biting style when it�s not openly mean, it simply makes the subject person more plausible and interesting. Too much praise and sweetness is a much bigger turn-off.
~amw #1241
Hurrah, at last a good UK review for MLSF and they have singled CF out for particular praise at http//:www.whsmith.co.uk go to entertainment, films and then what's showing, also a good review for Sunshine. "Firth's expert protrayal..." and "Excepting Firth the performances are average at best particularly MMcD..." Sorry to hear you have not been well Elena, hope you will soon feel better.
~amw #1242
http://www.whsmith.co.uk
~Tracy #1243
Bethan - Now, does he lurk? Or have we "smelling the coffee" articles in abundance? I'm not a Firthian of longstanding but I've never seen any coffee references in any articles ..ever! Does he lurk?.....an interesting thought indeed. Elena - I�ve been a bit unwell and still am but of course I can�t keep off from Drool It works wonders for an ailing body all this happy banter. Sorry to hear you're under the weather.
~lizbeth54 #1244
As regards his parting comment "but I took it to mean that I should just go back to being Mr Darcy all the time for ever, that I should just own up to the fact that this is all my life will ever amount to"...wonder where he read that. I, for one, say bring on those stuttering masturbatory village pervert roles! ;-) (Eileen) Reminds me that one of my favourite CF roles, despite the flaws in the script (aren't there always? :-))was in "Master of the Moor" where he lived in a village, was a lonely social misfit, strode over the moors in the rain, clad in anorak and baggy corduroy trousers, couldn't make love to women, retreated to subterranean caves, strangled his wife, and shot himself....and still managed to be terribly attractive. Stuttered slightly. Can only guess at the other aspect! :-)
~heide #1245
"Master of the Moor" where he lived in a village, was a lonely social misfit, strode over the moors in the rain, clad in anorak and baggy corduroy trousers, couldn't make love to women, retreated to subterranean caves, strangled his wife, and shot himself....and still managed to be terribly attractive. Heh heh. The guy can't win for losing. He could have played one of the hillbillies in Deliverance and still be attractive. ;-) Considering how nasty some of the articles we've read have been about otehr actors, I'm pleased with the Telegraph. And as Elena points out from her sickbed, it's publicity. Two major articles in one month. Amazing. (LizG)Surely his career cannot honestly be reduced to a repetition of "handsome hero" roles! (Gi) In fact, haven't we been complaining of a dearth of such roles? Yes because it's been so long since he's had such a role. Donovan Quick applies. Look at his roles would see how many of those heroic roles he's actually had. Sorry, he can't help the handsome. ;-) Will Armadillo be one? (Tracy) I'm not a Firthian of longstanding but I've never seen any coffee references in any articles ..ever! Does he lurk?.....an interesting thought indeed. IMO, more likely Helen has returned to lurking at BJD.
~Arami #1246
So what is the source of this coffee quote? And how did he know about it if it's not from a paper? Or is it? (I seem to have fallen asleep at some point... Familiarity and all that thing, you know... :-))
~Moon #1247
(Arami), I seem to have fallen asleep at some point... How about a cup of that coffee? ;-) The source of the quote seems to be right here, Arami. Whether it was a PR person gathering news for him, or ODB lurking we do not know.
~KarenR #1248
So what is the source of this coffee quote? And how did he know about it if it's not from a paper? Or is it? If you don't know, then it doesn't exist. Correct? ;-)
~KarenR #1249
From the Evening Standard's site, an article on Denis Forman from 5/22 (a definite read for all those who want to know about MLSF's origins): Forman: It's my life and I like it by Trevor Grove What exactly is a clear water worm? Sir Denis Forman leant forward in his red braces and raised a glittering eye. "Now that," he said, "is a really interesting question." Abandoning a lukewarm discussion of Scottish devolution, he took a pensive puff at his pipe. "Around this time of year, all the water in the streams and rivers of Scotland is as clear as gin. It is exceedingly difficult to entice a trout because he can see everything. So, what you do is, you take a worm ..." he began to explain. Sir Denis has been many things in his long life, among them director of the British Film Institute, deputy-chairman of the Royal Opera House and, most famously, chairman of Granada Television during its glory days. He is revered in the ratings-wary, accountancy-minded, post-Birtian broadcasting world as the man who presided over the creation of The Jewel in the Crown, World in Action and Coronation Street. Now he has notched up another singular achievement: his own boyhood has become the subject of a full-length feature film. Imagine being able to trot around the corner to your local cinema and watch yourself winningly depicted catching your first trout in a movie directed by Hugh Hudson, produced by David Puttnam and starring Colin Firth as your father. Sir Denis seems modestly delighted that with My Life So Far playing at the Hampstead ABC, only a few steps away from his garden flat, he can do just that. Well, not trot, exactly: he lost a leg at the battle of Monte Cassino in 1944, which ended his days as a tireless Scottish reeler. But he remains a remarkably hale-looking 82 and still goes loch fishing every year. He has been to see the film twice, applying a professional eye. He finds it "highly agreeable", graciously passing over the implausible fictional embellishments. My Life So Far is based on Sir Denis's funny, touching and evocative memoir of his childhood in the Dumfries countryside in the 1920s, when farms were still run on horsepower and before the scythe gave way to the combine harvester. The title of the book, published 10 years ago, was Son of Adam, and the author rather wishes the film-makers hadn't changed it. "I think mine was better." Adam was the name of his father, the decent, God-fearing but deeply eccentric figure who became the focus of Denis's pubescent rebelliousness. The Rev Adam Forman, head boy of Loretto and later its chaplain, never shed his bracing, public-school attitude to manliness and godliness, even after he married and became the factor, or agent, on his mother-in-law's estate, Craigielands. When he wasn't holding Presbyterian discourse at the dinner table or herding his large family off to St Mary's United Free Church for their spiritual improvement, he was seeing to their physical cleanliness with year-round bathing in the loch, except when the ice was too thick. His small sons were intrigued to discover he kept a morsel of cotton wool "about the size of a pea" inside his foreskin for purposes of personal hygiene. It was in keeping that Adam's most notable achievement was the harvesting of quantities of sphagnum moss during the First World War, to be processed into field dressings for the wounded. He claimed its properties far exceeded those of cotton wool. For this unusual wartime initiative he was awarded the CBE. The smell of moss was not the only one to imprint itself on Denis's young memory. He and his five brothers and sisters (Denis, the chief mischiefmaker, was number four) were horribly perceptive in the olfactory department. The visiting seamstress smelt of exhaust fumes combined with "the inside of a spaniel's ear and dead rat". Marnie the housekeeper ponged of unwashed underparts and embrocation, with overtones from her wig of "dead mouse blended with nutmeg". Much of this comically perceptive writing is lost in the film, so we never properly encounter the highly strung cook, Mrs Henderson, who "at times of great stress became hysterical, throwing her apron over her head and making noises like a railway engine taking in water". "But we were not a posh household, with liveried foot-men," Sir Denis insists. Passage through the green baize door was free and easy. His intimacy with the servants, his liking for working in the fields alongside the farm men at harvest time and the camaraderie of the great curling contests on the frozen loch form a key theme in the book, leading the little boy to think that "perhaps I preferred the likes of them to the likes of us". Even before he is sent away to boarding school he is kicking against the pricks of class and religion, spending furtive hours reading up the entry under "Prostitution" in the Encyclopaedia of Ethics. Wasn't it odd that those early seeds of rebellion should have led to a career spent entirely among the officer class, from being head boy of Loretto onwards? Not at all, says Sir Denis. "I was always subversive." Even in the army he "aided and abetted" the shift of thinking that led to so many servicemen voting Labour after the war. In his television years he was a determined advocate of investigative journalism. Today he deplores TV's lack of will to explore a controversial subject in depth. The Zimbabwe Test match was under way. "Who's going to do corruption in cricket?" he asked rhetorically, knowing the moment has passed. Campaigning for women to be let into his clubs, the Garrick and the Savile, has proved a lost cause (he finds his opponents' behaviour "weird"), but one knows he is not done yet. His independence of spirit is manifest in the great clouds of Players Medium Navy Cut fumes wreathing his head. After 20 years of abstinence he defied doctor's orders and took up his pipe again at the age of 80. But we haven't finished with the clear water worm - brandling worms, to be precise, dug out of dung-heaps then fattened on brick dust and moss to make their skins tough enough to stay on the hook. "So what you do is, you walk up the bed of the burn or the stream and where there is broken water, over a slight fall, you drop the worm in at the top and lead it down to where you think the trout lie might be. The trout is looking at fizzy water instead of clear water. Therefore he doesn't see the cast on the worm - and he takes it. It's even more skilful, I think, than dry fly fishing." As the pipe is refilled, one cannot escape the impression that there is an even more enchanting version of My Life So Far winning top ratings in Sir Denis Forman's head.
~Arami #1250
Colin - lurking HERE????????????????????????????????????? Well, hallloooooooooooo there, dear boy....we meet at last... ;-) ;-) ;-) ;-D *** Oh, btw, I've just read somewhere that Paul Lyon Maris (or is it Maris Lyon? I can never remember) was also the late Sir John Gielgud's agent. So there.
~Moon #1251
Paul Lyon Maris (or is it Maris Lyon? I can never remember) was also the late Sir John Gielgud's agent. So there. How old could he be? Sounds like retirement is in order. ;-)
~KarenR #1252
Now who thought that Julie Andrews didn't have a devoted following? This was posted at the RV site: Is there a press release available on the release yet?. Can you please give us some more information on the premiere. I know that there are fans out there that have already booked flights and hotels for these dates, are you 100% sure that it will be the 21st?. Do you have any info on Julie A. being present at the 21st?. Would you be so kind as top give us this info asap, so the rest us us can start booking flights etc. too. Thank you. Iris
~Ming #1253
Colin - lurking HERE????????????????????????????????????? Very much doubt it. Livia, perhaps?
~patas #1254
Elena, i hope you get well soon :-)
~Lizza #1255
Do hope you are feeling somewhat better now Elena. Re running your favourite CF vid works wonders! Take care
~Elena #1256
Thanks for all your good wishes Lizza, Gi and Ann :-) (Arami)Colin - lurking HERE????????????????????????????????????? (Ming)Very much doubt it. Livia, perhaps? I very much doubt it too, especially now that he�s busy working and probably has other things to do than to visit fan sites. The coffee-smelling must be a coincidence of some kind. (Colin, please tell me I�m wrong!! ;-);-) If he really was interested in the thoughts of his fans enough to lurk here I think he would also be slightly more active in reading and answering his fan mail ;-). But I also think it would be very strange if he had NOT visited the Spring once or twice this year after 3DOR. (Karen)Now who thought that Julie Andrews didn't have a devoted following? Not me. The Sound Of Music was the first film I ever saw in a cinema and I watched it at least five or six times. I loved her voice. I still have the soundtrack somewhere, I think. Maybe I should book a flight too? :-D
~lizbeth54 #1257
Hope you're feeling better, Elena! I got my latest copy of the ChoicesDirect catalogue today...the major supplier of videos for sale in the UK. Out of interest I just rang up to see if SLOW was going to be available soon. I expected the usual hesitation..."sorry, can you repeat that for me so I can check it" ...but I got an instant response "Oh, we've been inundated with requests for this, but unfortunately we don't have a date". So, there is a hidden army out there (we just don't always make it to the movies!)
~catheyp #1258
Hi Bethan I brought a PAL copy of SLOW from http://www.kvs.co.uk back in April. It was about 41 pound.
~Arami #1259
The coffee-smelling must be a coincidence of some kind. (Colin, please tell me I�m wrong!! ;-);-) Elena, I can see you are much better. :-) I have looked again at the whole quote and Colin actually mentions an article... Unfortunately I haven't got the time to get to the bottom of this at the moment... Unless Colin can be so kind and help? Please, Colin? Or even Livia will do... ;-)
~KarenR #1260
http://www.guardianunlimited.co.uk/Archive/Article/0,4273,4022031,00.html
~ommin #1261
Can someone in the U.K. complain that this man doesn't know what he's talking about. Jealous again I suppose. I loved Fever Pitch, so did my husband and for that matter my son. There's a wonderful book out there called "The Abolition of Man by C.S. Lewis (Another name for it is "Men without chests" i.e. he warned that in the future in the U.K. due to the educational system, we would lack imagination, a sense of beauty using a description of a waterfall as an example. One man would see water pouring off a ledge a hundred feet above, another would see the lovliness of it all, the mist from the water, the greenery, the sound etc. I know this doesn't seem relevant but the very system he abhored was indeed brought into the British educational system. I am not saying the poetry has gone out of all Brits. of course it hasn't but it certainly has affected the reviewers and critics out there. Colin has certainly seen it and not just for himself. Sorry I have gone on. But I was angry with the idiocy of it al . They can't discern between good and bad, evil or good it seems to me. Anne despairing in Oz.
~lizbeth54 #1262
Hmm...Thanks for the above article, Karen! I dipped into it, and dipped out again. It's so easy to criticise, so difficult to create. The British film industry isn't perfect, but our critics are like leaches, sucking out the life blood. Give me some old-fashioned, if misplaced, enthusiasm anyday!
~Moon #1263
This genre is also known as the Colin Firth movie. What is that about? CF is not that well known to be a genre of any kind! Why pick on him? Thanks for posting, Karen. Apart from the CF comments, I happen to agree with the reviewer. The film industry is in crisis. What ever happened to intelligent, witty dialog? Enough with the depressing-vulgar-shock films. Give me some old-fashioned, if misplaced, enthusiasm anyday! My thoughts exactly!
~luvvy #1264
I, too, agree that "Fever Pitch" does not belong in a list that includes "Rancid Aluminium" and "Mad Cows" (two of the most appalling movies I've had the misfortune to sit through). But the article is bang on target in most areas, and a damned funny read, too. I'm mean, really, have any of you ever watched "Absolute Beginners"? All of it? I haven't. I haven't been able to get past the first half hour. So don't take this as a critique of Colin Firth or Rufus Sewell or Joe Fiennes or Jude Law (all of whom get blasted indirectly). It is, imho however, a legitimate blast at the incredible amount of money that has been wasted by the current Brit film mess.
~patas #1265
Thanks for the url, Karen. V. funny article. I hated Absolute Beginners too. Interesting about the "CF genre". Ummm... Guess it's better to be talked about than not be talked about, right? :-)
~mari #1266
I have to agree with Chris--that article is hysterically funny. Yes, it's too bad that CF was mentioned but at least he didn't come off nearly as poorly as Jude Law and the rest of the Natural Nylon mafia.:-) Don't mean to pile on, but here's a similar article from today's Telegraph, which raises some questions I've always had about the disingenuousness of some of the British press concerning American films: British isn't always best Hollywood scores with a chiller but the All Saints' heist movie is a botched job, says David Gritten THE perception of Hollywood in large sections of our press is no longer merely amusing, or even irritating - it is now almost wilfully misleading. We constantly hear of British film talents "selling out" or being "lost" to Hollywood, as if this were some cultural kiss of death. Only this week, a broadsheet newspaper ran an article on the excellent English actor Adrian Lester's "escape" from Hollywood. To what, one wonders? Essentially, Hollywood is a massive factory, producing its share of disposable, unmemorable fare just to keep its assembly lines constantly moving. But in any given month it also offers a wide range of films more skilfully written, carefully considered and expertly executed than the cinematic output of any other country. So much for Hollywood, then, as a repository of all that is trash. This British perception is especially grotesque given our film industry's woeful current state: in percentage terms we produce more movie garbage than the US, with the savage twist that this garbage isn't even very popular here. All the Lottery money and grants in Britain, it seems, cannot change this. To judge by our films, Britain is a country overawed by violent minor-league gangsters, an island noisily off its communal face on lager every night. Two new films perfectly illustrate this schism. Stir of Echoes, from 20th Century Fox, is a workmanlike, unspectacular thriller with a supernatural theme. It will appear on few year-end best-film lists. Hollywood makes movies like this in its sleep, yet it's a creditable, satisfying piece of work. Kevin Bacon plays a telephone lineman living in blue-collar Chicago. His six-year-old son talks to ghosts, but Stir of Echoes is no Sixth Sense clone: this is Bacon's story. He agrees to be hypnotised by his flaky sister-in-law (Illeana Douglas) and finds to his horror that he is a "receiver", open to images and sensations from a supernatural world. He starts hallucinating about a slow-witted teenage girl who has mysteriously gone missing, and becomes increasingly withdrawn and obsessed as events progress towards a grisly climax. Sardonic and sympathetic by turns, Bacon gives his character his usual shrewd reading. But the real star here is writer-director David Koepp (The Lost World: Jurassic Park), who has painstakingly fashioned a script that is logical and intelligently thought out, and then filmed a story that never relaxes its grip. Stir of Echoes may not change your life, but nor is it an insult to the intelligence, or indeed a waste of money. Which brings us neatly to the British film Honest, featuring three members of the female pop group All Saints, and set in the Swinging London of 1968. Throughout the film, I recalled a recent rebuke by director Alan Parker, the new boss of the Film Council, that too many British films are rushed into production before their scripts are ready. One doubts if the script for this depressing, feeble film could ever be ready - it's surprising to see old comedy pros Dick Clement and Ian La Frenais among the writing credits. What's it about? One character conveniently tells us: "Three girls from the East End who dress up like men and rob the rich? That's pretty intense, man!" That gives you a whiff of the plot - and, I fear, the putrid dialogue. Yes, Natalie and Nicole Appleton and Melanie Blatt don men's suits and fake moustaches and beards to stage jewellery heists. In this guise, they alarmingly resemble the tiny pop star Prince. Natalie, the only All Saint with any acting aptitude, plays the sister who has a romance with a young American Rhodes scholar (Peter Facinelli, a puppyish junior Tom Cruise type). He works on an underground newspaper, and tries to write the sisters' story. His first paragraph: "It's only a �2 cab ride from Carnaby Street to Bethnal Green, but it's another world." But why single out one line? Much of Honest is worthy of derisive sniggers. Characters constantly tell each other what they already know. "We're in the middle of Mayfair," one sister confides to another. "It's full of toffs and nobs." And poor Natalie has to say, "Nothing's free in this world. Things have to be earned." An unlikely remark from a character making a living from theft. This fiasco was directed - if that's the word - by Dave Stewart, the less winning half of another pop group, the Eurythmics. Stewart may have a sure touch with three-minute pop videos, but a full-length feature film seems beyond him. And unforgivably for someone steeped in pop culture, he can't even make the era authentic. This is 1968, and yet there's a glimpse of the cover of Abbey Road (released in 1969), and a reference to one of the album's songs, She Came in Through the Bathroom Window. You could dismiss this as pedantry - or agree that it's symptomatic of how this shoddy enterprise was thrown together. One last objection to Honest: its brutish sexual content (quite inappropriate to its overall tone) has condemned it to an 18 certificate, which prevents younger All Saints fans from seeing it. In terms of commerce and common sense, it's an ill-judged decision. And, whatever we in this country may say, it's a blunder that Hollywood would never have made.
~Brown32 #1267
I can't seem to find an RV Drool, so I am posting this here. It is from the official site mailing list. Release Information Midsummer Films are pleased to announce that Relative Values has been sold in the following territories:- Distributor - Global Media Distribution Inc. Territories - LATIN AMERICA (Argentina, Belize, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Columbia, Dominican Republic, Ecudador, El Salvador, Guyana, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico, Nicaragua, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Urguay & Venezuela) & PUERTO RICO, PORTUGAL, TURKEY, GREECE, ESTONIA, LATVIA & LITHUANIA Distributor - Europa Filmes Territories - BRAZIL Distributor - Compagnia Distribuzione Europea Territories - ITALY, SAN MARINO & VATICAN CITY Distributor - WMS Film Consultants Territories - POLAND Distributor - Manga Territories - SPAIN & ANDORRA Distributor - Encore Media Group LLC Territories - USA Distributor - Alliance Atlantis Territories - UNITED KINGDOM, ISLE OF MAN, CHANNEL ISLANDS & GIBRALTAR
~heide #1268
That article Karen posted would have been funnier if it weren't so damn boring. Ho hum, more clever writers sharpening their knives on the British film industry. (also Mari's post above.) The theory is made, let's contort as many facts as we can to support it. the big Hollywood adaptation of High Fidelity, starring John Cusack and completely junking any Hornby element False. Wake me up when someone dares to write an opposing viewpoint. Glad you posted it anyway, Karen, simply because DB was mentioned. As Gi says, Guess it's better to be talked about than not be talked about, right? :-) Thanks for posting the distribution info, Mary. Fingers crossed we can see this film by autumn.
~heide #1269
Naughty me..italics are fixed.
~mari #1270
Don't worry, from now on I'll only post boring stuff if it has Colin's name in it. Murph, thanks for the distribution info--though I have no idea who Encore Media Group is.
~heide #1271
Oops, sorry Mari. It's not your posting that I find boring. It's the repetitious theme the journalists keep harping on. Post as many articles as you like 'cause it stirs up conversation. There's no need for me to state my opinion again on why these writers continue beating this poor horse.
~EAGrace #1272
I'm not disagreeing with the claim that the British film industry is in a crisis --- I'll take the word of fellow Droolers. I thought the Guardian article (response #1260) was incredibly cynical. Someone else has of course, already expressed a suitable summary --- I couldn't have said it better: "It is such a spur to one's genius, such an opening for wit to have a dislike of that kind. One may be continually abusive without saying any[thing] just; but one cannot be always laughing at a man without now and then stumbling on something witty." With reference to the Telegraph article (response #1266)there are some wonderful American films, but the success of the formulaic in $$ terms is never proof in my mind that America is better at making films than anyone else. I saw Stir of Echoes and found it neither "creditable" nor "satisfying". I think the best American films can't be described as formula films. In relation to the debate of good film/bad film, is another important point that both writers ignore. We're not all Americans and each culture needs an opportunity to express itself in it's own terms, even if we make bad films while trying to do that. If the British film industry is in a crisis, surely the solution is to be more authentic, not less. Perhaps part of the problem is that British filmmakers are trying to be American filmmakers. The most they could ever hope to achieve then, is what David Gritten (response #1266) seems to suggest Britain should aspire to: A so-so British-pretending-to-be-American formula flick.
~Brown32 #1273
Mari says: Murph, thanks for the distribution info--though I have no idea who Encore Media Group is. ******** We have an Encore cable station here. It shows older films usually. Perhaps it is the one distributing RV. I'll check and see if they have a web site. Murph
~Brown32 #1274
Yep: Here is the web site for Encore Media Group. Starz is once of theirs too. Murph
~mari #1275
Thanks again, Murph. Don't mean to spread panic but . . .it sure sounds like "straight-to-cable TV" to me.:-( Really hope I'm wrong, but I don't see anything to indicate that Encore does theatrical releases.
~nan #1276
Aha! So this is where everyone is hanging out. Murph! Mari! Good to see you here, guys :-) Geez...I *have* been away too long. Now, before I comment on things I know nothing about I have to back up and read this topic :-/ Oh, and Mari...I'm sure you join me in wishing the Devils godspeed on their road to ruin. I can't find your email, so send me a note and we'll give them the double malocchio (nan@ntr.net)
~lizbeth54 #1277
Hi there Nan! Welcome! Couple of snippets from today's Telegraph which vaguely impinge on CF. BBC1 are going to turn a new novel about "multicultural Britain" into a �5million 6 part series. It's the first project approved under Alan Yentob's regime and will be one of the highlights of the BBC's programme schedule next year. Filming is to start later this year. They are busy looking for a scriptwriter, cast , director etc. On this basis, I would assume that if "Armadillo" has already been given the greenlight, has a producer and lead actor in place, and if it is being adapted by the author, then there's no reason why fiming shouldn't start very soon. The article also mentions that the BBC's last "classic" adaptation "Gormenghast" was a flop in terms of viewing figures. I think that the emphasis under the new BBC/Greg Dyke regime will definitely be on "relevant" contemporary drama. No more bonnets! Fortunately "Armadillo" *is* New Britain, but a more humane, humorous interpretation which cuts across the so-called socal divide! BTW...I hope the the new BBC wakes up and does something with DQ as a highlight for this year's drama.....it's socially relevant, multi-cultural, regional, unglamorous and very, very good! Also, there's an article about how the release of all the chickflicks has been delayed to coincide with Soccer Euro 2000 in the UK (3 weeks from the second week of June), to catch the honey-I'm bored-with-the game female audience. Mentions of movies starring Ben Affleck, Rupert Everett, Matthew Perry etc. No mention of RV (would not like to see it branded as a chickflick!) but it is certainly coming out during the alternative soccer season. Nor a blockbuster in sight.
~odessa #1278
I found this place today and now have been reading these Firth-sections. Chats about if Firth can`t kiss and so on...this is so the right place for me! Because I live in Finland I haven`t seen many of his films (only P&P of course, Shakespeare in love and the English patient) and I was happily suprised that there was darcymania in UK.
~patas #1279
(t o)Because I live in Finland I haven`t seen many of his films (...) and I was happily suprised that there was darcymania in UK. Welcome t o! We are happy to count another drooler from Finland in our midst. (Mari)Don't worry, from now on I'll only post boring stuff if it has Colin's name in it. LOL! No offense to anybody, but this sounds like a worthy resolution :-P (Mary Murphy)... Relative Values has been sold in the following territories:- Distributor - Global Media Distribution Inc. Territories - ... PORTUGAL... Great! Thanks Murph. I hope to see this one at least :-)
~heide #1280
(t o) I found this place today and now have been reading these Firth-sections. Chats about if Firth can`t kiss and so on...this is so the right place for me! Yes! It's always exciting when someone new finds their way here and takes teh first plunge by posting. Now and then we have some serious discussions but eventually we get around to talking about the really important issues. ;-) Kissing fits right in. Not quite what I had in mind since I personally prefer the left shoulder grinding method ala Fever Pitch. :-x0x0x0 Hoorah! Gi won't have to fly to London again to see a Colin film. Not that you'd mind.
~Moon #1281
Welcome Odessa!
~lizbeth54 #1282
Just spotted what must be the first review of RV....and it's a good one! Was shopping for Soccer magazines (not for me!) and I noticed a new movie mag (June issue) "Hotdog" which is priced (initially, I think) at �1.50, which doesn't break the bank. There's an interesting rating system: 5 stars (equates with Goodfellas), 4 stars (Heat), 3 stars (Cape Fear), 2 stars (Analyse this), 1 star (New York, New York) and no stars (We're no angels). To show the relative ratings, no 5 stars, Woody Allen's "Sweet and Lowdown" gets 4 stars, "Return to me" (Minnie Driver, David Duchovny) gets no stars, and "The Next Best thing" (Madonna, RE) is relegated to "also released" and classed as "one to take your walkman to". "The Ninth Gate" (Johnny Depp) gets 3 stars as does the DVD of "The Full Monty". So it's quite severe rating. RV gets 3 stars. CF seems to have 2nd billing. PG certificate. Full review... "Based on a Noel Coward stage play, RV is a very British "comedy of manners" that may be deeply unfashionable but benefits from perfect casting and great performances. Set in the fifties, it plays on the class culture clash between two Hollywood stars and an uptight aristocratic family, to create, as Coward would no doubt have put it, " a positive feast of hilarity". Balwin is superb as the bigscreen boozehound Don Lucas, Jule Andrews' cool calculating Countess is remarkable and Stephen Fry almost steals the show with his Jeeves-like butler. But it is Sophie Thompson's Moxie who blows them all away as the below stairs maid pretending to be the newly monied lady. It's no "American Pie", but if you like your comedy stylish, sophisticated and as dry as good Martini, then look no further". As ever, no mention of CF, but I guess he's used to it, poor guy, from British reviewers. :-( But it's a good review....especially compared with the drubbing given to some of the other offerings. "The Next Best Thing" apparently opens the same week, and Buena Vista (who did absolutely nothing, and I mean nothing, for MLSF...not even a miserly arthouse distribution) are apparently spending a huge amount to promote it. All out talented webmistresses...please feel free to use the review...it's good to promote RV!
~Elena #1283
I found this place today and now have been reading these Firth-sections. Terve teeoo! Please post often and tell us more about what makes you Drool ;-) Encountering another Finn here (for the first time ever!) seems to coincide with the fact that P&P is having a rerun in the tv over here. It will probably give many people a fresh need to look for more information about you know who.
~Brown32 #1284
Thanks for the RV review, Bethan. I have it up. Film sounds like fun. Welcome, Odessa, to the original "firthamanic" (and best) site on the planet. Murph Nan -- How lovely to see your name. Tell us how school has been.
~Moon #1285
(Bethan), As ever, no mention of CF, but I guess he's used to it, poor guy, from British reviewers. :-( This is especially cruel because we know from his interview that he asked to play this part. I hope they were not making a statement by omiting his name as well as JS. Balwin as superb I have got to see. :-/ Keeping fingers crossed for the other reviews.
~Brown32 #1286
I wrote this earlier today in response to a little dicussion on Burt Lancaster: I think the biggest difference between Burt and Colin is that Burt had the power to do mostly what he wanted to do thanks to his clout in Hollywood as one of the heads of a major independent company. Having said that, he also had the guts -- and that is the best way I can describe it -- all his acting life to choose roles that were "heavyweight," and that challenged him as an actor. He did do some silly ones too, but he did them with Errol Flynn-like �lan. On of my biggest disappointments with CF's career is that he has chosen not only much lighter weight films since P&P, but also ones that are easy roles for an actor. I have not seen him on the stage, but having read comments on Caretaker, and on 3 DOR, it seems that is the place where he is most willing to take a chance. I have said before that IMO as Robert Lawrence he reached a pinnacle of daring and great acting that he has not scaled since. Donovan Quick comes the closest in recent years. I am following closely the career of Russell Crowe. I have compared him to Lancaster (physical daring and chance-taking), and I think my comparison has merit. His next film after he plays a Circus freak in Flora Plum may be "A Brilliant Mind," the biography of John Nash, the brilliant Nobel Prize winner and schizophrenic. Nash was a man who roamed the Princeton campus in his bad years, dirty and disheveled, mumbling to himself. He is much improved now and teaching again, and his story is one that touches the heart. Colin could do this kind of thing too, I know he could. I wish I knew why he makes the choices he does. What does everyone think?
~ommin #1287
Trouble is Murph. I am not sure he is motivated too. I have a feeling he is happy just to be working - doing a good job of it, wipe his shoes on the door mat and leave and get on with his life, working with refugees etc. and avoiding publicity as much as possible.
~patas #1288
Also, Murph, he must choose among the parts he is offered. He can apply to others, but maybe he is not given them.
~lizbeth54 #1289
He's just not in the "Burt Lancaster/Russell Crowe" league (in terms of clout). Hollywood doesn't seem to have knocked on his door, his movie performances receive very little recognition from most reviewers in the UK. I just don't think he's offered the parts he's capable of doing. He said somewhere that Darcy didn't open any doors for him...infact, I suspect some doors have closed. That's why he says he wants interesting roles and to be seen as a character actor!! "Maid of Buttermere" (although change the title please!) would stretch him, and "Armadillo" will give him a lot of screen time and the opportunity for a range of more subtle acting. But I honestly believe that it's very difficult for most British actors to fulfil their potential....that's why most of them give their best performances on stage (and radio!).
~amw #1290
RELATIVE VALUES PREMIERE UPDATE - Relative Values Premiere is on the 21st June, and is in aid of the NSPCC. Tickets are available by telephoning the NSPCC regional office 02075963700 for application form/Invitation. Ticets for Premiere only are �25. each
~Renata #1291
http://www.classicfm.co.uk/pages/OutAbout/FreeTickets/relative.htm
~Moon #1292
June 21st is his 3rd wedding anniversary. Will he attend? (Bethan), That's why he says he wants interesting roles and to be seen as a character actor!! That struck me as rather odd when I read it. Being cast as a character actor is not something many actors aspire to. Especially ambitious ones. (Murph), I have said before that IMO as Robert Lawrence he reached a pinnacle of daring and great acting that he has not scaled since. Donovan Quick comes the closest in recent years. Sadly, I do not agree on DQ. In Tumbledown, AZ and Valmont I saw his best acting skills. I also loved what he did in TEP, but that was a supporting role. Of course, we can not forget that his Mr. Darcy started this CF admiration. And because of it, HF has written his role into BJD, which may turn out to be his "break-out" film.
~amw #1293
Moon. June21st is his 3rd wedding anniversay. Will he attend? I jolly well hope so, I have read somewhere that CF, JA & SF were to attend, as I have just posted my cheque!!
~nan #1294
(Murph)I think the biggest difference between Burt and Colin is that Burt had the power to do mostly what he wanted to do thanks to his clout in Hollywood as one of the heads of a major independent company. I can argue both sides of the fence here because, as a Colin fan, I want so much to see him in roles worthy of his ability. I want the rest of the world to catch on to our little secret (or do I? ;-p). I want to see him on the cover of People magazine and say, "I knew him when..." ;-p Well, maybe not People magazine, but you get the gist... On the other hand, I don't think he'd be happy as part of the Hollywood machine. He seems fairly content with his life. He earns a very respectable living doing something he loves and does well (how many people can say that?). He has enough fame to get the best seats in a theatre but not enough to prevent him from walking down the street or taking his son to a movie. It could certainly be the kind of roles he's offered, but most of the really good roles go to those who have "star" power. Of course, you can only be a "star" if you are willing to become a product and sacrifice your privacy. Perhaps the enormous success of P&P gave him a glimpse of what his life would be if his career really took off...and maybe he didn't like it. Anyway, I prefer to think of it as Colin's choice rather than a lack of interest on the part of casting directors ;-) I try to think of him in a sort of Michael Caine way. Sometimes he does movies because he needs money (and I would do the same--gotta eat ;-p) and sometimes he takes supporting roles in fine films where he gets to show his stuff and be proud. If it's okay with him, then it's okay with me. I'll watch anyway and I'm sure you will too ;-) BTW, we are doing a Virtual View of An Ideal Husband over at Pemberley and I was thinking Colin would have made an excellent Sir Chiltern, don't you think? No offense to Jeremy Northam, of course...
~Renata #1295
http://www.classicfm.co.uk/pages/OutAbout/FreeTickets/relative.htm Hello everybody, just popping in from lurkdom. Sorry I posted that link without comment, but I did it from work, and just when I was about to write a word, everybody wanted to talk to me ;-)), and I just hit the submit button. So, this is something for our UK folks, a link to a page where you can get free tickets for private previews of RV on June 11, in London and elsewhere in the UK. They give June 23 as opening date.
~patas #1296
(Nan) I'll watch anyway and I'm sure you will too ;-) You can bet on that! :-)
~lafn #1297
Hi everybody...I am just back from NY and I only have one thing to say... I want Colin on Broadway SD is getting the biggest reception imaginable...At the end of TRT the audience went wild.After reading the depressing Telegraph interview, and having his two films tank (who cares if they buy SLOW, Bethan...Those turkeys stayed home and didn't support it in the theatres), Colin could use some good reviews and audience enthusiasm . The Brit audiences pale in comparison to Broadway. (And so does the compensation) He needs a project with critical and commercial success that catapults him to center court.A Tony would do it. A & DQ isn't going to do it in the US. And we all know no one goes to his films in the UK.Now they're even going back three years and picking on FP...I don't know why he doesn't defect. I sat in the NY theatre and so wished Colin was on that stage taking bows to the tumultuous response. He deserves it. I don't think he's so happy in his professional career...I think he's sadly resigned to the current state of affairs. But he wants more.
~CherylB #1298
Hello and welcome Odessa. Murph, about that Burt Lancaster/Colin Firth comparision and the Burt Lancaster/Russell Crowe comparision. It is true Russell Crowe is currently an incredibly hot property. Regardless of what you think about "Gladiator", it is Crowe's movie and it is making him an international film star. The thing RC shares with CF is that is a fine actor, something which not all movie stars can claim. It should also be noted that it took Crowe years to get to this point. It was supposed to have happened for him about 1994/1995 due to the movies "The Quick and the Dead" and "Virtuosity". Both underperformed, and Crowe went back to Australia to work, later snagging roles in the "LA Confidential" and "The Insider". He has always been a critical favorite, and "The Insider" got him an Oscar nomination. So what are the differences between CF and RC? No one has really ever noted any problems in working with CF. By all accounts he is professional and personable. He does what he needs to do with a minimum of fuss. RC by contrast can be difficult. Directors have praised his work, but it can be an ordeal coping with him. By all accounts he can be an absoulute jerk, while at the same time being very generous and charming. Difficult, but worth it. The second difference is that men are more likely to have a better opinion of RC than they do CF. Lastly, and this is a biggie, RC plays the game. He is countlessly interviewed, photographed, and plugs away relentlessly at the publicity for his projects. I really don't fault CF for not doing that. I don't think he likes doing that sort of thing, nor is he comfortable with it. I think he feels himself successful. He has worked as an actor for almost twenty years, not having to augment his income with other jobs. Acting has afforded him the opportunity to support himself n financial comfort. I don't know that CF necessarily wants to be a film star, while I'm pretty sure RC very much does want it. Yes, either of them could play John Nash in "A Brilliant Mind". I don't, however, think CF has ever even been in consideration for the part. I hope RC gets the part, as the other name in contention is Tom Cruise. Don't get me wrong; Cruise is a good actor, but he's not in same league as Russell Crowe or Colin Firth. Either of them would be superb in the part, while Cruise would do a commendable job. Crowe is hot right now, so he probably gets it. "A Brilliant Mind" is also the kind of role that wins Oscars. So RC may well get his first American Academy Award as well. As for Colin Firth -- I would love to see him in something intense and dramatic. I think those are the parts in which he is his best.
~Moon #1299
while Cruise would do a commendable job. Crowe is hot right now, so he probably gets it. "A Brilliant Mind" is also the kind of role that wins Oscars. And that is why TC is going to fight all the way for this part. His MI2 just landed the #2 spot for all time high gross during the Memorial weekend. TC is just as hot now and it will be interesting to see who gets it. I don't know that CF necessarily wants to be a film star, He is happy as a character actor. That I do not understand.
~mari #1300
Empire's review of RV by Patrick Peters (thanks to Martine for sharing). RELATIVE VALUES Such was the surefire nature of a Noel Coward play in the salad days of the "talkies" that his sophisticated comedies were snapped up for adaptation even before the first night's greasepaint had dried. However, Relative Values has taken nigh-on half a century to reach the screen, which tends to suggest that it's not on par with its peers. Those still scarred from Eric Styles's previous directorial outing, last year's Dreaming of Joseph Lees, could be forgiven for approaching this with trepidation. But, the opening segment, which establishes both the period and central characters Miranda's and Don's superstar credentials, is done with a brilliantined control that recalls the montage sequences that no selfrespecting 1930s movie was without. Natually things slow down once we reach Blighty, although the action is still taken at a decently farcical clip. Returning to the big screen for the first time since Tchin Tchin (1990), Julie Andrews remains as poised as ever. But she's spent so much time in the oh-so-clever angst-ridden chatfests of her husband, Blake Edwards, that she tends to deliver her lines like an LA luvvie. She banters effectively with man-about-town Colin Firth, but comes off second best to Sophie Thompson, who twitters beautifully as Moxie, the devoted domestic rendered distinctly uncomfortable by her sudden elevation to the peerage. With Stephen Fry and Edward Atterton contributing a second-division Jeeves and Wooster act, the film reaches its quotient of gentle smiles. But such is the precision and polish of the performances that it's obvious everyone is acting, instead of inhabiting their long-gone world. ANY GOOD? Rigidly adhering to the comedy of manners formula, this is inescapably a filmed play. Quips are tossed off and insults exchanged impeccably. But, with the cast performing like an amateur dramatic troupe, there's far more starch than sparkle on show. * * (fair)
~lizbeth54 #1301
The second difference is that men are more likely to have a better opinion of RC than they do CF. Lastly, and this is a biggie, RC plays the game. He is countlessly interviewed, photographed, and plugs away relentlessly at the publicity for his projects. (Cheryl) I think that one of CF's problems in the UK is that most men don't like him, and as virtually all reviewers are male, the hostility spills over into dismissive reviews (which do have an impact). Men admire and prefer actors like Tom Cruise, Ewan McGregor, Robert Carlyle etc because they play macho roles. CF's other "problem", if you can call it that, is that he is just not a natural self promoter. I just hope that BJD is a huge success in the States, and he gets the opportunity to experience some genuine US enthusiasm! Although apparently Kathleen Turner has been receiving standing ovations every night...we just don't give them to homegrown actors slogging their guts out for �25 per performance (�200 divided by eight!)
~CherylB #1302
(Moon) And that is why TC is going to fight all the way for this part. His MI2 just landed the #2 spot for all time high gross during the Memorial weekend. TC is just as hot now and it will be interesting to see who gets it. Russell Crowe is ascendant right now, and his asking price is lower. Big advantage. Finally, he is, at the very least, twice the actor Tom Cruise will ever be. He (Colin Firth) is happy as a character actor. That I do not understand. I can understand it, to a point. He wants his life to be his own. I really don't think he has the stomach, or the personality to play the publicity game. I think he may well find it distasteful and dull. Acting is his job. It may well be a job he loves, but when he's done with a character, he's done with the project. He wants to move on to something else. As noted acting is his job, not hawking his wares.
~lizbeth54 #1303
But such is the precision and polish of the performances that it's obvious everyone is acting, instead of inhabiting their long-gone world. This is Noel Coward...it's not the real world, never was. However, Relative Values has taken nigh-on half a century to reach the screen, which tends to suggest that it's not on par with its peers. I read that the copyright to RV only became available in 1999, enaabling it to be freely adapted for screen. As CF would say "Do. Your. F****** Homework." Those still scarred from Eric Styles's previous directorial outing, last year's Dreaming of Joseph Lees, could be forgiven for approaching this with trepidation. "Joseph Lees" actually got quite good reviews for direction/photography, and Samantha Morton got a Best Actress award for it... the screenplay was criticised, and the plot was rather bizarre.
~fitzwd #1304
Regarding Colin wanting to be a character actor - perhaps he views character actors as having more longevity in the business? And could this be an influence of working with the likes of Donald Pleasance, Lawrence Olivier, Peter O'Toole and Anthony Hopkins so early in his career? Could his problem with self-promotion be related to the fact that he had such great roles and reviews early on in his career? Was early success too easy, so that he didn't have to chase roles? He never learned how to play the game because he didn't need to? Lots of questions and speculations, no answers... Blah blah blah :-)
~lizbeth54 #1305
He deserves it. I don't think he's so happy in his professional career...I think he's sadly resigned to the current state of affairs.But he wants more. I think he wants/needs more challenging roles and more critical recognitition. I always remember the camera panning onto him about 15 minutes after he hadn't won a BAFTA....you could see how disappointed he was. And I don't really believe he wants to "haunt the margins"!
~lizbeth54 #1306
Agree with you about character actors, Donna...they have a very long shelf life! And it's true it is all speculation, but I quite enjoy it (even though I'm most probably wrong!):-)
~Brown32 #1307
Meant to tell everyone that thanks to Martine, I have the RV poster on my news page. He is on it! http://www.geocities.com/firthfan/news2.html Thanks everyone for responding to the CF/RC/BL thing. All most interesting.
~fitzwd #1308
(Evelyn) Hi everybody...I am just back from NY and I only have one thing to say... I want Colin on Broadway SD is getting the biggest reception imaginable...At the end of TRT the audience went wild. And Colin certainly has the looks and talent to be a success on Broadway, not to mention that the US reviewers wouldn't be biased against him! Quite the opposite, I bet they would love his easy manner and droll sense of humor. He just needs a bit more theater experience under his belt and the right vehicle. And Rosie O'Donnell would go ga-ga over him! Gone would be Tom Cruise as her favorite cutie-patutie. I bet he could charm the panties right off her, with just a flash of his slight overbite and those gorgeous dimples :-) I think the thing that Stephen Dillane and Ralph Fiennes may have in common is their extensive stage work and cultivating relationships in the theater, working with respected companies or directors, repeatedly. So when a plum role comes up, they are immediately considered for the part. Colin stayed away from theater too long, so he has some catching up to do. I hate to be repetitive, but Evelyn is right. The audience loves SD. I suspect he is getting a standing-o daily at this point (I saw again on Sunday, a few days after E., and up went the audience to their feet). He has become the talk of the town, so all the Hollywood biggies are showing up in the audience. I am sure he and the rest of the cast are quite overwhelmed by the response. So I'm hoping that Colin's role in BJD, however small, will open the doors the way they were opened for Rupert Everett after My Best Friend's Wedding. And if it doesn't, I think he should go back to the theater and plug away. Ok, I'm done :-)
~KarenR #1309
From the Independent on Sunday (28 May 2000): IT WAS 12 YEARS AGO TODAY: FALKLANDS DRAMA 'TUMBLEDOWN' PROVOKES PUBLIC OUTRAGE BY CHARLOTTE EDWARDS Britain was still licking its Falklands War wounds when, this week in 1988, the BBC broadcast Tumbledown. Based on Scots Guard Robert Lawrence's account of the assault on Mount Tumbledown in June 1982, the film starred the then little-known Colin Firth as Lawrence, who had sustained serious injuries in the attack. Was Tumbledown based on fact or fiction? Before the film was screened, Captain James Stuart contested a scene which, he felt, clearly identified him as an officer who encourages desertion. Stuart won a legal battle for the sequence - which "just did not happen" - to be cut. Tumbledown's director, Richard Eyre, said the film deliberately rejected a "balanced" account of events, and was intended to be "deeply political" (Sunday Telegraph). But producer Richard Broke insisted: "Tumbledown is not meant to be a documentary. . . It's a play acted by actors" (Sunday Times). Government ministers worried that the film would question Britain's involvement in the Falklands conflict, despite assurance from the BBC that the content was "absolutely non-political" (Sunday Telegraph). Response to the drama - shown on 31 May - was mixed. Some viewers claimed its criticism of army officials was "blatantly unpatriotic" (Star) and "an insult to the brave lads who fought for this country" (Daily Mail). But others applauded Tumbledown for raising questions about the treatment of Falklands veterans. Former Scots Guard John Clark said: "I am chuffed that at last the horrors of the war are coming out" (Daily Mirror). There was little assessment of Tumbledown's merits as television. Colin Firth - later to set pulses racing as Mr Darcy in Pride and Prejudice - hardly got a look-in. But Mark Lawson commented that, were it not for the film's "deliberate ambiguity", the occasion would have been hailed as "another night for British television to be proud of" (Independent).
~Allison2 #1310
(Nan)If it's okay with him, then it's okay with me. I'll watch anyway and I'm sure you will too ;-) Nan, I agree up to a point but I do wish he would appear in films that were of interest to my DH or friends. SIL and EP, fine, but SLOW, MLSF, Londinium, and also RV unless it gets some really good reviews - I am really getting fed up of going to the cinema by myself!
~Moon #1311
Could his problem with self-promotion be related to the fact that he had such great roles and reviews early on in his career? Was early success too easy, so that he didn't have to chase roles? He never learned how to play the game because he didn't need to? You might have something there, Donna! (Bethan), I think he wants/needs more challenging roles and more critical recognitition. I always remember the camera panning onto him about 15 minutes after he hadn't won a BAFTA....you could see how disappointed he was. Charater actors only get challenging roles when they break out of being character actors. That is the point I was trying to make before. That is why I do not understand why he would say he is happy to be a character actor. (Donna), I think he should go back to the theater and plug away. I agree! I am interested in seeing what SD does after his big Broadway success.
~SusanMC #1312
(Donna) Colin stayed away from theater too long, so he has some catching up to do. Yes -- and he has more-or-less attributed this to his inability to do long runs. That, BTW, is something that's always puzzled me a bit -- I'm not sure what he considers a "long run." In its Donmar run, TRT opened at the end of May and ran till August. Seems like that kind of run -- school vacation months --would fit nicely into his parenting schedule.
~SusanMC #1313
I meant to add -- it would fit nicely assuming he was able to have his son with him during that no-school period -- i.e. he wouldn't have to worry about the run preventing him from making visits to L.A.
~Lizza #1314
I think he and Livia now take Will to Umbria for the Summer don't they? Either way I agree that stage work is an excellent way forward, and it will certainly be interesting, as Evelyn says, to see the impact TRT has on SD's career. I mean no one exactly remembers him for his Joanna Trollope adaptions do they?? It would be a great move for CF to be directed by Sam Mendes back at the Donmar.
~lafn #1315
That is why I do not understand why he would say he is happy to be a character actor. Consistency in his interviews is not one of ODB attributes. He tends to change with the wind.
~MarianneC #1316
VCR Alert "Another Country" will shown on the Sundance Channel this Saturday @ 7:30pm (EST), again on the 6th and 25th. http://www.sundancechannel.com/category/tin#screenings "Camille" will be shown on the Romance Classics Channel tomorrow @ 6pm (EST). http://romanceclassics.com/programming/index.html
~MarianneC #1317
The Sundance Channel misdirected to me the wrong page ... just click on the Sundance Channel, then program guide, film finder, and feature film ... hope that works.
~patas #1318
Evelyn, do I detect some disenchantment with ODB?
~lafn #1319
(Gi)Evelyn, do I detect some disenchantment with ODB? No...after all these years, I know him too well. One time he says he's happy and the next he has an insurmountable list of "I want to be..." I don't think he means to be diliberately disingenuous, I don't think he has a clue
~amw #1320
Wonderful review for RV in this month's "Film Review" 4 stars out of 5 stars "NC was a playwright, screenwriter, director and songwriter of genius. He wrote camp, bitchy, contrived, furiously-plotted little farces and comedies which more than stand the test of time. Even the most ambling third-rate, am-dram production of say, Private Lives, exudes a wit and verbal sophistication that comes straight from the words the great man put on the page. The plot is simple English Earl plans to marry Hollywood actress. He takes her to meet his family, while pursued by her ex-lover, chaos ensues. It would be so easy to put the success of adaptation of Coward's Fifties comedy of manners down to The Master himself; easy, but unfair. No the enjoyment to be had from RV (and that enjoyment is considerable) is due to the sympathetic adaption of the script, the "sunhy day" atmosphere of the country retreat setting, and terrific ensemble casting. It has been an age since JA graced the silver screen and she clearly relishes her typical Coward matriarch figure, but brings to her a warmth and yes, light sexiness that works wonderfully. JT makes me drool, frankly, and as Miranda Frayle, Hollywood superstar, she gives a knock-out self-mocking turn that might rank as her best screen work to date. WB also demonstrates an admirable ability to laugh at both himself and the cliches of his profession, while hinting at the humanity behind the stardom. In Coward's own role of Peter, COLIN FIRTH, sex symbol and TV icon, is cast against thoroughly against type - and clearly revels in it. Whether changing sly looks and pink gins, sneering at his family or conspiring with the maid, FIRTH IS A DELIGHT. The family butler is SF. He could do this in his sleep, but no one else could do it so well, so it's nice to have him on board. Everyone else chips in with bright, convincing, appropriate performances and the period detail is exquisite. As well as examing an older type of film making, RV evokes it. Simply done, charmingly played and clocking in at just under an hour and a half, it's an absolute pleasure. Jim Smith"
~mari #1321
Now *that's* the type of excellent review we want to see! Thanks Ann.
~patas #1322
Thanks Ann. How happy and proud I feel for ODB. And looking forwards to seeing this film :-)
~Lizza #1323
Some positive news Ann, thank you. Here's to more of them. Renate, thanks to posting the site for preview tickets. Sadly I'm out of area but hope that someone will go on June 11th.
~lafn #1324
Now *that's* the type of excellent review we want to see! Yeah...'cept I don't like to see him viewed as "Sex Symbol and TV icon". And I wonder if he does....
~patas #1325
(Evelyn) I don't like to see him viewed as "Sex Symbol and TV icon". I guess he is, though... So why not accept and make the best of it? :-)
~lizbeth54 #1326
Ah, that's what I like to see! This could be a winner...at least for those over 21! "Film Review" has a slightly more mature readership, I think. BTW..re. that rather churlish and incoherent "Empire" review....what on earth is an LA luvvie? I'll be seeing MLSF next week. Hopefully, RV will go on natiowide release. To see two CF movies in a month would border on a miracle!
~KarenR #1327
Re: Encore Media Group and Relative Values Yes, cable rights have been sold to Encore, but RV is NOT going straight to cable. Encore will have it AFTER the theatrical release. No US distrib yet; are still screening it for potential buyers.
~mari #1328
Whew! Thanks, Karen. I couldn't fathom how this one would go straight to cable and am greatly relieved to hear they're shopping it for the big screen here. Will be even more greatly relieved when big screen buyer is found.;-) And speaking of RV . . .has anyone checked out the new poster on Murph's site? Bet the Ed Atterton fan club (if there is such a thing) is up in arms!;-)
~mari #1329
Sorry, more about the RV poster. Can anyone read the name of the publication in the lower right corner, from which they've pulled a great review quote?
~KarenR #1330
Looks like "New Woman" Here's the poster from Murph's site. Hope she doesn't mind. BTW, Atterton IS the guy who used to be with Salma Hayek.
~KarenR #1331
Actually, shoulda pushed Billy Boy off poster. Is he the ugliest Baldwin or what? Can't keep track of them. ;-)
~lafn #1332
(Evelyn) I don't like to see him viewed as "Sex Symbol and TV icon". (Gi)I guess he is, though... So why not accept and make the best of it? :-) IMO this dilutes his stature as a serious actor... Besides...I nevah accept what I don't approve of;-) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Actually, shoulda pushed Billy Boy off poster. Is he the ugliest Baldwin or what? Looks like he's on drugs.Cute of Colin though...
~Brown32 #1333
Karen: Re the RV Poster: I don't mind at all. Martine sent it to me, and I reduced it in size. I'll ask her for the bigger file again to see if we can read the small print.
~amw #1334
I have just recieved my application form for tickets to NC Relative Values Uk Charity Film Premiere in "the company of Julia Andrews, Colin Firth (thank goodness), William Baldwin and Stephen Fry". yippee
~ommin #1335
Ann, enjoy and have a wonderful time - we will be with you in spirit if not in the flesh (sigh)! We await with anticipation all you experience.
~Moon #1336
Ann, you did a great job at the SIL premiere and we expect great things from RV. Thanks and have a ball! Love CF in the RV poster, but you all know how much I adore Geoffrey and it does come very close. :-)
~patas #1337
Ann, how wonderful that you'll be going to the premiere! Do you think you can ask CF whether they'll film any BJ scenes in Albufeira?0-)
~Brown32 #1338
Here is that close up from the RV poster. It is New Woman Magazine.
~lafn #1339
Ann...you are really racking up the Premieres....SIL,SLOW...now RV. Proud of you.Sounds like a terrific show. As they say on Broadway "Enjoy the ride";-)
~Elena #1340
Premiere in "the company of Julia Andrews, Colin Firth WOW Ann! Just to imagine seeing Colin again in the flesh and having a chance to watch his movie in the same audience with him....wonderful. And if RV really is as good as is expected, it�s going to be a great experience.
~amw #1341
Thanks Elena, wish all my Reunion friends could be with me though.
~catheyp #1342
Hi Ann Just want to add my "have a great time". Have to admit I'm a bit jealous ;-)
~lizbeth54 #1343
It sounds as though it will be a marvellous evening, Ann. A night to remember! We might even catch a glimpse of you on GMTV. I think that there will be a lot of publicity for Dame Julie..and the rest of the cast, of course! I was very impressed by JA when she was interviewed after receiving her damedom from the Queen. A very gracious lady. I really like the RV poster, although it reminds me of "there were six in the bed, and the little one said 'move over'"......a tight squeeze! Colin looks very youthful. He and Ed Atterton look as though they could be cousins...some similarities in looks.
~mari #1344
Yep, that says New Woman--that will be a good review to look for. Thanks, Karen and Murph. (Karen) Is he the ugliest Baldwin or what? Can't keep track of them. ;-) IMO, they're all the same Baldwin. No one has ever seen them in the same room at the same time.;-) Colorful poster, if a bit crowded; not sure if Peter is gay but he sure is uxurious.;-) Still feel bad for poor Ed, doesn't even get his name on the thing. Ann, so happy for you getting to go to the premiere! Very exciting--you're a great rep for Spring!
~KarenR #1345
~lizbeth54 #1346
Just seen another very good review for RV (4 stars), CF mentioned specifically..and very positive. Also long interview with JA, with interesting RV mentions. Pics of CF/JA in both. Am busy...will post later!
~Brown32 #1347
A young Firth fan from Hong Kong found this Japanese actor book at a used book stall and sent us the scanned pictures. I have them on one page. It is slow loading, but worth it, I think. The beautiful final picture is the one the Three Deer had on their site earlier on. http://www.geocities.com/firthfan/cfyoung.html
~Moon #1348
Is that a young Kenneth Branaugh in the pix with the girl? Who is the girl? Bethan look forward to seeing those pictures.
~Brown32 #1349
Moon: That's Natasha Richardson in AMITC with Branagh and CF. Murph
~Moon #1350
But of course! Thanks, Murph.
~lafn #1351
Thanks Murph...I think that Hong Kong fan used to come to the chat room.
~Allison2 #1352
My DH woke me this morning with a cup of tea and the newspaper (nice man) and I blearily opened it to be confronted with two large photographs of Tony Blair next to our very own DB. Finding it difficult to focus so early, I feared that finally Colin had become a labour luvvie or had signed up to cool Brittania. However the story concerns plans by the BBC to make a film which follows the take over of the modernisers within the Labour party and the election of Tony Blair as leader. It finishes with the general election landslide. It says that that the role of Tony Blair has been linked with Colin. The star turn of Peter Mandelson they are talking of Kevin Spacey (where is the Beeb going to get that sort of money). Jeremy Irons is also being talked of for a role (I would have thought that he would be a much more credible Tony Blair - sorry). Lots more on this but too long to post. I'll pop over tot he Times website and see if it is there.
~Allison2 #1353
Andrew Pierce on new Labour theatre � Tony Blair may find his part in the drama played by Colin Firth, who won plaudits for his dashing Mr Darcy Photograph: SAMANTHA PEARCE / PA Labour drama to upstage Tories THE BBC is heading for a fresh row over alleged political bias after commissioning a television drama about the triumphant emergence of Tony Blair as Labour leader, to be shown in the run-up to the general election. The programme will dramatise the tensions among the modernisers during the two-year leadership of John Smith and will conclude with the election landslide of May 1997. Senior Tories predicted last night that the programme could trigger one of the biggest rows between the party and the BBC since the selection as Director-General of Greg Dyke, who gave �55,000 to new Labour. "The programme will be monitored very closely," said one senior Tory last night. The programme, which has no agreed title, will be directed by Peter Kosminsky, one of Britain's most prominent film-makers. Last year Mr Kosminsky directed the award-winning Warriors, the powerful series about British peacekeeping operations in Bosnia. Neil Kinnock, Mr Smith and Mr Blair will all have starring roles in the drama-documentary, but artistic licence will be used in depicting their actions and their characters will be given different names. "They will be easily identifiable," one BBC executive said last night. "You will be able to tell Kinnock, Smith and Blair from a mile off." Colin Firth, who played the dashing Mr Darcy in the acclaimed BBC production of Pride and Prejudice, has been linked with the role of the new Labour leader. The Oscar-winning Jeremy Irons, who has impeccable Blairite credentials and has been to the Labour luvvie parties at Downing Street, has also been named in connection with the project. The star turn in the programme will be the character based on Peter Mandelson, the orchestrator-in-chief of Labour's modernisation. The name of Kevin Spacey, star of the Oscar-winning film American Beauty and an old hand on the London stage, was being touted around the BBC yesterday as the ideal candidate to play Mr Mandelson. The programme will be shown in prime time on BBC1 next year. The precise timing will be determined by the date of the general election. The extraordinary rise in importance in Labour Party politics of the pager, the spin doctor, and public relations advisers will be charted. But while the drama will give off the whiff of the corridors of power, it will unfold in true kitchen-sink style. The writers plan to tell the story of Labour's modernisation through the experiences of three friends who share a house and plot Labour's rebirth from the rubble of the 1983 election disaster. The Friends-style arrangement of apparatchiks at home is modelled directly on the Eighties living arrangements of Mr Mandelson, his ally Colin Byrne, who was a Labour Party press officer, and Mr Byrne's former partner, Julie Hall, who was Mr Kinnock's press secretary. The drama will use the different personalities to help to bring alive the rows within Labour over which direction the party should take, with re-creations of the strategic discussions on the minimum wage and income tax levels interspersed with high personal drama. The BBC research team is talking to people who worked for Labour between 1985 and 1997 to ensure that the script is as true to life as possible. Some of their targets, however, have already been written into the script. Philip Gould, the advertising millionaire who conducts Mr Blair's focus groups and persuaded Mr Kinnock to stop smoking in public, will be easy to spot. "He will be projected as a shiny-suited adman who has the gift of the gab," the BBC source said. Some of the BBC's most informative sources include figures no longer constrained by the need to be discreet. One such is Derek Draper, who worked for Mr Mandelson, but fell from grace after becoming embroiled in the cash-for-access row involving paid lobbyists and ministers. The writers of the drama acknowledge that David Hare's play Absence of War has trodden similar territory, with its thinly veiled depiction of Mr Kinnock in the 1992 election. The new project will bring the story of Labour's modernisation bang up to date, but even though the drama will end happily for Labour this time, there are still risks. The detailed nature of Mr Hare's portrait of the Labour leadership led to the left-wing playwright being shunned by the party establishment. Mr Hare had been given unparalleled access to Mr Kinnock in the run-up to the general election. John Thaw played Mr Kinnock at the national theatre, but the Labour leadership was appalled by the result. Mr Kinnock was projected as a verbose Welshman, uncomfortable in the double-breasted suits that his advisers had ordered him to wear, a leader who no longer knew what he stood for. Mr Hare was banned from the 1997 Labour Party election bandwaggon by Alastair Campbell, Mr Blair's press secretary. The writers of the new BBC drama are taking a risk themselves by giving Mr Campbell a starring role in the programme. Mr Kosminsky, however, is no stranger to controversy. He has built a formidable career, having directed a documentary on the Falklands war and a harrowing film on child abuse. Nevertheless, there was still nervousness within the BBC last night about the expected political fallout from the programme. "It is hard to see how the young Labour leader, who changes the party, wins a landslide and who is easily identifable as Tony Blair, can come out in anything other than a favourable light. The plan is to do it before the election. In the run-up to polling. I suspect the Conservatives will kick up hell over this one," said one BBC source. � Tony Blair may find his part in the drama played by Colin Firth, who won plaudits for his dashing Mr Darcy Photograph: SAMANTHA PEARCE / PA Here it is: Labour drama to upstage Tories THE BBC is heading for a fresh row over alleged political bias after commissioning a television drama about the triumphant emergence of Tony Blair as Labour leader, to be shown in the run-up to the general election. The programme will dramatise the tensions among the modernisers during the two-year leadership of John Smith and will conclude with the election landslide of May 1997. Senior Tories predicted last night that the programme could trigger one of the biggest rows between the party and the BBC since the selection as Director-General of Greg Dyke, who gave �55,000 to new Labour. "The programme will be monitored very closely," said one senior Tory last night. The programme, which has no agreed title, will be directed by Peter Kosminsky, one of Britain's most prominent film-makers. Last year Mr Kosminsky directed the award-winning Warriors, the powerful series about British peacekeeping operations in Bosnia. Neil Kinnock, Mr Smith and Mr Blair will all have starring roles in the drama-documentary, but artistic licence will be used in depicting their actions and their characters will be given different names. "They will be easily identifiable," one BBC executive said last night. "You will be able to tell Kinnock, Smith and Blair from a mile off." Colin Firth, who played the dashing Mr Darcy in the acclaimed BBC production of Pride and Prejudice, has been linked with the role of the new Labour leader. The Oscar-winning Jeremy Irons, who has impeccable Blairite credentials and has been to the Labour luvvie parties at Downing Street, has also been named in connection with the project. The star turn in the programme will be the character based on Peter Mandelson, the orchestrator-in-chief of Labour's modernisation. The name of Kevin Spacey, star of the Oscar-winning film American Beauty and an old hand on the London stage, was being touted around the BBC yesterday as the ideal candidate to play Mr Mandelson. The programme will be shown in prime time on BBC1 next year. The precise timing will be determined by the date of the general election. The extraordinary rise in importance in Labour Party politics of the pager, the spin doctor, and public relations advisers will be charted. But while the drama will give off the whiff of the corridors of power, it will unfold in true kitchen-sink style. The writers plan to tell the story of Labour's modernisation through the experiences of three friends who share a house and plot Labour's rebirth from the rubble of the 1983 election disaster. The Friends-style arrangement of apparatchiks at home is modelled directly on the Eighties living arrangements of Mr Mandelson, his ally Colin Byrne, who was a Labour Party press officer, and Mr Byrne's former partner, Julie Hall, who was Mr Kinnock's press secretary. The drama will use the different personalities to help to bring alive the rows within Labour over which direction the party should take, with re-creations of the strategic discussions on the minimum wage and income tax levels interspersed with high personal drama. The BBC research team is talking to people who worked for Labour between 1985 and 1997 to ensure that the script is as true to life as possible. Some of their targets, however, have already been written into the script. Philip Gould, the advertising millionaire who conducts Mr Blair's focus groups and persuaded Mr Kinnock to stop smoking in public, will be easy to spot. "He will be projected as a shiny-suited adman who has the gift of the gab," the BBC source said. Some of the BBC's most informative sources include figures no longer constrained by the need to be discreet. One such is Derek Draper, who worked for Mr Mandelson, but fell from grace after becoming embroiled in the cash-for-access row involving paid lobbyists and ministers. The writers of the drama acknowledge that David Hare's play Absence of War has trodden similar territory, with its thinly veiled depiction of Mr Kinnock in the 1992 election. The new project will bring the story of Labour's modernisation bang up to date, but even though the drama will end happily for Labour this time, there are still risks. The detailed nature of Mr Hare's portrait of the Labour leadership led to the left-wing playwright being shunned by the party establishment. Mr Hare had been given unparalleled access to Mr Kinnock in the run-up to the general election. John Thaw played Mr Kinnock at the national theatre, but the Labour leadership was appalled by the result. Mr Kinnock was projected as a verbose Welshman, uncomfortable in the double-breasted suits that his advisers had ordered him to wear, a leader who no longer knew what he stood for. Mr Hare was banned from the 1997 Labour Party election bandwaggon by Alastair Campbell, Mr Blair's press secretary. The writers of the new BBC drama are taking a risk themselves by giving Mr Campbell a starring role in the programme. Mr Kosminsky, however, is no stranger to controversy. He has built a formidable career, having directed a documentary on the Falklands war and a harrowing film on child abuse. Nevertheless, there was still nervousness within the BBC last night about the expected political fallout from the programme. "It is hard to see how the young Labour leader, who changes the party, wins a landslide and who is easily identifable as Tony Blair, can come out in anything other than a favourable light. The plan is to do it before the election. In the run-up to polling. I suspect the Conservatives will kick up hell over this one," said one BBC source
~Allison2 #1354
Sorry that was a bit of a double posting mess. Hope you can fathom it out.
~amw #1355
wow!I hope this doesn't mean the postponement of Armadillo but thanks Allison.
~lizbeth54 #1356
For someone who has just woken up, you've been very quick off the mark, Allison! I saw the news item but had to read it several times to understand it! I thought that Colin had gone into politics! It all sounds very interesting. As far as I can understand, the BBC has commissioned a major drama about events leading up to the Labour victory in 1997, with characters based on Labour personalities, but not called the same name. ie there will be a dashing young Prime Minister designate, a Machiaveilian figure etc. CF is mooted to play the PM, Kevin Stacey his Machiaveili. The programme will be directed by Peter Kominsky, one of Britain's most prominent film makers who directed "Warriors" for the BBC. "Warriors" was very good (about the Bosnian conflict) and very serious. This implies that the new drama would not be a light-hearted affectionate satire, but have serious targets amd be very well written. All-in-all, it is guaranteed to be hugely contraversial in the UK (although not globally) to generate enormous interest/discussion (is the BBC biased etc), and to attract a large audience, especially if CF is "Blair". Could also attract some attention internationally. A thumbs up. Back to RV (am distracted by Blair Firth!)... New Woman gave RV 4 stars, its highest rating. It panned Madonna and RE's latest, also Minnie Driver and David Duchovny, but was all praise for RV. "Great performances make RV a compelling comedy which will really crease you up." The role of Peter "is played hysterically" (ie he is hysterically funny not subject to hysteria!) by CF. Woman and Home had long interview with JA. She loved making RV. The cast became very close knit...bonded like a family. She became the "mum" figure (they used to call her "mum") and dispensed advice even when it wasn't needed. RV is described as "charming". JA and husband attended a special screening in LA. Review and interview have the same pic (heads only) of CF and JA together... the one where Colin is grinning. It's already up on the net.
~lizbeth54 #1357
The programme doen't have a title so far..how about the Blair Mandelson Project? I would think CF would be very keen to do it...it's in the same mould as "Tumbledown" and "Hostages"..playing real contemporay figures.
~lizbeth54 #1358
Me again.....this is all so-o-o interesting. "The plan is to show it in the run up to the General Election" This would be next year 2001, when? June? Makes it even more controversial, and politically significant.
~odessa #1359
I`m feeling sad: today will be the last episode of P&P and then- no more Darcy/CF ! Well, next time I have to record it and I have seen it 3 times already (but that`s not enough!). Now I just have to comfort myself by hanging in here :)
~KarenR #1360
Television, more television? Gaaa *shaking head* Well, at least I can console myself that this is probably just spin, using name names to generate some interest in the project. Come on, Kevin Spacey, Jeremy Irons and Colin! Same as they do for all Hollywood projects, using the name of whoever is the current hot properties. Might as well say that Matt Damon (has Tony Blair's ears) and Ben Affleck (Mandelson) are being considered for the roles. ;-)
~KarenR #1361
Here are the pics of Colin and Blair, accompanying the online article (are they the same as in print?):
~amw #1362
yes. What's wrong with TV Karen, at least we get to see it in reasonable time and we can always record it for our US friends.(DQ excepted)
~lafn #1363
What's wrong with TV Karen, at least we get to see it in reasonable time and we can always record it for our US friends.(DQ excepted) I'm not Karen...but I hate to see him pidgeon-holed into UK television. I know we get to see him...but who else? Do we matter? Aren't we being a little selfish? Time to graduate, Colin...Take the theatre/film route
~KarenR #1364
As far as I can see, this is the full review from New Woman: Julie Andrews plays an aristocrat who's peeved when her son introduces a classy Hollywood actress (Jeanne Tripplehorn) as his fiancee. Turns out Jeanne's a sham from Stepney, and the sister of the maid. With the butler (Stephen Fry) , his nephew (played hysterically by Colin Firth) and Tripplehorn's ex (William Baldwin), Julie sets about exposing Jeanne as a working-class bint. Great performances make it a compelling comedy that will crease you up. ******** (Ann) What's wrong with TV a) Ralph Fiennes wouldn't do it. b) Ralph Fiennes wouldn't do it. c) Ralph Fiennes wouldn't do it. at least we get to see it in reasonable time If Colin were in better films, they wouldn't sit on the shelf so long looking for distributors. Hot properties get on the screen as fast as possible or are plugged way in advance for prime release season (December).
~Moon #1365
I'm not Karen...but I hate to see him pidgeon-holed into UK television. Character actors get a lot of TV work. I agree with you, Allison, Jeremy Irons does seem like a better choice to play Blair. I can only think of Mrs. Blair insisting CF play her DH because like us she loves Mr. Darcy. ;-D I hope RV is still playing in in London when I visit in July.
~lafn #1366
I'm not Karen...but I hate to see him pidgeon-holed into UK television. Character actors get a lot of TV work. Not ones that do starring roles.And that's what I want him to do.. But I seem to be in the minority here....
~KarenR #1367
I think Moon was being facetious
~CherylB #1368
Which isn't quite the same thing as being a sea fish.
~lafn #1369
I think Moon was being facetious Sorry....hey Moon...you gotta put a *winkie* or I think you're serious. Oh...heck I don't care...he can always go on to be on "The Eastenders" or be Daffodil's co-star on "Keeping Up Appearances" or if he's lucky take over from Mr. Bean... and then they can see him nightly!!!
~Moon #1370
Oh...heck I don't care...he can always go on to be on "The Eastenders" or be Daffodil's co-star on "Keeping Up Appearances" or if he's lucky take over from Mr. Bean... and then they can see him nightly!!! Evelyn, I think your winkie is missing. ;-)
~Tineke #1371
co-star on "Keeping Up Appearances and next time he meets Karen "oh no, it's that Bucket woman again!";-)
~KarenR #1372
I'm calling it "The Bouquet" these days. ;-)
~lizbeth54 #1373
I dunno, am I the only one who's really keen on the New Project? These politico-dramas are always done very well (it's ages since the BBC has done anything like this) are thought-provoking and have lots of teeth. They are not just mild bio-pics...there's an edge. And this will undoubtably get a huge amount lots of publicity and will be taken very seriously by the media. Eye of the storm stuff, not haunting the margins. And if CF, Kevin Spacey and Jeremy Irons (too world-weary looking for Blair) are involved it will be even more high profile (and should be sold world-wide). And the director is very well respected. I actually don't see anything wrong in mixing good TV, film and theatre. Ralph Fiennes appeared in a one hour drama about Marcel Proust on BBC2 a couple of months ago (so he does do TV!). CF's got BJD and RV up-coming, so his film profile is high. And compared with the Brit movies which are sucessfully hitting the multiplexes at the moment (puerile would be an understatement!) even "Londinium" may not be as bad as feared! Might surprise you yet! RV is being promoted by Classic FM ( a very popular UK radio statio, featuring classical music, 6 million listeners.) Ann, I don't think the Blair programme would upset plans for "Armadillo" ...there's lots of time ahead!
~amw #1374
Actually, Bethan, I am with you, a good mix of television, film and theatre and actually not counting TTOTS when was the last time he was on the TV, Nostromo? so he is hardly over doing the TV. I hope, however, that it does not affect Armadillo as I think it will be great for him to work with SB again.
~Brown32 #1375
I agree too, Bethan, on those political type series. The Politician's Wife garnered a BAFTA for Juliet Stevenson, didn't it? This seems like a heavy duty production, but I am a bit confused. Is this seen as a coup for Labour? Will they use it to help in their campaign? I'm not sure I think that is quite fair...but then I'm an old political activist, and nothing is fair in politics! Evelyn -- you are not alone in wishing every day that the man would get going and seek out one of those block buster projects - on screen or stage. Look at Gabriel Byrne - a wonderful screen actor now up for a Tony tomorrow for Moon For The Misbegotten, or at Clive Owen, who made people note his presence with Croupier, or at Russell Crowe, for heaven's sake, or the aforementioned RF. This is IMO, of course. Others seem to be satisfied with his character actor status. And maybe BJD will give him that big push he needs. Murph
~patas #1376
( Bethan)I dunno, am I the only one who's really keen on the New Project? No. I was quite happy with it too. (Murph)...I am a bit confused. Is this seen as a coup for Labour? Will they use it to help in their campaign? Most films about politics and politicians are not usually very favourable...I can't see Colin agreeing to play a faultless Blair, God's gift to Britain, besieged by old corrupt politicians but able to keep his purity through all the battles... Arrrgh!
~lizbeth54 #1377
Most films about politics and politicians are not usually very favourable...I can't see Colin agreeing to play a faultless Blair, God's gift to Britain, besieged by old corrupt politicians but able to keep his purity through all the battles... Arrrgh! Agreed. One of the guys the writers/researchers are talking to is Derek Draper who was Mandelson's hennchman and then unceremoniuosly dumped. He is now well known for his dislike of his former boss...and for his knowledge of inside dealings in New Labour.. This will be "warts and all" and cutting edgse stuff, and could be political dynamite. "The Politician's Wife" was pure ficion, this will be fact as fiction...maybe nearer to "To play the King" (Ian Richardson as Francis Urquardt) which had several thinly veiled attacks on leading politicians. Playing Tony Blair in the run up to the election could be extremely challenging for CF, in more senses than one. This will be a programme that will be centre stage.
~lizbeth54 #1378
Sorry...done in haste! S-o-o many typos!
~KarenR #1379
The RV website now has a section of news items about the movie. They're mostly one liners so far and about Julie Andrews. Go here to check the list (need to pick up Tatler and Harpers & Queen for June): http://www.relative-values.com/news/summary.html One of interest was from Baz from March 3rd: "Julie Andrews ... displays marvellous comic timing in the film of Noel Coward's Relative Values." "Director Eric Styles gives the film, which opens in the summer, a glossy lustre ..." "Sophie Thompson, Colin Firth and Stephen Fry are also spiffing."
~Elena #1380
(TO)I`m feeling sad: today will be the last episode of P&P and then- no more Darcy/CF ! Oh no, I missed it! Totally forgot it but luckily I have the video. TO, I�m sure you know that you can order the two-pack video via the internet if you like. Haven�t seen it on sale anywhere in Finland. Try www.videoplusdirect.co.uk (Karen)Television, more television? Gaaa (Karen)a) Ralph Fiennes wouldn't do it. (Karen)If Colin were in better films Careerwise, I don�t see anything wrong with more TV work if it�s as good as this Blair Project sounds to me. Ralph Fiennes wouldn�t do it because he�s getting good roles in good movies all the time but as we know, Colin isn�t so it�s great if he�s getting them in the TV. Let�s face it, Colin has to do what he�s offered and his biggest international breakthrough so far was in the TV, not in films (yet). (Moon)Jeremy Irons does seem like a better choice to play Blair. But I do think there�s something similar in Tony and Colin but I can�t say exactly what. It has happened to me a couple of times that TB�s face in a paper has made me blink for a fraction of a second because I�ve thought it�s Colin!!
~heide #1381
The New Project Cool! Blair should be flattered as hell. And what great company. I agree, Elena, I think Colin and Blair aren't that far off and in 1997 Blair was what...44? 45? Catching up on the interesting comments on CF's career. I agree with most of what you said but one point that may not have been brought up is that the roles that Colin chooses may look a lot more interesting than what we end up seeing on the screen. Colin finds the complexity in each of his characters and usually manages to convey the many layers. Some of his films have turned into dogmenat but I'm sure he expected more from them. As far as being a character actor, I don't think that's his goal at this stage. I think his facetious nature is misinterpreted (again) by the interviewer. We know he wanted the Will Shakespeare part but became too old as the project dragged on. He took the next most interesting part and will continue looking for interesting parts whether they be star-making vehicles or 6th banana roles. It's our loss, I suppose, but I think he's very happy. That's not to say he's not dissappointed when the end result's not what he expected. I don't think Relative Values will be a hit. (OK, you can stop counting how many times I've been wrong before.) It was a chance for Colin to bring Noel Coward to the screen and you can bet he found something about the role that's different from what he's done before and I don't mean the hairdressing part. If he doesn't go to the premiere because it's on his anniversary, then he's a big wussy. Maybe that's why the date is now changed to June 23. '-) Ann, you're a doll to go to the premiere and bring us back a report. (Karen) Actually, shoulda pushed Billy Boy off poster. Is he the ugliest Baldwin or what? Pretty ugly but I think Stephen (the blonde one) is even uglier. (Mari) Still feel bad for poor Ed, doesn't even get his name on the thing. Sure, Mari. Let's see if we can wring out a few leftover tears after we're finished feeling bad for poor Colin when his name is omitted time after time. ;-) I hope BJD is a break-out role but I would so love to see him on stage. The Donmar and Same Mendes sounds like a wonderful combo for him. Forgive all this opining. It's all based purely on conjecture and gut reaction, as always. ;-) Thanks for the film channel updates, Marianne. I don't get either and am crying in my coffee that I can't see Camille. Donna, I'm with you on Colin changing Rosie's heart. He is indeed a "cutey patootie" as you so eloquently put it. ;-)
~mari #1382
I think the new project sounds promising, if it comes about. The disappointment you hear from these shores has to do, I think, with the fact that this show is unlikely to be broadcast outside the UK, and therefore does not raise his international profile as P&P did. Granted, it's a selfish position.;-) I think behind-the-scenes political stories are fascinating, but that they don't travel well outside their home countries. We've had a number of good TV dramas here, on FDR, JFK, Truman, and most recently an award-winner with Gary Sinise as George Wallace. I doubt it those were shown in many places abroad, if at all. TV does seem like the better venue for this type of topic; Primary Colors, a very good film, did poorly abroad, and underperformed in the U.S. as well.
~lafn #1383
(Mari)I think behind-the-scenes political stories are fascinating, but that they don't travel well outside their home countries Pssst... They don't do well in-country either....I never watch-em. They get poor ratings.Boorrrrring. Bad enough to have to put up with the antics of politicians, without having to hear about 'em for entertainment .At least in our country. But UK probably find politico's lives fascinating .
~Tracy #1384
Just a quick reminder to those in the UK. Channel 4 are screening CoF tonight at 9.30...time to set those VCRs!!
~KarenR #1385
The disappointment you hear from these shores has to do, I think, with the fact that this show is unlikely to be broadcast outside the UK, and therefore does not raise his international profile as P&P did Frankly, I don't care *what* the subject matter. It's television. Actors here graduate from television and only go back when they're no longer bankable on the big screen (e.g., the upcoming Geena Davis series). Kevin Spacey doing television in the UK? Puh-leez, he did his television here (the wonderful Mel Proffit); has graduated and is done for it. If Colin says he wants to be "respected," then it has to be stage or screen and that never means little screen, unless of course he wants to be a Dick Van Dyke. ...and Proust? Come on. Fiennes hasn't done television for ages (except perhaps for lending his voice to animated features) and this was more in line with a contribution to art and literature, much in the same vein as his doing the two Shakespeare plays now and Onegin. This Blair thing is no more than a made-for-TV movie. "Playing the King"? I liked it, but who saw it? The Masterpiece Theatre crowd. Sorry if my view offends you all, but when I read in the trades that Universal Pictures is wooing Colin to star in huge quality production starring high calibre actors, then I'll get excited. An actor appearing in a TV movie barely gets a mention.
~amw #1386
but if he isn't being offered "huge quality productions starring high calibre actors" ...... well
~KarenR #1387
very sad then, but he could do something about it. All I have to console myself is that (1) this TV movie hasn't even been written yet so no one has agreed to be in it and (2) BBC is probably just trying to create some buzz and can sit there smoking whatever, dreaming about its dream cast. Using those names guaranteed it got into the papers (wouldn't here). Doesn't mean anything.
~lizbeth54 #1388
Maybe the perception of TV and movie work is different in the US and UK. I think some of the best writing and performances are to be seen on British television, and not in British movies, which currently are mainly geared towards adolescent tastes. (And I like the pace of a five or six hour adaptation and I like politico-dramas!) British actors seem to move freely between big and small screen and theatre and radio. The likes of Ian Holm, Albert Finney, Michael Gambon have always done this and are still going strong in their sixties. I'd love to see CF in major international projects, which are seen by everyone worldwide, not just in the UK, and hopefully he will be offered them, but I have to say I like the projects he is getting involved in at the moment. Maybe we'll have to beg to differ on this! :-)
~Brown32 #1389
Kevin Spacey doing television in the UK? Puh-leez, he did his television here (the wonderful Mel Proffit); has graduated and is done for it. ********* Karen: I had forgotten about Mel Proffit. What a role that was! Wasn't he in love with his sister too? Who played her? The only show I can think of on TV recently that might say actors do come back is George Clooney's try with Fail Safe. It was not a success, however. Bethan, you are right about British actors moving easily back and forth. Over here a big hurdle is moving successfully from television into film. Not too many make it. I think of my poor David Caruso (though he does have a pretty big part in Ryan/Crowe's Proof of Life) and Jimmy Smits.
~ommin #1390
I have to agree. I much prefer T.V. plays and I suppose because here in Australia we get a lot of BBC stuff on our ABC we are used to political plays such as to Play the King etc. Ian Richardson was magnificent. If it is ever made I have no doubt it will reach here! Maybe even first like Donovan Quick!
~Ruperbear #1391
No comparison. Most British TV is far superior to Hollywood Productions IMO.
~lafn #1392
YIPEE....THEY WON!! THREE TONY'S....OUR GANG CLEANED-UP. Welcome to Broadway!! BEST REVIVAL TRT BEST ACTOR SD BEST ACTRESS JE Big Night......So take that, Olivier's!!
~KarenR #1393
Joan Severance. Fail Safe was an event and highly successful one from a critical standpoint. The actors it attracted (excepting one who shall remain nameless) and the director...it is the exception to the rule.
~lafn #1394
I want Colin on Broadway, so he can win a Tony too
~Lizza #1395
Wow Evelyn, break open the champagne!!! You must be just so thrilled, congratulations to them both and TRT. C'mon Colin, what a way to go!! Now he's smelled the coffee, we need to make sure it's a double expresso.
~lafn #1396
(Bethan)but I have to say I like the projects he is getting involved in at the moment. Maybe we'll have to beg to differ on this! How couldyou say that? This distinguished British actor , whom I consider the best in this generation has had his last TWO starring films tank. SLOW took in 2,000+ UKP!! And 300 of those were from Spring & FOF!! Embarassing. His current projects are stagnant and will get him no where except more stagnant televisions roles, and excuse me..."supporting character roles." He isn't getting any younger and meanwhile the world is passing him by. He is watching all his peers get all the best roles and all the awards. I bet he feels like a million bucks.
~lafn #1397
I want Colin in this picture next year.... The Best of Broadway....Best Actor and Actress in a musical, Best Actor and Actress in a Play ...Both from THE REAL THING... JE & SD.
~ommin #1398
Evelyn it is not the material point. I do not believe he is interested. He works to live, to have a nice home, a happy marriage and to pursue what he believes in - in doing good where he can. I think we have to face the fact he will never be a 'star' in the Hollywood sense - I truly believe he is not interested. As long as he is true to himself, I believe he is satisfied. He is from a strong religious background and it shows. (IMHO) Of course living in Australia we do get his T.V. stuff and it is sad that it doesn't make it in the U.S. Unfortunately commercial t.v. is all important and where the BBC and ABC do well in U.K. and Australia it does not happen in the U.S. We need to educate the masses to watch the good rather than the crass. Please Evelyn do not be offended but that I truly believe is how it is.
~KarenR #1399
We will never know what for certain he wants or if he is happy with his career. But the statements in the last three newspaper articles had undercurrents of melancholy and wistfulness, as if the boat had left him behind. He wants to be a respected actor. For that to happen, he has to make a commitment to stage or screen and prove his stuff. Sorry, but your television doesn't count for much in the grand scheme of things. Those are the things that must be faced.
~KarenR #1400
~KarenR #1401
...and as I meant to end my last post: We will agree to disagree. I like going *out* to the movies. Nothing can replace the experience of seeing performances on a big screen. The poor Empire review of Relative Values is online: http://www.empireonline.co.uk/reviews/review.asp?id=5912&ss=relative+values&sb=t&or=bf&c=&r=0&f=0&cp=1
~KarenR #1402
There is a review of MLSF in the Monday Canberra Times. Am assuming that it is now out on video in Australia (says "available now" by Roadshow). This would be PAL version if people wanted to purchase.
~EileenG #1403
Have been away from the computer for awhile, but have finally caught up (with this topic, at least). Lots of interesting discussion...lots of differing viewpoints. First let me say congrats to all faithful fans of SD and JE--how proud you must be. I was pleasantly surprised at TRT's clean-up at the Tonys last night. Like Evelyn, I'd love, love, love to see CF on B'way earning like praise for his abilities (with or without awards--preferably with, of course). I've always maintained that Livia would love it here; besides, LA's only a five hour flight and a three hour time difference. ;-) Regarding the discussion about CF's career view: (Anne) I do not believe he is interested. He works to live, to have a nice home, a happy marriage and to pursue what he believes in - in doing good where he can. I think we have to face the fact he will never be a 'star' in the Hollywood sense - I truly believe he is not interested. I used to believe this, based on quotes I have read in the past. However, as Karen points out, this latest batch of remarks has shed new light on the subject. Sure, he's still ambivalent about being a star (i.e., it's clear he's not after stardom for stardom's sake), but his recent comments reveal (IMO) a more aggressive and less passive approach to his career. Regarding the latest rumored project: I agree with Karen here (never realized that Matt Damon and Tony Blair have similar ears :-P). I'll belive it when I see it, especially Kevin Spacey's involvement. Bethan has made a good point--TV roles are weighted differently in the UK than in the US. I'd much rather see CF in a film or theater role, but I'd be OK with TV as long as it was a high profile, high publicity project (albeit in the UK alone, not globally). I'm happy with anything he does as long as it's better than his performance in SLOW, which I found below his usual standard, and as long as he stays far away from the likes of Big Daddy (DH had this on over the weekend. Utter 'video toilet paper' but it made a ton of $$$). I hope RV finds a US distributor; I'm looking forward to seeing CF's performance and would love to see it on the big screen. Enjoy the premiere, Ann!
~luvvy #1404
I find the attitude that US standards of life and work are the benchmark by which all actors' lives and careers are to be measured to be provincial and condescending. And I am pretty sure that's how Colin Firth would view them too. The majority British actors have always moved among the multiple media with regularity. They go where the work is, they hone a variety of skills, and are better for it. If they want to do Hollywood films exclusively, they piss off for California (e.g. Tim Roth, Gary Oldman, Anthony Hopkins) and have done with it. An actor in Britain is considered successful if he/she is making a living at his/her chosen craft doing projects of which he/she is not ashamed. That means doing television, radio, concert narration, audiotape recording, theatre, and film. Apparently an actor in America is only considered to be successful if he has made financially successful films and the cover of People magazine. God forbid he should do television. But then since so much American television is total crap, he'd have a hard time being proud of such a job. And since intelligent American radio is a non-sequitur (NPR being the exception that proves the rule), there's no work there for an actor anyway. American theatre? Concerts? You know what? You are right. There isn't anything but films in this country.
~KarenR #1405
I find the attitude that US standards of life and work are the benchmark by which all actors' lives and careers are to be measured to be provincial and condescending. Then you misread what I've said. Apparently, you only view the extreme ends of the continuum: People magazine covers and...whatever. There is more IMO. There are respected actors, talented and who haven't sold out for glitz, but who shrewdly do enough to have name recognition, which counts so much in casting decision. Movies are a business. My last words on the subject are that I'm not apologetic about my own culture and never attempt to hold it above anyone else's as superior. I have too much respect for all cultures to do so. and, btw, we try to stay away from personalizing comments when it might be interpreted as name-calling.
~lafn #1406
(Anne)We need to educate the masses to watch the good rather than the crass. Please Evelyn do not be offended but that I truly believe is how it is. Honey..I'm not offended, but I am stunned at your naivete. Please go back and read his latest interviews...esp. the pathetic one: "I want to be respected...I want to be prosperous...I want to get good roles". Obviously anyone who is happy in the present state of his career, would not be making this statement.Nor do I consider it crass for him to wish for these things. He is a normal human being who likes to be recognized for his endeavors.And who sees lesser talented people "get the gravy". When I sat in front of the TV last night and saw Kenneth Branngh introduced as "the distinguished British actor"...and thought that both he and SD were supporting actors to Colin in previous films....both less talented than he...I could have cried.
~luvvy #1407
KarenR said "and, btw, we try to stay away from personalizing comments when it might be interpreted as name-calling" Eh? "personalizing"?? "name-calling"??? I'm sorry, where did I do either? Unless your name is American Television, in which case I called you crap. For which I apologize, Ms. Television. The only person I mentioned was Colin Firth.
~Lizza #1408
I'm inclined to say let's show some tolerance, especially as having met our kind and generous bucket host, I know her to be incredibly tolerant herself and a cultural oasis too!( put a lot of Brits to shame too). KJ's card said most of what I feel (given at 3dOR) about our group and without Karen's driving energy and generosity we wouldn't have half the OBD stuff we do. Personal enough? Oh dear must be a bad hair day :�)) Seriously let's do what we do here best , drooling. Someone put up a gorgeous picture of ODB and quick!! After 12 hours in an office I need dimples and big brown eyes (kohl rimmed or not!).
~Moon #1409
I do not wish to be polemic, but I believe Karen was referring to: (luvvy), I find the attitude that US standards of life and work are the benchmark by which all actors' lives and careers are to be measured to be provincial and condescending. I happen to think that, in general, US TV is crap. I also think that BBC/America is crap.
~mari #1410
Karen, if you're Ms. Television, and Milton Berle used to be Mr. Television, does that make you . . .hmmm, he's about 107, rich as Croesus, and badly in need of somebody to leave all that money to!;-) For those of us who read discontent into CF's recent remarks, there seems to be a disconnect between his professional choices and his aspirations. We look at the poor reception to some of his recent work and we see a guy who needs to change horses pretty quickly if indeed he wants respect, esteem, prosperity, the good roles, etc. We compare his achievements to those of his peers (and I think Evelyn nailed it in the statement about wanting to cry last night when seeing Branagh and Dillane), and we hate to see him settle for less, much less. Then to read him possibly signing on for more of the same, well, it's disappointing. Having said that, I do understand that some others may not see it the same way. As for crap, we all--every country represented here--has its strengths and weaknesses, just as every person has, but certainly there is more to admire in each other than not. It's been my pleasure to get to know Karen, and her attitudes are neither provincial nor condescending. But she sure will be rolling in it once Uncle Miltie croaks.;-);-)
~KJArt #1411
I think we're *all* Jasperizing at the moment! ;-D (As we, of course, have every right to do.) I'll jasperize enough to say that on the whole, I tend to agree with Chris. I was never happier for Colin than when I felt he had finally decided to stick with the "home" country. It has the disadvantage of its media industry not getting the support it deserves, but the advantage of at least being the source of a much greater variety of roles on offer and a potential audience for them. That is not to guarantee the roles will all be plums or that everyone working in the U.K. media are competant at what they do, but I think he increased his chances of getting the kinds of roles he wanted about 300% by deciding to stick with Britain. (Chris)so much American television is total crap, he'd have a hard time being proud of such a job. And since intelligent American radio is a non-sequitur (NPR being the exception that proves the rule), there's no work there for an actor anyway. American theatre? Concerts? You know what? You are right. There isn't anything but films in this country. And how many Americans genuinely appreciate and admire the craft of acting, even among their own? They are more likely to attune their approval on whether or not the guy is gorgeous and "a real man" and hope he is violent enough to get good box office so he can go play the same part again. all he wants is for people to think he is a good actor The people who will think he is a good actor are the people who appreciate the craft and respect it in all of its forms. He'll be more likely find his appreciative audience abroad than in the US.
~KarenR #1412
We've never agreed on any of these points, but let's have tolerance for others' points of view and not resort to ridicule or other demeaning comments. OK, am up to Chapter Six in my "Diplomatic and Gracious Hosting for Dummies" book. ;-)
~KarenR #1413
(Lizza) Someone put up a gorgeous picture of ODB and quick!! After 12 hours in an office I need dimples and big brown eyes (kohl rimmed or not!). Your wish is my command. I have a new one, but am going to work on it now. Will put up later and am interested to hear where you all think it was taken. :-)
~CherylB #1414
As I'm prone to a particularly viriulent case of virtual foot in mouth disease, I'll offer my views on CF's career. Perhaps he had too easy when he started, and thus never had to really pursue quality work -- it came to him. Seriously, taken in overview his career in the 1980's was nothing short of charmed. The Drama Centre stages its one and only production of "Hamlet"; who should snag the celebrated role of the Dane but CF. Then it gets to be even more of a fairy tale, an agent is in the audience, and behold he gets cast in the lead of the West End hit "Another Country". Then he's cast as the second lead in the film version. There are also leading roles in the top quality films "A Month in the Country" and "Apartment Zero". Of course, there's "Valmont". Milos Forman's search for the vicomte was almost as epic as Selznick's for Scarlett O'Hara. Out of all the young actors who auditioned, quess who gets the part? Why, CF, of course. Also "Tumbledown" should be noted. Yes, it was done for television, but it ealt with an important and painful subject. CF also won an award for it. It would seem that in his twenties, CF could do no wrong. That all seems to have changed. Now he inhabits the "real world", as it were. The roles don't fall easily to him anymore. He sees his contemporaries surpassing him. Why? Perhaps it is because he never had to hone his survival skills as an actor since he never really was a struggling actor. I do think that, overall, he is a successful actor. He has supported himself well for almost twenty years on his income as an actor. Most working actors cannot say that. He also can be proud of most of the projects in which he has been involved. That's my two cents, anyway. I just could be all wet in my analysis.
~Ruperbear #1415
I applaud everything Luvvy said. She/he made a lot of sense.
~lizbeth54 #1416
Wading in here..I'm not sure where to start! Firstly, although it makes me look as though I'm operating in a different time zone, I've actually seen MLSF! It was a horrid rainy day, and I went with fairly low-keyed expectations, but I have to say that I really enjoyed it. I tend to go into hyper critical mode when watching anything of CF's , and so sometimes can't enjoy the experience. But I liked MLSF ...it has charm, and all the performances are very good. It was episodic, but I had no problem with this. I spoke to one of the Museum staff afterwards and said that that I was pleased that they were showing it. He said that they had great difficulty in getting hold of a print as the distributors couldn't care less about it. I feel sad for him about this...he deserves much better. I guess this is one of the reasons I'm keen on good TV work. It does reach its audience, and, in the UK certainly, is a respected medium. But I do accept that film is a much more accessible and high profile medium for the US. (at least he's doing BJD...I'm sure this will be a multi-million dollar smash...and he'll have to give interviews!) There was actually something on the radio today about the proposed New Labour drama. A BBC spokesman said that they were very excited about it...the script was going to be "first-rate" and "very thought-provoking" they were looking to put together the highest calibre cast possible. They didn't have a date for filming...maybe the end of the year, for transmission in Spring. I wouldn't rule out Kevin Stacey's involvement. I remember reading that when he was in Lodon doing "The Iceman Cometh" he was very friendly with Peter Mandelson (Mandelson moves in artistic circles). I'd rather see CF doing something like this (and the excellent "Armadillo") in addition to movies, which can be so unpredictable. And of course theatre. It would be very nice indeed to see him getting the respect and acclaim that JE and SD, deservedly, are getting. No more CF-wetshirt comments (there was actually one in the Times a couple of days ago...let it be, please!) Okay, back to Drool!
~lizbeth54 #1417
Spacey, sorry!
~Brown32 #1418
Lizza, while Karen is getting her picture ready, here is some Kohl-lined for you to gaze at and remember -- and it is from television -- how about that! Seriously, everyone has made good points in this discussion. I think those of us who have followed CF for some time are disappointed that his career has not taken off. For folk like me, being an accomplished actor in many media in the UK is not enough. I personally would love to see him get the international attention Russell Crowe is getting right now. We should remind ourselves that he is a star in England, and always will be. I just wish it had spread further aboard. When I still have to tell people who he is by mentioning SIL - "you know Lord Wessex?" That says something I'm not particularly glad to admit. But, many fine actors found their "role" at 40. He still has time -- and more than enough talent.
~Brown32 #1419
Sorry...
~heide #1420
(Mari) For those of us who read discontent into CF's recent remarks... An excellent way of putting that not all of us do read discontent into CF's recent remarks. And I doubledare you to call me naive, Evelyn. ;-) Actually, I think it makes me skeptical as hell because I scarcely believe anything I read in articles. It's all what the writer/editor chooses to tell us. Whew! Anyway, I don't think anyone is really too worked up over the percieved state of his career. There are other more weighty matters. Such as what's with the big hair MarkG reports Colin is sporting as Mark Darcy!? And Karen, what picture could you be finessing? Don't keep us in suspense too long, dear. I am so glad you saw MLSF, Bethan, and glad you told us here. I'd love to hear what charms you found in it. KJ, what is "jasperizing"? Sounds fascinating.
~Moon #1421
40 is a mystical number. Maybe we just have to wait for September 10th. ;-)
~KarenR #1422
Lookie Here
~lafn #1423
(Heide)And I doubledare you to call me naive, Evelyn. ;-) Actually, I think it makes me skeptical as hell because I scarcely believe anything I read in articles. It's all what the writer/editor chooses to tell us. Sometimes I believe what are in quotations in an article .. but I scarcely believe what some people post on drool:-D
~Brown32 #1424
Karen asks: Where was that picture taken? 1. At Prince Charles's party recently? The one where the Queen finally said a cool hello to Camilla? Whereever it was, he looks good. A little thicker around the neck. Is he lifting weights?
~mari #1425
YOWZA! Here's something on which we all can agree: that is one fine looking fellow! I have a feeling Moon will approve of this outfit.:-) I'll guess: the AMFAR benefit at Cannes
~KJArt #1426
Mmmmm, nice. But I wouldn't want to jasperize... (Heide) KJ, what is "jasperizing"? Sounds fascinating. Re: Rees Article in the Times glossy magazine, May 6: Response 922, KJArt, Mon May 8, Jasper is enamoured of "positing" and it really shows in his language, as he hedges when he's simply inventing what he wants to believe about Colin. Response 1002, Eileen, May 9, 2000 We've been doing the same thing as Jasper -- projecting our own interpretations into CF's words . \...\ It's human nature to do this. Response 1015 Mari, May 9 Just me Jasper-ing away here . . .;-) Response 1039, Lisa JH Wed, May 10 First there was "doing a Harvey;" now we have "pulling a Jasper." Too funny... We turned the proper noun into a verb. It can take many forms; I was just trying out 'jasperize' as an alternate form of the verb, meaning "to conjecture according to one's wont" or as Eileen so succinctly put it ...."projecting our own interpretations into CF's words". Mary, now, knows exactly when she is "pulling a Jasper", and lets us know it... 1418, Mary Murphy, June 5 I personally would love to see him ... We should remind ourselves ... I just wish ... Tres honest, no?
~mari #1427
(KJArt) The people who will think he is a good actor are the people who appreciate the craft and respect it in all of its forms. He'll be more likely find his appreciative audience abroad than in the US. Oh, please don't tell this to a group of people who crossed an ocean twice to see him on the stage. That appreciative audience in his home country doesn't go to see the movies in which he stars. Either: A.) that is not an art form that they respect, or B) the roles he's taking don't turn them on. "A" would be a gross overstatement (of which I've seen a few here today) so that leaves B, which means they have the same opinion some of us do.
~nan #1428
(Karen) I'm calling it "The Bouquet" these days. ;-) LOL! Now that's funny ;-) (Mari) Primary Colors, a very good film, did poorly abroad, and underperformed in the U.S. as well. (Evelyn) They don't do well in-country either....I never watch-em. They get poor ratings.Boorrrrring. I tend to agree that politics in film is a very hit or miss topic. However, if you haven't seen Primary Colors, then you should, Evelyn. As Mari said, it's a very good film. You should rent it, if only for Kathy Bates, who steals every scene she's in, chews it up and spits it back out. A woman after my own heart ;-p Evelyn) YIPEE....THEY WON!! Congratulations, honey! I'm as excited for you as Jennifer ;-) Since I already had my say about Colin's career (in a verbose post last week) I'll stay out of the current debate. ...except to say that Mari's Uncle Miltie comment had me rolling ;-D (Heide) Such as what's with the big hair MarkG reports Colin is sporting as Mark Darcy!? Now this is of major import ;-p Big hair, indeed!
~KJArt #1429
Test
~nan #1430
I swear I closed the tags, but okay...I'll close 'em again. I love Yapp. I love Yapp...c'mon, everybody...I love Yapp... ;-/
~KJArt #1431
That happened to me yesterday on 127. I KNEW I closed the bold, but...
~nan #1432
This is to keep your eyes busy while I continue to screw with tags... From Renate's archives ;-)
~KarenR #1433
(Mari) I'll guess: the AMFAR benefit at Cannes That was my guess too, but I couldn't get confirmation. Just checked my Cannes footage and seems right. A tag reminder: If you think you subsequently closed the tag, then you probably have. But if the offending *open* tag is still up on the screen, then it won't show. Leave the topic. Come back and go back one to see your *corrected* post. Oooooooooohhhhhhh, neat picture! Thanks for posting it, Nan.
~KJArt #1434
Ooooooo! Delish!! Thanks, Nan (Mari) Oh, please don't tell this to a group of people who crossed an ocean twice to see him on the stage. Of course I consider all of us to be the exceptions that prove the rule. :-) That appreciative audience in his home country doesn't go to see the movies in which he stars. Either: A.) that is not an art form that they respect, or B) the roles he's taking don't turn them on. Don't forget: C) They didn't approve of the final form these projects took. And the majority of that is out of his hands. "A" would be a gross overstatement Seems to me someone was complaining of this just the other day...something about they usually wait for the video..... ;-) so that leaves B, which means they have the same opinion some of us do. All a matter of taste. You saw MLSF (the final product). Did you consider that an unworthy project for him to do? I didn't, in spite of the fact that the powers that be cut it to ribbons and refused to promote or distribute it. CF has to call them as he sees them, *before* they're made, and he's not clairvoyant. He's taking the chances that I recall someone here was complaining that the US media don't take (only their expression for that failure was a bit stronger ... :-D) and taking chances means courting failure every time.. He takes TV roles because TV is a respected medium where he takes them. He takes the types of roles he hasn't done before or with which he has not been associated before. "It's just that I want to do interesting work," he says, with feeling.\...\ "I actually asked to play that role because I felt it was something I hadn't done before." He takes the roles that are interesting to *him* ... not necessarily interesting to us. I haven't decided whether a stuttering masturbatory village pervert would appeal to me, but I don't deny him the privilege of aspiring to such a role...( he's the one who's got to play it!! ;-D)(Or should I say GETS to play it? **Heehee**) (CF) I'm not hugely ambitious in those directions [attention, power]. As much as the next person, I want to be approved of, but I'm not greedy for that stuff. It's not where life's blessings lie as far as I'm concerned. He's only been saying the same thing over and over for the last few years. When are we going to start *listening* to the man? OK, I'll get off the soap.box now. KJ, still running off at the keyboard... = 8-D
~KarenR #1435
When are we going to start *listening* to the man? Just like you can prove anything you want with numbers, you can do the same with words. Face it, no one is going to convince anybody of anything with this argument. There's absolutely no way to confirm his views on the state of his career, whether he is offered the kind of roles he wants or is content. His personal life is no concern of mine. I'd like to close with Bethan's words: I feel sad for him about this...he deserves much better. Amen
~mari #1436
(KJArt) Don't forget: C) They didn't approve of the final form these projects took. How could someone approve or disapprove of what they haven't seen? Now, in fairness to the movie-going public, no matter if it's the U.S., the U.K., or elsewhere, the distributors didn't exactly make it easy for people to see. (KJArt) You saw MLSF (the final product). Did you consider that an unworthy project for him to do? I didn't, in spite of the fact that the powers that be cut it to ribbons and refused to promote or distribute it. Hey, I liked it, remember? But it's not the stuff that appeals to the general public and until he does that (and BJD might be a great way), moviegoers will stay away and he won't get the parts that now routinely go to his peers. As for cutting it to ribbons, films that are working don't get edited for the hell of it. If someone thought it trite, meandering and episodic (criticisms leveled at it by those who didn't like it) then 120 minutes instead of 95 would have only brought 25 more minutes of trite, meandering and episodic. Hey, I can subtract!;-) As for *listening to him,* I could also cite quotes to support various points of view because he's inconsistent. I'll also get off my soapbox now. No hard feelings, anyone. At least we're all passionate enough to discuss it, though we may disagree.
~lizbeth54 #1437
And lest we forget.....CF is at this very moment playing the romantic lead in a movie which will be promoted (and extremely well promoted) as "from the same team that brought you the hugely successful 4 Weddings and Notting Hill". Both NH and 4W took over $300 million dollars worldwide. From what Mark has posted, it sounds like a 10 week shoot....this will be a major film worldwide! And perhaps we might even get a sequel!
~Brown32 #1438
Bethan: I agree that BJD will be a major film. It seems to me, though, (Jasperizing, KJ!) that the downside will be that this will link him even closer in people's eyes as a Darcy, Mark or Fitzwilliam. Is that bad? I don't know. If you have your performance of Darcy to leave as a legacy, that ain't bad! But hasn't he said (somewhere) that he doesn't want to be remembered solely for that? Though I think recent interviews show that he has come to terms with the Darcy icon thing. A final comment -- Even with P&P, over here in the USA, not enough people saw it to make a national impact. It was on a cable channel, and only available to those who could get cable.
~lizbeth54 #1439
One downside about TV, which I hesitated to post. is that it can be equally unpredictable, at least as far as CF is concerned. For all UK-ers, I phoned up re. a scheduling date for DQ, as I thought they might have one by now. And was told, horror upon horrors, no date, tentatively 2001. I phoned another number to complain, and was told, "no transmission date...it's down as having gone out in 1999. Maybe it was just shown in Scotland." Well, it sure wasn't!! They are looking into it for me, and will ring me back. I'm not a pessimist but I really have no more hopes for this...spring, summer, autumn, 2001, difficult to schedule, already gone out. Something has happened to this (it was based on a real-life Bus company...are they sueing?)...it's no go. The tragedy is that it's a very good drama, by a BAFTA winning team, and starring the "most popular actor in 60 years of the BBC." Words fail me. Give the guy some good luck, puh-leese!
~lizbeth54 #1440
PS. This is �1.25 million of British tax payer's money. We have the right to see it! If anyone has a spare moment, please write or email the BBC for a scheduling date for DQ (and not 2001!)
~Moon #1441
Bethan, maybe they are trying to latch on to the CF publicity once BJD is out in 2001. YOWZA! Here's something on which we all can agree: that is one fine looking fellow! I have a feeling Moon will approve of this outfit.:-) What friends we have become! You know me well. I think he looks reat! Finally a tux the way I like, with the skinny 1960s bowtie. True connoiseur, bravo! Thank you Colin for listening! I do not think it was Cannes because they were in rehearsals for BJD. What about the opening of the Tate Modern Gallery?
~KarenR #1442
Cannes, last year, when MLSF played at the AmFAR benefit. and...BJD is what we are all hoping will change things. Sometimes I have nightmares thinking that Universal didn't want him for the role and that Working Title had to fight to get him accepted. Grrr Am glad it worked out and that it leads to better roles in better projects.
~lizbeth54 #1443
Bethan, maybe they are trying to latch on to the CF publicity once BJD is out in 2001. He doesn't need publicity, not for a BBC programme. Actually, I do believe we'll see it....sometime, okay, 2001. I just find it very frustrating not to get a straight answer. My job involves getting information...and I'm usually successful! For DQ, I've drawn a blank.
~Moon #1444
Cannes, last year, when MLSF played at the AmFAR benefit. This picture is a year old and we never happen to see it???
~LauraMM #1445
ooh, I just thought of an idea. A game sort of what Francoise used to do on the CF List only with pictures. Post a pic and try to find out what movie it came from? this one is a giver;) Now you can't cheat and check the url either;)
~amw #1446
Bethan, I just can't believe this, I really thought we would finally see it aired this Autumn. What is going on Anna Karenina (sp?) was filmed after DQ,. same Director and has already been shown, why is it always CF projects? We had to wait ages for Nostromo but I think that was because it wasn't considered all that good for what it cost to make but this, (DQ) is good very good. When they say it has already been shown do you think they mean Australia!! I have an idea Bethan and other UK fans, you are right we should be allowed to see this drama, we have paid our license fees, I have tried writing to the Letters page at Ceefax (BBC) about DQ and the letter has not been shown, even though letters I have written in the past have, so I think we should all write to (Teletext - ITV) asking when we may expect to see the BBC drama DQ (starring CF) which was completed over a year ago and which has already been shown in Australia and asking if he has any information on DQ, etc and when we may expect to see it on our TV screens. Telextext being ITV may be more forthcoming and at the very least may show our letters. I shall write this week, Teletext letters are shown at the weekend, Ceefax letters are shown daily. Ceefax (BBC) email address box.ceefax@bbc.co.uk can't find Teletext email address, should be there Saturday, Teletext page 110 will show Letters page on Saturday, to write, however, here is the address: Letters, Teletext, PO Box 297, London SW6 1XT.
~nan #1447
(Murph) ...that the downside will be that this will link him even closer in people's eyes as a Darcy, Mark or Fitzwilliam. Good point...I hadn't even thought of that. I was just so delighted that he accepted the role, mostly because it means (to me anyway) that he has a sense of humor about himself, Darcy and the whole P&P2 phenomenon. I find that very attractive and my good opinion of him was, again, reinforced. I just love when that happens ;-) (Murph)Is that bad? I don't know. If you have your performance of Darcy to leave as a legacy, that ain't bad! Well, to always be associated with one of the most excellent male characters in fiction doesn't suck, that's for sure ;-) With all the handsome, fine actors there are in the world I still cannot think of one who could have personified Darcy as well as Colin. Each time I watch it, I'm amazed at how closely he resembles the Darcy of my girlhood imagination, both physically and in mannerisms. But hasn't he said (somewhere) that he doesn't want to be remembered solely for that? To constantly be reminded of that one role must get old, I imagine. On the other hand, things like that can also open doors. Look at Patrick Stewart, who is a wonderful actor with amazing presence (and sexy as all get out, too ;-p). He can do Shakespeare until he's blue in the face, but he will always be Captain Picard. I've seen him interviewed about this same topic and, while he admits that he would prefer to do more "important" work, he is (I'm paraphrasing here) "so grateful to Star Trek for giving me choices". So, if Colin rides the P&P bandwagon (which he always seemed to want to avoid) by taking the BJD role and that opens other doors for him, then it simply can't be a negative thing. If it's really successful, he'll have the opportunity and, more importantly, the power to choose in which direction his career will go. Well, that's what I'm hoping for anyway :-/
~lafn #1448
Jasper is enamoured of "positing" and it really shows in his language, as he hedges when he's simply inventing what he wants to believe about Colin. With all due respect, KJ, that's what you are doing too.... It's infectious;-) ~~~~~~ (Nan)I tend to agree that politics in film is a very hit or miss topic. However, if you haven't seen Primary Colors, then you should, Evelyn. As Mari said, it's a very good film Nan, I saw "Primary Colors" and read the book. Woof, woof.... a)I perfer to see John Travolta dancing, b)Emma Thompson's American(?) accent was affected c) It was still borrring. ~~~~~~ Sorry about DQ UKers.You seem to have TV problems. I don't think it will ever show in the US. (And count me OUT about writing to any station to cajole them into showing it either.) I want Colin on Broadway My gang got a Tony each...(she said *glowingly*)... poor Colin only has a Wet Shirt and no one seems to give a damn. So there!
~lizbeth54 #1449
I have an idea Bethan and other UK fans, you are right we should be allowed to see this drama, we have paid our license fees,I have tried writing to the Letters page at Ceefax (BBC) about DQ and the letter has not been shown, even though letters I have written in the past have, so I think we should all write to (Teletext - ITV) asking when we may expect to see the BBC drama DQ Ann, I think any action on this would be a good idea! I'm feeling quite militant about this...although I have calmed down a bit (2001 was like a red rag to a bull to me...WOT!!WOT!!!!) The BBC isn't exactly awash with good drama at the moment! I'm sure we will see DQ sometime but confirmation would be reassuring! I tried three numbers...general enquiries ( reply: 2001), BBC Publicity drama/information (1999?) and BBC Scotland Drama department. All were very nice and helpful...just couldn't give me the information I wanted to hear! I would suggest ringing BBC Scotland (0141 338 2000) and asking for the Drama department. You're connected straightaway. They were very pleasant and actually rang me back. They made DQ, but have no responsibility at all for scheduling it. This is done by another department (who should all be sacked!) They noted my address and promised to send transmission details when available. I think it would be a good idea for anyone who is interested in seeing DQ on screen to ring BBC Scotland (Drama) and say you're looking forward very much to seeing DQ (and this year, 2000!) and please could they let you know when there's a date for transmission or perhaps when it has been sold to other territories. As I say, they're the creative people who actually made the programme and it's good to let them know there's interest in it. Programes not even made are being scheduled for 2001. Autumn 2000 makes sense! (Maybe 2001 is a computer error!) Go to it! Karen, do you still have your source of information for DQ? If it's really successful, he'll have the opportunity and, more importantly, the power to choose in which direction his career will go. (Nan) Power...that's the word. Being in control, rather than being controlled!
~lafn #1450
So, if he's so *hot* in the UK, why are they putting his film on a shelf..?? This attitude seems to imply that's he's not so hot, maybe. That perhaps he's "yesterday's news"...and it doesn't make any dif when they show it. BBC is a straaaaaange entity.And this is what you want to chain him to?? "Tis a mystery"
~patas #1451
(Mari)But it's not the stuff that appeals to the general public and until he does that (and BJD might be a great way), moviegoers will stay away and he won't get the parts that now routinely go to his peers. When he does that, though, others might stay away...American Pie, Bid Daddy, another Escape from Alcatraz, Armaggedon... starring Colin Firth? Yikes! BTW, I tried to watch Primary Colors almost two years ago and hated it. Not that it matters.
~KarenR #1452
(Mari) he won't get the parts that now routinely go to his peers. (Gi) American Pie, Bid Daddy, another Escape from Alcatraz, Armaggedon... starring Colin Firth? Which of his peers starred in these movies? I think you all know, these are not the movies to which we are referring.
~lafn #1453
C'mon Gi...sometimes we make good movies. Not all of them are crap. Besides....those films only reflect the taste of the people who attend. ;-)
~patas #1454
(Evelyn) C'mon Gi...sometimes we make good movies. Not all of them are crap. I know, dear! American films are actually the ones I watch and enjoy most of the time. I only meant that the "general public"'s tastes are not necessarily what we *all* here would like to see Colin in, either. Anyway, perhaps, as in painting and most other arts, everything has already been said in cinema. You can have boy meets girl, cops and robbers, alien monsters, basic humour... How many different ways are there to tell the same half a dozen stories with a couple of cameras? So I don't know what to wish for Colin or what to expect of him. I don't mind re-watching P&P anyway :-)
~Moon #1455
I did not like Primary Colors, either. If you want Kathy Bates try Misery. The male role in that film would have been great for Colin( could have brought his AZ strangeness out). if Colin rides the P&P bandwagon (which he always seemed to want to avoid) by taking the BJD role and that opens other doors for him, then it simply can't be a negative thing. If it's really successful, he'll have the opportunity and, more importantly, the power to choose in which direction his career will go. I agree, Nan! For once let P&P work for you. There were some people who thought he should not take the MD role because it would forever associate him to Darcy. I will not mention smelling the coffee. ;-)
~KarenR #1456
Pictures from the 3DOR gala and other Donmar mailings supplied by Evelyn: http://www.spring.net/karenr/general/donmar/galas.html
~Moon #1457
Thanks, Karen! DLDLDLDLDL;-)))))))))
~Lizza #1458
STOP PRESS RE DQ ****************** Radio Times issued today states that location filming has just finished and it will be seen "NEXT WINTER" Not so long after all!! Thanks for all the lovely scrummy pics Murph, Nan et al Really appreciated.
~Tracy #1459
On DQ -(Bethan) I think we should all write to Teletext - ITV Lizza J -Radio Times issued today states that location filming has just finished I'm with you on this one Bethan let's bombard them and the Radio Times too. That well-respected orifice , I mean oracle. JUST FINISHED indeed! How long ago was it shown in Oz? How long have we been aching to see this show? Do they really think they can pull the wool over our eyes in this way? Can I think up any more questions? Answers on a postcard please to Greg Dyke c/o BBC. It's all very straaaange ((c) Evelyn) Thanks BTW for the delish pix - back to some real drooling
~amw #1460
STOP PRESS RE DQ I DON'T BELIEVE IT, it sounds as if the right hand doesn't know what the left fhand is doing, AGAIN. Bethan just reported that it was not scheduled!! BTW Bethan you didn't say how many people were in the cinema for MLSF, or did you have an exclusive viewing like Allison?
~Tracy #1461
Lizza J it will be seen "NEXT WINTER" Not so long after all!! Ah but do they mean next winter in a normal type way i.e. at the end of this year or are they spouting 'BBC speak' where next winter could mean anything from the back end of 2001 to early 2002. Who knows! Donovan Quick - I'd have sooner have called it Donovan-bloody-Slothlike! (apologies to those who may have made a similar pun and for language which is not that strong for over here but may not travel well) Soapbox now safely descended from - I feel so much better
~lafn #1462
(Gi)I don't mind re-watching P&P anyway :-) I'm telling ya'...it's part of my religion:-)
~lizbeth54 #1463
Radio Times issued today states that location filming has just finished and it will be seen "NEXT WINTER" WOT! WOT! WOT, WOT, WOT!!!!!!! Well, I go to the bottom of the class, I really do! Didn't the same thing happen when I phoned up about MLSF and was told there was no premiere, it wasn't at the Curzon etc.. Is it me, or what? "Location filming has just finished" ? Pardon? Oh well, I won't quibble....I'm just happy to see a DATE! Perhaps I should phone the BBC and tell them! Thanks Lizza! You've beaten me hollow here! :-)
~lafn #1464
Good scanning Karen... 3 DOR Gala in London netted 41,000 UKP Did you see David Leveaux , Moon? So how come you didn't post that TRT Gala in NY netted 96,000 UKP!! But Steven Speilberg gave $1. Million!!alone.......LOL.
~CherylB #1465
Did you know a sloth can move so slowly fungus will actually grow on its fur. KJ, I use the word "posit". I also enjoy "positing", and my name is not, never has been, nor ever will be "Jasper." Something ironic occured to me reading through all of these recent posts. (Mine included.) Why so much disparagement towards CF working in television? Wasn't it television which gave him his best known role to date -- Fitzwilliam Darcy.
~lafn #1466
(Cheryl)Why so much disparagement towards CF working in television? Wasn't it television which gave him his best known role to date -- Fitzwilliam Darcy. We are v. grateful to the BBC/A&E and mean no disparagementas a genre.. but some of us think it's time ODB graduate to bigger and better things. And IMHO it would be theatre which he does so well (having seen him five times on three separate crossings over the pond...same play!!!)
~CherylB #1467
Yes. I would love for him to theater in New York, either Broadway or Off-Broadway. I could actually go to see him on stage. Time really shouldn't be too much of a constraint for him. Actors that have recurring roles on American tv series, (22 episodes per year), very often do New York theater when their series take the annual production break. CF was also in two Oscar winning films. There's nothing wrong with being a supporting actor. Some of the best written parts are supporting roles. Besides the wonderful actor Robert Duvall has spent most of his career in supporting roles.
~amw #1468
Bethan - Should I phone the BBC and tell them LOL, seriously Bethan I think you should.
~Lizza #1469
Did I mention that the snippet on DQ (response to a RT reader's enquiry about CF) had a thumbnail snappy. They don't stint those BBC execs do they? Actually the reader who sent in the query is really Bethan!! Has to be ! But of course the question about what CF "an RT favourite" is doing now , was received in 1998. Good going Bethan. Slothlike enough for you Tracy! Send in those darling little queries about a special role to mark ODB's 50th NOW!! Be too late otherwise.
~EileenG #1470
(Karen) Am glad it worked out and that it [BJD] leads to better roles in better projects. Amen and hal-lay-luuuu-ya, Sistah Karen. I'm to the point where I don't care about the medium in which he works--radio, TV, movies, theater, making shadow puppets on the wall... (CCheryl)Actors that have recurring roles on American tv series, (22 episodes per year), very often do New York theater when their series take the annual production break. I always chuckle a bit when I see who's being cycled into some of these long-running projects (who *didn't* play the role of Rizzo in Grease? Even Lucy Lawless did, for gawd's sake). It's such an obvious audience-grabbing, money-hungry strategy. Art, shmart! (Tracy) Donovan Quick - I'd have sooner have called it Donovan-bloody-Slothlike! LMAO! (Bethan) I'm just happy to see a DATE! Hate to burst your bubble, but 'next winter' isn't a date. It could mean (as Tracy pointed out) 2001, as you were told. (Lizza) Send in those darling little queries about a special role to mark ODB's 50th NOW!! Be too late otherwise. LMAO again! But the Beeb sure can't wait to air this political drama, which hasn't even been written yet. When there's an agenda, there's an agenda.
~Moon #1471
Too funny, Lizza! Will we still be around for ODBs 50th? (Evelyn), Did you see David Leveaux , Moon? Oui, oui, Madame! Tres beau. :-D
~nan #1472
(Evelyn) Nan, I saw "Primary Colors" and read the book...Woof, woof.... LOL! Don't mince words, honey...tell us how you really feel ;-p My opinion about Kathy Bates, stands. a)I perfer to see John Travolta dancing I quite agree ;-) (Gi) American Pie, Bid Daddy, another Escape from Alcatraz, Armaggedon... starring Colin Firth? (Karen) Which of his peers starred in these movies? I think you all know, these are not the movies to which we are referring. True. I'm thinking Jeremy Northam, rather than Ben Affleck. I'm not even thinking Hugh Grant (though it would be great if he were to have that choice, if he wanted it). BTW, I happen to love Escape from Alcatraz ;-p I have this weird fascination with prison films...
~mari #1473
(Tracy) Donovan-bloody-Slothlike! LOL! I always said you know how to turn a phrase, Tracy.:-) Keep agitating the Beeb, ladies. Can't hurt. a)I prefer to see John Travolta dancing See? Even the biggies get typecast. Colin can't shake off Darcy and John can't shake off Tony Manero. CF is a wet shirt, JT is a white suit.;-) RE my previous post on CF's career--Now, you all *know* I wasn't talking about the crapola. What I had in mind was: --When a deep pockets studio decides to buy a Nick Hornby novel for a major big screen adaptation, that they hand it to CF, not John Cusack (though he did a good job in HF) and not Hugh Grant (who has snared About A Boy). --That when CF wants to do an ensemble comedy with a funny American director, please God, let it be Woody Allen (as HG has just done, to good reviews) and not Mike Binder. --That when Madden or Minghella or Scorsese or Mann are casting their next lead, we get CF and not Nic Cage or Fiennes, or Jude Law, or Daniel Day Lewis or Russell Crowe. Ditto Neil Jordan. --When Sam Mendes/the Donmar is producing the next play that has Broadway potential, that CF gets it. I'd even happily settle for Sam's next movie gig.:-) I'll stop now, but that's the general idea.:-) These fellows get first crack at the good stuff because they've proven themselves *in lead roles* in films that did well with audiences--not all blockbusters, but good, popular, critically acclaimed films. It's a building process; each new role that CF takes should be geared toward laying the foundation.
~Allison2 #1474
Hate to burst your bubble, but 'next winter' isn't a date. It could mean (as Tracy pointed out) 2001, as you were told I cannot see how "next winter" could mean THIS winter. Surely they are referring to 2001! That is it. I shall write. To the Radio Times and to the BBC. I do not think that Ceefax and Teletext are much concerned. They only seem to print letters abut the current TV output.
~amw #1475
I do not think Ceefax and Teletext are much concerned...., I Just thought Allison that if a letter was shown on C or T, it would shame and blame the BBC and would bring it to attention of other CF fans (not on the Internet) and perhaps the BBC might explain themselves if more people go in touch with them. Just a thought.
~KarenR #1476
Do you not think that publicizing *another* CF project that is languishing on a shelf somewhere a bad idea?
~amw #1477
No, as Bethan said we TV License payers have a right to see it.
~amw #1478
and it hurts me to say this but DQ is good, very good whereas SLOW, well wasn't.
~Moon #1479
I am in the minority here but I did not think DQ was very good. (and I do not mind ducking tomatoes, they are my favourite fruit.) ;-)
~KarenR #1480
~KarenR #1481
Aside from the right to see it, I just meant that DQ would become additional fodder for the journalists, i.e., another project "termed" losers like MLSF, SLOW...
~lafn #1482
I just meant that DQ would become additional fodder for the journalists, i.e., another project "termed" losers like MLSF, SLOW... Negative ammunition...just what they want and CF doesn't need. Think about this. I think DQ is the best thing he has done in ten years...even if I could not understand a lot of the Scottish accent...(but that is my problem.) UK journalists are pathological liars...for those of us who saw the Tony's on TV...reading about them in your papers...is pure fiction. Imagine if they get hold of something that is true!
~Allison2 #1483
I find it hard to believe that they will hang on to DQ until 2001. It is not like cinama where they have to find a distributor. If they thought DQ was a turkey they would just show it during the summer. I have yet to see it (though if it really is scheduled for 2001 I may have to get hold of a copy) but I cannot believe it is not so bad that the BBC would not show it. Why would they wait? There are plenty of TV slots.
~lafn #1484
Run...don't walk...to your nearest Spring friend who has a copy...it is brilliant. (Though LOL...I'm afraid to build it up so much....look what happened to MLSF because I kept shooting my big mouth about it.);-)
~KarenR #1485
(Allison) but I cannot believe it is not so bad that the BBC would not show it. It is not bad at all; in fact,it is wonderful. Remember that little news item about the poor ratings for television shows produced by the regional companies. Might be that BBC is afraid that DQ will suffer the same fate since it comes from the *provinces*
~EileenG #1486
I find myself in a perpetual state of dumbfoundedness (clinically similar to flabbergastedness) about the BBC's treatment of DQ--initially, for failure to air it within a reasonable period after it was finished, now for reportedly postponing broadcast for another year. Why? Why? It is good--well written (hurrah!) and well acted. Evelyn has a point about MLSF. Many of us thought it was good and that it would be well received in Britain; we were wrong about its reception. Perhaps there's something condescending and provincial about the DQ story that we're missing on this side of the pond. ;-P Take Evelyn's advice, Allison.
~KarenR #1487
~Renata #1488
Maybe they keep DQ for the Christmas program to push the quotes ;-))
~lafn #1489
(Renate)Maybe they keep DQ for the Christmas program to push the quotes ;-)) Nah...They're gonna repeat TTOTS ;-)
~lizbeth54 #1490
I have yet to see it (though if it really is scheduled for 2001 I may have to get hold of a copy) but I cannot believe it is not so bad that the BBC would not show it. Why would they wait? There are plenty of TV slots. (Allison) I've been fortunate to see a copy of DQ, courtesy of the intrepid Spring network. I can be perfectly objective about this, and say that it is indeed very good. On their last collaboration "Taking over the asylum", Donna Fairchild and David Blair won the Best Drama BAFTA, and this is from the same stable. I think it's part fable (the DQ theme) and part gritty reality, in keeping with the types of dramas that are popular at the moment. It's poignant, often humorous and features very good ensemble acting. As a bonus, CF is very handsome throughout, and we get a nice kiss thrown in for good measure at the end! Seriously though, this is not something the BBC should be sitting on. Whenever I've rung up about it, I've got the impression that there's something "wrong"...no-one is forthcoming. And the latest BBC statement ("just finished filming") is a lie! My theory is that there may have been some legal complications. There are soe parallels with real-life businesses (eg Stagecoach). A recent drama about the closure of the BBC picture library (better than it sounds ) starring Tim Spall, was delayed for nearly 2 years because of a libel action. I'm only guessing, but there must be something wrong behind the scenes...no problems with the actual quality. "Next winter" must be the winter that is approaching surely ...slack usage of language I admit, but it has to this year, or possibly Jan 2001. (When does winter end?). Christmas, New Year? Hopefully. But the whole business is definitely a mystery. Shades of Harvey and mis-information "for the role of Edward Miramax chose CF fresh from the success of SIL"!!! My final contribution (I promise!) to the Movie v. TV debate. I've a lot of sympathy with the pro-movie camp, and I do realise the international significance of movies, but there are times, maybe once or twice a year in the UK when a TV programme/drama can be a Major Event...something that everyone watches, talks about, rushes home to see etc. Something that really creates an impact. I think the best combination is a mix of high calibre TV and high profile movies...difficult, I know!
~lafn #1491
I think the best combination is a mix of high calibre TV and high profile movies...difficult, I know BUT I want Colin on Broadway Frankly,I Don't Care if the British public runs over women and children to get home...empties the pubs...to look at him on TV. Because, they DO NOT support his films.They only watch him when it's FREE!! AND they don't have to go out in the rain...Settle down in front of the ole "telly" THEATRE is his only hope to get out of that millieu that he's chained to.
~lizbeth54 #1492
My absolutely final last comment (good debate though!) I'm with you 100% on the theatre, Evelyn, and I'm sure that after such a positive experience in the Donmar, he'll do more. A depressing number of well-known British actors have given up on theatre because of rough handling from our delightful sabre-toothed critics...Alan Rickman, Anthony Hopkins, Jeremy Irons, Ken Branagh have all retired hurt. But CF is okay, thankfully! BTW didn't someone ask him about Broadway and he mentioned problems with the Actors'Union? But don't the Donmar also have some sort of special agreement? There's talk apparently of a revival later this year of Edward Albee's "Who's afraid of Virginia Woolf". Would love to see the 40-ish CF in the Richard Burton role. JE as Martha..too young? Good role though. And Sam Mendes seems to have a few new projects lined up for the Donmar (don't know what, except for the World War 1 drama)). Won't say any more in defence of the "telly"! We'll beg to differ here! But (final, final, last-ever, ever remark on the subject!) increasingly "success" of movies in the UK is also measured by video rentals/purchases, cable screenings etc. We're just not going to the movies any more. Richard Branson sold his Virgin chain of theatres because they weren't profitable. Right, that's it! :-)
~patas #1493
(Mari)See? Even the biggies get typecast. Colin can't shake off Darcy and John can't shake off Tony Manero. CF is a wet shirt, JT is a white suit.;-) John was very good in Pulp Fiction. --When a deep pockets studio decides to buy a Nick Hornby novel for a major big screen adaptation, that they hand it to CF, not John Cusack (though he did a good job in HF) and not Hugh Grant (who has snared About A Boy). CF had Fever Pitch. Too bad. (Moon)I am in the minority here but I did not think DQ was very good. (and I do not mind ducking tomatoes, they are my favourite fruit.) ;-) Guess I'll join you, Moon. DQ is good, not *very* good. We can use those tomatoes to cook some pasta ;-) Sorry. Been working in E.R. all day...
~Brown32 #1494
A Former FOF suggested this pairing. He looks lovely at both ages: Then and Now Murph
~heide #1495
Yum, I've always loved that photo on the right. Thanks, Mary. Like the young Colin too though I'll take the man over the boy anyday. Besides, the hair's just a little too big. Hope that's not his Mark Darcy look. ;-) That Donmar photo...well, I've seen better. He looks a bit wired. Now the one below of Colin as Walker..that's the Colin I adore. Great find of Colin in a tux. And the suit fits! Are you sure that's not Colin's head super-imposed on another man's body, Karen? Like Hugh Grant's? (Sorry, couldn't resist.) (Gi) Sorry. Been working in E.R. all day... Jeez, I've been reading "sorries" all over the place. Heaven forbid if anyone feels they have to apologize for going against the tide. Soak away those ER blues with more lovely Colin photos or throw P&P on the VCR again if the DH doesn't object. You know we don't take ourselves too seriously, my dear.
~KarenR #1496
(Telegraph) TONY BLAIR yesterday suffered his biggest public relations fiasco since becoming Prime Minister when he was given a slow handclap and heckled by the massed ranks of the Women's Institute....The protest began mid-way through the Prime Minister's address to an audience of 10,000 at the WI conference at Wembley Arena, north London. As it gathered strength, Helen Carey, the chairman, appealed to members to give Mr Blair a polite hearing. Mr Blair, looking uneasy, dropped several sentences from his prepared speech, in which he called for a return to "traditional British values". At the end he appeared subdued as many WI members sat stony-faced, refusing to extend the customary applause. Maybe BBC can get Rik Mayall to play Blair?
~lafn #1497
Maybe BBC can get Rik Mayall to play Blair? Too funny Karen...and I've got a similar event vid of Rik with Jennifer that has a ribald "flashy" ending .
~KarenR #1498
The July issue of Empire (at your news agents now) has the results of the online questions to Stephen Fry. Anybody care to thumb through it to see if there's anything on Relative Values or Londinium.
~KarenR #1499
This was in an email from the Relative Values people:We know that there are many of you who will not be able to make it to the premiere - in which case the relative-values.com are planning to broadcast live on the night. BUT we need to hear from you so we can judge the popularity of this idea. Send an email to premiere@relative-values.com if you think this is a great idea and you would watch.So send them an email and tell them this is the greatest idea since sliced bread! I did.
~CherylB #1500
I still say CF should be thankful he wasn't in Jordan's adaptation of "The End of the Affair". It blew. It was one of 1999's worst films with artistic intent. It missed. The Graham Greene novel is a terrific read, though. I'll give him the benefit of the doubt and assume he was basing his hope on the book and not the putrid NJ film. Personally, I don't really have a preference as to which medium CF works in, just so long as he keeps working.
~lafn #1501
premiere@relative-values.com Done!I told them to include interviews with the stars esp. CF. Maybe they'll do an interactive..... ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ (cheryl) still say CF should be thankful he wasn't in Jordan's adaptation of "The End of the Affair". It blew. It was one of 1999's worst films with artistic intent. It missed. Do I detect a little "IMO" missing here?;-) The New York Times and I liked it
~EileenG #1502
(ShewhowantsColinonBroadway) Frankly,I Don't Care if the British public runs over women and children to get home...empties the pubs...to look at him on TV. Pffftttt! However, I have a feeling he'll be supported as long as he's playing a character with the name 'Darcy'. IMO. IMVHO. ;-P
~KarenR #1503
New article in The Independent done as part of the Relative Values publicity. Mentions RV and Bridget: There's no escaping Mr Darcy By Carol McDaid Colin Firth hates the whole 'Darcy business' but looks set to revive it by appearing as Mark Darcy, opposite Ren�e Zellweger, in Bridget Jones's Diary. What's he playing at? At a sedate drinks party, I mention to a poised mother of two that I'm going to interview Colin Firth. "Oh, God, that shirt, those trousers," she moans, sitting back into a bowl of assorted nuts. A friend says: "Something deep in my soul is moved by the man." (Her wedding is soon.) Another friend e-mails a request: "Will he sleep with me? But in Mr Darcy garb? I'd hate to get off with Nick Hornby." Poor Colin Firth. Will he ever be free of that shirt, those trousers? The "pond scene" of 1995's Pride and Prejudice (intense, sullen Mr Darcy douses his quietly scorching desire for Miss Bennet, then bumps into her) recently made it into Channel 4's Top 100 TV Moments, between Death on the Rock and the Gulf war. Firth, 40 in September, got rave reviews last year for Three Days of Rain at the Donmar; has appeared in A Month in the Country, The English Patient and Shakespeare in Love; played any number of aristocrats ("I have never been inside a stately home in any other circumstances," he tells me) plus Nick Hornby (Fever Pitch). Yet in most minds � female ones anyway � he is still striding towards Pemberley, clutching a riding crop and half his clothes: damp, magnificent. We meet in a dark, panelled room in Soho House, the London media haunt that could easily double up for a spot of costume drama. Unlike Mr Darcy, Firth lopes in, tanned and casual, though the sideburns remain impressive. He is perfectly polite but has been doing interviews all day; the words "under" and "duress" hover in the gloom (outside the sky is bright blue), and the publicity woman is holding her watch like a stopwatch. Also, Arsenal are playing in the Uefa Cup on telly in a couple of hours, and Firth, I later discover, is going to watch the match round at a friend's house. I plan to avoid the D-word for at least 10 minutes. He is here to promote Relative Values, an adaptation of No�l Coward's play shot last August in an old nunnery on the Isle of Man. The comedy is needlessly hammed up, though Sophie Thompson is a revelation, and Firth, as the twinkling, camp Cowardy character, manages to sit around smoking, reading the paper and getting the best lines. He chased the part. "I wanted to occupy that position," he says in that well-groomed voice, "as a kind of impish commentator and schemer." The opposite of intense and sullen, in fact. His co-conspirator in the film is the long-lost, radiant Julie Andrews, as his aunt. "She was fantastic," Firth says, possibly not for the first time today. "She was a company leader in the traditional sense. She wanted people to be comfortable. If there was a birthday, she would celebrate it in style. There was this sense that we were working with a legend." Ten minutes are up. I will have to mention Mr Darcy. Not least because the next morning, Firth is to start filming Bridget Jones's Diary, in which he will play the "v. eligible bachelor" Mark Darcy, the Helen Fielding character inspired by the Jane Austen character as played by Colin Firth. "I'd read the columns in The Independent," he says. "There are certain things that I didn't identify with � weight and boyfriends � but I did think it was very funny and I think the script's very funny as well. I wouldn't be doing it if I didn't. And it's got a very good cast [notably Hugh Grant]. I wouldn't have done it just to be symmetrical about the Darcy thing." Unsurprisingly, he is not ecstatic about discussing the Darcy thing or, more sinister still, "the Darcy business". But somehow he cannot stop himself: "I do feel that I am talking about something which I know nothing about," he explains, sinking further into his small, battered armchair. "It honestly doesn't mean anything to me." And later: "I don't have anything to do with anything I did six years ago. I don't know if you remember how you spent your summer of '94, but that's how I spent my summer of '94, and that's about it." He protests too much: the Darcy business is karmic; there is no escape. For her Bridget Jones sequel, The Edge of Reason, Helen Fielding "interviewed" Firth over lunch (he could always have said no). She pretended to be Bridget filing for The Independent; he pretended to be "a rather serious actor", a cross between himself and Mr Darcy, someone impatient to finish an interview. The resulting transcript is one of the best bits in the book. And now, to prepare for his current Darcy incarnation, Firth has tapped into the Austen original. "I actually went to look at a bit of Pride and Prejudice for the first time in five years," he owns up; "partly because of the Bridget Jones thing. I'm not playing Mr Darcy but I am aware there's a reference involved and I was just curious again to see if I could understand what the fuss was about." And can he? "Not really. It's an intoxicating story. The language is wonderful. I think it's [big intake of breath] very romantic, beautifully structured, and the actors do a good job." Chiefly Jennifer Ehle, whom Firth fell for off screen, too. Though people don't think Jennifer Ehle: Elizabeth Bennet. "No. She won a Bafta for it. [He didn't.] Darcy is the romantic destiny. She's the one you're meant to identify with." Given that he's the role model, does he feel any responsibility towards Darcy II? "Yes, in a way." He pauses. "No, I think I've had to create him as something specific in my mind, as unique as possible. He's based on lots of people I know." Playing the Ur-Darcymaniac Bridget is the Texan actress Ren�e Zellweger, a controversial choice (Fielding is said to have been furious) for a character who hails from Northamptonshire. "Ren�e, yes. Well I've been in that situation too, in A Thousand Acres, where I had to be an American in front of American actors. It's er, yeah, it is, it's mortifying." It's hard to know if he is being tactful. Given that he is so famously English, America is "a very big part" of Firth's life. His mother grew up there; his sister married an American. He spent a miserable year in Missouri as a boy; five more in the wilds of British Columbia with Valmont co-star Meg Tilly, where they had Will, now nine, who lives in LA. Firth is an assiduous transatlantic dad, but, otherwise, Hollywood holds no appeal: "I feel more connected to London. I like the multiculturalism, the fact that it's accepted here, despite the attempts to make it less so � Hague wanting to lock 'em all up, and unfortunately the Home Office not far behind." As for the work: "Here you can have a wonderful career without being in the big time. It's just not where the emphasis lies." He hastily adds that obviously it's all right for him to say that; he's never been out of work, a fact he puts down to luck and being "sort of down the middle". As in: "I'm not enormously fat, I don't have gigantic ears, or a bizarre, squeaky voice or an incredibly rich, boomy voice. And I come from a family background [both parents are academics] that means I've got the education and articulacy to argue my way into things." I ask which young actors he admires, now he's nearly 40 ("I feel like a bizarre genetic experiment that's gone wrong � it's all happened far too quickly"). He perks up. "I've been thinking about this constantly recently," he says. "Joaquin Phoenix is one � River's brother. I noticed him right from the start and I think he's absolutely brilliant. I think River was brilliant, too. And I'm not using his first name because I know him," he adds, editing himself, "but ecause we've already used his surname." He then says: "I do know Joaquin, actually," and, head back, obligingly tries to reel off Joaquin's movies: "Gladiator, To Die For, Return to Paradise, Inventing the Abbotts..." Firth's other favourite is better known: "I think DiCaprio's fantastic; I think he's got incredible skill in front of the camera. I just think he's very real. The thing I admire most is when you just look at someone's eyes and you're convinced, far more than the pyrotechnics. It's what you see here", he says, pointing to his own famously eloquent eyes, "that's impressive." When in Rome, home town of his wife, Livia Giuggioli, Firth does as the Romans do. "This," he says, hitting the inside of his elbow with the side of his hand, "means, 'Let's get out of here'. That [brushing his hand under his chin] means, 'Who gives a shit?'" I suspect he may have been thinking as much for the past 40 minutes. So you wave your arms around? "Well, yeah, I quite like that." His voice brightens. "I'm not necessarily so restrained in my life. That's just something I've been asked to do as an actor, on film." He starts eating nibbles, warming to his theme now that our time is up. "I mean, the first theatre job I ever did, Another Country, was Guy Bennett, who was about as flamboyantly gay as a character could get. I can still remember my performance being called 'elasticated'. It's not my condition to be restrained. You do it once and you get asked to do it again, and off we go..." 'Relative Values' is released 23 June ********** Will post at Bucket... Ladies, there would have to be pictures with this? Right?
~KarenR #1504
OK, article is up http://www.spring.net/karenr/articles/independent060900.html and a few paragraphs appear on the Bridget page I don't know if you remember how you spent your summer of '94, but that's how I spent my summer of '94, and that's about it." Don't take it personally, Evelyn ;-)
~lizbeth54 #1505
We have today's "Independent" at work....my advice to all UK-ers..Go buy! Great half page photo of CF, looking, I imagine, as he will as MD. Hair not too big!
~Moon #1506
What a great artcle, thanks, Karen! They finally got Livia's last name right! "This," he says, hitting the inside of his elbow with the side of his hand, "means, 'Let's get out of here'. No! That means, 'Up yours!' Hitting the palm of your hand on the side of your other hand means, 'Let's get out of here'. (He is allowed one mistake) ;-) Joaquin Phoenix is on the cover of one of the entertainment magazines (I think EW), and he looks fantastic.
~amw #1507
Yippee, I have tickets for the RV Premiere on the 21st June, can't wait.
~mari #1508
Apparently there is another big article on Colin in the Evening Standard magazine today. Two-page spread, photos, entitled Don't Call Me Darcy. Karen, thanks for the Independent article. Ann, congrats on the RV tickets!
~lafn #1509
Great article ...At least he's not whining and we didn't have to hear about the traumatizing childhood.... "I don't know if you remember how you spent your summer of '94, but that's how I spent my summer of '94, and that's about it." (Karen)Don't take it personally, Evelyn ;-) ......or the Jennifer saga. Thank you Colin ,Independent and Karen. This should rally pull 'em in to RV.....I can see them flocking now. ~~~~~ Thanks Moon for all the hand signal translations. Congrats Ann on the tickets!
~KarenR #1510
You should have a RV-filled weekend of material from the press junket. Here's something off the PA wire: Jeanne treasures British film-making experience Hollywood beauty Jeanne Tripplehorn has men falling at her feet in her latest period romp Relative Values - and confesses to loving every second of the experience. The feisty brunette, who tried to unlock cop Michael Douglas's mind in Basic Instinct, was also the object of desire for John Lynch in Sliding Doors and Hugh Grant in the Mafia yarn Mickey Blue Eyes. In the new screen version of Noel Coward's vision of upper crust Britain in the Fifties she is pursued by Edward Atterton - Salma Hayek's real-life [ex]boyfriend - and William Baldwin. She plays self-indulgent movie siren Miranda Frayle who gets herself engaged to Nigel, the Earl of Marshwood (Atterton) but is also coveted by her old flame Don Lucas (Baldwin). The glittering cast list includes Julie Andrews, making her screen comeback, Colin Firth, Stephen Fry and Stephanie Beacham. [WOT??] Jeanne, a 35-year-old bachelor girl from Tulsa, Oklohoma, says: "I just gasped when I looked around me because of the quality of the actors involved. "Though I have done a lot of stage work in America I really felt out of my depth to start with. Almost everyone apart from William and myself are used to dealing with this kind of so British material. "The whole experience was absolutely fascinating and so different from working in Hollywood. I felt so popular as well being chased by Edward and William. What more could a girl ask for?" The film, which was made on the Isle of Man, is being released in the UK on June 23. ********** "Though I have done a lot of stage work in America... I don't think high school plays in Tulsa should count. ;-)
~Allison2 #1511
Great article in the ES magazine. Fabulous pictures. Sadly no time to post more as am rushing out. Sorry!!! Will do so when I can unless someone else - Tracy, Mark, can get a copy.
~mari #1512
LOL! Oh, you're gonna love this one! Here's Part 1 of the ES article; many many thanks to FoF Martine. ******* MR DARCY MAKES A COMEBACK After six years trying to live down his love-god status acquired in BBC's Pride and Prejudice, Colin Firth is playing another Darcy - in the new Bridget Jones film. Victoria Coren corners him in Soho. DON'T CALL ME DARCY Six years after P&P, Colin firth's love-god status rages on. Never mind that he plays a gay character in his new film Relative Values. Adoring female fans are more interested in his forthcoming role: the brooding love interest in Bridget Jones's Diary. Just don't mention the wet shirt, says Victoria Coren. On the internet, there is a countdown to Colin Firth's birthday. Like the millenium clocks last year, except with a little more salivating love, it currently reads, '93 DAYS TO COLIN'S BIRTHDAY!' We are also informed that he shares his birthday with Amy Irving, that Nastassja Kinski married on his bithday in 1984, and we go on to read everything that has ever been written about Colin Firth, said by Colin Firth or done near Colin Firth; links to a staggering number of other web pages called things things like 'Firth Frenzy!', and what Malcolm McDowell once said about Colin Firth in an interview (nothing terribly interesting). This is a site which is updated *daily*. Somebody out there really love this guy. It even includes, without irony, a quote from Firth a year ago: 'There is too much information out there. I don't think it is appropriate to be peering into what others are doing all the time.' But never mind that; it's only 93 days till his birthday! Can't wait to find out which underpants he wears on the day. On 10 September, Colin Firth will be 40. There is no sign that the internet clockposter is disappointed by this milestone. Firth's blueprint fan would be about 34, professional, middle class, still single (essentially, she would be Bridget Jones) and Firth's sexy authority will only increase as he turns a respectable 40. 'OK!' magazine has officially labelled him a 'SAGO' - Sexier As they Get Older - albeit in the slighly unflattering company of fellow SAGOs Linford Christie and Bono. Authority is crucial because his devoted fans are those who intentify him (of course) with Mr Darcy. Anyone - any *man* - who is baffled by the adoration danced on this fairly normal-looking English actor should remember that that Mr Darcy was more than just another costume drama heart-throb. He was an island of masculinity in a post-feminist world; a summary of everything yearned for by a certain sort of woman adrift among tearful, quichebaking men; a vision of dark, brooding, monosyllabic reserve on a big horse. A million hearts fluttered as he plunged, fully clad, into that infamous lake; and let a million teeth gnash when I tell you that Colin Firth volunteered to play that scene naked but the broadcaster wouldn't allow it. Complaints to the BBC at the usual White City address, please. Never mind the Queen Mother's birthday; they also rejected the offer of Colin Firth's bare rump! Fools, the lot of them, and fools with our money. Although it could be argued that the soaked clothes were even more seductive: Firth explains now, sensibly over a nice cup of tea in a Soho members' club, that, 'That the Darcy fantasy is the idea of the raw, pulsating animal qualities lurking underneath the stuffed-shirt qualities. Hence the interest in the wet shirt, which starts to reveal that which is imagined to be underneath.' Darcy's symbolic power is what guarantees Firth's continuing love-god status some six years later. Nobody minds that he's more usualy to be found playing someone gay (his first big break on satge in Another Country; his latest film Relative Values) or cuckolded (The English Patient, Shakespeare in Love) - or indeed that the Daily Mirror tried to scupper his 19th-century sex symbolism during Pride and Prejudice by publishing an unflattering photo of Colin arriving home with a new Hoover. Nobody cared. They just thought, 'Ooh, look at his muscles clenches around that Hoover.' Actually, for my money, Another Country provided Firth's sexiest roles by far (Guy Bennett on stage, then Tommy Judd in the film). Who wants an old-fashioned Strong Silent Darcy when they could have a handsome, vulnerable public schoolboy lost in aworld of sexual confusion? Well, just about everyone else, I suppose. Irresistible, heterosexual machismo is what the nation associates with Mr Firth; hence its delight when he finally confirmed as Mark Darcy in the new Bridget Jones film. Mark Darcy is the character inspired by Pride and Prejudice - his blueprint fan really *is* Bridget Jones. Bridget even went to interview him on set in Rome, disguised as author Helen Fielding, and followed him everywhere until he said: 'I'm going to have to go on alone from here; it's the men's toilet.' ------------------------------------ (... to be continued)
~mari #1513
Part 2 of 3, from ES: Firth's first project after Pride and Prejudice aired was Fever Pitch, in which (as Nick Hornby said) 'the man famous for smouldering in a wet white shirt was forced to wear lurid Arsenal boxer shorts and shout swear words out of windows'. 'It's a great irony ,' says Firth, who lives in Barnsbury and is the son teachers, 'that people characterised Fever Pitch as big stretch, asking if I had o do a lot of research to transform myself into this middle-class football fan from North London. I was even wearing some of my own old clothes in the film! Yet that was considered a bigger stretch than playing someone who lived 200 years ago and who was the richest man in England. As if it would come very naturally to me, by virtue of my birth, to play the owner of Pemberley in Derbyshire and ride around on a horse.' He acknowledges that class is a key determinant for any English actor's career. 'Actors are channelled into class categories very quickly. I'm lower middle class really, but I was identified immediately with the upper end of the system and I've benefited enormously from it. Even so, I've noticed critics give more credibility to the working-class end because they like things to "have an edge". And this seems to come from a lot of cosy middle-class people who'll run to the National Film Theatre to see a Tarantino film where everyone's brains get blown out and they use the n-word for black people. I'm getting a bit weary of the "edge" thing.' In terms of the watching public, Firth says, 'I think class has screwed us up quite badly, and we have a very confused take on our class archetypes. The upper classes are romanticised if we turn them into a fairy tale of the past, but otherwise loathed. There's a fascination with the world of champagne and white flannels and Brideshead, but very few examples where the upper class today is looked at with any romance.' The new film Relative Values, is one such champagne-and-romance vision; Firth plays the camp and witty nephew of the countess of Marchwood (Juile Andrews) in Noel Coward's drawing-room comedy. Thus he suspects that critics will not credit it with 'an edge', although it might be argued that actors are never happy: Michael Caine grumbled rather grudgingly at the Bafta awards that critics only respect posh actors never Cockney ones. Of this opposite view, Firth says, 'I'm not in Michael Caine's position so I can't judge, but I agree there's a stark contrast between England and Los Angeles. Americans make no distinction between English actors; they can't tell the difference between Michael Caine and Pirnce Charles. We're all Prince Charles to them.' When in Los Angeles, it's a relief to hear that Firth doesn't run around with the English set there (the Liz Hurleys, William Cashes and Henry Dent-Brocklehursts). He goes to LA specifically to visit his nine-year-old son Will, born of a romantic fews years living in the forests of British Columbia with a lot of grizzly bears and Meg Tilly. (Meg Tilly was his co-parent, of course. Not the bears. Obviously.) Firth is now married to Livia Guiggioli, an Italian film-maker described by Nick Hornby as 'joke-perfect: PhD, beautiful in that sultry Italian way, funny and vivacious.' Damn. Half the British nation is obsessed with his romantic status, and he told one interviewer that, 'We had the Diana experience leading up to the wedding in Rome' - by which I assume he meant that the paparazzi would not let up, rather than that his fianc�e caught him whispering epithets down the phone to Camilla Parker Bowles. _________________________ (....to be continued)
~mari #1514
Part 3 of 3, from the sore-fingered Martine.;-) It's a cosmopolitan life: the boy whose parents travelled between India and Africa, and who went to school in Winchester and St Louis, Missouri, now has an Italian wife and a Canadian son who lives in America. He doesn't mind that his son won't grow up on the Highbury terraces in the rain because 'I'm not territorial-minded' and this is reflected in his politics. During our conversation I found myself in the slightly surreal position of chatting with 'Mr Darcy' about asylum seekers. 'Our perceptions of people shouldn't be based on where they're born, and compassion shouldn't stop with national borders. There's only about 98,000 people seeking asylum, which can be made to sound like a very big figure, but only in the way that a "�150,000 flat" can sound like so much when in London it's actually nothing. We're talking aboout a substantial football crowd in a country of 55 million.' And yet Colin Firth is so English, and so closely identified with Englishness on screen: the accent, the reserve and (possibly his strongest quality) the ability to be sardonic, a word which I believe does not translate into any other language. His Englishness seems unaffected by geography or family. I'm reminded of an old Jeremy Hardy stand-up routine, where Hardy talked about his adopted baby daughter who was not born in this country, and people asking him whether he thought her 'national traits' would come out later 'as if a baby born in England but brought up exclusively in Spain by Spanish parents would wake up one morning and say: "Ooh, very mild today. Still best wear a cardigan".' Hardy was being sarcastic, and I'm paraphrasing his words, yet it rings oddly true of Colin Firth. He's affectionate about his English roots: 'Beyond that famous English reserve lies incredible loyalty, and I cherish the English capacity for Friendship. Other places have more apparent accessibility, but after five years you've got no further than you did on the first exchange.' At the end of Another Country, Guy Bennett is asked what he misses most about England, the country he betrayed. All he can reply is 'the cricket'. Firth misses the cricket too, when he's away, but most of all he misses the comedy. 'Sometimes I come back and I've entirely missed a phenomenon - like Vic Reeves or Harry Enfield. This time round it was Ali G, which I then caught up on and thought was hilarious. The English in general are brilliant at laughing at themselves and their country, and there's nothing more pleasing in person - starting with yourself is the root of all humour. When I've been in comedies, I've tended to be the butt of the joke. In Shakespeare in Love [where he played Lord Wessex, the heroine's unloved fianc�] my function was to be the one guy who lacks poetry, romance and humour - all the things that the film celebrates. It's an important comic function, and having a sense of one's own ridiculousness is something that keeps me sane.' I assume his friends must have laughed when he was galloping around on Mr Darcy's horse? 'Oh, they laughed themselves to death. And they continue to. The contrasts to that character are quite extreme if you see me daily over breakfast.' Well, I'd be happy to give it a try. It remains to be seen how much Mr Darcy will be sent up in the character of Mark Darcy in Bridget Jones's Diary. Very much an actor, if an unusually clever and articulate one, Firth insists that, 'I have to forget his origins and play him as a character in his own right.' The day after our meeting is the first day of filming: 'It's a scene where I meet Bridget by the dustbins,' Lucky old Bridget. ---------------------------------------- END
~patas #1515
Thanks, Mari and martine, I enjoyed reading this very much.
~lafn #1516
Mari...you are a gem to bring this to your Drool friends...and thank Martine too.Thankfully, the author hasn't found Drool....but I feel they're closing in on us....anybody else get that feeling??? Today I called JE's agent to offer a PAL tape of all of JE's US interviews, I told her about all the SUNSHINE reviews..."when will you have them on the website", she wanted to know!! We might have to go undercover. Never mind the Queen Mother's birthday; they[BBC] also rejected the offer of Colin Firth's bare rump! Fools, the lot of them, and fools with our money. BIG sense of humor here....OK...along with DQ release...let's complain about rejecting the bare rump... LOL He's more adventurous than I thought...;-)
~amw #1517
Karen, wasn't the dustbin scene in "The Edge of Reason", perhaps they are using bits from both books.
~Renata #1518
I'm not going to list names because you know who you are, but I want to say thank you to all for researches and alerts, finding, typing, scanning, posting articles and pictures, scene of crime reports, and keeping up excellent (news-)webpages. You are doing great team work: the Firth-net at it's best ;-))
~nan #1519
Mari and Martine, I thank you for that very pleasant read. He was clearly in a better mood that day than in the previous article. But I always find it funny that the interviewers are drooling all over him as well. What a hoot! He is contagious, this Firth person ;-)
~nan #1520
Oh...and Karen...I forgot Karen! :-) You're a peach for The Independent article. I would never get to read them otherwise. Is it me, or was he sounding out of sorts?
~lizbeth54 #1521
All the interviews ("smelling the coffee", the Independent and the ES) were given in the same location - Soho House. I'm wondering if they were done back to back, released at different times? Thanks for the ES interview, Mari and Martine, and for the Independent alert, Karen! Mark Darcy seems to be the role that the Fleet Street ladies are eagerly awaiting (aren't we all!). Very much an actor, if an unusually clever and articulate one That's quite an endorsement from Victoria Coren. She's a very smart ex-Oxbridge journalist...daughter of Alan Coren, a well known humorist, political commentator, editor of Punch magazine etc. From her, "clever" means "clever"! The huge photo in the Independent is very droolable. Have copy, can't scan.
~heide #1522
On the internet, there is a countdown to Colin Firth's birthday. Like the millenium clocks last year, except with a little more salivating love, it currently reads, '93 DAYS TO COLIN'S BIRTHDAY!' What a hoot! Haven't found this site yet (and I don't think I'm gonna try.) Great articles, ladies. Thanks all! Wonderful to see so much publicity. Great fun to pick out all the misinformation. Grizzly bears indeed. (Karen re Relative Values) Stephanie Beacham. [WOT??] Maybe she's playing Lady Hayling? Or perhaps reprising her Dynasty role? Ann, can't wait to hear about the premiere. This is what, your third?
~Brown32 #1523
From the ES Magazine Article: On the internet, there is a countdown to Colin Firth's birthday. Like the millenium clocks last year, except with a little more salivating love, it currently reads, '93 DAYS TO COLIN'S BIRTHDAY!' We are also informed that he shares his birthday with Amy Irving, that Nastassja Kinski married on his bithday in 1984, and we go on to read everything that has ever been written about Colin Firth, said by Colin Firth or done near Colin Firth; links to a staggering number of other web pages called things like 'Firth Frenzy!', and what Malcolm McDowell once said about Colin Firth in an interview (nothing terribly interesting). This is a site which is updated *daily*. Somebody out there really love this guy. It even includes, without irony, a quote from Firth a year ago: 'There is too much information out there. I don't think it is appropriate to be peering into what others are doing all the time.' But never mind that; it's only 93 days till his birthday! Can't wait to find out which underpants he wears on the day. ************************** Well, now that I'm a laughing stock to everyone who reads the Evening Standard in the UK, I am ready to bury my head in the sand, or fight back! Here I thought I was overseeing a fairly serious fan page, and it turns out I give this dame, Victoria Coren, visions of underwear and silliness. All I can do is hope and pray Colin does not read the article -- fat chance, I know. If I were Livia, I'd have great fun reading portions out loud to him. I have my response to Ms. Coren on the news page http://www.geocities.com/firthfan/news2.html Also, on a more pleasant note, the wonderful pictures are now up, again thanks to Martine: http://www.geocities.com/firthfan/indepen2.html
~lizbeth54 #1524
Murph, I wouldn't take what Victoria Coren writes too seriously....this is how she always writes, tongue in cheek, sending everyone up.(As I said, her dad is/was the editor of "Punch") Nothing malicious intended. You have a first-rate (and serious) site, which is absolutely invaluable for pulling together all the latest news, and more, about Colin. I'm sure that a lot of ES readers are at this very moment searching for your site, and giving thanks!
~lizbeth54 #1525
I've just re-read what Victoria Coren wrote, and I can see why you wouldn't like it, Murph. It's very flippant. Particularly the last bit. But that *is* her style of writing, and I hadn't realised how offensive it could sometimes appear to be.
~KJArt #1526
(CF) The English in general are brilliant at laughing at themselves and their country, and there's nothing more pleasing in person - starting with yourself is the root of all humour. When I've been in comedies, I've tended to be the butt of the joke. \...\ It's an important comic function, and having a sense of one's own ridiculousness is something that keeps me sane.'    Aww, c'mon Murph, we need you sane ... desperately!!    She sounded like she was taking the sites collectively, and was not always referring to just yours. And you've got to admit, he's got some "interesting" admirers out there!!    It all sounded like it was done in admiration, not malice. Let's take a cue from ODB and be brilliant at laughing at ourselves. We all need it! ;-D KJ
~KJArt #1527
(AnnW) Karen, wasn't the dustbin scene in "The Edge of Reason", perhaps they are using bits from both books. I don't think so. It was when he encountered her outside waiting for the dustbin to ring (for Tom's cellphone.) Daniel subsequently came by. Wasn't that in BJD1? (Gosh it's so easy to get confused once you've read both.)
~Brown32 #1528
KJ: I am usually the first to find humor in something, but this time she just got to me. I will probably think things over and tone down my response, maybe even poke a little fun back at her. The pictures, as I said, are something else though. Thanks.
~nan #1529
(Murph) Well, now that I'm a laughing stock to everyone who reads the Evening Standard in the UK, Oh, bite your tongue! I am ready to bury my head in the sand, or fight back! I vote for fight back...in one way or another ;-) I understand the feeling. You work arduously on a project and then someone you don't even know, who can't bother to do any real in-depth research, pokes fun at you. Actually, I felt that she was poking fun at all us Colin obsessives, and just mentioned items from your site to underscore it. Since the length of time remaining until Colin's birthday is such an issue to her, I think we should email a reminder of the countdown every day ;-p Well, maybe that's taking things a bit too far...but you know what I mean...
~Brown32 #1530
Thanks, Nan, I do know! I have calmed down and figure that even if she doesn't, I know what all of us do to try to make the man more visible to the rest of the world (she forgets there are quite a few of us outside the UK, where his news is still sparse!). The birthday thing might be a bit much. I really used it because I found a neat java applet for it! I don't think I'll change anything, though. I'm a stubborn Irish Lady in this regard.
~mari #1531
Murph, my sweet, don't get mad; get even. Since she apparently has you pegged as the "blueprint fan, age 34, single, etc., etc., just like BJ" . . .how about if Bridget answers her, sending a copy to Ms. Coren as well as the featues editor of the Standard? Sample entries could include: June 9, 8 a.m. Weight: none of your damn business; cigarettes: none; age: 67; mood: terrific! Internet friend in England advises that new article on Mr. Darcy is in Evening Standard. Can't wait to scan and put on web page. June 9, 10 a.m. Still 67. Friend has e-mailed article. V. v. confusing, as article is on Colin Firth, not Mr. Darcy. Chuckle over writer's account of CF Internet site with clock countdown to birthday, obviously designed by poor, obsessive, Bridget Jones-like person. June 9, 10:05 a.m. Age: still 67 and aging by the minute; cigarettes: none, but am ready to resume vile habit. Have read full article and have realized that Internet site referenced is mine! GAH! Writer has zeroed in on one bit of silliness (bloody clock) and ignored rest. Where is my lovingly-researched Shakespeare In Love page complete with description of the era's dress, the actors, the Globe Theatre? Where? Where?? Obsessive thoughts about Colin Firth and entire British public reading article and no longer wishing to speak to me: 1,627. June 9, 10:10 a.m. Obsessive thoughts about Colin Firth and entire British public reading article and no longer wishing to speak to me: 926 (making v.g. progress). Have realized that Colin Firth and entire British public have never spoken to me anyway, so what is bloody use in being upset. June 9, 10:20 a.m. Have decided to call Evening Standard and ask to speak to Ms. Coren. Will need to disguise voice so sound like 34-year old, hip, singleton Londoner instead of 67-year-old grandmother from New Jersey. Right. Not sure can pull this off, but decide if Renee Zellweger can do it, so can I. And so forth and so on. Of course, Ms. Coren won't be there to take "Bridget's call" so you can make gazillions of *69 calls to see if she rang back while you were out. You get the idea, Murph. They might even print it.;-)
~nan #1532
(Murph) I really used it because I found a neat java applet for it! I don't think I'll change anything, though. LOL! How well I know the feeling of finding a great toy and finding a place to use it ;-) I'm a stubborn Irish Lady in this regard. Good for you! Murph, my sweet, don't get mad; get even. Now that's what I want to hear ;-D Since she apparently has you pegged as the "blueprint fan, age 34, single, etc., etc., just like BJ" Well, she can just kiss my blueprint ;-p Oh, wait a minute...I *am* 34, single, etc., etc... Hmmm.... . . .how about if Bridget answers her, sending a copy to Ms. Coren as well as the featues editor of the Standard? Sample entries could include: LMAO!! Mari, that was priceless. Remind me to call you the next time I need to slap the crap out of someone ;-D
~KarenR #1533
Thanks, Mari (and Martine), for posting the article. (CF) I'm lower middle class really Huh? Had no idea your class structure was that severe? How many million dollars/pounds does he need to make in a year to move up? ;-) I hate to think where I'd fall. Gaah! (CF) Americans make no distinction between English actors; they can't tell the difference between Michael Caine and Pirnce Charles. We're all Prince Charles to them.' How did he know Mari about you saying, "What's it all about, Alfie?" to Prince Charles at the Albery (after you pawed him)? (AnnW) wasn't the dustbin scene in "The Edge of Reason", perhaps they are using bits from both books Absolutely, it was TEOR. Chapter 10 is entitled "Mars and Venus in the Dustbin." That dustbin story was Fielding's stock example of a situation suggested by a friend of hers that she used. They might be using bits from the other book, but certainly not the plotline. Waiting for the dustbin to ring happens after they've broken up. Hysterical response, Mari. v.v.good.
~odessa #1534
Great articles, thanks! "...an unflattering photo of Colin arriving home with a new Hoover. Nobody cared. They just thought, 'Ooh, look at his muscles clenches around that Hoover.' " Now there`s a photo that I would like to see :D
~Tracy #1535
Firth's blueprint fan would be about 34, professional, middle class, still single In the words of Janice from Friends "Oh...MY...Gahd!" You and me both Nan, now I know what is is to feel pigeonholed ;-D *Sob* for the first Friday in weeks didn't get the ES mag....still faint heart never won fair Firth-pic - I'm on the case and will see if I can procure one from my sources!
~Tracy #1536
Gah italics!
~CherylB #1537
(Evelyn) Do I detect a little "IMO" missing here?:-) The New York Times and I liked it. My opinions are never little. I'm such a pretentious twit. As opinions go, Film Comment, Sight and Sound, and I didn't like it. That's what makes film going, you find what you like.
~Moon #1538
Thanks to all for this article! 'Sometimes I come back and I've entirely missed a phenomenon - like Vic Reeves or Harry Enfield. This time round it was Ali G, which I then caught up on and thought was hilarious. Does this mean he has a TV now? ;-) Why does he insist on saying he is lower middle class? Should I remind him of the frappe? ;-)))
~KJArt #1539
(Moon) Why does he insist on saying he is lower middle class? Should I remind him of the frappe? ;-))) You know he was talking about his origins, my dear. I'm sure all the Firths, Firths senior included, have climbed the economic ladder since. The frappe indicates that his lower-middle-classness has been contaminated, but genetically, he will probably still be true to his origins. Mari, you must publish that reply. Either that or slip the copyright to our hardworking Murph and then volunteer to daily send the Evening Standard an update in her name, since she's so busy with the regular business of updating that incredibly wonderful site of hers. (Nan -- You work arduously on a project and then someone you don't even know, who can't bother to do any real in-depth research, pokes fun at you. Actually, I felt that she was poking fun at all us Colin obsessives, and just mentioned items from your site to underscore it. I agree with you Nan, except in the idea of doing research. She was quoting stuff from too many other recent articles to be accused of that (even if they were innaccurate the first time. ;-)) And I wanted to ask Murph, did that "Too much information" come from your site? I thought it was still up on Ellen's, but I don't think I have seen it on yours. I got the impression that she first found you via the links on the margin of ?The Telegraph? article, followed quite a few more links from you and others and was so overwhelmed by the result, she felt impelled send up us "Colin obsessives" because of the sheer force of numbers and variety -- that really impressed her (as it should!). :-) KJ
~lafn #1540
...I'm lower middleclass really... (Moon) Why does he insist on saying he is lower middle class? Colin, honey, lower middle class people work more than seven months out of a year;-)
~patas #1541
On the internet, there is a countdown to Colin Firth's birthday. Murph, it may even not be your site.I found this a while ago. There are countdowns for every actor. http://www.fansites.com/countdown.cgi?1960,9,10,,,,Colin%20Firth%20Birthday (CF) I'm lower middle class really (Karen)Huh? Had no idea your class structure was that severe? How many million dollars/pounds does he need to make in a year to move up? (Evelyn)Colin, honey, lower middle class people work more than seven months out of a year;-) No offence, anyone, but this class thing has nothing to do with what his profession is or how much he earns.
~lizbeth54 #1542
lower middle class If his grandparents were clergymen and his dad went to public school and Cambridge, and he's the first one in generations not to go to university, then he's as middle-middle as you can get. The trouble is that in the UK (not in the States...what class is Bruce Willis?) actors are very much pigeon-holed by their perceived "class" and accent. And as CF says, most available roles at the moment are "cutting edge", real, ordinary bloke-ish (or for ex-soap stars, or twenty-something "relationships" dramas or gangster movies).....not many good acting opportunities at the barrister-aristo-Noel Coward end. Helena B-C recently made the same point...that her perceived "class" counts against her in casting. As slight touch of re-invention perhaps?
~KarenR #1543
Pardon me, but "class" originated with professions/economics. You had upper class (nobles), middle (the shopkeepers--people in trade) and the lower classes. That's history. However, if Colin is referring to how he behaves IRL, as opposed to what class his parents were in, that's another story. what class is Bruce Willis? Who knows, who cares. Also, a huge distinction in the US is that people can better themselves. They are not forever tied to family origins. most available roles at the moment are "cutting edge", real, ordinary bloke-ish and is that why actors like Malcolm McDowell, Alex Kingston, Jude Law (and his crowd) are all in those films? They all speak Received Pronunciation. I do agree about Helena B-C. She is making a concerted effort to change her image and to be recognized as more versatile (more than Shakespeare or E.M. Forster).
~lafn #1544
(Gi)No offence, anyone, but this class thing has nothing to do with what his profession is or how much he earns (bethan).. and he's the first one in generations not to go to university, then he's as middle-middle as you can get. I don't want to belabor the point...(Bethan...he says lower middle class..not middle middle)...Gi no one said this has anything to do with his profession My Webster's dictionary says: lower class: a social class occupying a position below the middle class and having the lowest status in a society by virtue of a low material standard of living, social instability ,and a low level of personal ambition and aspiration esp. towards education Obviously, in different cultures, lower middle class has a different meaning.
~lafn #1545
sorry Obviously, in different cultures, lower middle class has a different meaning. That's my comment, not Danny Webster's.
~KarenR #1546
One little bit of clarification, when I said Upper Classes, I probably shouldn't have termed them nobility. More a case of "not having to work for a living," instead one's land holdings (and investments) worked for you. Done with economic/social history.
~Moon #1547
When Colin says his origins are lower middle class and as Bethan said, If his grandparents were clergymen and his dad went to public school and Cambridge, and he's the first one in generations not to go to university, then he's as middle-middle as you can get. That is the point. He was referring to his origins, not his current status.
~CherylB #1548
It is difficult for some Americans, such as myself, to grasp all the details of as class stratified a society as Great Britain.
~KarenR #1549
Gaah! This discussion is going round in circles.
~Allison2 #1550
Who knows, who cares. Also, a huge distinction in the US is that people can better themselves. They are not forever tied to family origins. Nor are they in the UK. Lots of interesting discussions recently in the UK press about this. The most interesting observation I read is that class is the way the British define social differences between themselves. We are actually amongst the most fluid societies in the world though I think this fluidity has lessened in the last 20 years due to the sad state of our education system which has become a political football - IMHO of course! IMO Colin's family are middle middle. All his social hangups come from his education. There is something very wrong with our present education system. That is absolutely my last word on the subject on this board anyway!!!
~Renata #1551
Can we agree on this: Colin is a class of his own, whatever his origins? [No, I'm not trying to be clever, ..... ;.)) ]
~Renata #1552
http://www.firth.com/renate/cfwarhol.gif (Nan, do you remember?)
~Renata #1553
Ooops, I meant to post the pic, not the link: Would you believe it, I have forgotten how to do it! This was my first attempt at webdesign, the pic is from Nan: http://members.aol.com/rmmaier/cfwarhol.htm
~Renata #1554
http://members.aol.com/rmmaier/index.htm
~Renata #1555
~Brown32 #1556
Renate: Before getting teeth fixed. Great. Here he looks more like brother Jon.
~nan #1557
(Renate) Nan, do you remember? Hell, yes :-D It was your first try with web design and my first with Photoshop. Then I became completely obsessed with my computer, quit my job, and went back to school...;-p Who knew this Colin thing would have such an impact, huh? I just liked the way he looked in his breeches ;-p You know, that picture is kind of cool. Wish I could remember how I did it.
~Renata #1558
(Nan) You know, that picture is kind of cool. I still like it very much myself: my fav Colin pic combined with those great colours. Wish you had the time again to play with photoshop - and Colin. ;-))
~KarenR #1559
The MOB is still *officially* in preproduction: Spanish actress Ariadna Gil and Italy's Anna Galiena and Claudia Gerini have joined the cast of English-language comedy Off Key from Spanish production house Lolafilms. [...] The $9.8m film is one of four ambitious English-language pictures Lolafilms CEO Andres Vicente Gomez has in production right now. The others are: Susan Seidelman's Gaudi Afternoon, currently in post-production; The Dancer Upstairs, now shooting under debut director John Malkovich; and The Maid Of Buttermere, in pre-production.
~Lizza #1560
Looking in my local Evening Paper tonight in "quotes of the day" section, there is a picture of Colin and the following quote "Americans make no distinction between English actors. We are all Prince Charles to them." Actor Colin Firth, famous for mr. Darcy role. YEEEOUCH!!! Anyone know the article it is from? If it's part of the recent RV publicity? The quote is not acknowledged, so I am relying on droolers. have to dash back to work.
~KarenR #1561
Lizza, that quote was just in Friday's ES magazine.
~Lizza #1562
Thanks Karen, must catch on Murph's.
~lizbeth54 #1563
The MOB is still *officially* in preproduction: That's a very good role - great acting potential (and he gets to wear a white shirt, get wet and ride a horse!). Hope it's still very much on. A friend of mine has just spent a few days at Crummock Water (about 2 miles from Buttermere). She said it's very busy at the moment. I wonder, if it goes ahead, if they'll actually shoot it there (it's very popular in July-August and the summer is over by September, makes location work difficult). Perhaps Buttermere can be re-located to the Italian lakes?!
~Moon #1564
Perhaps Buttermere can be re-located to the Italian lakes?! That is my territory. Great idea!
~KarenR #1565
The Victoria Coren article is now online at the This is London (Evening Std) site: http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/dynamic/generic/bottom_review.html?in_review_id=289743&in_review_text_id=234635
~lafn #1566
....'that people characterised Fever Pitch as a big stretch, asking if I had to do a lot of research to transform myself into this middle-class football fan from North London. I was even wearing some of my own old clothes in the film! I remember folks on Drool picking up on this...the leather jacket??...when we were discussing "Fever Pitch"..and some theatre literati amongst us assured us that never happened;-) Now we have it from the man himself...
~Allison2 #1567
Now we have it from the man himself... Check out the vacuum cleaner photograph (okay I know none of you ever looks at paparazzi shots;-)). I am sure that is Paul Ashworth. Same clothes and hair and barber.
~mari #1568
Anne R. read in a Spokane paper that Relative Values was shown at the Seattle Film Festival last weekend. You may recall that Colin won that Fest's Best Actor award in '88 for Apartment Zero. Wish that RV site would provide some Relevant data like this for a change, and preferably in advance!!:-(
~KarenR #1569
Is that right? It isn't listed at the festival's website. Overseas is trying to sell it here. Wish that RV site would provide some Relevant data like this for a change, and preferably in advance!!:-( You tell'm, girl. There's supposed to be an online chat tomorrow, although absolutely no details are provided as to how or when.
~EileenG #1570
Chiming in late as usual...thanks for posting the articles, ladies. Loved your comment, KJ: She [author Victoria what's-her-name] was quoting stuff from too many other recent articles to be accused of that [research](even if they were innaccurate the first time. ;-)) *sigh* Again we see evidence of how the press distorts things. She didn't do. her. effing. homework either, but wanted to impress readers with her internet savvy. I wish these authors wouldn't classify all CF's active fans as Darcy obsessives because we're not. We obsess about all his characters, though Darcy does hold a special place in our hearts. :-) As for the discussion about class: I appreciate the impact class has in different cultures. As for me, though, I'm *virtually brushing my fingers under my chin* A few comments about the Independent article: We meet in a dark, panelled room in Soho House, the London media haunt that could easily double up for a spot of costume drama. Unlike Mr Darcy, Firth lopes in, tanned Hope he hasn't already been to the Italian lakes, Moon. ;-) ...and casual, though the sideburns remain impressive. Note to Colin: if you want Mark Darcy to be "unique," rather than Darcy II, lose the sideburns (she says, too late). ...He is perfectly polite but has been doing interviews all day; the words "under" and "duress" hover in the gloom (outside the sky is bright blue), and the publicity woman is holding her watch like a stopwatch. Where was that writer from Horse and Hound Magazine? Mark? ;-) Also, Arsenal are playing in the Uefa Cup on telly in a couple of hours, and Firth, I later discover, is going to watch the match round at a friend's house. Hope he wasn't interrupted by any aliens from the Planet Zarg.
~KarenR #1571
*hitting head against wall* Can't believe I missed this listing from Saturday's Seattle Times (was definitely not on Sunday). Of course, it would have to be Relative Values! ;-) 9:15 p.m. - Sneak preview. Another of the festival's mystery films.
~EileenG #1572
Gee, Karen, you'd better get those peepers checked. Can't believe you missed it, either. 8-P
~mari #1573
(Karen) 9:15 p.m. - Sneak preview. Another of the festival's mystery films. Well you *should* be contrite; that item was a dead giveaway.;-) Believe it or not, that was it: 9:15 p.m. The Egyptian: "Relative Values." This romantic comedy/period piece (circa 1954) is based on the Noel Coward play and stars Julie Andrews, Edward Atterton, William Baldwin, Colin Firth and Jeanne Tripplehorn. ***** Thanks for the ES and Independent pics, Murph. Yum. I am *very* fond of the Mark Darcy look! Hollywood Video is having a sale through June--previously-viewed copies of MLSF are going for $7.99 U.S.
~KJArt #1574
I *might* have whined: "If you'd only let me know with a little warning... ", but, come to think of it, I'm not so sure I'd take the 2.5 hr. drive (each way) for a night showing ... Just as well I wasn't put to the test, possibly resulting in severe guilt feelings questioning the level of my faithfullness to ODB.
~KarenR #1575
Nothing about Colin, but here are Iain Dale's comments about the proposed new Blair movie. I'm sure they are funnier to you ladies on the other side. ;-) So the BBC are making a political drama based around Tony Blair's rise to power. The casting should be interesting. I wonder if I might be so bold as to make the following suggestions. I think Simon Callow would do a brilliant Gordon Brown, while the role of Peter Mandelson is so obviously made for Dale Winton. Tony Blair is more difficult. Jerry Springer was my first thought - after all, he's all show and no substance too, but then I hit on Hugh Grant as they both have a somewhat hesitant style of speech, although Tony's oral problems cannot of course be compared to Hugh's - if you get my drift. Prescott would be done brilliantly by Bernard Manning, while Stephen Byers is ready-made for the bloke who plays Ashley on Coronation Street. The words 'lettuce', 'leaf' and 'limp' all come to mind. For obvious reasons, Robin Cook would have to play himself. Feel free to email me (iain.dale@politicos.co.uk) for further suggestions on this and also the casting for any future film on the current Tory Party. What a bl ckbuster that would be...
~lafn #1576
Karen's pic accompanying the ES article are great....and don't forget to run your mouse over the "Prince Charles" picture.....hee, hee...almost missed it...
~Moon #1577
Tony Blair is more difficult. Totally ignored CF. That is not good. I think Jeremy Irons should play him. I find lots os similarities between the two, much more so than CF. Maybe they could add a scene and have Bridget interview her luuvy Blair. ;-)
~lizbeth54 #1578
I think the "casting" for the Blair drama is very tongue in cheek....half of those suggested aren't even actors! Isn't Bernard Manning deceased? Blazingly hot day here todaay...ideal for any outside location shots for BJD. Saw a photo of RZ on set with Jim Carrey...she was smoking a "fag" and looked plump-ish, wearing heavy overcoat. The weather reminds me of something. Ages ago you asked me, Ann, whether I watched MLSF in solitary splendour. It was a pretty miserable sort of day...raining, dull...and the film theatre (admittedly not big) was actually more or less full. Weaher does impact on audiences. BTW, I would be very grateful if anyone could give the alert when MLSF is out on video in the UK, as I definitely want to watch it again. I am not ringing up about this (or anything else!) as I think I give off bad vibes and never get good/accurate news! :-) :-( Finally, look forward to hearing about the RV premiere, Ann! I do so hope that RV isn't going to be another "London only" release. It's not going to be showing at our local Showcase or Warner (we're getting "Next Best Thing", "Deception", "Chill Factor" and Simon Says". Thrills!!) This is not exactly a backwater (third largest city in UK, major university city, lagest rep theatre, home of Northern Opera and Ballet, etcetera) but it's a veritable CF desert! Finally, finally, to put Box Office figures in perspective, Minnie Driver and David Duchovny's "Return to me" opened in 250 theatres, took just over �200,000, in a week and Ewan McGregor's latest (200 theatres) took �100,000. Only a few movies really make it over here (lousy weather helps!)
~KarenR #1579
Oh dear! v.v. bad (shield your eyes, premiere-going ladies)...from The Scotsman, a short review of Relative Values: Relative Values (PG) Director: Eric Styles Starring: Julie Andrews, William Baldwin, Colin Firth Two-second summary: Limp adaptation of Noel Coward's Anglo-American culture clash comedy. Even if you are someone for whom the exact appeal of Julie Andrews has remained uncompellingly obscure, you may still feel some minor shiver of outrage that she has been persuaded once more into active service for this dog. That said, it's not as if she actually does any work. A profoundly unengaging Noel Coward adaptation, Relative Values is a country-house class farce set in the early 1950s. To the alarm of blue-bloodedly proper but nice with it Lady Something (Andrews), her son Nigel (Edward Atterton) has taken up with vulgar Hollywood movie starlet Miranda Frayle (Jeanne Tripplehorn). Colin Firth, looking about 70, lounges around the edges of scenes as the gay cousin who spouts one-liners in response to anything anyone says and Stephen Fry lends support in the Stephen Fry-butler role. Why did anyone think this was worth spending money, let alone time on?
~KarenR #1580
I think the "casting" for the Blair drama is very tongue in cheek Didn't I mention at the outset that it was supposed to be funny? We're wondering here whether the reference to Hugh Grant/Tony Blair "oral problems" is halting speech or the TB's halitosis mentioned in the Vanity Fair article??? MLSF is out on video in Australia. Surely it can be mailordered. Perhaps Cathey or AnneH could find out the details.
~patas #1581
(Eileen) I wish these authors wouldn't classify all CF's active fans as Darcy obsessives because we're not. We obsess about all his characters, though Darcy does hold a special place in our hearts. :-) LOL! Very true... (Karen)Nothing about Colin, but here are Iain Dale's comments about the proposed new Blair movie. I'm sure they are funnier to you ladies on the other side. ;-) Very funny indeed :-)
~jcjc #1582
(Bethann) Blazingly hot day here todaay I don't believe it--what is it about 79F. Here it is 108F--try that for blazingly hot. (Karen)Colin Firth, looking about 70, lounges around the edges of scenes as the gay cousin who spouts one-liners in response to anything anyone says and Stephen Fry lends support in the Stephen Fry-butler role. Ouchhhh!
~Renata #1583
Not new, but I get never tired to read Colin's praise ;-). Sorry if this has been posted before. --------- http://www.ams.ubc.ca/media/citr/discord/jun98/vphilter.html Newly on the shelves is one of the 1997 festival�s most crowd-pleasing efforts, Fever Pitch. The story that many a Vancouver hockey fan could easily relate to centres on a 30-ish, laid-back teacher whose defining personality trait is his love for the game of soccer in general and, specifically, his devotion to the Arsenal team. As this is a time in history when Arsenal was not exactly a football powerhouse, he has learned to live with suffering. Into his life walks (primly erect) a female co-worker with whom he begins an �opposites-attract� relationship, despite her ignorance of and dislike for his life�s passion. Following the true events of the 1988/89 English football season and intercut with flashbacks that give insight into the origins of a true fan, the film�s romantic story mirrors Arsenal�s rocky road to the championship. A successful romantic/sports comedy is hard to pull off; a delicate balance between the lovey-dovey and jock elements must be tempered with a good sense of humour about both. Though Fever Pitch does occasionally fall into the dumb-plot trap of pitting the uptight female who�s looking to �nest� against the slobbish, easy-going sports nut who doesn�t want to be �tied down,� its willingness to poke fun at itself with an honest, self-depreciating wit gives it a likeability that most Hollywood pictures in this vein don�t have. It helps that, in place of the de rigour-in-the-USA Kevin Costner, we get the charming and affable Colin Firth. ---------- BTW, Fever Pitch will be in German TV next week, June 22.
~mari #1584
Hmmm, somehow I don't think that the RV website will be posting that Scotsman review in their "press coverage" section.;-) Does anyone know if The Scotsman ever ran a review of MLSF? I recall checking there a few times and didn't see anything; was just wondering how it was reviewed in Scotland.
~KarenR #1585
Yes, it did. v. lukewarm review; not scathing like this one. Go back to read here: http://www.spring.net/yapp-bin/restricted/read/drool/129.1108
~EileenG #1586
(Iain Dale) Tony's oral problems cannot of course be compared to Hugh's (Karen) We're wondering here whether the reference to Hugh Grant/Tony Blair "oral problems" is halting speech or the TB's halitosis mentioned in the Vanity Fair article??? Hee hee! When one reads the words "oral" and "Hugh Grant" in the same sentence, it is undoubtedly a reference of divine nature. If you get my drift ;-) (nasty review) Colin Firth, looking about 70 Wonder if the author has seen any real 70-year olds lately...
~KarenR #1587
(nasty review) Colin Firth, looking about 70 I dunno...in this pic he almost looks like 17 or 27! ;-) Bring on those septugenarians. Yi-haaaa!!!
~lizbeth54 #1588
I think someone needs their eyes testing...or do I detect a slight hint of malice? How to strangle a movie at birth. "Looking 70" probably means wearing a decent suit and polished shoes. I've found a couple of good movie sites....they may be familiar, but if not, try them out. http://www.filmworld.co.uk Completely UK focused...check out Coming Attractions for details of RV http://www.film.com US/UK Has Search facility Has a very perceptive review for MLSF (which vastly exceeds anything written about it in the UK...especially the last paragraph) http://www.film.com/film-review/1999/13097/23/default-review.html
~lafn #1589
... Relative Values is a country-house class farce set in the early 1950s... I want a cognoscenti to tell me the difference between this "English-country-house" film about the life of the rich..servants,scenery etc. and MLSF.Which at least had Irene Jacob. Of course no one has seen it yet...so you can wait til then. (And I'm not even mentioning the class stuff..so don't slap me with it. OK?
~amw #1590
Dame Julie Andrews is on The Arts Programme with Sheridan Morely Radio2 next Friday, 23rd June, at 10.30pm., same day as RV goes on general release.
~ommin #1591
It would be extremely difficult to find a copy of MLSF, I live somewhat in the sticks, and although I have rented MLSF and copied it - it is an extremely poor copy and wouldn't recommend it to any one - anti-copy I suppose, I intend to wait until the local video store sells it. If I ever find it on sale I will certainly let you know.
~KarenR #1592
The Times Metro section had this: COMING SOON... Cuba Gooding Jnr and Skeet Ulrich in Chill Factor; Bette Midler and John Cleese in Isn't She Great and William Baldwin and Colin Firth in Relative Values.
~lizbeth54 #1593
The Times Metro section had this: That's recognition of a kind...given that there seem to be about 10 movies opening next week, including Madonna's latest and Ben Affleck's. Metro is aimed at the twenty something reader (I guess) and normally highlights three movies. Obviously Julie Andrews is not cool enough for a mention!
~KarenR #1594
There's a television news story from Wales about Relative Values up at the site that you can watch. It shows a number of clips from the movie: http://www.relative-values.com/multimedia/htvstory.html You'll laugh when you hear what they compare it to. ;-)
~lafn #1595
I can see clips from the film (can't wait to see Marshwood House;-) but audio is not clear. Pray tell...what is RV compared to?Don't tell me it My Life with a Dog that's what they compared MLSF to....
~Renata #1596
Hm, quiet here these days. Guess it's a well-deserved break. A question to the collective memory: does anyone recall which paper/site published the labrador/volvo article, and where I can find it?
~KarenR #1597
Wasn't it a short item in the Tatler which had spoken to the staff at the box office?
~KarenR #1598
(From the RV website) Eric Styles, the director, has been answering questions. Here's one in which he mentions Colin: Q: How long did it take to bring Relative Values to the big-screen? What other projects are you working on? Do you have plans to work with any of the RV cast again? A: When I came on board the project it took about year to assemble the cast and for our Producer Chris to raise the finance. This is pretty quick as far as feature films go. I have a number of projects in developement with Chris, mostly written by our writing partner Catherine Linstrum, who wrote "Dreaming of Joseph Lees" - she is a wonderful writer and I looking forward to working with her again. I don't like to say too much about future projects until they're ready to go ito production. I really enjoyed working with the whole cast of Relative Values and would jump at the chance of working with any of them again. A lot of the actors demostrate a fabulous versatility in our film, Jeanne plays a really interesting fallable character, Colin experiments with the more usual exprectations for him as a strong leading man and Sophie steals the whole show for me - but again we were very lucky to be able to assemble a whole cast of hardworking generous actors - and that certainly makes my job a lot more fun.
~lizbeth54 #1599
Julie Andrews is interviewed by Jonathon Ross about RV on Film2000 (Thursday) and Jeanne Tripplehorn is on Woman's Hour (Tuesday). There's also an ad for RV in today's Sunday Telegraph, on the editorial page, so it does catch the eye. Possibly other papers as well?
~amw #1600
Yes, there is another ad. in The Sunday Times, with a quote from the Daily Mail.
~amw #1601
and I see that according to the ad. is is to go on general release, which is wonderful, it may reach the far far southeast!
~heide #1602
The recent blurbs on RV intrigue me about Colin's character: "Colin Firth, looking about 70, lounges around the edges of scenes as the gay cousin" Colin experiments with the more usual exprectations for him as a strong leading man Yes, I think this may be a Colin we've never seen before. ;-) Can't wait for your report, Ann. Thanks to all for giving us the latest. And for the older stuff too. Loved the Fever Pitch write-up, Renate. Lucky you, getting to see it on TV. No matter how often I've viewed one of his films, I'll always tune in when it's broadcast on television.
~lafn #1603
Happy Father's Day, Colin....
~lizbeth54 #1604
I see that according to the ad. (RV) is to go on general release, which is wonderful, it may reach the far far southeast! Actually, Ann, it's "nationwide release" (as was SLOW and MLSF), which can literally mean one theatre in London and one eleswhere! I think RV will get quite a lot of favourable publicity, but a very select release. Nothing wrong with that. All we get at our local multiplexes are the latest Hollywood movies, and rather crass Brit comedies, which appeal to the usual multiplex crowd. One thing puzzles me...why hasn't RV secured a US release? Eric Styles' first movie "Dreaming of Joseph Lees" was actually released in the US before the UK. RV has a far more stellar cast, and JA must still have a lot of popular support in the US. She's an icon! Doesn't it even get a limited release? Lots of controversy here about apparent "misrepresention" in "The Patriot", the new historical movie about the War of Independence, starring Mel Gibson. I remember reading about it and thinking there might have been opportunities for CF in the English roles. (Army officers,uniform, horses etc) But apparently the English are portrayed very unsympathetically! Better to stick to Mark Darcy! Other tidbits...Sam Mendes has apparently turned down offers by Tom Cruise and Brad Pitt to play at the Donmar, which is very fashionable at the moment. Ralph Fiennes is taking a lot of flak for his "Coriolanus"...there's a piece in the Telegraph today poking fun at him, and telling him to read his own reviews (he has said that he is indifferent to praise or blame)and lighten up. Our press is not kind. Sometmes a low-ish (but not too low!) profile is best!
~lizbeth54 #1605
"Misrepresentation"...sorry, can't spell!
~KarenR #1606
Dreaming of Joseph Lees opened in the US just a month before the UK. It barely played here. Not even sure if it got out of NY/LA. I saw it locally at a filmfest. It made NO money; its reviews were tepid. Samantha Morton was wonderful, the cinematography was interesting, but the story was stupid. Bethan, while you may not go to the Odds & Ends topic, some of the these items have already been mentioned there or belong there. I would email you, but apparently you don't answer or check it.
~lizbeth54 #1607
Sorry, I must remember look at the Odds&Ends topic so that I don't repeat things. My personal e-mailing is, I admit, a mess...I have a family email address and two or three personal ones, and end up always being in a complete muddle. The address that I try to rememember to check is bethan54@yahoo.com
~amw #1608
Not a very good review for RV at Popcorn UK, 2stars out of 5. oh dear, if only he would appear in a really big hit that has him as the leading man, another P&P but on the big screen.
~KarenR #1609
Thanks, AnnW. Had checked there earlier today with no results. Not good comments about Colin. :-( Here's the review by Simon Wardell (2/5 stars) In the wake of 'Wilde' and 'An Ideal Husband', an adaptation of Noel Coward - the latter-day standard bearer for Oscar's brand of sophisticated drawing-room comedy - probably seemed like a good idea. Unfortunately, no amount of witty repartee or star performances can disguise how dated the whole exercise feels. Set in an English country house in the 1950s, the film kicks off with family heir Nigel (Edward Atterton) announcing his engagement to Jeanne Tripplehorn's fading Hollywood star, Miranda. This causes a few problems for his mother (Julie Andrews), not only when she discovers that her maid Moxie (fine work from Sophie Thompson) is Miranda's long-lost sister but also with the subsequent arrival of the actress's besotted former lover, film idol Don Lucas (William Baldwin). A series of mightily predictable entanglements and misunderstandings ensue, all wrapped up in Coward's acid but airy prose. There are some nice touches by director Eric Styles, who previously made the little-seen 'Dreaming Of Joseph Lees' - the entrance of Lucas coincides with the appearance of an escalating number of Girl Guides outside the estate gates, while Miranda's American accent slips tellingly into Cockney during one confrontation. However, the travails of the landed gentry, even if they are represented by the venerable Miss Julie, do not make for absorbing viewing. And Andrews and Colin Firth, as her Coward-esque nephew, obviously take the whole exercise so lightly that it's asking a bit much for the audience to care either.
~Moon #1610
Picking the NC was role was a risk for Colin as there is plenty of footage out there of NC. It was a risk, he took it. Now it is up to you AnnW to let us know how it really is when you see it at the premiere. We are in your hands. :-) Blockbuster Video has put their extra copies of MLSF on sale! I bought one for $10. I would like to thank my boys who nagged and insisted on my taking them to B to rent The Matrix. Synchronicity, yeah! I also rented 'Dreaming Of Joseph Lees' to check out Styles.
~amw #1611
Moon, I shall like it whatever, but I shall try to be unbiased, anyway to quote someone I shall also be seeing "The Real Thing" and he looks even better in real life and looked so smart at the SIL Premiere. Will report tomorrow night if it is not too late.
~ommin #1612
A very good trailer of R.V. in the Independant Newspaper - United Kingdom. Go into enjoyment - then film. It last quite a long time and each of the seven Principal Players are in it.
~lizbeth54 #1613
And Andrews and Colin Firth, as her Coward-esque nephew, obviously take the whole exercise so lightly I thought that was how Coward was to be played....not he-a-v-y! all wrapped up in Coward's acid but airy prose. Sounds okay to me. Makes a change from expletive deleted. I'd just sit back and try to enjoy, Ann. It's certainly not going to appeal to everyone and it's very difficult to have a "hit" movie in the UK unless you appeal to that all-important 16-25 group.(They even write most of the reviews!) I think that actors in the UK just have to grit their teeth and plod on. Which is what they do. You can't please all of the people all of the time. BJD has all the ingredients for universal success though...and he is the leading man!
~KarenR #1614
The RV site has its recorded interviews with the cast up. You can see and hear Colin answer 4 questions: 1) Tell us about your role 2) What's it like working with Julie Andrews? 3) Where does Peter's humour stem from? 4) Why do people still want to make films of Noel Coward's plays Listen to the last one carefully. He uses the words "witty, airy, and urbane" to describe the dialogue and talks about how they are "made to look easy but are not terribly easy" [or something to that effect] Go here for the interviews: http://www.relative-values.com/multimedia/castcrew/cf.html
~KarenR #1615
Another uh-oh review of RV, this time from Screendaily, dated June 16, by Allan Hunter: A warm welcome for the big screen return of Julie Andrews is unlikely to translate into significant audience goodwill towards the creaky, time warp attractions of this 1950s Noel Coward adaptation. A flimsy romp through the hypocrisies of the post-War English class system, the basic material is badly dated and the workmanlike handling merely emphasises its plodding theatricality. UK distributor Momentum Pictures faces an uphill struggle to prevent this becoming another swift casualty of a merciless British market when it is released on June 23. Displaying a crisp comic talent, the ageless Andrews is every inch the star of the show as Felicity, the Countess Of Marshwood. Distressed by the news that her son is intent on an entirely unsuitable marriage to American movie queen Miranda Frayle (Tripplehorn), she prepares to welcome the couple to the family's vast estate in the English countryside. Matters are complicated by the sudden revelation that her loyal maid Moxie (Thompson) just happens to be Miranda's long lost sister. The plot thickens again with the arrival of Miranda's former lover Don Lucas (Baldwin), a boozy Hollywood star who still carries a torch. Beginning with a jaunty flourish and an energetic montage covering the Marshwood-Frayle romance, this soon settles into a much more mundane approach to the plot's mechanics and comic set pieces that makes little effort to render the material more accessible to a modern audience. Andrews may have the flair and experience to rise above it all but others are not so lucky with Fry offering an over familiar reading of the Cockney butler and Firth left simpering on the sidelines as the campy, mischievous nephew.
~KarenR #1616
Film Unlimited (Guardian and Observer) also has the RV trailer link up [same as the one AnneH posted used by The Independent] This trailer from mymovies.net is better as is Flash-based vs. streaming video on Real Player. The link from Film Unlimited will give you a bigger picture, as is not constrained by frames: http://www.mymovies.net/movie_st/alliance/relative_values/mid/frdefault.htm
~lafn #1617
Thanks Karen...the Q/A on the RV website is clever...Peter..."the harmless mischief-maker." He uses the "C" word a lot."..the crisis is borne out of snobbery....preserving the class system"."Peter is the mocking-voice ...time for a social change"...LOL I can see why the part appealed to the "lefty" side of him ;-) But sadly, IMO,I doubt it would appeal to a wide American audience. "C"-based plots are not v. compelling over here.But then, I am sure this was made solely for a British audience, and I'm sure they will respond.
~amw #1618
simpering on the sidelines...Oh dear and I was so looking forward to this and now I have to sit with my good friend, who is not a CF fan but liked P&P, but then who didn't, to watch Colin "simpering on the sidelines" and to think he went after this part...oh hum. I think Colin is due for a "hit" let us hope it will be BJD.
~mari #1619
Ann, enjoy yourself at the premiere tomorrow. Try not to let these early reviews rain on your parade: you're seeing Colin on the big screen AND as "the real thing!" We'll all be thinking of you and will look forward to your report, whether good, bad, or indifferent. (Bethan) One thing puzzles me...why hasn't RV secured a US release? That puzzles me too. I think Karen has said that Overseas Film Group were considering distributing it here themselves? I hope that's the reason, but I have my doubts. Frankly, bad reviews in the UK will not bode well for a theatrical release here. But, let's wait for the major reviews to come out. Plenty of time to panic later on.;-) Agree with you, Bethan, that The Patriot would not have been a good move; CF doesn't need to be portrayed as a one-dimensional "baddie." I had been looking forward to seeing this one, and still will, but the more I read of it the less enthused I am. It seems it will be a black-and-white-no-gray-areas type of story. I had hoped for a more realistic, balanced view reflecting the complexities of the actual conflict.
~lizbeth54 #1620
Ann, don't panic!! Who is this Allen Something guy anyway? Having seen a brief clip of RV, I'm positive that SF does *not* have a Cockney accent, and having read the original Noel Coward play, Peter does not "simper" (nor do I think he's particularly "campy")...he's sardonic and quizzical..and he's also a successful businessman (well, he runs a successful travel agency...but, hey, he does work for his living!). Reviews are always a mixed bag. There have been some 4 star reviews ! So just go there and enjoy...I'm sure it will be a great evening! BTW.."The Scotsman" gave RV a bad review. I read the other day that it's under new management, and is severely alienating its traditional Jean Brodie type readership. It apparently published an article on the Royal Family, with a so-called website link, which led directly to a hard porn site. Can't see RV fitting in with this new regime!:-)
~KarenR #1621
(Mari) It seems it will be a black-and-white-no-gray-areas type of story. I had hoped for a more realistic, balanced view reflecting the complexities of the actual conflict. Better to remember the old "Swamp Fox" we saw on the Wonderful World of Disney as kiddies, many eons ago. ;-) BTW, you have read that the real Francis Marion was not the hero we saw on that show and that's why they changed his name in this film. Agree, we need to see what the major newspapers say about RV. Unfortunatley, I had that same feeling about it being "dated" when I read it and was hoping they had rewritten those bits. Where does "dated" end and "atmospheric period piece" start?
~KarenR #1622
Hoorah!! Finally a review I don't have to apologize for in advance. This is from the Shadows on the Wall website (Rich Cline), who gave it 3-1/2 stars. Not too shabby: Based on Noel Coward's play, Relative Values is sunny, cheeky and bright... just like a screwball comedy from the period in which it's set, the early 1950s. Complete with a cheesy, bouncy musical score! As it highlights a collision between starry Hollywood and stiff-upper-lip England, it makes fun of (and warmly affirms) the British class system. Felicity, the Countess of Marshwood (Andrews), is quietly worried when her son Nigel, the Earl (Atterton), falls for a glamorous movie starlet Miranda Frayle (Tripplehorn), who has recently broken up with her leading man Don (Baldwin). But the big problem is that, on the day Nigel is bringing Miranda home to meet Mummy, Felicity's maid (Thompson) confesses that she's actually Miranda's sister. So Felicity, a cynical cousin (Firth) and the unflappable family butler (Fry) concoct a scheme to salvage some dignity from the situation. And all is going according to plan until Don shows up at the gates ... along with platoons of giggling Girl Guides and, of course, the paparazzi. Dry, witty dialog trickles out delightfully from start to finish, as the cast relishes each word and nuance, eyes sparkling and teeth flashing. While it all feels stilted and starchy, it also gets very funny as the farce cranks up. Fry steals the show completely with a terrifically droll performance--as only he can pull off (over and over again!). And Thompson gives another clever, subtle comic turn. Since Styles (Dreaming of Joseph Lees) directs the film exactly like a '50s romantic farce, it's an intriguing reminder of just how much film comedy has evolved from simple and unassuming (like this) to sharp, gimmicky and outrageous (like, say, There's Something About Mary). The result is a bit odd--enjoyable and entertaining, inducing smiles and knowing chuckles more than outright laughter.
~KarenR #1623
He's stirring again. Peter (Firth) and his aunt the Countess (Andrews) grin gleefully as things get more and more complicated at Marshwood.... Here's the review: http://www.users.zetnet.co.uk/rcline/swrelval.htm
~mari #1624
Way to go, Karen. Obviously Rich Cline has better taste than Allen Hunter.;-) The reviews so far seem all over the board for this one; will be interesting to see what the coming days bring. Thanks too for the RV site CF interview links. (Karen) Where does "dated" end and "atmospheric period piece" start? It's a good question; even that positive review seems to feel this one creaks a bit. Yet something like P&P remains true to its period while managing to feel utterly timeless and like a breath of fresh air. (Karen) BTW, you have read that the real Francis Marion was not the hero we saw on that show and that's why they changed his name in this film. Yep, and I don't have a problem with them fictionalizing real people (though the studio was stupid to say it was in any way based on the Swamp Fox in the first place--they knew months ago about this guy's yucko nature). I just think there are more interesting aspects of the War that few filmmakers have delved into. For example, the real Swamp Fox spent most of his time fighting not the British, but other colonists who wanted to remain loyal to the Crown (a very common sentiment among the average folk). Wealthy landowners and merchants drove the revolution because they had the most to gain. I'd like to see someone make a film about that internal conflict instead of the good guys/bad guys routine that so many war films stoop to. (I liked Clooney's The Three Kings very much for being an exception in that respect.)
~KarenR #1625
Ann kindly sent me that article from Heat magazine, which showed Renee Zellweger on location. (actually, the bigger hook to the article was Jim Carrey visiting the set) Have put them up on a new Bucket page: http://www.spring.net/karenr/mdbro/bjdloc.html (be grateful you don't have to look at me, Mari and Evelyn in front of all those places. *hee hee*)
~lafn #1626
WOW Karen....your 'BJD On Location' page is fantastic....No kidding....all the Bridget haunts...you got 'em all."192" folks, serves a superb lunch and the best Chardonnay in London. I think I took the Cafe Rouge picture...
~CherylB #1627
(Karen) Where does "dated" end and "atmospheric period piece" start? That sometimes is contingent to the particular reviewer. It's a judgement call. The best you can do is to find a critic/reviewer whose taste is closest to your own. (Mari) For example, the real Swamp Fox spent most of his time fighting not the British, but other colonists who wanted to remain loyal to the Crown (a very common sentiment among the average folk). It was approximately 2/3's of the population of the American Colonies that supported the British during the American Revolution. The objective of the film "The Patriot" is not explore American history, but to hopefully duplicate the success of "Braveheart" for Mel Gibson. "Braveheart" was a largely white-washed and historically inaccurate accout of William Wallace. The historical Wallace was far more complex and brutal than what came across in that by-the-numbers popcorn extraganza.
~mari #1628
Karen, I love your latest "drop" in the Bucket!:-) Makes me want to hum the theme from MisterRogers: "It's a beautiful day in the neighborhood. . . " (You should send your BJD Bucket URLs to the publicity lady, seriously.) (Evelyn) "192" folks, serves a superb lunch and the best Chardonnay in London. I'll second that. Great food, reasonably priced, good service. What a fun day day we had. Starting to think "reunion" again . . .:-)
~heide #1629
Darn, I was hoping Ann would be able to report. Was it too late for you dear? "Braveheart" was a largely white-washed and historically inaccurate accout of William Wallace. Well that was kind of obvious wasn't it? Still and all, it had Mel "The Midas Touch" Gibson so he can pretty much do as he pleases. Besides, he's still kinda cute. ;-) Karen, my compliments too on the BJD page. It's fun to just look at or read.
~Brown32 #1630
Thanks, everybody, for the news, and Karen, your Bridget On Location is wonderful. Nice to hear Colin's voice once again. I don't care what the critics say, I love drawing room comedy, and so does Colin. You can tell from the snippets that he is having great fun. What was going on behind him in the one interview? I expected him to get up and strangle the person back there! Ann, have a great time tomorrow night. Can't wait for the report.
~KarenR #1631
(Mari) Makes me want to hum the theme from MisterRogers: "It's a beautiful day in the neighborhood. . . " Don't laugh, but I almost called it Bridget's Neighborhood, but then I took off my cardigan ;-) Thank you, ladies. I've been planning it for a long time, just waiting for some fabulous pictures of frumpy woman coat to unveil. (Murph) What was going on behind him in the one interview? I expected him to get up and strangle the person back there! Think he was being heckled by Stephen Fry; it was all in good fun. Maybe we should check out the Stephen Fry interview to see if Colin was dancing around in the background or similar. ;-)
~SadieR #1632
Wow Karen, your BJD site is sure lookin'good! I too am thinking the BJD people should see this!
~KarenR #1633
Have posted v. long BBC press release about fall season's highlights on 127. No relevance to this topic unfortunately.
~mari #1634
Geez, there's stuff on that BBC schedule that hasn't even been filmed yet--but already they've got slots for it. Would love to know the real reason DQ has apparently been buried. Pending lawsuits, you think? Cheryl, I just posted a rather prickly Evening Standard article on Mel and The Patriot on 127 that you might be interested in.
~KarenR #1635
Pending lawsuits, you think? v. much doubt that. If it were the case, don't you think it would be big news? Besides, there have been jillions of movies, plays, books, etc., that have done the same thing. Notwithstanding the differences in our libel laws, I don't see how anyone (even Brian Souter) could sue or get an injunction against its broadcast.
~lizbeth54 #1636
I read your BBC Autumn schedule news, Karen, and felt sufficiently riled to have one last shot at getting information (I mean, we're getting another series of the absolutely appalling "Scarlet Pimpernel", and dramas as yet unfilmed have been slotted in. Words fail me!) Tried general info...they could give me nothing except "has not been scheduled yet". Absolutely no mention of 2001...where did that come from? Tried BBC Scotland again...Drama information. DQ is listed on the database (thanks!) but they have no schedule date confirmed."Maybe it's only going to be shown in Scotland" Finally, tried the BBC general switchboard, and asked for scheduling information. Nearly got transferred back to the uselss general info, but I insisted on speaking to someone in the Department of Broadcast Strategy and Channel Management (yes, there is one!). Was put through, and asked about DQ's scheduling and complained about "inconsistent" information. The person I spoke to was, I thought, rather curt. She said she'd go and check. She returned in less than a minute and said that DQ "had not been scheduled yet". I asked if it was possible to give some indication of season (Spring 2005?), but she just repeated, abruptly, that DQ "had not been scheduled". Positive thought ...they're saving it for Christmas, and the Battle of the Schedules. Negative thoughts...well, I did think "libel"...but it's just not hard-hitting enough, more of a quixotic fable. But I give up completely and on this one...Information unobtainable! On a happier note, our regional arts magazine (quite a serious mag) gives RV a very good review (and ridicules "The Next Best Thing"). Says RV is "great fun" and "transfers from stage to screen surprisingly well" "Marvellously performed by a classy cast who complement the material perfectly". Special praise for Sophie Thompson, JA and CF "cast against type as the campy nephew". So he *is* "campy"!
~mari #1637
Ok, we know he was there! From Excite UK: Sound of music set Dame Julie cast at ease Wednesday 21 June 2000 Top News� Dame Julie Andrews put awe-struck co-stars of her latest movie at ease by bursting into one of her best known songs, screen colleague Stephen Fry has disclosed. The actor, at the UK premiere of their film Relative Values, said the cast members were terrified of approaching the movie legend when they first arrived on set. However, Dame Julie broke the tension with a rousing chorus of the theme tune from the Sound of Music which prompted spontaneous applause. Fry said: "There was a bit of tension, not because she's a monster or anything but because mapped into our psyches - we'd seen Mary Poppins and the Sound of Music so many times. "We were sitting on a sofa wondering what we should call her, whether it was Miss Andrews, Julie or just Jules. She'd looked out of the window and started singing 'the Hills are Alive with the Sound of Music' - everybody just burst into applause." The actor, at the screening in London's Odeon West End cinema, added: "She seems quite embarrassed that so many people know her for the Sound of Music, but she doesn't realise the affection we have for it. It's etched into our childhoods." Dame Julie was also at the premiere for her first film in a decade. Explaining her long screen absence, she said: "I've been working on Broadway and I've been working on television and doing all sorts of bits and pieces. It just took that long - let's hope it doesn't take that long again." The 64 year-old star revealed she was quite nervous herself when she first arrived on set but her co-stars relaxed her. She said: "They felt like family within two hours. We laughed a lot and told endless stories and got on with each other so quickly." The film is based on the Noel Coward comedy about a well-to-do family whose lives are turned upside down by a marriage announcement. It also stars heart-throb actor Colin Firth, best known for his role as the dashing D'Arcy in the BBC drama Pride and Prejudice. He was also at the screening. The film opens nationwide on Friday.
~lizbeth54 #1638
There was an item on the 10pm Sky news about RV. Showed JA arriving at the Premiere, large crowds. Two clips from the movie, one with CF smiling next to JA. Interviews with JA and Eric Styles, the director. Also a shot inside the foyer, showing Stephen Fry talking to Edward Atterton, JA to one side talking to some other people. Commentator said that although the movie "also starred Wiilliam Baldwin and Srephen Fry" there was no doubt that the main attraction was JA. So wot about the Invisible Man then? We await your report, Ann!
~Brown32 #1639
While we wait for the real thing, I thought you all would enjoy this darling page. It is all thanks to Jennie, an FOF and dollhouse person. She is at the premiere with the others tonight. http://www.geocities.com/firthfan/dolls.html
~KJArt #1640
(Murph) What was going on behind him in the one interview? I expected him to get up and strangle the person back there! It would be appreciated for those of us without audio to get an approximation of the answers to questions. V. curious.
~heide #1641
Agree with KJ. Can someone transcribe please? Checking again on Ann. This time I got the date right. ;-)
~mari #1642
While we wait for word from Ann, here is a great review from the BBC: Director: Eric Styles Cast: Julie Andrews, William Baldwin, Edward Atterton, Sophie Thompson, Colin Firth, Stephen Fry Certificate: PG Opening Date: 23rd June 2000 Running Time: 89 mins No-one ever said that Julie Andrews didn't glow. Or didn't look utterly English. Even now, as she nudges 65, she seems - even when standing motionless - to have the jolliest kind of life going on inside her and to represent an England which barely exists any more. It is most fitting, then, that she is the comic cornerstone of No�l Coward's high-jinks frolic, a happy satire on English class set in the 50s. She is the Countess of Marshwood, a woman content with her status and class, but bright enough to see that social change is just over the hill. The Countess is mother to a decent idiot of a son (Edward Atterton), who has brought home a self-serving Hollywood film starlet (Jeanne Tripplehorn) who drools, if not over her fianc�, then certainly over the perks of his position. When the Countess's maid (Sophie Thompson) discovers she is the starlet's sister, the comedy of social mobility is about to explode. Which it does. Most amusingly indeed. Eric Styles (whose first film was "Dreaming of Joseph Lees") has kept Coward's play evenly balanced between satire and farce, and for every waspish line there is an outbreak of running around and door-slamming. Andrews savours every vowel as the kind of woman who appears to be nice even when being highly offensive, Colin Firth is increasingly hilarious as the cousin who has an objective view of the spiralling lunacy, Stephen Fry is predictably (but no less amusingly) cast as the urbane, intelligent butler, and Sophie Thompson has a grand old time feigning airs and graces. Fun in every frame.
~lizbeth54 #1643
The two clips that were shown on Sky were both funny...there's a lot going on...watch the facial expressions. The dialogue was new...not in the original.
~amw #1644
MAJOR DISAPPOINTMENT -,he was not at the Premiere, filming commmitments, filming running late, anyway according to JA when she was introduced she said that Colin had just popped his head in but had to return to filming. Everyone was so disappointed,we never saw him, I really think it is too bad, he could at least had come up to the stage and been introduced to the audience like the others. We kept waiting and waiting for his car to pull up but no sign so we had to go in the cinema and so I asked is Colin Firth suppossed to be here tonight and they said it looked likely that he would not be there as he was filming and it was running late. I ask you, how long has the Premiere been scheduled for and quite a few people had come quite a long way just to see Colin and it says quite clearly on the Invitation "in the Company of CF etc" I can't tell you how disappointed I was and still am, talk about the invivible man he certainly was invisible tonight. The members of the cast who did appear were JA, of course, S , Sophie Thompson, (the star of the film imo) and Edward Atterton. The film was fun but I am afraid I have to agree with the reviewer who said Colin Firth "simpered on the sidelines", he said very little which was not particularly witty and pulled silly faces, what a waste of his talents. He did not play "camp" very well but maybe that is a good thing. Can't wait for BJD and those smouldering looks once again, we didn't get one smouldering look unless you count the odd look he gave the William Baldwin character. What an anti-climax, the only good thing was meeting some new Firth friends. Am going to bed will write some more tomorrow but there really isn't much more!
~Moon #1645
I have to agree with the reviewer who said Colin Firth "simpered on the sidelines", he said very little which was not particularly witty and pulled silly faces, what a waste of his talents. He did not play "camp" very well but maybe that is a good thing. Oh, Ann! How much more can we endure? He better be brilliant in BJD. Thank you for attending.
~lafn #1646
Ann...thank you for being our rep. You're a brave gal for going all that way...and in the morning I bet the film will seem better.At least they all had fun making it. He might just have had a few minutes before re-takes on BJD. Some actors don't like to get out of character between takes on the same day.
~KarenR #1647
The Times review: In Coward's Relative Values Julie Andrews is every inch a star, says James Christopher Very superior mother Dear, darling Julie Andrews. To some she is the governess we never had. To others she is the nun whom Christopher Plummer had far too much. In Eric Styles's beautifully transposed version of Noel Coward's 1951 comedy, Relative Values, she blooms and blasts into the Mother Superior of leading ladies. The hair is slightly more orange than usual, the face is a blaze of freckles, and the bosom is far ampler than any of us would care to remember. As the doughty Countess of Marshwood, she is the picture of primness and poise. She has much to disapprove of, and a lot to reveal. Her dashing son, the Earl (Edward Atterton), has fallen for a Hollywood starlet. Worse, he's bringing her home to be his bride. We are never in any doubt about the seriousness of this country-house catastrophe. Jeanne Tripplehorn's pouting flake looks suspiciously older than Atterton's sixth-form earl. Her career is on the skids. Her famously sozzled former boyfriend (William Baldwin) arrives unannounced. Relatively speaking, she belongs downstairs - which is precisely where her long-forgotten and stunningly plain sister, Moxie (Sophie Thompson), has resided for 20 years. Social meltdown is on the cards. "If ever a girl needed her bottom smacking, she did," squeals Thompson with a perfect Sidcup accent. How Styles managed to leap from his first film, Dreaming of Joseph Lees (a ghastly piece of Northern grit), to this champagne charmer defies gravitas. Characters who struggle for oxygen on stage here compete to steal whole scenes. Stephen Fry is spookily perfect as one of life's natural butlers. Colin Firth, as Coward's acid-stripping alter-ego, has a way with one-liners that's almost indecent. But there's no mistaking the star and chief manipulator of this frivolous classic. Andrews could use a lot more steel, and a little less twinkle, when sticking the knife into the luckless Tripplehorn. Perhaps she simply hates the sight of blood.
~Moon #1648
Colin Firth, as Coward's acid-stripping alter-ego, has a way with one-liners that's almost indecent. Oh, God, yes! Somebody stop that man! ;-) Surprisingly, he did not rave about Sophie's performance which everyone has said is the best.
~KarenR #1649
Thanks, Ann, for reporting in after what was such a long and disappointing day. Perhaps, a little champagne beforehand or a glimpse of Mr. Invisible would've improved the evening. we didn't get one smouldering look unless you count the odd look he gave the William Baldwin character. I bet I know when this takes place. That scene *nailed* it for me. There was no doubt in my mind about Peter after that... ;-)
~lafn #1650
A "Champagne Charmer"....that's good news from the Times. *sigh of relief*. I hope they use that quote in the adverts. On second viewing Ann, I bet you'll see the merits of the film. (Karen)I bet I know when this takes place. That scene *nailed* it for me. Karen, your sixth sense is scary;-)I well remember your diagnosis of Peter's character early in the game. When everyone else was disagreeing with you... Right Again!
~mari #1651
From the Evening Standard; Karen, note the "confirmed bachelor" line;-) Relative Values (PG) Julie Andrews, Alec Baldwin, Jeanne Tripplehorn. Dir: Eric Styles. UK. 2000. 89mins. A comedy after Gordon Brown's heart. Noel Coward's comedy, in fact, written in 1951, about class distinctions in Wodehouse country. Seems the Earl of Marshwood (Edward Atterton) has gone and fallen for a Hollywood star, Miranda Frayle (Jeanne Tripplehorne). Panic at crenellated Marshwood Hall: his mother the Countess (Dame Julie Andrews) calls for aspirin on a silver salver. Even worse news is that Moxie (Sophie Thompson), her ladyship's maid, is revealed as Miranda's long-lost sister and the star herself was born in Sidcup. Surfacing in the troubled waters of British cinema: Relative Values, with Colin Firth and Julie Andrews Social equality is creeping up on class distinction, and must be frustrated. But Moxie won't accept instant promotion to being "secretary-companion". The butler Crestwell (Stephen Fry) has the solution: pretend Moxie has come into a fortune - money is the great leveller. Enter the lovers, fresh from France (with Le Monde in hand to prove it). But in hot, ingenuous pursuit is Miranda's co-star and ex-squeeze: famous, sleazy, cigarette-dangling Hollywood hick Don Lucas (William Baldwin). The countess schemes to break the engagement; Peter (Colin Firth), her confidant and "confirmed bachelor", lends aid and comfort; Moxie dithers in terror at her impersonation of the ruling class; Miranda flounces, flaunts and further disqualifies herself for county membership by insisting on a pre-dinner Hollywood-style dip in the pool; Crestwell steadies the boat with poly-syllabic smoothness of tongue; and Girl Guides muster in the shrubbery to gawp at the screen idols. The film was shot on the Isle of Man, presumably for tax-break reasons, and surfaces in the troubled waters of current British cinema, among the Lottery-funded wrecks, like the prehistoric coelacanth. One is sorry to see Eric Styles, whose debut film Dreaming of Joseph Lees showed such freshness, resurrecting the snob entertainment of the 1950s. But this said, it's competent, lightly enjoyable (in a mildly contemptuous way) and appeals to contemporary xenophobia by looking down its aristocratic nose at the Yanks. Coward had an understandable hit with it in an era when people still knew (and kept to) their respective places and the matinee-going class could chuckle self-flat-teringly at the very notion of Hollywood marrying into Debrett's, while seeing the family crisis end in time for church ("Everyone got change for the collection?"), just a Bentley's ride down the lane, where a nice girl called Caroline, clearly "one of us", catches the jilted young earl's eye. Class rules OK (for now).
~KarenR #1652
Evelyn: I see dead people too! ;-) ***************** Teletext's review of RV (3 of 5 stars = good) by Doug Cooper At 64, Julie Andrews is still indisputably a star. Her screen presence remains undimmed and her immaculate sophistication and beauty is as radiant as ever. It's great to see her back on the silver screen again and a pity that she's not done more over the years. Her performance is a pleasure to watch, holding together this light-hearted romp from Noel Coward's play. As the matriarch, Lady Felicity, she registers a warm, motherly love to virtually all the characters around her - a calm centre while everyone else gets to cut loose and frolic energetically. Her son (Edward Atterton) has become engaged to the Hollywood movie siren Miranda Frayle (Jeanne Tripplehorn), but a spanner is thrown into the works when her ex-beau, film icon Bud Lucas (William Baldwin) arrives on the scene to win back her heart. Also on hand is Colin Firth, very amusingly playing against type as the family cousin, Peter, and Sophie Thompson, giving an impeccable comic performance as the family maid. Keeping in the background, but making sure that decorum is maintained at all times is Stephen Fry, first-rate as the head butler. Only Atterton, in fact, lets the side down with a slightly colourless and one-note turn as the impetuous son. It's sugary entertainment, amiable but disposable. But let's leave all that aside and just be grateful to the film for bringing back a genuine legend in Dame Julie. She reminds you of a Hollywood from a bygone era. More innocent, more glamorous and more glorious.
~mari #1653
Capsule review from The Independent. 2 out of 5 stars Relative Values (PG) Director: Eric Styles Starring: Julie Andrews, Colin Firth, Stephen Fry It's rather curious that someone would want to film a No�l Coward play this way, in the kind of comforting production that TV used to do so well. It's a treat to see Julie Andrews back in the saddle, though a shame it's in this dated tale of a son bringing his bride-to-be home, only to discover she's the sister of the family maid. Silly premise, really. **
~KarenR #1654
(PG) Julie Andrews, Alec Baldwin, Jeanne Tripplehorn. Dir: Eric Styles. UK. 2000. 89mins. Mari: Actually, I noted that This is London has Alec in the credits! :-)
~lafn #1655
ES: ...appeals to contemporary xenophobia by looking down its aristocratic nose at the Yanks. ROTF...I'm so stupid...that went over my head!! (See,we're used to it, folks) ~~~~ Thanks Reporters...they're not awful.
~KarenR #1656
From the Northern Echo, review by Steve Pratt: Relative Values (PG) ** THIS adaptation of Noel Coward's comedy has a tendency to look too much like a filmed stage play but the top-notch cast and attractive locations ensure it's all jolly good fun in a TV drama sort of way. The cast do their utmost to invest the piece with the necessary wit and style led by Julie Andrews, making her return to the silver screen, as a countess whose joy at the news of her son's engagement is tempered when she discovers the identity of his fiancee. For the Earl of Marshwood (Atterton) has popped the question to quite unsuitable glamorous Hollywood actress Miranda Frayle (Tripplehorn) who's been getting romantic with her screen lover Don Lucas (Baldwin). Matters are complicated when the Countess's personal maid Moxie (Thompson) reveals she's actually Miranda's long-lost sister. Then add a camp nephew (Firth, relishing the chance to abandon his wet shirt Mr D'Arcy image in favour of limp-wristed bitching) and a sardonic butler (Fry at his most urbane). Put them all together for the weekend at a country estate and you have far too much plot and too many characters for a picture running a shade under an hour-and-a-half. Still, it's good to see Andrews again even if she doesn't burst into a chorus of "The hills are alive". Thompson is superb as the mousey maid forced to pretend to be a society woman while Tripplehorn and Baldwin seize the chance to gently send up tempermental Tinseltown types. ********** Also a bit in a Financial Times article that sarcastically critiques the summer movies in the form of a lecture: Well, class, there are just two more English-speaking movies this week and perhaps they're a little better. Relative Values, set in the 1950s, stars Julie Andrews, Colin Firth, William Baldwin, Jeanne Tripplehorn and Sophie Thompson in a film of the Noel Coward stage comedy. A lady with an ancestral pile wants to keep her son and heir from marrying a film star. Not great, but a certain polish?" "Oh no, sir. I couldn't agree less. For me, a mirthless mid-Atlantic mishmash." "Ancestral piles, sir!" "Scary Poppins, sir!" "Sir, on the subject of eternal recurrence I didn't understand if all that jolly music and loud apricot colouring in the visuals were a parodic pastiche of film styles of the period or just their own form of naffness." "You are cruel but possibly just. I must, however, commend the performance of Stephen Fry as the butler, an actor who knows how to use words like 'cognizance' and 'tinctured' and make them count in mixed vernacular company.
~lizbeth54 #1657
The Times has a quarter page ad for RV and also brief oneliners about each movie. You can appreciate how good a review is when you see other reviews. For RV, it's "JA in a fabulous Coward", for "Chill Factor" it's "thrilling as frozen chips", Deception (aka Reindeer Games) gets "overplotted thriller" and Next Best Thing gets "feeble drama" and a lousy review. RV is not the kind of movie that the Independent would like. The FT interview is too clever by half!
~mari #1658
Ann, I meant to say thanks for the report. Maybe the film will improve for you on a second viewing, or maybe it won't, but I do appreciate your candor, dear. So disappointing that CF didn't show up; I can imagine your frustration. Darn. (Karen)Actually, I noted that This is London has Alec in the credits! :-) Like I told ya before. . .they're all one Baldwin.;-) (Karen, quoting) Then add a camp nephew (Firth, relishing the chance to abandon his wet shirt Mr D'Arcy image in favour of limp-wristed bitching) "Camp" seems to be the watchword for this performance. My question: If P&P brought us the "wet-shirted Darcy," does RV bring us the camp-shirted Peter?;-) (Evelyn)(See,we're used to it, folks) Hey Evelyn, if you lend me your star-spangled hairshirt, I'll let you borrow my red-white-and-blue "Kick Me" sign. ;-) Hee hee . . .
~Moon #1659
Hey Evelyn, if you lend me your star-spangled hairshirt, I'll let you borrow my red-white-and-blue "Kick Me" sign. ;-) Hee hee . . . LOL! My question: If P&P brought us the "wet-shirted Darcy," does RV bring us the camp-shirted Peter?;-) And they both fit! Thanks for the reviews, Karen and Mari. I just hope it will still be playing when I am in London.
~KarenR #1660
(Mari) does RV bring us the camp-shirted Peter?;-) *reaching for my bottle of Glass Plus* LOL!! Since all the reviewers are commenting on the openly gay character Colin plays, it is very different from the play, as written and performed in the early 1950s. The character is not overtly gay. He doesn't prance around, limp-wristed or otherwise. We are viewing the playing through our present-day eyes, in which the character can be what was only hinted at in the '50s. In Act III, when Peter is talking to Don Lucas (and where I think that smouldering look might be), it seemed to be a private joke of Cowards that would sail over the heads of the 1950s audience. Don Lucas says something about "how there's only one Pete to me" [which is what Miranda and Don call each other] and Peter says "I'm sure it's very charming of you to say so." Didn't I tell you guys that I would've cast Harvey Fierstein in the role? ;-)
~lizbeth54 #1661
Ann, thanks for your report! I can appreciate that you would feel v.disappointed that Colin didn't show, but filming isn't always predictable. If they're filming to a tight schedule and if they had to finish a particular shoot in a particular booked location by a particular time, he'd have no option but to stay. Time is money, especially in Central London. I wonder if Livia had kitted herself out in her best frock, and then got a phone call from hubbie saying "sorry,darling...!" :-)
~mari #1662
Thanks to Anne R., 2 more capsule reviews, one good, one bad: From The Birmingham Post: Relative Values: Never mind the plot contrivances, look at the frocks. Julie Andrews makes a triumphant return as an aristocratic matriarch whose son wants to make an unsuitable match with an actress. Colin Firth, Sophie Thompson and Stephen Fry all help to bolster up this impeccably dressed adaptation of a Noel Coward play. From the Sunday Herald: The same ["the film has a certain charm"] cannot be said for Relative Values, a completely unmemorable adaptation of the play by Noel Coward. A well-preserved Julie Andrews gives a strong showing but there is little else to recommend this flabby picture save an unintentionally hilarious attempt by Colin Firth to be CAMP. ***** (CAPS mine;-)
~KarenR #1663
The Noel Coward Society's website: http://www.noelcoward.net/html/filmrelativevalues.html has a review from the webpage author; also mentions that Colin did attend the party afterward. (wonder if that is true) This is the first feature film of a No�l Coward script for over 50 years. The new Theatrical Companion to Coward (see separate offer!) tells us that the last major Coward film was Blithe Spirit in 1945. Since then there have been some remakes for television, but nothing like a major nationwide release. The event benefitted the Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children and Fashion Acts. Dame Julie Andrews (who plays Felicity, Countess of Marshwood), William Baldwin (Don Lucas), Stephen Fry (Crestwell) Colin Firth (The Honourable Peter Ingleton), Edward Atterton (Nigel, Earl of Marshwood), the Director Eric Styles and Producer Chris Milburn were were all at the film and the premiere party. The film is on nationwide release from the Friday 23rd June. The film's web site is www.relative-values.com. Review of the Film - an immediate reaction from the web author after viewing the film. Let me say at the outset that this is a wonderful and expertly crafted film. I watched it with an audience of some 50 people from the press, media and the general public. It was extremely well-received by all. The film is set in the 1950s and evokes much of the feel of that decade - even the film stock has the colour quality of films of the period. The performance of each member of the cast is superb! Julie Andrews is faultless as Felicity and exhibits the all-knowing assuredness that we hoped the upper classes might have possessed! As The Tatler puts it "She is the witty, sensible but stylish matriarch, the Countess of Marshwood, faintly disapproving of her son and heir's imminent marriage to a Hollywood starlet. It is a magnificent piece of casting .." Colin Firth playing Felicity's nephew, Peter, is a wonderful foil for her in her more michievious moments in the film and is a genuinely funny character from start to finish. Sophie Thompson must plead guilty to almost stealing the film. Her performance, in what is a pivotal role in the plot, is comic acting at its finest with both pathos and humour. Stephen Fry, as his accent and demeanour switch when moving from upstairs to downstairs, is the trustworthy butler who wins respect by his understanding of his betters, their weaknesses and foibles and by his kindly but firm management of the staff - and his special relationship with Moxie. I must say a word for Alice played by Anwen Carlisle one of those essential character roles that lie at the heart of the best of British comedy films. From shots of her, 'out of control', dogwalking to an enraptured expression reserved for the stars of the silver screen she is wonderful! Jeanne Tripplehorn, William Baldwin and Edward Atterton as the love triangle, one working-class 'made-it', one laid back American 'has-it' and one up-tight aristocratic British 'got-it' - play off each other with great comedic skill and brilliance. For the Coward purists - the play is there - and at times the text is largely untouched. The exciting thing is that in enlarging the play, to make the film, nothing is lost and a lot has been gained. The underlying structure of the three act play is there but much has been added to give context and richness to the plot and the action. Essentially the film feels right, in period and is very Coward! Eric Styles has done a wonderful job in directing a comedic film of considerable weight within a limited budget, with, one has to say, excellent actors. This film should be the surprise hit of the year. It is a 'must see' film! ********** (he might have gone bit too OTT) ;-)
~KarenR #1664
You know, Mari, I prefer being called a "camp follower" than a cult member any day, but I fear we'd have to hang out at King's Cross ;-)
~KJArt #1665
LOL!! I'd follow that particular "camp" anywhere! Anybody with audio willing to transcribe the interviews?? Please?
~Allison2 #1666
(Bethan), but filming isn't always predictable I am sorry to be cynical but I don't buy this reason. Don't forget it was his wedding anniversary. I do really hope it was not for that reason he cried off. It would not surprise me however. I think he is rather too good at putting his private life before his career which is all very fine but you can't expect to *drink the coffee* that way. And why should the rest of us worry when he doesn't? I am feeling for Ann on this. She should complain!! He has known about this premier for weeks. They could have let him go for the evening. I think it was an excuse.
~lafn #1667
They could have let him go for the evening. I think it was an excuse. Didn't RZ attend the premiere of "Me , Myself and Irene" last Friday day night in LA? ~~~~~~ I am feeling for Ann on this. She should complain!! Show 'em...ask for your money back;-)
~Arami #1668
I'm afraid I tend to share that suspicion.
~amw #1669
Thanks Ladies for your sympathy, it was a disappointment but I guess we will never know the true story. According to Liza' Timeline, Colin turned up at the cinema, after we had taken our seats, chatted to the reporters outside before returning to the BJD set and actually made it to the Party later. To think we paid 25pounds for the privilege of "not" seeing him,when we could have stayed by the barriers for nothing and seen him. (now then Ann!!) Oh hum.
~KarenR #1670
The Guardian's Peter Bradshaw: Eric Styles made a distinctive debut with his first film, Dreaming of Joseph Lees, a gloomy, Hardyesque tragedy. Now he has exhumed No�l Coward's Relative Values, a brittle comedy which is not of the Master's first rank. In attempting to dissolve its theatrical boundaries, the adaptation smudges the clarity and unity of the stage settings and in any case ends up becalmed in the various rooms of "Marshwood Hall". There is much tinkling laughter and people in black tie saying lines like: "Everything is quite, quite ghastly!" Julie Andrews is a regal presence as the Countess of Marshwood - though her hair and deportment suggest modern California rather than pinched, 50s Britain. She resents her son's engagement to Miranda(Jeanne Tripplehorn), an American movie star being pursued by another Yank, Billy Baldwin. It's the kind of accomplished cast that would pack them in at, say, London's Theatre Royal, Haymarket. But on the screen everything looks too creaky - including the reactionary view that Brits and Americans should know their respective stations in life. That said, there is a droll turn from Stephen Fry as the butler and an outstandingly funny, sympathetic performance from Sophie Thompson as Moxie the maid. ******************** And then Imogen Tilden's from Film Unlimited: A relative success Although its theatrical origins are all too evident, this is a light and witty adaption, says Imogen Tilden It is almost 50 years since Coward wrote his play, but Eric Styles is the first to bring it to the cinema screen. This is no coincidence. Coward, the master of mannered comedy is one of the stage's undisputed greats, but directors have shied away from transposing his sparkling, stylised and theatrical prose to film. Last year, the centenary of his birth, eight Coward adaptations were reported to be in production; this is the first to see the light of day. Eric Styles's directorial debut was the humourless and tragic Dreaming of Joseph Lees, and you could be forgiven for approaching his second film with caution. Styles has again teamed again with producer Christopher Milburn, but there the similarities end. Relative Values is a tightly paced and very funny film with barely a second wasted. Set in the early 50s in a postwar Britain still riddled with class snobbery, the plot is simple. The Earl of Marshwood becomes engaged to glamorous Hollywood actress Miranda Frayle (Jeanne Tripplehorn), and takes her home to meet mummy (Julie Andrews), who is less than happy about the prospect of an actress as the future Lady of the manor. When Moxie, Lady Marshwood's personal maid (Sophie Thompson) reveals the actress is in fact Moxie's sister who ran off to Hollywood 20 years previously, it becomes clear that the marriage cannot go ahead. Miranda is also being pursued by her on- and off-screen former lover, the rakish Don Lucas (William Baldwin), who has realised she is the only woman for him. Lady Marshwood, of course, knows what is really best for all concerned, and takes matters into her own hands. The opening montage of film-reel news and newspaper clippings establishes the characters, setting and mood very effectively, and it is with something of a clunk that we move to Marshwood House. But the pace soon picks up again, and an enjoyable story unfolds. The bright technicolour sets give a nostalgic 50s feel, and although the small budget is sometimes painfully evident - 'London airport' looks like something left over from Carry On Abroad - it seems small-minded to carp about it. There are some delightful touches and amusing moments, many provided by the American actors, William Baldwin and Jeanne Tripplehorn, who send themselves up particularly well. In fact the entire cast is impressive. Colin Firth does an extraordinary turn as Lady Marshwood's mischievous nephew, clearly enjoying himself enormously, Firth's role is reputed to have be on Coward: he just stops short of holding his wrist limply and lisping. Various comic understairs characters add to the familiar landscape of English farce (Stephen Fry does his best sub-Jeeves impression). It is Sophie Thompson (Emma's younger sister) who steals the show. As Moxie, Lady Marshwood's personal maid, hers is the pivotal role. She maintains the delicate balance between outright farce and Coward's subtle comedy of manners, while managing to convey a complex and anguish character. If, like me, you can't watch Julie Andrews on screen without expecting her to break into 'My favourite things', it will be a delicious shock to see her playing a character more akin to Lady Bracknell than Mary Poppins. Andrews is majestic and she glides through each scene with the hint of a smug smile on her lips, managing to get everyone dispatched "in time for church", and resisting the temptation to tip her character into broad caricature. But when all's said and done, this is a film of a play, and its theatrical origins give it at best the feel of a television drama. The cast are a little too smug, and some of the dialogue could have been more rigorously edited - many of the asides sound overly theatrical. Styles directs with a light touch. He did well to remember Coward's maxim: "Comedies of manners swiftly become obsolete when there are no longer any manners", and keeps the emphasis firmly on the manners. But this comes at the expense of the darker undertones of Coward's script: and Julie Andrews could have done with a bit more steel and a bit less sparkle as she sticks the knife in the back of her son's fiancee. Still, any film that features Colin Firth delivering the line: "There are two girl guides in the shrubbery dear" with barely a smirk must be worth a look.
~lizbeth54 #1671
Lisa's posted at her website (Timeline) that he arrived late and chatted to reporters outside the theatre, and then rushed back to finish some shots for BJD. And later attended a post-screening reception at the National Portrait Gallery. (Who is the source of all this information? :-)) Sounds as though he tried ....if he didn't want to go, there was no point in turning up late. Sounds more disorganised than anything else! :-)
~Arami #1672
I'm afraid I tend to share that suspicion.
~KarenR #1673
And Film Unlimited also has an interview with Julie Andrews to view and the transcript is provided here: http://www.filmunlimited.co.uk/Feature_Story/interview/0,5365,335262,00.html Or watch interview here: http://www.silicon.com/Guardian/guardian_julie_andrews.htm Sorry to hear the latest, Ann. You couldn't have known and it does sound like he really could not get out of work. BTW, Ev, Renee Z was not at any of the Me Myself and Irene stuff I don't think. Everything on TV had been recorded long ago. KJ: We will get Colin's answers transcribed. Have no fear. Just rather buried at present. ;-)
~lafn #1674
(Karen)BTW, Ev, Renee Z was not at any of the Me Myself and Irene stuff I don't think. Everything on TV had been recorded long ago. I just saw her on ET the other night and they spoke about the premiere...so I thought....But if you say so, boss:-) Arami....your computer is stuck on the same posting ;-))
~amw #1675
The invisible man syndrome again - have just watched Film 2000 Interview with JA and film clips, no mention of CF and no clip, recorded Screentime on at the same time on ITV, of the cast of 7, six names mentioned guess who was missing! Oh well, I guess it is better to be ignored that be told you look "70". I shall be seeing RV again on Saturday in a better frame of mind, and feel sure I will like it more.
~lizbeth54 #1676
Yes, it's "funny" how they manage to miss his name...too much of a coincidence! Hope you're cheering up, Ann. Something must have seriously delayed him on the BJD set, otherwise there was absolutely no point in turning up late. On the name thing, RV is (miracle upon miracle!) showing in our local Showcase, and the ad just says "Julie Andrews and Colin Firth" in RV. You win some, lose some! BTW, on CF's movies...probably nothing will ever match the impact of P&P. Nowadays, I think it's an achievement for British actors just to appear regularly in reasonably okay stuff. Very few do!
~CherylB #1677
Thanks to everyone who posted articles and reviews from various and sundry sources. Another thank you to Mari for posting "The Patriot" article at Odds and Ends.
~Arami #1678
Arami....your computer is stuck on the same posting ;-)) I'm afraid I tend to share that suspicion... ;-)
~Brown32 #1679
One of the women who attended the gala after the premiere has posted a great report at FOF. I have asked permission to put the whole on my site, and when she says OK, I will point all there. A brief summary: Colin arrived late, was dropped off in a Jag in front of the Odeon at the very last minute. Did not appear on stage as was said. I think it was at that point that he had to go do the BJD filming, because he came a bit late to the gala at the National Portrait Gallery. Livia was there, looking gorgeous, and Colin's mother, being very nice and attentive to people. Julie was also gracious and lovely to all. CF had a great time talking. At one point he and Rushdie were deep in conversation. They appeared to exchange addresses. Colin was fooling around too, grabbing some guy's coat and darting back to the group he was in, giggling like mad. It seems they knew one another and had a great laugh. His group left late, as the FOF was leaving.
~Brown32 #1680
Oh yes, and this is how he looked: His hair was great and he did have Darcyesque sideburns. He was wearing a dark blue suit, with a white shirt (or very pale blue) with a silvery tie. He was thinner again, but quite dazzling, all smiles and delight!
~mari #1681
Review from the Telegraph (had to pick up the last sentence of the previous review or it wouldn't make sense): But make no mistake - this is Midler's film and it's a pretty good one. So too is Relative Values, despite Julie Andrews being the least aristocratic English countess you can possibly imagine. Thirty-five years on from Mary Poppins and The Sound of Music, she still exudes a niceness that, if not at odds with No�l Coward's original satire about Britain's post-war class system, certainly undermines it. Put just about any other actress of the right vintage in the part of the Countess of Marshwood and you would have a very different film. Then again, I don't suppose the plot would make any more sense. Ah yes, the plot. A wonderful set of 1950s opening graphics quickly brings us up to date with the fact that the young Earl of Marshwood (son of the the widowed Countess) has rocked genteel society by becoming engaged to an American film actress, Miranda Frayle (Jeanne Tripplehorn). This, as far as his mother is concerned, is wearisome but livable-with - until she discovers that her son's fianc�e is actually the sister of her devoted personal maid, Moxie (Sophie Thompson). Then it gets really complicated - not because that makes Miranda working-class but (and here I really begin to struggle), because her elevation to countess would humiliate her hard-working, ever-so-'umble sister. The solution, dreamt up by the Countess's ever-so-resourceful butler (an on-form Stephen Fry) is to pretend that Moxie has suddenly become a wealthy heiress and make her a house-guest rather than a servant. This, of course, doesn't make it all right, but I'll leave it to you to find out why. Frankly, this is one of those films that becomes less satisfactory the more you think about it. So I think the sensible thing is to stop thinking about it and just enjoy the view. Andrews remains an attractive presence on screen, and she receives diverting support from Colin Firth, whose unlikely performance as her CAMP, cravat-wearing nephew lies in that delicate area between beautifully understated and possibly not very good. Given that he is occasionally ill-served by Eric Styles's otherwise confident direction, I think we will incline toward the former.
~MarkG #1682
Flier for RV found under the windscreen wiper of a car in my street: shows the film poster on one side, and 4 small pics + quotes + free-glass-of-wine-with-this-leaflet-at-Chez-Gerard offer on the back. Never seen a film ad under a windscreen wiper in this area before.
~aishling #1683
2/5 rating from Daily Mail Julie Andrews sails through the latest British costume comedy RV, like some stately galleon, but something should have been done about her outfits, which make her look like Margaret Dumont in the Marx Brothers pictures. RV is probably the most creakiest and snobbish of Noel Coward's social comedies and although the film is set less than 50 years ago, its characters seem to come from another planet. Can we really care whether the Earl of Marshwood is going to marry Hollywood star Miranda Frayle and thereby lower the tone of he aristocracy? Tripplehorn and William Baldwin, as her former boyfriend, can do little that's funny as a couple of caricature Hollywood actors. Colin Firth, hilariously miscast in the Noel Coward role, flounces around the edge of the plot with an entertaining impersonation of John Inman (Oh bliss! he gasps as some new disaster unfolds. 'Histrionics!'). This is a pretty awful performance, but I have a sneaking admiration for Firth's courage. I just hope he doesn't run into Peter Tatchell on a dark night. The best thing in the movie is Sophie Thompson, funny and sad as the frumpy sister who can expose Miranda as a fraud. RV is never less than amiable, but you end up wondering why director Eric Styles bothered to make the film. It looks like an old-fashioned stage play, insufficiently rewritten for the cinema. Small picture of CF and JA. He looks mischievious. Possibly a clip from the film. I'm looking forward to seeing the film this weekend.
~Allison2 #1684
Lisa's posted at her website (Timeline) that he arrived late and chatted to reporters outside the theatre, and then rushed back to finish some shots for BJD. And later attended a post-screening reception at the National Portrait Gallery All is forgiven. He was there with Livia and his mum. Ahhhh.
~KarenR #1685
Never seen a film ad under a windscreen wiper in this area before. Wish they'd do that here...and a free glass of wine. What an idea! What a hideous review, Aishling. The Daily Mail person really has something stuck up his posterior. Margaret Dumont?! Colin flouncing? Is he a joke or what. (that isn't a question)
~mari #1686
From The Mirror: Best bet of this week's releases is Relative Values - an hour and a half of light-hearted, slightly dated but agreeable whimsy. It's England in the 1950s and the countess Felicity (Julie Andrews) is not too pleased that her son intends marrying American film star Miranda (Jeanne Tripplehorn). But her plans to avoid scandal by passing Miranda off as a rich spinster go awry when her future daughter-in-law turns out to be the sister of her maid Moxie (Sophie Thompson). So Miranda's arrival causes a stir both upstairs and downstairs. Adapted from a Noel Coward play, Relative Values is entertaining, well acted and funny. Sophie Thompson is outstanding as Moxie, and the rest of the film saunters along amiably. Still, it's hard to get worked up about the social stigma attached to an upper-class twit marrying a movie star and, although Relative Values is enjoyable, I wouldn't want to sit through it again.
~mari #1687
Here's the Time Out review (thanks to FoF Martine). _____________________ Relative Values Director Eric Styles follows 'Dreaming of Joseph Lees' with another 1950s British setting and, more broadly, another depiction of the complications of romance and marriage. In this case, the marriage in question is that of the Earl of Marshwood (Edward Atterton), a young, highly eligible English gentleman expected to marry within his own class. His announcement, therefore, that he plans to wed Hollywood starlet Miranda Frayle (Jeanne Tripplehorn) is met with some consternation. His doting mother, the Countess (Julie Andrews), ia hastily advised by friends not to allow her little corner of England to be sullied; her persoanl maid Moxie (Sophie Thompson) reveals that she's Miranda long-lost sister and terrified lest their disparate personal circumstances be made plain; and the staffof Marshwood Hall are dizzy with excitement at the prospect of meeting a famous Hollywood actress. Near-hysteria builds further when hot on the heels of the happy couple comes Don Lucas ( William Bladwin), a big-shot actorand Miranda's former lover who wants her back. Based on Noel Coward's satire of the classist society of post-war Britain, Styles' film is undemanding, but possesses funny moments and contemporary relevance. The casting is appropriate: Thompson and Stephen Fry (as the droll, urbane butler) in particular demonstrate the precision and wit of Coward's language, Atterton has the requisite classic English looks and is afforded the funniest lines ('We just say riding in England, the horseback's taken for granted'), while Tripplehorn captures the capriciousness of a stereotypical Hollywood star. Unfortunately, however, the hidden depth of compassion of Coward's play only occasionally surfaces - it seems to have been lost in the effort to keep things light - and we're left with something of little substance, sporadically amusing, but fleeting and flimsy. Katy Wilkinson
~EileenG #1688
(Telegraph review) Andrews remains an attractive presence on screen, and she receives diverting support from Colin Firth, whose unlikely performance as her CAMP, cravat-wearing nephew lies in that delicate area between beautifully understated and possibly not very good. Given that he is occasionally ill-served by Eric Styles's otherwise confident direction, I think we will incline toward the former. (Mari, I assume the caps were yours). Uh-oh, I don't know if I like this. Sometimes CF is a little too understated for his own good (IMOIMOIMVHO). About half the critics loved the movie/his performance while the other half hated it and/or him. Talked about mixed reviews...don't think this bodes well for our ever seeing RV on the big screen here in the states :-( (Yet we liked MLSF better, so who knows.)
~lizbeth54 #1689
Mixed but predictable...you almost know which reviewer is going to like it/him/dislike it/him. Apparently Alexander Walker of the ES (who liked MLSF very much) praises RV as "Witty and clever" whereas the Daily Express reviewer (who dismissed MLSF as a boring waste of space) doesn't even bother to review RV. The Daily Mail reviewer is the same one who said in no uncertain terms that CF was miscast as Edward in MLSF.
~amw #1690
Was it Christopher Tookey, Bethan, only he gave CF a glowing review for Fever Pitch. Incidentally RV is playing at two cinemas in Brighton!!! and I forgot to mention that I recorded GMT yesterday morning just in case they had something on the Premiere, no Premiere news but a televsision advert for Relative Values, when was the last time I saw a television advet for a CF film probably SIL and they said there was no money for advertising and distribution, must have found some somewhere. Actually I have been thinking about the film and he is quite cute in it and obviously having a great time so what the heck. I am glad I am seeing it again tomorrow.
~Lizza #1691
Just returned from a local evening showing of RV, just 12 of us in the cinema! I have to admit to enjoying it, end of week relaxation etc I can't remember a time when ODB 's dimples have been more pronounced, gorgeous! He's not John Inman. that's for sure and the part's too big to be considered as "simpering on the sidelines" etc I have to say that the cravat is as big a mistake as his TOTS suit, not v. authentic, but he got a lot of laughs from the audience. For me, it was pure pleasure just to focus on his expressions. His eyes were sparkling and his dimples in evidence, I can't say that i really took everything else in too much. What a shame, will have to go again, just to focus on the plot, now that's hardship for you. Sorry to hear about your experiences Ann. Hope you enjoy your experience more tomorrow. It has been quite a day...... This morning Helen Fielding mentioned Colin quite clearly before anyone else in her C4 interview and was delighted with what she had seen on set this week. Must dash to check out Karen's site and all the other goodies you put up. Thanks everyone for the links.
~lizbeth54 #1692
http://www.amazon.co.uk have the soundtrack to "Relative values" available at �11.99...music and dialogue from the movie. Congrats on being so quick off the mark, Lizza! RV is showing in one cinema here, but the biggest and best. Hope to go Sunday, or mid-week latest! I slammed a tape in when the RV item came up on SkyNews, so have a few megaseconds of CF to study. Looks young and cute. No cravat. Light grey suit, waistcoat, white shirt and grey tie, Tres elegant. Is smirking, but I've no problem with that! Re. the reviews. Compared with the US, our reviewers are generally less enthusiastic, less generous and can be very cutting. 2 stars is very okay (1 star/no star is common) If you want b-a-d reviews you should read some of the comments on Madonna and Rupert. And Donald Sutherland in the West End theatre!
~KarenR #1693
Here's the full [bad] review from The Independent: YOU CAN practically smell the mildew on Relative Values, a stiff adaptation of a Noel Coward play that sets Hollywood and high society on a collision course. It centres upon an inappropriate love match: a titled twit falls for a leading American actress and announces their engagement, much to the chagrin of his mother Lady Marshwood (Julie Andrews) and her maid Moxie (Sophie Thompson), who unbeknown to all is the estranged sister of the Hollywood star. Meanwhile, Lady Marshwood's raffish nephew (Colin Firth) and butler (Stephen Fry) orchestrate a plot to foil the nuptials and direct the "jumped-up colonial floozy" back into the arms of her leading man (William Baldwin). That the piece is dated wouldn't matter so much if there were some pizzazz in the writing and staging, but director Eric Styles and writers Paul Rattigan and Michael Walker haven't provided the oil to stop it creaking. I can't imagine Coward's original exactly popped like champagne, but on film it's about as enticing as flat Lucozade. Left high and dry by the adapters, the cast flail madly, retreating into mannerism or, in Colin Firth's case, cutting a faintly ridiculous dash as the gay blade. The one person who emerges from it all with dignity intact is Andrews; she manages to waltz through the drawing-room twitter with something very like aplomb.
~KarenR #1694
Also, an interview with Sophie Thompson from The Birmingham Post, where she mentions Colin from Tumbledown time. INTERVIEW: SOPHIE, AN ACTOR IN WAITING: STAR OF RELATIVE VALUES SOPHIE THOMPSON, SISTER OF EMMA, TELLS ALISON JONES OF WEIGHTIER THINGS ON HER MIND. 23-Jun-2000 Sophie Thompson has been considering her career options lately. The lulls between jobs that are part of most actors' careers have prompted her to consider what else she could turn her creative talents to. 'I'm quite good at gluing things and cutting up,' proffered the devoted mum of three year old Ernie. 'In my darkest hours I do wonder what else I could do rather than sitting around waiting for other people to give me work.' 'My husband and sister both write but I don't have that kind of natural urge. I don't believe the saying that everyone has a book in them, I reckon I've only got a pamphlet.' For the moment Sophie, who is married to actor Richard Lumsden, has weightier matters on her mind, namely that she is six-and-a-half months pregnant with their second child. It will be the latest addition to a theatrical family dynasty that could soon rival the Redgraves. Apart from Ernie, Sophie's big sister Emma Thompson and her partner Greg Wise are the proud parents of baby Gaia. Proud grandmother Phyllida Law lives in the same street as her two daughters and is conveniently on call for baby-sitting duties. 'I'm getting quite big now. I'm over the morning sickness but I'm feeling a bit slow and lumpen,' admitted Sophie, who is 37. 'Ernie's getting quite excited. He rather likes the idea of having someone to show off to.' If the blooming mother-to-be feels the need to refresh her memory about what her toes look like, she can slip along to the cinema where, thanks to the time lapse that occurs between the making and release of a film , she is her usual trim self in Relative Values. Adapted from Noel Coward's play, it is a rather strained comedy of manners about an aristocratic family who are mortified by the scion of the estate's plan to marry a movie star. Adding to the potential for public scandal is the revelation by her Ladyship's personal maid Moxie (Sophie Thompson) that the actress (Jeanne Tripplehorn) is in fact her estranged sister. Though they are ill-served by the script, there is some sterling work from Sophie, Stephen Fry as the butler and Colin Firth as a camp cousin, attempting to wring laughs from the situation. 'What I found lovely about the part was I actually got the chance to work with everyone,' said Sophie. 'Very often in movies you never actually meet some of your co-stars. 'For example I knew Colin because I shot a small scene for a brilliant film he did about the Falklands called Tumbledown. I met him on set but I had never acted opposite him. 'Stephen Fry was in Footlights at Cambridge with my sister Emma. I used to hand him his outfits and props backstage when they appeared at the Edinburgh Festival.' Relative Values does enjoy a certain curiosity value in that it boasts a rare screen appearance by Julie Andrews, who is in stately form as the blue blooded matriarch. 'She is just amazing,' enthused Sophie. 'She is the most professional person you are ever likely to work with. She was practically born in a trunk so she has got incredible stamina and poise. 'She doesn't play the grande dame at all. It was the same with Meryl Streep who I worked with on Dancing at Lughnasa. At first you feel like you already know them but you get over that quite fast. Then you just feel like you are working with someone brilliant.' The newly Damed Julie is clearly conscious of the reputation that precedes her. While gazing at the view from the window of the stately home where they were filming she broke the ice by bursting into a quick chorus of 'the hills are alive'. 'We practically wept with laughter when she did it,' recalled Sophie. 'She is very comfy with all of that and she has still got a cracking voice, even though I know she has had trouble with it.' American actor William Baldwin rounded out the cast as Jeanne's jilted movie star ex. 'They settled in quite nicely once they had got their computers set up and could start sending e-mails. 'I think they were the most home sick and I really felt for them. Billy flew a couple of times because his wife was having a baby and Jeanne's chap came over.' The role of Moxie is a rare lead for Sophie, who usually specialises in scene stealing character parts. She was hilarious as the second bride in Four Weddings and a Funeral who memorably enjoyed a mid-reception bonk with her husband, unaware that Hugh Grant was cringing in a cupboard nearby. And she was particularly touching as the twittering spinster who was crushed by a careless remark from Gwyneth Paltrow in Emma. Her ability to transform herself for each role means that, unlike her sister, she can take part in hugely successful projects yet retain a degree of anonymity. 'I've never wanted people to stop me in the street. I would love it if you could look completely different when acting but you never quite do. 'It is very pleasing to think your face can do different things, however, it would be nice to be able to put it down and walk away from it like a musician can with an instrument. As an actor once people recognise you they develop expectations because of the parts you've played 'Of course I have seen what Emma has gone through with the press on her doorstep and naturally I've been supportive. I said 'Don't darken our doorway again woman, you're coming nowhere near our home,'' she said going off into peels of laughter. Despite the glittering prizes Emma has received as an academic and an actress, she remains genuinely proud rather than envious of her success. Sophie herself has won a prestigious Olivier award for her performance on stage in the Sondheim musical Into The Woods. 'I think we are all pretty good about not being jealous - the thing is acting is not a sport. People don't go into it to win medals like they do in the Olympics, so I always think that is a funny attitude to have. Anyway we are all so different as actresses that I don't think it would occur to us to compete.'
~Tracy #1695
A couple more reviews: Excerpt from this week�s GAT magazine: (On The Next Best Thing) The scene at the graveside of a gay friend who has succumbed to AIDs is truly appalling in its schmaltziness and even the intervention of two of the most evil queens this side of Sleeping beauty cannot save the enterprise from being a dud�. Talking of queens, everybody�s favourite Mr Darcy, Colin Firth, gets a bit camp himself in Relative Values, the big screen reworking of N�el Coward�s play. Julie Andrews is the upper class mum whose son decides to marry a very unsuitable Hollywood actress (Jeanne Tripplehorn). Just hoe unsuitable becomes apparent when she turns up at the family�s country seat with her ex-lover and fellow film star (William Baldwin) in tow. Lots of skeletons in different closets come out, mostly revealed by the maid (Sophie Thompson) and everybody has a jolly good time screaming and shouting. Firth bitches it up a storm as the Countess�s nephew and Stephen Fry does a nice job as the butler in this rather old fashioned but charming comedy. ************************************************ From Metro 23/6/2000 Real Lack Of Class � Fiona Morrow There are grande-dames and period costumes from both Britain and America this week, as Julie Andrews and Bette Midler play matriarchs, albeit from different sides of the track. Andrews is predictably, unremarkably okay as the upper-crust Countess of Marshwood in Eric Styles� version of Noel Coward�s Relative values, a flabby production that functions largely as an exercise in comic mistiming. The examination of class and manners may be ever pertinent, but Styles does nothing to bring things up to date. Edward Atherton plays Andrews� son, determined to marry a Hollywood star (Jeanne Tripplehorn) whose pedigree turns out to be even deeper below stairs than everyone imagined. Credit goes to Stephen Fry's kindly, super-articulate butler,the deliciously camp Colin Firth and the game Sophie Thompson for trying to inject life into the proceedings though the same can�t be said for William Baldwin, as Tripplehorn�s real love, who kills every scene he�s in. ***** Not the greatest reviews ever, but at least CF comes off relatively unscathed!
~lizbeth54 #1696
RV is showing in 4 theatres (all major cities) in the NE and NW, so there's no way it can feature in the box office Top Ten! I'm just pleased it has been released......believe me that's a major achievement for an "English" film without obvious "yoof" appeal. Even JA's iconic status doesn't seem to count for much with some reviewers. "The Sound of..what?" "Mary Who?" The examination of class and manners may be ever pertinent, but Styles does nothing to bring things up to date. Why should he? This is a 1950s period comedy, not a socially-relevant docu-drama set in Docklands in the new millenium. The "Independent"..hmmm. I seem to recall that it was the Independent reviewer who praised Ben Elton (screenwriter of "Maybe Baby", which has done well at the Box Office) for "skillfully blending jokes on masturbation, dog shit and lesbianism". I was eating at the time I read this...quite put me off! Tastes obviously differ!
~Renata #1697
I'm really looking forward to seeing RV, though it will take some time until it gets here. There may be some bad reviews, but the majority of reviewers obviously enjoyed it. BTW, my twinwave email address doesn't work today (?). If necessary please use threedeers@yahoo.com, thanks.
~Brown32 #1698
Thanks all for the RV reviews, good and bad. Someone found a link to an official Londinium Site. I think this is new. Same pictures Karen has: http://sunlightproductions.com/Londinium/stills.html
~Arami #1699
From the interview with Sophie Thompson: Her ability to transform herself for each role means that, unlike her sister, she can take part in hugely successful projects yet retain a degree of anonymity. 'I've never wanted people to stop me in the street. I would love it if you could look completely different when acting but you never quite do. 'It is very pleasing to think your face can do different things, however, it would be nice to be able to put it down and walk away from it like a musician can with an instrument. As an actor once people recognise you they develop expectations because of the parts you've played ' Sounds familiar... :-)
~Moon #1700
Thank you ladies for posting all those reviews. I am looking forward to seeing Colin camp it up. I hope it will still be playing in July.
~KarenR #1701
According to a list I pulled last night, RV is playing at 80 theaters in the UK, probably not enough to make a dent in the box office charts. If anyone is curious, I can post it. Thanks, Tracy, for the new reviews. Am wondering how some people can write that Colin is underplaying the role and some how he is having great fun CAMPING it up.
~KarenR #1702
Interview with Colin at Film Unlimited today: Firth goes forth With a non-romantic role in Noel Coward's Relative Values, followed by Bridget Jones' Diary, Colin Firth is playing against his "dashing" screen persona Steve Rose Saturday June 24, 2000 He's still best known as TV heart-throb Mr Darcy in the BBC's 1995 dramatisation of Pride And Prejudice, but Colin Firth's cinema work has been equally impressive. From his debut with Rupert Everett in Another Country, he's developed into a reliable character actor in features such as The English Patient and Shakespeare In Love (he also plays Shakespeare himself in the Millennium Dome's Blackadder film), mixing in more contemporary films such as Nick Hornby's Fever Pitch. In the current Noel Coward adaptation, Relative Values, he plays the foppish cousin of lady of the manor Julie Andrews. Was the prospect of working with Julie Andrews daunting? There's no question she has legendary status. But she was a wonderful team leader in an old-fashioned sort of way. You know, rallying the troops and keeping spirits high, reminding us to keep our backs straight. The film addresses Anglo-American tensions and differences. Were there any on set? It's funny, I do find that American actors tend to be irrationally in awe of English actors and the whole English tradition. And we envy American actors for their ease in front of the camera. I think, certainly in the press, there's a sort of self-loathing for our own cinema at the moment, but that's not how it's perceived abroad. The Americans all perceive us to be highly trained and to have this theatrical discipline, some sort of substance which they lack, which I don't think is really true to be honest. So generally there's no tension. If anything, there's a tremendous mutual respect, probably slightly baseless. You're in the middle of Bridget Jones' Diary. Is it refreshing not to be doing a costume drama? Everything's a costume drama really. It's all an artificial world you're creating, and in some ways it feels far more artificial trying to re-create the present day. It's very odd, you get bogged down in far more difficult detail when you do modern stuff than when you're doing period. If you're playing Mr Darcy [in Pride And Prejudice] you just say he'd wear one of those sorts of frocks and it would probably be blue, whereas with the modern stuff you really get caught up in some tricky decisions - what kind of trainers would he wear, etc. The audience knows what the reference points are. You, Colin Firth, actually feature as Bridget Jones' fantasy in the book. Does that make things complicated? No, thankfully they've dispensed with all references to me in the film. You did actually meet Helen Fielding, though, didn't you? Yes, the interview she does in the second book, I was part of the contrivance. It was a sort of performed conversation we had, which was very funny. I don't know how conscious she was, but she sort of went into "Bridget" mode, which was rather different from her. Does that mean you had to go into Colin mode? Well I did a bit. I tried to be a bit more serious, and less patient. There are also rumours that you're going to play Tony Blair. This often happens: I read what I'm going to do in the papers, but no one's told me about it. Did you entertain the prospect for a while? Well, it depends, it's very hard for those things to work when they are so contemporary. It's better to wait 10 years or so to get a perspective on it, but by that time I'll be old enough to do the Enoch Powell story or something.
~KarenR #1703
BTW, Film Unlimited summarizes the ratings of RV as follows: The Times (9/10) Evening Standard (6/10) Daily Mail (4/10) Mirror (8/10) Daily Telegraph (8/10) Guardian (6/10) Independent (5/10)
~SusanMC #1704
You, Colin Firth, actually feature as Bridget Jones' fantasy in the book. Does that make things complicated? No, thankfully they've dispensed with all references to me in the film. Darn! Leaving that stuff in would make the film much funnier.
~KarenR #1705
This is especially for us non-UKers, who may not realize how sarcastic that last remark of Colin's was because we don't know about Enoch Powell. Here's a news article from 1998, when he died: Mr Powell was one of the most controversial British politicians of his generation and a powerful orator. His opposition to black immigration thrust him into the headlines in the late nineteen-sixties. In one of his most famous and controversial speeches he warned that unchecked immigration could lead to violence in British cities, and that rivers of blood would flow as a result. In the national outcry that followed, the Conservative Party leader Edward Heath denounced Mr Powell as a racist and sacked him from the shadow cabinet.
~amw #1706
Ladies, I have seen RV for the second time and in a better frame of mind and I have to say "it improves upon acquaintance". Colin seems to be having a great time so what the heck and today the audience responded to all his one-liners. So please disregard my previous comments, I think you will all enjoy it, it is fun. Aishling enjoyed it and it seemed so did the 40-50 audience. My only complaint and that of several others, was the the background music was too loud and one missed one or two of the one-liners, which was a shame. Yes it was fun.
~lizbeth54 #1707
That's really good news, Ann! I'm looking forward to seeing it! According to a list I pulled last night, RV is playing at 80 theaters in the UK, probably not enough to make a dent in the box office charts. (Karen) Must be showing at far more venues in the south, than way up north! IMHO it doesn't really matter whether it shows in the charts or not (needs about 200 theatres to do this), but what's important is that it has registered as a movie. It featured on the national news, and there have been lots of interviews and articles. So many films just come and go (sadly, MLSF was one), and the names just don't make any impact. Next week, we get "Chicken Run" and the week after, "Mission Impossible 2"....there's such a rapid turnover that most films are instantly forgotten. Thanks for the Film Unlimited interview, Karen! He makes (as always) some good points. I don't give up on the Man who would be PM (aka Tony Blair) project though...CF said same thing about Mark Darcy. His comment about "perspective" is valid though, but if it's a satirical drama, it has to be contemporary. A lot depends on the screenplay. Our political scene is really hotting up, and the script could be very controversial!
~KarenR #1708
Great to hear that you've seen RV in a new light and that you and Aishling both enjoyed it. Must be showing at far more venues in the south, than way up north! You can check out the locations here and sort them out if you can. Seems to be a true UK listing, as has Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland included. http://www.spring.net/karenr/cinemalstings.txt
~heide #1709
Agree, Susan. I hope that doesn't mean the Pride & Prejudice references will also be removed. The abridged audiotape I have of BJD virtually wiped out all P&P/Colin Firth references, showing that it's possible to do it though highly undesirable IMO. ;-) There are also rumours that you're going to play Tony Blair. This often happens: I read what I'm going to do in the papers, but no one's told me about it. LOL! Sound familiar? Suspiciously like what he was saying before he was cast as Mark. Nice find, Karen.
~KarenR #1710
Well, Cosmo trashed RV. Gave it one star in the Sunday Times: Golly gosh! A No�l Coward country-house "comedy" of manners, in which the master pokes fun at the English class system. It's all about this ghastly American movie star called Miranda Frayle (Jeanne Tripplehorn) who is planning to marry Nigel, the Earl of Marshwood (Edward Atterton). When everyone at the Marshwood estate hears the news about the earl and his "jumped-up colonial floozy", they get into a frightful tizzy � despite all their talk about the barriers of class being irrelevant. But when the long-serving and ever-faithful maidservant, Moxie (Sophie Thompson), tells her mistress, the Dowager Countess of Marshwood (Julie Andrews), that Miranda is her long-lost sister, a comic conspiracy against the engaged couple starts to unfold. This trite piece of snooty, leftover whimsy has the clipped rat-tat-tat dialogue of vintage Coward, but not one really witty line or memorable character. With Stephen Fry as the Jeeves-like butler, and Colin Firth as the wise-cracking fop who simpers and smirks on the sidelines, it has a kind of formulaic fatuousness you find in "classy" Brit comedies. CL
~lafn #1711
Thank you Karen and everybody for the reviews of RV.Glad they're mentioning Colin in the comments. I will enjoy it too when we see it...TV or screen..makes not difference.Though for me it will probably be video.No chance of Noel Coward making it to mid-America. Never mind, if it doesn't get a theatrical release, we'll get it faster on video;-) Glad RV was better the second time around, Ann. (See, you should have given MLSF a second try:-) Sorry, I just had to get that one in ;-)
~lizbeth54 #1712
Well, I'm off to see RV today with my mother (she enjoyed MLSF!). I don't think it will appeal to my DH and/or sons. and even if my mother doesn't enjoy it, she won't complain! There'a a smashing pic of CF at the RV Premiere (or possibly reception)at http://www.noelcoward.net/home.html Must be in MD mode as he's hot from the set. Plus an account of the Premiere....Ann, you'll find this interesting, if you haven't already seen it. One thing that strikes me is that the Noel Coward webmaster, who must be a very keen and knowledgeable fan, gives RV an excellent review, whereas several of our newspaper reviewers complain about "lack of social relevance" (yawn!) and how this version of RV has ignored Coward's biting satire and just concentrated on the "fun" element. Call me dim, but I never thought NC was a biting saririst..I thought he wrote primarily to entertain.
~ommin #1713
Yes so did I. I have seen most of the plays by Noel Coward and am convinced they were written for entertainment value only. He certainly did not try to educate that wasn't his idea. Just to entertain. I am looking forward to this with some anticipation if it ever reaches Oz.
~Tracy #1714
Thank goodness for the multiplex! Looking at my local paper and the list referred to by Karen, it appears that RV is showing in all the major venues around me so this time I'll get to see one of his films while it's actually on general release ;-D Unfortunately the cinema in my home town is of the 1.5 screen variety (the half being barely larger than my lounge at home) and so with "bigger" films out at the moment it's unlikely RV will show in the short term..if at all! Anyway am now in preparation mode for the screening, goosebumps at the ready -check, sticky tape (for repair purposes in case I ROLTLMAO) - check, photographic memory to aid report back to Spring - check.
~KarenR #1715
WOW!!! Thanks, Bethan, for finding this. Does he ever look fabulous! And nothing to criticize from the "collar contingent" ;-) Of course, Mark Darcy would dress impeccably (except when wearing Christmas presents).
~patas #1716
(Karen, quoting)With a non-romantic role in Noel Coward's Relative Values, followed by Bridget Jones' Diary, Colin Firth is playing against his "dashing" screen persona Wot? Not dashing as Mark Darcy? Is he gonna keep the dreadful sweater all through the movie then? ;-) with the modern stuff you really get caught up in some tricky decisions - what kind of trainers would he wear, etc. Trainers? Please let him *not* make the decisions here!;-) No, thankfully they've dispensed with all references to me in the film. Oh no! :-( Does that mean you had to go into Colin mode? Well I did a bit. I tried to be a bit more serious, and less patient. :-) We all know how patient he really is, and are grateful for it... by that time I'll be old enough to do the Enoch Powell story or something. Is this the notorious Fear of Forty?;-) Karen, as a non-UKer, thanks for explaining about Enoch Powell. And Bethan, for the noelcoward.net link.
~KarenR #1717
Check out the short trailer at the BBC site. It seems to be of better quality and especially check out Colin's little dipsy move in shaking hands with Billy Baldwin. *running screaming from the room* http://www.bbc.co.uk/movies/whatson/relative_values.shtml
~Moon #1718
Thanks, Bethan and Karen. Lovely,MD! And he is finally wearing a white shirt! (Gi), Trainers? Please let him *not* make the decisions here!;-) LOL! We know him too well. ;-)
~lafn #1719
And nothing to criticize from the "collar contingent" ;-) I approve. At least it's not black ..and a tie! Must have been in honor of Noel Coward. (karen)...Colin's little dipsy move in shaking hands with Billy Baldwin. *running screaming from the room* LMAO. Oh Karen, I'm running right behind you. For sure we won't have to set up a topic "Peter Drool" He could not have picked a role further from Mr. Darcy:-( However, he could be the next pin-up boy for a gay magazine....now there's a target audience we hadn't thought of....
~Arami #1720
Haven't we? But he has been acknowledged as a (minor?) gay icon for long enough. I'm sure it has been mentioned here before. Meanwhile I have the UK Sunday Express before me. Two pieces with Colin... A not so good review of RV (though in a "Best of the rest" column) and an intrusive gossipy piece (that will make the tongues wag again! ;-D) with a new pose from an old series of ODB and Wife resplendent in evening garb. She's in a red dress (with black pattern, so it's not Baftas, but very similar). Small and bad quality, might not scan well. Anyone going to copy them here or must I...? (My scanner is dodgy.) ;-)
~lafn #1721
(Arami)But he has been acknowledged as a (minor?) gay icon for long enough. I'm sure it has been mentioned here before. I never heard that before...I was only joking... (Arami)....an intrusive gossipy piece (that will make the tongues wag again! ;- Don't leave us hanging, Arami. Pray tell what is the gossipy piece .
~Arami #1722
I never heard that before... You don't know/don't remember the "kiss of the burly stagehand" episode??? Seems I'll have to type the story etc. next. Patience...
~Arami #1723
Sunday Express (UK), June 25, 2000 "Soundtrack" By Henry Fitzherbert and James O'Brien [a showbiz gossip page] Birth of a new Firth? Colin Firth's gorgeous Italian wife Livia Guiggioli [*] told us of her yearning for a baby at the premiere of Relative Values, the Noel Coward adaptation in which Firth, as an exceedingly camp aristocrat, looks incapable of fathering anything. "I'm desperately trying to become pregnant," explained documentary-maker Livia, who married Firth three years ago after meeting on the set of the BBC's Nostromo, where she was a production assistant [**]. "I'd love nothing better than to have a baby with Colin and he'd love that, too. He's a natural with kids. It would also be a diversion for him from work." Firth, meanwhile, who has a son from his marriage [***] to actress Meg Tilly, was struck by deja vu at the party in London's National Portrait Gallery. Referring to his role in the Bridget Jones movie, he said: "I've spent the past three days doing exactly that - standing around in an art gallery, sipping fake wine and talking platitudes." [end] =================================================== [*] sic! [**] sic!! [***] sic!!! (my comments - A., always trying to do my f...ing research.)
~Moon #1724
Thanks, Arami! Colin in that tux with the skinny bowtie we have seen before, the hair gives it away too. Karen thought it was taken at Cannes last year. Do you still think so Karen? "I'm desperately trying to become pregnant," Why would she say this to a gossip reporter? This is very private and Italians are very superstitious, it doesn't sound right. It would also be a diversion for him from work." Wot? Sick of his guitar playing already? ;-)
~Arami #1725
Must have been something they slipped in her drink...;-) It all sounds very suspiciously un-Firthy to me. Quite likely one of those things which get passed round the social circles with bits added or distorted, and are best politely ignored - though perhaps not wholly dismissed... And why should she talk about "desperately trying to become pregnant" to a couple of young male upstarts at a publicity bash? Unless she's rather more cosmopolitan than Italian and not so superstitious... and perhaps she knows them well from somewhere else. But even so, it still doesn't sound right somehow... "Desperately trying..." hm... Doesn't that suggest images of a certain nature, too...? ;-D
~KarenR #1726
Why do I find it hard to believe that Livia discussed this with two tabloid reporters??? BTW, that IS the same tux as in Cannes, but Livia's dress I recall being different. Will have to check the tape again. But his hair is the same. ;-)
~lafn #1727
Thanks for the pic, Arami.She looks gorgeous. IMO the reporters' comments are sick. Trash.I'd be ashamed to attach my name to that copy. ~~~~~~~~~ You don't know/don't remember the "kiss of the burly stagehand" episode??? Missed it somehow....(you can put it up on Springfolk if you think it's more apropos there)
~Renata #1728
I join the chorus, and say it doesn't ring true. Heavens, what kind of paper is that?! This is just a taste of what happens if somebody gets into that tabloid/paparazzi hell. To all webmistresses: please, don't put this "news" up, or it will confirm this breed of ********* [expletive for journalists] that this is the kind of articles we want to read. Hope I don't sound too theatrical
~aishling #1729
As Ann said, I really enjoyed RV. The film is light and airy and a bit of nonsense but moved long quickly enough. I loved the way Colin portrayed his character. He was very mischievious and stirred up the other characters whenever the opportunity arose. As we have all witnessed before, his facial expressions reveal a lot and his gestures are great. I found his campness hilarious and not over the top. As the man himself said, he wanted that part and it looked like he had a terrific time. The other 50 or so people in the cinema laughed along with him. He was dressed very smartly throughout the film with only one casual outfit which would have looked better had he not been sporting a polka-dot kerchief. He was smoking in a few scenes. Lots of smiles but I can only recall one hint of a toothy one. ST was excellent as was SF. The sound in the cinema was very loud and there are noisy scenes as well, so we couldn't actually hear all the one liners. I shall go and watch it again at my local cinema.
~sprin5 #1730
I saw part of a Colin Firth / Rupert Everett movie last night, they must have in their 20s when this was made and they were boys at a well to do private school. Does anyone know the movie I'm referring to?
~amw #1731
Another Country?
~Brown32 #1732
I have the picture Bethan found and the article on the gala by the FOF (with her kind permission) here: http://www.geocities.com/firthfan/values/rvreviews.html That gossip thing is so poorly done, and full of inaccuracies. I too wonder if Livia really said all that to those reporters. Maybe they overheard her speaking to someone else.
~carrieg #1733
Colin Firth did say in a recent interview (in response to a question of he and Livia having children ) "It'll happnen" Unless that was a fabrication as well. I do wonder at the report of seeing CF and Livia at the premiere when I have heard that he was nowhere to be seen.(Just mentioned by JA)
~carrieg #1734
Sorry , I missed the page at An Appreciation...Very nice to be able to read this. I really doubt that she would have mentioned it at all.( Livia re trying to have a baby) The topic and the comments credited to her sound like the sound very much like some of the sleazier gossip 'publications' here in the USA. It may be that they picked up on the 'It'll happen .' comment that was in one of the recent publications from the UK. Cannot remember offhand which one.
~patas #1735
(Arami)It all sounds very suspiciously un-Firthy to me. Same here. That thing about "standing around in an art gallery, sipping fake wine and talking platitudes" is too rude, don't you think?
~Arami #1736
Colin Firth did say in a recent interview (in response to a question of he and Livia having children ) "It'll happnen" Yes - that comment made me think that they may have been experiencing some delays/difficulties in that area, but why would they talk about it publicly? Except, of course, we don't really know how talkative Livia really is... That thing about "standing around in an art gallery, sipping fake wine and talking platitudes" is too rude, don't you think? Ummm... it's a kind of thing Colin would say and not realize it may be taken as rude. He sometimes talks incoherently... E.g. the short interview snippets on Relative Values website... sorry, but they made me cringe... :-( (But I'm still mad about the boy, nevertheless...) Talking about RV - I must confess that I've just seen it...I've seen it... But please, don't ask any questions yet - I'm still thinking... :-( No, it's not Colin, he's all right - as gay men go... - but the film generally seems rather weak. It's basically a jolly little romp made for Julie. Not the best of Coward's plays, imo, and the director wasn't clever enough to improve it. A great pity.
~fitzwd #1737
"standing around in an art gallery, sipping fake wine and talking platitudes" I assumed that he was talking about filming a scene, not real life. But since I haven't seen/read RV or BJD, I may have assumed wrong :-)
~mari #1738
(Murph) Maybe they overheard her speaking to someone else. My thoughts exactly. (Arami) Ummm... it's a kind of thing Colin would say and not realize it may be taken as rude. Agreed. Flippant and wry . . .and sort of funny actually.:-) So, Arami, I take it that RV is *not an artistic achievement,* IYHO?;-) Love the premiere pic, Bethan--good find.
~Allison2 #1739
(Murph) Maybe they overheard her speaking to someone else. Perhaps talking to a heavily pregnant Sophie Thompson?
~lizbeth54 #1740
First of all, I saw RV at the weekend, in a modern 20 screen mulltiplex, about 60 to 70 in the audience (small theatre, almost full). I was actually quite laid back about it all, thinking "Hey, it's just a movie, and there are going to be others coming along" instead of "when is he going to give that Oscar winning performance in a lead role." I also reminded myself that he is an actor who obviously wants/needs to do different things, even though I do prefer him in the serious, restrained dramatic roles! So, in this very positive frame of mind, I saw...and enjoyed it. It's good gentle fun, in a rather old-fashioned sort of way (nothing wrong with that). It moves along at a good pace, and the cast, especially ST, SF and CF, are obviously enjoying themselves. I thought the audience liked it...people stayed on throughout the credits! CF wasn't overly camp...more facetious..and certainly wasn't John Inman-ish. The screenplay isn't the same as the original, obviously, but quite a lot of the dialogue is preserved intact. Would definitely have no appeal to anyone who likes the Adam Sadler (?). Jim Carrey, more outrageous Ben Elton stuff, which a lot of reviewers admire. (Murph) Maybe they overheard her speaking to someone else. Perhaps talking to a heavily pregnant Sophie Thompson? (Allison) This was a rather nasty tabloid piece. The juxtaposition of the comments about CF playing a character who looked "incapable of fathering anything", the fact that that they've been married 3 years, and that L "desperately" wants a baby is, I'm sure, deliberate. CF's comment on just having filmed something similar sounds genuine to me and may be correct reporting. As to Livia's "alleged" remarks, I think Allison's observation may be correct..perhaps the reporters are embellishing on an overheard private comment. It could also be expected that C & L may now be trying for a family, and our intrusive press are going to pick up on this...if they can't report that a couple are splitting up, they have to find some other marital issue to write about. And the tabloids have the power to damage people and cause pain.
~Arami #1741
(Mari) I take it that RV is *not an artistic achievement,* IYHO?;-) It depends. Compared with SLOW, it is certainly much more artistic - but on the other hand, SLOW is much more cinematic, if you see what I mean. As a frustrated (I prefer this description to "failed"...;-)) filmmaker myself, I prefer my films more filmic, so to speak. (Bethan) It's good gentle fun, in a rather old-fashioned sort of way (nothing wrong with that). It moves along at a good pace, and the cast, especially ST, SF and CF, are obviously enjoying themselves. Yes, my impressions were very similar. But I thought it was too static and confined - more like a filmed theatrical performance - and lacked cinematic vision. The directing was routine and uninspired, the camera work was rather indifferent, the lighting was amateurish in places (e.g. in one scene Colin's face kept disappearing in the shadow of Wm. Baldwin's head!). Admittedly, there were some brilliant and funny touches (e.g. a repeated sight of a lone figure dragged across the screen by dogs on an early morning walk - a classic!), but much too few and far between. I appreciate they had financial problems (again!) but I still think it could have been a much better film.
~amw #1742
Review for RV at Variety.com, says Colin was miscast and looked uncomfortable.
~lizbeth54 #1743
IMHO he wasn't and didn't! I've read the same about him in MLSF and SLOW. I think he's typecast, not miscast. People expect to see him in a certain kind of role (the reserved, brooding, very serious type). If he does something different (grins, fools around) he's "miscast". But I can half see where they're coming from (to quote a phrase). The first time I saw him singing "Yes we have no bananas" in TEP I had to look away because I was embarrassed for him. It took time for me to get used to this scene!
~Moon #1744
(Arami), But I thought it was too static and confined - more like a filmed theatrical performance - and lacked cinematic vision. That is a basic problem when you turn a play into a film. Can you think of any play that turned really filmic when filmed? The directing was routine and uninspired, the camera work was rather indifferent, the lighting was amateurish in places (e.g. in one scene Colin's face kept disappearing in the shadow of Wm. Baldwin's head!). I thought I was the only one who picked up on these things. ;-) That thing about "standing around in an art gallery, sipping fake wine and talking platitudes" is too rude, don't you think? Ummm... it's a kind of thing Colin would say and not realize it may be taken as rude. Agreed! But I do not think he talked platitudes with Salman Rushdie. ;-)
~KarenR #1745
Here's the link to the Variety review: http://www.variety.com/body.asp?HbkId=13094960&CatId=REV&ReviewID=1117787469 (review) By trying to create a full-scale comedy of confusion, they're hampered at every turn by the fact that Coward's play is almost plotless, relying on the felicities of its dialogue, rather than physical farce, for effect. Plotless? While motivated by class issues, it's not much different than "Lady for a Day," which was remade into "Pocketful of Miracles." (Moon) Can you think of any play that turned really filmic when filmed? Aside from musicals? ;-) Actually, lots. Think of all the great playwrights from Tennessee Williams to Arthur Miller, etc. Their plays have all been adapted with great success.
~mari #1746
Here's The Observer's review. Not much better than most, but at least he blames it on the director.;-) Relative Values Peter Preston Sunday June 25, 2000 I say, old man... wizard idea. Why not film No�l Coward's Relative Values 46 years late in the Isle of Man, so we get all our tax breaks and stuff? Then we could afford a couple of lesser Hollywood luminaries (say, Jeanne Tripplehorn and the stunningly non-charismatic William Baldwin) to pretend to be the brightest lights of their day. And Stephen Fry to do his sub-Jeeves butler bit. And... and Julie Andrews as the Countess of Marshwood. Bound to be a smash, what? Well no, because this wizened saga of the British class system is too long ago and far away from any modern experience; because Coward's control of plot and characters is hopelessly diffused among the mugging and smirking; and because Eric Styles, on this showing, can't direct actors for toffee. Colin Firth is camply impaled as Peter, fount of sardonic witticisms. Sophie Thompson's Moxie, the upwardly mobile maid, twitters desperately. It's all jolly embarrassing, especially for an increasingly formidable Dame Julie, the only human reference point around. I kept hoping she'd burst into song.
~lizbeth54 #1747
Re. the Observer review....very sarcastic and oh, so "clever". I don't appreciate this kind of review. No wonder Brit movies just die. The earlier reviews were much better!!
~mari #1748
Time for Colin to take a different tack? A bold stroke of some sort, though I'm not sure what it would be. BJD seems like a good move and will get lots of attention, but beyond that . . . The last really good reviews Colin has had were for 3DOR. MLSF, SLOW, and now RV are just not the type of thing that the critics and general public are going for these days. That's three strikes in a row. I'm not suggesting he pander to the lowest common denominator, but I think it's time to concentrate *strictly* on projects with more "edge," to employ an overused term. 3DOR had it in spades and that worked out wonderfully for him. DQ had it to an extent, but God knows why they're sitting on it. Just rambling here . . . any thoughts?
~fitzwd #1749
(Mari) Just rambling here . . . any thoughts? Mari, you're right about the "edge." I think he went againt "typecast" in his Wessex role too, and I thought he was marvelous. I'm still a bit stymied as to why that role didn't lead to some meatier parts. Ramble ramble :-) Time for a "heavy" role. I don't believe in the miscast thing for him, as I think he has the talent to pull off a variety of characters. Other actors don't have that range. But then, I liked his greasy Michael in Playmaker :-) I think he needs to search out the meaty roles, where he can be unattractive, unlikable. I'm with Evelyn (hee hee) and would love to see him gain a wider reputation on the stage. And if he can't get the roles he wants, then I suggest he leave England and go where he can get them. Hey, it worked for Clint Eastwood :-)
~Moon #1750
(Moon) Can you think of any play that turned really filmic when filmed? (Karen),Aside from musicals? ;-) Ca va sans dire. Actually, lots. Think of all the great playwrights from Tennessee Williams to Arthur Miller, etc. Their plays have all been adapted with great success. You left out IMO, Karen. ;-) My opinion tends to the opposite view. One thing is for a play to be adapted to film and become a success another thing is for a play to become really filmic once it becomes a film.
~Moon #1751
~Moon #1752
Sorry about the double post. Italics have been closed.
~lizbeth54 #1753
The Guardian gives RV 2 stars, which may not sound great, but they're very picky and don't even bother to rate a lot of films. "Gladiator" and "Sweet and Lowdown" get 3stars, "Next best thing" 1 star. The only 4 stars is "Boys don't Cry." Running the gauntlet of our reviewers is not a pleasant experience! I think most of them are more interested in how they write (the bon mot, the devastating critique) than what they write! Interesting article in the Guardian about how the UK rates only 30th in terms of importance for movie distribution...a "backwater" where there's not much interest in going to the movies and non-mainstream films don't stand a chance. True! (And our critics don't help!) Success in the US is all-important (half the world's market) for film-makers and actors! As to what CF should do next...that's a really difficult one (and might get us back to that TV versus Movie debate!)
~Arami #1754
(Mari) MLSF, SLOW, and now RV are just not the type of thing that the critics and general public are going for these days. Sorry, but I think we're missing the point here...:-) IMO, if these films had been made REALLY WELL, then everyone would have gone for them, too. It's the quality of the finish that counts. It's not enough for a film to be oddly enigmatic, vaguely nostalgic or raising a mere titter when the screen next door shows movies full of roar, thrill, amazement and belly laughter. When is Londinium due to open? Maybe that one will be better...
~lafn #1755
(Bethan)The Guardian gives RV 2 stars, which may not sound great, but they're very picky and don't even bother to rate a lot of films. "Gladiator" and "Sweet and Lowdown" get 3stars,"Next best thing" 1 star. The only 4 stars is "Boys don't Cry." WHEN did we ever think that we'd be rejoicing that one of ODB's films got a 2 star instead of a 1!!!This is a distinguished British actor,fergodsake. Well...you know what I think...so I won't rant on... BUT..the point of my posting is... I don't hear of anyone asking for a Keepsake of RV *winkie,winkie*
~KarenR #1756
(Moon) You left out IMO, Karen. ;-) Quite right, dear. Ca va sans dire. ;-) (Mari) MLSF, SLOW, and now RV are just not the type of thing that the critics and general public are going for these days. (Arami)IMO, if these films had been made REALLY WELL, then everyone would have gone for them, too. It's the quality of the finish that counts. While there is substantial evidence to support Mari's assertion these days, I really have to agree with Arami [did I type that??? ;-)] The final product is the most important thing. While Noel Coward may not be the In thing to bring to the screen now, if it had been done very well, then it might have been the first in a mad scramble to do more copycat productions. Somebody has to be first. Even if no one goes to a film, the critics remember a well-made film and the makers are upped in their esteem. (Evelyn) I don't hear of anyone asking for a Keepsake of RV *winkie,winkie* A ha!! I know this is against the rules, but I'll take the limp wrist. You know how us straight girls love a challenge. ;-)
~CherylB #1757
(Arami) But I thought it was too static and confined - more like a filmed theatrical performance - and lacked cinematic vision. (Moon) That is a basic problem when you turn a play into a film. Can you think of any play that turned really filmic when filmed? (Karen) Aside from musicals? ;-) "Breaker Morant" has a wonderful sense of cinema. It was originally a play, and most definitely not a musical, even though Edward Woodward does sing a song in it. (Donna DL) I think he went againt "typecast" in his Wessex role too, and I thought he was marvelous. I'm still a bit stymied as to why that role didn't lead to some meatier parts. My quess is because he seems loathe to travel any great distance to work in films. Most of his recent work has been done someplace in the UK, with the exception of SLOW. That was filmed in the south of France, not all that far from England when you check the map. Since he seems determined not to go very far afield to work, television may well be the best metier for him at present time. Although, theater would seem preferable.
~lizbeth54 #1758
IMO, if these films had been made REALLY WELL, then everyone would have gone for them, too. (Arami) So what British movies are made REALLY WELL these days? I can't think of one, off-hand, recently. Or Hollywood movies (of the type that he would be considered for)? I think you're too hard on him! I don't see an abundance of great projects! And although I'm advocating some TV work (the prestige dramas) most TV drama is unwatchable. Theatre seems to provide good choices though.
~lizbeth54 #1759
And on 2 star ratings...the Guardian gave "The Winslow Boy" one star. I tell you, our critics aren't generous! I must be a bit uncritical, because I've liked MLSF, SLOW and RV.
~Brown32 #1760
Mari, in response to your comments: Time to give Harvey W., John Madden, Sam Mendes and Anthony M. a call to remind them that he is available for major roles in major films. He has so many contacts and knows the major players from working in big films over the last few years, he should pick up the phone - if he hasn't already. Once again, BAHHH to his agent! We have no idea what kind of work he is being offered. So far, outside of BJD, which is a kind of satire on himself, it ain't much. Though maybe this is exactly the way he wants it, always working, comfortable as far as money is concerned, ready to start a family. He has never burned with ambition.
~lafn #1761
He has never burned with ambition. That's it in a nutshell.. (Bethan) I must be a bit uncritical, because I've liked MLSF, SLOW and RV. I will too probably. You all have dragged me down to your mediocrity.I no longer have high standards for ODB...Like you...I will rave about any piece of crap he throws our way.Whether it tanks or not...Just don't let him mention wanting anything better in an interview....(which we can't believe anyway, cause it comes from the press ;-)
~Arami #1762
(Bethan) I think you're too hard on him! Not at all. No doubt all movies start as very ambitious projects. No one purposefully produces mediocrity. But I suppose real quality filmmakers are now priced well above the budget of an average British film.
~mari #1763
(Arami) When is Londinium due to open? Maybe that one will be better... . . .than a poke in the eye?;-) RE Peter Keepsakes: Evelyn, I want his Campshirt, his yellow cravat, his Judy Garland record collection, and his autographed photo of Montgomery Clift.;-) Interesting comments from everyone. I agree with Murph; no burning ambition there. The problem, though, with being satisfied existing as just comfortable and safe and employed in the acting field is that it wreaks havoc with your reputation and prospects. Honestly, you don't think some of these reviews are humiliating for him? And hardly a springboard to better things, let alone treading water to keep place where he is! Certainly every actor has his/her share of failures, and I agree no one starts out to produce mediocity. But by confining himself largely to certain genres, coupled with his obvious reluctance to leave the vicinity for work, he is dramatically narrowing his sphere of possibilities. I still think he needs to shake things up; maybe something commercial like BJD will help. Bethan, I agree that there aren't a lot of great projects around--but those that are invariably go to the bigger names. Just thinking aloud here--would it be so terrible to take on even more commercial ventures? Something to get his name out there, raise his profile, and which could pave the way for consideration in the better roles. He has nothing to lose--can't be worse, or more embarrassing, for him than the string he's got going. I keep thinking of something John Cusack said recently: "I do one for 'them' then two for me." Also, he'd be able to pocket some good money which would enable him to afford to do theater more often.
~luvvy #1764
It's a great pity, but he cannot possibly support his current lifestyle (i.e. seeing his son) on what he would make doing only theatre. Nobody can unless they have major "family" money. He would have to supplement it with television (and we've already had that conversation), radio, and the occasional crap film (e.g. "The Shadow" co-starring Ian McKellen) or bad film ("Up at the Villa" co-starring Derek Jacobi). He's clearly not inclined to go that way.
~amw #1765
According to The Sun today, Colin's has lost" 2stone to play the romantic hereo in his new film BJD". Will get the Sun and post the whole article later.
~KarenR #1766
2 stone! That's 28 pounds. Perhaps he's 28 pounds lighter than last year? What are we getting - a frail Mark Darcy? :-(
~Moon #1767
How much tome did he have between signing for the MD role and starting the film to lose 2 stone? It is a fact that men lose more weight than women on the same diet, but that is v. hard to believe. I hope The Sun gives out his diet secrets. ;-)
~KarenR #1768
Am guess that no one will be commenting about his jowls in this one or whether the costume was padded. ;-)
~lafn #1769
Karen your news pics on the BJD page are really "cool". Is that really a pic of Snowhill? Who is the babe? (See, am already exclusively focusing on next film...v.v.g.)
~KarenR #1770
Yes, that's Snowhill and I imagine that's just a local kid frolicking in the fake snow.
~mari #1771
(Luvvy) He would have to supplement it with television (and we've already had that conversation), radio, and the occasional crap film (e.g. "The Shadow" co-starring Ian McKellen) or bad film ("Up at the Villa" co-starring Derek Jacobi). He's clearly not inclined to go that way. But he's already doing some bad films. Might as well do one that he'll be well-paid for. And not every commercial film is crap or bad; many I've seen recently compare favorably with much of the stuff on his CV. (Evelyn)(See, am already exclusively focusing on next film...v.v.g.) Er . . .that would be Londinium.:-( Oh, alright, I'll be good too: RV was the #11 film in the UK last weekend, bringing in about 88,000 pounds on 81 screens.
~KarenR #1772
Have posted Sun article about Colin's weight loss at Bucket's Bridget page; has pictures. Not to worry.
~lizbeth54 #1773
Glad that we've moved on to the new topic of non-porky Colin! (Are those your pics or the Sun's, Karen?) Porky Colin looks cute to me, but he obviously has slimmed down a little (not 2 stone though). Has he been to the gym, cut out the beer and pasta, been jogging in California/Umbria? Can I just throw in another comment on CF's current output? I've trotted along to both MLSF and RV (with my mother in tow!), enjoyed them both (as I think did the other folk in the audience), and that's it. I'd definitely like to see them again on video. I don't feel there's anything to get upset about. And Chris has a point...we have a host of good actors, but opportunities for british actors to excel on film seem limited. Michael Gambon gave an interew recently...said he'd completed roles(some cameos) in 6 movies over the last year or two...one very good, two so-so, three "crap". Also, if actors paid attention to their reviews, especially film reviews, they'd never have the confidence to act again. Ken Branagh, for example, has had some horrendous reviews. And I noticed a review in today's Guardian for Helen Mirren in the new production at the Donmar. Very good review, all praise for HM, but only 3 stars, not even Recommended (4 stars) and certainly not 5 stars, Muted enthusiasm, as ever! I'm fairly sure that DQ will surface over Christmas on the BBC. The new DG of the BBC was on the receiving end of a recent phone in on Radio 4...some quite hostile questions and criticism of the abysmal drama output. He blamed lack of cash. DQ was relatively cheap to make (just over �1million)...I'm sure they'll use it to shore up the Xmas schedules. BJD is getting a terrific about of pre-release publicity (as did "Notting Hill"...we were reading about it from day 1)which is a good sign! And this is one movie that will make an impact in the US...I appreciate that most (all) of CF's recent work seems limited to the rather unenthusiatic UK market. The paperback of The Edge of Reason has shot to the top of the book charts in the UK, selling nearly 50,000 copies last week. Good free publicity for CF's bald patch!
~mari #1774
Bethan, you know I was MLSF's biggest booster; I think at this point in his career, he does need to take into consideration what the public wants to see. I have, however, come to realize just how severe your critics can be; one star for Winslow Boy? Shocking. Ok, enough beating that horse.;-) (Bethan)Good free publicity for CF's bald patch! You mean the part that's been loved off?:-) Agree, the BJD publicity people are really doing their job. Even over here, where the books have been bestsellers, but not the type of phenomena they were in the UK, you'd have to be living in a cave not to have heard of this project. There's another piece in this week's People mag (more of the RZ weight thing, but hey, it's news for people who aren't following this as closely as we). More . . . but will take it over to 131.
~lafn #1775
(Bethan)Can I just throw in another comment on CF's current output? I've trotted along to both MLSFand RV (with my mother in tow!), enjoyed them both (as I think did the other folk in the audience), and that's it. I'd definitely like to see them again on video. I don't feel there's anything to get upset about. Bethan...I am not upset. Moreover, you have not convinced me either that his "current output" is worthy of his talent.Period. ~~~~~~~ (Bethan)Michael Gambon gave an interview recently...said he'd completed roles(some cameos) in 6 movies over the last year or two...one very good, two so-so, three "crap". Somehow I had something better in mind for Colin besides taking after Michael Gambon...(talk about porky...) ~~~~~~~~ As I said, I am focusing on his new films....unless anyone wants to bring this topic up again....
~KJArt #1776
(Arami) You don't know/don't remember the "kiss of the burly stagehand" episode??? ( Evelyn) Missed it somehow.... Sunday Independent Date: 97-01-19 A MAN OF MANY PARTS by Jasper Rees: "Though he's been a pin-up to both genders (William Boyd, whose 'Dutch Girls' gave Firth his first television lead, once told me how a burly crew member suppressed his feelings till the end of the shoot and then planted a huge kiss on the vulnerable hero's lips), it was Darcy that made Firth sexy." (Mari) MLSF, SLOW, and now RV are just not the type of thing that the critics and general public are going for these days. That's three strikes in a row. .... (Mari) RV was the #11 film in the UK last weekend, bringing in about 88,000 pounds on 81 screens. Does that make RV a strike, a foul ball, or a base hit??? ;-) (Evelyn) Moreover, you have not convinced me either that his "current output" is worthy of his talent. Period. Depending on one's taste [and IMHO], the script hasn't been written yet that is worthy of his talent. Period. And I doubt it ever will... Even P&P had its flaws ... (Mari) But he's already doing some bad films. (Evelyn) Somehow I had something better in mind for Colin ... As I'm sure each of us does ... and for each of us it's probably something entirely different ... until then I will have to settle for ODB within what he has done, and like Bethan I find there is something to enjoy in most everything. Still, there just ain't no pleasin' some folks ... **Heehee** ;-) KJ
~Arami #1777
HEY, CAN'T YOU ALL JUST STOP MOANING AND ENJOY THE MAN? :-) Here's a RV review from www.virgin.net site. The last paragraph sums it all very neatly. http://www.virgin.net/cinema/whatson/index.html Relative Values (PG) Starring: Julie Andrews , Stephen Fry Director: Eric Styles Full cast list: IMDB Made: 2000 After a routine throat operation caused almost irreparable damage to her vocal chords, Julie Andrews returns to the big screen in an old-fashioned farce, based on the No�l Coward play of the same name. Directed by Eric Styles (Dreaming of Joseph Lees), Relative Values was filmed on the Isle of Man with a sturdy British cast (Colin Firth, Sophie Thompson, Stephen Fry) playing second fiddle to a pair of brash American interlopers (Jeanne Tripplehorn, William Baldwin). The narrative follows similar lines, with the unflappable Countess of Marshwood (Andrews) utilising all her feminine wiles to stop her son (Edward Atterton) from marrying glamorous Hollywood starlet Miranda Frayle (Tripplehorn). It transpires that Miranda and Moxie (Thompson), the Countess'devoted personal maid, are sisters. And things don't get any less complicated when Miranda's hell-raising boyfriend (Baldwin) turns up out of the blue with an engagement ring in one hand and a bottle of Jack Daniels in the other. Styles can't make Coward's creaky characters breathe on film, but Firth and Fry play their supporting roles with �lan, while Julie never puts a foot wrong. by Neil Smith
~lafn #1778
What a virtuous crowd... bring on the halos,*hee*,*hee*
~mari #1779
(KJ) Does that make RV a strike, a foul ball, or a base hit??? ;-) I'd call it a bunt.;-) Ahem, I didn't post those numbers because I thought they were anything to write home about. That's about $1,700 U.S. per screen, which would be considered very low here for an opening weekend when interest and media attention is presumably the highest.
~KJArt #1780
Ah, but it isn't opening here. :-) Although I certainly do hope it will, eventually. How many movies are on release in the UK at any given time? (Arami) The last paragraph sums it all very neatly. So it does, so it does ...
~Arami #1781
Forget the crowd - it's that yet another slap on the wrist for Styles - and a pat on Colin's back - which matters. Want some more? From Sunday Express, 25 June 2000 Best Of The Rest Relative Values ** [two stars - dodgy] One of the oddest casts is assembled for this adaptation of Noel Coward's comedy of manners exploring the contrast between brash, classless America and the English aristocracy. Who could imagine the graceful julie Andrews sharing a screen with William Baldwin, that lightweight B-movie actor people hire when they a) can't afford a decent Hollywood star, and b) can't afford any of the other Baldwins. [...] So far so eccentric, but some of the casting is inappropriate. Colin Firth, totem of brooding manhood, is the Countess's camp, effete nephew, eyes bulging from sockets whenever a well-scrubbed young buck hoves into view. [...] With so many characters the main problem is inevitable - who is the movie about? [...] The other problem is the dated look and feel of the film [...] And rather than reach an energetic climax, the story peters out unsatisfactorily. The project required more imagination. (** Dodgy. Review by Henry Fitzherbert) ---------------------------- The Sun. June 21, 2000 Sun Woman Lorraine Kelly - Real Views From A Real Woman * Who could forget the sight of Colin Firth as Mr Darcy in P&P, striding out of that lake with his hair all tangled and his wet breeches clinging to his thighs. Phew! Well, that image has all but disappeared from my mind after seeing Colin as an extremely camp young fop in the new julie Andrews movie Relative Values. Colin plays Julie's nephew and is camper than Rupert Everett in My Best Friend's Wedding. But he's still the best thing in the film. ================================================ I don't see why Colin is "inappropriately cast", but I can understand that some people may have problems accepting it. In both the above pieces the last sentences say it all. AND NOW... TA-RAAAAAAAA! How does he do it - the secret is out! Colin is actively fighting the flab! From Daily Express, June 13, 2000 Section: Life [...] In the first of our exclusive three-part series, fitness trainer CORNEL CHIN - whose clients include Colin Firth and Leonardo Di Caprio - and BBC nutritionist Fiona Hunter show you how to shape up for a holiday to remember. [A piece about diet follows. Overleaf:] Work out for the perfect holiday body - CORNEL CHIN, personal trainer responsible for Leonardo Di Caprio's fabulous figure in the film The Beach, and currently training Colin Firth, shows you how to get in shape for the sun [followed by advice on exercises]
~KarenR #1782
(Mari) That's about $1,700 U.S. per screen, which would be considered very low here for an opening weekend Time to do the analysis... Actually, RV did very well and just missed getting into the Top 10 by $12,000. It did better on a per screen basis than Nos. 7-10, one of which (the ridiculously renamed Reindeer Games or Deception) was an opener that weekend as well, but all played on many more screens (il.e., more than 129). RV's per screen average was on a par with that megahit Maybe Baby (now in it's 5th week) and The Next Best Thing (it ain't). ;-) Why so many people went to see that Madonna/Rupert Everett thing (or nearly any of those other loser flicks in the Top 10) is beyond me! So many of those are substandard crap (new category) and were severely trounced in the B.O. here.
~KarenR #1783
A personal trainer now... ooo la la! He's getting lean and mean and real fighting machine.
~CherylB #1784
A personal trainer, how gauche. He has gone Hollywood, make of that what you will.
~CherylB #1785
A personal trainer, how gauche. He has gone Hollywood, make of that what you will.
~Arami #1786
Gauche? Gosh... Honestly, chaps, whatever that guy does, he can never win with you any more. Well, I'm sorry, but his purpose in life is not necessarily to please everyone at all times. I am determined to like him, come what may. Meanwhile, perhaps we should open a moans topic? Sling a bit of mud on Colin board? ;-P
~heide #1787
Omigod. You mean we're going to get pecs? What does this all mean? A revival of the Superman series? How about a remake of Streetcar Named Desire? Fearing the over 40 flab? It's been awhile since I've seen a smidgen of extra flesh on the man. Interesting that he wants to stay in fighting trim.
~heide #1788
I'm in agreement, Arami. He pleases me no matter what and it appears to me he does things which please him. If it's true he has a trainer, the better for him and the better for us. He's not ready yet to content himself with being a character actor.
~Arami #1789
That trainer is just a fitness coach and obviously Colin finds it easier to follow a set regime in order to lose excess weight. I don't think for one moment he's going to acquire pecs.
~KarenR #1790
I don't think for one moment he's going to acquire pecs. From an article on how this guy worked with Leonardo for The Beach:Well, it may be fantasy for most of us but one supremely fortunate Bromley resident had the job of actually pushing and prodding Leonardo DiCaprio into shape. One of Cornel's clients was Andrew Macdonald, part of the trio of film makers responsible for cult hits Trainspotting, Shallow Grave and A Life Less Ordinary. Andrew told Cornel he was making a film version of Alex Garland's book, The Beach, and he was hoping to get Leonardo DiCaprio to play the lead role. ...Just before Christmas last year, Cornel had a call "It was Andrew" he said. "He told me the cast had been out in Thailand, and now they needed a personal trainer to shape them up...to give them a lean and sinewy look especially for the film." "I told him I'd love to. And so on January 4 this year, I flew out there." Cornel had just 16 days to whip the cast into shape. But Leo always looks so toned anyway, surely he wasn't far from the right look? "Leo was in pretty good shape, he plays a lot of sport. But to get the lean look the role required, we had to do a lot of aerobic exercise with him, and weight resistance exercise" Said Cornel.******** I don't know about you, ladies, but I'm hoping there's a towel scene. ;-)
~lafn #1791
but I'm hoping there's a towel scene. ;-) You nailed it...that's the one. Arami, we're not slinging mud at ODB...we just wish better roles for him...there is a slight diff;-)
~Brown32 #1792
Mari says:and his autographed photo of Montgomery Clift.;-) ********* Peter has one too? I bet mine is older. http://www.geocities.com/firthfan/movies.html#clift We are all so frustrated with the poor man. I agree that he must be suffering through some of these RV reviews. He is quite proud after all, plus being extra intelligent, tall, with two wonderful dimples and a great suprasternal notch!! Who needs pecs?
~KarenR #1793
Perhaps this will count for something: James Christopher picks his favourite five from the current crop of films on release 1. Relative Values Eric Styles revamps Coward's 1951 country house charmer to accommodate its vintage star Julie Andrews as a prim Countess who must extract her son from a ghastly Hollywood marriage. With Stephen Fry, Colin Firth, and Sophie Thompson. 2. Gladiator 3. Gangster No. 1 4. Sweet and Lowdown 5. Not One Less ******** Maybe Colin's going after the Peter Lawford role in Ocean's 11 ;-)
~patas #1794
(Murph)He has never burned with ambition. (Evelyn)That's it in a nutshell.. More likely, his ambition has been curbed as years have gone by... (Evelyn)You all have dragged me down to your mediocrity I'd resent that if I took you seriously ;-) (Mari)one star for Winslow Boy? Shocking I thought it was a reasonably good film that lacked something. (Arami) Gauche? Gosh... Honestly, chaps, whatever that guy does, he can never win with you any more. So it seems...
~KarenR #1795
(Arami) Gauche? Gosh... Honestly, chaps, whatever that guy does, he can never win with you any more. I don't know why anybody is assuming this was at his initiative. Often, it is required for a part (as in the above snippet for The Beach). The personal trainer may have been engaged by the studio for all we know.
~mari #1796
(Karen) Maybe Colin's going after the Peter Lawford role in Ocean's 11 ;-) I read the other day that Scorsese wants Hugh Grant for the role. No kidding. Murph, I forgot that you really do have a Monty Clift autograph! Nice; Peter would approve;-) (I *still* want his Campshirt.)
~KarenR #1797
*scowl*
~mari #1798
Hmmm . . . maybe I've mixed O-11 up with the Rat Pack film. I think that's the one Marty's doing whenever he can assemble what he calls his dream cast. Oh, just hand the reins over to Mike Binder and he can cast Christopher Lawford.;-) Arami, I like your idea of a "moaning board"--especially given all this delicious info on sprouting pecs!:-)
~patas #1799
(Mari)Arami, I like your idea of a "moaning board"--especially given all this delicious info on sprouting pecs!:-) Especially since everybody's grown so serious about ODB :-( Where's good-natured Drool gone to? No more drowning in chocolate-brown puddles - no, it is all career strategies nowadays! IMO, the man ought to consult a feng-shui specialist and correct something missing in the Career, Fame and Prosperity areas of his home(s) :-)
~Arami #1800
(Mari)Arami, I like your idea of a "moaning board"--especially given all this delicious info on sprouting pecs!:-) Mari, I think I like your idea of moaning... ;-)
~KJArt #1801
(Mari)Arami, I like your idea of a "moaning board"--especially given all this delicious info on sprouting pecs!:-) (Gi)Especially since everybody's grown so serious about ODB :-( Where's good-natured Drool gone to? No more drowning in chocolate-brown puddles - no, it is all career strategies nowadays! IMO, the man ought to consult a feng-shui specialist and correct something missing in the Career, Fame and Prosperity areas of his home(s) :-) **Heehee** As Richard Finch would exclaim: "Brilliant! Absolutely F*****g Brilliant!! (to your left breast!) ;-D (Arami)Mari, I think I like your idea of moaning... ;-) Yeh, especially since there's more than one kind of moaning .... ;-)
~Arami #1802
From the Sun comment quoted recently. Cheap newsprint. Bad scan. Nice pic. Seems familiar - have we seen it before?
~heide #1803
(Gi) Where's good-natured Drool gone to? No more drowning in chocolate-brown puddles - no, it is all career strategies nowadays! At least we're heading in the right direction...from debates on the state of his career to debates on the state of his body. ;-) Didn't mean to start a pecs controversy, btw. Just having fun as usual.
~lafn #1804
**Eureka** Why don't you start a Colin- Body- Board...then everybody will be happ-happy.:-D Just having fun as usual;-)
~Arami #1805
His body is a tool of his trade and talking about it should be done here, on this board!
~Jana2 #1806
(Heide) Didn't mean to start a pecs controversy, btw. Just having fun as usual. Oh my, now here's a topic I can dive into ;-). Pecs, pecs, pecs.... happy thought indeed. Actually I've always thought ODB had a nicely defined chest in its natural state (i.e. without pumpitude), but I have always longed for just a bit more definition and size in the upper arms. Dare I hope that Mr. Chin will engineer some biceps for Mark Darcy? Not that we'll be able to see them under that black robe, mind you ;-). There - how's that for drooling?
~patas #1807
Jana, forget not the towel-clad oration ;-) KJ, pl. explain the left breast thing :-)
~lizbeth54 #1808
I don't think MD disrobes...:-( I quite like those skinny arms....shows a pleasing lack of vanity! I suspect that the trainer may be part of getting into character...playing a rich, successful lawyer in a Hollywood movie, well, almost Hollywood. And he gets the girl from that well-established romantic lead, HG! Glad that the Times critic rated RV as number 1. There was a little snippet in a magazine that someone was reading at work (Prima? Best?) Article on trendy florist shops in London. There's apparently one in Islington whose customers include "Colin Firth, buying flowers for his wife". Nice man! (Doesn't really need a trainer!)
~KJArt #1809
(Gi) KJ, pl. explain the left breast thing :-) Bridget noticed that Richard rarely addressed her to her face but rather spoke to her breasts. When he finally praised her as a f******g genius, I think she said something like "I always wanted to be a genius, but thought it would never happen to me ... or my left breast..." 8-D
~lafn #1810
Heard from a reliable JE UK male fan on the Ehle List.... "Incidentally, for all you Firth fans, he is busy recording a TV drama to be broadcast next year on BBC in which he play a rather "foppish" character by all accounts. " Didn't give his source...and not knowing what"foppish "is,can't tell if it's Milo or Donovan....But it does sound like a BBC drama is imminent.Happy Days! After all...winter isn't too far off:-))
~Arami #1811
I quite like those skinny arms....shows a pleasing lack of vanity! Yes, yes! Leave him be. I wouldn't have any objection whatsoever to being wrapped in those skinny arms. (as it happens, I have another, somewhat similar, but not quite the same pair at my disposal...;-)) and not knowing what"foppish "is Sort of dandyish; affectedly elegant or fashionable. Or - a bit of a prat... ;-)
~Arami #1812
Here's a gloomy pose from the Jongleurs photocall.And no, he's not wearing an earring.
~judy #1813
Hello,after lurking for many months I have finally plucked up courage to join in.Its great to be amongst fellow Firth admirers! There are a few pictures of the RV premiere in this weeks Now mag including one of our slimline Colin and Livia. I hope this works as I am using my sons Dreamcast!
~amw #1814
Hi Judith or is it Judy, welcome to our merry band, I shall go out immediately and but a copy of Now mag, thanks for the tip.
~lizbeth54 #1815
Welcome Judy! I hope that now you've joined in, you'll stay with us! Thanks for the "Now" news. "Incidentally, for all you Firth fans, he is busy recording a TV drama to be broadcast next year on BBC in which he play a rather "foppish" character by all accounts. " Ah, thanks Evelyn! Definitely sounds like "Armadillo". Milo is good looking, dresses well, is concerned about his appearance, keeps his flat tidy (does his own hoovering!), doesn't drink much...all of which could be construed as "foppish" (as opposed to laddish!) I'm very keen on "Armadillo"....first class TV work does make an impact, and I don't think it closes avenues in film work..it is possible to move between the two. Will be driving within 30 miles of Snowshill today!
~Tracy #1816
Judy, welcome to Firthdom I hope you'll enjoy your stay! Thanks for the 'Now' tip ....off to newsagents now!
~KarenR #1817
Judy! Glad you came out of lurkdom and jumped in. Thanks for the news about the magazine. Have you gone to see RV? I was thinking if all you ladies who have seen it want to discuss it, our "current Firth spoiler" topic http://www.spring.net/yapp-bin/restricted/read/drool/126/new might be nice to start something up at. (Bethan) all of which could be construed as "foppish" (as opposed to laddish!) Hmmm, foppish automatically brings to mind The Scarlet Pimpernell, but if you're contrasting it like that to "laddish," yes, then maybe it does refer to Milo's fastidiousness. Otherwise, I was going to say Evelyn's source probably mistook this Firth for baby bro Firth who was going to reprise his role as a fairy. ;-D
~CherylB #1818
Hello Judy. Please happily drool away.
~KarenR #1819
Looks like MLSF is playing in Dublin. Not a good review by Michael Dwyer in the Irish Times: The feature film career of Hugh Hudson, the director of the Oscar-winning Chariots of Fire, has been in decline ever since he made the folly that was Revolution. That downward spiral continues with the plodding and anodyne My Life So Far, which is so belatedly arrived that Hudson's subsequent movie, I Dreamed of Africa, has already opened in the US. My Life So Far is drawn from the memoirs of the distinguished British television executive, Sir Denis Forman, and deals with his boyhood experiences on the family's Scottish Highlands estate in the 1920s. The pivotal character if the freckled-faced Fraser Pettigrew (Robert Norman), a precocious 10-year-old and one of six children in the family of an impetuous inventor, Edward (Colin Firth) and his patient wife, Moira (Mary Elizabeth Mastrantonio). The estate is owned by her widowed mother (Rosemary Harris). Malcolm McDowell plays the boy's millionaire uncle who has designs on the estate, with Irene Jacob as his young French fiancee who becomes the object of Edward's unwelcome attention. Meanwhile, young Fraser conducts his own sexual education, poring over his late grandfather's secret library of mild erotica. Despite having assembled a more than capable cast - although Firth seems distinctly ill-at-ease - director Hudson never allows them to develop beyond the level of stock characters, and he surrounds them with an array of folksy Scottish working-class stereotypes. This flaccid film is further undermined by a surfeit of voiceover and a twee mood of forced jollity and phoney nostalgia.
~Arami #1820
Oh, all right, then. :-)
~lafn #1821
She gets prettier every year, and he looks younger ..... Thanks Arami.
~heide #1822
Classy looking couple...very elegant. Thanks! Love the photo of Firth disheveled a bit earlier also. Ah, those curls. Glad to see you here, Judy. Now that you made it, I hope you keep coming back. It's quite habit forming but as a long time lurker, you already know that. ;-)
~judy #1823
Thanks to all for the warm welcome,its great to be here at last. I'm definitely a Judy,Judith reminds me too much of irate school teachers.I hope to be around for a long time as I can't see my already long term firth fixationabating At the risk of being thrown out before I've even got started I have to confess to not having seen RV yet I know I'm letting the side down but I will try and seeiit as soon as I can.
~judy #1824
sorry,my first mistake,of no doubt many.That should read fixation abating.
~patas #1825
Welcome Judy! What a nice way to de-lurk, with a piece of news as a present for all of us :-) KJ, thanks :-)
~KJArt #1826
Hello, Judy! Coming clean, eh? Finally coming out of hiding? Well, dive right in and Welcome!
~alyeska #1827
I would like to add my welcome too, Judy.
~Arami #1828
Thanks, Judy, for dropping the hint about Now. My hubby has graciously got it for me so I could show it to the rest of the Firth-thirsty world (try saying that with your teeth out!). ;-)
~Tracy #1829
Am now coming down from having seen Relative Values today.. I enjoyed it but why shouldn't I, OBD graces the screen? That obvious bias aside, it was amusing, though whether I'd have bothered tracking it down had CF not been in it is questionable.. no it's not - I know I wouldn't have! Trying to get to see it was the first hurdle. Boyed by the fact that it was showing all over the place last week I looked at the listings yesterday expecting to see a huge choice of venue but I was wrong, oh so sadly mistaken. In the whole of Kent it is showing at 3 cinemas. Two of which are miles away and and one had it showing only at 1pm on weekdays (???) so I opted for the nearest which had it on for a limited period i.e. yesterday and today at midday! So I found myself in a small auditorium totally on my own, feeling extremely sorry not only for myself but for ODB too. Oh that it should come to this! Eventually the door opened and others came in but I think I take the prize for being in the smallest audience at a public showing i.e. FIVE......unless, that is you know different. ODB was fab, that goes without saying, I read somewhere (I don't think it was on these hallowed boards) that he looked uncomfortable, I can't say I agree with that. But, it was ST who stole the show of course - I loved her performance at the dinner table, SF was under-used I thought, JA was just JA, excellent as usual and WB was just plain awful, possesses a face I could cheerfully slap and acted as wooden as an extremely wooden thing! I don't think RV deserves all of the bad reviews it has received. Its horses for courses at the end of the day, the audience I was in obviously appreciated the writing of Noel Coward - a few of us, myself and the two women behind me, were obviously there for Colin..as every look, every "hmmm", knowing "ahh" and witty reposte was greeted by giggles. Who can forget "I've heard the fleet's in...I'd hate to disappoint!" To sum the experience up, not huge belly laughs but a damn good giggle.
~kolin #1830
Tracy :(I take the prize for being in the smallest audience at a public showing i.e. FIVE......unless, that is you know different.) Tracy, I know the feeling. There were 8 of us for Fever Pitch in the audience and not many more for My Life so Far. Oh, how I would love to see a Colin starring role movie in a full house!
~lafn #1831
(Vera) Oh, how I would love to see a Colin starring role movie in a full house! It's my dream too.Some day, Vera...some day. I haven't given up. First time, in Dallas, cinema was half full...about 100.!I saw MLSF the second time with a friend, and we were the only ones.I clearly love the film...but I felt sad.
~Fran #1832
Hello everyone! I saw Shakespeare in Love with a full house and folks waiting in line outside! Feel better now?
~ommin #1833
Well can top that English Patient with just five. I was amazed. Having one all the awards.
~fitzwd #1834
(Tracy) WB was just plain awful, possesses a face I could cheerfully slap a damn good giggle Hee hee
~KarenR #1835
~KarenR #1836
(Vera) Oh, how I would love to see a Colin starring role movie in a full house! (Fran) I saw Shakespeare in Love with a full house and folks waiting in line outside! Feel better now? Unfortunately, SiL isn't a "Colin starring movie." We're going to have to wait until he steals the thunder from Hughie in Bridget. *fingers crossed*
~KarenR #1837
Here's Total Film's 2 star review of RV: The Earl of Marshwood (Atterton) is returning to his family stately home with a new fiancee. Arrangements, however, are plunged into confusion with the discovery that the loyal maid of his mother (Andrews) is the sister of the prospective bride... Based on Noel Coward's highly successful play, this adaptation struggles to conceal its theatrical origins. As a comedy of manners, Relative Values provides a smattering of laughs, with the wittiest of Coward's lines going to Stephen Fry's suave butler. Unfortunately, the direction of Eric Styles (Dreaming Of Joseph Lees) is prosaic and the performances variable in quality. A more adventurous approach to the source material would surely have paid greater dividends. Tom Dawson
~july #1838
Coming out of lurkdom to ask: wasn't RV initially meant for the TV screens?
~Arami #1839
Welcome, Silvie - and welcome to all newbies and lurkers alike. Unfortunately, the direction of Eric Styles (Dreaming Of Joseph Lees) is prosaic Pedestrian is the better description. He was lucky that the actors were at least experieced and some very gifted.
~judy #1840
Hoping to see RV this coming weekend but after reading about the lack of audience I think I am being over optimistic in expecting it to be still showing.I'm not having much luck with his most recent films-SLOW was only shown for a week in my area and I couldn't get to see it and MLSF was a no show!
~KarenR #1841
The RV situation isn't too dire. While it had a net loss of 18 screens over last week, it is opening up in new venues. I've put up a new listing here of where RV is currently playing: http://www.spring.net/karenr/cinemas630.txt Haven't seen this past weekend's box office figures yets, but it wouldn't have bettered its ranking with the loss of screens. A film needs to be on at least 150 screens in order to make the top 10.
~catheyp #1842
Welcome Silvie. Nice to see you come out from Lurkdom; although that's where I spend most of my time too ;-) I don't know a lot about the origins of RV, but I have always thought it was for the screen. Maybe TV would have been a better option ???
~lizbeth54 #1843
Thanks for posting the RV venues, Karen. I thought it had disappeared, but it seems to be a North/South divide. And what about Wales? :-) When I saw RV there actually was a good turnout, at least three quarters full, although it was a small theatre. But what I noticed was that all the crowds milling round the multiplex (except the RV crowd!) seemed to be teenagers, or certainly no more than student age. Ditto, local Blockbusters. They'll all be swarming to see Mission Impossible 2 and Tom Cruise this week. However BJD will pull them in (but only, I'm beginning to realise, because it's from the makers of the "hugely successful NH and 4 Weddings and a Funeral" (forget the book!)
~CherylB #1844
Hello and welcome Silvie.
~KarenR #1845
New publicity pic taken at the RV premiere:
~judy #1846
Thanks karen, its a wonderful way to start the day- with a new picture.
~amw #1847
That's really nice, thanks Karen.
~patas #1848
I really like it when he dresses well :-) Thanks Karen.
~lizbeth54 #1849
Incidentally, for all you Firth fans, he is busy recording a TV drama to be broadcast next year on BBC in which he play a rather "foppish" character by all accounts. " Meant to add, re. Evelyn's insider information....I'm sure this must be true. If the BBC are shooting "Armadillo", which needs quite a lot of London location work, the summer months are crucial, especially for early morning shoots. Perhaps that's why he needs a trainer...to keep him fit for an arduous filming schedule! And I should imagine that MD and Lorimer are two characters who could look alike...no beards/long hair necessary, so he could even film in tandem. BTW, I searched on Sue Birtwhistle and found a quote from her that I hadn't seen before. She said that she asked CF to do P&P but "he said he wasn't interested because it was girlie stuff". (This was when he hadn't read the script (or novel)!) He was sent the script anyway, read and liked it, but still, as we know, said "no" because he didn't think he was right for the part, until SB finally persuaded him. All thanks to SB for being so tenacious!!! :-)
~Arami #1850
For those who don't go to BJD board, here's Colin on the set of BJD in London:
~Renata #1851
He's obviously morphing into Tony Blair mode.
~patas #1852
( Renate ) He's obviously morphing into Tony Blair mode. ROTFLMAO! He looks gorgeous... IMHO...
~Tracy #1853
More pix of ODB, this time in tonights ES magazine in the Party section. It's a variation on one we've seen before from the RV premiere. There's also a little bit beside the photo: " An Apology ES would like to take this opportunity to apologise unreservedly to all Colin Firth fans for printing this picture of him with his stunning wife Livia. We accept that it is insensitive and likely to cause untold heartache. Letters of protest to the usual address." Apology accepted, just!
~Tracy #1854
Argghh! Trying again
~EileenG #1855
Thanks, Tracy. We'd gladly accept the apology if they'd promise to spell her f***ing name right! Aargh!
~mari #1856
LOL--My thoughts exactly, Eileen! Thanks for the latest pics to Tracy, Arami, Ann, & Karen!
~KarenR #1857
Quite the jokesters, aren't they, at the ES? Yes, we can't abide to see pics of his beautiful wife. What a bunch of jealous jerks! (probably think we sit at home in Regency dress with industrial-strength Wonder bras waiting for Mr. Darcy to ring the bell.) Thanks for posting the pics, Tracy. Tried lightening up the Empire pic but I'm pretty pathetic at this stuff. Am sure Murph can do better.
~Brown32 #1858
From Anne R: This seems to be the latest word on Armadillo, from the Friday, June 23 edition of Broadcast magazine. No mention of Colin yet: Birtwhistle to bring Boyd novel to BBC. The BBC is developing a two-part adaption of William Boyd's Armadillo, to be produced by veteran drama executive Sue Birtwhistle, writes Tabitha Cole. The BBC is understood to have banded together with drama heads from US network A&E to co-fund the development of a screenplay penned by Boyd himself. Birtwhistle, the producer behind the BBC's award winning Pride and Prejudice and Wives and Daughters, is believed to have played a central role in negotiating the deal. It is not known whether the TV version of Armadillo, which is still in the early stages of development, is being lined up for BBC 1 or 2. Boyd, an acclaimed British author and critic has written extensively for the screen since the mid-1980s. He made his directorial debut last year, with a film of his book The Trench. Karen: I'm afraid even my trusty Photoshop can't do much with THAT picture! Just for fun, and a bunch of "one degree of Colin" people, Southeby's and Amazon is holding an on-line auction of the puppets from The Spitting Image TV show. They are a riot. Sthephen Fry is there, and Joanne Lumley and Elvis, and Olivier and a funny Oliver Reed, and a host of others. Beyond my means, of course. Spitting Image Puppets
~Tracy #1859
According to that font of all knowledge ...my mum, CF and JE were on the national news at lunchtime yesterday..anybody catch it? It appears that there have been studies done by boffins in the States about what it is that attracts people to certain faces and they used CF and JE as examples! Any old excuse to get His face on the box has my vote ..even if they Do have to rake up all the P&P stuff -AGAIN! Re Empire pic, the original in the mag is very distorted and dark - and doesn't look very professionally done. (Eileen) We'd gladly accept the apology if they'd promise to spell her f***ing name right! LOL! Exactly how many different permutations are the going to try before they hit the right one. (Karen) probably think we sit at home in Regency dress with industrial-strength Wonder bras *sheepishly removing Empire-line frock now* ;-D
~judy #1860
Tracy your mum wasn't wrong.BBC News 24 showed a clip from P&P to illustrate a report on love and romance being controlled by the head and not the heart after all [according to some medical report about the brain] The clip was of Darcy and Elizabeth at Longbourn after his return to Netherfield.The report went on to say that D & E epitomise romance for most people. It's great that P&P sticks in peoples minds after this length of time.
~KarenR #1861
(Tracy) *sheepishly removing Empire-line frock now* ;-D Ha!! So is basis for this comment. Hmmm, thought only valid jealousy point was fact that she is wearing horizontally striped dress and does not look like 3-ton pickup truck. ;-)
~lizbeth54 #1862
It is not known whether the TV version of Armadillo, which is still in the early stages of development, is being lined up for BBC 1 or 2. Oh well, bang goes my theory that they're shooting now...although sometimes projects move on surprisingly quickly...and this is in most respects "old" news. The BBC is developing a two-part adaption Now that is new news! I was hoping that it wouldn't just be the equivalent of a BBC film (90 minutes or so) but thought that it didn't perhaps lend itself to a six-parter series like P&P. Two parts is normally about 3 1/2 hours ( "Madame Bovary" type adaptation). And you'll see it in the States! Thanks for the pic (dark & light version!) Tracy and Karen! Thought MD was wearing a towel in the fight scene! Must be a different version! According to that font of all knowledge ...my mum, CF and JE were on the national news at lunchtime yesterday..anybody catch it? It appears that there have been studies done by boffins in the States about what it is that attracts people to certain faces and they used CF and JE as examples! Don't know if it was the same item, but Darcy and Lizzie were on BBC news 24 in the evening...as examples of falling overwhelmingly in love, and the way the brain reacts to love.
~KarenR #1863
Murph, thanks for passing on news re: Armadillo. Ask AnneR if alright (don't have her new email address) or send it to me. The BBC is developing a two-part adaption (bethan) Now that is new news! The confirmation, that is. Had to be. Most effective format for thriller types. Must build some suspense. And you'll see it in the States! Hoorah!!!
~judy #1864
Great news about Armadillo but are the BBC to be trusted after their handling of DQ? Any news of a release date for Londinium? Any news of video release for SLOW? RV no longer showing in my area-another one bites the dust!
~Brown32 #1865
YEAH!!!!! Use it, Karen, it is from a non Firth friend. ENGLEWOOD, Colo., July 7 /PRNewswire/ -- Robert Leighton, president of Starz Encore Entertainment, today announced STARZ! Pictures' latest lineup of original movies through the end of 2000. The slate includes such unique films as a legendary Academy Award(TM) winning actress' feature directorial debut, an epic fact-based drama about saving Kenya's lions and an English comedy of manners adapted from Noel Coward's 1951 play. "STARZ! Pictures has once again assembled an impressive group of star-packed and unique original movies," said Leighton. "This diverse and powerful lineup demonstrates our strategy to complement our first-run Hollywood films with a selection of superb original movies. This collection of films is just a sample of the top-notch material and stellar talent that STARZ! Pictures will deliver in the future." October: STARZ! Pictures presents the never-before-seen comedy "Relative Values," starring Academy Award(R) winning actress Julie Andrews ("Mary Poppins"). Co-produced with Overseas Filmgroup, "Relative Values" is based on the 1951 Noel Coward play. The film, directed by Eric Styles ("Dreaming of Joseph Lees"), is a comedy about class versus classlessness. Set in the 1950's, "Relative Values" is the tale of Hollywood star Miranda Frayle (Jeanne Tripplehorn -- "Basic Instinct") who becomes engaged to snobby aristocrat Nigel, the Earl of Marshwood (Edward Atterton - "Man In The Iron Mask") while aboard a yacht in France. The couple's wedding plans upset Nigel's mum, Felicity, the Countess of Marshwood (Andrews) and Don Lucas (William Baldwin -- "Virus"), a dashing but high strung screen idol, who happens to be Miranda's former lover. When Moxie (Sophie Thompson -- "Emma"), Felicity's longtime maid announces that Miranda is her despised sister who left England for Hollywood 20 years ago, Felicity, with the help of her nephew (Colin Firth -Shakespeare in Love") and her butler (Stephen Fry -- "A Civil Action"), sets about an ingenious image change for Moxie -- just in time for Miranda and Nigel's arrival in London. This year marks the 100th anniversary of playwright, screenwriter, novelist, director, producer, actor and composer Sir Noel Coward's birth. On the stage at the age of 12, Coward went on to become one of the most creative and controversial figures in British theatre.
~judy #1866
Murph it's great that RV is going to be shown in the US.I've not got over my disappointment at having missed RV,I was hoping to go tonight but it has already been pulled in my local area, maybe I should fly over in October[in my dreams] Spotted a small clip in Heat mag,although not directly CF related I thought it was interesting in view of CF agent bashing I've read on older posts. 'whats's up with talent agency ICM?Recent months have seen Catherine Zeta Jones,Eddie Murphy,Meg Ryan and Russell Crowe quit the agency.Now Dustin Hoffman and hot young thing Leelee Sobieski have followed them.'
~amw #1867
Judy, I don't know if this helps but RV is still playing in London, according to the Times Metro section, as Odeons Kensington, Swiss Cottage, & West End and the ABC Hampstead.
~KarenR #1868
(Judy) Any news of video release for SLOW? The video has been available for rental since March 6. The price hasn't come down yet to purchase however. Here's a listing of all the cinemas where RV is playing this week. As I feared it lost huge numbers, probably because of MI:2 coming in and taking over all the screens. However, don't despair. It seems to be moving around to new towns, as well as staying in London. http://www.spring.net/karenr/cinemas707.txt Thanks for the direct-to-cable news on RV, Murph. Will book time over at sister, who has every channel under the sun. ;-)
~judy #1869
Ann & Karen thanks for the info regarding RV,however its still not showing in my area. I'm waiting to buy SLOW as I don't use a video rental shop- I'd rather buy.
~CherylB #1870
(Karen) Hmmm, thought only valid jealousy point was fact that she is wearing horizontally striped dress and does not look like 3-ton pickup truck. ;-) Actually, she looks like my Aunt Martha. Well, she looks like my aunt did when Aunt Martha was about thirty. Tracy, 'fess up. I know you are the real Bridget Jones. You have a closetful of empire style dresses. I do have a question for you Tracy. What is a boffin? Is anything like a nerd, twit, or dork?
~lafn #1871
Great News Today:Thanks everybody. Three Cheers for Starz Cable. No commercials either:-)) Happy, Happy that A&E getting involved in "Armadillo"...(unfortunately commercials:-( ODB is moving out:-))
~KarenR #1872
What is a boffin? Does it not mean scientist or technical expert, as stated in the dictionary? (Evelyn) Happy that A&E getting involved in "Armadillo"... (unfortunately commercials:-( A&E sells videos too and knows better than most that will sell even better if Colin features prominently on cover (unlike stupid marketing folk at PBS who put Peter Quint on US video cover of TTOTS) ;-)
~ommin #1873
A boffin. Its a World War 2 term for sometimes daffy scientists who thought up all sorts of schemes to defeat the Germans. One was a wheel with fireworks attached to each spoke which extended just behond the rim. If you have ever seen in in Dads' Army you will know what I mean. The inventor of the Dam Buster Bomb was called a boffin. My friend worked with them and has some hilarious tales to tell of nutty inventions.
~CherylB #1874
Thank you Anne and Karen.
~KarenR #1875
Didn't want to make a big deal, as you can't really do anything with the info yet, but Londinium will be screened at Toronto. Don't have a date. Won't be available until late August. Have put up all there is at The Bucket site. http://www.spring.net/karenr/mdbro/london.html
~Moon #1876
Hello ladies! Writing from London, will be catching RV, RF as Richard II and VR in The Tempest. Keeping quite busy and at least it is not raining today. Cheers!
~lafn #1877
Thank you for thinking of us Moon. We await your reports. Miss ya' :-((
~KarenR #1878
~mpiatt #1879
Tee hee! I'm afraid I subscribed to STARZ! today. Having RV in the future put me over the edge.
~EileenG #1880
(Judith) BBC News 24 showed a clip from P&P to illustrate a report on love and romance being controlled by the head and not the heart after all LMAO! This is news? Agree with Tracy, any excuse to have ODB's pic on the telly will do. The BBC is understood to have banded together with drama heads from US network A&E Better and better. This has CF written all over it. Bethan, why don't you try ringing his agent? We haven't heard 'Armadillo? What is Armadillo?' in awhile. October: STARZ! Pictures presents the never-before-seen comedy "Relative Values," Oh, woe is me, I no longer get Starz :..( *major pity party ensues* Karen, will need to tap your distribution enterprise once again. (Karen) Londinium will be screened at Toronto. Glad to read this is still the plan.
~lafn #1881
(Karen) Londinium will be screened at Toronto. This is great news indeed. Toronto IFF isn't Cannes, but it is the major market for films in North America.It's not a competition like Cannes, but is covered by all the major industry newspapers who review the films. Thanks Karen. Londinium and BJD.....Things are looking up:-)) *singing 'Happy Days are Here Again'*
~Tracy #1882
Cheryl -Tracy, 'fess up. ...... boffins Ok, Ok ..I confess, I am the REAL Bridget Jones. 34 ish, single, professional from the Home Counties - trouble is I've let myself go a bit of late (all that Milk Tray I s'pose) and need to lose many, many pounds! Y'know it's getting hard to squeeze myself into those frocks so have sent them off to Wellington in manner of trendy philanthropist. Hakuna Matata! My grateful thanks to those who stepped into the breach on the boffin question, especially Ann whose daffy scientist was exactly what I had in mind.
~winter #1883
Tracy (all that Milk Tray I s'pose) HEY! Don't you bring Milk Tray into this! ;-D THanks for the info, Karen. At the moment, I'm close enough to Toronto that a trip up there in early August would've been ideal. But, if it's late August, then I guess I'm out of luck, eh? Have just come back from Mall of America in Minneapolis. All I can say is, "I made it out of there barely alive!" Hope your trip is going better, Moon.
~judy #1884
Help, LMAO can you explain to a new recruit,please. Eileen,Tracy,any excuse to have ODB's pic on the tellywill do .I know another way - show DQ! karen Londinium will be screened in Toronto Phew-relief-I was beginning to think it had been forgotton.
~lizbeth54 #1885
Thanks for keeping us in touch with all the news, Karen! I noticed that, according to IMDB, the cimematography for "Londinium" was done by the same person who did "Mrs Dalloway"...which I thought was very classy. The look of a movie *does* matter...and they had great weather for the shoot (we actually had a summer last year!)and chose some excellent locations. See, I'm an optimist. (It has to be better than some of the crass Brit movies currently being successful. And, I am reliably informed, Jack Dee is very much an "in" comedian with the 16-19 year olds who flock to the movies in the UK) Judy...if you're interested in buying SLOW, check for availability with mailorder VideoPlus Direct (01733 232800). I was told that they would be getting it, but no date yet. And I should think that MLSF will be out on rental in a couple of months. I'm really pleased to hear that CF is going to be available in the North America again...September "Londinium", October RV (and you can videotape it!) and February BJD...not bad! I also think that if "Armadillo" is a 2 parter (and I would guess for BBC2), and if they start shooting soon, there's no reason to delay showing it. "Madam Bovary" was shown within a few months of completion (and shown first in the US). I'm just hoping that this spate of incredible delays on CF projects (2 to 3 years for nearly everything!) is over!!
~kolin #1886
The Toronto Film Festival runs from September 7-16 http://www.bell.ca/filmfest/2000/index.asp The official list of films shown will come out only August 22, but passes and coupons go on sale in July. Tickets for single films go on sale only September 6th.
~Brown32 #1887
I have a new pic on my RV page from a Julie A fan - the one who sent me stuff from the Isle of Man. Her friend took it, and they were disappointed not to catch his face, but I like the feel of the picture - all anticipation. http://www.geocities.com/firthfan/values/values.html
~kolin #1888
If you are thinking of coming to Toronto for the Film Festival here is some information from the Festival website: Special rates on Air Canada Air Canada, the official airline of the Toronto International Film Festival, offers special rates to the Festival from Air Canada gates in North America and around the world (some conditions apply). Call your travel agent or Air Canada at 1-800-361-7585 or (514) 393-9494. Please ask that the Festival Event Number CV500910 be entered in the Tour Code box of your ticket regardless of the fare urchased. Hotel reservations Special hotel rates are available through the Festival's Guest Relations Office. If you require information or reservations, please call Festival Guest Relations at (416) 934-3210 or fax us at (416) 966-1329, and ask for PYO Hotel rates. Due to the volume of inquiries please allow at least two weeks to process your requests. All hotel requests are subject to availability.
~KarenR #1889
Re: Londinium I'm getting some confusing and conflicting information now. I wonder if they "can't" confirm the information because the TIFF hasn't (a) made all its decisions and (b) released its final list of films. Oh well, if it turns out to be true, then you read it here first. If not, then, go rent The Best of Binder at Blockbuster. ;-)
~patas #1890
I do like the pic, Murph, you're right about the atmosphere :-) I suppose that's the same Audi that drove ODB to location the first evening of MarkG's investigation?
~MarkG #1891
Nope. In fact, the Audi at the BJD shoot (silver) was later (perhaps) found to be RZ's car, as it always seems to be driven by the ex-bouncer who appears to be RZ's regular personal driver.
~patas #1892
Oh well... Hope he doesn't drive a Fiat Uno...;-)
~judy #1893
Bethan,thanks for the phone number unfortunately they had never heard of it and didn't have it listed even under rental videos,although she had heard of CFand did have a few titles under his name. I think I had better renew my membership with Blockbusters. Murph, I liked the photo-he looks good from any angle!
~lizbeth54 #1894
Oh, sorry for that..... perhaps it depends on who you speak to. The salesperson I spoke to said that they'd had a lot of enquiries for SLOW and it would be available at some date, but they didn't know when. I think SLOW can be bought from blackstar videos , but it's priced at �60 plus! Best wait (or rent from Blockbusters!)
~lizbeth54 #1895
http://www.blackstar.co.uk Search under Secret Laughter of Women It's �66.99! But will come down eventually to normal price range.
~judy #1896
~lizbeth54 #1897
Sorry, this is in dribs and drabs...but I never realised how informative a site blackstar is. Gives cinema listings as well. RV is still showing on about 20 screens, and, surprisingly, MLSF is still showing in Stirling (a very nice (large) arts cinema...we went there one holiday) and Dublin.
~judy #1898
Bethan, thanks for the extra info on SLOW.The girl I spoke to did sound pretty useless!
~Tracy #1899
Judy, Ann..........Re SLOW, Blackstar have it for �66-99, bensonsworld.co.uk for �59.35 (WOW what a saving!!). Bensons say "If you can't wait, we can often source ex-rental, or rental copies that have never been used, at a much more reasonable price (usually around �30). Please contact us with your specific requirements I don't know how reputable they are having never used them (I got their name from my ISPs shopping page - they were given three stars by Lineone - likewise Blackstar). NOT that I've been shopping around at all :-P
~judy #1900
~judy #1901
Sorry I keep pressing the wrong button. Tracy, NOT that I've been shopping around at all-you need to at those prices-NOT that I'm a skinflint or anything. Bethan,you're right about Blackstar,I've just had a nosey around and they're v.informative.
~Tracy #1902
Whilst scouring the various vid sites I've spotted the artwork to 'The Advocate'..what I want to know is what the Sam Hill is that supposed to be on the cover? I suppose it vaguely resembles ODB but since when did Maria wear a -strappy chemisey thing ?? See what I mean..(probably not if my PC skills are anything to go by, if the pic is not here check out amazon.com, search for The Advocate and you'll see what I'm looking at) Many apologies if this has been covered before in the dim and distant past of Ye Olde Droole Boarde.
~KarenR #1903
(Tracy) I've spotted the artwork to 'The Advocate' You're so generous to call it "artwork," although I know you mean it in a graphics sense. Yes, us poor souls over here have had to abide with this thoroughly ridiculous cover as well as the missing minutes from the real film. Runners up in the same category of "whothehelldesignedorisonthecover" category is Playmaker and Dutch Girls.
~catheyp #1904
I purchased SLoW from an on line store a few months ago for �41 (free postage). I can't find the link at the moment but if anyone is interested, mail me privately and I will pass it on when I can.
~KarenR #1905
And the answer to "what the Sam Hill" is on the Advocate's cover... Looks to me like those people who were cavorting around naked for the human hunt in Courtois' dream. Doesn't the guy remind you of the sicko son?
~judy #1906
Ah well any excuse to watch it again.
~CherylB #1907
"Playmaker's" cover is a hoot. Seriously, in the "what the Sam Hill" category -- those people bear no resemblance at all to CF and that horrible actress Jennifer Rubin.
~lafn #1908
We could play the game: What question would you ask Colin if you saw him in person? (Keep it clean;-) Cheryl you just posted your question.... "Did you pose for the Playmaker video cover?" Mine: Was that your high school picture that was featured in the 3 DOR program?
~Arami #1909
... Who the heck is Sam Hill?... 8-O
~heide #1910
(Karen) "whothehelldesignedorisonthecover" category is Playmaker and Dutch Girls. Included in this category is Femme Fatale's cover...the disembodied blue head. At least it's Colin's head. (Evelyn) What question would you ask Colin if you saw him in person? Ooh, good game, Evie. I'd ask if he's in disguise when he wears his pink-tinted glasses. (Or were they blue?) Glad for the news about Londinium. Won't get too excited yet as per instructions but I'm checking flights anyway. Wouldn't worry too much about availability for film tickets. Don't think a Mike Binder/Mariel Hemingway flick will be boffo at the box office. Meredith, good idea about Starz. Hope you got it when they had free installation. I'll be calling my cable company up soon too. Should be plenty of VCRs ready to roll.
~KJArt #1911
Luckily, I've got a friend who sees STARZ (**Heehee**), and he's promised to roll the tape come October. (He's got a dish and digital, too. Gee!) Aren't I lucky? ;-)
~lyndaw #1912
The on-ine store selling SLOW for 41 UKP is KVS - www.kvs.co.uk. No, I haven't ordered it yet. With Cdn dollars almost as worthless as Mexican pesos and the cost of conversion, I will wait a bit. Hopefully the price will come down. I hope Londinium will be shown at the Toronto FF - am looking forward to meeting all you droolies. Toronto is much less expensive than London and a nice city to visit in the fall.
~heide #1913
LOL..was hoping you'd turn up Lynda. If not, I was going to torment you via e-mail. Don't worry, we won't be camping on your doorstep if things do work out fortuitously but will be counting on your GWN expertise. Scour those Toronto papers for us!
~Tracy #1914
(Karen) "whothehelldesignedorisonthecover" category is Playmaker and Dutch Girls. Ooh *shaking head with a pained expression* that Dutch Girls cover....it is a bit of a worry isn't it? Assuming the guy clutching the tulip & wearing the tartan scarf is supposed to be Neil - why has he metamorphosed into Jim Dale? And not quite on the same subject but almost, why is OBD's face obscured by Kathy Bates' chin on the 'Hostages' cover? Come to think of it ...why is she on it at all considering she occupied about 0.0001% of screentime?( Yeah, yeah I know the answer..big name, blah, blah..but you can't blame me for whingeing can you? Anyway I have to keep the "Whingeing Pom" stereotype going for all our Aussie cousins!) ;-D
~Tracy #1915
Whoops hadn't finished. On the subject of the blurry 'Empire' pic, I emailed them thusly: "Am puzzled by the picture accompanying the Bridget Jones blurb on p 43 of Aug 2000 issue. What is it of? My money is on a wrestling match between Colin Firth & Hugh Grant but perhaps you can enlighten me or better still the picture!!" And got the following reply from Emma Cochrane: "Your guess is right, it's one of those long lens jobs, hence the fuzzy edges." Inspired! *huge helpings of sarcasm* So there you have it, confirmation that it is CF and HG (rather than MarkG wrestling with his fanbase) and that Empire obviously employ quality photographers for their scoops ;-/
~patas #1916
Good for you Tracy! Inspired indeed :-)
~judy #1917
Tracy great detective work with the empire pic-nevermind a whingeing pom you're one smart lady. Now tell us why its CF who's down and not HG?
~KarenR #1918
*hee hee* Good going, Tracy! Turning into a real Go-Getter, a whinging one albeit, but a go-getter nevertheless. Long lens stuff reminds me...I've got some of those to develop for Gi and Heide. ;-) Think mine will be clearer *she says with no clue*
~Tracy #1919
July - great detective work Just doing my duty Karen - Think mine will be clearer Ooh, I think that anything you do will make the Empire snapper's photographic excellence (NOT) pale into insignificance (even with no clue)! For we droolers are a band of resourceful, go-getting, top techie types willing (oh so very willing) to turn our hands to anything *grin* ;-)~~
~patas #1920
(KarenR)Long lens stuff reminds me...I've got some of those to develop for Gi and Heide. ;-) I can't remember... Now I'm very curious :-)
~Tracy #1921
Judy -Now tell us why its CF who's down and not HG? Beats me. Well, at least CFs face is to the camera rather than HGs. Although I think I know whose bum I'd prefer to look at. Sorry, lowering the tone again. ;-D
~Brown32 #1922
I long for a clearer picture of that scuffle. Thanks, Tracy, for your work. Karen, I look forward to seeing your "clearer" view. I now have a page on my web site for original art work by Colin fans, and our own KJ has sent in her lovely graphite on paper offering. Thanks, KJ. Anyone else have something to send in? I tell how on my news page. http://www.geocities.com/firthfan/art/artwork.html
~KarenR #1923
My clearer view isn't of that picture, Murph. Totally different stuff and not even Colin. ;-O
~heide #1924
Enterprising lassie, Tracy. Thanks for the confirmation. Yes, why does our DB look like he getting the tar beaten out of him again. While we know he gets the girl, I wouldn't mind him being on the winning side of a tussle for a change. Gi, my guess is that Karen's got some close-ups for us of those love patches that have been rubbed off his scalp. ;-) Tell me I'm wrong, please.
~heide #1925
not even Colin. ;-O Goodie, that was quick, Karen.
~Arami #1926
the Empire snapper's photographic excellence (NOT) One less for the eBay (or is it eBuy?) auction.
~patas #1927
(KarenR)not even Colin. ;-O Curiouser and curiouser... :-)
~judy #1928
Not even Colin;-O, Come on karen spill the beans,I can't stand the suspense. Tracy,don't apologize for lowering the tone,you can talk about his bum all day for me.If they did have to knock him down couldn't he just have been wearing a MD towel-you know lay down legs splayed wide!
~Arami #1929
Decorum, woman!
~Arami #1930
(Besides, what you would possibly see from that angle, isn't particularly pretty, even on CF. Interesting, maybe - but definitely not pretty.) ;-)
~KarenR #1931
(Judy)Come on karen spill the beans, I can't stand the suspense. shush! Mel's the word (Arami) Besides, what you would possibly see from that angle, isn't particularly pretty, even on CF. Your source, please.
~judy #1932
(Karen),Your source,please.Yes come on Arami the balls are in your court now! (karen),shush!Mel's the word-is that supposed to help,thats made it even worse-I can't think under pressure
~EileenG #1933
(Judy) Yes come on Arami the balls are in your court now! Atta girl, Judy, that's the spirit.
~KarenR #1934
(Judy) I can't think under pressure On the contrary, as evidenced by the response above. OK, the pics I have are of Mel Gibson, the scourge of Liverpool. ;-)
~lizbeth54 #1935
Decorum, woman! I think that now he 's in the habit of taking mum and mama-in-law to screenings, decorum is all you're ever going to get. Although there's always the the kilt in "Armadillo"! My clearer view Talking of "clearer views" nothing can ever beat a certain scene in "Playmaker", a high resolution 14" TV screen and a sharp pair of eyes! :-) Lots of stuff in the papers about the role of the Englishman in current Hollywood movies....from butler to baddie. An English accent is now seen as "evil"! I'm wondering if Mark Darcy is just about the only portrayal of the Englishman as a decent bloke/mildly "heroic" type that we're likely to see this side of the Millenium. Even Brit movies are all about sadistic gangsters or pathetic, bumbling nerds...not a hero in sight! Yes, why does our DB look like he getting the tar beaten out of him again. While we know he gets the girl, I wouldn't mind him being on the winning side of a tussle for a change. Yes! Agreed. Can't he win for once? He's always getting beaten by men who are shorter than him. And why are MD and DC brawling? I hope the Richard Curtis version keeps the P&P parallels....Andrew Davies had said that in *his* screenplay, he emphasised the similarities with P&P. I'd like to see MD as the slightly detached noble saviour of BJ's family (you see, an English hero)...fat chance!
~judy #1936
Did someone mention a kilt-ah the possibilities! Bethan,I envy you your control.How can you write about CF in a kilt and that P scene and still manage to write sensibly afterwards.Did you take a cold shower between passages? (Karen)the scourge of Liverpool-the wonderful world of publicity-thats enough to get my fellow mancuniansto see it.
~Arami #1937
(Karen)Your source,please. LOL! (judy) the balls are in your court now! LMAO! I wish! Alas, the balls are still firmly attached as before and completely out of reach...;-D I'm afraid there's only one player now... and she's not among us... ;-P (Bethan) nothing can ever beat a certain scene in "Playmaker", a high resolution 14" TV screen and a sharp pair of eyes! :-) LOL! I still think it's an optical illusion. The angle is all wrong ;-P
~lizbeth54 #1938
LOL! I still think it's an optical illusion. The angle is all wrong ;-P Looked all right to me. To quote a well known phrase..."No acting required in that department at least" :-) So, what angle were you expecting....obtuse, acute? In the interests of scientific dicovery and impartial evaluation, I once viewed selected parts of the tape on our larger screen TV, and I can tell you that size does matter! 14" (the TV screen, that is) high resolution produces a much sharper image. No optical illusion, definitely TRT!
~lizbeth54 #1939
Sorry, potential Freudian slip...."discovery" of course!
~heide #1940
I have never seen TRT in P myself. But, as with Santa Claus, I continue to believe in the possibility. ;-) Oh, to get hold of that Bridget Jones screenplay. Oh Markeee!
~EileenG #1941
(Bethan) And why are MD and DC brawling? It has to do with two magic words used liberally within the film industry: "based" and "on". I hope the Richard Curtis version keeps the P&P parallels....Andrew Davies had said that in *his* screenplay, he emphasised the similarities with P&P. Don't know about this. RC has perfected his winning (read: moneymaking) formula, has he not? Wonder what *he* would have done with P&P...;-P (Heide) Oh, to get hold of that Bridget Jones screenplay Now, there's an idea. Oh Markeee Indeed!
~lizbeth54 #1942
There was a news item today on the radio about Tony Blair's current run of "bad luck". The commentator said that there were choppy waters ahead for him as the BBC were going ahead with their planned drama about the rise to political power of a young charismatic leader, which would be shown before the next General Electiion and would be directed by Peter Kosminsky. A source said that the material was expected to be very controversial, revealing and thought-provoking. I still think that this will be an excellent project to get involved in...as centre stage as you can get! They are talking about a Spring Election...May latest.
~Arami #1943
the BBC were going ahead with their planned drama about the rise to political power of a young charismatic leader... the material was expected to be very controversial, revealing and thought-provoking. If Colin does get involved I shall hope for the best - but I shall also be very, very uneasy... The last time he was in a "very controversial, revealing and thought-provoking drama", the political row was so loud as to drown almost completely the excellence of the production and the outstanding acting... Remember Tumbledown? :-(
~SadieR #1944
I'm back!! Survived 'holiday'! Will have more to say about this soon. Returned to civilization to find it all gone bonkers, and ball courts and TRT scenarios! Colin Firth board is now place for Darcy Drool? And Darcy Drool Board is for? . . . v.v. confusing but very interesting! Darcy Drool Board must, according to my Drool Manuel 2000, always exceed the limits of other boards in terms of its Droolability:
~SadieR #1945
The United League of Sensible Women's International Declaration on Drooling Sports and other related activities, governing the spirit and letter of all operations at SPRING DROOL* (*SPRING DROOL:Geneva-type international structure for the peaceful exchange of information pertaining to all Drooling sports, negotiations, and related activities, inclusive of all persons of the female persuasion, either lurked or delurked (and, additionally,sympathetic men)regardless of race, creed, or color, etc.., in accordance with the United League of Sensible Women, the political body which it serves.) Formed secretly in 1945,in recognition of a felt need the United League of Sensible Women (and sympathetic men) was mandated to steer all activities and energies of their country of origin towards a much more gratifying exchange between nations, "to the end that every individual and every organ of society, keeping this Declaration constantly in mind, shall strive by teaching and education to promote respect for these rights and freedoms pertaining to said Drooling activites,and by progressive measures, national and international, to secure their universal and effective recognition and observance, as a means to lasting peace, both among the peoples of Member States themselves and among the peoples of territories under their jurisdiction." Other Notable Events in Development of the United League of Sensible Women: 1960s: John Lennon and Yoko Ono become most public advocates of League mandate. 1990s: Advent of world wide web means that Drool exchanges are no longer hand-written or restricted to primitive type of email exchange. 1995: Colin Firth is recognized by the United League of Sensible Women as the primary locus of Drool activity; Spring Drool is formed shortly thereafter. ARTICLE 1 All Droolers are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of sister/sympathetic-brotherhood. ARTICLE 31 Colin Firth is, and shall remain, the primary locus of all Drooling sports, negotiations, and related activities, either with regard to his entire being, or simply various, er, aspects of his being. ARTICLE 32 The Colin Firth/Darcy Drool Board must always exceed the limits of other boards in terms of its Droolability. In the unlikely event that another board exceeds the Colin Firth/Darcy Drool Board in terms of its Droolability, all members are required to set this serious matter to rights by posting messages on the Colin Firth/Darcy Drool Board which rank more highly on the droolability scale. Snappies are also highly desirable. Should this adjustment not occur, then the United League of Sensible Women (and sympathetic men) will be forced to plead with and heckle, (but never threaten) all fan-fic authors to post on said board, until a satisfactory higher level of droolability has been obtained.
~judy #1946
(Arami)very,very uneasy...I agree.I would love him to be in topical,hard hitting drama but I have a feeling he would do more for Tony Blair than a comparison with TB could ever do for him.I can see the headlines now 'Darcy for PM' although that may regain a few of those lost WI votes.Yes it could definitely become another Tumbledown lost in a political quagmire. Sadie hope you enjoyed your holiday.I'm not sure if we've 'met' or whether I delurked while you were away.I am very interested in your drooling sports (Arami I would like to apologize in advance for my 2nd loss of decorum)and would like to join up for any ball games. Here we go,here we go,here we go...
~SadieR #1947
Judy, Judy, Judy . . . sorry, could not resist! No, we have not met officially. OFFICIALLY: WELCOME Have enjoyed reading your funny posts while catching up since "holiday", such as it was!
~heide #1948
Thank you, Sadie, for your Spring Declaration. By God, you've got it! Darcy Drool is for Darcy drooling and Colin Firth is...guess what? for Colin drooling! I was wondering if you'd made it back from the wilds and am glad to see you've returned unharmed, unbowed and irrepressible as ever. ;-) the material was expected to be very controversial, revealing and thought-provoking. Well, our boy was never one to shy away from a controversial topic. Think this is not one of those projects he's doing to support that jetsetting lifestyle. ;-)
~KarenR #1949
Welcome back, Sadie. I see that trip to the wilderness has not dulled your appareciation for the "cultured" world of Drool. ;-) BTW, Colin's done the kilt thing before... lest you forget those adorable legs striding along in MLSF. NOTE: We are getting v.v. close to message 1999, which will be the last in this topic. So whoever is around then, please shut off the lights, lock the door and leave a note for everyone to join us at 133 (which I think should be next).
~Brown32 #1950
"He was pleased to be wearing a kilt again after so many years and surprised, as he always was, by the transformation it wrought on him. He almost didn't recognize himself... "You've got to have the right arse for a kilt," said Oliver Rollo, throwing his cigarette end into the fire. "That's essential." Lorimer could have sworn, inwardly, that at the mention to word "arse" a sudden coolness seemed to spread across his buttocks. "Och aye, he's a true Scot," Potts said, standing behind him, the pleated hem of his kilt held high in her hands. "he's nae wearing knickers." -- Armadillo, Chapter 8
~SadieR #1951
Thanks for such nice welcome back, Karen and Heide. Was as warm as the long shower I savoured as soon as I got home! I have discovered v. good reasons why we have formed ourselves as CIVILIZATIONS!!! Have missed this place soooooo much. Glad you like my declaration. For what else do we live but to commit sophistry in the service of Drool! (Heide)Thank you, Sadie, for your Spring Declaration. By God, you've got it! Darcy Drool is for Darcy drooling and Colin Firth is...guess what? for Colin drooling! Sounds bloody fantastic to me! Although...oh, I see, Mr. Darcy is not really Mr. Firth. Hmmm. That's going to get v. confusing.
~KarenR #1952
Such a great passage from Armadillo, Murph....but you know the camera won't be shooting from behind. :-o (Sadie) oh, I see, Mr. Darcy is not really Mr. Firth. Hmmm. That's going to get v. confusing. Just remember these immortal words from Bridget: "Then we had a long discussion about the comparative merits of Mr Darcy and Mark Darcy, both agreeing that Mr Darcy was more attractive because he was ruder but that being imaginary was a disadvantage that could not be overlooked." As most of us can testify, there's no substitute for the Firth in the Flesh.
~KarenR #1953
Does this sound familiar: [from The Sunday Times] Sean Bean is gambling on a blockbusting new Lord of the Rings trilogy. Could it prove the touch of magic his career deserves, asks GARTH PEARCE Sean Bean has always been a risk-taker. He's been in a Bond film and a Harrison Ford hit but, to the public, he's TV's Sharpe. He could be aiming for Hollywood, but he's allowed himself to be anchored down by television and small-budget movies so he can remain living in Britain. It's a constant tightrope walk, from which he's toppled more than once as the years have taken him from twentysomething sex symbol to a thrice-married 41-year-old father of three daughters. But nothing quite sums up his bumpy career path more than his latest role as Boromir in the $300m epic trilogy based on The Lord of the Rings. [...] [Alex] Kingston, of course, has done with the slender international success of Moll Flanders something Bean has so far failed to do with his strong portfolio: use it as a springboard for solid Hollywood recognition. She has been enjoying rich pickings as Dr Elizabeth Corday in ER. Bean, on the other hand, has nearly made it several times.... It does not seem to bother him. "The Hollywood life has never really appealed," he says. "I do not go to too many dos or premieres. It seems such a palaver, you know. I could be doing other things. I went to the premiere for Ronin at the Venice Film Festival. It was an extraordinary experience, but then it's back to the hotel room and you think, 'What was all that about?' "Whichever accent Bean uses on screen - Irish, Geordie, clipped English, Essex - away from it, he delivers in broad, no-nonsense Sheffield steel. It's straight, call-a-spade-a-shovel stuff. "I can do accents, no problem," he says. "I don't know what anyone makes of them, though, particularly in America. It is difficult for some people to accept you unless you're playing a decent guy with a decent accent. I'm doing Boromir in RP [received pronunciation], and he's a bit of a hero, so that might make a difference." [...] "My twenties were full of excitement, my thirties were all about consolidating, and now I have to look at things in a new light. Before Essex Boys and The Lord of the Rings, the stuff I was offered was not good and I suddenly realised I had to be careful."
~judy #1954
(Karen)Colin's done the kilt thing before-aagh MLSF never reached me in the back of beyond. Murph,loved that quote"the pleated hem of his kilt held high in her hands,"he's nae wearing knickers." Colin has to do Armadillo!Seriously though when I firstread Armadillo I thought it had Colin's name written all over it. Karen,I can see why the article about SB rang a bell but I was green with envy when I read about him beingin Lord Of The Rings I always wanted CF to be Aragorn.
~Tracy #1955
Sadie, back with a BANG I see - loved your Drooling Sports declaration. Obviously the holiday did not stifle your drooling capabilities. Judy - would like to join up for any ball games. Here we go,here we go,here we go. Would like to suggest season ticket to same ;-D On Armadillo, I agree whole-heartedly -when it was first mooted (all those months back) that there was a vague link-ette with CF and I rushed out to WH Smiths to buy a copy just in case, on reading just the first few chapters I decided it had to be done ..and he was definitely the man to do it. (Mind you, did exactly the same with MoB - anybody know the score there??) Karen - Such a great passage from Armadillo, Murph....but you know the camera won't be shooting from behind. :-o Say it ain't so! But you're probably so right, more's the pity :-(. We shall have to console ourselves by superimposing the image of Courtois/Talbert, in their respective bathrooms, at that point in the piece. *he-he-he*
~judy #1956
(Tracy)rushed out to WH Smiths to buy a copy just in case-SNAP That season ticket is a must buy.I've also took your advice about superimposing images and the effect is cheeky!
~patas #1957
(KarenR) OK, the pics I have are of Mel Gibson, the scourge of Liverpool. ;-) Ooooh! I can't wait :-) (Bethan) Even Brit movies are all about sadistic gangsters or pathetic, bumbling nerds...not a hero in sight! Aren't you forgetting one? The greatest hero of them all? A hint: his name is Bond... James Bond... (Judy) would like to join up for any ball games. Here we go,here we go,here we go. (Tracy)Would like to suggest season ticket to same ;-D Wow! And I was recently complaining of too much seriousness in these boards... :-D
~KarenR #1958
Why isn't there a snappy/capture of Edward in his kilt? *hands on hips, tapping toes* Have found a rather long article about another television project William Boyd appears to be very busy with now. Will post on 127, as doesn't mention CF or Armadillo. Would give anything to see the steam coming out from your ears, Bethan! ;-)
~SadieR #1959
(Karen)As most of us can testify, there's no substitute for the Firth in the Flesh LOL Karen, and I love that quote too. I have not had the pleasure of Firth in the Flesh (the Flesh of Firth?; who's on Firth, whot's on second, wake up and smell the coffee...Firth Base) but Bridget has a point. Must look for MD out there!!! "Och aye, he's a true Scot," LOL Murph. Also, have been meaning to tell you that I've enjoyed your site. (Karen)Colin's done the kilt thing before (Judy)- never reached me in the back of beyond. Judy, try lifting it from the front! (Tracy)Sadie, back with a BANG I see I always enjoy a good --- one of those things you mentioned and wrote in upper case letters...Sliding straight to the gutter :-) Judy - would like to join up for any ball games. Here we go,here we go,here we go. (Tracy)Would like to suggest season ticket to same ;-D *snort* Ah, of bums and bangs and balls and Bonds, and Colins and Kilts and Games. Drool monitor is screeching. Steam and smoke. Where is my fan? You realize, we're getting sooooo good at lowering the moral tone (yippie) and raising the drool bar, that it's going to be mighty HARD to top it. Quick, somebody send in those missing minutes from The Advocate. Or maybe just a snappie from Playmaker...yes, any excuse. (Gi) Wow! And I was recently complaining of too much seriousness in these boards LOL. I can safely assure you madam, that I am rarely serious. (Meant to sound impressively Darcyish, whilst he stands and lifts his kilt to moon...sorry, I am all run away with my feelings. Moon, this must be a happy thought for you, though, no?) Dearest, loveliest Evelyn, where are you? So sorry I missed your B-day! Hope it was a terrific one. Sean Bean? Do not know him at all. Is he good-looking? Sure does echo CF's sentiments!
~CherylB #1960
(Bethan) Even Brit movies are all about sadistic gangsters or pathetic, bumbling nerds...not a hero in sight! (Gi) Aren't you forgetting one? The greatest hero of them all? A hint: his name is Bond... James Bond... Do you know what junk bonds are? Any James Bond movies in which Sean Connery does not star. I enjoyed the article on Sean Bean. Lately he's been in television commercials for AccuView contact lenses; at least, in the United States. It's nice to see that you've returned from your excursion into the wilds Sadie. I'm also certian that all the woodland creatures, large and small, are grateful you and your boyfriend are no longer there to terrorize them. Just kidding.
~judy #1961
(Sadie)try lifting it from the front-I always do as I'm told but if you don't mind I'll do it one-handed I'll need the other one free...its a hard job but someone'sgot to do it! Sean Bean is not good looking unless you like ugly! He did play a baddie in one of the Bond films but I don't know which one.
~patas #1962
(CherylB) Do you know what junk bonds are? Any James Bond movies in which Sean Connery does not star. I beg to disagree ;-) All Bond movies are junk, notwithstanding Sean Connery. On the other hand, they are pretty entertaining when you just need a rest for your little grey cells. Also, a hero is a hero, irrespective of what junk movie he is in. And I love Pierce Brosnan :-)
~Tracy #1963
Judy, Sean Bean was in Goldeneye and I agree - not a patch on CF in the looks stakes but then I don't go particularly for blonds. Other things you may have caught him in (don't know if they were shown elsewhere other than the UK) was the series Sharpe and the 1992 TV adaptation of Lady Chatterly's Lover - he was Mellors. He was also in that other footie movie that took a nose dive 'When Saturday Comes'. (Judy) try lifting it from the front-I always do as I'm told but if you don't mind I'll do it one-handed I'll need the other one free...its a hard job but someone's got to do it! Pffttt! *spraying coffee all over the monitor* Glad to see that tone is well and truly lowered..hurrah!
~Arami #1964
I beg your pardon but I don't subscribe to the United League of Sensible Women. I've always been a maniac and a loner. However, I shall have to declare a keen interest in ball games. Secondly, when I come here for my periodical relief from my daily tribulations, the last thing I expect to hit me in the eyes is the name of some male person in the acting profession other than ODB. So please refrain from overtly declaring your admiration for Beans, Connerys, Brosnans and other such likes around here - and if it's absolutely, but absolutely crucial to the discussion to mention these names, at least write them in very small letters. Thank you. And now I'd like to reserve my place in the queue (line) for the kilt.
~Arami #1965
Oops, come and relief should be in bold, but I'm lagging behind with my html. ;-)
~patas #1966
Arami, be content that Brosnan didn't hit you in big bold red CAPITAL letters... My html is not too bad yet ;-)
~SadieR #1967
(CherylB)Do you know what junk bonds are? Any James Bond movies in which Sean Connery does not star. Here,here...well...Gi, I see your point about Brosnan...so many Bonds, so little time for international intrigues. Maniacal Arami Alert! Must make it DIRECTLY about CF :-) Imagine: "My name is Bond. Colin Bond." Or maybe: "Look out, it's Mr.Bean tripping down the stairs.Darcy Bean. Oh my God, he's knocked Colin Bond directly into Firth Connery, who promptly beats the tar out of him, even though he's taller. But wait, who is that woman with a film camera in one hand, and a maniacal expression on her face. Good God, with one swift jump cut,and a terribly determined splice, she's landed them all in a rerun of Three's Company, or was that a quick parallel action sequence in Rescued By Rover? Just teasing Arami, I deeply respect a woman who chooses to be in A League of Her Own.
~lafn #1968
Wassup? No ball game today?
~judy #1969
(Evelyn) Wassup? No ball game today? Not to worry its nearly time for lick-off oops sorry kick-off!
~CherylB #1970
Sadie, don't even get me started on my diatribe against Colin Firth playing James Bond. Grrr. Arami, I don't want to sleep with Sean Bean, I just think him a good actor. I liked the interview with him for several reasons; one of which was comparing what he had to say about being a fortyish actor who chooses to live and work in England to what Colin Firth had to say about it.
~Arami #1971
that woman with a film camera in one hand, and a maniacal expression on her face Sadie, have you been spying on me in Covent Garden? ;-) (CherylB)I don't want to sleep with Sean Bean Are you absolutely certain? ;-)
Help!
The Spring · spring.net · Drool! / Topic 129 · AustinSpring.com
📚 SERIES · 7 parts
This topic is part of a multi-part series:
  1. Part 3
  2. Part 4
  3. Part 5
  4. Part 6
  5. Part 7
  6. Part 8
  7. Part 10