~sprin5
Fri, Nov 3, 2000 (08:03)
#101
She was bad to the bone.
~MarciaH
Tue, Nov 7, 2000 (21:36)
#102
The Middle East
Theodor Herzl is considered the father of Zionism. He felt
that Jews across the world would always be susceptible to
anti-Semitism as long as there was no Jewish state. Arab
nationalism was a simple idea, which consisted of a search
for a long lost Arab identity. For hundreds of years, the
Arabs had been under the leadership of the Ottoman Empire.
At the early part of the 20th century, there was a possibility
for these two movements to co-exist. This is a story of that
lost opportunity.
In the beginning of the 20th century, about a half million
Arabs lived in Palestine along with about 50,000 Jews. The
budding discontent within the Ottoman Empire provided the new
Zionist movement with its first real choice. Should they work
with the Arabs against the Turks and join the upcoming revolt
or should they try to acquire an international charter for a
Jewish homeland? Unfortunately, the early Zionists sided with
the Turks, but a small minority advocated working with the Arabs.
The Arab leaders faced a dilemma of their own. Should they
work with the new settlers or oppose them? This is not as
unusual as it sounds today. The early deputies of Palestine
spoke of the common Semitic heritage among the two people.
But Jewish leaders felt that getting along with the Arabs
was secondary to the establishing of a Jewish homeland. What
they needed was the help of a European state to help them
establish a charter. At first, Herzl went to the Sultan but
the conversations went nowhere. Then, he approached Kaiser
Wilhelm who considered the idea briefly but the Kaiser was
rigid anti-Semite and eventually sided with the Turks.
Finally, Herzl turned to the British, who liked the idea
because it was a way to extend the British control and
protect the Suez canal.
Nothing happened until the outbreak of the first world war,
which opened the doors of opportunity for the Jewish state.
In November of 1917, the Zionists achieved their aim with the
Balfour Declaration. There were many reasons for the British
decision, including an effort to engage the United States in
the war, the fear of Bolshevik revolution and those who saw
this as a way to maintain a foothold in the Middle East.
The leader of the Arabs was Emir Faisel. Faisel was fighting
the Turks with the hopes of creating a great Arab kingdom and
was aided in this by T.E. Lawrence, who was a British agent
in Cairo. Lawrence was extremely anti-French and saw the Arab
Nationalist movement as a way to cheat the French and extend
British control over the area. Faisel, for his part, was
sympatric with the aims of a Jewish state. He felt it should
be part of his great kingdom. In a letter to Felix Frankfurter
he stated: "We know the Arabs and Jews are racial relatives.
We shall do everything we can, as far as it depends on us,
to assist the Zionist proposals by the Peace Conference, and
we shall welcome the Jews with all our hearts on their return
home."
This was no idle boost. Two months earlier Faisel and
Welzmann, who was now the leader of the Zionist movement,
had drawn up such a plan under the guidance of Lawrence. The
agreement never happened, as the French invaded Damascus and
drove Faisel out of Syria. The Zionists were rewarded by the
British and talk of a great Semite state disappeared. But the
possibilities were still there and it was a defining moment
that was missed which the people of the Middle East have
paid for ever since.
Sources: Israel Without Zionism, Uri Avnery
~MarciaH
Fri, Nov 10, 2000 (14:04)
#103
Standard Oil and the Nazis
William Teagle was a giant of a man, standing 6'3" tall and
weighing over 260 pounds. Teagle had risen quickly through
the ranks of John D. Rockefeller's Chase Manhattan and later
moved on to Standard Oil. There he avoided scandal after
scandal of price fixing schemes. Teagle enjoyed Cuban cigars
and Nazi politics and was a major contributor to the Nazi
party along with Dutch Shell. Teagle also established early
relations with I.G. Farben.
I.G. Farben was the German industrial giant who had become
rich by arming the Nazi war machine and would soon become
a business partner. Teagle's business interests with I.G.
Farben caused him to visit Berlin frequently. It was at this
time he hired Ivy Lee, the father of public relations, to
help him gain information regarding the United States
government's reaction to the Nazi military build up.
When Hitler came to power, Teagle made sure that Standard Oil
maintained its ties with Germany. Goring's planes could not
fly without the lead additive tetraethyl so Standard, DuPont
and General Motors made sure that he had it. In fact, during
the Battle of Britain, Great Britain actually had to pay
royalty rights to Standard through the French while Goring's
planes bombed London. Because of the bad publicity, Teagle
turned the account over to the Paris office and made sure
their tankers were using a Nazi crew.
Before the United States entered the war, Standard Oil would
ship their oil tankers through Vichy, North Africa. An
example of this can be found in an incident where British
ships seized a oil tanker headed for Casablanca. Cordell Hull
demanded that the vessel be released and when it was, the
ship went on to Africa, soon followed by six additional
freighters. Summer Welles, a State Department official,
accused Standard refueling stations in Mexico and South
America with supplying the Nazi's. In Nicaragua, Standard was
caught delivering Nazi propaganda.
The list goes on and on. On June 15, 1943 Joseph Flick sent
Cordell an astonishing list of oil sales showing Standard
subsidiary firms shipping fuel to Aruba. The list was then
sent to Fascist Spain and later on to Germany. Standard then
sued the United States government for seizing synthetic rubber
patents and using them to aid the Nazi's who were developing
different synthetic products. Judge Charles E. Wyzanski gave
his verdict, which reflected that he had decided against
Standard. The final word came when Standard appealed the case.
Judge Charles Clark words were quite harsh: "Standard Oil can
be considered a national enemy in view of its relationship
with I.G. Farben after the United States and Germany had
become active enemies." Oil companies have no loyalty.
Sources: Trading With the Enemy, Charles Higham
~MarciaH
Tue, Nov 14, 2000 (12:38)
#104
The Election of 1876
While we sit and ponder who will be the next president of the
United States, it might be useful to look at the last time an
election was this close. It was in 1876, the centennial year
of the United States, and it pitted Samuel Tilden against
Rutherford B. Hayes. The states of things at this time was
not good for the country was in a severe depression. Also,
the corruption of the Grant administration caused many to
feel that it was time to end Republican rule.
The South had never accepted the emancipation of black people
and had fought it tooth and nail during reconstruction. It was
during this time that the Ku Klux Klan was born and black
voter's, along with their Republican supporters, were attacked
throughout the South. It was only the presence of federal
troops that kept Republicans in power. The election of 1876
was so close that it was impossible to tell who had won and
to make matters worse, Louisiana, South Carolina and Florida
each had different two different sets of results. The Klan
had attacked black voters and their white supporters during
the election and ballot boxes were stuffed throughout the
region, so when all the dust cleared, it was still impossible
to see who had won.
Early returns had seen Tilden gain the lead but as the
counting continued, Hayes closed the gap and appeared to have
won. When it was all over, Hayes had gained 185 electoral
votes, which was enough to win the election, but Tilden had
won the popular vote. Republican officials had invalidated
many of the Democratic votes in the South because of the
violence and the Democrats challenged the result. There was
even talk about another civil war, and the headline "Tilden
or War" appeared on more than one democratic newspaper. This
was definitely a crisis and despite the rhetoric, neither
side had the stomach for another war. Tilden was a man who
feared disorder and seemed to resign himself to defeat.
Grant didn�t help matters at all. He felt that the 15th
amendment had been a mistake and had done little or nothing to
stop the terror of black people in recent years. He felt, as
many Republicans did, that the party would be better served if
it sought the aid of former members of the Whig Party rather
than black people and their white supporters in the South.
Something had to be done so a commission to solve the matter
was established, consisting of 15 members, five from the
House, five from the Senate and five Supreme Court justices.
The split was even between Republicans and Democrats except
for the Supreme Court members where the GOP had an advantage
of one vote. What the South wanted more than the election of
Tilden was home rule in their states, so a deal was made
whereby Hayes would win the election and in return federal
troops were to be removed from the South. In an 8 to 7 vote,
Hayes was elected president.
While Hayes himself pledged loyalty to black voters and
promised to protect them, Congress refused to appropriate
any money for the troops. In the South, the Democrats now
cut government programs drastically, and in addition, schools,
hospitals and other government services were closed. By 1890,
black people had lost their right to vote and an apartheid
system took over in the South that would not be removed until
the 1960�s. While Hayes would not send troops to the South,
he would send federal troops to break the strike of 1877.
The election was an overall disaster for the United States.
To win, the Republicans had forsaken the rights of black
people and spit on the bravery of those who had fought and
died for the Union cause. The Democrats established a rule
of terror in the South and the idea of democracy in the
United States became a hypocritical joke. Things have changed
in the United States since then. Whoever wins this election
will not face the possibilities of another civil war. It is
a testament to the strength of our democracy that people like
you and I can make jokes about the election. However, in 1876,
it was no joke.
Sources: Reconstruction, Eric Foner
Rutherford B. Hayes, Ari Hoogenbrook
~MarciaH
Tue, Nov 21, 2000 (16:54)
#105
Hugh Thompson, American Hero
Hugh Thompson was the son of an electrical worker and a
military man. His father served in the army and later, for
thirty years, in the navel reserve. Thompson's parents
taught him to stand up for other people and once he defended
a physically handicapped boy from a group of young bullies
who made fun of the unfortunate youngster. After high school,
he joined the navy for three years, but later switched to the
army and entered officer school. He became a helicopter pilot
and was sent to Vietnam in 1967. On March 16, 1968, Thompson
was sent to cover American troops advancing on the village of
My Lai. He saw no hostile fire from the ground so he went back
to the base to refuel. But on the ground something horrible
had begun, the infamous massacre at My Lai. Many of the men
would not follow the orders of the Commanding Officer
Lieutenant Calley. In fact, one man shot himself in the foot
rather than carry out the orders to kill. When Thompson
returned, he was shocked to see what was happening on the
ground.
"We started noticing all those bodies everywhere," said
Thompson. "Your thinking, 'What happened here?' This little
thing in your mind is saying what happened, but you don't
want to believe it because it looks bad...I can remember
thinking, 'Dammit, isn't this what the Nazi's did?'" Thompson
saw a young girl rolling along the ground, obviously in great
pain, and radioed for help. During this time a soldier walked
up to the girl and executed her. Lieutenant Calley was goading
his men to open fire. He had driven the villagers into a
ditch, and with the help of Paul Meadlo, began to slaughter
the Vietnamese. Blood and body parts flew everywhere and when
it was all over, fifty Vietnamese men, woman and children
lay dead on the ground.
Thompson knew it was time to act. He flew down and gathered
help from some of the soldiers on the ground. They sought to
protect another group of villagers who had been thrown into
a ditch by the Americans and awaited a similar fate. Thompson
had seen enough and when a group of American soldiers
approached an elderly couple and a small child fearfully
hiding from the crazed Americans, Thompson's humanity told
him not to let this madness continue. "I was going to save
them. I set the aircraft down this time between the civilians
and the Americans and told my people if they open up, you
open up." The soldiers, who had followed Calley's orders,
felt a sigh of relief since they would not be forced to kill
anymore.
News of the massacre spread among the troops. In fact,
Thompson's heroism most likely saved other lives, because the
Mi Lai massacre was part of a larger search and destroy
operation designed to clear out suspected communist hamlets.
When he landed, Thompson angrily reported what he had seen to
his superiors. The army conducted an investigation of its own
which was led by Colon Powell. Powell tried to whitewash the
whole thing, denying that the massacre occurred, but the army
and Powell were unsuccessful in their cover-up.
Twenty-five men were tried for murder and rape at My Lai but
only Calley was convicted and was later pardoned by Richard
Nixon. Two years ago, Thompson received the Soldiers Medal,
which is awarded for actions on the battlefield not related
to combat with the enemy. Hugh Thompson now goes around the
country speaking about that horrible day. He is an American
hero who knew what the right thing to do was, and did it.
Sources: Lecture by Hugh Thompson
~MarciaH
Fri, Nov 24, 2000 (12:40)
#106
George Seldes: Tell the Truth and Run.
George Seldes lived to the ripe old age of 104 and is
considered to be the link between the muckrakers and the
current alternative press. Seldes was a lifetime critic of
the press who often attacked the "prostitution of the press."
He took on all the powers of his age, including the Tobacco
companies in the 1940's, Mussolini and his American supporters
in the 1920's, Charles Randolph Hearst, J. Edgar Hoover,
Joseph McCarthy and the Communist Party. Seldes never backed
away from a fight and, in fact his book "Tell the Truth and
Run" aptly describes his incredible life.
George Seldes was born in 1890 and grew up with his Jewish
immigrant family in a cooperative farming community in New
Jersey. Seldes came of age in the era of the muckrakers,
which was also a time when journalists reported on and exposed
the injustices of the American system. George got a job at
the Pittsburgh Leader, at the age of 18, for the grand
salary of $3.50 a week. But the era of muckraking was short-
lived as the rich bought the magazines that published these
writers and expansion of advertising caused a self imposed
censorship by the major papers. News was now big business
and there was no room for those who were critical of the
system.
Seldes found himself a job as a war correspondent for the
Chicago Tribune where he reported back on the war, however
the close censorship by the army disturbed him. Once, after
the armistice, he reported favorably on the defeated German
army for he saw them as people and humanized their situation.
This action brought down the wrath of General John Pershing
who threatened to court martial him. Seldes was also one of
the first journalists to be allowed inside the Soviet Union.
He wrote about what he saw, which did not sit well him with
the Communist Party of the new Soviet Union and they soon
asked him to leave their country.
When Seldes was assigned to Italy to report on the newly
created Fascist government of Benito Mussolini, he immediately
reopened the story about the assassination of the Socialist
opposition leader. This angered Mussolini and he began to exert
pressure on Seldes. The newspapers back home supported El
Duce's government while the liberal New York Times compared
him favorably with Jefferson and Adams. Mussolini's corporate
state appealed to publisher's like Hearst and asked him to
write columns for his papers.
Seldes was finally kicked out of Italy so he returned to the
US to write about the disputes between the United States and
Mexico regarding oil. Seldes had the nerve to tell both sides
of the story for which he was promptly fired by the Chicago
Tribune.
At the age of forty, he began to publish his newsletter called
"In Fact." Seldes refused advertising money for his publication
to show that he would not be beholden to the whims of those
advertisers who sought to censor the news. He took on the
Tobacco companies in the early 1940's, long before anyone else
would. Seldes reported studies about the dangers of tobacco
while newspapers and magazine's took tobacco's money and
refused to report findings of the medical community. The
mainstream press had the same information that Seldes had but
they didn't have his integrity.
The same thing went for the FBI. Seldes wrote about the
bureau abuses while the mainstream press lionized the corrupt
FBI Czar. When the hateful demagogue Senator Joseph McCarthy
began his red-baiting campaign. Seldes accurately stated that
the "press chains have made McCarthy a hero." While reporters
knew that McCarthy's allegations about communists were suspect,
their editors were on McCarthy's side. George Seldes was only
interested in the truth. Seldes understood that the attacks
were aimed, not at the communists, but at the New Deal.
Finally, Seldes was forced to close his publication and
started having difficulties in getting his books published.
But he had influenced people like I.F. Stone, Ralph Nadar,
Howard Zinn and many others. At the age of 90, he appeared in
the film "Reds" where he spoke about radical journalist Jack
Reed. George Seldes was one the rare people who criticized the
press and also exposed their prejudices and destroyed their
lies about objectivity. When George Seldes died, the press
lost one its most harshest critics and the public lost one of
its most honest defenders.
Sources: Film Documentary, Tell the Truth and Run
~MarciaH
Sat, Dec 2, 2000 (13:59)
#107
A Brief History of the early Drug Trade
The Opium Trade began in 1500, when Portuguese merchants
first introduced the practice of smoking opium. Opium in its
early days was used as a painkiller and for recreation. The
Chinese believed that smoking opium was barbaric and soon
banned its use. In the 1600's, the drug was introduced to the
people of Persia and was later imported to England by Queen
Elizabeth's trading company. It was distributed throughout
England by the crown, making the historic queen of England
the first renown drug dealer, which is how the empire acquired
most of its fortune.
The Dutch then introduced the blending of tobacco and opium
in its quest to gain a foothold in the emerging drug trade.
However, the British East India Company cut them off quickly
by controlling the growing process in Bengal to assume
control of the trade. The Chinese tried to stop importation,
as the drug epidemic soon reached staggering proportions, but
by that time the British had achieved a monopoly on the drug.
In India, growers were forbidden to sell opium to anyone
other than the British East India Company, giving the British
government a free hand on the drug commission.
While the Chinese sought to ban the drug, the crown sought
other avenues of distribution and soon opium was being grown
for importation into the United States and Europe. Some
Americans, like John Cushing, invested heavily in the trade.
In fact, one of the most famous families of America, the
Astors' of New York, bought tons of the drug which was then
sent to England for sale. This is one of the ways they
acquired their fortune and in effect became a part of the
drug cartel. Considering today's laws, maybe we should
confiscate their property which was, in part, gained through
the sale of opium.
The Chinese tried to fight back but the drug lords, under the
guise of the British government, soon declared war on China
and the Opium Wars began. By 1841, the Chinese were defeated
and were forced to pay a large indemnity to the crown and
surrendered possession of the city of Hong Kong to the British.
Now, the British sought to increase their markets and their
profits and by the end of the second Opium War in 1856, the
Chinese are forced to legalize opium while the addiction rates
in China skyrocketed.
Efforts were begun at this time to limit its use. The effects
of opium were so devastating that laws were soon passed in
the United States and Britain to regulate its use and to
prohibit importation. Finally, after 150 years of failed
attempts to rid its country of the drug, the Chinese were
successful in forcing the British to stop the importation of
opium to China. However, the damage was already done and many
lives were wrecked by the British search for wealth. The
monarchy of England stands today as a beneficiary of the drug
trade. The profits were enormous for the crown and today
hardly anyone remembers them as the drug traders they were.
So next time you see all that pomp and circumstance remember
who they are, the descendants of drug lords, and try not to
be impressed.
Sources: The Corporation of Public Broadcasting
~MarciaH
Tue, Dec 12, 2000 (14:43)
#108
The Plague
When people speak of the "Black Death," they are usually
referring to the 14th century calamity which killed about 30
percent of the population of Europe. The Europeans believed
they were being punished by God and that the plague was a
sign of the Apocalypse. We know now that it was caused by
a lack of adequate health precautions and ignorance. Because
people feared that the end of the world was near, farmers
refused to plant crops, alcoholism rose and civil disruption
resulted in many deaths. Althought this was catastrophic,
another plague occurred when the Europeans settled in the
new world and has been misunderstood over the years.
The warmer climates of Africa, Asia and Northern Europe have
always been the breeding ground for disease, so people moved
to colder climates to avoid them. As people migrated across
the then drained Bering Straits, the crossing served as a
kind of incubator so the first immigrants of America may have
been the most healthy people ever to live on the planet. Many
of the diseases, tuberculosis, cholera, small pox that come
from animals did not exist in the new world because there
were no cows, horses, pigs or chickens, because they had not
been brought over.
This when coupled with the superior hygiene practices by the
regions habitants made the natives a remarkably healthy race.
They lived largely in villages as opposed to the densely
populated areas like London, where raw sewage flowed through
the streets. But the health of the natives in the new world
ironically proved to be their Achilles heel. They had not
built up a resistance to the diseases that were brought from
Europe and Africa. In 1617, a couple of years before the
pilgrims landed on Plymouth Rock, fishermen landed on the
Massachusetts coast and came upon the natives of the new
world. This contact would result in the worst health
catastrophe in the history of the world, for within three
years, the plague wiped out ninety percent of the coastal
population. Those that did survive fled the area, so when
the pilgrims arrived, all they saw were empty villages.
Robert Cushman, a British eyewitness, said that only about
one in twenty survived the plague. The ground was covered
with the bones and skulls of the natives because there was no
one left to bury them. The Europeans took this as a sign of
God while the natives, much like the survivors of the plague
in Europe, felt that their Gods had abandoned them. Robert
Cushman reported, "those that are left, have their courage
much abated, and their countenance is dejected, and they seem
as a people afraid."
This scenario was repeated again and again when natives came
across Europeans and contributed to the Aztecs succumbing to
the Spaniards. Disease traveled across the entire new world
and many populations were destroyed. It is estimated, on the
high end, that 100 million people lived in the new world at
the time of Columbus, while others claim there were only 20
million living at the time. When you consider that George
Catlin estimated that in 1840 only two million out of 14
million remained, you can see the results of the epidemics that
plagued the people of the new world. By 1880, because of war
and disease, only 250,000 natives had survived. The numbers
are astounding. What can we learn form all of this? One thing
we should learn is that it was disease, and not a superior
culture, that was the dominant factor in the conquering of
the new world.
Sources: Lies My Teacher Told Me, Loewen
~MarciaH
Tue, Dec 26, 2000 (17:56)
#109
Sidney Reilly: Ace of Spies
The strange story of Sidney Reilly began in Odessa, Russia.
Reilly was born on March 24, 1874 as Georgi Rosenblum, and
later became a linguist who learned to speak seven different
languages. This ability served him well throughout his years
as a spy. He soon was recruited by M16 and assumed the name
of Sidney Reilly. Reilly began his work for the British in
the Russo/Japanese wars and later was assigned to help with
the creation of British petroleum.
With the outbreak of World War I, Reilly became the Czar
of Russia's arms agent. At that time, Russia was a huge,
but very backwards power, whose industrial capacities were
not strong enough to fight a modern war. During these years,
Reilly earned commissions of over one million dollars. He
also shiped inferior munitions to the Russians while his
cost cutting schemes earned him millions more. His activities
created suspicion, however, the evidence of any wrong doing
was destroyed in the "Black Tom" explosion of 1916. Did Reilly
have anything to do with the tragedy in New Jersey that killed
hundreds of people? He certainly had the motive.
With the Bolshevik victory in Russia, Reilly was sent to help
foster and counter revolution. In additon, he worked to
assassinate Lenin with the help of British representative
Bruce Lockhart. Under the urging of Winston Churchill,
working as first lord of the Admiralty, the allies invaded
the new Soviet regime. They hoped to work with anti-bolshevik
forces and forced the collapse of Lenin's government.
It was at this time Lenin formed the Checa under the
leadership of Felix Dzerzhinsky. The plans of the British
were soon exposed by Dzerzhinsky, which destroyed their hopes
for a counter revolution for the time being. The question still
remained, was Reilly a spy? If he was working for the British,
his efforts would be a disaster. However, if he is working for
the Russians, as some have suggested, then Reilly was the most
clever double agent in history. The arrest of Boris Savinkoff
provided an interesting opportunity to look at this question
as to whether Reilly was indeed a double agent.
Boris Savinkoff was a long time anti-czarist terrorist who
became part of the British attempts to overthrow the Russian
Revolution. Reilly was working with Savinkoff at the time he
was arrested by the Russian secret police and Savinkoff was
given a very public trial. There, he spilled the beans about
the British efforts and the names of everyone involved, except
for Reilly. In the trial, Savinkoff was not asked, nor did he
volunteer, any information about Reilly. The question then
became why nobody asked about Reilly?
It is believed that Reilly was captured and executed by the
Trust, a large deception operation run by the secret police
of Felix Dzerzhinsky, when he entered Russia in 1925. But
bank records of Reilly's provided quite a different scenario.
Reilly had been transferring money to Swiss banks in early
1924 and now, the amounts stood in the millions. Could Reilly
have offered his services to the new regime and promised them
contacts with other business people willing to do business with
the Russians?
The Soviets were desperately strapped for cash. It is unlikely
that they would have killed a man who had access to millions
and could deliver millions more for any business willing to
work with the Bolsheviks. Could Reilly have become the middle
man for the Russians and, in fact, become a Soviet agent?
Robin Lockhart, son of Bruce Lockhart, thought so. He contends
that Reilly went to work for the Russian secret police and
was the infamous first man who recruited famous double agent
Kim Philby. We will never know, however, we do know that when
Ian Fleming was in Russia in 1930, he asked questions about
Reilly. Years later, Fleming created the character James Bond.
Coincidence; I think not!
Interviews with John Long and Richard Spence.
~MarciaH
Tue, Jan 2, 2001 (15:18)
#110
Just what is a Yankee Doodle?
So "Yankee-Doodle went to town." And just why should anyone
care? Why would anyone ever sing such goofus-like lyrics?
"Stuck a feather in his cap and called it macaroni." Really?
You must be kidding!
In fact it's ironic that Americans proudly sing a song that
originally mocked them and their notion that they should be
free and independent. It originated as a 14th century
nonsense song in Holland about a silly character named
"Yankee-Doodle." English school children adopted it to make
fun of Oliver Cromwell. In the same spirit the British
troops fighting against the colonists in the American
Revolution poked fun at their adversaries with the song. But
wouldn't you know it! The Americans not only shot from
behind trees at the Redcoats marching in the open in
formation, they also turned their own song against the
British troops, making of them not macaroni but mincemeat.
(Source: JUST CURIOUS, JEEVES by Jack Mingo and Erin Barrett)
~MarciaH
Fri, Feb 9, 2001 (20:50)
#111
Enigma
The Enigma cipher machine was used by the German armed forces
during World War II. The Germans believed that their coding
device was impregnable due to its sophisticated nature. It's
rotating rotors were changed regularly, once a day after
World War II began and over three times a day afterward, so
even if the allies captured one of the machines the infor-
mation gained from the machine's capture would be useless to
them. This proved to be a great error for the Nazi's and
helped lead to their defeat in the World War II. The allies
were able to intercept messages and use this knowledge to
their advantage. This information was especially useful in
the North Atlantic and helped turn the tide of the war.
In 1932, the Polish "Buroszfrow" was able to break into the
code with the help of the French. The French provided docu-
ments, stolen by one of their agents, which were then used
for decoding. As war approached in Europe, the Germans began
to change their operating procedures for transmission. They
not only changed the keys and rotors but they increased the
frequency of the changes. When Poland was overrun in 1939,
and France followed a year later, the task was left to the
British to continue the work done by the Polish and French.
The capture of German weather ships and the help of American
intelligence aided the British effort. The use of the enigma
gave the British and Americans a great advantage. By 1942,
they were deciphering an average of 39,000 messages a month
from the Nazi forces. At first, the Allies shared their
information, but not their decoded enigma machines, with the
Soviets. In 1943, the Soviets captured there own machine,
which at first was thought to be a typewriter, and began to
use it. Knowing this, the British then sent them another
machine to go along with the first and began to help the
Soviets. This information was crucial in the Soviet liber-
ation of Nazi held territory, which would cumulate with the
capture of Berlin.
What is really remarkable about the whole thing is the sec-
recy regarding the breaking of enigma. Thousands of people
had access to the Ultra secrets, and the Germans captured
many, yet none of them betrayed those secrets. In all some
30,000 men and women knew of the success in breaking the
codes. But it was not until 1967 that some of the information
came out, and not until 1974, was the whole story told.
The Germans used the enigma throughout the war and from 1926
to 1945, about 100,000 machines were delivered to their forces.
They never suspected the allies had their codes. It is a test-
ament to the men and women of the allied forces that the sec-
rets of enigma never leaked out. Our government and military
are always worried about free citizens leaking information and
that we are not capable of having privileged information. But
citizens can be trusted. In the end, it was the commanders who
wrote books about the enigma, not the ordinary men and women
who worked that finally told the story. The ordinary citizen
had kept their lips sealed.
Sources: The Encyclopedia of Espionage. Norman Polmar and
Thomas B. Allen
~cfadm
Wed, Mar 2, 2005 (15:47)
#112
http://www.lossless-audio.com/usa/index0.php
Site Overview
This site aims to provide a basic outline of important, but too often unknown to the public consciousness, information relating to US foreign policy around the world over the past few decades - information which should perhaps be kept in mind when looking at the current direction the US is taking in its foreign policy. All information is backed up with links to articles / sources from around the web, to allow for quick verification.
A few highlights of recent US Foreign Policy ...
CIA's overthrow of democratic governments in Guatemala, Brazil, Chile, Guyana, Iran, Indonesia and Congo.
CIA's overthrow of Iraq's government in 60's and installation of Saddam.
US terrorism in Nicaragua leading to condemnation by the World Court.
CIA training and support of death squads and repressive secret police in Iran, Indonesia, El Salvador, Chile, Guatemala and Vietnam.
~cfadm
Wed, Mar 2, 2005 (15:48)
#113
http://hoffmanshome.com/native/
The intent of this page is to provide fascinating information about the Natives of North America, that I can almost guarantee you have never heard or thought about before. Unfortunately, this is due to the Euro-Centric nature of our history books. I was spurred to the creation of this page by the most interesting book I have ever read, titled, Lies My Teacher Told Me, by James W. Loewen. I read this book literally slack jawed.
I had thought that I knew a good deal about the history of this country. Well I didn't & wanted to share with you the most interesting facts I found, in the briefest manner possible. I sincerely urge you to read the book however! It is anything but boring & is truly essential reading.
~cfadm
Sun, Mar 6, 2005 (11:18)
#114
http://www.buckyogi.com/footnotes/subject.htm
footnotes to history
Artificial Islands- For some reason, the late 1960s saw a rash of artificial islands declared independent nations. None of the platform nation projects were successful, and with the clarification of international law under the 1982 Law of the Sea Convention, it appears that individuals, corporations, and other non-state entities may never gain the right to erect new sovereign entities on unclaimed or artificial territory. Well, it was fun while it lasted.
See Abalonia, Atlantis, Minerva, New Atlantis, New Utopia, Isle of the Roses
~historian
Mon, Jan 15, 2007 (19:16)
#115
Forgotten History of the Western People
From the Earliest Origins
Mike Gascoigne
This book, published in October 2002, covers most of my current research into ancient history.
"It is not often that a really good book comes our way, but Gascoigne�s Forgotten History is certainly one of them." full text...
Bill Cooper, author of After the Flood. Published in Creation, the Journal of the Creation Science Movement, Vol. 13, No. 8, May 2003.
"This book provides a survey of many ancient traditions from the ancient near east, the classical world and the British Isles." full text...
Michael Tunnicliffe, Manchester Ancient Egypt Society.
"...a picture of our past that is very different than the one taught in most schools." full text...
Pat Franklin, Sub-Editor of the Surrey-Hants Star. See also the PDF version.
"When I was given this book, I had a difficult time putting it down... this book is a wonderful accompaniment to other texts and offers a critical look at obscure texts not often discussed in more mainstream history books... a roadmap through people and stories of our roots." full text...
Robin McDonald, Eclectic Homeschool Association.
"This book is an attempt, like some others before it, to survey ancient mythological texts and compare them to Biblical accounts... it makes Jonah a lot more understandable..." full text...
TheologyWeb Campus, Recommended Reading List. See also the archive copy, in case the main forum topic disappears.
"...Mike shows that there is only one true history and that is the history presented in Bible." full text...
Martin Emerson, Light in the Darkness.
~cfadm
Mon, Jul 21, 2008 (21:17)
#116
Colombia protests against Farc kidnappings
Hundreds of thousands Colombians across the world marched to call for an end of the scourge
of kidnapping and the 44-year civil conflict in what was perhaps the greatest demonstration
in this blood-soaked nation's history.
In Paris, former hostage Ingrid Betancourt took the stage and shook her hips to Colombian
music, leading the crowd in chants of "Freedom for all" at a concert dedicated to captives
held by the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (Farc).
The French capital's Place du Trocadero was awash in the red, yellow and blue colours of
the Colombian flag.
Miss Betancourt, the 46-year-old French-Colombian politician who was rescued three weeks
ago in a daring operation carried out by Colombian agents.
"This is a special day for us all," said Ms Betancourt. "Just 20 days ago I was in the
jungle listening to the radio for news from my family, fighting to survive. Now we must
remember those still being held."
Hours later, in Bogota, the Colombian capital, hundreds of thousands massed on the streets.
"This is an historic moment for us," said Cristina Jimenez, 37, a university lecturer, as
she marched. "We are for the first time building a civil society, crying out with one
voice."
"Libertad, Libertad (Liberty, Liberty)", was the cry that echoed off the high rises in
Bogota as people marched to reject the kidnapping and violence meted out by Colombia's
Marxist rebels.
Whilst there have been demonstrations in the past the protests were given new impetus by
the successful rescue of Miss Betancourt and 14 other hostages snatched from the hands of
Farc rebels. Twelve 12 Colombians and three US defence contractors were liberated in a
bloodless coup for Oxford-educated president, Alvaro Uribe, who now enjoys 85 per cent
approval ratings and may be positioning himself to run for a third term in office.
Farc are still holding 25 political hostages whom they want to exchange for hundreds of
their comrades in prison. Some of those held have spend more than a decade in their jungle
prisons, chained to trees at night and forced to march constantly to avoid army patrols and
US monitoring aircraft that search relentlessly for their locations. Often forgotten are
around 700 people being held for ransom by the rebel group.