spring.net — live bbs — text/plain
The SpringNews › topic 59

Pakistan

topic 59 · 11 responses
~terry Tue, Oct 16, 2001 (11:49) seed
Pakistan.
~terry Tue, Oct 16, 2001 (11:49) #1
http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/20011015/ts/attack_musharraf_dc_2.html Pakistan Says U.S. Should 'Take Out' Taliban Leader
~terry Tue, Oct 16, 2001 (11:51) #2
http://www.dawn.com/2001/text/top7.htm Controversy brewing over Musharraf interview. Did it take place or not?
~terry Sat, Nov 24, 2001 (22:08) #3
Pakistan is evacuating Pakistanis who have been fighting alongside Afghan Taliban forces trapped in Kunduz. "American officials, who have been evasive on this subject, say they do not have information on the planes. Pakistani officials today declined comment." "The United States is indebted to Pakistan for its support of the war against terrorism but has said it wants any foreign fighters trapped in Kunduz captured or killed. Pakistan has made clear that it is deeply concerned about some of its agents and soldiers trapped in the town." ... "Some alliance officials accused Gen. Abdul Rashid Dostum, an alliance commander, of striking a deal with the Pakistani government to evacuate several hundred foreign fighters. Atiqullah Baryalai, the deputy defense minister, was one of a handful of Northern Alliance leaders who asserted today that General Dostum had allowed more than 50 pickup trucks full of foreigners to leave Kunduz and gather at an undisclosed location outside Mazar-i-Sharif. Mr. Baryalai said he suspected that General Dostum may have acted at the request of the Pakistani government." http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nyt/20011124/wl/pakistanis_again_said_to_evacuate_allies_of_taliban_1.html
~terry Sat, Nov 24, 2001 (22:30) #4
Washington Post: Pakistan Continues to Hold Nuclear Scientists Pakistan's military intelligence service continues to detain two nuclear scientists for questioning about their alleged connections to Osama bin Laden and his al Qaeda terrorist group, senior Pakistani intelligence sources said today. "We want to be absolutely sure before giving a clean chit to nuclear scientists who had confessed to having met Osama bin Laden, Mullah Omar and several al Qaeda leaders last year," said a senior Pakistani official. Sultan Bashiruddin Mahmood and Abdul Majid have acknowledged meeting bin Laden and Taliban leader Mohammed Omar during at least three visits to Afghanistan last year, the sources said. But the scientists have insisted throughout the six-week investigation that those meetings were in connection with Ummah Tameer-I-Nau [Islamic Reconstruction], a relief agency they founded in 1999. [snip] Mahmood ... vigorously advocated extensive production of weapons-grade plutonium and uranium enrichment with a view toward equipping other Islamic countries with nuclear capabilities [snip] "Mahmood was the strongest advocate of the view that only nuclear weapons could provide ultimate security to Muslim nations against infidel powers," said an MIT-trained Pakistani nuclear scientist who works at a key Pakistani nuclear facility and spoke on condition of anonymity. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A6708-2001Nov23.html
~terry Mon, Dec 3, 2001 (13:55) #5
Pakistan's Jihad Fervor Replaced by Resentment By KIM MURPHY, Times Staff Writer TALASH, Pakistan -- Mohammed Youssef tried to stop it, first calling the local religious leader on the phone, then following his convoy of young jihad recruits into Afghanistan and confronting him in person. Don't take them, Youssef said. They're just boys. They don't know how to fight. If it gets bad, they don't know how to run. "I personally talked to Sufi Mohammed twice and requested him not to go to Afghanistan with the large number of young people, all untrained," Youssef, a 55-year-old veteran of the Afghan war with the Soviets, said over the weekend. " 'Don't kill them,' I asked him. But he did not listen to me, and he refused." After the U.S.-led bombing campaign in Afghanistan began eight weeks ago, young Pakistani men from the deeply religious border region were clamoring for the chance to fight with the Taliban. In this small farming village in the northwest frontier, more than 60 youths joined thousands of others who followed Mohammed, charismatic founder of the fundamentalist Movement for the Enforcement of the Laws of Muhammad, across the rugged frontier to take up arms. A few weeks later, the Taliban was in substantial retreat, reports of Pakistani fighters being slaughtered were emerging, and Mohammed slipped quietly back across the border. Of the 60 jihadis who left with him from Talash, fewer than 25 have returned. "It's a tragedy," Shansur Rehman, whose 23-year-old son was confirmed dead near Jalalabad, Afghanistan, said with a shrug. http://www.latimes
~terry Wed, Dec 26, 2001 (09:23) #6
Just in time for Xmas: Tuesday December 25, 3:50 AM Pakistan military warns of nuclear conflict with India By Raja Asghar CHAKOTHI, Pakistan (Reuters) - A senior Pakistani army officer said on Monday continued border clashes with India could spark an uncontrollable flareup involving nuclear weapons. [. . .] "Because in that situation, that tension, even a small little incident can result in a chain reaction which nobody will be able to control," he told Reuters Television at Muzaffarabad, capital of the Pakistani-held part of Kashmir. He said an all-out war between the two nations could "become really horrific for the entire world". Asked if nuclear weapons could be used, Yaqub, giving what he called his personal view, said: "But if there is a war between the two countries and if any country feels that it comes to its own survival, probably there won't be any hesitation to use nuclear weapons." http://sg.news.yahoo.com/reuters/asia-80387.html
~terry Fri, Dec 28, 2001 (10:59) #7
Three "must read" articles. http://www.thefridaytimes.com Najam Sethi, in his weekly editorial: ---------------------- As India ferries its tanks and missiles to the border to "teach Pakistan a lesson" for "meddling in Kashmir", it might sensibly pause to consider its error. One nuclear power can�t possibly teach another nuclear power any lessons through war. Nor can it rest assured that its military intervention will have limited objectives. Escalation is inevitable when each side is able and willing to hit back, as both India and Pakistan discovered to their mutual discomfort in the Kargil conflict. Equally, Pakistan�s old strategic doctrine of supporting proxy wars in India�s periphery, especially through an Islamic jehad in Kashmir, so that the conventional military balance is restored to more manageable proportions, is out of sync with recent realities. In particular, the post 9/11 world sees Islamic jehad as pure terrorism that must be stamped out everywhere. Then, Khaled Ahmed, who has just been thunderous in his critique of Pakistan government policy the last month or so: Extremism and shariat: One reason Talibanisation spread in Pakistan was the identity between what Mulla Umar wanted to enforce in Afghanistan and that which the ideological state of Pakistan wants to enforce as shariat . There is a general misconception in Pakistan that the Taliban actually put forward a vision of Islam which was alien to Pakistan. The truth of the matter is that the Taliban vision was alien to Afghanistan and was exported to it from Pakistan. The department of Amr bil Maruf , responsible for most of the extreme measures taken in Afghanistan, was actually proposed by the PML government of Nawaz Sharif in its 15th Amendment. The only difference is that Mulla Umar went ahead and implemented what the Pakistani state was first in contemplating. The Council of Islamic Ideology in Pakistan has been recommending institutional reform - for instance the inquisition-like office of Hisba - that would 'complete' the ideological state. And finally an intricately argued piece by Ejaz Haider on the dynamics of the India/Pakistan conflict and the status of Kashmir: There is need therefore for India to give General Pervez Musharraf the room to implement the rethought policy. The problem the general is facing just now is the all- or nothing situation he is confronted with. That is a problem inherent in any policy that has been allowed to run longer than it should have. Given India�s refusal to talk Kashmir, the issue before Islamabad is whether Kashmir can be kept alive without its force- multiplying role -- i.e., whether the Kashmiri groups themselves will be able to sustain New Delhi�s repressive policies and allow Pakistan to play a purely political role. This is especially important if India continues to deny that Kashmir is a dispute. Nicholas Kristof in the Friday NYT: -------------- The scariest aspect of the crisis between India and Pakistan today is not the way troops are exchanging artillery fire along the snowy mountains of Kashmir. Rather, it is the way the escalations mimic war simulations held over the years. Spooks and scholars have conducted many mock conflicts between the two countries, with specialists playing the parts of leaders on each side. Very frequently the result is nuclear war. In conversations with experts, including those who launched nuclear strikes in these war games, the precariousness of the South Asian nuclear balance is clear. Paradoxically, the tiny number of nuclear weapons on each side creates instability and an incentive to launch a first strike -- use your arsenal or lose it. Now, I don't really think that another war will erupt between India and Pakistan, or that if it does it will go nuclear. Essentially what is happening is that the Indian government is huffing and bluffing, both for domestic political gain and to scare Pakistan into making concessions. As Stephen P. Cohen, an American scholar, puts it: "The Indians are escalating the crisis to an international level. They see this as a good opportunity to press Pakistan." http://www.nytimes.com/2001/12/28/opinion/28KRIS.html
~terry Sat, May 18, 2002 (18:10) #8
Pakistani police are DNA testing blood and hair samples from a butchered body found in a shallow grave 18 miles from the center of Karachi to confirm whether the remains are those of Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl. The body was found near a blood-splattered shack where Pearl was believed to be murdered. A chair found in the shed matches the one Pearl was photographed in by his abductors. Police also say they found the top of the track suit Pearl was wearing in the death video. http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=514&ncid=716&e=4&u=/ap/20020517/ap_on_re_as/slain_reporter_77
~terry Fri, May 31, 2002 (11:47) #9
Posted on Fri, May. 31, 2002 India Says Al Qaeda Moving to Pakistani Kashmir BY Y.P. RAJESH NEW DELHI - (Reuters) - A large number of al Qaeda militants have moved to Pakistani Kashmir from Afghanistan and have joined separatists opposed to Indian rule in its part of Kashmir, Indian defense officials said on Friday. Some of the militants have set up base close to a cease-fire line between Indian and Pakistani forces in the disputed Himalayan region but there was no evidence any of the al Qaeda members had crossed into Indian Kashmir, a defense official said. The Indian officials, citing military intelligence reports from Pakistani Kashmir, said the al Qaeda members moving to the region were evading U.S. and Pakistani security forces hunting for them elsewhere in Pakistan. "There are a plethora of reports from premier (intelligence) agencies that al Qaeda has merged with terrorist camps there," a senior defense official told reporters on condition of anonymity. "They have obviously shifted to areas lesser developed and where the law and order situation is far more looser. http://www.miami.com/mld/miami/news/world/3373429.htm
~terry Fri, Sep 20, 2002 (07:31) #10
Pakistan Says Arrests Suspect in Suicide Bombing By REUTERS Filed at 3:56 p.m. ET ISLAMABAD (Reuters) - Pakistan said Wednesday it had arrested seven ``most wanted terrorists'' including the suspected mastermind of a suicide bombing which killed 11 French naval engineers in the port city of Karachi earlier this year. . . . The arrests came a day after Pakistan's military ruler General Pervez Musharraf vowed to crack down on local militant groups involved in attacks on foreign nationals and religious minorities in the Muslim nation. ``Top leaders of local militant groups have been arrested, while with the passage of time others will also be held,'' he told senior bankers in Karachi. ``We cannot allow a handful of fanatics to hold hostage the destiny of 140 million people.'' http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/international/international-pakistan-militants-arrests.html
~terry Mon, Mar 7, 2005 (12:51) #11
Pakistanis Pursue Qaeda Forces in Offensive on Afghan Border By CARLOTTA GALL KABUL, Afghanistan, March 6 - Pakistani forces have begun operations on the border with Afghanistan, continuing their pursuit of foreign members of Al Qaeda into the mountainous tribal area where Osama bin Laden has been thought to be hiding for the last year, Pakistani and American military officials said late last week. On Saturday, in the most recent operation, the Pakistani military killed two foreign fighters who appeared to be Arabs in a raid in Devgar, near the Afghan border in North Waziristan Province. They captured 11 others - one from Sudan, one from Qatar, and some Pakistanis from Punjab Province, said Brig. Mehmood Shah, chief of security for the tribal areas. The military seized large amounts of arms and ammunition in the operation, he said. Maj. Gen. Eric Olson, commander of the combined joint task force in Afghanistan, confirmed Thursday in an interview at Bagram Air Base, north of Kabul, that Pakistan had begun operations in North Waziristan and planned more. American officials have pushed for Pakistan to move on North Waziristan after military operations in South Waziristan last year smashed at least two militant training camps and disrupted hundreds of foreign militants taking shelter there. More than 300 foreign fighters and local tribesmen were killed or captured, but more are thought to have fled into the North Waziristan mountains. Some reports in the past 18 months have put Mr. bin Laden and his deputy, Ayman al-Zawahiri, in the impenetrable mountains, where they are thought to live warily, not doing anything that would attract attention. Others have suggested that they moved into the cities of Pakistan last year as the fighting intensified in South Waziristan, but American and Pakistani officials say they suspect that Mr. bin Laden is hiding in the mountainous border areas. Pakistani forces lost about 200 soldiers in the fighting in 2004 and now are waging operations with targets based on specific intelligence, rather than the broad sweeps that were so costly for them, officials said. The United States military in Afghanistan is also running "very extensive operations" on the Afghan side of the border in Khost Province, General Olson said, in part to watch for movement of militants. More: http://www.nytimes.com/2005/03/07/international/asia/07afghan.html
log in or sign up to reply to this thread.