~jwinsor
Tue, Feb 4, 1997 (21:45)
#301
The ultimate victory! ABC showed the President's entire speech - and then was still able to tune in to the trial just in time to get the verdict live. HA HA HA! Take that CBS and NBC!
~JohanneD
Tue, Feb 4, 1997 (21:49)
#302
I'm speechless.....
~Inko
Tue, Feb 4, 1997 (22:15)
#303
I stayed on ABC all evening, and never realized that CBS and NBC were not on the President's speech. My feelings about the evening - what else is new???
~Inko
Tue, Feb 4, 1997 (22:15)
#304
I stayed on ABC all evening, and never realized that CBS and NBC were not on the President's speech. My feelings about the evening - what else is new??? Sorry, I'm feeling cynical!!;-)
~JohanneD
Tue, Feb 4, 1997 (23:45)
#305
I'm speechless.....
~Ann
Wed, Feb 5, 1997 (00:21)
#306
Clinton has an excellent sense of timing. He finished exactly as the verdict came in. Now that's a great politician!
~Kali
Wed, Feb 5, 1997 (03:56)
#307
He's a slick one, he is...;)
~Adi
Wed, Feb 5, 1997 (14:22)
#308
I'm in such a terrible mood, I had to share it with you: yesterday 73 Israeli soldiers were killed when 2 helicopters collided. Seventy-three young men! the majority of them were just twenty years old. they were just born and now they are dead...
I know at least 2 of them (there are still 20 more names not published), and the feeling is awful. If they were killed because of the war in Lebanon - I could at least understand it, but they died because of a stupid mistake, and it was a horrible death (there was ammunition on the helicopters, and it caused fire and explosions when it crashed on the ground). everyone here are so sad. almost everyone knew someone that died. I wish things like that will never happen again to anyone in any place.
~Kali
Wed, Feb 5, 1997 (14:28)
#309
That's awful, Adi. Even if they had died in actual battle, would it have been worth it? I doubt it. Most wars today are such ego-vehicles that I have trouble justifying them. And I've always considered myself a hawk.
~Inko
Wed, Feb 5, 1997 (16:15)
#310
Deepest sympathy, Adi. It is always bad whenever young people have to die, but in such a horrible crash it seems even worse. Also agree with Kali, death in battle or in a war would not have made it worth it--but then I'm a dove!! I hate all wars and can see no logical reasons for them.
~Anne3
Wed, Feb 5, 1997 (16:18)
#311
Adi, I'm terribly sorry. If the helicopters were as explosive as you say, it's likely that they at least died instantly. I hope that's some comfort.
~Adi
Wed, Feb 5, 1997 (16:42)
#312
Kali, of course it's not worth it, those lives are so precious. those boys should not die, period. but sometimes you just can't help it - our men soldiers don't "play" in war, they are defending our northern border from terrorist attacks and from missiles. so it's understandable to die while you are defending your love ones and practically giving them life. I can assure you that in this case no ego is involved.
what's killing me is that those soldiers were the top of the top of the youth in Israel: they were fighters in their way to their missions in Lebanon. they weren't just "Jobnicks" [=this is the name to describe the men soldiers who do office jobs like clerks]. they were already risking their life in their jobs protecting the rest of us, so they should have a better destiny than they had...
~Amy
Wed, Feb 5, 1997 (18:22)
#313
Adi, I can't even begin to imagine how you must feel. But I am so sorry.
~kendall
Wed, Feb 5, 1997 (21:29)
#314
Adi - I am so sorry. You are bringing the 'other side of the world' closer to all of us.
~JohanneD
Thu, Feb 6, 1997 (10:49)
#315
Let me had my voice to Inko, Amy and all us in share this pain. We're thinking of you and all who is hurting.
~lasalle
Thu, Feb 6, 1997 (11:26)
#316
Let me add my sorrow, Adi. Life can be so unfair--the Israeli people have suffered so long; the endless war and persecution. So many Israeli youth gone
in past mideast wars. Now, even technology revolts against them. And Israel the only real democratic state in the mideast. The older I get, the more I think the universe was somehow wrongly put together.
~JohanneD
Thu, Feb 6, 1997 (11:34)
#317
Too many have Carl, Israely and not, whether the're made knowns to us or kept in the back of the medias priorities. Too many innocent victims, especially children.
~Adi
Thu, Feb 6, 1997 (17:50)
#318
Thank you all for your kind words.
Carl, I never thought about it like that but I guess you're right: the universe was wrongly put together. God probably made a mistake when he placed Israel in the middle east.
this was another horrible day. most of the funerals took place today. On the radio and T.V there were just quiet and sad songs, and between them - stories about the lives of all the dead soldiers, talks with their families and friends, talks with politicians and basically anything that could make you cry endlessly. I can't take it anymore. I wish this week will be over already.
~Kaffeine
Thu, Feb 6, 1997 (22:48)
#319
I just had to stop by before I head to bed to recommend a show I just saw. If "Riverdance - The Show" comes to your town, RUN to get tickets! I don't think I've ever had two hours in the theatre pass so fast! I'm not even sure how to explain it to you...its main focus is traditional Irish dance, but there's Russian, Spanish, and American dances as well. The energy level is just phenomenal.
Also, in the program there was an ad for "Tap Dogs" which will be in town in a couple of weeks. Am I right in remembering that this show was highly recommended here?
~Anna
Fri, Feb 7, 1997 (04:03)
#320
] "Tap Dogs" ... was highly recommended here?
mmmmnnnnhhhhh!
all male, more 'modern' than Riverdance (at least the shows I saw) but definitely worth a look...
~Donna
Fri, Feb 7, 1997 (09:00)
#321
Kathleen, I have seen these ads for "Riverdance" but I think it is to purchase the video. What area are you in? I don't think they are coming here.
~Ann
Fri, Feb 7, 1997 (15:56)
#322
MY CAR JUST GOT STOLEN!!!!!
~JohanneD
Fri, Feb 7, 1997 (16:01)
#323
So sorry Ann, hope nothing too valuable in it !
~Anne3
Fri, Feb 7, 1997 (16:09)
#324
Oh, Ann, I'm sorry.
~Inko
Fri, Feb 7, 1997 (16:12)
#325
That terrible. I'm so sorry Ann.
~Amy
Fri, Feb 7, 1997 (16:19)
#326
That's awful, Ann. What a horrible annoyance x 50 plus disgust and inconvenience and I can't even think what else. Yuck.
~elder
Fri, Feb 7, 1997 (16:28)
#327
Oh, Ann, how awful. And it makes you feel so angry, helpless, violated -- a truly rotten experience. Were you at work or home when it happened? I hope you are OK.
~Mari
Fri, Feb 7, 1997 (17:25)
#328
Ann, so very aggravating! Ok in body, if not spirit, I hope.
~Kaffeine
Fri, Feb 7, 1997 (17:28)
#329
Ann - That's terrible! Its one of those things that's hard to grasp - you know where you parked it and it takes a minute to register that it's really not there.
Donna - I'm in the Detroit area. I don't know where its headed next, but hopefully it will end up near you soon.
Anna - I think I'm going to check it out (Tap Dogs). :)
~Ann
Fri, Feb 7, 1997 (19:03)
#330
My car was parked in the lot in front of my apartment building and was probably stolen sometime last night. The cops were hopeful that they would be able to find it, but I doubt it. This is actually the second car that I've had stolen. The first one was stolen from my brother at gunpoint. The cops eventually recovered that one and the thief got 4 years in jail. Now I've lost another one. It is a pain in the neck to be carless. At least the weather won't be too bad for the next few days, so walking won't b
too bad. Thanks for your messages.
~terry
Fri, Feb 7, 1997 (19:39)
#331
That's really bad news Ann. I hope you were covered and you get some new wheels
soon. What kind of car was it?
~Ann
Fri, Feb 7, 1997 (19:50)
#332
1989 Jeep Cherokee Limited Edition with tinted windows and leather seats! I inherited it from my parents when they bought a Land Rover. It is a very popular car among thieves, but is getting on in years. I don't think there is any chance that I will be able to replace it with a comperable vehicle.
~Donna
Fri, Feb 7, 1997 (20:14)
#333
Very sad indeed Ann. I do hope you get it back.
~jwinsor
Fri, Feb 7, 1997 (20:19)
#334
Ann, what a bummer!
~Susan
Fri, Feb 7, 1997 (22:20)
#335
Ann, I'm somewhat new here -- where do you live? I'm so sorry to hear about your
rig; Jeep Cherokees are cool. You have a good attitude about it, though. Hang
in there and keep your chin up.
~Ann
Fri, Feb 7, 1997 (22:37)
#336
I live in Minneapolis, not the best place to be carless in the middle of winter. I figure that there is nothing I can do about it. It's just going to be a pain in the butt to get it replaced!
~terry
Fri, Feb 7, 1997 (23:14)
#337
I lived and worked in Mpls without a car for about a year. I worked as a city
planner till I left there in a schoolbus that I recycled into an "rv". Bought it
from the Owatonna School district. But that was then. In today's world, getting
around in a good car is more of a necessity. I really liked the town, I met some
very good people there.
~Susan
Sat, Feb 8, 1997 (00:07)
#338
Will be sending good thoughts your way, Ann. Keep thinking positive. Hope
this next week brings better things.
~Kali
Sat, Feb 8, 1997 (03:44)
#339
Suck.
~Ann
Sat, Feb 8, 1997 (14:05)
#340
Good news:
THEY FOUND MY CAR!!!
I haven't seen it yet, so I don't know how much damage was done. I know they broke a window and had to damage the ignition to start it. Thanks to everybody for your support, I'm sure it showed up so quickly because I had so many people thinking about it across the world. Thanks to all!
~Ann
Sat, Feb 8, 1997 (14:06)
#341
I didn't realise that yapp takes the word news and makes it into a link!!!
~elder
Sat, Feb 8, 1997 (14:28)
#342
Ann, that's terrific. I hope you can get your car fixed and functional really soon. Glad you didn't have to wait too long to find out about it, either.
~Susan
Sat, Feb 8, 1997 (15:41)
#343
Ann, it's wonderful!!! You did get lots of instant support, and I'm sure
it helped.
~Becks
Sat, Feb 8, 1997 (16:38)
#344
Hope everything works out, Ann!
~Amy
Sat, Feb 8, 1997 (16:45)
#345
Gee, maybe we should start charging -- strangers, that is -- for this psychic service. Woman power. Be afraid. (Hil, did you start that "be very afraid" stuff?")
Very glad to hear it, Ann.
~Inko
Sat, Feb 8, 1997 (19:27)
#346
Ann, So glad they found your car. Hope it'll be driveable soon!!
There is a terrific review of P&P2 in today's NY Times by Christoper Lehmann-Haupt, a book reviewer. He compares P&P2 to the book and likes it very well indeed, better than any other Austen adaptation.
Link is:
http://www.nytimes.com/yr/mo/day/news/arts/tv-austen-review.html
~Ann
Sat, Feb 8, 1997 (19:37)
#347
That is an increadible review!!
(By the way, you probably have to register at the NYTimes site before you can view the stories there. I would heartily recommend that you do. The NYTimes site is one of the best newspapers on the web and includes most, if not all, of the printed paper (including the crossword puzzle!!))
~Ann
Sat, Feb 8, 1997 (20:06)
#348
I have sent the NYTimes a E-letter in response to this article. I thought I would share it with all of you:
Dear Sir or Madam,
Your reporter, Christopher Lehmann-Haupt, is not the first to fall in love with the BBC/A&E production of Pride and Prejudice. This production in particular, and Jane Austen in general, has a large and loyal following on the internet. There are several sites which have been founded specifically for the purpose of discussing this production, and which have subsequently been broadened to include all of the works of Jane Austen. Other sites have been established solely to provide information and access to Au
ten's works on the internet. Some of the URL's are as follows:
http://uts.cc.utexas.edu/~churchh/janeinfo.html
http://www.spring.com/yapp-bin/restricted/browse/austen/all/new (requires registration)
http://www.bluemarble.net/~amyloo/wwwboard/ppbb.html
It is suprising to me that she, of all authors, has such a strong following in cyberspace. I am continually amazed by the wide variety of Jane Austen information available on the internet, as well as the variety of people interested in her work.
The virtual community which has been created around an interest in Jane Austen includes men and women, it includes people from the age of nine to well over sixty, and spans several continents and languages. It represents the best of what the internet can be by bringing together so many people in so many different walks of life, races, and cultures. We have come together and have indeed formed a community. We cry together when one of us suffers from a loss of a loved one, and we celebrate when one of us pa
ses a milestone in life. We support eachother, even though few of us have ever met or even know what the others look like. We are grateful to Miss Austen for giving us the reason come together, and are grateful to the BBC/A&E production for introducing so many of us to her work.
I am glad that your paper has recognised this wonderful production, which has brought so many people to enjoy Pride and Prejudice and Jane Austen, and which has brought so many of us together in cyberspace.
Thank you,
Ann Elizabeth Haker
haker001@tc.umn.edu
~Donna
Sat, Feb 8, 1997 (21:47)
#349
As Lizzie would say "Beautiful".
~terry
Sat, Feb 8, 1997 (22:03)
#350
Great news Ann. Whewwww! * slaps Ann a high five *
~Susan
Sat, Feb 8, 1997 (22:27)
#351
Ann, whatare we going to talk about next? Do keep us
posted regarding your now recovered vehicle.
~churchh
Sat, Feb 8, 1997 (22:53)
#352
Did someone save the review -- it's expired from the NY Times site...
~Donna
Sat, Feb 8, 1997 (23:00)
#353
Yes, it did expire. I did a search and found an old review about JA which listed your site HC.
~Amy
Sat, Feb 8, 1997 (23:00)
#354
February 8, 1997
CRITIC'S NOTEBOOK / By CHRISTOPHER LEHMANN-HAUPT
'Pride and Prejudice': A Great Movie of a Great Book
Plenty of bad movies have been made of good books, and a fair number of good movies have come from bad books. But a great movie of a great book? Speaking from a book reviewer's vantage point, I nominate Jane Austen's "Pride and Prejudice," a co-production of the BBC and A&E, which is being rebroadcast by A&E in two parts, on Saturday and Sunday.
I had missed the production the first time around, but when a friend lent me the tapes, I was instantly and completely caught up by the Bennet family and the thwarted romances of the two eldest daughters, Jane and Elizabeth. I did not get free until I had watched the entire five-hour production three or four times.
The Bennets' world seemed more real than mine. I found myself repeating the memorable lines. I caught myself humming the music. As with a really good book, I discovered more and more to enjoy as I grew familiar with the main action and could concentrate on the smallest of details: for example, the way you can still overhear Miss Caroline Bingley (played with grand imperiousness by Anna Chancellor) after the camera has shifted away from the reception line at the Netherfield ball.
But best of all was the way the film spurred me to read the book again after 40 years and to re-experience as literature the wayward romances of Jane and Elizabeth Bennet with Charles Bingley and Fitzwilliam Darcy.
Surprisingly, the book proved somewhat disappointing at first. As the friend who lent me the tapes rightly put it when I asked him how the book compared with the film, "It makes you fear for literature."
"Oh! Shocking!" as Miss Bingley would say. To admit that the literalness of film might surpass the stimulus to the imagination of Austen's language. "Abominable!"
But this was my experience at first. And it is not simply to be explained by the inherent vividness of film as a medium or by the masterly performances of Jennifer Ehle as Elizabeth, Colin Firth as Darcy, David Bamber as Collins, Crispin Bohham-Carter as Charles Bingley, Adrian Lukis as Lt. George Wickham and Barbara Leigh-Hunt as Lady Catherine.
Other films of Austen's novels I happen to have seen don't come near to offering the pleasures of this production. One need hardly consider the 1940 Hollywood movie directed by Robert Leonard, with its mangled script (by Aldous Huxley yet!) draining the story of all dramatic tension, its miscasting of a too-old Greer Garson as Elizabeth and its simpering performance by Laurence Olivier as Darcy.
Both the "Emma" starring Gwyneth Paltrow and a forthcoming BBC/A&E co-production of the novel with Kate Beckinsale (to be shown on A&E on Feb. 16) are entertaining enough but seem thin compared with Austen on paper.
While Emma Thompson's "Sense and Sensibility" has much to recommend it, it suffers considerably from the lack of the novel's ironic narrative voice, which mercifully distances the reader from the excesses of its two leading characters.
And "Persuasion," while the best of the feature-length adaptations of Austen, is so brilliantly cinematic that one almost misses Austen's narrative voice. Moreover, it is not nearly as faithful to the original as the film of "Pride and Prejudice" is, and one has to have read the novel to understand certain subplots that are barely touched upon in the movie.
(I have not seen the 1985 BBC production of "Pride and Prejudice," directed by Cyril Coke, or the movie "Clueless.")
In "Pride and Prejudice," an early work of Austen's (at least in its original form, completed in 1797 and titled "First Impressions"), little distance exists between the narrator and the viewpoint of the leading characters.
In fact, the narrator's outlook is close to that of Elizabeth, who, except for the prejudice that prevents her from seeing the truth about the deceptively charming Wickham and the too-proud Darcy, is one of the most liberated women in all of literature, especially impressive considering the narrowness of the society she lives in.
So "Pride and Prejudice" translates easily onto the screen. True, the initial hostility between Elizabeth and Darcy is more deeply and subtly developed in the book. And we understand more clearly the extent to which Mr. and Mrs. Bennet are alienated as husband and wife.
But consider how the film improves on the book. Take, for instance, the introduction of Collins, the cousin of the Bennets who is to inherit their estate.
In the book, Bennet reads aloud the letter to him from Collins detailing how he wishes to "heal the breach" that subsists "between yourself and my late honored father" and how he plans to visit the Bennets. The family then reacts to the letter, noting the pompousness of its style. A few paragraphs later, the text announces: "Mr. Collins was punctual to his time, and was received with great politeness by the whole family."
In the film, Bennet starts reading the letter, but Collins' voice takes over a little way through, as the viewpoint shifts and, to the mocking sound of a bassoon, we see the clergyman's world through his eyes: his church; his condescending patroness, Lady Catherine; his departure in his "own modest equipage" and his arrival at the Bennets' estate by hired carriage.
As his reading of his letter ends, he is greeted at the Bennets' front door with Bennet's words, "And here he comes!" Thus, with magical fluidity, the novel's space opens up, and we are given a tour of Austen's little world as well as firsthand experience of Collins' toadying pompousness.
Comparing the film and the book up to this point, I was prepared to admit that my friend was right: It does make you fear for literature. I thought of Henry James' remark, "An acted play is a novel intensified."
By the end, I'm relieved to report, the book's richness overtakes the film's. The book's suspense is greater, mainly because the narrator goes inside Elizabeth's head (as the film cannot do) and allows the reader to share at length her despair over Darcy's probable loss and her hope for the remote possibility of his return.
And where the film can give us only snapshots of the various characters reacting to the consummating weddings, the book ends by leaping into the future and explaining with narrative tongue in cheek how various characters adapt to the outcome.
Still, despite the triumph yet again of the written word over the pictorial image as the better way to tell a tale of psychological nuance, this reader will never again be able to open the pages of "Pride and Prejudice" without picturing the actors in this unforgettable television production.
In a perfect example of the synergy possible between written word and moving image, the film brings to life the world Jane Austen saw and makes you appreciate how she sifted it in her imagination and rendered it in her prose.
Home | Sections | Contents | Search | Forums | Help
Copyright 1997 The New York Times Company
~Susan
Sat, Feb 8, 1997 (23:41)
#355
Amy, thanks for sharing ... but we already knew P&P2 was
addicting and very difficult to improve upon. This just proves the point. (Although
I don't necessarily agree with his opinions regarding other adaptations).
~Cheryl
Sat, Feb 8, 1997 (23:45)
#356
Sounds like Christopher needs to be sent our URL so he may continue to wallow with the rest of us! ;-)
~Inko
Sat, Feb 8, 1997 (23:47)
#357
Ann, thanks so much for e-mailing the N.Y. Times. I think it's great that they know their article is appreciated and that there is a bunch of us out in cyberspace who feel the same way their reviewer does!
And thanks, Amy, for getting the article here. I wasn't sure how to do that. After all, that was my first link ever!! I'm learning, but ever so slowly!!
BTW, I watched A&E tonight but I was disappointed--I really missed all the extra scenes I have on my tapes, and I hate being interrupted by commercials all the time! But it allowed me to get some work done and listen to it in the background!
~Cheryl
Sun, Feb 9, 1997 (00:28)
#358
Inko: BTW, I watched A&E tonight but I was disappointed--I really missed all the extra scenes I have on my tapes, and I hate being interrupted by commercials all the time! But it allowed me to get some work done and listen to it in the background!
YES Inko! Me too! In fact I only watched the last 15 minutes...the proposal scene...ooh baby, lots of heat in that room! ;-)
~Anne3
Sun, Feb 9, 1997 (17:54)
#359
Susan: but we already knew P&P2 was addicting and very difficult to improve upon. This just proves the point.
Yes, Susan, but what delighted me about the article was that a big cheese like Lehmann-Haupt, who as regular book critic for the New York Times holds a high position in literary circles, would admit in public to being as obsessed with a t.v. adaptation as an ordinary mortal! P&P2 conquers ALL!
~kendall
Sun, Feb 9, 1997 (18:05)
#360
Ann - I am making my way into this conversation late - like Mr. Woodhouse. I am glad they found your car - please let us know more as you get it back and back into working order.
Thanks for the letter and the article.
~Hilary
Sun, Feb 9, 1997 (20:13)
#361
I have just been reading back, having not visited for a while.
Adi, I wish I knew some way of comforting you. I hope as time moves on you will feel better.
Amy (#345),not me, I think?????....I don't think I'm that scary!
~terry
Mon, Feb 10, 1997 (21:25)
#362
I guess this topic got kicked out of Austen!
~Mixu
Wed, Feb 12, 1997 (06:36)
#363
Ramblings, everyone!
I have a terrible flu, am low on cash, and on a tight schedule.
And yes, I almost forgot: I'm also turning 27 on Thursday!
I'm beginning to feel old...
On the other hand, it's Valentine on Friday, so:
Happy Valentine!
Thank you for letting this off my mind. I feel better already.
I'll see you next week!
~TJ
Wed, Feb 12, 1997 (14:08)
#364
beginning to feel old???????????
old is just a state of mind....take it from someone who is about to celebrate the 21st anniversary of his 21st birthday.........
~fuzz
Sun, Feb 16, 1997 (11:34)
#365
I have just browsed down through the responses, all 364 of them and find
them to be interesting. I thought this would be more of a political
discussion than I have found, but am certainly glad for the camaradery.
~terry
Sun, Feb 16, 1997 (21:50)
#366
Welcome Don! Hope you keep checking back in with us.
~fuzz
Mon, Feb 17, 1997 (17:42)
#367
Thanks for the welcome. Where does peoples interest lie? I would be
interested in people that have ideas that would lead to organizing the
State Univ. of New York (SUNY) students into a voting block, or at least a
political voice with a little muscle.
I think it is a damn shame what the SUNY Board of Trustees are trying to
do to the state system.
~terry
Wed, Feb 19, 1997 (03:22)
#368
Open a topic in politics, the conference.
~aubrey
Tue, Apr 8, 1997 (12:53)
#369
You guys are very interesting but I'm not sure how I fit in since I'm going to go out on a limb here and actually say I'm not a huge Austen fan--I like what I've seen but I guess it didn't hit me the way it hit you all (so what am I doing here? long story). But you welcome even lukewarm fans, eh? You seem like a nice bunch folks, you won't wallop me, right?
~terry
Tue, Apr 8, 1997 (19:37)
#370
You're cool. Come on out and play!
~mtlady
Thu, Apr 10, 1997 (15:16)
#371
I wrote my intro. in another section. I heard today that there is a virus out there and it comes in your e mail and says from aol and states free aol on line and when you open it your entire system is wiped out including your antivirus programs. I figure it is for real because the alert was from washington and sent out to gov. fac. recieved in Atlanta at a gov. research fac. anyone heard about this?
~terry
Thu, Apr 10, 1997 (20:36)
#372
No, can you provide more details. Is it documented anywhere on the web or is there
any anti-virus company that recognizes it. Have you contacted the folks at F-Prot
or Norton to see if it's real. An email to them might clear things up.
~stacey
Sat, Apr 12, 1997 (14:23)
#373
My,my, my...
Terry, this has really grown since last I checked in.
At the Denver Public Library today.
Brandon is on a plane bound for Philly and I'm cold and lonely. The weather is bringing me down. The middle of April. 10 degrees. Six inches of melting snow. My flowers, the ones I planted three weeks ago, will never bloom. Sad. I'm checking out a Kabir poetry book, an Aaron Copland CD and several other random fiction stories -- sci-fi, romance, modern weird, you know... a little bit of everything to help me get through the week. Miss Austin, miss warm weather. Need a cup of caffeine and a chocolate macad
mia cookie. Mountain biking and skating are on hold until the snow melts and the trails dry up. Thinking fondly of my former life...
~terry
Sat, Apr 12, 1997 (17:27)
#374
Wow, Miss Stace' checkin' in... glad you found some access.
Are those Interent terminals very busy? Isn't it cool that libraries
have net access now. Nearly all the Austin libraries have net access.
I get Denver stations on my satellite dish so I got a little glimpse
at your weather. I won't mention what kind of day we're having in
Austin or that all the plants all over are in multi-colored profusion.
Do you go snow skiing? That would seem a natural for you with your
athleticism. Have you been in any more ironman competitions (run,
swim, bike)? Well, enough of this indoor activity for now, time to
get outdoors. Keep on checkin' in, Stacey!
~aubrey
Mon, Apr 14, 1997 (09:23)
#375
Stacey stacey check back in! I'm a desperately unhappy Dallasite longing to relocate to Denver/Boulder. Please give me some words of encouragement while I wait out this interminable job-hunt. I miss Austin, too--partly why I'm heading for D/B! It's the closest I've found to that great Austin ambience. Guess I'll trade hellishly hot summers for frosty winters!
~aubrey
Wed, Apr 16, 1997 (12:57)
#376
well, I'm bummed...one of the 2 main potential employers I'm looking at in Denver now lists "no jobs available" on their home page (they used to have half a dozen) and the other one still has the 2 unsuitable-for-me jobs they've been listing since Feb. Time to do more searching and sending.
~terry
Wed, Apr 16, 1997 (21:18)
#377
Did you get in touch with Stacey yet?
~terry
Wed, Apr 16, 1997 (21:42)
#378
Have you thought about moving to Austin? Just a thought.
~aubrey
Thu, Apr 17, 1997 (13:18)
#379
Like I said in one of my many intros, it would be a dream come true to return to Austin, the town of my heart. Unfortunately, the reality is that I am just too old to live in the squalor afforded by the measly salaries paid for my line of work in Austin...so I visit and dream...
~aubrey
Thu, Apr 17, 1997 (13:33)
#380
Plus I'm just too dainty these days for the blistering hellfire of those Austin summers (they made a man of me in my 20s, but now...I can't breathe!)...like Colo winters will be any less hellish!
~terry
Thu, Apr 17, 1997 (23:37)
#381
What work do you do again?
~aubrey
Fri, Apr 18, 1997 (08:07)
#382
Molecular biology (got my MD, quit my residency, took up lab work). Sadly, the labs in Austin are easily staffed by peons fresh out of college willing to work for peanuts. There is Ambion, the lone industry. Perhaps I should give them a whirl, see if they'd be willing to pay me vast sums of money to enjoy the Austin ambience....
~terry
Sat, Apr 19, 1997 (00:25)
#383
Talk to my friend Bob Nagy who works at UT Botany when he gets over his
throat surgery (about a week). He's mailto://bob@spring.com
He may be able to help steer you in the right direction. I'll mention
him to you. His home page is at http://www.spring.com/~kreblon
There's hope!
~aubrey
Mon, Apr 21, 1997 (13:07)
#384
You are very kind, terry. I will definitely look there! Sadly, UT is the lowest-paying, but what the heck, I'll see what's up. My ramble for today: I changed the tire on my car ALL BY MYSELF!!! last Saturday. I'm so proud of myself. Plenty of lacrimal lubrication to get the lugs off (fortunately this all took place in the privacy of my own driveway)!
~terry
Tue, Apr 22, 1997 (23:26)
#385
The folks I know there love it. Despite the low pay. They like the relaxed
atmosphere and benefits.
~aubrey
Wed, Apr 23, 1997 (08:55)
#386
As indeed I did during the 3 1/2 years I toiled in the Micro dept--great people and a fine ambience (ESB is a cool bldg)--much better than the tense unsmiling environs of UTSWMC Dallas! I'll see what the pay scale is for my now-advanced status (cf my previous inexperienced level), eh. I just need enough to pay the vet bills and the car repairman!
~aubrey
Wed, Apr 23, 1997 (09:24)
#387
And apropos of nothing, let me just rant about my pet peeve, trafficwise: so you're tooling along virtually alone on the road (plenty of oncoming traffic)(but no one near you in your direction). Mr Doofus is exiting a parking lot, wants to join you on the road. He sees you 10 blocks away and waits. And waits. And waits. When you are right upon him, mere inches from his front bumper, he EASES his tuna boat out directly in front of you. Having used up every last ounce of driving courage on this bold m
neuver, he proceeds to drive 5 mph for a block or two, then slams on his brakes without warning, apparently (why use a turn signal? HE knows where he's going) wishing to turn left past all the oncoming traffic. So the pair of you spend eternity waiting for a brek in traffic sufficiently large to accomodate a tuna boat driven by a moron whose used up all his courage. Not a soul behind you; he could have done all of this after you passed, but NOOOOO, he HAD to pull in front of you. Thank you and good ni
ht. seriously, any other traffic annoyances out there? Or do I just need to get the idiot magnet removed from my front bumper?
~aubrey
Wed, Apr 23, 1997 (09:26)
#388
sorry about the typos--combination of spleen-venting and weird response frame (I can't see half of what I type!)
~aubrey
Wed, Apr 23, 1997 (09:28)
#389
I'm over in Austin rambling, go back to main menu, see there's a new response in porch, come over here, and it's ME! This is too fun, chatting with myself (are the voices in my head bothering you?).
~aubrey
Wed, Apr 23, 1997 (13:03)
#390
And I return hours later,see another new response, and whaddaya know--ME AGAIN!
~aubrey
Thu, Apr 24, 1997 (13:04)
#391
AUBREY RULES THE WORLD!! I am the only responder! I am queen of everything! Ruler of mesopotamia! Goddess of The Spring!
~terry
Thu, Apr 24, 1997 (16:09)
#392
Well, you see, aubrey, the 'ramble' topic is actually replicated throughout several
conferences and forms sort of a common thread through all these conferences. It started
out in the austen conference and spread out from there (though it's no longer linked to
austen after the major metamorphosis it went through.
Anyone see the story on the WELL in the latest issue of Wired? Two folks I know pretty well,
Cliff Figallo (fig@well.com) and John Coate (tex@well.com) are on the cover looking like
guys out of the Xfiles. Also pictured is Stewart Brand. I was one of the original members
of the WELL and much of the inspiration for the Spring comes from what Cliff and John did at
the WELL, even the name was originally a play on the WELL. Anyway, check it out.
~aubrey
Fri, Apr 25, 1997 (08:13)
#393
I thought someone was typing in porch while I was typing in austin. Ddidn't realize the computer wouldn't be able to figure out it was me all the time. Will look for Wired and your pals. You're a funny man of the spring/well/geyser.
~aubrey
Wed, Apr 30, 1997 (09:10)
#394
Once again, aubrey is the queen of all she surveys! I rock the Spring! I am so large and in charge! I think I will chat with myself a while....
~terry
Wed, Apr 30, 1997 (17:10)
#395
I've been offline here about 3 days, I'll be getting back on soon.
~aubrey
Fri, May 2, 1997 (09:26)
#396
But I'm having sooo much fun! I NEVER get to be the one in charge! However, you are better at it than me...Fun in the lab: I was doing an experiment yesterday that required the use of some truly noxious organic chemicals; when I was pouring them out under the fume hood (like one of those kitchen range exhaust fans, only it's enclosed on 3 1/2 sides)(designed to suck away noxious vapors so they don't enter the lab) I couldn't quite reach the sink at the back of the hood, so without thinking I NATURALLY
tuck my head under the hood to get better leverage...just a half a whiff of that stuff and I blacked out and hit the floor. Yikes-a-hootey! I'm still reeling from the shock a day later! Maybe I should consider a different profession? One that doesn't require frequent use of noxious and dangerous chemicals and gene-altering isotopes?
~terry
Fri, May 2, 1997 (13:21)
#397
I wondered why you hadn't been posting for a couple of days! Wow!
Take it easy there. Glad you back with the conscious folks. You're
set up as a telnetter now! Let me know if you have any questions about
how to use the telnet / yapp interface.
~aubrey
Mon, May 5, 1997 (09:08)
#398
Well, terry, I've tried every way I can but I still seem to have some sort of block vis a vis telnet. I can get to stroud (but only via typing it into netscape or clicking on the url you left me in tv conf--the url on the welcome page still doesn't work), but get lost therafter. There is a ws-ftp to click on at one point in the depths of Stroud, but my choice seems to be to download it, which (since this is NOT my own computer) I am a bit leery of. There is no Windows95 choice. On this computer (NOT i
NetScape) there is a ws-ftp icon which I played with a little, but it couldn't find telnet://www.spring.com so I stopped (but now my password and name are on the ws-ftp page). Maybe I should try this from a personal personal computer (my brother is a computer jockey; I will enlist his help).
~aubrey
Mon, May 5, 1997 (09:10)
#399
Where the hell did THAT come from???? All I did was type in the letters for that telnet thing and it went purple!!! Does that work for other sites? http://www.vabeach.com for example?
~aubrey
Mon, May 5, 1997 (09:31)
#400
Help terry I'm scaring myself--every time I type in a url it lights up. Did I sniff too much pet ether last week or is this the glorious result of being a telnet gal? Yikes! Stop me before I hurt someone! So that vabeach url is from my e-pal who wants so desperately to join the Spring but cannot get on. I don't know what the site is, it was just the first thing I tried! AND IT WORKS! This is toooo spooooooky for me. How does the computer know where to go if I didn't tell it?