~terry
Thu, Aug 7, 1997 (05:39)
seed
Is the Spring a community? In what sense? Would it take more folks
knowing each other personally for this to happen? How can we become
more of a community?
~KitchenManager
Fri, Oct 10, 1997 (05:59)
#1
Uh, maybe I could not wait so long between postings?
Actually, I finally have a computer so I should be able
to post more often.
Yippee,
WER
~terry
Sat, Oct 11, 1997 (19:05)
#2
Great news, WER!
~KitchenManager
Wed, Oct 15, 1997 (00:21)
#3
The best things in life are nearest:
in your nostrils.
WER
~mikeg
Thu, Oct 23, 1997 (05:44)
#4
Is the Spring a community? If so, which communitarian aspects does it simulate
and which does it thumb its nose at?
~stacey
Thu, Oct 23, 1997 (09:21)
#5
Well, Mike, we're more into stimulating than simulating and we don't thumb our noses at anyone (but sometimes we pick them).
~terry
Thu, Oct 23, 1997 (11:19)
#6
She's right ya know. We're working on it. On being a community.
There are some meager rules on the main page, nothing beyond common
sense and courtesy.
~KitchenManager
Thu, Oct 23, 1997 (21:38)
#7
I'm not quite sure what you're asking, Mike.
Could you go into a bit more detail?
WER
~terry
Thu, Nov 6, 1997 (07:53)
#8
Did I ever mention about how the Spring got started?
It started probably with my early exposure to the EIES network and to the
WELL in the early days. I remember hitching a ride with fig to the offices of the
Whole Earth Software Review where fig was an r:base programmer and looking through
the software archives. Cliff turned me on to a copy of Appleworks (which was then a
beta) to review and I installed it on my Apple //e and started logging in to the early
WELL. I was living in Bolinas on the mesa at the time with Gail Moss and we used to
go over to Cliff and Anitas house and hung out and talked about computers and online
community some. I had been a "Farmie" for a while like fig and I had some ideals
about community building. I had been an urban planner for a number of years also.
I thought that it would be cool to start up a community like this in Austin some day.
Eventually I did make it back to Austin and started the Spring dialup bbs around
the mid 80s. And three years ago we broke it out on the net like I was saying.
But I'm getting ahead of the question now.
~terry
Tue, Jan 19, 1999 (13:12)
#9
http://www.salonmagazine.com/21st/feature/1999/01/cov_19feature.html
is a good article on the meaning and misuse of online "community"
- - - - - - - - t h e r e_.g o e s_.t h e
___neighborhood
ARE COMPANIES LIKE GEOCITIES
TRULY "BUILDING COMMUNITIES" -- OR
JUST PLASTERING ADS ON INCOMPLETE,
OUT-OF-DATE WEB PAGES?
BY JANELLE BROWN | Welcome to my home at GeoCities. I live at 9258 Fashion
Avenue, in a neighborhood appropriately called Salon. I moved in here
earlier last week because I was told that "Design, Beauty and Glamour are
the toast of Fashion Avenue," but so far there's not a whiff of glamour to
be seen -- my neighborhood is a ghost town of hundreds of empty pages,
half-started Web sites and vacant lots; only a handful of the members seem
to be at all interested in fashion. I suppose my bare-bones Web page is no
better.
GeoCities may call itself the "largest and fastest growing community of
personal Web sites on the Internet," but there's no community to be found
in my neighborhood.
"Community" is quite possibly the most over-used word in the Net industry.
True community -- the ability to connect with people who have similar
interests -- may well be the key to the digital world, but the term has
been diluted and debased to describe even the most tenuous connections,
the most minimal interactivity. The presence of a bulletin board with a
few posts, or a chat room with some teens swapping age/sex information, or
a home page with an e-mail address, does not mean that people are forming
anything worthy of the name community.
Nowhere is this more apparent than on the free Web page services -- sites
like GeoCities or theglobe.com that give away free Web space and then sell
ad space based on the traffic that "user-generated content" attracts. Such
companies have been the darlings of Wall Street over the past year. But it
remains to be seen if they can preserve the cozy promises of community
that they've made to their constituency with the lavish promises of
profits that they've had to make to their investors and shareholders.
Free Web page services are one of the fastest growing sectors of the Web
industry, enabling any person with Net access to slap up a Web site using
simple tools. You can choose from scores of services: Not only the
granddaddies like GeoCities, Angelfire, Tripod, theglobe.com and Xoom, but
smaller services like FreeYellow, FortuneCity, Nettaxi and Homestead. You
can even create a home page at your favorite portal; all they ask is that
they be allowed to put ads on your page.
Undoubtedly, you've visited one of these services at some point -- whether
you are a member of one of them yourself (together, the top seven services
boast more than 20 million members) or have simply stopped by one of the
member pages (GeoCities' member pages alone claim 8 percent of the content
on the Web). If you haven't visited one, perhaps you've invested in them
instead: Xoom, GeoCities and theglobe.com had three of the hottest initial
public stock offerings of 1998, and Lycos picked up Tripod for $58
million, which it now runs along with the previously acquired Angelfire.
These companies have ambitiously promoted their "communities," boasting of
their astronomical numbers of members and interactive interest groups. But
there's a breakdown between what's being hyped and what's actually
happening at these sites: Few of the members actually seem to be
communicating with one another. Most people, it seems, just want a place
to slap up a picture of their cat.
And there's more. This is an excerpt.
~KitchenManager
Wed, Jan 20, 1999 (22:48)
#10
can't disagree with her...