The Spring BBSMovies › Topic 11
Help!

What movies have you been seeing?

Topic 11 · 329 responses · archived october 2000
» This is an archived thread from 2000. Want to pick up where they left off? post in the live Movies conference →
~Amy seed
We have a topic for "Favorite non-Austen movies," but the one I saw last night would not fit into that category.
~Amy #1
I rented Total Eclipse last night, a biographical account of one part of Arthur Rimbaud's life. I don't know if I will see it again for another 10 years, but I am pretty sure I am glad I've seen it once. http://us.imdb.com/M/title-exact?Total%20Eclipse%20%281995%29
~geekman #2
Amy, you've been busy here all the while I've been viewing this conference. Now I know why things kept changing. :-) Now, I have recently seen, Persuasion (again), Shine, Romeo + Juliet and GP and JN's Emma. :-)
~Cheryl #3
I just got home from seeing Shine and liked it very much. Some wonderful performances there and fabulous music. I loved the whole Rach 3 sequence, starting from when he was working on it with his teacher (great job here by John Gielgud) and the concert itself was amazing! But I must disagree with my friend (and little brother) Ian and say that Geoffrey Rush does not deserve the Oscar. It was a good performance but he was only in half of the movie! Now if they could split it between him and Noah Taylor (the adolescent David) I might go for it. ;-) But that will never happen, so I continue to believe that Ralph Feinnes (*sigh*) will win the Oscar.
~Becks #4
What have I seen lately---hmmmmm All of the Oscar contenders, except for Breaking the Waves. Portrait of a Lady, Hamlet, Everyone Says I Love You. I really loved Hamlet and Everyone....Both really entertaining, and worth the money.
~winter #5
i've been on a HUGE movie-kick this past week; seeing films for the second time, renting a film though i'd seen it twice before... trainspotting (rented) life is sweet (rented; seen it twice before) the english patient (my 2nd viewing) secrets & lies (my 2nd viewing) hamlet (that's this afternoon--my first time) and of course...P&P2 gets popped into the VCR (i watch it as i fall asleep occasionally)
~Luba #6
Hi, Luisa here.Back again! Recently I saw films I don`t think I will forget that soon. Breaking the Waves is one of the most moving and interesting love stories I have seen in years. Well, apart from ours truly P&P2...Very different altogether. This one was about immortal and all-consuming love with a huge tenderness and spiritualtity. Loved it! I also saw Secrets and Lies. Made me laugh, cringe with embarassment and gasp. Well the normal stuff that makes a movie exciting, I guess. Brenda Blethyn is very, very good. Shine was wonderful and I have to agree that the younger, adolescent actor deserved some recognition for his touching portrayal. Geoffrey Rush was good, but the movie is not all about him. The Mirror has two faces is one movie I would advise as a great comedy about love and hazzard. Left me in a jolly great mood. :-)
~Carolyn #7
I just saw "Fools Rush In" this weekend. I really like it. Matthew Perry & Selma Hayek have a good chemistry together. And it was very funny. Star Wars--special edition--Still great after all these years and the new special effects just enhance the story, and don't distract from it.
~amy2 #8
Instantly forgettable: VACATION IN VEGAS. Save your money! I highly recommend: THE WHOLE WIDE WORLD with Rene Zellwegger & Vince D'Onofrio. Awesome! A powerful romance that is the story of Robert E. Howard, the man who created CONAN. Saw SHINE this weekend. Was not blown away. The lesson: playing piano drives you to madness?? (Cheryl?)
~Cheryl #9
Amy2: Saw SHINE this weekend. Was not blown away. The lesson: playing piano drives you to madness?? (Cheryl?) Now, now Amy, this is the conclusion you came to from seeing the film? ;-) Replace "playing piano" to "living with a controlling, manipulative father" and I'll agree with you! For the record: Learning to play the piano does not drive one to insanity. There, I feel better having defended my beloved piano.
~Inko #10
"living with a controlling, manipulative father" Good for you Cheryl. That's what I got out of "Shine" too, it was the father not the piano playing that did the harm. Still liked the movie, though, even though the father was such a monster, albeit a believable one considering everything he'd been through.
~LauraMM #11
I just saw Primal Fear which was excellent, I think Edward Norton deserves the oscar for Supporting Actor. A Time to Kill, Matthew McConaughey (gorgeous) and I just saw Trainspotting, Ewan McGregor is to die for, drop-deap gorgeous, the best scottish actor of his age group. Oh and I just saw A very Brady Sequel.
~amy2 #12
I am of course being facetious. But you have to admit that having young David actually HIT THE FLOOR after playing the Rach III kind of conveys the impression that this piece can drive you to madness. I saw the film with my sister & brother-in-law, two accomplished pianists, and they agreed. I didn't like the "Hollywood" version of having David go mad right at the pivotal moment. If this actually happened in real life, I will eat Cheryl's Steinway!
~Dina #13
I saw Shine and Sling Blade recently. Well written, well acted but very hard to sit through. Just kept shaking my head. Boy, have I had an easy life. The Whole Wide World is also very good. Take a hanky. Looking for time to go see Hamlet Got to see some good stuff at the Sundance Film Festival (aka: The Wear Black and Use Your Cellular Film Festival). Best of show: House of Yes I think Miramax bought it so look for it this Summer.
~Cheryl #14
Amy2: If this actually happened in real life, I will eat Cheryl's Steinway! According to my Australian source, Ian, and every newspaper article printed in the country about the movie that he has read, it is TRUE!!! Amy, I do not happen to own a Steinway at the moment, but I do have a fine Yamaha. While I shall mourn its loss, it may be worth it to see you eat it...would you like some catsup or perhaps a fine dijon to accompany it? ;-)
~elder #15
Oh, Cheryl & Amy2 -- please do not start this fine repast until we can all be present to watch. And what wine goes best with a Yamaha piano, pray tell? :P
~bernhard #16
maybe saki instead of wine
~JohanneD #17
and teriyaki sauce ;)
~Ann #18
Served over some nice white steamed rice.
~Cheryl #19
hee hee hee hee hee hee hee hee hee hee hee hee hee hee hee hee hee hee hee hee hee hee hee hee hee hee hee hee hee hee hee hee hee hee hee hee hee hee hee hee hee hee hee hee hee hee hee hee hee hee hee hee hee hee hee hee hee hee hee hee ;-)
~cassandra #20
Everyone says I love you, HAmlet(why didn't KB get nominated???), the Crucible, Evita, and Portrait of a LAdy. I also should confess that my friend(she's a major TIm Dalton fan-he's her one and only JAmes Bond) dragged me kicking and screaming to the Beautician and the Beast. If you're ever suffering from insomnia, watch/rent that one! What happened to Dalton-Scarlett was bad enough, but this one? A few weeks ago, Wuthering Heights was on TV and he was so wonderful in that-dark, brooding... Oh and if there is any justice in the world, Ralph Fiennes will win the Oscar for the English Patient. Besides EMMA2 and my first viewing of Casablanca, seeing TEP was the only time I ever cried in a movie theatre. The tissues were flying. The woman next to me could barely stand up after it was over. The cave scene-I will come back. I'll never leave you. oOOH BABY!
~Pandora620 #21
I'm sure you have all seen Barry Lyndon long ago but I rented it today. It is so great. Everything was so authenic from the Georgian period. I didn't remember that it was an Acadamy Award winner in 1975. Also heard Restoration was from the periods we are interested in. I don't know a thing about it. Anyone know anything about it? Will see The Madness of King George for the second time tomorrow.
~kate #22
] Restoration Haven't seen it, but its from the 1670s (ie the Restoration of the British monarchy after the civil war), and about 140 years before our period.
~Cheryl #23
I just got home from seeing The Empire Strikes Back. My whole family went, four die hard fans and my sister-in-law who has never seen these movies before! (too young, it seems...;-p) Well, afterwards she said "Oh no! Darth Vader is Luke's father? And poor Han Solo! And who is "the other?" And now I have to wait three weeks to find out what happens next?" I said, "Oh honey! We had to wait two years!" It's fun seeing these movies in the theater again, and Empire has always been my favorite of the three. I may have to go see it again! ;-)
~kate #24
Cheryl I went on Saturday too. Every one went crazy when Yoda said "No there is another" In fact everyone went crazy every time some key line was said, or some key character appeared. (Han, R2D2 and Yoda got the biggest cheers) The best bit was just before Han was about to kiss Leia for the first time some guy yelled out "DO IT Han!" It brought the house down...
~Tracey #25
I saw Cold Comfort Farm this weekend. In the wake of Emma3, it was really interesting - there are quite a few parallels between KB's characters in these 2 films. And, The Madness of King George! Watched that for the first time 2 weeks ago, and was totally bowled over! It really should have won Best Picture when it was nominated; what beat it? Forrest Gump?
~Ann #26
Forrest Gump also beat Shawshank Redemption which was clearly the best picture of that year. I was very depressed that oscar-night.
~Becks #27
I was so angry that S&S was beaten by Braveheart last year. ALthough it was a good film, S&S was much better.
~bernhard #28
and Braveheart won for makeup, too "let's see is that blue on the left and red on the right, or red on the left and blue on the right?"
~Amy #29
But Braveheart was a fine movie.
~Cheryl #30
Ann: Forrest Gump also beat Shawshank Redemption which was clearly the best picture of that year. I was very depressed that oscar-night. Ann, I felt the same way! Shawshank REdemption was a remarkable movie, riveting, very moving...definately the best movie of the year!
~Tracey #31
I stayed up 'till 2 am last Friday watching Shawshank Redemption on Flix and I agree - what a great film! By the way, have you ever read the Stephen King story it's based on, Rita Hayworth and the Shawshank Redemption? A really good piece of writing, and translated into film very well, just like his short story The Body, which became Stand By Me (love that movie!)
~Amy #32
Stand By Me is wonderful.
~Amy #33
Did anyone else find the Ken Burn's film on Jefferson a disapointment? It showed on most PBS stations last week. It didn't seem so compelling as Civil War or even Baseball and I love Jefferson. Maybe there are not enough colorful and knowledgable people to talk interview -- no Shelby Foote. Is Dumas Malone dead now? He is or was probably boring. Horrible generalization I know, I hope I am wrong.
~maud #34
Speaking of the Regency period I rented Princess Carabou last night. A wonderful story and strong cast, including Kevin Kline, Stephen Rea, Wendy Hughes and John Lithgow---I recommend it. Also Anna Chancellor is in it!
~Ann2 #35
Is there anybody out there at all familiar with the work of Dennis Potter? 'The singing detective' and 'Pennies from Heaven' ? Now they(Swedish TV2) have sent 'Karaoke', a very fine and heart-tearing piece staring Albert Finney and in a smaller part Anna Chancellor; they are both very good. And it is now followed by the last film he wrote before he died, 'Cold Lazarus' about how the author from Karaoke has been frozen for hundreds of years and scientists in the future are getting into his memory. One scientist played by Ciaran Hinds !
~Cheryl #36
Those of us who are in the thralls of a new Star Wars addiction may enjoy this David Letterman, Top Ten signs that you are obsessing over Star Wars: 10. Your poodles are named "C," "3," "P" and "O" 9. You won't sleep with your wife unless she says, "Help me, Obi Wan, you're my only hope" 8. You spent $10,000 trying to Rogaine yourself into Chewbacca 7. You're continually stunned when the President makes major decisions without consulting Mark Hamill 6. Your favorite pickup line: "Would you like to handle my light saber?" 5. You keep referring to your lawn mower as "that crazy droid" 4. You spend most of your days trying to use "the Force" to open a can of pears 3. You once saw an eggplant that looked kind of like Darth Vader and almost had a heart attack 2. Your sex life is strictly "Han Solo," if you know what I mean 1. You like Yoda so much, you voted for Ross Perot
~Susan #37
#33 Amy, I taped Burns's Jefferson, but haven't watched it yet. I'll let you know what I think when I do. TJ is by far my most favorite historical character. There's an excellent biography out on him by Fern something (can't remember her last name) -- it's huge, but reads like a novel. I recommend it highly. #36 Cheryl, those are great. Even though I've watched Star Wars enough that I don't need to see it again, I can still remember enough to appreciate the humor. Thanks for sharing!
~Carolyn #38
#33 Amy, I watched Burn's Jefferson, and was disappointed also. Our local station was able air an interview with Ken Burns after the first episode. I do not know if it was available to other PBS stations. PS--I did get kind of choked up during the Tristam Shandy quote piece.
~Amy #39
I liked hearing about his ideas for the university. I'd like to read more about that.
~LauraMM #40
I started to watch Jefferson, but I too found it extremely boring. I really do prefer A&E's Biography specials. Speaking of what we have been watching. Last nite on one of our PBS stations in Boston, they repeated Prime Suspect 3. And who was in it but Ciaran Hinds and Mark Strong. I personally liked MS in this, he is much balder as he has a very close haircut and well CH really did nothing for me. I have seen this series before but watching it again is great fun. Oh yeah, David Thewlis is also in his one and he totally reminds me of Rod Stewart.
~amy2 #41
Speaking of the makeup in BRAVEHEART -- I didn't see the film, so can someone please explain to me why a Scotsman is wearing the blue makeup of A PICT? Thank you.
~Donna #42
It is "war paint" Amy. It does have a lot of unexpected violence that I really didn't want to see.
~Ann #43
Where would they have gotten the blue pigment? It is fairly rare in nature.
~kate #44
From their local face paint store of course.
~elder #45
Kate -- I believe you must be right! And most likely this store had a sale on blue face paint. :-)
~Donna #46
indigo-(natural source-anil) a plant that yeilds blue dyestuff.:-)
~Elaine #47
Ha anyone read why Hamlet received so little attention from the Oscar nominations? I thougt K. Branagh was a favorite of theirs.
~LauraMM #48
Elaine I have searched hi and lo looking for why it was snubbed. but to no avail. For anyone who has seen it, it is the most glorious adapations of a Shakespeare play. Filmed in Blenheim Castle and part of Denmark, it is visually stunning. Branagh just looks amazing. I would see this movie again and again and again and again and again. Wait until you see the costumes which did indeed get a nomination, they are so beautiful.
~Tracey #49
My husband and I are going to see it this Saturday night. I do have one slightly "unelevated" question, though: is there an intermission, or does the RFF (Rear fatigue factor) become an obstacle to enjoying the film?
~LauraMM #50
at the 2:30 hour mark there is a 10 minute break, just enought time to use the ladies and gents and get a drink. I advise not to get a drink for the first half as you will probably have to use the loo during that time.
~amy2 #51
I know that Picts used blue body makeup, but the Scots? This doesn't seem historically accurate to me. Anyone?
~Inko #52
Maybe the cold made them blue!! It's bitter up in the north! Just being facetious - don't know the answer!;-)
~Ann #53
I believe Russians used blue war paint as well.
~Susan #54
Ha anyone read why Hamlet received so little attention from the Oscar nominations? I haven't seen Hamlet yet, but heard that Branagh was considered to have been hamming it up quite a bit and that it was WWWWAAAAAYYYYY too long.
~amy2 #55
The industry was surprised at the snub to Branagh and HAMLET too. Don't know why they chose to totally overlook this -- maybe they found their Academy "epic" in THE ENGLISH PATIENT, and didnt' need to look any further. . .
~JohanneD #56
A MAJOR oversight from the Academy, utterly vexing, this production is of epic proportion the like we haven't see in a very long time. Worth every minute and every penny. Riveting and many more superlatives...
~Dina #57
Claudia - A little late but.... Restoration is about an English physician (Robert "Dope head" Downey Jr.) who is asked to the Palace to help the King with some "healing", because it seems he has quite and knack is a dedicated Dr.. He is asked to stay and be the King's physician. He lives at the palace and becomes quite decadent. The King asks him to marry his mistress and they go live in Surrey off the Thames. He falls in love with her, but she loves only the King. The King finds out and our boy is banished. Thus, the beginning of his Restoration. Great costumes (last year an Oscar?) and sets. I saw Sling Blade this past week. I thought Shine was hard to sit through....The violence is not really seen and Dwight Yokam's character has a potty mouth, but Billy Bob Thornton's acting is incredible!!!! I think he deserves the Oscar (though sentimentally I want Ralph to win and realistically Jeffery Rush will win it). I say GO SEE IT!!!!
~Pandora620 #58
Dina and Kate, thanks so much for your comments on Restoration. Ann, re your #53 - are you into Russian History? Comment sounded like you were. Pre 1917 Russian history is my passion and has been for many years. Cheryl, your comments are always SO witty. Enjoy them and ROTFL. Forgot to say that Anthony Calf (our own dear Col. Fitzwilliam) was in Madness of King George. He was rather nondescript and sullen. Not at all agreeable as our Col. was.
~Ann #59
No, I'm not into history, but I have a mind like a steel trap when it comes to trivia.
~Hilary #60
Ann2, I consider 'The Singing Detective' one of TV's finest programs. I only saw a little of "Karaoke', but did catch 'Cold Lazarus' and thought it interesting and good. Did you ever see the interview with Dennis Potter shortly before he died? Now that was one of TV's finest interviews.
~Ann2 #61
I'm glad Hilary to share this experience with one friend from Pemb! Interview with Dennis Potter no I have not heard anything about that but shall keep my eyes open as they have sent Karaoke recently and directly followed by "Cold Lazarus".You would have liked Karaoke, Hil.It was sad and funny and Albert Finney did this great love scene. Did you see that; in the hospital!? And did you not love when he said goodbye to his old agent friend:' I'll even cake tare '.?
~Hilary #62
NO, I must have missed that part. What a pity. The interview was extraordinary apart from what he said with regard to his work, because it was basically en-edited: therefore long, rambly, and included him smoking like a train, asking for medication, talking about death approaching. Very unusual.
~Ann2 #63
Hil I taped this interview yesterday comming back from a journey and just happened to catch sight of it's being aired in the paper...Looking forward to it
~winter #64
hi all... just came back from catching an evening feature of 'smilla's sense of snow.' it was pretty good-- nothing spectacular. gabriel byrne and julia ormond were cast appropriately, and you can see the chemistry definitely kicking in in some scenes. they've been going out in real life since then, and so there you have it. one thing that i wnated to share with you all was the trailer for 'paradise road', movie set during WWII. IT FEATURES JENNIFER EHLE! I was pretty proud when they announced her name along with Glenn Close, frances McDormand and Julianna Marguiles. That says a lot about the exposure she's gotten since P&P2. anyway, the movie i think is about a large group of women (allied--US, Brit, etc) who are taken into an internment camp by the Japanese. Kinda like a female version of empire of the sun, i'm guessing. anyway, they start up a choir during their time in internment, and learn about life, each other, etc... comes out this spring. (anyone in the l.a. area want to catch it sometime?)
~kate #65
Winter I saw this trailer ages ago and couldn't remember what the film was called. It does look really good. Also reminiscent of "ATown Like Alice", which will be very familiar to the Aussies, but perhaps not everyone else.
~Inko #66
Kate, I love "A Town Like Alice" - read the book first and later saw the movie. Of course, Nevil Shute is also one of my favorite authors!! "Paradise Road" also reminds me of the TV series "Tenko". Did anyone see that?
~elder #67
"A Town Like Alice" was a wonderful movie. It was my introduction to Bryan Brown, and I found him quite attractive. And a good actor, besides! I ought to read the novel sometime, but I seem to have a list of books longer than the number of days in a year. Maybe in my next lifetime!
~Donna #68
Tenko liked that on very much,but this reminds me of "Playing for Time" with Venessa Redgrave,watched both seires and movie when aired. Tenko hasn't been on A&E for a while.
~jwinsor #69
the movie i think is about a large group of women (allied--US, Brit, etc) who are taken into an internment camp by the Japanese. Kinda like a female version of empire of the sun, i'm guessing. anyway, they start up a choir during their time in internment, and learn about life, each other, etc... The plot is based - very loosely, I'm afraid - it's been pointed out that it's a dramatization, not a documentary, on something that actually did happen during WWI. 600 Dutch, Australian, and British women and children were interned for 3 1/2 years by the Japanese in a series of prison camps on Sumatra. Thirty-seven percent did not survive. During their internment, as a way to rise above their inhumane conditions and dehumanizing experiences, a group of the women formed what became known as a vocal orchestra. Two of the women wrote down from memory classical orchestral works and arranged them for womens' voices which became the instruments, singing on a series of neutral syllables. The concerts given by this "orchestra" was instrumental in maintaining morale among the internees. The concerts ceased when 19 of the 30 singers had died. One of the survivors and singers in the vocal orchestra later attended Stanford University, and 40 years later decided to donate her copy of the music to the University's music library. The archivist of the library was interested in having some record of how the music would have sounded, and approached the director of our local women's chorus about preparing a few sample pieces to be recorded for their archives. The chorus agreed to do this, and thus began a project that took over our lives for the next 4 years. In the process we sang the music of the vocal orchestra for the first time since it was sung on Sumatra in a concert which was attended by the original conductor and 8 of the original singers who were still surviving and came from their current homes in England, Australia, Indonesia, the Netherlands, and the United States. The original concert led to a series of concerts, recordings and a documentary film which was shown on PBS. Some of the survivors have also had books published about thier experience. Many of us who were a part of re-creating this moving real-life experience have very mixed feelings about what "dramatic license" will have been taken with the story when it reaches the movie theatres in the name of making it a "commercial" success.
~bernhard #70
Oh, Joan, is this when you cam eto San Antonio? I am awed.
~Ann2 #71
Many of us who were a part of re-creating this moving real-life experience have very mixed feelings about what "dramatic license" will have been taken with the story when it reaches the movie theatres I can understand that. This must have been a very revolting experience for your choir and you were able to transfer some hints of it in this account ,Joan.
~jwinsor #72
is this when you came to San Antonio? Right. :-) And also to honor composer Kirke Mechem with a program of his works for women's chorus. This must have been a very revolting experience for your choir Really, the best word for it was "inspiring"- what those women were able to accomplish though starving, ill and malnourished and living in subhuman conditions, yet maintaining their connection with "civilization" and rising above all of the squalor in this way. The name of the PBS film was "Song of Survival." I find it difficult to imagine how they settled on a title like "Paradise Road" for such an experience!
~Susan #73
Joan, this topic interests me greatly because my father was a Japanese POW for 44 months. How people can rise above such things is a source of endless astonishment and admiration! What an honor for you and your choir! I can't wait to see this movie.
~Kali #74
Kathleen's copy of A Fatal Inversion is going around this group like it's a disease. If you like Jeremy Northam, or if you're just into really twisted mysteries, I suggest you get your hands on a copy. Those of us who've seen it agree that it's REALLY worth it...;)
~Susan #75
Has anyone seen The Crucible or Portrait of a Lady who is willing to share their opinion? I am interested in both, but have not heard first-person accounts of either.
~terry #76
I saw the world premiere Saturday night of "Still Breathing" which is one of the best movies I've seen in a long time. The audience was held spellbound by this remarkable love story. It starred Brendan (Encino Man) Fraser and the lovely Joanna Going (both of who I get to meet in person). It took place in San Antonio and LA and had some really cool twists and turns and emotional moments. Since, this was the world premiere, everyone in the theater a free CD with the entire soundtrack of the movie. The only pressing there will ever be of this CD. The movie had a remarkable soundtrack, specifically the "Berceuse" by Chopin, which was the soul of the film, as well as Verdi's "La Traviata" and the Jim Cullum Jazz Band playing Louis Armstrong. I met Paul Mills along with the cast and production company at a fabulous party after the movie that went into the wee hours, it was quite an experience. Highly recommended. I predict good things for this movie.
~jane #77
Terry, I didn't know you were part of the arty scene in Austin! Sounds like fun, and I'll look out for the movie. Now I'll tell you about the premiere party I went to last week. I was in a fantastic modern hotel in Munich with my boss, on a business trip of course.. The huge atrium of the hotel had been decorated in white with black spots. Turned out to be the German premiere of "101 Dalmatiner". Not a kid in sight, just lots of cool looking Germans dressed in black (with a little white and red visi le) smoking cigarettes like crazy. Claudia Schleiffler (sp?), the supermodel, was the MC. I usually don't go to parties that I have not been invited to, especially when everyone is speaking a language I don't understand, but my boss really wanted to wander in so we did. I did not eat or drink anything, however, out of respect for the hosts and my questionable status. There was a really wacky fantasy fashion show with dalmation-inspired clothes worn by very gorgeous giant models. The grand door prize as a white Macintosh with black spots, of course. I can't believe that I just confessed to my Austen friends to crashing a party---not even Wickham would go to a party without a proper invitation.
~terry #78
Claudia Schieffer! We'll have to move this discussion to celebrity lusts in 'drool'. If Claudia Schieffer was there, it was worth crashing. Good work.
~winter #79
hey! i just caught "cinema paradisio" on bravo tonight. i had seen this so many times before, but this was when Colin Firth was not part of my vocabulary. so... imagine my surprise when i see this again, and the actor (don't know his name) who plays the old salvatore/"toto" (the main character) is the spitting image of colin firth!!! older, but just as dreamy!! a colin clone who speaks italian! i'm sure livia would just love that!
~Anne3 #80
Susan: Has anyone seen The Crucible or Portrait of a Lady who is willing to share their opinion? I am interested in both, but have not heard first-person accounts of either. I saw The Crucible last week and was very disappointed. I thought that both Arthur Miller and Nicholas Hytner blew the opportunity to make a really gripping film. As I remember it, the play was a tense human drama, but Miller sabotaged his own work by opening it up for the screen--the addition of so many new characters and scenes detracted from the central moral dilemma of the hero. And Hytner, who is primarily a stage director, still has a lot to learn about film directing (although I like his irst movie, The Madness of King George). It makes me nervous because Hytner's next project is a film version of a novel I absolutely adore, The Object of My Affection by Stephen McCauley, and I'd hate to see him mess it up.
~kate #81
I quite enjoyed the Crucible, but as I have said before, I was in a production of it at school, and I was really interested in what they had done to it. Portrait of a Lady. Don't bother. I found it long, dull, and depressing. She should have KNOWN that any character played by John Malkovich was going to be trouble. There is supposed to be all this sexual tension, and I just didn't get it at all. Very disappointing, because I really like Jane Campion. But I went last night to see HAMLET. It's fantastic. I cried (even though I knew what was going to happen) The incredible depth of the ideas expressed, which came across so clearly. Branagh really made Hamlet a real and believable person, caught up in complex events beyond his control, frustrated by his own fears and doubts. It also made the Ophelia/Hamlet relationship make sense to me in a way it hadn't before - when he realises she's dead and cries "I loved Ophelia" you can really believe it, even though he treated her so badly. Go and see this film. But make sure you're in a comfortable seat. The first half is 2 1/2 hours, the second half 1 1/2 hours. And Derek Jacobi was great too. Jack Lemmon was awful, but he's only on the screen for about 15 minutes.
~Becks #82
Yes, I didn't like Portrait of a Lady or the Crucible. What talent, and completely wasted. DDL is nowhere near droolable in this one! Kate, JM gives me the willies too! And Hamlet is one of the most exciting films I've seen in years. Everyone-go see it! And add Sling Blade to your list--it didn't hit me till after I left the theatre. There are so very few films that stay with you, and this movie certainly does.
~winter #83
saw "marvin's room" this afternoon. it was good. i really didn't think too much of it-- i mean, no one stood out, no spectacular performances. but perhaps, because of the mood of the film, no one was supposed to have stood out. leonardo di caprio was a little TOO attractive, to play his character-- his looks definitely were a distraction. but i'm not complaining!
~Becks #84
Winter, besides the helicopters, what is Oscar week like? See anyone? Who are they predicting will win?
~Cheryl #85
Kate, you must join us over at the Kenneth Branagh topic at Drool...we are all agog over Hamlet, have tons of pictures, but not the elusive undershirt pic yet...:-(
~winter #86
oscar week is like living in the middle of an obstacle course. they have to set up scaffolds for the press, bleachers for the fans (you can sit on them, but get there on saturday or sunday if you want a seat), they've got people with walkie talkies all around looking like the secret service, catering trucks, satellite trucks vying for spaces on the parking lot, and those big gold statuettes get hauled in. all this, and i'm trying to just drive into my garage without getting into an accident or being block d. it's exciting, because you feel the 'electriciyt' of it all, because 364 days a year, the shrine is a real dump. you'd be surprised at how unglamorous it looks in real life. but also local residents get to short end of the stick because getting in and out of your street becomes a 10 miniute nightmare. everyone's hidden in their limos, so i never see people, but i always hang about for a half hour or so, just in case i get lucky. as for winners, i predict a sweep for the english patient (but ralph fiennes won't even be there :( )
~Ann #87
Some people say that he will be at the Oscars. The play he is in must have given him time off.
~LauraMM #88
I thought I had the undershirt one. Well anyway, I saw SHINE, didn't like it. But I have been watching a movie my aunt videotaped THE FLIGHT OF THE PHOENIX with James Stewart, Ernest Borgnine, Dan Duryea, Ian Bannen, Sir Richard Attenborough. Its about 2:45 mins long, but I only have seen 1:30 of it will finish tonite. Was very good. Beginning reminded me of TEP.
~Amy #89
I love that movie, Laura. Have you reached the part yet where they all learn what the designer really designs?
~LauraMM #90
Model Airplanes!!!! But he got it to fly. I figured he must have been a genious. I felt bad because Ian Bannen's character who was jewish kept giving Dorfman a horrible time. I thought the movie was wonderful. I kept getting very thirsty.
~Donna #91
I just watched Babette's Feast. I loved it. It is about gratitude,faith,love,scarfices,commitment and choices you name it is there.
~Amy #92
I kept getting very thirsty. __ LOL, Laura. Those cracked lips. Made you want to rush up to the screen with pitchers of water.
~LauraMM #93
Not just cracked lips but skin, oh god they looked like there were melting. I don't know when you saw it last but the beginning is just like THE ENGLISH PATIENT.
~Cheryl #94
I saw Secrets and Lies last weekend and liked it very much. It was overflowing with emotion and had some marvelous performances. Wasn't brother Maurice Rosencrantz in Hamlet? (Or was that Guilderstern?!)
~Quarky #95
Just watched Spellbound last night after a lapse of many years. The attrraction between Ingrid Bergman and Gregory Peck is ... well, spellbinding. If I ever take my friends advice, I would only have my head examined by the likes of an Ingrid Bergman. Very good tense story line with some dream sequences by Salvidor Dali.
~kate #96
Cheryl, yep, maurice was Rosencrantz.... or possibly Guildenstern ;-)
~winter #97
don't remember which one maurice was, but he was BRILLIANT!!! i know i keep mentioning it, but "life is sweet" , another mike leigh flick, has got him as a real slime ball sleaze, who makes a pass at alison steadman (mrs. bennet from P&P2). really hilarious. please rent it if you haven't already seen it.. it's just one of those movies that constantly get overlooked. i'm getting dragged to see 'private parts' tomorrow. it's part of a deal. wish me luck. anyone seen it?
~LKenn #98
Winter - haven't seen "Private Parts" yet and really don't desire to, but I too agreed to see it as part of a "deal." My husband accompanied me to TEP which he moderately enjoyed, so I told him I would go to PP. The reviews have been great but I'm not much of a Howard Stern fan.
~Luba #99
On Thursday, I saw The English Patient. Man, what a truly marvellous film! I cried, laughed at some point, and for the rest of the time, was completely enraptured with the photography, the music, the actors,sp.Juliette Binoche and Kristin Scott Thomas, and small poetic details, like the seduction scene with the candles in the courtyard, the murals in the church, etc. I just loved it, it left me with a deep feeling of peace, though it`s so sad in a way. Poor Colin Firth, I felt so sorry for his character. Such a nice guy, didn�t deserve to be cheated on...oh well... :-)
~Charlotte #100
Last night I saw The Truman Show. Everything you may have heard or read about this film is true. You will never think of Jim Carrey the same again. I have never liked Carrey, and studiously avoid his films, but on the other hand, I will pay to see anything directed by Peter Weir, so I went last night. I want to see it again. It was enchanting. Carrey blew me away. And the music was spellbinding. I can't wait to buy the soundtrack! Go see it. Tell me what you think.
~autumn #101
Charlotte, I will put this on my must-rent list. Anything that can be described as "enchanting" winds up on my list!
~terry #102
Sounds great. I'll check it out.
~Charlotte #103
I saw Armageddon last night. Enjoyed the ride. I've been a longtime fan of Bruce Willis, but last night I fell in love with one of his costars. I have spent the entire morning searching the web for a photo of him, without success! So if anyone ever comes across an image of William Fichtner, could you please email it to me (cbridges@esri.com)? He also starred with Jodie Foster in Contact, and in Quiz Show, and Strange Days. You think with that kind of resume, I would be able to find at least one image of him on the internet! sheesh! :) If you saw Armageddon, he played Colonel Sharp, the nemesis of Bruce Willis's character.
~terry #104
From http://www.armageddon.com Commander of the overall mission is no-nonsense Colonel Willie Sharp, played by William Fichtner ("Contact"). "I don't want to use the term 'straight man,' but he's going to complete the mission no matter what it takes, no matter what it costs," says Fichtner. Fichtner declares that Touchstone Pictures' "Armageddon" has been his favorite film experience to date and credits the crew as well as the technical advisors for his having had such a good time. "Being around people like Joe Allen and Chuck Davis [from the Department of Defense] and the other astronauts was like having a virtual encyclopedia of space. I also spent some time up at the Niagara Falls Air Force Base where my sister is a major and with the pilots at Edwards when we were there. For most of them the dream is to qualify for NASA. I watched those guys and they're not kidding. They're the real deal." http://www.movies.com/armageddon/Main/TheMovie/prodnotes/index.html
~riette #105
I am defenitely going to see that movie if and when it comes to Switzerland. My sister says it's fantastic.
~terry #106
Believe me, it will come to Switzerland.
~riette #107
Yes. When you have all long forgotten about it. Then I rave about it in here, and you will all think me slow! So be warned!
~Charlotte #108
Thanks, Terry. I had found that link, but was surprised and disappointed to see that the Russian astronaut got higher billing than my Colonel! :) No photo to be found at that site. I went to see it again last night. Hoping to rid myself of this juvenile obsession. Didn't work. :)
~riette #109
Good!
~Charlotte #110
hahaha! Riette, are you saying "Good!" to me, or to Terry?
~riette #111
To you! For the juvenile obsession.
~autumn #112
Charlotte, what role did he have in "Quiz Show"? Was he the blond cutie with a name like Van Dorn? Saw "Bean" (big snooze), "Good Will Hunting" (pretty good, but I can only hear the F word so many times) and "Conspiracy Theory" (interesting without being very good, if you know what I mean) this week. When it rains it pours!
~riette #113
Saw none of those!
~Charlotte #114
Autumn, naw, that was Ralph Fiennes who had the starring role of van Doren in Quiz Show. Fichtner had a very minor role as the stage manager. Last night I rented Sphere (big snooze), and Switchback, which was a passable suspense thriller.
~autumn #115
Wow, how could I not remember Ralph Fiennes?? Must've been early on in his film career... Saw "Reality Bites" last night (on TV), and really enjoyed it. I'm not usually big on Winona, but the ensemble cast worked well. My husband and daughters are going to see "Madeline" today.
~autumn #116
OK, I have a big problem--my VCR cut out on the last 5 minutes of "The Usual Suspects" (Kevin spacey, Gabriel Byrne, Suzy Amis) and I missed the exciting conclusion. Spoiler, please!! Who is Kaiser Sozay and how does this film end???
~jgross #117
Autumn, Sandrine Bonnaire is Keyser Soze. And your beauty eclipses hers. Your VCR is nasty....what was it thinking when it did that to you? Seriously, the following will spoil the surprise ending for anyone who hasn't seen the movie, so don't read this if you want to experience some day one of the greatest surprise endings in film history: Film Review: "The Usual Suspects" MA in Disability Studies Centre for Psychotherapeutic Studies University of Sheffield Yaara Di Segni Garbasz December 1996 The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn't exist' ("Verbal" Kint, The Usual Suspects, 1995). The greatest trick the mysterious criminal overlord, Keyser Soze, ever pulled, was to convince the world that he was just a pathetic, harmless cripple. A truckload of gun parts is hijacked in Queens, NY. Five suspects: Michael McManus, Todd Hockney, Dean Keaton, Fred Fenster and Roger "Verbal" Kint, are arrested for the night and questioned. A sequence of crimes involving the five follows, reaching its climax when a ship docked at the San Pedro Harbour, explodes leaving 27 charred bodies, a dying man in a hospital and no sign of the presumed cargo of $91 million in cocaine. "Verbal" Kint is arrested at the harbour and released the next day with total immunity due to pressure from high up. Special Agent Dave Kujan of the United States Customs Department is not willing to let the matter drop. He is convinced that Dean Keaton, a corrupted ex-cop who, according to Kint's testimony, was shot at the harbour before the explosion, is alive. For Kujan, who has been after Keaton for years, this is a quest. Kujan is convinced that Kint knows something, and is determined to find out. In a cluttered police station, "Verbal" Kint, the pathetic cerebral palsy victim, tells Agent Kujan his version of the events that started with the line-up in New York six weeks earlier and ended with the explosion at the harbour the night before. As Kint tells his story, new details emerge. He provides Kujan with an explanation to the name "Keyser Soze" screamed by the dying man at the hospital. The body of an Argentine criminal washed down to the beach provides an explanation for the missing cocaine. As the story unfolds, Agent Kujan becomes convinced that Keaton is no other but Keyser Soze, the mysterious overlord criminal, and that Kint is lying in his testimony on the death of Keaton/Soze. As Kint limps away from the police station to his freedom, Agent Kujan has a short moment of satisfaction. His questions are answered. But his satisfaction lasts only for minutes, as he suddenly realises his terrible mistake. Kujan rushes after Kint, but it is too late. Outside, a no longer limping and semi-paralysed Kint lights a cigarette, steps into a car driven by Soze's middleman, the lawyer Kubayashi, and drives away.
~autumn #118
Wow!!!! What a mind-blowing ending! I may just have to rent that one now and fast-forward to the end to see it for myself after all! Where did you get this review, Jim? Have you been rummaging through filing cabinets at the sanitarium again??
~jgross #119
Mia Farrow's sister called me to ask if I wanted to go see "The Purple Rose of Cairo" with her. A harsh light shone on the wall, I talked into the phone receiver forgetting it was packed with cocaine, and the white stuff blew all over the place, I coughed, "Stephanie, I'll be right over." We got to the theater and entered without my car. The movie started, Jeff Daniels looked at us and of course motioned for us to come in. We stepped into the film. I immediately took refuge in the projectionist's ear , by calling out to him, way up there in the projection room, "Hey Ziegmund, could you splice in 'Shock Corridor'?" I saw what I heard---his own voice negotiating an attractive YES! I barely had time to rewire my future or fuse with a rental rectal android---there we were, me and Stephanie, shuffling down the corridor looking for the heart of Saturday night. She helped a man zip back up, brushed his hair, spoke to him in wall-to-wall lumberjack talk. I lost her and scooted around the corner, into a ro m that had thousands of folders of information on open shelves above the lobotomist's wide and delicious sketches of a Thai Buddhist monastery. I went through all the usual suspects until I came to a folder labeled "Kubayashi". When I opened it, Stephanie walked into the room with a straightjacket that she said used to belong to Keyser Soze. I asked her how she knew. Kevin Spacey walked in and shook my hand, slapped me on the back, began apologizing and edging us out to the door and back into the corr dor. I looked back, but he was gone behind the closing door. Jeff grabbed the file out of my hands, perused its wrenching innards, and said, "Oh I knew it would end like that." He gave it back to me and pushed me outa the movie. No Stephanie to be seen. I went home alone, although my car kept me company. What was in the file folder was the review you read, Autumn. I couldn't piece together how all the new information got in the folder and how all the old information got out, but the Kinko's guy, wh scanned it onto a diskette for me, said, "Sir, if Marie-France Pisier, Isabelle Adjani, Jacqueline Bisset, Marie-Christine Barrault, Nathalie Baye, Juliette Binoche and Isabelle Huppert all like you, you'll do all right. If they don't, you'll starve and be known as a dope." So anyway, what I actually did was, I went to the 'Internet Movie Database', one of those 3 websites that I gave the url to, in another topic, and searched for 'The Ususal Suspects', then within that, I clicked on reviews, and I think it was about the last of some 20+ reviews, because it was the only one that gave away the ending.
~autumn #120
You skimmed through 20 movie reviews for me?? What a prince! Had you seen this film before, Jim? Saw "Flirting with Disaster", which was marginally funny, and "Chasing Amy", which had its moments, but all in all pushed the envelope of good taste too much for me to endorse it. Watched "The Vanishing", a Dutch film, which was disturbing and dramatic, in a mildly interesting way. It's definitely been a lukewarm rental week.
~jgross #121
I'd skim 120 and just ask, "What do you mean, is that all?" You're worth it. I did see "The Usual Suspects" when it first came out, but get this, Autumn, I couldn't, when you asked and everything, I couldn't even remember how the darn thing ended. And so many of those crazy reviews would tease the reader by saying, "Who was Keyser Soze? Was it 'Verbal' Kint? Was it Mephistopheles? Was it agent Kujan? Was it Keaton? Or Kubayashi? Was it that Hungarian survivor who died in the hospital? Was it Kenneth Starr? Was it Osama bin Laden? Perhaps Trigger or Lassie?" I saw those movies you mentioned, all of 'em, on their initial run in the theaters......"Chasing Amy" would've made my week, though, movie-wise. It, I wanted it to push my envelope some more---I wish it had gone on another 4 hours or so. Your comments are really interesting, no matter what they are. I love to listen in to your train........of thought.
~riette #122
Serial Jim. Going to see Lethal Weapon 4 today. I loved the other Lethal Weapon films, so I'm quite looking forward to it. But this is very old news for you, huh?
~autumn #123
You enjoyed "Chasing Amy", Jim? I thought the roommate "Banky" was terrific--I'd love to see him in something else. He was responsible for some of the most clever and funny moments in that movie. But there was just zero chemistry between the girl and the guy (I've forgotten THEIR names already!), and he seemed so repulsed by her it was incredulous that a couple days later he decides he's in love with her. I saw this guy's first film, "Clerks," which I absolutely loathed as it was so insipid and un-fun y. I didn't realize this film was one of his until she makes that reference to the girl having sex with the dead guy in the convenience store bathroom, and then it clicked. What films have YOU been seeing lately, movie man??
~jgross #124
"Blade" hatched an egg for me. The shell cracked when my eyes touched it, and there wasn't anything inside. Within its own genre (action/vampire) it was okay, cuz I didn't expect too much. The archnemesis was a good contrast to the usual action movie nemesis. Society looked like it acted the same, even though half of the power-structure was controlled by vampires. The opening nightclub scene got real intense with tension building and building and then all out action mayhem. The film was speeded up to show how fast vampires move. I don't know what it needed---lotsa stuff. Will see "Your Friends and Neighbors" sometime this week. I expect much from it, though....I won't walk in the theater for it anticipating little, like I did for "Blade." Seemed like most of what was going on in "Chasing Amy" was discord, to you, right? Same with me. He, Holden, took an immediate liking to her, Alyssa, but she had to overcome her own bias for lesbian exclusiveness. Even while she was doing that, she was having a great time with him. He definitely got to her, she admits to him while saying she wants to find the....well, here she is saying it herself: Alyssa: I've given that a lot of thought, you know? I mean, now that I'm being ostracized by my friends, I've had a lot of time to think about all of this. And what I've come up with is really simple: I came to this on my terms. I didn't just heed what I was taught, you know? Men and women should be together, it's the natural way---that kind of thing. I'm not with you because of what family, society, life tried to instill in me from day one. The way the world is---how seldom you meet that one person who gets you---it's so rare. My parents didn't really have it. There was no example set for me in the world of male/female relationships. And to cut oneself off from finding that person---to immediately half your options by eliminating the possibility of finding that one person within your own gender.....that just seemed stupid. So I didn't. But then you come along. You---the one least likely; I mean, you were a guy. Holden: Still am. Alyssa: And while I was falling for you, I put a ceiling on that, because you were a guy. Until I remembered why I opened the door to women in the first place---to not limit the likelihood of finding that one person who'd complement me so completely. And so here we are. I was thorough when I looked for you, and I feel justified lying in your arms---because I got here on my own terms, and have no question that there was someplace I didn't look. And that makes all the difference. [she snuggles into him and closes her eyes. Holden stares at the ceiling] Holden: Can I at least tell people that all you needed was some serious deep-dicking? [she hits him with her pillow. They kiss, deeply---the calm before the storm] --------------------------------------------------------------------------- That scene was all pretty convincing for me (chemistry was in flow and fluid---heat was going back and forth). But the movie did have alotta storms. I couldn't understand why his character would fall for such a bias against what she was doing in high school (her past, which was past). I liked Jason Lee (Banky) alot, too. Ben Affleck (Holden). Joey Lauren Adams (Alyssa). I think Kevin Smith (director) was trying for a movie about a stormy relationship with powerful conflicting forces pushing up into their faces. The dialogue and characters made me feel the atmosphere, and it felt like what I could walk into in alotta different places around town, here. They felt closer to my real life than characters in soooooooo many movies. I wondered why so many people didn't react to it like I did. I wondered why it didn't take off like "sex, lies and videotape" did, or "The Crying Game" or "Trainspotting"---they all started out small and gained momentum and got acclaim. I guess "Chasing Amy" had the effect of repulsing as much as pulling people into it. It's a real luxury, Autumn, to hear your take on these movies you see. Somehow your viewpoint is a living thing regardless of how it turns out. It's fun to travel back through a movie by way of your reactions and interpretations.....something has to happen.....whatever this might mean, it brings a peculiarly festive glow to my face which I can feel going on in, and that impresses me.
~autumn #125
I can tell you really appreciate cinema verite! It is truly the "seventh art", as the French say (though exactly what the first 6 are is unclear). I appreciate and understand your defense of "Chasing Amy" (indeed, your opinion seems to prevail amongst my circle of friends), and I think you characterized it perfectly when you talked about the in-your-face conflicting forces driving them all together/apart. I have never heard of "Blade" or "Your Friends and Neighbors." I am not big on the horror/sci-fi genre, so I'll skip the first (especially since you panned it!) I'd be interested to know what the latter is all about and read your review.
~KitchenManager #126
What's your three favorite Vampire flicks, Jim?
~riette #127
'The night of the Hermit' 'The true confessions of a justified boat maker' 'Nightmare on Sorewilly Street'
~jgross #128
Goin' around the city, easing on the gas, crossin' over a dry river under a drunk moon, then feeling that displacement of the black clock, no sense of time.....but still finding myself going down that long narrow Old Cemetery Road, I just wanted to say to ya, wer, it's a giddy good feeling hearin' from you, and now I wait for your car, just sitting here, motor purring, now it's off, WHAT A THIRST I feel comin' on.... in park in the dark. ___________________________________________________ Hear are sum 5 vampers that're ma faves, with "Vampire's Kiss" coming way out on top of the others: Vampire's Kiss (1988) [Nicolas Cage, Elizabeth Ashley, Jennifer Beals, Maria Conchita Alonso] Near Dark (1987) [Adrian Pasdar, Jenny Wright, Bill Paxton] Andy Warhol's Dracula (1974) [Joe Dallesandro, Udo Kier] Nadja (1994) [Elina Lowensohn, Galaxy Craze, Suzy Amis, Martin Donovan, Peter Fonda] The Addiction (1995) [Lili Taylor, Christopher Walken] ____________________________________________________ Plot Summary for Vampire's Kiss (1989) A publishing executive is visited and bitten by a vampire and starts exhibiting erratic behavior. He pushes his secretary to extremes as he tries to come to terms with his affliction. The vampire continues to visit and drink his blood, and as his madness deepens, it begins to look as if some of the events he's experiencing may be hallucinations. `Vampire's Kiss' (R) --reviewed by Hal Hinson (Washington Post) "Vampire's Kiss" is a one-of-a-kind movie, proving -- for all time, perhaps -- that singularity can be as much of a curse as it is a blessing. What it also proves is that it is possible for a person to stay in New York too long. Take Peter, for example: young, well-to-do, handsome, a successful literary agent by day, womanizing bar crawler by night -- a dictionary-definition yuppie. As yuppies go, Peter is one of the stranger ones, particularly as Nicolas Cage plays him. One night, he picks up a sultry number in a red dress (Jennifer Beals) who proceeds, once they're in bed, to satisfy herself by feasting on his jugular. Almost immediately he begins to feel run down and anxious. Little tensions become gargantuan. When his secretary (Maria Conchita Alonso) is unable to locate a contract, he jumps up on top of her desk, shouting madly and wagging his forefinger in her face. Mirrors, too, become something of a sore point. Gradually, as his behavior grows more and more erratic, Peter becomes convinced that he has turned into a vampire. He hasn't, though -- not really. Of course, metaphorically, he's been a kind of parasite for years, preying on young women, using them and disposing of them. It's on this symbolic level that the picture sets up camp. But using words like metaphor and symbol is a stretch in this context. It makes the picture appear to be up to something, and it's not -- at least not something worthwhile. Directed by Robert Bierman, "Vampire's Kiss" is stone-dead bad, incoherently bad, but it goes all the way with its premise -- and when I say all the way I mean all the way. You've heard of actors making a strong choice and going with it? Well, see it in the flesh! Stomping, snorting, his hair hanging over his eyes like a curtain of foppish dementia, Cage acts as if he has been taking hits off of Dennis Hopper's gas mask. There's no way to overstate it: This is scorched-earth acting -- the most flagrant scenery chewing I've ever seen. Part Dwight Frye in "Dracula," part Tasmanian devil, Cage makes the previous champ -- Crispin Glover in "River's Edge" -- look like Perry Como. If Bierman had been able to create a compatible comic atmosphere the movie might have become an instant cult classic. And even with Cage, you have to fight your way through the uncertainties of tone, the funereal pace and the inept staging to find any enjoyment. Still, you're not exactly sure if the material is meant to be funny or is laughable merely by default. Cage makes sure that we're never bored, though. In one scene he gobbles down a live pigeon; in another, he converts his sofa into a makeshift coffin by turning it upside down and lowering it down on himself. No amount of description can prepare you for these mad excesses. They have to be seen to be believed. _______________________________________________________ Nadja (1994) This ultra-hip, post-modern vampire tale is set in contemporary New York City. Members of a dysfunctional family of vampires are trying to come to terms with each other, in the wake of their father's death. Meanwhile, they are being hunted by Dr. Van Helsing and his hapless nephew. As in all good vampire movies, forces of love are pitted against forces of destruction. `Nadja' (R) By Hal Hinson Washington Post Staff Writer September 22, 1995 Early on in "Nadja," Michael Almereyda's insanely brilliant fantasia on the Dracula legend, the protagonist confesses over drinks with a stranger that she has no job, no interests, no skills. "I'm not really good for much of anything," Nadja asserts, pausing to drag deeply on her cigarette. "I want to change my life." Typical singles-bar talk, but Nadja (played with feline elegance by Elina Lowensohn) is not like most girls you meet at happy hour. With her hair pulled back to accentuate her high, sculpted forehead and black, hypnotic eyes, Nadja isn't cruising the bars looking for love. Nadja is a vampire. The daughter of Count Dracula and a peasant woman he fell in love with by "the shores of the Black Sea," she prowls the nightspots of New York City looking like a Eurotrash Garbo. But Nadja is burned out on the club scene; she's ready to move beyond the night to more simple, normal things_sunlight, a lake, a dog. How, exactly, the undead diva intends to achieve this metamorphosis is not clear. Actually, a good portion of the film's story is confusing; plotting is obviously not Almereyda's strong point. Still, this idiosyncratically talented writer-director ("Twister," "Another Girl Another Planet") manages to keep a lot of elements in equilibrium. Almereyda uses New York clubs as the backdrop for this vampire saga_a stroke of genius_ much the way Jean Cocteau did when, in "Orphee," he set the myth of Orpheus among a group of squabbling Left Bank poets_as a means of giving a classic story a sharp, contemporary edge. Almereyda shares some of Cocteau's sense of film as a magic plaything. Shot in hallucinatory black-and-white by Jim Denault_who also works the Pixelvision camera used in some sequences_the film has an atmosphere that fluctuates between languid and hysterical. Visually, it's a thrilling movie, gorgeously, hypnotically textured. Images fly in from all over_a snippet of Bela Lugosi's Rorschach eyebrows, a few frames of a ravishing peasant girl, a grainy long shot of a skulking, caped figure_as if Almereyda had found a way of patching directly into the collective pop id. Somehow through all this, the picture's effects remain appealingly low-key. For all its stylishness, it never becomes a mere exercise in style. Almereyda has a great sense of postmodern comic inflection; he knows exactly the precise mixture of irony and conviction needed to maintain the film's droll sense of the absurd. And yet, even when he's riffing on vampire lore and wildly throwing together incongruous elements, he keeps us engaged by his muddled story. The cast of "Nadja" is a sort of A-list of independent filmmaking superstars. Executive producer David Lynch makes a brief but memorably pathological appearance as a morgue attendant. Peter Fonda, wired, with a long gray-streaked ponytail down his back, plays Dr. Van Helsing, the intrepid vampire killer. Galaxy Craze makes an appealing zombie as Lucy, the depressed girlfriend of Van Helsing's nephew, who is played by a baffled-looking Martin Donovan. Not everyone stands out. As Cassandra, Suzy Amis is mostly wasted, and Jared Harris, who plays Nadja's dying twin brother, Edgar, looks as if he's dosed on cough medicine. Still, in Lowensohn, Almereyda has found an actress in perfect sync with his haywire vision. Nadja is rated R. ________________________________________________________ plot summary for Near Dark (1987) A mid-western farm boy reluctantly becomes a member of the undead when a girl he meets turns out to be part of a band of southern vampires who roam the highways in stolen cars. Part of his initiation includes a bloody assault on a hick bar. NEAR DARK (reviewed by "Mike's Movie Reviews") Released the same year, NEAR DARK showcases the sharp unbridled style and originality lacking in 1987's "other" young vampire thriller, the more publically-embraced Hollywood product THE LOST BOYS. In my opinion, the latter was overrated and did not deserve the attention it recieved. NEAR DARK, on the other hand, is an amazing, stunning, and sometimes brilliant horror film that is so much better than you could expect. Caleb (Pasdar) falls in love with Mae (Wright) from the moment he sees her in his small Texas hometown. He picks her up, but this night will soon go to hell ... and fast. Mae is a vampire, a child of the night, forced to wander through eternity killing helpless mortals with her motley "family" of bloodsucking criminals. There's the cult's leader, Jesse (Henriksen), his love Diamondback (Goldstein), the psychopathic Severen (Paxton), and Homer (Miller), trapped forever as an ageless youth. And lucky Caleb makes six. They spend their nights killing and their days sleeping, or wrapped up in protective rags and sunglasses driving the countryside in a van with the windows spray-painted black. Splicing in a "cowboy-noir" element (not unlike the Coen Brothers' BLOOD SIMPLE, or John Dahl's RED ROCK WEST) to the common vampire film, Bigelow (who would soon direct actioners like POINT BREAK and STRANGE DAYS) creates a stand-out, watchable film influenced just as much by art as violence. During the production of this film she was married to James Cameron, who had just completed the sci-fi horror sequel ALIENS. Note the large number of ALIENS cast members (Paxton, Henriksen, and Goldstein), and how much Severen's final scenes resemble Cameron's THE TERMINATOR (and 1991's TERMINATOR 2). NEAR DARK has is failed moments (where exactly did Thomerson run off to in the last ten minutes?), but the effect and entertainment survives each and every deficit. One original action sequence involves a shoot-out at high noon (remember how vampires react to light ...), and an unnerving bloodbath in a bar is surreally calm. The final shot is stunning and brilliant, owing more to TAXI DRIVER and THE SEARCHERS than anything else. (Did she really want to be saved?) One of the greatest minor masterpieces of horror filmmaking. Brutal violence, horror, coarse language. MPAA: R ____________________________________________________ Andy Warhol's Dracula (Director: Paul Morrissey) --reviewed by "Find-A-Video" Spawned by the commercial success of Flesh for Frankenstein, this campy treatment of the well-worn Transylvanian tale features Udo Kier as Dracula, the creepy vampire in search of ripe, succulent throats and virginal blood. Leaving Hungary for the purer pastures offered in Catholic Italy, the Count's toothy appetite for a fix of virgins proves elusive as the strapping Joe Dallesandro makes sure that the Count's intended victims are no virgins -- even if it means deflowering a 14-year-old. (aka: Blood for Dracula) Rated PG ___________________________________________________ The Addiction --reviewed by Walter Addiego (San Francisco Examiner) FINALLY, A film that truly captures the graduate school experience. Abel Ferrara's "The Addiction" posits an NYU philosophy student who's bitten by a vampire and becomes less interested in metaphysics than in fresh blood. Sometimes you really need a break from the books. Actually, it's a funny conceit - Nietzsche and neck-biting - and enjoyable as long as you overlook Ferrara's speculation on ultimate evil and redemption. The film works better as straight horror - it's quite gory and the inky black-and-white photography adds intensely to the mood - than as a meditation on morality. In short, it's a typical Ferrara production, mixing high aspirations with the sleaze and shock of exploitation pictures (his first commercial feature was "The Driller Killer" ). The combination has made the director a brand name, at least on the art-house and festival circuits, where "The King of New York" and "Bad Lieutenant" created a loud buzz. The buzz focused on the more sensational aspects of those pictures - over-the-top violence, drug use, unsavory sex, Harvey Keitel's frontal nudity and, at least in "Lieutenant," a Catholic sensibility about moral choice and the possibility of salvation. It's not a mix calculated to appeal to a mass audience. In "The Addiction," New York is again the scene for one of Ferrara's walks on the murky side. Kathleen (Lili Taylor), working on her philosophy doctorate, delivers a sermon on collective guilt after watching a film on the My Lai massacre. Shortly thereafter, she is dragged into a dark alley by an extremely scary-looking woman (Annabella Sciorra), who, taking enormous pleasure in her victim's fear, bites her neck. As Kathleen slowly descends into vampirism, she verbally spars with fellow student Jean (Edie Falco), who doesn't share her increasing sense of futility and despair. In fact, with her oracular pronouncements ( "There is no history" ), she sounds not like a monster but your average humanities grad student on the road to burnout. Soon her studies fall by the wayside; she devotes all her time to finding victims (a homeless man, a cab driver, a professor) and observing her own reactions to her newfound "life" as one of the undead. ( "It's the violence of my will against their's." ) The director offers two payoff scenes. One is Kathleen's encounter with an experienced vampire (Christopher Walken) who advises her on how to cope with the changes in her life - try to blend in with the humans, and treat your condition like a controllable addiction. She listens to this wisdom, finishes her studies and throws a hellacious party to celebrate. (This sequence is a strong dose, even in black and white.) Ferrara and writer Nicholas St. John try to draw an analogy between vampirism and what they call mankind's ultimate addiction to evil (we're shown photographs of Dachau). The vampire's high is to dominate a victim completely. But these grim reflections don't mesh well with the narrative. Much better to remember the glum Kathleen - Taylor does quite a good job with the role - offering this insight as her friend munches a hamburger: "Medicine is just an extended metaphor for omnipotence." In a recent interview, Ferrara described his audience, in a crack he attributed to Keitel, as "six guys dressed in black living in Berlin." He's being modest. Between here and the East Village, he has at least a dozen more.
~KitchenManager #129
intriguing choices...
~stacey #130
I feel so inadequate knowing that Salem's Lot is the only (pseudo) vampire movie I've seen...
~jgross #131
But that's a LOT. See, that's the one, it's the one that drank the blood of all the other vampire movies ever made. Guess that jus' means ya ain't got no mo inadequacies, Stacies.
~stacey #132
*smile* thanks
~KitchenManager #133
*wide-eyed* that's the only one, Stacey? if'n we lived closer, I'd suggest we start having Beer and Blood nights...
~stacey #134
sounds like a winner! (nope. probably not the only one but I've been feeling pretty confident lately... so, nothing to bemoan!)
~KitchenManager #135
*thumbs up*
~stacey #136
bottoms up!
~KitchenManager #137
it's my turn to buy the next round, isn't it?
~stacey #138
oh! you're thinking THAT kind of bottoms up... oh well... sure... yea, your turn to buy!
~KitchenManager #139
naw, actually I was talking about the plane ticket and hotel room...
~stacey #140
Groovy! when ya coming? (to Colorado, that is...)
~autumn #141
OK, let's hear some fresh reviews...come on, Jim, I know you've been seeing 'em: Rounders, Simon Birch, Next Stop wonderland. Talk to me!
~jgross #142
I do like to talk to you. No doubt about it. Rounders and Simon Birch hit town today. I'll be all over 'em. Next Stop Wonderland I fell asleep during, about 20 or so minutes from the end. These 2 main protagonists still hadn't met yet and it was over an hour into the movie, even though time and again, like about 10 times, it was being telegraphed that they would meet.....like they would pass each other and then the camera would be on his face with him wondering about what it was that he just saw. The stuff that was going on in the meantime was dorky AND wonky. I fell right to sleep out of impatience, plus I'd had this big deli sandwich and 2 beers out in the car right before I walked into the theater, plus I was already a little tired. I woke up during the last 10 seconds of credits, the movie went dark, I stood up, turned around, the place was empty. I was glad to see a pack of messages left for me. They were placed in my sleeping left hand. Written by the people who watched the movie and noticed me sound asleep. Their notes to me were full of hate. Like it was the best movie they'd seen in centuries. One said: "I hope Rounders comes round and smacks you a good one for me." Another said: "You probably had sex with Clinton and now I bet you want to apologize to us and everyone else for it." Another said: "I hope you like the way I emptied my soda can on your head."
~autumn #143
Ha-ha!! I hate it when my fellow theatre-goers turn on me! I heard NSW was a lot like "Sliding Doors", but that didn't mean a whole hell of a lot to me because I didn't see that, either. So, it's wonky, eh? One of the local candidates running for office was described by the newspaper as "wonkish and nerdy." I had to laugh! Of course, I'm voting for him. He's not going to have to worry about making any apologies, I sense.
~jgross #144
I bet he was in NSW. I do like that actress, Hope Davis; she was pretty good in "The Daytrippers." She's good in NSW.....and I wonder what did happen when she and Alan Gelfant finally do meet up....what if it was like Ellen and Newland....ack! wonk wonk wonk.... It was compared to "Sleepless in Seatle", here. I compare it to sleeping soundly in Austin.
~KitchenManager #145
(I actually, *gulp*, finally saw Titantic and Good Will Hunting this past week...)
~jgross #146
alotta people in Titanic gulped.... and they kept gulping when they saw good Will hunting.... hunting underwater for them with an underwater harpoon gun.... then again, they mighta just been seein' things as they were losing consciousness.... maybe they were seeing a movie that was showing around that time in Waterworld
~autumn #147
Wer, we had a deal!! No seeing Titanic, remember?? Oh well, at least it's still my claim to fame. What did you think of Good Will Hunting? Jim, heard high praise for "Daytrippers"--what did you think? Another sleeper? (double-entendre, there!!)
~KitchenManager #148
Zoe made me watch it, her mommy bought it for her...sorry, Autumn... Will Hunting is very much like you-know-who, but much smarter... didn't care for the ending much, but it was a decent flick...
~jgross #149
Rounders left me and didn't come back. Left me wanting more. More than it could give. Lotsa things just didn't come off and could have. They were there waiting to happen. What it gave me was good, just not near enough. It's funny trying to talk about a movie without giving anything away. Don't wanna ruin anyone's movie-going experience. If a person wants to watch a film that's gonna be great, this isn't it. Unless you're not me, which is the case with many people I've run into in my life (they're not me.....and that worries me.....when I was a kid I used to think everyone was me, thought like me, felt like me....which never happened, but I could convince myself otherwise.....but it too astounded me when I found out for real that other people were actually not me.....that took alot outa me). Rounders would be a great flick for someone wanting to get feeling for what it's like to gamble at cards. I missed half of what the narrator said about playin' cards. And the narrator says alot in this movie. What I did catch was pretty interesting, though. Here's the most interesting thing: they, professional card players, get tons of information by observing minute details in what's going on in another player's face and other body language and nonverbal behavior. Alotta that gets explained. Movies like Rounders are great learning experiences. They take you way in, way into the story, a good story. But it's not enough if you want more'n some learnin'. Unless you're not me, and if ya liked Rounders for more'n I liked it for. If schools could teach stuff like Rounders taught cards, look out, kids.
~jgross #150
'Simon Birch'. Yeah. I mean, okay. See, it was good, but it felt too Norman Rockwell directed, for me. But it was good, no doubt. Simon definitely falls into that 2% of the population who are unattractive people. But by the end of 'The Elephant Man', I felt John Merrick was attractive. There were some great scenes in 'Simon Birch'. It's just amazing to see someone feel things so different from what other people around them are feeling, and then to see that person be soooooo true to theirself. Simon has TREMENDOUS strength of character. There's this other thing that happens that I haven't really seen before: he will do something amazing (I'm really only thinking of one scene in particular), and after it happens he'll be alone with his friend and talking about himself in a self-congratulatory way like 12-year-old kid would do it, instead of being in awe of what he did or real quiet about what he did. That humanized him for me. It was funny. I really liked the little guy. But I bet tons of churches and their church members all over the place are telling each other to go see the darn thing or asking each other if they've seen it yet. Cuz it's got sorta heavy religious overtones. But that didn't ruin it for me. It's held in check and tempered well enough by story and characterizations that would work and hold up under any conditions. Still, too Norman Rockwelly, for me, for it to be a great movie.
~autumn #151
I've heard alternately that "Simon Birch" is heartwarming and touching, and sappy and overly sentimental. Have you read John Irving's "Prayer for Owen Meany?" It was soooo good, I'm sure the movie doesn't come close. For one thing, Vietnam isn't even in the movie, is it? Damn Hollywood. "Rounders" sounds like something I'll skip. I don't need a primer on poker, I want to be entertained!! And there's a narrator?? (*shudder*) I hate the feeling that I'm being read to in place of just being shown. You know, I didn't realize there was such a resemblance between MD and LD till you mentioned it, wer...both "golden boys" (remember all the hype surrounding Brad Pitt a few years ago?) Saw "The Truman Show" tonight. It was a very interesting premise and Jim Carrey gave a terrific performance. However, it wasn't executed/developed as well as it could have been, I thought--I can't say I'd even recommend it, but it was thought-provoking (in a "Future Shock" sense). What else is playing?
~Charlotte #152
I can recommend "Smoke Signals". But you may not want to listen to me..."The Truman Show" is one of the best films I've seen all year. I adored it. :)
~autumn #153
Really! Tell me what impressed you so much, Charlotte. Maybe I just didn't "get it." What is "Smoke Signals" about?
~terry #154
I haven't seen a movie in a long time! Maybe this weekend. Maybe Smoke Signals?
~jgross #155
Didn't know 'Simon Birch' was based on a book (then again, I don't know much). Prolly said so, somewhere in very beginning (which I missed) or in the credits. Barb, one a my sisters, really wanted me to read Irving's 'Prayer for Owen Meany'---and that was about 5 years ago or so. But it had like more'n 50 pages in it, and every page had a whole buncha words on it. That'd wear me plum out.....make me into plum pudding, betcha a plum. Some day I gonna have ta sit down by somebody who's readin' one a them thick books, take a good long look at 'em in action, and just try'n figger out how they maybe do it. Do you guys actually read every page, or do ya skip hunks of 'em at a time?
~autumn #156
Ha-ha, Jim! Actually, my eyes glazed over at a lot of the Reagan-bashing in that novel. But if the reading gets you down, I bet they have it on tape at the library. My husband "reads" lots of good books this way in the car.
~jgross #157
Maybe I could hitch a ride with him and while he's switching the tapes, I could ask him about you. Wonder how he'd describe you....
~jgross #158
'One True Thing' [Meryl Streep, Renee Zellweger, William Hurt] Saw it at 30 minutes after midnight. Got out 2 hours later. Felt good at the very beginning to be in a movie where people were really relating to each other, like compared to the people in 'Rush Hour' and 'Slums of Beverly Hills' and 'The Governess'. Then right off I could see that they weren't relating at all. But they did a good job of being unable to apprehend each other. I think the problem for me with it was that each person stayed who they were too relentlessly, I guess like they were supposed to. I was starting to think just now that the emotions need to deflate, break down, give way, let go, so that incoming change can impart its fresh new turnaround, and affect that penetrated place inside where instincts wave in the badly needed and inconceivable conduit to other possibilities. Sure is fun to see Meryl Streep flesh out each latest persona, as she once again makes this one distinct and capable of being touched and felt. This family of father, mother, daughter, and son, was struggling with what each person felt the other's intentions were for them---the daughter was struggling more than anyone, and she made the others struggle, and the mother said how she learned to deal with the struggle she had had over the years with her husband, who has tremendous influence over everyone, and it turned into a movie-long process for the daughter to learn to look differently at the hold he's had on her and on the others.
~Charlotte #159
Jim, (it is Jim, isn't it?) It's time to say that I enjoy your reviews immensely. Each one is a poem. So do you recommend "The One True Thing"?
~jgross #160
I actually wouldn't recommend it. Yet I feel that lotsa people will like it enough to where it sure could've been recommended to them, and lotsa people could have the experience I had, which was that I was glad I saw it because I'm interested in the subject matter and I'm interested in what Meryl Streep and William Hurt and Renee Zellweger did in the acting department (even though all of them have done much better in other films, imho, but Meryl Streep did some pretty good work this time around....the others I was okay with except I wanted more from them than I guess they felt they could give for the scenes they were in). I'd recommend a film if it seems like a great movie, or if it just gets to me really really really well in some sorta special way. This movie wasn't like that for me. But I had my reasons for why it held my interest alright. That's the best I can do as far as being totally honest with you, Charlotte. Did it sound like I was just equivocating, or did it sound like I was making some kinda sense on some level?
~Charlotte #161
The latter. Poets always make sense, even if it takes awhile. :)
~autumn #162
Absolutely! I love the way Jim throws out a lucid, straight-forward response occasionally just to let us know he's not a whack-job. But if he posted like that all the time, it would frighten me! Sounds like a lot of people struggling in that film, Jim. That wears me out to watch it, like an Anne Tyler novel. I don't want to work that hard, even for Meryl Streep. (Did you ever see her in "House of Spirits"?) Are we to understand that you have seen "Rush Hour", "Slums", and "Governess"? I'd be interested in hearing your comments on those as well.
~jgross #163
Yeah, that one (One True Thing) might be a bit wearing for ya, Autumn. Didn't see "The House of the Spirits". But do like to see Meryl up against people who are real different from her and who are powerful in their own way, like Clint Eastwood and Shirley MacLaine. Jeremy Irons does impress me. But then so does Winona Ryder. Glenn Close is hard for me to swallow, personality-wise, and at the same time I really like her and know that she can make a movie that much better than if she's not in it. Alotta this kinda stuff depends on the movie and also of course on my personality and just my likes and dislikes. I saw "Rush Hour" at 5:57 p.m. It wasn't as good as "The Negotiator" or "Snake Eyes". "Rush Hour" was going for comedy. I dunno, Chris Tucker just doesn't have what Eddie Murphy has. The story didn't carry very well. Jackie Chan and Chris Tucker were trying to do take-offs on each other as they got more into who-and-where they were with each other as partners. It was just an ok picture, I guess. "Slums of Beverly Hills"---I wish I knew something about directing & filmmaking, so I could say what this one could've used more of. Quirky and well-drawn characters made me care about whatever in the heck was gonna happen to them. Wanted Marisa Tomei to have been given the chance to explode more, like she did at moments during this certain odd dance she does with Natasha Lyonne (there's that special city again). I like it when she kinda loses control, Marisa, that is---it's a unique kind of humor that makes me feel just great inside. Natasha Lyonne was pretty interesting at times---that kind of person she was, was somebody I wondered about, somewhat put-off by her, but mostly really wanting to be that guy living next door to her so I could be around her alot. Just don't know what that movie needed, to be more what I wanted, doggone it. "The Governess" was just plain too stuffy for me. The lead male needed somebody much better in there. Minnie Driver just doesn't have enough to carry a film, or at least not that one. I really grooved on how she did what she did when she was getting new ideas, and would share them so generously. Her enthusiasm during a moment when a discovery was coming over her was really something to see, because for one thing she was actually making some world-breaking findings that could just come to her because she had a better scientific mind than the scientist. Plus Minnie was combining so much in her life, like photographic aesthetics and chemistry and sex and business enterprise and fun. She was pretty human, and she could look over the layout of a room and tell what's been going on, just by closing in on certain things as she surveyed the room---and her mind was extremely quick and knowing and very very nicely unpresuming. I dunno, maybe the way the repertory setups in the incidents weren't wide open enough, often enough. The drama in it needed more situational spark, if ya ask me.
~autumn #164
Well, with those lackluster reviews I won't be seeing any of them, even on video. There are too many other good ones to rent out there! I have never seen Marisa Tomei in anything and never heard of Natasha Lyonne (!).
~jgross #165
Both Marisa and Natasha were telling me, before breakfast, that they've heard of you, Autumn. Their faces flushed with excitement. Then that look of longing....so deep and true....hard to take that, just sitting there at the same table with them, observing their frank starker emotions. It was so weird---the next thing I knew, they both looked over at me and and asked (demanded, almost) impatiently: "So Jim, you know, don't you? When IS Autumn's first film coming out?!! Nothing will keep us from attending the world premiere!" I didn't want to let them down, their image of me, plus my image of their image of me, but I had to come out with it, even though English, at that moment, was so hard to come by, since I was thinking then in French, verrry French, then somehow the anglo words started coming back to me: "Please don't hurt me or anything.....really honestly I don't actually know Autumn that well. I'm finding out from YOU for the first time that she even IS coming out with a film. I mean, I didn't know she'd even done any stage work." Just like that, Marisa I think it was, reached down and pulled the cork outta my leg, and blood came gushing out....I came this close to bleeding to death. When I came to, I was in some tiny health clinic in northern Namibia, surrounded by a bunch of refugee Albanians who stared wild-eyed at me as a intrauterine device was sticking out of my mouth while an underage Eros and an even younger Psyche were at my side trying to blow air into my head through my ears.
~Charlotte #166
I'm so jealous of you, Autumn. How did you earn such lovely tributes from JIm? :) Do you think if I am very good he might someday tell me about the breakfast he had with Kevin Costner?
~autumn #167
Charlotte, I think that even if you behave deplorably you couldn't prevent Jim from telling you all about his breakfast encounter with Kevin Costner!! And I bet YOU came up in the conversation!!
~Charlotte #168
Well, I blatantly ignored Jim's subtle warnings and I went to see Simon Birch on Friday. It insulted my intelligence, of which I have more than some, less than most. I will pay more attention to you in the future, Jim.
~jgross #169
This is a weird thing to say, but it's really hard to tell when a movie just doesn't come through enough, cuz being able to tell feels so subjective---I can't really tell---like with "Simon Birch", I don't know if it was a good movie for me or not, and that's me I'm talking about (not even someone else). I know parts of it were real good for me. And I know that overall, for me, it wasn't a great movie. But I can easily see how people across the full spectrum of intelligence could or will say it was the best movie of the year. It's just so weird to get into. Recommending movies is scary. I recommended "Gross Pointe Blank" to some friends, saying it was as good as "Pulp Fiction". Then they saw it and said, "Well, I was expecting a little more. It was okay, I guess." And then I wondered right away how I could compare it to "Pulp Fiction", like maybe I emotionally needed some engaging approval that was very grateful of me for telling them about it. That was scary. So now I just try to see if I can sorta say what I liked and didn't like about a flick, and leave it at that. Yet, I do have this thing that I do with myself---I say to myself that the film was either great or good or okay or not so good. And I'll go like this---"it was closer to okay than good"---but I gotta start remembering to include the words, "for me....not for anyone else, now." How do you go about all this stuff, Charlotte, when you talk to someone about a movie you've seen, and they haven't seen it yet? I saw "What Dreams May Come" Friday night. And hopefully I can't remember any of it by now. It was like a little less than okay. There were certain scenes in it that broke new ground in special effects. I'd visualized or imagined afterlife, but this movie helped me see it like it read, when I'd read of afterlife. It was just a 10 minute part of the movie, though, that dealt with that one part of afterlife I was interested in. Like I wasn't interested in their version of certain other parts of afterlife. And even that one part of afterlife I was interested in, they were managing to make it become more and more too overdone or sappy. But there was a thing or two that they did really well with the parts I liked that motioned out of the moment and went through a revelation for me. As the movie went on and on, I cared less and less about what Robin Williams was doing with his character---he just started looking like a retread---and Annabella Sciorra started looking like she didn't know how to get out of the movie and was stuck there---and Cuba Gooding, Jr. looked like he'd rather be playing some football with Tom Cruise or Ricky Williams (top running back in college football). I mean it's just too bad movies fall apart like they do, when they do---cuz what if they'd been in the hands of a great director and a great screenplay writer.....? So the thing is, with all this, somebody else who saw "What Dreams May Come" may want to come over and kick my ass for what I said about it. It's so subjective. People may have well-devised critical criteria for saying what they say about a movie. But me.....I'm a complete ninny. I have no idea what I'm talkin' about. It's just stuff. Just some subjective reactions that this Jim guy had. Is all. I hope no goes by what I say. I just like to talk. Can you imagine how far off I could feel about something that someone else feels about? It's just so far.
~stacey #170
I have difficulty reviewing movies for people because my scope of flicks is so narrow. I simply like it or not or sometimes really fall in love with the characters or the plot or the music or the projections I make based not solely on what I've seen but how I've internalized it. I saw The Avengers and Mafia! They were stupid but I laughed really hard at times. I cannot say that I'd recommend the films to anyone but I'd probably quote a few lines from one or the other... just to be silly.
~stacey #171
I guess the real difficulty arises when I see a movie I love. I cannot express just how I feel. I mean it'd be so much easier just to hug someone and say, "the movie felt like this." Or to sob and cry and come to realization after realization and say, "See how I am now... the movie triggered that response."
~Charlotte #172
... so much easier just to hug someone and say, "the movie felt like this." I think this is a superb idea, Stacey! Far more eloquent than words. I know it's a long shot, but do any of you get up early enough on Sunday mornings to watch Sunday Morning? There is a reviewer who makes regular appearances on that program (John something or other) who makes me crazy. His language is so pseudo-intellectual, ridden with references and allusions that are beyond my understanding, a vocabulary that sounds too cerebral to be real, and a philosophy that typically says "the more vague the better". I'm always yelling at the TV "but what does that MEAN!! is it a good book? did you enjoy the movie? what are you really SAYING!" grrrr. That said, I love the reviews that I read here in this lovely, warm, totally two-dimensional den. What I read here means something to me. The remarks are genuine and sincere, and there is no pontificating and intellectualizing. oops. somebody at the door...i'll continue this later.
~Charlotte #173
Sorry 'bout that. Several hours and a bottle of wine later... The Sunday Morning reviewer's name is John Leonard, by the way. I'm afraid I can't offer much by way of an answer to Jim or Stacey who want to know how I describe movies to my friends. Like you both, I have unpredictable and eclectic tastes. I will simply adore a film that leaves my friends scratching their heads in puzzlement. No one understood why I saw Strictly Ballroom 27 times. Or what I saw in The Fifth Element that made it warrant 7 viewings. No one cries over Peter O'Toole's version of Goodbye, Mr. Chips the way that I do. The best I can come up with is this word: resonance. When a character or a scene touches me on some deep level, something inside me resonates, and I have to watch it again and again just to relive that feeling. Sometimes, it is something so banal as the fact that the leading man makes my knees weak. Like William Fichtner's role in Armageddon, or Alan Rickman in Truly Madly Deeply. But most of the time, it is merely inexplicable. Even if I understand the appeal that a film holds for me, I can't seem to manage to explain it. The best example of this is Nickel Mountain, starring Michael Cole, from "Mod Squad" so many years ago. I have yet to meet another person who has even seen this film, much less treasure it like I do. :) So...to summarize...our love of films, to my way of thinking, resides on that intangible plane where words are not always compatible. In that nebulous, inexplicable realm where we also find beauty and passion and love.
~jgross #174
Yeah, movies really get to us and sometimes they don't. I wish people could listen closely to what I say about them, while at the same time kind of dismissing what I say as pap. I like that balance, if it were only possible, because it seems to me to be closer to what's actually going on, what with the extreme personal, private, and peculiar nature of our response to a film. Is it that we can't really do anything about how another person will tend to let our opinion guide them on whether they should or shouldn't go see a movie? Sometimes our impressions of a movie do affect people's choices and sometimes they don't affect them, right?---and that's just the way it is....it's out of our hands, yes? See, Charlotte, I would feel bad if, for example, I had disclosed here how I had felt about "The Truman Story" before you saw it, because it could have affected you to choose not to see it, and if you hadn't seen it, you would've missed a really good movie-watching experience for you. So, I mean, how do you feel about that? Plus, I just thought of something else. Oh this is embarrassing. Ah yes, this is quite embarrassing. My vanity. I'm looking right into it. Um, uh, Charlotte, what's happening is that I've built into my mind that what I say here about movies really affects you, even if you blatantly ignore it (like with "Simon Birch"). And my vanity, I think, doesn't want to lose that feeling about myself that that gives to me. Yet, another part of me, my conscience, which I fear may be actually fairly vain as well (have you ever felt that feeling?), I think my conscience feels this feeling of responsibility that says that I should not indulge the vanity of my vanity at your expense, by letting my notions or impressions of a movie sway you, when my notions are so noodle-headed in origin just by their very nature (since they're so subjective in origin). It's probably hard to make sense of what I'm saying right now, so maybe I should let you respond or not, without my adding any further words, for now, so as not to further complicate what may be difficult to communicate. Are you....I mean, is there....is there any wine that you have left, there....oh that would be nice to have a little glass....mmm yesss....ahh, more would be fine.... oh, a full glass....thank you, Charlotte.
~Charlotte #175
Jamie, dear Jamie. Methinks you worrieth too much! Of course what you say here effects my judgment, but so does whatever SIskel and Ebert have to say. So do the reviews of James Berardinelli, my favorite internet reviewer. So do the opinions of my friends. They all go into the messy pot disguised as my brain, where they get stirred and sifted. Then, as we all do, I make my own, independent, decision about whether or not to see the film. I am also influenced by the trailers, to some degree. So, in retrospect, I wish I had NOT gone to see Simon Birch. I would wish this, even if you had loved it. And I am very glad that I went to see The Truman Show, twice, no matter what you feel about it. But (listen up, Jamie's ego), I would sorely miss your input here. Without it, my decision making process would be like a pizza without cheese, fudge without walnuts, peanut butter without jelly, popcorn without salt. In other words...possible, but not nearly as enjoyable.
~stacey #176
or fudge popcorn without walnutty jellypeanut salted-butter even!
~jgross #177
I understand alot of what you're saying, Charlotte---like the part about how you value my reactions to movies because they enter into your decision-making process along with all the other things (trailers, reviews), and then you make your own independent choice. It sticks in my mind that "Well, I blatantly ignored Jim's subtle warnings and I went to see Simon Birch on Friday" could imply that if you hadn't "blatantly ignored Jim's subtle warnings" then you would have not gone to see "Simon Birch". Maybe it doesn't imply that at all. But that's where my confusion stems from. Also, using that same possibly highly inaccurate implication, if I had said something similar or more negative about "The Truman Story" as what I'd said about "Simon Birch", and if I'd said it before you'd seen "The Truman Story", then you would have not gone to see "The Truman Story". Even if, after having seen it, you're very glad you've seen it, you might not have seen it if you'd seen something negative from me about it before you'd seen it. "I will pay more attention to you in the future, Jim"---that could mean that you might not have seen "The Truman Story" in the first place (and may be staying away from it to this day) if you paid more attention to something I said about it if I'd said something negative about it before you'd seen it. And that seems different from what you're saying about how you consider lots of things besides just my thing---also, taking the scenario in this paragraph, if you had considered lots of other things, and then each time you considered my thing, if my thing has the effect on you that it sounds like it does from those words in quotes, then it seems like my thing more determining than the other things, and not just more determining, but also overly determining. It feels like there's a difference going on between valuing my reaction to a movie and using it as a warning system to not see a movie, and sort of reprimanding yourself for not having paid more attention to warnings in my reaction. But you're saying I worrieth too much. And that could imply that it's too common or natural to read a negative reaction as a kind of guide to beware of the movie being reacted to, and to really consider staying away from it....and that to corroborate what you thought my negative reaction was, to 'Simon Birch', by way of saying that you wished, in so many words, that you hadn't done what you did (seen it), is nice way of giving me encouragement---something like that? I think what I'm saying is that I think I've said to other people something similar to what you said to me, and it felt to me like what you're saying it feels like to you. But for some reason, this time around, being on the receiving end of it, it felt different. It felt like my reaction was weighing in heavier than a valued input for you, that it was a 'don't see/warning/guidance system', and feels like something different from just valued input. I can sense how this sort of talk on my part can cause tension, if it feels like worrying too much or overanalyzing or being ridiculous. But what if it actually makes sense....in some valid sense....? What if it's looked at as something that we all go through and isn't exactly smooth sailing.....I don't mean to be a curmudgeon....I mean to inquire into 2 different meanings (that may not be different after all), and I wanted to be clear about how my confusion stemmed from those words of yours that I put into quotes. Here's another notion: we often say one thing and do another. I can tell my friend Gerard that I like to hear what he says about certain things and regard it very highly when considering stuff. But in actuality, I rely very heavily on what he says and just go by it fairly blindly because it makes things easier and also because I like how he thinks and stuff. But I of course tend to withhold from him this truth, and tell him stuff that implies that I'm not concealing the truth that I withhold. He may sense otherwise by certain things that I've told him that I may have forgotten that I've said, but that he still remembers. He may question me about it, and I may be caught red-handed, and then I may admit that I wanted to look to him like I was more level-headed and reflective of many points of input. And he may say back that while he was sensing something was amiss there, before he asked me directly about it, that it was getting to him and making him feel like not what he wanted to feel like---like too much of a beacon or something. The coolest things about a movie don't have to do with whether the movie should be seen or not, it seems to me. Like a movie that I couldn't stand, I wouldn't want to mention it if that was all I was gonna say. If I didn't like a movie, I'd like to say why, and that 'why' is where the value is in my reaction, not in whether it's best to stay away from seeing it. Consumer choice---should I see it or not---can consume us more than we might realize. We might even all agree that it's impossible to separate out the consumer choice part of reading movie reactions. Maybe it's too normal or natural or human, or maybe in our modern culture with so many choices to be made with so many things in life, it's unavoidable. I just wish the stuff I say could be read as only reactions to be considered for their ideas and their situational content---like looking at something that happened to you today and wondering about it, feeling it, but not necessarily using that experience as a warning to not do the experience again at a later time....because at a later time, the "same" experience can look quite similar but have many important things going on in it that are different from the earlier "same" experience. But I admit that I pan stuff, like all I'm really doing is nothing MORE than panning it, which really means that all I'm really doing is warning anyone to watch out about this movie.....in other words, I'm acting like some sort of beacon. So I think I'm contradicting myself, aren't I? It doesn't make me a complete ninny, though. But complete ninnies are real saturated in contradiction.....I think I'm drenched, but I may not be dripping.... well I take that back....there's a puddle here now. I just hope nobody read any of Response 177 (this response). You didn't, did you? Man, do I ever have no idea what I'm talking about. I need a dumpster to live out the rest of my days in. I guess I'll go look for one right now.
~KitchenManager #178
Jim, you're starting to sound like the way my brain thinks...
~terry #179
LePlep, can you expound more on the 5th Element? Anyone seen the new Robin Williams movie?
~terry #180
... since you've seen the 5th Element 7 times.
~Charlotte #181
I've also seen it 7 times, or maybe 6 or 8. I've lost track. The Fifth Element is just plain fun (to me). No deep and profound thinking required. Just hop on and go for a ride through a visual smorgasboard. Fine comic performances all around, but especially from Ian Holm (is there anything this man cannot do?). This film contains what must surely be the funniest mugging scene in cinema history. Once you've seen it a couple of times, you begin to feel like you're at a party with well-known friends. You anticipate the scenes you love, and you know the dialogue by heart. I was never one of the Rocky Horror Picture Show junkies, but I imagine that what I feel when I watch The Fifth Element is similar to their rapture. ("Anybody else wanna negotiate?")
~jgross #182
Is there another Leplep in your life, Terry? I saw "The Fifth Element" one time, back when it first came out. But it's fun to think that I'm 2 people, and one of me is going around saying I've 7 times seen Looloo do what she does in that movie. Response 169 had some junk on "What Dreams May Come" (Robin Williams new flick) Did you (Terry) see "The Fifth Element"? If so, was it for you kinda like what it was for Charlotte? I wonder what feelings you felt, what crazy notions came to you....mmmm.... and it's just fun to fancy you being IN the movie, some character that operated as a go-between between Looloo and the Bruce Willis character, and that now you're checking in with us to tell us what it was like to be in that movie and to be that character.....yeah, and you're singing for us this song that you sang in the movie....that song that you sang that lasted only 31 seconds, or was 21 sec.? Actually, I've never seen a movie 3 times. Only about 5, probably, I've seen twice. I really like the element of surprise---don't know what's gonna happen next.... not that the element of surprise is the 5th element or anything.....
~KitchenManager #183
I wanna watch Glory and Nightbreed again...hmmm...
~autumn #184
Think I'll take the kiddos to the $2 Sunday matinee of the Parent Trap remake.
~jgross #185
Don't do it, Autumn. It's a trap. You might not be able to get out of this one. Bet it will test all your mettle. Hope you're at the top of your game Sunday afternoon. If you want to wait, they'll probably release you by Tuesday. Don't carry too much money on you. Carry lotsa candy---that's one of the best bribes. Yeah, if ya bring lotsa candy, you could get out even before all the credits roll. But it's still takin' a chance. You might be pushed into having to become another frantic Indiana Jones. I could start preparing you for it by calling you Indiana. Or would Maryland be a little closer?
~stacey #186
Uh oh... did she make it out safely?
~autumn #187
Whew--they let me out a day early for good behavior! Actually, it was a pretty cute remake, if a little long by Disney standards (a solid 2 hours). Juliette liked it, Lydia didn't get it, and my sister cried throughout the whole movie.
~jgross #188
I was sitting behind Lydia---that's the only reason she didn't get it. But she met a great new friend. We messed around alot. Glad you liked the movie enough to not notice what we were doing. Me and Lydia were so lucky---the stuff we got away with! Can't wait till next time. She's really alotta fun. Especially at movies.
~jgross #189
"The Mighty" If you have kids who are like between 9 and 16 (I have several hundred--- thankfully, none of them know who their father is), this movie is for them, and maybe for you. I liked it alot. But almost all because of Kieran Culkin. It's his eyes. They're so much fun. The looks he gives Elden Henson are delicate and mischievous and challenging, and totally alive---they really wake Max up. Elden Henson plays Max (the Mighty), and Kieran Culkin plays Kevin (the Freak). It's based on a book, "Freak the Mighty". The movie is "Simon Birch, Part Two". So many similarities. But "The Mighty" is pretty watchable. There's alotta tough spots they have to get themselves out of, the biggest being their own lonelinesses, their isolated miserable lives. So they discover each other. Kevin has the same disease Simon Birch has. Max has the body and legs and Kevin has the brain, and when they become friends, Kevin is often perched on Max's shoulders, and Kevin gives them both a joined name: Freak the Mighty. The way their friendship begins is like it was conceived with its own birth---I mean they both got impregnated with something that reproduced life for both of them. How they became friends.....um, well, it started out slender and meager, and then it grew on them very naturally and prevailed. They have lots of real adventures. The Kevin character is as precocious as Simon Birch and Will Hunting, and I liked seeing how he, Kevin, would react when he was really provoked, under threateni g conditions, and also under intimate conditions. "The Mighty" jerked tears from me during those times when Kevin passed through people's defenses with his facial expressions, his rapier wit, his voice, and most of all his impish delight. Sometimes it happens to me that a character in a film I've just seen will come back to live inside me for maybe 20 minutes at most and vanish forever. Kieran Culkin did that to me as I was driving home. It was like his personality was going on inside me for about 10 inutes. And I wish the movie had more challenges for him, like that one in the bar in "Good Will Hunting" where Will and that other student were going at it for a while. Yeah, I woulda liked to have seen Freak (Kevin) and Blade do that in their own way. The kid who played Blade looked kinda interesting. "The Mighty" is still a whole other flick from "Simon Birch", those two movies have differences that are pretty different. The Max character was compelling good acting.
~autumn #190
I had already added this one to my rental list based on a review I read in the newspaper--thanks for the affirmation, Jim. Have you met Joe Black yet?
~jgross #191
Not yet. Have met him before in other movies, though.....heh-heh....
~terry #192
Do you ever watch Siskel and Ebert, LePlep?
~jgross #193
Ebert's personality isn't so appetizing for me. They go over movies I haven't seen yet. And I like to go into a movie with no preconceptions. I'd like to know who's in a movie and whether it won some award and who the director is---I get all that from the Austin Chronicle. I'd like to know if they gave a movie 2 thumbs up. I'd probably like the show ok if I'd already seen the films. Sometimes that's the case and they're okay. Ebert's written reviews are pretty worthwhile reading, if I've already seen the movie. Never read anything by Siskel. Ebert gets into this emotionally stuffy/huffy crusty rigid crotchety and dyspeptic manner when they disagree with each other. I'd rather he just pull the stick out from up his butt. But he doesn't ever pull his pants down and do the deed. So I just switch the channel to the one that's always auctioning off these really different fake beards at ridiculously low prices.
~Charlotte #194
I saw ANTZ this weekend. It was ok. Not nearly as miraculous as all the hype leads you to believe. Pretty mundane storyline. A few spectacular images. Excellent animation. But I still think Toy Story is the superior film.
~mikeg #195
Toy Story is a wonderful wonderful film - "OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO" :-)
~autumn #196
That's right, an all-around fun movie.
~KitchenManager #197
Like Aliens?
~jgross #198
or maybe like "Western"? "Western" It was in french, subtitles were in English though (not Afrikaans like last time), so the only person there in the audience who didn't have to read 'em was Autumn, but I dunno if she liked the movie at all (she kept kicking my butt the whole way back to the car, after the show). The center of the story was its own easy going movement. It had its focus on a quirky relationship between these 2 men. A relationship that came outa nowhere and could come apart as easily as it could fumble back together again. These 2 guys were real different from each other and they did stuff together that you just don't see people do. They made it work. It worked real well. I thought I would give people more of a chance after I saw this movie. This one guy would mess up a lot, like it was in him to do that because of how he saw himself and because he sorta didn't know any better. This other guy did well with people, but he was I think somehow truly affected by the guy who messed up, starting with the hospital scene (which was real near the beginning). The one guy was real steady and would give people a chance. The other guy was driven but in a sort of gypsy way, a lost way that was always hoping he would finally find a way to make things work. They really helped each other to realign themselves to each other after each of the many bad episodes they had with each other. It took some doing. But they worked it through each time. You can really feel the struggle they were going through with each other. But the pace and open air of their always changing circumstances could touch you where you were willing to let in their undeveloped but developing small but larger amounts of companionable friendship. You could see them getting to see what they meant to each other. This movie was really well put together. So human, and also so nicely non-big budget, non-Hollywood. A french sensibility with a cool spirit of adventure. With tough situations like jealousy and rejection and dislocation. And self-image taking a big hit sometimes. It's funny how their surroundings and the controlling factors would shift so frequently and with such a swift vigor that made me WANT to trust the road "Western" was taking.
~autumn #199
Went to the $2 movies last night and saw "There's Something about Mary." Turns out there's really nothing about Mary. Laughed in spite of myself a few times--brought out the lowest common denominator in the audience. The humor was pretty base.
~osceola #200
The discount theater in my neighborhood keeps the same movies for weeks and weeks, and usually it's nothing I want to see. Or there hasn't been anything I want to see in over a month. I can't even remember the last one I saw. I hate being carless. There's a theater up in Round Rock (a suburb north of Austin) that has a lot of competition from a new mega-complex, so they have $2 matinees and $4 admission every night -- and they're all first-run features. It's so far away city buses stop about three miles short of the theater :(
~mikeg #201
I saw "Awakenings" with Robert De Niro and Robin Williams. It was super super super super super *grin*
~Charlotte #202
I agree. I read some critic's remarks lately, to the effect that Robin Williams' "bearded" roles always seem to be much better than his "beardless" roles. I'm inclined to agree. :)
~mikeg #203
Autumn: I *loved* "There's Something About Mary" - it is my film of the year, and is up there in my top five films *ever*! - anybody even vaguely thinking about seeing it should definitely go. George: Why are you car-less old chap?
~osceola #204
There's something drawing power out of the battery. No, it's not the alternator. To save money, I got a friend of mine to fix it in March because I don't have to pay him all at once, like a garage would expect, but he can't locate the problem. No one can. I also got him to do it because the problem started after he put in a new water pump.
~mikeg #205
ouch...sounds awkward...
~autumn #206
Mike, what exactly did you find likable about "Mary"? Some of the stuff with the dog was very funny, but other than that it was pretty gross. I wouldn't think that someone who was into nuclear physics would pick that film to tickle their funnybone! George, too bad about the car. Hopefully you can still get transportation to the nearest video store?
~pmnh #207
i loved 'mary', too... yeah, it was dumb, and gross, but that was sort of the point i think... (and i like just about everything ben stiller does)... watching beavis and butthead (doing america and all) currently...
~mikeg #208
Whoever said i was "into" nuclear physics, autumn? :-) It's the bane of my life :)
~wolf #209
ok, i finally saw breakdown. am still waiting to go to the store to rent city of angels... see, george, you're not so bad, i'm lucky to see a movie during it's showtime. but we (read: the whole family) drug ourselves out to see antz, which, IMMHO, was not a show meant for children under the age of, uh, 13...cuz i don't think my 9 year old got it...didn't understand the woody allen routine, nothing--but who'd expect him to. though, on a positive note, the effects were pretty good. and my kids didn't suffer too much from the cursing and all....
~TIM #210
City of Angels is excellent. You'll Love it.
~autumn #211
Saw "Feeling Minnesota" (Cameron Diaz, Keanu Reeves) last night. I didn't particularly like, nor would I recommend it, but the dynamics between the brothers were interesting.
~Charlotte #212
I didn't like it either, Autumn. I only watched it because I am a huge fan of Vincent D'Onofrio, and I will watch anything that has him in it. If you can find it, rent "The Whole Wide World". It's the true story of the misfit who wrote the Conan the Barbarian stories.
~terry #213
I taped the Ice Storm a couple of nights ago, now to find time to watch it!
~wolf #214
i watched it the other day-what can i say, it's really out there, but it wasn't too bad...really captured the essence of "growing up" for all parties involved-including the adults.... did manage to see feeling minnesota (at least part of it) and what i saw i didn't care for too much. then there's the one with batgirl (her name slips my mind-but she's the gal in the picture on the top left side of babes) and some dude where she's pretending to be kidnapped and i only saw the end. speaking of only seeing the end: i caught the last 10 minutes of contact-but it didn't give a thing away (and for one, i thought jodie wasn't going to come back after seeing the previews). good thing it shows again on saturday at 4:30 central time. will definately see it then. oh, and i saw a movie about a bunch of kids all grown up who went to visit their old camp and found out it was going to close-sorry, old age, you know, (or is this a result of too much sweet n low?) can't remember the title. it had diane lane, elizabeth something (not mcgovern)--from big--and a bunch of other people i can't name. it wasn't too bad.
~autumn #215
I got "Contact" from the library this weekend, wolf, and really enjoyed it. I was afraid it was going to be too sci-fi-ish, but it was a nice brainy mix of science and adventure, with a dab of romance thrown in (the weakest element, I thought). Charlotte, what else has Vincent D'Onofrio done? I had never heard of him before this film.
~wolf #216
the movie i couldn't think of any of the actors was called excess baggage (alicia silverstone). and i missed contact on saturday. boo hoo! will have to rent it along with city of angels, which, i still haven't seen.. this weekend i caught event horizon, which, to me, didn't make any sense. and i saw a life less ordinary, which kinda reminded me of excess baggage...... charlotte: i've never heard of him either. hi autumn!!
~ratthing #217
D'Onofrio was also in one of my favorite movies "Stuart Saves His Family."
~Charlotte #218
Here is the filmography for Vincent D'Onofrio: Abbie! (1999) .... Abbie Hoffman Impostor (1999) .... Hathaway Taking of Pelham One Two Three, The (1998) (TV) .... Mr. Blue 13th Floor, The (1998) Claire Dolan (1998) .... Elton Garrett Newton Boys, The (1998) .... Dock Newton Velocity of Gary, The (1998) .... Valentino Men in Black (1997) .... Edgar Boy's Life 2 (1997) (segment "Nunzio's Second Cousin") .... Tony Randozza Nunzio's Second Cousin (1997) Feeling Minnesota (1996) .... Sam Clayton Good Luck (1996) .... Tony "Ole" Olezniak Guy (1996) .... Guy Whole Wide World, The (1996) .... Robert E. Howard Winner, The (1996) .... Philip Strange Days (1995) .... Steckler Stuart Saves His Family (1995) Hotel Paradise (1995) Ed Wood (1994) .... Orson Welles Imaginary Crimes (1994) .... Mr. Webster Being Human (1993) .... Priest Household Saints (1993) .... Joseph Santangelo Mr. Wonderful (1993) .... Dominic Malcolm X (1992) .... Bill Newman Salt on Our Skin (1992) .... Gavin Player, The (1992) .... David Kahane Dying Young (1991) .... Gordon Crooked Hearts (1991) .... Charley Warren Fires Within (1991) .... Sam JFK (1991) .... Bill Newman Naked Tango (1990) .... Cholo Signs of Life (1989) .... Daryl Blood of Heroes, The (1988) (as Vincent Phillip D'Onofrio) .... Young Gar Mystic Pizza (1988) .... Bill Full Metal Jacket (1987) .... Pvt. Leonard "Gomer Pyle" Adventures in Babysitting (1987) .... Dawson First Turn-On!!, The (1983) .... Lobotomy
~osceola #219
Finally, something I want to see a the local discount theater. Saw "Mask of Zorro" -- good, light entertainment. That actress Zeta-Jones -- YOW!! Where has she been all my life? Saw "Snake Eyes" the next day. The first part of it is visually very interesting. Terrific camera work. The assassination conspiracy plot is really dumb and farfetched (as all assassination conspiracy films seem to be) and so once the great camera work is done and you start paying attention to the plot the film goes downhill. Nicholas Cage and Gary Sinise have done better. But for $1.50 it was worth it. Next week "Something About Mary." Boy,no movies for months and now I'm gorging on them!
~osceola #220
Vincent D'Onofrio was also in an episode of "Homicide" last year about a man pushed onto the subway tracks and pinned between the train and the platform. It was a really memorable episode of TV.
~jgross #221
Vincent D'Onofrio Date of birth (location) 30 June 1959, Brooklyn, New York, USA. Notable TV guest appearances 1."Homicide: Life on the Street" (1993) in episode: "Subway" (episode # 6.7) 12/5/1997 2."Equalizer, The" (1985) in episode: "Suspicion of Innocence" 1987 3."Equalizer, The" (1985) in episode: "Counterfire" 1986 4."Life Goes On" (1989/I) playing "Victor" in episode: "Basketball Player, The" 1990
~autumn #222
By George, I think you've got it! I do remember him as the obnoxious guy caught in the subway tracks. All those movie credits and I don't think I've seen but one or two of those films, and none of them memorable. Oh well. Snake Eyes and Rounders are both at the $2 movie place. I'm still saving my pennies for Pleasantville, which is coming in a couple weeks.
~stacey #223
Saw "A Bug's Life" the other night. Really enjoyed it. Forget the morals and the feel good ending... the characters were just hysterical and the outtakes were quite the event (Stick around for all the credits!)
~PT #224
Thanks, I'm going to have to see that.
~stacey #225
saw Star Trek last night (ANOTHER first run!!!! in a month or so, they'll be nothing at the cheapo theatre I ain't seen!) okay... just like an episode only bigger. No real groovy effects (which I kinda expected) I'd save it for a really boring evening.
~PT #226
Saw Dr. Doolittle on videotape, with Eddie Murphy. It was great.
~stacey #227
Saw "Life is Wonderful" last night. Left the theatre with bubbles of emotion bursting out everywhere and little questions knocking around in my head. I loved the movie. I loved the characters. I was fascinated with the story and pleased with the range of emotions the movie help facillitate in my little head.
~Charlotte #228
Stacey, is this the one with Roberto Begnini? "Life is Beautiful"? I saw "Waking Ned Devine" Friday night. It's no "Full Monty", but it is delightful, charming, and hilarious in parts. Hard to find, but worth the effort.
~stacey #229
yes Charlotte... go see it!!!
~jgross #230
This movie, 'The Celebration', has subtitles. But it's a really good movie. At first it takes some getting used to. Some of the characters are not so appetizing. And you wonder what you're really watching. It doesn't seem to be leading to much through about the first half. But it's a really good movie. Because it does kick in. And really says something. And the way it happens has all the threads and pieces fitting together eventually. Emotions and personality tendencies make sense. The acting stays with you long after the pause of time. It's so strange to walk into their situation and be a part of it. You look around the table wondering what's gonna happen next and who's gonna do what. The director is pretty good at what he does. You're just amazed that you've seen what you saw, how it unfolded. And how you, too, were thrown by the turn of events, as it winds its way to reaching a critical mass finally. I just think how it's interesting that we are all really the father. I just made that up, but I think it's really true. But also we're all really the son, too......the sons, and both daughters. This movie, I wish most movies could get to me like this did. It makes me hungry for difficult human subjects that somehow a great director, actors, etc. can skillfully move in and out of tense unsure masterful revealing of what we're really like. Powerful. And it had some cool cinematic camera effects that had just the right understated expressive effect. Gonna be 'best foreign film' oscar winner hands down. I think it did that at Cannes.
~Charlotte #231
Well, I crossed 4 movies off my wish-list over the weekend: Shakespeare in Love Patch Adams You've Got Mail Prince of Egypt Clear leader of the pack was Shakespeare in Love. Delightful, wonderful, enchanting film. All the others could have waited for rental. Hope to see Gods and Monsters this week.
~jgross #232
Stacey hasn't been here yet, right? I don't think she has. Good --- then I've got a better chance of making it all the way into 1999. Uh, that film, 'Life is Beautiful', I didn't know it was in Italian with subbies (subtitles). A foreign film, and it just happened to win the darn Grand Prix at Cannes. 'The Celebration' was co-winner of the darn Jury Prize at Cannes. So do I now think 'The Celebration' will hands down win 'best foreign film' on Oscar night? Nopers. And how many other great contenders are there out there? What a blowhard statement ("gonna be 'best foreign film' oscar winner hands down"). The lengths Roberto Benigni (in 'Life Is Beautiful')would go to win the attentions of his real-life wife's character, and the lengths he would go to preserve the innocent well-being of his son under the worst of conditions, was something else. His lengths involve humor and tremendous imagination. And they involve kids. When he impersonates a school auditor, he does it in front of kids, and she is their teacher. He had to see her and get her attention. He's a slapstick/pratfall kinda guy. But he's much more than that. What keeps sticking in my mind, again and again, is the way he would look when he had to come up with an effective comeback to his son's questions or assertions. Benigni would look up and buy time, with a "no, uh, uh, no, uh" or something like that, and then the inspiration would come, and he'd talk to his son like what he was saying was tremendously informational and very deliciously important to get behind on. He's a kid at heart, through and through, so kids are pretty important to him.
~Charlotte #233
"Life is Beautiful" is also on my "to see" list. Just moved up a couple of notches. Thanks, Jim. :)
~autumn #234
Definitely adding "The Celebration" to my list, if it evoked that much pathos in Jim ("Life is Beautiful" was already on my list). Who knows, maybe it will win an Oscar after all? I plan to rent beaucoup movies in the coming weeks--got a Blockbuster gift certificate for Xmas from my in-laws (thank God it wasn't another pink nightgown!)
~jgross #235
I hope you don't wear all those pink nightgowns at the same time, Autumn. oooh, try this: glitter warpaint and tortoiseshell glasses, yeah and a bottle of Ripple....the setting? a late-night candlelight vigil, with you on the piano playin' boogie woogie with your toes.....oh man, I'm gettin' the picture real clear now....yikes but it's a doozie.
~autumn #236
(*cough*) Actually, I happen to like the taste of Ripple. Not as sweet as Boone's Farm (or my other favorite, TJ Swann), but close! Unfortunately, the piano lessons just didn't pay off for my parents. Perhaps if they'd let me use my toes it would be a different story today, hmm? (I despise pink! I would much prefer a tortoiseshell nightgown to match the glasses.)
~jgross #237
You got it, it's in the mail ('you've got mail').
~KitchenManager #238
mmmm...tortoise shell...
~wolf #239
watched Misbegotten the other night. had kevin dillon playing a psychopath. was kinda scarey, interesting and sad. no oscar material though.
~autumn #240
Got "Eve's Bayou" from the library, but haven't watched it yet--tomorrow. Happy New Year, springeurs!
~KitchenManager #241
watched Bloodsport 3 and Peacekeepers tonight
~Charlotte #242
I saw Life is Beautiful last night. Lives up to all the hype.
~stacey #243
Double feature at the dollar theatre on SUnday night... Practical Magic (kinda cute and funny but not real lasting) Seige (more tense and difficult that I imagined, I am having some problems getting the thoughts outta my mind... so it rates)
~autumn #244
Wer, did those two cancel each other out? I kind of liked "Eve's Bayou". Perhaps a lukewarm endorsement, but there it is.
~KitchenManager #245
Not really, Autumn...the following night I watched The Relic and Contact, then the next day watched Badlands... (and, yes, these are about the average time that I see movies for the first time after their release...)
~autumn #246
Don't feel bad--I just saw "Contact" last month, and I've never even heard of "Relic."
~pmnh #247
we saw 'practical magic' at this beautiful old theater downtown, few weeks ago... was the second half of double feature (with 'the wizard of oz', which we actually were there to see, cause we'd never seen it on the big screen)... 'wizard' of course was amazing, 'magic' was terribly disappointing (being a sandra bullock fan,and an aidan quinn fan too, really wanted to like the movie... but it was just awful)... saw 'shakespeare' last week (we saw it twice actually, loved it that much...and we may end up seeing it again)... 'ned devine' was excellent as well... was undeniably a little self-conciously... um, 'adorable' 'cute', whatever... but didn't cross the line all that badly, and we enjoyed it a lot... we saw 'you've got mail' too... to call it a bad movie wouldn't be fair... but it should've been, deserved to be, redeemed just a little by the wattage of the hanks- ryan persona... nora ephron has written a couple of very decent screenplays, this wasn't one... have seen the original, the movie it was based on whatever anumber of times... jimmy stewart's 'the shop around the corner' is a wonderful film, far far (far) superior to this... if you haven't seen it, save yourself the 8 bucks... rent this for 49 cents at your video store instead, you won't regret it... far and away the best film we saw this holiday season was 'henry bloom'... thomas jay ryan is a terrific actor, fashioned an unforgettable character, and the film was successful on every level... one of the reasons i love movies, this one...
~Charlotte #248
I saw Gods and Monsters yesterday. Formidable acting expertise displayed. A little talky, but then I like those kinds of flicks. :)
~Charlotte #249
I can't find any information about Henry Bloom. Could the film you are talking about be Henry Fool? *sigh* That's not playing in my area anymore, either.
~pmnh #250
yup, 'henry fool' is what i meant cannot imagine where 'bloom' came from (was a movie from the seventies i think, 'bloom in love' with george segal has nothing whatsoever to do with the film i just saw... but um anyway) i really really wanta see 'gods and monsters' james whale is among my favorite directors, and from what i've seen the film looks fascinating some time this week we're gonna see the oscar wilde film (hmm, is it 'wilde'? or is it 'oscar'? cant seem to keep it straight)
~pmnh #251
(no pun intended i swear)
~KitchenManager #252
okay... watched 'Watchers' for the first time the other night...
~KitchenManager #253
Who was the female co-star with Yule Brenner(sp?) in 'The King and I'?
~Charlotte #254
Deborah Kerr
~KitchenManager #255
Thanks, Charlotte!
~autumn #256
My, you two have been busy! The last film I saw was "Eve's Bayou."
~jgross #257
I was the one who kept her hair in place.... you can't see me because it was my job, on the crew, to be a master at not being seen (had to work closely with the camera person for best angles) I'm also the one holding Yul's hair outta the way so he looks bald throughout the movie it was a skill that just couldn't be passed on, and now I'm forgotten and uncredited today I just feel worthless and ugly and depressed and suicidal
~autumn #258
Jim! Get thee to inner!
~jgross #259
some slippage there, with Autumn trying on the slipper it does, though, give me an excellent opportunity to hardly mention that it was me who turns Dr. Batiste on to all those women in "Eve's..." I was just playing myself. Again I ask you, although this is the first time, why is my acting footage left on the cutting room floor? ....what with my role being so critical to the action (and I mean action) once more, here I am, more suicidal than I am depressed, though more depressed than I am ugly, though more ugly than I am worthless and I feel incredibly worthless as you would too, if this happened to you ....it's okay, I'll survive (or not)
~jgross #260
there you go again, Autumn you're like a regular Cinderella or somebody with your slippers have you tried on the ones made of glass, yet, that the Prince is taking around to lovely young women of becoming qualities?
~autumn #261
Nay, I fear my wicked stepmother dost protest too much.
~autumn #262
Oops, that's "doth", and besides, what kind of foundation is that for an alliance between two people--having the right shoe size? I guess empires have been built on a lot less, but I need a little more sympatico between me and my my mate!
~KitchenManager #263
why, Autumn, you've had the power inside of you all along... "There's no place like love." "There's no place like love." "There's no place like love."
~autumn #264
If the shoe fits, wear it, huh?
~KitchenManager #265
yes, Princess...
~KitchenManager #266
Took Zoe to see Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory at Deep Eddy Saturday night, we saw 101 Dalmations there the Saturday before.
~autumn #267
We saw "The King and I" (animated version) recently, it sucked big time, even by Disney standards. S. took a carful of kids to the drive-in last week to see "Star Wars", which they all claimed to like. Rented "Next Stop Wonderland" (big snooze), "Love and Death on Long Island" (interesting w/o being fascinating), and "7 Years in Tibet" (a bit slow) recently. Oh, and rented "Austin Powers I"--yeah, baby, yeah!!!
~stacey #268
oh YEAH, baby!
~Charlotte #269
They still have drive-ins somewhere??
~stacey #270
they do in Englewood (just south of Denver right off Santa Fe and 285)
~aschuth #271
Rhein-Main area has one or two, too... Need directions? ;=}
~stacey #272
sure!
~aschuth #273
Sout of Frankfurt, near or in Neu-Isenburg, lies Autokino Gravenbruch. Showing now: Autokino Gravenbruch Telefon 06102 / 55 00: Matrix, Do-Mi 22, Fr/Sa 00.45 Uhr. Enjoy, Stacey. There was another one to the west, along A66 between Frankfurt and Wiesbaden, but I don't know for sure if that still operates... Been there last year for a fleamarket, and it looked not too operational.
~stacey #274
they hold flea markets in the Englewood one as well! .ok damn, damn, damn,
~KitchenManager #275
too much coffee today, Stace?
~autumn #276
Long time, no see, Charlotte!!!
~stacey #277
no coffee perhaps that was the problem Brandon has promised to take me to the Phantom Menace this weekend!
~wolf #278
woo hoo!! hi charlotte! alex, i stayed overnight in rhein main last year! no movie seeing for me, though. i just saw great expectations. i must say that that really was a great expectation. i wasn't necessarily impressed. like gwyneth, but ethan doesn't do anything for me. i loved the old lady but was disappointed that she wasn't in the wedding dress throughout the movie (read the book?)
~wolf #279
k, i went to the movies and saw two, back to back (kids out of town!).... instinct: very good no matter what the critics say....there were some parts that seemed to slow it up (i was more interested in ethan's (hopkins) life with the gorillas--surprise, surprise)! it has lessons that i think a lot of people could learn from. ap, the spy who shagged me: i dunno, didn't get into it, but did laugh a few times...there was a guy behind me who was funnier than the movie (he laughed the whole time). mike meyers is one talented actor-i esp. was impressed with the scottish character, let's just call him fat b. oh, luved mini-me, and mr evel was particularly funny along with his whole entourage. we're renting rush hour and beloved....i'll review them later *grin*
~wolf #280
rush hour didn't interest me very much....i like chris taylor in the fifth element but didn't find him funny in this one...seemed like he was trying to emulate eddie murphy in beverly hills cop and i just wanted him to be himself! beloved was emotional....i am still confused about certain parts of the film....i didn't understand why beloved haunted the house and came back and then left again...perhaps it had to do with coming to grips with the past...usually i am very sensitive about a movie's underlying theme...maybe i should watch it again!
~KitchenManager #281
or maybe you just didn't have enough popcorn...
~stacey #282
i finally saw Episode 1. loved it. every bit. When the screen went black and after"... galaxy far, far away..." came up I was smitten but when the John Williams music started pulsing. Oh I just got so excited! Like being seven again! I was honored to know obiwan as a young Jedi knight and am compelled to discover the turning point which made young Anikan's future what I know it will become. And do I know Luke's mother now? I believe I do. Oh I just really loved the whole damn thing. I wish Episode Two were released already... dum... da da dum...
~stacey #283
(seeing as it's 2036, I suppose the movie should be out any day now, no?)
~terry #284
We're back from the future.
~wolf #285
i talked to a lady at work who saw beloved and she didn't understand the whole of it either. she said after the movie, she could hear others who didn't get it. so it wasn't just me. but i must say, the woman who played beloved deserves an award. she was excellent!! on the disney channel, mary poppins is playing and i am gleefully watching it. stacey: i was full of goosebumps listening to the star wars theme and reading the intro. i've been convinced to watch star wars with the additional footage. they said it didn't take anything away from the original.
~wolf #286
more movie reviews: waterboy--i liked it and laughed most of it, better than AP.... rented stepmom last night--cried, a lot, julia roberts is wonderful even though i'm not a huge fan and susan serandon was most excellent...she has this way of using her face to say things that words cannot. it was a good chick flick. tonight: everafter--finally get to see this one, will let you know..... and don't forget: big daddy comes out tomorrow!!
~wolf #287
ever after: nice story. prince henry was ever so dashing. i really disliked angelica houston's character, but i suppose that was the point! am a little girl at heart, so fairy tales are still magical for me. tonight--sliding doors.....
~stacey #288
you are ms. movie watcher!
~stacey #289
B leaves the country on business for two weeks so I'll probably be seeing lots at the dollar theatre ($0.50) coming up soon!
~wolf #290
can't wait for your reviews (b's going out of the country?)
~stacey #291
Sao Paulo Brazil Loiusville, Kentucky (which seems like a separate country!) Copenhagen, Denmark somewhere in Sweden Hamburg, Germany he leaves tomorrow returns for 48 hours on July 2 Leaves July 4 for Copenhagen returns July 14. quick trips all of em, but stacked together he's outta town for awhile...
~wolf #292
i'll say and over the 4th of july too!
~stacey #293
yep... no schmancy red white and blue holiday for us... *frown* His parents have a party every year though and that'll be fun!
~terry #294
What are your plans on the Fourth Stace'?
~wolf #295
i think the gal will be partying *woohoo*
~autumn #296
All-night movie rentals, back to back! ha-ha! Wolf, did you like Sliding Doors? I loved it!
~KitchenManager #297
Stace, tell him to say hi to my relatives in Louisville... saw The Creature from the Black Lagoon in 3D tonight at Deep Eddy...
~terry #298
Wow, the perfect movie to see in Deep Eddy. How was the water?
~stacey #299
do your relatives happen to work for GE there?
~KitchenManager #300
oh, probaly not but if he runs into a Roland, they'll be a relative...
~wolf #301
autumn: i loved sliding doors. i'm especially happy that her choices got her to the right man sooner or later.
~mikeg #302
We saw Rogue Trader on Friday. Interesting story, awful acting. Ewan McGregor was wooden.
~stacey #303
I assume this enigmatic 'we' is your fiancee? Or is she your wife yet? Have you two found a place? In England? I think I'll finally see 'analyze this' tonight... purty lonely at home *wimper* *grin* lookit me! throwing my very own pity party... anyone else care to join me?! I also want to see that one with... oh poop, now I can't remember either of their names... two guys... action/scary... nevermind, I'll come back to that.
~wolf #304
um, two guys, action/scary, does it include very large alligators?
~aschuth #305
Or any rabid canines?
~stacey #306
ummm... i don't think so
~aschuth #307
Too bad. Hey, did anybody see "Abott and Costello meet the Wolfman"?
~wolf #308
i think that's taking place right here! so stacey, which movie were you talking about?
~mikeg #309
sorry, yes, that's Ca and I. we had a place sorted out before she arrived, so we're all moved in and playing at being domestic. Ikea, shopping, cooking and cleaning. Fun. We saw Notting Hill last weekend - quite good, but I didn't think Julia Roberts was particularly suited to the part. Hugh Grant was excellent, though, which surprised me (I'm not a big fan).
~terry #310
Lethal Weapon III?
~stacey #311
i don't think I saw three... isn't four out already...
~wolf #312
four is out on video...i don't recommend three, it was terrible (immho)
~stacey #313
four was pretty funny -- the one where the girls were preg-o right?
~autumn #314
Mike, the previews for Notting Hill didn't look very enticing to me. I've never heard of Rogue Trader, maybe it'll be released here later. Ewan MacGregor = Trainspotting? Not sure if it's the same actor. IKEA, LOL!!! Have you hit Bed, Bath & Beyond yet? :-)
~wolf #315
just came back from a very packed theatre with kids in the ranges of 6 mo to 80 yrs. the place was packed and they had two screens dedicated to this disney film-yep, tarzan. it was alright. can't say it really, i dunno, kept comparing it to greystoke and christophe lampert. isn't that strange? well, i did, but i was distracted by this man next to me scratching himself. now i don't know if he scratched the goods or not, but the location of his hand was bothering me and i kept leaning the opposite direction and almost was in my daughter's lap!
~wolf #316
i watched part of rogue trader the other night-cinemax (no, no, i wasn't finished yet, just had to let you guys breathe after reading my experience at tinsel town today). did you know that was about a real guy? ewan mcgregor (most recently) was obi wan kinobe in star wars (but you knew that). i haven't seen trainspotting either, who all's in it? and autumn, bed, bath & beyond? is this a store i haven't been in yet?
~autumn #317
Ha-ha, if you've never been in one then you must be living under a rock! I dunno, maybe they don't have them in the South. Trainspotting is full of a bunch of Scottish guys. That's all I can tell you! Oh, and it was good!
~KitchenManager #318
living in the South=living under a rock...hmmm...
~wolf #319
hmm...we're only just now getting some of the popular city stores that i've seen on my travels *grin* and that one mentioned above is not here yet....hey, but we have casinoes!! haha...
~stacey #320
i saw October Sky tonight. I enjoyed it, feel good movie with those little wet eyes of happiness. Wolf, BB&B is like a Linens&Things all ramped up with Container Store items too! (is that helpful or am I merely confusing the situation?)
~wolf #321
what? you know, i think i went into one of those places and it was overwhelming! in fact, i think it was on my last trip to ohio.
~stacey #322
what! you chose to go shopping instead of watching the corn grow?!?!?
~KitchenManager #323
and both over just leaving?
~autumn #324
I want to see the following films that are at the $2 theater: October Sky 10 Things I Hate About You Analyze This Shakespeare in Love
~wolf #325
you'll love shakespeare in love (at least i did)....i think the only cheap seats in town here require a weapon. i'd like to see analyze this and october sky. not familiar with 10 things i hate about you, though.
~stacey #326
that's exactly my list Autumn! cross off the October Sky and 10 Things... I saw OS on Monday night and 10 Things last night. cute. entertaining. certianly worth a dollar definitely not worth $5! Analyze This is only showing at 5:10 and 9:30 -- one's too early for me and the other wouldn't put me to bed until after midnight... perhaps I will save this one for a schedule change! I think I'm pooped out on movies for tonight though... maybe Thursday!
~autumn #327
Did see Shakespeare in Love last night, very sweet! My theatre has the same showtimes as yours, Stacey, good thing I don't have to be up early. We've been sleeping till 9:30 ever since school ended.
~KitchenManager #328
THE HORROR!!!
~stacey #329
*chuckle* awww... WER, we're missing the best parts of the day, huh?
Help!
The Spring · spring.net · Movies / Topic 11 · AustinSpring.com