Bridget Jones' Diary
Topic 80 · 1999 responses · archived october 2000
~LauraMM
Mon, Feb 2, 1998 (19:29)
seed
Well someone had to create this topic. As we all absolutely adore it. I would like to start by saying that I think a man who has a little insecurities is extremely sexy. And Mark Darcy, who comes a cross as a strong-headed male, just proved to the female race that he does indeed have some insecurities. Now will it scare Bridget away;)
1999 new of
~chey
Tue, Feb 10, 1998 (01:39)
#1
I have been away for a long time and just read some discussions. What is Bridget Jones' Diary? Does it have anything to do with Darcy or Colin? Thanks, Chey
~Kate
Wed, Feb 11, 1998 (14:43)
#2
It's a novel in the form of a diary, set in London in 1996. The every day life of a London yuppie. Among other things, she get's a bit obsessive about P&P2.
It's not available in the US, but Bookserve is getting copies of it for Pemberlians. Let me know if you are interested.
~LauraMM
Wed, Feb 11, 1998 (16:19)
#3
I thought I would start this board, just as a way to discuss the current week's installment and when we finally get the book we can talk about it here.
~AllisonM
Wed, Feb 11, 1998 (22:48)
#4
As "Clueless" is to "Emma", so "Bridget Jones's Diary" is to P&P (or P&P2 in particular).
~Kate
Wed, Feb 25, 1998 (15:18)
#5
Bridget Jones is now available at Bookserve!
They have it especially for Pemberley people, and you will need to order by phone or email - it's not on their database.
Here is the message from our man Doug
"We now have copies of the book by Helen Fielding in our possession and ready to ship for $10.18 (plus S + H). Please notify your
people that they may place their orders with me via email (doug@bookserve.com) or by phone (615) 287-4205."
Apparently there are about seven or eight copies left right now, so hurry!
Please say that you are from Pemberley. Pemberley will receive a small percentage of your purchase price to help keep us going. I'm hanging out for my copy....
~KarenR
Thu, Feb 26, 1998 (20:54)
#6
Well I think the NY Times is monitoring this website because today, in the Arts section is an article entitled, "Men as Oafs, a Genre with 17th Century Roots." A title like that is bound to catch my attention!! Anyway, it mentions Bridget and, according to the publisher Viking, the book will be out in July. I wonder if it will have a glossary in the back. I have a hard enough time reading the weekly installments at the Telegraphs. I don't have a clue as to who many of the people she mentions are. Fo
those who have read the book, is it as topical?
~lisaC
Thu, Feb 26, 1998 (21:27)
#7
I read the book in about three hours. I think I'm going to go back and reread it, since I tend to skim things the first time. Anyway, I think the "Men as Oafs" refers to the relationship she has with her boss. It starts off with really cute flirting via office e-mail about the length of Bridget's skirt and develops into a sexual relatioship with her getting hurt in the end.
I too was lost to some TV show references and so on, but all in all it was a great read. Bridget's extremely paranoid, thinking that everything is her fault, and she's worthless. Very neurotical but extremely funny. Especially the part about her mother leaving her father and having a fling with a younger Spanish man (I think it's Spanish, it's been a while since I read it), who turns out to be not as nice as originally thought.
~Kate
Fri, Feb 27, 1998 (02:18)
#8
Just a follow up, on the BJ at Bookserve post.
Unfortunately, and this arose because of a miscommunication with bookserve, although the price of the book is $10.18, they are charging $10 shipping and handling because they imported them from england. I hope this doesn't cause disasters for anyone - if we'd known about it we would have let you know earlier.
~LauraMM
Fri, Feb 27, 1998 (14:27)
#9
actually julio was portuguese. I loved when the police were after them. and mark darcy comes to the rescue. Daniel was a CREEP!!!! love jude, sharon (reminds me of you Karen!) and Tom!!!
~lisaC
Fri, Feb 27, 1998 (16:05)
#10
Didn't you love it when Tom went missing and they freaked out about him only to find out he had a nose job? Very entertaining.
~LauraMM
Fri, Feb 27, 1998 (16:31)
#11
Oh yes!! Poor Bridge, and to be jealous that Jude called the police and Bridge is his best friend!!! Actually, I loved Perpetua well after she told Daniel that she was quitting.
Oh And now back to the studio;) LOL!!!!!
~KarenR
Fri, Feb 27, 1998 (19:37)
#12
Uh oh, I remind you of Shazzer!! Since I don't have the book in my hot little hands--that is, yet--I'll have to go back through the Telegraph installments to see what I think of that!! ;-)
~LauraMM
Fri, Feb 27, 1998 (21:42)
#13
she's great karenr she speaks her mind, is tough and lovable at the same time!!!!
~KarenR
Fri, Feb 27, 1998 (21:49)
#14
So why doesn't Mark D go after her?? She wouldn't care if she noticed a little bald spot starting out. I just love those little bits he's been doing in the weekly installments....
~lisaC
Sat, Feb 28, 1998 (03:51)
#15
Because he's involved with Natasha? and I think he was a little put off by her at their first meeting. Plus everybody was pushing for them to get together and maybe it annoyed him.
~Kate
Sat, Feb 28, 1998 (05:40)
#16
Ok. I got my copy today and devoured it in one sitting. What a HOOT!.
I found the Telegraph site, but the earliest diary entry I can find is from November 1997, when BJ is missing the plane.... are there any between the end of the book and this, and if so, where would I find them??
And I agree, CJ would be ideal to play Mark. I very much suspect he won't however. He's too determined to throw the Darcy monkey off his back...
~Kate
Sat, Feb 28, 1998 (05:40)
#17
Ok. I got my copy today and devoured it in one sitting. What a HOOT!.
I found the Telegraph site, but the earliest diary entry I can find is from November 1997, when BJ is missing the plane.... are there any between the end of the book and this, and if so, where would I find them??
And I agree, CF would be ideal to play Mark. I very much suspect he won't however. He's too determined to throw the Darcy monkey off his back...
~Kate
Sat, Feb 28, 1998 (05:41)
#18
Doh! I thought I'd stopped the first post. oh well.
~KarenR
Sat, Feb 28, 1998 (22:43)
#19
No, Kate, that's the beginning--in November (around the 8th as I recall). I can't remember if the early ones had the links going all the way back, but there were links entitled "What's Happened So Far..." or something like that. You may want to do the Search thing for Bridget Jones and all the installments will be listed. That's how I got to the beginning.
Boo hiss, I haven't received my copy yet.
BTW, I can't figure out what happened to Rufus and Kim Bassinger was supposed to be on!! Totally different lineup. :-(
~LauraMM
Mon, Mar 2, 1998 (14:03)
#20
Natasha what a B*#@h. But you do get the feeling that MD is interested in BJ. As he said, what he was wearing wouldn't exactly score any points with many people.
I find myself agreeing with things that BJ does. Like standing MD up because she is blowdrying her hair. I've done that!!! well don't want to give too much away for the nubiles who haven't read it;)
~KarenR
Mon, Mar 2, 1998 (22:11)
#21
Kate: Didn't you post the address of a website that dealt with British slang? I've got a few words that I need translated and I have a feeling that one of them couldn't be explained adequately here or at Ramble!!
~Kate
Tue, Mar 3, 1998 (01:10)
#22
KarenR: here it is
http://www.dur.ac.uk/~dgl3djb/ukus.html
~KarenR
Tue, Mar 3, 1998 (20:32)
#23
Thanks, Kate. I'll give it a go.
Started reading Bridget last night, but am only about 100 pages into it. So, if Natasha our Caroline Bingley character or what?? I really can see the P&P now with the book. The weekly installments don't do it.
Can you believe the e-mailing between her and Daniel? Naughty naughty!
~LauraMM
Tue, Mar 3, 1998 (20:53)
#24
i didn't see the connection until towards the end of the book. i don't think there is a big one during the beginning or even the middle. so karen what do you think of Sharon?????
~TrinaH
Fri, Mar 6, 1998 (18:34)
#25
What a great book! I was laughing hysterically the whole time I was reading it. I kept reading my husband passages outloud--he didn't find them quite as funnt as I did, but he thought they were pretty humorous. I was suprised at how much Bridget worried about her weight--I thought that was much more of an American than a European thing.
One of my favorite passages: "Wise people will say Daniel should like me just as I am, but I am a child of Cosmopolitan culture, have been traumatized by supermodels and too many quizzes and know the neither my personality nor my
body is up to it if left to its own devices. I can't take the pressure. I am going to cancel [the date] and spend the evening eating doughnuts in a cardigan with egg on it."
Favorite phrase that hasn't made it to America: her discussion of men's emotional f*ckwittage. What a beautiful phrase!
Question for you Brits out there: what they heck does she mean when she talks about being eaten by an Alsatian?
I was also very excited when she started mentioning Pride and Prejudice and had the idea of interviewing the stars. I thought the interviews with Colin Firth would be there, but I guess those appeared later in the newspaper column? I'll have to go to the link and check them out.
~LauraMM
Fri, Mar 6, 1998 (19:55)
#26
Alsatian
it is a german shepherd;-)
~Kate
Sun, Mar 8, 1998 (02:40)
#27
Did anyone read today's installment. LOL! especially about men thinking they've done SO MUCH housework if they pick up a dish and carry it into the kitchen! But poor BJ now has bigger problems on her mind.....
~scave
Sun, Mar 8, 1998 (04:01)
#28
ain't that typical of men?
~KarenR
Sun, Mar 8, 1998 (22:13)
#29
Yes, quite funny and true to life. Must take my teaspon to the sink and run it under the water... Ah, so much hard work to do. Liked the Jodie Foster comment as well!
~LauraMM
Mon, Mar 9, 1998 (14:39)
#30
Kill all jellyfishers in the world!!!
~KarenR
Mon, Mar 9, 1998 (18:13)
#31
Oooh yes, what is that Rebecca up to???
Had another thought about Kate's comment, could you ever imagine a Darcy or, any Darcy for that matter, doing such menial things as washing dishes? Nevah!! But that doesn't explain Jeremy! ;-(
~Kate
Mon, Mar 9, 1998 (18:27)
#32
could you ever imagine a Darcy or, any Darcy for that matter, doing such menial things
as washing dishes? Nevah!!
All I can say is, a Darcy or any Darcy would be much more attractive if they did ...."Put your feet up, darling, and let me deal with this".... now that is the way to my heart. ;-)
~KarenR
Mon, Mar 9, 1998 (18:33)
#33
I much prefer the Fed Ex'd Valentine's Day instructions with a driver to whisk me off to wherever....although the too-small red slip...was a waste!!
~LauraMM
Mon, Mar 9, 1998 (19:17)
#34
KarenR: Oooh yes, what is that Rebecca up to???
She really wants to become friends with Bridget Jones now that her star is shining and she wants someone really beautiful to play her in the upcoming movie!!!! She's so jellyfishing jealous that BJ has gorgeous Mark Darcy and interviewed Colin Firth that she just want to get the IN on everyone that BJ is around.
Now back to the studio......;-)
~KarenR
Mon, Mar 9, 1998 (19:29)
#35
Did you see that article about Ruby Wax? I nearly fell off my chair when it said right at the beginning that she was from Evanston, where I grew up. So far, all I've found is her parents' address/phone number. I can't visualize the street though. Does anyone know how old she is? Must check to see if my HS has an alumni database on the web? ;-)
~LauraMM
Mon, Mar 9, 1998 (21:01)
#36
Ruby wax is in her mid 50's i believe she's quite famous in uk and had a show on fox last summer it was okay but she interviewd people like pamela anderson lee who would flash her fake breasts for ruby. RW also was script supervisor for ABFAB.
~KarenR
Tue, Mar 10, 1998 (16:54)
#37
Thanks, in the picture she didn't look like mid-50s. Is this just another case of you youngins just thinking that anyone older than you is over the hill?? ;-)
~LauraMM
Tue, Mar 10, 1998 (17:25)
#38
hmmm your right she doesn't look that old, but on her tv show she was fat! and not pretty at all! And I would hope you know that i don't think anyone over 40 is over the hill yet;D
Ruby looks like she lost a bit of weight maybe a couple of stones;D maybe she's only mid 40's, but wow she looked old on her tv show, honestly.
~KarenR
Tue, Mar 10, 1998 (18:03)
#39
OK, OK you're forgiven!! I remember seeing little bits about the TV show, but never watched it.
Did you see the mention about making the movie of BJD on one of the other topics? It will certainly be interesting to see who they will cast. A complete unknown for Bridget? Too bad, I could really see her as an Ally McBeal type person, although Bridge is horror on horror the big 3-0!!!
~LauraMM
Tue, Mar 10, 1998 (18:15)
#40
Touche! Karen Touche! hows the snow by the way. I'm unknown, thirty and singleton tho' singleton with child; with the pretty little girl that Bridge wants so bad. I refuse to have my colours done and i hate my mother. Oh no! I AM BRIDGET!! So where's my Mark??????????
~KarenR
Tue, Mar 10, 1998 (19:08)
#41
The snow was hideous because most of it wasn't snow, but slush. Weighed a ton!! I cleaned off my steps early in the morning and pushed the junk off, but when I left later on there was about 3 inches. Good thing I wore my wellies because it was a wet mess. My car is frozen shut--even though the doors are unlocked--I can't open them!! Hopefully, within a couple of days this mess will go away. Then to see all my dead little plants underneath!! BWAHHH!
~KarenR
Thu, Mar 12, 1998 (17:50)
#42
#17 Reprised
(Kate) I found the Telegraph site, but the earliest diary entry I can find is from November 1997, when BJ is missing the plane.... are there any between the end of the book and this, and if so, where would I find them??
After having read the book and figuring out that there were *indeed* a number of missing months from the Bridget saga, I decided to check into it in my usual pitbull fashion! Using the awesome power of the web, I e-mailed the Telegraph and yesterday received the following answer from etcetera's features editor:
"As to what happens between the end of the book and the start of the columns, Im afraid only Bridget Jones knows. Maybe Helen Fielding could bring out 'Bridget Jones's Diary: The Wilderness Year (or so)'. In any case, If I hear anything to help you, I shall let you know."
So there you are. Those missing months do no exist, so we're not likely to know what happened between her and Mark that broke them up. :-(
OK, so who's going to e-mail Helen?????
~LauraMM
Thu, Mar 12, 1998 (18:29)
#43
i will, just get her email address and i'll email her.
~KarenR
Thu, Mar 12, 1998 (19:06)
#44
Why is this my job???? I'd suggest her UK publisher. What was it? Picador or something?
~LauraMM
Thu, Mar 12, 1998 (21:41)
#45
because karen you get the job done and the publisher will most definitely NOT give me her email address. you have your ways;-) i mean you emailed the telegraph:)
in the words of Fitzwilliam Darcy, 'Go to it!'. hahahahahahaha!!!!
~Kate
Thu, Mar 12, 1998 (22:45)
#46
Reading the recent posts, they seem to assume that there is no gap - she has only been going out with Mark for a short time - months, not one and a half years - so it's almost as though she picked up the story where she left off.
~KarenR
Fri, Mar 13, 1998 (21:58)
#47
I don't have my book here with me, but it ended around the holidays, Christmas, right?? The columns start at the beginning of November, which I believe is November of the following year because in Week 7 (Christmas Day), she and Mark are together at her parents home and she says:
"Is always thrilling when there is something going on between you and someone else and no one else knows. Two Christmas days ago exactly it seemed as though Mark and me were going to start going out, then it all went wrong and Mum and Una were furious but now they do not know we are back together...."
"Two Christmas days ago" is two years ago, when Mum and Una were plotting to introduce Bridge to Mark and then they met at Una's Turkey curry dinner.
Something happened between when the book ended and November, when the diary picks up, and they broke up.
That's just how I read it.
~lizbeth
Tue, Mar 17, 1998 (10:31)
#48
Will BJ's Diary be hugely popular in the US, as it is in the UK? Or will the cultural allusions (TV shows, personalities etc) cause a problem? Perhaps, some slight re-editing is needed. Do you have Blind Date and Gladiators on US TV?
~LauraMM
Tue, Mar 17, 1998 (13:58)
#49
We have singled out and gladiators on tv here stateside. similar to your blind date and gladiator show. And she is fairly popular already. I read an article in NYT that states that booksellers have been deluged with orders for this book. Viking Press has picked it up and will release it hardback in August.
~KarenR
Tue, Mar 17, 1998 (19:35)
#50
I think some of the people she refers to will be a problem, but we'll muddle through. I do hope it isn't changed. Maybe a glossary at the back would suffice, but then again, when you have to explain jokes, they lose something.
Even though I didn't *get* all the pop/political culture references, I still enjoyed the book and don't think I missed all that much.
~Kate
Wed, Mar 18, 1998 (03:21)
#51
I don't have my book here with me, but it ended around the holidays, Christmas, right?? The columns start at the beginning of
November, which I believe is November of the following year because in Week 7 (Christmas Day), she and Mark are together at her
parents home and she says:
"Is always thrilling when there is something going on between you and someone else and no one else knows. Two Christmas days ago
exactly it seemed as though Mark and me were going to start going out, then it all went wrong and Mum and Una were furious but
now they do not know we are back together...."
"Two Christmas days ago" is two years ago, when Mum and Una were plotting to introduce Bridge to Mark and then they met at
Una's Turkey curry dinner.
Something happened between when the book ended and November, when the diary picks up, and they broke up.
That's right, and yet, when the column entries start, she talks about the relationship as though they've just started going out together.... maybe we'll have to email Helen F and ask her!
~Kate
Wed, Mar 18, 1998 (03:27)
#52
I think some of the people she refers to will be a problem, but we'll muddle through. I do hope it isn't changed. Maybe a glossary at
the back would suffice, but then again, when you have to explain jokes, they lose something.
Even though I didn't *get* all the pop/political culture references, I still enjoyed the book and don't think I missed all that much.
I hope they don't change it (other than to add a glossary.... f***wittage might need some explanation?? ;-) ) but otherwise they should just leave it. It's good for people to have to try to understand each other - it's just that americans in general (please note - no disparaging comment intended here - just a comment on my experience as a non-american in the US) are less used to accomodating other cultural and linguistic experiences than people from other places.
I mean, if we could watch Bull Durham and Major League, and be able to work out what was going on without any understanding of baseball, or read a book like Primary Colors, with a fairly minimal understanding of the ins and outs (gee, that was freudian...) of American politics, and get it, then I think you all will be able to deal with the odd inexplicable cultural reference. (Not being british, they were inexplicable to me too, though the language was probably more accessible)
~lafn
Wed, Mar 18, 1998 (21:58)
#53
Maybe, those of you who have British Cultural Backgrounds could help construct a glossary of terms right here.It would be a great contribution.towards cultural communication.
I had no problem with the terms..or with the culture which, incidentally, I admire tremendously,.....it was the proper names ...political? televison personalities?
pop stars?
Anyway, it's a great read.
~Kate
Wed, Mar 18, 1998 (22:20)
#54
Why don't you post the names and we'll see if we can identify them?
~lafn
Thu, Mar 19, 1998 (03:00)
#55
Kate
Why don't you post the names and we'll see if we can identify them?
Thank you for your kind offer. Unfortunately,my copy of the book is on loan, but as soon as it is returned I shall take you up on your offer.
~KarenR
Thu, Mar 19, 1998 (20:43)
#56
That's right, and yet, when the column entries start, she talks about the relationship as though they've just started going out together....
Didn't it also mention that Mark had recently come back from being in Japan. Maybe there wasn't a *real* breakup or anything, just that work took him out of the country for an extended time????
maybe we'll have to email Helen F and ask her!
Better yet, Kate, Helen F is bound to come here when her book is published to do some promotional stuff. Maybe you and Jane E can go to a book-signing and ask her THE QUESTION!! Just be sure to put lots and lots of Post-It Notes of various colors in the book!!
~LauraMM
Thu, Mar 19, 1998 (21:44)
#57
i want to know why was he in Japan. what is he doing???? and wasn't he living there also. so bj only saw him sporadically.
~KarenR
Thu, Mar 19, 1998 (21:59)
#58
Isn't he described as some big-time human rights lawyer? And wasn't he in the4 US before the book started?
~Kate
Fri, Mar 20, 1998 (03:38)
#59
Better yet, Kate, Helen F is bound to come here when her book is published to do some promotional stuff. Maybe you and Jane E can
go to a book-signing and ask her THE QUESTION!! Just be sure to put lots and lots of Post-It Notes of various colors in the book!!
LOL!. Regrettably, I suspect I will no longer be here when she arrives.... so someone else may have to do the job!
~lizbeth
Fri, Mar 20, 1998 (12:42)
#60
Just read through all the postings here. Thanks everyone for your replies to my question about whether BJ's Diary will be as popular in the US as it is in the UK. I think it's a really great book - and so do all my friends at work!!We've started quoting from it to each other...."very Bridget Jones". :-)
Karen, I think the Daily Telegraph installments are intended to be partly a social commentary on the week's events in the UK, and so a lot of the references are topical (the Millenium Dome, Campaign for the Countryside etc).
Laura, HF is supposed to have two sequel novels in the pipeline. I know that she wrote the Diary in the Independent for a couple of years before joining the Telegraph, and that is where you might find out about the missing year(s) in Mark & Bridget's relationship. But if there are a couple of sequels due, then HF must take us on from Christmas 1995! We can't just jump to November 1997!
Kate, I really do think CF will play Mark Darcy. I don't think he's determined to "get the Darcy monkey off his back". He has said in interviews that he really appreciates the attention which Darcy has given him, and I'm sure he must see that the Mark Darcy role is one that most actors would covet, and should be his by right. Who else would play it? The book is very "hot", and the movie is being made by Working Title who made "Four weddings and a Funeral" - it's a plum role, and surely one that he can't r
fuse! :-)
Trina, the interview between Bridget and CF is given in full in one of the new websites listed in Ellen's FirthFAQ. I think it's called Colin's Timeline (the word "timeline" is mentioned, anyway. Just scroll along to BJ's Diary.
Thanks, Laura, for starting this topic! I love the book (so many favourite bits, like when she tries to set the video recorder!) and the CF connection (hopefully!) is an added bonus. BTW Does everyone on the other topics (#67,69,59 etc) know about this?
~Kate
Fri, Mar 20, 1998 (15:58)
#61
she wrote the Diary in the Independent for a couple of
years before joining the Telegraph,
oh my goodness. I'll have to go looking for that.
The book is very "hot", and the movie is being
made by Working Title who made "Four weddings and a Funeral" - it's a plum role, and surely one that he can't refuse
I hope you're right. I keeping checking on IMDB for it, and it's not there yet, so if you hear anything definite, please let us know!
I was chatting to an acquaintance the other night and we were talking about the old britsh/american language divide and she mentions "f***wittage" and I knew immediately she'd read it! She picked it up in London, and loved it.... so the word is getting out here.
~LauraMM
Fri, Mar 20, 1998 (16:59)
#62
i used f***wittage all the time even before I had heard of Bridget. I use that and f***wit to refer to my ex-boyfriend:) I think he's the biggest one!
~KarenR
Fri, Mar 20, 1998 (19:50)
#63
Thanks, Bethan, for all the additional info. The local events--even if explained to us--would likely not add all that much to our understanding. Thankfully, Bridget doesn't let us out by including the Clinton refs and the celebrity skiing accidents!! ;-)
Kate, I looked ALL OVER the electronic Independent a while ago and its achives don't seem to have anything by Helen Fielding. (When are you going home?)
I did find an interview somewhere in which Helen F explained f***wittage, but I didn't print it or write it down. I shall go looking for it again and post later.
The features editor at the Telegraph didn't have a clue as to the missing time period, so it probably wasn't in the Independent either.
~Kate
Sat, Mar 21, 1998 (00:48)
#64
Kate, I looked ALL OVER the electronic Independent a while ago and its achives don't seem to have anything by Helen Fielding.
I couldn't even find the archives, so you were doing better than me.
(When are you going home?)
some time in August I think.
The features editor at the Telegraph didn't have a clue as to the missing time period, so it probably wasn't in the Independent either.
Yeah, but they're competitors - it wouldn't be in his/her interest to know anything about it... s/he isn't going to send you off the Independent, is s/he?? ;-)
~KarenR
Sat, Mar 21, 1998 (17:27)
#65
some time in August
Then, unless you are traveling far and wide (i.e., outside of Manhattan), you m might be around when Helen comes to promote the book! I think it's going to come out in July. ;-)
Re: Competitor's motivations. The features ed seemed quite nice and if HF isn't working for them now then what's the big deal??? he/she didn't even have to respond to me and even offered to get back to me if and when he/she found out anything.
~TrinaH
Sun, Mar 22, 1998 (17:46)
#66
(lizbeth)
Trina, the interview between Bridget and CF is given in full in one of the new websites listed in Ellen's FirthFAQ. I think it's called Colin's Timeline (the word "timeline" is mentioned, anyway. Just
scroll along to BJ's Diary.
Thanks!
Trina
~TrinaH
Mon, Mar 23, 1998 (20:51)
#67
Thanks to Lizbeth's directions, I just went back and re-read that hysterical interview that Bridget did with CF. Sorry if this has been asked before, but was there ever any talk about whether CF actually read that when it appeared in print, and if so, what did he think? I thought she painted a flattering portrait of him myself--ever charming in the face of zealous drooling!
~KarenR
Mon, Mar 23, 1998 (21:35)
#68
Anglo-American Translation Time
I don't have my Bridget here with me, but Rebecca is supposed to be wearing "snookerball-bottomed" jeans or something like that. I know what snooker is. So would this be what we called bell-bottomed pants? Strange, I would never described them as ball-shaped if that's what is meant.
Anyway, I was sooo upset after this week's installment that I wanted to slap Bridget for being so dumb. How wrong she was about not cancelling out on the weekend. The jellyfisher is her acquaintance and why should she care if she cancelled out at the last minute. It isn't like Mark is going to go without her.
Loved the line about Rebecca's bathing suit being cut up to the chandelier!
~lizbeth
Wed, Mar 25, 1998 (10:40)
#69
Snooker is the UK equivalent of pool. I took it to mean that Rebecca has a pert bum (UK)/ass(USA)! Yep, Bridget has been incredibly dumb. She should have been struck down with an imaginary virus. But it makes the next installment very interesting... will he/won't he?
~LauraMM
Wed, Mar 25, 1998 (14:18)
#70
HE BETTER NOT!!!!! hee hee;)the he'd would join the world class of f***wit's;)
~KarenR
Wed, Mar 25, 1998 (22:12)
#71
I hadn't heard that line about sitting on a radiator since I was in high school, which was quite a while ago. Didn't think girls pulled that kind of schtick anymore?? ;-)
~KarenR
Wed, Apr 1, 1998 (20:20)
#72
What!! No one has anything to say about last Saturday's installment?? Incredible! After the dismal feeling I had when that jellyfisher sicced her brother after Bridget the week before, I thought things were looking up. I mean who wouldn't with Mark strutting around the bedroom in barrister mode clad only in a towel!! ;-) Oooowwweeee!!
So what's with Mark? Are they breaking up? Is he recalling his first marriage tand the other woman who cheated on him? Is he afraid of his own feelings? What is this yutz doing???
Signed,
Nurse Shaz
~lizbeth
Wed, Apr 1, 1998 (21:19)
#73
Ah, but as he drove away he (angrily) wiped a tear from his face (didn't he?). Maybe he's just insecure! Bridget should never have mentioned those dire words "splitting up"!
Long interview with Helen Fielding in this month's UK Vogue. There are two sequels (already in the pipeline)to BJ's Diary. HF is currently writing the screenplay for the movie (or was when interviewed for the article. Hopefully it is completed by now) It must be VERY tempting to introduce wet scenes, scenes in showers, scenes clad only in towels, scenes not clad in towels, scenes clad in wet towels etc, etc, etc!
~KarenR
Wed, Apr 1, 1998 (22:29)
#74
Anger or sad that he was, in fact, going to split up with our neurotic girl? Terrible!
Sinjun, a world famous eye, ear, nose and throat man!!
~LauraMM
Thu, Apr 2, 1998 (13:45)
#75
I think that BJ has it all wrong. He is just hurt. His pride was hurt because he thinks she doesn't trust him. IMVHO, of course;)
~lizbeth
Thu, Apr 2, 1998 (14:24)
#76
I agree. I think Bridget just aggravated the situation by trying to "explain." And what was he going to say? "But maybe we should.... (trust each other more?). Love the way BJ & co always turn to Thelma and Louise for comfort!
~LauraMM
Thu, Apr 2, 1998 (15:51)
#77
"But maybe we
should.... (trust each other more?). Love the way BJ & co always turn to Thelma and Louise for comfort!
Exactly!!! Although, I think he would've proposed marriage "But maybe we should get married!!!" okay wishful thinking on my part.
Bridget is an obsessive/compulsive paranoid. After a while, it does get tiresome. We know and Mark knows how crazy he is about her, but she doesn't... She feels with his good looks and her mediocre looks (she thinks) that he will up and leave her for a Rebecca type. But Mark probably sees right past Rebecca and her shallowness, he is not stupid.
~LauraMM
Thu, Apr 2, 1998 (15:53)
#78
I never understood why they would use Thelma and Louise, i mean they die at the end!!! how empowering of a movie is that????
~KarenR
Thu, Apr 2, 1998 (18:24)
#79
So, in your VHO, Mark is ready to settle down? He's tired of playing the field and can see that Rebecca is probably like that Natasha is the book? All flash and no substance. OK, but then where would Helen go with the columns? Will this turn into Ozzie and Harriet? or Mad About You (which wouldn't be bad)?
~LauraMM
Thu, Apr 2, 1998 (19:31)
#80
no, but i think he is trying to stabilise bridget. mad about you, oh please! ozzie and harriet, i'll throw up!!! I think mark is looking to settle down. why do you think he is sticking around in london and not taking the job in japan????? i think bridget would be another lucy actually!
~LauraMM
Thu, Apr 2, 1998 (19:37)
#81
i made absolutely no sense. what i am trying to say is that mark is looking to stabilise bridget. mark does see thru rebecca because he is a smart man. if he was just a man he would be taken in with her. he loves bridget unconditionally. and he trusts bridget. she doesn't trust him. part of her obsessive/compulsive paranoia.
~Kate
Fri, Apr 3, 1998 (00:04)
#82
But this is basically about real live human relationships.... women who feel they are too unattractive for the Mark Darcy's of this world, and that legs that go to the ceiling are more important that anything else.... men who don't communicate... women who worry about every little thing... men who don't understand what the problem is. That kind of stuff.
~LauraMM
Sat, Apr 4, 1998 (14:50)
#83
I CANNOT BELIEVE THIS. I FEEL LIKE CRYING!!! THIS IS HORRIBLE!!!! AS IN THE WORDS OF BJ GAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I say that we boycott Helen Fielding!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! This is too much, way too much. How dare she do this to us pariahs!!!!!
Karen, that's it I can't take the emotional rollercoaster. I feel like he is cheating on ME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I say kill the commie B*****D!!! I hope HF sees this!!!!
Oh, can you tell i'm quite pissed!!!!
~lafn
Sat, Apr 4, 1998 (15:05)
#84
Laura: that's it I can't take the emotional rollercoaster. I feel like he is cheating on ME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I say kill the commie B*****D!!! I hope HF sees this!!!!
They open-neck white shirt tells it all. So out of character for him.
I can't stand it!!! How can we survive another week!!
~KarenR
Sat, Apr 4, 1998 (17:03)
#85
AAARRRRRRGGGGGHHHHHH!!!!! I hate this story.
(Kate) But this is basically about human relationships
Shall we add *assholes* to your list of human foibles??
Laura re: rollercoasters
Remember the lust that was in his eyes when he saw Rebecca in that high-cut bathing suit. Sometimes they just can't get beyond those urges. Smartness has nothing to do with it--most of the time--and that goes both ways.
Evelyn
Why can't this be a daily column! This waiting until Saturday is killing me.
I'm soooo trying to be rationale here, but I tooo can't stand it. Where is the "and they all lived happily ever after"!! :-(
~LauraMM
Sat, Apr 4, 1998 (19:42)
#86
If it was Happily ever after, then it would be Ozzie and Harriet, your words Karen;)
I, too, am trying to be rational, am introducing my Irish friend, Helen to BJ and she will soon enough become quite addicted because i will make her!!! Helen P. my friend says hello!!!!!!
Sorry, drinking wine due to totally depression for Bridget!!!! am abouyt to leave to go to liquor store for more!!! Karen call me tomorrow!!! we must talk!!!! this is ridiculous!!!!
~lizbeth
Sat, Apr 4, 1998 (21:38)
#87
Voice of reason here! Remember there are two sequels to the book and Mark and Bridget have broken up before. The relationship is rekindled when he asks her to join him in Paris for the weekend (and she accidently sets fire to the flat!). And premature happy endings could mean that we would lose interest in HF's column!
BUT.....what a downer. I much prefer it when he's buying her tight red nighties and calling her "darling" and being sweet. Maybe he's got a good excuse...a business meeting with Rebecca? Or maybe Rebecca is comforting him and he really wants to have Bridget back. Why the open necked shirt though? Wait until next week!!
~KarenR
Sat, Apr 4, 1998 (22:19)
#88
I knew you would come through, Bethan--or should we call you Miss Optimism!!
Why the open necked shirt though?
The "white, undone shirt" likely resulted from Rebecca attacking him in the back seat of the cab. But will we *really* ever know???
Re: the two sequals
Any news on when at least one of them will be published? You know we want to know why they broke up the first time and how Bridge and Thelma and Louise got along.
Would be terrible if Mark brought Rebecca to any neighborhood family Easter egg hunt or some such thing!! Ultra tacky.
~nan
Sun, Apr 5, 1998 (03:11)
#89
(Karen) What!! No one has anything to say about last Saturday's installment?? Incredible! After the dismal feeling I had when that jellyfisher sicced her brother after Bridget the week before, I thought things were looking up. I mean who wouldn't with Mark strutting around the bedroom in barrister mode clad only in a towel!! ;-) Oooowwweeee!!
Oh dear! I haven�t been keeping up with the diary lately...obviously I�m missing some seriously juicy stuff. Gotta get there...
~LauraMM
Sun, Apr 5, 1998 (16:05)
#90
(Bethan) Voice of reason here! Remember there are two sequels to the book and
Mark and Bridget have broken up before. The relationship is rekindled
when he asks her to join him in Paris for the weekend (and she
accidently sets fire to the flat!). And premature happy endings could
mean that we would lose interest in HF's column!
Voice of Reason, Puhleeze!!!!! WHY OH WHY IS HE WITH HER!!!!!
Okay to get back to some semblance of sanity here, granted they have broken up before, but we do not know the reason why??? and Why would he be so distraught last week and with the jellyfisher this week???? It just doesn't make any sense.
Now, my question is: Does Bridget just let it happen??? or does she go all Fatal Attraction and hop out of the car and confront them??? I can tell you that Rebecca would have no more long legs after I got through with her!!!! hee hee;)
~KarenR
Mon, Apr 6, 1998 (22:27)
#91
(Nan)Oh dear! I haven�t been keeping up with the diary lately...obviously I�m missing some seriously juicy stuff. Gotta get there...
Where you been?? Yes, you are missing some great stuff!! Mark has done some ooo-soo-meltingly stuff lately and seems to be in heat quite often!! Indicated by lots of "mmmmmmms" interspersed.
(Laura) or does she go all Fatal Attraction and hop out of the car and confront them???
Interesting choice of movie analogies...Like a bunny rabbit? a boiled bunny rabbit? Or perhaps like an attendee at a Tarts and Vicar party who has a bunny tail pinned on her arse? ;-)
Definitely time to get Tom, the fag hag involved. Bridget needs serious direction now. A dumb Bridget would show up drunk on his doorstep, no wait, I did that many years ago. Forget I typed that!!
~mrobens
Tue, Apr 7, 1998 (00:42)
#92
Nan will back. She is fighting with her suicidal computer.
~LauraMM
Tue, Apr 7, 1998 (14:54)
#93
Well Myretta nothing like bringing us back to real life;) I forget that Bridget is NOT a real character. But, like her, this has happened to me. I was in a restaurant and my boyfriend told me he had to go to graduation party. I saw him with another girl. I was soooo devastated;( hell, I was only 19! but boy did I confront him!!! hee hee:)
~lafn
Wed, Apr 8, 1998 (01:31)
#94
Point of information, Please.
In last week's installment:
What is; Jaffa Cake, who is Jarvis Cocker, and are 1471 calls like caller ID.
But it doesn't make sense with "1471 - calls: 12 (better)"
Will some friend across the Pond pl. explain .
Thank you.
~AllisonM
Wed, Apr 8, 1998 (07:18)
#95
What is; Jaffa Cake
Revolting sweet thing, a cross between a cake and a biscuit(cookie). Chocolate covered. Translating cooking terms into American is difficult but in English english, I would describe it as made of sponge, filled with jam and topped with chocolate!
who is Jarvis Cocker
Pop singer. Skinny, bespectacled.
But it doesn't make sense with "1471 - calls: 12 (better)
She calls 1471 which tells her the number of the last caller. I presume she keeps dialling every time she thinks she has been out of earshot of the 'phone just in case??
Hope that helps.
~AllisonM
Wed, Apr 8, 1998 (07:19)
#96
BTW jam = jelly!
~Kate
Wed, Apr 8, 1998 (13:26)
#97
and the jam is orange flavoured, yes? hence the jaffa....
~LauraMM
Wed, Apr 8, 1998 (13:33)
#98
I had a jaffa cake and it is sickly sweet. sorta like our twinkies only covered in chocolate with jam instead of cream. But when depressed, it is the most wonderful thing to eat!!! And poor Bridget is very, very depressed:(
I think Mark needs to get off his high horse and run back to her and explain everything!!! And Bridget needs to become the ice woman once again and make him beg to come back!!!!
~LauraMM
Wed, Apr 8, 1998 (13:33)
#99
ooh i meant to say in ireland when in ireland! i had jaffa cake but it was called something else!!!!
~Kate
Wed, Apr 8, 1998 (16:16)
#100
Is it just me, or have all the other boards gone dead? When are we moving to spring.net, or have we already done it and all the conversation is going on somewhere else??
~LauraMM
Wed, Apr 8, 1998 (17:04)
#101
kate, i've been using the spring.net since late last week! but my browser seems to be a little screwy lately. very bizarre.
~KarenR
Wed, Apr 8, 1998 (19:05)
#102
Thanks for the cake details. I just figured it was a basic orange cake from the Jaffa designation as that is a distinct type of orange propagated in Jaffa, Israel.
Sorry, Laura, dear, but with all that cream and filling...yuck!! If I'm depressed, just give me chocolate in any semisolid form...ice cream to semisweet morsels to heavenly Nutella!!
Evelyn, I believe there is a whole big discussion about the 1471 feature of their telephone system in the book. Not quite Caller ID. Can't give you page and verse as have just lent my book to my local librarian!!
Re: Dead Boards
And where have you been, Kate? And where are the pictures that you took of your tea party? Haven't seen them posted at Meetings!! Did Nan escape your camera's lens as well? ;-)
~terry
Wed, Apr 8, 1998 (22:59)
#103
What's so screwy Laura?
~Kate
Thu, Apr 9, 1998 (01:14)
#104
And where have you been, Kate? And where are the pictures that you took of your tea party? Haven't seen them posted at Meetings!!
Did Nan escape your camera's lens as well? ;-)
I've been right here. And yes, Nan is not in any photograph. Although mine are still in my camera.
So does that mean that nothing has been happening on the Firth boards for the last couple of days???
~LauraMM
Thu, Apr 9, 1998 (13:06)
#105
Ah, Terry:) well sometimes, not all the time, when I log in everything blurs together! I reload and it is fine until I try to drag the mouse to move down the page and it blurs again. very annoying! it also happens on the ramble page at Pemberley. I think its just my browser, but if you could check into it. Would be very very helpful!
~KarenR
Thu, Apr 9, 1998 (18:54)
#106
Well, *some* of the lack of activity could be Nan's absence as well but you'll have to e-mail me for other possibilities.
~KarenR
Thu, Apr 9, 1998 (20:56)
#107
I'm sure Laura would be too modest to say anything but she's been writing a modern-day Darcy and Elizabeth story at Pemberley and within the last few chapters, she's included references to the Bridget Jones story. Apparently, Caroline and Bridget are friends, so she has just heard about Bridge and Mark breaking up. Caroline of course knows the jellyfisher, but the best is in today's posting (Chapter 10) where we get a certain person parading around in a towel!! Do check it out.
~KarenR
Thu, Apr 9, 1998 (20:57)
#108
I forgot to mention its title, "Second Chances."
~LauraMM
Thu, Apr 9, 1998 (21:05)
#109
*blush*
~LauraMM
Sat, Apr 11, 1998 (15:09)
#110
Okay, the deal is Bridget has to dump her friends!!!!! I've only glossed over while trying to use up my whole hour on the computer!
Bridget, darling, we thirtysomethings must stick together!! Hee hee I'm finally 30!!! dump the fuckwittage friends and I'll steer you in the right direction!!!!
~KarenR
Sat, Apr 11, 1998 (15:09)
#111
Oh yeah, and what advice would you have given her after that pathetic phone message he left for her??? Miss *now-that-she's-30-she-thinks-she-knows- everything*???
But I am dying to hear his explanation!!
~lizbeth
Sat, Apr 11, 1998 (15:09)
#112
Ah, I told you that he'd have an "explanation"! But I think Bridget should ignore Shaz and Jude's advice, for a day or so, anyway. I mean, he did ring TWICE and he was sounding "anguished". (I'm a sucker for "anguished!).BTW shades of Mr Darcy in "all right, you've said enough", although not as cutting as "you have said quite enough, madam"! :-)
~AllisonM
Sat, Apr 11, 1998 (15:09)
#113
I think BJ is pathetic. She is, after all over 30 years old and should have enough sense to make up her own mind. I think Mark Darcy could do MUCH better. He must surely see what an airhead she is now. BTW I rather hope Helen Fielding treads carefully. I would hate her to spoil the story before the film, particularly if CF is playing MD.
~lafn
Sat, Apr 11, 1998 (15:09)
#114
Listen to your heart, Bridget, not your friends.
Everyone has a different agenda.
Think long term.
A classic case of Men are from Mars...Women are from Venus.
~AllisonM
Sat, Apr 11, 1998 (15:09)
#115
Bridget Jones is from .......... PLUTO
~lafn
Sat, Apr 11, 1998 (15:09)
#116
Poor Bridget, she's honest...artless. Hasn't learned how to be devious and calculating. Part of her charm.
Sadly, she'll grow-up.
~KarenR
Sun, Apr 12, 1998 (02:46)
#117
I see the dates have gone nuts again here at Drool. Ah to be the same age in 2036!!
Well, after my quickie read this a.m., I reread and now am dying to find out what on earth could Mark have as an explanation. Like Bethan, those "miserables" and "anguished" descriptions now have me thinking along some new lines. But what! I won't buy that he was sooooo hurt by the Sinjun thing. That was laughable. It couldn't possibly have reminded him of the first wife incident.
My advice: Slip into bedroom to call Mark without loyal, witty, caring girlfriends around. Say you want to talk and that he should come over. If he agrees, throw Jude and Sharon out and make lots of strong coffee.
But then again, what do I know?????
~LauraMM
Mon, Apr 13, 1998 (12:48)
#118
WHAT DID HE DO????? Now, talking to Karen I think that when he says we have lost touch. I think it means communication wise, obviously. But then again, I don't think Mark treats Bridget all that well to begin with. He laughs at her. He doesn't think she says anything brilliant. He uses her like the dumb blonde to his gorgeous person. I think he needs to treat her better. Personally.
~TrinaH
Mon, Apr 13, 1998 (16:37)
#119
I think Helen Fielding has tapped into something really important with BJ's character. If you think about it, most of her problems stem from her very
low self-image. She's been told by popular culture (i.e., Cosmo and Vogue)
that she's not worth anything because she's not super skinny with big boobs
and long legs. A lot of her problems with men (especially Mark) stem from the fact that she doesn't think she's worthy of him, so she always thinks the worse. If she had more confidence in herself, she wouldn't let her friends push her around and she'd give Mark a chance to explain himself. If you remember in
the book, he says a few things that show that he really likes Bridget, but
she just doesn't see it.
Sorry to get on my soap box, but I think a lot of Western women (especially American women) are devastated by hatred of their bodies and their looks, and
it really wreaks havoc on their relationships with men.
~KarenR
Mon, Apr 13, 1998 (18:48)
#120
Yes, Trina, that is a major problem with Bridget. She has a very poor self image and doesn't believe that anyone could love her for herself. I suspect from a physical standpoint there is absolutely nothing deficient about Bridget. She may not be as tall as Rebecca and therefore her legs may not be as long, but I'm sure she is just fine. In the book, when she lost 7 pounds, everyone said she looked terrible.
Even though Mark is "amused" by her, he does love her. She is not like the other women who throw themselves at him (shades of Fitzwilliam Darcy), Bridget is not from a long line of Caroline Bingleys. Is he "slumming" it by going out with her, no I don't think so. He really enjoys her unique outlook on things.
But onto what should she do. Another assignment for Tom. Obviously, Mark's message was written in some secret code that only men can understand. Since Tom is a man who has really gotten in touch with his feminine side, he will be the only one who can translate the message for Bridget!!
~LauraMM
Mon, Apr 13, 1998 (19:32)
#121
but to be just amused by someone. I think bridget is probably the most realistic looking person. Rebecca is a fantasy nobody has legs that long and is that gorgeous naturally. plastic surgery helps:) he does belittle her observations as not realistic and maybe they're not, but at least she is trying to partake of whatever conversation is being had. Rebecca just flaunts her good looks and people automatically thinks she is witty.
~LauraMM
Thu, Apr 16, 1998 (14:54)
#122
okay question for all you across the pond or those over the pond here who can answer this question:
Who is Delia Smith and is he like Jenny Craig????
~Arami
Thu, Apr 16, 1998 (23:58)
#123
Delia Smith is a popular cookery writer and presenter of cookery shows.
She's not a he.
Who's Jenny Craig????
~LauraMM
Fri, Apr 17, 1998 (13:05)
#124
i meant she thank you arami. Jenny Craig is a dietician sort of on the Weight Watchers or Overeaters Anonymous schpiel. Jenny Craig has her own line of diet meals that you pay an arm and a leg for and while doing her dieting you can ONLY eat her food.
~Arami
Sat, Apr 18, 1998 (00:21)
#125
Oh, no, Delia is not like that at all. Healthy and nutritious, but I don't think she's heavily into dieting.
~LauraMM
Sat, Apr 18, 1998 (17:35)
#126
Okay I just clicked into Electronic Telegraph and it said Page no longer there or something like that!! what happened????? NO BRIDGET!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
~Kate
Sat, Apr 18, 1998 (19:27)
#127
I CAN'T FIND BRIDGET! and for some reason, I haven't been getting this page for the last few days. The electronic gods are against me.
~KarenR
Sat, Apr 18, 1998 (21:29)
#128
There's another way, ladies. From the etcetera index page, pick the story just before Bridget, then scroll down to the end and the link to "next story" will get you to Bridget. You've just got to be creative!!
Kate, when you get there (to this week's installment), do the previous week thing to get last week's *killer* episode.
This week's no biggie (i.e., Mark Darcy's not in it); just some vague references to more English baked goods!! ;-)
If you are still having problems with these instructions, let me know. On Monday, I do a cut & paste for someone who can't get into the Telegraph site. I'd be more than happy to e-mail it.
~Kate
Sat, Apr 18, 1998 (22:18)
#129
Thanks Karen. I had even sent a desperate message to ET....
And not being able to get this page referred to THIS page, the BJ page of drool... it doesn't show up on my new list.
There has obviously been some big feature on Diana-grief being fake, and how we all need to be more self-disciplined....
~LauraMM
Sun, Apr 19, 1998 (02:27)
#130
yah, kate i did too:-) pathetic isn't it. Karen, as always the lifesaver;)
~KarenR
Mon, Apr 20, 1998 (19:44)
#131
Aw shucks, just a little septic tank ingenuity!
~lizbeth
Mon, Apr 20, 1998 (20:35)
#132
I'm happy to hear that you can still access the Diary. Very ingenious! But this week was all social commentary (some professor has published an article criticising Diana). My mother,a regular Daily Telegraph reader, has quite independently (without any prompting from me!) become addicted to BJ's Diary. She said the latest episode was "very boring...it's not the same without Mark Darcy". I agree!!
~KarenR
Mon, Apr 20, 1998 (20:54)
#133
(Bethan) it's not the same without Mark Darcy". I agree!!
No quibbling here either!! I've decided that Helen Fielding has painted herself into a corner. She cannot come up with a plausible excuse (i.e., one that we would buy) for Mark's having broken up with Bridget. Nothing makes any sense. What kind of second thoughts could be possibly be having...Bridget is getting too serious...what????
BTW, I had lent my book to the branch librarian and she returned it this weekend. When I told her the story was continuing online, the first thing she asked me was what was going on with Mark Darcy. Yes, he is an addicting character!!
~LauraMM
Mon, Apr 20, 1998 (21:47)
#134
i thought this installment was quite funny, actually!
~Kate
Mon, Apr 20, 1998 (23:06)
#135
Aw shucks, just a little septic tank ingenuity!
Every board needs its seppoes.
I actually got an email back from the ET.
Dear Kathryn,
Please accept our deepest apologies for the trauma you and thousands of
others have suffered - this was due to a faulty link on our side.
However, we have corrected this problem and Bridget is now waiting for you
on the Etcetera home page.
Happy reading. . .
Yours,
etcetera
I thought that was very thoughtful of them, particularly as there were obviously quite a few emails to respond to!
~lizbeth
Tue, Apr 21, 1998 (12:21)
#136
Kate, I'm impressed! Full marks to the ET for good customer relations. There must be a lot of BJ addicts out there!
~LauraMM
Tue, Apr 21, 1998 (13:47)
#137
Especially in the States!!! I emailed them and got nothing in return:( Oh, well, Kate did you threaten them with legal action;)
~Kate
Tue, Apr 21, 1998 (23:41)
#138
Maybe it was because I sounded so desperate!
~Kate
Sat, Apr 25, 1998 (04:43)
#139
omigodomigodomigod it's a super installment...
sisterhood is powerful - not only do they kidnap Rebecca, but they give BJ a superb ego boost as well
and the CHEST.....and the gentle hand on back of neck... while he escapes to Bhutan (typical man!)
~LauraMM
Sat, Apr 25, 1998 (16:14)
#140
But why Bhutan???? And I ADORE that he left Rebecca there to "deal" with the problem. hee hee!!! But he does still have some 'splaining to do!!
~Kate
Sat, Apr 25, 1998 (18:21)
#141
Why Bhutan???
Because I suppose it's the most remote and inaccessible place he can think of!
~lizbeth
Sat, Apr 25, 1998 (20:32)
#142
Good one! Back on course again!! But why is he still hanging round with Rebecca?
Bhutan - highly remote, rugged and detached from the world.
~KarenR
Sat, Apr 25, 1998 (21:14)
#143
Shazzer jumped to her feet...grabbing Rebecca by the ear...twisting Rebecca's arms behind her back now...jerking on the armlock like something out of LA Confidential
Now, who was advocating dumping the true and loyal friend depicted here? I couldn't have put it better than Jude though: Rebecca is a "rubbish girlfriend." hee hee
There are moments in life...when women are best left to sort things out between themselves...and a man's place is somewhere remote in the Bhutanese highlands
Sorry, Markee, that won't cut it!! Is he playing Mr. Innocent here? Men belong in the Bhutanese highlands when women are fighting over a 75% markdown on a Prada bag!
Why does he *think* that R&B need to sort things out?? She's rubbish; chuck her out!! Now, Mark and Bridget are the ones who need to sort things out.
He hasn't convinced me that he doesn't deserve that f***wittage speech...yet!!
Next I felt him touch me on the back of my neck
Ooooooohhhhhhh, can't you just feel the electricity! Helen must have just seen ATA and was inspired. ;-)
~lizbeth
Sun, Apr 26, 1998 (14:52)
#144
Sorry, Markee, that won't cut it!! Is he playing Mr. Innocent here?
Or Mr Rather Enjoying the Situation! Two women fighting over him, and all he does is smile sweetly, say "talk to you soon" (when is "soon"? )and swan off. And did Rebecca see him touch Bridget on the back of the neck? Talk about fanning the flames....!!!
~LauraMM
Mon, Apr 27, 1998 (12:43)
#145
Now, who was advocating dumping the true and loyal friend depicted here? I couldn't have put it better than Jude though: Rebecca is a "rubbish girlfriend." hee hee
It wasn't planned and the advice they normally give, I wouldn't give a dog! Yeah, they came thru in the end. But with girlfriends like that who needs enemies;)
Sorry, Markee, that won't cut it!! Is he playing Mr. Innocent here? Men belong in the Bhutanese highlands when women are fighting over a 75% markdown on a Prada bag!
HEE HEE!!! But I don't see Prada EVER marking down 75%;p
~KarenR
Tue, Apr 28, 1998 (19:45)
#146
Question:
Thought I'd just throw this one out and see what everyone had to say. Well, did Rebecca shag Mark (as true and loyal friends wanted to know)? Please remember that Mark doesn't seem to have a great deal of self-control in this area. I've seen lots of "mmmmmms" throughout and Mark and Bridget did on their first date in the book, when he whisks her off on Christmas Day.
~LauraMM
Tue, Apr 28, 1998 (19:58)
#147
As Karen knows my answer, here it is for the rest of you. I say no. Because, the way Rebecca says quoting from memory here, "We have a peculiar relationship." Meaning, I'm trying, haven't quite succeeded yet.
I think Mark is totally nuts about Bridget, but hell, she can be trying at times. This time away from each other is a good thing. Although, its driving us nuts!!!
He doesn't save Rebecca from the *women*, and he is enjoying this little scene. What guy wouldn't actually? He does tell Bridget he'll talk to her soon. How soon. who knows, but he's mad about her. He figured out Rebecca and realised that was NOT what he wants. Sorry for ranting;p
~lizbeth54
Thu, Apr 30, 1998 (10:57)
#148
Well, did Rebecca shag Mark (as true and loyal friends wanted to know)?
Well, they have been swimming together, and he was looking at her lustfully, and why was his shirt undone in the taxi? And his taste in women (pre-Bridget) has been rather suspect.....a wife who slept with someone else two weeks after the wedding, and the terribly elegant but not-so-nice Natasha!! Doesn't look good! BUT, BUT, BUT, I think he's remaining true to BJ, although perhaps tempted to do otherwise! :-)
~KarenR
Thu, Apr 30, 1998 (19:38)
#149
(Bethan) why was his shirt undone in the taxi?
We better find out what was going on in this scene!!!
BTW, I do tend to agree with you that nothing has happened between Mark and Rebecca, even though she is giving it ALL she's got!! I was just interested in others' opinions.
~KarenR
Sat, May 2, 1998 (21:10)
#150
"Garrrrr! You black-livered devils from hell, I'm gonna eat yer kidneys."
I've had it with that woman (i.e., Helen Fielding). This roller-coaster ride is driving me nuts!
Has everyone seen the May Vogue (U.S.) with the Bridget excerpt? Only a couple of paragraphs introing the BJ phenomenon. I did a quick scan of the article and as had been pointed out to me, the only changes were from stones to lbs. and the use of lottery tickets for 'instants.' Like, duh, we couldn't figure that one out, although multiplying by 14 is rather a pencil-and-paper-type thing!! ;-)
Now, I think I've figured out this week's installment. Helen has been v. sly here. Using the name Rebecca must have some significance. First thought was Ken Follet's Key to Rebecca. Ah-ha!!! The columns have been written in code!! So I've consulted the original and (much better) Du Mauier Rebecca and have come to the conclusion that Mark=Maxim and Rebecca=you know.... So Mark/Maxim is taking Rebecca up to Scotland, where there are lots of lochs and he will put her in a boat, drive lots of holes thr
ugh the planking and sink the Jellyfish!!
Well...at least it stopped me from ranting about what a f***wit Mark still is!!
~LauraMM
Mon, May 4, 1998 (13:44)
#151
Hee Hee, Karen, very funny indeed!!! Now, why didn't I think of that!!!
But you are right, HF and MD are playing head games here. And it's getting old AND to true to life!!!! Gaaaaaahhhh!!!
Bridget needs to find NEW BULL and throw away OLD BULL. Maybe, and this would be wonderful, albeit, childish, "I'll get you back, you sod!" Bridget it's time to call Daniel and show up in Scotland looking all luvvy, duvvy. And totally pissing MD off!!!! Bridget has to stop feeling sorry for herself and DO something. Like dump him!!! He's not worth it, actually. He's got too many problems.
~KarenR
Mon, May 4, 1998 (16:11)
#152
...but I like OLD BULL...lots! Major melting factors at work here. ;-)
~LauraMM
Mon, May 4, 1998 (17:21)
#153
...but I like OLD BULL...lots! Major melting factors at work here. ;-)
OLD BULL has way too many problems and is not healthy to OLD COW and NEW COW is a jellyfisher!!! hee hee. Karen nobody has any clue what we are talking about!! hee hee.
~KarenR
Wed, May 6, 1998 (00:58)
#154
From the Desk of Dr. Marie Goodall
Cofounder and Director of the Institute for the Study of Pathological Narcissism
Subject M is a physically superior male of the species, dominant in class structure and much sought after by highly overbred females. Tested monogamous relationship with female member of cruel species that did not last since such permanent-type pair bonding only successful in 3% of animal kingdom. Current relationship cycle falls into parameters for annual monogamy, in which a pair stays together for only one breeding season and then finds new partners.
Additional Study Needed:
1. Is Subject M ddriven by insecurity and low self-esteem and acting out of the fog of his own confusion? (Myth of Male Shyness) Initial meetings between Old Cow and Subject Bull may support; empirical evidence that Subject admitted his insecurity and was convinced that Old Current (was then potential New Cow) was not interested in him. Would indicate latent narcissism, fear of rejection compelling him to seek attention from New Cow ad mauseum et infinitum.
2. Does Subject M's behavior show evidence of the Coolidge Effect? "A male, after engaging in a romantic and sexual relationship with a female for a period of time...grows increasingly bored with his previously New Cow...usually referred to as the 'itch'....At present writing there is no cure...."
3. Is Subject M's Current Cow relationship a manifestation of gynogenetic reproduction, wherein a male services females of another species in order to become more attractive to females of own species?
Initial Conclusions:
Subject M exhibiting classic signs of nonempathetic sociopathic behavior
Prognosis: Ass-holicism
Next stage: Imminent appearance of Old Cow bovine-icide.
Moo
~LauraMM
Wed, May 6, 1998 (12:46)
#155
Nah, subject M is just an arsehole! hee hee.
~KarenR
Wed, May 6, 1998 (14:57)
#156
Could anyone explain or describe what is meant by "terraced" houses. To me, a terrace is a balcony, but I know this is not how it is being used. Is it just a multilevel house?
In case anyone is wondering what Laura and I are talking about, it comes from the book Animal Husbandry by Laura Zigman. It came out at the beginning of the year and is really funny and a natural for all of us Bridget fans. What you have in this book, is a young woman who gets taken in by this guy at work, he abruptly dumps her, she loses her apt in NYC because she had agreed to live with the guy in a new apt, and moves in with another guy from work who is a well-known womanizer. She begins to n
tice certain behaviors and starts doing research into psychology, zoology, you name it to better understand the male animal. She comes up with the Old Cow-New Cow theory. She starts documenting the various phases in relationships and cites analogous behaviors from the animal world, eventually becoming in her own words a "crazy monkey scientist."
Highly recommended reading. Should only take a couple of days.
BTW, no other insights on Bridget? or Mark? Or is everyone just toooooo disgusted for words?
~KarenR
Wed, May 6, 1998 (15:55)
#157
~AllisonM
Wed, May 6, 1998 (16:21)
#158
(Karen)Could anyone explain or describe what is meant by "terraced" houses.
A terrace of houses is a row of houses, each joined to the next. In a very densely populated country like England, it is a very common form of housing. London is full of terraced houses built in the last century. Bridget assumes that Mark Darcy will live in a terraced house in Holland Park (a v expensive area of London). That would still be a very desirable home but in fact he lives in the Boltons or somewhere, a small area of Holland Park where the houses are HUGE and magnificent and cost lots and l
ts of millions of pounds (even more dollars)!
I hope that was the reference to terraced houses that was worrying you.
~LauraMM
Wed, May 6, 1998 (16:23)
#159
And he has a detached house to boot!! Karen, similar to row houses here!!
~KarenR
Wed, May 6, 1998 (17:14)
#160
Thanks, Allison, I can understand row houses. We have them here too, but why they are called terraced houses shall remain a mystery. ;-)
~KarenR
Sat, May 9, 1998 (21:16)
#161
Initial Reaction: Can anyone be THAT stupid? Does Helen Fielding really expect us to believe that Mark Darcy is as insecure as Bridget? He has asked her if she *cared* for him before (remember his job offer in Japan). As far as I can see, nothing occurred before the country home weekend that would lead him to believe Bridget didn't *care* for him.
Which leaves us with the Weekend from Hell. What really set him off on this path of self/Bridget doubt? It can't be Sinjun--that would be an insult to our collective intelligence. What was it? Perhaps, that Bridget just left him in Rebecca's clutches. Maybe he thought that a sign of caring should be to be more possessive of him in the face of the enemy. He expected a woman in love to claw the eyes out of another female who tried to encroach on her territory. That might explain why he felt his place
was in the Bhutanese Highlands--although from there, he would not have a good ringside seat at his desired catfight. Hmmmm, was Mark Darcy forcefed a diet of Dynasty in his childhood. Does he picture himself as Blake Carrington, with Bridget as the wonderful C(K)rystal and Rebecca as Alexis? Is there a swimming pool or a fountain nearby?
But, this afternoon, whilst cleaning tree debris off my *rooftop terrace,* the thoughts of Daniel Cleaver kept haunting me. Yes, Mark Darcy is as insecure as Bridget but he has a polished facade--necessary for his profession--that rarely gives him away. He was incredibly hurt by what happened with his marriage and like good old Fitzwilliam William there will always be the nagging question of whether a woman loves him or his wealth/social position. He needs that constant reinforcement because he was hum
liated and cuckholded just after the wedding. How would that affect you. Then he goes out with a stream of women who are as real as a three dollar bill and have the emotional depth of a kiddie wading pool. He's insecure and he's been insecure since the first time we've laid eyes on him. He admitted it in the book to Bridget. He didn't think she liked him because he looked dorky at the Turkey Curry Buffet at the beginning.
Now, Laura keeps berating me, calling me a Darcy Apologist. Now who needs to apologize for someone who's *perfect.* It's the Lizzy character who's a huge dummy IMO.
Kate: I've got a question for you. Mark is a human rights barrister. What would that be equivalent to in the U.S. Is he a defense attorney? Civil or criminal? Is it more in the vein of a Constitutional Lawyer who concentrates on Bill of Rights matters?
~Kate
Sun, May 10, 1998 (05:03)
#162
Kate: I've got a question for you. Mark is a human rights barrister. What would that be equivalent to in the U.S. Is he a defense
attorney? Civil or criminal? Is it more in the vein of a Constitutional Lawyer who concentrates on Bill of Rights matters?
Yes, well, I don't know that Helen Fielding really understands the English legal profession, but anyway.
In England (among other places) the legal profession is divided into solicitors and barristers. Barristers basically do work in court - they are the ones who wear wigs and gowns and stand up questioning witnesses in episodes of Rumpole...They also do court-related paperwork.
Solicitors do everything else - write wills, draft contracts, draft pleadings in cases, etc etc.
Barristers are not able to deal directly with clients. If you have to go to court in england, you consult a solicitor, who then retains a barrister on your behalf. Solicitors work in partnerships - often very large, whereas barristers work solo - they share chambers, but their practices are quite separate, and they are entirely dependent on their own skills.
Barristers tend to develop specialist skills, so they might specialise in criminal defence, or patent work, or negligence or whatever. But, strictly speaking, they are obliged to take whatever case is offered to them, providing they have time. This is called the "cab rank" principle, and it is meant to ensure that everyone, however unsavoury, gets legal representation (assuming he or she can pay!)
So, what's a human rights barrister? Well, given that England doesn't have a bill of rights, this is a fairly rare breed. The example whom I think MD is modelled on is Geoffrey Robertson, who is a barrister who often takes on cases involving human rights issues. "Human Rights" is what you in the US would understand to be first amendment issues (freedom of expression, freedom of religion, association), as well as fourteenth amendment issues (equality, privacy). In some cases it would involve criminal l
w issues, but mostly to do with punishment (eg anti death penalty - although there is no death penalty in the UK, the Privy Council, which is a British court, hears death penalty cases from Jamaica, and Geoffrey Robertson and others have been involved in these) and the treatment of prisoners.
It might also involve wider human rights issues such as access to education and health, the protection of children, the disabled, homeless rights etc.
So the rough US equivalent would be an attorney who does mostly court based work in Bill of Rights matters, but other human rights issues too.
What I don't understand is when Helen Fielding spoke of MD being offered a job in Japan. First of all, it's virtually impossible for foreign lawyers to practice law in Japan - apart from the language issues, they are very resistant to giving foreigners licences to practice. And secondly, barristers don't really have "a job" - they work for themselves. As such, they are very dependent on maintaining good and continuous relationships with solicitors - and heading off overseas for long periods would not b
a good way of doing this, unless one had a very well established reputation, which I think MD is a bit young to have established.
~lizbeth54
Sun, May 10, 1998 (13:01)
#163
Karen, just a hurried posting to say I agree with your "insecure MD" analysis. A bad marriage must have left him prone to self-doubtand with a need for reassurance. And in the book, doesn't Bridget's mum say that Mark works all the time and is very lonely (ie not a womaniser) But what exactly is he DOING with Rebecca? Holding hands, discussing whether Bridget loves him? Is he rather enjoying the situation, instead of resolving it?
BTW, what do you think HF will do with the screenplay for the movie? Do you suppose she will base it directly on the book, with the P&P parallels, or will she move the story-line forward into different territory? I would think they must be starting filming soon if it's to be this year. Most London based location movies have to be shot in the summer because of the climate and lighting. Unless you want grey days and pouring rain!
~Charlie1
Mon, May 11, 1998 (10:24)
#164
Hallooooooo!. Is this a girls only thang, or is there room for a blokey who's just got hooked on BJD? Ho hum, top notch book anyway - kept me up til 5am. Which paper is the diary printed in??
~Kate
Mon, May 11, 1998 (12:58)
#165
Charlie, you will find that much of our discussion relates to our mutual obsession with the OTHER Darcy, but feel free to join in.
Helen Fielding has a weekly BJ's Diary column in the Telegraph, in the etcetera page every Saturday. If you check their archives on the web, you can read previous weeks' installments too,
Here's the web address for etcetera
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/et?ac=000126890151976&rtmo=99999999&atmo=99999999&pg=/etc/etchome.html
Scroll to the end, and you find a link to BJ
~LauraMM
Mon, May 11, 1998 (13:44)
#166
(Karen)Now, Laura keeps berating me, calling me a Darcy Apologist. Now who needs to apologize for someone who's *perfect.* It's the Lizzy character who's a huge dummy IMO.
I'm sorry guys, but this man is an idiot!!! His line to Bridget is too ambiguous. What does he want her jumping up and down telling him she loves him? Okay, I will allow that she thinks things more than she actually comes out and says them. But, what I see here is a definite breakdown in communication. Had they just took the time to ask the relevant questions, this could have been avoided.
(Kate)So the rough US equivalent would be an attorney who does mostly court based work in Bill of Rights matters, but other human rights issues too.
This is something right up my alley. I studied Con Law when Pre-Law at Suffolk University which, btw, has a wonderful Law School. I remember watching a Dalziel and Pascoe show and one of the characters pleaded the 5th amendment,and I distincly remember yelling at my television that HE couldn't plea the 5th!
~nan
Mon, May 11, 1998 (15:19)
#167
(Charlie) Is this a girls only thang,
By no means, Charlie. Please do join in...and glad welcome :-)
I'm behind on my BJ reading...gotta check out etcetera. Get back to you later.
~KarenR
Mon, May 11, 1998 (16:58)
#168
Thanks Kate for the info. That Japan thing really threw me as well. What would he do in Japan...but then again he didn't get real specific...maybe he would be doing what you're doing!! ;-)
Nan, get cracking!!
~LauraMM
Mon, May 11, 1998 (17:07)
#169
Who else thinks this Gary person is just the person to help Bridget overcome Mark? Well, maybe not overcome him, but shake Mark up a bit. I've been telling Karen that this Gary person has come around for a reason and why else would he show up unexpectantly? I think he likes Bridget.
~KarenR
Mon, May 11, 1998 (19:45)
#170
Re This Supposed Ambiguity
I really didn't think any other than Mark meant that he didn't know whether Bridget cared for him NOT that he didn't know whether Bridget cared whether he messed around with Rebecca.
But shouldn't he have known after the restaurant incident and WHY didn't he call her as he said. Of course, Bridget should not have waited a week to finally call him. She could have nipped Scotland in the bud.
Gary
Helen is going to have to give a description of him because the picture I have in my mind is not conducive to being a *love* interest or *jealousy* interest!
~LauraMM
Mon, May 11, 1998 (19:54)
#171
But shouldn't he have known after the restaurant incident and WHY didn't he call her as he said. Of course, Bridget should not have waited a week to finally call him. She could have nipped Scotland in the bud.
And that be where the trouble lies. She isn't overtly saying to him that she wants him. So he feels it may be better to be with someone who at least tells him what he wants to hear. Bridget internalises everything. She needs to open up more. I am over analysing this to death!!!! UGH!!! Get thee(me) a life!!!!
I imagine Gary to be around mid-30. Short dark hair, tall about 6' body that looks like he goes to the gym everyday, but alas, the guy has no brains all brawn!
Well, a girl can drool can't she? hee hee
~Ann
Sat, May 16, 1998 (01:51)
#172
Laura-- I remember watching a Dalziel and Pascoe show and one of the characters pleaded the 5th amendment,and I distincly remember yelling at my television that HE couldn't plea the 5th!
}
I noticed the same thing!!
-----
Karen--Helen is going to have to give a description of him because the picture I have in my mind is not conducive to being a *love* interest or *jealousy* interest!
}
I'm seeing a refrigerator repair man with a butt-crack!
~Ann
Sat, May 16, 1998 (02:14)
#173
Toooooo painful!
MD needs a good pummeling after this latest stunt! Jerk!
(and Magda isn't far behind, b---h!)
~LauraMM
Sat, May 16, 1998 (15:52)
#174
I figured it out!!! Mark was a test subject for Viagara!!! And its finally catching up to him. Personally, I think these two people are sluts!!:) Sorry, Karen, I know you're a Darcy apologist, but this is completely out of hand!!!!
Bridget, dump the guy and find someone nice. That is my advice.
~KarenR
Sat, May 16, 1998 (16:49)
#175
(Ann) I'm seeing a refrigerator repair man with a butt-crack!
Same here. :-)
~lafn
Sun, May 17, 1998 (17:04)
#176
Re: Saturday's Installment:
This is a relationship??
The guy is looking for a cheap lay..fergawdsakes!!
Doesn't even have the decency to Buy her flowers...has to steal 'em en route.
Give that girl a "Rules" book.
~nan
Mon, May 18, 1998 (02:56)
#177
Okay, I'm all caught up with my reading. Of course, I would catch up at a time when it's particularly juicy. Next Saturday seems like eons away :-(
~Ann
Mon, May 18, 1998 (04:46)
#178
I just read it this week for the first time. It was so nice to be able to read 67 pages straight, without waiting for the next installment. The waiting is going to drive me nuts!
~KarenR
Wed, May 20, 1998 (19:37)
#179
This week's took me a little longer than most to figure out. OK, here goes...ARE YOU LISTENING, HELEN?
Mark did tell Rebecca that he's back with Bridget, but she got all teary and lied that she had already made plans to have a dinner party. Being the *sweetie* that he is, he agreed to play along and then she wouldn't have to call off the party and be humiliated in front of her friends.
BTW, the Washington Post article on Helen Fielding imminent arrival (officially) on our shores mentions that Kate Winslet is being considered to play Bridget, both having weight problems. Argh, but better than Gwennyth!!
~LauraMM
Wed, May 20, 1998 (20:50)
#180
I DO NOT THINK MARK AND BRIDGET ARE BACK TOGETHER!!!
He came (pun intended) for one thing and one thing only!!!
~Allison2
Wed, May 20, 1998 (20:57)
#181
Kate Winslet is being considered to play Bridget
What a cop out. Bridget is a thirtysomething, Kate Winslett is a hardly twentysomething. What would she know of rejection, heartache and parents desperate to marry her off.
~Ann
Wed, May 20, 1998 (21:09)
#182
I agree with you, Allison. Bridget is absolutely 30 something. That's half the point. To have an ingenue play the role would be silly. Bridget's clock is ticking, and she's been scarred by years of dating failures. Having a sweet young thing play her would be ludicrous!
Karen--Stop being a Darcy apologist!!!
~KarenR
Thu, May 21, 1998 (15:48)
#183
Darcy POV
I prefer to view it as *the other, more rational POV*!!! ;-) Are we supposed to really take Bridget's alcohol-pickled peabrain as capable of discerning anything. All we have to do is go back to the source. Elizabeth Bennet, a major peabrain. She didn't deserve Darcy. If she hadn't stumbled into him at Pemberley, she wouldn't have gotten together with him. On the other hand, he was perfect. She was just too proud (and stupid) to see it.
American Edition
I also noticed that the publishers have changed the use of her calling 1471 to voice mail.
Winslet
Agreed. No way.
~LauraMM
Thu, May 21, 1998 (15:56)
#184
I prefer to view it as *the other, more rational POV*!!! ;-) Are we supposed to really take Bridget's alcohol-pickled peabrain as
capable of discerning anything. All we have to do is go back to the source. Elizabeth Bennet, a major peabrain. She didn't deserve
Darcy. If she hadn't stumbled into him at Pemberley, she wouldn't have gotten together with him. On the other hand, he was
perfect. She was just too proud (and stupid) to see it.
I think Karen needs therapy to stop being a Darcy Apologist!!! hee hee. Karen, give it up. The guy is scum!!!! No lower than scum!!!
~lafn
Thu, May 21, 1998 (22:50)
#185
Karen:
Elizabeth Bennet, a major peabrain. She didn't deserve Darcy. If she hadn't stumbled into him at Pemberley, she wouldn't have gotten together with him. On the other hand, he was perfect. She was just too proud (and stupid) to see it
Hey , Karen...Marry a guy who doesn't respect your family (I didn't say like)
And doesn't respect you and you're in for it ...Big Time.
Lizzie put him in his place and he loved her more for it.
~Ann
Fri, May 22, 1998 (05:15)
#186
Nick Hornby, author of "Fever Pitch", was on line earlier today in the Barnes and Noble chat room. I asked him what British authors currently writing were worth the difficulty to procure from America. He only gave one title: "Bridget Jones' Diary". I had to laugh, because he named probably the only title that I was already familiar with.
~lizbeth54
Fri, May 22, 1998 (10:08)
#187
On Mark Darcy...I think he's great in the book, and in most of the weekly installments, but I'm not sure what HF is doing to him at the moment. His shirt is always open, and he runs to Bridget's flat, and picks flowers from the garden????!! What's happened to the seriously sexy, dark-suited, rich and successful barrister?
Kate Winslett...NO! NO! But, she's mega box office and that's what oftencounts in casting, even if the essence of the book is destroyed. I hope they do what HF wants and cast a relative unknown, who's right for the part, (and CF, of course!)
~KarenR
Fri, May 22, 1998 (15:11)
#188
I knew after I wrote the comment about Elizabeth Bennet that you (Evelyn) might take umbrage. Of course, I'm only referring to the fictional character and not the brilliantly talent actress who played her. ;-) But her family was the pits! Yes, he got put down a bit and corrected the *minor* flaw he had, but she made *major* errors in judgment. She should have listened to big sister who could really peg them.
I do have to agree with Bethan. HF's characterization of MD has thus far only been favorable. She has had him rush over on numerous occasions when he sensed Bridget was feeling badly, not only when he wanted a little roll in the hay. She adores him, just like she adores Darcy and Colin. The part that bugs me is that we don't hear what MD has had to say to Bridget. That mysterious explanation. What were those *moonie* things that were going on in their last phone call.
Remember, we are only seeing things through Bridget's eyes. I thought we needed another possible POV.
Casting Choices
I kind of like that Helen Baxendale (???) the only who is playing Cordelia Gray in the Mystery series, "An Unsuitable Job for a Woman" and is the woman that Ross is to marry in "Friends." She is very average looking, but has the potential to be pretty. Also, she is not anorexic. The only thing is I wonder how she would do playing a major ditz.
Saying that an "unknown" is being sought is often a ploy used to get major stars to take less $$$$$ for a part, BTW. Gwynneth Paltrow I think is suffering from the opposite of Colin. She is overexposed.
~lizbeth54
Fri, May 22, 1998 (21:51)
#189
I've often thought that Mr Darcy (P&P model) must have been absolutely besotted with Lizzie, to take on Wickham and Lydia as in-laws (feckless, always in need of financial support), two unmarried sisters-in-law (in need of doweries), a dreadful mother-in-law, and, if Mr Bennet died, a family without a home. Although I guess that Pemberley was large enough to accommodate Mrs B. And he already had Georgiana to provide for. and he'd parted with �10,000 to save Lydia's honour. He got Lizzie, but he's paying h
avily!
BTW, confirmation that BJ's Diary is shooting this summer...see my message on #59. No mention of casting as yet. How about Jennifer Ehle as BJ? She must be 28 or 29 by now, so an early thirties role would be OK for her. Better than Kate Winslett!
~lafn
Sat, May 23, 1998 (01:39)
#190
(Bethan)
I've often thought that Mr Darcy (P&P model) must have been absolutely besotted with Lizzie...... He got Lizzie, but he's paying heavily
He got his $$$worth....or I should say UKP!!!
(Karen)
but she made *major* errors in judgment. She should have listened to big sister who could really peg them.
True. Esp. on Wickam. .
~lafn
Sat, May 23, 1998 (01:46)
#191
(Bethan) How about Jennifer Ehle as BJ? She must be 28 or 29 by now, so an early thirties role would be OK
JE is 28; but she starts filming "Sunshine" with Ralph Fiennes and her mum on July 15th and the shoot goes through December "98!! (IMDb)
RF is a perfectionist!!! The woman must be worn-out...has shot two films this spring!!
~Kate
Sat, May 23, 1998 (02:56)
#192
Well, there you have it. No excuses for MD any more. He was cheating on Rebecca with Bridget, not the other way around, or so he would have her believe.
Can someone explain the Mary Bell reference?
~lizbeth54
Sat, May 23, 1998 (08:32)
#193
Disappointing, especially with the movie about to roll. Maybe MD isn't such a great part after all! Is HF killing off the goose that laid the golden egg?
~LauraMM
Sat, May 23, 1998 (15:53)
#194
Any reference HF makes she takes, I'm finding right out of the London Times newspaper. I believe Mary Bell was in Tuesday's paper.
I think that Mark Darcy is totally screwed up right now and he's taking Bridget and Rebecca with him. He wants his cake and eat it too. Men love the idea of two women wanting them, and it is feeding his ego. Which has now become the size of Ireland! Fuckwittage isn't his problem its who he wants that is his problem.
~LauraMM
Sat, May 23, 1998 (15:56)
#195
Mary Bell is a convicted child killer. she was 19 or 20 when she did it in 1978. she sold her story and a couple of weeks ago there was a big uproar that she was getting money for her crime. Mary Bell has 14 year old daughter who had no clue that she was a convicted killer and recently found out. It destroyed her.
~lafn
Sat, May 23, 1998 (19:50)
#196
(MD) "I'm involved in this mess with Rebecca. I can't make another mess so soon".
(Kate) He was cheating on Rebecca with Bridget, not the other way around, or so he would have her believe.
What a rat. He deceived ALL OF US!!
Am I glad he isn't on my list of Freebies!!
~KarenR
Sat, May 23, 1998 (20:20)
#197
I will need sometime before I can respond intelligently, rationally, etc. (hee hee). On the way home, I nearly took out about a dozen rollerbladers who began to look like Helen Fielding as I got closer and closer to them with my car....
But NOW, she's going to start making a plan? Is her mouth sewn shut? What about LOVE???? Doesn't she SEE the openings?? Come on, guys, Rebecca is just plain smarter than Bridget. Mark is your basic insecure type. We've been through this before. He *thinks* he is doing the honorable thing staying with Rebecca because SHE is putting something into their relationship, not like Bridget who is tooo insecure to do anything herself. The blind leading the blind. I am betting that there's a big showdown a
Jude's wedding. Can't you just see Bridget pushing Rebecca's head into a bowl of punch or something??
~KarenR
Sat, May 23, 1998 (20:23)
#198
Another P&P Observation:
Remember at the end which of Lizzy's relations visited them at Pemberley. I seem to recall only the Gardiners and Mr. Bennet. So, while he may have accepted her family, they didn't become frequent Derbyshire drop-ins. ;-)
HELEN FIELDING, YOU RUINED MY WEEKEND!!
~lizbeth54
Sat, May 23, 1998 (20:54)
#199
I think HF has (temporarily, I hope) lost the plot. But BJ does seem very wimpish...why doesn't she fight back instead of day dreaming about marrying Mark? Why didn't she throw the glass of wine in his face and show some character for once? He's a rich successful Cambridge-educated barrister....perhaps the equally rich Cambridge-educated Rebecca is more suitable for him... she's good at organising dinner parties and holidays, she moves in the same social crowd as he does, she's always there to give him su
port and she must make it very obvious that she wants him!!! Who can blame him for feeling attracted and obligated.......and BJ just let it happen. What does BJ do for Mark (apart from the obvious)?
Has that cheered you up, Karen? :-)
~KarenR
Sat, May 23, 1998 (21:36)
#200
Good try, Bethan, but only Mark Darcy huffing and puffing at my door, shirt undone, dying to come in would brighten my day.
On surface, it would appear that Rebecca is more suitable for him, but she is only interested in him because he is successful barrister and is in with all the right people. At some point, Mark is going to realize that Rebecca doesn't really love him and he certainly doesn't love her. But it better be soon!!
~lafn
Sat, May 23, 1998 (23:00)
#201
How's this for a scenario:
CF has turned down the MD role and HF is mad as hell.
"Oh yeah. I'll fix you. He's not such a nice guy, after all."
~KarenR
Sat, May 23, 1998 (23:07)
#202
"Oh yeah. I'll fix you. He's not such a nice guy, after all."
LOL!! Evelyn, I think you've got it!!
~LauraMM
Sun, May 24, 1998 (01:26)
#203
"Oh yeah. I'll fix you. He's not such a nice guy, after all."
LOL!! Evelyn, I think you've got it!!
]
That is the only possible reason for doing this. I don't think Rebecca is better or worse for Mark. He's just an idiot!! Karen, are you saying that you don't like MD anymore???? Hmmmmm......
~vlyne
Sun, May 24, 1998 (14:03)
#204
I hope it's OK for a newbie to join in. I've been addicted to BJD since February and I'm very glad to find others. I have to admit that I'm a chronic Darcy Apologist, but after this week I'm not so sure I want Bridget to take him back.
I've heard that HF is going to be in New York on June 8th. Are there any New Yorkers willing to go to the B&N at 4 Astor Place and find out why HF decided to ruin Mark Darcy? ;)
~KarenR
Sun, May 24, 1998 (15:14)
#205
Valerie: The more the merrier. Addiction, yes it certainly is and I was so proud of myself that I had given up smoking last fall. I didn't realize that I had replaced it with something else.
Do go to B&N and do a Jude and Shaz on her? We need to know why she has turned MD into an invertebrate.
(Laura) Karen, are you saying that you don't like MD anymore???? Hmmmmm
No way, Josefina! I'm not as fickle as you. ;-) There's an explanation out there. I know it. I feel it in my bones.
Translation Time
Now that I can see straight, it's that time of the week:
1) That whole Loaded magazine, Which Car, What Car thing????
2) What are 'furnishing fabrics'?
30 Where's Ubud?
In case, you're wondering where I am, Laura, I'm downstairs at *my Gary's*!!
~lizbeth54
Sun, May 24, 1998 (19:24)
#206
"Ruining" Mark Darcy just when the movie is just about to roll is rather like throwing the baby out with the bathwater! We all need a happy ending......at least in the movies! But I reckon that true love can't be smooth, not when you've got a weekly column to write. I predict that Bridget will fight back (she still loves him) and he will redeem himself (he still loves her, sort of ), but not for several weeks.:-)
Dunno where Ubud is. Furnishing fabrics=curtain/drapes material. Can't remember the references to Loaded etc, but Loaded is a laddish magazine.
Is BJD on sale yet in the US?
~lafn
Sun, May 24, 1998 (19:58)
#207
Casting for Bridget:
How about Minnie Driver with 30 Lbs (don't know that in "stones")
Or
Holly Aird (Sarah's flat-mate, Jo in FP)
For Rebecca: Saffron Barrows (Nan, in CoF)
Translation Time : ( a few weeks ago)
"munching on a fairy cake"
Worzel Gummidge
"slag off Princess Diana"
( Valerie) Are there any New Yorkers willing to go to the B&N at 4 Astor Place and find out why HF decided to ruin Mark Darcy?
There's one here in exile who would love to.......
Go Valerie!!!
~LauraMM
Sun, May 24, 1998 (21:15)
#208
In case, you're wondering where I am, Laura, I'm downstairs at *my Gary's*!!
]
That's okay, I'm down the Cape at my Aunts house. At least you have a Gary. Who doesn't do much anyway;p
I think that Minnie Driver would be a good Bridget. But I'd be better. I'd have to put some weight on, but one stone shouldn't kill me;p
~KarenR
Sun, May 24, 1998 (21:51)
#209
Minnie Driver would be good, but would she put the weight back on???
And, of course, Mark will redeem himself. He doesn't love Rebecca; he loves Bridget. It's just this godawful wait until he gets to be dreamy again!!
Isn't "slag off" putting down? I'm pretty sure I looked it up, but can't remember!! :-(
~lafn
Sun, May 24, 1998 (22:11)
#210
(Laura)
I think that Minnie Driver would be a good Bridget. But I'd be better. I'd have to put some weight on, but one stone shouldn't kill me.
Aw, shuddup!!
Besides, it can't be anyone beautiful like Kate Winslet, or Jennifer Ehle(who were previusly mentioned) orYOU!
~Ann
Mon, May 25, 1998 (04:18)
#211
Minnie Driver is too young for the part. Her b-day is 01/31/71 which makes her 27. Bridget it decidedly 30-something. I don't think the part should go to anyone under 32, and 34-36 would be preferable.
~vlyne
Mon, May 25, 1998 (15:43)
#212
Thanks for making me feel welcome! I would love to attend the BJD book reading, unfortunately, I don't live in NYC. There is a web site that lists upcoming author tour dates, but I'm not counting on a book reading near me. :(
I shouldn't have said that MD is completely ruined for me, but he is definitely flawed. I've been making excuses for him week after week. I even accepted his "I didn't know you cared" excuse, but after this week he knows he is hurting Bridget but he won't stop doing it. It is going to take several 'romantic mini-breaks' before I feel he's made it up to her. ;)
Here is who I would like to see in the movie: Imogen Stubbs (Lucy Steele, Sense & Sensibility) as Bridget; Greg Wise (Willoughby, S&S) as Daniel Cleaver; Patsy Kensit (Angels & Insects) as Rebecca; and Jane Horrocks (Ab Fab) as Sharon. I really hope this will be a British production. I was a little disappointed when I found out John Cusack is doing Nick Hornby's "High Fidelity".
~nan
Tue, May 26, 1998 (04:47)
#213
(Valerie) I hope it's OK for a newbie to join in.
But, of course! Glad you found us ;-)
(Bethan) We all need a happy ending......at least in the movies! But I reckon that true love can't be smooth, not when you've got a weekly column to write.
This is a very good point, Bethan. I agree with Karen�there *is* an explanation of some kind, but I don�t believe it will be one which completely exonerates him. I think it very likely that the situation is exactly what it appears to be; a stupid mistake brought on by miscommunication between M & B. The most appealing part of the book (for me, anyway) was how real it seemed. How many of us have thought or said things similar to some of the entries in B�s diary? Life is messy and complete harmony is borin
. In keeping with the spirit of the book, HF is creating some real life turmoil. If M & B were together and blissfully happy, who would bother to read the entries?
I predict that Bridget will fight back (she still loves him)
Well, it would be about time. Frankly, this whining, wounded, waiting-for-the-phone-call crap is getting on my nerves. Geez, woman! If he�s that important to you then open your mouth, find out what�s really going on (don�t just assume). Squeaky wheel gets the grease. Until she has a full conversation with Mark about it (not just one line of dialogue and a paragraph of mental suppositions) we�ll never know why he�s with Rebecca.
and he will redeem himself (he still loves her, sort of ),
I don�t know if he�ll be able to redeem himself. Bridget got no explanation for the break up. Then again, I wasn�t entirely sure he wanted to break up, she said the words, not him. Then her insecurities got going and he went along with it because he�s a fool. That didn�t make much sense, let me try that again ;-) Have you ever said something to a close friend and they completely misunderstood your intentions? You are so hurt that the friend doesn�t know you better--that they assume the worst of you. So y
u just shut off, rather than correct the mistaken idea. Then you think to yourself, �Fine. If that�s what you think� and walk away. This is what that whole break up scene seemed to me. I can easily see a proud man walking away, rather than admit he�s hurt. So now things are all screwed up because he�s a jerk and she�s a wuss.
However (and this is a BIG however), there is nothing that can justify involving himself with one of Bridget�s �friends�. It was cruel, disrespectful and showed a tremendous lack of judgement (especially if he still has feelings for Bridget). So, IMO there is no way of redeeming himself there, but perhaps she could forgive him (more clutching for realism). Someone hurts you, you forgive him (for whatever reasons) and, hopefully, move on. Of course, I�m assuming that both parties are adults ;-p
(Laura) I think that Minnie Driver would be a good Bridget. But I'd be better. I'd have to put some weight on, but one stone shouldn't kill me;p
Laura, on behalf of all the women in the world who could not be considered skinny, I would just like to say:
Tthhpphhtthhpphhtthh!!! ;-p
~MarkG
Tue, May 26, 1998 (09:51)
#214
Some translations that were requested:
munching on a fairy-cake = eating a small cakey delicacy (v bourgeois)
Worzel Gummidge = children's fictional scarecrow character (i.e. a mess)
slag off = criticise
Mary Bell & those nurses = Mary Bell, a convicted child-killer now receiving payment for contributing to psycho-book; two Brit nurses in Saudi jailed for life for killing Aussie flatmate, but now released in curious political deal
Loaded/What Car etc = there are several magazines called "What HiFi", "What Camera", "Which Car" etc advising purchasers. Since the main feature of lads' magazine Loaded is scantily-clad semi-celebrities, Bridget thinks it could be called "What Cleavage".
Hope nobody minds a contribution from another male
~nan
Tue, May 26, 1998 (16:17)
#215
(Mark) Hope nobody minds a contribution from another male
Of course we don't mind! It's not your fault MD is a fool ;-) Thanks for the translations, especially the "What Cleavage" LOL!
So, Mark--what do you think of all this? It's not often we get the opportunity to hear a man's POV.
~KarenR
Tue, May 26, 1998 (16:59)
#216
(Valerie) There is a web site that lists upcoming author tour dates
Could you post it here? I'm dying to know if HF will be coming to my city.
(Nan) However (and this is a BIG however), there is nothing that can justify involving himself with one of Bridget�s �friends�.
OK, even if we start with the premise that Rebecca isn't really a "friend," it does happen in real life. I agree, it is despicable of him and shows he has little if any judgment. Then, the question becomes "should" Bridget take him back if and when he comes to his senses, finds out what boyfriend-pinching jellyfisher she is and that she does this only for sport?
It's going to be interesting to see how HF brings B&M back together. Will we buy it? How did Rebecca do it? That boy was 100% primetime in love with her.
(Mark) Hope nobody minds a contribution from another male
Not at all!! Does the "G" stand for "good" Mark as opposed to the "bad" Mark under discussion? ;-)
~lizbeth54
Tue, May 26, 1998 (18:30)
#217
A defence of MD (I think!)
He's rich and successful but deeply scarred by his wife's unfaithfulness and his failed marriage. When he sees Bridget kissing Sinjun (and that is what he sees), he is deeply hurt and his pride is wounded. Bridget makes matters worse by mentioning "breaking up". He retreats, hurt, but does eventually phone her. BJ, encouraged by her idiotic friends, harangues him a la Linda Florentino (?) and refuses to listen to his (so far) innocent explanation. His pride deeply wounded ("I will not pester you again"),
e seeks solace (no longer innocent) in Rebecca, who promptly ensnares him in her social network ( along with Magda and Jude).
He is now in a mess but is still in love (deep down) with Bridget. BUT (the defence falters) he is basically insecure (his wife cheated on him, great dent to male ego) and he starts to enjoy the fact that two women want him (wife and mistress scenario), and ,like all males, he also wants to avoid confrontation (with Rebecca).
But. MD, be warned, I agree with Karen, Rebecca does this for sport. Once she's got her trophy, he'll be dumped, and more insecure than ever.
MD has little if any judgement. Perhaps not with women... a cheating wife, the elegant bossy Natasha, and the man-eating Rebecca.
We need a male POV on this. How about it, Mark?
~lafn
Tue, May 26, 1998 (19:51)
#218
Yeah, Mark. We need your POV on the BJ &MD situation.
And while you're at it....
(Mark) munching on a fairy-cake = eating a small cakey delicacy (v bourgeois)
I'm a little dense...what is the "cakey delicacy" and Why is it Bourgeois?
(This is turning into a FAQ on British pastries!!)
Thank you for coming to our rescue on the translations.
~Kate
Tue, May 26, 1998 (20:57)
#219
HF's tour.
I am HOPING to be at Astor Place B&N on June 8 to get the dirt but I am on a plane that day which is scheduled to arrive at Kennedy at 5:45. Baring late aircraft, and traffic jams, I should make it, at least in time to get my copy signed and ask some key questions. (it's just around the corner from my place)
So, what should I ask?
1. Who is going to play MD in the movie?
2. What the hell is MD up to?
3. Where did the column appear before the Telegraph, and how can we get to it?
Any others?
(KarenR: this has a certain deja vu about it: remember AS Byatt?? ;-))
There is a post on Pemberley about a book reading time and date in DC (see ramble). I checked the book reading site, and no other times/locations are listed yet. However, will keep you posted.
~lafn
Wed, May 27, 1998 (02:09)
#220
(Kate) Re: HF Booksigning on 6/8
what should I ask?
Who is to play Bridget.?
When will the film start shooting? Be released?
I envy you . Wish we could all accompany you.
Will be eager to get your report......that night.......no rest for the weary!!
Someone pl explain: "AS Byatt"
~Kate
Wed, May 27, 1998 (03:43)
#221
Someone pl explain: "AS Byatt"
AS Byatt, author of "Possession".
We discussed Possession (a great book, BTW) in the Library at Pemberley. We had a big debate about whether one of the characters was, or was not, a lesbian. So when she came to do a reading of her latest book in NYC, I went along to ask the question.... So you can see I'm experienced in the dirt digging role!
~MarkG
Wed, May 27, 1998 (08:17)
#222
Male POV - Bethan is spot on: MD would have to be superMAN to see easily through blonde, long-legged, organiser-of-social-life, especially when feeling dumped by confused and confusing BJ. Are you girls taking the P&P analogy too far in your expectations of this Darcy?
*Fairy-cake* - used for a variety of small, often home-made, sponge-cakes - I think they have overtones of middle-class people imagining they mimic upper-class people's taste for dainties - other Brits may disagree.
Who should play BJ and MD? Isn't Colin Firth a cert? I am so impressed by US knowledge of suitable British actresses, but I would like to suggest Louise Lombard (known to UK for The House of Eliott, but poss unknown enough to the rest of the world to suit HF)
~Kate
Wed, May 27, 1998 (12:39)
#223
Louise Lombard
Louise Lombard worried about being over 9 stone??? I don't think so!!!
~LauraMM
Wed, May 27, 1998 (12:44)
#224
(Mark G)Are you girls taking the P&P analogy too far in your expectations of this Darcy?
YES!!! I don't think she is following the P&P thing anymore. It was just for the book!!!
~vlyne
Wed, May 27, 1998 (14:45)
#225
(Karen) "Bookwire.com" is the web site that lists upcoming author tours. When you get to the site click on "Authors on the Highway". I wish I could say Bookwire had a complete listing, but I think it leaves out some of the smaller venues (and a few of the not-so-small venues).
Questions for HF:
I don't know if this has already been discussed, but I'm curious about whether that interview with Colin Firth actually took place? Also, does HF feel that Bridget has to remain a singleton? (Maybe this is why she split up BJ & MD?) Of course, you can't forget Bridget's standby questions: What is your favorite color? & What is your favorite pudding? ;-)
Louise Lombard as Bridget? Great idea!
~lafn
Wed, May 27, 1998 (15:12)
#226
Media Alert:
New York Times Book reviewed BJD and related article yesterday, but it is still on today.
Good picture of HF.
URL: nytimes.com/books/
Thanks Mark.for all the translations.
~KarenR
Wed, May 27, 1998 (16:24)
#227
Bethan's Defense
Ah hah, so I can't be labeled the *only* Darcy apologist here anymore!! But I must add something funny that I saw recently in the trailer to the new Harrison Ford movie, Six Days Seven Nights (?) which also goes to something Mark said about our, perhaps, too lofty expectations for Darcy. In the trailer, Harrison Ford asks Anne Heche 'what does a woman have to do to turn a guy on.' I don't remember if she answers or not, but his answer is 'Just show up. We're very basic, not complicated.'
Louise Lombard
Oh, I remember her from House of Eliot. Has she been in anything lately? Must check the IMDb.
(Valerie) I wish I could say Bookwire had a complete listing, but I think it
leaves out some of the smaller venues (and a few of the not-so-small venues).
Thanks for the info, but have no fear, I'm not in one of the smaller venues.
A.S. Byatt
How could I forget, Kate!! But I know deep down that, if I had posed the question to Byatt, we might have had a different response! ;-) And we would have known the mystery man's identity!!
~KarenR
Wed, May 27, 1998 (17:34)
#228
Are you girls taking the P&P analogy too far in your expectations of this Darcy?
Yes and No. Plotwise, it is basically over. But in terms of characters, it would be inconceivable to me that their P&Pness wouldn't carry over into the columns. An author does not change a character. If Mark Darcy is supposed to be like Fitzwilliam Darcy (as played by Colin Firth) then it would continue.
~lizbeth54
Wed, May 27, 1998 (18:48)
#229
I've just posted on a very recent radio interview with HF, in which she mentioned Mark Darcy and CF. See #59.
Mark, I think that Louise Lombard is the best suggestion so far for BJ (although I agree she is rather slim...no obvious weight problem!). I'm surprised we haven't seen more of her since the House of Elliot.
~lafn
Wed, May 27, 1998 (19:52)
#230
Bookwire gives NYC as the only destination for HF.
There must be other cities.
Kate, could you ask her,pl. what other cities she will be appearing at?
If she gets CF to play MD, she can get an unknown actress to play B.(Like FP)
But two unknowns.....won't be too profitable.
~KarenR
Wed, May 27, 1998 (19:52)
#231
Bookwire doesn't have all the appearances. I checked under Nick Hornby and noticed it was very incomplete. So let's not fret too much. Did you see, Helen will be on 20/20 and the Today show. Crank up the old VCRs!!
~KarenR
Wed, May 27, 1998 (19:52)
#232
Some needs to call the publisher to get a run down on the promotional tour. They will give it out!! :-)
~Kate
Wed, May 27, 1998 (19:52)
#233
But I know deep down that, if I had posed the question to Byatt, we might have had a different response!
LOL!! It's all in the way you pose the question!
HF is appearing in DC - there's posts on Ramble at RoP about dates and locations.
We shouldn't assume that she'll have ANY say over casting - most writers sign over everything when they sell their book to a production company, and control over casting is something she wouldn't have any say in at all.
BJ is being published (hard back = $16 plus) by Viking. I've emailed them for info, but don't hold your breath.
~LauraMM
Thu, May 28, 1998 (12:35)
#234
The BJ Diary book will be on bookshelves next Tuesday at it is $22. Cover art is ok.
~vlyne
Thu, May 28, 1998 (13:46)
#235
I found another book reading location. June 16th at The Booksmith, 1644 Haight St., San Francisco. I e-mailed Viking, but so far I've only received a sort of standard reply. The audiobook is being published by Random House so I wrote to them as well. Random House has been very responsive in the past so I'm hoping we'll hear something soon.
~LauraMM
Thu, May 28, 1998 (18:41)
#236
Okay, BJD is at the Bookstores!!! I was in Borders today just a little while ago and I saw it for 30% off it was $20.65.
~nan
Thu, May 28, 1998 (19:13)
#237
(Mark G)Are you girls taking the P&P analogy too far in your expectations of this Darcy?
Only as it relates to Colin. We are all so set on CF as MD that we already think of them as one and the same. The problem with this is that we cut MD more slack than we normally would, I think.
~vlyne
Thu, May 28, 1998 (20:56)
#238
Here is the response I've received from Random House. I'm just going to "paste" the entire response. I apologize for the length.
Hi. Thanks for writing about BRIDGET JONES'S DIARY.
We have published this on audio - read by actress Tracie Bennett - and it's
available at bookstores nation-wide.
For more information regarding the audio, please visit:
http://www.randomhouse.com/catalog/display.cgi?0375404783
MEDIA
06/08/98 NBC/The Today Show
06/08/98 ABC-TV/20/20
04/27/98 Newsweek
06/01/98 Marie Claire
06/01/98 Jane
06/01/98 Harpers Bazaar
06/01/98 Detour
06/01/98 Cosmopolitan
06/01/98 Glamour
06/22/98 Women's Own
07/01/98 Vogue - 1st Serial
07/01/98 MS. Magazine
07/01/98 Mirabella
TOUR
06/08/98 Barnes & Noble Astor Place New York, NY - Reading & Signing
06/09/98 Waterstones Boston - Reading & Signing
06/11/98 Olsson's Books and Records Washington DC - Reading & Signing
06/12/98 Book Stall Winnetka, IL - Reading & Signing
06/15/98 Tattered Cover Denver, CO - Reading & Signing
06/16/98 Book Passage Corte Madera,CA - Reading & Signing
06/18/98 Borders Los Angeles - Reading & Signing
I hope this helps - and please let me know if you have any questions.
~lafn
Sat, May 30, 1998 (01:12)
#239
Thanks Valerie for all the media info on BJD. They miss the Southwest again.
It's like we don't read in this part of the country. All we do is listen to Garth Brooks!!
Latest BJD:2.15pm: Was Gary. "Morning dear," he said to me with a leery smile. "Thanks for last night. Brought you a cappuccino. Can I come in?"
Oh my God, what did I do?
You're right, Laura, Gary is the new love-interest.Competition for MD??
~Ann
Sat, May 30, 1998 (04:44)
#240
Still no progress on the MD-Rebecca-Bridget triangle!!!!
~LauraMM
Sat, May 30, 1998 (17:36)
#241
Like I'm ever wrong:) hee hee. Ann called me last night and read it to me and I was grinning!!! Now, if she'd only describe him!!! Personally, I think Bridget would not just sleep with anyone, he'd have to be somewhat cute.
~LauraMM
Sat, May 30, 1998 (18:15)
#242
I would like to hear Mark's reaction to her sleeping with Gary. I hope that whatever plan BJ comes up with she develops a spine!!
~lizbeth54
Sat, May 30, 1998 (22:39)
#243
I thought Bridget had a plan.....all she's doing is making a reconciliation with Mark impossible! Don't forget they have already split up once and he went off to work in Japan. Then he asked her to spend the weekend with him in Paris...and she was pleased because this meant he had forgiven her. For what? (this is the lost year in the MD/BJ relationship). Is that why he was so upset about Sinjun? Had it all happened before? Is it happening again? Someone ask HF about the missing year, please!!
~vlyne
Sun, May 31, 1998 (01:15)
#244
(Evelyn)Thanks Valerie for all the media info on BJD.
It was my pleasure. I wish HF was making an appearance in my area too. I noticed that the information that I received from Random House is not consistent with the dates posted on Bookwire. I think the book signing dates are OK, but I'm not sure about the television interviews. I'm sorry I didn't check the info before passing it on. :(
~KarenR
Mon, Jun 1, 1998 (15:59)
#245
Thanks, Valerie, for all your effort. We shall figure out the TV appearances.
Anyway, great idea for a question, Bethan. The infamous "missing year" and why they broke up. OK, HF's in my neck of the woods 6/12 so if the question hasn't been asked by then, I'll do it. Right now, I'm working on my Nick Hornby questions for tomorrow! ;-)
My reaction to this week: wake me up next Saturday morning. Boooring! What would you expect from me: No Mark!! :-(
~LauraMM
Mon, Jun 1, 1998 (16:44)
#246
Karen, but Jude cancels the wedding. Shazzer is shagging Simon, again. Tom's chasing twins that are having an affair with each other (What's up with that?) And Bridget, the tramp she is, shags Gary the builder. Not boring in the least!!! And Vile Richard show up with fake Irish sounding 22 yo babe and Shazzer decks him!!!
Would call this one of the better ones!!!!
~lizbeth54
Mon, Jun 1, 1998 (22:02)
#247
Karen, you could ask NH if he has any plans to work with CF again! I think he's working on a film script at the moment. The movie rights to "About a boy" were sold to Robert de Niro's company.
~Ann
Tue, Jun 2, 1998 (04:47)
#248
I'm now one degree of separation from CF!!!
"For Ann, Best Wishes, Nick Hornby"
That's what he signed in my copy of "About a Boy" tonight.
As for the films: High Fidelity is being done by the people who did "Grosse Point Blank", and will have John Cusak in it.
About a Boy is being adapted by the guy who did "What's Eating Gilbert Grape" and is being done by deNiro's company. Hornby is listed as one of the Exec Producers, but he isn't sure what that means. He figures that if any conflict arises between himself and the others, he'll be overruled.
BTW, he's a cutie! (And we made eye contact several times. Hee hee hee.)
~LauraMM
Tue, Jun 2, 1998 (12:42)
#249
Why can't Nick Hornby be loved for himself. WHO CARES ABOUT THE COLIN FACTOR??? Don't you think he wants to move on with his career? I don't think CF is that important of a person to him. NH is very talented on his own!!!! Sorry, I'm done ranting now!!!
I secretly trying for the Shazzer role in Bridget;)
~KarenR
Tue, Jun 2, 1998 (15:31)
#250
(Bethan) you could ask NH if he has any plans to work with CF again!
I heard somewhere that Colin would've liked to do Will (Boy) but that since it's going to be Americanized, they probably wouldn't offer it to him. Which of course is total and absolute tripe!! All we've seen over here is Britisha nd Australian actors wonderfully playing Americans. Emma as the first lady, Branagh over and over again, Guy Pearce and Russell Crowe in L.A. Confidential. Not to mention, CF in that farm flick!!
Another thing Hornby mentioned elsewhere is that one of the original scripts he's working on now for his production co. with Evans and Posey is about a 21 year old and that Colin *might* be a little old to be in that one.
Besides, I think I would be too embarassed to ask NH about CF!! I will try to pose insightful, thought-provoking questions. hee hee!!
(Laura) Would call this one of the better ones!!!!
Well, I guess that's why there are sooo many books on the shelves at the bookstore. Although I do want to know how many people participated in that tent. Was this a group effort? When Bridget woke up, Shaz was there fully clothed as was Simon. So were Gary and Bridge going at it with the others in attendance? Hmmmm Not only is she a tramp, she is a tramp without any sense of propriety. Ha!!
~KarenR
Tue, Jun 2, 1998 (15:32)
#251
~KarenR
Tue, Jun 2, 1998 (16:07)
#252
Gaaagh!!! Helen Fielding is scheduled to be online with Barnes & Noble on Wednesday, June 10 at 9:00 EST.
~KarenR
Tue, Jun 2, 1998 (16:08)
#253
ooops, that would be EDT.
~KarenR
Fri, Jun 5, 1998 (16:23)
#254
Hornby in Chicago
The side door opened slowly as the restless crowd's low murmurrings and twentysomething laughter were finally quieted. He saw the dark-haired, blue-eyed beauty in the first row and their eyes met. She smiled and he smiled back. Up onto the raised platform he climbed, only to be introduced by a baggy-shorts-clad store clerk with large horn-rimmed glasses. Looking embarassed by the unvarnished praise, he spoke softly about his new book and then began to read the first of three excerpts. A reading made
ery difficult by his attempts to sneak glances at the mysterious woman in the first row with the eyes that said everything but when. He tried to clear his mind, his throat but all in vain as his thoughts would not be tamed....
Ooops, maybe this belongs on Topic 34.
~LauraMM
Fri, Jun 5, 1998 (16:25)
#255
HEE HEE HEE HEE. Karen, You saw me there. I was trying to be discreet!!! But alas, my beauty could not be detained from him:) hee hee hee. Very funny indeed!!! Keep going, I wonder if Hornby and I ever connected;) hee hee.
~KarenR
Fri, Jun 5, 1998 (16:32)
#256
In your dreams you were here! You want more!! Come on he's a respected writer. That would be so disrespectful!!
~KarenR
Fri, Jun 5, 1998 (16:33)
#257
Anyway, isn't your hair blonde now, v. blonde???
~LauraMM
Fri, Jun 5, 1998 (16:37)
#258
No, not v. blonde, sorta ash blonde:) But you are NOT a respected writer;-p hee hee. hee hee. Good Job, Karen!!!
~KarenR
Fri, Jun 5, 1998 (19:16)
#259
Nick was here on Tuesday night. I got there well ahead of time and most of the seats were taken, except one in the front row. I set my stuff down and went to buy High Fidelity and then settled in for the wait. He came out of a little door next to where I was sitting and I was probably the first person he saw. Our eyes met and I smiled in recognition and he smiled back. (That part really happened.) He went up on the raised area, which is the "kiddie korner" of the store (I'm smiling inwardly a
how appropos this is) and was introduced by a store guy and then he read three selections from AAB. Audience reaction was very good.
He was wearing this "comfy-type" outfit. Something one would wear on a plane to be comfy. No jeans. No leather jacket. Even though the weather had taken a dive and has been cool for several days now. He is short to medium height, very nondescript (i.e., you wouldn't notice him on the streets) and unassuming looking. Of course, bald with stick out ears.
When he finished his read and after the thunderous applause, he took questions from the audience. Took a while for someone to break the ice, but then there were a lot. A sampling of those I remembered. (Sorry, I should've taken notes.)
Are changes made in his books for the American audience? Yes, some but not significant. He's very sensitive to pop cultural differences and wants to get them right.
Does he listen to music when he writes? Not the stuff he listens to at home. At his writing flat, he might listen to contemporary classical, whatever that is.
Will he always be writing novels? Does he want to get into film? Already has. He did the adaptation for FP, which will be shown here in ltd release later this year or next year, and is now writing an original screenplay.
How long did he teach and was there a prototype for Marcus (AAB)? He didn't teach for very long and yes there was a Marcus. He then went on to describe this loner of a kid who wasn't nerdy like Marcus, but stood out for other reasons, which he went into in detail.
How do his various audiences get along (i.e., the football types vs. the literary types)? Nick said there is a third audience: the music types. He said at first that the football types would interrupt and take over the Q&A sessions at his promotional tours with football questions, but now they all seem to get along just fine.
Then it was signing time. Since I was in the front row, I *could* have been up there rather quickly, but instead I went to the back of the line. It was a long line. People had jillions of copies of his books. I now am familiar with all editions from both sides of the Atlantic. But I am pretty sure I was the only one with a FP Screenplay!!
OK, I'm finally at the front of the line and the view of Nick is unobstructed. He looks at me approach and he smiles broadly. I can read on his face: "So there she is, the one from the front row!!" (Well, maybe not, but that's how I like to interpret it!! Everyone has to have their fantasies.) I plopped down my three books; don't know why I didn't bring regular FP to complete the set. As he looks at it, I said, "Probably don't see too many of these around?" To which he replies: "No (with a twinkl
). Are you a Colin Firth fan?" I quickly say yes and turn the subject back to him and how much I enjoy his work. How I loved the movie and how much it made me want to read the book as well as High Fidelity in order to better understand the characters for my film discussion group. How I thought the two had to be taken together. He looked pleased, especially when I said he did a "Brilliant job."
Now, it's all downhill as I turn into a babbling moron. I asked him if he wouldn't mind answering some truly trivial and boorish questions. No problem. He was very amused, listened politely to my questions, and answered them when I would give him half a chance to speak. At this point, he must have thought me a raving idiot with a pea brain, unable to ask any halfway intelligent questions. He would have been right.
So ends the nightmare. I need counseling before Helen Fielding shows up. I'm likely to throttle the poor woman because of what she is doing to a fictional character!! :-)
OOhhhh tomorrow.......what horrors shall be in store?
~LauraMM
Fri, Jun 5, 1998 (19:24)
#260
Actually, Karen hop on your Gary's computer tonight around 8pm your time and you'll find out!!!
~lizbeth54
Fri, Jun 5, 1998 (20:50)
#261
I loved your account, Karen! Great stuff! By the time you meet Helen Fielding you'll be a seasoned babbler! But you chickened out on Colin-questions! (I would have, too :-) )
BTW how come NH is popular in the US.....he seems to have quite a following. I didn't think that FP had taken off in the US, although I can imagine that High Fidelity would be successful.
I'm really looking forward to hearing about your meeting with HF. Maybe Mark will have redeemed himself by then (he really does love her, you know!) My prediction for tommorow's episode...........BJ finds herself embroiled with Gary against her better judgement. They go out somewhere together and are seen by Mark who looks at her in horror and disappointment! She realises she still loves him, but will he still love her now?!!!!
~LauraMM
Fri, Jun 5, 1998 (21:07)
#262
NO COLIN QUESTIONS TO NICK HORNBY!!!!
~lafn
Fri, Jun 5, 1998 (21:29)
#263
Thanks Karen for the Nick Hornby report. Never heard of the guy till FP.
I do think he should stick to novels and skip the screenplays.
IMHO the weak link in FP was the screenplay.
~LauraMM
Fri, Jun 5, 1998 (21:37)
#264
Evelyn, The novel FP was autobiographical, NH did a good job turning it into a fictional movie!! honestly.
~lafn
Fri, Jun 5, 1998 (22:26)
#265
(Laura) Evelyn, The novel FP was autobiographical, NH did a good job turning it into a fictional movie!! honestly.
Okay, fearless leader.....if you say so.
~Ann
Sat, Jun 6, 1998 (01:21)
#266
*Bridget Jones is away
AAAARRRRGGGGHHHH!!!!
What happened with Gary!!!
Karen, you're Hornby reading went much like mine: I got there about a half hour before, but most of the seats were taken--except for the front row, where I sat. When he came in, he walked right past me, our eyes met, as they did several times while some bloke from the store introduced him (he has a cute smile, which he seemed to flash my way once or twice).
Even the questions he was asked were similar: Do you listen to music when you work (contemporary classical means Philip Glass, who he mentioned at the St Paul reading)? Did you get the prototype for Marcus from your teaching? What's up with the movies of your books?
Probably half or more of the questions were about film adaptations, which must be discouraging for a writer--as if you haven't succeeded until you have movies made of your work, then the movies take precidence over your writings.
~LauraMM
Sat, Jun 6, 1998 (02:47)
#267
Okay, Nick Hornby is ADORABLE. He was on time. My friend Lynn came and I will kill her later for the big mouth that she has!! Anyway, I asked the first question! (of course) and it was
Rob and will are Self-centered, manipulative and Childish. Is Nick Hornby?
He got a big laugh out of that one and adored me for it!!! I gave him a New England Revolution T shirt and he was sooooo happy. He is great!!!! He told me that Jonathan Firth lives downstairs from his working studio. See When I gave him the T shirt, Big mouth Lynn said I wanted it signed by COLIN FIRTH!!! I said Absolutely not. Then she offered that I was a big fan of Jonathan Firth and he said that he lived downstairs!!! I handed him a yellow piece of paper and he was very excited by it. I can only h
pe girls!!!
Second question was.
You have been quoted as saying that you would like write screenplays for small British films, yet your novels have been bought by American studios. Does the Americanization of your films bother you as it seems to go against your grain?
Because of my first question, his next book will be about a woman who is self-centered, manipulative, and childish. He was looking dead at me when he said that.
All in all, I made an impression on him. I told him I was a single mum and he was quite shocked. I don't look like a single mum? Or whatever a single mum looks like!
~lafn
Sat, Jun 6, 1998 (04:02)
#268
Thanks Laura ,m'dear for your prompt report. You made my weekend!
(Laura)He got a big laugh out of that one and adored me for it!!!
And so do we!!!
And three cheers for" Big Mouth Lynn".
Did he sign your books?
~Allison2
Sat, Jun 6, 1998 (09:37)
#269
Laura. Brilliant. It is so intersting that JF lives in the flat below. So that probably means that the hype about CF and NH being such good friends while making FP was really true. Otherwise it would be too much of a coincidence for Jon F to have found a flat there of all places. BTW he was living in Colin's flat while he was flat hunting. QED.
(Evelyn)IMHO the weak link in FP was the screenplay.
I am afraid I agree with you. That and the TV style cinematography. I watched it again the other day. The more I watch it, however, the more I adore Colin's portrayal of Paul.
~KarenR
Sat, Jun 6, 1998 (15:24)
#270
(Bethan) But you chickened out on Colin-questions!
Told you I would. :-) But have absolutely no fear, it is far easier asking a woman about Colin than another man. Helen would *understand.* ;-)
BTW how come NH is popular in the US.....he seems to have quite a following. I didn't think that FP had taken off in the US, although I can imagine that High Fidelity would be successful.
You're right, FP was not all that popular in the U.S. If and when they ever show the movie, maybe people will be interested enough to read the book, which I adored. High Fidelity has a more universal appeal because music transcends national boundaries for the most part. That being the case, I just gave my autographed HF to my brother-in-law to read. He is a committed audiophile.
Maybe Mark will have redeemed himself by then
Alas it was too much to hope for. You better believe I'll have the firstquestion out to the gate for Helen!!!
(Ann) Probably half or more of the questions were about film adaptations, which must be discouraging for a writer--as if you haven't succeeded until you have movies made of your work, then the movies take precidence over your writings.
That's where yours was different. At my signing, there weren't many questions about the film adaptations. He actually volunteered this info, and from the way he sounded he appears more interested himself in film/movies. He is part of the Wildgaze production company with David Evans, the director, and Amanda Posey. I do not get the impression that his main goal in life is to get the Booker!!
~LauraMM
Sat, Jun 6, 1998 (17:45)
#271
He said that HIGH FIDELITY will take place in Chicago or Boston. I was in the ladies room when that question was asked. Big mouth Lynn told me. I am soooo mad at her. When I handed him the t shirt he really was excited and asked if the REVOLUTION were any qood. I told him because of damn Alexi Lalas, which brought a big grin to his face. (He HATES Alexi Lalas!!) They weren't doing to well. ALAS, I'm going tonight to a book signing that is INVITATIONAL only. Karen ask how I managed THAT one:) Hee He
!! Will tell you how all went again!!!
BTW, did I tell you the Nick Hornby is ADORABLE!!!!!
~LauraMM
Sat, Jun 6, 1998 (17:46)
#272
What's up with the tagging:(((( Anyway, Helen Fielding will be in Boston on 9 June, AND I will DEFINITELY ask why MD is a jerk, creep, FUCKWIT!!! And will post ASAP!!!
~LauraMM
Sat, Jun 6, 1998 (17:47)
#273
~KarenR
Sat, Jun 6, 1998 (18:24)
#274
...and you've been keeping that information to yourself, i.e., about the invitational appearance....see if you get the book back!!
BTW, the fuckwit is Bridget. She's the commitmentphobic. Mark was always the one who tried to find out from her how she felt.
~MarkG
Mon, Jun 8, 1998 (08:34)
#275
!!! Bridget Jones is away !!!
If this is because a certain HF is doing a certain promotional tour in the USA, then I suggest the whole thing be called off. Ha!
Meanwhile, at least we have The Tracking of Nick Hornby around the Nation to divert us. Does the poor man know he's being targeted?
~LauraMM
Mon, Jun 8, 1998 (14:47)
#276
My invitational went Wonderfully splendid. It was at this Bookstore in Brookline. Nick Hornby looked quite dashing in Black pants and maroon button-down silk shirt! Because a lot of trade people were there the section he read from had more colorful language.
Okay, get there at 7.00pm, my date was my 20 y.o. brother who I have turned into a Nick Hornby fan. He did the reading. Noticed me and smiled. When Tim, my brother, went up to have his book signed, Nick said "Hello, Laura." and I smiled sheepishly. Didn't want him to think I was stalking him:) Anyway, I told him that Tim was my kid brother. Tim wanted to ask him questions not related to the book because he thought he's sick of answering. The question my brother asked? "What cereal do you eat?" I
aughed. Nick looked right at me and said "Laura what is it in your family with these questions?" He answered. In England, a raisin weetabix? in the States he's been eating a lot of granola.
After the book signings, he mixed and mingled and came over to talk to me. We chatted for about 8-10 minutes. Which is a long time, actually. He asked me what I would do with the information about JF living downstairs and I told him that my ticket was already bought. "Your serious?" he said incredulously. I said yeah. Then explained how I was going to Ireland in three weeks:) He told me he loved Ireland and I offered the same. I told him now I have incentive for going to London and checking out Hi
hbury;) said it very cheekily. I apologized for the self-centered, manipulative, childish question. Told him the reason why I asked was because that seems to be the type of men, I'm attracted too. My brother said that sounded like I was asking him out on a date!
I mentioned my daughter and being a single parent. He asked how old she was and I told him 7. "How old are you anyway?" I stared at him. Then told him 30. He said he wouldn't have believed it. I do look young and not old enough to have a 7 y.o. who will be 8 in October. His son is 5. And that is the long and short of it. Did I do well?
~lafn
Mon, Jun 8, 1998 (17:30)
#277
Very well, indeed. Don't know if I could have chatted for 10 minutes and not even mentioned "FP...and oh, incidentally...about Colin Firth....".
I admire your restraint.
Saw HF on the Today Show this AM. She is v. attractive. Katie Couric interviewed her and unfortuately had not read the book....yet; "I plan to read it this summer"she said. So the interview was v. general and she did not get into the Bridget and MD relationship. Had she read the book she would have.
On the question about the film, HF commented that they are looking for an actress.But nothing definite. "The other day at the gym I saw this young woman on a stationary bicycle just reading a magazine. I said that's her!!
~LauraMM
Mon, Jun 8, 1998 (17:32)
#278
BTW how come NH is popular in the US.....he seems to have quite a following. I didn't think that FP had taken off in the US,
although I can imagine that High Fidelity would be successful.
}
HIGH FIDELITY which is a cult classic here in the States garnered the most questions. Also, someone asked him about his popularity here in the States and he thought it quite odd in a country of 200mm people where 100mm people are writers! He said he was chatting with Helen Fielding recently and they were perplexed by it all.
One thing else about Nick Hornby he is very unassuming and gentle. I adored him!!! Ok??? hee hee
~LauraMM
Mon, Jun 8, 1998 (17:35)
#279
Very well, indeed. Don't know if I could have chatted for 10 minutes and not even mentioned "FP...and oh, incidentally...about Colin Firth....". I admire your restraint.
Well, I was known as the Jonathan Firth fan. So telling NH that CF is my wallpaper on my computer at work, wouldn't have gone over too well!!!! hee hee. I wanted NH to know that I liked him for him and not CF. Although, many other CF fans there made it known that they were there for the CF connection only. Which I think is in poor taste!
~LauraMM
Mon, Jun 8, 1998 (21:39)
#280
http://reports.guardian.co.uk/papers/19980606-39.html
Mark Darcy's Diary
~Kate
Tue, Jun 9, 1998 (01:48)
#281
Ok, I did the Helen Fielding thing tonight.
She read a longish excerpt from May, in which MD does not appear once. She has the most gorgeous RP accent which is BJ to a tee.
I asked her about casting for the movie. She said she wanted an unknown for BJ and told the stationery bike story.... but didn't mention MD!!! When I got my book signed "v.g. wishes" ;-) I said I REALLY wanted to know about CF... she said "I hope so, I really hope so..."... and it all sounds very far off.
She said the book was a total rip off of P&P, because it's had centuries of market research. When she first started writing the column it was anonymous... she used it to support her "serious" writing. The column was the basis of the book, but she rewrote it quite a lot so it had a beginning middle and end. There is a sequel in the works, but don't hold your breath.
And some other things too, but I can't remember right now.....
~lafn
Tue, Jun 9, 1998 (02:33)
#282
Thanks Karen for your report. I waited- up for it!!
A pity she could not be more specific on CF playing MD. But at least it was not a definitive "no".
HF has had a long day!!She was interviewed this am in New York. Tonight in Chicago!!!
I read on the other board that she will be interviewed on CBS This Morning on Wednesday the 10th.
Ann previously said that she would also be on 20/20. Does anyone know when?Must be this Friday. Wow, what a week.
~lafn
Tue, Jun 9, 1998 (02:36)
#283
Correction: I just realized Kate is in New York City .
So HF is still in NYC,
It's still a whirlwind-week.
~lizbeth54
Tue, Jun 9, 1998 (07:33)
#284
I love the Mark Darcy Diary in the Guardian....well spotted Laura!
On the movie, it would have been reassuring to get some more positive information. HF told that story about casting an unknown and seeing someone in a gym a couple of months ago, but there have been subsequent reports of looking at high profile actresses like KW, MD, GP. They won't use an unknown, surely. Probably HF isn't in a position to release any info, until Working Title are up and running. This summer has been mentioned a couple of times in the press as the starting date. There are a couple of othe
"single girl" type movies also being filmed, so Working Title can't afford to delay too long. Even BJ can become old news.
As to MD, I do hope that HF isn't dangling CF's name as a carrot, like the story of the unknown. (I'm being cynical here!). But she is reported to have told friends that he has agreed. But I have nticed that with CF projects there tends to be no news until filming has virtually started.
~LauraMM
Tue, Jun 9, 1998 (12:39)
#285
Helen Fielding has been quoted as saying NO Gwynneth Paltrow!!! Karen read me the Entertainment Weekly article last night. HF is in Boston today!!!! Kate, how is it that your memory falters so quickly??? And why should we not hold our breath about the sequel???
Did you ask as to why she is making Mark Darcy into such a FUCKWIT!!!! These are hard hitting questions, that I guess I'LL have to ask! Hell, if I can ask Nick Hornby if he is self centered, manipulative and childish, this should be a piece of cake!! hee hee. You want to see Bridget!!! I'll give her Bridget!
~lizbeth54
Tue, Jun 9, 1998 (15:35)
#286
Laura, ask her if they are starting shooting the movie this summer as reported,and if not, when?. And when there will be definite news of the casting. I'm fed up with all this will he/won't he stuff! This surely can't be confidential!
~KarenR
Tue, Jun 9, 1998 (15:40)
#287
Bethan: Entertainment Weekly this week (6/12 issue) has a two page article about both Bridget and AAB. In it, Helen states, "absolutely, positively NOT GP for Bridget," with a shudder!! Hoorah!! Then, there is a little blurb where she asks "how old is Calista Flockhart?" who plays Ally McBeal. Nick Hornby stated that he though Jerry Seinfeld would be a good Will Freeman for AAB, of course he has no real say on that as it is being made by De Niro's film company.
Helen Fielding is also supposed to be on Charlie Rose on 6/10.
What happened to 20/20?? Did she get bumped by one of those other *hard-hitting* stories? Yuck!!
~LauraMM
Tue, Jun 9, 1998 (16:03)
#288
It should definitely be a British woman who plays Bridget. No Americans!! Pretty bad coming from an American!
~Kate
Tue, Jun 9, 1998 (23:13)
#289
Laura, the Barnes and Noble was packed. I asked two of about the ten questions they allowed (one about casting the movie, to which she replied ONLY about BJ, and not about MD, one about basing the book on P&P). I was fourth in line to get my book signed, and there were about 200 people after me, so I squeezed in my question about CF being cast .... but it was impossible to ask more without being a total f***wit and holding up the line.
One person (our Marisa in fact!!!) asked about why there was no column in etcera this week - HF seemed very surprised to discover we could get it at all. And since most of the audience were completely new to BJ, it hardly seemed fair to say "why has MD turned into such a bastard??"
Lame excuses I know. But I had also literally just got off a plane, and I was a little out of it.
~LauraMM
Wed, Jun 10, 1998 (01:49)
#290
~LauraMM
Wed, Jun 10, 1998 (01:53)
#291
Okay, Helen Fielding was here today. I mean she checked out this Board!!! she mentioned today how she was surfing the net typed in BJD and it brought her here. I had printed out the URL for her earlier and when I handed it to her, I told her I created the topic!! She was amazed and said it was great. She said we've come up with better scenarios then she has!!!
Okay, I told her to describe Gary and she will (He is gorgeous!!) Bridget did NOT sleep with Gary!!!
I took pictures and will post a more detailed version tomorrow. Want to go home. brought up CF and JF and told her that if CF turns the part down to go with JF and she thought the same thing!!!!
well, enjoy she will probably post something in the future here!!!
~lafn
Wed, Jun 10, 1998 (03:01)
#292
WELL DONE,
LAURA AND KATE.!!!
You do us proud.!!Can't wait for more postings .Thanks a bunch!!
~nan
Wed, Jun 10, 1998 (03:15)
#293
~nan
Wed, Jun 10, 1998 (04:03)
#294
(Laura) I mean she checked out this Board!!!
Oh, the poor woman! :-O Can you imagine the shock? ;-p
I told her to describe Gary and she will (He is gorgeous!!)
What? No refrigerator repairman crack? ;-p
. brought up CF and JF and told her that if CF turns the part down to go with JF and she thought the same thing!!!!
Oh, dear! Laura, this sudden preference for JF is really starting to worry me...
To be perfectly honest, we all searched the UK bookstores for BJD months ago simply because of the Colin connection. The fact that the book was such a hoot was just icing on the cake. I howled through the whole thing. I'd like to think that Colin has a sense of humor about the Darcy thing and would be willing to do the film. IMO (and no offense to JF), if it ain't Colin, it ain't Darcy (either one).
~LauraMM
Wed, Jun 10, 1998 (12:45)
#295
Okay, I tried to post something yesterday BUT because I used the word Fuckwit it censored me:( I was at kinkos last night.
Helen Fielding read from the May chapter. She says bloody bastard awesomely!!! she is absolutely GORGEOUS!!! Made me feel like sh-t! Anyway, she said these booksigning were always nervewracking because you never know if ppl will show up!
She read for about 20 minutes:( Took questions, I asked two. She had not seen the Mark Darcy's Diary and I was kicking myself for not printing it and bringing it to her! Oh yeah, big mouth Lynn came with me:) She was on her best behavior!!!
Helen F. is obsessed with CF. She went to Arsenal game with NH, CF, JF. She said the similarity in the two brothers is amazing, she kept calling them both Mr Darcy!
I told her MD was a fuckwit and she had some 'splaining to do. I think she hasn't put her heart and soul into it recently??? She was supposed to turn in the sequel three weeks ago, she said the publisher should expect it in six months:) very Bridgetesque;p
I was talking to Lynn when I asked her to describe Gary because I wanted to know what this guy that Bridget slept with looked like.
"SHE DID NOT!" Helen F. says, smiling.
"She didn't? What happened in that tent?" She smiled sneakily. Damn! Well No Bridget this Sat. But next week when on Cape, (Nan, are you going?) Ann will bring her computer so we can log into BJD. It comes out aroun 9pm edt.
I think that is all for know.
~Moon
Wed, Jun 10, 1998 (14:44)
#296
(Laura) Helen F. is obsessed with CF. She went to Arsenal game with NH, CF, JF. She said the similarity in the two brothers is amazing, she kept calling them both Mr Darcy!
What a lucky girl!!!!
Laura you were great! Thanks for the info. If her book tour turns out to be a big success, maybe, she will convince Colin to do the movie. Keeping my fingers crossed.
~lizbeth54
Wed, Jun 10, 1998 (16:02)
#297
Laura) Helen F. is obsessed with CF. She went to Arsenal game with NH, CF, JF. She said the similarity in the two brothers is amazing, she kept calling them both Mr Darcy!
(Moon) What a lucky girl!!!!
Mmmm!! I second that!
~LauraMM
Wed, Jun 10, 1998 (16:10)
#298
Well I could be on my way to Highbury!!! Now that I know that Jonathan lives downstairs from NH's writing flat and he does live within spitting distance of the stadium. BTW, Brazil is leading Scotland. Scored in the fourth bloody minute!!!!!
~KarenR
Wed, Jun 10, 1998 (18:14)
#299
OK, I'm making up my list of questions for Friday. Somehow I can't imagine that there will be over 200 people at the store she will be at. I mean it is not in the downtown area or a Notting Hillish area, but in a suburb packed with beyond Smug Marrieds. That area is definitely NOT her audience. I'm wondering what clueless person booked her into that store.
However, I shall be there with my questions and my scenarios for her future colums!! ;-)
~lafn
Wed, Jun 10, 1998 (20:42)
#300
HF was interviewed on CBS This Morning by Jayne Robileaux (sp )who unfortunately had not read the book. They had a bunch of British props on the desk. Things that Bridget refers to : Milk Trays, British cigarettes, lottery tickets (alas no Fairy Cakes) . She denied being like B. but admitted to be a "forty-something" (doesn't look it). Repeated some of the same comments.
Did she mention MD or CF...NO.!!
She is scheduled for Charlie Rose tonight.
Good for you Laura, for bringing up CF.(Nan, Laura's fascination with JF is only a passing fancy. And there is this about it...he is single. And CF is taken!! What's a girl to do!!)
~Ann
Wed, Jun 10, 1998 (23:04)
#301
Only an hour until Fielding is in the
Barnes and Noble chat room (take the "Book Talk" link in the banner at the top of the page).
I've been asked to keep a transcript of that page, like I did with NH, and I'll try.
~nan
Wed, Jun 10, 1998 (23:33)
#302
(Laura) But next week when on Cape, (Nan, are you going?)
Sure am :-)
(Evelyn) Laura's fascination with JF is only a passing fancy. And there is this about it...he is single. And CF is taken!! What's a girl to do!!
There is no such thing as "taken" when I'm having a fantasy. Unless, of course, he's "taken" by me ;-p
~lafn
Thu, Jun 11, 1998 (02:13)
#303
Okay. Tonight on the Helen Fielding Chat Room Baarnes & Noble Book Talk , I asked The Question I knew you all wanted to know: Here it is:
Evelyn from Oklahoma
: Wish you were coming to the SW. We never get to meet an author...it's like we sit around listening to Garth Brooks all the time! Loved your book . But many of us are eager to know about the film....Mark Darcy ...any luck that Colin Firth will take it.? After all, he IS Darcy
.HF: Which I was coming too, do they have cowboys there? Saw Colin Firth at a party and he agreed to keep the next three years free for the film. Stop. I think. Stop.
~heide
Thu, Jun 11, 1998 (02:14)
#304
Congratulations ladies! Ann, Karen, Kate, Laura did you get on too? You all asked probing questions and managed to get Colin into the conversation. Mission accomplished! One question, who is this Mr. Dawcey? Guess the typist never heard a Brit speak before.
Well done.
~heide
Thu, Jun 11, 1998 (02:16)
#305
Oops, I knew it was you too Evelyn. Good question. What did she mean though?
~heide
Thu, Jun 11, 1998 (02:19)
#306
Congratulations ladies! Ann, Karen, Kate, Laura did you get on too? You all asked probing questions and managed to get Colin into the conversation. Mission accomplished! One question, who is this Mr. Dawcey? Guess the typist never heard a Brit speak before.
Well done.
~heide
Thu, Jun 11, 1998 (02:25)
#307
Oh shit.
~Ann
Thu, Jun 11, 1998 (02:32)
#308
I have the transcript up and running!
The Transcript From Helen Fielding's B&N Chat
~lafn
Thu, Jun 11, 1998 (02:45)
#309
This is the answer I didn't understand:
I interviewed Colin Firth in Rome. I was pretending to be Bridget and he was pretending to be Mr. Darcy. We endeed up in front of the statue of Moses, who we both agreed he was clealry gay, murmuring Mr. Darcy, Mr. Darcy. It was weird but strangely delicious.
~lafn
Thu, Jun 11, 1998 (02:50)
#310
Heide, I think Re: Colin Firth taking the MD role...she didn't want to appear too definite. Of course, I think his answer was facetitous too. .Still, it was encouraging and positive...no? Happy?, Bethan?
~lafn
Thu, Jun 11, 1998 (02:53)
#311
Sorry for the misspelling: facetious
~Allison2
Fri, Jun 12, 1998 (08:06)
#312
Thank you all for all the wonderful snippets from Helen Fielding and Nick Hornby. I have really enjoyed hearing what they had to say. It is so good to hear things like- "I met CF at a party" or "I went to arsenal with CF". It gives a small (very small)insight into his real life. Great.
~lafn
Fri, Jun 12, 1998 (13:39)
#313
Rof P Ramble Board has a posting by CK "HF in DC"
posted on 6/11 in which she comments on the reading and booksigning in Washington DC last evening. Worth reading.
I was particularly interested in the comment that HF is still early in the process of writing the BJD screenplay!!! I thought it was ready to go into production this summer!!
So, that gives us hope..".....where we dared not hope before...."
~lizbeth54
Fri, Jun 12, 1998 (19:33)
#314
I interviewed Colin Firth in Rome. I was pretending to be Bridget and he was pretending to be Mr. Darcy. We endeed up in front of the statue of Moses, who we both agreed he was clealry gay, murmuring Mr. Darcy, Mr. Darcy. It was
weird but strangely delicious.
Evelyn, I think CF must have taken Helen on a tour of Rome's famous sights. Didn't she mention the Colisseum and Moses in the BJ/CF interview? (Glad to hear that was real!) Moses must be Michelangelo's statue of Moses in the Church of St Peter in Vinculis, Rome. There's a photo of the statue in our home encyclopaedia, and, I do agree, from his posture and expression Moses does look exceedingly gay!!.......although I must say I think it was highly irreverent of CF and HF to think along these lines! Tut! :
)
Thanks for all the news of HF/BJ and CF/MD. I think I'd be reasonably confident now that he will do it, but I was rather disappointed to read that the BJ script was still in the early stages. There's no way they can be shooting this summer...more like next. :-( :-( Didn't NH write about FP that he had to do 6 drafts of the screenplay? It must take quite some time) The sequel sounds interesting .....MD the Avenging Angel (again).
~LauraMM
Fri, Jun 12, 1998 (19:50)
#315
I think we were pushing it along further than they were. Helen Fielding comes across as a bit lazy when it comes to deadlines. So.... Next summer sounds more reasonable. The question I asked her was
"Everyone knows that BJD is in preproduction.... I am interuppted.."yeah, pre-preproduction!" lots of laughs and some people saying I didn't know that!!!
So, if not next year the year after that!! she did ask CF to keep his calendar for three years!!!
~Allison2
Fri, Jun 12, 1998 (20:28)
#316
By which time he will no longer be a thirtysomething - perhaps MD doesn't have to be?
~lafn
Fri, Jun 12, 1998 (20:44)
#317
IMO I think the real positive outcome of these two book tours (NH &HF) is that they now realize (and hopefully tell CF) that there is an audience throughtout the US awaiting his next project. And you can be sure HF will tell him that wherever she went people asked for CF to play MD!!
BTW is Winter going to check out the booksigning in LA?
Or JANA?
~lizbeth54
Fri, Jun 12, 1998 (21:59)
#318
By which time he will no longer be a thirtysomething - perhaps MD doesn't have to be?
Well, CF doesn't look his age, so a just forty will be okay! But not three years ple-e-ase! The newspaper reports certainly created the impression that the movie was about to roll......,sigh!
So, what is he doing NEXT then, if it's not MD. Any predictions? :-)
~lizbeth54
Fri, Jun 12, 1998 (22:35)
#319
Does this work? Moses in Rome
http://familiar.sph.umich.edu/cjackson/michelan/p-michel22.htm
~lafn
Sat, Jun 13, 1998 (00:50)
#320
I see in www.bookwire.com that Helen Fielding will be on line on
Tuesday June 16 at 8pm: Yahoo National On-Line at the Time Auditorium.
Would someone please tell me where the H--- Time Auditorium is?
I can't find my way. If I can get there Bethan, I'll ask what the expected timeline is for this film. If she was smart she would get crackin' on that screenplay and strike while the book is Hot.
~lafn
Sat, Jun 13, 1998 (00:55)
#321
Moses' pose is quite compromising alright.
But then Michelangelo was gay.
Doesn't mean poor Moses (who isn't around to defend himself) is gay.!!
~KarenR
Sat, Jun 13, 1998 (15:21)
#322
As they say, inside every grey cloud is a silver lining. Last night, Helen Fielding was in town and the turn out was positively pathetic. First off, she appeared at a bookstore in the suburbs and, second, there was a possibility that the Bulls would wipe out the Jazz last night and everyone was fixed to their TV screens.
I got there early (fighting Friday night city traffic) and couldn't quite figure out where they would hold the reading. A clerk pointed to a small settee and 4 chairs. I gasped and said "There!!?? You must be joking!" The person said, "Well, it's up to the author and how she wants it set up. We can bring in a few more chairs." I replied that she had huge turnouts in the other cities she had been in. The clerk said, "Well, there is the Bulls game, you know." Yes, dear, I know but that is not until
ater.
When Helen arrived, there were about 6 people. As she read, several more showed up and there may have been about 20 at the most. I'm pretty sure I was the only one there who knew about the column and was asked by several of the people there for the url.
Helen read several selections, the pregnancy, getting dressed and no pantyhose and dieting, as well as a few of the New Year's resolutions at the beginning. Helen volunteered most information as few had even read her book yet. She mentioned our site's discussion and I chimed in with the fact that I am part of it and most often known as the "Darcy Apologist." In response to a question about British newspaper columns, she said that others had done takeoffs of Bridget and there was one recently by Mark Da
cy that she hadn't read. I then gave her the copy and said I thought she would probably like the end part. She was quite surprised I had it for her.
Anyway, the intimacy of the group allowed me to talk to her quite a bit. But reverting to my true nature (a babbling idiot), I did forget to ask the most important questions (i.e., what did Mark mean when he said 'it's not what you think, what was he trying to say on the phone when he left Bridget the message, and what even got him thinking that it was OK to go out with that piece of rubbish!!). We did discuss the Mark-Bridget relationship and she did assure me that things would be resolved, but that ev
n when two people love each other things don't always go smoothly. Life intrudes. She said that Rebecca is bossy and just took over Mark's life. He being such a busy barrister type allowed it to happen. I was arguing that Mark knew what Rebecca was (Bridget told him), but Helen said why should he believe it. Of course I maintained that Bridget was an idiot and that she should never have gone to Rebecca's parent's county home.
Helen talked about the Colin interview and reiterated that it did indeed happen. She said that Colin really got into it. She explained to the group about the impact of P&P in Britain and how everyone had the obsession with the wet shirt and how Bridget kept working it into the interview. I told her I liked the questions about having a younger, foreign girlfriend and others.
She talked about casting the movie and mentioned she saw someone like Omar Sharif playing Julio. (Sorry, I know this is all disjointed.)
She wrote the greatest stuff in my book and on one of the columns. In the book, she wrote "I'll be watching you on the net. vg best wishes from ...." Then I gave her a copy of the column with Mark strutting barrister mode clad only in a towel and I told her that was an image that is permanent etched in my brain. She said, "Do you want more sexy scenes?" I smiled and said but of course. SO when she signed that column, she wrote something to the effect (I don't have it in front of me--sorry): "Mmmmmmmm
More sexy Mark scenes for you....."
It was great!! I do agree that the screenplay and the sequel are a ways off. SHe mentioned how the new book would pick up where the other left off and she did talk about the Bangkok drug smuggling and Mark rescue.
Someone asked her if after all the popularity of Bridget would she be able to write a serious novel or has she been stereotyped now. Her answer: She has no complaints. This is just fine. Hmmmmmm
OK, got to go.
Jana or Jennifer: It's up to you or someone in Denver (if you're out there)
~Kate
Sat, Jun 13, 1998 (16:15)
#323
*sigh*... that was great Karen, you were lucky that so few people turned up! But I am glad for her sake that so many people came to her NYC reading which was the first one, even though it made it impossible to talk to her at all - it must have given her a real boost. And then small discussions like yours would make her know that she has some devoted fans!!
One thing I forgot to mention in my report was that a fair proportion (maybe one quarter) of the people at the reading had the british paperback edition - and had obviously read it. So maybe she had more import/traveller penetration in this market.
~KarenR
Sat, Jun 13, 1998 (16:35)
#324
(Kate) But I am glad for her sake that so many people came to her NYC reading which was the first one
She definitely understood the significance of what was going on relative to the Bulls and even mentioned that the same is quite common for football in England. At that, I did bring up how I had seen Nick last week and so thoroughly enjoyed his book FP. yadda yadda yadda
However, I do believe location also played in to it. Those bookstore people were pretty smug. Before she got there, they were saying how they get all the *biggies* and get *exclusives.* V. typical attitude for that area. They did serve wine and snacks. A minor plus.
fair proportion (maybe one quarter) of the people at the reading had the british paperback edition
There was only one other person with the British paperback edition at the signing and she said she picked it up at the airport. There were two Brits at the signing, neither of whom had read the book yet. The younger woman identified herself as British and Helen commented that she sounded more American to her, but I said, to an American she didn't. Then I added that one would never know she herself was from Yorkshire because of her accent. The other woman was surprised, saying she herself was from Shef
ield. Helen said that she just lost her Yorkshire accent...it just happened.
~lafn
Sat, Jun 13, 1998 (19:42)
#325
Karen....What a TREAT you have given us. A real gift. I read your posting twice!
HF was probably not disappointed to have a small group for a change.
She has been" on the go". And to find someone as knowledgeable as you; she must have been pleased.
Thank you, thank you, for taking the time, You , Kate &, Laura , to share your experiences with us less fortunate . And Ann for giving us the on-line transcript.
I downloaded the latter and am sending it to a friend in UK!!At her request.
How's that for a turn-about!!
~lizbeth54
Sat, Jun 13, 1998 (19:42)
#326
Great report, Karen! I'll wait quite happily for the movie (with CF, of course)......although not YEARS and YEARS! (Evelyn, try for an approx. date...1999, 2000, 2007???) I also like the image of MD strutting in barrister mode clad only in towel. All credit to you if we get more! And thanks for the news about the Rome interview.
How is BJD selling....I really hope it takes off for Helen. There was an article in the Telegraph last week about her increasing worldwide popularity......I think 700 people (women? or does Bridget have male supporters) turned up for a book signing session in Norway.
BTW I thought Mark Darcy's Diary was very, very funny! Bridget could have a rival! :-)
~lafn
Sat, Jun 13, 1998 (19:48)
#327
(Bethan I also like the image of MD strutting in barrister mode clad only in towel. All credit to you if we get more!
My personal favorite was CHRISTMAS DAY,( 3 January 1998.)
I'm going to ask her if she'll include that episode in the screen play.
~lafn
Sat, Jun 13, 1998 (20:14)
#328
Okay, I found the TIME Chat Room Auditorium
: Helen Fielding
Tuesday, June 16 pm ET /5PT
Yahoo & Time Magazine On-Line
URL http://www.pathfinder.com/time/community/index.html
(sorry,I'm not v. good at creating links...Renate...where are you?)
also: here are the rest of the dates:
6/15 Denver Tattered Cover Bookstore
6/16 Book Passage, Corte Madera, Ca. (where is that?)
6/18 Borders, LA
I shall alert Jennifer in LA. Anyone want to alert Jana?
~Kate
Sun, Jun 14, 1998 (01:35)
#329
Regrettably, BJ seems to have dropped off the NY Times bestseller list. ;-(
~Ann
Sun, Jun 14, 1998 (04:42)
#330
It's wierd, one Barnes Ignoble near me has About a Boy, but not BJD, and another (larger one) has BJD, but not AAB.
~Meggin
Sun, Jun 14, 1998 (04:51)
#331
Ann, my local Books-A-Million insisted that BJD wouldn't be released until August! I got my copy at WaldenBooks (which is a much smaller store).
Thanks to everyone who posted accounts of HF's booksignings and readings. I really enjoyed them!
~nan
Sun, Jun 14, 1998 (14:52)
#332
Margaret! Where have you been, hiney? ;-p Did you lose ICQ again?
~Moon
Mon, Jun 15, 1998 (18:50)
#333
Ladies in yesterday's New York Times, in the Style Section, there was a horrible review of BJD. She called it passe and said basically that women in the UK are to be pited if they indeed are like B. The NYT is on-line so you may wish to check it out. What says you Laura? If Colin reads it he may not be interested in MD any longer. YIKES!
~Meggin
Mon, Jun 15, 1998 (19:06)
#334
Margaret! Where have you been, hiney? ;-p Did you lose ICQ again?
}
Sweatie, I've been right here! ;-b I still have ICQ but it never shows your status. ;-( Are you still active?
~Arami
Mon, Jun 15, 1998 (19:22)
#335
(Moon) If Colin reads it he may not be interested in MD any longer.
If Colin took all the media criticism of his various projects too seriously, he'd have to change his profession.
~LauraMM
Mon, Jun 15, 1998 (20:14)
#336
Arami, I think that is the MOST cogent thing I've ever heard from you;)
Personally, not every review is going to be a great review. Take it with a grain of salt. Was it a man who reviewed the book? If that is the case, then he is a fuckwit and has no clue about women at all! Bridget is me, you, Arami, and Karen R. Nan is perfect so it can't be her;) hee hee.
Colin will PLAY MD because he wants to be famous and this will make him famous!
~lizbeth54
Mon, Jun 15, 1998 (21:41)
#337
We've just acquired Ally McBeal. Women reviewers gave her the thumbs down (very emphatically). Men like her. Draw your own conclusions!
Arami, I think that is the MOST cogent thing I've ever heard from you;)
Sabbaticals sharpen the mind! :-)
~Moon
Mon, Jun 15, 1998 (23:51)
#338
Laura, it was a woman who also quoted lots of her female friends: they all hated it!
I hope you're right about CF wanting to MD. I just want to see him more often.
~nan
Tue, Jun 16, 1998 (16:11)
#339
(Margaret) Sweatie, I've been right here! ;-b I still have ICQ but it never shows your status. ;-( Are you still active?
When I got the new computer I had to re-register at ICQ...I sent you an authorization request but it never went through. I'll try it again, baby ;-)
(Laura) Nan is perfect so it can't be her;)
Well, I'm glad you're finally catching on ;-p Actually, there are many things about Bridget which remind me of myself. Unfortunately, they seem to be her more negative qualities (or what *I* perceive to be negative qualities). This could be why I sometimes want to crack Bridget upside the head...because I've made similar mistakes.
~LauraMM
Tue, Jun 16, 1998 (17:32)
#340
Ah, Nan the truth comes out!!! I think Bridget is everywoman and everywoman is Bridget!!! Just this morning it took me at least thirty minutes looking for decent hose to put on with a run.
~lafn
Tue, Jun 16, 1998 (18:43)
#341
I have contacted Jennifer (Winter) and Jana. They will try to attend the HF Booksigning in LA at Borders. Both concur that CF must play the role of MD.
(Actually, I'm getting a little paranoid about this.)
Tonight is the Yahoo/Time On-Line with HF at 8PM , ET.
I shall try to get on, if I can navigate my way through that Chat Room; it looks involved.
~Arami
Tue, Jun 16, 1998 (23:05)
#342
(Laura)Colin will PLAY MD because he wants to be famous and this will make him famous!
Oh, dear... I'm trying to think of something to say about it and can't. Maybe it's best left without a comment...;-)
~Arami
Tue, Jun 16, 1998 (23:10)
#343
...Not so sharp then, Bethan, huh? Well, that's emotional fuckwittage for you, baby ;-P
~lafn
Wed, Jun 17, 1998 (01:26)
#344
The transcript of the Yahoo/Time Chat Room will be on-line soon, they say.
It was an interesting chat. Sadly, I could never get my browser to accept the Java software and was not ablel to ask the question. But other people asked our questions.
CF's name was mentioned several times in connection with MD.
The most interesting fact is that HF said she expected the film would be out in 18 months.
And she hasn't decided whether B and MD will marry!!!
~nan
Wed, Jun 17, 1998 (03:56)
#345
(Laura)Ah, Nan the truth comes out!!! I think Bridget is everywoman and everywoman is Bridget!!!
Yes, I think we all have our bursts of Bridget, though most of mine happened in my early 20s.
(Evelyn) The most interesting fact is that HF said she expected the film would be out in 18 months.
Oh my! That sounds like a long time. I'm afraid my interest will be gone by then...well, unless Colin decides to take the part ;-)
(Laura)Colin will PLAY MD because he wants to be famous and this will make him famous!
(Arami) Oh, dear... I'm trying to think of something to say about it and can't. Maybe it's best left without a comment...;-)
Well said, m'dear ;-)
~Kate
Wed, Jun 17, 1998 (13:28)
#346
The Yahoo chat was kind of weird. I was in this small chat room with five others all of whom had weird handles, and some of whom had no idea about HF and were only there to ask questions like "are you sexy?" BLERK. Makes me realize how civilized our little corner of the web is.
But the HF part was very interesting, and they picked a couple of the six or seven questions I posted, including the "will they ever get together?" one.
She said that she never really knows what is going to happen until the Friday morning when she starts writing the column (leaving it till the last minute - woman after my own heart), but that she likes MD very much as a character and would be sad to lose him. She also said at one point that not all the columns will end up in the book - some that get written very late are "absolute drivel" or words to that effect!
~LauraMM
Wed, Jun 17, 1998 (13:44)
#347
Bull crap that was well said!!!! Its the truth!!!!
~KarenR
Wed, Jun 17, 1998 (18:07)
#348
(Kate) She said that she never really knows what is going to happen until the Friday morning when she starts writing the column (leaving it till the last minute - woman after my own heart
All procrastinators unite!! But that also supports something I think that Bethan or Allison have been mentioning for quite some time: the fact that Helen doesn't really have a plot well-established in her mind for the columns. I would expect that, when she has to turn the columns into the sequel, she will once again have to come up with a "beginning, middle, and end." ;-)
but that she likes MD very much as a character and would be sad to lose him.
So do we and IF she loses him, how many others will defect!!
~lizbeth54
Wed, Jun 17, 1998 (19:53)
#349
I was cheered to read that HF expects the movie to be out in 18 months. I think that's quite a reasonable timescale and could indicate that they may start shooting soon. A lot of British movies take over 18 months from the first day of the shoot to actually hitting the screen. If (:-( ) MLSF had opened in July, the timescale would have been just over 15 months. But obviously movies can be rushed through as well......SIL seems to be opening quickly.
Anyway I think 18 months is positive news...I was worried that HF might take another 2 years to finish the script, by which time it would be a case of Bridget Who?!!!
If you're interested in checking out info on BJD (or absolutely anything/one else!), one metasearch engine I use at work is
www.askjeeves.com/
It pulls up quite a few articles about BJD in the US (although you also have to sift through the irrelevant stuff). The movie seems to have Hollywood backing.
~nan
Thu, Jun 18, 1998 (00:40)
#350
(Laura) Bull crap that was well said!!!! Its the truth!!!!
I still don't agree. We've had this discussion about Colin and fame (or lack thereof) so many times that I've run out of things to say--apparently, Arami has as well ;-)
Sorry dear, all the exclamation points in the world will not convince me that Colin would accept a role simply because he craves fame.
~lafn
Thu, Jun 18, 1998 (01:56)
#351
but that she likes MD very much as a character and would be sad to lose him.
Actually, last night at one point , she casually said ;"I coud live without him".
I will let you know when Time posts the transcript.
They seem to be behind.
~heide
Fri, Jun 19, 1998 (02:03)
#352
Has no one mentioned the People magazine article on Helen Fielding this past week? Wot?! Kate Winslett and Minnie Driver being considered as Bridgets? What bitter irony to have a mint fresh, shiny new ingenue playing 30-something, battered-a-bit Bridget. Let's hope the people with influence will see the light.
~lizbeth54
Fri, Jun 19, 1998 (08:11)
#353
It's Hollywood star power. If Hollywood have a vested interest in BJD - The Movie, then they will go for names rather than verisimilitude. If Working Title want to be true to the book they should cast someone who is relatively unknown, but if they want the movie to be promoted and successful in the US (and without this exposure, a movie cannot be deemed a success )they'll have to go for names. I'd lay even money it is KW or MD. Does CF have Hollywood star power?!!!
~KarenR
Fri, Jun 19, 1998 (17:55)
#354
(Heide) Kate Winslett and Minnie Driver being considered as Bridgets?
Kate Winslet has the heft, but Minnie Driver has the face of averageness. However, I can't see Minnie putting on the pounds to play the role after having taken up the anorexic/bulimic lifestyle and hanging around with a convict druggie. Of course they are both way too young.
(Bethan) Does CF have Hollywood star power?!!!
This is a rhetorical question, isn't it? ;-)
~Renata
Fri, Jun 19, 1998 (20:59)
#355
What about Kristin Scott Thomas as Bridget. She is a) British, but is b) known well enough in the US, c) has the right age, and d) she's a very good actress. That she is very thin doesn't matter, IMO, since this dieting-mania has nothing to do with the actual weight, but is a state of mind, and would be emphasised in its absurdity by a very slim actress. If it had to be an American actress there can only be one: Jeaneane Garofalo (Help! How do you spell her first name!?). Come to think of it, she's exactl
the person who could bring BJ's character across....
~Moon
Fri, Jun 19, 1998 (21:42)
#356
What about Meg Ryan? She is also the right age.
~winter
Sat, Jun 20, 1998 (02:27)
#357
unbelieveable... so exactly 24 hours ago, Jana and I actually saw Helen Fielding! She made an appearance at the Borders Bookstore at the Santa Monica Promenade (same setting as Colin's interview a while back), and just our luck: we sat right in front of HF's podium!!!!!
She read the pregnancy test excerpt from her book, which drew lots of laughs.OH oh! oh!!!! AND she enlightened us (me at least) on the correct pronunciation of "fuckwittage": [fuck-wit-ahh-zsh] very shi-shi and French for a cuss word, if you ask me ;-)
anyway, she's really very beautfiful in person, taller than i had imagined, so she sort of looks statuesque in an un-Bridget sort of way.But she's so down to earth, and answered all the questions, and didn't mind the 2 colin questions i asked her.
-she didn't get specific about whether or not he'll be marck darcy, but she's run the idea past him, he hasn't committed to any other films for the next 3 years, and ... well, she's hoping for him to sign off to do it.
-i asked her about the interview she did in rome with him. she had a good time with him, and they kept staring at a statue somewhere in rome, and she kept thinking "mr. darcy, mr. darcy.."
anyway, i also hit her up for a part in the movie.. since i'm considered an 'ethnic type' in Hollywood, i figured the only part i was good for was Elena Rossini (was that her name?).. the woman accused of murdering her employer, and who was defended by mark darcy in trial. (Bridjet gets an exclusive interview with her). HF drew a complete blank when i told her i wanted to be Elena Rossini-- really dumb question on my part, but hey-- i had to ask.
she'll be living in LA now, for the time being, as she writes the screenplay.
I'm so excited!
Jana and I had a lovely talk after the booksigning (i'll try to scan our picture!).. and it's so amazing how much we have in common and can talk about, though this was the first time we've actually spoken to one another.
Anyway, i'm neglecting someone in the other room right now... so i have to sign off. but i just wanted to share our little encounter with HF.
winter (jennifer)
~heide
Sat, Jun 20, 1998 (02:34)
#358
There has to be actresses out there not only the right age but also the right look.
Kristen Scott Thomas? I wonder if she can get past her "classy dame" typecasting; Janeann Garofalo, oddly enough, looks like the Bridget in my mind - that's a possibility; Meg Ryan? IMO, too blonde and bubbly.
Surely there are other Brits out there who can do this? How about Emily Watson?
~lizbeth54
Sat, Jun 20, 1998 (07:41)
#359
he hasn't committed to any other films for the next 3 years
E-e-ech! I want him to do MD...but not THAT much! Commit, Colin, commit!
~Arami
Sat, Jun 20, 1998 (22:18)
#360
Commit, Colin, commit!
Ditto here. This must be some misunderstanding, surely. Perhaps at the time they talked he had no other plans and tentatively agreed to keep BJD in mind.
~winter
Sun, Jun 21, 1998 (00:19)
#361
on casting bridget: I always thought that actress from "Friends" should play Bridget. I don;t remember her name, but she playerd Ross' finacee, and sh's been on a PBS series for a while now.
can someone gimme her name?
~lafn
Sun, Jun 21, 1998 (21:02)
#362
Thank you Winter and Jana for attending the LA Booksigning. You did us
proud!! And we appreciate your efforts.
, he hasn't committed to any other films for the next 3 years, and ... well, she's hoping for him to sign off to do it
I am in shock.Why, Why is he doing this??
Casting Bridget: Tara Ftizgerald ( Brassed Off, Tenant of Wilfell Hall).
Kate Beckinsale, Samantha Bond (Rebecca), It can't anybody too beautiful...they wouldn't be out there looking for a husband. The guys would be lining up for them!!
As for CF's Star Wattage ...if it's a well-known Bridget, MD's role would not need a megastar. (Sliding Doors with GP and John Hannah...an obscure Scottish actor...has been on the top 10 films in the US) I hope they don't cast Jennifer Jason Leigh...I read she is eager to do a role with a British accent!!!
If HF is to live in LA for the duration of the screenplay writing...will she continue the weekly BJD installments in the Telegraph.??
~Jana2
Sun, Jun 21, 1998 (23:51)
#363
Sorry I'm tardy with my report on the Helen Fielding book signing, but thanks for sending me. Jennifer and I had a great time! I have to admit I hadn't read any of BJD before I went, but enjoyed the reading and meeting her in person. As others have said, HF is quite attractive, witty and charming.
I'm not sure I have a lot of news to report. Most of the comments and anecdotes that HF shared I have already (or since) read in other interviews with her. For example, we got the "looking at the Moses statue in Rome and moaning Mr. Darcy" story, for example. There was a pretty large, appreciative crowd there who laughed in all the right places during the reading.
Winter (jennifer) was brave and asked if CF would consider playing Mark Darcy. HF related the story I've read before about her asking him to do it at a party and him saying he'd save the next three years. Hearing her say it in person however, I got the distinct impression it was just teasing banter between them, not a real type of commitment. She had quite the twinkle in her eye and she phrased it so carefully, I would bet that there is no real understanding yet that CF will in fact play M.D. This is
ertainly only IMHO and I will happily eat my hat later if it turns out to be true.
Someone asked if she would be returning to London since this was her last signing, and she said no, she was staying on in LA to work on the screenplay. The crowd oooohed in unison to this for some reason, and we all laughed, HF included. I think we were just so happy that she was sticking around our little world for awhile. (She didn't say for how long though, Evelyn. Sorry, I should have asked.) It sounds like there is still quite a bit of work to be done on the screenplay. Maybe HF will snag tha
CF commitment yet!
Someone asked what she thought about the different places in America that she'd visited. She really liked New York and thought it looked like a movie set. She didn't see much of Washington DC or Boston other than the hotel rooms. She liked Chicago and thought it looked like a perfectly designed, imaginary city one would create in the SimCity game. She didn't think the Denver reading went particularly well. There was a lot of shifting about uncomfortably when she used the first swear word (I think it
as F**kwittage) and she said she felt a bit like she was heading towards Niagara Falls in a barrel because she knew she had to read the "B**stards, B**stards" part shortly.
Jennifer asked if HF had really done the CF interview in person, and she said yes. HF said CF was a delightful person and that he really got into the spirit of the interview. (or maybe she said he was charming. I can't remember exactly, but she clearly likes our DB. :-)
We had just a brief, private moment to speak with her when she was signing our books. The book store folks were moving the line along quickly. Jennifer told HF we were from the internet group and she brightened up and said something like "You folks have been at almost every signing. There was a woman in Chigaco, I remember." (so you see K, you made quite the impression) I said, "Oh yes, that would be Karen. And the ladies at the net made sure we were attending tonight so that we would definitely have
LA representation." HF just laughed. Then Jennifer had a moment with her, we got our picture taken and were whisked out of the way. So, as I said, not a lot new to report, except that she's currently doing the Hollywood thing. My journalistic skills are a bit lacking, I fear.
Anyway, thanks ladies, for suggesting a lovely evening. Far and away the best part was meeting Jennifer, real live and in person :-).
~Jana2
Sun, Jun 21, 1998 (23:56)
#364
(Bethan and Arami) Commit, Colin, commit!
Ditto here. This must be some misunderstanding, surely. Perhaps at the time they talked he had no other plans and tentatively agreed to keep BJD in mind.
My impression of CF's comment that he'd wait three years to play MD was that it was something flip he threw out at a party to hush up HF, not that he really had no plans in the works for the next three years. I could be wrong, but I thought HF made it sound that he was just teasing about waiting the three years for this part. Only MHO, but there you are.
~lafn
Mon, Jun 22, 1998 (04:04)
#365
Jana, you have excellent journalistic skills. And we thank you for going.to the LA Booksigning
I, too, am glad that we had representatives all over (except Denver...which didn't go well. Maybe, that's why!! )
Thanks to all The Spring Reporters, the rest of us got to find out some good stuff.Thanks for sharing guys!!
BTW USA TODAY list of the Top 50 Best Sellers in the US ranks BJD as 42. (Last week it was 58). I noted at Borders that it is a Book of the Month Club Selection. Way to Go, HF!!
~Kate
Mon, Jun 22, 1998 (13:36)
#366
Have you seen HF's diary of her trip around the States? It's hilarious, especially the account of her media training (no wonder the poor thing answered all questions the same way!) and the sound-bite-esqueness of the whole interview process...
I LOLed at this...
"Go to Central Park, first removing all jewellery and stuffing money and credit cards cunningly into bra. Assume will be murdered on arrival but find ambrosia-like Utopia - children playing ball games, gay lovers canoodling, smiling grandpas etc."
since I did exactly the same thing when I first came to NYC.
~KarenR
Mon, Jun 22, 1998 (16:32)
#367
Thanks Jennifer and Jana for the great reports. I remember in one of her interviews, she said that she bought a book in true Bridgetesque fashion on how to write a screenplay. Guess that it didn't do the trick!! Needs private tutoring from the pros. Either that or wants to go to Disneyland.
Loved her *Report* from the States. I seriously doubt that the sign she posed with in Chicago said "Haircolouring by Bridget" unless signmaker is time-served graduate of Chicago Public School system and therefore cannot spell.
Too bad she went to eat at the 95th. Is only good for the view and for having a drink on a clear day. Have found inverse relationship between altitude of restaurants and quality of food.
Starting, though, to notice absence of anything old
Hmmm, Chicago call boy escort must failed to have told her that city burned down in the 1870s. Another CPS graduate. BTW, call boy did not look like Richard Gere. v.disappointing.
You're quite right, Kate, about that media training. She certainly learned her bullet points well.
OK, big question: What is a twin set?
The only association I get from twin sets are those sweater sets that were worn in the '50s and '60s and might be worn today by those shopping at Talbots or readers of Town & Country. Retro fashion????
~KarenR
Mon, Jun 22, 1998 (19:47)
#368
(Winter) I always thought that actress from "Friends" should play Bridget. I
don;t remember her name, but she playerd Ross' finacee
Her name is Helen Baxendale. I'm glad you agree. She is playing Cordelia Gray in the Mystery series, "An Unsuitable Job for a Woman." She is average looking (i.e., not perfect), but has the potential to be pretty. The only thing is I wonder how she would do playing a major ditz.
Renate: While Janene Garafalo (sp.?) might look right and definitely played a woman who is insecure in "The Truth About Cats and Dogs," I've heard her being interviewed and she is way too intelligent. I couldn't imagine her playing a ditz.
~Arami
Mon, Jun 22, 1998 (20:27)
#369
I've heard her being interviewed and she is way too intelligent. I couldn't imagine her playing a ditz.
LOL! So much for your knowledge of acting skills...
~lizbeth54
Mon, Jun 22, 1998 (20:33)
#370
Congrats Karen on getting recognition for the Chicago ladies!
Yes, it does sound as if HF was repeating (as per her orders) the same sound bites. I think it's interesting that she's staying on in LA to work on the screenplay.....maybe it's reached the "knocking into shape" stage!
I'm repeating what I've just said on #59, but I think that Emma Thompson's younger sister Sophie (she was in Emma) would make a good Bridget..she usually does comedy.
~lafn
Mon, Jun 22, 1998 (21:53)
#371
Yes, it does sound as if HF was repeating (as per her orders) the same sound bites.
The media-managers didn't count on us who followed all her television interviews and on-line chats....AND the reports from The Spring Reporters.
I would have liked to have heard what HF herselfwould have answered.
Instead of scripting her.
~KarenR
Mon, Jun 22, 1998 (22:18)
#372
(Maria) LOL! So much for your knowledge of acting skills...
She is primarily a comedienne and I wouldn't think she would want to play a ditz. That's just my take on her. It has nothing to do with obviously my inferior knowledge of acting.
~LauraMM
Tue, Jun 23, 1998 (17:17)
#373
To end the casting question once and for all. Hello all I am back from the Cape and cannot believe that Renate was left in charge. Hee hee. Anyway.
For Bridget:
Imogen Stubbs aka Lucy Steele
Claire Rushbrook aka I have no clue.
Janeane Garofalo is too intelligent to play Bridget and too American!!!
And can we please be civil here. I understand everyone has their own opinion as to who should play what and whom, but when everyone starts getting testy it makes for a nasty page ESPECIALLY when we now know that Ms Fielding can jump on this page whenever she wants. Thank and now back to the studio.
~Arami
Tue, Jun 23, 1998 (20:22)
#374
(Karen)She is primarily a comedienne and I wouldn't think she would want to play a ditz. That's just my take on her. It has nothing to do with obviously my inferior knowledge of acting.
I am sorry if you feel offended, but it seemed that you were questioning an actor's ability and/or willingness to stretch. That's typecasting.
(Laura)And can we please be civil here.
Are you taking over from Renate?
~Kate
Tue, Jun 23, 1998 (23:11)
#375
Ms Fielding can jump on this page
whenever she wants.
I have to confess that this is not something that fills me with joy and delight (much as I love your books, Helen). If someone is going to hand over the url to a subject of our discussion, could you at least give us some notice, if not actually discuss it with us?
~lafn
Wed, Jun 24, 1998 (01:43)
#376
Kate: If someone is going to hand over the url to a subject of our discussion, could you at least give us some notice, if not actually discuss it with us?
I was under the impression that this is a public board. Anyone can access it through The Spring. No one invited me!
~Ann
Wed, Jun 24, 1998 (05:06)
#377
Kate: If someone is going to hand over the url to a subject of our discussion....
I thought that she found it on her own, and that she mentioned having found the website before anyone had told her about it. I know I've done a couple of web searches on my name, and it's not surprising that other people do as well.
Now, if only HF will join us in the chat room some time!
~Kate
Wed, Jun 24, 1998 (13:44)
#378
I was under the impression that this is a public board
of course it is. But that does not mean we actually have to tell the objects of our discussion about it - if they find it on their own, well and good.
I thought that she found it on her own
Oops! in that case I was mistaken. I thought Karen or Laura gave her the url.
~lafn
Wed, Jun 24, 1998 (13:48)
#379
TIME MAGAZINE has posted the transcript of the June 16th interview in the TIME/Yahoo Chat Room with Helen Fielding.
http://pathfinder.com/time/community/transcripts/chattr061698.html
~KarenR
Wed, Jun 24, 1998 (16:07)
#380
HF found this site by doing a search, but I did not get the impression that she comes here very often and only to get a feeling of our reaction to her columns, i.e, why there isn't a lot of discussion when she focuses on news items v. the Bridget-Mark relationship. She has not intention of posting.
I gave the Electronic Telegraph url to several people, but not this place.
So I suggest that we just continue as before...saying what we want to and forget the fact that HF *might* read it. However, I might tone down my threats of bodily harm a bit...or maybe not!! :-)
Speaking of Time magazine, the cover this week is entitled "Is Feminism Dead" and depicts Susan B. Anthony to Ally McBeal. I had a feeling that BJD might be mentioned and she is...about three paragraphs trashing the so-called British version of AMc. Ah yes, where has feminist literature gone? To compare BJD to the 60s and 70s seminal works of Germaine Greer, Kate Millet, Betty Friedan, et al. is positively absurd. Time: lighten up!!@
BTW, Kate, I was surprised that Bridget in America didn't note the absence of pavement folk art (chalk outlines of people) in NYC which, if one believes all one sees in movies/TV, should be all over the place. Perhaps, Bridget/HF thought Central Park was a violent place because Kennedy hunks might be assaulted by their fiancees! ;-)
~lizbeth54
Wed, Jun 24, 1998 (17:45)
#381
Thanks for the transcript of the HF interview! Actually, talking about searching on names, if you search on "Colin Firth" on some search engines you come straight into the Spring (Drool), and the same must apply to a search on HF!
~KarenR
Wed, Jun 24, 1998 (22:03)
#382
Evelyn, read the chat transcript and thought the session had some great stuff in it. More than the usual answers we heard everywhere else. Her comment about whether Bridget and Mark are EVER going to get it together was definitely optimistic. "But I really like Mark Darcy as a character and I'm not sure I could live without him." Was that your question, Kate?
Does no one know what a "twin set" is? Am on the edge of my chair and have bitten my nails down to the quick! ;-)
~Kate
Wed, Jun 24, 1998 (22:34)
#383
Her comment about whether Bridget and Mark are EVER going to get it together was definitely optimistic. "But I really like Mark
Darcy as a character and I'm not sure I could live without him." Was that your question, Kate?
yes. ;-)
Does no one know what a "twin set" is? Am on the edge of my chair and have bitten my nails down to the quick! ;-)
A twin set, as I understand it could mean either a sweater and cardigan set or a dress and jacket set. I don't think it refers to a suit, but I'm not claiming to be an authority on english fashion terms, and I could have this complelety wrong.
~lafn
Thu, Jun 25, 1998 (01:41)
#384
Karen: To compare BJD to the 60s and 70s seminal works of Germaine Greer, Kate Millet, Betty Friedan, et al. is positively absurd. Time: lighten up!!
Why don't you write a letter to the TIME editors and tell them that.
Someone should come out in defense of Bridget and HF.
(I feel as if they're part of my family!!....or at least good friends!!)
BTW twin-sets are the short sleeve and cardigan matching sweater sets.
They're hot now...a little retro.
~KarenR
Thu, Jun 25, 1998 (15:41)
#385
Re: Twin Sets
...but didn't she mention a gingham one in the Denver section? I've never seen a gingham sweater set, but then again I've never seen a purple cow either. ;-)
~CatFan
Sat, Jun 27, 1998 (01:35)
#386
I have nothing enlightening to say, but just wanted to join in the enthusiasm over THE BOOK. I have just read it (twice) and am passing it around to my single friends (I am a smug married). My husband asked what I was laughing so much about. I have a question to those of you who are "in the know". Why is there this backlash against Mark Darcy in these postings? Has Ms. Fielding continued the story and turned the dashing man from the book into something else? Does she continue writing for the newspape
(or wherever this story started) and if so, which one, and can I access it from my computer? I'd love to read a continuing saga. Thanks.
~lafn
Wed, Jul 1, 1998 (01:54)
#387
(Susan) Does she continue writing for the newspaper
(or wherever this story started) and if so, which one, and can I access it from my computer? I'd love to read a continuing saga.
Welcome , Susan.
Yes HF writes a weekly column in the Saturday issue of the Electronic Telegraph (only it stays on all week)
www.telegraph.co.uk Click on "Etcetera" Scroll down to the bottom. And as a bonus, The Telegraph gives you all the back installments too.
You'll be as hooked as the rest of us. And hey, we all like Mark Darcy....on account of we expect Colin Firth to play the role in the forthcoming film.
So ,start reading and then, by all means tell us what you think every week..
~Kate
Wed, Jul 1, 1998 (02:18)
#388
I have to say that this was one of the funniest columns HF has written recently. First of all the recitation of the famous people: "gay". And the description of Jerome's poetry reading had me ROTFLOLing....
And it ties up so neatly at the end: Jerome: straight.
~Ann
Wed, Jul 1, 1998 (02:46)
#389
I couldn't help but think of HF's book tour when she started talking about book groups. I was just waiting for her to mention someone named Karen or Laura.
~lafn
Wed, Jul 1, 1998 (16:45)
#390
I thought last week's column was a hoot too,
Esp. the ladies of the Lifeboat Book Club sitting on their faux regency chairs listening to Pretentious Jerome!! What a picture!
BTW I wrote to Time Magazine and explained that HF did not write BJD to be a feminist treatise to be compared with Germaine Greer or Gloria Steinem as the writer intimated in last week's cover story.
Anyone else want to email: Letters@time.com Give name, address and daytime phone..
~Ann
Wed, Jul 1, 1998 (17:13)
#391
CNN is doing a piece on Helen Fielding and Bridget Jones. It will be on their Entertainment Weekly/CNN show
Thursday night at 10 PM Eastern.
~KarenR
Wed, Jul 1, 1998 (17:48)
#392
THERE'S only one explanation," declared Jude. "Mark Darcy's gay."
Quite right!! Only one explanation that a scorned woman could accept. One that would make her feel better as though the breakup had nothing to do with with her!! So, that would...what...make Rebecca a transvestite, right? ;-O She's v.tall and has a pert bum. Could only be a guy. Is biologically against laws of nature!!
no. of days since saw Gary the Builder, who...pretended something had happened between us, then disappeared again: 13
So much for the grand passion, Laura. He's a wolf in sheep's clothing. How better than to get Bridget than to put Mark down and pretend to be the sensitive Alan Alda-ish male and bring her capuccino in the a.m.!! Can spot a skunk at 1000 yds.)
(Ann) I couldn't help but think of HF's book tour when she started talking about book groups. I was just waiting for her to mention someone named Karen or Laura.
Yes, I was starting to get uncomfortable, myself!! :-) Hmmm Does HF think we should, perhaps, get a life?
FYI, there is a great interview with HF at amazon.com. It has some of the pat answers we've all seen plus a few of the things that were in her "Bridget in America" column, but other new comments. The url is really long, but you can access from the home page. There's a ref to HF and Bridget and there are three link options. I'm sure you can figure out which one to go to. :-)
~lafn
Wed, Jul 1, 1998 (17:48)
#393
Hmmm Does HF think we should, perhaps, get a life?
Nevah!
~LauraMM
Wed, Jul 1, 1998 (17:48)
#394
Susan, welcome to our nightmare!!! hee hee. Regarding the why I hate Mark Darcy. Well read the columns and you'll see;)
Hee hee.
I really have noting to add, sad isn't it! I've been gone for a week or so and can't think of one bloody thing to say:)
~lafn
Wed, Jul 1, 1998 (17:48)
#395
Welcome Back, dear leader....we have missed your pithy remarks!!
Thank you, Ann for the info on HF to be featured on CNN tomorrow night
What would we do without Ann who keeps us posted on the BJD promos.
.
And Karen, that interview with HF on Amazon.com is great. Mobetta' than some of the Chat Rooms where they often ask inane question. (Like mine!)
~Ann
Fri, Jul 3, 1998 (04:11)
#396
On the CNN/Entertainment Weakly show, the bozo bloke said that Bridget should be played by Christina Ricci! Excuse me! Yes, let's have a 30-something, with biological-clock ticking, woman who is reaching her sell-by date played by a 19 year old. EXCUSE ME!!!!
I really fear that Hollywood is going to do this sort of thing to BJ.
~lafn
Fri, Jul 3, 1998 (14:13)
#397
(Ann) I really fear that Hollywood is going to do this sort of thing to BJ.
I do too. I just hope they keep the cast British.. But if they do I lay bets GP gets the role...she was mentioned in the CNN /Entertainment Weekly Show.
Along with Toni Colette, and Heather Locklear (sp?)Also Minnie Driver with
20 lbs.( I said that months ago).
No mention of MD in the interview.CF still has a shot...esp. if they cast it with a well-known Bridget. Two unkowns in a $$$ film...uh,uh.
~KarenR
Fri, Jul 3, 1998 (19:07)
#398
Wednesday Addams!!!
Are those people out of their minds?
Definitely agree with you, Ann, Christina Ricci is TOO young. That list of possibles they came up must have really taxed their little pea-brains. Not one new name that we haven't already heard bandied about. All pretty mainstream choices. No one who would really qualify as an unknown.
BTW, Looked like the outfit HF was wearing in Chicago. Dark pantsuit with a white bodysuit underneath. The one here had little subtle pin stripes. Couldn't tell if this one did as well.
~Kate
Fri, Jul 3, 1998 (22:02)
#399
I just hope they keep the cast British.. But if they do I lay bets GP gets the role..
?? last time I checked, GP wasn't British....
~lafn
Sat, Jul 4, 1998 (02:27)
#400
?? last time I checked, GP wasn't British...
I knew someone was going to get me on that the minute I hit submit!!
But you know what I mean...I don't want them to Americanize
Bridget (keep London locale etc.).
And GP's British accent is "flawless" (London Times)
Aside from the fact that she is too skinny and too beautiful...I wouldn't have a problem with GP. She was great in Sliding Doors.
~Ann
Sat, Jul 4, 1998 (06:04)
#401
He's BACK!!!
Yea! Markie is back in the story!
Laura and I thought the line about needing more communication sounded an awful lot like things we have said in here. HF is using our ideas!!!
~KarenR
Sat, Jul 4, 1998 (16:44)
#402
When Mark Darcy appeared at door, lungs got in throat. Always forget how tall, strong yet kind, and irresistible he is.
Pffft!! Not me, honey, you don't deserve him. ;-)
At this he sprang to his feet and started pacing. He was still in his work suit, with top buttons all undone showing his hairy chest: all hot and rumpled and manly.
Mmmm....Ask and ye shall receive. Thank you. :-)
I'll sort everything out. I never realised you felt so...so much. Oh darling.
Sort what out? He's clueless. He thinks that Bridget's all upset about the match. But if that gets the two of them back together, who am I to complain?
~lizbeth54
Sat, Jul 4, 1998 (22:00)
#403
Happy Fourth of July and welcome back MD!
Mmmm....Ask and ye shall receive. Thank you. :-)
Reader power, y-e-ess!
Great episode. HF is spot-on. The David Beckham sending off transfixed the nation. At work, the next day, my male colleagues acted as though someone had died. Talk about morose! And I love the bit about the Queen. A journalist asked her if she was going to watch the match and she replied "what time is it?"
And I'm v. happy to see the reurrn of MD! He walked in purposefully like he always does, inspecting everything But, yes, what/who is he going to sort out? David Beckham? Is Rebecca dumped? Can't see her giving up MD without a fight!
~lafn
Sat, Jul 4, 1998 (22:44)
#404
Bridget calls him on Tuesday night at 9PM.
He is going to "call back".
Then he prances in on Thursday at midnight.
Sheeeesh!!
~LauraMM
Mon, Jul 6, 1998 (17:10)
#405
Okay, Bridget is a doormat and needs a friggin' spine!!! What COMMUNICATION???? She didn't talk; she internalised. Mark D. has no clue, yes it was a wonderful episode, but what is he going to fix. Try Hoddle for Treason no, no, better yet, Beckham for treason for getting the damn red card and getting tossed out of the game. Or the Argies by winning in pathetic PKs? Can't say that too loud as brother in law is an Argies;) Thank God, Hollan beat the crap out of the Argies!!!!
Oh yeah, Go Croatia!!!! And Holland!! (I always root for the underdog!)
Now back to Bridget. Hole is becoming a great conversation piece, should keep it. Mark leaves Bridget all hot and bothered and goes back to Rebecca, because as Tina Turner said "he is a typical male":)
Something about this leaves a definite bad taste in my mouth. Oh yeah, I'm back;) hee hee.
~lizbeth54
Mon, Jul 6, 1998 (19:01)
#406
Yes, the air was hardly cleared. And what is Rebecca going to do....she's not going to say "Go back to Bridget darling, with my blessing. You two are meant for each other". Hasn't Mark seen "Fatal Attraction"? I hope he doesn't have a pet rabbit! Or maybe R. is just a trophy hunter....but I would have thought MD would be a trophy for keeps.
~Ann
Mon, Jul 6, 1998 (23:43)
#407
I was surprised to have just found a copy of Fever Pitch at a Barnes Ignoble here in Minneapolis. I'm happy. :-)
~winter
Tue, Jul 7, 1998 (04:03)
#408
hi... i've been lurking over the past few weeks...sort of pissed and sort of happy that bridge and mark shared that intimate, hot and bothered moment. i asked my sports-fanatic boyfriend whether or not a man would actually be attracted to a woman even more, were she to show as much emotion over a game as a man did. to my surprise, he told me that a mutual friend of ours stayed with his girlfriend as long as he did (he lost interest WAAAAY before the eventual break up) because she was just as interested an
knowledgeable in football he was. AGH!
BTW, have worsened my eyesight due to the fact that last weekend, i bought both about a boy and high fidelity. read both in the course of three days. i have lost ability to see anything past sundown, but oh.... these two novels are so well worth it! (anyone know how i can get a hold of nick hornby? i want to wite him a letter)
~Jana2
Tue, Jul 7, 1998 (06:07)
#409
(Winter) BTW, have worsened my eyesight due to the fact that last weekend, i bought both about a boy and high fidelity. read both in the course of three days. i have lost ability to see anything past sundown, but oh.... these two novels are so well worth it!
I just finished About a Boy last weekend and High Fidelity not long before that. I agree with you Winter, both were hilarious and a fabulous read!
I'm just beginning my HF autographed copy of BJD - am trying to catch up with all of you. So far it's vg :-)
~Arami
Tue, Jul 7, 1998 (18:21)
#410
i asked my sports-fanatic boyfriend whether or not a man would actually be attracted to a woman even more, were she to show as much emotion over a game as a man did.
I watched a game on TV in a pub and a young boy actually insisted on buying me a couple of drinks when he saw me jumping up and down and yelling... I don't know about "attraction" as such (or perhaps it happens as a bonus), but there is strong cross-gender bonding emerging over shared interests. The problem is, people still do not "expect" women to like sport (=butch), or men to get excited about, say, cookery (=sissies), but there's less and less of that. Our modern times actually encourage equalization
in these areas, stereotypes are disappearing.
~Ann
Sat, Jul 11, 1998 (06:14)
#411
Hmmmmm.....
This installment has left me feeling a bit empty inside. I know I should be glad that Mark dumped Rebecca, but for some reason I'm not terribly thrilled. I think perhaps I've thought him a total spineless dweeb for so long, that I no longer want Bridge to be stuck with him? Maybe I don't believe him when he says he is through with the Jellyfisher--and she certainly won't give up that easy. Maybe I'm still wondering about Gary (who apparently does not have a refridgerator-repairman's butt-crack).
And why does Bridget sabotage herself at every opportunity? "Are you a man," I said, turning to face him belligerently, "or a mousse?"
I know the answer to that--she keeps listening to the Shazzer even when she's been giving bad advice from the outset.
~KarenR
Sat, Jul 11, 1998 (17:00)
#412
Are you a man...or a mousse?
LMAO!! If of the chocolate variety, then who cares!! All that matters is that Mark is back!! He's pried the Jellyfisher's tentacles off him. Hoorah!!
Agree though that Rebecca will not let this stand. She doesn't strike me as the type who could live with being the *dumpee* Can't decide against whom she will strike out.
sabotage herself
Naw! Just Bridget finally speaking up for herself like we've been wanting her to do for months. OK, so's she's a little soused. She could've said "hair gel." ;-)
wondering about Gary
Sorry, but I don't think he's going to be the Prince Charming that Laura has fantasized.
for the first time ever with Mark nothing seemed to be well...happening
Just stress. Purely temporary condition. Emotionally drained. No need for Mark to make an appointment at the doctor's yet. Not my Markeeeeee!!
~Kate
Sat, Jul 11, 1998 (20:35)
#413
HF responds to feminist critique in US by incorporating it into story line!!
Yay HF!
I think this is v. funny and moderately post modern. HF, having dealt with all the flak in the press about BJ being a product of too many self help books and beauty magazines, incorportates this into her story line: BJ is attacked by friends and self for being insufficiently spineful. I love it!
And I'm glad she turned around and told him off. Just to take him back without a murmur would be ridiculous.
And as its obviously going to be shortlived (they can't stay together for long or HF will run out of story) maybe MD's "little problem" is going to be the source of the next split?
~lizbeth54
Sat, Jul 11, 1998 (20:53)
#414
The mousse that roared! Good on you, Bridget!
Nothing seemed to be well....happening
And no wonder. Obviously the stress of maintaining a dual relationship and a high powered job, not to mention all these midnight dashes to Bridget's flat, dinner parties and mini-breaks, have taken their toll of MD. What he needs is an early night with a good book and a mug of Horlicks.
The next stage.....well, I still foresee a Fatal Attraction scenario with the dumped Rebecca striking back. And when is Bridget going to get a foot in Mark's door (ie huge detached house in posh Holland Park)!
~KarenR
Sun, Jul 12, 1998 (16:30)
#415
(Ann) This installment has left me feeling a bit empty inside.
This one hit me after the fact!! LOL!! A little *unsatisfied* perhaps.
(Kate) HF responds to feminist critique in US by incorporating it into story line!!
Hmmmm Didn't she get any flak in the UK? Where've you been, girl? Post-modern, indeed. Don't want to get tooo deep here. ;-)
(Bethan) I still foresee a Fatal Attraction scenario with the dumped Rebecca striking back.
V. possibly. We all know how good your eyes are. ;-) Another Tarts and Vicars party with Bridge wearing a bunny tail, perhaps!!
~Ann
Sun, Jul 12, 1998 (17:18)
#416
WALL STREET JOURNAL BEST SELLING BOOKS FICTION
4. ``Bridget Jones's Diary'' by Helen Fielding (Viking)
PUBLISHERS WEEKLY BEST SELLING BOOKS HARDCOVER FICTION
3. ``Bridget Jones's Diary'' by Helen Fielding (Viking)
USA TODAY BEST SELLING BOOKS
20. ``Bridget Jones's Diary'' by Helen Fielding (Viking) (F-H)
Key: F-Fiction; NF-Nonfiction; H-Hardcover; P-Paperback
USA Today's list is based on a computer analysis of retail book sales nationwide last week. Included are more than 1 million volumes from approximately 3,000 large-inventory, diverse-content bookstores.
~lizbeth54
Sun, Jul 12, 1998 (20:04)
#417
HF in the charts........is this good/v.good/exceptional for a first novel by an unknown in the US? How did Nick Hornby do with "About a boy"?
It probably also means that there will be more interest in getting the film version up and running......hopefully!
~KarenR
Sun, Jul 12, 1998 (21:56)
#418
About A Boy never hit the bestsellers' list. My Sunday paper showed BJD dropped from fourth to seventh this week nationally, although I don't know its source.
~lafn
Mon, Jul 13, 1998 (01:43)
#419
This week's New York Times Best Sellers List:
BJD is #4 up from #8 last week after only 4 weeks on the list.
~MarkG
Mon, Jul 13, 1998 (08:29)
#420
Awful few weeks - lost my way here. What use is BJD without the BJD discussion group?
Twin set - as understood in UK, believe twin set is jacket and skirt in same material (often tweedy?), associated with middle-aged women pre-WW2 (though am man, and therefore not fashion expert).
Can confirm woman showing genuine interest in sport increases attraction levels dramatically - difficult to rationalise, but true.
Also can confirm GP's accent in Sliding Doors was so flawless as to spark several arguments about whether she wasn't English or resident.
Surprised by HF staying in LA, I actually thought I saw her in a restaurant here in London on Friday.
~KarenR
Mon, Jul 13, 1998 (19:29)
#421
(MarkG) Awful few weeks - lost my way here. What use is BJD without the BJD discussion group?
v. true. Felt same when site down for four days.
twin set is jacket and skirt in same material (often tweedy?)
Work for British Vogue?
Can confirm woman showing genuine interest in sport increases attraction levels dramatically - difficult to rationalise, but true.
Why difficult? Evidence of shallowness. ;-)
Also can confirm GP's accent in Sliding Doors was so flawless as to spark several arguments about whether she wasn't English or resident.
Scary, isn't it. Apparently, she thinks self is also. Should talk to parents more often.
~Allison2
Mon, Jul 13, 1998 (20:01)
#422
Work for British Vogue?
Mark, you cannot be English and definitely do not work for Vogue if you think a twin set is a skirt and jacket made of tweed!!
Also can confirm GP's accent in Sliding Doors was so flawless as to spark several arguments
about whether she wasn't English or resident.
In a recent interview she said she hated bubble and squeak, therefore there is no doubt. She cannot even be even an honourary English woman!!
~LauraMM
Mon, Jul 13, 1998 (21:15)
#423
Okay, I've been fairly silent of late and would like to change that:) First of all, so Mark FINALLY leaves Rebecca!!! But, and I mean but, how long does he stay with Bridge and does he, in essence go back to Bridge. I mean with mum on the answerphone talking about Viagara and he can't quite get it up; should prove quite interesting:)
I betcha anything she is reading this
~Kate
Tue, Jul 14, 1998 (00:50)
#424
I betcha anything she is reading this
oh puhleeze.... don't you think she has better things to do? as in, a life? ;-)
and if she is reading this, don't you think she would find our analysis of her column down to the tiniest detail, a mite pathetic ;-) (as in, get a life?)
~Ann
Tue, Jul 14, 1998 (01:11)
#425
She found the site on her own and said that she would check it again, so what's so far fetched, Kate? Do you think famous people don't surf the net? Only people like us?
~Kate
Tue, Jul 14, 1998 (04:45)
#426
I wasn't clear that she found it on her own - I thought one of us gave it to her, but I'm happy to concede the point. However, if she is in Hollywood working on a screenplay (though that may not be the case!) she probably doesn't have time, given that she's also writing her column and keeping up with events at home sufficiently to make it current.
Also, to be honest, I think repeatedly saying "she's reading this" not only makes us more self conscious about what we post, but also perhaps gives us an inflated idea of our own importance in her universe.
I'm sure famous people surf the net. I just think BUSY people don't - or not as often as the rest of us do. I know I am nostalgically surfing madly at the moment, knowing that when I start a real job again in a month or so, time to surf is simply not going to exist.
~Ann
Tue, Jul 14, 1998 (04:58)
#427
Keep in mind that she doesn't start writing the weekly column until Friday (and it shows up here in the states around 8:30pm Friday night), I think you might overrate the ammount of time that she spends on it. Concidering how disjointed and incoherent it is at times from week to week, I wish she would spend more time on it.
~MarkG
Tue, Jul 14, 1998 (07:43)
#428
Apologies for ignorant definition of twin-set. I do not work for Vogue.
I have little fondness for bubble and squeak, so maybe I'm not even English.
I feel if the column is ever disjointed and incoherent, this is quite deliberate from HF, and totally in keeping with Bridget. I thought this week's was one of the best ever, with Bridget even in her moment of triumph jeopardising the relationship with feminist sensibilities, and then the great MD falling down on the job!
~LauraMM
Tue, Jul 14, 1998 (13:42)
#429
Kate, Helen Fielding has told everyone that she is the biggest procrastinator on the other side of the pond! Surfing is better when at work! hee hee. Anyway, she came across this quite on her own because in Boston she said that there was a board where women from the States discuss BJD. My hand immediately went up and I told her that I created the topic. AND I also invited her to join in the conversation at times. She was quite ecstatic that "Americans" were discussing this little British book!!! I ex
lained that we said what we felt and that there were "no holds barred"; especially, when I told her the numerous times I called Mark Darcy a F-ckwit! She was pleased that-- well, I was honest in my opinions!
~KarenR
Tue, Jul 14, 1998 (21:19)
#430
Let's just forget that HF might occasionally visit here.
Saw a number of doctors being interviewed last week at the BMA convention in Cardiff. Amazingly high numbers being bandied about for men needing Viagra. If what I hear about the waiting list situation is true, would be criminal if NHS provided Viagra, a medically sanctionaed recreational drug in the US. ;-) Of course, it has been the substance of most talk show comedians' standup routines since coming out. Do you think there's an official Viagra joke book out here on the Web?
~lizbeth54
Wed, Jul 15, 1998 (22:09)
#431
Has anyone seen the readers' reviews of BJD at amazon.com Bestsellers - all 113 of them? Mostly 5 star raves. There seem to be a lot of Bridget Jones out there!
~lafn
Thu, Jul 16, 1998 (01:19)
#432
I was disappointed in this week's TIME letters to the Editor that no one took up for Bridget (alas, I wrote, but it was not published ).
However, one letter should make HF feel good:
...".It seems a sad state of affairs when every young woman who writes about culture is judged on whether she is a "good feminist." Women should be judged for the individual voices we are not for whether we conform to an outdated vision of what a good feminist is. It is a sign that feminism has not died, but has succeeded....young women don't have to be as single-minded or rigid as
Gloria Steinem or Germaine Greer....."
Keep going, Helen. Don't capitulate to your critics.
~lafn
Thu, Jul 16, 1998 (19:34)
#433
This morning on CBS This Morning the book reviewer from USA TODAY
gave BJD a glowing review for a summer read..."a must for your beach bag..."
She called Bridget one of the most* endearing* modern day heroines .
(Imagine...our B.!) " She loves everybody, is kind to family and friends.
Looking for love....painfully insecure...but we all end up cheering up for her!"
I think Our Girl has made it!!
~LauraMM
Sat, Jul 18, 1998 (17:35)
#434
I cannot believe that no one posted regarding today's/last night's BJD.
Ok, personally, I didn't think Rebecca would deign to show up the next day! after being chucked by Mark. I thought she was more in control, but I guess not:) hee hee. And to accuse Bridge of pinching Mark, hee hee, what a joke. Someone give this lady therapy!!!!
Mark telling Rebecca that he wants to LIVE with Bridget, hmmmm...
The house smelled... mmmmm... like sex no doubt!!
I think Pam Jones is much better than Viagara......
And I don't think we've seen the last of Rebecca or Gary for that matter. I envision it now... Bridget is in the shower there is a knock on the door Mark (in towel, no less) opens door to see two cappuccinos being thrust at him. It's Gary!!! hee hee.
~LauraMM
Sat, Jul 18, 1998 (20:25)
#435
(Bethan)Yes, the air was hardly cleared. And what is Rebecca going to do....she's not going to say "Go back to Bridget darling, with my blessing. You two are meant for each other". Hasn't Mark seen "Fatal Attraction"? I hope he doesn't have a pet rabbit! Or maybe R. is just a trophy hunter....but I would have thought MD would be a trophy for keeps.
How prophetic!! Do you think that Rebecca in sleek, black convertible will park outside of Bridge's flat every night that Mark decides to stay the night??? And why the hell didn't Bridge SLAP her!! Did anyone learn anything from Dynasty and Alexis and Krystle??
~lizbeth54
Sat, Jul 18, 1998 (21:50)
#436
Wasn't Mark there for a whole week - or have I misread something? I actually think that Mark got off rather lightly! Perhaps Rebecca will plan some dastardly revenge!
~lafn
Sat, Jul 18, 1998 (22:02)
#437
Laura I cannot believe that no one posted regarding
today's/last night's BJD.
Saturday's Electronic Telegraph didn't come on last night as usual. I bet they were waiting for HF !!
This is one of my all time favorites...next to the Christmas Dinner.
I wonder if it's part of the screenplay.
...can contribute suitable insights ... ..to football.
I think HF must have read Winter and Mark G's posting re: men get turned on to women who are interested in sports.
Anyway...Bridget 5....Rebecca 0
7/17/98 Publisher's Weekly Hard Cover Best Sellers List:
BJD is # 3 (6 weeks on the list)
~KarenR
Sat, Jul 18, 1998 (22:18)
#438
Wasn't Mark there for a whole week - or have I misread something?
I was confused about that myself. When they left the flat, it was after being together for 14 hours. Other entry was current or one week later, i.e., Mark wanting to watch the next match with his friend.
I loved this installment. I always knew that, if Mark dumped Rebecca, Bridget's self-esteem would rise. How else to account for her having the guts to actually say something in the presence of the Rebecca. Although I too wish she had slapped her!! ;-D
Ah Mark! Loved how he took charge and told her off. What can I say about our wonderful boy! Knew the *problem* was only temporary. Although it was pretty funny when he said he couldn't be pinched and was own man. Yeah, sure, if you want to believe it.
So Bridget feels safe and secure with Mark, and Mark doesn't feel like he always has to be proving his love to Bridget because she is so insecure and neurotic. What will they do? Enter Gary, with or without the cappucino. No!! The adventures of them living together at Mark's house!! Yes, that where she's going with this.
(Bethan) Perhaps Rebecca will plan some dastardly revenge!
Agree. Need either Fatal Attraction scene or catfight from Dynasty to make complete. Rebecca leaving Bridget's flat in tears wasn't enough. She deserves far worse.
~KarenR
Sun, Jul 19, 1998 (20:59)
#439
Oh yes, meant to ask what news story in Britain triggered this column with its focus on racist language carryovers?
~lizbeth54
Sun, Jul 19, 1998 (21:25)
#440
No news story that I'm aware of! I agree that it's time Mark invited Bridget over to his place. Bridget's tiny flat seems to be a cosy love nest (they don't seem to go out much except for disastrous weekends at Rebecca's). A move to Holland Park would be a real test of their relationship....but would BJ still be a singleton? Perhaps they could take a long holiday together (to the US?)
~lafn
Mon, Jul 20, 1998 (01:50)
#441
Re: Brigid's move to Mark's house....
Bethan....but would BJ still be a singleton?
Right. What does a singleton become once she hooks up with a guy in a relationship?
Let's see what term HF coins.
~Kate
Mon, Jul 20, 1998 (02:31)
#442
What does a singleton become once she hooks up with a guy in a relationship?
Let's see what term HF coins.
But I gather that in "the missing Independent year" they did actually hook up...and break up....and hook up...and break up.....so I don't think we should hold our breath!
~MarkG
Mon, Jul 20, 1998 (16:04)
#443
You're right, Kate.
Shortly after the book, HF said in an interview that BJ would probably never live "happily ever after" as she wasn't at her best in a relationship.
But it's great to just enjoy the moment! Clearly an onside penalty thrust-out.
~KarenR
Mon, Jul 20, 1998 (18:13)
#444
Does anyone have access to the columns for those *Wilderness* years. They would be in The Independent. Can't wait for her to write the sequel that would incorporate those columns.
HF said in an interview that BJ would probably never live "happily ever
after" as she wasn't at her best in a relationship.
Don't people grow? I think Bridget showed much more self-confidence and maturity when she told Mark to have a good time watching the match with the boys. She's a person who's been conditioned to feel inadequate by Cosmo, television, movies, self-help books, etc. Mark's chucking of Rebecca was a major ego boost. Perhaps, it will stay with a while before she slides back into her neurotic self. ;-)
Laura: Have you checked The Times?
~LauraMM
Mon, Jul 20, 1998 (18:32)
#445
I did check the Times. Why????
~lizbeth54
Mon, Jul 20, 1998 (18:39)
#446
Can't wait for her to write the sequel that would incorporate those columns.
Didn't HF tell someone when she was on tour that BJ falls for a handsome villain when on holiday in Banghok, gets arrested for drug smuggling and is rescued by MD. Sound as though they have a turbulent history! (Or did I dream this?)
I would like to see Bridget meeting "Malcolm and Elaine" (or should it be "Elaine and Malcolm"?), MD's parents. Could be some comic potential there! Competition for Pam Jones?! (BTW why is Bridget's dad called Colin?)
~KarenR
Mon, Jul 20, 1998 (18:50)
#447
Yes, that's right. I forgot about the drug-smuggling story.
~LauraMM
Mon, Jul 20, 1998 (18:53)
#448
Well, Bridge has already met Malcolm and Elaine:) at their Ruby Wedding anniversary. She gave Elaine the Bodyshop Terra Cotta essential oils burner, (which I have too, should check to see if it does indeed take in milk:))
~lafn
Mon, Jul 20, 1998 (21:04)
#449
(Bethan) (BTW why is Bridget's dad called Colin?)
Oh no.......here we go again with John the Baptist!!
~LauraMM
Mon, Jul 20, 1998 (22:49)
#450
(Evelyn)Oh no.......here we go again with John the Baptist!!
Too funny!! Because she couldn't call him Fitzwilliam Jones:)
~Arami
Mon, Jul 20, 1998 (23:29)
#451
She could, but Colin sounds better.
~LauraMM
Tue, Jul 21, 1998 (13:15)
#452
Okay a couple of things to note:
Headline of Stinky fish smelling Boston; Boston Herald: FEVER PITCH alas, it is about Pedro Martinez, Bosox pitcher extraordinaire and over-zealous fans. Tho' always thought the field was called the green and not the pitch:)
And thinking about what terminology HF could come up with in regards to MD and BJ living together why:
Smug Singleton, of course. v.g. I thought:)
~lafn
Tue, Jul 21, 1998 (21:02)
#453
(Laura) in regards to MD and BJ living together why:
Smug Singleton, of course.
Yeah...I like that. Let's see what Helen thinks of it!!
~Meggin
Wed, Jul 22, 1998 (04:49)
#454
Helen Fielding appeared on The Weekend Edition of All Thing's Considered on National Public Radio. You can hear the interview (but you must have a Real Audio Player) at:
http://www.npr.org/plweb-cgi/fastweb?getdoc+npr+npr+31904+1+wAAA+Helen%26Fielding
It's nearly 8 minutes long. She does not mention Colin Firth. It's more about how darned rich she's getting from BJD, now published in 22 countries.
:-)
~Meggin
Wed, Jul 22, 1998 (04:52)
#455
Forgot to say---scroll down to the bottom of the page and hit the hypertext link with her name.
~Kate
Wed, Jul 22, 1998 (13:12)
#456
Thanks for the link Meggin. At least we know she's still in LA and hopefully working on that screenplay!
~Allison2
Thu, Jul 23, 1998 (07:37)
#457
At least we know she's still in LA and hopefully working on that
screenplay!
And also, according to the Times Diary, hanging out with Helena Bonham-Carter. The Times suggests that Helena may be first choice to play Bridget.
~lizbeth54
Thu, Jul 23, 1998 (09:36)
#458
Allison,
I saw the Times Diary item and I must sayt that my gut feeling now is that it will be Helena B-C. The Times (for those of yoy who didn't see it) said that HF was hanging out at a Health Farm in LA with HBC and Keneth Branagh and they seemed very friendly.
One thing that struck me though, gloomily,........the Times called the film "the Hollywood version" of BJD. Hollywood is all about bankability. BJD is no longer a little book that was popular in the UK. It's big business. HB-C is bankable. KB seems very Hollywood now.....in a recent interview he said he didn't want to do any more theatre and he's playing the baddie in a huge special effects movie with Will Smith.
So how about a power couple for BJ and MD?. Or Rupert Everett for MD?. Sometimes I get the odd twinge of doubt about the casting......the money men must have the last say. Just hope some of CF's current batch of movies start being released in the US, soon! I wonder if CF is in LA......his son must be on summer holiday from school now. Or are the school terms different in the US?
~Nan11
Thu, Jul 23, 1998 (12:09)
#459
(Allison) The Times suggests that Helena may be first choice to play Bridget.
Ick!
~Kate
Thu, Jul 23, 1998 (13:23)
#460
Or Rupert Everett for MD?.
since RE came out, Hollywood has not cast him in a straight role (all power to the British film industry for managing to recognise that actors do act!). I think it very unlikely he'd be cast as MD in a Hollywood-produced BJ.
Sad that Hollywood seems to have got its claws into this - I was hoping for something small budget and british, like Brassed Off or the Full Month. Oh well...
And actually, I don't think HBC would be that bad. At least she's the right age!
~LauraMM
Thu, Jul 23, 1998 (13:25)
#461
Helena B-C is too skinny:) And too beautiful. I think Bridget should be rather plain looking. Now, I don't see how every person that HF says hello to is destined to be the next Bridget. HF has said she wants and "unknown" for the role. She may still get that. They need massive casting call, say women btw the ages of 32-38, and must be British!!!
~KarenR
Thu, Jul 23, 1998 (13:30)
#462
Let's not let our imaginations run amok here re: HB-C as BJ. I would not find it unusual for HF to be hanging out with HB-C and KB as this is v. common for an ex-pat crowd. HB-C is so totally associated with costumes dramas, Merchant-Ivory productions here, but she's appeared on the late night talk shows and portrayed a v.different image. Some of her less refined roles (like Margaret's Museum) hardly anyone would have seen.
Or Rupert Everett for MD
LOL!!
~LauraMM
Thu, Jul 23, 1998 (14:26)
#463
I'm about to do some anti-Mark Darcy ranting, so forgive me. And please indulge me.
What right does Mark have to worm his way back into Bridget's life!!! And why Bridget didn't put up more of a fight is beyond me? He dumps (chucks) her goes with Rebecca who tangles him in tissue of engagements all the while, Bridget should be inducted into sainthood for being a martyr!!!(I'm joking, of course:)) She never once cheated on MD!! She stayed faithful, while he was lollygagging in Scotland, Majorca or whereever Rebecca would take him, forcefully, of course(what the hell is up with that!).
He is NOT his own man!! (Why did it take months and months for him to finally realize that all this was done without any reference to him!)
How many times is MD going to indecisive and changeable? He wants to "live" with Bridget. But can he really "live" with her?
This reconciliation is just too "pat"; too easy. Bridget fell into bed with him, I don't call that being a "strong" woman. Telling him to really, truly decide what he wants. (Yes, I "know" he wants Bridget, but he has to decide if it is longterm that he wants.)
Okay, enough of my ranting. I wanted to say something that was cohesive and made sense.
~lafn
Thu, Jul 23, 1998 (20:45)
#464
Mobetta' HBC than GP for Bridget.
And I agree with whoever said that authors have no say in casting.
It's up to Directors and producers.
the money men must have the last say.
Unlike many European countries the US film industry is not government- subsidized.
These producers must answer to the company shareholders....people like you 'me!! If the company continuously loses money on films, the CEO soon finds himself tanked.
~LauraMM
Thu, Jul 23, 1998 (21:02)
#465
Evelyn, you have nothing to say re: my rant???? I'm shocked:)
~lafn
Fri, Jul 24, 1998 (00:30)
#466
(Laura )Evelyn, you have nothing to say re: my rant???? I'm shocked:)
Moi?? I'm leaving it to Renate. :-)
In truth," Markee Baby" has lost ground with me.
If he cheats on you now, Bridge, when love is in full bloom....
.....wait til the seven-year- itch hits.
~LauraMM
Fri, Jul 24, 1998 (12:58)
#467
If he cheats on you now, Bridge, when love is in full bloom....
.....wait til the seven-year- itch hits.
]
Exactly!!!!!!!!!!!
~lizbeth54
Fri, Jul 24, 1998 (21:05)
#468
HBC for BJ - on reflection I think that not only is this very likely, but also HBC isn't such a bad choice. She's the right age, she can do comedy (not just the period stuff) and as she is small, she could probably, with the right (or wrong) choice of clothes, be made to look dumpy. I could actually imagine HBC and CF playing opposite each other, and having the right sort of chemistry. But I have difficulty seeing this with Kate Winslett or GP or whoever.
~Ann
Fri, Jul 24, 1998 (21:39)
#469
as she is small, she could probably, with the right (or wrong) choice of clothes, be made to look dumpy.
}
Who said Bridget it dumpy!!!
Part of the point of her obsession with her weight is the fact that she is not over weight! Fielding was touching on the problem most women have between their perceptions of their bodies, and the reality. Bridget thinks she is fat, but when she got down to her goal weight, everyone told her she looked sick. She is, after all, about 125-130 lbs. In order to be overweight, she would have to be around 5' tall, and since Fielding never says that she is short, I think we can assume that Bridget i
a size 6 or 8 (US)--hardly dumpy!
~lafn
Fri, Jul 24, 1998 (22:37)
#470
Bridget...5' tall...130 lbs......?
She's got a roll here n' there.
Stay on the diet, Bridge.
~KarenR
Fri, Jul 24, 1998 (23:15)
#471
Quite true, Ann. Nowhere and no place is it stated that Bridget is dumpy, frumpy or homely. She just can't be *drop dead gorgeous* or as thin as a supermodel. Her problem is self-image and what TV, movies and magazines (Cosmo) parade around as the *ideal*.
HBC is not a bad choice from the standpoint of age and her beauty is v.unusual. (BTW, Bethan, she was extremely dumpy in Margaret's Museum).
~lizbeth54
Sat, Jul 25, 1998 (12:45)
#472
"I may have briefly mentioned to Giles that there'd been a ground swell in the frilly blouse department"
Love it! Great episode....HF is back on form. And I must admit I prefer the rather badtempered dominant Mark to the soppier Mark who picks flowers from public gardens!
~Ann
Sat, Jul 25, 1998 (18:38)
#473
I'm 5'2" tall, 125 lbs, and I wear a size 8. No one who wears a size 8 should be concidered dumpy! I've got news for you--I haven't got a 'roll in there'!
According to the latest US government weight data, people should have a body-mass index of between 19 and 24 (less than that is too skinny!). My BMI is 23, so I'm right where I should be.
(Weight in pounds)
BMI = -------------------- X 709.95
(Height in inches)^2
~LauraMM
Sat, Jul 25, 1998 (19:23)
#474
Oh, oh, she pulled out the weight chart!!! Helen, what the hell are you doing to us!!!! hee hee.
~lafn
Sat, Jul 25, 1998 (19:43)
#475
Ann is showing us all up. She is obviously happy with herself.
Good for you! :-)
I'm 5'2"...weigh 117 Lbs.....take a size 4 on top....8 on bottom..
Have big thunder thighs.Cellulite all over the place. Hate Myself!!:-(
I like this Chapter too. Have we ever met Giles before?
And I don't like badtempered Mark.IMO, I think he has to get in touch with his feminine side!
~LauraMM
Sat, Jul 25, 1998 (19:57)
#476
What does "there has been a ground swell in the frilly blouse department" mean? Is he making reference to Rebecca maybe being a bit larger than Bridget? I would think that is a horrible remark?
I still think MD needs a good swift kick in the A--!!!
~Nan11
Sat, Jul 25, 1998 (20:07)
#477
You're kidding me with that chart, right Ann? You guys have been reading too much Bridget...she's making you obsessive, too.
~LauraMM
Sat, Jul 25, 1998 (20:52)
#478
We are obsessive!!! (I will readily admit to it, and only this:))
~lizbeth54
Sat, Jul 25, 1998 (22:03)
#479
What does "there has been a ground swell in the frilly blouse department" mean?
Bit of a mixed metaphor I think. "There's been a ground swell" is nautical, meaning a bit of turbulence. "Frilly blouse department" ia a very Hooray Henry (upper middle class public schoolboy type)reference to women. ie his love life has been rather unsettled.
I'd like to see more of Giles. Sounds like the sort of friend Mark would have. I think the contrasting friends/lifestyles/attitudes of Bridget and Markee could be v. amusing! Looks like Rebecca is out of it, though.
And I don't like badtempered Mark
Oh, but I do! Shades of Fitzwilliam Darcy. Not so much bad tempered, more terse and slightly arrogant!
~lafn
Sat, Jul 25, 1998 (22:53)
#480
Thanks Bethan for the translation of the "frilly blouse dept."
And now I also know the meaning of the reference to Mark as a bit of" Hooray".
Was Henry a fictional character...or just alliteration ...like we refer to a
Mr. Fixit as "Harry-the- Homeowner".
Didn't you love the reference to Martha Stewart when she went to get the dishes for the carry-out !!
~Ann
Sun, Jul 26, 1998 (04:18)
#481
You're kidding me with that chart, right Ann? You guys have been reading too much Bridget...she's making you obsessive, too.
}
That is the correct chart, Nan. This happens to be one of my pet peeves--women who are incapable of seeing themselves as they really are, but as they are + 10-20 pounds. I believe in being a healthy weight, not a bean pole! Unfortunately that's not what most women aim at.
~Nan11
Sun, Jul 26, 1998 (05:37)
#482
That is the correct chart, Nan.
You misunderstand my meaning. I have no doubt of the chart's accuracy. My point was that comments made by a fictional character actually inspired you to go find that and post it. Don't you see the humor in that? ;-)
women who are incapable of seeing themselves as they really are, but as they are + 10-20 pounds.
I agree with you that, as a general rule, women are too concerned about being rail thin (brought on by having to stare at photos of Kate Moss, no doubt). Personally, I couldn't give a rat's ass. I am what I am--hasn't kept me from having the same experiences (both good and bad) as women who are 100 lbs. Then again, most of it is because of my attitude. This is, perhaps, why I find Bridget's insecurities so irritating. At first they were funny, because we all have them to some degree...but, really! Get ove
it, already. Get some therapy :-)
~KarenR
Sun, Jul 26, 1998 (13:27)
#483
Thought this column was a riot, and everyone said that a reconciled Bridget and Mark would be boring!! ;-) Should be like I Love Lucy if and when they ever move in together.
Love Mark when he's *in control.* I don't think of his no-nonsense approach as bad tempered. (miming throat slitting, indeed!!) But isn't it all just a facade. Look at what he does at the end, he hands the phone over to Bridge.
The best has to be the interchange when Bridget can't believe he didn't discuss his relationship problems with his friends.
"How do you know what to do?"
"I work it out for myself."
Thanks, Bethan, for the explanation of the phrases; they had me in a quandary (sp?) as well.
One thing nags at me is the "Bill" thing and its parallel with Bridget and Mark.
A guy dating one friend and then calling another ostensibly for innocent reasons. Then Mark's advice to Shaz: Don't have anything to do with him. I'm getting the idea that Mark was the one who called Rebecca in the first place not the other way around. In last week's, Rebecca is referred to as "the arch-queen of Rules-style behavior." From what I know, she would certainly be manipulative, but she would NEVER CALL Mark. The Rules state a woman doesn't call a man; they don't even return their phone ca
ls. They give all appearance of being the pursued. *Just another reason for you to despise Mark, Laura!!
~lizbeth54
Sun, Jul 26, 1998 (14:22)
#484
Should be like I Love Lucy if and when they ever move in together.
This could be a show (Bridget and Mark?) that could run and run. I thought more "Philadelphia Story"...Katherine Hepburn and Cary Grant) :-) (My kind of movie by the way, but they don't make them anymore!)
~KarenR
Sun, Jul 26, 1998 (15:22)
#485
I thought more "Philadelphia Story"...Katherine Hepburn and Cary Grant) :-)
Bridget a Tracy Lord type?? I think she's too strong a character, self-assured and all that even though she can't see True Love living right next door.
Reason I used Lucy is (1) first thing popped into head and (2) all those shows where she messes up in the kitchen. Can see Lucy with foot in pot of mashed potatoes. ;-)
~lafn
Sun, Jul 26, 1998 (16:48)
#486
"....ground swell in the frilly blouse department"....
I'm curious Bethan....(and pl. answer my question: Who is Hooray Harry?"..a few posts back)
....if a guy says the above quote re: a relationship "going south"......
what does a gal say......"ground swell in the tight breeches department"?
~Ann
Sun, Jul 26, 1998 (17:31)
#487
My point was that comments made by a fictional character actually inspired you to go find that and post it.
}
Actually, I opened Excel, used the spread sheet to make the calculations, copied the chart over into Paint Shop Pro, saved it as a .gif, uploaded it onto my account, and then posted it here!
My point was not so much about what Bridget might or might not think about her own weight, but about how too many women are deeply screwed up about their body image. I wanted to prostelitize for being a healthy weight, istead of a bean pole. I'm just trying to counteract the messages many women absorb about their weight out there.
~lizbeth54
Sun, Jul 26, 1998 (18:32)
#488
"Hooray Henry" is just an expression, used to describe upper middle class public schoolboy types who still perhaps use the slang they learned at school and haven't completely grown up. There's no such actual person , except that I suppose Henry is a typical name of that social class. Geoffrey Clifton was described in some reviews as a Hooray Henry type, which infact he wasn't, although he pretended he was!
Male equivalent of "frilly blouse department"? Well, I guess "tight breeches" would be fine! :-)
~Nan11
Mon, Jul 27, 1998 (03:24)
#489
(Ann) Actually, I opened Excel, used the spread sheet to make the calculations, copied the chart over into Paint Shop Pro, saved it as a .gif, uploaded it onto my account, and then posted it here!
And she admits it! ;-D Mercy, woman, this is even worse than I'd imagined. You've fallen into the abyss ;-p
(Ann) My point was not so much about what Bridget might or might not think about her own weight, but about how too many women are deeply screwed up about their body image.
You're right...she could not be considered overweight by any stretch of the imagination. My original point was that body image is all about attitude. If you think you look bad, then you do. If you think you look good, then you do. It doesn't matter what the reality is because most people will unconsciously pick up on the fact that you are comfortable with yourself and forgive you your "faults". And if they don't then they probably aren't the kind of people you would want around, anyway.
~Allison2
Mon, Jul 27, 1998 (07:37)
#490
(Evelyn)(and pl. answer my question: Who is Hooray Harry?".
To expand on Bethan's description -
The term Hooray Henry was coined by a journalist(?) called Peter York in Harpers and Queen originally, I think. A Hooray Henry is the male equivalent of a Sloane Ranger, a young upper/upper middle class woman whose London life revolves around Sloane Square(near the King's Road - remember that?).
They would be preppies I think in US speak. There way of life was explained in a v funny book called the Sloane Ranger handbook.
~lafn
Mon, Jul 27, 1998 (16:30)
#491
Allison...... Sloane Ranger, a young upper/upper middle class woman
I remember HF describing JE with the "Sloaney blond hair".
I knew about Sloane Rangers...now we know Hooray Henry the male counterpart...thanks.!
~Allison2
Mon, Jul 27, 1998 (19:45)
#492
There way of life
I am not really illiterate!!
~susanne
Wed, Jul 29, 1998 (19:12)
#493
Hi y'all
I've been lurking here a few weeks catching up on all the responses. I read
200 of them yesterday and while my head was spinning,I know much more about
Bridget than before. Thanks to my internet friend, Evelyn,for recommending
BJ to me and also directing me to these boards (also CF boards).
I just want to say if CF is not cast in this part, I don't know if I can
watch the movie as he is fixed in my mind as MD. He's so adorable in his
diamond pattern sweater and ducky socks. CF is Darcy, MR. or Mark.
HB-C is a pretty good choice for BJ, but is v. tiny and doesn't seem that
she has 5 lbs to lose. Can we even come up with 5 actresses in their early
30's that have any weight to lose? I think they must all starve themselves.
Yesterday, I was thinking maybe Jane Leeves from Fraiser would work. She's
the right age, attractive but not beautiful, British, a recognizable
name but not a superstar, and already plays a slightly Bridget-like character as
Daphne.
~LauraMM
Wed, Jul 29, 1998 (20:16)
#494
Hi Sue,
200 posts in one day!! yowser!! Jane Leeves, hmmm... now there's a thought:)
~lafn
Thu, Jul 30, 1998 (00:57)
#495
I want you all to be real nice to Sue.
She and I have been sluggin' it out with triple digit heat for over 20 days now.
And we don't need any additional stress.
Besides, I told her how charming you all are!!
~Nan11
Thu, Jul 30, 1998 (04:23)
#496
Welcome, Sue :-)
(Sue) I just want to say if CF is not cast in this part, I don't know if I can watch the movie...
I like you already, honey! :-)
(Evelyn) I want you all to be real nice to Sue.
And just what are you implying, missy? ;-p
~Ann
Thu, Jul 30, 1998 (05:05)
#497
Jane Leeves, hmmm... now there's a thought:)
}
And a pretty darn good one too.
~KarenR
Thu, Jul 30, 1998 (05:09)
#498
Hi ya Sue! Any friend of Evelyn's is most definitely welcome here. Just don't let her current views on MD affect you. ;-D
I've been lurking here a few weeks catching up on all the responses. I read
200 of them yesterday
Don't sound so bad when the alternative might be going outside!! ick
Welcome aboard, Sue. Always like to hear new points of view.
~Ann
Thu, Jul 30, 1998 (05:13)
#499
Hey Karen, say hi to your Gary for me while your in his flat!
~KarenR
Thu, Jul 30, 1998 (13:08)
#500
say hi to your Gary for me while your in his flat!
hee hee hee!! Didn't she tell you he went back to his wife? Of course, I will have to deal with Trampetta when she shows up!
~lafn
Thu, Jul 30, 1998 (16:38)
#501
(Evelyn) I want you all to be real nice to Sue.
(Nan) And just what are you implying, missy? ;-p
Just a friendly remark.Not trying to be devious:-)
~LauraMM
Thu, Jul 30, 1998 (18:44)
#502
We are all very friendly, Sue. Just follow along and have a minor problem w/ Mark Darcy and you'll be my best friend;-)
~lafn
Thu, Jul 30, 1998 (21:19)
#503
Did anyone else notice that Bridget didn't smoke last week??
Think Hilary has gone after HF like she did all the Hollywood stars?
~KarenR
Thu, Jul 30, 1998 (22:57)
#504
Did anyone else notice that Bridget didn't smoke last week??
Yes, or at least on the diary entry date. Has Bridge gone cold turkey?
Think Hilary has gone after HF like she did all the Hollywood stars?
I don't quite catch your drift. Need more.
Isn't the Horse Whisperer opening in Britain? Will Bridget comment on the May-December thing again (like for As Good as it Gets)? With Redford, however, I had no problem. She could also comment on ATA, with *her* Mr. Darcy semistarring as an Iowa farmboy. Could be funny.
~Nan11
Fri, Jul 31, 1998 (01:12)
#505
(Karen) Didn't she tell you he went back to his wife? Of course, I will have to deal with Trampetta when she shows up!
I have no idea what this means, but it sounds really juicy! ;-)
(Evelyn) I want you all to be real nice to Sue.
(Nan) And just what are you implying, missy? ;-p
(Evelyn) Just a friendly remark.Not trying to be devious:-)
Of course not, honey! Just tuggin' your Murphy ;-p
~lafn
Fri, Jul 31, 1998 (02:46)
#506
Think Hilary has gone after HF like she did all the Hollywood stars?
I don't quite catch your drift. Need more.
Remember last summer Hilary Clinton took Julia Roberts on for smoking in
"My Friends Wedding and enjoying it !!
Oh, furgeddit!
~MarkG
Fri, Jul 31, 1998 (07:48)
#507
Bridget will be back on the ciggies this week as sure as a sailor returns to the sea. The blissful period must end soon.
Incidentally, Jane Leeves would make a great Bridget for all Sue's reasons, unless her Manchester accent is her own and unchangeable, in which case it will sound as wrong to a British audience as an American accent.
~susanne
Fri, Jul 31, 1998 (17:01)
#508
Thanks guys for the words of welcome and for not ridiculing my JR suggestion. It's just so hard to come up with the right casting. I hope they make casting announcements soon so that we can be put out of our misery. I don't think it will be an unknown which I think would really be best in this case. Hollywood is always more concerned about the $$$ than the artistic make-up of a movie. Just don't cast John Travolta as MD!
I've only read BJD a few weeks ago,but am already addicted. I'm glad I missed the parts in which MD was being a jerk. I hope he's on the road to recovery. He'll prob. backslide sooner or later (he's a man afterall :) ) or else it will boring and then what would talk about.
~LauraMM
Fri, Jul 31, 1998 (17:22)
#509
Oh, he'll definitely backslide. He hasn't been properly humbled, yet!!! And a man who cheats once will cheat again.
John Travolta!! Well that would be odd casting:)
~susanne
Fri, Jul 31, 1998 (17:59)
#510
~KarenR
Sat, Aug 1, 1998 (14:02)
#511
Oh Lucy...
Yes, Ricky.
'splain to me those police cars.
Well...promise me you won't get mad.
Just 'splain, Lucy.
Well, ok, um, ya see it was like this...
'splain.
It was Ethel, not me Ricky. It was Ethel. She did it!!
~LauraMM
Sat, Aug 1, 1998 (23:15)
#512
Hee hee, hee hee. Very funny!! However, this Bridget episode was not. The funniest thing was the phone ringing at 10.30pm; I'm asleep on the couch and answer the phone "Which One!!!" hee hee. Ann or Karen usually phone me w/ Bridget!!
~lafn
Mon, Aug 3, 1998 (22:13)
#513
So, how do you think poor Bridge is going to make out.?
Will she get busted ?
Do you think the leering Lizard Executive is an American:?
"Nice goin' , babe"
BTW. This really did happen. Story was in last week's London Times.
A British Airways pilot detained the passengers on the tarmac for 3 hours...waiting for the smoking culprit to fess-up.Passengers were livid.
Pilot got in trouble! Don't think they ever found the stealth smoker.
~KarenR
Mon, Aug 3, 1998 (23:55)
#514
Oh, I suspect that's the last we hear about it. She's bound to get herself into more trouble on her miniholiday in Strasbourg. Perhaps, she will get arrested protesting the inhumane treatment of geese there (force fed) in order to satisfy the world's craving for foie gras. That is the place, isn't it?
~lizbeth54
Tue, Aug 4, 1998 (22:24)
#515
Oh so it was topical then. Although that was one news item that didn't make any impression on me. BTW I'm beginning to see the Lucy/Ricky parallels! Why are they always either in Bridget's flat or on mini-holidays. Is Mark's place out of bounds? He's a non-smoker isn't he....maybehe's afraid that Bridge will set the place alight!
~KarenR
Wed, Aug 5, 1998 (00:05)
#516
BTW I'm beginning to see the Lucy/Ricky parallels!
Having grown up with Lucy and Ethel's exploits, everything is beginning to take on a Lucyesque feel. Perhaps, they could go stomp on some grapes next.
Is Mark's place out of bounds?..maybe he's afraid that Bridge will set the place alight!
LOL!! Didn't she start a small fire in Paris when they got back together?
Mark's house is described as a "wedding cake" house. What is that? Do you think there's an image of one somewhere on the web?
~LauraMM
Wed, Aug 5, 1998 (01:01)
#517
Karen, I have a picture of a "Wedding Cake" style house for you when I come to Chicago. (Can't type all the red wine I'm drinking tonight:)) It has decorations on the side that resemble the frosting on the side of a wedding cake. Sort of loopy loop and roses or what kind of flower one likes. you will see on. In Massachusetts we have a TON of them!!!
~susanne
Thu, Aug 6, 1998 (16:19)
#518
After this experience maybe Bridget will give up cigerettes for good.
~susanne
Thu, Aug 6, 1998 (16:39)
#519
Oops! Can you tell that I am a non-smoker and also in serious need of a spell-checker since I cannot even spell cigarette properly.
~Ann
Sat, Aug 8, 1998 (06:05)
#520
She's a bum!
She just took a couple of weeks off!!!
I suppose she intentionally left us with Bridge and Mark being chased down by the cops--a cliffhanger of sorts.
~KarenR
Sat, Aug 8, 1998 (14:59)
#521
Bad week to take off...Monica before the grand jury, DNA dress, etc. Could have been a riot. ;-D
~lafn
Sun, Aug 9, 1998 (01:31)
#522
(Ann) She just took a couple of weeks off!!!
Who said " a couple"? I thought just one.
(Karen) Bad week to take off...Monica before the grand jury
, DNA dress, etc
Unfortunately, this stuff will be around for more than a week. HF will have
many opportunities to take some shots at it.
~Ann
Sun, Aug 9, 1998 (03:51)
#523
She took two weeks off, I think during her book tour.
She told one audience that she didn't even begin to write the column until Friday, then spends one day on it, so why does she need so much time off!!!
~riette
Tue, Aug 11, 1998 (05:58)
#524
To paint her toenails.
~Ann
Sat, Aug 15, 1998 (03:21)
#525
All right, if I were Bridget and Mark showed such trust and faith in me, I would have gotten out of the car and fumed for a while and let him know fully and loudly that I expected some respect and trust from him!
He's known her for, what, 2 years now? Is she that untrustworthy? or is he that insensitive? or has she never stood up for herself in her life?
It is getting harder and harder for me to be sympathetic to our Bridge!
~LauraMM
Sat, Aug 15, 1998 (04:33)
#526
I have come to the conclusion that MARK DARCY is a FUCKWIT!!!! And Bridget needs to move on without him.
Bridget had been the epitome of the classic emotionally scarred girlfriend!! Mark takes advantage of her and its disgusting!!!
Let's see how quickly Markee runs back to the Becks:) Fuckwit!!!!
~Ann
Sat, Aug 15, 1998 (04:54)
#527
I think Bridge is a fuckwit!
~lafn
Sat, Aug 15, 1998 (19:09)
#528
( Laura)...(.Ann)....I think Bridge is a fuckwit!
And so do I!!!!
Why, does this woman just sit around and wait for Mark's telephone call!!
I 'd tell him to go and stuff his legal profession....and his detached house in Holland Park up his....
Bridget is a world- class- doormat.!!!
~Ann
Sun, Aug 16, 1998 (04:46)
#529
Bridget is a world- class- doormat.!!!
}
YES!!
~MarkG
Mon, Aug 17, 1998 (09:15)
#530
What I'm hearing, then, is this:
MD is somewhat insensitive/thinks Bridget probably smoked in the toilet/doesn't phone often enough. Therefore demands should be made, and/or he should be dumped and Bridget should move on.
To what? Do we assume that Mr Even-more-right is just around the corner waiting to be discovered? Or is sisterhood enough and to hell with men? Hmmm .... I can't help thinking Bridget would be plunged into a bigger whirlpool of self-doubt if she took this advice.
~susanne
Mon, Aug 17, 1998 (16:21)
#531
MD might v. well be a fuckwit, but to give him the benefit of the doubt, he could be reacting to Bridget's general lack of self-confidence and self-esteem. She should stop comparing herself to media images and girls like Rebecca and tell herself that MD is lucky to have a girl like her. BJ should realize that she is pretty enough, thin enough, and so what if she smokes a few fags a day-if MD doesn't like it he can go bugger off. BJ is turning into a bit of a wimp and she should cut it out.
~KarenR
Mon, Aug 17, 1998 (20:31)
#532
But, Sue, that is the Bridget character!! She is a real wimp, a doormat, whatever. She has no self-confidence or self-esteem. Given my *role* as the Darcy apologist, he does have some basis for believing Bridget capable of smoking in the lav. She has done lots of stupid, idiotic things. She is Lucy Ricardo, who was always getting into trouble. However, I don't like what is going on here. Bridget and Mark can still be together with funny columns. Helen Fielding does not have to split them up to make
it interesting. The phone call one two weeks ago is a prime example of where she could take this.
This airplane one and the followup were just plain stupid.
~lizbeth54
Mon, Aug 17, 1998 (21:23)
#533
I completely agree with you on this Karen...the last two installments were not up to standard. I think HF feels obliged to work in topical references, to give the column some sort of social commentary slant. But she's at her best with MD and BJ together, but slightly at odds with each other.
My mother (who absolutely loved the book) has lost patience with the column. She thinks that Bridget should move in with Mark ("why is she still so involved with her mother? Time she grew up")and HF should write about their new relationship as live-in lovers (how would they get on with each other's friends, work colleagues, share the bathroom, wash up etc (or does Mark have domestic help?)
I think my mother's right! Lots of comic potential to be explored!
~KarenR
Mon, Aug 17, 1998 (23:46)
#534
The two of us are on the same wavelength. There would be a lot of comic potential with the two of them living together as we saw with the telephone call column. MD was reacting to the endless calls and consultations that went on with Jude, Shaz and Bridge.
Bethan, your mom is right! Tell her to submit a column to the Telegraph! ;-D
~LauraMM
Sat, Aug 22, 1998 (02:03)
#535
"Well, they do have newspapers in the Mediterranean," I whispered.
"So what do you think about the Villa Lucia," he whispered back. "Mrs Darcy?"
}
Oh Helen, we do love you after all:) This was brilliant!!!! I mean keep them like this and we'll love ya forever;)
Karen, are you smiling into your coffee and floating through the air???
~Ann
Sat, Aug 22, 1998 (04:32)
#536
A lack of fuckwittage in this episode!
~lizbeth54
Sat, Aug 22, 1998 (11:14)
#537
HF is back on top form! "Oh hello Mrs Darcy, it's Yolande here from Something Special holidays" Loved it...laugh-aloud-funny, as they say! I even hooted at the Nigel bit. Stick to Bridge and Mark, Helen, backed up with Shazzie and co, Bridget's mum and Tom! :-)
~Ann
Sat, Aug 22, 1998 (15:53)
#538
Stick to Bridge and Mark, Helen, backed up with Shazzie and co, Bridget's mum and Tom! :-)
}
And Gary.
~LauraMM
Sat, Aug 22, 1998 (19:54)
#539
Uh oh, what about Gary??? Is he going to mysteriously reappear to fix the gaping whole in the wall? Will Mark ever ask Bridge to marry? Will Clinton strike again? Ah, we must wait for next week. Hee hee:)
~susanne
Sun, Aug 23, 1998 (15:17)
#540
I loved the Mrs. Darcy thing in this week's column. It's like being caught in a private fantasy. MD demostated why women love him so much (even the times when there is some fuckwittage going on). Quiz on current events was priceless. Would we all pass? :-)
~lafn
Sun, Aug 23, 1998 (16:53)
#541
, but sometimes I think I have got involved with a member of a brigade of lunatics."
LOL....... "You just catching on, Markee?
And dear ole Bridget is taking a tip from Rebecca
........don't let a relationship get stale, Bridge.......bring on the Villas....with a small double -bed!!
~KarenR
Mon, Aug 24, 1998 (01:42)
#542
Haven't known quite what to say. Initially thought it was v.funny, then starting thinking that Helen was doing a v.cruel stereotyping thing with Bridget and that Mark was being v. cruel in ridiculing the way her mind works. If it were me and someone were quizzing me like that I'd strike back with the sort of stuff only guys *care* to remember, like who scored what and when with how much on the clock back in 1967. Arrrgh!!
Another thing. What kind of office does she have Mark working in. Isn't he supposed to be some bigtime barrister. His office sounds more like a Dilbertville or cubicle farm. Isn't Nigel a colleague? What high-priced lawyer is concerned with people thinking he's at his desk. I doubt a Mark would even be cognizant of two women talking about anything in the outer office area.
Or just maybe I'm in a bad mood???? Or maybe the use of *Mrs. Darcy* hit me right in the forehead because earlier that day I had used something similar in something I was writing, but my inspiration was an old Doris Day-Rock Hudson movie!
~KateMcQ
Wed, Aug 26, 1998 (00:08)
#543
Having the experience of working at a big time law firm, I can attest that keeping a jacket on a chair is common practice. You always want others to think you are always working, even if you are not. If you're not around, tongues will wag. While it is unlikely that MD would get too interested in the office gossip, trust me, even the big partners want to hear the gossip when it's good. Life is not that different at a law firm than at other companies. I would be interested to hear the thoughts of any o
her attorneys or law firm employees on whether MD's law office is typical.
Also, when Bridget used "Mrs. Darcy" I thought - I may have wanted to do that on occasion, but never would have the guts for fear of being caught. My worst fear happened to Bridget! But, I've got to hand it to her - a real fast come back.
~KarenR
Wed, Aug 26, 1998 (02:58)
#544
Thanks, Kathryn. Your experiences reminded me that HF said she gets a lot of real life ideas from friends, who pass on funny stories that have occurred to them. So likely, someone told her about a guy who had two jackets made for each suit in order to keep one on the back of his chair.
~KarenR
Sat, Aug 29, 1998 (01:37)
#545
Really think we have found outselves in LA and are not going to drink or smoke but be relaxed modern women of substance.
Finally, Lucy and Ethel go to Hollywood. Some of the all-time best Lucys. Whose cement hand and footprints will they try to steal from Mann's? Will they go cruising looking for stars?
Loved the description of "thin orange young people lounging all over a giant Bacchanalian mattress talking on mobile phones." LOL!! And the bit about smoking! Banish thee to a leper colony.
What in God's name are you doing?"
But Markee, bwaaa, I was finding inner peace! ;-)
About time Helen brought Bridge over here.
~LauraMM
Sat, Aug 29, 1998 (04:02)
#546
OOH, but a Baccanalian orgy with Mark sounds soooooo delicious or is that Colin Firth:)
Lucy and Ethel go to Hollywood, good one, Karen:)
~heide
Sat, Aug 29, 1998 (04:16)
#547
Forgive me for barging on in here but I have been a faithful reader for some time now, thanks to Karen, so I feel perfectly justified in whining "What is Helen doing to Mark Darcy?" He's so predictable, he's become a cartoon.
Who couldn't guess Mark would show up all cold and stuffy? "What in God's name are you doing?" he said coldly. "I thought this was a respectable bar, and I come here to find you unprotestingly participating in a sordid Bacchanalian orgy."
Where's the understated, sexy barrister who only needed to arch an eyebrow or make a snotty, but witty remark?
This entry was hilarious until the end. I hope this isn't the means to the end for BJ and Mark.
~LauraMM
Sat, Aug 29, 1998 (14:13)
#548
You know I was just thinking this over. In June when HF was here, I had asked her if she would be bringing BJ to the States, she said no. But BJ is here, strange......
~LauraMM
Sat, Aug 29, 1998 (14:14)
#549
Ricky Ricardo stayed with Lucy. However, we do know what happened to Desi and Lucy:)
~KarenR
Sat, Aug 29, 1998 (15:45)
#550
(Heide) Forgive me for barging on in here
How many times have you been invited? ;-) Glad you finally showed up.
"What is Helen doing to Mark Darcy?" He's so predictable, he's become a cartoon.
Absolutely agree. Didn't I say something about Dilbert last week when I was ranting and raving and generally out of my mind???? About the only thing she appears to be changing is the animal noise Mark makes!! This week he barked. Most time he growls (although I do *like* the growl). He has probably roared as well.
Where's the understated, sexy barrister who only needed to arch an eyebrow or make a snotty, but witty remark?
Ooof! Front door bell. Fingers crossed. Is Mark!! Hurrah!
~lafn
Sun, Aug 30, 1998 (01:50)
#551
(Heide) "What is Helen doing to Mark Darcy?" He's so predictable, he's become a cartoon.
She's making him the British stereotype male ( according to American perception). But who is the little oriental man? I thought Mark was working on some hispanic case.
The description of the bar is too funny....think Helen was a participant in a similiar event?
~Ann
Sun, Aug 30, 1998 (01:50)
#552
If I were Bridge I would have gone over the edge long ago about Mark's continuing condesension. He doesn't come close to seeing her as an equal, but lords himself over her. I hate the fact that she lets him do it.
~Jana2
Sun, Aug 30, 1998 (07:11)
#553
(Evelyn) The description of the bar is too funny....think Helen was a participant in a similiar event?
I was thinking the same thing too. I wonder if HF has had to endure the Hollywood social whirl while she's been in LA? That should give her enough material for a lot of columns!
And I agree with the comments many of you have made. HF hasn't made our Mark too appealing in the boyfriend department, has she? Unless you go for the judgmental, parental type I guess.
~lizbeth54
Sun, Aug 30, 1998 (08:33)
#554
I think you're all being rather hard on Mark! He's always been slightly stuffy, part of his charm, (Mark "Perfectpants" Darcy, as Bridget called him!),a non-smoking, non-drinking workaholic! Takes his work v. seriously. Doen't like being embarassed in public or with colleagues (in private may be okay!) A cold comment is quite consistent with all this.......or do you think he should fling off his jacket and join the snogging session on the mattress? :-)
~KarenR
Sun, Aug 30, 1998 (15:38)
#555
(Evelyn) But who is the little oriental man?
We'll probably have to wait for next week's column to find.
(Bethan) Mark "Perfectpants" Darcy...a cold comment is quite consistent with all this
True, true, true. But totally unnecessary in loose L.A. Get down on that mattress, Mark!! ;-)
~LauraMM
Sun, Aug 30, 1998 (18:47)
#556
Americans do perceive Britons to be stiff; however, I honestly believe that men aren't like that anymore. Let say Mark is to be around 35, so why he is so stiff is beyond me. Here's hoping that Bridget can loosen him up. I wonder what a wild Mark Darcy would be like....hmmmmm....
~lafn
Sun, Aug 30, 1998 (19:32)
#557
(Laura( Americans do perceive Britons to be stiff; however, I honestly believe that men aren't like that anymore.
(Jana) HF hasn't made our Mark too appealing in the boyfriend department, has she.
(Bethan) I think you're all being rather hard on Mark! He's always been slightly stuffy, part of his charm
I wonder if that is how British women prefer their boyfriends to act.....hmmmmm?
How's that for a Sunday Bombshell!! :-)
~LauraMM
Sun, Aug 30, 1998 (20:46)
#558
yeah, I guess you're right, Evelyn. I do like my men to be stiff too:)
~KarenR
Sun, Aug 30, 1998 (21:18)
#559
(Laura) I do like my men to be stiff too:)
Bad girl!! I'm going to call your mother and tell on you...or I'll just have R do it. ;-D
~lafn
Sun, Aug 30, 1998 (22:20)
#560
(Laura) yeah, I guess you're right, Evelyn.
I do like my men to be stiff too:)
Did Ken Starr make you say that???
~LauraMM
Mon, Aug 31, 1998 (20:28)
#561
Did Ken Starr make you say that???
Well it depends in what context you take the meaning stiff;-)
And because I neglected to before:
WELCOME HEIDE TO BRIDGET JONES'S DIARY PAGE!!!!
~LauraMM
Sat, Sep 5, 1998 (00:44)
#562
Okay, today's was all right. But Bridget weighing 110lbs is ridiculous:) hee hee. At least she knew he was wrong:) Counselling Recommended. It took an American police officer to tell her that???? hee hee.
~KarenR
Sat, Sep 5, 1998 (01:19)
#563
It was cute. Bridge and Shaz aka Thelma and Louise. Hmmm Probably looking for Brad Pitt! Watch out for dem truck stops.
What on earth do they want to go driving in the desert now? Isn't it like 125 degrees now??
This is going to be tough: Trouble magnet or Love pariah???
Only those two could see a compliment (110 lbs) scrawled on a speeding ticket.
~Meggin
Sat, Sep 5, 1998 (02:32)
#564
Wasn't "counselling recommended" just the cop's way of setting up a date? Maybe I read this wrong...
~Ann
Sat, Sep 5, 1998 (05:09)
#565
I think the cop thought she was crazy! -- He must have been part-phychic.
I liked the fact that Helen softened Mark's reaction from the end of last week's, and made him more understanding. And she also seemed to have made Bridge a little stronger this week--which I am happy about. She was really sinking into a piece or worthless jello there for a while.
~heide
Sat, Sep 5, 1998 (16:54)
#566
Yeah, a little bit stronger, Ann. She could have followed Shazzer's advice, bought a gun and driven off from the cop. But she's still eager to take everybody's advice under consideration. Okay, that's Bridget.
I liked this weeks. At least we didn't have to watch Mark be a prig. I want him stuffy and I want him a little condescending but I don't want him to be a pompous ass. Actually, what I really want of him is for him to growl more. More sexy Darcy.
~LauraMM
Sat, Sep 5, 1998 (19:32)
#567
Actually, what I really want of him is for him to growl more. More sexy Darcy.
]
Hmmm, Heide, I can just imagine what you would like MD to growl to you too:)
Margaret, a date??? Hmmm.. I think if that is what he wanted she should go for it!!! Let MD know that other men find BJ attractive also. With those bluish-grey(gray?) eyes;)
~KarenR
Sat, Sep 5, 1998 (21:37)
#568
(Laura) Hmmm, Heide, I can just imagine what you would like MD to growl to you too:)
I'd put money on: "Here?" "Yes, here." Two of my all-time fav lines. ;-D
(Heide) She could have followed Shazzer's advice, bought a gun and driven off from the cop."
How would she explain driving Mark's car off the cliff to Mark? He being a lawyer, you know. :)
~LauraMM
Sat, Sep 5, 1998 (22:40)
#569
WHY IS BRIDGET IN LA? I mean the people there are soooo plastic (Not you, Jen:))I don't see the plot in this at all.
~heide
Sat, Sep 5, 1998 (23:00)
#570
(Karen) I'd put money on: "Here?" "Yes, here." Two of my all-time fav lines. ;-D
Took the words right out of my mouth. And of course, "You have to marry me."
Actually, I kind of like Margaret's take on the counseling. Would that be plot enough to satisfy you, Laura?
(Laura) WHY IS BRIDGET IN LA? I mean the people there are soooo plastic
Ouch, I almost winced but I know you'd never be guilty of such a gross generalization, my dear. ;-)
~KarenR
Sun, Sep 6, 1998 (00:49)
#571
(Laura) Why is Bridget in LA?
Reason #1: Why not? Bridget wants to go on miniholidays with Mark. Mark cancels out on Corfu villa. OK, LA is not Corfu but he is risking his professional career inviting her to accompany him and to bring one of her partners in crime.
Reason #2: Helen Fielding's been in LA. It's a goldmine, a veritable treasure trove of people, places, things to amuse her readership.
Reason #3: (I know this is before your time, Laura, but...) HF's in LA and is no different than Charlie McCarthy and Edgar Bergen, Shari Lewis (RIP) and Lambchop, Paul Whosits and Jerry Mahoney. Get the idea!! :)
I mean the people there are soooo plastic
Are you implying Bridget has the depth of character of a Mother Teresa? ;-D
Didn't the two of them just admit they had come into their own element??
~LauraMM
Sun, Sep 6, 1998 (02:11)
#572
Sorry, just depressed for some strange reason today. Bridget is British and I like her in London, not LA. It will make her too American;(
~KarenR
Sun, Sep 6, 1998 (03:17)
#573
My take on the "Counseling" recommendation is the near-universal perception that everyone in California has a therapist. HF's audience would likely share that perception. (Of course, I'm not saying that its true or not true!!) ;-D
Where I live they just want you to pay the lousy fine. Counseling is not an option for a speeding ticket, although I beat two in court!
~lafn
Sun, Sep 6, 1998 (03:20)
#574
This is one funny installment. Again I wonder if this happened to HF or to a friend. Discriptions are too accurate...esp. the policeman.
Love the confused look on his face when she went into the stones bit re: her weight.....imagine how he would have reacted if she said she needed a fag
"right now".....!!
~Jana2
Sun, Sep 6, 1998 (07:22)
#575
(Karen) Reason #2: Helen Fielding's been in LA. It's a goldmine, a veritable treasure trove of people, places, things to amuse her readership.
This was my take on it as well. I thought the LA junket was sort of an inside joke to her readers who know she's been here doing the Hollywood shuffle. I am enjoying the LA storyline quite a bit, but maybe I'm biased being born and raised in LA. And BTW, I don't have any plastic parts that I'm aware of :-)
~KarenR
Sun, Sep 6, 1998 (15:55)
#576
(Evelyn) .imagine how he would have reacted if she said she needed a
fag "right now".....!!
Oh yes!!! LOL!! And HF is very aware of how Americans would react. She mentioned it at her booksigning. Yes, time to bring on the fags and why not see what kind of reaction she'd get to "pissed." Such an uncouth word to us. ;-D
(Jana) And BTW, I don't have any plastic parts that I'm aware of :)
So glad to hear that. And you say you were born and raised there??? Ah, so plastic is embedded for non-natives, then???? :) Just kidding. Another perception.
~lafn
Sun, Sep 6, 1998 (19:49)
#577
why not see what kind of reaction she'd get to "pissed." Such an uncouth word to us. ;-D
New one on me too. Karen, you are a walking dictionary. Pray tell...what means "pissed " in merry ole' England.
(Jana) And BTW, I don't have any plastic parts that I'm aware of :)
Droolers are excepted, Jana. You 'n Winter :-)
~KarenR
Sun, Sep 6, 1998 (20:15)
#578
One use of pissed (aside from the various ways we use is) is to be drunk.
Too bad Bridget didn't plead the "Kase for Kilometric Konfusion" to his officership. He might have bought it. Would've been going near real speed limit then. Stones, pounds, kilometres, miles, whatever. ;-D
~Ann
Sun, Sep 6, 1998 (21:41)
#579
Too bad Bridget didn't plead the "Kase for Kilometric Konfusion" to his officership. He might have bought it.
}
Yes after all 100 KPH is 60 MPH, so Bridget could easily have claimed to have mixed the two up.
~winter
Mon, Sep 7, 1998 (07:06)
#580
(Jana)This was my take on it as well. I thought the LA junket was sort of an inside joke to her readers who know she's been here doing the Hollywood shuffle. I am enjoying the LA storyline quite a bit, but maybe I'm biased being born and raised in LA.
See, this is where I'm going to have to disagree. As much as I like this town (not a native) I don't want to see Bridget stuck here for the next few weeks. I really miss seeing Bridge in action in familiar surroundings--- f***ing things up with people and settings she's accustomed to. Here, it's like "Lucy goes to Hollywood" (which were the episodes I didn't think were as funny as when she was her bumbling-self back home).
~MarkG
Mon, Sep 7, 1998 (08:16)
#581
Though "pissed" and "having a fag" are understandably vulgar-sounding in the US, this works the other way round sometimes:
Possibly Bridget would be as shocked as I was a few years ago in NY to hear several people described as "anal" - or maybe I'm just too stuffy/pompous.
Also Bridget would never have thought of the clever MPH/KPH thing, as we still use those old miles in Britain.
~KarenR
Mon, Sep 7, 1998 (13:08)
#582
(MarkG) Possibly Bridget would be as shocked as I was a few years ago in NY to hear several people described as "anal"
Have you never heard of anal-retentive, a psychological condition? I merely thought it would be funny for HF to play up the (s)language differences for a couple of columns. BTW, "pissed" is crude here as well, especially when referring to bathroom functions. :)
MPH/KPH thing, as we still use those old miles in Britain.
On your speedometers? On the road signs? Hmmm, I haven't driven in your country for over quite some time, but things change. Well, at least I didn't refer to your driving on the "wrong side of the road" (as HF did for ours). I've always tactfully referred to this aberration as the "other side of the road." :)
~LauraMM
Mon, Sep 7, 1998 (15:04)
#583
I still think Helen Fielding will Americanize Bridget. I wish she would develop some sort of plot line. Even in sitcoms, we have some semblance of a plot. And they at least answer questions we might have. Like what about the damn gaping hole that is a wonderful conversation piece, but has since disappeared. Much like the originator of the gaping hole. What happened to Simon that Shaz was shagging? or Tom? Where has he been?
and I hate this LA mini break. How much time does Bridget get off from work? not very realistic, imvho, of course!
She's all over the place and it's driving me absolutely bananas!!
I'm a little disconcerted with what's been going on with everything. Sorry if I'm sounding a little blase. It's how I feel:(
~lizbeth54
Mon, Sep 7, 1998 (22:12)
#584
Where has Tom been?
I agree with you, Laura. I wish sometimes that the "story line" flowed rather than jumped. For instance, I would have liked to have heard some more about Mark's bossy friend Giles whose wife had left him. Or what else happened to Bridget and Mark on their minibreak in Strassbourg (?), apart from being "chased" by a police car. And, yes, there's the hole. And did Rebecca just fade away. Sometimes I would prefer that HF wasn't writing in weekly column format. I'm looking forward to The Diary 2!!
Mark, I'm all in favour of the occasional show of stuffiness! I'm in the minority here, but I find MD rather endearing when he's being pompous! :-) (Strange looking word, "pompous"....what's its origin?)
~KarenR
Sat, Sep 12, 1998 (16:09)
#585
Thought this was a riot!! I don't care what some of you think, the fish out of water (i.e., Bridget in LA) is a tried and true comedic genre.
Traffic School as an encounter group!! Too funny (although I did see it coming)! "My name is Bridget and I am a traffic violator because I am a trouble magnet!" Say it, Bridge and you'll be cured. If not, put a couple of crystals under your pillow, wear a few magnets and start chanting. ;-D
Loved the "whatevers" she came up with for Mom. "Madly over-confident nightmare" "Lump-free grasvy obsessive adultress" "Girl-child torturer"
Musn't forget the *growl* Yes!!
~heide
Sat, Sep 12, 1998 (17:04)
#586
Yes, he is growling again. "Com'ere". Ummmmmm.
This was terrific starting with Mom's advice to Monica that she should be "riding high on her triumph" and it just got better and better.
Kudos to those of you who guessed the counseling/encounter session. Priceless. Bridget really is a trouble magnet though, isn't she. How else to explain Alexander?
~lafn
Sat, Sep 12, 1998 (20:16)
#587
Musn't forget the *growl* Yes!!
"Com'ere". Ummmmmm.
Let's hear it for that growl......
Can just hear CF saying that as Mark!!
And that would be a good opening audio for the new website......
~KarenR
Tue, Sep 15, 1998 (17:16)
#588
"Com'ere". Ummmmmm.
(Evelyn) Can just hear CF saying that as Mark!!
And that would be a good opening audio for the new website......
What an idea!! Now, I know you want him saying something from Rupert Brooke, Bethan, but this does sounds soooooo delicious and, since the site sprung from the loins of Drool, it shouldn't be toooooo hoity-toity. :)
Were Evelyn, Heide and I the only ones to have read the column this week? Yeah, I know there was competition on the lurid and licentious front, but really that was soooo boring and repititious. ;-D
~lizbeth54
Tue, Sep 15, 1998 (18:08)
#589
Nope, I read it as well! Is Mark becoming a "new man"......cooking meals for Bridget, calling her "sweetheart" and giving (sorry, not giving) good-night kisses.
~susanne
Wed, Sep 16, 1998 (16:01)
#590
I can't see Mark changing into a "new man" for any length of time, but it was a nice change to see him laugh at Bridget's antics. She truly is a trouble magnet just the same way some people are naturally clumsy.
Evelyn- I hope this will do. I'm waiting for BJ to get back to her home turf. Hopefully,then I will have more to contribute
~lafn
Wed, Sep 16, 1998 (17:18)
#591
a nice change to see him laugh at Bridget's antics. She truly is a trouble magnet just the same way some people are naturally clumsy.
I think Life with Bridget would be a lot of fun....unpredictable,yes..but
never boring. Doesn't that make a better relationship?
~KarenR
Wed, Sep 16, 1998 (18:11)
#592
(Sue) but it was a nice change to see him laugh at Bridget's antics.
He's been amused at her antics since the beginning. Even in the book. At that cocktail party he attends with the other ice queen (whatshername? Natasha??). I suppose it could just be a matter of how much work pressure he's under. As Bethan has mentioned before, Mark is serious and a workaholic. But I do love when he's not so serious and *growls* ;-)
~LauraMM
Thu, Sep 17, 1998 (01:04)
#593
Hi all, remember me?
Well, personally, I didn't really care for this epi at all. Of course Bridget would start showing how truthful she could be to a SEX ADDICT; Come to think of it. Maybe she should send Alexander over my way:)
Have we ever heard Mark or Bridget say I love you; I wish they would open up more to each other. It's that damn communication thing.
~lafn
Thu, Sep 17, 1998 (01:37)
#594
( Ahuntie Laura) Mark or Bridget say I love you; I wish they would open up more to each other. It's that damn communication thing
Or that "commitment-phobic" thing.....
~lizbeth54
Thu, Sep 17, 1998 (22:53)
#595
Remember the book, Laura! Page 306 "..and he (Mark) told me all this stuff how he loved me: the sort of stuff, to be honest, Daniel was always coming out with."
Mark does try! But Bridget doesn't always seem to be listening properly. :-)
~lafn
Fri, Sep 18, 1998 (00:51)
#596
( Bethan) Laura! Page 306 "..and he (Mark) told me all this stuff how he loved me:
Actions speak louder than words, folks.
~LauraMM
Fri, Sep 18, 1998 (03:29)
#597
Bullcrap!!! Sorry, guys. But the book was YEARS ago!!! This is now and they haven't said I love you EVER!!!
I'm sorry just disillusioned lately. End of summer depression and lack of a certain domestic felicity that both M&B seem to be sharing lately:( as wellas C&L.
~LauraMM
Fri, Sep 18, 1998 (03:30)
#598
Actions speak louder than words, folks.
And sex is just sex.
~Ann
Fri, Sep 18, 1998 (05:41)
#599
And sex is just sex.
}
Tell that to Clinton.
~LauraMM
Sat, Sep 19, 1998 (17:16)
#600
Hello my name is Laura and I am a ________aholic. I am not a trouble magnet nor am I a cheating wife. But I do covet my girlfriend's husbands, mother's sons and girlfriend's boyfriends. I understand where Mark is coming from it is human nature. (Get this, I am actually defending the dog!)
Like I said earlier, sex is just sex. Making love is something entirely different.
~KarenR
Sat, Sep 19, 1998 (21:06)
#601
Thought this was hysterical...except for the very ending...kinda flat. But anyway, back to the good stuff:
"You stretch the rubber back and grip it nice and hard. That's the way! Then squeeze and stroke, squeeze and stroke, and off it comes in your hand! Super! Ouch, mind the overspray!"
"...But they're just like little animals. Our job is to train them up so they can perform some sort of useful role in society"
ROTFLMAO!!!! Oh, Pam dear, you are a riot.
Thought Mark's answers to Bridget's ill-advised questions were great. Shows he's not such a humorless character (e.g., the comment about no one else would imagine sleeping with Nigel or Giles).
~KarenR
Sat, Sep 19, 1998 (21:06)
#602
Must have forgotten something....:(
~KarenR
Sat, Sep 19, 1998 (21:07)
#603
Out I say!! Now!!
~KarenR
Sat, Sep 19, 1998 (21:07)
#604
I give up
~lizbeth54
Sat, Sep 19, 1998 (22:28)
#605
Nice one! But what sort of relationship do Bridge and Markee have? He stayed in her flat (when it had the hole in the wall), they're always taking mini-breaks together, but now it seems it's Home alone at the end of a telephone...again. They're like yo-yo's. When is Bridge going to get an overnight(or longer) invite to Mark's mansion in Holland Park?
~heide
Sat, Sep 19, 1998 (23:07)
#606
Everyone should be happy now that they're back home. This was another good one.
Okay, is there really a book called "What Men Want?". Remind me not to read it thought I'll probably agree with everything they say.
Love the idea of Mark imagining sex with Shazzer:
"Do you want to have sex with Sharon, and Jude?"
"Well," he said, "obviously I'd be delighted to oblige.
Do you think he was getting excited about a possible foursome? And I don't mean golf.
And dear Pam, squeeze and stroke, squeeze and stroke. This woman keeps getting all the best lines.
I agree with Bethan about the separate abodes. How long do they have to date?
(Laura) But I do covet my girlfriend's husbands, mother's sons and girlfriend's boyfriends
But they at least have to be cute or something. And I draw the line at my mother's sons. ;-)
~LauraMM
Sun, Sep 20, 1998 (00:13)
#607
And I draw the line at my mother's sons. ;-)
I should have said other mother's sons:) I don't think I'd like shagging my brother either:)
~Jana2
Sun, Sep 20, 1998 (07:23)
#608
"Do you want to have sex with Sharon, and Jude?"
"Well," he said, "obviously I'd be delighted to oblige. I realise women have their needs. Did you mean both at the same time?"
This part slayed me. I like to see Mark getting the funny lines on occasion.
~lafn
Sun, Sep 20, 1998 (18:59)
#609
I think Mark and Pam had the funniest lines in this episode.
Then squeeze and stroke, squeeze and stroke, and off it comes in your hand!
An all time classic..... Helen Fielding is getting salty....
Do not ask your boyfriend if all this is true or he will just lie through his teeth."
Husbands too. Save your breath.
Oh God! Maybe Mark was lying and the truth is actually worse than he said. Or maybe he is telling the truth. But that, then, must surely call the whole premise of the book into doubt? Do not know what to think or do now.
Agree with everyone who said the ending was flat. My theory is that Helen F.
didn't know what to do either and the deadline was looming.....
~susanne
Tue, Sep 22, 1998 (17:04)
#610
~Ann
Sat, Sep 26, 1998 (02:17)
#611
On vacation AGAIN??????
~Meggin
Sat, Sep 26, 1998 (03:35)
#612
In my next life, I want to be a syndicated newspaper columnist.
~Ann
Sat, Sep 26, 1998 (05:24)
#613
In my next life, I want to be a syndicated newspaper columnist.
}
LOL Cuz! The good life, indeed.
~lizbeth54
Sat, Sep 26, 1998 (20:41)
#614
Very possibly she's under pressure to finalise the screenplay. I have a hunch that the movie could be very imminent. And don't forget the book sequel.
~lafn
Sat, Sep 26, 1998 (21:47)
#615
In my next life, I want to be a syndicated newspaper columnist
Here, here
I have a hunch that the movie could be very imminent. And don't forget the book sequel
I bet she knocks these columns off in a half-day....she says she does them on
Friday.
~KarenR
Thu, Oct 1, 1998 (22:41)
#616
Ran across another Time magazine dig at Bridget. Was in the "Technology" section.Tom Clancy's new book is more than just another tale of antiterrorism. Rainbow Six is a new brand. Clancy's idea for the book grew out of a PC game out of the same name (due out Aug. 27) from Red Storm Entertainment--a company Clancy founded two years ago. Game players will face the same sort of predicaments that befall John Clark, the novel's hero. Next we'd like to see the game that inspired Bridg
t Jones's Diary.
Do you think it is corporate policy for all contributors to hate BJD? ;-)
~lafn
Sat, Oct 3, 1998 (21:51)
#617
Yessss! "So much easier if you lived here!"
Hurrah..Bridge!! :-)))
Just in time...Markee...my hotel next week is in Kensington..only down-the- road- a- piece from Holland Park and I was goin' to go over and give you a piece of my mind!!
~LauraMM
Sun, Oct 4, 1998 (01:37)
#618
You go girl!!!! Hee hee. BUT wait, doesn't the sitcom end when they move in or get married? I see that there is not silver lining in the near future for these folks.
ALSO,
What the hell kind of job does Mark do? Why would a human right lawyer really give two beans about the stability of the yen? Why would a human rights lawyer care if the NYSE Market crashed? Helen, is Mark SUPERMAN and can and will do everything? Will he protect President Clinton next because his human rights are being exploited. Give the guy ONE job and ONE job and one job only.
(Coming from somebody who works in the markets:) Market are not crashing; it is a long overdue correction!
~Adi
Mon, Oct 5, 1998 (10:50)
#619
Hi, my name is Adi and I'm from Israel. Some of you may remember me from the early days of the RoP.
I want to thank you for introducing Bridget to me. I first "bumped" into her here. Because you were all very excited about the diary, I got curious, searched and read all the installments in the Telegraph, which led me of course to order the book.
It's such fun to read a great story and know it's not going to end in the end of the book. Every Saturday when I wake up I know there is something nice waiting for me in my computer, and it really makes my weekend.
The only thing I'm sorry about is that the diary isn't published in Israel, so no one knows about it. There was an interview with Helen Fielding in one of the newspapers - but that's it. I tried to make my friends read the book, but they don't seem to be interested. Well, I'll just keep trying.
BTW, when I ordered the book from "Bookpages" I noticed that they have another title by HF: "Bridget Jones: I Will Survive". It�s supposed to be published in October 98. Do you think it�s the new book HF is currently writing?
~LauraMM
Mon, Oct 5, 1998 (13:24)
#620
Hmmm.. Very interesting news Adi, thanks a bunch!!! Will check it out ASAP!!!
~LauraMM
Mon, Oct 5, 1998 (13:27)
#621
Bridget Jones: I Will Survive by Fielding, Helen
Price:
�6.99
Bookpoints:
35
Availability:
This book will be sourced from the publisher, so may take a little longer to arrive.
Format:
Paperback
No. of Pages:
320
Publisher:
Picador
Date Published:
Oct 1998
Category:
Fiction, General
~KarenR
Mon, Oct 5, 1998 (15:13)
#622
~susanne
Mon, Oct 5, 1998 (15:18)
#623
Bridget should set her sights higher than moving in with Mark. I say go for an engagement. That way there will be endless possibilites for funny columns. Bridget could get herself in some hilarious situations since planning a wedding is rather stressful. HF could solicit funny engagement stories from her friends and incorporate them into the column. If B & D lived together now it would prob. kill the romance entirely. I think they are already on shaky ground. They seem more married than most married coupl
s. Where is the romance in their relationship?
Evelyn, You might want to drop by and visit Mark anyway because after all he does look a lot like CF. Tell him to buy his poor girlfriend flowers once in awhile.
~LauraMM
Mon, Oct 5, 1998 (15:29)
#624
Oh it looks as though it will only be published in the UK for now. Evelyn look sharp in bookstores you may have to purchase a bunch of copies!!!!
~KarenR
Mon, Oct 5, 1998 (15:33)
#625
After a few minutes of calm meditation phone itself responded to meditative vibes and rang bearing forth Mark.
Hmmm. Knew I was doing something wrong. ;-)
Yessss! "So much easier if you lived here!"
Watch, Mark's overtired and doesn't know what he's saying.
(Laura) BUT wait, doesn't the sitcom end when they move in or get married?
Mad About You....
HF doesn't have to fall into the boring syndrome. There could be lots of interesting (funny) stuff happening and WHO said anything about getting married???
What the hell kind of job does Mark do? Why would a human right lawyer really give two beans about the stability of the yen?
Well, we've already determined how unlikely it would be that he could practice law in Japan and the US...maybe he's just concerned about his personal investments as many of us watch our paper profits swirling down the drain. :)
(Adi) Every Saturday when I wake up I know there is something nice waiting for me in my computer, and it really makes my weekend.
Welcome Adi. Unfortunately, the way the columns were going this spring-summer (with the Rebecca thing) they also ruined a number of my weekends. ;-)
I tried to make my friends read the book, but they don't seem to be interested. Well, I'll just keep trying.
I've experienced the same thing with my sisters, college-age niece and several friends. I think you have to start with a P&P base to truly get into it and be hooked by the characters and their exploits.
Do you think it�s the new book HF is currently writing?
Thanks for the information about the other book. Haven't heard anything about it and it hasn't been mentioned anywhere. Surprised that the Telegraph hasn't added anything to the little blurb at the bottom of the column.
Strange that it's being released in Paperback. I wouldn't expect that for her sequel. Bethan, time to get on the phone again!! Anything in the Times Book section?
~LauraMM
Mon, Oct 5, 1998 (15:44)
#626
I check the Times Book section faithfully on Sat, Sun, and Thursday's nothing!!! Hey I'm glad it's in PB it's cheaper!!!! $11.53USD:)
~LauraMM
Mon, Oct 5, 1998 (15:45)
#627
(Karen)HF doesn't have to fall into the boring syndrome. There could be lots of interesting (funny) stuff happening and WHO said anything about getting married???
I also mentioned moving in with each other!
~KarenR
Mon, Oct 5, 1998 (15:49)
#628
Am assured, mature and accomplished woman. I am able to control my emotions, my impulses and my thoughts. Am assured, mature and accomplished woman. I am able to control my emotions, my impulses and my thoughts. Am assured, mature and accomplished woman. I am able to control my emotions, my impulses and my thoughts. Am assured, mature and accomplished woman. I am able to control my emotions, my impulses and my thoughts.
~LauraMM
Mon, Oct 5, 1998 (16:23)
#629
uhoh!! Karen, have I reduced you to chanting this mantra:) hee hee.
~lafn
Mon, Oct 5, 1998 (20:35)
#630
(Laura) Evelyn look sharp in bookstores you may have to purchase a bunch of copies!!!!
I'll be there for most of October. Going to Waterstone's on Kensington High Street next Monday to pick up my two copies of A Month in the Country.
(They had two on the shelves)Will inquire about Bridget.
Welcome Adi...you sure made a splash with the latest Bridge news.Thanks.
(Sue)Evelyn, You might want to drop by and visit Mark anyway...... Tell him to buy his poor girlfriend flowers once in awhile.
Yeah, instead of stealing them from the "common -ground " park on the way to see her.
~lizbeth54
Mon, Oct 5, 1998 (23:38)
#631
Very interesting! Is this the sequel? I read that HF is appearing as a guest at the Cheltenham Literary Festival mid-October (I think). It's the UK's premier literary festival and would be a good launch pad for a new book. Why paperback though? Although to be honest it's the paperbacks that sell and if they want to sell another million it might be a good sales ploy to jump straight in with the p/b version. Oh well, sounds promising (who said that?) Perhaps (true to form!)I should ring Picador!
I agree with Laura about Mark's job! So very versatile! Although perhaps, as Karen suggests, he's worried about his investments. (Aren't we all :-) )Perhaps he'll lose all his money, sell his big white house and move in with Bridget and the hole in the wall!
~LauraMM
Tue, Oct 6, 1998 (12:47)
#632
Yeah, but, he still has work to do and doodling with his investments should NOT be permitted on work time:) They guy is just a superman! :) NOT!!!
~KarenR
Tue, Oct 6, 1998 (15:20)
#633
(Bethan) Although to be honest it's the paperbacks that sell and if they want to sell another million it might be a good sales ploy to jump straight in with the p/b version.
Didn't do that in the U.S. though. BJD was put out in HB and made the bestsellers' list nonetheless. These days there's not that big a difference in price between HB and quality (trade) PBs, especially at the discount chains where bestsellers are always 30% percent or better.
Perhaps he'll lose all his money, sell his big white house and move in with Bridget and the hole in the wall!
Then I guess we'll see if the Lizzy Bennet comment at the Meryton Assembly is true or not regarding rich men. ;-)
(Laura) Yeah, but, he still has work to do and doodling with his investments should NOT be permitted on work time:)
You wanna tell us what other golden rules you follow whilst at work? ;-)
Evelyn, You might want to drop by and visit Mark anyway......
Oh yes, this reminds me. I still don't know what a wedding cake house looks like. Take a picture and send it to me, puh-leez.
~LauraMM
Tue, Oct 6, 1998 (16:35)
#634
Laura) Yeah, but, he still has work to do and doodling with his investments should NOT be permitted on work time:)
You wanna tell us what other golden rules you follow whilst at work? ;-)
TOUCHE!!!
~lizbeth54
Fri, Oct 9, 1998 (00:01)
#635
I rang Pan Books (Picador is one of their imprints). "Bridget Jones: I will survive" will be published in April 1999. Sorry!
I thought that October was unlikely in that there's not been any "buzz" or build-up. Oh well, we've still got the weekly installments to look forward to!
~LauraMM
Fri, Oct 9, 1998 (00:53)
#636
Thanks Bethan, I was getting all excited. Could you also find out if Nick Hornby has another book out. I was at a lunch meeting with a magazine advertising sales person, and we started talking Britlit and I mentioned NH and she said he had a new book out called "Steel..." something or other. Golancz is his British publisher.
Any and all info is very welcome!
~MarkG
Fri, Oct 9, 1998 (09:57)
#637
For desperate addicts like us, the UK shops do now have: "The Bridget Jones' Diary 1999 Diary". Each week begins with a Bridget thought, lifted from the book or the columns, and the days of the year have little handwritten notes from Bridget, example:
Friday March 23
Spring Breaks 99 Exhibition, Horticultural Halls, Westminster
Hurrah, whole exhibition on mini-breaks! Yesss!
Saturday March 24
FA Cup, 4th Round
Date? Forget it!
You get the picture.
BTW, Evelyn, most hotels in South Kensington would be closer to Waterstone's in Old Brompton Road, which has plenty of copies of "About A Boy". I have not seen a new Nick Hornby book yet.
~MarkG
Fri, Oct 9, 1998 (17:15)
#638
Whoops! I now see that Evelyn is in fact purchasing "A Month in the Country". I must have got confused with the other Hornby stuff.
~Ann
Sat, Oct 10, 1998 (04:05)
#639
A good one. Yea!!!
Great ending. LOL.
~KarenR
Sat, Oct 10, 1998 (15:40)
#640
(MarkG) "The Bridget Jones' Diary 1999 Diary". Each week begins with a Bridget thought, lifted from the book or the columns, and the days of the
year have little handwritten notes from Bridget
Mark, meant to ask, did you see on what day the "alien shag-beasts" will descent on earth?
~lizbeth54
Sat, Oct 10, 1998 (16:12)
#641
There does seem to be a new BJ book out...priced �10.99 and published by the BBC (it's new in the Times Bestsellers list). I phoned the local Waterstones and they weren't sure what it was...possibly a tie-in with a Bridget Jones evening on BBC2 this month. But it's not the new Helen Fielding.."BJ:I will survive". This is listed against October, but the sales assistant (v. helpful) I spoke to said that publication had been put back until next year. She said that there had been "difficulties" and that "the
lot had had to be altered". Wot plot?!!
~lizbeth54
Sat, Oct 10, 1998 (16:15)
#642
Oops!! For "lot" read "plot"!
~heide
Sat, Oct 10, 1998 (16:50)
#643
Oh my God! I had forgotten Bridget actually had a job. And of course she wants to direct! Singers want to act, models want to act, but actors want to direct. As do "feature" reporters, I suppose.
I'd love to have that 1999 diary.
~LauraMM
Sat, Oct 10, 1998 (18:25)
#644
(Heide) Oh my God! I had forgotten Bridget actually had a job.
So didn't Helen Fielding:)
He splashed out on a dress; that is so, like, five minutes ago! hee hee. Too Funny!!! and So true!!!
I think we should be paying attention to what is going on in Kosovo, the Prez thing is just a glorified Witch hunt!!! (Spoken from someone in Boston!)
~Jana2
Sun, Oct 11, 1998 (06:32)
#645
Well, it was sort of fun to see Bridget back at work, but what's up with her Dad and that speech impediment? It seems sort of odd to throw his probibombom out there and just leave us hanging....
~KarenR
Sun, Oct 11, 1998 (20:05)
#646
I was wondering about that speech thing too! Is that the new hip talk (that has to date me) that spreading like wildbittybombomtabombomfire throughout London?
Hope not.
Also, was there a similar event on British TV or do you think this is a parody of our ancient astronaut (John Glenn) going up in space imminently?
Bridge is just trying so hard to be taken seriously. Keep trying. ;-)
~lizbeth54
Sun, Oct 11, 1998 (23:40)
#647
I didn't understand the speech thing...couldn't see the point at all! So, is Bridget moving in with Mark? Do we get to know?
~KarenR
Mon, Oct 12, 1998 (15:21)
#648
Now that I think of it, Dad's speech problem sounds v.much like some of the slang my nieces use and I just ignore. There's bom or bomb and bitty-bom or some such thing. Can't remember what they mean though. Will have to ask.
~susanne
Mon, Oct 12, 1998 (17:39)
#649
If that speech thing is a sign of hipness, I just hope he doesn't start wearing those wide pants that slide down the teenagers bums these days.
~Adi
Tue, Oct 13, 1998 (22:52)
#650
it was a good one, but I always feel after reading the weekly installment that it was too short! I always want more.
What I really want to know is what's going on with Tom? Are we going to hear anything about wicked Rebecca? What happened to the hole in the wall? and more important - where is Mark?
~KarenR
Sat, Oct 24, 1998 (21:54)
#651
Again??? No comments??? Thought this week's travelogue was a riot. Can you picture HF up on a stage doing Bohemian Rhapsody? (Would need a chorus behind her though.) I'd pay to see it.
Didn't it seem like she was fighting back against the "insult to feminism" attacks? Hey, what's irony? ;-D
Perhaps, I should go off to Japan where will feel like giant, but do not like eating squishy centipedes and toilets that play music.
To quote Freddie Mercury:Nothing really matters,
Anyone can see
Nothing really matters to me.
BTW, it's Akihito. And no wonder this woman has an obsession with Beelzebub and his subdevils!!
~LauraMM
Sun, Oct 25, 1998 (02:52)
#652
Well I'm speechless.
~Jana2
Sun, Oct 25, 1998 (07:46)
#653
I adored the travel logue, I must say. Maybe it's because I'm leaving for Japan on business on Monday and it helped put me in a better mood about it! Really, her comments are right on. I was in Tokyo in April (my first trip ever to Japan) and the three big things that stuck with me were the food, the endless business card ritual (I ran out long before everyone else, ah - the shame) and the toilets. The one at the hotel had a control panel with all kinds of... ahem, washing devices with temperature and
pressure controls. The one at the office had a seat warmer and I read in a magazine that the real high end toilets also have controls for music (to mask sound) and for scent. Goodness, such high tech conveniences. Her comments about jet lag hit home too. Our trips are usually fairly short - a week or so, and they go by in a blur because of sleep deprivation. All this while you're trying to be on your toes at a meeting. Poor Helen - I pity her trying to field questions in that state.
~heide
Sun, Oct 25, 1998 (20:27)
#654
Happy birthday in Japan, Jana. Does this mean you'll actually miss your birthday because it will really be Tuesday on Monday? ;-)
Guess I better run over to the Telegraph and read about these centipedes and toilets.
~Jana2
Mon, Oct 26, 1998 (06:50)
#655
Thanks for the good wishes, Heide. Yes, I'm hoping that missing the day over the international date line means I don't have to add another year to my age!
~KarenR
Mon, Oct 26, 1998 (17:04)
#656
Happy Birthday Jana!! Quite the theory. Bridget would buy it!
~lafn
Fri, Oct 30, 1998 (16:09)
#657
(Mark) BTW, Evelyn, most hotels in South Kensington would be closer to Waterstone's in Old Brompton
Actually, I was close to the Waterstone's on Kensington High Street (nr. Holland Park) Yes, I did get A Month in the Country, but did not see the BJ date Diary. Waterstone's is great about mailing though.
And yes, Bethan, I inquired about " BJ I Will Survive "and was told it has bee rescheduled for March.
It was fun to read Bridget in hard copy. Sent one to our Leader.
I was surprised to see that it receives such high visibility in the Saturday Daily Telegraph. Some of my friends who normally buy The Times purchase the Telegraph on Saturday for Bridget!!
We're not the only nuts!!
~LauraMM
Fri, Oct 30, 1998 (18:41)
#658
Evelyn, welcome home!!!!! I missed you soososososososososo much!!!!! Do I owe you any money btw;P hee hee.
~lizbeth54
Fri, Oct 30, 1998 (23:05)
#659
Laura, you asked me ages ago if there was a new Nick Hornby novel coming out. I did check, but couldn't find anything. Isn't he currently writing a screenplay?
~Ann
Sat, Oct 31, 1998 (02:24)
#660
Gee, what a surprise. No column again this week.
~LauraMM
Sat, Oct 31, 1998 (02:54)
#661
I just checked myself!!! nothing!! UGH!!! how does she expect loyal followings if she doesn't write!!!!
~KarenR
Sat, Oct 31, 1998 (16:14)
#662
(Laura) how does she expect loyal followings if she doesn't write!!!!
You aren't putting yourself in *that* category, are you? ;-p
Was thinking, however, the exact same thing. Bridget who???
~heide
Sat, Oct 31, 1998 (18:51)
#663
Sitting here impatiently tapping my foot...
~KarenR
Sat, Oct 31, 1998 (22:41)
#664
And the acronym for that would be...A most common urban phrase. ;-D
~LauraMM
Sat, Nov 7, 1998 (19:21)
#665
This was not a Bridget Jones' Diary column, this was a Helen Fielding feminist ranting column. Although the British Government may think it would be better the citizens of Great Britain were to marry, they cannot make people marry.
Although I did like MD going down on one knee to propose because he'd get a tax break. That WOULD be the only inducement to marry BJ!
~lafn
Sat, Nov 7, 1998 (19:57)
#666
I agree, Laura, this was not Bridget. Helen Fielding on her soap box.
Giving us the advantage of being a Singleton.
( But what about the cold feet on a winter night?, Helen.)
~susanne
Sat, Nov 7, 1998 (21:27)
#667
Definitely not the Bridget that we know and love.
More advantages to being smug-married:
-being brought hot-tea when we've got the sniffles
-having shoulders rubbed on a stressful day
-being loved even on a bad hair day
-constant companionship
-Mr. Fixit around the house when we're an idiot about that stuff
-Computer wiz when we're an idiot about that
-regular shagging :-))
Lots more when the marriage is good and isn't a good marraige to what most would aspire. I think BJ would give her eye teeth for it. It's not like her life is all the great as a singleton. I will grant a good live-in relationship can also do the trick.
~lafn
Sun, Nov 8, 1998 (19:53)
#668
You got a winner, Sue...."regular shagging" is what most girls get.
I do think the installment this week was a bit strident.
Bridget is usually teflon-like...things roll off her. She is jovial and accepts the lumps in life. (While eating another Jaffa cake!)
Is there a psychologist among us? I think this tells us a lot
about Helen Fielding....sour on marriage and relationships?
The pre-marriage compulsory reading of Men are from Mars...is a hoot.
(Though not a bad idea for high school.)
The only true Bridget-line , IMO, was the last...."tell government to shuddup and get on with it"
~KarenR
Sun, Nov 8, 1998 (21:19)
#669
(Evelyn) Is there a psychologist among us? I think this tells us a lot about Helen Fielding....sour on marriage and relationships?
Not a psychologist, but maybe she's just saying there are GOOD things about being a singleton and that "marriage" is not the be all and end all. I didn't see where she ruled out relationships at all.
Regarding the Top 10 list of Why Husbands Are Useful, those are certainly not givens with ALL men. The Mr. Fixit type occurs less and less these days. In my family (growing up) I was the one who put together everything (shelving units, etc.). My dad was handy but would never do anything. My brother-in-law hires someone to program his universal remote and I wonder if he knows how to change a lightbulb. I'll never forget the day the home security company sales rep came out to my house and was talking d
wn to me. My boyfriend showed up and the guy got all excited because he was going to talk to a man. My boyfriend told the guy I knew more about telecommunications and electronics than he did!! (BTW, I wrote a letter to the company about their sales staff's patronizing attitude and got several free months of monitoring.)
Regarding keeping one's feet warm, a good down comforter works even better.
OK back to Bridget. I liked this week's column. It was well thought out and had some great lines. My favorite has to be:
...you have to go on at least 12 government-arranged dates before you can declare yourself a Singleton; and only then if have reasonable grounds for rejecting all 12. If unreasonable, then have to declare self a fuckwit.
Too funny!!
~lafn
Mon, Nov 9, 1998 (02:55)
#670
.(Karen) Regarding keeping one's feet warm, a good down comforter works even better
Or in a pinch....socks.
Karen; I didn't see where she ruled out relationships at all.
I really mean't to say that I wondered if a relationship that has gone sour precipitated this sudden antipathy to marriage...under the guise of the Green Paper.
On the contrary, one of the positives of being a Singleton she says is: always the possibility of thrilling new liaisons without being slyly adulterous
~LauraMM
Mon, Nov 9, 1998 (03:44)
#671
The only true Bridget-line , IMO, was the last...."tell government to shuddup and get on with it"
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nah, that was all Helen Fielding! bridget was not around this column!
~KarenR
Mon, Nov 9, 1998 (16:02)
#672
Laura, didn't you say the Green Paper thing had to do with Prince Charles and Camilla Parker-Bowles?
~LauraMM
Mon, Nov 9, 1998 (17:04)
#673
No, some British Bishop gave the green light for Prince Charles and CPB:)
Green Paper is a tax I believe on single people. White paper is a tax on Married??? I remember seeing the definition on CSPAN, but can't remember.
~Allison2
Mon, Nov 9, 1998 (18:46)
#674
A green paper is a government consultation document. A green paper may become a white paper which is a provisional piece if legislation. Ask Ben. He used to be a Mandarin.
~BenB
Wed, Nov 11, 1998 (04:18)
#675
Allison is right. A green paper is purely consultative; a white paper is consultative too (comments are invited from interested parties), but it includes specific policy proposals. Anyone may respond to either. The next step is a Bill, which goes before parliament; it has to pass through various committees, and it gets three "readings" (debates, votes, and chances for amendments) in the Commons; the final approval by the Lords is nearly always a rubber stamp....Often, when the House of Lords objects, it i
with good reason (c.f. recent case about charging non-Scots for Scottish Universities). If the Lords object, they can send it back to the Commons with suggested ammendments.
Not all legislation gets presented as green or white papers before going to parliament.
Anyone still awake?
~KarenR
Wed, Nov 11, 1998 (19:08)
#676
This was from booksigning.
~LauraMM
Wed, Nov 11, 1998 (20:06)
#677
Hmmm... She has my hairstyle and color!!! I should sue;)
~lafn
Wed, Nov 11, 1998 (23:32)
#678
Thanks Ben. Interesting to see how Parliament bills originate.
So who writes the original Green Paper.? Some MP? Or does it come out of committee.
Anyone may respond to either. The next step is a Bill, which goes before parliament;
Who is anyone ....MPs?
Good picture of HF, Karen.
I assume it was in Chicago.Thanks for sharing.
~LauraMM
Sat, Nov 14, 1998 (02:38)
#679
Okay, HF is back in top form!!! it is about time!!! this one is brilliant and brilliant is what I needed because I have flu and pneumonia:(!!
THANK YOU HELEN FIELDING
~Ann
Sat, Nov 14, 1998 (20:23)
#680
So how many calories? How many cigs? How many stone? How many alcohol units? Inquiring minds want to know!
I wonder why she changed the format and dropped those.
Other than that, I liked this one.
~LauraMM
Sat, Nov 14, 1998 (21:38)
#681
I didn't even notice that was missing! Must be the horrible headache:(
~KarenR
Sat, Nov 14, 1998 (22:30)
#682
I haven't been able to get into Telegraph all day. :-(
~lizbeth54
Sun, Nov 15, 1998 (08:32)
#683
Hope you're over the flu, Laura! Karen, have you established contact yet? This week was good, but what's happened to the passion and the romance?!!! MD is "post-work exhausted, giving perfunctory kisses, having sleep problems (camomile tea?)... sleeping like a baby"?!! And's what's this about Bridget not being "allowed" to turn up at his house when she's had a bad day. She has to wait for an INVITATION? Or does he set the dogs on her, or ask his housekeeper to eject her from the property?
~Ann
Sun, Nov 15, 1998 (17:13)
#684
She has to wait for an INVITATION? Or does he set the dogs on her, or ask his housekeeper to eject her from the property?
}
She's always been a bit of a wimp when it comes to standing up for herself and taking initiative.
~lafn
Sun, Nov 15, 1998 (22:00)
#685
....and what's this about Bridget not being "allowed" to turn up at his house when she's had a bad day. She has to wait for an INVITATION?
Yeah, that's what I was thinking...what's goin on here?
Is this an Equal Opportunity Relationship, or what?
"You eat 'n drink 'n sleep 'n...(you know what else).. in my house why can't I eat in yours..?"
Unless, of course HF has a surprise in store for us along those lines....
The sentence seemed too cryptic....sneaked in....
And talking about sneaking in....have you noticed that The Telegraph now promotes amazon.co.uk as their book distrb? Amazon is moving out...c'mon Waterstone's get rollin!!
~susanne
Wed, Nov 18, 1998 (18:01)
#686
I really loved the new kick-ass Bridget, but I know she will only be around until the next self-help book.
Evelyn, I never felt that the BJ/MD relationship was an Equal Opportunity Relationship, but maybe if BJ keeps some of her new attitude it can turn into one.
~Ann
Sat, Nov 21, 1998 (05:05)
#687
Well, I like the idea of Mark trying to help Bridge gain a back-bone!
And I like that the calorie counter etc is back, but it was a bit of a slow episode.
~heide
Sat, Nov 21, 1998 (05:05)
#688
Yes it was slow and I hope it doesn't go too far on the Jude storyline. I mean anytime I hear about a lump, my hand automatically goes up and starts palpating. Suspect HF is just using this as a device for Bridget to get "nicer" again.
~susanne
Sat, Nov 21, 1998 (05:05)
#689
It didn't take Bridget long to confess to Mark about her recent evil ways. I knew she wouldn't last too long. I rather liked evil Bridget.
~LauraMM
Sat, Nov 21, 1998 (05:05)
#690
I was kinda hoping maybe she did ring Daniel. I think Markee needs to realise how important BJ is to him.
RE: Lump, sad way of making BJ feel bad!!! It was low.
Gary, What is up with him?
HF, make BJ sorta nice, sorta bad and tell us why she can't pop over Mark's whenever she wants??? Hmmmm.. suspicious minds want to know!
~lizbeth54
Sat, Nov 21, 1998 (05:05)
#691
HF, make BJ sorta nice, sorta bad and tell us why she can't pop over Mark's whenever she wants??? Hmmmm.. suspicious minds want to know!
He's secretly co-habiting with Rebecca and needs time to pop her in a cupboard!
But, seriously, seriously, when will they really get it together (minibreaks and overnight stays in Bridget's flat don't count!)
I was listening to an entertainment-type programme on the radio...all about books being made into movies. BJD was mentioned as "soon" to start shooting. But no cast/director details were given. And how soon is "soon"? I predict CF and Helena BC for the leads. How about Alison Steadman (Ma Bennet) for Bridge's Mum? Any other casting suggestions? Daniel? Jude? Perpetua? Anglo-American cast permitted!
~MarkG
Sun, Nov 22, 1998 (12:08)
#692
Story from the radio:
Apparently Cherie Blair sped over to HF at a Downing St reception to say how much she had loved BJD, having read it in three nights while her husband was away "..which was handy, because Tony's normally very demanding in the bedroom."
~lafn
Sun, Nov 22, 1998 (21:34)
#693
Re; Cherie Blair on reading BJD
".......Tony's normally very demanding in the bedroom."
LOL
Good for Tony 'n Cherie.At least he's demanding with his wife!
I liked this week's installment. Poor Bridge couldn't keep the the New Evil Behavior wave crest going for long...had to confess to Mark.
I liked what Mark told her: "...stop worrying about getting everything right..."
Bridge is the perfect daughter,friend, girl friend ('n ex-girlfriend),
employee, tries in vain to be the perfect hostess and cook.
So, like she says: " Bad is the new good in parts.
Maybe now she wont' be the ole doormat.
~KarenR
Sun, Nov 22, 1998 (21:53)
#694
I liked this week's too. See how old Markee just puts in all in perspective! Poor Bridge is still in a muddle.
~LauraMM
Mon, Nov 23, 1998 (18:43)
#695
Hmmmm.... This is what I wrote when I started this blasted topic. Funny how things come back to haunt you.
Mon, Feb 2, 1998 (13:29) | LauraMM (LauraMM)
Well someone had to create this topic. As we all absolutely adore it. I would like to start by saying that I think a
man who has a little insecurities is extremely sexy. And Mark Darcy, who comes a cross as a strong-headed male,
just proved to the female race that he does indeed have some insecurities. Now will it scare Bridget away;)
~lafn
Sun, Nov 29, 1998 (00:09)
#696
As Richard would say: "Boring, boring...bloody boring".
HF on her soapbox. Took on the NHS, doctors examining women in a demeaning way,scans (mammograms?) of breasts make one feel like a meat package at the supermarket....("2lbs of tripe sqashed between to tin plates").
C'mon Helen...you can do better than that.
~LauraMM
Sun, Nov 29, 1998 (00:12)
#697
Maybe HF had a mammogram, her first one. She around the age to start having them. I thought it rather lame too! What the hell is up with her father???
~lizbeth54
Sun, Nov 29, 1998 (10:20)
#698
I think there could be an underlying personal agenda, but I agree that it was lame and rather dispiriting.
~KarenR
Sun, Nov 29, 1998 (17:36)
#699
I think there could be an underlying personal agenda
As I told Laura, it perfectly related the entire humiliating and painful experience of having a mammogram and the pathetic way women are treated when *something* out of the ordinary is seen. If you've ever gotten a call from some office person telling you you have to come back because the radiologist wants to look at something again, then you can't relate. You go out of your mind like Jude, only to find out that it was nothing.
I've always maintained that if this test were performed on men, you can be sure that a better, less painful and easier to read test would be developed. Didn't they just develop a *blood* test for prostrate cancer?
I hope Helen mounts a campaign and screams from her soapbox!!
~lafn
Mon, Nov 30, 1998 (01:32)
#700
(Karen)If you've ever gotten a call from some office person telling you you have to come back because the radiologist wants to look at something again, then you can't relate. You go out of your mind like Jude, only to find out that it was nothing.
You wouldn't go out of your mind....I've had a masectomy and I'm still sane
(no remarks!)The whole thing is overblown. Lots of worse things in life.
~heide
Wed, Dec 2, 1998 (00:15)
#701
Am I hallucinating or is there really a 1999 Bridget Jones calendar/diary out there somewhere in the shops? I read this somewhere but don't know if my leg was being pulled. Have checked amazon, borders, and barnesandnoble but no dice so far.
~lafn
Wed, Dec 2, 1998 (02:08)
#702
I think one of the UK fans told us that. Try Waterstones or
amazon.co.uk, or Dillon's
~KarenR
Wed, Dec 2, 1998 (19:18)
#703
Heide, they probably wouldn't sell the same version here because of the holiday differences.
~lafn
Fri, Dec 4, 1998 (17:07)
#704
I called Waterstones re: The Bridget Jones' Diary .
It is a diary and not a calendar...the latter does not exist.
Waterstones has it:
Hardback, ( the size of a paperback) 9.99 UKP
postage to US 4.88 UKP
Total 14.87 UKP
Order online through their website email.
~Ann
Fri, Dec 4, 1998 (17:07)
#705
I was surprised Helen Fielding didn't take the week off. Isn't she about due for some time off--after all she's written a few weeks in a row now!
1) Laura should be happy that Tom is back
2) I'd kill Mark after that last comment
3) Bridget would probably, instead, notice that he actually referred to their relationship going somewhere, and take it as a positive sign. Might be a good time for her to get Mark to expand their relationship--like maybe actually ask her over to his house for once!
~Ann
Fri, Dec 4, 1998 (17:07)
#706
Does anyone know why this topic is not showing me on the index when there are new messages here? It is not set ast frozen or forgotten, but it never tells me when there have been new posts. When I actually come in, it does show me the new ones since my last visit though, so it is keeping track somewhere.
~KarenR
Sat, Dec 5, 1998 (16:15)
#707
Everything is acting up again, Ann. Must be the February 2036 syndrome. Topic 97 isn't showing up for me as having anything new, but I can see people have posted. The only way I know of to fix it (for yourself) is to manually open all the topics you frequent, by typing in the URL. That seems to reset everything after a date-induced bout of amnesia. ;-)
~lizbeth54
Sat, Dec 5, 1998 (17:16)
#708
Today's episode....I agree with Ann. I think HF is in danger of throwing the baby out with the bathwater! We're just limping along....I'd much rather see a stronger narrative framework (and some movement in the BJ/MD "relationship") or a complete break. The sequel to BJD is coming out in April and then there's the movie....it's better perhaps to build in some "space".
BTW I can sympathise with MD for losing patience with BJ's theories!
~lafn
Sat, Dec 5, 1998 (22:50)
#709
I liked this week...we have our old Bridget back...indecisive , insecure...hey Mark loves her that way. What the hell.
BTW I looked up pashmina : made of pashm
Don't know what that is?..... pashm.. a kind of fine wool for making shawls obtained from Tibet
Your fact for the day:-)
My new topics aren't showing up either. But I just delete the number up in the
URL and type in the topic number I want. No need to type the whole URL.
(Brought to you by evelyn, the Computer Pro..who still can't figure out the chat room procedure!!)
~LauraMM
Sun, Dec 6, 1998 (01:12)
#710
Mark Darcy is a definite PASHMASTER.
And Bridge really needs to TELL HIM OFF REGARDING HIS LAST STATEMENT. She's too, smooshy!
And sad to say I have a Pash Married and an ex-Pashspurt!
~Jana2
Sun, Dec 6, 1998 (01:12)
#711
If Jesus had known how much heartache his birthday was going to cause Singletons, surely he would have shut up about same, especially being Singleton self.
I thought this bit was pretty darn funny. It reminded me of what I enjoyed when I first read BJD(the book).
~heide
Sun, Dec 6, 1998 (16:53)
#712
Bravo Mark! Bridget's insecurities and self-help books would have driven me out long ago. Then again, if he is a Pashmaster, guess that's why he's still with her.
Jana, maybe you've got it. Screw the relationship - what I love are Bridget's observations. Remember Rhoda Morgenstern? She got boring too after she got married.
~KarenR
Sun, Dec 6, 1998 (22:13)
#713
Mark really knows how to push her buttons!
~LauraMM
Mon, Dec 7, 1998 (13:22)
#714
10pm: Oh my God. Mark just called. Told him about pashmina conversation at
which he went quiet.
"What? What?" I said.
"It's just strangely prophetic." he said. "With Christmas coming round again, I've been thinking. . . look this is not going anywhere, Bridget. I think it might be betterif we were just friends."
Cannot believe it. Am cast out again on sea of singleton Torture Season at mercy of pashminas and Gaah! phone again.
"Just kidding." (Was Mark.) "Can I come round?"
Okay, I'm gonna go on my damn soapbox here and scream bloody murder. Why the hell, must HE always come round her place. What is WRONG with his place. What is he hiding? Who is he hiding? And who the hell does he think he is!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I am getting more and more disgusted with this controlling freak of a boyfriend! He may be sympathetic sometimes, but generally he's out for himself and only wants to get his rocks off!
~lafn
Mon, Dec 7, 1998 (22:20)
#715
Re: Markee: He may be sympathetic sometimes, but generally he's out for himself and only wants to get his rocks off!
So...what else is new?...he's just like most other men, no different.
That's the nature of the beast.
~heide
Tue, Dec 8, 1998 (00:08)
#716
(Laura) He may be sympathetic sometimes, but generally he's out for himself and only wants to get his rocks off!
You may be right. Why does she put up with it? 'Cause Bridget's Bridget.
I see this all the time and have been guilty of it myself. You're an independent woman, then you get a boyfriend and all of a sudden you sit and wait for him to make all the moves, so afraid if you do the wrong thing, you'll lose him. What's wrong with THAT picture?
~LauraMM
Tue, Dec 8, 1998 (13:49)
#717
I see this all the time and have been guilty of it myself. You're an independent woman, then you get a boyfriend and all of a sudden you
sit and wait for him to make all the moves, so afraid if you do the wrong thing, you'll lose him. What's wrong with THAT picture?
The thing is WE need to let THEM know who's in charge. It sure as hell isn't them!!!
We shouldn't allow them to walk over us, we are much more stronger than they are. Heck, they couldn't deal with childbirth!
~lafn
Wed, Dec 9, 1998 (02:10)
#718
You're an independent woman, then you get a boyfriend and all of a sudden you sit and wait for him to make all the moves, so afraid if you do the wrong thing, you'll losehim. What's wrong with THAT picture?
We shouldn't allow them to walk over us, we are much more stronger than they are....
At the risk of losing my dear friends...I'll tell you what's wrong with that picture.....you don't have to show "all your cards at once". You can coast a little ...that's not being a hypocrite ...just astute. The important thing
is to have a plan. Maybe two. A&B. ( And not every relationship is alike.)
After you assess the situation , hell, you might decide it's not worth the effort. But if you do...then go for it.
~KarenR
Wed, Dec 9, 1998 (02:14)
#719
Wise woman!
~lizbeth54
Sat, Dec 12, 1998 (14:32)
#720
There seem to be some problems with the Electronic Telegraph...but just I've read this week's BJD in the paper....and it's VERY funny. Back to "I love Lucy" territory - "Mark and Bridget go Christmas shopping." Mark is v. organised - shopping list for four- his Mum, Dad, his secretary, and Giles (he's obviously an only child with a not very extensive emotional life!) He also manages to find pressies for Nigel, Jude and Shaz, whilst Bridget is yet to leave the starting blocks! Good fun! Hope the Electronic
Telegraph soon connects.
~LauraMM
Sun, Dec 13, 1998 (03:19)
#721
ARGHHHHHHHHH v. bad of Telegraph to NOT connect. Did they forget to pay the bill????
I think M.Darcy is emtionally scarred!
~KarenR
Sun, Dec 13, 1998 (22:28)
#722
What is going on? Won't the Telegraph shell out for its technical support people to come in on the weekend and fix a problem? Are they that cheap that they won't pay time and a half? And Bethan you made it sound so good. Better be there tomorrow!!
~lizbeth54
Sun, Dec 13, 1998 (23:48)
#723
Quote...(always willing to oblige!)
"Oh God" said Mark suddenly standing still. "Shopping isn't supposed to be a mystical quest for inspiration in the teeming aisles of John Lewis. It's a systematic purchasing poeration"
"WEll, what are you getting then?"
"Father - Archangel by Robert Harris and A Man in Full by Tom Wolfe. Mother - Liberty's silk nightie and dressing gown; ever so slightly Oedipal I accept, but as requested. Debbie the secretary - Tiffany's earrings."
"Ooooh" I said excitedly, wondering what would be for me.
"Giles - bottle of scotch, and that's it"
"That's it" I gasped. How could four presents, plus hopefully mine, be "it", when I've got to buy for Jude, Shaz, Tom, Magda, Simon, five godchildren, one nephew, one brother, one sister-in-law, Mum, Dad, Una, Geoffrey and Granny.
More like this if you want it, and still can't connect!
~lizbeth54
Mon, Dec 14, 1998 (00:53)
#724
Didn't Bridget used to think that Mark was a Mummy's boy?!
Mark then goes on a shopping roll, buying American Monopoly for Nigel (his other friend) and meditation balls for Jude and Shaz, while Bridget doesn't even get off the starting blocks. Bridge then copies Mark and buys the same for her Mum and Dad, buys joke-y cosmetics which she then returns for a refund and leaves Mum and Dad's presents in the shop (from where they are nicked)! Return (inevitably)to Bridge's flat (one day she will cross Mark's threshhold) where they spend evening pruning BJ's over-sized
mas tree with a scissors.
Hope you get the full-length version soon!
Christmas episode....Mark asks Bridget to spend the night at HIS place?
~venezia
Mon, Dec 14, 1998 (02:30)
#725
I just remembered that the National Post (national newspaper in Canada) runs Bridget's column every week in their Arts & Leisure section. ( I stumbled on it by chance when they sent a free copy to the house a few weeks ago). Anyway, they're also on-line and I thought this week's column would've been posted, but unfortunately it isn't, 3 older one's are. But there is an article on HF. It basically states all the things everyone here knows but I thought I'd give you the link anyway if you wanted to r
ad it.
The Helen Fielding Fan Club
I hope the link works. If not go to www.nationalpost.com and do a search for BJD.
~LauraMM
Mon, Dec 14, 1998 (13:28)
#726
AH, its there, its there. But... I HATED IT. I think the next step for BJ is to be deemed certifiable and locked up in Bedlam.
~heide
Mon, Dec 14, 1998 (19:01)
#727
Didn't do much for me either. Is Bridget really such an idiot that she can't get a normal-sized tree? I did like the bra-shopping and wish she would have gone on more with that. Something to relate to.
~lafn
Fri, Dec 18, 1998 (03:07)
#728
(Laura)Is Bridget really such an idiot that she can't get
a normal-sized tree
Hey...I've done that.In a big open-air nursery it's hard to judge size.
I liked this week's installment.Verrrry Bridge.
~LauraMM
Fri, Dec 18, 1998 (13:51)
#729
I can't quite figure Mark out tho. He seems to only want sex from Bridge, he's not extremely romantic nor does he seem to care one toss about her.
~LauraMM
Sat, Dec 19, 1998 (18:55)
#730
Is this the end of Bridge? Is Helen Fielding giving up London for the smog and plastic of LA? Will Bridget come back from LA in six months 1)married and 2)pregnant?
And still Mark Darcy is NOT romantic!
"Will you?" he said, suddenly passionate. "I need you Bridget. I know you're
always getting squiffy and into a mess, but I love you just as you are. And,
when I think of being without you, life would be just so, so lonely and . . . dull."
There is NO passion, no wanting, not flailing of arms to kiss each other. No grabbing at each other in the hot steamy passion for each other.
Mark Darcy is DULL!
~lizbeth54
Sat, Dec 19, 1998 (23:58)
#731
There is NO passion, no wanting, not flailing of arms to kiss each other. No grabbing at each other in the hot steamy passion for each other.
Ah, but you've overlooked the crucial line...."And I looked at his eyes."!! The eyes convey true passion! Who needs flailing arms? :-)
I'm puzzled...is this the end of Bridget? The Telegraph (paper) calls this week's episode a "Christmas cliffhanger", so maybe the story continues in the New Year. Various options:
The absolute end of BJ's Diary OR Temporary break
Story continues....BJ and MD living together (Yes!!)in LA (Would this mean that HF is relocating to LA?)
Story continues...BJ has second thoughts. What's in it for her? Chucks job, leaves friends...all for "six months"? MD refuses longer term commitment, goes to LA alone.
Story continues...BJ decides doesn't want to chuck job/leave friends etc. MD makes noble career sacrifice and stays in London with BJ!
What do you think?
~lafn
Sun, Dec 20, 1998 (02:51)
#732
( Bethan)What do you think?
I think HF is taking a holiday and no more installments till the New Year.
Then it's off to LA and more experiences on the thru ways!
Laura....Mark is NOT dull. That's just his style. He is not a demonstrative
type.(He probably saves it for the bedroom :-))He told her in many words he can't live without her.
They don't have to be grabbing at each other's crotches to prove it.!Sheeesh!!
~LauraMM
Sun, Dec 20, 1998 (02:56)
#733
Passion equates feeling. Looking into someone's eyes for passion is boring. MARK IS DULL HE OWNS IT HIMSELF!!!!!!!!!!!
He says that Bridget makes his life more interesting not...Dull!
~KarenR
Sun, Dec 20, 1998 (22:09)
#734
Interesting how the Telegraph put a question mark next to "Last Bridget Jones." My guess is that it is up in the air if HF is going to continue with the column, and if she does resume it may not be for another six months. HF has so much to do you know: work on the screenplay (they must have figured out that her book won't translate well to the screen) and on the sequel. She couldn't possibly fit in the demands of a once-weekly column. ;-)
Once again, Mark tells Bridget that he loves her and...once again, have we heard Bridget say the same to him. He loves her, Laura. Who else would put up with her nutso behavior. Also, I think Mark is anything but dull. He's a serious guy (but has definitely loosened up with Bridget), with a serious career, and he's a workaholic.
One thing I'm sorry about...if the column goes on hiatus...is we won't get another Geoffrey and Una turkey curry buffet gathering where everyone should be harping on Bridget and Mark about "why aren't you two getting married" type stuff!!
I thought this week's was a riot, in a "creative" way. I also feel very close to you all, as fellow posters, at this time of year. Am now thinking about Nigel.... ;-)
~lafn
Sun, Dec 20, 1998 (22:31)
#735
(Laura)Passion equates feeling. Looking into someone's eyes for passion is boring. MARK IS DULL
Wrong, Wrong ,Wrong. Lots of people have a problem demonstrating passion and feelings ...wearing your heart on your sleeve syndrome....doesn't mean passion does not exist in that person. Individual thing...maybe even cultural.
And Mark is not dull...don't forget he was "burned" once.This time is being cautious.
I hope HF doesn't dump us next year.And maybe they should get Nora Ephrom to write that screenplay. I hear "You've Got Mail" is v. cute.
~lizbeth54
Sun, Dec 20, 1998 (23:50)
#736
My guess is that it is up in the air if HF is going to continue with the column, and if she does resume it may not be for another six months. HF has so much to do you know:work on the screenplay (they must have figured out that her book won't translate well to the screen) and on the sequel. She couldn't possibly fit in the demands of a once-weekly column. ;-)
Tongue in cheek I think, Karen?! The sequel must be done and dusted as it's due out in April. And when I phoned Working Title way way back, the initial response (before they went all coy and reverted back to "in development") was that they were definitely making the movie and would start shooting "early next year". So won't HF be twiddling her thumbs by now....or maybe she's got a major re-write on her hands!
I think there are many scenes in the book which will very easily translate to the screen....but I think they must press ahead and SHOOT!! There are other Singleton-type movies already in the can.
BTW, is Polygram (and Working Title) now part of Universal? Hope this won't affect the casting....MD becomes a Harvard educated attourney!!
~lizbeth54
Mon, Dec 21, 1998 (01:06)
#737
Out damned italics!
Apparently there is an item in this week's Entertainment Weekly which includes HF in its list of top entertainers and states that "BJD will be made into a film by early 2000, courtesy of Working Title."
I take this to mean that the film will be completed BY early 2000, not that filming starts then. Didn't HF say on her publicity trawl that the movie would be out in about 18 months?
How do you all read "BY 2000"...(good news..they must start shooting soon, or BAD...another year's wait).
~winter
Mon, Dec 21, 1998 (06:10)
#738
Now that Jana's back, Karen... is it possible to post the picture I sent you of us with Helen Fielding? Jana hasn't seen it yet. Thanks!
~LauraMM
Mon, Dec 21, 1998 (15:57)
#739
test
~LauraMM
Mon, Dec 21, 1998 (16:00)
#740
Okay, YOU WILL NOT CONVINCE ME!!!!!!!! I think MDarcy is dullsville, boring, dull and dull again. Doesn't matter who well someone performs in the bedroom, I like romance (okay I'm a hopeless romantic) and BJ and MD just aren't romantic in the "You've got Mail" or "When Harry met Sally" sorta way.
~KarenR
Mon, Dec 21, 1998 (16:08)
#741
test
~KarenR
Mon, Dec 21, 1998 (16:11)
#742
Since I haven't received my official okie-dokie from Jana, here's part of the picture. ;-)
~KarenR
Mon, Dec 21, 1998 (16:21)
#743
(Bethan) The sequel must be done and dusted as it's due out in April.
Perhaps we should double-check after the first of the year.
"BJD will be made into a film by early 2000, courtesy of Working Title."
I take this to mean that the film will be completed BY early 2000, not that filming starts then. Didn't HF say on her publicity trawl that the movie would be out in about 18 months?
A movie like that probably wouldn't take all that long to shoot. (Wasn't FP a really short shoot?) Since they haven't started casting, I'd say all these dates are wishful thinking. No one can know or give out any decent information. Is there a director?
~lafn
Mon, Dec 21, 1998 (18:03)
#744
Great pic, Winter. Thanks. We were proud to have you as our LA rep.Along with Jana.
Karen...you get better 'n better at this. She cuts people out at the stroke of the mouse....!Once we get Jana's OK can we have a repeat?
~KarenR
Mon, Dec 21, 1998 (21:33)
#745
...but of course!!
~Jana2
Tue, Dec 22, 1998 (06:42)
#746
Hmmm, who is that masked woman ;-)????
I think it's my fault that I'm cropped out. I told Karen I trusted her to use her best judgment and if the picture of me was too awful, please cut me out. I suspect she's just being polite by saying she doesn't have my OK, not wanting to admit that my likeness might frighten small children! Thank you Karen for sparing me the public humiliation :-) Besides, I kind of like being a woman of mystery. Now all you know is that I have brown hair and a perm and you can just imagine the rest. On second thoug
t, Winter is cute enough for two. Karen why don't you just paste a second copy of her in my general area :-) ??
~KarenR
Tue, Dec 22, 1998 (16:24)
#747
But Jana, I gave you the url so you could preview the pic. Well, I'm sure everyone wants to see your permed hair:
(Who shall I unveil next?)
~winter
Tue, Dec 22, 1998 (21:12)
#748
Now, all of you should know... that cropped out of the picture, to Jana's right, is Colin Firth. He's actally got his arms wrapped around Jana. But as you know, I have such bad luck with cameras, that he couldn't fit into the shot! :-D
~KarenR
Tue, Dec 22, 1998 (21:18)
#749
(Winter) Now, all of you should know... that cropped out of the picture, to Jana's right, is Colin Firth. He's actally got his arms wrapped around Jana.
Too funny, Winter. I was going to play with trying to get him into the picture, but that's a little advanced for me. Nan could do it though.
~lafn
Tue, Dec 22, 1998 (22:54)
#750
Hey...a great looking threesome.
Like your hair, Jana ...and Winter's radiant smile...no wonder Livia
warmed up to her :-)And she does look 16!!I bet they card you when you order a drink.
~Jana2
Tue, Dec 22, 1998 (22:54)
#751
(Winter) Now, all of you should know... that cropped out of the picture, to Jana's right, is Colin Firth. He's actally got his arms wrapped around Jana.
LOL! Oh honey, from your lips to God's ears!
(Karen) But Jana, I gave you the url so you could preview the pic.
Oh goodness gracious, was the URL in the email you sent me? I complete overlooked it. Durf! I got your email the day I got home from Manila. After flying all night I must have been in a jet lagged induced coma. Hope I didn't say anything worthy of a Bridget Jones Christmas card. "Really Karen, I feel so close to you as one of the hosts of Drool...." :-)
Well, now that I've been outed, who's next?!?!
~KarenR
Tue, Dec 22, 1998 (22:54)
#752
(Jana) Hope I didn't say anything worthy of a Bridget Jones Christmas card. "Really Karen, I feel so close to you as one of the hosts of Drool...." :-)
LOL!! That line has quickly become one of my faves, and I know when you are arguing in Manila with all those banker types that your creativity and sensitivity as a human being bubbles up and shows through...If Mark weren't going out with me, I'm sure he would go out with you!
Pfoah!!
~heide
Sat, Dec 6, 1930 (00:29)
#753
All you ladies are lovely and you're real brave to put your picture on a public board. I must ask though...it looks like all three of you are putting your hands on the book as if you're ready to take an oath of office. Or is it the Mr. Darcy Pledge of Allegiance?
~LauraMM
Thu, Dec 24, 1998 (18:58)
#754
Okay from the GODS at Telegraph. Cry now or forever hold your peace;)
This is the last entry in Bridget Jones's Diary. She has flown off to a better life in LA, with her boyfriend, Mark Darcy. We wish her well and hope she sends us a postcard from time to time. A full archive of her work will appear here shortly.
So I guess that's it. We'll never know if MDarcy knocks up Bridget. OOohhh, how disgusting!
~winter
Thu, Dec 24, 1998 (19:54)
#755
NOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!! It's not true!!!!! It's impossible!!!!! (to quote a line from Empire Strikes Back). But frankly, I was getting upset over the last few entries
~lizbeth54
Thu, Dec 24, 1998 (21:28)
#756
Mmmmmmmmm! (To quote someone we all know!)Well done Laura, for going to the source....BUT, I'm surprised if it's really the end. I've been slightly critical of one or two of HF's recent efforts, but only because I thought there were so many characters and situations that she could have made use of.
Maybe HF's just had enough of Bridget, with the screenplay and the book!
Or (possibility?) she wrote originally for the Independent, then there was a break, then exactly a year ago, she moved to the Telegraph, probably on a more lucrative contract. Perhaps she's had an even better offer (as Bridget is now truely global) to re-locate BJ and MD to the States. Watch the US columns!
Or maybe, that's really it, finish. Well, there's always the book and the movie!
Merry Christmas!
~lafn
Thu, Dec 24, 1998 (22:56)
#757
This is the last entry in Bridget Jones's Diary.
Boo Hiss.
Well, it was fun while it lasted. But Laura....this presents a
new opportunity for Fan Fic....(In the words of our fav actor)
Hmmmmmmm.
~LauraMM
Fri, Dec 25, 1998 (00:57)
#758
Well to be just a little vain, there is always "Olivia"
Merry Christmas all!
Laura (who hasn't quite learned how to spell!)
~heide
Sat, Dec 26, 1998 (14:45)
#759
I'm sorry too that this looks like the end for Bridget. Why can't good things ever last?
I got a delightful little gift from Santa (well, I got it for myself, actually). Bridget Jones Diary 1999 came in from a site in Canada that one of our visitors, Cathy, sent to me. (Thanks Cathy.)
Entry for September 10 reads:
Mr. Darcy's Birthday mmmm! (or the actor Colin Firth as he is known)
Should be NATIONAL WET SHIRT DAY
e-mail address for Fanfare Books is fanfare@cyg.net
Site address is http://www.cyg.net/~fanfare/
ISBN for the book is 033037558X
$25.49 Canadian dollars for book including postage and handling (steep) but $19.61 American dollars for the whole deal.
~KarenR
Sat, Dec 26, 1998 (15:30)
#760
I think we can safely blame Laura for Helen's giving up the column. All that criticism, week after week. For shame!! ;-)
~lizbeth54
Sat, Dec 26, 1998 (17:53)
#761
Doesn't anyone agree with my theory that HF (possibly) may be transferring her talents to another newspaper syndicate? Or perhaps she may want to build up some anticipation for the new book!
~LauraMM
Sat, Dec 26, 1998 (20:27)
#762
I think Helen Fielding has sold out, personally. And Karen, if she can't take constructive criticism, then she is definitely in the wrong business;)
Now to go back to selling out. She is enjoying the plastic life of LA: Warm weather, palm trees, fake women and men. More of an opportunity she thinks then in London? It's sad, because I think the ending of Bridget was terrible. I need closure (like a wake or something), she can't just run away to LA w/ Mark Darcy. Their relationship wasn't that solid that after two weeks, he'd be sending her back to London!
HF if you read this YOU SHORT CHANGED YOUR FANS!!!!!!!
~lafn
Sun, Dec 27, 1998 (17:04)
#763
I think we can safely blame Laura for Helen's giving up the column
Yeah!!I liked Bridge....warts 'n all :-))And it will leave a void in my life!!
Please, Helen...defect to another newspaper....LA Times??
~Jana2
Mon, Dec 28, 1998 (07:35)
#764
(Laura) the plastic life of LA: Warm weather, palm trees, fake women and men.
Hmmm, it's been in the 20's, we're freezing our butts off and when I pinch myself I certainly seem real :-). Sorry, just couldn't let that dig of my home town go by withtout comment.
Jana - an original Valley girl
I'll keep an eye peeled on the Times for you all, in case anything develops!
~LauraMM
Mon, Dec 28, 1998 (14:52)
#765
(Jana)Hmmm, it's been in the 20's, we're freezing our butts off and when I pinch myself I certainly seem real :-).
Sorry, just couldn't let that dig of my home town go by withtout comment.
An abnormality, Jana, an abnormality.
~winter
Tue, Dec 29, 1998 (02:27)
#766
Hmm....I'm very disappointed with HF leaving us with very little, if any, closure on Bridge's life. I agree Laura, I feel very short-changed.
BTW--- I will also keep my eye open for any news of HF here in town because GUESS WHAT?!?! Throughout the Christmas break, I've been doing temporary office work at the L.A. Times. It's the accounting department, but hey-- I could wander around on my lunch break and when I have to deliver mail! I could very well run into her in the bathroom too! ;-) (BTW, the Times is L.A.'s only newspaper--besides the Spanish "La Opinion.". As much as I've grown to dislike this city, I can sure benefit from it being the
ubub of our droolworthy stalking.
~lizbeth54
Wed, Dec 30, 1998 (00:38)
#767
I think you'll get closure in the sequel "BJ -I will survive" (or whatever). HF has said that it's all about what happens when BJ gets her man. I think that the weekly columns have almost a separate existence...more of a semi-topical social commentary (which could continue anywhere), whereas the book may well start and finish at completely different points. I was in our local Waterstones today and I asked about the sequel...it's still listed as due out in April, but I don't know how reliable this is.
~lafn
Wed, Dec 30, 1998 (23:02)
#768
Thank you , Laura, for the BJD Archive. Great fun re-reading.
But surely, this isn't the end of Bridget.....
Don't we have the new book, to be published in April, to look forward to?
Aaaaannnnd. Then there's the movie after that....
Lots more Bridget in our future, folks.....
~lizbeth54
Thu, Feb 7, 2036 (10:43)
#769
Just to say that Nick Hornby has apparently switched publishers (Gollanz to Penguin) in a new �2 million deal. It may well be that HF is re-negotiating, particulary after her US success. There's a lot more mileage left in Bridge and Mark, and I'm hopeful we'll see more, but not in the Telegraph!
~lizbeth54
Thu, Feb 7, 2036 (07:56)
#770
I phoned Macmillan (Picador is one of their imprints)."BJ - I will survive" is scheduled for publication in April, ISBN 0330 367 34X, price �12.99.
~LauraMM
Thu, Feb 7, 2036 (11:50)
#771
Bethan, is there a way for you to find out if it will be published simultaneously in the States??? or shortly thereafter.
Ah, so Nicky boy has new publisher, interesting. I wonder if they will require him to start churning the books??? I'm waiting for him to come to Chicago, I think I just might hang around the film site;) John Cusack is temptation enough for me!
~LauraMM
Thu, Feb 7, 2036 (11:52)
#772
I meant churning OUT the books! ugh!!!!!!!!!!!!!
~lafn
Thu, Feb 7, 2036 (07:31)
#773
Hi Laura....Saw you on National Television yesterday morning.
Here I was eating my granola and lo and behold this "gorgeous" blond
comes on during the Today Show on NBC and is telling me about the snow in Chicago and how it interfered with their plans......
Hey...this looks like Laura...sounds like Laura...
IT IS LAURA....
Lookin good kid....so how come you didn't mention CF's interview:-)
*******
Laura, why don't you call MacMillan in Boston...if it is to be published in April in the US they would know.Esp. since Bethan graciously got us the ISBN number.
~KarenR
Wed, Jan 6, 1999 (18:07)
#774
Hi Laura....Saw you on National Television yesterday morning.
Probably didn't notice me (wearing a parka the color of CF's eyes) shoveling, while Laura got interviewed!!
~LauraMM
Thu, Jan 14, 1999 (14:37)
#775
My 15 minutes of fame!!!!
Wow, so now I'm gorgeous, I've been called cute, but gorgeous???? Thanks, Evelyn!
Will do call MacMillan!
~lizbeth54
Sat, Jan 16, 1999 (00:25)
#776
Helen Fielding is writing again in the Telegraph, but in the Travel Section...her experiences on a ski-ing holiday. So she's not taken time off to finish BJD2 or to burn the midnight oil over the screenplay. Sound as though everything is done and dusted, and she has taken a break from Bridget. Oh well...
~lafn
Sat, Jan 16, 1999 (02:45)
#777
(Bethan).....and she has taken a break from Bridget.
Actually, this is a good marketing strategy ....people will be ravenous to read about Bridge and pounce on the book when it's published.
If she continued her weekly column, the readership would have enough
of a Bridget-fix and not be as eager to purchase the book.
~Allison2
Sat, Feb 6, 1999 (09:15)
#778
From "The Times" diary Feb 6th:
"Andrew Davies, the costume dramatist[P&P2], has teamed up with Helen Fielding... to pen the screenplay for Hollywood's version of BJD. To appreciate the fictional life of the chain-smoking, caffeine-addicted, young and always single heroine, Fielding took the screen writer around some of her old haunts....
Was the sixtysomething able to stand the pace? "Of course ," Davies says. "Bridget's big mistake is that she never considers the possibilities of going out with an older man."
Now , what do we all make of that??
~amw
Sat, Feb 6, 1999 (09:20)
#779
Interesting, very interesting!
~amw
Sat, Feb 6, 1999 (09:20)
#780
Is that the end of Mark Darcy, hope not?
~lizbeth54
Sat, Feb 6, 1999 (09:53)
#781
Hah! V. interesting indeed.
One thing I've noticed is that by the time something appears in The Times Diary, it's already fait accompli, done and dusted. Which means, I think, that the screenplay is completed.
The co-involvement of Andrew Davies is, I think, terrific news. Authors aren't necessarily the beat equipped to adapt their own material as screenplays. You often need a fresh approach. And writing screenplays is very different from writing a more internalised novel.
Terrific news! Andrew Davies is a very skilled and highly entertaining screenwriter (who is not averse to the occasional sexy scene! Didn't he want Colin to dive naked into the lake. But CF refused. :-)() And who better to write a screenplay about Mr Darcy, or a contemporary updated version of P&P? Excellent PR possibilities here.
As to AD's comment, I merely took this to be a reaction to the question about standing the pace. He's just saying it's a pity Bridget didn't go for an older man....I don't think it means we see BJ walking away into the sunset with an octogenarian!
~Allison2
Sat, Feb 6, 1999 (10:43)
#782
Is that the end of Mark Darcy, hope not?
I didn't understand your remark, Ann, until I read Bethan's comment. I think the line about an older man was just an AD joke. I hope!
~Arami
Sat, Feb 6, 1999 (14:04)
#783
Davies says. "Bridget's big mistake is that she never considers the
possibilities of going out with an older man."
Now , what do we all make of that??
Merely that Andrew Davies, a known and self-confessed libertine in his private life, made a quip about imagining himself in the role.
~Moon
Sat, Feb 6, 1999 (14:15)
#784
I will add the MD question when I speak to his agent next week.
Has AD ever done anything contemporary?
~heide
Sat, Feb 6, 1999 (16:36)
#785
Good news! We can keep this topic active with speculation on the upcoming filming.
Merely that Andrew Davies, a known and self-confessed libertine in his
private life, made a quip about imagining himself in the role.
Or perhaps in Helen's life. ;-)
~lafn
Sat, Feb 6, 1999 (17:03)
#786
Grrrreat News....
Andrew Davies is a great screenwriter....(which was my objection to FP..
weak screenplay, IMO)
Now....Sue Birwistle ...where are you when we need you.
Anybody have her email??
~Lizza
Sun, Feb 7, 1999 (20:34)
#787
Andrew Davies IS a great screenwriter, particularly when working
for B.B.C. Some of his other British I.T.V. work has been much
weaker (Emma).
He needs to be part of a "Dreamteam", so let's add Susie Conklin
and of course our DB and we are on to a "Surefire winner".
~lafn
Sun, Feb 7, 1999 (23:36)
#788
Let's not forget the director.....can we hope for Simon Langton?...
and- what- the- hell...let's throw in Carl Davis for the music.
But, wait a minute...we forgot the crucial one...who will play our Bridge??
~winter
Sun, Feb 7, 1999 (23:42)
#789
But, wait a minute...we forgot the crucial one...who will play our Bridge??
I've been thinking about this...
How about..
Claire Rushbrook (Brenda Blethyn's daughter from Secrets and Lies; played Spice Girls' manager in 'Spice World')?
More suggestions to come.
p.s.: NOT Helena Bonham-Carter. Much as a I like her, she's too wispy to play someone like Bridget.
~LauraMM
Mon, Feb 8, 1999 (00:03)
#790
I've always thought Claire Rushbrook would be perfect. when I saw her in SpiceWorld!!!! I brought it up way back when!
~Allison2
Mon, Feb 8, 1999 (15:21)
#791
From today's Evening Standard, a snide and horrid piece about GP by the awful Julie Birchall entitled "Why I Hate Gwyneth". One thing she throws in at the end.
"Her (ie GP) heart's desire, it is whispered, is to play the lead in the fil of the pitiful BJD. The wettest film star in the world playing the wettest heroine in the history of literature..."
Arghhh...Surely not. She is way way to young and is just not the right type. But it might account for why she is the only person involved in SIL who mentions Colin. She has him on her mind.
~Allison2
Mon, Feb 8, 1999 (15:23)
#792
From today's Evening Standard, a snide and horrid piece about GP by the awful Julie Burchill entitled "Why I Hate Gwyneth". One thing she throws in at the end.
"Her (ie GP) heart's desire, it is whispered, is to play the lead in the fil of the pitiful BJD. The wettest film star in the world playing the wettest heroine in the history of literature..."
Arghhh...Surely not. She is way way to young and is just not the right type. But it might account for why she is the only person involved in SIL who mentions Colin. She has him on her mind.
~Allison2
Mon, Feb 8, 1999 (15:26)
#793
Ooops. Read the second of those. Not that she deserves, it but I spelt J Burchill's name correctly there. Did not mean to post the first version.
~lafn
Mon, Feb 8, 1999 (21:49)
#794
(Allison) GP to play BJD. She is way way to young and is just not the right type. But it might accountfor why she is the only person involved in SIL who mentions Colin. She has him on her mind.
Someone on this board suggested her last year.
Let's look at it this way: Automatic hit with Gwynnie.And if she talks Colin to play MD, not bad for him to star with GP.
Did you see "Sliding Doors"? GP put in a powerful performance as a trendy
British chick.Americans and the British love her.Looks like win-win to me.
~KarenR
Mon, Feb 8, 1999 (22:25)
#795
New Time magazine has a full page article about the hair extensions she wore to the Golden Globes.
~Moon
Mon, Feb 8, 1999 (22:41)
#796
Her hair extensions looked great! They say she spends hours at the salon.
She may be too skinny for BJ, but she could handle the role.
~lizbeth54
Tue, Feb 9, 1999 (00:02)
#797
I'm very pro GP for the role. Six months ago I might have thought differently, but I genuinely like her, and she's hugely popular. If it's a Hollywood backed production they'll go for a name, and I honestly can't think of anyone except Helena BC or Minnie Driver. Bridget only perceives herself as "plump"...I always imagine her as rather attractive! GP is rather young, but then all 30 something actresses look 20 something, so why not go for a 20 something?
And yes, I'd like to see GP and CF star together...at least she wouldn't slap him in the face this time!
Allison, I agree that Julie Burchill is awful...she always goes for the jugular.....but I thnk she does have her finger on the pulse, and if she writes that GP is interested in BJD, then there will be some substance in this. Keep reading the Evening Standard (forget the Mail!)....seems a good source!
How about keeping the P&P connection, and having Alison Steadman and Benjamin Whitrow as Bridget's Mum and Dad. And Anna Chancellor as Natasha. And David Bamber as Tom, or Richard Finch? Lots of scope for in-jokes, with AD as co-writer. This may be the nearest we get to a sequel to P&P!! And GP has Jane Austen connections via "Emma". :-)
~LauraMM
Tue, Feb 9, 1999 (16:02)
#798
I like David Bamber as Tom, that would be coup casting! I'm still iffy on GP as BJ. I would prefer a more plain person. True, we never really know what BJ looks like, but with her weight, she seems quite average for the average 5'5/6 person. BJ should be mid-30s, MD late 30s.
I still go with Claire Rushbrook, she is quite pretty and very versatile! And it would be a big boon to her career. Adrian Lukis as Daniel;)
~KarenR
Tue, Feb 9, 1999 (16:59)
#799
Oh yes!! Adrian Lukis as Daniel. But somehow I doubt that the bigwigs would go for such an in joke in their casting decisions. Alack and alas. It would be their loss. :(
Gwynnie's good, but I think too young and enough with this Brit thing and her.
~LauraMM
Tue, Feb 9, 1999 (17:10)
#800
Gwynnie's good, but I think too young and enough with this Brit thing and her.
]
Amen to that!!!!
~Allison2
Tue, Feb 9, 1999 (18:43)
#801
I am beginning to worry whether CF will in fact do MD. I was feeling confident but two things worry me. Firstly, will he have the time? I am really not sure how long films take to make but I assume he will only start preparing for DQ after 3DOR i e mid March. I realise I have very little idea about how films are made but they must have a lead in time, rehearsals etc. or do they do that as they go along? It is hard to imagine that they would start filming before the beginning of May. I assume BJD wil
be filmed in the Summer. I would guess June or July. Presumably not later if they are looking to an early 2000 release. Wouldn't that make it rather hectic for anybody but especially for Mr"I hate working back to back" Firth. Secondly I am worried about that comment about being too old to play moonstruck young lovers any more. Perhaps he doesn't put MD in that category.
~Moon
Tue, Feb 9, 1999 (19:34)
#802
(Allison), Wouldn't that make it rather hectic for anybody but especially for Mr"I hate working back to back" Firth.
I think Colin seriously wants to change this and is working hard at it now.
The new Colin is emerging hold on to your hats!
~lafn
Tue, Feb 9, 1999 (23:00)
#803
(Laura)I still go with Claire Rushbrook, she is quite pretty and very versatile!
Only thing is....who would go to see this movie?.... A bunch of no-names.
*******
( Allison) Wouldn't that make it rather hectic for anybody but especially for Mr"I hate working back to back" Firth.
(Moon)The new Colin is emerging hold on to your hats!
That's known as "Paying the mortgage on the new house"syndrome.
~lizbeth54
Tue, Feb 9, 1999 (23:32)
#804
MD isn't a moonstruck lover...he's a successful divorced barrister, late thirties, with a bit of a commitment problem!
Mortgage, kid, non-working wife (probably). Hey, he'll be working back to back all the time now! And if a few more bambinos appear on the scene...
3DOR will be over by mid-March (with stage plays most of the work is before the opening). Block out April-May for DomQ, which could be filmed in 6 weeks, and that still leaves June thru' Sept for BJD.
And he has just had six months off!
I still haven't given up on Mary Queen of Scots...way to win an Oscar, major romantic role in big costume drama, horrible death at end! But that really would be back to back to back. But he's a man with responsibilities now!
The Oscars...Why Brenda Blethyn again? She got awful reviews in the UK, and her voice really grates on my poor ol' nerves. And it's always the same performance. And what happened to Bulworth? Got rave reviews over here, ditto The Trueman Show.
~LisaJH
Fri, Feb 12, 1999 (18:19)
#805
Haven�t been able to post much this week, as life and work seem to be interfering with my time at Drool. Very good news about P&P and BJD sharing the same screenwriter�. Anyway, here is an exceedingly short (and bad) poem which sums up my feelings about the MD casting issue:
Dear Mr. Firth, please put us to rest,
Don the bumblebee socks and ugly vest--
"Mark Darcy! Mark Darcy!" they call out to you;
We Firthettes need an inside joke or two.
Oh won�t you please be our Valentine
And sign the movie contract on the dotted line?
Note: after I wrote this, I did check my facts, and in BJD MD is wearing an ugly sweater (jumper) in lieu of an ugly vest (waistcoat). Didn�t want to rework the rhyme, so I left it alone. My apologies to the BJD purists. Happy Valentine�s Day to all.
~lizbeth54
Fri, Feb 12, 1999 (23:36)
#806
Nice one Lizza!
I'll add...
"Cuckolds, madmen,haughty earls,
Soccer fans and fickle churls,
You've shown your range,
Now hear our pleas,
Just one romantic hero please!"
Pleas...please, oh well, it's late.
What I would like to see is GP winning an Oscar, and then announcing that her next project is BJD with CF. I think this all falls within the realms of possibility!
~lizbeth54
Fri, Feb 12, 1999 (23:38)
#807
Sorry, Lisa . As I said, it's late!
~lafn
Fri, Feb 12, 1999 (23:42)
#808
Lisa....Bethan....we hardly know ye...What talent...
Poets in our midst!!
~KarenR
Sat, Feb 13, 1999 (16:08)
#809
Brilliant Ladies! All of our sentiments so succinctly and eloquently put. Far better than what is scrawled in any Hallmark VD card. :)
~heide
Sun, Feb 14, 1999 (21:16)
#810
Such a creative bunch...it only takes a little inspiration.
Also in honor of the day, I see in my 1999 Bridget Jones Diary that besides being St. Valentine's Day, today is also National Impotence Day. (That's what it says!) And then a note from Bridget saying, "You see life imperfect for many"
~amw
Mon, Feb 15, 1999 (11:35)
#811
Has Kate Winslet ever been suggested to play Bridget Jones opposite CF, I think she would be perfect, she has a high Hollywood profile after Titanic, she has a slight weight problem, is about the right age, she is british, and now with her short haircut looks like my idea of BJ. I don't remember her name being mentioned before but I may be wrong.
~LauraMM
Mon, Feb 15, 1999 (23:12)
#812
Kate Winslet is TOOOO YOUNG. BJ is in her mid thirties.
~lafn
Tue, Feb 16, 1999 (01:23)
#813
Kate Winslet looks older than she is....she could do it.
A British star who is well known to Americans.
~venezia
Tue, Feb 16, 1999 (04:30)
#814
I tend to lurk here more than post but I just had to give my two cents, if you don't mind. Has anyone ever thought about Jennifer Ehle as Bridget? Granted she doesn't have the Hollywood profile but it's a British film, isn't it? And personally, I don't want to see an American in the role, especially GP. When actors are shoved down my throat in so many movies and magazine covers and interviews in such a short period of time, they tend to grate on my nerves, and she is bugging me like crazy lately. If she p
ays yet another British person, I will scream. Enough already. Try a southern drawl or something.
I'd just get such a kick if JE were paired with CF again. What better place than a modern take on P&P to reunite them? That's my ideal casting choices but I have a feeling it'll snow in hell before my wish would happen.
~amw
Tue, Feb 16, 1999 (07:57)
#815
If GP could play BJ then I don't see why KW couldn't, she must be about the same age and is very popular here in the UK.
~lizbeth54
Tue, Feb 16, 1999 (08:34)
#816
I've thought of JE as Bridget, and if this was a purely British film, I'd think this could be a possibility. But it's the "Hollywood" version (Why? It can't be an expensive movie to shoot, London locations,character driven, many interior shots, no special effects, British actors are cheap...couldn't Film Four or BBC Films have done it for �2 or �3 million? ) Anyway, if it's Big business, it will be a Big name. I still think GP is the odds on favourite. Although I agree KW could look early thirties...she h
s a more womanly type of beauty! But if it's the "Hollywood version" it will really boost CF, otherwise he seems to be overlooked. And he has to play this role (Hollywood, d'ya'hear me! Not Hugh Grant, not Ben Affleck, okay!)
~Moon
Tue, Feb 16, 1999 (13:31)
#817
Hugh Grant would be such a total turn off. BA is too young for the role.
Who would look better in that tart outfit Bridget wears? I think Kate W.
But at this point it looks like whatever Gwynnie wants she gets. I'm just hoping that they offer MD to CF.
JE could be offered the part of one of Bridget's friends. This could be a great P&P reunion film but I doubt it would happen.
~lizbeth54
Tue, Feb 16, 1999 (14:31)
#818
I was reading about the casting for the new Miramax film of Jane Austen's "Mansfield Park" shot in England....the lead role of Fanny is played by an Australian actress, and the rest of the principal cast is American, with, I think, one British actor who was in "Trainspotting". So I don't know what that portents for BJD!! It's big business, bankability and profits that matter. I wouldn't be unhappy with Gwynnie, provided that she stays loyal to CF! Isn't she quoted somewhere as saying that Harvey wanted an
American to play Shakespeare, but she persuaded him that it had to be a British actor!!
~LauraMM
Tue, Feb 16, 1999 (17:54)
#819
Again, I will say it Kate Winslet is TOOOO DAMN Young as is Gwyneth Paltrow. JE is on the cusp. They need an unknown British actress who is in her early to mid thirties. Perhaps Helen Fielding could play Bridget. She is Bridget!
~lafn
Tue, Feb 16, 1999 (22:48)
#820
(Lisa) CF & JE in BJD....That's my ideal casting choices but I have a feeling it'll snow in hell before my wish would happen.
I think you could easily bet the "family farm" that they'll never be cast together.
***
I vote for Gwyneth.Bag the unknown British actress :-)
Movies with unknowns play on each coast and in UK (who also don't go to see them!!)Producers hate them because they can't get funding without a bankable star.
They are made alright and then they sit on a shelf because no distributor will touch them.
~heide
Wed, Feb 17, 1999 (02:33)
#821
So you know what's practical to make a bankable film. But what do you really want? Forgetting money for a moment, who do you really want to see as Bridget? A fantasy, I know but I'll be damned if I want a 20-something playing a woman in her thirties. There are too many good actresses (American and British) in their 30s who could do this role. I like Jane Leeves or Emily Watson myself.
~LauraMM
Wed, Feb 17, 1999 (02:44)
#822
Thank you, Heide. GP is too young!!!! I will not rest until I get everyone to figure that out!
~amw
Wed, Feb 17, 1999 (08:18)
#823
Ok then, not KW, what about Natasha Richardson, (a Month in the Country(, the chemistry between CF and NR was good in AMITC, and I think she would be the right age and is quite well known in the US?
~Moon
Wed, Feb 17, 1999 (13:28)
#824
(Heide), I like Jane Leeves or Emily Watson
I can't place JL but I disagree on EW. She is a v. good actress but I don't see as Bridget, and the same goes for Natasha R.
Laura, GP may be too young but as Evelyn pointed out it is a Hollywood movie. We should just hope they get it right and at least have the intelligence to offer MD to CF which is NOT a given. I'm afraid the producers are gong to want to reach a younger audience with BJD and if GP wants to be BJ she will probably have first pick. I would prefer a P&P reunion but that would be too much of an inside joke I'm afraid.
~EileenG
Wed, Feb 17, 1999 (17:11)
#825
Age aside, I can't see GP as Bridget. She seems too...I can't describe it...together? Sophisticated? Same for Natasha. I think KW could pull off that manic, disorganized 'why do these crazy things keep happening to me?' quality of BJ but YES, LAURA, she's too young. I've never seen Emily Watson do comedy, but she's not right either. Now Jane Leeves, I could see her, but is it too close to her 'Frasier' persona? Has she done any films lately? Considering the big-bucks Hollywood angle, it's still a ga
ble when US TV stars move to films (e.g., 'Friends').
How the closely the screenplay will match the book is another interesting question.
~lafn
Wed, Feb 17, 1999 (21:51)
#826
Nothing like a little controversy to get some life on this board:-)
(heide) Forgetting money for a moment, who do you really want to see as Bridget? A fantasy, I know ...
Hmmmm, let's see...if Andrew Davies doesn't change it all around....
Natasha would be OK ( Parent Trap, cute and she wowed 'em in Cabaret).
I guess firstly I would like Colin to be cast as Mark...and whom they cast him with is immaterial...I just hate to see these good Brit movies just go on a shelf.Have they announced the director yet?That is crucial. The more I look at P&P the more I think Simon Langton was the unsung hero.Agree with Moon a P&P reunion would be the fantasy "Dreamteam".
~LauraMM
Thu, Feb 18, 1999 (00:32)
#827
Laura, GP may be too young but as Evelyn pointed out it is a Hollywood movie
]
I think we will see differently. Helen Fielding has maintained that she wanted creative control when it came to casting BJ. We will not see GP and KW as BJ. How do I know this, because it's HF's baby and she would not let them ruin it.
I will remain adamant and when I am proved right, I will then gloat! I really could care less who plays MD, he's a dog anyway!
~KJArt
Thu, Feb 18, 1999 (23:42)
#828
How about Ruth Gemmel??
~amw
Thu, Feb 18, 1999 (23:50)
#829
Or Holly Aird, who played RG's flatmate, she has the right kind of dizziness and sense of humour.
~heide
Fri, Feb 19, 1999 (00:39)
#830
I think Holly Aird would be a great possibility.
As far as "essentials" - what an actress needs to play Bridget, apart from looking the part (hence no 20-somethings, my rule only), the women we've mentioned above are all actors - I'm sure any one of them can do comedy roles even if we equate them only with dramatic roles now.
~lafn
Fri, Feb 19, 1999 (01:42)
#831
I think Holly Aird would be great...(reminded me of Rosie O'Donell with Meg Ryan in "Sleepless in Seattle".)
Can't stand Ruth Gemell's voice!!Grating.
~venezia
Fri, Feb 19, 1999 (02:28)
#832
OK, so how about a discussion on the secondary roles? Who do you want or would you think would be fun in the following roles? (Please keep in mind, that not that much thought went into this, I haven't read the book in a while so the description of the characters escapes me.)
Daniel Cleaver...... Rupert Everett
Pam Jones........... Joan Collins
Colin Jones.........
Sharon.............. Julia Sawalha
Jude................
Una Alconbury....... Phillida Law
Geoffrey Alconbury.. Michael Caine
Natasha............. Elizabeth Hurley
Perpetua............
Magda...............
Jeremy..............
Vile Richard........
Rebecca.............
Richard Finch.......
Tom.................
Julio............... Ricky Martin
This was a lot harder than I thought that's why so many are left blank. Any one else want to give it a try?
~LisaJH
Fri, Feb 19, 1999 (07:13)
#833
Well, I guess I am the only one in the dark.... Who is Holly Aird?
~winter
Fri, Feb 19, 1999 (08:02)
#834
Wait! and don't forget to cast:
Elena Rossini (the domestic servant MD defends in court)........ ME!
(I shamelessly asked HF at her booksigning last year if I could possibly have a minor role)
~LauraMM
Fri, Feb 19, 1999 (19:44)
#835
I like Imogen Stubbs as Bridget also, aka Lucy Steele or Sarah in Jack & Sarah (she died in childbirth:()
Ricky Martin!!! LISA!!!!!!! too funny, but Julio wasn't he an older man?????
~lafn
Fri, Feb 19, 1999 (22:23)
#836
Who is Holly Aird?
She was Ruth Gemell's flatmate in FP.
~LisaJH
Fri, Feb 19, 1999 (23:12)
#837
(Evelyn) She was Ruth Gemell's flatmate in FP.
Thanks, Evelyn. Ah, now I know why I had not heard heard of her. And now I have to wait until May to see her(and CF, of course!) in FP....::sigh:: I used to consider myself a patient person, but waiting for the release of some of CF's movies has tested me beyond reason......::bigger sigh::
~LisaJH
Fri, Feb 19, 1999 (23:13)
#838
Sorry for the two *heards* above....
~amw
Fri, Feb 19, 1999 (23:55)
#839
When was the release date for FP changed to May, I thought the latest date was March, I don't know first February, then March and now May, goodness knows when we will see MLSF at this rate.
~lizbeth54
Sat, Feb 20, 1999 (00:54)
#840
I reckon FP is being released close to the release date of MLSF, so that perhaps
he'll promote the two in tandem in the US. May be too busy now, with 3DOR, and perhaps DOMQ.
Holly Aird would be fine, but if they want the film to be an international success, I still think they'll go for a "name". All-British cast films often struggle, even in (particularly in?) Britain.
~heide
Sat, Feb 20, 1999 (03:42)
#841
Ouch! Hollywood's reality is so harsh, I'm just going to forget it and live in my fantasy world - who I'd like to see play the roles, not who Hollywood should cast to get the most bang from their buck.
I like Lisa's game. Joan Collins as Pam? Interesting...kind of a viper image.
Daniel Cleaver...Colin Firth. Ha ha!!
Perpetua...Tracey Ullman in one of her guises.
~venezia
Sat, Feb 20, 1999 (05:10)
#842
What's wrong with Ricky? I have no idea how old Julio is but I'd love to see RM in the role.
Come on! Shouldn't Julio be this hunky latin guy with buffy broad shoulders that just makes Pam and every lady in the theatre melt? I'd be ready to plunk down 8.50 Cdn multiple times just to hear him say: "You sleep with MY woman" in a dangerous, possessive way.
I'd rather Julio be younger than Pam anyway. I don't want to see a Ricardo Montalban scaming her but a young latin stud with a great butt do it.
~LauraMM
Sat, Feb 20, 1999 (21:50)
#843
I think Jennifer Saunders would be a good BJ; watching ABFAB today it hit me that HF must have had Eddie in her mind when she conceived BJ/.
Ricky Martin is WAY too young for Joan Collins!
~amw
Sat, Feb 20, 1999 (22:02)
#844
Oh no Laura, I would rather see Dawn French as BJ!
~venezia
Sat, Feb 20, 1999 (23:24)
#845
Ricky Martin is WAY too young for Joan Collins!
Didn't JC marry a young guy a few years back and he took her money? She'd be perfect for the role of Pam, she wouldn't need to do any research for it!
OK, you don't like Ricky, how about Placido Domingo? Is he old enough for you? Or would you prefer Antonio Banderas? (I'm running out of Latin men here!)
~LauraMM
Sun, Feb 21, 1999 (00:22)
#846
No, Lisa, they are good choices, but he must be older. Not Ricardo Montalban older, but in his 40s. I always thought Julio was more greasy, if handsome looking;)
Dawn French! Oh dear Lord, that's funny! Okay, I'll stick with Claire Rushbrook, she's pretty and funny! and not your typical perfect looking model, but NORMAL looking.
I could always play BJ, but I'm too thin:( ;)
Karen, come back to us soon!!!!!
~EileenG
Mon, Feb 22, 1999 (15:04)
#847
For Julio: that actor from 'Nostromo' (can't for the life of my remember his name), you know, the one who played the soldier/bad guy. Had dark, wavy hair all slicked back. Sorry I can't be more specific, it's been awhile since I watched Nostromo (not one of my Firthfaves).
Joan Collins as Pam? What a hoot.
~KarenR
Mon, Feb 22, 1999 (18:02)
#848
I'm back (sorry, folks)
Anyway, HF mentioned that she had in mind Omar Sharif for Julio...not a younger guy! ;-)
More later
~venezia
Mon, Feb 22, 1999 (23:42)
#849
Omar Sharif? Is he Portuguese? Isn't Julio supposed to be from Portugal? How old is OS anyway? I guess he's about JC's age or maybe more... yeah... he's OK... I'll settle for him if I have no choice, although I'd prefer someone a bit younger.
~heide
Tue, Feb 23, 1999 (01:43)
#850
Believe it or not I actually watched Nostromo on Sunday! Must have been desperate. Eilenn, that actor who was the nasty Sotillo (sp.) would be good as Julio though a bit older too than I'd imagine. Still, he was slimy. And a bad actor to boot!
~winter
Tue, Feb 23, 1999 (05:52)
#851
Omar Sharif? Is he Portuguese
He's Egyptian.
~EileenG
Tue, Feb 23, 1999 (13:27)
#852
Saw Ricky Martin on ET last night. I hadn't been making the connection before. Him? For Julio? Isn't he still in diapers??? And forgive me, but I thought Omar was dead :-( . Guess not, if HF was thinking about him.
Seems we're having the same age thing (too old, too young) with this character as well as BJ! I hope the real casting people aren't...
~venezia
Tue, Feb 23, 1999 (15:09)
#853
Saw Ricky Martin on ET last night. I hadn't been making the connection before. Him? For Julio? Isn't he still in diapers???
OK, you've all convinced me he's too young, but I still think he'd be fine if they can't find anyone else. He can act, I saw him on General Hospital a few years ago (thank God he chopped that mop off his head!)and if they wanted, Julio could always break out into song and serenade Pam!
I saw him on ET too Eileen. I had no idea he was singing at the Grammys on Wednesday. I wasn't planning on tuning in before but I am definitely now. The only thing that bothered me was that he was singing his song La Copa De La Vida in English. What a disappointment! If he was going to sing in English he should've picked Maria, Un, Dos, Tres . There's an English version of that song and it's so much fun to bowl to!
I tried looking up other Latin men actors but I didn't have much luck. They are few and far between. I could only come up with three more: Jimmy Smits, Edward James Olmos and Andy Garcia.
~KarenR
Tue, Feb 23, 1999 (15:54)
#854
I think Helen was referring to a certain "look" when she said she visualized Omar Sharif in the role. You know, dashingly handsome and mature. A Ricardo Montalban would right as well. (Is he alive?)
(Heide) that actor who was the nasty Sotillo (sp.) would be good as Julio though a bit older too than I'd imagine.
He's really short!! Was also the bad guy traitor in "Clear and Presdent Danger." But he isn't too old...
~venezia
Wed, Feb 24, 1999 (15:12)
#855
OK, I'm grasping at straws here, but Cheech Marin came to mind after I saw commercial for Nash Bridges.
If like Karen says, HF wants a dashingly handsome older man for Julio, he's definitely out of the picture, but the thought of him with Joan Collins gave me a good laugh.
And Ricardo Montalban is alive!!!!!!!!!
~KarenR
Wed, Feb 24, 1999 (19:04)
#856
I like that Hyacinth Bouquet lady for Bridget's mom. Joan is way too glamorous.
~LauraMM
Thu, Feb 25, 1999 (01:11)
#857
Karen, it's Hyacinth Bucket! What about the grandma on ABFAB as Pam, she's plays ditzy well, I mean who uses condoms to wash dishes? hee hee;)
~KarenR
Thu, Feb 25, 1999 (15:59)
#858
Yeah, as soon as I sent it, I remembered that it's Bucket, but she pretentiously pronounces it like the other. Oh well, I don't watch the show, but she looks about right.
Don't watch AbFab either.
~KarenR
Thu, Mar 4, 1999 (16:14)
#859
Finally, I shall be able to see what the fuss is about Cadbury Milk Trays!!
~LauraMM
Thu, Mar 4, 1999 (22:52)
#860
Chocolate, Karen, Chocolate. Plus Cadbury is made there, so it's much different from our Cadburys! Oh do bring some back;)
~KarenR
Tue, Mar 9, 1999 (17:42)
#861
OK, managed to find several of the more important Bridget junk foods! Can say categeorically that Jaffe Cakes (brand name) are the exact same thing as a cookie thing made by the LU brand and sold in the US. They call them Pimm's or some such thing and are available with orange or raspberry jelly.
Brought a deluxe tin of Milk Tray at the airport on the way out (what else does one do with leftover cash!!). Haven't opened them up yet (or the tin of Flake either), but seems to me they aren't going to be much different from any assorted chocolates one can buy from Fannie Mae, Fannie Farmer, Sees, Whitman,e etc. These were a "deluxe" tin, so the shapes and decorations were a bit more la-di-dah!
So Helen is addicted to these things...
~LauraMM
Tue, Mar 9, 1999 (19:15)
#862
I don't like Flake;( It's too flaky. Rebecca flipped out when I brought some back from Ireland. She hated it too!
~lafn
Thu, Mar 11, 1999 (23:21)
#863
I like Jaffa Cakes. Karen and I munched on them during the Jennifer Ehle movie on Sunday.Yummmmm.
****
I vote for Antonio...(Gi's fiancee) to play Julio. He is Portugese and v. handsome.
~patas
Tue, Mar 16, 1999 (22:43)
#864
No way, Evelyn! Antonio says there really is a Julio in Albufeira, who lives off foreign women. Antonio has business and lives in part in Albufeira, and can I but dream that they'll shoot BJD there if Colin is in it? :-)
~lafn
Tue, Mar 16, 1999 (23:01)
#865
(GI)No way, Evelyn!
AAA. Did not mean to imply that Antonio is a gigolo:-)
Mean't it as a compliment....as handsome as Antonio Banderas;-D
~patas
Wed, Mar 17, 1999 (15:52)
#866
No offence taken. But I would not have him play Julio :-)
~KarenR
Fri, Mar 26, 1999 (13:28)
#867
From today's Variety (also a mention of Captain Corelli's Mandolin and High Fidelity toward the end):
Working Title duo to stay
U may slate 'Bridget,' 'Captain'
By ADAM DAWTREY, March 26, 1999
LONDON � Tim Bevan and Eric Fellner, co-chairmen of Working Title Films, have
finally signed a five-year deal to continue at the helm of the London-based production company under Universal Pictures.
The long-awaited arrangement, due to be announced today, is understood to guarantee them the same creative autonomy they enjoyed under Polygram Filmed Entertainment, as well as richer personal terms.
It will enable Bevan and Fellner to greenlight the same kind of risky medium-budget fare, such as the $25 million �Elizabeth� and the $18 million �Bean,� that they previously persuaded PFE to bankroll.
The first projects likely to be financed by Universal are �Bridget Jones� Diary,� an adaptation of Helen Fielding�s bestseller about being a single female over 30, and �Captain Corelli�s Mandolin,� to be directed by Roger Michell, from Louis de Bernieres� romantic novel set in Greece during World War II.
Bevan and Fellner will also be asking U to greenlight �Thunderbirds,� a blockbuster live-action version of the cult TV series.
Concern over Hollywood
Bevan, who was not available for comment Thursday, previously has said that if Working Title had been owned by a Hollywood studio for the past five years, the company would only have managed to make �French Kiss� and �Notting Hill,� both mainstream projects costing more than $40 million. Instead the company has produced a stream of low-budget hits, including �Four Weddings and a Funeral,� �Fargo� and �Dead Man Walking.�
One of Bevan and Fellner�s highest priorities during their months of negotiation with Universal was to secure the right to continue making quirky British and American films at lower budget levels.
The duo�s old contracts with PFE were due to expire in June, but last year�s takeover of PFE by Universal raised questions about whether Bevan and Fellner would renew their deal or seek better terms elsewhere.
They had been heavily courted by other studios but in the end were unwilling to leave behind their company and its slate of upcoming projects, all now owned by U.
PFE Intl. to distrib
Working Title�s films will be distributed internationally by PFE Intl., soon to be rebranded with a Universal label. Domestically, the company�s big-budget films will go through U, but given the uncertainty over the future ownership of both October and Gramercy Films, the fate of Working Title�s smaller films remains undecided.
Meanwhile, Working Title is already in the midst of preparing Stephen Frears� adaptation of the Nick Hornby novel �High Fidelity,� starring John Cusack, for Disney. Disney and Universal have also agreed on a split-rights deal for the next Coen brothers movie, �Oh Brother, Where Art Thou,� starring George Clooney,
which Working Title will produce.
~LauraMM
Fri, Mar 26, 1999 (14:04)
#868
K- I've started reading Correlli's Mandolin, it's very interesting.
~EileenG
Fri, Mar 26, 1999 (14:27)
#869
Working Title is already in the midst of preparing Stephen Frears� adaptation of the Nick Hornby novel �High Fidelity,� starring John Cusack
Didn't Frears do Dangerous Liaisons?
~LauraMM
Fri, Mar 26, 1999 (16:08)
#870
Didn't Frears do Dangerous Liaisons?
Yes, so....
~lizbeth54
Fri, Mar 26, 1999 (20:35)
#871
Good news...Working Title must start shooting BJD soon. I still see CF as a cert for MD, but Bridget herself, who knows?
~lizbeth54
Fri, Mar 26, 1999 (20:40)
#872
Captain Corelli's Mandolin is a wonderful novel, but in some ways I'd rather it stayed as a book...I can picture the characters in my imagination, and I don't think any film version would them justice.
~lafn
Sat, Mar 27, 1999 (01:58)
#873
On Bethan's recommendation I read "Captain Corelli's Mandolin"; it is a brilliant novel and sorry, B. I must disagree..IMO it would make a touching film...talk about a romantic novel...And yes, I can see CF as
Captain Corelli....hair dyed black, ,of course:-)
*****
Thanks Karen for the Variety article.
~LauraMM
Sat, Mar 27, 1999 (03:04)
#874
Don't give too much on the book, I've just started it! I like it. Loved the The Duce chapter, lmao!
~KarenR
Sat, Mar 27, 1999 (03:33)
#875
I picked up Captain Corelli's Mandolin about a month ago when I was in Firthland West (that's the book, Winter). Read about 4 chapters and it sits... Think I'd better make a concerted effort. ;-)
~winter
Sat, Mar 27, 1999 (08:03)
#876
(that's the book, Winter).
That's right! Now I feel I should follow suit...you think I'd have any difficulty tracing a copy?
~Allison2
Sat, Mar 27, 1999 (08:22)
#877
And yes, I can
see CF as
Captain Corelli....hair dyed black, ,of course:-)
I remember reading that Ewan McGregor was going to play him. I must confess, I could not get into CCM. My DH and lots of friends loved it but I could not join their enthusiasm so I don't have much feel for whether CF has been robbed:-)
~lizbeth54
Sat, Mar 27, 1999 (08:42)
#878
Oh, Ewan McGregor :-( Must admit that despite my comments, a CF film version would have been very acceptable. Ewan McGregor just isn't Captain Corelli, just as Mel Gibson isn't Sydney Carton. But they're big Box Office. I shall stick to the book. Looks like the only hope of another romantic role for CF is in BJD!
~lizbeth54
Sat, Mar 27, 1999 (11:08)
#879
I don't have much feel for whether CF has been robbed:-)
The Antonio/Pelagia story is v-e-ry romantic, but a lot depends on the adaptation. On screen, it could be just another mawkish WW2 love story. And I always feel that depicting characters when they have aged is not convincing. I actually think the part should have gone to a bona fide Italian..I mean , there are actors in Italy! Or to an actor of Italian extraction (or an actor marriied to an Italian:-) )
~LauraMM
Sat, Mar 27, 1999 (17:19)
#880
I thought the love story between Kip and Hana in The English Patient was more important than the Katharine/Count Almasy relationship, and they dwindled Kip/Hana down to nothing!
~winter
Sat, Mar 27, 1999 (19:01)
#881
I wholeheartedly agree. It's actually the primary love story in the novel, from what I remember.
~KarenR
Sat, Mar 27, 1999 (19:03)
#882
Saw Michael Ondaatje yesterday btw...very nice man, interesting sense of humor and pretty near all the questions were about TEP!
~winter
Sat, Mar 27, 1999 (19:11)
#883
Details, Karen! Where did you see him?
~lafn
Sat, Mar 27, 1999 (19:59)
#884
Re: CCMD , Antonio...I remember reading that Ewan McGregor was going to play him.
Whaaaat?
Burp, burp!!The guy should stick to Trainspotting and heroin...period.
******
Re: CCMD, It goes slowly at first ...maybe first 150 or so pages.
After that pure bliss. Not just your usual romantic novel...v. much like Frederico Garcia Lorca's "100 Years of Solitude"(Almost said it in Spanish to impress Ben:-)It is inventive , compelling and funny.
Stick with it..you will be rewarded.I promise.
I think it won the Booker Prize in 1995.
***
Yes K. pl. tell us more of Mr. Ondaatje's lecture
I can see Juliette Binoche as Pelagia. And Albert Finney as Dr. Iannis
~lafn
Sat, Mar 27, 1999 (20:01)
#885
100Years of Solitude is not by Lorca...sorry.
~lizbeth54
Sat, Mar 27, 1999 (20:18)
#886
Ewan McGregor as Antonio Corelli...thanks Evelyn for your burp reaction!!! You know, I've been feeling quite depressed about this. Almost spoils the book for me. EMcG is emphatically not, NOT "my" Antonio...he's completely WRONG for this role!
~lafn
Sat, Mar 27, 1999 (20:25)
#887
EMcG is emphatically
not, NOT "my" Antonio...he's completely WRONG for this role!
Think he'll play it with a Scottish-Italian accent?
~winter
Sat, Mar 27, 1999 (20:42)
#888
100Years of Solitude is not by Lorca...sorry.
Gabriel Garcia Marquez... and a wonderful book BTW. Brilliant writer.
~lafn
Sat, Mar 27, 1999 (21:53)
#889
(Winter)100Years of Solitude is not by Lorca...sorry.
Gabriel Garcia Marquez... and a wonderful book BTW. Brilliant writer.
Winter to the rescue.!!! Thanks.
Was afraid the Mob Squad was going to come after me :-))))
~Moon
Sun, Mar 28, 1999 (01:00)
#890
WOT? Ewan McGregor as Antonio Corelli!!! Impossible! Is this absolutely confirmed?
(Winter)100Years of Solitude is by Gabriel Garcia Marquez... and a wonderful book BTW. Brilliant writer.
I am also a big fan.
~lizbeth54
Sun, Mar 28, 1999 (10:13)
#891
I'd rather see Roberto Bergnini as Corelli. But it's "bums on seats" that matter, not keeping faith with the book. Sniff!!
~lafn
Sun, Mar 28, 1999 (20:12)
#892
From today's London Times re: Working Title/Universal merger:
....Other projects include High Fidelity, from Nick Hornby's novel, which will soon start shooting in Chicago, with John Cusack starring; Bridget Jones's Diary, which Helen Fielding has scripted with Andrew Davies; and Captain Corelli's Mandolin, adapted by Shawn Slovo.
Looks like BJD and CCMD are a "go".
~winter
Sun, Mar 28, 1999 (20:50)
#893
Or as they say in the business, "Green-lighted."
~lizbeth54
Sun, Mar 28, 1999 (21:02)
#894
Well, if we know the director and "star" of Captain Corelli (am still depressed about the inappropriate choice of EMcGr..... will he keep his clothes on this time?), isn't it time that details of director/cast for BJD were announced.
~Allison2
Mon, Mar 29, 1999 (10:31)
#895
I am sorry to get you all upset about EMcG. I might be wrong. I am fairly sure, though, that I read it in an article but it was some time ago, so maybe plans have changed.
~KarenR
Mon, Mar 29, 1999 (13:45)
#896
Don't worry about it. It doesn't take much to get this group upset. ;-) Since I haven't gotten very far into Corelli's Mandolin, I haven't formed any opinions on who I would like to play the role; however, Ewan (not Elizabeth McGovern) wouldn't be the first to spring to mind.
~Allison2
Mon, Mar 29, 1999 (14:41)
#897
LOL! Now Elizabeth McG - that would be an even more popular choice round here :-))
~amw
Mon, Mar 29, 1999 (15:53)
#898
This is very strange in view of Evelyn's posting above from Sunday's Times, but quite by accident I picked up the Tatler magazine and there is an article in it which says that Working Titles has withdrawn plans to make the film Bridget Jones' Diary, who is right. Bethan have you had contact with Working Titles and if so can you clarify. Personally I shan't be sorry I couldn't see CF as Mark Darcy but it would still be nice to know for sure.
~KarenR
Mon, Mar 29, 1999 (15:59)
#899
Ann, since the recent news about Handmade was on all the wire services and the Tatler (April issue I assume) went to print eons ago, I'd go with the entertainment news organizations' latest releases. I mean, why would they even mention BJD in talking about their latest deal with Universal if it they had abandoned plans to pursue it?
~KarenR
Mon, Mar 29, 1999 (16:00)
#900
Oops, sorry, meant Working Title, not Handmade.
~lizbeth54
Mon, Mar 29, 1999 (16:59)
#901
I actually rang Working Title about two weeks ago (before the news of the Universal deal) and asked about BJD and when it would be sceduled for release. They said that they hadn't started shooting yet (which means that they are doing it!) and mentioned the end of the year. Which I took to mean release date (although that's a very fast turnaround) as no shoot for a British film with exterior locations would surely start in December...has to be Spring/Summer.
Ann, I like Mark Darcy, and with an Andrew Davies screenplay and world-wide distribution, this has to be a good role!
~amw
Mon, Mar 29, 1999 (17:22)
#902
The article was really definite that they had cancelled plans to make the film but I agree that it could have been printed a while ago as it was the April issue, but would you ring them again Bethan in a few weeks time just to make sure. Although I am not sure about BJD I can't see anyone else playing MD and it would be nice to know that we have two projects to look forward to.
~Moon
Mon, Mar 29, 1999 (22:35)
#903
And when you ring them Bethan, please ask who are the actors. How could they have a release date in mind and no confirmed actors?
~lizbeth54
Thu, Apr 1, 1999 (19:30)
#904
I keep on pressing respond instead of redisplay. Third time lucky!
Was trying to say that I think his in his attributed comment re the Internet, he was objecting more to a perhaps unmwelcome encounter in a party with a boorish individual who seemed to know too much about him. Maybe he didn't like to be reminded about his schooldays! :-) He has never actually said that he objects to the websites (respectfully) dedicated to his work!
BTW marvellous filming weather in Scotland at the moment...the hottest Easter for 100 years (allegedly!)
~lizbeth54
Thu, Apr 1, 1999 (19:32)
#905
I give up ...should have been posted at #118. Not my day.
~heide
Fri, Apr 2, 1999 (15:53)
#906
Spring Pledge Drive
Terry will gratefully accept any small donation you can make to help
keep the Spring out of the hole. No obligations, of course, but if
you're able to help out, a check can be made out to The Spring and
mailed to:
The Spring
Rt.2 Box 56r
Cedar Creek, TX 78612
I will post this at the other topics, so bear with the repetition.
~KarenR
Thu, Feb 7, 2036 (10:02)
#907
A very little tidbit about "High Fidelity" at the ain't it cool news site. Hardly meriting the large font size.
http://www.aint-it-cool-news.com/display.cgi?id=3381
~KarenR
Fri, Apr 9, 1999 (00:46)
#908
High Fidelity starts shooting here in Chicago on the 19th.
~winter
Fri, Apr 9, 1999 (02:28)
#909
Karen! Be on the lookout! Keep those eyes peeled for John Cusack! ;-)
~KarenR
Fri, Apr 9, 1999 (02:42)
#910
I had read that there were posters up at a small record shop that said they needed extras for the movie. Went into three used "vinyl" shops (all within a few feet of each other) the other day, but no joy.
Winter, dear, I always I have my eyes peeled for Cusack. So far have only run into William Devane at the grocery store. (hee hee) Am hoping to see Harrison Ford sitting on my front steps next month!
~winter
Fri, Apr 9, 1999 (02:47)
#911
What's Harrison Ford filming?
~KarenR
Fri, Apr 9, 1999 (02:52)
#912
It's called Random Hearts. Most of it apparently was filmed in DC, but now they're doing stuff here. Bonnie Hunt is in it and she plays a waitress. The restaurant where she works is the place next door to me. Manager of the restaurant told me about the story, had read the script. Said that Minnie Driver was in it as well, but the IMDb says Kirsten Scott Thomas. Who knows??
~heide
Sat, Apr 10, 1999 (02:51)
#913
Please don't tell me Minnie Driver will be Harrison Ford's love interest. Kirsten Scott Thomas and Robert Redford was bad enough.
~winter
Sat, Apr 10, 1999 (03:37)
#914
Michael Douglas and Gwyneth Paltrow was the worst...IMHO.
~patas
Sat, Apr 10, 1999 (17:46)
#915
I'd be interested in a game of "The worst pairings ever"...Perhaps at 113 if Marcia agrees :-)
I just saw "6 days 7 nights" and was appalled at Anne Heche/Harrison Ford. Don't these men ever grow too old to be cast as romantic interests?
~KJArt
Sun, Apr 11, 1999 (00:22)
#916
---The problem is NOT that these men are no longer "sexy" as they age. To women of a certain age, they may be sexier than ever. Casting them as romantic leads is perfectly appropriate.
The problem is that the mindfix in the entertainment business is that the only FEMALE that they can cast in a romantic lead must be under 35 (preferably under 30), nubile and knock-your-socks-off gorgeous. Any other actress may be an interesting character part, but certainly not sexy, and certainly not to be cast as a romantic lead. It's the past-it male's ideal sexual fantasy...and since it's mostly the past-it males who run things, we get these absurd pairings!!
~heide
Sun, Apr 11, 1999 (01:33)
#917
The problem is that the mindfix in the entertainment business is that
the only FEMALE that they can cast in a romantic lead must be under 35
(preferably under 30), nubile and knock-your-socks-off gorgeous
Precisely and I'll bet we all agree with you. What horrifies me even more is when the role calls for an older actress (as in As Good as it Gets) and they still cast a younger actress. Which is what I'm afraid will happen with the casting of Bridget.
~MarciaH
Sun, Apr 11, 1999 (02:49)
#918
(Gi)I'd be interested in a game of "The worst pairings ever"...Perhaps at 113 if Marcia agrees :-)
Oh yes, please do! And I will think up one to start them off. New listing on 113. Thank you Dear Gi! I was at a loss to know what would reinvigorate the old site.
~patas
Sun, Apr 11, 1999 (19:12)
#919
(KJArt)---The problem is NOT that these men are no longer "sexy" as they age.
The problem is that ...the only FEMALE that they can cast in a romantic lead must be under 35 (preferably under 30)
I expressed myself incorrectly. I don't mean older men aren't sexy...What bothers me is the pairings in themselves, and also that older men get cast in parts that seem to me demand a younger actor, while the women are always young (sometimes too young).
In the case of 6 days 7 nights, at least she wasn't the usual useless screaming girl, but did a lot of work!
~Elena
Sun, Apr 11, 1999 (19:56)
#920
(KJArt) and since it's mostly the past-it males who run things, we get these absurd pairings!!
Yeah. And think about Harrison Ford and....oh my, who was that girl in...what was that film again?? Oh yes, Julia Ormond in Sabrina. Ormond is great but the pairing of the two really was near pedophilia, disgusted me. The lovely young girl and the old man again. And as a model for everybody on how things should be or at least could be (="men can not possibly love women of their own age"), it�s seriously deranged, downright age racism.
I remember somebody wished that Colin would be cast as the professor in the Pygmalion but that�s actually one of the coarsest girl & daddy roles. I wish he�s not going into that sort of stuff but probably he is because romantic scripts just tend to be like that....don�t tell me MLSF is one of these too? What�s Irene Jacob�s age?!
~KarenR
Sun, Apr 11, 1999 (20:18)
#921
(Elena) And think about Harrison Ford and...Julia Ormond in Sabrina. Ormond is great but the pairing of the two really was near pedophilia, disgusted me.
Anyone familiar with the original stage play? I ask this because the first movie version of Sabrina starred Humphrey Bogart (old and seriously out-of-date for the 1950s, boolah boolah type) and Audrey Hepburn at age 25. Bogie was 55 at the time.
Actually I didn't think the Ford-Ormand thing was as bad as many others. Harrison still looks good to me.
don�t tell me MLSF is one of these too? What�s Irene Jacob�s age?!
Only from the standpoint of her being afianced to Malcolm McDowell, who is 55 now. I'd guess Irene Jacob to be about 30.
Older men and younger women is an age-old theme and has prevailed because of what KJ said, "men control the industry" and it's their fantasy.
Thank goodness, "Reckless" is on TV tonight (older woman and younger man with nice ass!) and I am taping it for posterity (no pun intended). ;-D
~heide
Sun, Apr 11, 1999 (21:17)
#922
(Elena) I wish he�s not going into that sort of stuff but probably he is
because romantic scripts just tend to be like that....don�t tell me MLSF
is one of these too? What�s Irene Jacob�s age?!
Now wait a minute...Colin's not that old! ;-) He can still be paired with a 25-year old and it not be outlandish. I agree with you, Elena, about Harrison Ford and Julia Ormond though as Karen points out, it was even worse with Bogie and Hepburn. Marcia's got a new list on this topic going at 113.
~lizbeth54
Mon, Apr 12, 1999 (00:15)
#923
Irene Jacob is 30-ish (looks younger). Mary Elizabeth Mastranonio must be slightly older than Colin, and of course Michelle Pfeiffer and Jessica Lange were older than him. So he's more the younger man!
"Sabrina" was on UK TV tonight...I really couldn't be bothered to watch it! I rarely like re-makes.
~MarciaH
Mon, Apr 12, 1999 (01:50)
#924
(bethan)I rarely like re-makes.
That's what nearly kept me from watching yet another remake of Pride and Prejudice. But, I did. And, here I am =D Things like that haunt me when I tend to dismiss remakes. Of course, if I know the actors they are talking about in the remake and do not care for them...it is much easier. Still...!
~EileenG
Mon, Apr 12, 1999 (17:48)
#925
(KarenR)Thank goodness, "Reckless" is on TV tonight (older woman and younger man with nice ass!) Wasn't it goood?! Robson Green is quite droolworthy (not as much as ODB but droolworthy all the same). Bring on the sequel!
~patas
Mon, Apr 12, 1999 (18:23)
#926
(Elena)I remember somebody wished that Colin would be cast as the professor in the Pygmalion but that�s actually one of the coarsest girl & daddy roles. I wish he�s not going into that sort of stuff
(Heide)Now wait a minute...Colin's not that old! ;-) He can still be paired with a 25-year old
Pygmalion is girl-and-daddy in the sense that the man is superior, and he "makes" the girl, she's his work. Is that what you mean, Elena? In that sense, it can be very male chauvinism, while of course Higgins does not need to be much older than Liza. It can also be taken in other perspectives , like class differences, ecc, and Higgins is so obvious in his egotism that I think it is much less hurtful of women than other, more subtle, stories.
Anyway, in the original Bernard Shaw's play, Liza does leave Higgins in the end.
(Karen)Harrison still looks good to me.
He looks alright with his clothes on :-)
~Elena
Mon, Apr 12, 1999 (19:27)
#927
(Gi) In that sense, it can be very male chauvinism
Pygmalion of course is a very chauvinistic play and what I�m thinking of is the version I saw recently in which Leslie Howard played Higgins and is considerably older than the actress, don�t know her name. That old movie is dreadful, the girl is put into a role of a complete clown because of her social class and sex....and he can love her only after he has made her the kind of creature that he wants her to be. Yuch! With plastic surgery the result would�ve been ever better!!
Anyway, what I�d hate (and what would ruin my admiration) would be to see Colin in a movie that I�d find chauvinistic, and of course the sort of age racism that we have been discussing here is one form of it. I really wish that he has enough sense to keep away from such films.....btw, I haven�t seen Playmaker and I have the idea that it�s pretty chauvinistic actually!
~KarenR
Mon, Apr 12, 1999 (23:45)
#928
Sometimes a "little" perspective helps... :)
On Pygmalion, from my Halliwell's: "Despite 1964's My Fair Lady, this straight version of Shaw's play, directed by Anthony Asquith and Leslie Howard, remains the most satisfying and perfectly cast: Howard as Higgins, Wendy Hiller as Eliza, Scott Sunderland as Pickering and Wilfred Lawson as Dolittle. Produced by Gabriel Pascal, photographed by Harry Stradling, with music by Arthur Honegger, it remains one of cinema's most civilized comedies."
Shaw's plays revolutionized the Victorian stage. This one, written in 1913, satirizes English class attitudes. He based on the Greek myth of Pygmalion, the king of Cyprus, who was also a sculptor, who fashioned a statue of a beautiful woman and, by praying to Aphrodite, was able to bring her (Galatea) to life and then married her.
Through the ages, men have fantasized about creating the perfect woman. In the Victorian age, when class was everything, Higgins' transformation of Eliza into a lady who would be accepted by society was a major coup for him professionally. This version did not have the happy ending that was done for My Fair Lady. What does that say to you?
Playmaker's male-female relationship is not chauvinism because of gender. It is a master-slave or teacher-pupil type thing. It is power and authority, not necessarily having anything to do with gender.
~KarenR
Tue, Apr 13, 1999 (01:07)
#929
Forgot the most important thing!
We don't watch Playmaker for the story (unless you want to laugh). Colin is at his most adorable as Michael, the very clean Michael ;-D
~LauraMM
Tue, Apr 13, 1999 (16:39)
#930
I will jump in and say that Robson Green looks better with his clothes off, whereas, CF definitely looks better with his clothes on. Just stoking the fire, girls;) hee hee. Yes, bring on the sequel!
~Elena
Tue, Apr 13, 1999 (17:46)
#931
(Karen) It is power and authority, not necessarily having anything to do with gender.
Haven�t seen Playmaker so I can�t really say if it�s chauvinistic or not, I only know about that teacher-pupil thing and that the pupil (I�ve understood) is naked or almost in the movie poster!? Anyway, I feel that power and authority have always a lot to do with gender.
Naturally one or two cases never prove anything but if there is a tradition of certain type of thing like that superiority is usually a male quality in movies, or that it is usually the man who looks at the woman and she has to please that look, you can see a trend and call it an ism, or even a social pattern that�s reinforced in art....!
What I mean is that it�s never JUST a teacher-pupil relationship or an upper class- lower class thing, it�s always a male-female thing as well, and the reason why the woman usually isn�t the authority with power is called chauvinism.
(Laura)CF definitely looks better with his clothes on
Why? Tell me more:-)
~EileenG
Tue, Apr 13, 1999 (20:15)
#932
(Laura)CF definitely looks better with his clothes on
Actually, it was Robson's puppy dog eyes that got me (he was looking pretty wounded all through Episode 3). There was only one naked butt shot that I recall. I think Colin's taller and thinner (conjuring up images from "The Advocate") but I didn't see too much of a difference. And Colin (as of mid-March, anyway) has more hair (on his head)!!
~Jana2
Tue, Apr 13, 1999 (21:41)
#933
(Elena) the pupil (I�ve understood) is naked or almost in the movie?
Oh yes, Elena but the teacher is too ;-). Which goes back to Karen's comments as to why we tolerate watching this film. Sorry Elena, you actually had a serious discussion going but I just can't get that mental picture of Ross Talbert out of my mind (Michael's pretty cute too);-).
~KarenR
Tue, Apr 13, 1999 (22:13)
#934
Robson Green vs. Colin Firth
I think we need a cheek-to-cheek comparison. ;-)
In another PBS/A&E (who remembers) show, where RG was a bodyguard to the Prince of Wales and it was a Cyrano-type story, he's au naturel there too!
In Playmaker, there is a reversal of roles. The woman gains the upperhand, the power a little later on. We all remember this turn of events and what poor Michael has to do!
~lafn
Wed, Apr 14, 1999 (05:18)
#935
don�t tell me MLSF is one of these too? What�s Irene Jacob�s age?!
If Irene Jacob is 30....I'm 50!!That doll has mileage.
And Mary Elizabeth Mastrantonio is 40.
They paired him with some ole broads.
****
(BTW...a reminder....let's use role names and not actual names when referring to anatomy:-)
Ahem....I'll put Courteois' and Ross Talbert's butt up against anybody's (pun not intended).
~amw
Wed, Apr 14, 1999 (07:38)
#936
Karen, there is no comparison in the body parts between Colin & Robson Green, Colin wins hands down as he does in the acting department, Robson always wears the same expression whatever he is in, sorry to get on my soap-bos about Robson Green buts thats all we hear over here, he is very popular over here but not with me . He was in something called Rhinocerous on Sunday which was on at the same time as the BAFTA's and got 10million views approx compared to 4.5 millions approx. for The Bafta's but I person
lly can't understand it, I feel as if I would like to wipe the smile off his silly face and as I say in every role he plays himself, that's not acting. Oh dear I have gone on a bit, I apologise to RG fans.
~amw
Wed, Apr 14, 1999 (07:43)
#937
soap-box not soap-bos
~LauraMM
Wed, Apr 14, 1999 (13:55)
#938
(Karen)We all remember this turn of events and what poor Michael has to do!
Now some people actually like this. Only kidding, Mr. President! Hee hee.
Robson Green has a better body than Colin Firth. It's more toned, in shape, curvier. Yes, he doesn't have the height, but ah, well you can't win'em all!
Karen, the PBS movie was Prince of Hearts w/ Tara Fitzgerald playing an American (really bad one at that!).
What do I mean about CF looking good with clothes on? Hmmmm... I prefer CF w/ clothes on rather than off. Even he states the same thing!!! Remember when he say something like who'd want to see me in those Arsenal boxers!!! Ha, but Robson Green, he could wear nothing and make me simply happy! CF just doesn't have the "gorgeous" body as does Robson Green, doesn't make CF less of a person. {Just means he doesn't work out;)}
Now has anyone read Tiffany Trott's Dating Diary. I found it on the ET, it was a column just before BJD and I tried sending it to Karen, did it work???? It was interesting, not as clever nor witty as BJD, but it seems as tho a regular gal did it. It's now out in book form.
~KarenR
Wed, Apr 14, 1999 (14:59)
#939
(Evelyn) If Irene Jacob is 30....I'm 50!!That doll has mileage.
And Mary Elizabeth Mastrantonio is 40.
According to the IMDb, Jacob was born in '63 and is 35, but that's OK, her character is supposed to be engaged to Malcolm McDowell, who is in his 50s. Now Mastrantonio was born in 1958, so she's slightly older than Colin by two years. Not all that significant.
They paired him with some ole broads.
They don't look so old, and I'm a very old broad by comparison! :)
(BTW...a reminder....let's use role names and not actual names when referring to anatomy:-)
Actually, within this context, it's OK to use real names. :)
Now, this is really where we need some side-by-side Snappies!
(AnnW) there is no comparison in the body parts between Colin & Robson Green, Colin wins hands down as he does in the acting department
As Laura says, they are very different body types. RG is short, compact and curvy. Definitely looks very buff. Colin on the other hand is tall and lanky.
Agreed that Colin wins hands down in the acting and overall looks department. RG is not a great actor, though he has incredibly blue eyes and good-looking bum, but that's about it! :)
(Laura) the PBS movie was Prince of Hearts
Thanks, I'm always forgetting the name of this one and I liked it, a combination Cyrano story and political satire.
Even he states the same thing!!! Remember when he say something like who'd want to see me in those Arsenal boxers!!
His usual self-deprecating comment. Besides, most guys would say the same thing. :)
Tiffany Trott's Dating Diary...I tried sending it to Karen, did it work???? It was interesting, not as clever nor witty as BJD, but it seems as tho a regular gal did it. It's now out in book form.
I could read what you copied and sent me via email, but couldn't get to it via the link, nor could I find it by searching at the Telegraph site. What section was it in and when (date)?
You are right, though, definitely not as clever as BJD. A second-rate ripoff.
This week's Time magazine reviews three new books about the life of 30-something single women. The title of the article is "Beyond Bridget Jones: Three new novels dig deeper into single life." Apparently, these are not clones nor ripoffs, but you do remember that Time magazine hated BJD.
The last paragraph: "Defenders of Bridget Jones brook no complaints about its portrayal of the single condition because the book, after all, is a comedy. But there was something unsettling--something that drained the satire--in Bridget's pursuit of a boyfriend. It was was though she wanted one not because falling in love is a signature experience of humanity but because she saw a man as a necessary accoutrement of urban life, like a Prada bag. Her bane Stateside compatriots aren't nearly as abs
rd--or maybe they just have better shrinks."
~LauraMM
Wed, Apr 14, 1999 (16:13)
#940
Karen, I've read all of the Tiffany Trott's Dating Diary. I can't believe the link doesn't work??? I have it bookmarked.
this is the link:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/et?ac=000772005502828&rtmo=awHeRbaL&atmo=99999999&pg=/et/97/11/8/tltif08.html
It will bring you up to I believe the last diary entry, but above it has all of them that you click on to get one, two, etc..., they were interesting, could've been very good. It had a huge following one and was brought back by popular demand when it was "cancelled". At the end of the run, it said if someone else wants to take over the column to send a note to the editor. It does leave one just hanging. I found on Amazon.com/uk that they have it in book form with a couple of reviews, although, most of
the reviews do say to stick with BJD.
and speaking of BJD, has the new book come out yet, it IS April;) !!!!
~KarenR
Wed, Apr 14, 1999 (17:13)
#941
Now, that link worked. Interesting how BJD started right after this one. Will read the other parts later. Thanks.
~EileenG
Wed, Apr 14, 1999 (18:09)
#942
(Ann) and as I say in every role he plays himself, that's not acting Sounds like he has the "George Clooney Syndrome." 'Reckless' is the only thing I've seen RG in.
(Laura) Robson Green has a better body than Colin Firth. He has a different body type. Long and lanky can still be appreciated. Variety is the spice of life!
~LauraMM
Wed, Apr 14, 1999 (18:32)
#943
Long and lanky can still be appreciated. Variety is the spice of life!
]
for someone who IS long and lanky, I hope I can be appreciated:p; However, it could be that I just prefer men of the Robson Green type??? His blue eyes just mesmerize me. Piercing blue eyes!! oooh!!!
~lafn
Wed, Apr 14, 1999 (19:50)
#944
(Laura)Robson Green has a better body than Colin Firth. It's more toned, in shape, curvier. Yes, he doesn't have the height, but ah, well you can't win'em all!
Hey , Laura....."size matters" :-)
*****
(evelyn) They paired him with some ole broads.
(Karen)They don't look so old, and I'm a very old broad by comparison!
Don't take it personal....Don't you know? "Present company is always excluded."..If you don't believe me...take a look at Sabine's picture of the Donmar Dolls!!
Anyway Karen...everyone knows you're a Natalie Wood look-a-like":-)
I got pissed at MEMastrantonio because she gave an interview in last month's Movieline...all about a new movie she is shooting and never even mentioned MLSF. Gwynnie was more magnanimous.
~amw
Wed, Apr 14, 1999 (20:14)
#945
Personally I prefer brown expressive mesmeric eyes that speak that say so much !
~patas
Wed, Apr 14, 1999 (20:31)
#946
(Laura)His blue eyes just mesmerize me. Piercing blue eyes!! oooh!!!
Could you be a fan of Mel Gibson's eyes as well? ;-)
~KarenR
Wed, Apr 14, 1999 (22:30)
#947
Natalie Wood look-a-like":-)
That would be *after* she washed up on the beach, right? ;-p
I got pissed at MEMastrantonio...
From looking her up on the IMDb, I found out she was born in Lombard, IL - western suburb of Chicago. I think I had to go there once???
~lafn
Thu, Apr 15, 1999 (02:27)
#948
(Evelyn).... got pissed at MEMastrantonio...
(Karen)From looking her up on the IMDb, I found out she was born in
Lombard, IL - western suburb of Chicago.
She is also the wife of Pat O'Connor, Director of C of F.
And, also AMITC.
~LauraMM
Thu, Apr 15, 1999 (14:02)
#949
I don't think height and "size" have much correlation, Evelyn!!!! OR else I would hope so.
And I think Karen does look like Natalie Wood, when she was alive, not when she washed up on the beach. (that was bad!!)
~lafn
Thu, Apr 15, 1999 (19:45)
#950
Waterstone's has the new BJ book listed as:
"BJ and the Seven Men" hardback 12.UKP to be published in April 99.
I called Waterstone's in Islington and the person in charge will find out exactly when it will be in. Will call tomorrow.
Stay tuned....
~LauraMM
Thu, Apr 15, 1999 (20:17)
#951
BJ and the Seven Men? Oh dear!!!
~lafn
Thu, Apr 15, 1999 (22:06)
#952
Amazon.co.uk has it listed as "BJ I Will survive" paperback 6.99UKP
to be published 23 April 1999 by Picador'
ISBN 0330367358
I'll go with amazon...they are seldom wrong.
~LauraMM
Thu, Apr 15, 1999 (22:30)
#953
Hee hee, Evelyn, I did the same thing!!
Bridget Jones: I Will Survive
Helen Fielding Our Price: �6.99
Category(ies): Literature & Fiction
Paperback (23 April, 1999)
Picador; ISBN: 0330367358
Learn more about
1-ClickSM ordering
Availability: We expect to be able to find this title for you within 4-6 weeks. However, please note that titles occasionally go out of print or publishers run out of stock.
Amazon.co.uk Sales Rank: 4,634
hahahahah!
~KarenR
Thu, Apr 15, 1999 (22:43)
#954
I suggest we coordinate orders to save on the exorbitant shipping!
~Moon
Thu, Apr 15, 1999 (23:20)
#955
Bridget Jones: I Will Survive
Helen Fielding Our Price: �6.99
This price seems very low. That's what I paid for my BJD paperback in the UK last summer.
~KJArt
Fri, Apr 16, 1999 (03:18)
#956
(Laura) Robson Green has a better body than Colin Firth.
(AnnW)...no comparison...Colin wins, hands down...
Girls, girls! Now remember, there's no accounting for taste. Laura faults Colin for not having looked like he "works out". Well, I vote with AnnW on this one. You may have the bulgy weight-lifters, Laura, but unless they're lumberjacks or construction workers, they look absolutely grotesque to me...(they look like they're perpetually eager for a punch-up, which does not appeal). I prefer Colin's clean natural (and lithe) look...it's more than sufficient for the occasional sword-fight, horseback ri
e, or swim; aesthetically it's a great part of the drool factor (but not necessarily the admiration factor...it's the acting for that...) To my artist's eye he has several characteristics that seem positively made in heaven. And even though--overall--I still think he looks like he was assembled by a committee, I only find that endearing. Nevertheless each part is perfectly proportioned within itself. Yum!
But that's MY taste!
~EileenG
Fri, Apr 16, 1999 (14:23)
#957
(KJArt) And even though--overall--I still think he looks like he was assembled by a committee LOL! What ever is your meaning?
Much as I admire ODB's talent and *other* attributes, I will admit there was a time when he looked too thin. Those Levi's he wore in ATA positively swam on him. Did anyone else notice this? At the time I wondered if he was bouncing so much from country to country (London-Rome-LA) that he forgot to eat!
~LauraMM
Fri, Apr 16, 1999 (15:57)
#958
Laura faults Colin for not having looked like
Geez, nothing like having words put in my mouth!!! I don't fault him for not working out. I was saying that he doesn't work out. Obviously Robson Green has some sort of physical workout (not horizontal either). RG DOES have a better body. End of subject!
~amw
Fri, Apr 16, 1999 (16:01)
#959
But he is too short!!
~KarenR
Fri, Apr 16, 1999 (16:03)
#960
"Better" is subjective. :-)
To each, his/her own. How I wish! ;-)
~LauraMM
Fri, Apr 16, 1999 (16:08)
#961
So what if he's short??? Karen's short but I don't dislike her for it? (Karen, just using you as an example only;))
~LauraMM
Fri, Apr 16, 1999 (16:10)
#962
That didn't sound good actually. I mean that because Karen is shorter than me, I would never not like her because of that. I like Karen very much indeed! She's a great person. and I bet Robson Green is a great person too! as is CF also!
~amw
Fri, Apr 16, 1999 (16:12)
#963
I like my hero's to be taller and gorgeous and with the most wonderful speaking voice in the whole world.
~amw
Fri, Apr 16, 1999 (16:13)
#964
a nd Karen is not a man!!
~Elena
Fri, Apr 16, 1999 (16:23)
#965
and Karen is not a man!!
LOL! Yeah Ann, you said it!
Besides, it�s the *something* in Colin that is simply unique. Hard to beat that one, Laura? :-)
~LauraMM
Fri, Apr 16, 1999 (17:21)
#966
Unique??? He's a man. He goes to the bathroom just like you and me. He brushes his teeth and washes his face. He probably yells and screams like the best of us. Idolizing someone to certain degree is well, weird.
~Lizza
Fri, Apr 16, 1999 (17:31)
#967
Ann and KJ , some great comments.
It's like comparing the chocolate they use on Reese's peanut butter cups with
Lindt excellence chocolate.
One is rough and kind of unfinished, the other is quality, smooth and satisfying.
Know which one I would rather nibble on!!!
Those of us who remember RG in his "Soldier Soldier" days and as a sometime MOR crooner, could never find him fascinating in the least.
As he is a millionaire, maybe it is his "wad " rather than his buns of steel
that are the attraction.
He certainly doesn't get paid due to his acting talents.
Those of us seeing our DB on stage know we have been in the oresence of a phenominal talent.
Off for my chocolate ration!!!
~Lizza
Fri, Apr 16, 1999 (17:32)
#968
OK OK it's "presence"!!!
~Lizza
Fri, Apr 16, 1999 (17:34)
#969
and phenomenal!!
~KarenR
Fri, Apr 16, 1999 (17:50)
#970
(Laura) Karen is shorter than me
just like you and me
than I & like you and I!! tsk tsk ;-)
He goes to the bathroom just like you and me
Not really, unless you're hiding something from me. ;-)
I consider myself fairly versatile. Sometimes I like cheapo chocolate candies, although I really prefer the good stuff. I can turn down the cheapo stuff when I want to, but rarely the good stuff. Colin is definitely the good stuff, to be savored and appreciated despite the calories!
Nothing wrong with looking at buns of steel, but I don't confuse them with acting ability. ;-)
~SBRobinson
Fri, Apr 16, 1999 (18:59)
#971
(Ann) I like my hero's to be taller and gorgeous and with the most wonderful speaking voice in the whole world.
I couldnt agree more :)
(it also helps if they can sing to you... but if they've only got the first three, i wont complain)
~Elena
Fri, Apr 16, 1999 (19:32)
#972
(Laura) Idolizing someone to certain degree is well, weird.
OK I admit I�m weird enough to think that one can be unique in spite of being a man, using the bathroom, brushing one�s teeth etc.!!!....To be honest, I haven�t given much thought to these things in Colin�s case, you�ve opened my eyes to reality Laura :-))
~lizbeth54
Fri, Apr 16, 1999 (19:49)
#973
Entering into the fray, I have to say that Robson Green plays the same part in everything he does (macho Geordie hero gets girl) and is fortunate that both the BBC and ITV seem to fall over backwards to offer him a never ending series of vehicles for his rather limited acting talent. But it's made him very, very rich.
He's 5'6", apparently!
I like tall and lean, although I have to agree with you, Eileen, that in ATA Colin really looked too thin and in need of some tender loving care and dollops of pasta!
~MarciaH
Fri, Apr 16, 1999 (19:53)
#974
Speaking of buns and their desirability, everyone who thinks his are less worthy of Drool than others should go back and look at the Turkish Bath scene from TA or I'll send Karen one to post...delightful!
~KarenR
Fri, Apr 16, 1999 (21:17)
#975
What other little Snappies do you have squirreled away, Marcia? (one eyebrow is now raised....)
~LauraMM
Fri, Apr 16, 1999 (21:34)
#976
Hey I'm 5'6 and considered tall;)
~EileenG
Fri, Apr 16, 1999 (21:40)
#977
(Laura) He goes to the bathroom just like you and me
(Karen) Not really, unless you're hiding something from me. ;-)
Ditto! Laura, do you have something to tell us? 8-o I've got images of "The Crying Game" in my head!
...I'm kidding! KIDDING!
Idolizing someone to certain degree is well, weird. Then I must be wierd.
~amw
Fri, Apr 16, 1999 (21:43)
#978
5'6" is tall for a girl, short for a man!!
~KarenR
Fri, Apr 16, 1999 (21:56)
#979
These days, 5'6" is more average for a girl.
idolizing to a certain degree is well, weird
Nope, you did say *certain* None of us goes overboard or subscribes to stalkerish activities. What we do here is fun. Not weird at all. Now if we were idolizing a serial killer, that would be weird. Colin is deserving of adoration for his talent (and his looks aren't anything to sneeze about).
~amw
Fri, Apr 16, 1999 (22:03)
#980
Here, here and isn't that why these boards are called Drool because we love to drool over this man, nothing wrong with that. Aishling, as you were the first to post the report about JE, does that mean that you are a fellow UK drooler, I do hope so as we are in the minority here, so please keep posting and oh yes welcome, sorry.
~MarciaH
Fri, Apr 16, 1999 (23:13)
#981
Karen, I have just enough of them salted away to prove my point about TDB. He is so exquisite, is he not. I am also 5'6" and out here that is sky-scraping.
~KJArt
Fri, Apr 16, 1999 (23:56)
#982
Welcome, Aishling.
(KJArt) And even though--overall--I still think he looks like he was assembled by a committee
(Eileen) LOL! What ever is your meaning?
I mean the various parts don't seem to quite match to others, as if 2 "man-kits" were used but the pieces got mixed up (Incidentally, I'd like to see the other one, too!):) We all focus on the broad shoulders, the long, thick neck, the tapering LONG waist...the torso is beautifully assembled. But hadn't you also noticed that the arms are a bit too slender for that torso, the hands (beautiful though they are) a bit to big for the arms--and for the face, which is about a half-size too small for the neck,
tc. Everything is beautiful, but slightly out of proportion to everything else (I won't even begin on those thighs, which shall remain nameless!!!) as if someone else took charge after the one who had started the project had to leave to answer the phone, or something!
I can remember several people groaning when the term "burly" was applied to our young hero in that article done just after Lost Empires was aired (1986)...but I can understand the illusion. And his appearance in ATA is an excellent example: coming at you he looks broad and bulky, with those wide shoulders and broad chest. But it's not deep--when he turns sideways, he practically disappears!!!;) So I just lovingly think that there was a slipup somewhere--more likely it was done on purpose...we m
stn't have perfection, now, must we?! That might go to his level head!!! (which, though a bit out of proportion to the rest, is still the best part of him, what?) All the more reason to admire AND drool!
But, as I said before, MY taste and MY perception, which as Karen reminds us is purely subjective!
~KarenR
Sat, Apr 17, 1999 (15:11)
#983
Nick Hornby will be at the following locations for booksigning:
Wed, Apr 21 7:30 PM New York, NY
Barnes & Noble
4 Astor Place (212-420-1322)
Sat, Apr 24 7:30 PM Dayton, OH
Books & Co.
350 E. Stroop Road (937-298-6540)
Sun, Apr 25 7:00 PM St. Louis, MO
Left Bank Books
399 N. Euclid (314-367-6731)
Tue, Apr 27 7:00 PM San Francisco, CA
Booksmith
1644 Haight Street (415-863-8688)
Bookwire doesn't show that AAB has come out in paperback yet. Only the hard cover is shown.
~Elena
Sat, Apr 17, 1999 (16:31)
#984
(KJ)the torso is beautifully assembled.....but slightly out of proportion
Sometimes an artist can sound about as merciless as a surgeon dissecting people! But I think you�ve probably found something essential about him as an actor, I mean the chameleon quality. He looks very different from different angles and depending on which of his features are emphasized by the makeup & clothing department.
But I wish you could see him in real life! You�d forget everything about proportions. Like I�ve told you his beautiful body looked absolutely perrrrfect on stage, nothing was out of proportion......yes Laura, I�m being weird again but I just can�t help it:-))
~Moon
Sat, Apr 17, 1999 (17:34)
#985
Laura, how could you possibly be attracted to ODB's brother? There are no muscles there.
I have never been attracted to the muscular types. Their brains suffer from it I'm afraid.
~Elena
Sat, Apr 17, 1999 (19:07)
#986
(Moon)I have never been attracted to the muscular types.
Neither have I, and isn�t it a real turn-off to find a heap of body building gear lying about in a man�s apartment?!?
I also can�t stand men who are aware of their good looks. I liked it that Colin obviously did nothing to his looks when he came down to the Donmar lobby from backstage, except possibly wiping some makeup off and changing for the nice worn clothes of his own. He seems to mind his looks amazingly little for an actor, dunno how that�s possible in such a highly looks-conscious job.
~lafn
Sat, Apr 17, 1999 (19:49)
#987
Excuse me
...may I digress for a minute to say that Waterstone's
in Islington does not have any concrete news on the new BJ book...not even the title...only that the "new BJ book will be out in April '99."
Big Deal!!We knew that in October. We better stick with Amazon.
Thank you....
Now ,please continue with the discussion at hand.....
~lizbeth54
Sat, Apr 17, 1999 (22:16)
#988
I phoned our local Waterstone's re BJD..the sequel (whatever the title is!). I was told that it should have come out at the end of last year and a first draft had been submitted, but there was some problem with the structure. I was told that there was no actual date for publication but it should be "soon" and news of this would certainly be in the papers. I'm wondering if they'll time it to coincide with the start of filming of the movie...good promotional tie-in.
Re. the BJD movie. I noticed in today's Times an item about Working Title and a new film about the Manchester United and Matt Busby which hasn't been greenlighted yet, but they expect to start shooting later this year. What struck me was despite the fact that the screenplay wasn't complete, the greenlight not given, they still gave details of the cast (Liam Neeson, Robert Carlyle). Can't understand why they can't announce who is playing BJ and MD...they must know!!!!
His body...one thing I'm in total agreement with Elena about, is that I can't stand any man who is too conscious of his looks. I'm sure a lot of actors spend a lot of time working out and preening in front of a mirror. And you can be fit without being muscular...a lot of athletes are lean (aerobic as opposed to anaerobic). I think if those thin arms suddenly acquired muscles, I'd be disappointed in him! Anyway, strength with vulnerabilty is a rather attractive combination!
~lafn
Sat, Apr 17, 1999 (23:29)
#989
Re: His Body...
...If a commitee put him together....they did one-helluva-job!!
~KJArt
Sat, Apr 17, 1999 (23:48)
#990
--I never denied it!! Such an appealing combination, what? Perfection can be so boring, but he's perfect in the ways we want him to be.
To repeat: yum!!
~Lizza
Sun, Apr 18, 1999 (11:20)
#991
Isn't it great to be "Weird".
It's even better to know we found each other to be weird together!!!
Actually I was convinced that I was weird till I found thees boards.
Long Live "Weirdos" ( of the drool kind).
~amw
Sun, Apr 18, 1999 (11:44)
#992
Here, here!!
~EileenG
Mon, Apr 19, 1999 (16:00)
#993
Ditto, Ann and Lizza!
I watched 'Reckless-The Sequel' last night and noticed Robson's lack of height (and he is quite follicularly challenged, just like *sob* ODB :-( ). But I uphold my original comment that RG's body is not better than CF's--just different.
Thanks for your 'committee' explanation, KJArt. I think of CF as just plain thin (too thin in ATA, part of which I watched on Encore Saturday night. Those jeans he wore in the making coffee scene were way big, but the back ones weren't so bad. And he looked ssoooo handsome in this film--its only redeeming quality!).
~EileenG
Mon, Apr 19, 1999 (16:02)
#994
Whoops, that should read "black" ones, not "back" ones...not that I wasn't looking at his back!
~KarenR
Mon, Apr 19, 1999 (16:38)
#995
(Eileen) ..not that I wasn't looking at his back!
Needed more *front and back* in the garbage-y love scene IMO! ;-)
~jcjc
Tue, Apr 20, 1999 (00:57)
#996
In earlier discussions on this board there was word play as to who would make a good BJ. I'm kinda late with my suggestion, however, we don't officially know who's going to get the role. I was wondering what do yout think of Julia Ormond. She's really classy and extremely beautiful and after reading the book I'm not sure she'd fit--it might be a total stretch. But, she's british and thritysomething and she's talented. Funny thing is she used to live in Hackney. I wonder if she knew CF.
~Moon
Tue, Apr 20, 1999 (01:19)
#997
Jana, I like JO, you're right, she could do it. All they need to do is to dye her hair. That Hackney artistic click is breaking up.
~KJArt
Tue, Apr 20, 1999 (02:37)
#998
(Ann) Here! here!
Isn't that "hear! hear!"?? (I know, picky, picky :-))
~lizbeth54
Tue, Apr 20, 1999 (09:05)
#999
Well it won't be Kate Winslett...she's spending the summer filming "The Marquis de Sade" with Geoffrey Rush "described by insiders as a pornographic SIL" (do we really need this?!!)
And I doubt if it will be GP...she must be overwhelmed with offers.
But if it's a Universal production, it has to be someone currently bankable. Really dunno.
~amw
Tue, Apr 20, 1999 (09:24)
#1000
Of course, "Hear, Here"!! oh no "Hear,Hear" (got a lot on my mind including another trip to the Donmar with Eveleyn and Lizza.)
~LauraMM
Tue, Apr 20, 1999 (13:57)
#1001
Julia Ormond is a TERRIBLE actress!!! UGH!!!! Nope, I hope for Claire Rushbrook, and I will not be swayed!!! Hee hee.
On another note, I was a bit disappointed in Reckless the Sequel. I adored the first one, thought it funny, witty, sexy etc...this one left me feeling flat. I mean there were some funny moments. Michael Kitchen is just hysterical and a bit sexy, I must admit. And the woman who played the sister? Could she have enough hair???? Personally in my own opinion, I think when one reaches a certain age, shorter hair is called for. I didn't say short, just shorter. Okay enough of my ranting.
Again, Claire Rushbrook! no ifs, ands or buts! ;-p
~lafn
Tue, Apr 20, 1999 (16:41)
#1002
(Laura) Claire Rushbrook! no ifs, ands or buts! ;-p
OK...but who is she?. And what's more if she's another unknown who will go to see her?
Can't be a "no-name".
Besides, I liked Julia Ormond in Semilla's Sense of Snow. But I think they are teaming her up with Richard Harris again in another film this summer.
~LauraMM
Tue, Apr 20, 1999 (16:52)
#1003
And what's more if she's another unknown who will go to see her?
]
we ALL will!!! Because we ALL love BJD!!! and if CF plays MD, then who cares if an unknown plays BJ. I seem to recall JE was a relative unknown when she took the role of EB....
Jesus, the abbreviations! LOL!
~patas
Tue, Apr 20, 1999 (16:57)
#1004
(Elena)Sometimes an artist can sound about as merciless as a surgeon dissecting people!
Speaks an artist *and* surgeon: he looked very English to me :-). Tall, broad shouldered and thin...that's my experience of young English men.
(Elena) isn�t it a real turn-off to find a heap of body building gear lying about in a man�s apartment?!?
I shudder to imagine it!
(Lizza) Isn't it great to be "Weird".
It's even better to know we found each other to be weird together!!!
I love it too!
~EileenG
Tue, Apr 20, 1999 (20:10)
#1005
Julia Ormond...too Audrey Hepburn-ish. I couldn't see her as BJ for the same reason I couldn't see GP. They each look too sophisticated (and are TOO YOUNG as Laura will surely point out).
I thought Kate Winslet had the right kooky quality (also too young) and a bankable name (she's getting good reviews in 'Hideous Kinky' but the movie itself isn't).
Who is Claire Rushbrook??
~Elena
Tue, Apr 20, 1999 (20:16)
#1006
(Jana)Julia Ormond. She's really classy and extremely beautiful
(Laura)Julia Ormond is a TERRIBLE actress!!!
LOL!
But the truth is of course that Julia Ormond is GREAT. End of discussion:-):-)
But for the role as BJ, JO is too classy and too beautiful. I don�t know if I�ve read that book in another way than you guys but I didn�t get the idea that BJ is very classy let alone very beautiful. I mean, above all, she�s a great *character* but are there any great young character actresses in this world??.....Hmmm, good question.
~LauraMM
Tue, Apr 20, 1999 (20:23)
#1007
Here is her IMDB profile:
Plunkett & MaCleane (1999) .... Lady Estelle
Spice World (1997) .... Deborah
Under the Skin (1997) .... Rose
Secrets & Lies (1996) .... Roxanne
... aka Secrets et mensonges (1996) (France)
She is roughly early thirties; she put on weight and grew her hair long for Secrets & Lies, but in SpiceWorld, she had shoulder length hair and was very attractive! (she played Richard E Grant's assistant). I think she'd make a good BJ!
~LauraMM
Tue, Apr 20, 1999 (20:24)
#1008
Uh, sorry that is Claire Rushbrooke's imdb!!
~EileenG
Tue, Apr 20, 1999 (20:38)
#1009
I feel for anyone whose credits include "Spice World" (that goes for Alan Cumming, too).
Sorry, I can't place her. Does she have enough draw to carry this movie?? Unless they cast Rupert Everett as MD (gag, gag)!!
~winter
Tue, Apr 20, 1999 (21:50)
#1010
But Richard E. Grant was in "Spice World" too, and he's great! Bob Hoskins as well. (Yes, I admit it, I did see Spiceworld)
~Lizza
Tue, Apr 20, 1999 (22:31)
#1011
Just catching up on my favourite "weirdos",
I am SURE I saw Claire Rushbrook in Cardiff earlier this year too.
Only I didn't know her name, despite seeing S and L 3 times!!
~lafn
Tue, Apr 20, 1999 (22:36)
#1012
(Laura)I seem to recall JE was a relative unknown when she took the role of EB....
But P&P was a Televison production. And I think at the time she was fairly well known in UK. (Brit fans...am I making this up?)People didn't pay 17 UKP to go see her.....(Folks, that is what a movie costs in London...roughly $17.).
Even now, I don't think JE is a bankable star.It takes a lot of have star-wattage...
****
And as far as those films that you quoted from IMDb on Claire Rushmore...
ROTFLMAO.
I would hate to be the producer trying to fund BJD.
~LauraMM
Wed, Apr 21, 1999 (01:32)
#1013
JE was definitely an unknown in 1995! she made a few tv movies, nothing of much credit. she was probably more known for her stage work, and I recall people freaking out because JE is an American and she had a twang. She needed to be coached for the Regency period language.
I read that somewhere, can't remember.
~lafn
Wed, Apr 21, 1999 (02:33)
#1014
(Laura)..and I recall people freaking out because JE is an
American and she had a twang. She needed to be coached for the Regency period language.I read that somewhere, can't remember.
Now Laura....don't want be nasty...Jennifer Ehle went to the School of Speech and Drama in London before she did The Camomile Lawn for Sir Peter Hall...I hardly think she had a twang...but I never heard her.
I never said,however, that JE is a bankable star that people (except me) will go to see...but either is Claire Rushmore:-)
~aishling
Wed, Apr 21, 1999 (10:39)
#1015
Ann -does that mean you are a fellow UK drooler
Yes it does. Like others have said before me, I never feel I have anything to add which hasn't been said. Also, I only have access to a computer at work and it isn't always that easy, hence the delay in replying to you. But, I am here and will dive in if and when the opportunity arises.
~LauraMM
Wed, Apr 21, 1999 (14:41)
#1016
I'm not being nasty, Evelyn, I read it somewhere. They were freaking out because she's from North Carolina! Honestly!
~EileenG
Wed, Apr 21, 1999 (15:24)
#1017
(Winter) But Richard E. Grant was in "Spice World" too, and he's great! Bob Hoskins as well.
I still feel for anyone whose credits include 'Spice World.' It has nothing to do with their talent.
(Evelyn)I would hate to be the producer trying to fund BJD.
Or the casting folks. Perhaps that's why the cast hasn't been announced.
~LauraMM
Wed, Apr 21, 1999 (15:54)
#1018
I seem to recall Helen Fielding stating MOST VEHEMENTLY that an UNKNOWN MUST play Bridget Jones. I think if you have star power in the other vehicles (i.e leading man, supporting cast), IT WILL WORK and people will go see it. People will see it if there are unknowns because WE LIKE BJD.
THE FULL MONTY had a bunch of relative unknowns, but they have since been propelled to stardom. (Robert Carlisle and Mark Addy and Emily Woof, specifically.)
geez, I seem to recall a lot of things lately, if I can find proof of it, I will. But I'm not going to look very hard;-p
~KarenR
Wed, Apr 21, 1999 (16:00)
#1019
(Laura) THE FULL MONTY had a bunch of relative unknowns, but they have since been propelled to stardom. (Robert Carlisle and Mark Addy and Emily Woof, specifically.)
Who's Emily Woof? :)
As I've maintained since the beginning, HF probably has little control over the project. She sold it, she tried writing a screenplay, and they've brought in hired guns to help or to take it over completely. Given her lack of clout relative to other hugely successful pulp fiction authors, she couldn't possibly have negotiated creative control over this flick. That just MEO!
And stop shouting! ;-o
~lafn
Wed, Apr 21, 1999 (16:18)
#1020
(Laura)They were freaking out because she's from North Carolina! Honestly!
Well, if you say honestly... what can I say?:-)
*****
They said the same thing about GP playing EMMA.
Now she's the nation's darling!
Janeites are a difficult bunch to please.I" read "somewhere that they didn't like the bathtub scene either." Oh dear, can't remember where I read it":-)
~LauraMM
Wed, Apr 21, 1999 (16:46)
#1021
I wasn't shouting, just proving a point!!! all caps can't always mean shouting. (that's stupid lingo ANYWAY!!!) :p Honestly!
~EileenG
Wed, Apr 21, 1999 (18:10)
#1022
(Laura) People will see it if there are unknowns because WE LIKE BJD
I would venture a guess that "the money" (producers) don't see it this way. *We* loved BJD more because of the CF-Darcy link (at least I did) but there aren't enough of *us* to bring the degree of profit desired. They'll aim the picture towards everyone--those who read the book and those who didn't.
Translating a successful book into a motion picture is always risky--especially one written in diary format, where the reader sees the character's direct thoughts. The only ways to get the same result in a movie is through voiceovers or when they address the audience directly (a la Ferris Bueller). Sometimes it just doesn't work!
PS. CAPS = SHOUTING. Like it or not.
~LauraMM
Wed, Apr 21, 1999 (18:30)
#1023
Actually, the P&P, CF connection really didn't do it for me. as I really didn't like MD! So I can't use that excuse! I'm difficult:)
~LauraMM
Wed, Apr 21, 1999 (18:31)
#1024
Oh and I like Nick Hornby for himself and not because of the CF connection too!
~patas
Wed, Apr 21, 1999 (19:09)
#1025
Laura, "I read somewhere" that if you want to give emphasis to a word or phrase you put it between asterisks ;-)
~LauraMM
Wed, Apr 21, 1999 (20:06)
#1026
Geez, everyone's a comedienne! *WILL DO!* ;)
~amw
Wed, Apr 21, 1999 (20:13)
#1027
Karen, Emily Woof, was in "This Year's Love" with JE., she played the Lesbian and is in the forthcoming adaption by Alan Bleasdale of Oliver Twist and has the role of Nancy which I had hoped would go to Jennifer.
~amw
Wed, Apr 21, 1999 (20:18)
#1028
Aishling, did you by any chance go to see Colin in 3DOR at the Donmar in March and if you didn't will you be going at the end of the year if it comes back
again, albeit at another theatre and what did you think of him in SIL (so many questions so little time)
~aishling
Thu, Apr 22, 1999 (09:30)
#1029
Ann, so many questions
I didn't get to the Donmar but since delurking, I would love to go when and if 3DOR's comes back at the end of the year. Also, I am having to wait for the video to be released for SIL.
~KarenR
Thu, Apr 22, 1999 (15:09)
#1030
Finally, something about High Fidelity. Wonder what part she will play. This is from Variety (4/22/99):
Sara Gilbert has been added to the cast of Disney�s �High Fidelity� for director Stephen Frears. She joins thesp John Cusack in the pic.
Gilbert will next be seen in Samuel Goldwyn�s Morgan J. Freeman-helmed �Desert Blue� alongside Christina Ricci, Kate Hudson and Casey Affleck. Gilbert, best known for her role as an angst-ridden adolescent on the ABC sitcom �Roseanne,� recently wrapped the CBS pilot �The Next Big Thing,� for creator Brad Hall in which the thesp starred and produced.
~LauraMM
Thu, Apr 22, 1999 (17:32)
#1031
Sara Gilbert of "Roseanne" fame??? She could NOT play Laura, she's too young! Maybe the singer??? Hmmmm.
~winter
Fri, Apr 23, 1999 (04:55)
#1032
She DOES have that Susan Dey look about her...;-)
~LauraMM
Fri, Apr 23, 1999 (13:57)
#1033
She DOES have that Susan Dey look about her...;-)
]
No, she doesn't;) I'm at a loss!
~winter
Fri, Apr 23, 1999 (16:52)
#1034
It's the eyes...they both have that 'half-asleep' or heavily drugged look in them.
~SBRobinson
Fri, Apr 23, 1999 (18:46)
#1035
(Evelyn) Janeites are a difficult bunch to please. I read somewhere that they didn't like the bathtub scene either.
What?!?! Obviously they have NO appreciation for the finer things in life. ;)
~MarciaH
Fri, Apr 23, 1999 (20:18)
#1036
SB, I am sure they *must* have had some other P&P production in mind. Surely No One in their right minds would object to that lovely bit of artilfice we enjoyed so much! It was essential to the story line to the effect that he admired her livliness (while we admired his ... !)
~LauraMM
Fri, Apr 23, 1999 (21:04)
#1037
I had a problem with the tub scene, the footman arrived too quickly with the bathrobe!
~Jana2
Sun, Apr 25, 1999 (06:43)
#1038
Sorry I'm a bit late, but SARA GILBERT?!?!? I cannot imagine what part she could possibly play in High Fidelity (not Laura, please not Laura). I adored this book and will be quite depressed if the Hollywood types ruin it. I will have to pin my hopes on John Cusack who rarely puts a foot wrong.
~KarenR
Sun, Apr 25, 1999 (12:45)
#1039
She could be Marie, the singer. There are all those "former" loves of his life, who might be shown in flashback when he was younger because she is definitely too young to play Laura.
~winter
Sun, Apr 25, 1999 (18:29)
#1040
(Jana)I will have to pin my hopes on John Cusack who rarely puts a foot wrong
Amen to that.
(Karen) There are all those "former" loves of his life, who might be shown in flashback
If this were true...How does one get audition for such a part?!?! ;-D
~winter
Sun, Apr 25, 1999 (18:30)
#1041
How does one get audition for such a part?!
Ooops! I meant, "How does one get to audition..."
~EileenG
Mon, May 3, 1999 (16:48)
#1042
Apropos to the above discussion, I read in the Sunday paper (May 2) that Catherine Zeta-Jones leaves for Chicago in about a month to star in 'High Fidelity' with John Cusack. The snippet did not specify which role she would play, but it seems reasonable to assume it's Laura.
Which begs the question: would any man *ever* leave her? For Sara Gilbert, no less?? Sara can't be playing the singer--must be one of the flashback girlfriends. Or the screenplay is very different from the book...
~EileenG
Mon, May 3, 1999 (16:52)
#1043
Amendment: I know he doesn't leave Laura, she leaves him...in his misery he finds himself attracted to Marie...in any event, I can't see Sara as Marie.
~Moon
Mon, May 3, 1999 (18:05)
#1044
John Cusack and Catherine Zeta-Jones seem oddly paired. She looks like she could eat him alive. He always seemed so short, small and boyish to me.
I'm sure NH would love a night out with CZ-J.
~KarenR
Mon, May 3, 1999 (22:07)
#1045
He's about 6'2" Just saw him on Letterman about a week ago, before Pushing Tin opened. He just doesn't stand straight!
Eileen, in what Sunday paper was this mentioned?
~Jana2
Tue, May 4, 1999 (02:05)
#1046
There was an interview with Catherine ZJ in the LA Times on Friday that said she was doing a cameo in High Fidelity as John Cusack's former girlfriend. The article specifically mentioned that now she can pick and choose her roles a bit more and can even do interesting cameos without losing momentum (or something like that), so I took that to mean she was his old college girlfriend, not Laura. You know the woman who dumped him in college and he pined for her ever after, and then when he finally met up wi
h her again she was kind of odd? I pictured that ex-girlfriend as kind of a nutty, barracuda type and I think CZJ will do a good job with that. But I still don't know who is going to be Laura (and am praying that Sara Gilbert gets no bigger part than Marie!)
~KarenR
Tue, May 4, 1999 (02:57)
#1047
Oh yes, she'll be Charlie--his great love from university. She lives a ritzy, arty life and has Rob over for the cocktail party. She's supposed to be gorgeous. Aside from the minor detail that she was supposed to be blonde, but what the hey, they've changed everything else.
I can see Sara Gilbert as Marie though.
~EileenG
Tue, May 4, 1999 (17:39)
#1048
Oh yes, she'll be Charlie Mystery solved.
I can see Sara Gilbert as Marie though I can't, unless she's gone through a metamorphosis since 'Roseanne' ended (which is possible).
~SBRobinson
Tue, May 4, 1999 (17:49)
#1049
Didnt Sara Gilbert go to Harvard or Yale (or something impressive) after Roseanne? I might be totally wrong- never been a Roseanne fan, and didnt keep up with any of the actors on the show.
~winter
Tue, May 4, 1999 (18:45)
#1050
Yes-- she went to Yale, though I'm not sure whether or not she graduated.
~KarenR
Tue, May 4, 1999 (20:36)
#1051
Question: Do these schools have lower admission standards for child actors? ;-)
~LauraMM
Tue, May 4, 1999 (20:54)
#1052
Shall we rename this the Nick Hornby page;)
Any news on the New BJD book? I have coworker going to London in June, already have her staked out on buying the book if it's been published.
~heide
Tue, May 4, 1999 (23:31)
#1053
Thanks, Jana. Your deduction makes sense. I can't get over how trampy CZJ looks these days. She was quite beautiful in Out of the Blue but I've yet to see a recent photo of her that makes her look anything but hard.
~EileenG
Wed, May 5, 1999 (14:25)
#1054
CZJ must be doing something right. 'Entrapment' was #1 in US box office last weekend and it has received some bad reviews (Newsweek trashed it). I think it has something to do with that butt shot when she slides under the lasers ;-P
(Karen) Question: Do these schools have lower admission standards for child actors? ;-)
Do they have any admission standards for child actors? Well, Jodie Foster went to Yale (that strikes me as appropriate), Brooke went to Princeton, etc. Anything for publicity.
(Laura) Shall we rename this the Nick Hornby page
We go where the action is.
Hey, maybe CZJ will be cast as BJ?! (Gag, sputter...)
~winter
Wed, May 5, 1999 (14:49)
#1055
CZJ must be doing something right. 'Entrapment' was #1 in US box office last weekend and it has received some bad reviews
It's not CZJ. Sadly, I think the bombardment of ads over the last few months did the trick. People will flock to see a root-canal, if it's advertised enough.
~LauraMM
Wed, May 5, 1999 (18:37)
#1056
(winter) It's not CZJ. Sadly, I think the bombardment of ads over the last few months did the trick. People will flock to see a root-canal, if it's advertised enough.
Oh too true!!! Personally, I thought CZJ was TERRIBLE in OOTB. I haven't seen Zorro, so I can't really say if she wasn't very good. But she is getting away from her Welsh roots!
Now, is Sean Connery -- Welsh or Scottish?
I saw About a Boy in paperback! $12.
Any news on the new BJD book? Anything???????
Evelyn, are you okay? Were you near the tornadoes?
~SBRobinson
Wed, May 5, 1999 (18:49)
#1057
Laura, Sean Connery is Scotish :)
(now there's a man i'd like to see in a kilt!)
~patas
Wed, May 5, 1999 (19:07)
#1058
CZJ was very beautiful and sweet in Mask of Zorro. I'd seen her before only in a terrible mini-series about Catherine the Great, and found her "trampy" too.
As for "Entrapment", most people will probably go see it for Sean Connery.
My, has *he* aged beautifully!
~EileenG
Wed, May 5, 1999 (19:22)
#1059
(Gi) As for "Entrapment", most people will probably go see it for Sean Connery
The women will, yes, but the men? My DH wants to see it...and he's not necessarily a SC fan.
(Winter) Sadly, I think the bombardment of ads over the last few months did the trick. People will flock to see a root-canal, if it's advertised enough.
You're right, Winter. As long as there are special effects. Witness 'The Matrix.'
Laura, there was discussion a while ago about the new BJD book. Check out 118 (I think that's where it was--anyone else remember?
~KarenR
Wed, May 5, 1999 (19:48)
#1060
(Laura) Personally, I thought CZJ was TERRIBLE in OOTB.
As I recall, you hardly watched any of OOTB...30 minutes??
I haven't seen Zorro, so I can't really say if she wasn't very good.
And you're not going to comment anyway? ;-)
But she is getting away from her Welsh roots!\
So?? That's her call. She decided she wanted to be a big movie star and now it's going that way. I just read the scripts are flying in. We really have to be less parochial about this. For all you know, she may speak Welsh at home all the time. To whom, who know? ;-)
~LauraMM
Wed, May 5, 1999 (20:26)
#1061
Why would the new BJD book be discussed on 118? Why did I set up this page?
~lafn
Wed, May 5, 1999 (21:03)
#1062
(Laura)Evelyn, are you okay? Were you near the tornadoes?
Tornado two miles away...I was in the basement. I am fine, thank you.
And thanks to all who sent me emails.
(Laura) Personally, I thought CZJ was TERRIBLE in OOTB.
I liked her in OOTB. Good chemistry between those two....and those tongues!!
~LauraMM
Thu, May 6, 1999 (00:43)
#1063
Evelyn, I am so happy that you are okay!!! YEAH.
Karen, I did watch OOTB with you. It was the one where the wife tried to off herself that I didn't finish.
~winter
Thu, May 6, 1999 (03:27)
#1064
Anyone know if CZJ is 100% Welsh? I suppose, nowadays, you can't say anyone is 100% anything. But I'm just wondering about the origins of "Zeta." Sounds Greek to me (and I don't mean that in the figurative sense).
~KarenR
Thu, May 6, 1999 (03:50)
#1065
Precisely, winter, Zeta is Greek. That is actually her middle name. She hyphenated it with her last name to make herself sound more exotic than Catherine Jones. I believe she said that was her Greek grandmother's name, Zeta.
I did watch OOTB with you. It was the one where the wife tried to off herself that I didn't finish.
OK, how did OOTB end? ;-) Didn't I make you a copy of DBS?
~LauraMM
Thu, May 6, 1999 (12:12)
#1066
It ended with CF getting a mouth infection;) From Cathy Tyson! hardy har har! CZJ leaves the CF I forget why.
~LauraMM
Thu, May 6, 1999 (12:13)
#1067
It ended with CF getting a mouth infection;) From Cathy Tyson! hardy har har! CZJ leaves the CF I forget why. Remember I got a case of the giggles when CZJ notices the white stuff on his tongue? hee hee
~KarenR
Thu, May 6, 1999 (12:29)
#1068
...and you singled CZJ out for being bad? You've already mentioned why CZJ leaves CF. ;-)
Oops, her name isn't hyphenated.
~Moon
Thu, May 6, 1999 (12:31)
#1069
CF and CZJ together??? How did I miss that movie?
Took my boys to see Zorro and they liked her.:-D
~EileenG
Fri, May 7, 1999 (14:34)
#1070
(Laura) Why would the new BJD book be discussed on 118? Why did I set up this page?
Why are we discussing 'High Fidelity' and 'OOTB' here? You just gotta go with the flow...
~LauraMM
Fri, May 7, 1999 (16:14)
#1071
You just gotta go with the flow...
There is no flow!
~EileenG
Fri, May 7, 1999 (22:33)
#1072
Sure there is. Great minds are entitled to digress, don't you think?
~LauraMM
Sat, May 8, 1999 (13:23)
#1073
Sure there is. Great minds are entitled to digress, don't you think?
um, no comment? ;p
~EileenG
Mon, May 10, 1999 (18:46)
#1074
Then as hostess of this topic, I have no doubt you'll set it right again.
Did you find the discussion you were looking for at 118?
BTW, did you enjoy your date, 'Dr. Laura?' ;-P
~LauraMM
Mon, May 10, 1999 (20:16)
#1075
BTW, did you enjoy your date, 'Dr. Laura?' ;-P
Oh yeah!! But let me tell you reading about oneself is odd. NO, I have heard nothing about BJD, I've checked Amazon.com/UK and it's listed with no name. Odd.
Then as hostess of this topic, I have no doubt you'll set it right again.
I've been trying, but everyone else wants to talk about Nick Hornby, which is cool with me, I adore him. but I just want some info on the new BJD book. Anyone, if you have any and all information, could you please pass it along. I'm getting to the point where I might call Picador and find out what's going on!!!
~KarenR
Thu, May 13, 1999 (14:13)
#1076
From the Independent (courtesy of AnneR):
MYRIAD ADMIRERS of Bridget Jones, the chronically single, self-improving, wine- drenched lovelorn icon of thirtyish urban femmes, will raise a collective glass of Jacob's Creek to the news that Working Title has just greenlighted the film of Helen Fielding's bestselling book. What cool fun to have the amorous japes of Bridget and her two girlfriends, Shazzer and Jude, finally captured on celluloid. But hold up, which thespians will portray Fielding's tangy troika? It's been a hot topic between la belle He
ene and her real-life models for
Shazzer and Jude, whom Pandora names as (respectively) Sharon Maguire (the
writer and documentary maker) and Tracy Macleod (the DJ and broadcaster). The
plot quickens when you learn that Working Title has just signed Sharon Maguire
to direct the movie. Will the real-life Sharon get some glossy talent to play
her fictive counterpart? Will the role of Shazza steadily eclipse that of
Bridget Jones as the script goes through its rewrites? Watch this space.
~LauraMM
Thu, May 13, 1999 (14:23)
#1077
Very interesting, Karen. I still think that this movie will be the sleeper hit. Regardless of who's in it. I'm just excited about it. Now if only we could get info on the new book;)
~lafn
Thu, May 13, 1999 (16:21)
#1078
Thank you Karen and Ann for that bit of news. Maybe Sharon Maguire will play the role of Shazzer in the movie. (Don't laugh...stanger things have happened)
The question is ...Who is the real Life Bridget?...or is she a composite of all of HF's dippy friends :-)
~KarenR
Fri, May 14, 1999 (12:57)
#1079
Another Variety tidbit:
U nails Plus pact Transatlantic team backs Working Title pix
By ADAM DAWTREY, 5/13/99
CANNES � Universal Pictures has finally closed a 50-50 joint venture with France�s Canal Plus to co-finance the production, development and operational costs of Working Title Films, U�s London-based production company.
For the first three years of the deal, Canal Plus will get continental European TV rights to all of Working Title�s movies. It will also receive theatrical and video rights in France to every second film produced by the company, with Universal Pictures Intl. retaining the other half of the slate.
Starting with the fourth year of the deal, that equal split of theatrical and video rights will be extended across the whole of the Continent.
UPI will continue to release all of WT�s films in English-speaking territories, and in any other non-European countries where it opens its own distribution operations in the future. UPI also plans to launch in Latin America next year.
Sales in other territories will be divided up between UPI and Canal Plus.
Radical deal
This radical co-financing deal was initiated by Working Title co-chairmen Tim Bevan and Eric Fellner, who recently signed a new five-year deal with U giving them wide-ranging powers to greenlight their own movies with budgets of up to $25 million.
The two were keen to cement their autonomy by bringing in another financier and to restore their European links after the sale of WT�s former Dutch parent Polygram to U.
For U, the deal offers a massive injection of cash � Canal Plus� contribution to WT�s annual production slate alone will be $50 million-$100 million � while taking films off its balance sheet.
The pact is being financed under a bank deal with Societe Generale.
Film flow follows
For Canal Plus, the agreement guarantees a flow of movies from Europe�s most successful film production company, initially for its Euro TV outlets and later to fuel its expanding theatrical ambitions.
WT looks set to shoot at least half a dozen films in the next year. The first film to fall under the deal is the Coen brothers� �O Brother, Where Art Thou?,� which just started shooting in Mississippi and will be released in France by UPI.
WT�s next project looks likely to be �Bridget Jones� Diary,� which will go to Canal Plus in France. Also upcoming is �Captain Corelli�s Mandolin.�
Everyone is happy
Ron Meyer, prexy and chief operating officer of Universal Studios, said, �This strategic partnership ... fulfills Universal Pictures� commitment to increasing its global production and distribution activity while continuing our strategy of bringing in key partners for strategic co-financing.�
Pierre Lescure, chairman and chief exec of Canal Plus, said the deal is �significant for the European film industry.�
Vincent Grimond, chief exec of Canal Plus Image, the distribution arm through which the deal is channeled, commented, �We have always considered Tim and Eric as great producers. We share the same vision and the same culture. Working Title has proven that European films can achieve global critical and commercial success.�
Bevan and Fellner said, �This partnership between the U.S. and Europe mirrors our continued strategy to produce European movies with truly international appeal.�
~EileenG
Fri, May 14, 1999 (15:48)
#1080
The fact that Sharon Maguire is the model for 'Shazzer' answers the question as to why she's directing this film despite a background in documentaries.
Laura, no doubt by now you've seen news about BJD-the sequel over at 118.
Hey Working Title! Announce the BJD cast, already!
~LauraMM
Fri, May 14, 1999 (17:48)
#1081
Uh, I haven't, but I'll repost it over here.
~LauraMM
Fri, May 14, 1999 (17:52)
#1082
Transfered from 188
Bethan: BJD: The Sequel (whatever the title is!) is going straight to paperback (no hardback) at �6.99. I was in our local Waterstones the other day and asked about it. They were expecting delivery in April, but the date has been put back. Perhaps to coincide with the beginning of the film shoot...good PR! Sorry, this should be at #80...am too lazy.
Uh, Yeah? Thank you for the information. I wonder if they are charging HF for any delays;)
~LauraMM
Fri, May 14, 1999 (17:52)
#1083
I meant 118, duh!
~heide
Sun, May 16, 1999 (12:54)
#1084
I'm sure you've all seen the news on BJD from 118. Thanks, Ann, for getting up so early on a Sunday morning. There was one paragraph in that article that must made me laugh:
Friends say Fielding once harboured hopes of marriage but Curtis fell instead for Emma Freud. Fielding, 40, remains unmarried and currently has no steady companion.
I don't know who else would write like that but a "smug married". ;-)
I think Cate would be a fine choice. We're used to seeing her in heavy, serious films. She's got to be ready for a comedy break-out. Sounds promising for Colin too. Oh, I hope this new writer doesn't leave out the P&P references. One of my favorites:
The testosterone-crazed fans do not wish themselves on the pitch, claims Hornby, instead seeing their team as their chosen representatives, rather like parliament. That is precisely my feeling about Darcy and Elizabeth. They are my chosen representatives in the field of shagging."
~KarenR
Sun, May 16, 1999 (13:24)
#1085
Thank you, Ann, for posting the good parts. I'll copy the entire article from the Sunday Times in the next message for all who want to read it.
In the Sunday Times today:-" Bridget Jones gets her man" (can't type it all but here are the interesting parts.
Oscar nominee Cate Blanchette has been tipped for the lead role, as has Helena Bonham Carter, though she has less in common with Jones than the 29 year old Australian star of Elizabeth.
Blanchette would be v. good. She's not beautiful like HBC and can be quite plain. I haven't seen Pushing Tin yet, but it is a broad, over-the-top comedy role for her as a Long Island housewife. I believe I read good things about her in it.
COLIN FIRTH who played Darcy in the BBC production of P&P is expected to play the LOVE interest, Mark Darcy."
Expected!! He'd be a fool to turn down the opportunity to play opposite one of the hottest actresses going. Just think of the publicity machine surrounding this film a la Notting Hill. Wow!!
"Insiders at Cannes said that a film of BJD wold succeed only if there were significant changes to the character...insiders say that Curtis (4 weddings and a Funeral, Notting Hill) is likely to insist that Bridget gets her man"
Huh?? In the book I read, Bridget wound up with Mark in the end. Has the script changed that much?
~KarenR
Sun, May 16, 1999 (13:35)
#1086
Bridget Jones gets her man
by Richard Brooks
Arts Editor
BRIDGET JONES has found her Mr Right. The creator of the neurotic "singleton" has turned to the man who once thwarted her hopes of marriage to salvage a movie version of her book.
Helen Fielding, who created a bestseller by portraying modern urban women as shallow, vulnerable and desperate for marriage, has turned to one of the most successful men in the British film industry for help with her screenplay.
The involvement of Richard Curtis would have mortified the fictional Jones, who goes to desperate lengths to conceal her dependence on men. But senior sources at Universal, the Hollywood studio, said Curtis would play a vital role in
improving Fielding's draft screenplay, which she began more than a year ago.
This weekend one industry insider at the Cannes film festival said a film of Bridget Jones's Diary would succeed only if there were significant changes to her character. "Bridget needed help. Helen was good at scripting characters on the page but not able to transfer them to the screen," said the source.
Jones is defined largely by her hang-ups. She hates married couples, who ask her about her barren love life and imitate the ticking of her body clock. Insiders say that Curtis, a master of romantic comedy, is likely to insist Jones gets her
man. He wrote the screenplay for the movie Notting Hill, in which Julia Roberts's film star falls for Hugh Grant's struggling bookseller. His past box office hits include Four Weddings and a Funeral.
Curtis's romantic entanglement with Fielding proved less successful than his films. The couple met each other at Oxford University and embarked on a relationship after he saw her performing in a play.
Friends say Fielding once harboured hopes of marriage but Curtis fell instead for Emma Freud. Fielding, 40, remains unmarried and currently has no steady companion.
Oscar nominee Cate Blanchette, has been tipped for the lead role, as has Helena Bonham Carter, though she has less in common with Jones than the 29-year-old Australian star of Elizabeth. Colin Firth, who played Darcy in the BBC
production of Pride and Prejudice, is expected to play the love interest, Mark Darcy.
This weekend there were signs that female solidarity is not entirely dead. The film is to be directed by Sharon McGuire, a close friend of Fielding and the model for Jones's best friend, Shazza.
**************
(Heide) I don't know who else would write like that but a "smug married". ;-)
It does, doesn't it? However, shocked to see the article was written by a man!!
Article has pictures of HBC and Helen Fielding at top. Helen has changed her do. :)
~Lizza
Sun, May 16, 1999 (15:42)
#1087
Thanks Karen for posting all of that for us to see.
I agree that he wouldbe a fool to turn it down.
C.B, I still have my reservations and this has been increased by what I
have read about her recently on stage.
Still as we know, ODB can bring the best out in most (sorry E.MC!!)
actresses.
~heide
Sun, May 16, 1999 (18:02)
#1088
(Lizza) Still as we know, ODB can bring the best out in most (sorry E.MC!!)
actresses.
LOL, Lizza. Be grateful E McG won't be Bridget. ;-) And I'm happy to report since I'm one of the ones who have insisted the actress be at least 30, that Cate is actually 30, not 29 as the article says.
Pushing Tin...I had forgotten that one, Karen. I have heard good reviews for her as well though not for much else in that film.
~Moon
Sun, May 16, 1999 (22:16)
#1089
She turned 30 this week, I think.
At least this confirms that they are trying to get well known actors, so there is backing which can only fare well for Colin. But I still need a confirmation.
Heide, we must work on this.
I wonder if Curtis has Hugh Grant in mind for any of the male roles? Perhaps, he would only consider the lead role. I've had it with his overacting!
Poor Helen, she couldn't cut the sceenplay. But why would Curtis need to touch up Davies's script?
~lafn
Mon, May 17, 1999 (00:44)
#1090
(Moon)But why would Curtis need to touch up Davies's script?
Probably for the same reason that they hired Tom Stoppard to "touch up"
SIL.....IMO , it wasn't v. good.....Why else bring on another screen writer. Davies did CoF and P&P...but I didn't like his TV EMMA.
~Allison2
Mon, May 17, 1999 (07:47)
#1091
I wonder if Curtis has Hugh Grant in mind for any of the male roles?
I think he would make a good Daniel Cleaver! BTW HG is just one day older than Colin.
~LauraMM
Mon, May 17, 1999 (14:49)
#1092
WOW, I go away for a weekend and return to oodles of information. Double WOW!! Cate Blanchett would be a good BJ and of course, CF will DEFINITELY do MD. (being very optimistic!)
Thank you to all for the information. Now, any news on the new book?
~KarenR
Mon, May 17, 1999 (20:35)
#1093
Argh!! Just drove past a movie set a few blocks away. They were just setting up. Went around the block a couple of times and then asked the police what movie it was. Shoot!! It wasn't High Fidelity, but the Bonnie Hunt movie with David Duchovney and Minnie Driver.
Hey Laura, they shot at the Northside Cafe for High Fidelity and no one told me!! Also at one of the harbors. Don't remember Rob being much of an outdoors person. ;-)
~KarenR
Mon, May 17, 1999 (20:43)
#1094
From Empire:
Bridget Jones is V. Competitive
Bafta award-winning actress Cate Blanchett (Elizabeth, Oscar and Lucinda) is among the top three choices mooted to play the neurotic thirty-something heroine Bridget Jones. Helena Bonham Carter and Geri Halliwell are also in the running, but Blancett is thought be have the edge at present.
Meanwhile Notting Hill�s Richard Curtis is giving Bridget creator Helen Fielding a hand with the script for Bridget Jones, which she is adapting from her hugely
successful novel, Bridget Jones� Diary. Production on the film is due to start a the end of the summer.
**********
Geri Halliwell?? That's one of those Spice Things, right? Or ex-Spicers? Yuck! Or does that appeal to you, Laura. I seem to recall you liked someone in Spiceworld. ;-)
~patas
Mon, May 17, 1999 (20:46)
#1095
At least (at last) it starts to roll!
(Laura McCarthy)of course, CF will DEFINITELY do MD.
I so want him to do it too!
(Karen)Blanchette would be v. good. She's not beautiful like HBC and can be quite plain.
HBC beautiful? How tastes differ... I wouldn't mind CB as Bridget, but isn't she perhaps too thin?
I hated the article, BTW. Good news should come in better packaging :-)
~patas
Mon, May 17, 1999 (20:49)
#1096
Geri Halliwell? Goodness, has everybody gone mad?
~Allison2
Mon, May 17, 1999 (20:58)
#1097
Geri Halliwell?
AAAArrrrgggg! I cannot believe it. For heaven sake how can they mention her in the same breath as Cate Blanchett (or CF)?
~EileenG
Mon, May 17, 1999 (21:05)
#1098
Geri Halliwell???
Gasp!
I think I need CPR.
~KarenR
Mon, May 17, 1999 (21:26)
#1099
Among those short-listed for the role of Bridget Jones are two Academy Award nominees and one ex-Spice Girl. These people are into serious drugs...
~lafn
Mon, May 17, 1999 (22:24)
#1100
Can you imagine if Geri Halliwell actually gets the role?...selected over the other two? Good reason for CF to say: "No thanks".
~KarenR
Mon, May 17, 1999 (22:46)
#1101
I think then they could pair up Keanu Reeves with Geri...
~MarciaH
Mon, May 17, 1999 (23:17)
#1102
I think I could stand to miss that version :U
~lizbeth54
Mon, May 17, 1999 (23:20)
#1103
Aaaargh!!! GERI HALLIWELL! If an ex-Spice Girl gets the role I shall burn my copy of BJD. And pray that Colin says NO!
Actually, I can't believe this...Cate Blanchett and Helena BC are highly experienced and gifted actresses. Geri Halliwell, well, I'd better not say, as I wouldn't be kind. This would be dumbing down on a colossal scale.....no, I can't believe this!
Returning to reality, end of summer sounds okay for both Cate and Colin though.
~Moon
Tue, May 18, 1999 (00:14)
#1104
Thanks ladies, I needed a good laugh!
~KJArt
Tue, May 18, 1999 (01:39)
#1105
Sorry, Evelyn, but I really LIKED the A&E version of "Emma"...found little to distinguish it from the movie version, except shorter (who knows...maybe I'm a closet Mark Strong fan!! ;-))
~KarenR
Tue, May 18, 1999 (05:06)
#1106
From the 5/18 Independent:
Sunday Times, which has managed to lift one of Pandora's scoops-du-jour just nine days after you first read it here. But commiserations too, because the Murdoch rag, in following up the Bridget Jones movie story, omitted to mention that the current front runner for the film's lead is Emily Watson.
************
Now that's better...Emily Watson. Excellent actress. Loved her in Breaking the Waves.
~LauraMM
Tue, May 18, 1999 (12:26)
#1107
Geri Halliwell I think is more of a joke; sort of like a write-in campaign. Cate Blanchett would be brilliant as would Emily Watson. I tend to lean more towards Cate Blanchett. I find that she can really become the role; and I've seen more of her movies. I've only seen two Emily Watson movies so I can't really say.
You know, now that I think of it. Geri is probably built more like BJ. She is spunky. But not quite old enough to do the role.
~Moon
Tue, May 18, 1999 (12:52)
#1108
(Karen), Emily Watson. Excellent actress. Loved her in Breaking the Waves.
I agree! She really becomes the role and her face can be comical, she would be a great Bridget. CB is too skinny for the role.
Now with Helena B.C. as one of her friends. Hugh Grant as Daniel C., CF as MD and Ewan as the plumber and C. Zeta-Jones as Rebecca, it would bring in a big audience.
~LauraMM
Tue, May 18, 1999 (14:36)
#1109
CZJ as Rebecca is brilliant! She's gorgeous, can probably play catty. HBC would have to be Shazzer. I don't think she could do Jude. Jude is a bit wimpy.
~EileenG
Tue, May 18, 1999 (16:56)
#1110
I think the press has caught up with our posts. Excepting that Geri H. trash, of course! She's too busy being a UN ambassador to star in a movie (read that with all the sarcasm you can muster). Didn't we go through HBC (much too thin--move over Calista) and EW? Next the press will add Kate Winslet (too young) as a front-runner and viola! Was there any discussion about CB? IMO she'd be the best.
If ODB *ever* costarred with GH, I'd be wondering who put the gun to his head.
(Moon) Ewan as the plumber
LOL!
~KarenR
Tue, May 18, 1999 (17:11)
#1111
(Eileen) Didn't we go through HBC (much too thin--move over Calista) and EW?
Probably, sometime after Minnie Driver, Toni Collette, Jane Leeves, et al. Although, I'd put HBC in the too beautiful as opposed to too thin. She is an OK age and can be made to look plain (as in Margaret's Museum). Wasn't that "Theory of Flight" movie, with HBC as a woman with ALS, a comedy? (BTW, I'm not trying to be funny or cruel or anything)
~lafn
Tue, May 18, 1999 (17:48)
#1112
Emily Watson
Now, you're talking.... Her performance in Hilary and Jackie was as good as CB in Elizabeth.
~Moon
Tue, May 18, 1999 (18:50)
#1113
If you think she was good in H & J rent Breaking the Waves, she was fantastic!
I don't consider HBC a beauty or too skinny. She would be a good Shazzer. Let's give CB Jude. (So she won't be out of work);-)
Someone, quick, fax our casting ideas to Universal!
~lizbeth54
Tue, May 18, 1999 (19:13)
#1114
CB finishes in "Plenty" on July 10, so could certainly be available for filming mid-August (I'm allowing her a short break!). I'd make her first choice, with Emily Watson a close second. What's pleasing, I think, is that all three actresses mentioned (note that I am excluding our non-roving UN ambassador! ) are high calibre Academy Award nominees, which means that BJD must be rated as a high profile project.
BTW I'd like to see Alison Steadman as Bridget's mum!
~Moon
Tue, May 18, 1999 (20:33)
#1115
I second Alison S. for her mum!
~patas
Wed, May 19, 1999 (20:16)
#1116
Hear hear! But I'd like the insufferable Don Johnson as Julio ;-)
~KarenR
Wed, May 19, 1999 (21:07)
#1117
But I'd like the insufferable Don Johnson as Julio ;-)
hee hee
~MarciaH
Wed, May 26, 1999 (02:27)
#1118
Moon, you arwe getting so good at flowers...perhaps I should find the transportation - planes, limos, bicycles, sledges...? and tables and dining rooms...so much to do - but that is your thing. I am amidst the green and growing. Off you go - expect to see wheels tomorrow!!!
~MarciaH
Wed, May 26, 1999 (02:38)
#1119
Ooops - this is where my posting went. I could not find it on 72. Sorry for the intrusion, Laura Dear!
~LauraMM
Wed, May 26, 1999 (12:24)
#1120
I was wondering if we were going to be overtaken by leis and flower arrangements on everyboard! LOL!!! Don't worry, Marcia, you're allowed one faux pas per board;p
~MarciaH
Fri, May 28, 1999 (05:16)
#1121
How frightning - it could have been that string of Yaks on that rope bridge...=P
~vlyne
Tue, Jun 1, 1999 (20:01)
#1122
Hi. I hope you remember me. It's probably been a year since I've posted to this board. I really miss reading the weekly BJD & hope she comes back some day. Anyway the reason I have resurfaced is to pass the news that HF is touring again. Her schedule is listed here: http://www.penguinputnam.com/bridgetjones/tour.htm
Valerie
~lafn
Tue, Jun 1, 1999 (20:16)
#1123
Thanks Valerie....we've missed you...
Oh Karen....HF will be at your Borders on the 9th....We will await your report anxiously....you know what questions to ask....like when is
Bridget II gonna be released!!To say nothing of the BJD film....
Anybody else near the other cities?
~LauraMM
Tue, Jun 1, 1999 (20:17)
#1124
Valerie, it has been awhile! Good to see you back here and with great info!
Just an aside, I saw the paperback of BJD and it cracked me up. It says on the top of the book
National Bestseller!
(v.g.)
LOL!
~Moon
Tue, Jun 1, 1999 (21:10)
#1125
It seems odd that she would do another tour just before the new book comes out.
That should be one of the questions. She does plan to tour once the new book is released I would imagine.
And, don't forget the obvious questions like who has been cast for the film and exactly when will the shoot begin. Go to it!
Karen, you also get her in Chicago.
~KarenR
Wed, Jun 2, 1999 (00:32)
#1126
Great!! Better choice of bookstores this time. I'll be there and I'll ask the question again... maybe this time she'll have a different answer. Hmmm, have nothing left for her to sign. Thanks Valerie for posting the info. I miss her silly column too. :(
~MarciaH
Wed, Jun 2, 1999 (02:26)
#1127
Karen, just a thought, but a spare program from 3DoR for her to sign, and when she asks what it is, tell her a play with CF - which will be your opening to Mark Darcy et al.
~KarenR
Wed, Jun 2, 1999 (03:55)
#1128
A spare program?? What's that? ;-) Maybe I'll print off her Bridget interviews Colin column from the Independent. At least this time she won't have to compete with Bulls Championship games.
Anyone want a paperback BJD? I could get it and have it signed for you. Just another thought.
~Moon
Wed, Jun 2, 1999 (12:57)
#1129
I could send you may UK paperback for her to sign...but do I want it signed?
I just want to know what the h... is going on with the next book, the movie, the cast, etc. Is it Davies or Curtis, etc.
~lafn
Wed, Jun 2, 1999 (19:20)
#1130
My guess is that she's bringing her new book along....why would she be on a press junket for an old book that is now in paperback already.
Doesn't make sense.
~KarenR
Wed, Jun 2, 1999 (19:58)
#1131
No, it's for the paperback. Nick Hornby did a similar mini-tour for About A Boy coming out in PB. Do we really think she's made any progress on the sequel? Looking at the odds in Vegas, I don't think so. ;-)
~patas
Thu, Jun 3, 1999 (10:50)
#1132
(Karen)Maybe I'll print off her Bridget interviews Colin column from the
Independent.
I think that's very clever. Go for it!
~SBRobinson
Thu, Jun 3, 1999 (18:36)
#1133
I just read BJD night before last (finally!)
I laughed SO hard :)
I'm now Dying -along with the rest of you- for info on the movie! Karen, I also think that printing out the BJ interview is an excellent idea :)
Cant wait to read your report from meeting her-
~KarenR
Fri, Jun 4, 1999 (12:37)
#1134
This was in Liz Smith's column today about Cate Blanchett. I also read that "Plenty" has been extended for a few weeks. She still could be doing BJD, as CG is still a ways off. Anything for Colin in CG, anyone?
"Blanchett has scooped the title role in 'Charlotte Gray,' based on Sebastian Faulks' best-seller about love and betrayal in wartime. John Madden, who put 'Shakespeare in Love' on the map, may direct. And Cate is also on the verge of signing for 'The Man Who Cried,' about the loves of Russian dancers. Her costar would be Robert De Niro. Hmmmm, De Niro in tights, executing a fabulous jete ?!
~KarenR
Fri, Jun 4, 1999 (14:37)
#1135
More FYI About High Fidelity
Release Date: Spring 2000
Stephen Frears directs this romantic comedy about a slacker (John Cusack) who
owns a record store who sets his sights on winning back his ex-girlfriend (Iben Hjejle). Joan Cusack, Beverly D'Angelo, Sara Gilbert, Lili Taylor, Harold Ramis, Jack Black and Todd Louiso star. Catherine Zeta-Jones has a cameo. Based on Nick Hornby's novel. (Touchstone)
So Iben Hjejle plays Laura, per the IMDb. She's a Danish actress. Anyone know her? And Sara Gilbert does play Marie.
~lizbeth54
Sat, Jun 5, 1999 (21:21)
#1136
Charlotte Grey will be a very good serious role.....I wonder if this mean that CB isn't going to do BJD. If she's busy signing up for other roles, she would have signed for BJD as well. Perhaps we'll get an announcement of the casting now! Karen, if you do meet Helen, please ask her when the sequel is due out, and whether P&P's Andrew Davies and/or Richard Curtis have been involved in the screenplay. And, of course, when will we hear about the casting! Perhaps she'll give us a clue (Will Mark Darcy have a
bald spot?) :-)
~KarenR
Sat, Jun 5, 1999 (21:59)
#1137
I will definitely be going to the booksigning. So I will attempt to get those questions asked, Bethan. The info on Charlotte Grey didn't indicate when they would be getting started on it though.
~Jana2
Sun, Jun 6, 1999 (07:59)
#1138
That's the first I've heard about Lili Taylor being in High Fidelity. She usually seems to take quirky parts in less mainstream fare. If she's not playing Laura, Marie or Charlie though, which part do you think she plays? I can't think of any other big female roles.
~KarenR
Sun, Jun 6, 1999 (13:11)
#1139
From the list of his "desert-island, all-time, top five most memorable split-ups in chronological order:"
1. Alison Ashworth
2. Penny Hardwick
3. Jackie Allen
4. Charlie Nicholson
5. Sarah Kendrew
Lili Taylor could play any of those. If CZJ plays Charlie, which I'm beginning to wonder about, because her part is being called a "cameo" and there's that whole cocktail party thing, I'd guess Lili Taylor might be Sarah.
~KarenR
Sun, Jun 6, 1999 (13:37)
#1140
From today's Sunday Times:
Hornby kicks football habit
by Jon Ungoed-Thomas
HE FOUND fame and fortune writing about Arsenal, but now Nick Hornby has grown weary of the subject of football.
Hornby's memoir, Fever Pitch, which charted his club's fortunes and his own emotional vicissitudes, established football writing as a lucrative literary genre. While other writers, such as Martin Amis and Salman Rushdie, are now eager to pen their own football tomes, Hornby has let it be known that he considers it all slightly pass�.
After the phenomenal success of Fever Pitch in 1992, Hornby went on to write two bestselling novels, High Fidelity and About a Boy. While Hornby's imitators have rushed to publish their own confessional football books, Hornby has decided to leave the sport on the sidelines.
"He is weary of it," said Caroline Dawnay, Hornby's agent, last week. "I don't think he is bored by football, but he would prefer to be thought of as a serious novelist."
Hornby's decision to steer clear of the subject has been welcomed by both football fans and other writers.
Greg Williams, whose novel Football Crazy is due to be published this year, said: "After Fever Pitch, I would hear fans going to Arsenal matches actually talking about the book, which was a great achievement. The problem was everyone wanted to write a similar book and people have got fed up with the sheer amount of repetition. My own book is not about football, but celebrity."
Fever Pitch has sold more than 700,000 copies and has been made into a film starring Colin Firth. Its vivid depiction of Hornby's endearing but obsessive fixation on Arsenal helped give the sport a new cultural cachet and also highlighted its importance in Britain.
"Fever Pitch hallowed and directed everybody's sense of football as a religion," said Dawnay. "It also legitimised women's response to football and as a result of that there are many more women watching the sport."
The success of the book also meant more literary figures were eager to write about football.
Despite Hornby's weariness, the trend has not waned and within the last week Rushdie has written about his love of football in The New Yorker while Amis has described a trip to see the match between Manchester United and Bayern Munich.
"I once took the Peruvian novelist Mario Vargas Llosa to White Hart Lane," writes Rushdie. "As I left the ground, beaming foolishly, a fellow Spurs fan recognised me and waved cheerily in my direction. 'Gawd bless you, Salman,'
he yelled."
Such outpourings in praise of football have prompted many fans to argue that the world literary figures should perhaps leave the sport alone. "There's no objection to them writing about the sport, but they are not saying anything that is remotely new," said William Ainslie, 30, an Arsenal fan.
For Hornby, the decision to stay away from football writing is unlikely to affect his career or his bank balance. The film rights to About a Boy have been sold for �1.8m.
~lafn
Sun, Jun 6, 1999 (18:13)
#1141
"Fever Pitch hallowed and directed everybody's sense of football as a religion," said Dawnay. "It also legitimised women's response to football and as a result of that there are many more women watching the sport."
And you kids say FP is not a film about football....??
You're kidding....!!
~KarenR
Mon, Jun 7, 1999 (13:43)
#1142
Uh oh!!
**************
Nicolas Cage May Strum On 'Mandolin'
By Chris Petrikin
HOLLYWOOD (Variety) - Actor Nicolas Cage is in negotiations with Working Title Films and Universal Pictures to star in "Captain Corelli's Mandolin," to be directed by "Notting Hill" helmer Roger Michell.
While a deal has not been finalized, sources said that Cage wants to do the World War II-era love story, which will likely go before the cameras next March in Italy.
The film, based on Louis De Bernieres' British novel, is a "Doctor Zhivago" Di-like love story/drama set on the idyllic Greek island of Cephalonia during World War II.
Cage would play Captain Antonio Corelli, a sophisticated Italian officer (and musician) who commands the isle's garrison after the Italians invaded Greece. He soon begins a heated affair with the daughter of the local doctor; and despite their feelings for one another, they are forced to navigate their political and personal allegiances against the backdrop of war.
Cage recently began production on the thriller "Gone In 60 Seconds," for which he reportedly received his first $20 million payday. "Gone" is expected to wrap in late summer, giving the Oscar-winning actor a window to shoot another film before "Captain Corelli."
"Corelli" will mark the followup for Michell to his current hit, "Notting Hill," the romantic comedy starring Julia Roberts and Hugh Grant that also was produced by Working Title.
Michell, an acclaimed stage director who seems to have come into his own with "Notting," has been developing "Corelli" for several years.
The film is likely to be the first project greenlit under the newly hatched production pact that Working Title struck with Universal earlier this year. That unique deal allows the British-based banner to greenlight its own films with budgets up to $25 million.
While the original "Corelli" budget was tagged at that level, it's unclear whether that budget will be significantly increased with the addition of Cage's high eight-figure fee, or whether the actor's deal will go light on the upfront fee but heavy on contingent compensation.
*******
Better Nic plays Corelli than Mark Darcy, huh? ;-)
~EileenG
Mon, Jun 7, 1999 (14:46)
#1143
(Evelyn) And you kids say FP is not a film about football
I gather you're being facetious, Evelyn. I related more strongly to the football fan aspect of the film than to the love story (I'm an avid US football fan). But without the love story, the film would have been a documentary. It will be interesting to see how it's promoted in the US.
'Gawd bless you, Salman,' After all the hoo-ha concerning Salman a few years ago, I'm glad to see he's progressed to writing about football :-P
Nicolas Cage May Strum On 'Mandolin'
"Uh oh" is an understatement! "Oh no" is my statement! I'm 3/4 of the way through this book now (BTW, if anyone is looking for it, the title is 'Corelli's Mandolin'; no 'Captain'). Corelli is not described physically so H'wood can have their way. Heck, at least it's not Roberto Begnini! I generally like Nic Cage but his work has been so...dark.
Better Nic plays Corelli than Mark Darcy, huh? ;-) Your point is taken!
~KarenR
Mon, Jun 7, 1999 (15:10)
#1144
(Evelyn) And you kids say FP is not a film about football
(Eileen) I gather you're being facetious, Evelyn. I related more strongly to the football fan aspect of the film than to the love story
This has been an ongoing argument. I've always maintained it is not a *sports* film, but about a character who is sports obsessed and his relationship with a woman. Unfortunately, the love story was not all that well-developed. Lots of good arguments about why someone like Sarah would love a Paul Ashworth and go back to him.
~LauraMM
Mon, Jun 7, 1999 (15:25)
#1145
Eileen, it's called Captain Corelli's Mandolin in the UK, Canada, and most of Europe, they shortened it here in the States.
Actually, I think Nic Cage will be good in this role. He doesn't come in until halfway through the book. I'd be curious who'd play Mandras and Pelagia. Nic can smolder with those intense eyes of his. I think the casting might be good, and Nicolas Cage is technically a Coppola, so his nationality is right!
~lizbeth54
Mon, Jun 7, 1999 (23:32)
#1146
Helen Fielding will be on CNN (Riz Khan's Q&A)on Tuesday (tomorrow), answering questions which can be emailed or phoned. Riz mentioned that BJD is about to be turned into a movie.
Nic Cage...marginally better than Ewan McGregor, but still IMO completely wrong. I actually think this is one character I prefer to just "see" in my imagination. Nic Cage is too old for a start...I think of Corelli as late twenties.
I thought BJD was the first project to be "greenlit" for Working Title, if they're shooting in September (I hope) But again this begs the question, if the main casting for Corelli can be announced now, why not BJD. Why is it taking so long?
~LauraMM
Tue, Jun 8, 1999 (12:05)
#1147
Perhaps, and this is a big perhaps, Colin Firth is doing Mark Darcy, but will get no credit for it. Especially, where it could technically be a cameo role. Similar to Mel Gibson in Fairytale: A True Story. Who knew MG was in that movie until the end????? Oh well, anything to say as to why they haven't announced casting;)
I thought it good reasoning;-p
~KarenR
Tue, Jun 8, 1999 (12:49)
#1148
Especially, where it could technically be a cameo role.
Technically, it would never been considered a cameo role. A cameo is where an actor makes an appearance in one scene. There is a surprise cameo in Notting Hill and as you said Mel's in Fairytale and there are lots of others. However, Mark Darcy (in the book) appears numerous times.
The issue of credited v. uncredited is unrelated to being a cameo and done for different reasons.
~Moon
Tue, Jun 8, 1999 (13:07)
#1149
Laura, you don't really believe Mark Darcy is a cameo role, do you?
~LauraMM
Tue, Jun 8, 1999 (14:16)
#1150
Well, I'm not a big Mark Darcy fan, now am I????? Yes, I think it is a cameo role. A few shots here and there. He'll probably only do a couple of days shoot. (because the role is so minimal)
~Moon
Tue, Jun 8, 1999 (14:28)
#1151
So basically it is an all girl film with guys in cameo roles?
(That will cause Bridget to put on a few stones!) ;-)
~LauraMM
Tue, Jun 8, 1999 (14:33)
#1152
Oh, come on, this is definitely going to be a chick flick! Men take backdoor to this story. I think I'd like Stephen Fry as Tom;)
~LauraMM
Tue, Jun 8, 1999 (14:35)
#1153
Um, I meant, in this story;)
~KarenR
Tue, Jun 8, 1999 (14:45)
#1154
If it is be a "chick flick" to use your term, then you've disproved your own comments. A chick flick (i.e., sappy romance and/or tearjerker) MUST have a hunky guy role for chicks to drool over.
If you think Mark Darcy is a cameo, then you must think the same of Mr. Darcy. Wrong!
~LauraMM
Tue, Jun 8, 1999 (15:14)
#1155
(Karen)If you think Mark Darcy is a cameo, then you must think the same of Mr. Darcy. Wrong!
I see confusion here. First of all, Mark Darcy is NOT 1813 Mr. Darcy. Mark Darcy is 1995-98 Mark Darcy. Mr. Darcy doesn't cheat on Elizabeth. Mark Darcy cheats on Bridget. Mr. Darcy is more prominent in P&P. Mark Darcy is touched upon in the book. I don't see MD as a direct takeoff of Mr. Darcy, she alludes to certain qualities, but MD is definitely his own person. We definitely saw more of MD in the weekly columns (where there was no similarity to Mr. Darcy).
~Moon
Tue, Jun 8, 1999 (17:57)
#1156
You have built up MD's character nicely Laura, it looks like a lead role to me. :-)
~EileenG
Tue, Jun 8, 1999 (18:07)
#1157
Re: Mark Darcy: The character is more than 'touched upon' in the book. It's central to HF's updated P&P theme.
Since *none* of us has seen the screenplay (correct me if I'm wrong), who knows?Will the screenplay be based on the book alone, or the book plus the weekly columns?
Cameos? John Travolta and George Clooney in 'Thin Red Line' (or I should say George Clooney playing Doug Ross playing an officer in 'TRL', since all his roles are Doug Ross. You know, Doug Ross as Batman, Doug Ross as the army officer with Nicole Kidman, Doug Ross running around with Jennifer Lopez, etc.).
(Bethan) I think of Corelli as late twenties
Don't forget he ages at the end of the story, but yes, most of the action takes place while he's in his 20's. The central character in the book is Pelagia so that should be the key part (but we haven't seen this screenplay either). I just finished the book yesterday; if the screenplay follows the story the movie should be a good one.
~KarenR
Tue, Jun 8, 1999 (19:17)
#1158
(Eileen)Since *none* of us has seen the screenplay (correct me if I'm wrong)
Let's see, if Richard Curtis is now involved with the Andrew Davies-amended script, do we really *need* to see the screenplay? I suppose it will go like this:
Boy, with floppy hair, meets...oops, sorry... start again
Girl (model-like in appearance) meets guy with floppy hair at wedding, funeral, bookstore, parents' friends' New Years Day buffet, etc., or some such trendy locale. Boy makes lasting impression on girl due to ugly sweater and they fall in deep like although neither knows what to make of it.
We will because of a camera shot of boy giving girl a LOOK!
Each goes own way, but meets up with other at other trendy spots. We will see boy taking a leisurely bath and going for a dip in a pond. Boy will stammer a lot and flutter eyelids, and be endearingly self-deprecating. Years will pass and they keep meeting and we will be suitably aggravated.
BTW, there will be loads of colorful characters for the supporting cast. Tom will be played by Simon Callow. Mark will have a colorfully vulgar Welsh co-worker named Spike.
Boy and girl will finally get together at end and while credits roll we will see pictures and/or snippets of their life together.
The End
~LauraMM
Tue, Jun 8, 1999 (19:20)
#1159
Wrong, Moon, I haven't built up his character, I just mentioned one glaring aspect of it in the weekly series. His character most likely in the screenplay will be small. He's not quite the love interest until much later.
Pelagia and her father are the main characters. And I liked Mandras before he went off to war. The book had a very weak ending. I do HOPE they change that.
~LauraMM
Tue, Jun 8, 1999 (19:22)
#1160
Karen, I think YOU should write the screenplay, cast the movie, direct, produce and edit it. That was hysterical;) Much better than what HF could ever do.
~EileenG
Tue, Jun 8, 1999 (19:31)
#1161
LOL, Karen. No doubt boy will also have a tendency to oversleep and a propensity for statements such as 'f**kety-f**k'. Boy will have chance encounter with girl, who has just finished excercising and is quite sweaty. Boy will have peculiar look on face, as if he's...ummm...
~KarenR
Tue, Jun 8, 1999 (20:07)
#1162
Forgot to describe boy's first encounter with girl at Una's Turkey Curry Buffet. Boy will spill curried turkey all over girl, whilst muttering "bollocks." Boy will then show everyone his manliness by snuffing out lit candle with fingers.
~lizbeth54
Tue, Jun 8, 1999 (20:21)
#1163
LOL, Karen, you're really on a roll here. Laugh aloud funny, as they say!!
And Eileen, your Doug Ross comments, ditto!
My take on MD is that in the screenplay of BJD it will be a central role.
~Moon
Tue, Jun 8, 1999 (20:42)
#1164
Bethan, I agree completely. Sorry Laura.
LOL, Karen!
~KarenR
Tue, Jun 8, 1999 (21:07)
#1165
Have heard that Curtis has changed Mark's girlfriend's name from Natasha to Duckface and will be reprised by KST.
Oh, definitely, agree with you Bethan. Mark must be featured in the movie as that allusive guy, seemingly looking down on Bridget, fighting his attraction for her.
~KarenR
Wed, Jun 9, 1999 (11:49)
#1166
From Empire:
Cage Sharpens his Bow
08/06/1999
He may have started his career in teen angst flicks like Rumblefish and Fast Times at Ridgemont High, but it didn�t take long for the hell-raising Nicolas Cage to don the action hero cloak and keep it securely fastened while he racked up a repertoire including The Rock, Con Air and Face/Off.
All the more strange that he�s reportedly considering the title role in an adaptation of Captain Corelli�s Mandolin, from the best-selling novel by Brit author Louis de Bernieres.
Set on the Greek island of Cephallonia during the Second World War, the book follows the story of a sensitive Italian officer who falls in love with the local doctor�s daughter. Despite Cage�s dalliances with matinee idol status in Moonstruck or Leaving Las Vegas (the twisted matinee idol) it�s pretty hard to imagine him speaking soft word of love under the olive trees.
Still, with Notting Hill�s Roger Michell slated to directed � a man who made Hugh Grant appear attractive (apparently) � Cage might just be the new thinking woman�s heartthrob.
~KarenR
Wed, Jun 9, 1999 (12:04)
#1167
Cage to play Captain Corelli?
Having established his action man credentials in films like Snake Eyes, Con Air and Face/Off, Nicholas Cage is said to be considering a romantic leading role. One of Cage's most memorable performances was as Cher's volatile Italian love interest in the Oscar-winning Moonstruck: now romance beckons once more.
Cage could take the lead role in Working Title's production of Captain Corelli's Mandolin, playing the suave Italian officer and musician whose troops take command of a Greek island in the second world war. British director Roger Mitchell is said to be first choice to direct the adaptation of Louis De Bernieres' best-selling novel. Mitchell's last project was Notting Hill, whose closing shot sees Hugh Grant's character reading a copy of the very novel. Coincidence? We think not.
Cage is currently filming Gone in 60 Seconds with Angelina Jolie and Vinnie Jones. With his fees $20 million for 60 Seconds and the budget of Corelli originally limited to $25 million, some financial juggling will be needed.
**********
Reading the book on the park bench, huh? Well, didn't think you could see the title, but then again your version doesn't look like ours.
~KarenR
Wed, Jun 9, 1999 (12:43)
#1168
A Variety gossip column is about all the roles that are being tossed at Blanchett. Says she is being "courted" for Charlotte Gray and numerous others. Nothing solid. However, Bridget is not mentioned. (Didn't realize CB's in Costner's "For Love of the Game" and I've seen the trailer in the theater already!)
~MarciaH
Thu, Jun 10, 1999 (01:52)
#1169
NC will Not be this thinking woman's heart-throb. He makes my flesh crawl!
~Jana2
Thu, Jun 10, 1999 (03:20)
#1170
I must agree with you for the most part, Marcia. While I have enjoyed NC in certain of the roles he has played, he engages in too much scenery chewing (i.e. way too broad, overacting) for my taste. He's kind of the anti-Colin ;-)
~KarenR
Thu, Jun 10, 1999 (04:29)
#1171
This article is about the guys at Working Title. Compares them to the Weinstein bros. Mentions BJD and Captain Corelli's Mandolin and their marketing coup with Notting Hill.
http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/html/hottx/film/top_direct.html
Will write up what HF said tomorrow. *yawn* Nothing to stay up for. ;-)
~amw
Thu, Jun 10, 1999 (09:32)
#1172
Evelyn telephoned she is having a lovely time enjoyed TRT, Stephen Dillane and Jennifer were wonderful. She also enquired at Waterstones about" Bridget Jones Diary I will Survive" and was told it should be ready in the Autumn and definitely before Christmas. Also "Son of Adam" is being re-released in December 2000!!
~Moon
Thu, Jun 10, 1999 (12:50)
#1173
(Karen), Will write up what HF said tomorrow. *yawn* Nothing to stay up for. ;-)
Karen, how could that be? Did you asked her all our questions? :-)
~KarenR
Thu, Jun 10, 1999 (13:44)
#1174
how could that be? Did you asked her all our questions? :-)
Of course, I asked as many as I could. However, there were a lot of people there. Not the intimate little gathering of last year. ;-)
OK, Helen did her reading from the book. She is definitely improving and put much more into it. Great response from the people. Probably a hundred or so based on number of chairs, rows, people sitting on floor on sides and standing in rear.
Took questions. First one asked was "who she would like to play Bridget in the movie?" She initially answered about how she would've liked do it herself and described her forays into acting at university, then ended with same line from last year about a "new face" and all the Hollywood actresses were too thin and too beautiful.
That's what I mean about the event and the news being a *yawn*. Her answers are carved in stone from when she was initially coached by the publicists. She added little new from what I could tell, except when a question was off-the-cuff and/or funny.
There were the terribly insipid questions like "I noticed there was some similarity to P&P. Was that intentional?" (Do these people live in caves?) Or "how much of Bridget Jones is yourself?" (Argh, even the store person used that in her intro.) When asked "if" she was writing a sequel (listen, stupid, it was also mentioned in the intro) and when it would be released, HF clowned around and said it was now officially one year from the date when it was due at the publisher. She said it was about 3/4 done
then revised downward, ending by saying that she's done "some." Didn't sound very encouraging. Went into this whole thing about how she hates writing, has no disciple whatsoever, lives in Notting Hill and finds too much there to distract her (coffee bars and shops) and that she will go off into the country to do her writing. About the screenplay, she said she did 2 drafts. She said that initially tossing BJD together as book was quick and easy as she had no expectations that people would buy/read it.
Now she feels much more pressured with the sequel, to make it good, etc.
BTW, when talking about the P&P thing, she mentioned that the sequel will use another Austen novel. It's going to be loosely structured on or borrowing from Persuasion. (Am having a hard time myself trying to make that work with her Telegraph columns.) She did explain to the crowd that she continued to write Bridget after the book's action ended and that the sequel would be about what happens when you've landed Mr. Right (or Mr. Darcy) and how he doesn't do things like clear the table, take out the tra
h, etc. (remember the one column about rinsing off a spoon). Never mentioned anything about their breakup.
Question that got the funniest response: One woman asked if she imagined Bridget in her later years as one of the AbFab ladies. Helen responded absolutely and started acting like Patsy, a little sloshed. It was cute.
OK, enough with the audience interaction. Went up to get a book signed for a friend and it was your basic quick sign and move on type situation. When I got up there, I said "this is certainly much better than last year." She looked up and said "Oh, I remember you." (doubt it, but that was nice). Told her that I wasn't supposed to leave without getting a "real" response to some questions. The person from the publisher was standing right next to her as we spoke and Helen continued to sign for others.
hen I asked about the sequel, it was very apparent they have absolutely no clue when it will be published. The publisher's rep said they talk about this on nearly a daily basis. I told them that my British friends have been waiting far longer for the sequel. About the movie, my take is that she's out of the loop. She did mention to the crowd that she *hoped* her friend Sharon would be the director. I said I had read the article about her friend being the director and Helen said she hadn't and that sh
had been away for a while. About Cate Blanchett being BJ, she said that they are no where near getting started with filming. Nothing about the casting of Mark Darcy, but did forget to ask if she "beefed up" his role. (I felt rather pressured as she was continuing to sign and the line was moving along but I wasn't.) Anyway as a final thing, I told her about my search for Milk Tray in Britain as she raved about the stuff last time and gave her a small box of Fannie Mae's Trinidads (do die for). She wa
amused at hearing about the Milk Tray adventure (remember Heide and Evelyn??) and appeared very touched that I did this.
That's all folks. Sorry there wasn't anything earth shattering. :(
~SBRobinson
Thu, Jun 10, 1999 (13:55)
#1175
OK- what are the Telegraph Columns?
And where can I find them?
BTW- Karen, thanks for the lovely write up! Since I've just read BJD recently, I didnt know a bunch of this stuff. :)
~KarenR
Thu, Jun 10, 1999 (14:22)
#1176
Essbee, Helen started the column at the Independent and then moved over to the Daily Telegraph. The book is based on columns she wrote at the Independent; however, there is a gap between where the book left off (Mark whisking Bridge away at Xmas) and where she picked up at the Telegraph. You can read the columns at the Telegraph's site by doing a search. They started November 8, 1997 and ended December 19, 1998.
You can pull them up sequentially from the search function. The main page of "Features" still has I believe a link to "Bridget Jones's Diary" that will take you to the last installment. At the end of each column is a link to the previous week, so you can go backwards to the beginning.
Here's the link to the Telegraph (you might still need to register, but it's nothing)
http://www.telegraph.co.uk
This topic was started by Laura to discuss the weekly columns. We all commented on them, speculated and generally ranted and raved about Bridget's stupidity. Last year, Helen actually acknowledged that she had read this stuff on occasion (probably once or twice) to get some feedback.
Hope this helps.
~KarenR
Thu, Jun 10, 1999 (14:24)
#1177
One last thing, the Independent doesn't archive.
And, someone asked if HF and her publishers ever considered doing a blank journal. She described the one that was sold in the UK last Christmas, what they added to the various dates, etc., and said that maybe they would do one in the US this time.
~Moon
Thu, Jun 10, 1999 (14:43)
#1178
What about Davies and Curtis? Who is really incharge? I hope they are not looking for an American to play B.
And did you ask about Colin?
Thanks Karen, now we should ask Laura to continue and then Winter and Jana2 in LA. We will get our answers yet, I hope!
~LauraMM
Thu, Jun 10, 1999 (14:58)
#1179
Is she coming to Boston? I haven't seen that in the line up from Valerie. If she is, where, when and I'll definitely be there!
Karen, I think she'd remember you. You have that remembering kind of face. (Natalie Wood, come to think of it.)
~LauraMM
Thu, Jun 10, 1999 (15:01)
#1180
Uh, I meant Vivian!
~SBRobinson
Thu, Jun 10, 1999 (15:19)
#1181
Thanks Karen! :)
will check it out sometime this weekend
~KarenR
Thu, Jun 10, 1999 (15:23)
#1182
Re: Curtis and Davies
I couldn't figure out a way to word this one without it appearing to be insulting. It really shows that she couldn't write the screenplay and that others have been brought in to help. I probably should have brought the Times article with me, but when I came home and looked at it for the specific wording about her friend Sharon being the director, I remembered how smug the article was about Helen and her turning to her former boyfriend and how Bridget wouldn't translate well to the screen without major c
anges. Now I can see why Helen wouldn't acknowledge having seen it.
According the schedule, she's already been in LA and I didn't see Boston on the list. Today is Milwaukee, then she goes to Kansas, Minneapolis, and back to NY.
Here's the link to the publisher's website. There's an interesting section of "Discussion Topics" (hey, maybe we should do this??) and a mention of the Persuasion theme for the sequel.
http://www.penguinputnam.com/bridgetjones/index.htm
~Elena
Thu, Jun 10, 1999 (17:13)
#1183
(Karen)Last year, Helen actually acknowledged that she had read this stuff on occasion (probably once or twice) to get some feedback.
Oh really? That�s news to me and very interesting. Where did she make this acknowledgement? Well if she did it once she has definitely done it again (and again?)
Hi, Helen! :-p
~LauraMM
Thu, Jun 10, 1999 (18:58)
#1184
She acknowledged it to me, then I told her that I had started up the board. I also brought up about Colin Firth playing Mark Darcy in the movie and if she couldn't get him, then his brother (she liked the idea;)). Now don't go all crazy on me, it happened exactly a year ago!
~KarenR
Thu, Jun 10, 1999 (19:41)
#1185
We talked about it as well. She told the little group last year that there was a place on the web where people discussed her column. I immediately chimed in that I was one of the people and that she would be seeing Laura in a few days. She said that she was (at that time) not very good on the computer and that she had found this place by doing a search for Bridget. She said she had no intention of participating. I remember she asked me about specific columns and why we hadn't reacted much to them. P
obably had to do with the fact that Mark wasn't in them!!
Go back to last June and read my account and read Laura's account and the LA postings (Winter and/or Jana) of going to the booksigning.
I got a few raised eyebrows at the copy of the book (UK paperback) I brought for signature. Will send it back to you shortly, Cathy. ;-)
~winter
Fri, Jun 11, 1999 (04:58)
#1186
(Karen)According the schedule, she's already been in LA
Wot? When? Why don't I ever hear about these things beforehand?
read my account and read Laura's account and the LA postings (Winter
and/or Jana) of going to the booksigning.
That reminds me, Karen. It was about this time Jana and I first met! And coincidentally, we're meeting up again this Friday to see "An Ideal Husband."
a mention of the Persuasion theme for the sequel.
EEK! I'm actually not thrilled to hear this. Persuasion is much to sacred to resurface as a BJ sequel. What could possibly happen?...Jude recklessly jumps off a ledge in Lyme, only to dislocate her hip and fall in love with some sailor who keeps her company as she recuperates...
(Ann)Evelyn telephoned she is having a lovely time enjoyed TRT
Oh, good! I'm glad... Can't wait to hear her account when she gets back next week. Oh, and by the way, our Ben is in England right now, though I don't know if he's going to make a stop at the Donmar to see HDG.
~amw
Fri, Jun 11, 1999 (07:00)
#1187
HDG??!!
~Moon
Fri, Jun 11, 1999 (12:24)
#1188
His Dear Girl.
~KarenR
Fri, Jun 11, 1999 (12:33)
#1189
our Ben is in England right now, though I don't know if he's going to make a stop at the Donmar to see HDG.
Not going to make a stop at the Donmar? Oh I see, if he brings a sleeping bag and tent and sets up camp, it would not be called a "stop." ;-) Too bad we probably won't hear HOW MANY times he will have gone to see it and his "objective" of HG' (his goddess') performance.
~KarenR
Fri, Jun 11, 1999 (12:33)
#1190
missing word after "objective" was: review
~KarenR
Fri, Jun 11, 1999 (17:15)
#1191
Reporting from Hollywood (on Lake Michigan, that is):
Can't walk and/or drive anywhere around here without bumping into a movie van. Shooting is going on right now with Minnie Driver. They have set up the Old Town Art Fair (one day ahead of time) so that her character can exhibit her works. On Monday, they will be filming next door to me for two weeks minimum.
Now the big news!! Have stumbled on High Fidelity!!! Yeah!!
Went over to the post office and parked illegally and noticed the signs. Walked down the residential street and saw the trailers lined up. As I'm reading the signs on their doors, saw "Barry" and "Dick" written. Yes!!
A guy whose sole job it is to sit in a lawnchair and watch the empty trailers was basically doing nothing so I asked if it was High Fidelity. He said yes. Asked where they were shooting and he said the movie theater around the corner). The Biograph? (that was the famous one where John Dillenger went with the Lady in Red and got shot in the alley) No, the other one. The Three Penny Cinema, a little hole in the wall place that was carved up.
In talking to the guy I mentioned that I hadn't heard of them being anywhere, and he said they had just finished soundstage work.
Asked if Nick Hornby had been there. He looked blank (as befits anybody whose job it is to sit in a lawnchair all day). Another guy passed by and answered, "yes." I went to talk to him. He said Nick had been there a couple of weeks ago for a few days. I asked whether he worked on the script and the guy said he didn't think so as he doesn't have any writing credits. He just stopped by.
Then I asked about casting. shut your eyes, Laura He said that Lisa Bonet is playing Marie and that Sara Gilbert is Anna. Since not one of his girlfriends (or childhood crushes) is named Anna, perhaps he meant Sarah. He admitted he wasn't too good with the names of all those *bit* parts. He told me who was playing Dick and Barry, but I've never heard of them. Jack Blake and somebody else. This guy must have wondered why I didn't ask about Cusack! ;-o
They hadn't started for the day, so I will walk over later on and see if I can see anything of either shoot.
~EileenG
Fri, Jun 11, 1999 (17:28)
#1192
Good sleuthing, Karen.
He said that Lisa Bonet is playing Marie
Lisa Bonet from The Cosby Show?? Have they scoured the 'TV Hall of Fame' or what?
~KarenR
Fri, Jun 11, 1999 (18:14)
#1193
yep, that's the one. I must have had a strange look on my face because he specifically said "The Cosby Show," even though I did know who she was.
Now I need to find out what Alan Grier (from that Wayans show) looks like. The cashier at my grocery store said he was in there (this must be the lunch break) and he's in the cast of Return to Me.
~winter
Fri, Jun 11, 1999 (20:56)
#1194
David Alan Grier was from "In Living Color" (Fox comedy variety show, early 90's-- where Jim Carrey got his big break). He;s a great actor-- hilarious guy.
Lisa Bonet? "Denise" from the Cosby Show?
If I had known casting was more diverse, I would've been more agressive in trying to get a part in this film! ;-)
~KarenR
Sat, Jun 12, 1999 (00:46)
#1195
These are two different movies, Winter.
Lisa Bonet is Marie in High Fidelity and that's a definite. Went back to the set and saw her in her trailer, which said "Lisa/Marie" on the door. No door was labeled "Rob" which would have been Cusack's, but he could have been in any of the ones that said "producer" as well. And "Lawn Chair Boy" was wrong. They were not shooting in the movie theatre but a bar a couple of doors down called "Lounge Ax" Talked to a PA and some of the extras hanging around.
David Alan Grier (I looked him on and found a picture of him) is in "Return to Me," the Minnie Driver/David Duchovney movie. I ran into him on the street. Boy was he noticeable. It's hot and humid and here's this shortish, stocky guy wearing a dark business suit. Everyone's in shorts. I actually said something to him.
Saw Minnie as well on the art fair set. Hair was long and wild but gathered at the back. She was wearing real baggy capris. They were rehearsing and I just walked over and took a look. They weren't keeping anybody away.
~winter
Sat, Jun 12, 1999 (05:09)
#1196
Agh! Sorry!!! This is what happens when one skims...
~lizbeth54
Sat, Jun 12, 1999 (12:21)
#1197
Thanks for all the info on HF, Karen. I agree with you that she's probably out of the loop for the movie now. Pobably has very little involvement in any decision making, and certainly won't be able to say anything.
But they can't delay filming forever! I'm hoping that there's more Andrew Davies/P&P than Richard Curtis. Davies is a more original scriptwriter ( and does have a dark side). If Curtis takes over I honestly think we'll have Notting Hill 2, with Bridget (as a male Hugh Grant) and her assortment of chums. But that may be exactly what Universal wants!
The "Persuasion" theme...BJ gets MD, finds he's not perfect to live with, has major row, he feels hurt and rejected, goes to Japan for a year, comes back ,is interested in steady relationahip with Natasha-type, BJ falls for attractive unreliable type who lets her down, BJ and MD realise they still love each other, end.
~Moon
Sat, Jun 12, 1999 (13:26)
#1198
Wow! You are all getting so good at it. Too bad we have to wait for HF to write it! ;-)
I recently read that Minnie D. got engaged to James Brolin's son. She seems desperate for an attachment, with her past luck and many tries.
Karen, is she very skinny? You must, if you get a chance, ask her about Colin. I believe Circle of Friends was her first film, maybe he gave her a few tips.
I wonder if NH will be returning to Chicago.
Just being your fab. self will get you the answers. :-D
~KarenR
Sat, Jun 12, 1999 (13:47)
#1199
Re: Persuasion
The part I'm getting hung up on is *who* persuades Bridget to break it off? Perhaps HF will ignore that minor but pivotal part of the story. ;-)
Did MD get engaged to Josh Brolin? I hadn't heard that. Then she'll be Barbra's daughter-in-law. Minnie hit the jackpot. BTW, she's probably thin as a rail, although the outfit she was wearing in that scene was all loose and baggy. Should be able to tell more next week. Am interested to see if she acts like a princess though.
On Bridget, I do agree that Curtis' involvement will likely turn the movie into another NH (which isn't bad, guys) or 4Ws. I caught the end of a special on AMC last night about the making of NH and there were interviews with a couple of men, but by that time they weren't showing captions as to who they were. I wonder which one was Richard Curtis and which one was Roger Mitchell.
~lizbeth54
Sat, Jun 12, 1999 (14:13)
#1200
Minnie Driver was also in "Chatsky" with Colin, so she'll know him very well. someone on the set of COF said that MD didn't mix off set, whereas Colin used to go to the pub with the crew.
~heide
Sat, Jun 12, 1999 (14:16)
#1201
I know you're probably out right now prowling the movie sets, Karen. Your reports are fun to read. John Cusack bought the rights to HF, am I right? He's not spending too much money on salaries. No big names though I like that idea. Is it too soon to ask when the film is expected to be released?
~KarenR
Sat, Jun 12, 1999 (14:45)
#1202
There won't be any filming around here today as this weekend is the Old Town art fair (50th anniversary), its hanging-onto-its-coatails cousin Wells Street Art Fair, and the St. Michael's shindig. They aren't THAT STUPID. This is the best weekend of the year around here. Everybody having parties in their yards and on their decks. Love the atmosphere and the crowds of people aren't too bad. Am used to garbage being thrown into frontyard and bottles/cups being left on front steps. ;-) Unfortunately, r
in is in the forecast again.
~KarenR
Sun, Jun 13, 1999 (04:36)
#1203
Article in Sunday Times in the Culture section:
"Creating the new face of Britain" A small group friends appears to be responsible for how the world views the UK. Bryan Appleyard worries about Bridget Jones and Notting Hill
http://www.sunday-times.co.uk/news/pages/Sunday-Times/frontpage.html?999
Doesn't provide any info on Bridget but is interesting.
~heide
Sun, Jun 13, 1999 (14:50)
#1204
Interesting article but just another diatribe on big bad Hollywood - in this case, Curtis pandering to Hollywood to get his films made. Most Americans know there's more to Britain than Hugh Grant's characters. Simplistic analysis, I know but then so's Appleyard's viewpoint.
~KarenR
Sun, Jun 13, 1999 (15:05)
#1205
You should read the article in the Telegraph about "Rogue Trader" Heide! It's the article about Anna Friel. This movie has been sitting on the shelf for about two years and now the spin is that they had timing issues having to do with Leeson's plight (i.e., cancer and now his release from the Singapore jail). Yeah right!! It didn't sell here and they give some lame excuses about American film execs.
"One setback for Rogue Trader is that it will not be shown in American cinemas, but will be seen instead on HBO, the pay-cable channel. I understand at least one Hollywood studio balked at Dearden's script because Leeson's dodgy dealings could not be traced back to some traumatic incident in his childhood. The mere fact that there was no incident, and that his is a true story, was irrelevant to them. This tells you much about the narrow, predictable mindset of Hollywood executives.
In the long run it doesn't matter. HBO paid handsomely for Rogue Trader, and it has been sold into almost every conceivable world territory. 'This film will be in profit even before it opens,' says Dearden. As well as being another step in the inexorable rise of Anna Friel."
IMO the story does seem more of a "made for TV" type.
~LauraMM
Sun, Jun 13, 1999 (18:44)
#1206
LISA BONET????????????????????? OH MY F*&#$%G GOD!!!!!!!! UGH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! is this movie a get together of TV sitcom actors???????
Now, I think they can absolutely anything with BJ. Perhaps Mindy Cohn from Facts of Life can play BJ;)
~amw
Sun, Jun 13, 1999 (20:07)
#1207
In yesterday's Daily Mail magazine Aishling showed me an article last night that suggested that Liz Hurley might play Bridget Jones!! pleeeese no
~Moon
Sun, Jun 13, 1999 (20:23)
#1208
NOooooooooo! Get those collagen lips out of my face!
~Moon
Sun, Jun 13, 1999 (20:24)
#1209
Ann, and you thought JE had become too thin to play Bridget???
~amw
Sun, Jun 13, 1999 (20:44)
#1210
Give me JE anyday, too thin or not!!
~lizbeth54
Sun, Jun 13, 1999 (22:53)
#1211
Ginger Spice....Liz Hurley. Gets worse and worse. Sometimes I have a horrid feeling that BJD The Movie will become just another Hollywood film, driven by "star" names and bankability. The ideal couple (who would have maintained the P&P connection) would have been JE and CF. I really would have preferred BJD to remain a small cheap British movie!
If it's Liz Hurley for BJ, how about Hugh Grant for MD. Ghastly thought.
~KarenR
Sun, Jun 13, 1999 (23:07)
#1212
If Colin refuses to be Mark Darcy, then I'd accept Jeremy Northam. He strikes me as being able to portray MD correctly (and that's the MD that in my mind's eye, mind you). Hugh Grant? Never, ever and ever. There's absolutely not one iota of Mark Darcy in HG's repetoire.
~LauraMM
Mon, Jun 14, 1999 (00:32)
#1213
You know this whole 'who's gonna be BJ?' is reminiscent of the casting call for Scarlett O'Hara. I can she a whole list of people 'considered', but in all seriousness, not even in contention. Most likely CF will play MD (okay, I'm being optimistic.), and hopefully, they will get an unknown. Similar to Vivian Leigh was in America;) (meaning, she may be a well-known British actress in UK, but not in America.)
~winter
Mon, Jun 14, 1999 (01:43)
#1214
Right on! Jeremy Northam as Mark Darcy! I don't mind JN being second-fiddle for this role.
~EileenG
Mon, Jun 14, 1999 (02:34)
#1215
(Laura) Now, I think they can absolutely anything with BJ. Perhaps Mindy Cohn from Facts of Life can play BJ;)
LOL! Too cruel!
(Bethan)If it's Liz Hurley for BJ, how about Hugh Grant for MD. Ghastly thought.
Indeed! But I'd lay odds that their names have been mentioned.
~Jana2
Mon, Jun 14, 1999 (06:32)
#1216
Oh dear, I've been away from the board for a few days and such aggravating news. Liz Hurley as a possible BJ?!?! Lisa Bonet as Marie?!?!? Oh, the horrors Hollywood can perform on a good book. I really need Marie to look like Susan Dey :-).
BTW, happy anniversary dear Winter. It was lovely to see you as always. Aren't I lucky to have a Spa girl in my very own neighborhood? And ladies, An Ideal Husband was really enjoyable. Rupert E. handled Wilde's witty dialogue well and I enjoyed Cate B. and JN a lot too. Winter and Jana2 give it a thumbs up!
~amw
Mon, Jun 14, 1999 (06:47)
#1217
I'm sorry but there is only one actor who can have the name DARCY!!!
~amw
Mon, Jun 14, 1999 (06:49)
#1218
sorry" who can play a character with the name Mr. Darcy," to be honest and I exclude Laura from this, I am sure that is why most of us where interested in the book in the first place, certainly for me.
~amw
Mon, Jun 14, 1999 (06:51)
#1219
BTW Winter will you be going to see MLSF when it opens in LA on the 16th, you will one of the first, I look forward to your report. BTW Evelyn saw AIH in London yesterday and said the performances were good but the film dragged on.
~LauraMM
Mon, Jun 14, 1999 (12:26)
#1220
Ann, I think I have been very vocal about CF playing MD. I would LOVE to see that. Personally, I can't picture JN playing MD. I still see JN as Knightley and well, Emma is my least favorite Austen book. I can't picture anyone playing MD other than CF.
One thing is that I don't care for the character of MD. I felt that in the columns he used Bridget. He would only come over late at night for one thing only, and she generally gave in to him. I like BJ, but I found her to be too much like us, however exagerated she was. I found again in the columns that MD wavered to much. There was no communication between BJ and MD; THAT was the most frustrating part. I am curious to see how they portray MD in the movie though. That should be interesting.
~Moon
Mon, Jun 14, 1999 (12:42)
#1221
(Laura), Most likely CF will play MD (okay, I'm being optimistic.), and hopefully, they will get an unknown. Similar to Vivian Leigh was in America;) (meaning, she may be a well-known British actress in UK, but not in America.)
Laura, I think you might have something there, at least, I hope you do.:-)
As far MD, there are lots of men out there that work all day, get home late, and decide to call their mate, go over, ...., and return to their home because it is where they have their closet, shaving gear, etc. Bridget knows it, and has a tendency to give in all the time. It would help her if she drank less. ;-)
I think that CF wants this part now and he can use MLSF as a barganing chip to get it.
Like you Ann, I read the book because of the P&P connection.
~KarenR
Mon, Jun 14, 1999 (13:25)
#1222
Unfortunately, I don't feel that optimistic about CF playing MD. Unless there were an A-list actress playing Bridget, what would tempt him to play this role, one that would bring back 1000fold all the wet shirt and tight breeches comments. Yes, we think it would be marvelous casting and could be viewed as his having a great sense of humor reprising this part in modern day, but I remain unconvinced that he would.
With Richard Curtis involved you can be sure that changes would be made in the storyline to make both Bridget and Mark more appealing so that when we have the *happy* ending, we will be very satisfied.
For me, Darcy existed before Colin and for quite a long time Olivier was Darcy. And I read the book somewhere in between seeing the Olivier version and this production. (I've never seen the Rintoul one.) I like to keep my literary characters separate from real life people.
Re: Northam as Darcy, Laura, you haven't seen The Winslow Boy obviously.
But as I said he would be my second choice. Like that means anything in the grand scheme of things. ;-)
~LauraMM
Mon, Jun 14, 1999 (13:35)
#1223
Well I guess I am off to go see The Winslow Boy;) (Actually, I have wanted to see it, but finding time lately is difficult!)
I tend to agree with Karen, Darcy existed before CF. Still when I read the book, I don't see CF as Darcy, I see a young man with wavy hair. I may be prejudiced by a woodcut picture in the first P&P book I had ever read. They had pics of Elizabeth, Jane, Darcy, Wickham, Mrs. Bennet and Lady Catherine.
And regarding Mark Darcy coming over to Bridget's late at night, they weren't quite a couple again (yet), and he was definitely using her. He would be with Rebecca the very next day. She (HF) instituted too much of real-life. Meaning, exes getting together for a quickie, but going back to the current girlfriend. THAT bothered me. (It hit a nerve.)
~lizbeth54
Tue, Jun 15, 1999 (20:32)
#1224
HF was just on CNN in a 30 minute interview with Riz Khan, talking about BJD. Nothing new, but must be very good promotion as CNN is watched everywhere in the world. A couple of mentions of the movie "soon to be made." Question about casting BJ...usual answer "would like a complete unknown etc". Asked about the book (sequel)HF said it starts where BJD finished.."it's about what happens when you get the guy in your appartment, and he hasn't done the washing up, not tonight, not ever". Said that sequel was
year overdue.
~lizbeth54
Tue, Jun 15, 1999 (20:36)
#1225
Also have to agree with Ann...it was the P&P connection that got me interested in BJD, and I can't see anyone other than CF playing Mr Darcy. Didn't HF say in a radio interview that CF "was" Mark Darcy. He's probably not into washing up!
~KarenR
Tue, Jun 15, 1999 (21:00)
#1226
HF said it starts where BJD finished.."it's about what happens when you get the guy in your appartment, and he hasn't done the washing up, not tonight, not
ever". Said that sequel was year overdue.
Word for word exactly what she said at the booksigning last week. ;-)
~heide
Wed, Jun 16, 1999 (00:23)
#1227
Mr. Darcy will always be Colin for me. I saw P&P with Larry long before 1995. Didn't do a thing for me and I love Larry but I didn't like Darcy played as a fop. Loved the book since age 13. Colin's portrayal met all my expectations and so many more. Doesn't mean I can't separate actors from their roles!
As for Mark Darcy, I'd love to see Colin play him but I'm not convinced it's a good career move and never have been. Considering how ignorant the critics are of his entire career, I'm afraid they'll see it as a desperate move for an actor not able to cash in on his brief fame. A supporting role in an Oscar winner means little. After all, he had that same experience 2 years ago. Had to offer my 2 cents since it is the minority opinion.
Do agree with Karen that an A-list actress would be a big temptation though.
~KarenR
Wed, Jun 16, 1999 (12:59)
#1228
High Fidelity Update
From Variety:
Todd Louiso, memorable as the new-age nanny from "Jerry Maguire," is John Cusack�s best pal and employee in "High Fidelity," the comedy based on the Nick Hornby novel which Stephen Frears directs from a script by Cusack and writing partners Steve Pink and D.V. deVincentis. Louiso, a semiregular on "Chicago Hope,"...
*********
Another nobody!
~LauraMM
Wed, Jun 16, 1999 (14:03)
#1229
Nooooooooooooo, Karen, he's hysterical!!!! I guarantee you'll like him. He seems to play a lot of gay/homosexual roles, but he's got great comedic timing! I think you'll like him. But I don't see him playing Barry. Maybe Dick.
~KarenR
Wed, Jun 16, 1999 (14:28)
#1230
All I said was that he was a nobody (to me). Has no bearing on whether I'd like him or not. I'll have to look him up to see if his face rings a bell, because his name means nada to me.
~KarenR
Wed, Jun 16, 1999 (14:39)
#1231
Is this him on the right? It's from "8 Heads in a Duffel Bag" but there's no caption.
~LauraMM
Wed, Jun 16, 1999 (15:23)
#1232
Yep, that's him!
~KarenR
Wed, Jun 16, 1999 (16:15)
#1233
Quite the receding hairline, no? ;-D
~LauraMM
Wed, Jun 16, 1999 (17:18)
#1234
Quite, but I don't behoove bald men their baldness. I think he'll add some great comic moments to the movie. His humor is dry, but biting.
~KarenR
Thu, Jun 17, 1999 (14:16)
#1235
From today's Variety:
IBEN MOST WANTED GAL: Remember the name Iben Hjejle, who savvy Hollywoodites are betting will quickly transform from a walking typographical error to a hot actress. Every agency chased the star of �Mifune,� and she was signed by William Morris�s Motion Picture co-head John Burnham and Gaby Morgerman just as she signed for the female lead of the Working Title romantic comedy �High Fidelity,� which John Cusack, Steve Pink and D.V. Devincentis adapted from the Nick Hornby novel. The film�s directed by Stephe
Frears, who cast Hjejle after a chance meeting while he was in Germany accepting the Golden Bear Award for �Hi-Lo Country� and she was being honored as an up and coming star. The WMA contingent flew to Germany to sign the actress, who ought to begin establishing a presence when Sony Pictures Classics releases �Mifune� later this year.
**********
She's the one playing Laura. They make her sound like she's a German actress. She's Danish. Need to find a picture of her just in case I run into her on the street. ;-)
~KarenR
Thu, Jun 17, 1999 (14:30)
#1236
Another item in Variety, this time Army Archerd's column, mentioning High Fidelity. It's about time the PR people started placing tidbits about the movie!! This one is about Natasha Gregson Wagner. It says she is Robert Wagner's daughter, but isn't she really Natalie Wood's daughter with her second husband who was named Gregson?
"Young Wagner also wound a role in Stephen Frears� "High Fidelity" with John Cusack, Joan Cusack, Iben Hjejle and � Catherine Zeta-Jones (unbilled) �"
~LauraMM
Thu, Jun 17, 1999 (15:26)
#1237
Who is Joan Cusack playing? And does he put his sister in EVERYTHING?????
~LauraMM
Thu, Jun 17, 1999 (15:29)
#1238
Karen, perhaps Natasha Gregson Wagner needs an auntie in the movie, you would fit right in;) and you are correct, she is not 'technically' Robert Wagner's daughter.
~winter
Thu, Jun 17, 1999 (15:37)
#1239
From an unofficial John Cusack website:
...More news about High Fidelity - Barry will be played by Jack Black, Joan Cusack will play Laura's best friend Liz, and Lili Taylor, Beverly D'Angelo, Harold Ramis, and Todd Louiso will also be involved
I like Beverly D'Angelo and Harold Ramis. It's like old times again-- bringing back stars from the old 1980's rite de passage comedies!
~KarenR
Thu, Jun 17, 1999 (15:43)
#1240
Harold Ramis and Beverly D'Angelo could be playing Laura's parents???
~KarenR
Thu, Jun 17, 1999 (15:46)
#1241
No, better yet, they are Rob's parents. Would be perfect for that bit when he goes home and the parents are doing the wine sampling thing at the neighbors and reluctantly invite Rob to accompany them to a movie.
~winter
Thu, Jun 17, 1999 (15:51)
#1242
Strange...they both seem too young to play anyone's parents. Realisitically, yes, they can play Rob or Laura's parents, but I'd pictured a couple much older than BdA and HR.
~LauraMM
Thu, Jun 17, 1999 (16:33)
#1243
BdA played Ed Norton's mom in American History X (Which was fantastic btw!). I can't see Harold Ramis playing Laura's dad. Plus we know what happens to him.
~KarenR
Thu, Jun 17, 1999 (16:42)
#1244
That's why I changed my mind and made them Rob's parents, the closet *swingers*!! Better than Carroll O'Connor, who is playing Minnie Driver's father next door. He looks old enough to play her grandfather. I'm not kidding. He looks real old.
~LauraMM
Thu, Jun 17, 1999 (17:16)
#1245
Archie Bunker playing Minnie Driver's dad, hmmmmmmmmmmmm........
~lafn
Sun, Jun 27, 1999 (02:24)
#1246
(Ann W.) Daily Mail magazine Aishling showed me an article last night that suggested that Liz Hurley might play Bridget Jones!! pleeeese no
Good thing Aishling didn't show it to me...or I would have thrown-up all over the Luna Nuova.
Next thing we'll hear is that Mike Meyers is going to play MD!!,
~lizbeth54
Mon, Jul 5, 1999 (21:03)
#1247
Check out a new interview with Helen Fielding at
http://www.powells.com/authors/fielding.html
Some new comments on BJD sequel and screenplay
~KarenR
Mon, Jul 5, 1999 (22:16)
#1248
Thanks, Bethan, for the new article on HF. The interview was conducted during her last US tour. Definitely some new material, but you wonder how much of it is true. Almost sounds like she and the interviewer are putting each other on. For example:
DW: Whenever critics say anything bad about it, they say it's too on the surface. But that overlooks a lot of what's going on underneath. Sentence structures and so forth. It's definitely a grown-up, intelligent voice.
Sentence structures? A grown-up, intelligent voice? Pfwah, oof, gaaah, durrr. They seemed obsessed with the ability to write complete sentences. Did like how HF is making fun of her standard sound bites, every single one of which I've heard several times.
~lizbeth54
Mon, Jul 5, 1999 (23:57)
#1249
One thing I felt after reading this, is that the sequel and screenplay are being taken seriously, by HF and by Working Title. It would be very easy to rush out a BJD2, which would sell on the strength of the original. Similarly it would be very easy to "transplant" a screenplay directly from the dialogue in the book without worrying whether the humour carries. Most of the humour isn't so much in the dialogue, but in the accompanying comments.
If they get both book and screenplay right, I don't mind waiting. And I still think the involvement of Andrew Davies is a good thing....he has over 20 years of experience of crafting entertaining scripts.
~KarenR
Tue, Jul 6, 1999 (00:23)
#1250
I've thought it would be difficult to do BJD on the screen only because so much of the humor is what she's thinking. It could be done in cartoon form, with a little thought bubble above her head.
Still, I don't think she's involved with the screenplay anymore. Her attempts failed. Now they've brought in the "pros from Dover." ;-D Hey, F. Scott Fitzgerald failed as a screenwriter. Not that I'm putting Helen in that league.
~Jana2
Tue, Jul 6, 1999 (07:37)
#1251
Thanks for the link, Bethan. The article was interesting and as Karen said, it was nice to hear something new from HF, instead of the tired old blurbs.
(Karen) Sentence structures? A grown-up, intelligent voice? Pfwah, oof, gaaah, durrr.
I had to laugh at this, Karen. I also thought this was a little over the top! But I did find her comment interesting that the incomplete sentences and words BJ is so famous for started out by HF trying to get her column down to the right number of words.
~KarenR
Thu, Jul 15, 1999 (03:54)
#1252
From an article in the Daily Telegraph (7/15) about Stephen Frears: (and yeah, I know this is BJD's topic)
Perhaps it's this more recent critical disfavour that makes him say now, "I've been given tremendous opportunities in America; I see it in a rather romantic sense, as full of endless possibilities. In England, which is much more confined, insular, you're forced into corners the whole time. I found, or find England claustrophobic."
How reassuring to know, then, that his next film is an adaptation of High Fidelity, a study of north London laddishness by the quintessentially British Nick Hornby, the author of Fever Pitch and About A Boy and a life-long Arsenal supporter. "Yes," confirms Frears. "It's set in Chicago."
I wonder for a moment whether he's kidding, but, no: it seems Disney bought the rights to the book, which then passed to the actor John Cusack, a Chicagoan. He adapted it, basing it in his hometown and then turned to Frears, who had directed him in The Grifters.
"I read the script with scepticism and was convinced. First of all, Chicago is actually rather like Camden Town: it's a blue-collar, industrial city. Also, they're absolutely bananas about music there. And they're just as primitive in Chicago as they are in Camden Town. So I'm astonished. But I've clearly accepted it. This may be because I've been fooled into it, or it may be perceptive."
And he adds (somehow this seems a very Frearsian equivocation), "You'll tell me in a year's time whether I was right or not."
**********
Camden Town? Isn't that the setting for "This Year's Love"? Is he kidding? Must have been fooled.
~Allison2
Thu, Jul 15, 1999 (08:04)
#1253
First of all, Chicago is actually rather like
Camden Town: it's a blue-collar, industrial city
What is this man talking about? Has he ever BEEN to Camden Town...blue collar, industrial... There just must be another Camden Town somewhere that I don't know about.
~lafn
Thu, Jul 15, 1999 (16:37)
#1254
Stephen Frears: "Chicago is actually rather like Camden Town: it's a blue-collar, industrial city. Also, they're absolutely bananas about music there. And they're just as primitive in Chicago as they are in Camden Town"
LOL I don't think ole Stephen has ever been in Camden Town or Chicago.
And" bananas about music??"..every city is...Chicago is better known for its theatre.
Yes...Karen Camden Town was the setting for This Year's Love...known for their flee market and tatoo parlors!!!
What an insult to Chicago!!!
~KarenR
Thu, Jul 15, 1999 (18:50)
#1255
It has to account for why I haven't seen them filming, except for that one club scene that was done at a bar that would be frequented by DePaul University students. My guess is that someone took Stephen on a drive to So. Chicago, right across from the Gary (Indiana) steel mills. ;-D
No, music is big here too. All the blues clubs.
~Jana2
Wed, Jul 21, 1999 (02:44)
#1256
OK - this is silly, but it made me laugh for some reason. Could be the late hour and the fact that I'm still at the office. But bear with me Laura, this is actually slightly BJD related :-).
I was just reading the latest world wide travel advisory which describes dangerous areas and precautions business travelers should take. Due to idle curiosity I checked out Israel, even though I'm not planning a trip there anytime soon. Here's a quote:
"Occasional attacks by singleton Palestinians also mandate that Old Jerusalem be entered only with security escorts and never late at night."
Somehow this brings to mind an image of terrorists that are overly concerned with weight gain and finding new boyfriends :-).
~LauraMM
Wed, Jul 21, 1999 (02:50)
#1257
Occasional attacks by singleton Palestinians also mandate that Old Jerusalem be entered only with security escorts and never late at night."
Somehow this brings to mind an image of terrorists that are overly concerned with weight gain and finding new boyfriends :-).
Actually, that's very funny! I picture the same thing!
~KarenR
Wed, Jul 21, 1999 (03:22)
#1258
Very funny, Jana. ;-D
~SBRobinson
Wed, Jul 21, 1999 (15:22)
#1259
*hee hee* Cute Jana :)
~SBRobinson
Wed, Jul 21, 1999 (15:25)
#1260
ok- here's another leap:
over at DWG a writer is posting a story called Anne de Burgh's Diary, and it's a take off on BJD. Quite amusing actually, you might want to check it out. :)
~EileenG
Wed, Jul 21, 1999 (19:09)
#1261
By now everyone has read this from the NY Daily News:
Firth is getting tired of playing hopelessly romantic figures. "I really don't want to go out and make the moony faces anymore," he says.
Assuming he actually said this (one never knows), what might our chances be of seeing him play Mark Darcy?
~KJArt
Wed, Jul 21, 1999 (19:42)
#1262
Mark Darcy is a lot of things, but moony he ain't. A top-notch human-rights barrister?! Bite your tongue, girl!!
~EileenG
Wed, Jul 21, 1999 (20:47)
#1263
Excuse me?
~KJArt
Thu, Jul 22, 1999 (01:15)
#1264
Oh, I do...I do!!! ;-D
~EileenG
Thu, Jul 22, 1999 (18:59)
#1265
I was not asking you to excuse me, KJArt.
And I'm not biting anything. I believe it to be a reasonable question. There's more to a romantic character than simply moony looks. Fitzwilliam Darcy's considered romantic, why not Mark?
~lafn
Thu, Jul 22, 1999 (19:17)
#1266
CF isn't goin to take BJD... not because of the romantic hero implication....
but because there's bound to be a shag or two......(after the Christmas Curry Lunch...in the hallway!!!)
~KJArt
Fri, Jul 23, 1999 (02:08)
#1267
He could make a stipulation in his contract if he feels so adamant about it. Was HF that explicit about the shags in her book/columns? Seems to me they were implied...thus in the movie too.....(but not if Andrew Davies has anything to say about it!! ;-D )
Question is, how much would they be willing to cede to get the genuine article?? (Again assuming they would have to cede anything.)
Parenthetical: we probably shouldn't be throwing "shag" around so lightly ... in the U.S. it IS casual, but I "read somewhere" that in the UK it's considered even worse than the "f" word!! We don't want to be offending our UK contingent, now do we?
~KJArt
Fri, Jul 23, 1999 (02:21)
#1268
Sorry, Eileen, I missed your post. I don't think ODB objects to ANY romantacism in his characters, just to the adolescent, "moony", hopelessly smitten ones. After all, despite how Karen defines him, I find Paul's role VERY romantic, but hardly "moony" and ODB was perfectly willing to do a "bed scene" without its becoming a "shag" scene. And until I see MLSF (and, knock wood, SLOW) I am going to reserve judgment on how much of that unwillingness he MEANT. And Mark has a certain dignity that doesn't p
t hium into that category.
~KarenR
Fri, Jul 23, 1999 (05:13)
#1269
(KJ) After all, despite how Karen defines him
Hey, you picking a fight with me now? ;-D Food fight!!!
At his advanced age, any adolescent mooniness would be ridiculous. What I would expect to see is *smoldering lust.* That would be more appropriate. That being the case, Mark Darcy would be the same as Mr. Darcy in attitude. I love thinking about the scene at his parents' anniversary party, where Colin...whoops Mark cuts in on raging hormoned teen cousin (?) dancing with Bridget outside in the yard. Visions of a potentially suavely romantic Darcy here. ;-D
~Allison2
Fri, Jul 23, 1999 (10:02)
#1270
we probably shouldn't be throwing "shag" around so lightly ... in the U.S. it IS
casual, but I "read somewhere" that in the UK it's considered even worse than the "f" word!!
We don't want to be offending our UK contingent, now do we?
Shag away! For my part the F word is much worse, tho' these days people (including ODB, I regret to say) use the F-word in every sentence (that's me showing my age...). BTW, I thought shag was a UK slang word or am I wrong?
~KarenR
Fri, Jul 23, 1999 (14:13)
#1271
From the Guardian today, a Corelli update:
� Nicolas Cage has decided to pass on the film adaptation of Louis de Bernieres' World War II romance Captain Corelli's Mandolin. It's reported that the film's producers - including Notting Hill director Roger Michell - and Cage himself were not able to work out a schedule that would allow for the actor's involvement due to other commitments.
******
Do I have a huge sigh of relief? ;-)
~EileenG
Fri, Jul 23, 1999 (14:59)
#1272
All mooniness and romanticism aside, as much as we pine about Colin playing Mark, HF's Mark Darcy is nothing more than an updated Fitzwilliam Darcy, which he's already done to perfection.
*Virtually ducking those hurling rocks now*
Karen, that is good news about CCM. Now if we can hear the same about Ewan McGregor...(uh oh, this opens the door for Roberto Begnini!).
~lafn
Fri, Jul 23, 1999 (22:40)
#1273
(Eileen)Re: CCM ..oh, this opens the door for Roberto Begnini!).
Or if they go the Italian route...godferbid, the guy who played Nostromo.
Re; Shagging..We don't want to be offending our UK contingent, now do we?
(Allison) Shag away!
Wheww!! Had me worried for a minute...the way we throw that word around...I never equated it with the F word...though it means the same. Yes, it is a British slang word, Allison, but it has become popular usage in the US.
~LauraMM
Sat, Jul 24, 1999 (00:46)
#1274
oh GAWD, if they cast Roberto Begnini I'll hurl!!! I HATED LIFE IS BEAUTIFUL!!! yuck!!!!
~lyndaw
Sat, Jul 24, 1999 (01:09)
#1275
And I (and every one else who saw it) hated his schtick at the Academy Awards (and apparently all the other awards show he attended). What a phony! Double Yuck!!!
~lafn
Sat, Jul 24, 1999 (02:36)
#1276
(Laura)I HATED LIFE IS BEAUTIFUL!!
Ditto.
(Lynda) What a phony!
Ditto.
~KarenR
Sat, Jul 24, 1999 (03:30)
#1277
I don't think I need to post. ;-) (good thing Moon isn't around)
~patas
Sat, Jul 24, 1999 (10:17)
#1278
Am I the only one to disagree? I liked Life is Beautiful very much; thought it had the right balance of comicity and gentleness. Of course some things were unsubtle or downright impossible, but all in all I was entertained and moved.
Benigni's performance at the Oscars... well, he gave an interview on BBC world and acted the same way - "the intense italian" stereotype. But it wasn't worse than Gweenie's hysteria, was it?
~heide
Sat, Jul 24, 1999 (13:32)
#1279
(Eileen) All mooniness and romanticism aside, as much as we pine about Colin playing Mark, HF's Mark Darcy is nothing more than an updated Fitzwilliam Darcy, which he's already done to perfection.
Agreed! Now Daniel.....love to see him do the absent skirt schtik.
* Cowering with you while the rocks are hurled *
"the intense italian" stereotype. But it wasn't worse than Gweenie's hysteria, was it?
Depends on which you think was more scripted.
~KJArt
Sat, Jul 24, 1999 (22:05)
#1280
(Karen) Hey, you picking a fight with me now? ;-D Food fight!!!
Yeh...creamed carrots at 20 paces!! ;-D
(Heide)...where Colin...whoops Mark cuts in on raging hormoned teen cousin (?) dancing with Bridget outside in the yard. Visions of a potentially suavely romantic Darcy here. ;-D
Yeh...after which she won't dance, he starts pacing the patio with his hands in his hair and comes out with the suave, romantic opening: "read any good books lately? (hee hee)
~LauraMM
Sun, Jul 25, 1999 (19:19)
#1281
The thing about Life is Beautiful is that it was SO ridiculous!!! He threw scenes in there as an afterthought, because he wanted the crowd to go "awwwwwwwwww". His wife was good, the music I liked. Best use of Offenbach ever. But story wise and acting wise, PUHLEEZE, Nick Nolte deserved that Oscar!!! I've finished my rant.
Heide, I think CF would make a GREAT Daniel!!! *and uh, you've always said you'd like him to play that role anyway;)*
~Jana2
Mon, Jul 26, 1999 (01:53)
#1282
Oh dear, have to disagree with you a bit about Affliction (Nick Nolte's role). I haven't seen Life is Beautiful so cannot compare the two performances, but it has been a long time since I have despised a movie as much as Affliction. I usually like Nick N's work very much but thought he was just scenery chewing and a one-note baddie in this one. James Coburn who played his father was even more like Snidely Whiplash (and really got the Oscar for lifetime achievement, not for this role IMHO). I'm a sucke
for subtle nuances which explains my devotion to a certain Mr. Firth.
But Laura, I seem to be in the minority as the Academy loved Nick N. and Affliction, so maybe it's just me :-).
~Jana2
Mon, Jul 26, 1999 (01:54)
#1283
Eek, that cut off word was supposed to be sucker.
~KarenR
Mon, Jul 26, 1999 (03:43)
#1284
hmmm, I would've given it to Ian McKellen myself and to Ed Harris for supporting. Haven't like Nolte since Rich Man Poor Man. ;-p
~LauraMM
Mon, Jul 26, 1999 (14:38)
#1285
Hmmm... I just saw Gods & Monsters and well, it was an okay, movie, not great. I didn't think Ian McKellen did anything amazing in that role. Nick Nolte is definitely an underrated actor. NN did look VERY GOOD in RMPM (uh, I saw it in repeats;))
~EileenG
Mon, Jul 26, 1999 (16:23)
#1286
IMO after reading Colin's comments in Parade yesterday ("it's boring to play the same kiind of role again and again"), it's a given that he won't play Mark Darcy. I don't think he'll play Daniel either, Heide (too much like Wessex--the baddie).
*Virtually digging a foxhole now*
oh GAWD, if they cast Roberto Begnini...
Ladies, please! I was being facetious!! In your wildest dreams, could you see Begnini as Correlli? "Bon giorno, Principessa Pelagia..."
~KarenR
Mon, Jul 26, 1999 (16:31)
#1287
Don't worry, we know facetious....very, very well, Principessa! ;-o
About the Mark Darcy thing, this weekend on Siskel & Ebert, Rog and Joe Morgenstern (WSJ critic) were reviewing Inspector Gadget. One of them made the comment that it was much too early in Rupe's career to do self-parodying parts. And what would Mark Darcy be? A self-parodying part.
~lafn
Mon, Jul 26, 1999 (17:02)
#1288
At this point...I will gladly take him in a role that he isn't a baddie,a loon, a creep, gay, a cuckold, a two-timer (ATA),a slob (F).
Please, Please, Please,...give us "boring normal".
~Allison2
Mon, Jul 26, 1999 (17:18)
#1289
(Evelyn) Please,...give us "boring normal".
That is what we all want ....but that is because we want HIM not all these characters he insists on playing;-))
The trouble with CF is that he decided to become an actor when he could have been my...bank manager, dentist, personal fitness instructor, masseur...
~LauraMM
Mon, Jul 26, 1999 (18:02)
#1290
Okay, I saw Inspector Gadget.... IT sucked. I mean this was the worst movie I have ever seen. Now my daughter knew my feelings on this movie because, well, I fell asleep! I was excited to see Rupe play a baddie, but it was pathetic and the worst part. I think there will be a sequel!
BTW, DO see Blair Witch Project, it's WONDERFUL.
Now to make this jive with BJD, how about Rupert Everett as Daniel?? He can play straight.
~KarenR
Mon, Jul 26, 1999 (20:52)
#1291
I'm drinking a cup of coffee now, having just come back from seeing the Blair Witch. *yawn yawn* Could barely stay awake, especially with all those blackout scenes. Would've been so nice to take a nap, but the guy next to me had this distinctive odor about him. ick!!
~SBRobinson
Mon, Jul 26, 1999 (20:53)
#1292
Rupert Everett as Daniel? Oh, I think that's fabulous casting Laura!
I stayed away from Inspector Gadget this weekend, (*pats back*) but did see Drop Dead Gorgous. Laughed myself silly :)
~lafn
Mon, Jul 26, 1999 (21:49)
#1293
Well, as long as this is developing into Spring's VV.....
I saw EYES WIDE SHUT last week. It's really an OK movie...not a masterpiece
but not bad. Very visual (not just nudie), script pretty poor. Nicole Kidman is terrific ...Tom Cruise...same ole, same ole...the guy is always Top Gun...
double standard...frontal female nudity...no male!!Don't know how they could rate this film R...this is NC 17 if I ever saw one ( and I never have....most of them are soft-porn). Oddly enough, it was not erotic IMO.
~heide
Tue, Jul 27, 1999 (01:01)
#1294
(Allison) The trouble with CF is that he decided to become an actor when he could have been my...bank manager, dentist, personal fitness instructor, masseur...
Brava Allison, I love it!
~KJArt
Tue, Jul 27, 1999 (01:15)
#1295
(Karen) And what would Mark Darcy be? A self-parodying part.
Which is precisely why I think CF would be tempted...it is, rather, a Darcy-parodying part. I am hoping he can't resist the opportunity for the dig!!!
(Laura)...with BJD, how about Rupert Everett as Daniel?? He can play straight.
Laura, brilliant casting!!!!! What better face-off than CF Vs RE?? Oh, I'd love to see these two get together again on the same screen...they've both come so far!! ;-D
~LauraMM
Tue, Jul 27, 1999 (01:41)
#1296
Karen, Blair Witch was brilliant!!! Inventive, original, scary as all hell!!!! I definitely see this one going up for Original screenplay at the Oscars. (It was all improvised). THE ENDING.... WOW!!!!!!!!!!!
~KJArt
Tue, Jul 27, 1999 (01:41)
#1297
(Eileen)... HF's Mark Darcy is nothing more than an updated Fitzwilliam Darcy, which he's already done to perfection.
(KJ)... comes out with the suave, romantic opening: "read any good books lately? (hee hee)
Yup. A perfect repeat of Fitzwilliam Darcy... 8-D
~LauraMM
Tue, Jul 27, 1999 (15:33)
#1298
Oh yeah, Karen, one other thing, Jimmy figured it out, but with BWP, think of Hansel and Gretl, it makes more sense.
~EileenG
Tue, Jul 27, 1999 (18:37)
#1299
(Evelyn) Tom Cruise...same ole, same ole...the guy is always Top Gun
I agree. Or 'A Few Good Men': "I want the truth!" (to which Nicholson responds "You can't handle the truth"). Tom has a line in every movie which he says exactly this way. It's in the EWS commercial!
~Jana2
Tue, Jul 27, 1999 (20:07)
#1300
Yes, I generally agree with you about Mr. Cruise, but I thought he provided some lovely, subtle character changes in Jerry McGuire - some of the best work of his career IMHO. Then again, maybe I was just distracted by his pretty face :-). Evelyn's right, this is becoming the Spring's Virt Views board. Oh well, we have to pass the time productively until there is some BJD news, don't we?!?!?
~aishling
Fri, Jul 30, 1999 (14:16)
#1301
Fom August's Cosmopolitan
Report on "Hip to be Brit" and GP and CB winning awards for impersonating us Brits. Comments on GP's roles and CB in E and AIH AND the leading role in the forthcoming film of BJD. Enjoy your weekend Evelyn!!
~amw
Fri, Jul 30, 1999 (19:33)
#1302
Hi, thanks for that Aishling, was the report about CB & BJD definite or just speculation again.
~lafn
Tue, Aug 3, 1999 (01:31)
#1303
Interview with Helen Fielding...nothing really new except she's still hoding out for Colin as Mark Darcy!!
http://www.laweekly.com/ink/99/36/books-taylor.shtml
~lizbeth54
Thu, Aug 5, 1999 (12:07)
#1304
Working Title say that BJD will start shooting in a couple of months (October).
~KarenR
Thu, Aug 5, 1999 (13:35)
#1305
Thanks, Bethan. Did you ask when they will know who will be in it? Doesn't seem likely that CF will do Mark. Schedulewise, it is a smallish part relative to Bridget, her pals and Daniel, but that would be getting near his Donmar run dates.
~amw
Thu, Aug 5, 1999 (15:08)
#1306
Karen, OT why are you keeping us in suspense, I am dying to know what you thought of MLSF last night!!
~lizbeth54
Fri, Aug 6, 1999 (08:07)
#1307
No, I didn't ask about casting, Karen. They wouldn't tell me, anyway! I still think that CF will do Mark. It's a Universal film which will have automatic world-wide distribution, and he must see the advantages of that (witness MLSF having to prove itself in the market, and, of course, SLOW!) BJD must be shot in London, and the Mark D scenes could always be scheduled first. Judi Dench filmed SIL whulst doing a London theatre run...the two can be combined. The reason I think he'll do it is that the screenpl
y is by Andrew Davies and I can't think who else could play (or would be acceptable as)"Mr Darcy"!
~patas
Fri, Aug 6, 1999 (13:33)
#1308
Nobody else! I hope!
~KarenR
Fri, Aug 6, 1999 (14:49)
#1309
Hey!! I want Colin to play Mark too. Here's hoping that all the writers (HF and AD) have some input and clout.
~KarenR
Fri, Aug 6, 1999 (16:07)
#1310
It would appear Cate B is in discussion for every movie coming up. More conflicts in dates too and same production company. From The Hollywood Reporter:
Johnny Depp is committed to star with Christina Ricci in Sally Potter's World War II story "The Man Who Cried" for Universal-based Working Title Films. Cate Blanchett and John Turturro are also deep in discussions to join the $20 million film, which is slated to begin shooting next month. Potter, who helmed the acclaimed "Orlando," will write and direct the film, which follows a young woman who flees Germany for Paris in hopes of eventually making it to the United States. Potter and Christopher Sheppard's
Adventure Pictures will produce. Tim Bevan and Eric Fellner's Working Title will finance with Canal Plus, which will have world rights outside of English-speaking territories and Benelux.
~lizbeth54
Sat, Aug 7, 1999 (06:59)
#1311
There was an item on Radio 5 yesterday (about movie news) on Cate B. She's been offered the lead in "Charlotte Gray" the movie version of the bestseller by Sebastian Faulks, about a woman who goes undercover to France in World War 2 to search for her airman lover who has gone missing in action. It's to be directed by John Madden (a couple of good male roles (supporting, of course!) there as well!). The reporter then said something like "Cate is also reported to have been offered the lead in the soon-to-b
-filmed BJD..Colin Firth is expected to co-star".
Cate B. seems to be in pole position at the moment...her only problem seems to be deciding which roles to turn down!
~Allison2
Sat, Aug 7, 1999 (13:14)
#1312
The reporter then said something like "Cate is also reported to have been offered the
lead in the soon-to-b
-filmed BJD..Colin Firth is expected to co-star".
Don't want to give you all the impression that I am in a grumpy mood today but what is all the fuss about CB? I found Elizabeth unwatchable (though that was not particularly her fault) and in Plenty she was fairly dire. "Acting by Numbers". Much too shrill and self conscious. Maybe ODB could learn a thing or two. Perhaps that is what it takes to get on in Hollywood.
~KarenR
Sat, Aug 7, 1999 (14:51)
#1313
OK, Grumpy here's my take on CB... ;-D
Like you, I didn't think the movie Elizabeth was all that good, but I did think CB was excellent. I walked out feeling that that was a best actress of the year performance I had just seen. The reason everyone wants her for their films is that she has demonstrated tremendous range as an actress, unlike her co-nominee Gwynnie. Look at the variability of her roles. She does plain and homely (Paradise Rd, Oscar and Lucinda), Long Island housewife (Pushing Tin), intelligent and steadfast wife (Ideal Husban
). She's demonstrated she can do costume drama, historical uplifting tearjerker to intelligent comedy. Gwynnie, on the other hand, has not. She's hasn't shown her stretch in terms of characters. Shakespeare was a stretch, but she was still playing the beautiful upper class girl.
Don't stone me, but CB has a chameleon-like ability too. She doesn't look the same or act the same in her varied roles. Just my two cents. ;-D
~lizbeth54
Sun, Aug 8, 1999 (00:06)
#1314
The CB phenomenon interests me. Obviously I didn't see her in "Plenty" but I think (from reading the rather lukewarm reviews) that Allison's assessment is spot on. Yet there was a terrific build-up for "Plenty", the run was extended, it was a sell-out and the adverts all managed to stress the few positive references made in the reviews. So CB is established as a great stage actress. Ditto, "Elizabeth"...didn't particularly like it, but the role of Elizabeth was a plum...it would have been difficult for an
reasonably good (and CB is this) actress to shine.
Where CB is fortunate is that she's now being inundated with choice leading roles in Hollywood backed movies, which will be seen worldwide, so her reputation will go from strength to strength. There's a lot of luck...neither CF or JE (both better actors) have had this sort of breakthrough in movies nor the sort of defining roles which enable them to do justice to theit talent.
My three cents worth!
PS. If CF has to find a niche, it's playing Mr Darcy! I just want to see him playing one more authoritative, rich, heroic handsome alpha-male!
~lizbeth54
Sun, Aug 8, 1999 (00:08)
#1315
correction...it would have been difficult for any reasonably good actrss NOT to shine
~jcjc
Sun, Aug 8, 1999 (07:04)
#1316
Here's the URL of an interview done with HF on CNN International. (August 6, 1999) It's three parts. http://cnn.com/books/news/9908/06/helen.fielding/
~patas
Sun, Aug 8, 1999 (09:55)
#1317
(bethan)it would have been difficult for any reasonably good actrss NOT to shine
Indeed... Forceful characters bring actors out. I've said it before, if Colin had played Wessex less "naturally", like a more caricatural (?) villain, people would have noticed him more.
Not that I would have preferred him to do so, mind you!
~KarenR
Sun, Aug 8, 1999 (14:53)
#1318
Thanks Jana for the link. Was definitely done during her last book tour of the US in June. She's wearing the same suit that I saw her in. And she mentioned that the sequel was due one year ago Monday.
Didn't say anything new about the casting. Told same old story about wanting to cast an unknown, but this time she embellished it by saying that she wanted to go up to the girl at the gym who is doing nothing and offer her the role.
~lafn
Sun, Aug 8, 1999 (19:50)
#1319
(Allison)...but what is all the fuss about CB? I found Elizabeth unwatchable (though that was not particularly her fault)
I agree with you and Bethan...'n Gi. Really didn't want to say so before....yeah...I do wish Jennifer would get offered those roles.But she's not bankable enough. "Elizabeth" was a plum role.Kate Winslett, Emily Watson both tried out for it. And any one would have been as good!!
I saw AIH and was not blown away by CB's portrayl as the wife...she played it so bland ...the love scenes with Jeremy Northam (fergawdsakes!)were positively
neutral.No chemistry there. "Paint-by-number"-acting.
I'm glad that filmed bombed...but sadly MLSF came right on its heels. IMO it had a negative effect on MLSF.
~KarenR
Sun, Aug 8, 1999 (21:32)
#1320
Am not disagreeing that another good actress *could* do Elizabeth, the point is that CB did it and got the acclaim, the nominations, the awards and therefore the script offers. ;-D As I recall, she got the part of Elizabeth because of Oscar and Lucinda. Re: AIH, I don't think I said she was brilliant in it (no one particularly was). My point is that she's shown her versatility, something Jennifer has been trying to do. And I don't put Winslet in the same category of talented actresses with CB or Emily
atson.
~KarenR
Mon, Aug 23, 1999 (02:03)
#1321
From The Guardian, August 19, 1999:
Work in progress
Film producer David Parfitt
It's still terribly early days, but among the projects I've got bubbling away, I'm working on a movie adaptation of Bridget Jones' Diary. Now when I say early days, I mean it - we're basically in pre-pre-production - but taking these first steps (knocking the script into shape, finding our Bridget, generally ensuring everything is on schedule) is something I relish.
We're lucky in that our director Sharon Maguire - aside from being enormously talented - has an unusually close relationship with the subject matter. She was Shazza in Helen Fielding's original book (I believe the phrase "fuckwittage" was her invention), and she's got a fresh take on what could potentially have seemed slightly dated and clich�d.
For me, one of the attractions of the project is that it's obviously a break from the period pieces which take up so much room on my CV (I've co-produced, amongst others, The Madness of King George, Much Ado About Nothing and Henry V). In particular, it was important for me to find something which was radically different to my last movie, Shakespeare In Love; I'm not, of course, going to
feign modesty here - I'm enormously proud of Shakespeare - but it was important to prove I could work with material which was set in the 20th century!
Having said that, it's great that I could be involved in a film which has hopefully helped make it easier for British films to get out there and find their audience. What we could do with - and not necessarily from government - is a way of letting development money flow a little easier; ideally, you want to be able to say "OK, the script's ready - let's get it made". Because getting it made (whatever it may be) is what a producer's life is all about.
� David Parfitt is the co-producer of Shakespeare In Love
~patas
Mon, Aug 23, 1999 (08:58)
#1322
Thanks, Karen, this sounds promising - at least they *are* working on it!
~Moon
Mon, Aug 23, 1999 (16:29)
#1323
While visiting Oxford, I had the manager/buyer for Blackwells (which is an important bookstore), ring up Picador to inquire about the release date of the next BJD book. Their contact at Picador assured us that there is no set date for its release. If the script is still in pre-pre production, I am sure they will want to hold off its release at least until the pre-production stages so that the time difference does not amount to two years.
I am happy to see that they want to cast the perfect Bridget, I think we might trust Shazzer on this one.
~KarenR
Tue, Aug 24, 1999 (13:59)
#1324
They must really want this guy!!
Cage plays 'Mandolin' again
(Variety) After scheduling conflicts caused him to walk away from the project once (Daily Variety, July 22), Nicolas Cage is back in negotiations to star in the Working Title/Universal feature "Captain Corelli�s Mandolin."
"Notting Hill" helmer Roger Michell is directing the adaptation of Louis De Berniere� novel, a sweeping love story set on the idyllic Greek isle of Cephalonia during World War II.
Cage previously entered negotiations to star in the pic nearly three months ago (Daily Variety, June 7), but later dropped out due to scheduling conflicts. It�s not clear what has been resolved since that time.
However, in July, the actor added another starring role to his upcoming roster when he signed to topline Beacon Communications� "Family Man" for Universal. "Family Man" is slated to go before the cameras in December, leaving Cage available to shoot "Mandolin" in April in Italy, although these dates are likely to change.
~alyeska
Fri, Aug 27, 1999 (03:26)
#1325
There was a good article about BJD in the paper Sunday. It seems that there have been several pirate copies written. None of which measures up. The writer really loves the book and recommended that we forget the others.
~KarenR
Thu, Sep 2, 1999 (13:14)
#1326
It's done. Per Variety:
Cage just pacted for "Captain Correlli's Mandolin" with "Notting Hill" helmer Roger Michel.
~lafn
Thu, Sep 2, 1999 (21:28)
#1327
...Cage just pacted for "Captain Correlli's Mandolin"
I am not pleased. But maybe they'll get MEM for the female lead.
She's even of Italian heritage...but then so is he.
~EileenG
Fri, Sep 3, 1999 (15:53)
#1328
Pelagia was Greek, not Italian. No matter, MEM could do it.
Cage's performance in Moonstruck comes to mind here. Can't see Correlli with a wooden hand, though :-P
PS. OT (but then, so is this whole discussion) Ever notice the kitchen in Moonstruck? It bears *strong* resemblance to another notable Italian kitchen: white tile walls, pics of saints hanging...I was looking for the old radio on the shelf (alas, no DB pouring espresso, only Olympia, Vincent and Cher).
~EileenG
Thu, Sep 16, 1999 (16:08)
#1329
Don Johnson as Julio, Gi?? There's one we haven't heard before! I was thinking about the person who proposed Ricky Martin for Julio a few months ago--bet Working Title couldn't afford him now, even though he is *way* too young.
~patas
Thu, Sep 16, 1999 (19:46)
#1330
Don Johnson would be perfect. I've said it before. Think about it! Look at him and don't you see how he thinks he is so handsome? The perfect gigolo. Ricky Martin is too young and not "vile" enough.
~KarenR
Thu, Sep 16, 1999 (20:19)
#1331
And is Don Johnson your *type*? Eowwwww!!
~LauraMM
Thu, Sep 16, 1999 (21:07)
#1332
Okay, no Don Johnson (though he is cute.) NO KATE WINSLET!!!!! Nada absolutely not!!! Hurricane Floyd won't stop me from jinxing the set;) AND WHEN is CF going to be named as MD.
Jane Horrocks would be smashing as BJ actually;)
Um on the weather front, Tineke is enjoying this hurricane, I, on the other hand, could do without it!
~winter
Thu, Sep 16, 1999 (21:18)
#1333
Jane Horrocks would be smashing as BJ actually
Yes... but, just like HB-C she's too thin. The girl's gotta put on a few more pounds before she'd even be considered in the running.
BTW, would Toni Collette be considered too young for the role?
As for Antonio, there's an actor I'm sure all of you have seen: Joaquim de Almeida (Clear and Present Danger, Only You, Good Morning Babylon). Bears a weird resemblance to the late Phil Hartman. I think he'd be perfect.
~KarenR
Thu, Sep 16, 1999 (21:58)
#1334
Joaquim de Almeida
He was also in Nostromo! v.v. short, but he only has to seduce Bridget's mom.
~winter
Fri, Sep 17, 1999 (01:10)
#1335
Nostromo?! Really? Guess I haven't been paying attention.
~KarenR
Fri, Sep 17, 1999 (02:26)
#1336
How could you miss him in that bright red jacket. He was the jerky colonel.
~patas
Fri, Sep 17, 1999 (07:45)
#1337
(KarenR)And is Don Johnson your *type*? Eowwwww!!
No, ma'am, he is not.
Joaquim de Almeida... v.v. short, but he only has to seduce Bridget's mom.
Portuguese actor playing portuguese gigolo? Ummm... A good idea, and Joaquim can act the part. Approved from this side. Short? They can work around that anytime, make him step on a ladder, sit him on a book... whatever :-P
~KarenR
Fri, Sep 17, 1999 (12:27)
#1338
They don't have to do anything about the height thing, you know. Just commenting. He was an effective seducer in Clear and Present Danger. All depends on who plays Bridge's mom. But it still may not matter.
~winter
Fri, Sep 17, 1999 (15:48)
#1339
Now I'm curious... HOW short is JdA??? It never occurred to me that the man was below average height. But then, I'm only 5'0"-- Humphrey Bogart never struck me as a short actor either.
~patas
Fri, Sep 17, 1999 (20:56)
#1340
I've sat in the same restaurant as JdA a few years ago, but as he was sitting too, I didn't notice the height.
~winter
Fri, Sep 17, 1999 (22:51)
#1341
Gi-- how popular is he in Portugal? He seems to have a somehwat steady career here, usually as the foreign scoundrel, however. What roles has he played there?
~patas
Sat, Sep 18, 1999 (08:25)
#1342
He is very popular. The Portuguese only value their own after they are recognised abroad - so Joaquim's career in the US has landed him leading roles here for several major films.
~LauraMM
Sat, Sep 18, 1999 (23:43)
#1343
Okay, here's my two cents worth.
I think Kate Winslet is not a good choice for BJ. 1. she is too young. 2. Can she be neurotic enough? 3. Can she be funny in a zany(and witty) way. 4. She just isn't Bridget Jones material, honestly.
Winter, Jane Horrocks could easily gain weight for the part if that is what it called for, but I suspect that BJ is not overweight, nor does she have a weight problem. She's just your typical woman obsessed with weight. I always thought of BJ as a normal size woman. Jane Horrocks has this crazy zaniness about her that is endearing; and she's brilliantly hysterical! I can easily see her getting into BJ-type dilemma's!
RE: Who to play Julio? Well I always thought of a Julio Iglesias lookalike, but I guess the Portuguese man Joaquim (insert last name here) would do nicely.
All in All, I still think Colin Firth is the only one who could play Mark Darcy. And I think it would be a sad loss if he passed up on the chance.
One more thing to note, I hope they have at least a decent screenplay. I don't see how what the difficulty is in turning BJD into a movie. I loved this book and would be really upset if they destroyed it in anyway. We're all very strong as to who shouldn't play BJ. I hope when they finally do cast it they choose someone because of talent and acting, and not just a name. Big name doesn't necessarily mean good, and we know that all too well.
~patas
Sun, Sep 19, 1999 (04:37)
#1344
For more on Joaquim de Almeida go to:
http://www.hollys.com/joaquim/
There's several pics from his movies and a midi sequence of one of my favourite songs by a Portuguese songwriter, it's called, in translation, "If I could one day be your look" - as in "The Look".
It is here: http://www.hollys.com/sounds/Olhar.mid
~KarenR
Sun, Sep 19, 1999 (04:58)
#1345
Gi, what are you doing up at this hour?
~MarciaH
Sun, Sep 19, 1999 (05:20)
#1346
She is on IM with me and it is storming out and she could not sleep!
~Moon
Sun, Sep 19, 1999 (15:29)
#1347
I have come up with another Bridget! Why not a real Bridget...Fonda! She could pull it off. I am not so keen on Jane Horrocks, she reminds me too much of that TV actress Amanda...(forgot last name).
~Moon
Sun, Sep 19, 1999 (15:34)
#1348
I remember Joaquim de Almeida , but I think he is too old looking for the part. He should be younger looking for there to be a big contrast in looks between B mom and himself. (some young handsome gigolo type)
~Hollykins
Sun, Sep 19, 1999 (16:14)
#1349
Hi!
I am the one who has the web site for actor, Joaquim de Almeida. I saw all the hits from this site and HAD to come check it out.
Yes, it is true, Joaquim is not very tall. He is between 5'6 and 5'8, but I've never asked his exact height. I can find out if you want.
Smiles,
Holly
Webmaster: Joaquim de Almeida Fan Site
~KarenR
Sun, Sep 19, 1999 (17:18)
#1350
(Moon) but I think he is too old looking for the part. He should be younger looking for there to be a big contrast in looks between B mom and himself. (some young handsome gigolo type)
I don't think Julio is a younger gigolo type. Remember, HF said her role model for the part is Omar Sharif. Could definitely be an older man, who is very suave, debonair, etc.
Thanks, Holly, for giving us an approximate height. I don't think we need anything more. His height really showed up in Nostromo, standing next Colin or SST. In Clear and Present Danger, it wasn't as evident.
~Moon
Sun, Sep 19, 1999 (18:02)
#1351
HF said her role model for the part is Omar Sharif. Could definitely be an older man, who is very suave, debonair, etc.
True, but I think it works better if there is more of an age contrast. After all, he is supposed to be latin and OS is an Arab.
~KarenR
Sun, Sep 19, 1999 (18:06)
#1352
OS could pass for any number of ethnic types. Remember, he was Dr. Zhvaigo and Nicky Arnstein!! ;-o
~Moon
Sun, Sep 19, 1999 (18:07)
#1353
Yes, but never Ricky Ricardo! ;-)
~KarenR
Sun, Sep 19, 1999 (18:21)
#1354
True, only one person has played Ricky Ricardo. However, Omar did play Che Guevara in the movie Che! He seems to have played a multiplicity of ethnic roles and I can see exactly what HF meant in saying that is who she pictured in the role.
~Moon
Sun, Sep 19, 1999 (18:26)
#1355
Case closed!
~KarenR
Sun, Sep 19, 1999 (18:46)
#1356
Case closed!
Judge Moonie has spoken. ;-D
~patas
Wed, Sep 29, 1999 (20:05)
#1357
How nice of Holly to drop by, wasn't it? I think I can welcome her in Drools's name :-)
~KarenR
Sat, Oct 2, 1999 (14:38)
#1358
Laura, you might be interested, although the book is probably not available here:
*******
She writes about the lives and loves of the Nineties single woman, but Marian Keyes is much more than Ireland's answer to Bridget Jones. Take her new novel, which is even outselling Roddy Doyle at home. By Alex O'Connell
*******
Craicing good read
The atmosphere in The Clarence, Bono's modernist hotel in Dublin, is a perfect combination of style and surliness. Thank Jesus, Mary and Joseph, then, for the Irish writer Marian Keyes, who is so down-to-earth you are tempted to look for soil under her fingernails.
Five foot nothing, with the carefully crafted features of an expensive doll, Keyes is a cross between a young Vivien Leigh and the generic heroine of a children's book. Her cute cheeks, long black hair and green eyes combine to make her look naughty when she's trying to be serious and tragic when she's delivering a devastating one-liner.
But then Keyes has a lot to smile about: shortly before we met she learned that her latest tragi-comic novel, Last Chance Saloon, out in Britain this week, had reached the number one position in the Irish book charts. It shot ahead of the competition despite the fact that bestselling Irish authors Patricia Cornwell and Roddy Doyle both have new titles out.
This is Keyes's fourth novel. Her first, Watermelon, published in 1995 by Poolbeg, a small Irish publisher, was an immediate success in Ireland. Reed International spotted her and a �435,000 deal was signed. Her second novel, Lucy Sullivan is Getting Married followed in 1996. In 1997 the giant Random House swallowed Reed and Keyes decided to move to Penguin.The same year, Rachel's Holiday, her third novel, a semi-autobiographical story of alcoholism and recovery, properly established her as a serious cont
nder in a by now burgeoning "single girl" market.
But just how seriously is a female comic novelist taken? Keyes, 36, is definitely earning serious money. She is seriously married to Tony Baine, a book editor, and lives in a seriously grown-up house. (In 1997 she decamped with her husband from a small flat in Gospel Oak, north London, to a townhouse in South, Co Dublin). She has a serious past (the alcoholism and depression that plagued her twenties) and a serious future (two new novels in the pipeline and film deals coming out of her ears).
Last Chance Saloon, which is about the lives and loves of three Irish childhood friends living in London, is likely to be seen as following Bridget Jones (although Keyes was published before Helen Fielding's book) and lumped together with other, less stylish contemporary "women's novels". Keyes's latest is certainly accessible and addictive. But it is also well-written and entertaining. "There is a part of me that thinks something is missing, that I'm just not serious, which is a pity," she says. "The thi
g that most makes me happy is entertaining people and giving them a lift. But I want everything and nobody can have that."
In Ireland, she says, there is an even sharper division between literary and mass market fiction than there is in Britain. "There is a growing acknowledgement for what I write, but it's not going to win the Booker Prize, as people are fond of telling me," she smiles. "There is more than one set of criteria for judging a book. If you divert people, take them away from their own situation, that is valid. I think it is sad that mass-market authors take on the shame given to them by others. It's seeking appro
al."
Keyes's novels are character-based rather than plot-driven, but she reckons that this is hardly a crime. "I think I'm just really interested in people," she reflects. "I love getting to know people. I don't want to write about perfect people, I like it when they're flawed."
But does she consider herself a key member of the girly gang led by Helen Fielding and which includes Jane Green, Louise Bagshawe, Lisa Jewell and Freya North? On this point she is impeccably diplomatic. "Everyone likes to think they are unique, but it is nice to be part of a Zeitgeist. I don't want to write a book that isn't funny. Not yet. It would be excruciating to write an entirely bleak book."
There is no commercial reason why she should. Watermelon is being optioned for a 90-minute film for Granada Television, with Caroline Aherne as executive producer. Rachel's Holiday has been bought by Touchstone Pictures. And Lucy Sullivan is Getting Married has been made into a 16-part ITV series to be shown next year.
Although Keyes was an obsessive Enid Blyton fan as a child, she did not come from a particularly literary family. "I so wanted to go to those boarding schools and I loved Jilly Cooper and P.G. Wodehouse. But there really wasn't an Irish writer I identified with until Maeve Binchy." The eldest child of five, she was born in Limerick but soon afterwards the family moved to Cork. When Keyes was 11 her parents, Ted and Mary, moved the family to Dublin because her father, a local government worker, had changed
jobs. "I found it very hard to settle, but please don't make it sound like I'm blaming them," she says. "Some people have a propensity for feeling displaced and I'm one of them."
A model student ("I was too scared not to be") she excelled at school, despite persecuting the nuns at the Presentation Convent in Dublin with dodgy make-up and dangerously short skirts. "I had a great thing about justice," she remembers, "not doing what people wanted me to." After A-levels she took a year out working as a clerk in Dublin, and then went to University College where she gained a 2.2 in Law.
However, she realised that she did not want to be a lawyer and would have to rebel against her parents' wishes. So she fled to London in 1986, along with hordes of other Dubliners. This was before the trendification, when the city was deep in economic depression.
Delighted to be in London, despite feeling guilty at letting her parents down, she spent her twenties working as a clerk and later began an accountancy course which her subsequent success left uncompleted. Keyes's experiences during this period provided much of her inspiration for her novels.
Boredom with her succession of dead-end jobs prompted her to hastily scribble the odd short story in her spare time, although she didn't do anything with them until 1994.
I had been warned that Keyes did not want to talk about the drink problem that led to a spell in the Rutland treatment centre in Dublin in 1993. But while she does not elaborate on the subject, she is the first to raise it and we talk about the previous comments she has made, and what she describes as a "salvation" of sorts. Low selfesteem, a fear of being single and getting involved with men who didn't want to commit themselves all contributed to her illness. She had what she now suspects was clinical de
ression. "I could have died, been knocked down and killed, but then eventually I realised that I was OK and nothing had really happened to me," she says. The drying-out centre, which a friend had persuaded her to check into, changed her life.
"When I went there [the Rutland] I remembered all the terrible things that nearly happened to me as an active alcoholic. I don't want to go all New Age on you, but I felt like the first novel was written outside of me. It was the most magical, joyous experience I have ever had."
Brought up a Roman Catholic, Keyes now favours a looser form of spirituality. "I very much believe in God but I am opposed to any organised religion. I think it is very anti-democratic," she says, playing with her hair. "I am repelled by the cruelty of Catholicism. Women in Ireland have 13 children. It is very misogynistic." She adds quickly: "My poor mother will cry her eyes out when she
reads this."
Keyes's own story reads like the most thrilling of plots. But she insists that her characters are neither based on herself nor her friends, ("the thought of putting someone I know in a book feels like the biggest abuse of power"). She is happy, however, to compare herself to her creations. The two women protagonists in Last Chance Saloon are opposites. Katherine is a control freak with perfect hair, Tara is a dumpy victim with a chronic fear of being single.
Katherine, says Keyes, is the least like her. "She is the woman I wish I was. She is tragic and damaged but has a smart answer for everything. But I'm much more of a Tara really. Tara was me at my worst. I did think I'd end up alone, I did, I did, I did. I got past 30 and I'd had relationships with men not concerned with my wellbeing. But I was the one shooting myself in the foot. I picked people who weren't emotionally available, or only up to a certain point."
She met her husband six years ago through a mutual friend. At the time he worked as a computer analyst. When she talks about him the corners of her eyes crinkle up. "He is a good man," she says. "That need for door-slamming passion has abated. He is very supportive of me and me of him."
Falling Upwards, her next book, which is about a London journalist who goes to Dublin to edit a fashion magazine, is already on its way (Keyes has obviously been doing her research and has written an article in this month's Irish Tatler). She also plans to write a book set in Los Angeles which will feature the same family as Rachel's Holiday and Watermelon.
Meanwhile she remains realistic about the future. "I realise that I am on the crest of a wave at the moment," she says. "There is this 'ordinary girl fiction' craze now, but before it was Aga sagas and before that it was sex and shopping novels. I suspect there will come a time when I'm no longer favoured." With her track record, that looks highly unlikely.
The Last Chance Saloon is published on October 7.
LAST CHANCE SALOON
Penguin, �9.99 (Fiction)
ISBN 0 718 14385 X
Special offer: Order from The Times Bookshop for �8.99
(free p&p in the UK). Telephone 0870 160 80 80
~MarkG
Mon, Oct 4, 1999 (08:42)
#1359
I haven't read the latest, but Marian Keyes' first three books are not quite in the Bridget Jones mould. Lucy Sullivan is Getting Married is the most singleton-seeks-man storyline, and a decent read, but Watermelon and Rachel's Holiday are more about a woman with a problem sorting out her love life. In the former, the wife is dumped by her husband an hour after giving birth, and the other is about an addiction clinic recovery.
For a classic Bridget Jones style book, track down Blonde With Attitude by Virginia Blackburn (or Blakeburn?)
~SBRobinson
Mon, Oct 4, 1999 (18:07)
#1360
I read (or attempted to at least) Watermelon, and only got about a third of the way through it. It just didnt capture my interest the way BJD did and i gave up and went on to another book. I passed Watermelon onto a friend, who loved BJD, and she didnt like it either. Havent tried any of MK's other books -so cant comment on them. I was disapointed, cause i was really hoping to find another good author. I'll have to try BWA -thanks for the tip Mark. :)
~KarenR
Mon, Oct 18, 1999 (04:07)
#1361
Early comments on High Fidelity at the AICN site. Check out the Talk Back section. There are two mentions of Colin and, no, I didn't do it!
http://www.aint-it-cool-news.com/display.cgi?id=4535
~heide
Mon, Oct 18, 1999 (23:18)
#1362
So Karen, do you agree with "Grunter's" assessment why it doesn't matter what the film's locale is?
~KarenR
Tue, Oct 19, 1999 (01:58)
#1363
In a sense, I do agree. Hornby's characters in FP, AAB, or HF could live anywhere. They are very universal types. Rob's record store clerks--Dick and Barry--are garden variety slackers. That being said, I would have still liked Colin to play the role. I identify him with music than Cusack.
So did Suki comment? ;-D
~MarkG
Mon, Nov 15, 1999 (08:34)
#1364
Months of no Bridget, huge delays on the sequel, and only the odd snippets about its progress posted on the CF topic to keep fans of BJD interested, but at last HERE IT COMES!
Radio ad this morning announced that BJD - The Edge of Reason would have advanced snippets serialised in the Daily Telegraph from Wednesday (Nov 17) onwards (so online also for sure). I did not recognise the woman reading a diary entry as Bridget on the radio, but doubt they would have cast and obtained the actress for the impending (ha!?) movie yet. And the book is due for release within a couple of weeks as far as I remember from the sleuths over at 123.
Incidentally, re post 1358 on Marian Keyes above, Lucy Sullivan is Getting Married is being serialised on ITV at 10.30 on (some, odd) weekday evenings at the moment. It is surprisingly (a) true to the book, and (b) good.
~Moon
Mon, Nov 15, 1999 (13:11)
#1365
I bet the party at the Hilton is on the 17th as well. Any chance of you crashing Mark? Thanks for the info!
~KarenR
Mon, Nov 15, 1999 (15:30)
#1366
Excellent news, Mark. I'll be checking out the ET nightly. *hee hee* We get to read it before you get up in the morning.
~MarkG
Mon, Nov 15, 1999 (16:28)
#1367
Karen, I was thinking about not telling you till Wednesday so I could read it first - then I remembered your sleuthing powers, and quailed.
Moon, I will admit I was thinking about trying to crash the Hilton bunfight - but I doubt that these things really happen like Notting Hill where you find out where it is and just breeze in at the back. Could I claim I'm from Horse and Hound?
I'm not convinced it's on Wednesday just because that's the first day of serialisation. Should I ring the publishers, the PR company or the hotel to try and find out what day it's on, do you think? Alternatively, I was thinking of ringing Picador to ask for a review copy (claiming to be from online web review site Springnet, perhaps?)
~KarenR
Mon, Nov 15, 1999 (16:47)
#1368
Horse and Hound
Brilliant choice of publications! ;-D Do remember to stammer, as is required for all staff.
I did check out Picador's website several days ago and nothing on Bridget. Call the publishers and ask. Never hurts to ask. BTW, Helen is very familiar with us, so it's wouldn't be too much of a fib to use Spring. Here's hoping that it works. Should we start referring to you, Mark, as our *colt* reporter? ;-D
~MarkG
Mon, Nov 15, 1999 (17:18)
#1369
Well, Picador just took down my details when I said I wanted to be on the review copy list, as if they'd been expecting my call.
I represent SpringNet, an online magazine. Now let's see if a book arrives.
~KarenR
Mon, Nov 15, 1999 (17:33)
#1370
Isn't it amazing! These people will give away the store without asking for credentials. And the party? You could drop hints all over the place about who we want them to cast in the movie.
~SBRobinson
Mon, Nov 15, 1999 (17:48)
#1371
I represent SpringNet, an online magazine. Now let's see if a book arrives. LOL! Bravo Mark!
And do try to crash the party, what a hoot that would be *grin*
you would definately be knighted Sir Mark for that effort, espically if you start every conversation with "you know of course who absolutely HAS to play Mark Darcy..."
(Karen)Do remember to stammer, as is required for all (Horse & Hound)staff.
ROTFLOL
~EileenG
Mon, Nov 15, 1999 (17:58)
#1372
Wow, Mark, you're really in the spirit of all this. *clap clap* Good for you! Go to it!
(Karen)Do remember to stammer, as is required for all (Horse & Hound)staff.
LOL, too. Don't forget to mess up your hair and maintain a look of perpetual bewilderment on your face.
~SBRobinson
Mon, Nov 15, 1999 (18:06)
#1373
(Karen)Do remember to stammer, as is required for all (Horse & Hound)staff.
(Eileen)LOL, too. Don't forget to mess up your hair and maintain a look of perpetual bewilderment on your face.
And the blinking.... you can't forget the constant blinking. *hee hee* :D
~MarkG
Mon, Nov 15, 1999 (18:41)
#1374
SB, this book is what I've been waiting for. The whole reason I found Drool was that I was looking for somewhere to talk about BJD. Then of course the hilarious adventures of the CF pursuers keep you coming back for more.
I don't personally care who they cast in the film, as long as they capture the flavour of the book. The only reason I would like Colin to get the role is because he's a good actor.
~KarenR
Mon, Nov 15, 1999 (19:16)
#1375
(Karen)Do remember to stammer, as is required for all (Horse & Hound)staff.
(Eileen)LOL, too. Don't forget to mess up your hair and maintain a look of perpetual bewilderment on your face.
(SBR) And the blinking.... you can't forget the constant blinking. *hee hee* :D
Gee, who could this be? ;-D *Am laughing hysterically*
(Mark) I don't personally care who they cast in the film
But since you represent SpringNet, a zine, your editorial staff expect nothing less than a pro-Colin position (stop thinking what you're thinking, ladies). Anywho... we are trying to obviate a similar situation as happened with Ms. Sagay. We know Colin (as Mr. Darcy) is HF's model and first choice.
So Bethan, what magazine will you represent? ;-D
~EileenG
Mon, Nov 15, 1999 (19:36)
#1376
DroolNet?
*cracking myself up*
~KarenR
Mon, Nov 15, 1999 (19:41)
#1377
How about Modern Drooler or Popular Drooler?
~Moon
Mon, Nov 15, 1999 (22:41)
#1378
(Mark),I'm not convinced it's on Wednesday just because that's the first day of serialisation. Should I ring the publishers, the PR company or the hotel to try and find out what day it's on,
That is exactly why it would be on that day! Go to it and make the call!
~heide
Tue, Nov 16, 1999 (01:27)
#1379
Very enterprising, Mark. I am impressed!
The whole reason I found Drool was that I was looking for somewhere to talk about BJD. Then of course the hilarious adventures of the CF pursuers keep you coming back for more.
Did we remind you of a certain serial? ;-) But of course we are so glad you found us and have kept coming back.
~MarciaH
Tue, Nov 16, 1999 (03:07)
#1380
...and don't forget he is a formidable Cricket player...
*smile*
~KarenR
Wed, Nov 17, 1999 (06:01)
#1381
*tapping fingers* OK, where is it? *tapping fingers*
~MarkG
Wed, Nov 17, 1999 (08:17)
#1382
Looks like print version only - and if you think I'm going to type it up...
~Moon
Wed, Nov 17, 1999 (12:56)
#1383
Mark, there is no need to type...just scan and post. ;-)
~KarenR
Wed, Nov 17, 1999 (13:56)
#1384
Print version only!!!
How dare they?! No wonder there was no mention/hype about the "Return of Bridget" to its pages. Time to email the ETelegraph editors.
~lizbeth54
Wed, Nov 17, 1999 (22:18)
#1385
Sorry the Electronic version isn't available. If Mark is a techno-whizz and can scan I'll leave it to him, but I do have two copies (home/work papers) of the excerpts and could post them (and tomorrow's) if need be, if you e-mail me addresses. The book is apparently in the shops tomorrow, so I shall certainly buy a copy!
Brief summary...continuing story of Bridget and Mark. Bridget ateends posh "do" with some of Mark's legal eagle colleagues, makes discovery about Mark which leads her to question relationship. Mark meets Rebecca and is impressed. Bridget accuses Mark of never taking her to his place. He reluctantly complies. Disastrous evening. Mark Darcy does not even know where to find his own fridge. Bridget makes second even more shocking discovery about Mark. Discovery proves to be erroneous, Bridge and Mark re-unit
for evening of lust and dicussion of spiritual tendencies. Bridget decides, in true Mills and Boon fashion, that Mark seemss a bit scary, but "underneath is very kind and sweet". Jude and Shazzer seem to think that Bridget should chuck Mark.
This takes us to the beginning of February...I can distinctly see the "Persuasion" plot-line looming.
Great fun, But I'll need to read the whole book before I pass comment. Very much looking forward to Mark's review!
~KarenR
Thu, Nov 18, 1999 (06:12)
#1386
So Jude and Shazzer will be Lady Russells, huh? ;-D Am very curious about that "shocking, though erroneous discovery about Mark." Since this early part of the book would have been based on the columns in the Independent, does it seem familiar to you, Bethan? [I've never read those.]
How were you planning on distributing? An emailed scan or a retyping (eek)? How many installment will there be? Did it say?
I've sent off an email to the ET's editor asking why. Love this instantaneously democratic internet!
~MarkG
Thu, Nov 18, 1999 (08:49)
#1387
It doesn't say how many instalments we'll get, except today that "Tom Kemp returns next week" (who he?). Each day we seem to get about 5,000 words. Bethan is avoiding spoilers by not telling you about Bridget's bizarre "discovery" about Mark Darcy.
I have no scanner, I'm afraid. Day two is v good also, featuring Jude's marriage to Vile Richard. I did not try crashing the Hilton yesterday. No review copy has turned up so I'll have to buy the book. Does "published today" mean "in the shops today" always?
~Moon
Thu, Nov 18, 1999 (13:18)
#1388
It should be in the shops today.
Mark and Bethan, we want *spoilers*. What is the discovery?
Bethan if you could scan it here it would be fantastic. I too have emailed the DT.
~MarkG
Thu, Nov 18, 1999 (14:16)
#1389
I went out at lunch to check the bookshops. No book, just a flier saying "Bridget Jones is back! Helen Fielding will be signing at our Piccadilly Branch on Thursday 18 Nov at 1.00" I looked at my watch. It was 12.45! Gaaaah!
Mobilised myself on the Tube, and got to the shop just in time to witnes the arrival of HF, and listen to the reading. Enjoyed telling a photographer to shut up until it finished.
Q&A was same old, same old: Autobiographical? Well, Bridget is exaggerated. How did the first book go down? I wouldn't have written it if I'd known how many people would read it. Bridget seems to be a universal character (well Europe and USA recognise her). Who will play Bridget? Would prefer an unknown (old story about woman not exercising on exercise bike). Are you writing the film? Well, everybody seems to be writing the film, you know how it is with films (er, no. How is it?)
I'm afraid I could not stay to get a book signed, as there were fifteen photographers to satisfy first and a queue of about 150 people with books to be signed, so I bought one (special price 9.99) and left.
Helen looked very well, was dressed in black (of course), admitted she missed the deadline by 71 weeks, new book is 420 pages long.
Oh, the *discovery* above is a naked Oriental boy, sitting on Mark Darcy's bed, with two wooden balls and a live rabbit.
~KarenR
Thu, Nov 18, 1999 (14:44)
#1390
Thanks, Mark, for your report from the field(ing). Her responses are getting v. old.
Isn't Tom their gay friend?
the *discovery* above is a naked Oriental boy, sitting on Mark Darcy's bed, with two wooden balls and a live rabbit.
Am guess that Bridget thinks the former is Mark's son. Can't imagine what she thinks about latter. ;-D
~KarenR
Thu, Nov 18, 1999 (14:46)
#1391
Here's my response from The Telegraph:
Dear Karen,
I'm afraid we didn't get the legal rights to publish these new extracts online.
I'm very sorry about this, but we simply could not afford them.
The only Bridget Jones available via our site at the moment is in the archive.
If you still want a copy of the new pieces, our back issues department can be phoned on (England) 01268 725579.
Please accept our apologies.
Best wishes,
Richard Greenwood, Electronic Telegraph
~LauraMM
Thu, Nov 18, 1999 (14:59)
#1392
Oh, the *discovery* above is a naked Oriental boy, sitting on Mark Darcy's bed, with two wooden balls and a live rabbit.
]
My book is in the mail. Can't wait to read that ONE!
~MarkG
Thu, Nov 18, 1999 (15:30)
#1393
Karen, you're too chaste. Bridget in fact says that "the one time someone seems such a nice sensible person such as approved of by mother and not married, mad, alcoholic or f---wit, they turn out to be gay bestial pervert." Needless to say, MD turns out not to be gay bestial pervert (probably).
I think the DT means Tom Kemp is a regular feature writer who has been left out for a while as they serialise BJ. But full marks for remembering Tom the gay friend.
The book begins where the last book stopped. Does this mean it runs side by side with the columns? Or have we moved into a parallel alternative universe? The first two pages I am sure I have read before: "Bridget. Will you stop. Bloody. Staring at me while I am asleep.", but then it's off on a new tack, and straight into a new "Now back to the studio" story.
Do you think the PR company would have had the launch party last night, then make HF get up and do readings and signing today, or will the launch party be tonight instead? I am pretty sure that this was the only signing session as the Waterstone's flyer claims an "exclusive".
~KarenR
Thu, Nov 18, 1999 (19:15)
#1394
(Bridget) they turn out to be gay bestial pervert
Actually, my thoughts re: rabbit were along similar lines, i.e., boiled bunny a la Fatal Attraction. But, alas, could not fit in wooden balls. ;-D
"Bridget. Will you stop. Bloody. Staring at me while I am asleep."
I remember that as well.
Seems she will have to fit in parts of her with a basic storyline (the development of which has probably been the difficulty all long). Will definitely want to know if she's left in one of my favs: At Rebecca's house party, Mark clad in towel doing his barrister stride. :-D I may not buy the book if it's not there! (yeah, right!)
~LauraMM
Thu, Nov 18, 1999 (20:05)
#1395
"Bridget. Will you stop. Bloody. Staring at me while I am asleep."
I remember that as well.
]
That was in columns not in the first book. By the way why is it the same picture as the original book? (I mean cover art?)
~KarenR
Thu, Nov 18, 1999 (20:26)
#1396
(Laura) That was in columns not in the first book.
I believe that's what Mark meant. That it was from the columns and that Helen had incorporated bits from the columns into the sequel as we expected.
Amazon UK and Waterstones show different cover art, both of which are variations on the previous UK PB. Actually, I thought the real cover would be neither and this was something they whipped up to fill space. ;-D
~lizbeth54
Thu, Nov 18, 1999 (21:42)
#1397
The second installment covers Jude's wedding (to Vile Richard) and seems to come towards the end of the book (December). Also seems to indicate that Bridget and Mark may follow Jude and VR's example, or at least, are a couple again (Rebecca ends up with Giles...remember, Mark's boring colleague) Again, I laughed out loud (several times!}
BJD will be a hard act to follow...and I'll bet that several of our vinegarish reviewers will be only too happy to knock the sequel..but I very much like what I've read so far!
~lafn
Thu, Nov 18, 1999 (22:50)
#1398
Thanks Mark and Bethan for giving us day-by-day reports of the the new BJ book.
I'm too cheap to pay for all that postage...Wonder when we'll get it.
~MarkG
Fri, Nov 19, 1999 (08:49)
#1399
More reports from the Field(ing) - (pun copyright KR)
At Moon's insistence, I crashed attended the launch party last night. I can report that celebrities in attendance included Salman Rushdie, Sebastian Faulks (writer), Harry Enfield (comedian) and ...... wait for it ..... HB-C.
So I would guess she's a certainty to play BJ. Meanwhile the only male actor I spotted was Tim McInnerny, who played HG's brother-in-law in Notting Hill.
Sadly I had used up all my courage getting in, so I did not ask any of these people questions like:
HF - do you remember the Internet group who tracked you round the States?
HB-C - delighted you're playing BJ, who's the leading man?
TMcI - What was CF like when you filmed Blackadder's Time Travel?
Further reading in the book suggests that she has mixed the best stuff from the articles with new material - Gary the builder and Rebecca the jellyfisher have been introduced from scratch right at the start of the book, and we just had the incident where Giles whinges at the time BJ spends on the phone succouring her friends and then Giles rings to say he's getting divorced.
I guess they have gone with a variant on the same cover art to persuade readers it's just like the original, and keep her looks obscure (i.e. you conjure her up for yourself). The speech of the head of Picador suggested that he has fallen into the *sequel trap* - "this book is longer, funnier and crazier than the original" (yeah, maybe the crazy bits weren't the best bits) - of course it'll still sell like hot cakes.
HF received an award for passing 1m UK sales (although the total is now 1.5m), and made the same jokes as at lunchtime: In Spain the book is called the Diaria of Bridget Jones (amusing pronunciation) - and an Italian review called it a transcendental study of existentialist despair. She looked great in a sparkly black dress and classic Bridget kitten heels.
~LauraMM
Fri, Nov 19, 1999 (13:14)
#1400
WHAT are kitten heels?
~Moon
Fri, Nov 19, 1999 (13:29)
#1401
At Moon's insistence, I crashed attended the launch party last night.
Congratulations, Mark! You have now reach official groupiness. :-D
It looks like HBC wants to be Bridget.
(Laura), WHAT are kitten heels?
You want to go buy them? Check the Victoria Secret's catalog, I just got mine in the mail. ;-)
~Moon
Fri, Nov 19, 1999 (13:31)
#1402
BTW, Mark, does your wife know you kind of follow Bridget around?
~MarkG
Fri, Nov 19, 1999 (13:51)
#1403
I am not the person who wrote a letter to the editor of the Independent saying: "Dear Sir, I would quite like to shag Bridget Jones. Can you give me her phone number, please? Yours..." HF read this letter out in her speech and said she thought the funniest bit was the quite.
My wife is staggered at the news that I crashed a party. I had better lie low in my stalking activities for a while.
Laura, I got into trouble on fashion items before. I will wait for Allison to define kitten heels, and then see if that is what I meant.
~KarenR
Fri, Nov 19, 1999 (14:43)
#1404
Bravo Mark! Excellent report. I am awed by your initiative.
Further reading in the book suggests that she has mixed the best stuff from the articles with new material
Great. I wondered how this would be, as all of us hadn't read the original Independent columns on which the first book was based. Therefore, as a book, it was new and fresh for us.
She looked great in a sparkly black dress and classic Bridget kitten heels
Bet she's cringing over the picture used on the ES online. Could they have used a more unflattering picture? :-o
I had better lie low in my stalking activities for a while.
Does this mean you will have to cancel your date with HB-C...now that she is available? ;-D
Didn't that kitten heels get answered a long time ago? Would seem they wouldn't be in style anymore? ;-D
~nky
Fri, Nov 19, 1999 (15:36)
#1405
Hello all!
I'm back! I have a lot to catch up on. Quick questions, anyone out in London get the sequel to Briget Jone's Diary, The Edge of Reason? I read that it was being released on the 17th or 18th of this month. The book can be ordered through Amazon.uk but I'm hoping it will be relased here in NY very soon.
Bye,
Nancy
~EileenG
Fri, Nov 19, 1999 (15:44)
#1406
Let's hear it for MarkG from Horse and Hound Magazine!
*rousing cheers and applause*
~KarenR
Fri, Nov 19, 1999 (15:52)
#1407
Nancy, I don't think the sequel will be released here all that soon. Remember, the paperback was only released here this June. We might have a significant wait in store.
~LauraMM
Fri, Nov 19, 1999 (16:58)
#1408
but you still haven't explained to me what a kitten heel is. Is it a spiked heel? what????
~MarkG
Fri, Nov 19, 1999 (19:24)
#1409
As I have used it, a kitten heel is a low spiked heel, typically on a backless shoe. Sorry if incorrect.
~KarenR
Fri, Nov 19, 1999 (23:47)
#1410
Wonder if the shoes have their origin in the classic Ann-Margret film "Kitten with a Whip"? ;-D
~lafn
Sat, Nov 20, 1999 (00:29)
#1411
Mark...I'm impressed...*clap,clap*.
You better quit hangin' around with pushy Americans
Did we consider HBC for Bridget?
CF would not have been able to attend due to 3 DOR.
~LauraMM
Sat, Nov 20, 1999 (01:07)
#1412
But for some reason H B-C is a VERY WELL-KNOWN name. Why does HF still say she wants an unknown?
I think I'll be 40 by the time the movie is made!
~lizbeth54
Sat, Nov 20, 1999 (01:08)
#1413
Mark, first you bunk off work, now you're gate-crashing parties! I blame it all on Evelyn :-) I'm most impressed!
H B-C, well, she was the original front-runner, before names such as Gwyneth P, Kate W, Cate B and (whisper it) Ginger Spice were thrown into the hat.
I actually think, on balance, and assuming that Bridget's weight problem is more in the mind, that she's the best candidate. I saw her play a BJ-type comic role in something co-starring Rik Mayall, and she was very convincing. She's the right thirty-something age, and, if life has to mirror art, is currently a singleton, having (according to the purportedly non-tabloid Times!) been dumped by KB. Can also see her working well with CF!
Get my copy of the sequel tomorrow. Some reviews have not been kind....but I find it better to ignore all reviews!
~lizbeth54
Sat, Nov 20, 1999 (01:12)
#1414
PS.....I agree with Laura, they should get a move on, and actually MAKE this movie. Why all the agonising about the screenplay? I'd have been perfectly happy if they had just taken all the dialogue, situations, and characters straight from the book. Why re-invent the wheel?
~LauraMM
Sat, Nov 20, 1999 (01:18)
#1415
and to think that H B-C was dumped for Alicia Silverstone! isn't KB old enough to be her father?
~KarenR
Sat, Nov 20, 1999 (02:53)
#1416
No! Really? Where's the Inquirer when you need it! ;-D
~lafn
Sat, Nov 20, 1999 (03:18)
#1417
I'll take HBC over CB anyday.
Where did you hear about Alicia Silverstone?
~KarenR
Sat, Nov 20, 1999 (03:42)
#1418
From the 19 November Evening Standard:
MEN JUST WANT TO HAVE FUN - WHICH IS WHY BRIDGET JONES CAN'T GET ONE
JULIE BURCHILL wishes it to be known that she's never had any problem having relationships with men. But she's worked out why that fictional thirtysomething does - Briar pipe and monocle notwithstanding, I consider myself to be quite a stereotypically feminine woman in many ways. I hate sports, pubs and violence; I love soap operas, drinks with tiny umbrellas in and photographical representations of fluffy ickle kittens and puppies.
Just once in a while, though, some cultural phenomenon comes along which makes me question just how much I have in common with my sisters. If I live to be 100, I will never understand why women in their millions go weak at the thought of Friends, Brad Pitt or being on the receiving end of cunnilingus.
And then there's Bridget Jones, whose Diary - as told to the journalist Helen Fielding - has been the publishing event of the decade. Published in 1997 and going on to sell more than a million copies, as well as spawning a raft of damp imitators ('Chick Lit'), it is now in development as a film, with every hot young babe in Hollywood fighting over the awesome task of bringing passion and purpose to a character who has slightly less substance than a paper dressing-doll. And a sequel, Bridget Jones: The Edg
of Reason, is published.
For anyone who has been living in an underwater cave with King Neptune for the past three years, Bridget Jones is a single woman in her thirties with a job in the media and a burning desire to get married and have children. However, she can't find a man. This is where I have a problem with the whole thing. In my experience, it is impossible not to have a relationship with a man. I am neither loyal, beautiful nor rich (though I am one hell of a lot of fun, which, at the end of the day, seems to work better
than being a size 10, or a Cordon Bleu cook, or anything), but apart from six months when I was trying to be a lesbian, I have been in steady relationships with men since I was 18, with not a week off for good behaviour. And when there was dumping to be done, it was always me who did it. MEN WANT WOMEN MORE THAN WOMEN WANT MEN. This is simply a fact. This is why men pay for sex and women don't; why married men, followed by single women, married women and single men, are the most physically and mentally he
lthy members of any society; why women instigate two out of three of all divorces; why the one thing the sociologists can agree on is that, as we go into the next century, more and more living-alone women will thrive and men will suffer. I really believe that the only two reasons why a woman has to be without a man is a) if she doesn't want one, or b) if she's a bore. Feminism or the alleged man shortage have nothing to do with it.
Some people would have it that BJ (and given her slavish attitude to men, were any initials ever more appropriate?) is satire. Well, I don't want to get so personal so quickly - oh, go on, then - but the first time I met Helen Fielding, at a birthday party on a Hampstead roof, I was about to tell her how much I liked her journalism (she really was a very good, witty journalist), when she asked me if it was true I had two children. I said yes, I'd had them both in my twenties. She asked if I was married; I
said I'd been married twice, in my twenties. Her face took on a look of absolute molten envy, and right there and then, in front of her boyfriend and my husband, she actually started talking about her biological clock! I'd never have believed women actually did that! In a highly interesting and ironic twist, Fielding's then-boyfriend (reputed to be the model for the Diary's callous love-object Daniel Cleaver, a notorious 'commitment-phobe') would subsequently go out with my ex-girlfriend (keep up) for two
years, and prove himself to be anything but. That's one of the nice things you discover about men as you get older; they'll take a man-hating, theoretical-lesbian, militant feminist over a calorie-counting, self-help-book-reading man-pleaser any time, for the simple reason that they're more fun.
'Read it for its style,' pretentious young New York bohemians used to say to their impressionable girlfriends of the Bible; it is impossible, to put it mildly, to imagine anyone saying this about Bridget Jones books. Made up completely out of diary entries, their strange telegrammish style sounds after a while like a racist doing an impersonation of an Indian: 'Is very, very good bargain!' Every time the telephone or doorbell goes, Bridget shouts 'Gaaah!' On the rare occasions she has sex with the priggis
hero Mark Darcy, this is signified by 'Mmm, Mmmm.' In order to show us that she is a 'proper' novelist, Fielding occasionally breaks away from the Vale of Tears that is Bridget's private life to have her incarcerated in a Thai jail for inadvertent drug-smuggling, or make her the target of a mystery madman's bullet. There are one or two episodes which would make good TV sketches - Bridget interviewing Colin Firth, supposedly about Fever Pitch, but not able to stop herself from drooling on about the Wet
Scene in Pride and Prejudice, or Bridget going to lay flowers at Kensington Palace when Diana dies, but being too late for flowers so leaving a copy of Vogue and a packet of Silk Cut instead.
Which, over the space of 422 pages, is as anorectic a ration as Bridget herself
could desire. To sum up, in the manner of this book: 'Good jokes, 2, reasonable sequels, 0, putative sales 1,000,000 plus.'
~KarenR
Sat, Nov 20, 1999 (05:50)
#1419
Excerpt from book (from The Times)
3 a.m. Don't know what I would have done without the girls yesterday. Called them instantly after Mark drove off, and they were round within fifteen minutes, never once saying 'I told you so.'
When Shazzer bustled in with armfuls of bottles and carrier bags, barking, 'Has he rung?' was like being in ER when Dr Greene arrives.
'No,' said Jude, popping a cigarette in my mouth as if it were a thermometer.
'Only a matter of time,' said Shaz brightly, unpacking a bottle of Chardonnay, three pizzas, two tubs of H�agen-Daaz Pralines and Cream and a packet of fun-sized Twixes.
'Yup,' said Jude, putting the Pride and Prejudice tape on top of the video, together with Through Love and Loss to Self-Esteem, The Five Stages of Dating Workbook, and How to Heal the Hurt by Hating. 'He'll be back.'
'Do you think I should call him?' I said.
'No!' yelled Shaz.
'Have you gone out of your mind?' bellowed Jude.
'He's being a Martian rubber band. The last thing you must do is call him.'
'I know,' I said huffily. I mean surely she didn't think I was that badly read.
'You let him go back to his cave and feel his attraction, and you move back from Exclusivity to Uncertainty.'
'But what if he . . . ?'
'You'd better unplug it, Shaz,' sighed Jude. 'Otherwise she'll spend the whole night waiting for him to ring instead of working on her self-esteem.'
'Noooo!' I cried, feeling like they were going to cut my ear off.
'Anyway,' said Shaz brightly, pulling the phone out of the wall with a click, 'it'll do him good.'
Two hours later was feeling quite confused.
~KarenR
Sat, Nov 20, 1999 (06:00)
#1420
Now the review from The Times. Seems unanimous. Best part of whole book is Bridget's interview with Colin! :-D
*********
Bridget Jones was a true Nineties heroine. But the follow-up to her bestselling Diary is about as appealing as last night's ashtray, says Lottie Moggach
Not v.g. at all
Helen Fielding's Bridget Jones's Diary was a good book. Bridget exemplified the feelings many modern women felt guilty about; that, despite being supposedly independent and career-minded, they secretly yearned for a man to sweep them off their feet. She relentlessly aired insecurities about her looks, which we previously thought best to keep behind a locked bathroom door. She was endearing in her honesty; it's fun reading about people who seem to have it all, but are really in a mess. The book was amusing
and palatable.
You couldn't blame its author for the fact that a worrying number of women did more than just relate to and laugh at Bridget Jones; they pronounced themselves to be her living embodiment. Or that the huge success of the book has led to hundreds of poor, lurid spin-offs - Straight Talking; Lucy Sullivan Is Getting Married; The Trials of Tiffany Trott. Fielding, obviously an intelligent woman, must be bemused by what she has started.
So, in writing a sequel, she had a golden opportunity for some corrective action. Bridget Jones could get a life. And the title, The Edge of Reason, does indeed suggest something a little darker. However, if this book is meant to represent a step towards sense and intelligence for Bridget Jones, it is merely a small teeter in Agent Provocateur mules and a size-too-small pencil skirt, before collapsing on the floor.
The form is the same as the first. Calories, Chardonnay, cigarettes. Lusting over Mark Darcy. Shrieking and swooning with her friends Shaz and Jude. The country may have changed but Bridget hasn't; her response to the 1997 election is that Cherie Booth is fantastic because "she too would probably not fit into tiny bikinis in communal changing rooms". There is zero character development. Bridget's self-absorption is unchallenged and complete. The nearest she gets to a healthy perspective on life is a momen
when, in despair because Darcy is getting off with someone else, she sits by a river and thinks, "perhaps none of this matters, because there'll always be nature." This, though, is just a throwaway comment.
Towards the end, there is an unconvincing plot twist. On a girl's holiday to Thailand, Bridget gets duped into being a drugs mule and ends up in prison facing ten years. Extraordinarily, Thai jail sounds rather a hoot. Bridget ends up, by popular demand, performing Like a Virgin, wearing a Wonderbra and sarong and using a Tampax as a microphone. And, of course, being fed on rice and water is very good for slimming.
Because this book fails to go anywhere, all the aspects that were original and lively about the first are now irritating and tired. The italicised statistics at the beginning. Sentences without prepositions. Bridget's distressed seagull cries of "Gaaah!". The clubby name-checking of the west London media lifestyle. Second time around, the minor characters seem like clich�s rather than caricatures.
Gaaah. The more the book sits on your stomach, the more queasy you feel; as if you've gorged on wine, chocolate and pizza at the same rate as Bridget does. The bits which do make you smile (notably when Bridget, trying to forge a career as a journalist, disastrously interviews the actor Colin Firth), quickly fade into insignificance.
The morals of this story are being generally self-absorbed, shallow and ignorant. For example, Bridget doesn't know where Germany is; she takes a stranger's bag on to a plane and thinks that a bullet is, in fact, a lipstick (another incredible plot twist, although this is passed off as kooky and charming rather than basic stupidity); and she thinks living her life according to Californian psychobabble is good.
Salman Rushdie may consider Bridget Jones to be a "brilliant comic creation", but I suspect that other men will think, understandably, that this confirms a view of women as silly, trivial, desperate creatures.
It's bad luck that this sequel has come out around the same time as Sue Townsend's Adrian Mole - The Cappuccino Years; it suffers heavily in comparison. Adrian Mole really is a brilliant comic creation, and Townsend's satire much sharper. Every sentence is witty and well thought out, and the whole has reverberations beyond itself.
But whatever reviewers say, The Edge of Reason will sell by the truckload. You just can't account for taste.
~lizbeth54
Sat, Nov 20, 1999 (09:04)
#1421
Hmmm, saw the Lottie Moggach interview (LM is a novelist, but not a best-selling one like Helen). Julie Burchill is a nototoriously "acid" writer, whom most people avoid like the plague. I thought the personal comments about Helen ("her face took on a look of molten envvy...biological clock" and particularly the fact that Helen's then boy friend switched allegiancies to Burchill's ex-girl friend) are way, way out of order. Cruel and unnecessary. Typical Burchill slum standard.
As I've said, I'll collect my copy today (Made the mistake of ordering from local bookshop who seem to operate 24 hours behind the rest of the world!). From the extracts, a lot of it seems to be re-cycled from HF's old stuff. The Colin interview must, I'm sure, be the Independent "interview". But as the Independent only has a readership of 300,000, going down daily, most people would not have seen this. And it's too good to waste.
I expect HF to suffer from the success-envy syndrome. It seems to me that in the UK that once you've been terribly successful, your subsequenrt efforts are always ridiculed. It's "knock-em off the pedestal" time. Think CF also suffered from this!
~heide
Sat, Nov 20, 1999 (16:59)
#1422
A sophomore slump has become so expected it's almost pre-destined.
And as for Burchill - she indeed sounds like a nasty piece of work. What an ego! Just begging to be brought down a few pegs. I'd like to see Helen do the honors. Still, JB was funny at times.
Mark, loved your on-the-spot reporting yet again. If we can do anything for you...come up with bail money, intermediate between you and your dear wife...please let us know.
~lizbeth54
Sat, Nov 20, 1999 (17:36)
#1423
Have skim-read the book and, shallow though I may be, I like it ...a lot! Mark Darcy is in evidence throughout, and CF as himself also puts in an appearance (very funny). Will now read properly!
~LauraMM
Sat, Nov 20, 1999 (22:48)
#1424
Couldn't exactly call this the sophmore slump, BJD was her sophmore book! Perhaps its the growing pains for being a junior;) (Well, I thought it was funny!)
Still want to read, and who cares if jealous non-bestselling authors condem a book. That's THEIR problem! so, ha!
~KarenR
Sun, Nov 21, 1999 (05:01)
#1425
Two articles in the Sunday Times about Bridget.
http://www.sunday-times.co.uk/news/pages/Sunday-Times/frontpage.html?999
An interview with Helen, using a Bridget-style setup, repeating many of her standard answers, including Mark's fav. I won't copy the entire thing here. Go to: News Review, "Me and Ms. Jones"
Differences between this book and the last one: many (obviously have not simply copied it out).
The Edge of Reason (very clever sounding, non?) starts where the last one left off, with Bridget in bed with Mark Darcy and about to discover what happens when you have a man, not as a fantasy in your head, but actually in your
flat and he thinks washing up means twiddling one fork under the tap then waiting to be praised for being a New Man.
The plot is more dramatic - Bridget goes to Thailand and ends up being banged in jail for alleged drug smuggling - but it is also about her internal state of mind. She starts off using self-help books in the same pick-and-mix way that
she once used diets, hopping between the Road Less Travelled and Buddhism Made Simple in the same way that she used to vacillate between the Scarsdale and the
F-plan.
Number of actresses cast in the part of Bridget in the movie: 0.
The film is being made by Working Title and will be shot next year, but we're still at the script stage with quite a few of us involved in writing it. I keep seeing girls who I think would be perfect for the part; my favourite was a girl in the gym who was sitting on a machine for really quite a long time reading a magazine and not exercising at all. I nearly walked up and offered her the part.
Plans to start work on new novel immediately: 0.
*********
But I must cut and paste the entire Review! It describes in quite a bit of detail the Persuasion angle:
Keeping up with the Jones by LYNNE TRUSS
There is no escaping recognition humour these days. Satire is struggling, wit is on the wane, but recognition humour arrives by dumper-truck. Everywhere you look, there is someone saying "What about dandruff then?" and waiting for applause. So, while the publication of a follow-up Bridget Jones volume - albeit modestly arriving in the shops without fanfare - might look primarily like a cynical way of making an enormous amount of guaranteed money before Christmas (and I do hope Picador realises how easily
heir intentions have been penetrated), for the author of such a sequel, there are a number of risks. How many times can you define the comic zeitgeist?
Bridget Jones's Diary (1996) was always funnier and more acute than its calorie-fixated reputation presented it as, but hasn't the world moved on a bit since the diary's heyday three years ago? Aren't the mating habits of ditsy urban "Singletons" a bit old hat? Good grief, think how quickly everyone got tired of Friends.
Moreover, there was a formal problem for Helen Fielding to overcome. Bridget Jones's Diary ended with a heavily underlined Pride and Prejudice romantic conclusion. After disliking and distrusting him for all the wrong reasons (remote behaviour, superior family connections, big house), Bridget had finally recognised the true worth of her very own Mr Darcy - conveniently Mr Darcy was his actual name, to avoid ambiguity - and acquired him at Christmas 1996 as (famously) "Nice boyfriends 1". "Where can go fro
here? Where? Where? GAAAH!" Fielding must have asked herself, in Bridget Jones-type feverish prose, as she surveyed her narrative options.
Well, the excellent news is that Bridget Jones: The Edge of Reason is - apart from being set without hiatus in 1997, about which truly nobody cares any more - funnier and more accomplished than the original diary, and in fact takes recognition humour into a new dimension. First, there is the everyday dandruffy stuff at which Fielding excels, in any case: Bridget wrestles with "mad" hair, buys "scary pants" in Marks & Spencer, dials 1471 18 times to keep making sure she hasn't gone inexplicably deaf (who h
sn't done this?), and has a mother who takes her to have her colours done in Debenhams and says things such as, "She's a spring or I'm a tin of pears". I loved Bridget's married friend Magda, forever addressing her small children while on the phone to her mates. "Bridget hi!" says Magda, memorably. "I was just ringing to say in the potty."
Then there is the nice, warmfeeling derived from simply meeting Bridget again, because unlike other fictional diary writers in the same league (Pooter; Adrian Mole; Private Eye's John Major), she breaks free of the restrictive faux-naif tradition and is therefore robust and entertainingly good company. And finally, there is an exceptionally nice, warm feeling when you realise that having exhausted the plot of Pride and Prejudice, Fielding has simply refused to be defeated. Instead she has continued wanton
y nicking ideas from Jane Austen and not minding at all who knows it.
True, Anne Elliot in Persuasion never got into comical difficulties at a Thai airport, as Jones does. True, she never worked in a television production office littered with "an inflatable sheep with a hole in its bottom, a blow-up of Claudia Schiffer wearing Madeleine Albright's head, and a large cardboard sign saying 'LESBIANS! Out! Out! Out!' ", or wished her child-bearing friends wouldn't casually launch into anecdotes of "slashing, stitchings and effusions of blood, poison, newts and God knows what as
if making light and delightful social chit-chat".
But she did watch in silent agony while her former boyfriend (Captain Wentworth) appeared to love another, having weakly been persuaded against him by well-meaning friends. And that's the plot - in skeletal form - of Bridget Jones: The Edge of Reason. The language is different, of course, but there are parallel incidents in heaps. Remember when Anne Elliot momentously confesses in Chapter 23 of Persuasion that "All the privilege I claim for my own sex . . . is that of loving longest, when existence or whe
love is gone"? Here is Bridget Jones in the same situation: "If you love someone, it's pretty hard to get them out of your system when they bugger off." See? It's the same really. Is Bridget's former boyfriend eavesdropping when she makes this sorrowful announcement, perhaps? He is! He is! Does he wordlessly scribble a note, like Captain Wentworth? He does! He does!
The theme of persuasion also gives the book an underlying seriousness, although naturally I hesitate to mention it. Bridget has no meddling Lady Russell to spoil her life, but she has the modern, comic equivalent which is, in its results, quite as bad - a set of loyal single mates (Jude and Shazzer), who are all addicted to 37 varieties of self-help books about Getting the Love You Want or Keeping the Love You Find and consider it their duty to gang up against any invading man from Mars. "There is nothing
a man finds more attractive than a woman who is in love with him," warns Jude at one point. "Says who?" asks Shaz. At which Jude has to confess the flimsiness of the authority on this occasion. "The baroness in The Sound of Music," she says, sheepishly.
The point is that boyfriends threaten the group. "Oh God," Jones records in her diary, "Feel guilty with Jude and Sharon now I have a boyfriend, almost like traitorous double-crossing side-switching guerrilla." But she is not just the victim here; in fact, she is equally determined to prise Jude away from her fianc� Vile Richard, because "a) He is mad. b) He is vile. Vile by name and vile by nature. c) Is intolerable to have to dress up as pink puffball and walk down aisle with everybody watching." This s
ems fair enough. Especially the spectre of the bridesmaid outfit. Yet, after a rift with Jude, Bridget is strolling on Hampstead Heath when "eye caught by a happy-looking couple" and she receives a sharp lesson in meddling that is really quite like an epiphany bit out of Emma or something.
"She on her back with her head on his stomach, him smiling, and stroking her hair while he talked. Something about them looked familiar. As I got closer, I saw that it was Jude and Vile Richard . . . Suddenly Jude burst out laughing at something Vile Richard had said. She looked really happy."
Personally, I still balk a little at Fielding's defiantly unrealistic attitude to the business of actually writing a diary. Bridget makes entries when frantically busy, or in jail ("11.02pm. Am wearing leg irons!"), or in the back of a minicab when late for the airport. One thinks of another Fielding 250 years ago (Henry, in Shamela) parodying the Pamela epistolary fad of present-tense writing with his heroine scribbling the unforgettable "Odsbobs! I hear him coming in at the door!" But Bridget Jones: The
Edge of Reason is a glorious read, and there is a laugh on every page, and just in case you were wondering, our heroine has still not finished The Famished Road by Ben Okri. Oh Bridget Jones, you are moi.
~Moon
Sun, Nov 21, 1999 (22:16)
#1426
One good review. Thanks for the print out, Karen! I was not able to get to Ms Jones article, tant pis!
I hope that our dear friends who are reading the book post the message CF leaves on Bridget's recorder.
~lizbeth54
Sun, Nov 21, 1999 (23:56)
#1427
Have to say that the bad reviews are totally unjustified, as are the personal attacks on HF,...there seems to be a HF/BJ backlash. It made me laugh...it's a funny book ...why do female reviewers seem to think it should be making serious statements.
Here's the main CF bit.. much edited:
10am Colin Firth hasn't rung.
10.03 Still hasn't rung
10.07 Wonder if it's too early to wake Jude and Shazzer up? May be he is waiting til his girlfriend has gone out shopping to ring me.
5pm Flat looks like bomb has hit it, due to Mr Darcy stakeout : sprawled all over sitting room like in Thelma and Louise when Thelma's house is taken over by police and Harvey Keitel is waiting for them to ring with tape recorders whirring in the background.....
6.15 Still has not rung. Maybe girl friend has just refused to go out shopping. Maybe they have just been having sex all weekend and sending out for Italian icecream and laughing at me behind my back.
(They go out..return after 14 minutes..answer phone is flashing..)
Tremulously as though it was an unexploded bomb, Shazzer reached forward and pressed ANSWER PLAY.
"Hello Bridget, this is Colin Firth" We all jumped a foot backwards. It was Mr Darcy. The same posh, deep can't be bothered voice that he proposed to Elizabeth Bennet in on the BBC. Me. Mr Darcy said Bridget. On my answerphone.
"I gather you're coming to Rome to interview me on Monday" he went on. I was calling to arrange somewhere to meet. There's a square called the Piazza Navona, sort of easy place to find in a taxi. I'll meet you 4.30 by the fountain. Have a safe journey"
1471, 1471" gabbled Jude. "Get the tape out...
"Call him back" screamed Sharon like an SS torturer. "Call him back and ask him to meet you in the fountain. OhmyGod."
(Then Tom rings with a message making fun of Mr Darcy..)
"Shut up Tom!"
But it was too late. My answerphone recording of Mr Darcy saying the word Bridget and asking me to meet him in Rome by the fountain has been lost for ever. And there is nothing anyone in the world will be able to do about it. Nothing,nothing.
Nice! I like it. Ignore the anti-BJ critics. The sequel isn't perfect, but it's fun.
There's another reference somewhere to CF as being "really nice". Helen gives him good PR!
~heide
Mon, Nov 22, 1999 (00:15)
#1428
Thanks, Bethan. You have certainly whetted my appetite.
~KarenR
Mon, Nov 22, 1999 (01:45)
#1429
That was hysterical, Bethan. Loved it. "meet in in the fountain" Hoping for a wet interview. :-D Also loved their conclusions about him and Livia laughing at her behind her back. Too much. Can't wait to read.
~KarenR
Mon, Nov 22, 1999 (06:07)
#1430
Review in The Observer:
http://www.newsunlimited.co.uk/Print/0,3858,3932818,00.html
Again, talks about the Bridget-CF Interview being a highlight. Pam goes to Kenya and brings back a tribal warrior too. ;-D
~Allison2
Mon, Nov 22, 1999 (08:24)
#1431
I will wait for Allison to define kitten heels,
I have not been to this topic for a while and now I have to confess to failure. Whilst Mark is crashing launch parties and Bethan and Karen are copying out vast tracts from books and press, I have to confess that I have no idea what a kitten heel is. It sounds rather 1950'ish!
Have reall yen joyed all the extracts. Will definitely put it on my Christmas list!
~MarkG
Mon, Nov 22, 1999 (08:42)
#1432
Cannot let the Julie Burchill comments pass unstabbed. Possibly HF only started talking about her own personal problems because she felt embarrassed (in a Bridget-like way) that an innocent question had revealed JB's inability to have any kind of satisfactory personal life. 2 failed marriages in her twenties, children, lesbian relationships, back to straight....
And possibly the fact that JB finds it so easy to land a man all the time is that she doesn't know how to form a functional relationship with a man (or indeed a woman) and has no standards. Uh-oh, I'm getting a little defensive about my sex here.
Back to the book - later in the evening that Shazzer and Jude bring round the videos, an emotional crisis for Bridget has them shouting: "Quick - put on the tape - fast forward to the wet shirt ... now ... now!" I thought that might find some approval here. I take it everyone read the BJ interview with CF when it weas available (on Lisbeth's timeline, I think) last year?
In a sense, HF has provided some cement for all the best bits from articles that were in the Telegraph (though I'm only halfway through the book) but done it very well.
Given the book's concentration on CF, and the fact that HF told Laura last year that she had visited this board, it's all too easy to believe that HF is lurking out there somewhere (or contributing under a false name ...???)
~Moon
Mon, Nov 22, 1999 (12:59)
#1433
OK, Mark, I confess, NOT!
Thanks for all the postings and the reviews. I can only imagine her to be stressing the CF thing to 1. Convince him to do Mark Darcy. 2. Convince the film producers to get him to be Mark Darcy. 3. To let everyone know that no matter who gets the part, he is Mark Darcy.
So Helen, if you are reading this, give us a sign.
~KarenR
Mon, Nov 22, 1999 (14:08)
#1434
3. To let everyone know that no matter who gets the part, he is Mark Darcy.
Definitely, this is the one. HF thanks CF, right up front, for being her inspiration.
Doubt she comes here anymore. The reason was curiosity at our responses to her columns. Since she writes those no longer...
About that JB article. I'm constantly amazed at the differences between what can be published in the UK and here. And didn't you say your libel laws were easier to prosecute under than ours...wait, that came from the UK Politically Incorrect show. Oh well...I thought the anti-Bridget and Ally bashing contingents had had their says and we've moved on.
~lafn
Mon, Nov 22, 1999 (17:10)
#1435
After this book, if CF doesn't take the role, I feel sorry for any guy who does.Blatantly second choice...and everyone will compare him to CF...
and moan...!
~patas
Mon, Nov 22, 1999 (20:31)
#1436
I shouldn't say this, but if Colin appears as himself giving an interview, does this mean he will not appear as Mark Darcy? Unfortunately, this seems very logical to me :'-(
Mark, congratulations on crashing the party (I never thought I would say such words :-P)
Everybody, you are a great read evenwhen I have no time and must rush through the posts.
~EileenG
Mon, Nov 22, 1999 (20:55)
#1437
Ditto to all the Julie Burchill comments made. When a reviewer makes the review all about herself (to which I say in earnest: Who cares?), it diminishes the content of the review.
Thanks for taking the time to find and post the reviews, Karen. And a big thanks to Bethan for posting the excerpt.
Maybe they have just been having sex all weekend and sending out for Italian icecream and laughing at me behind my back.
Fielding certainly hasn't lost her touch! I'll be buying when it comes to our friendly shores.
Hey, if CF doesn't play Mark (too busy with Flashman miniseries), maybe he'll play himself in a cameo...
~Allison2
Mon, Nov 22, 1999 (21:33)
#1438
Or perhaps he will play Mark AND himself....that would be interesting.
~LauraMM
Mon, Nov 22, 1999 (21:40)
#1439
OR better yet, Jonathon Firth plays Colin Firth and Colin Firth plays Mark Darcy. Get the best of both worlds;)
~SBRobinson
Mon, Nov 22, 1999 (22:21)
#1440
(Gi) if Colin appears as himself giving an interview, does this mean he will not appear as Mark Darcy? that was my first thought as well... but i like Laura's idea!!! :)
Mark- congrats on your sucessfully crashing the party!!!! And you didnt get caught!!! I'm so impressed - i crashed a wedding about 2 months ago, and was caught by the bride and groom (who thankfully were very gracious and invited me to stay even thought we had never met before in my life) *blushing*
The sequel is sounding wonderful... dont know if i'll be able to wait for it to be released here in the states, might have to order it and pay the horrid postage. Thanks for the excerpts and interviews, Karen and Bethan!!! :)
~mari
Mon, Nov 22, 1999 (23:47)
#1441
The new book sounds like a hoot. Thanks Bethan, Mark, and Karen for the excerpts, interviews, etc.
Surfing around a bit, I found a reference to a recent "live interview" with Helen in which she said, "We are still working on the new script. IT WILL BE MAINLY BASED ON THE FIRST BOOK." It hasn't been cast yet."
~lizbeth54
Mon, Nov 22, 1999 (23:54)
#1442
I'm waiting for Mark to give an erudite, well-considered review, as per SLOW, before I chip in with what will undoubtably be an inferior version!
But, in the meantime, I must have my say. I've been dipping into the book all weekend, reading backwards, forwards, from the middle (not how one is supposed to read a book, I know!)
And the more I read it, the more I like it, and I just cannot understand some of the uncharitable reviews. It's made me smile...a lot...and frequently hoot with laughter! It's quite sweetly romantic - happy endings all round, Bridget and Mark, Jude and Vile Richard, Bridget's parents, Mark's parents, Magda and Jeremy, even Shazzer. Although Rebecca gets stuck with Giles (Mark's boring colleague), Tom seems to be developing a fancy for Mark Darcy, and Geoffrey (of Una and Geoffrey) turns out to be, as Bri
get's mum comments, "one of those homos -but "bi", so it's okay" :-)
Other snippets. Some of the episodes are familiar (taken from the Telegraph columns). Gary the builder is back, though with a slightly different persona, Daniel appears and is punched on the nose by Mark Darcy, some Persuasion parallels, including Rebecca jumping off a bridge and being rescued by Mark and Fat Giles. Mark Darcy wears Newcastle United boxer shorts, wears a towel (twice), gets detained by the police (twice) and admits to sleeping (once)with Rebecca "I mean one's only human. I was a guest. It
seemed only polite". Pam goes to Africa and brings back a Masai tribesman. Also invites round Elaine Darcy and Admiral Darcy (MD's parents) to tell them off re. Mark's supposed behaviour to Bridget. Colin (Bridget's dad) takes to drink. Colin (Firth) makes several indirect appearances (at one point Bridget surmises that Rebecca is going out with Colin Firth). Richard Finch takes to snorting coke. Bridget gets a good job with Cinnamon Productions, makers of the programme "Blind Snog". Mark Darcy goes down
on his knees to propose, sort of.
Read the book...only 422 pages!
~KarenR
Tue, Nov 23, 1999 (05:49)
#1443
(Bethan) before I chip in with what will undoubtably be an inferior version!
Ah... do not sell yourself short. I've been laughing *with* your inferior version. Now, why is reading this book from page 1 to page 422 not desirable? ;-D
happy endings all round
Uhmmm... almost seemed like Helen was going to pull the rug out from under us. She intimated that Bridget-Mark was not going to be the fairy tale ending, i.e., life is not like that. (bummer, to bring in reality!) ;-D
Daniel appears and is punched on the nose by Mark Darcy
Yes!
Mark Darcy wears Newcastle United boxer shorts
Yes! Yes!
...wears a towel (twice)
Hoorah!! yes yes yes!! (HF listens to her fans)
admits to sleeping (once)with Rebecca "I mean one's only human. I was a guest. It seemed only polite".
V. convincing barrister-like argument. ;-D
Another article in The Telegraph called, "How Mr Darcy Manages to Turn up in Persuasion":
http://www.booksonline.co.uk:80/booksol?ac=002136006238665&rtmo=fafsvlss&atmo=mmmmmH9R&pg=/99/11/20/bobrig20.html
~lizbeth54
Tue, Nov 23, 1999 (10:21)
#1444
Interesting that the Telegraph picked up on the Persuasion parallels. They're there, but you have to look for them.
Mark Darcy writes a letter to BJ to tell her of his true feelings, but unfortunately gives her the wrong note..a handwritten copy of Rudyard Kipling's poem "If". Which BJ thinks is the equivalent of a self-help book.
Shazzer/Jude take on the Lady Russell role, phoning up Bridget to give her advice on her relationship with Mark, even when Mark is there.
"'E's 'ere" I hissed clenched-teethedly. (on phone)
!It's all right" said Mark, nodding reassuringly. "I realise I'm here. I don't think it's the sort of thing we should be keeping from each other".
Jude goes too far and precipitates major break-up...
While I was staring, Mark pulled the piece of paper off the fax, looked at it and handed it over. It was a scrawled note from Jude saying "Who needs Mark Darcy when �9.99 plus P&P will buy you one of these", on top of an advert for a vibrator with a tongue.
~Moon
Tue, Nov 23, 1999 (13:22)
#1445
LOL!
Thanks Bethan, for your enjoyable report.
And you Karen, for the article.
~MarkG
Tue, Nov 23, 1999 (14:35)
#1446
Bethan, I don't think I can top your review. And my "erudition" sadly does not extend to having read Persuasion. Shame on me! However, I am delighted if HF has constructed a second conceit based on JA, because I think it introduces a level of art into the humour.
I am still only halfway through (reading the book in the old-fashioned manner of start to finish), and fighting with my DW for the book at all times. However, I can say that I think overall the book is tighter and funnier than the first, although maybe a little more two-dimensional and harsh. Bridget's character infuriates some (including my wife and many reviewers) who want her to be a more plausible person rather than a monstrous magnification of certain insecurities and sensibilities.
If she is too feckless to look after herself, she earns sympathy and derision in equal measure, and you hope that Mark Darcy will eventually give her the commitment that she craves but hardly deserves. Although it's easy to see why she is reviled by some feminists.
The appearance of Colin Firth in the book (often referred to by BJ as Mr Darcy) right next to Mark Darcy, almost seems incestuous at times, but the cast of characters provides enough rich farce to carry the whole project along almost seamlessly.
Subjectively, of course, I think it's fantastically good and well-written. Note how many critics deride the style but still imitate it: "Laughs 26 (v.g.), sympathetic characters 0" harhar!
Love the idea of CF playing both Mark Darcy and himself in the film or a sequel!
~EileenG
Tue, Nov 23, 1999 (15:32)
#1447
Reviewers get too caught up in character analysis. I like it purely for HF's humor: It was a scrawled note from Jude saying "Who needs Mark Darcy when �9.99 plus P&P will buy you one of these..." LOL.
~KarenR
Tue, Nov 23, 1999 (16:07)
#1448
Another article in the Evening Standard; can't remember if this was already posted, but is critical. Thinks Bridget is too old (40) to be acting in this way anymore. Pfft!! Stereotypes re: age. Reviewer should be hung up by his toenails. ;-D
http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/html/lifestyle/books/top_direct.html
~LauraMM
Tue, Nov 23, 1999 (18:12)
#1449
MY BOOK CAME!!! I HAVE IT. Okay, sorry, I needed something to be excited over!!! WooHoo! (Now if I wasn't at work, sigh...) v.g! yessssssssssss!!!!!!!!
~lizbeth54
Tue, Nov 23, 1999 (18:53)
#1450
Bridget isn't 40! She's on the cusp of thirty surely. And the book is, putting it simply, very funny and an entertaining read. (And a book that can be dipped into at random!)
It's certainly worth ordering and paying the extra postage charges!! I don't understand why reviewers are trying to take it so seriously and attacking it, unless great success can only be topped by failure. Sour grapes! I hope Helen's friends are supporting her! :-)
Thanks Mark, for your supporting views!
~LauraMM
Tue, Nov 23, 1999 (19:01)
#1451
It's certainly worth ordering and paying the extra postage charges!!
]
Yep, yep, yep, Rebecca will play her Pokemon game on her brand new color game boy, while mom digs into BJ. OH BOY do I EVER need, BJ right now!!!!!
~lafn
Tue, Nov 23, 1999 (19:57)
#1452
Thank you Bethan for all the blurbs,Karen for the media reviews, and Mark for your comments from the male perspective....what does YDW think of the book?
OK Laura...go to it! We are eagerly awaiting what the BJ Topic Host has to say.
~patas
Tue, Nov 23, 1999 (20:05)
#1453
I've been so entertained by your reviews, excerpts and other posts! Thank you all very much. Can the book make me laugh more than you already managed?
I'm working on my shopping list for January :-)
~SBRobinson
Tue, Nov 23, 1999 (21:22)
#1454
Laura, what site did you order your book from? Do only the British-based sites have it in stock?
~KarenR
Tue, Nov 23, 1999 (21:50)
#1455
Esbee, you have to go to amazon.co.uk or waterstones.co.uk Can't buy it in the US. Shipping is a !@#$% argh
~LauraMM
Tue, Nov 23, 1999 (21:51)
#1456
Evelyn, yeah, me too!
Esbee, it was ordered thru amazon.co.uk last week (Tuesday to be exact, and was airmailed to me. Received today!). n.b, eh?
~LauraMM
Tue, Nov 23, 1999 (21:54)
#1457
For two books w/ shipping it was 28lbs. If I remember correctly, I deleted the shipping info that Lynn sent me.
~SBRobinson
Tue, Nov 23, 1999 (23:09)
#1458
Thanks Laura and Karen :)
~LauraMM
Wed, Nov 24, 1999 (13:21)
#1459
Okay, it's a fast read and I must say that most of it is what we read online, with more filler in it. I'm finding Shaz and Jude to be extremely annoying and Magda with her children while interacting with Bridge is also annoying. Just up to the part where Rebecca has invited Mark and Bridge to her house and Bridge was caught snoggin with whippersnapper(nephew). Anyway, that's all so far!
~KarenR
Wed, Nov 24, 1999 (14:26)
#1460
ooooh, towel bit coming up shortly... ;-D
~LauraMM
Wed, Nov 24, 1999 (14:59)
#1461
Yeah, but it was anti-climactic as I already knew WORD FOR WORD what happened! Right now I'm up to the Persuasion chapter (v. beginning). Mother is still annoying and dad is on drugs;) (not really, just walking around in a haze!)
~KarenR
Thu, Nov 25, 1999 (03:20)
#1462
From The Independent:
It's business as usual in Bridget Jones land
Louisa Young Bridget Jones: The Edge of Reason by Helen Fielding (Picador, �12.99)
SOME PEOPLE think it a good thing to criticise a novel for what it's not. It's not great literature, for example, or it's not a truly academic work, or it's not as searing/haunting/stringent as this or that � and its heroine is not a good example of how a modern, independent woman should be.
All of which is absolutely true of Bridget Jones: the Edge of Reason (follow-up to Bridget Jones's Diary, international best-seller, public icon and spawner of backlash), and all of which is utterly beside the point. Bridget Jones is what it/she is: funny.
I find Bridget, as well as funny, simultaneously reassuring and a pain.
She's a pain because I (along with 90 per cent of women in this country � yes, I do mean you, and nothing Camille Paglia can say will change my view on this) have had those telephone/chardonnay/boyfriend moments, and I don't care to be reminded of them or of myself at the time.
She's reassuring because even though she hasn't grown up, I have. I can look back and laugh, like a drain, and hollowly.
And that is what Bridget Jones is for. She's for laughing kind of at and kind of with. She's no role model � she never was. She's a scapegoat, a there-but-for-the-grace-of-God-go-all-of-us-except-of-course-Julie-Burchill-who-is-much-too-grand.
Our story takes up with Bridget listing her blessings: "9st 3 (total fat groove), boyfriends 1 (hurrah!), shags 3 (hurrah!), calories 2,100, calories used up by shags 600, so total calories 1,500 (exemplary)." So from the beginning we know that it's business as usual in Bridget-land.
Bridget has a job in television, a flat of her own, a lovely human rights lawyer boyfriend who owns a huge house in Holland Park, some corking girlfriends, lots of Voyage cardigans and lovely little slippy dresses from Agn�s B, breakfast and dinner in groovy Notting Hill hangouts, weekends in the country, holidays in exotic Far East locations. Sounds all right, doesn't it?
Unfortunately for her (though not for Helen Fielding, or really for the reader) Bridget still hasn't cottoned on to the simple truth that, no matter what your blessings, the key to a modern girl's happiness is not to care how much she weighs. Without knowing this, she will never be happy. But if she were happy, would she amuse us? I suspect not, vultures that we are. What's good for Bridget the Best-Seller is sad for Bridget the Girl.
No matter what happens to Bridget, she doesn't learn.
She lets her girlfriends make her chuck the lovely boyfriend; she carries someone else's bag through customs in Thailand; she gives a builder �3,500 in cash � but none of this matters because plot is irrelevant in these books. Even more so than in most novels, if anyone behaved in even a slightly realistic or reasonable manner there would be no story.
Bridget and her true love both manage to think that the other has chucked them, and don't bother to check. They are sent wheeling to and fro by classic devices such as a mislaid love note, overhearing a chat behind a hedge, and the heroine's being forced by circumstance to stay in the love object's home.
The role of the usual 19th-century storm-induced influenza is played here by one of the most unconvincing death-threats � no, the most unconvincing death threat � I've ever read. And also, of course, one of the funniest. No, the funniest. A bullet arrives in the post with her name engraved on it. She thinks it's a promotional lipstick. Attagirl!
In an attempt to win the happiness that will render her either fictionally obsolete or, at least, much more difficult to write about amusingly, Bridget has been reading self-help books. Fielding has a field day with them; Bridget, of course, learns nothing.
Still, at the end of this book there is a shaft of light. For a moment, she seems to be going to treat her young man as a human being. It's curiously heartwarming. I don't feel that Bridget is letting the sisterhood down by wanting to love and be loved on a day-to-day basis, and I would like her to be happy, because she's a nice girl.
She may not prove to be quite so funny any more, but I bet she has other fascinating qualities waiting to emerge in her maturity. Funniness is not everything. Whoops. It's that "not" word again.
~KarenR
Sat, Nov 27, 1999 (03:15)
#1463
Evelyn found this:
IT'S HELENA-BONHAM CARTER!!!
Article in Saturday's Times about the true purpose of BJD. But the best thing is a picture of HB-C (captioned "tipped to play Bridget") and the final paragraph:
"The film of the book should be with us next year: another chance for women to explain themselves to men. And with Helena Bonham Carter playing BJ, there shouldn't be any difficulty persuading Mr Right to take a seat in the stalls."
To the article:
http://www.sunday-times.co.uk/news/pages/tim/99/11/27/x-timwekwek02008.html?999
~LauraMM
Sat, Nov 27, 1999 (04:10)
#1464
Somehow, I just always pictured BJ as a blonde... hmmmm...
But I can deal with H B-C. (However, I cannot picture CF as MD now?)
Okay, finished BJ: The Edge of Reason. And to give you my honest opinion... It was okay, not great (but, yeah, I was glued, only to find out how BJ would get out of any trouble she got into!) And whatever HF did to Gary the Builder is ridiculous, but I won't spoil it. Will add that the Persuasion aspect of it, was glaringly obvious. Yeah, Rebecca takes a spill, but she's not the injured party in the sense that Louisa Musgrove was. There is another character. Shaz is still crazy as always (and still
iving Jude and Bridge bad advice at the same time! {um, hasn't she heard, practice what you preach?})
Mark Darcy is in quite a bit of it, but he's not really explored. She really could've had fun with this character of hers, but she lets us down (again), by not really going into much detail about why he does what he does (taking the Fitzwilliam Darcy persona a bit too far, perhaps? remember, JMHO;))
Again, Mom and Dad are just completely nuts, and no wonder why Bridge is a bit daft. Only Bridge could go to Thailand (during monsoon season, no less), and get into a bit of a squiff. She's gullible, vulnerable and sometimes just plain stupid. (she counts how many minutes she HAS NOT HAD SEX! and she does the math! {on calculator, of course}.
I wonder how good Mark Darcy and Bridget Jones are for each other, as they clearly still haven't figured out how to communicate with each other.
~nky
Wed, Dec 1, 1999 (18:11)
#1465
Just started to read "The Edge of Reason" and got through a couple of chapters and to tell you the truth, I'm not liking it as much as BJD. I guess the excitement died down a little. But, I saw that Helen Fielding acknowledged a bunch of people and Colin Firth's name was mentioned (hurray!!)
~heide
Wed, Dec 1, 1999 (23:32)
#1466
It is getting a little wearing. I'm only in March but I've wanted to ring her neck, let's see, about 60 times now. Still, there's enough to make me crack up and want to read more.
For my own curiousity, does anyone know which Kevin Curran it is that Helen gives a special acknowlegement to? Not a new boyfriend, is he? There's a professional tennis player from England or South Africa (forget which) who was around in the 80s - made it to the finals of Wimbledon one year - name of Kevin Curran.
~lizbeth54
Thu, Dec 2, 1999 (19:15)
#1467
Don't read it all at once...pick up, put down. Read it in short bursts.
It's sold nearly 50,000 in hardback in just under 2 weeks, which is excellent in terms of UK book sales.
~Elena
Thu, Dec 2, 1999 (19:39)
#1468
Seems it�s expected to be a big hit over here too, I bought it two weeks ago, scooping it from a huge heap in the best place of shop. Btw I like it so far, I�m on page 296 and have tittered aloud about 20 times. Did somebody say that feminists don�t like it?? I think this is a seriously feministic oeuvre :-D
~LauraMM
Thu, Dec 2, 1999 (21:10)
#1469
It's sold nearly 50,000 in hardback in just under 2 weeks, which is excellent in terms of UK book sales.
]
And I wonder how much flew out of the UK and into the US:)
~KarenR
Mon, Dec 6, 1999 (01:49)
#1470
Nice review by the Financial Times (4/12)
BRIDGET JONES: Still chasing Mr Darcy
By Susanna Rustin
The diary, by definition, is the most self-conscious of forms, and famous diarists cannot help but be aware of each other.
Thus Adrian Mole, aged 30 in Sue Townsend's latest novel, wonders enviously and without irony how Bridget Jones got her diaries published. Helen Fielding is quick to return the compliment: "Hurrah! The wilderness years are over" trumpets Bridget in the opening fanfare to The Edge of Reason.
The phrase is borrowed from Mole, but to Bridget, for whose unmarried thirtysomething persona Fielding coined the term singleton, wilderness denotes a specific lack: 1996's bestselling Bridget Jones's Diary achieved closure with its heroine's acquisition of "boyfriends 1" - as she reminds her new diary at the outset.
Now chronic insecurity, combined with pride and neurotic game playing, ensure that romantic bliss with Mr Darcy is shortlived. A series of farcical faux pas - saucy Valentines, botched snogs, filthy faxes - brings about the communication breakdown without which Bridget's love life would have no plot. Her infuriatingly unhelpful friends Shazzer and Jude heap coals on the fires of misunderstanding, until Bridget watches her handsome prince retreat into the clutches of the Other Woman.
Back in the wilderness, Bridget resolves to cultivate the inner poise which her library of self-help books values above all else: "Am woman of world with career", "Am going to be top-flight journalist", she announces, before embarking on a journey to Rome. There, she conducts a ludicrous interview with actor Colin Firth, ostensibly pegged to his forthcoming film Fever Pitch, but in fact entirely taken up with his role in the BBC's adaptation of Pride and Prejudice.
Even when ostensibly focusing on a career move, Bridget is ruled by romantic fantasies, with the result that her accident-prone working life is never more than a diverting sub-plot.
In Jane Austen's day, of course, marriage to Mr Darcy was all a girl could hope for, and Fielding was loudly criticised, first time around, for seeming to perpetuate the vain, self-obsessed, boy-crazy mentality of the sillier Miss Bennets. Certainly, Bridget Jones is no Elizabeth; although she has something of the self-contained dignity of Anne Elliot, whose plight in Austen's Persuasion is the model for the particular torments inflicted here. Publicly, she does retain her composure. And, finally, she lea
ns from her mistakes.
Two house parties hosted by arch-rival Rebecca provide some of Fielding's finest comic moments, as she works her devious, self-serving caricature to the bone. Bridget's mother is on memorably wild form, bringing a Kikuyu tribesman home from a holiday in Kenya and embarrassing her only daughter at every twist and turn. Magda's daughter Constance lives up to her name deliciously when, at her third birthday party, she makes her preference for honest Bridget over sycophantic Rebecca absolutely clear. Darcy ha
dly puts a foot wrong. He has wit - "dating war command" is his shorthand for Bridget's dubious line in advice - as well as brains, looks and money. And he does a smooth line in rescues.
I must admit to being taken aback to learn that Fielding's character is getting on for 40, and would bet money that the actress who plays her in the forthcoming film will be nearer 30. I laughed at the original Diary more, but for a sequel this holds up well. Helen Fielding is very clever and entertaining, and Bridget Jones has made her rich. Muddled-up and emotionally immature, Bridget is no role model; but since when did we look to satire for those?
~lafn
Mon, Dec 6, 1999 (02:18)
#1471
Good level-headed review....BJ not to be taken seriously....
The reviewer and I see eye to eye on Shazzer and Jude.."Her infuriatingly unhelpful friends Shazzer and Jude heap coals on the fires of
misunderstanding,..."The friends from hell!
~CherylB
Sat, Dec 11, 1999 (18:49)
#1472
I haven't read this book, but thought that those of you on this board might be interested to know that the actresses currently touted in the running to play Bridget are: Cameron Diaz, Kate Winslett, Rachel Weisz and Emily Watson.
~Moon
Sun, Dec 12, 1999 (00:49)
#1473
Thanks, Cheryl1B, where did you get this info? And what happened to HB-C?
~baine
Sun, Dec 12, 1999 (02:50)
#1474
OK, you guys got me to read this, and I started laughing aloud on page 1. But--a bit of translation please. What is f***wittage? An action, a condition, a person who behaves in a certain way? Despite the frequency of its use in the text, I'm still not clear on exactly what it means. Thanks to the idiomatic Britspeakers.
~KJArt
Sun, Dec 12, 1999 (04:47)
#1475
You've heard of half-wits and dim-wits, I'm sure. This is a term that HF was accused of inventing, but I'm not sure but what NH thought of it first. It is the condition of having ... um ... what was the Portugese expression? ... tomatoes? ... for brains. Let Gi translate.
An moral adolescent. A commitment - phobe.
(Mind you, all of this is taken out of context...I don't think it's in the dictionary yet ... But it will be. *Hee hee*!)
~lizbeth54
Sun, Dec 12, 1999 (06:23)
#1476
I think H B-C is still in the frame, at least according to UK sources! but I've never known there be so much conjecture about who takes on a role. I mean, Cameron Diaz playing BJ and H B-C playing her, there's quite a difference. Ditto Kate Winslett.
There was some news on one of our radio arts programmes yesterday. The sequel to BJD has book sales totalling �1 million, excluding online orders. It will be available in the US (and worldwide) from the first week of March. The news broadcaster said that the timing was expected to coincide with the start of the production of the movie. The movie is expected to stay true to the first book, with the same characters appearing. No casting has been announced as yet. Mind you as CF seems to dominate the Seque
, as himself, as himself playing Darcy, and (IMHO) as Mark Darcy (broad shoulders and bald patch!), he seem to be the obvious choice!
BTW, I like the sequel, particularly the bits that hadn't appeared in serial form in the Telegraph. It's the sort of book that can be dipped into, and still be funny. Although, I'm not sure if it's the sort of book to read through in one sitting!
~heide
Sun, Dec 12, 1999 (14:09)
#1477
The book grew on me. I've concluded I like Bridget better when desperately single rather than desperately coupled. Huge laughs in any chapter with Rebecca and Colin Firth. Loved the subplot(?) with Mum's new houseguest.
Cymbeline, did you read the first diary?
Cameron Diaz as Bridget blows my mind. Throwing names out like this can only mean they're trying to keep generating interest in this very old project.
~KarenR
Sun, Dec 12, 1999 (14:26)
#1478
I agree with Heide about the names. Just for buzz in the US. I'd go with the report in The Times about HB-C. Sounded pretty firm to me.
~Moon
Sun, Dec 12, 1999 (15:36)
#1479
Will they dye HB-C's hair? I don't picture BJ as a brunette. Rebecca, yes, not BJ.
~KarenR
Sun, Dec 12, 1999 (15:42)
#1480
Rebecca is, as I recall, specifically mentioned as a v. tall blonde with the long lion's mane of hair, as was the American woman who was sun bathing in the nude on Daniel's rooftop. For contrast, BJ should be a brunette IMO. The blondes make her feel inferior.
~baine
Sun, Dec 12, 1999 (16:22)
#1481
(KJArt) It is the condition of having ... um ... what was the Portugese expression? ... tomatoes for brains?
Ah. So would that be someone who thinks with his you-know-what and gets himself and other people into trouble b/c of that or simply refuses to think of women other than as Clarissa's Lovelace thought of them and so makes them miserable?
Heide, the first diary is what I'm reading.
~CherylB
Sun, Dec 12, 1999 (18:32)
#1482
The casting information came from "Entertainment Weekly Online". Those 4 actresses are considered the front runners, as of this point the film is still uncast.
~patas
Tue, Dec 14, 1999 (16:17)
#1483
Re: the brunette vs. blonde issue. Funny how I also imagined BJ as a blonde... Well, not a California type blonde, but very light brown hair (or very dark blond hair, whichever). Also, ever since someone suggested Catherine Zeta-Jones might play Rebecca, she had turned brunette in my mind. Otherwise, is she old enough for Sharon Stone?
~MarkG
Tue, Dec 14, 1999 (17:05)
#1484
Daniel's Valentine's Card in the original diary was "to the dusky beauty" which (together with the cover art) always made me think of Bridget as brunette. Of course HF (blonde herself) is careful to say almost nothing specific about Bridget's looks.
~Moon
Tue, Dec 14, 1999 (19:21)
#1485
(Gi), Also, ever since someone suggested Catherine Zeta-Jones might play Rebecca, she had turned brunette in my mind.
That was me! Rebecca must be sultry. I thought it would play better that way, BJ the blond in the little bunny outfit, etc. Also stressing the opposite attraction to the dark haired MD, to Daniel, the blond.
HB-C would be a perfect Shazz.
I just saw a picture of a very brunette Cameron Diaz in a mag. I wonder if auditions are going on now?
~KarenR
Tue, Dec 14, 1999 (19:34)
#1486
It's the other way around. HF has set up all Bridget's rivals as Nordic princesses and Bridget by default must be a regular type, i.e., brunette. Sultry can be done with either hair color (Kim Basinger's Veronica Lake character in LA Confidential most immmediately comes to mind). However, Bridget must be a brunette who envies blondes (who have more fun!) and their image, which makes Bridget feel insecure about herself. ;-)
~Moon
Tue, Dec 14, 1999 (19:55)
#1487
I prefer Veronica Lake to KB doing sultry. I know that in the BJD, it is the other way round, but that is how I imagine it. ;-)
~LauraMM
Tue, Dec 14, 1999 (21:40)
#1488
I don't think HF knows either, because in the second book, Rebecca is blonde again. I remember she describing her as being brunette, but BJ looks at her long legs and long swinging blonde hair. Perhaps, Rebecca colored her hair? :)
~KarenR
Tue, Dec 14, 1999 (21:42)
#1489
Rebecca was always blonde. Mark was referring to Bridget being described as dusky. The issue is getting totally confused. ;-)
~Moon
Tue, Dec 14, 1999 (23:07)
#1490
Do not make yourself uneasy, Karen, we perfectly understand HF choices, we just chose to imagine otherwise. ;-D
I guess Gwynnie will be going for the part of Rebecca. ;-)
~KarenR
Tue, Dec 14, 1999 (23:16)
#1491
I guess Gwynnie will be going for the part of Rebecca. ;-)
Why? I just saw her on TV yesterday (?) at the Ripley premiere and she's dark haired! ;-)
~Moon
Tue, Dec 14, 1999 (23:31)
#1492
Oh, No! They are all auditioning for Bridget!
~lizbeth54
Tue, Dec 14, 1999 (23:52)
#1493
Oon the book cove,r BJ looks like a brunette and (don't shoot me!) she also reminds me of Meg Tilly. :-)
On hair colouring, and quite irrelevantly, caught a glimpse of Joe Fiennes on TV, and he is now blonde with blonde designer stubble!
~KarenR
Wed, Dec 15, 1999 (00:11)
#1494
No!!!! (also quite irrelvantly...unless he's auditioning for Rebecca)
~Moon
Wed, Dec 15, 1999 (00:28)
#1495
LOL, Karen! He might be auditioning for Daniel. ;-)
~Moon
Wed, Dec 15, 1999 (01:09)
#1496
My Studio Exec. friend in Hollywood sent me this:
The auditions for Rebecca have begun. ;-)
~LauraMM
Wed, Dec 15, 1999 (13:21)
#1497
I KNEW she described Rebecca with dark hair, but in the new book, Rebecca is now blonde!
From the Telegraph
Bridget Jones's Diary
Wednesday, March 25
Number of times driven past Mark Darcy's house: 2 (vg); no of times looked up Mark Darcy's name in phone book to prove still exists: 18 (poor); 1471-calls: 12 (better); phone calls from Mark: 0 (tragic)
"But, you're not driving," I said. At which I caught Dad's eye in the rear view mirror, just as she yelled: "Mind that Fiesta! Hoot him!"
"I'm afraid she thinks she is," he said.
"Isn't that Mark?" said Una suddenly. "I thought he was working."
"Where?" said Mum, bossily.
With dumb horror I followed Una's pointing finger to where, Mark, dressed in his dark blue overcoat and a very white, undone shirt, looking so gorgeous, so lovely, was paying a taxi.
As if in slow motion, I saw a figure emerging from the back of the cab: tall, slim with long dark hair, laughing up into his face and taking his arm.
It was Rebecca.
~EileenG
Wed, Dec 15, 1999 (19:20)
#1498
(Bethan) she also reminds me of Meg Tilly
LOL!
Well, I do believe that's one name which heretofore hasn't been mentioned in the same sentence as the phrase 'Bridget Jones'.
~KarenR
Wed, Dec 15, 1999 (19:37)
#1499
(Laura screaming) I KNEW she described Rebecca with dark hair
Argh!! What did you do? Run a global search engine through the Telegraph site? Toot toot!! ;-) Now, where oh where did I read she was blonde? (of course, it wasn't the sequel...been checking my mailbox to no avail) ;-)
~patas
Wed, Dec 15, 1999 (19:37)
#1500
I bought The Edge of Reason today and am delighted :-)
~KarenR
Wed, Dec 15, 1999 (19:41)
#1501
Is it in the stores by you now?
~Moon
Wed, Dec 15, 1999 (19:46)
#1502
So now both Cameron and Gwynnie are brunettes. Back to auditioning for
Rebecca. ;-D
~KarenR
Wed, Dec 15, 1999 (20:13)
#1503
No Cameron is back to being a blonde, actually... ;-) Saw her doing the junket interviews for "Any Given Sunday" (the football movie) and (*hold your hats*) she's the team owner!! I'll bet that's real believable. :-D
~nky
Wed, Dec 15, 1999 (20:14)
#1504
Are we sure about Rebecca as a blond in BJ's Diary? She's definately has dark hair in The Edge of Reason. In BJ's Diary, Mark Darcy had a girlfriend, Natasha and I think she's a blond.
~LauraMM
Wed, Dec 15, 1999 (20:31)
#1505
(Laura screaming) I KNEW she described Rebecca with dark hair
Argh!! What did you do? Run a global search engine through the Telegraph site? Toot toot!! ;-) Now, where oh where did I read she was blonde? (of course, it wasn't the sequel...been checking my mailbox to no avail) ;-)
]
Oh yeah, ick! um, right, tomorrow, ugh! *oh hitting self on head* Would you believe that I am rereading Possession and totally forgot? Okay, that's a bad one. How about I was extremely broke and was waiting to get paid? A bit personal, but the truth. Will send off tomorrow. PROMISE.
Yeah, I did a search because I remember Rebecca being dark in the columns and a blonde in the new book.
(not really screaming, happily screaming 'coz I was right;)) for once! :)
~KarenR
Wed, Dec 15, 1999 (21:22)
#1506
You don't have to send it. I'll be getting my own copy next month. Just wanted to tweak you. Besides, I'm not done with that blonde thing. I've got my hard-copy of the columns sitting on the floor and I won't rest until I've found it!! BTW, I rented The Innocents today. *oohh spooky* ;-)
~LauraMM
Wed, Dec 15, 1999 (21:34)
#1507
I seriously think that HF kept forgetting what her hair color was!!! *am trying to call Karen right now*, but to no avail;( ;)
She probably couldn't make up her mind WHAT color hair Rebecca had. What if Rebecca/Bridget were identical twins? but were separated at birth? Okay a bit farfetched really. But you know how HF always changed one thing to another! So perhaps we're all correct and HF is wacked out? (I like it;))
The Innocents is spooky!!! the end is just enough to curl your toes and curdle the blood in your veins!
~patas
Fri, Dec 17, 1999 (16:51)
#1508
(LauraMM)I seriously think that HF kept forgetting what her hair color was!!!
How about this: Rebecca and Bridget both occasionally die their hair.
~KarenR
Tue, Dec 21, 1999 (14:51)
#1509
Illness has forced director Roger Michell ("Notting Hill") to drop out of the Nicolas Cage starrer "Captain Corelli's Mandolin" for Universal Pictures and Working Title Films. The studio and producers have shifted their sights to director John Madden ("Shakespeare in Love"). The dramatic project is slated to go before cameras in April. "Captain Corelli's Mandolin," based on Louis de Bernieres' 1994 best-selling novel, is described as a "Doctor Zhivago"-like love story set on the Greek island of Cephalloni
during World War II. Screenwriter Shawn Slovo ("A World Apart") wrote the script's most recent draft, which tells the story of Italian Capt. Antonio Corelli (Cage) who, while stationed on Cephallonia, engages in a heated affair with the local doctor's daughter, causing strong political and personal allegiances to come into play.
~LauraMM
Tue, Dec 21, 1999 (15:27)
#1510
Yep, Roger Michell had a heart attack back in October. Hope he is feeling better.
~KarenR
Sun, Feb 6, 2000 (23:20)
#1511
(Tracy) Tho' apart from HB-C am racking brains to think of someone else suitable and British.
Since it has to be a name, what about Catherine McCormack (b. 1972) or Tara Fitzgerald (b. 1968)?
~amw
Sun, Feb 6, 2000 (23:26)
#1512
or Kate Beckinsale? ( Emma)
~Sylvana
Sun, Feb 6, 2000 (23:44)
#1513
The ShowTime section of today's New York Daily News has a full page story about Helen Fielding. The article states that "Bridget Jones: The Edge of Reason" will be published here in the U.S. on February 28th.
I'm not sure how fresh this news is, but the article states "The script is almost ready and Fielding expects the lead to be cast in several weeks. Kate Winslet and Minnie Driver has been mentioned as possibilities."
The Sunday editions of The Daily News will be carrying excerpts from "The Edge of Reason." The optimist in me wishes that it will pique the curiosity of many (some?) readers to learn about Mark Darcy/Colin Firth, increasing name recognition here in the U.S.
...Well, a girl can hope...
~KarenR
Sun, Feb 6, 2000 (23:51)
#1514
All those names have been bandied about for soooo long. I pray nightly for NO Minnie Driver.
Unfortunately, Kate Beckinsale has little name recognition here, except to watchers of public television. Prefer Helen Baxendale...at least the Friends watchers know who she is. ;-)
~mari
Mon, Feb 7, 2000 (05:03)
#1515
I think the way in which the casting for this has taken place so publicly--and so protractedly--is bizarre and does not speak well for the project. And, after today's story, whoever is finally chosen will know it's public knowledge that she was second choice--or third, or . . .
Karen, what's wrong with Minnie Driver?
It's interesting that of all the names bandied about in the press, Working Title's first choice was the youngest--Winslet at 24. Way too young for BJ, IMO. Diaz is 27--too young also and she'd have to gain about 50 pounds.;) No idea if she could pull off the accent. She is a good comic actress, though, did a great job in Being John Malkovich, and is not afraid of looking silly or unglamorous.
I'm just waiting for them to shave 10 years off Mark Darcy and cast Joe Fiennes or Jude Law. :-( :-(
~Donna
Mon, Feb 7, 2000 (06:54)
#1516
Hello! I haven't been here for a while. I am still very interested in CF,but i has been a long time waiting to any of his movies. I finally saw Femme Fatal, Camile and MLSF. I was able to rent MLSF at Blockbuster. Of course I was able to go to the movies to see SIL.
We now have a B&N is our area and I was able to get a copy of FEVER PITCH. I was surprise to find it in the SPORTS/SOCCER section LOL. I didn't have any problem getting a copy of BJD.
I was hoping the JE would take the role but I understand that timing is an issue.
Someone mentioned that co-stars do not appear twice in a project together but what about MEG Ryan and TOM Hanks? THey did two moives togther,maybe they meant TV. Oh well anyway the actress I thought of to play Bridget was Andie MacDowell. I thought she would be a great Bridget. I love Four Weddings. She isn't to old. I am sure someone else around here thought of her. I always saw BRidget as a little over-weight burnette.LOL
I got this off a JE fanpage:
US Theater Alert - The Real Thing venue has changed to the Barrymore Theater for its Broadway run. It will still preview starting March 29th and open April 17th.
You all are so dedicated!
Donna
~KarenR
Mon, Feb 7, 2000 (14:12)
#1517
Hi Donna and welcome
Here's Empire's writeup of the same info:
Winslet Drops Bridget
07/02/2000
Despite being more than two years in pre-production, Bridget Jones's Diary is no closer to finding an actress for the lead role. According to sources, the book's author Helen Fielding has been blamed for the problem - particularly for the decision by Kate Winslet to film Therese Raquin instead.
Insiders report that Fielding's insistence that Bridget be played by an unknown forced Winslet - who had been very interested in the role - to take on the Raquin role rather than hanging around waiting for Working Title to get its act together.
Producer Eric Fellner said 'I am disppointed that I have not been able to sign up Kate.' But he dismissed rumours of a rift with the star, saying, 'She turned down the role because of a class of schedules.'
~EileenG
Mon, Feb 7, 2000 (15:14)
#1518
Following the discussion as it meanders around the drool boards to its proper home. Cameron Diaz? *gack* *poo* Sorry, but I had to get that out of my system. Mari, if you've read the old posts here, you'll see that general consensus was KW is too young. IMO she has the right nuance of kookiness (don't know if that's a word) and disorganization about her that would capture Bridget appropriately. But I suppose she's better than some of the others mentioned. Age (or lack thereof) doesn't seem to be a big deal--most of the names we've heard bantered about over the years (!) are all under 30. Though at the rate Working Title is going...it seems that casting is their biggest obstacle.
Insiders report that Fielding's insistence that Bridget be played by an unknown
This keeps coming up again and again, so one has to wonder if there's some truth to it. Though I find it extremely hard to believe this first time author has enough clout to force Winslet out of the role.
~KarenR
Mon, Feb 7, 2000 (15:25)
#1519
(Mari) what's wrong with Minnie Driver?
Any limit on the number of reasons? Also, would you prefer the listing organized into two categories: personal and professional? ;-)
(Eileen) Though I find it extremely hard to believe this first time author has enough clout to force Winslet out of the role.
Exactly. Also, if HF retained the right to make final casting decisions, why is Working Title negotiating with Winslet, Diaz, HB-C and the rest?
~mari
Mon, Feb 7, 2000 (16:54)
#1520
(Karen) Any limit on the number of reasons? Also, would you prefer the listing organized into two categories: personal and professional? ;-)
Any way you want to dish it is ok by me; I'm not picky.;-)
(Eileen) Age (or lack thereof) doesn't seem to be a big deal--most of the names we've heard bantered about over the years (!) are all under 30.
Hey, maybe if they start talking to the Olsen twins and Haley Joel Osment now, they'll be just the right age for BJ and MD by the time this thing starts shooting. ;-)
This whole thing smells to me. If I'm not mistaken, KW's decision to do Therese Raquin was announced awhile ago--like before Christmas. And I'd love to know who these "insiders" are who seem so anxious to make Helen the fall guy.
~EileenG
Mon, Feb 7, 2000 (17:05)
#1521
(Mari) maybe if they start talking to the Olsen twins and Haley Joel Osment now, they'll be just the right age for BJ and MD by the time this thing starts shooting.
LOL. You may be onto something.
Actually, the whole thing strikes me as a very informal focus group. Whoever gets the best reaction, wins. Right now they're 'testing' CD (I'm kidding, sorta--the actress they cast as BJ will either make or break this movie).
~lafn
Mon, Feb 7, 2000 (17:09)
#1522
(Mari)Karen, what's wrong with Minnie Driver?
Bring on the air sickness bag!
~~~~~~
Insiders report that Fielding's insistence that Bridget be played by an unknown
I believe it....and think she has the clout with Working Title.
~baine
Tue, Feb 8, 2000 (19:36)
#1523
(Mari)I'm just waiting for them to shave 10 years off Mark Darcy and cast Joe Fiennes or Jude Law. :-( :-(
Hey Mari, if they're considering giving BJ to an Amer. woman, how about Matt Damon for Mark Darcy? Oops, Firthettes, did I say that? Wash my mouth out with carbolic acid! Strike me with lightening! It's just sitting here ... day after day ... listening to your reports from the Donmar ...looking at those pictures with his beautiful arms around you all ... thinking about that smile washing over your flesh ... while I'm back here buried in the snow ... freezing in the dark ... lightyears from the source of happiness ... with nothing to do but listen to Mr. Ripley singing My Funny Valentine over and over and over ... until it just fills up my mind ... and I ... and I ... I just can't go on ... sob!
~Allison2
Tue, Feb 8, 2000 (20:48)
#1524
It'll be Jeremy Northam as MD. You see!
~lafn
Tue, Feb 8, 2000 (22:29)
#1525
(Allison)It'll be Jeremy Northam as MD. You see!
Well, he was a pretty sexy attorney in TWB....and just got an award for it.
Do you think the part was not offered to Colin? Or he doesn't want it...or both?
~amw
Tue, Feb 8, 2000 (23:29)
#1526
and just got an award for it JN received another Award today -The Variety Club Showbusiness Award for Best Film Actor and wait for it so did JE & SD for Best Stage Actress and Stage Actor for their performances in TRT.
~mari
Wed, Feb 9, 2000 (03:40)
#1527
(Cymbeline) Hey Mari, if they're considering giving BJ to an Amer. woman, how about Matt Damon for Mark Darcy? Oops, Firthettes, did I say that?
LOL!! He *was* a good Ripley, was he not? ;-)
with nothing to do but listen to Mr. Ripley singing My Funny Valentine over and over and over
I'll sing with you:
Don't change a hair for me
Not if you care for me
Stay little valentine, stay
Each day is valentine's day . . .
~KarenR
Wed, Feb 9, 2000 (04:44)
#1528
grrr...Mark Darcy shouldn't have such big white teeth
Mr. Northam, would you please step up into the on deck circle...
~baine
Thu, Feb 10, 2000 (15:15)
#1529
(Karen) grrr...Mark Darcy shouldn't have such big white teeth
The better to sing to us with.
Remember, Monday IS Valentine's Day.
Will we be smiling with our hearts, Mari?
~KarenR
Thu, Feb 17, 2000 (05:11)
#1530
Since we always talk about High Fidelity here...
The cast:
John Cusack....Rob Gordon
Iben Hjejle....Laura
Jack Black.... Barry
Lisa Bonet.... Marie DeSalle
Joelle Carter....Penny
Joan Cusack....[what else, but Laura's friend] nLiz
Sara Gilbert....Dick's girlfriend
Todd Louiso....Dick
Tim Robbins....Ian Raymond
Lili Taylor....Sarah
Natasha Wagner....Caroline
Catherine Zeta-Jones....Charlie Nicholson
Rob and Laura
The site, but not much there.
http://movies.go.com/highfidelity/index.html
~KarenR
Thu, Feb 17, 2000 (05:13)
#1531
~LauraMM
Thu, Feb 17, 2000 (13:07)
#1532
What an odd assortment of characters! Hmmm... I love this book, I hope the movie does it at least some justice!
~KarenR
Thu, Feb 17, 2000 (13:53)
#1533
I read a couple of places accounts from people who had seen test screenings and they say it is very true to the book...except for locations ;-)
~Moon
Thu, Feb 17, 2000 (14:03)
#1534
I am hoping for a true-to-book sound track. The Fire Engines and all, but I doubt it. NH should have insisted in being music director.
~LauraMM
Thu, Feb 17, 2000 (14:52)
#1535
Moon, if they could really find the Live version of the Sex Pistol's version of "God save the Queen", that would be a hoot!
~Moon
Thu, Feb 17, 2000 (15:28)
#1536
I saw them live in San Francisco, loved it! Johnny Rotten should have made an appearance in the record shop, he is still around.
~KarenR
Thu, Feb 17, 2000 (16:12)
#1537
Rumor (not closely guarded) has it that Bruce Springstein appears in HF.
~MarkG
Thu, Feb 17, 2000 (16:48)
#1538
Presumably, Bruce Springsteen would appear as Marie DeSalle's former boyfriend ("well-known singer-songwriter, let's just pretend it was Lyle Lovett") in flashback - in fact, I guess much of the film will be in flashback.
~lizbeth54
Sat, Feb 19, 2000 (08:29)
#1539
Isn't the new BJ book released next week in the US? I was wondering if this might (finally) provoke some announcement of the casting of the movie...good tie-in publicity.
~mari
Sat, Feb 19, 2000 (20:24)
#1540
Hi Bethan--Edge of Reason comes out here on February 28. There is an interview with Helen in tomorrow's Philadelphia Inquirer. It should be online tomorrow and I can post the URL. Nothing new though; about the film it only says this:
"Lately, Fielding has been dividing her time between London and Los Angeles for script consultation on the film version of her first book. The script is almost ready and Fielding expects the lead to be cast in several weeks. Kate Winslet and Minnie Driver have been mentioned as possibilities."
She may be doing personal appearances again here as she did with BJD, so we'll keep our eyes open. It would be a good publicity tie-in as you say, Bethan. Staying optimistic, I'm thinking that CF has signed on, but they aren't about to announce any casting until the lead is firmed up. Let's hope!
~mari
Sun, Feb 20, 2000 (17:56)
#1541
Here's the URL for the Helen Fielding interview:
www.phillynews.com/inquirer/2000/Feb/20/arts_and_entertainment/BRIDGET20.htm
~mari
Sun, Feb 20, 2000 (17:57)
#1542
Try this:
http://www.phillynews.com/inquirer/2000/Feb/20/arts_and_entertainment/BRIDGET20.htm
~catheyp
Wed, Feb 23, 2000 (19:58)
#1543
The following article appeared in the Australian NW magazine this week. More to do with the Bridget character, but there is a mention of ODB.
~~~~~~~
KATE�S DAYS NUMBERED
Author Helen Fielding�s "dithering" over casting in the film version of Bridget Jones�s Diary has dashed hopes of securing Titanic star Kate Winslet for the lead role.
The filmmakers were scheduled to start cameras rolling in the next few months, but have failed to secure a female star to take on the role of the neurotic thirtysomething character whose dating and dieting disasters have attracted millions of readers.
According to a set insider, Helen was unhappy with Kate, playing the part of Bridget, and has said she wants an unknown, even suggesting she should play the part herself.
Kate recently signed on to another film, Terese Raquin, which is a huge setback to Bridget�s production team, Working Title, who had their heart set on the star.
"She just got tired of waiting around for Working Title to make up their mind," a film source says.
Produced Eric Feliner expressed disappointment at missing out on the A-list actress. "I am disappointed that I have not been able to sign up Kate," he said. "We were in negotiations for the deal, and I am absolutely amazed it didn�t work out with her."
Despite Helen�s insistence that an unknown be offered the part, the film�s producers are still gunning for a top name. Frontrunners include Cameron Diaz and Emily Watson, as well as Australia�s Cate Blanchett. British heart-throb Colin Firth is tipped to play Bridget�s love interest.
~EileenG
Wed, Feb 23, 2000 (20:09)
#1544
There was also a HF interview in last Sunday's NYT. The content is similar to the Philly Inquirer article. This one's n/a on line so here's a brief excerpt:
NYT O.K., I want to ask you about Africa.
HF Please don't ask me where it is.
NYT No, I promise. Your first book was set in a refugee camp. How did you learn about life there?
HF I started my career at the BBC in television, and I made some documentaries in Ethiopia and Sudan and Mozambique. I was there doing a lot of reporting on the aid business in the mid- to late 80's, so I did spend a lot of time in those refugee camps.
NYT So you have done a lot of pretty serious journalism.
HF You should see the article I was made to write about the panties on sale at Marks & Spencer.
Vintage Helen!
~KarenR
Wed, Feb 23, 2000 (22:14)
#1545
Cathey, sounds like a reworking of the same article from The Times about the loss of Kate Winslet. Used a different word than "tipped" about CF. Wasn't it mooted? The great moot debate. ;-)
When will they ever get rolling on this??
Helen as Bridget? I don't think so.
~Moon
Wed, Feb 23, 2000 (22:30)
#1546
Helen as Bridget? I don't think so.
I hope not!
I am taking bets on CF playing MD. His agent would be insane not to fight for this role after HFs comments in the new book.
I bet Colin has signed but is sworn to secrecy until they can announce the whole cast.
Too bad about Kate W, I thought she was perfect.
~mari
Thu, Feb 24, 2000 (01:07)
#1547
(Karen) When will they ever get rolling on this??
It's funny, I was deleting some very old posts today and I came across one from April of 1999, quoting an article that stated "filming will begin this ('99) summer." Strange vibes on this one; protracted loggerheads over the script and the casting. Still, CF would be crazy not to do it if offered. Very low risk for him.
(Moon) Too bad about Kate W, I thought she was perfect.
Me too. I just rented Hideous Kinky, and thought she played contemporary very well. Can't recall seeing her in another contemporary role.
~KarenR
Thu, Feb 24, 2000 (01:41)
#1548
I think we're just too close to it. Many films are in development for years, even put in turnaround by studios, picked up by others and finally make it to the screen. Usually we don't know what's going on, but Bridget is pretty high profile.
~amw
Thu, Feb 24, 2000 (12:07)
#1549
NEWSFLASH - According to Teletext today Renee Zelwegger is set to play Bridget, sounds pretty definite, no mention of any other casting or CF. Who is RZ, have been to one of her websites and she seems pretty young, too young for Bridget I would have thought, can't see her and CF together with, oh well.
~amw
Thu, Feb 24, 2000 (12:46)
#1550
I have just read a review for "The Batchelor", starring Chris O'Donnell & Renee Zellweger, not a very good review 2 stars only -"and his (C.O'D) teaming with the pouty Zellweger suffers a terminal lack of onscreen chemistry. After seeing this, you'd think he'd have a better chance pulling Batman". I would hate to read this as regards Bridget & Mark Darcy!! I think I am beginning to hope he doesn't play Mark Darcy and why oh why an actress from Texas, I can't believe we don't have a suitable British actress.
~mari
Thu, Feb 24, 2000 (12:53)
#1551
Thanks for the news, Ann. Renee is 30 (31 in April), so actually she's older than most of those who had been mentioned. At least she's not stick thin.;-) She's cute, but not a glamor girl type. What a surprise, huh?
I've seen her in a few things, and she's always been very good: she was Tom Cruise's girlfriend in Jerry Maguire. Also, she played Meryl Streep's daughter in One True Thing; if you haven't seen that one, do rent it. It's very good and Renee does a great job; there was some Oscar talk for her that year. Also, I saw her in a film called A Price Above Rubies--again, a good job.
She's certainly not a conventional choice, but she does play sympathetic and vulnerable very well. She projects strong but sweet.
Oh, and she's Jim Carrey's girlfriend in real life.;-)
~Moon
Thu, Feb 24, 2000 (13:15)
#1552
She's certainly not a conventional choice, but she does play sympathetic and vulnerable very well. She projects strong but sweet.
But can she do a British accent? I doubt that. Plus her voice has an annoying tone. I am disappointed. I do not see that match with Colin at all.
Thanks for the scoop, Ann!
~mari
Thu, Feb 24, 2000 (13:36)
#1553
(Moon) But can she do a British accent?
She will once the dialogue coach gets through with her.;-) According to one of the reports, she's already working with one; I'm sure they'll get her a good one.
~amw
Thu, Feb 24, 2000 (13:43)
#1554
Well it seems to be pretty definite, it is reported on Ceefax as well and in the Electronic Telegraph, under the heading "Film's "perfect" Bridget Jones is a Texan". under UK News.
I am afraid I am with Moon, I can't see it, RZ & Colin. I guess I was hoping for H.B-C., incidentally what do they mean she is too "cold".
~KarenR
Thu, Feb 24, 2000 (14:02)
#1555
Oh my! Renee Zellweger?! This ought to be interesting.
Ann: You chose to read the wrong review about her. She's very highly thought of here; considered a very up and coming actress, and intelligent. But The Bachelor was a bottom-of-the-heap type movie.
She has that little girly type voice. It's not that annoying (I can think of worse), but wonder how it will sound with an English accent. The mind boggles at that thought. ;-)
~KarenR
Thu, Feb 24, 2000 (14:20)
#1556
Sorry, if this takes a while to load:
~LauraMM
Thu, Feb 24, 2000 (14:22)
#1557
I think Renee Zellweger could prove to be a good Bridget. I find her voice to be a bit whiny, but like you guys are saying a voice coach ought to help. (Perhaps GP's coach?) I couldn't picture CF w/ Nia Long, but hey, he might surprise you! (let's hope she doesn't pull out.)
~KarenR
Thu, Feb 24, 2000 (14:29)
#1558
From Ebert's review of Jerry Maguire:
There are a couple of moments in ``Jerry Maguire'' when you want to hug yourself with delight. One comes when a young woman stands up in an office where a man has just been fired because of his ethics, and says, yes, she'll follow him out of the company. The other comes when she stands in her kitchen and tells her older sister that she really, truly, loves a man with her whole heart and soul.
Both of those moments involve the actress Renee Zellweger, whose lovability is one of the key elements in a movie that starts out looking cynical and quickly becomes a heartwarmer.
********
From his review of One True Thing:
Ellen (Renee Zellweger) is bright and pretty but with a subtle wounded look: She has that way of signaling that she's been hurt and expects to be hurt again.
And Renee Zellweger, as Streep observed at the Telluride Film Festival, is able to create a place for herself and work inside it, not acting so much as fiercely possessing her character.
*************
Don't sell her short.
~KarenR
Thu, Feb 24, 2000 (14:37)
#1559
Ann, the reference to HB-C being "too cold." I think it means she's not a "warm and lovable" type like RZ or KW. HB-C is so finely chiseled in appearance and demeanor, like stone. That's how I'd interpret it.
~lizbeth54
Thu, Feb 24, 2000 (14:48)
#1560
I've not see RZ in anything, but from the photo above she looks as though she could be be both glamorous/non glamorous as required, and she looks 29/30 -ish, which is okay. With a name like Renee, does she have European parents? She also sounds as though she's a name in Hollywood which I'm beginning to realise really matters!
Ann, I also wondered why, according to the Telegraph report, H B-C was considered too "cold". She can do zany roles, and very well too!
The Telegraph also says that CF has been tipped as "the love interest, as an in-joke. In the diary the man in her life is named Darcy in honour of Firth in P&P."
Hope the selection criteria are based on more than an "in-joke"...like looks, acting ability etc!!
But I hope he's offered this and signs (must have happened by now, surely?). Without being too negative, it seems to be his only chance of playing the romantic lead in a mainstream Hollywood movie, rather than cuckolds and baddies! I wonder who'll play Daniel Cleever...I think this role may also go to a Hollywood actor. Don't see CF getting second billing (maybe third).
~lizbeth54
Thu, Feb 24, 2000 (14:51)
#1561
Ellen (Renee Zellweger) is bright and pretty but with a subtle wounded look: She has that way of signaling that she's been hurt
and expects to be hurt again.
Sounds like Bridget. I'd like to see this one. RZ sounds like a good choice!
~KarenR
Thu, Feb 24, 2000 (14:56)
#1562
Story is now hitting the other news sites. From the BBC:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/entertainment/newsid_655000/655190.stm
No mention of other casting.
While she looked glamorous in the above pic, she's really very normal looking. Cute as a button type. And here's the pic:
~Allison2
Thu, Feb 24, 2000 (14:57)
#1563
Ihad just read the news on Ceefax, so came over here to tell you all but too late! It seems to me that this is a Hollywood movie and the chances of CF being cast are slim unless HF really does have a say. Surely they must go for some big name to draw the crowds and if they do not have a megastar to play Bridget, surely they will have to have one to play MD? Otherwise who will go and see it in the US?
~amw
Thu, Feb 24, 2000 (14:57)
#1564
Maybe, I guess that if CF is to play MD, then they will have met and if he likes her then so do I.
~MarkG
Thu, Feb 24, 2000 (15:09)
#1565
Wow! Great newsflash, Ann. Who'd have thought?
RZ was very good in JM, IMHO, and actually wrung some pathos out of a dire script in Empire Records.
Trivia: She made FHM magazine's 100 Sexiest Women List (which must have been on the strength of JM only, where she didn't exactly play a sex-bomb) so she may have a certain part of the UK audience locked up.
Good choice, I think, but probably makes it a little CF's chances a little slimmer.
~KarenR
Thu, Feb 24, 2000 (15:10)
#1566
From the Guardian:
American actress Renee Zellweger has signed to play single thirtysomething Bridget Jones in Universal's upcoming adaptation of the bestselling "diary" by British journalist Helen Fielding. But what is v.good news for Zellweger looks to be a snub for the crop of homegrown actresses previously said to be in the running. Ever since the project was announced, industry insiders predicted that the role of scatty, chain-smoking Ms Jones would be fought out between the likes of Kate Winslet, Minnie Driver and Alex Kingston.
Hailing from the small town of Katy, Texas, the statuesque Zellweger initially looks miles away from Fielding's heroine - more Lone Star than London lonely-heart. But the thirty-year old actress won plaudits for her role as Tom Cruise's love interest in 1996's Jerry Maguire and is generally held to be one of Hollywood's most underrated players. She will next be seen in Neil Labute's Nurse Betty and the Farrelly Brothers' comedy Me, Myself and Irene opposite long-term partner Jim Carrey.
Zellweger is said to be consulting a voice coach in order to master a London accent. Universal already have a finished script, co-scripted by Fielding alongside her friend, Notting Hill scribe Richard Curtis and experienced screenwriter Andrew Davies. A director has yet to be announced.
~~~~~
Statuesque? I was wondering about that. Had the impression she was on the short side because of the Tom Cruise casting and that worried me re: CF.
Director: Is Shazzer out?
~KarenR
Thu, Feb 24, 2000 (15:14)
#1567
I don't know if just the casting of an American (which we all seemed to think was going to happen) will mean CF has no chance or a slimmer one. The main characters are Bridget, Shazzer and Jude, followed by Daniel. Mark Darcy kind of walks on and off. It's not like a Notting Hill, where the film centers around a single woman and man.
That whole theory gets thrown out if the film includes the sequel. ;-)
~amw
Thu, Feb 24, 2000 (15:22)
#1568
I think if AD is still involved, then there is a good chance CF will be MD.
~MarkG
Thu, Feb 24, 2000 (15:27)
#1569
True enough, Karen. I stand corrected.
Thinking back to Sliding Doors, the only other American in the cast apart from GP played an American (Jeanne Tripplehorn) so maybe they balance an accent-coached lead with real Brits.
Wouldn't surprise me if Shazzer was dumped. Sounds like Working Title are desperately fighting against HF's vision of a small movie all the way (mind you with HF as the star and her best friend directing, you'd probably have got all the shots of CF you want to see)
~KarenR
Thu, Feb 24, 2000 (15:29)
#1570
There appears to be lots more behind the scenes about this story. THR has an item about Kate Winslet set to star in another film, called Enigma (co-written by Stoppard), set to begin this spring...before the birth of her first child. So could it be that she couldn't commit to Bridget due to the delays and her pregnancy? Sounds like the other filme Therese Raquine is well off into the future for her...not immediate as was intimated.
~KarenR
Thu, Feb 24, 2000 (15:32)
#1571
(Mark) True enough, Karen. I stand corrected.
Ha ha! When I was writing my previous post, I hadn't even read yours yet. I think I was responding to Allison's comment. ;-)
~LauraMM
Thu, Feb 24, 2000 (15:41)
#1572
I didn't even know that KW was pregnant! I am soooooo behind in the times (I'm going to be an auntie again!!! well it's better than my telling you I'm going to be a mommy again;))
I still think a British cast with an American lead is not bad. (HF wanted unknown, and well, RZ is unknown to you Brits!;) Sharon Corr would've been a good BJ, she of the Corrs and was in Evita. (She's Irish.)
~KarenR
Thu, Feb 24, 2000 (15:44)
#1573
Variety's Michael Fleming says Shazz is still the director:
The character is as popular in London as Ally McBeal is in the U.S. Universal will distribute.
Pic is being directed by Sharon Maguire from a screenplay by "Notting Hill" scribe Richard Curtis, Fielding and Andrew Davies.
~Moon
Thu, Feb 24, 2000 (15:49)
#1574
(Karen), I don't know if just the casting of an American (which we all seemed to think was going to happen) will mean CF has no chance or a slimmer one. The main characters are Bridget, Shazzer and Jude, followed by Daniel. Mark Darcy kind of walks on and off. It's not like a Notting Hill, where the film centers around a single woman and man.
Good point. But everyone knows CF is Mr. Darcy and that should count for something. My bet is still on!
~lizbeth54
Thu, Feb 24, 2000 (16:01)
#1575
All this news flooding in...quite exciting! Thanks all!
KW seems to have opted for "Enigma" rather than BJD. She must play the girl friend who goes missing mid-way (and is later found to have been murdered). It's not a very star-ry role (although very serious!) and not very demanding. But I would have thought that if she's pregnant she couldn't play BJ in the summer.
I didn't think KW "was" Bridget anyway. IMHO KZ is a better (and more bankable choice).
Mark, I think your comment on "Sliding Doors" is very relevant. I think BJD The Movie will have an Anglo-American balance, with maybe Daniel played by a US actor (he could be an American Rhodes scholar type), and Jude, Shazzer and Mark by Brits, and the lesser supporting cast by Brits as well. As Karen says, it's not "Notting Hill" with an obvious male lead role with lots of screen time, and so I don't see why CF, despite the fact that he's not Hollywood bankable (and why not, I ask!), couldn't play a crucial but supporting role. BJD is very much an ensemble piece.
What's happened to Sharon McGuire then? Sounds as though there's been some blood-letting behind the scenes. Although I did wonder if a project like this could be given to a first-time director.
~Xian
Thu, Feb 24, 2000 (16:01)
#1576
They have got Bridget!
NEW YORK (Variety)
Renee Zellweger, who stole Tom Cruise's heart in the 1996 hit ``Jerry Maguire,'' will star in the upcoming comedy ``Bridget Jones' Diary,'' an adaptation of the Helen Fielding bestseller about a single girl in her 30s.
The character is as popular in London as Ally McBeal is in the United States. Universal Pictures will distribute the film.
Zellweger is working with a dialogue coach to play the role with a British accent.
The Working Title picture will be directed by Sharon Maguire from a screenplay by ``Notting Hill'' scribe Richard Curtis, Fielding and Andrew Davies.
Zellweger will next be seen starring with Jim Carrey in ''Me, Myself & Irene,'' directed by the Farrelly brothers, and starring with Morgan Freeman and Chris Rock in the Neil LaBute-directed ``Nurse Betty.''
Big big big surprise to me!!! She is not a British actress! Oh well, now who will be Mark Darcy? Another surprise, I guess ;-(
~KarenR
Thu, Feb 24, 2000 (16:05)
#1577
Bethan, Sharon Maguire is still in, per my Variety, Michael Fleming article.
~amw
Thu, Feb 24, 2000 (16:05)
#1578
re Therese Raquine directed by David Leaveux?,it must be in the far distant future because he is going to be tied up with The Real Thing on Broadway until August.
~amw
Thu, Feb 24, 2000 (16:09)
#1579
Karen, if they do go by the sequel,The Edge of Reason, then Daniel had quite a small role and I think MD is by far the bigger role - (let's hope Jim Carrey doesn't play MD!)
~KarenR
Thu, Feb 24, 2000 (16:22)
#1580
Yes, that's what I meant. If they incorporate the sequel, then the MD role is far more important and they'd want/need a bigger name for it. If they stick to the first book, then CF still has a shot.
~amw
Thu, Feb 24, 2000 (16:25)
#1581
If CF isn't MD, then all I can see is I now know hor Michael Crawfrod fans felt, he is the Phantom of the Opera!! as is Colin Mark Darcy!!
~lafn
Thu, Feb 24, 2000 (17:11)
#1582
RZ is darling....I thought she and Cuba Gooding were the best thing in JM
why oh why an actress from Texas, I can't believe we
don't have a suitable British actress.
C'mon.....Texas can breed good actors too;-)
I have always said two British actors with two British accents would send this film to the Art House genre.
~mari
Thu, Feb 24, 2000 (17:20)
#1583
Just a few questions and thoughts:
Is BJD really considered a "Hollywood" movie, and if so, why? It's the same group that produced Notting Hill and that's considered a British movie, right?
"If" there was any pressure to hire a "name" actress, I feel it didn't come from any American source. The British actresses mentioned (Winslet, Driver, Watson, Bonham-Carter) along with Blanchett and Diaz are all much better known to the average moviegoer here in the U.S. than Zellweger is, and frankly, any of them would have been considered much more "bankable" choices if that were the criterion. It seems to me that Helen may have gotten her wish to cast a (relative) unknown (relative to the other ladies mentioned).
Finally, here's a lighthearted reason to feel "Renee is ok"--the tabloids here had a field day calling her fat after last year's Oscar's, just because she wore a dress that showed she had (shudder!) hips like a real woman; and (horrors!)a stomach like a real woman; and (no!) breasts like a real woman.;-)
~EileenG
Thu, Feb 24, 2000 (17:21)
#1584
Well, well, news at last! I agree with Laura and Karen, RZ is a good choice. Renee is talented, seems to be well regarded and is able to satisfy divergent criteria: she's well known in the US (good for 'the money') and unknown in the UK (good for the author). I thought her younger than 30 but the films I've seen her in are a few years old. Statuesque? I agree with Karen, she hardly seems tall. I recall her presenting at an awards show, decked out in an awful dress and heels so high she could hardly walk (last year's Oscars??).
As for the elusive Mark, I expect we'll hear something soon.
(let's hope Jim Carrey doesn't play MD!)
Good God, Ann! I'm having a seizure! *twitch, twitch* ;-P
~amw
Thu, Feb 24, 2000 (17:23)
#1585
Evelyn, I have nothing against Texas or Texan actresses, I am sure it is and they are lovely, its just that I would have thought we had enough bankable talent in this country to play the definitive Brit girl.
~EileenG
Thu, Feb 24, 2000 (17:33)
#1586
(Mari) Is BJD really considered a "Hollywood" movie, and if so, why? It's the same group that produced Notting Hill and that's considered a British movie, right?
I agree (at least that's how things look on this side of the pond). I do hope, however, they don't turn BJD into another 4 Weddings/Notting Hill (am getting those Hugh-induced shivers, having just recovered from seizure induced by words 'Jim Carrey' mentioned in same sentence as 'MD').
the tabloids here had a field day calling her fat after last year's Oscar's, just because she wore a dress that showed she had (shudder!) hips like a real woman; and (horrors!)a stomach like a real woman; and (no!) breasts like a real woman.;-)
It was at the Oscars, then. Personally, I don't recall that she looked fat, but the dress was fugly and she walked as though she had a broom stuck--well, you get the picture. Good thing BJ wears 'kitten heels' (assuming kitten height is less than 4 inches).
(Ann) its just that I would have thought we had enough bankable talent in this country to play the definitive Brit girl.
I think most of us had one Brit or another in mind; as soon as KW pulled out and CD was mentioned, it seemed clear they were thinking American.
~KarenR
Thu, Feb 24, 2000 (17:43)
#1587
(Mari) Is BJD really considered a "Hollywood" movie, and if so, why?
I DON'T think it will be even though Working Title is owned by Universal. I recall the articles at the time said that WT boys' agreement gave them quite a bit of autonomy.
However, I DO think BJD will be in the 4Weddings/Notting Hill mold because:
(a) 4 Weddings was a hit and made a lot of money
(b) Notting Hill was a hit and made a lot of money
(c) Working Title wants hits and to make a lot of money
~EileenG
Thu, Feb 24, 2000 (17:51)
#1588
(Karen) (a) 4 Weddings was a hit and made a lot of money
(b) Notting Hill was a hit and made a lot of money
(c) Working Title wants hits and to make a lot of money
True, true, true! 'Mold' is one thing, 'duplicate' is another. Come to think of it, didn't you start a "Bridget goes to 4 Weddings and a Funeral in Notting Hill" script some time ago, Karen?
~KarenR
Thu, Feb 24, 2000 (17:54)
#1589
...and lest you forget:
(d) Universal desperately wants hits and to make lots of money
"Bridget goes to 4 Weddings and a Funeral in Notting Hill" script
*hee hee* I forgot about that one. Will have to go searching in the older messages for it. ;-)
~KarenR
Thu, Feb 24, 2000 (18:08)
#1590
Reposting from #1158 (6/8/99)
(Eileen)Since *none* of us has seen the screenplay (correct me if I'm wrong)
Let's see, if Richard Curtis is now involved with the Andrew Davies-amended script, do we really *need* to see the screenplay? I suppose it will go like this:
Boy, with floppy hair, meets...oops, sorry... start again
Girl (model-like in appearance) meets guy with floppy hair at wedding, funeral, bookstore, parents' friends' New Years Day buffet, etc., or some such trendy locale. Boy makes lasting impression on girl due to ugly sweater and they fall in deep like although neither knows what to make of it.
We will because of a camera shot of boy giving girl a LOOK!
Each goes own way, but meets up with other at other trendy spots. We will see boy taking a leisurely bath and going for a dip in a pond. Boy will stammer a lot and flutter eyelids, and be endearingly self-deprecating. Years will pass and they keep meeting and we will be suitably aggravated.
BTW, there will be loads of colorful characters for the supporting cast. Tom will be played by Simon Callow. Mark will have a colorfully vulgar Welsh co-worker named Spike.
Boy and girl will finally get together at end and while credits roll we will see pictures and/or snippets of their life together.
The End
Forgot to describe boy's first encounter with girl at Una's Turkey Curry Buffet. Boy will spill curried turkey all over girl, whilst muttering "bollocks." Boy will then show everyone his manliness by snuffing out lit candle with fingers.
Have heard that Curtis has changed Mark's girlfriend's name from Natasha to Duckface.
~lafn
Thu, Feb 24, 2000 (18:40)
#1591
The British actresses mentioned (Winslet, Driver, Watson, Bonham-Carter) along with Blanchett and Diaz are all much better known to the average moviegoer here in the U.S. than Zellweger is
Disagree....RZ like CD is v. popular with the cineplex crowd.
Watson, Bon-Carter, Blanchett..popular with older crowd..you know, the ones who wait to rent the videos;-)
~~~~~~
we had enough bankable talent in this country to play the definitive Brit
girl.
Bankable in the UK..If you want to show the film only there.
Hey, Vivian Leigh played the definitive southern belle...CB just played a perfect Long Island housewife....these guys are actors.
~susanne
Thu, Feb 24, 2000 (19:08)
#1592
Ann, I have nothing against Texas or Texan actresses, I am sure it is and they are lovely, its just that I would have thought we had enough bankable talent in this country to play the definitive Brit girl.
I have to agree with Ann. Since I live in Texas, I love Texans, but I think there are some very talented bankable British actresses who would have been good in this role. I like RZ but have never seen her as Bridget. Her last movie, The Bachelor, bombed so I don't think she is that much of a big draw on her own.
(Evelyn) RZ like CD is v. popular with the cineplex crowd.
Watson, Bon-Carter, Blanchett..popular with older crowd..you know, the ones who wait to rent the videos;-)
Oh please, It's bad enough I have to face that big birthday this year. Now I have count myself part of the older rent the video crowd. Just because you are part of that fun-loving Cineplex crowd, Evelyn,no reason to call the rest of us "old". :-))
~susanne
Thu, Feb 24, 2000 (19:09)
#1593
Sorry about the italics. It's been so long since I posted I screwed it up. Someone fix me please if this does not get it right.
~KarenR
Thu, Feb 24, 2000 (19:19)
#1594
closing the italics tag
bankable talent in this country to play the definitive Brit girl.
Aside from KW and possibly KST (whose not at all suitable for the part), the answer is no, not bankable enough for audience they're intending.
Face it, folks, not everyone is like us, i.e., watches and knows who the actors are on Masterpiece Theatre.
Personally, I think Renee Zellweger is an inspired choice. And I wouldn't blame The Bachelor on her. It came and went and she's untainted. There are more raves about her than boos.
She won the National Board of Review's award for Best Breakthrough Artist in a Supporting Role for Jerry McGuire and was nominated for Outstanding Performance by a Female Actor in a Supporting Role by the Screen Actors Guild (her peers).
~Moon
Thu, Feb 24, 2000 (19:24)
#1595
Another point is that since it is an ensemble-cast type movie. There is space for Hugh Grant as Daniel C, H B-C as Shazz, Minnie D as Jude, Ben Afflect as Richard, Jim Carrey as the handyman from hell, Cameron D as Mag...and of course ODB as MD.And, for Rebecca how about Liz Hurley?
~KarenR
Thu, Feb 24, 2000 (19:26)
#1596
*horrors* Where was your winky winky?
~Moon
Thu, Feb 24, 2000 (19:28)
#1597
Hey, anything to get ODB in the picture. ;-)
~Moon
Thu, Feb 24, 2000 (20:19)
#1598
From Empire0nline, the producer tells why she had the edge;
cutie Ren�e Zellweger has nabbed the role. Producer Eric Fellner tells today's Telegraph newspaper that Renee won the much coveted part thanks to her gift for comedy, which gave her the edge over British contenders. Those drowning their sorrows in buckets of Chardonnay and cigs at their local wine bar include Helena Bonham Carter, Emily Watson and Kate Winslet, who were all tipped for the part.
~lafn
Thu, Feb 24, 2000 (20:25)
#1599
KST (whose not at all suitable for the part), the answer is no,
not bankable enough for audience they're intending.
And KST after The Horse Whisperer and Random Hearts...both which were not exactly great successes...I doubt if she could carry a movie. And I'm sorry, I just can't see Colin Firth and Emily Watson busing them into the cineplexes.
~patas
Thu, Feb 24, 2000 (20:30)
#1600
Thanks for the news, Ann, it is so good to know this movie has had a good push forwards. I didn't know who RZ was, but she seems lovely, and if a good actress, then it'll be alright and I probably watch the movie ven if - o horror! - ODB should not be in it. I have faith that he will be, though. Why? It's a mystery ;-)
~mari
Thu, Feb 24, 2000 (21:35)
#1601
(Mari) Is BJD really considered a "Hollywood" movie, and if so, why?
(Karen) I DON'T think it will be even though Working Title is owned by Universal. I recall the articles at the time said that WT boys' agreement gave them quite a bit of autonomy.
You're right, Karen, as I recall WT had carte blanche on all projects up to a certain ceiling (for some reason $30 million sticks in my mind, but maybe not that high). Anyway, according to one of the sites today, BJD is an $8 million film. Which brings up another observation: RZ had to have come a lot cheaper than some of the others mentioned; could be that budget was one of the considerations also. Is WT actually owned by Universal? You know who owns Universal, right? Seagram's. And Seagram's is . . .a Canadian company! Let's blame the Canadians! LOL! (Don't anybody get offended; I just think it's funny how in this world of mega-conglomerates, it is difficult to trace back exactly who controls what.) LOL over your BJ/4Weddings/Notting Hill "script."
Ann, I can understand your wanting the lead to go to an English actress, I really do. It's like, why do we have to get our hands into everything. Please don't think we're insensitive; over here, we're perhaps more used to lots of British actors and actresses coming over to play Americans (just look at the Oscar noms, for example), and nobody here gives it a second thought, so to us it doesn't seem like a big deal when the reverse happens.
BTW, a spring start date for filming is now reported. Ok, let's see CF's name on that cast list!;-)
~KarenR
Thu, Feb 24, 2000 (22:20)
#1602
(Mari) BTW, a spring start date for filming is now reported.
Where? Let's hope that CF hasn't booked himself solid with commitments for one day here, one day there television work cause he had nothing better to do. ;-)
~lafn
Thu, Feb 24, 2000 (22:31)
#1603
$8.Mil? That's not much.They'll have to enlist the underling crowd from Notting Hill.
Let's hope that CF hasn't booked himself solid with commitments
You mean so he'll have a good excuse not to take it;-)
~mari
Fri, Feb 25, 2000 (00:05)
#1604
I saw it on the Mr. Showbiz site and they cited Variety so I figured all the sites had it. Anyway, the paragraph in question:
"First-timer Sharon Maguire will direct the film, which Universal will distribute. Bridget is set to start shooting this spring, with an estimated budget of $8 million, according to Variety."
That figure struck me as low, too, Evelyn, which is why I was speculating that budget entered into the decision. Hey, at least Eileen won't have to worry that Jim Carrey will show up--that's his tip money.;-)
~heide
Fri, Feb 25, 2000 (00:58)
#1605
I'm getting very nervous for you all. Looks like the casting of Mark must be announced soon. Will there be mass hari kari on the board if our own DB is not named? I'm standing by with the stretchers.
Let our a sigh of relief with Zellweger being named. Never would have dreamed it I agree with most here that it's a very good choice. You'd have had to drag me to the theatre if Cameron Diaz had been Bridget.
~lafn
Fri, Feb 25, 2000 (01:22)
#1606
You'd have had to drag me to the theatre if Cameron Diaz
had been Bridget.
And if Colin isn't MD, I won't fly to Dallas.
But expect me for Sunshine, Sue;-)
~mari
Fri, Feb 25, 2000 (03:43)
#1607
(Heide) Will there be mass hari kari on the board if our own DB is not named? I'm standing by with the stretchers.
LOL! I'm glad someone is thinking ahead, Heide. I do promise not to be the one who passes out the kool-aid.;-)
~MarkG
Fri, Feb 25, 2000 (08:31)
#1608
The more I think about RZ, the happier I am - an inspired bit of casting (unless she fouls up the accent or something). And I even liked Moon's ensemble list!
~EileenG
Fri, Feb 25, 2000 (14:05)
#1609
(Mari) Hey, at least Eileen won't have to worry that Jim Carrey will show up--that's his tip money.;-)
Too true. *wipes brow in relief* Let him stick to the Grinch and Cindy Lou Who (now, that's inspired casting).
(Karen) Let's hope that CF hasn't booked himself solid with commitments
(Evelyn) You mean so he'll have a good excuse not to take it;-)
Hee hee! I agree--despite all this "mooted" and "tipped" stuff, CF as MD is not a given. We should hear something very soon, I would think. I know! Let's call his agent, that warm, outgoing, font of knowledge (has this guy ever admitted that CF was doing anything? Seems to me all he/his reps ever say is "no, "not yet," and "never heard of it.").
~lafn
Fri, Feb 25, 2000 (16:10)
#1610
(Eileen)...has this guy ever admitted that CF was doing anything? Seems to me all he/his reps ever say is "no, "not yet," and "never heard of it.").
Or...."he's reading scripts". All the agents do that.They feel that's in the realm of a publicist..and CF doesn't have one.I found a nice PA who likes the internet and occasionally comes through with news about JE...but "not always"
~KarenR
Fri, Feb 25, 2000 (16:23)
#1611
From The Independent (25 Feb 2000):
V. Tall, V. Blonde and V. Flattering: Star from Texas to Play Bridget
The search to find an actress to play the angst-ridden, fag-smoking, chardonnay-guzzling thirtysomething Bridget Jones in the eponymous film could be compared with the worldwide hunt for Scarlett O'Hara in the 1930s.
Nearly every well-known British actress, and some Australian ones, too, have been touted for the part. Helena Bonham Carter was said to be "too cold" and Kate Winslet could not find time in her diary. There is no industry gossip consensus on why Cate Blanchett and Emily Watson were turned down.
But, after countless auditions and an 18-month search, a Bridget has finally been found. A tall, blond American actress, who bears little resemblance to the dark-haired woman on the cover of the books, has landed the coveted role.
Renee Zellweger, who made her name starring opposite Tom Cruise in Jerry Maguire, was yesterday said to be "honoured".
Ms Zellweger is a clean-living American, so it is unlikely that she smokes or drinks. She is also reportedly on the verge of becoming what Bridget would call a smug-married, as her boyfriend, the actor Jim Carrey, has just bought her a pounds 130,000 ring.
None the less, the film's director, Sharon Maguire, insisted Ms Zellweger was the right Bridget. "She has the correct degree of vulnerability mixed with inner strength, and a perfect comic instinct," she said.
Ms Zellweger, who is 29 and has, therefore, yet to experience the life of a single thirtysomething, said: "The diary is an amazing evocation of the life of a single girl. It reads like Jane Austen, with comic and ironic twists and turns."
Eric Fellner, the producer of Bridget Jones's Diary, who made Notting Hill (famous thirtysomethings), Four Weddings and a Funeral (rich thirtysomethings) and Fargo (murderous thirtysomethings), said the search for the perfect Bridget had been exhaustive.
He had been urged by Helen Fielding, the author of the Bridget Jones books, to cast an unknown actress, but said that Ms Zellweger had been chosen because she was funny.
"Renee is one of the best comic actresses of her generation," he said yesterday.
Rumours that Colin Firth, aka Mr Darcy in Pride and Prejudice and the object of Bridget's slavering affections, will play the love interest Mark Darcy remained unconfirmed yesterday. His agent said simply: "I have no idea."
A spokesman for Working Title said no other parts had been cast as they had concentrated on finding Bridget first.
Bridget Jones was born in the pages of The Independent in 1995 and became an essential read for all young women (and some of their boyfriends, too). She received Valentine cards from desperate swains and single-handedly made it cool to be uncool in relationships. The following year Ms Fielding turned the column into a novel, which sold more than four million copies worldwide.
The book's cover followed the paper's column and featured Susannah Lewis, a former secretary at The Independent. Ms Lewis subsequently ran off to Madrid to live with her Cuban boyfriend. The sequel, which was published last year, has remained at the top of the UK bestseller lists since it was released.
But the last word on the casting of Bridget should go to her creator. Ms Fielding, who has left the bartenders and off-licences of Notting Hill bereft since she moved to Los Angeles (where smoking is certainly not permitted), said simply: "Vg."
~Moon
Fri, Feb 25, 2000 (16:46)
#1612
Rumours that Colin Firth, aka Mr Darcy in Pride and Prejudice and the object of Bridget's slavering affections, will play the love interest Mark Darcy remained unconfirmed yesterday. His agent said simply: "I have no idea."
ROTFLOL!!! Put that giant joint down and smell the coffee! If he has no idea who does?
Come on Colin, put the guy out of his misery. ;-)
~KarenR
Fri, Feb 25, 2000 (17:08)
#1613
I think he read the little slip of paper that Eileen handed him. ;-)
Interesting info about the woman on the bookcover I thought.
~mari
Fri, Feb 25, 2000 (18:07)
#1614
His agent said simply: "I have no idea."
Thanks for the article, Karen. This is so funny/sad in light of the posts just prior to this one! I think the agent's new line should be "Colin's mooted . . .and I'm mute."
Evelyn, he does have an L.A.-based publicist--or at least he did back in late '97. Not sure if he deals/dealt just with the U.S. media or not.
~EileenG
Fri, Feb 25, 2000 (20:03)
#1615
The font of knowledge speaks, right on cue. At least he didn't say "never heard of it."
no other parts had been cast as they had concentrated on finding Bridget first.
Aargh! Will the suspense ever end?
Ms Zellweger /.../ said: "The diary is an amazing evocation of the life of a single girl. It reads like Jane Austen, with comic and ironic twists and turns."
Gee, I wonder why it reads like Jane Austen.
This article calls her tall, too. Jim Carrey must be a giant then--doesn't he tower over her?
(Karen) Interesting info about the woman on the bookcover I thought.
Well, the eyelashes were dark.
~lizbeth54
Fri, Feb 25, 2000 (20:26)
#1616
Rumours that Colin Firth, aka Mr Darcy in Pride and Prejudice and the object of Bridget's slavering affections, will play the love interest Mark Darcy remained unconfirmed yesterday. His agent said simply: "I have no idea."
J-ee-z...just how casual a response is that?
A spokesman for Working Title said no other parts had been cast as they had concentrated on finding Bridget first.
I find this difficult to believe.....the success of the movie will depend on good ensemble playing as much as an effective Bridget. And good actors have commitments...are they suddenly going to start ringing round? They must have some ideas and have put out feelers!!!
Well, I hope "mooted" means "sign on the dotted line", but sometimes I hae mae doots. But with HF, Andrew Davies and David Parfitt (producer of SIL, now producing BJD) all involved, CF must be the front runner. Yes? Hey, Mr Agent....let us know, pl-ee-ase!
I think that the RZ announcement was timed to coincide with HF's new book coming out in the States. Good publicity.
~lafn
Fri, Feb 25, 2000 (22:05)
#1617
.... And good actors have commitments...are they suddenly going to
start ringing round?
Just what I was thinking. Filming to begin this summer? Or is it spring?
What are they gonna do...check out the unemployed actors'roster?
~mari
Sat, Feb 26, 2000 (01:12)
#1618
Let the media blitz begin!
Helen Fielding will appear on The Early Show (Bryant Gumbel, Jane Clayson) this Tuesday, February 29.
Starting to see some reviews for Edge Of Reason: one in Mirabella (excellent), and one in Entertainment Weekly (not v.g.). Guess which one was written by a man? If you said the excellent one . . .you'd be right.
~KarenR
Sat, Feb 26, 2000 (03:24)
#1619
Here's the publisher's website with info on the book:
http://www.penguinputnam.com/bridgetjones/book.htm
Tour Dates...so far
New York, NY
03/01/00
12 noon
Book Signing and Reading
Borders Books
World Trade Center
New York, NY
03/01/00
7:30pm
Book Signing and Reading
Barnes & Noble
Union Square
Bethesda, MD
03/02/00
Book Signing and Reading
Barnes & Noble
Baltimore, MD
03/03/00
Book Signing and Reading
Bibelot
Nashville, TN
03/07/00
Book Signing and Reading
Davis-Kidd Booksellers
Atlanta, GA
03/08/00
Book Signing and Reading
Chapter 11
Dayton, OH
03/10/00
Book Signing and Reading
Books and Company
Houston, TX
03/10/00
Book Signing and Reading
Brazos
San Diego, CA
03/13/00
7:30pm
Book Signing and Reading
Warwicks
Los Angeles, CA
03/14/00
Book Signing and Reading
Vroman's
~lafn
Sat, Feb 26, 2000 (16:40)
#1620
The cover of the US version is different from the UK one.
I guess, they thought Americans would be corrupted by Bridget smoking;-)
~Moon
Sat, Feb 26, 2000 (16:45)
#1621
I have the British paperback and all you see is the close-up of the face not a brunette.
So, any news on casting?
~heide
Sat, Feb 26, 2000 (16:57)
#1622
(Mari) Starting to see some reviews for Edge Of Reason: one in Mirabella
(excellent), and one in Entertainment Weekly (not v.g.). Guess which one
was written by a man? If you said the excellent one . . .you'd be right.
Interesting. The People review was written by a woman and is also not v.g. Does say, "Some of Bridget's escapades are laughable (botching an important interview with a famous actor by flirting with him...)" but no mention of the film's casting. ;-)
~KarenR
Sat, Feb 26, 2000 (17:01)
#1623
(People reviewer) "Some of Bridget's escapades are laughable (botching an important interview with a famous actor by flirting with him...)"
When will these serious, career-minded People get a sense of humor? ;-)
~KarenR
Sat, Feb 26, 2000 (17:02)
#1624
fixed
~EileenG
Sat, Feb 26, 2000 (17:37)
#1625
I expect the reviews will be mixed, as they were for the first one (NY Times flamed it) and as they were for this one in Britain. Some folks just don't appreciate HF's humor! But the rest of us will make it a bestseller.
~mari
Sat, Feb 26, 2000 (18:11)
#1626
At least the EW reviewer gets his name in there: "Sent on a dream magazine assignment to Rome to interview actor Colin Firth--Pride & Prejudice's Mr. Darcy himself--the professional journalist misses her plane, misses her deadline, and misses the point of the assignment."
Seems she loved the first book, and is disappointed that Bridge, finally "in possession of a good man," has fallen into sequel-itis where apparently "possession is nine tenths of a bore" with Mark and Bridget "barely allowed a slap and a tickle" before Fielding steers BJ "away from the experience of a rewarding releationship and onward to ever more inane behavior and goofy misadventure."
~KJArt
Sat, Feb 26, 2000 (21:07)
#1627
Prozac is mainly for chronic depression, which is not, I think what Donavan was suffering from. I don't know -- he might have been bipolar (manic-depressive) in which case they had probably used lithium (which he has to continue taking).
But all these are mood alterers which wouldn't completely do the trick. I truly believed he had to go through intensive "counseling" (read brain-washing) to completely change his reactions to things, his attitudes towards them.
He had to be taught to hate and fear....again.
~KarenR
Sat, Feb 26, 2000 (21:28)
#1628
I believe KJ's comments belong on the Spoiler topic...so will move them. Or is this somehow related to Bridget? ;-)
~Moon
Sat, Feb 26, 2000 (21:43)
#1629
Or is this somehow related to Bridget? ;-)
vvg!
~Moon
Sat, Feb 26, 2000 (22:36)
#1630
Did you know that it is a tradition for women to ask men to marry them on Feb. 29? This is from the E.Telegraph:
MOST women keep a sliver of their heart for some man they always hoped to marry, who never asked them. But next week, the nation will echo to the sound of tables turning, as lovelorn women get their four-yearly chance to ask him to marry them - on leap year Tuesday, February 29.
A rising number of women take the opportunity - around 7,000 each leap year, according to the latest reports. "I can't see anything dangerous for the relationship in a woman asking a man," says Suzy Powing of the counselling service Relate. "These days, the decision to marry is mutual, anyway."
He's free to say no. But in times past, coy refusals weren't allowed. "Accept her, or pay a swingeing �1 fine," decreed Queen Margaret of Scotland in 1288, ordering eligible bachelors to accept any single woman who asked on February 29. Perhaps she was honouring the broken heart of St Brigid, who proposed to St Patrick and was refused.
Brigid meet Bridget. ;-)
~heide
Sat, Feb 26, 2000 (23:20)
#1631
Did you know that it is a tradition for women to ask men to marry them
on Feb. 29?
You betcha! I've heard it called Sadie Hawkins Day. Don't be surprised if I have a new last name on March 1. Now where is my multi-millionaire? Not! ;-)
~Brown32
Sun, Feb 27, 2000 (01:56)
#1632
Hope this is new news. Note paragraph four - Murph
By ANITA GATES
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BRIDGET JONES
The Edge of Reason.
By Helen Fielding.
338 pp. New York:
Viking. $24.95.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
When last we saw Bridget Jones, she was in a suite at Hintlesham Hall with Mark Darcy, celebrating Christmas with vast quantities of Champagne and sex in a four-poster bed. Bridget was satisfied with her diet too, having gained 74 pounds during the calendar year and lost 72.
A happy ending, however, is no excuse for forgoing a sequel. Especially when it comes to ''Bridget Jones's Diary,'' Helen Fielding's fabulously best-selling novel, the one that introduced the terms ''singleton'' and ''smug marrieds'' into the language. Said sequel, ''Bridget Jones: The Edge of Reason,'' necessarily lacks the joy of discovery that accompanied the original, but its heroine is still great company -- at least in the abstract.
Many things about Bridget haven't changed. She still begins her diary entries with her weight; daily calorie, tobacco and alcohol intake; and other quantitative assessments of her progress toward becoming an ''assured, receptive, responsive woman of substance.'' She still lives in fear of dying alone and ''being found three weeks later half eaten by an Alsatian,'' which is why she hates being in her 30's and single. She still procrastinates madly, infers life lessons from ''Thelma and Louise'' and gets hangovers. And her mother still seems the same too, regularly advising, ''Don't say 'What?' Bridget, say 'Pardon?' ''
But time waits for no woman, even the chronically self-monitoring. By Page 12, Bridget is already worried about losing Mark. She soon spends a weekend at a ''country cottage'' (with stables, outbuildings, a pool and its own church) that belongs to the parents of her potential rival, Rebecca. She becomes a bridesmaid. Gary the builder knocks a hole in the wall of her flat. She goes on holiday in Thailand and at one point has reason to make a list of good things about being in jail (weight loss, not spending money, restoration of natural oils to hair because of infrequent shampoos). Her career prospects brighten with the opportunity to interview the actor Colin Firth, but her Mr. Darcy fixation gets the best of her. (Firth starred in a BBC production of ''Pride and Prejudice.'') Her non-Darcy-related questions include ''What is your favorite color?'' and ''Do you think the book of 'Fever Pitch' has spored a confessional gender?'' As Firth fictionally responds, ''Excuse me?''
Yes, the secret Fielding's sequel reveals is this: Bridget may not be terribly bright. We know this because her ex-beau Daniel Cleaver says of her, ''How can you go out with someone who doesn't know where Germany is?'' This is not totally fair because she does know that it's in Europe. And she has some knowledge of its affairs. After a ''motorway signpost debacle,'' she muses parenthetically, ''If war today, better, surely, to confuse Germans by leaving signposts up?'' Later a rival suggests that Bridget believes Rimbaud was a character played by Sylvester Stallone.
How can a reader not love this woman -- not in spite of her faults but because of them? Bridget tries so hard. Her days are made up of glorious surges of hope followed by instant defeat or rash interpretations, or both. (Dare we compare her to Virginia Woolf's Mrs. Dalloway?) She knows the darkest despair. Reading a self-help book, she comes across ''Feelings of unworthiness? A belief that you are unlovable?'' and quickly answers: ''Huh. Is not belief is fact.'' Yet her spirit soars with the possibility of change. Reading Hello! magazine, she concentrates on pictures of Prince William. ''Cannot, though, ignore impression of great things fermenting around in young royal brain,'' she observes, ''and sense that, at maturity, will rise up like ancient knight of Round Table thrusting sword in air and creating dazzling new order.'' Well, yeah, but will he be a singleton?
~Brown32
Sun, Feb 27, 2000 (01:57)
#1633
Forgot the say the above is from tomorrow's NY times book review.
Murph
~KJArt
Sun, Feb 27, 2000 (02:00)
#1634
Sorry. Break time from class :-( KJ
~mari
Sun, Feb 27, 2000 (15:10)
#1635
Thanks for the NYTimes review, Murph. Glad to see it's a good one; so many people read the Times book reviews. USA Today gives the book a thumbs up too:
By Deirdre Donahue, USA TODAY
Bridget Jones: The Edge of Reason
By Helen Fielding
Viking, 352 pp.
List price: $24.95
One of the most enchanting heroines ever to overdraw her bank account, the good-hearted if utterly neurotic Bridget Jones returns in Helen Fielding's just-published Bridget Jones: The Edge of Reason (Viking, $24.95).
Like its best-selling 1998 predecessor, Bridget Jones's Diary, the story is presented in journal form, complete with Bridget's daily tally regarding her weight, cigarette intake and love life. "Minutes since had sex 16,005,124 (must, therefore do something about this)."
Unlike the first book, which focused on Bridget's search for love, Edge opens with the delectable and eligible Mark Darcy parked in Bridget's bed. As the first line of her diary reads, "Hurrah! The wilderness years are over." But love trouble veers into sight. Specifically in the shape of the man-poaching Rebecca, she with the "thighs of a baby giraffe" and an enormous country house.
Ever at the ready with bad advice and alcoholic libations stands "the dating war command," Bridget's friends Sharon, Jude and Tom.
Bridget continues to display the habits that made her so lovable in the first place: an insatiable appetite for useless self-help books, continual communing about men with her friends, a constant striving to be a good daughter to her demented parents. Always one product from greatness, Bridget blithely embraces all sorts of crackpot ideas, from tourniquet underwear to building an addition to her apartment.
Her global appeal stems directly from everyone's secret hope that they are loved as much for their faults as for their virtues.
One of the most appealing aspects of Bridget' s world is that workaholics do not dominate it. People have time to commiserate and lament, except the Smug Married Magda, who spends her time shrieking: "Mummy will smack" while potty-training her children.
Bridget's job as a London TV researcher/occasional on-camera reporter continues to be a source of humiliation mixed with merriment. Bridget also spends time with Mark Darcy's very upper-crust "clinking and braying" legal set.
OK, it is true: Edge's plot is a bit over the top. Foreign intrigue plays a role. And there are those who might find Bridget's constant dwelling and obsessing to be, well, pathetic and silly. But she does grow up a bit by the end of the book.
But the truth must be told.
This reader had to be evicted from the ladies' room where she was reading the book behind locked doors. Her mad howls of laughter were frightening co-workers.
It's that funny.
~patas
Sun, Feb 27, 2000 (19:42)
#1636
It's that funny.
It is, isn't it? :-)
~LauraMM
Sun, Feb 27, 2000 (22:39)
#1637
The Wall St. Journal trashed BJ: The Edge of Reason. It was in Friday's edition. Only skimmed article. Art thought vvf as everyone goes nutso over BJ.
I tend to like WSJ reviews. But this one was harsh.
~mari
Mon, Feb 28, 2000 (19:11)
#1638
From the L.A. Times:
Tuesday, February 22, 2000
'Bridget' Creator Discovers Fertile Ground in L.A.
Helen Fielding says she's more relaxed here than in London and finds the SoCal obsession with self-image provides plenty of new material.
By MARJORIE MILLER, Times Staff Writer
For the record, Helen Fielding had zero alcohol units and zero cigarettes at a Sunset Boulevard lunch, during which there was no calorie counting and no boyfriend talk.
In other words, the bestselling novelist is not Bridget Jones incarnate, even if some people do mistakenly call her by her 30-something heroine's name, and despite the fact she has just had a very Bridget-like experience with the roof of her new Hollywood house springing leaks in the manner of a garden hose ravaged by a great Dane.
"I am sure it will all be sorted out soon," Fielding said with the kind of optimism she admires in Californians.
Fielding, whose second diary, "Bridget Jones: The Edge of Reason," is to be published in the United States at the end of the month, recently moved to Los Angeles to the chagrin of her British friends and fans. It is tempting to ask how she could possibly trade Notting Hill chic at 192--Bridget's favorite hangout--for L.A. hip at Cafe Med, except that we are seated outdoors on a spectacularly bright, sunny day in the middle of what only Californians could call winter.
"I love it here. Look at it, it's February. I swam this morning. It's half an hour to the beach and 40 minutes to the Wild West. I can be in the desert in 2 1/2 hours, and Mexico is two hours away on the plane. It's brilliant," Fielding said.
"Especially for a writer, to come to L.A., well, even if things go wrong, there is so much to write about," she enthused.
Fielding finds it amusing that Angelenos complain about traffic--which does move, after all, and hardly compares to London gridlock. Or the way Californians go to pieces in the rain and refuse to come see her new house because it is wet outside, a condition that would turn Britain into an entire nation of shut-ins.
Then there is the positive, good-natured character of Californians, America's alternative to the stiff upper lip.
"As I was leaving a hotel in the desert, I told the woman working there that, by the way, the toilet is broken in the room. And she said, 'Oh, thank you, thank you so much for telling me.' I imagine I could have said that my friend died and I left the body in the room, and she still would have said, 'Oh, fantastic, thank you, thank you so much,' " Fielding said with a laugh.
* * *
Fielding clearly is having a v. good time. And why shouldn't she? "Bridget Jones's Diary" sold 4 million copies in 30 countries, and the British edition of "The Edge of Reason" has sold nearly 500,000 since it was published in November. She is collaborating on the screenplay of "Bridget Jones's Diary," to be directed by her friend Sharon Maguire for Working Title, which brought out "Four Weddings and a Funeral" and "Notting Hill."
"Bridget" has spawned a slew of knockoff books, none of them as successful, and has added several words to the vocabulary of Chardonnay-chugging, urban singletons who identify with this bundle of insecurities trying to live up to impossible standards.
In her new diary, Bridget has traded diet books for self-help books and has a boyfriend, the rich and handsome Mark Darcy, whom she is trying to hang on to against the advances of gorgeous Rebecca, a villain "with thighs like a baby giraffe."
Telephone-addicted Bridget juggles her relationship with Mark along with the full-time demands of a manic boss, friends Shazzer, Jude and smug married Magda, and a zany mother who goes off to Africa to bring home a tribes man named Wellington.
Bridget then heads for Thailand, where she and Shazzer are conned by a Harrison Ford look-alike. She ends up in jail on drug charges, comforted only by the thought that she is shedding pounds.
Bridget II offers the same mix of neurosis and parody that attracted and irritated so many women, from London to Los Angeles to Tokyo, the first time around. But what exactly is it, Fielding is asked over salad and scallops, that makes so many women identify with Bridget?
"It is the gap between how you are and how you feel you are expected to be," Fielding said. "There are so many confusing images--wife, mother, Cosmo girl and career woman with the body of an anorexic teenager. Even high-powered New York women in business suits identify with her not being able to find a pair of tights in the morning.
"This feeling of not being as you are supposed to be seems to be pretty universal," she said.
Many professional women in their mid-30s have had to make difficult choices in their lives, among them, perhaps, the decision not to marry, she said.
"For these women to then be subjected to comments from an uncle like, 'What, still not married?' or about being on the shelf past your sell-by date, it's just not fair."
* * *
While the plot of the first book comes from Jane Austen's "Pride and Prejudice," the second borrows heavily from "'Persuasion." Both stories, Fielding noted, were "well market-researched over a number of centuries."
But many feminists who love Jane Austen hate "Bridget Jones," which portrays modern women squandering their hard-fought freedom on worrying about thigh size and sell-by dates.
"I don't think it's good, but it's true," Fielding said. "If it hadn't hit a true note, the book wouldn't have sold as it did. But the women buying it are not anti-feminist. It's a mark of strength to laugh at yourself."
Besides, she noted with characteristic irony, her weightier endeavors on refugee camps in Africa--her first book, "Cause Celeb"--and a proposal on cultural clashes in the Caribbean have not been as popular. Not to mention those sincere newspaper articles she used to write on the future of the British countryside.
The British press reported that Fielding did not want to write a sequel to "Bridget Jones" but caved in to her publishers. Fielding said she was not opposed but feared she might not be able to sustain the character who sprang out of a newspaper column in 1995 without any expectations.
She squeezed the writing into a frenetic schedule of publicity trips to Spain and Japan and delivered the manuscript 77 weeks late.
* * *
Part of the appeal of Los Angeles for Fielding is that it offers her a calmer lifestyle than London does after the intensity of Bridget's success.
"I really like it. All of the phone calls [from London] stop at 10 a.m. and I can start writing," she said.
Fielding had planned to take a break, but Los Angeles is proving too fertile a ground.
"I can't help it. I already have got piles of notes and interesting characters to think about," she said. "There are all these man-women walking around with the bottom half of a boy and then these enormous breasts. How can it be? I feel I am from a different species.
"If you order potatoes au gratin or something like that in a restaurant, the waiter will look at you"--and here Fielding gives a look as if you are about to imbibe motor oil--"and he'll say, 'You know, that contains dairy.' "
This, of course, is hilarious to someone from a country that offers up a "chip sandwich," which is white bread smeared in butter and filled with French fries cooked in beef fat.
So where does all this lead? What is Fielding working on now?
"Oh," she said, "getting the roof fixed."
~EileenG
Mon, Feb 28, 2000 (19:40)
#1639
Thanks for this article, Mari.
"I can't help it. I already have got piles of notes and interesting characters to think about," she said. "There are all these man-women walking around with the bottom half of a boy and then these enormous breasts. How can it be? I feel I am from a different species.
LOL!
"getting the roof fixed."
Better not call your friend Colin (when he's in town), Helen. He's not too handy around the house.
~patas
Mon, Feb 28, 2000 (19:45)
#1640
Hilarious. Thanks, Mari :-)
~KarenR
Mon, Feb 28, 2000 (20:12)
#1641
Helen hasn't lost a beat! LOL! Loved the bit about Californians not coming over if it's wet outside or the waiter questioning your order. Too good. Probably won't be another Bridget book, but who cares. Thanks, Mari.
~Moon
Mon, Feb 28, 2000 (21:04)
#1642
Thanks, Mari!
"I love it here. Look at it, it's February. I swam this morning. It's half an hour to the beach and 40 minutes to the Wild West. I can be in the desert in 2 1/2 hours, and Mexico is two hours away on the plane.
She is there for all the right reasons, but I wonder how permanent her move is,
since there are plenty of handsome men but most of them gay. (Was that v. bad of me?) ;-)
~KarenR
Mon, Feb 28, 2000 (22:30)
#1643
v. bad, Moon. Am sending Rupert over to chain you up and administer some behavior-modification techniques. ;-)
~Moon
Tue, Feb 29, 2000 (00:54)
#1644
Am sending Rupert over to chain you up and administer some behavior-modification techniques. ;-)
Oh, goody! Maybe I can share the room with Daniel Quinn! ;-)
PS. In an interview to the Miami Herald Madonna said that Rupert is not your typical gay guy, he is very butch. :-D (That MUST be the attraction)
~CherylB
Tue, Feb 29, 2000 (00:57)
#1645
Yes, but can he possibly be more butch than Madonna? And I am by no means implying that Rupert is a sissy.
~LauraMM
Tue, Feb 29, 2000 (13:02)
#1646
Yes, but can he possibly be more butch than Madonna? And I am by no means implying that Rupert is a sissy.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out Vanity Fair. GREAT pic of Madonna and RE on cover. Just bought it today. RE is drop-dead gorgeous, and Madonna since having Lola has softened up a bit.
~patas
Tue, Feb 29, 2000 (18:27)
#1647
Lola? Is that what she's called?
~mari
Tue, Feb 29, 2000 (18:58)
#1648
(Karen) Loved the bit about Californians not coming over if it's wet outside or the waiter questioning your order. Too good. Probably won't be another Bridget book, but who cares.
Exactly. The L.A. experience will keep Helen in material for quite awhile! Did anyone see her interviewed on The Early show this a.m.? She was bright and funny as usual. Nothing mentioned about the movie.
(Gi)Lola? Is that what she's called?
Yes, Lourdes is called Lola by her mom. (Deeply ashamed that I keep up with these things;-)
~patas
Tue, Feb 29, 2000 (19:41)
#1649
(Mari)Deeply ashamed that I keep up with these things;-)
Don't be! How else could you tell me about them? ;-)
~KarenR
Tue, Feb 29, 2000 (19:49)
#1650
...and I was ready to get a dig in at Laura, who lives and breathes the trashy celeb columns! *rats* ;-)
~LauraMM
Tue, Feb 29, 2000 (20:01)
#1651
and I was ready to get a dig in at Laura, who lives and breathes the trashy celeb columns! *rats* ;-)
]
Hee hee:)
~lafn
Tue, Feb 29, 2000 (20:58)
#1652
I saw HF this morning...she already looks like a Californian with a mini-skirted pastel (light blue)suit..bomber style jacket with matching turtleneck.
Forget London black!Looked younger and prettier too.
~CherylB
Wed, Mar 1, 2000 (22:34)
#1653
Personally I don't think anyone can possibly be more butch than Madonna; not even Mike Tyson.
I couldn't really get into BJD, but if CF is in the movie I'll see it. Not that I thought it a bad book, not at all. I just couldn't relate to it. Actually I do think CF we be in the movie, playing himself if nothing else.
~Tracy
Wed, Mar 1, 2000 (23:02)
#1654
(Cheryl) I do think CF we be in the movie, playing himself if nothing else.
Absolutely! Nobody could ever play CF I mean who matches up... that voice, those eyes?
*dark thought* You never know with these Hollywood types they'll cast Danny DeVito you just watch :-o
~lafn
Thu, Mar 2, 2000 (00:20)
#1655
(Cheryl) I do think CF we be in the movie, playing himself if nothing else.
(Tracy)Absolutely! Nobody could ever play CF I mean who matches up... that voice, those eyes?
You mean like hallucinatory flashbacks,... Or dream-like squences?
"The Cameo Kid strikes again".
(Godferbid)
~NitaE
Thu, Mar 2, 2000 (14:09)
#1656
(Cheryl) Actually I do think CF we be in the movie, playing himself if nothing else.
Wouldn't it be fun if he were to play Mark Darcy as well as himself?
~KarenR
Thu, Mar 2, 2000 (14:13)
#1657
If the movie included the sequel, then Colin could actually do 3 parts. They would use BBC clips for the Mr. Darcy stuff, but Colin would be himself for the interview segment and then they'd dye his hair dark to be Mark Darcy. I think it would be a riot.
~Moon
Thu, Mar 2, 2000 (14:15)
#1658
I think it would be a riot.
More like a dream come true. :-D
~KarenR
Thu, Mar 2, 2000 (14:32)
#1659
Follow-up news item today:
LONDON (AP) - Britons adopted a wait-and-see attitude when American actress Gwyneth Paltrow was cast as oh-so-English Lady Viola in the film "Shakespeare in Love."
But some newspaper columnists already are sharpening their perfectly manicured fingernails over the casting of yet another beautiful American blonde - 29-year-old Renee Zellweger - as angst-ridden, calorie-counting Londoner Bridget Jones.
Jones, a self-obsessed thirtysomething in search of Mr. Right, is the creation of British author Helen Fielding, whose novel "Bridget Jones' Diary" has sold 4 million copies worldwide.
So what do calorie-counting, thirtysomething British journalists think about Zellweger for the film role? Too young, too pretty, too American.
"Of all the clunking, Hollywood idiocy," wrote columnist Zoe Williams in the Evening Standard. "Casting her as a young and perfect thing is like remaking 'The Elephant Man' with Jude Law."
"Ms. Zellweger is a clean-living American, so it is unlikely that she smokes or drinks," sniffed Kate Watson-Smyth in The Independent. "She is also reportedly
on the verge of becoming what Bridget would call a smug-married."
"The only good thing, I suppose, is it isn't Meg Ryan," added Suzanne Moore in her Mail on Sunday column.
~EileenG
Thu, Mar 2, 2000 (14:55)
#1660
"Ms. Zellweger is a clean-living American, so it is unlikely that she smokes or drinks," sniffed Kate Watson-Smyth in The Independent. "She is also reportedly on the verge of becoming what Bridget would call a smug-married."
One word: AARGH. Anyone have Zoe's e-mail address? I'd like to send her the definition of that oh-so-complex, abstract term called ACTING. Sheesh.
Guess I missed all the fallout when Cate Blanchett was cast as Elizabeth. Horrors! An Australian! What did *she* know about being a queen?
*shaking my head*
~mari
Thu, Mar 2, 2000 (16:28)
#1661
(Karen)If the movie included the sequel, then Colin could actually do 3 parts.
If they don't get off the dime soon, Colin can play Colin (BJ's dad;-)
Actually that would be a great question to pose to Helen on her book tour, and one that she would probably answer (unlike casting questions)--is the script more 1st book, or a combo of the two? Unfortunately, I don't know of anyone who is going. :-(
~patas
Thu, Mar 2, 2000 (19:06)
#1662
(Karen)"The only good thing, I suppose, is it isn't Meg Ryan," added Suzanne Moore in her Mail on Sunday column.
(Mari)If they don't get off the dime soon, Colin can play Colin (BJ's dad;-)
I don't know which of these made me LOL more :-)
~KarenR
Mon, Mar 6, 2000 (20:15)
#1663
Harumpf! I really should cancel my subscription to Time. That predictable bunch of humorless feminist editors and writers. They hated BJD and now the sequel. Phoo
Meander Miss Jones
Bridget's still hapless, but she's not so cute
by Elizabeth Gleick
Oh, dear, oh dear. By the time Bridget has landed in a Thai prison (don't ask) more than halfway through Bridget Jones: The Edge of Reason, the reader is beyond caring. Hapless is one thing--as the tremendous popularlity of Bridget Jones's Diary showed, hapless can be endearing. But hapless with no sign of a learning curve, in a sequel that has none of the novelty of the original yet is much longer--now that will try the patience of even a Bridget fan. [how would this writer know, as she is not?]
Bridget Jones's Diary, originally a column by Helen Fielding in Britain's Independent newspaper (and soon to be a movie) [soon? see, writer does not know beans], was one fo the publishing phenomenons of the 1990s. It has sold 4 million copies worldwide to date and been published in 30 countries. A very funny account of the minor woes and epiphanies of a 30-ish single woman living in London, it spawned [maybe, spoored?] a host of pale imitations and a humorless debate about Bridget's supposedly debilitating effect on the progress of women. (My two cents: Fielding is a wonderful comic novelist who obviously struck some vein of truth. To condemn Bridget for being a more pathetic version of the rest of us is to miss the point.) [Keep your two cents; you have missed the point.]
But some hits cry out for sequels, whereas other books are fine just as they are. We may occasionally wonder what happens after Elizabeth Bennett [sic] marries Mr. Darcy (after all he's kind of difficult), but Jane Austen's subsequent novels are variations on a theme, not repetitions of one. [Ms. Gleick really MUST publish.] With her modern-day version of Pride and Prejudice, on the other hand, Fielding got caught in the vise of a lucrative contract and a punishing deadline, and the new book has an air of desperation. With the diary format, complete with alcohol and cigarette logs, and the same wacky circle of friends, Bridget seems to be living in her own private Groundhog Day, unable to learn from her mistakes, move forward or pull herself together the tiniest bit. The plot--and is there ever a plot--is driven by her on-again, off-again romance with Mark Darcy. The fact that the reader is so much smarter and more observant than Bridget is, this time round, irritating rather than suspenseful.
Gaa!
~LauraMM
Mon, Mar 6, 2000 (20:56)
#1664
I have to agree with the reviewer, I got tired of Bridge always getting into trouble and MD right there to save her.
~EileenG
Mon, Mar 6, 2000 (21:00)
#1665
Veronica Chambers' review in last week's Newsweek was much the same. Excerpts:
"Like a relationship in its sixth month, 'The Edge of Reason' challenges our affection. All of Bridget's faults--the obsessive calorie counting, the addiction to self-help books--that seemed charming in the first book grow tired here."
"On far too many occasions, Fielding doesn't take her character seriously enough. The gags, like the one about her parents' African houseguests, are too one-note."
"...and her beau, Mark Darcy, is back in full swing--still smoldering from afar...Fielding is afraid of exploring a full relationship between Bridget and Darcy, so she keeps them apart for most of the book. As Bridget would say, she should feel the fear and do it anyway. Darcy and Bridget are a wonderful pair. They'd give Smug Marrieds a good name."
Oh, well. I started it the other day and I can say with certainty that it makes me laugh 'til I cry. Loved this:
"Whilst v. much grateful for being brought skiing, could not believe nightmare of getting up on to hill in first place, baffled by what was point of clunking through giant concrete edifices full of grilles and chains like something out of concentration camp, with half-bent knees and equivalent of plaster cast on each foot...Worst of it is hair has gone mad in altitude, forming itself into weird peaks and horns like bag of Cadbury's Misshapes...Also three-year olds keep whizzing by without using any poles, standing on one leg performing somersaults, etc."
~lafn
Mon, Mar 6, 2000 (21:33)
#1666
Letter-writing time to these publications.
Am I the only one who liked The Edge of Reason more than BJD?
It stood on its own...didn't seem like a sequel to me.
IMO, however, it will be an incredibly difficult screenplay to put over.Bridgets thoughts are funnier than what she does.He actions could come over as a bit "chaplinesque".
~KarenR
Mon, Mar 6, 2000 (23:13)
#1667
(Evelyn) Am I the only one who liked The Edge of Reason more than BJD?
*hand raised high in air* I liked the second book more as well.
(Time Austen Scholar) We may occasionally wonder what happens after Elizabeth Bennett [sic] marries Mr. Darcy
Enough so that an entire cottage industry of Austen-related sequels exist and the web is full of Austen fan fic. Did Ms. Scholar not read the article in the NYTimes about Austen and the web?
(TAS) With her modern-day version of Pride and Prejudice
Hadn't she noticed that this one was based on Persuasion? Or did she consider that a "variation" on the P&P theme as well?
(TAS) Fielding got caught in the vise of a lucrative contract and a punishing deadline, and the new book has an air of desperation.
Some punishing deadline. Book was like a year and half overdue. And if she really wants to sample "desperation," try reading the columns in the Telegraph, where Fielding didn't know what she writing from week to week.
What I like best about the book, is how well she sorted the columns out. During HF's tour last year, she sounded so down about Bridget and Mark, that the relationship was not going to work out. Remember all the discussions we had about how unbelievable certain columns were? As I read the sequel, I was constantly amazed at how she had patched up huge holes in logic and believability.
~KarenR
Tue, Mar 7, 2000 (01:03)
#1668
Newsflash
Read this at Pemberley:
There will be an online chat with Helen Fielding at CNN.com at 1 pm EST on Wednesday, March 8. The subject will be BJD and The Edge of Reason.
Here's the link:
http://www.cnn.com/chat/
~~~~~~
Remember when we all went on line before to ask HF and Nick questions? What fun!!
~lafn
Tue, Mar 7, 2000 (02:21)
#1669
Remember when we all went on line before to ask HF and Nick questions? What fun!!
Yeah....I think that was two years ago.And when she started the book junket,the
poor woman was bombarded with questions by droolies all across the country!
~Moon
Tue, Mar 7, 2000 (02:54)
#1670
Thanks, Karen! I am relying on finally getting an answer to the big question...is he or not. Somebody must drag it out of her non-commital answers. Can someone ask who her PR person is? They are doing a v.g. job.
Since it is Ash Wed. and if I get a chance to log on, I will ask if MD is a Catholic. ;-D Hey, she would know right?
~MarkG
Tue, Mar 7, 2000 (10:19)
#1671
Karen, love the [interpolations]! If Ms Gleick publishes, I shall send in a review to Time.
Someone please ask if BJD has spoored a host of pale imitations? And what is Helen's favourite colour?
not really
~mari
Tue, Mar 7, 2000 (13:58)
#1672
And please don't forget to ask my personal favorite: "What is neacher?" ;-)
Seriously, if any of us can get on, we should ask if the screenplay is based mostly on the first book. And also the obvious question (which she probably won't answer;-)
~EileenG
Tue, Mar 7, 2000 (14:40)
#1673
(Evelyn) IMO, however, it will be an incredibly difficult screenplay to put over. Bridgets thoughts are funnier than what she does
...which is why they had to call all the king's horses and all the king's men to put the screenplay together again. I agree with what you're saying, though. I think the movie will be v. different than the book(s). I can see a few scenes translating intact (tarts and vicars party, dinner party), but as for the rest, I keep feeling a gravitational pull towards 4W&AF and Notting Hill. Don't know why...:-P
Am taking my time with EOR, but thus far I can see what some of the reviewers are saying. I'm finding Bridget to be more predictable this time (heck, it is a sequel); however, this book is funnier. Helen's wit is sharper than ever.
~KarenR
Wed, Mar 8, 2000 (16:04)
#1674
Helen Fielding Online Chat Today
It's at 4:00 pm ET at the CNN site shown below. Previous post said a different time, but the ROP poster must have been giving her "local" time.
Go here:
http://www.cnn.com/chat/qa.html
~KarenR
Wed, Mar 8, 2000 (16:13)
#1675
There will also be another online chat at bn.com (Barnes & Noble) on Monday, March 13, at 7:00 pm ET.
http://www.barnesandnoble.com/community/community.asp?userid=4V3K48R6XI&srefer=
~patas
Wed, Mar 8, 2000 (16:27)
#1676
Converted time for Europe: 8 p.m. GMT, or 9 p.m. CET.
Will try to log in.
~patas
Wed, Mar 8, 2000 (16:28)
#1677
I mean today. Sorry.
~KarenR
Wed, Mar 8, 2000 (16:35)
#1678
Isn't it 9:00 pm GMT?
~Moon
Wed, Mar 8, 2000 (16:40)
#1679
Karen, the CNN chat message access seems to be about Super Tuesday. Will we only be able to log on at the moment? I thought we were able to send our questions in advance. I admit I am a novice at this.
~KarenR
Wed, Mar 8, 2000 (16:41)
#1680
You can go into chat Q&A at anytime, but it will be real time. So you can't send you message in advance.
~lafn
Wed, Mar 8, 2000 (16:44)
#1681
It's at 4:00 pm ET at the CNN site
I'll be there:-)
Yes, it is 9 PM GMT.
~patas
Wed, Mar 8, 2000 (16:58)
#1682
In that case I won't be able to log in :,-(
~KarenR
Wed, Mar 8, 2000 (21:41)
#1683
The CNN chat was slightly less than a half hour. Questions were typed in online and some seemed to be be coming from elsewhere. Not sure what/where is CNNI (interactive). Tineke was there too. A lot of silly irrelevant questions. She did answer mine about whether the movie was to be based on just the first book or would include the sequel. She said *first book only* but little bits that appear in both and gave the example of Magda potty training her kid. Tineke asked "who should play Mark Darcy?" No real answer there. There was a general question about casting and she answered that it hasn't been done yet. Another person asked "who was going to direct?" (you see what I mean?) and she answered about her friend Sharon but added that Sharon really knows Bridget's world. Helen tossed in her new soundbites from LA (about the restaurant and chip butties).
Let's try again next Monday on bn.com
~lafn
Wed, Mar 8, 2000 (21:45)
#1684
Hey...Springhost_USA saw you in the CNN Chat just now. Along with Tineke.
I was guest #20683. Couldn't get my name in that box...wouldn't take it.
Anyway, it was great fun to lurk.She didn't say anything startling..."no other casting"...except RZ.I liked her answer to:"Do you stand up to defend 'shagging'"...."I always stand -up"!
Proud of our Firthfans who repped us. Thanks kids.
~EileenG
Wed, Mar 8, 2000 (21:50)
#1685
Just watched the chat (that's one step below lurking). Saw we were well represented by Tine and Springhost aka 'Mark's Towelrack' :-P I was glad to see Helen pick up your question, Karen.
~KarenR
Wed, Mar 8, 2000 (21:58)
#1686
I tried to copy off the chat dialogue to another document, but it didn't seem to work. Oh well, you've gotten the gist of it.
~patas
Thu, Mar 9, 2000 (01:15)
#1687
Will the interview with Colin be in the movie? Did anybody get the chance to ask ?
~mari
Thu, Mar 9, 2000 (01:24)
#1688
(Karen) She did answer mine about whether the movie was to be based on just the first book or would include the sequel. She said *first book only*
Thanks for getting that one in there, Karen. Something concrete, finally. Not exactly the answer I wanted to hear given MD's limited appearance in the first book, but as it is the one based on P&P maybe CF has a better shot at the role. If he even wants it.;-) I wasn't able to log on--couldn't get past the opening screen.
~KarenR
Thu, Mar 9, 2000 (04:52)
#1689
(Mari) I wasn't able to log on--couldn't get past the opening screen.
Really? Is it because of the java?
~EileenG
Thu, Mar 9, 2000 (15:19)
#1690
(Gi) Will the interview with Colin be in the movie?
Not likely since, as Karen found out, BJD movie will be based solely on BJD book with bits from EOR (e.g., "in the potty! In the potty!").
~patas
Thu, Mar 9, 2000 (15:54)
#1691
(EileenG)Not likely since, as Karen found out, BJD movie will be based solely on BJD book with bits from EOR
Well, the interview could be one of those "bits", maybe...?
~LauraMM
Thu, Mar 9, 2000 (17:40)
#1692
She does bring up CF's affair w/ JE in the first book, hmmm....
~lafn
Thu, Mar 9, 2000 (17:58)
#1693
Let's get a list of questions going to ask her on Monday night on the B&NChat.
She does bring up CF's affair w/ JE in the first book, hmmm...
Never mind that one, Laura, ...it's old news anyway;-)
~~~~~~~
1. Will you include in the film the interview with Colin Firth in Rome?
~LauraMM
Thu, Mar 9, 2000 (18:55)
#1694
2. Will she include the affair between JE and CF:)
~lafn
Thu, Mar 9, 2000 (20:53)
#1695
Will she include the affair between JE and CF:)
"It wasn't an affair....we were together for almost a year..."
said 'The Great One' in an interivew.
~mari
Thu, Mar 9, 2000 (21:26)
#1696
3. Is she having any input into the film's casting?
(And yes, Karen, I think my problem with connecting was the java.)
~EileenG
Thu, Mar 9, 2000 (21:31)
#1697
Methinks question 3 should be moved to question 1.
~KarenR
Thu, Mar 9, 2000 (22:01)
#1698
Article on Helen in the Atlanta paper:
Asked about the casting controversy, Fielding is unflustered and, well, un-Bridget-like.
"She was very good in 'Jerry Maguire.' She had that thing of being able to look both beautiful and ordinary," said Fielding, who wrote two early versions of the script for the movie, then lessened her involvement this year because of the demands of promoting the sequel. "Besides, I can't be involved with things like casting. It hits too close to home. I've got my own picture of how everybody looks, and they don't exist."
Full article here:
http://www.accessatlanta.com/partners/ajc/epaper/editions/today/features_1.html
~lafn
Thu, Mar 9, 2000 (22:42)
#1699
Cute interview, Karen...UK publications must be giving her a hard time over RZ. (They'd give any American actress a hard time, let's face it. Why not? Lots of British actresses need a job.)But this gives ODB a better chance at making the cut.
OK, Eileen....that seems to take care of question #3.
~mari
Sat, Mar 11, 2000 (15:35)
#1700
Mixed reviews don't seem to be slowing Helen down. The Edge Of Reason is the # 3 bestseller in the U.S., according to Publisher's Weekly.
~CherylB
Sat, Mar 11, 2000 (19:53)
#1701
Some of the best reviewed books don't sell well. Her reviews seem to be quite favorable for what she writes. Gore Vidal would call them "novels of the consumer". Will Self has nothing good to say about the writing of either Helen Fielding or Nick Hornby. H. Fielding does not write literature; this chick will probably never win the Booker Prize. She writes books meant to entertain.
~heide
Sat, Mar 11, 2000 (21:55)
#1702
Will Self has nothing good to say about the writing of either Helen
Fielding or Nick Hornby.
To quote Jo from Fever Pitch, do we really care? ;-) I'm pleased to be entertained by Hornby or Fielding and a good or bad review isn't going to change my mind if the writer succeeds on that score. I know intellectuals have nothing to fear from me but I hope I'm never pretentious enough to only read "literature".
~CherylB
Sat, Mar 11, 2000 (22:00)
#1703
Good for you. I do know those whose motto is, "I have no idea what I like, but I know a lot about art."
~KarenR
Mon, Mar 13, 2000 (21:54)
#1704
Moon sent me this article from The Globe and Mail, a Canadian paper, about Bridget and Annette Bening's character in AB:
'Is there a conspiracy here? Probably, but it's so vast that it's more of a united front'
HEATHER MALLICK
Wednesday, March 8, 2000
I am a great fan of Helen Fielding's Bridget Jones novels, the Diary and The Edge of Reason, mainly because they make me laugh. How many things can you say that about these days?
But there is a school of thought that says her heroine is not a charmer but a scatterbrained fool and her ditz act is wearing thin as she nears 40.
Would you have an apartment so messy, they say, that you would accidentally throw out your friend's cellphone with the garbage? And if so, would you ask your friend to call his phone, and then go out to the dumpsters and wait for one of them to ring? Would you do this wearing only a leather jacket over your bra and panties?
Of course you wouldn't. Of course Jones would. Jones thinks Rudyard Kipling's If is a condensed self-help book. She's a chronically late, messy scrambler of a woman, who thinks the Smug Marrieds are laughing at Singletons like her. She yearns for a rescuer, a rich, patient, handsome, clever, kind human-rights lawyer named Mark Darcy.
Mr. Darcy (yes, from Jane Austen's Pride and Prejudice) is a perfect man, with all of the male virtues (rationality, lovely body) and none of the vices (idleness, unrestricted lechery). He's highly unlikely to fall for a woman who is correct in thinking that she eats too much Cadbury's chocolate, smokes like a barbecue and drinks like a sponge. In real life, she'd be a bovine, smelly alcoholic, and be treated as same.
But this isn't real life, it's the confessional novel of the female inadequate and it has a heavyweight literary history. For centuries now, Bridget Jones has been trying to make her way in a world made by and for men.
Jones's diaries are descendants of Shamela, the parody Henry Fielding wrote in 1742 when he became immensely irritated by Samuel Richardson's Pamela, a pompous, best-selling narrative of a virtuous servant girl. Instead of diaries, Pamela and her alter ego, the conniving little hussy Shamela, used the device of letters to parents, in which they tell of fighting off lecherous employers and seeking true love. There were no careers for women then, and, strangely, not now either (Jones's job is pure idiocy.) There is only one route to success in the 1700s and the 2000s and that is to marry a Mark Darcy.
Helen Fielding (no relation to Henry) ascribes the success of these novels to the notion that there is a little Bridget in all of us, a nice, well-intentioned female striving to be perfect and failing on a colossal scale. To feminists who think Jones is a moron, she rather smugly points out that somebody must be identifying with her because nobody bought her first "serious" novel about refugee camps. (I did. It was terrible.)
Columnist Johanna Schneller wrote in this section last week about the tidal wave of female idiots clogging American movies. She was dead right. Is there a conspiracy here? Probably, but it's so vast that it's more of a united front. Writers and directors, whether male or female, present women as foolish, dismissable creatures partly because nobody objects and points out that few women (or girls, as they are now unconvincingly called) in real life behave like cartoon characters or indeed, Bridget Jones.
Ms. Schneller mentioned the obsessive housewife character played by Annette Bening in American Beauty as the only one in the movie "who doesn't get a moment of grace." There is a scene in which her husband tries to seduce her on the couch, a scene that I think epitomizes the way men are taken seriously and women are laughed at.
"Lester, you're going to spill beer on the couch."
"So what," he says. "It's just a couch."
"This is a $4,000 sofa upholstered in Italian silk. This is not 'just a couch.' " Seduction ends, permanently.
Apparently audiences are united in their loathing of this woman, while the husband, who's trying to seduce his teenage daughter's best friend, wins their sympathy. I was left so aghast by this interpretation that I was silenced. I am a keen vacuumer and neatener myself and brought my beloved, butter-coloured couches to my marriage, so admittedly I am biased.
But Bridget Jones lives in all of us? Bening's character is a virago? And some oaf who gobbles beer while ineptly pawing the mother of his children is a hero?
So I committed heresy. I tossed my lifelong feminism in the bin and did what Jones, Pamela, Shamela and the writers and directors named by Ms. Schneller would do. I asked a man, specifically the Mark Darcy I'm married to and am not smug about because he's wise, nice and could easily discard me, as Bridget would say.
He was livid at my description. He was entirely on the side of Bening and her chesterfield. Why is this man drinking beer at a moment like that anyway? Clearly, they're going to divorce, so why ruin the furniture? Their children will have to sit on something. And what do you mean about the teenage girl? (We have two of those.) How appalling. No, of course I'm not leaving you.
And on in this vein.
So who thinks the Bridget Jones version of women that echoes down the ages is a crock? Me, my estimable husband, Ms. Schneller and a school of thought.
I love you dearly, Bridget, but pull yourself together.
E-mail at hmallick@globeandmail.ca
~KarenR
Mon, Mar 13, 2000 (23:39)
#1705
Reminder!! Chat with Helen at bn.com starts at 7:00 pm ET
Here's the link directly to the Auditorium. Questions can be submitted in advance.
http://www.barnesandnoble.com/community/aud/uaud.asp?userid=4V3K48R6XI&srefer=#marker
~KarenR
Mon, Mar 13, 2000 (23:43)
#1706
Here's the transcript from the online chat last year. You'll see a few familiar names. ;-)
http://www.barnesandnoble.com/community/archive/transcript.asp?userid=4V3K48R6XI&srefer=&eventId=1392
~KarenR
Mon, Mar 13, 2000 (23:44)
#1707
Ooops, the chat was in June '98 - nearly two years ago!
~KarenR
Tue, Mar 14, 2000 (00:22)
#1708
OK.. which one of you is Auntie Pasta? ;-)
~lafn
Tue, Mar 14, 2000 (00:55)
#1709
OK.. which one of you is Auntie Pasta? ;-)
I'm notta sayin....but it sure beats "Heavie Evie"( n' I wuz Lafn too!!)
I copied some of the Q&A.Did you Karen?Want me to post what I copied?
~KarenR
Tue, Mar 14, 2000 (15:45)
#1710
Here are some of the CF or movie-related Q&As from the Barnes and Noble chat:
Jude from Los Angeles: How do you feel about Renee Zelwegger being selected to play Bridget? Did you have any casting say?
HF: I'm very upset that they didn't ask me. My acting career came to an abrupt halt at university when I was given a part in the review, then in rehearsal, one by one all my roles were taken away from me. Apart from that of Miss Guided, a mute Chamber Maid. I haven't been involved in the casting, but I've heard she's very funny and she's learning to speak English with an English accent.
Auntie Pasta from USA: Did you have any input in the casting of the film. I think RZ as Bridget is brilliant! Who will be Mark Darcy? I pray it isn't Hugh Grant...
HF: I pray it is Colin Firth of the BBC's Pride and Prejudice fame, but I don't know who it will be.
Elisa from Pennsylvania: Has Colin Firth contacted you in regards to his many mentions in the new book?
HF: The interview in the book was actually a real interview in Rome with me pretending to be Bridget and him assuming a Mr. Darcy-esque tone. And he was very amused by it afterwards.
Benjamin from Atlanta: Do you know when the film will be released? How will they be able to use much of her writing in a diary on screen?
HF: to last: which is not to suggest that I am in any way shallow. To this: I hope it will come out before Christmas and I hope that they will use lots of voice-over.
Lesley from NYC: What are your fears about Bridget Jones' Diary being made into a movie? Are you working on the script too? How do you feel about Renee Zelwegger playing the part of Bridget?
HF: Authors traditionally turn into monsters when their work has been made into film, so I decided a few months ago, the time had come to graciously retire and maybe just turn up glamorously on set one day in a pair of sun-glasses and a gold turban then throw a hissy fit and flounce off for a large martini.
Lafn from Oklahoma: Will the film include the interview with Colin Firth in Rome?
HF: No, because the film is of the first book.
Karen from Chicago: Thought The Edge of Reason was even better than the first book and am amazed at how well you transformed the Telegraph columns into a story. How did you decide to use Persuasion, which worked brilliantly to add depth to Mark's character? If it was just whim, am glad you didn't go the Mansfield Park route.
HF: I am very pleased that you liked the book so much and was thinking of asking you to repeat the question seven times over the Internet. I chose Persuasion because it was my second favorite JA book after Pride and Prejudice and also began with a P which added a pleasing air of continuity.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I've put up the whole thing at:
http://www.spring.net/karenr/general/hfchat.html
~EileenG
Tue, Mar 14, 2000 (16:09)
#1711
Thanks for the excerpts, Karen. Auntie Pasta? Was that you, Moon? ;-D *heeheehee*
There you have it, Ms. Lafn. So I suppose there's no room for CF to play MD, be the Mr. Darcy in P&P whom BJ adores *and* do a cameo as himself. Oh, well.
~EileenG
Tue, Mar 14, 2000 (16:24)
#1712
Just read the whole interview. Eileen from NYC was not me--I was away from my computer yesterday (besides, am in Jersey). Sorry I missed it.
I finished EOR last week. I did laugh all the way through but found it very predictable (BJ will get herself in trouble, MD will get her out). Liked the ending. Liked Geoffrey Alconbury's line: "Wheee! Off they go!" Didn't you want to smack him? On the whole, though I prefer the original BJD, EOR doesn't disappoint.
~Moon
Tue, Mar 14, 2000 (20:17)
#1713
I went to the Chat at about 7:20 pm and asked whether she had spoken to CF about playing MD and if he would be interested in the role.
I guess she decided not to answer it. And at this point, I am inclined to think that they will not go for him. I have a feeling they want someone who is better known in the US. :-( Did anyone get that feeling too?
Do you believe she is in La Jolla? Yuk! Who is she mingling with? The martini set?
Thanks for the link, Karen.
~patas
Tue, Mar 14, 2000 (20:56)
#1714
Thank you Karen and Evelyn. Am going to the Bucket now to read the whole thing. It looks like it was hilarious. I'm sorry I could not be there.
(EileenG)So I suppose there's no room for CF to play MD, be the Mr. Darcy in P&P whom BJ adores *and* do a cameo as himself. Oh, well.
As long as he plays Mark Darcy... and this still seems possible :-)
BTW, I almost fell from my chair at HF's reply that the interview in Rome was real - sort of. Lucky woman!:-)
~lafn
Tue, Mar 14, 2000 (21:31)
#1715
... asked whether she had spoken to CF about playing MD
and if he would be interested in the role. I guess she decided not
to answer it.
I got tthe idea they were running out of questions...but I had one too that she didn't answer re: an audio that JE did of Cause Celeb Helen's first book.
I have a feeling they want someone who is better known in the US. :-( Did anyone get that feeling too?
I got the feeling she really doesn't like to answer anything much about that movie.
Tip: Ask lots of questions under different names..I got 2 out of 3 answered. Not bad.
Laura honey...I figured you could ask your own question;-)
~KarenR
Tue, Mar 14, 2000 (23:44)
#1716
(Moon) Do you believe she is in La Jolla? Yuk! Who is she mingling with? The martini set?
She had a booksigning yesterday in San Diego. I need to find out if a friend of mine went; she was coming in from London yesterday and planned to go.
I truly believe she has no input in the casting decisions and never did, which is usually the case with authors. If she has any influence, it will be via her friend Sharon, who is directing. Let's keep our fingers crossed that Sharon (aka Shaz) is also a P&P-loving, Colin Firth-as-Mr-Darcy fan as she is portrayed in the book. ;-)
~mari
Wed, Mar 15, 2000 (00:10)
#1717
HF: I pray it is Colin Firth of the BBC's Pride and Prejudice fame, but I don't know who it will be.
I think this is very hopeful. With no prompting, she brought Colin's name into the conversation--his first mention in the interview, looks like.
I agree that she probably has little input, if any, into the casting, but I'm sure she is very plugged into the process in terms of where things stand. If that's the case, then based on this interview, CF hasn't been ruled out. The thought of Renee and Colin is really growing on me; physically, it's almost like Carrie and Mr. Big on Sex In The City. Long-haired, vulnerable cute but not gorgeous blonde coupled with tall, dark and handsome guy several years her senior.
~lafn
Wed, Mar 15, 2000 (01:08)
#1718
(Mari)With no prompting, she brought Colin's name into the
conversation--his first mention in the interview, looks like.
Hee, hee. You catch on fast....that was the plan;-)
~Moon
Wed, Mar 15, 2000 (03:42)
#1719
You catch on fast....that was the plan;-)
Wot? She has a secret plan? And you knew about it Evelyn?
I hope this does not mean that we will have to set up petitions at all the CF sites for him to be considered as MD! ;-)
Can we wait a little longer for the cast to be announced or do we have to wait for Miss Dolittle to finish her diction lessons first???!!!
~LauraMM
Wed, Mar 15, 2000 (13:14)
#1720
I missed both chats:( Sorry, I didn't participate. But I did read the transcript. Karen, LOVED your question! She was bang on by asking you to repeat it 7 times over the Internet;)
~lizbeth54
Wed, Mar 15, 2000 (13:54)
#1721
I rang Working Title again. They said that shooting for BJD would run through May-June in various locations in London, with a view to an early 2001 release. Other casting is "currently being finalised".
~mari
Wed, Mar 15, 2000 (14:10)
#1722
Oh, I can't hold it in any longer! Postive report from last night's Fielding reading in L.A. Nothing absolutely definite on the casting news we've been waiting for, but let's just say it's looking good. Hope to have more to report later.
~KarenR
Wed, Mar 15, 2000 (15:38)
#1723
Ooooh, sounds like the casting will have to be announced shortly. Wonder if this will be a Friday Baz exclusive?
And that shooting schedule will certainly accommodate doing Armadillo this summer!
~amw
Wed, Mar 15, 2000 (15:41)
#1724
but what about The Maid of Buttermere?
~KarenR
Wed, Mar 15, 2000 (16:07)
#1725
The Buttermere thing was never confirmed as being a "go." It seems like its still in the preproduction phase, if anything.
~amw
Wed, Mar 15, 2000 (16:11)
#1726
Oh well, it sounded so perfect for CF, more so I have to say than BJD, I still have my doubts especially as we now know it is based on the first book.
~MarianneC
Wed, Mar 15, 2000 (17:41)
#1727
Hi ... attended last night's book reading/Q & A/book signing at Vroman's (Pasadena/L.A.), and it was a capacity crowd. Helen Fielding was charming and funny. She read 3 chapters from the book: hellacious haircut; cooking breakfast for Mark (but having none of the ingredients); and writing Christmas cards.
I timidly asked her if they (Working Title/Universal/casting agents) would take into account her wishes in regarding who will play Mark Darcy. Her reply
(paraphrasing) was that she wants Mark Darcy to be played by THE MR. DARCY of
"Pride & Prejudice," Colin Firth. Sorry, can't remember if there was more to that answer as I was overcome by the excitement of actually asking a question.
Maybe Jana or Winter can help me out on this. Most of the questions were ones that have already been answered in previous online Q & A's ... Renee Zelwiger ... HF suddenly appearing in turban on the set ... set in Notting Hill ... but, she wouldn't answer what her favorite color was.
Well, have to get back to work ... Jana and Winter, it was wonderful seeing you guys again!!!
~EileenG
Wed, Mar 15, 2000 (18:10)
#1728
Thanks for your first-hand report, Marianne. Glad you got to reprise your HF book signing appearance, Winter and Jana!
~LauraMM
Wed, Mar 15, 2000 (18:48)
#1729
Why doesn't HF come to Boston???? Did she really think we would run her out ala 1776?
~patas
Wed, Mar 15, 2000 (20:02)
#1730
Great report, Marianne. The flame is still burning :-)
~Jana2
Wed, Mar 15, 2000 (21:05)
#1731
Excellent report, Marianne! It was great to see you and winter again last night. We had a mini-Drool reunion over coffee. Oh yeah, the signing was fun too :-).
Winter and I thought Marianne very brave to ask "the" question. Her plan was similar to yours, Evelyn - ask very innocently about the casting of Mark Darcy hoping for an unsolicited mention of you-know-who. We were not disappointed :-). My recollection of HF's answer matches yours Marianne, although I think after saying she wanted CF for the role she added something like "but nothing is confirmed".
As Marianne said, we got a lot of the same soundbites from HF that we've heard or read before, but HF delivers them so spontaneously it would be hard to tell she's not making it up on the spot if you didn't have our team of researchers out in the world scouring for her every word. There were a couple of items that were new to me anyway (sorry if this is a repeat for you all).
Regarding the name of the book, she said the idea was somewhat based on the reviews of BJD in Italy. She then said the bit we've heard before about the Italian review saying BJD was a "study in existential dispair" (something like that - I may not have quoted exactly right.) She then went on to say that she chose the name "The Edge of Reason" because it sounded Sartre-esque to her (I hadn't heard that bit before).
She also said something new to me about the first book she wrote. I always thought it to be the one set in the refugee camp that she says no one bought. Last night though she said that was the first book she sold. Previously she had written a romance novel called "The Fires of Zanzibar" and submitted it to Mills & Boone (?) which from her description sounded to be something approaching the quality (or lack thereof) of Harelequin romance in the U.S. While HF thought her book to be quite good, she got a rejection letter from M&B saying her work was not up to the standards of the M&B reader. She said it was so depressing she didn't write again for six years. Sorry if this is a repeat for you, but it made me laugh!
Bottom line, publicly at least HF did not give any firmer comment about CF playing MD than she had in past interviews. We didn't ask her about this again when we had our books signed because that would have made Marianne look like some kind of fanatic :-).
~Moon
Wed, Mar 15, 2000 (21:43)
#1732
Thank you Jana and Marianne. Winter where are you?
(Karen), sounds like the casting will have to be announced shortly. Wonder if this will be a Friday Baz exclusive?
I think you might be right. I believe the ink is dry. Get the scoop, Baz!
~KarenR
Wed, Mar 15, 2000 (22:21)
#1733
Great going, Jana and Marianne. Helen must wonder if anyone cares about her new book, if all the questions tend toward the movie. Did anyone ask how her about progress on her new roof? Has she met the LA equivalent of Gary the builder? Doubt though he would be having tea with Helen.
FYI, she has mentioned the Mills & Boon (definitely Harlequin-ish) before - not frequently, but she did in the Barnes & Noble chat. The title was never mentioned before this round of promotion if I'm not mistaken.
Winter, hon, we want to hear about your *exchange* with Helen. ;-D
~winter
Wed, Mar 15, 2000 (22:38)
#1734
Here I am....heheheh... once again, I use my opportunity to meet HF as a way of getting into "the biz." ( 2 yrs ago I asked HF if I could play the convicted housemaid, once BJ started filming...)
Basically, Marianne and Jana and I decided to wait until the very end, so we wouldn't feel the pressure to move along the conveyer belt of autograph seekers. After we gushed over 'Edge of Reason,' and after Marianne asked about Mark Darcy's religious background ('Probably Church of England'), I took the opportunity to ask Helen, "Would you happen to be in need of an assistant???"
I gave her the story of how I dropped out of the PhD program (not really- just taking a hiatus) and am looking for work. Sister Jana was nice enough to back me up on my qualifications and HF actually looked slightly interested, if not amused! She asked for my #, and I dug into my wallet for my business card....
...well, after fumbling around my bag, I was about to hand over my card when I realized IT WAS MY MANICURIST'S BUSINESS CARD!!! A Bridget moment if there ever was one... Anyway, I apologized and told her it was my manicurist's card, and then found the right one, and then I handed it over to her. Everyone was very good natured about it, I think. We left immediately after, because I didn't want to seem too anxious.
~EileenG
Wed, Mar 15, 2000 (22:44)
#1735
*snort* Too funny, Winter. Of all people, I'm sure Helen appreciated your BJesque moment!
~KarenR
Wed, Mar 15, 2000 (22:49)
#1736
Winter, how bold, how brash, how FUNNY!! Now, if only a few Dairy Milk wrappers and a pair of torn pantyhose had fallen out of your purse, she would've hired you on the spot!
~lafn
Wed, Mar 15, 2000 (23:09)
#1737
Thanks Marianne, Jana and Winter....how gracious of HF to ask for your card, Winter.Great goin' girls. Wonder what the hold-up is on the confirmation of MD.
~mari
Wed, Mar 15, 2000 (23:14)
#1738
From FoF Leslie who is happy to share:
After the session was over last evening, she went up to Helen for autographs and asked her privately, wouldn't it be a hoot if Colin Firth played Daniel. Helen replied, "Well, he's probably going to play Mark Darcy."
So, a definite probably! ;-) Enjoyed everyone's reports--thanks.
~heide
Wed, Mar 15, 2000 (23:35)
#1739
A "definite probably" is better than a "definite possibly" but I'm still standing by with the smelling salts in case someone else whose initials are not CF is named as MD.
Helen's a hoot. Too bad you didn't ask her to join you for coffee. ;-) Could have made a fab four.
~Jana2
Thu, Mar 16, 2000 (00:43)
#1740
Winter, I'm glad you decided to post about your little adventure with HF. I keep thinking about it and it has been making me smile all day - it truly was a moment right out of BJD! I keep imagining the somewhat stricken look on your face when you realized you were proffering your manicurist's business card, albeit in a very professional manner :-). I thought HF's response was funny too. She smiled and with a twinkle in her eye said "you're fired". She was definitely kidding though and I'm sure she'll remember you now!
~KarenR
Thu, Mar 16, 2000 (05:03)
#1741
I thought her comments about ELiza Dolittle sounded like she was a bit miffed. Article in Empire (15/03/2000):
Bridget Jones Insulted
Speaking for the first time since the announcement that Renee Zellweger had been chosen for the role of Bridget Jones, author Helen Fielding said she had given up her involvement in the film-making process.
�I had some initial involvement with the script,� Fielding told a chat this week on People.com, �but authors traditionally turn into monsters when they turn their books into films so I thought I should gracefully retire a few months ago.�
When asked about the eventual choice of actress, Fielding responded, �Well, I'm very insulted that nobody asked me. My acting career was previously blighted in this way when I was cast in the university review and one by one in rehearsal all my parts were taken away from me�I've never met Renee but I'm told she's very funny and learning to speak English with an English rather than Texas accent.�
According to rumour, the casting for the part of Bridget had been held up for some months when Fielding couldn�t agree with the filmmakers on her leading lady. Kate Winslet � whom most people had thought would take on the role � eventually gave up waiting, deciding on the Therese Raquin movie instead.
~KarenR
Thu, Mar 16, 2000 (05:10)
#1742
Here's the link to the people.com chat with Helen on 3/13/00 - the same day that she did the bn.com one. Wonder if they were done simulataneously? ;-)
http://people.aol.com/people/interactive/transcripts/f/hfielding.html
~MarkG
Thu, Mar 16, 2000 (09:00)
#1743
Great story, Winter! With it being a manicurist's card especially, it is too BJ. HF may even think it was a set-up! :-)
A definite probably for CF as MD. Now just imagine if HF went away thinking: "Damn! I wasn't meant to mention that - if it gets into the press, I may be in trouble for leaking it too early."
~Moon
Thu, Mar 16, 2000 (13:26)
#1744
Winter, I love your huffspa! (sp?) You do great everytime!
Now what if she calls you for an interview on the day you are to leave for Bali?
Will somebody please e-mail Baz with HFs latest CF as MD comment and ask him to get the scoop. We are most impatient!
~LauraMM
Thu, Mar 16, 2000 (14:25)
#1745
(Moon)Winter, I love your huffspa! (sp?) You do great everytime!
Chutzpah;)
Yeah, that was very BJ-esque!
Now if only she'd come to Boston (or Providence, for that matter!)
~LauraMM
Thu, Mar 16, 2000 (14:25)
#1746
ugh! I did close tags!
~mari
Thu, Mar 16, 2000 (19:57)
#1747
And they thought they were rid of me after MLSF! Check this out, from Liz Smith's column today:
Miramax has acquired two new choice projects: "Bridget Jones' Diary" to star Ren�e Zellweger, and "Captain Corelli's Mandolin," with Nicolas Cage and Penelope Cruz. It will be directed by John Madden of "Shakespeare in Love" fame. Harvey Weinstein's studio will meld with Universal, Working Title Films and Canal Plus on these projects.
~KarenR
Thu, Mar 16, 2000 (20:01)
#1748
*hee hee hee* digging out Miramax's telephone number! Wonder why Universal feels a need to partner with Miramax on this one? BJD isn't some $40 million production...or is it? ;-)
~Moon
Thu, Mar 16, 2000 (20:22)
#1749
It must mean an increase in the budget. Remember the cast as I see it. Hugh Grant as Daniel, Elizabeth Hurley as Rebecca, HB-C as Shazz, etc. Colin will be the big bargain, so I bet he is in. :-)
Now please let Baz know we want the scoop! Karen, you must have his direct line by now. ;-)
~KarenR
Thu, Mar 16, 2000 (20:26)
#1750
Not me! The Daily Mail is beyond my reach. Besides, we have several fantastic on-the-scene reporters who are already in line waiting for tomorrow Mail to be delivered to the news agent. ;-)
~KarenR
Thu, Mar 16, 2000 (20:34)
#1751
Laura's post on 127 reminded me - Saffron Burrows would be a good Rebecca, don't you think? If RZ is fairly tall, then Rebecca needs to tower over her. Who better than Saffron or maybe Charlize Theron? And both of them have Hollywood appeal for the boxoffice, although it is a small part for the first book.
Since Hughie isn't even a consideration IMO - not wasting the grey cells - am going to have to give the Daniel casting some thought. Nobody really comes to mind. Names, need names!!
~Tracy
Thu, Mar 16, 2000 (20:51)
#1752
Daniel -
Does it have to be a BIG name? *Throwing names in from God knows where* how about Rupert Graves (Room with a View,The Madness Of King George)?
Too good looking perhaps.
~KarenR
Thu, Mar 16, 2000 (20:57)
#1753
Ooooh, yeah!! Rupert Graves would do very well.
~lizbeth54
Thu, Mar 16, 2000 (21:04)
#1754
So, Harvey's sticking his finger into the BJD pie? I can't work out if this is good or bad news. Have to say, overall, despite one or two (!) reservations about Harvey, it must be good news for the movie. Harvey's always on the look out for winners. And it should mean more promotion.
All we need is that vital confimation re. CF! It has to be via Baz or Teletext (Ann, keep on the alert...you get all the scoops!). Hope he gets co-starring, not fourth billing!
I'd love to make a few suggestions re the casting.
Saffron Burrows would make a great Rebecca or MD's barrister girl friend.
Alison Steadman for Bridget's Mum
Ben Whitrow for Bridget's Dad
Helena B-C for Shazzer
Julia Sawalha or Holly Aid (Sarah's friend in FP)for Jude
David Bamber for Richard Finch
Kathy Burke for Perpetua (she can do "posh")
? Dreyfuss ( co-stars with Kathy Burke in a BBC2 series) Tom
Charlotte Coleman (4 weddings) Patchouli
Daniel...definitely American, Rhodes scholar type, a sort of younger Kevin Kline
RZ is, I think, much better casting for Bridget than KW. KW is too young, and ,although I know you don't have to be an ax murderer in real life to play an ax murderer, she does come over in recent interviews as very happily Smug married. Needs a bit of angst.
RZ is apparently very popular over here, with males under 25. And they are usually the main target audience for a successful movie.
Ann, CF could still do "Maid of Buttermere" later on...sometimes projects take time to get off the ground. But BJD is high profile.
~Tracy
Thu, Mar 16, 2000 (21:05)
#1755
And Tom....? For Tom I think (I'm going to show my ignorance here as I'm not sure I've got the right name - but it's the guy who played Hugh in Tumbledown) Paul Rhys(?). Or for the quirky ( we know RC always has room for a quirky character) how about a Scots Tom in the shape of Alan Cumming?
~Tracy
Thu, Mar 16, 2000 (21:06)
#1756
Re Tom James Dreyfuss. inspired...even better!
~KarenR
Thu, Mar 16, 2000 (21:14)
#1757
(Bethan) Daniel...definitely American, Rhodes scholar type, a sort of younger Kevin Kline
Am having a hard time with this one. Rhodes scholar type? What is that? A Bill Bradley or a Bill Clinton?
Kevin Kline? He's definitely not a Rhodes scholar type (see above) and the clincher is he's married to the less-than-intellectually challenging Phoebe Cates. ;-)
~LauraMM
Thu, Mar 16, 2000 (21:57)
#1758
$40 million production...or is it? ;-)
{
Isn't that CF's price to film the movie? :)
Rupert Graves would be a wonderful Daniel or James Wilby. Sam West?
Loved Charlotte Coleman as Patchouli is perfect! She has to have a lot of body piercing tho!
~lafn
Thu, Mar 16, 2000 (22:45)
#1759
(Mari)And they thought they were rid of me after MLSF!
Oh Mari...too funny. You must be on first name basis with most of the people in the NY office. And we know all the Miramax reps across the country.
It's not all bad to get Harvey on board.But the producer line is getting crowded.Hope Colin's sticker-price (and pl. God it is he!)is more than SLOW.
~amw
Thu, Mar 16, 2000 (22:56)
#1760
if it is in The Daily Mail tomorrow, Aishling will be first to post it, so look out for Aishling in the morning. I am afraid I don't get out to the shops till midday. Fingers crossed, although I think it is a bit early to hear anything but what has he been doing for the last two months, I thought he said he wasn't
taking a break!! If he got a move on he could do Maid of Buttermere now for say 6 weeks and then Bridget Jones til about end of June, all ready for Armadillo in the summer which could mean June, July or August. Yes that will do me! (and then please can we see them before I draw my old age pension!!)
~lafn
Thu, Mar 16, 2000 (23:09)
#1761
he could do Maid of Buttermere now for say 6 weeks and
then Bridget Jones til about end of June, all ready for Armadillo in the summer which could mean June, July or August. Yes that will do me!
Poor Will:-(
~Arami
Thu, Mar 16, 2000 (23:31)
#1762
Not at all: he could have some very interesting time in England. There's the Dome for a start...;-)
~lizbeth54
Thu, Mar 16, 2000 (23:38)
#1763
How about one of the Fiennes bros for Daniel (a bit of role reversal)? And a Hitchcock cameo by CF as CF....Bridget could bump into him in a video store and not recognise him!
Final thought...does anyone think there's a resemblance between RZ with straight blonde bob and HF?
"Rhodes scholar"...Well, if Daniel is played by an American actor, it gives the movie a good Anglo/American balance, and Daniel met MD at Cambridge University.
~amw
Thu, Mar 16, 2000 (23:50)
#1764
Poor Will well I hope he is visiting with him now and as Arami says he can always come over to sunny England for his school hols!
~amw
Thu, Mar 16, 2000 (23:51)
#1765
oops, sorry
~amw
Thu, Mar 16, 2000 (23:52)
#1766
Help Karen!
~amw
Thu, Mar 16, 2000 (23:53)
#1767
I think I have got it
~amw
Thu, Mar 16, 2000 (23:54)
#1768
one more time
~KarenR
Fri, Mar 17, 2000 (00:05)
#1769
...about tag fixing...please read:
If you close a tag on a subsequent message, it WILL NOT APPEAR TO BE FIXED because the *BAD* message is still up on your monitor. To test whether you've chased away the bogeyman, leave the topic and then return so that NO messages appear. Then use the Redisplay box below and put in -1. That one "fixing" message should appear in a regular font. OK? :-)
~MarciaH
Fri, Mar 17, 2000 (00:27)
#1770
Listen to Karen! What she says is true!
~lafn
Fri, Mar 17, 2000 (01:40)
#1771
Arami says he can always come over to sunny England for his school hols!
Sunny California vs. an Islington flat?.....Sans TV, beach front and a pool?
~mari
Fri, Mar 17, 2000 (01:51)
#1772
(Evelyn) You must be on first name basis with most of the people in the NY office.
Well, I know what name they call me: Mud.;-) Evelyn, during the infamous "we only made 22 copies" phone call, I thought they were going to call Security on me.;-) Will have to adopt a different persona for BJD agitation activities--I dunno, maybe Mud Flaps. . . hee hee . . .
I can't figure out the Miramax connection either. With Harve now involved, I suppose Rupert Everett will make an unbilled cameo as Tom.;-)
Rupert Graves as Daniel works for me too, Tracy. I saw him in Closer on Broadway and afterwards he and Anna Friel were in the lobby collecting for Actors Equity for AIDS (as cast members do after all the NYC shows). Got up nice and close; he's awfully cute. Gave him a fat donation. Yeah, he'd be fine.;)
~lafn
Fri, Mar 17, 2000 (02:06)
#1773
From TELETEXT:
Fielding drops Bridget Jones movie
Furious Bridget Jones author Helen Fielding will not be developing her book into a movie script in protest at not being consulted over casting.
Texan star Renee Zellweger won the part of Bridget Jones against a number of English actresses such as Kate Winslet and Helena Bonham-Carter, described as "too cold".
Fielding said acidly: "I'm told Zellweger's learning to speak with an English accent rather than Texan."
17/03/2000
~mari
Fri, Mar 17, 2000 (02:07)
#1774
From Teletext. Are these people on drugs? They've taken her remarks totally out of context. Same for those people at Empire that you quoted, Karen. The irony of "they didn't ask me and look at all my vast film experience" was totally lost on them. Oi.
*******
Fielding drops Bridget Jones movie
Furious Bridget Jones author Helen Fielding will not be developing her book into a movie script in protest at not being consulted over casting.
Texan star Renee Zellweger won the part of Bridget Jones against a number of English actresses such as Kate Winslet and Helena Bonham-Carter, described as "too cold".
Fielding said acidly: "I'm told Zellweger's learning to speak with an English accent rather than Texan."
~KarenR
Fri, Mar 17, 2000 (02:15)
#1775
I know, I felt the same way after reading the people.com chat. Her comments were taken totally out of context. "they didn't ask me" was about her own acting experience, and not about RZ for the role.
However, the remark about Eliza Doolittle, which must have been from the Yahoo chat, struck me as a little !@#$%$ [figure that one out yourself] ;-)
~Arami
Fri, Mar 17, 2000 (02:15)
#1776
Hey, who said anything about SUNNY England... I just mentioned the wondrous Dome. Besides huge, cold beaches and heated public pools. And don't forget he's upgraded to a house in Islington.
~KarenR
Fri, Mar 17, 2000 (04:05)
#1777
An American for Daniel? Ok, I've got one: Aaron Eckhart from that Neil LaBute piece of trash, "In the Company of Men." He has playing a pig down pat. I see he's also in Erin Brockovich, Any Given Sunday and yet to be released Nurse Betty (another piggy movie from aforementioned pig), which RZ is in too ....so maybe it's a no go. Oh well, pick any pig who has been in one of his movies...
~aishling
Fri, Mar 17, 2000 (09:17)
#1778
Sorry ladies - no news regarding casting from Baz. He does say:
It's bye Bridget, hi, Bali
After doing yeoman work on the screen play for the forthcoming BJ movie, Richard Curtis has departed these shores with his family. They have set up camp on the beautiful island of Bali - complete with laptop. Plans to be on Bali for five mnths in a bid to 'completely get away from it all'.
Continues with past projects. And adds that RC is often employed behind the scenes as a script doctor. He performed such surgery on BJ and ended up giving the script a major funny bone implant.
~mari
Fri, Mar 17, 2000 (13:27)
#1779
Ok, here's the explanation on Miramax's involvment in BJD: it's an accommodation--distribution rights in return for John Madden's services (who apparently was under contract to do his next film for Miramax). From News Unlimited:
Screendaily reports that Miramax Films is in talks to handle the US distribution of Working Title Films' upcoming Bridget Jones' Diary. In return, John Madden would be released so that the Shakespeare in Love director can shoot Working Title's forthcoming Captain Corelli's Mandolin. Madden came on board the adaptation of Louis de Berniere's best-selling novel after illness forced Notting Hill director Roger Michell to drop out. Filming is due to begin in May; Nicolas Cage and Penelope Cruz will star.
~KarenR
Fri, Mar 17, 2000 (13:50)
#1780
Thanks, Aishling and Mari.
That makes sense about Madden and I think it is his next three films. We have had all that info posted here about CCM. So do you think Miramax can handle the heavy burden of distributing 22 reels of this film? ;-)
~Moon
Fri, Mar 17, 2000 (14:17)
#1781
think Miramax can handle the heavy burden of distributing 22 reels of this film? ;-)
The very thought, Karen! This could ruin a girl's breakfast. ;-)
Thanks, Aishling and Mari.
~EileenG
Fri, Mar 17, 2000 (15:03)
#1782
(Karen) An American for Daniel? Ok, I've got one: Aaron Eckhart from that Neil LaBute piece of trash, "In the Company of Men." He has playing a pig down pat.
Yesss! Perfect, perfect, perfect. He nailed that creepy, manipulative pig character in ICOM. Newsweek was singing their praises about his performance in EB; said it was going to be his breakout role.
(Bethan) So, Harvey's sticking his finger into the BJD pie? I can't work out if this is good or bad news. Have to say, overall, despite one or two (!) reservations about Harvey, it must be good news for the movie. Harvey's always on the look out for winners.
And don't forget this is now the 'kindler and gentler' Harvey, nicotine patches and all. He's supposed to be a changed man.
And it should mean more promotion.
You're kidding, right? ;-D After MLSF I've learned never to presume anything about Miramax (or this business, for that matter).
~mari
Fri, Mar 17, 2000 (16:03)
#1783
(Karen) Oh well, pick any pig who has been in one of his movies...
Th-oink you for these casting suggestions, Karen.;-)
Actually, I think Aaron Eckhart is a terrific actor, and he'd do a great job. But if we're going for people in Neil LaBute flicks, I've got the definitive Daniel: Jason Patric. Gorgeous and so smarmy under the thinnest veneer of charm in Your Friends and Neighbors. But, I doubt that they'll hire an American for this part; I think the Yank quota on this film has already been exceeded by one.;-)
RE: Miramax. This film will be fairly high profile; I think Miramax may bite for a full two dozen reels.;-)
One more interesting tidbit from the Fielding L.A. appearance: their original choice for director was Amy Heckerling, who wrote and directed Clueless. HF is apparently a fan of that film and quoted some dialogue. Not sure if this was during the general Q&A or privately afterwards. Not clear why Heckerling couldn't do it; must have been those dreaded "prior commitments.;-)
~KarenR
Fri, Mar 17, 2000 (16:19)
#1784
Wouldn't see Your Friends and Neighbors (even if someone held a gun to my head), but I do like Jason Patric, especially at a drive-thru carwash. ;-D However, he has dark hair and we'd need a better contrast to Mark, whose hair would have to be darker a la Mr. D. Doubt the part would go to an American.
~lafn
Fri, Mar 17, 2000 (16:26)
#1785
Thanks Aishling and Mari . Pure conjecture: I wonder if after Harvey got into the act RZ came on board (by audition, of course ;-) ). He likes Anglo-American casting.
~amw
Fri, Mar 17, 2000 (16:35)
#1786
Wouldn't this be wonderful if this were the turning point for both JE & CF, with Harvey investing in TRT and now BJD, if only they could both be sure fire hits (always assuming that CF will indeed play MD).
~mari
Fri, Mar 17, 2000 (17:04)
#1787
All the news services are carrying BJD stuff it seems. According to today's Hollywood Reporter, filming starts Monday, May 1. Just 6 weeks away--we have to hear something soon. Aishling, we're counting on you and Baz!;-)
And I could be wrong, but I get the impression that Miramax is not going to have much input on this film's production; they've only picked up distribution rights, and only for the U.S. I'm thinking that Working Title still has that carte blanche agreement with Universal, and that WT is still calling all the shots from a production standpoint, as they should.
~KarenR
Fri, Mar 17, 2000 (17:29)
#1788
While Miramax won't have much to do with production, we will see a much higher profile film in the making. They are v. good at placing news items. The HR item is evidence of that. RZ being cast as Bridget didn't make it into THR. Hey, if Miramax could promote CHR into getting 7 AA noms, then it can do anything.
~lafn
Fri, Mar 17, 2000 (17:30)
#1789
(Ann)....were the turning point for both JE & CF, with Harvey investing
in TRT and now BJD, if only they could both be sure fire hits..
I know BJD will be a hit, but I have no illusions of JE being cast as Annie in TRT when it is filmed by Miramax. Or SD. They are unknown in the US and are not bankable for a Stoppard production.
Having two stage hits this year in London, being nominated for a BAFTA and going to Broadway are pretty high accolades for an actress who has been away from the West End for seven years.
~KarenR
Fri, Mar 17, 2000 (17:51)
#1790
(Evelyn) but I have no illusions of JE being cast as Annie in TRT when it is filmed by Miramax. Or SD. They are unknown in the US and are not bankable for a Stoppard production.
It all depends on how well-known they become from the Broadway run and from how they will do for themselves. Even Judi Dench went on TV show. And look at Alan Cumming, which comes from his run in Cabaret, not Circle of Friends! ;-)
~amw
Fri, Mar 17, 2000 (18:07)
#1791
Actually Evelyn, I was referring to the Broadway run of TRT which Miramax is involved in, had forgotten about the film rights. OT In the papers TRT has been advertised as "must close next week, must close Sat and finally must close tomorrow", a sort of coduntdown. Incidentally the last week was a complete sell-out which isn't bad for a 700+seater, so they have everything going for them.(sorry I guess this should be on Odds & Ends but it sort of followed on.)
Anyway back to topic, is anyone game enough to telephone Colin's agent, I did hear a while aback that he had many irons in the fire and things should have been clearer by the end of February, and it is now nearly the end of March.
~EileenG
Fri, Mar 17, 2000 (18:09)
#1792
(Karen) And look at Alan Cumming, which comes from his run in Cabaret, not Circle of Friends! ;-)
Shucks, all this time I thought it was Spice World that did it for him... ;-P
~Moon
Fri, Mar 17, 2000 (20:30)
#1793
is anyone game enough to telephone Colin's agent, I did hear a while aback that he had many irons in the fire and things should have been clearer by the end of February, and it is now nearly the end of March.
I can tell you it would be a waste of time.
I have sent an e-amil to Baz demanding the scoop on the casting but especially, CF as MD. No word yet but as Mari said, six weeks away for filming to start, they have their cast. I am still having a problem as HF with RZ learning that English diction and I do not like her voice either. I would have preferred KW.
~MarianneC
Fri, Mar 17, 2000 (20:43)
#1794
Yes, HF did say that Amy Heckerling was her first choice, but that she eventually had other commitments ... (probably the long wait for the script). The two scenes she mentioned were when Cher is feeling down about her life and walking along Rodeo Drive and then spots a pair of shoes in the window and wonders if it came in her size; and the other is when she says she needs to be in a calm and peaceful place, next scene she is in the mall.
~LauraMM
Fri, Mar 17, 2000 (20:50)
#1795
Can I ask a stupid question? Who is Baz?
~lafn
Fri, Mar 17, 2000 (21:58)
#1796
(Laura)Who is Baz?
Baz Bambigoyne is a columnist in The Daily Mail. His column focuses on British
stage and screen stars and their projects, and sadly only appears on Fridays.
We brazenly send Aishling out at the crack dawn every Friday to report any news of CF, BJ or JE. BTW he is out best media source for the three.
~~~~~~~~~~
I have sent an e-amil to Baz demanding the scoop on the casting but especially, CF as MD
Demanding...ouch! I have tried to ask him too; once he came through. I have also requested from the Editor of The Daily Mail that they publish Baz's column on line. Never an answer...so far no results.
~lizbeth54
Fri, Mar 17, 2000 (22:23)
#1797
No word yet but as Mari said, six weeks away for filming to start, they have their cast.
Agreed. They'll be working on costume fittings etc soon. But I'm sure that CF's agent will still have "no idea"!
First week of May could be a busy one for Colin, as MLSF also opens. He could have an excellent publicity tie-in ....starring as Darcy again and a lead role in a new movie. Fingers crossed for some good PR. No hiding of one's light under a bushel ! :-)
~mari
Fri, Mar 17, 2000 (23:19)
#1798
(Karen) While Miramax won't have much to do with production, we will see a much higher profile film in the making. They are v. good at placing news items.
Good point. That's precisely their strength--nobody promotes better than Miramax *when they want to.* And when they *don't* want to . . .oh, I'm not even gonna go there. :-(
Speaking of Miramax and promotion, there's a full page ad for TRT in the new Entertainment Weekly. Will post more on 127.
(Bethan) First week of May could be a busy one for Colin, as MLSF also opens. He could have an excellent publicity tie-in ....starring as Darcy again and a lead role in a new movie.
I was thinking that too, Bethan, plus Cannes is mid-May and RV will hopefully be on the docket there.
~KarenR
Sat, Mar 18, 2000 (04:27)
#1799
From The Express:
AUTHOR QUITS AS AMERICAN IS PICKED TO PLAY MOVIE BRIDGET
17-Mar-2000
ATTEMPTS to make a film of Bridget Jones's Diary - the best-selling musings of a neurotic thirtysomething - are becoming as convoluted as the fictional heroine's own life.
In the latest twist to the saga, author Helen Fielding has withdrawn her co-operation from the film makers.
The news comes after it was announced that an American actress is to play the quintessentially English Bridget, a career woman with a comically dysfunctional personal life.
Ms Fielding has revealed that she is upset that she was not allowed a full say in which actress will bring her creation to life. "I'm very insulted that nobody asked me," she said.
"My acting career was previously blighted in this way when I was cast in the university review and one by one in rehearsal all my parts were taken away from me."
The film makers, Working Title, have chosen the relatively low-profile actress Renee Zellweger for the part in the GBP5million romantic comedy.
Ms Zellweger, who appeared in the Tom Cruise film Jerry Maguire, is best known in America as the girlfriend of comic Jim Carrey.
Ms Fielding, a former journalist who has now moved to Los Angeles, said: "I've never met Renee but I'm told she's very funny and learning to speak English with an English rather than Texas accent.
"I had some initial involvement with the script but authors traditionally turn into monsters when they turn their books into films so I thought I should gracefully retire a few months ago."
Although Ms Zellweger's star is rising in America, she is a far cry from the big name actresses who had originally been pencilled in for the part - including Kate Winslet, Cameron Diaz, Cate Blanchett and Helena Bonham Carter.
The role was first suggested to Ms Bonham Carter in 1998 at a meeting with Ms Fielding in America. Kate Winslet then expressed interest but apparently got fed up waiting for Ms Fielding to make up her mind and instead signed up for the lead in a period drama, a version of Emile Zola's novel Therese Raquin. Ms Fielding has said in the past she would rather an unknown played the part of her hard-drinking, chain-smoking heroine.
Having a big-name star, however, would have made the film much more saleable internationally. The book has sold well in America and even Japan but that does not necessarily guarantee success for the movie.
Ms Fielding, 41, wrote the first draft of the screenplay for the movie but production stalled amid rumours that casting was held up because she and the film makers had fallen out about who should star in it.
There have also been suggestions that rather like Joanna Lumley's character Patsy in Absolutely Fabulous - which was toned down in an American remake of the sit-com - US audiences will not be able to take the character in an undiluted form.
In the Diary, which began life as a column in The Independent newspaper, Bridget never gets her man and is fond of the odd bottle or two of Chardonnay.
In terms of contemporary Hollywood thinking these traits are the kiss of death for a heroine and it seems unlikely that Ms Zellweger's Bridget Jones will be quite the one familiar to fans of the Diary.
The book and its sequel, The Edge of Reason, have made the author more than GBP1.5million and have struck a chord with hundreds of thousands of women who relate to the chaotic life of Bridget and her worries about her weight, appearance and love life.A spokesman for Working Title Films said: "As far as we know, Helen Fielding is completely behind the project and the casting."
~lizbeth54
Sat, Mar 18, 2000 (08:45)
#1800
This is how "news" is made and why "no comment" is the best reply!!
How ridiulous....HF makes a joke, and it's taken literally.
The bad thing is that is bad promo for the movie, even before it starts...
Having a big-name star, however, would have made the film much more saleable internationally. The book has sold well in America and even Japan but that does not necessarily guarantee success for the movie.
Films need a good buzz from day one. The Express is a tabloid so hopefully this is not a story that's going to run and run.
~lizbeth54
Sat, Mar 18, 2000 (08:55)
#1801
I also get the feeling that there's a definite anti-RZ backlash in our press. So for damage-limitation sake, it's time Working Title announced some Brit casting!! On a positive note, I think that RZ is v. popular with the folks who matter...younger male movie goers (and Helena B-C isn't!)
~lafn
Sat, Mar 18, 2000 (17:19)
#1802
there's a definite anti-RZ backlash in our press
That's a given for any American actress 'cept Julia Roberts or Gwynnie.
I say :"Get over it ".
Anyway, the UK Box Office receipts are v. small. I just checked the #1 film last week in UK was "Ripley", it took in UKP153,611.("This is London")
That's not even $300,000.I bet LA does better than that on a weekend!
~~~~~~~
..GBP5million romantic comedy.
This is a small budget film. I doubt if they will do mega-publicity for this amount.
Agree with Bethan ..time for Working Title to put a spin on the bad press and announce our British hero as the co-star.
~lizbeth54
Sat, Mar 18, 2000 (21:40)
#1803
The UK market is a very small one, and to be honest, if only the UK is targeted, it's hardly worth the effort. I think that by going for RZ, Working Title have a good a chance of success in the all important US market. And in publicity terms there's a lot to be said for being known as Jim Carrey's girlfriend! What claim to fame does the Swansea-born Catherine Z-J have, for goodness sake!!!
I've just watched "Notting Hill" (on video, of course!). Must be the last person in the world to see it. But it was most certainly the luminous Julia Roberts who made it watchable and successful....otherwise it would have just been an extended British sitcom (Most of the British actors were familiar from sitcom work.) I know most people love "Notting Hill" but I found myself sincerely hoping that BJD won't be "Notting Hill 2". In many ways, I think that Andrew Davies is a better writer than Richard Curtis...I hope his original screenplay hasn't been given too much of a face-lift. And I hope that Mark Darcy is rather sardonic and reserved (a grown-up), not a "boy in love"!
�5million isn't much...has to be an all Brit supporting cast! But then it shouldn't be an expensive movie to shoot, mainly interior shots, and some London location work.
~MarianneC
Sun, Mar 19, 2000 (05:01)
#1804
Just saw this on the Sunday Mirror on-line edition ...
THE DIARY: HUGH GRANT WANTS BRIDGET JONES ROLE
HUGH Grant has thrown his fringe into the ring in the battle to play Bridget Jones's fella in the movie of her best-selling diary. Colin Firth was believed to have already landed the role of dashing Mark Darcy, but insiders reckon Hugh is now favourite with Colin being relegated to play one of Bridget's pals. If it comes to fisticuffs, I wonder who'll be first to step into the breech.
~amw
Sun, Mar 19, 2000 (08:31)
#1805
Nevah! Impossible, well I for one won't be buying a cinema ticket if this is the case and surely Colin won't play one of the lesser parts. Talk about ruining my Sunday.
~Jana2
Sun, Mar 19, 2000 (09:17)
#1806
HUGH Grant has thrown his fringe into the ring in the battle to play Bridget Jones's fella in the movie of her best-selling diary
Oh Marianne, say it isn't so! And I do know you're just the messenger, dear :-). Please no, not Hugh! I have nothing against Mr. Grant, but I won't be able to bear those halting, blinky mannerisms in Mark Darcy. Particularly since we know who is the perfect MD. Please, please make this just be a rumor.
~lizbeth54
Sun, Mar 19, 2000 (09:42)
#1807
A-argh!! Absolutely my worst nightmare (having just watched "Notting Hill")and I mean WORST!!!
Well, so we can now look forward to Notting Hill 2. Perhaps Colin can play Tom! Or,of course, a 2 second appearance as Mr Darcy on television. Jee-z, and what does it mean, "Thrown his fringe/hat"...can he just take roles away from people at the last minute..they start shooting in 6 weeks.
On the other hand this is a tabloid report (ie likely not to be based on facts)and the budget is only �5million, Hugh's asking rate. Unless they up the budget.
On the other, other hand, it's Hollywood, Colin's not a name (Who is this guy?) and things that I have believed could never, never happen, not in a trillion years, well, sometimes they do. And I don't like the delay in annoucing the cast. Worst case scenario, he could play Daniel. But if it's HG for MD, I think Colin should withdraw with quiet dignity from the whole mess. And I hope it's an absolute box office DISASTER!! Like "Mickey Blue Eyes". Thought HG was going to do "About a Boy" anyway...is he mopping up on all the leading man roles? And don't the powers that be in Hollywood realise that although Hugh is pretty, women in the UK do not find him attractive. How about in the US?
~amw
Sun, Mar 19, 2000 (09:57)
#1808
Oh Bethan, I thought you might have said something to make me feel better, this is a disaster, there is only ONE, man who can play MR. Darcy. (I think I am having one of Mrs. Bennet's turns). I agree if he does not play MD then he should have nothing to do with BJD and do the Maid of Buttermere. Actually even if people are not Colin Firth fans as such I think most people associate Mr. Darcy with Colin Firth, I just can't see them accepting Hugh Grant, at lease not in the UK.
~lizbeth54
Sun, Mar 19, 2000 (10:48)
#1809
Sorry, Ann! I actually don't believe this, but at the same time I do. It's the delay in announcing further casting that makes me shiver in my shoes, and the Hollywood connection...Hugh is Hollywood, Colin ain't. But it's a low budget movie....and why is HG allegedly interested now, at virtually the last minute. Perhaps he has a gap in his filming schedule. A-a-rgh, again. But then, do we believe The Mirror?!!!
~Tracy
Sun, Mar 19, 2000 (11:17)
#1810
I have only one (printable) word to say on the subject....NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
(Ann), Talk about ruining my Sunday.
big ditto
;-(
~Brown32
Sun, Mar 19, 2000 (13:01)
#1811
Thanks for finding this, Marianne. I went to the Mirror site, and there it is! All I can say is...."Say It Isn't So!
Murph
~Brown32
Sun, Mar 19, 2000 (14:37)
#1812
Breathe a little easier...from yesterday's Telegraph thanks to FOF Rai:
********************************
3/19/00 - THE DAILY TELEGRAPH(LONDON) March 18, 2000, Saturday SECTION: Pg. 20 HEADLINE: News Review: Will Hugh be diary date for Bridget? Saturday Premiere BYLINE: By NIGEL REYNOLDS
BEHIND the announcement that the blonde Texan Renee Zellwegger has been chosen to star as the eponymous neurotic in the forthcoming film of Bridget Jones's Diary lay the question - why hire a Yank to play Britain's most famous modern woman? The Working Title production team is hoping to redress the balance and have asked our own Hugh Grant to star alongside her, not as Mark Darcy, object of her desire throughout many diary entries, but Daniel Cleaver, her caddish boss with whom she has a fling. He's said to be "50-50" about accepting the film, which will start shooting in May. It is to be directed by Sharon Maguire, who is a friend of the author, Helen Fielding, and was the model for the character Shazza in the diaries.
***************
Murph
~heide
Sun, Mar 19, 2000 (15:16)
#1813
It wasn't that long ago that all these female actors' names were being thrown into the ring for Bridget. Surely they're trying to generate the same interest now with throwing out names for Mark. Can't wait to hear who else they'll frighten us with.
Thanks for printing the Telegraph article. I can live with that so I don't see Hugh being sexy enough for Daniel.
(Bethan) Worst case scenario, he (CF) could play Daniel.
I don't think so. I think playing the anti-Darcy would be quite clever. But I'm repeating myself.
Hugh is pretty, women in the UK do not find him attractive. How about in the US?
I think he'd make a nice girlfriend.
~mari
Sun, Mar 19, 2000 (15:44)
#1814
Thanks, Murph. Hughe sigh of relief.;-) I went from suicidal to calm in all of about 15 seconds.
Even if CF gets Mark, Hugh's casting is still not good news for him. Guess who will get all the media attention, the interviews, the talk show appearances . . .Is it some sort of rule that HG appear in all Working Title films?;-)
Someone please refresh my memory on the first book--Daniel is a much bigger part, right?
(Bethan) Hugh is pretty, women in the UK do not find him attractive. How about in the US?
I think he's considered as a cute kid brother type. Likable, but definitely not lust-inducing.
~Moon
Sun, Mar 19, 2000 (16:05)
#1815
I have always said that HG would be Daniel! I have also said I was taking bets on CF as MD. Ladies get ready, it will happen! :-D
This will make the film v. high profile.
Thanks for the info!
(Eileen I beat you to your crystal ball) ;-)))
~Moon
Sun, Mar 19, 2000 (16:08)
#1816
I forgot to add that I do not find HG attractive at all, but hate-able enough for Daniel.
Yes, Mari, Daniel has a much larger part. For CF to be in a film as Hunk Material will get him more such roles. Sweet dreams are made of this... :-)
~lafn
Sun, Mar 19, 2000 (16:49)
#1817
As I told HF in the Barnes and Noble chat room:"I pray that...."
And she answered; "I pray that CF plays MD"...but as we know she is out of casting.
But you know HG works v. hard at publicizing his movies.I wouldn't mind if he played Daniel.This is turning into higher profile than we thought.
~mari
Sun, Mar 19, 2000 (17:22)
#1818
Have been thinking about this (far more than I should;-), and I have to wonder, what would be in it for Hugh Grant to play Daniel? Nothing! Ok, it's a larger part than Mark Darcy, but ultimately he's a jerk and he doesn't get the girl! Hugh *always* plays the good guy who gets the girl, and he's not the sort of actor who tries to play against type. He's not stupid, he knows that MD is the hero and therefore the role that people will remember. I won't rest easy until CF is confirmed as Mark. The Daniel part is another villain, it does nothing for him.
It irks me to no end that Hugh can come in at the 11th hour and have his pick of the roles! (If in fact that is the case, which I pray it's not--as I said above, I've no doubt as to which part HG would prefer).
I don't care if HG's presence increases the profile or not. This is a small-budget pic; it's not like they're casting Gone With The Wind, or investing tons of money and they'd need a "name" to insure their investment.
Oh, I'm depressing myself . . .
~mari
Sun, Mar 19, 2000 (18:56)
#1819
Ok, have taken some positive action and am feeling slightly better.
1. Lit candle at Mass for Colin as MD, and
2. Have prayed for Divine (Brown) intervention in form of another discrediting sex scandal for HG.
Where, oh where is Divine when you need her? Er, him. Er . . D'OH!;-)
~lafn
Sun, Mar 19, 2000 (19:05)
#1820
It irks me to no end that Hugh can come in at the 11th hour and have his pick of the role
Perhaps Working Title went to him...after all, he's their "poster boy".
Every film he's done for them has been a mega-hit.
Hope that candle does it, Mari...and while you're at it tell Murph to take down that BJ page...Flashman and Buttermere have evaporated.I'm getting a little queasy about wanting to manipulate fate;-).
~Moon
Sun, Mar 19, 2000 (21:07)
#1821
I think Hugh might want to break the mold and play a villain for a change. And, could Elizabeth Hurley be far behind for the Rebecca part?
Hugh cold take a cut of the gross and get in at a lower salary.
~Arami
Sun, Mar 19, 2000 (22:17)
#1822
Have prayed for Divine (Brown) intervention
LMAO!
~Brown32
Sun, Mar 19, 2000 (22:27)
#1823
and while you're at it tell Murph to take down that BJ page...Flashman and Buttermere have evaporated.I'm getting a little queasy about wanting to manipulate fate;-).
**********
Evelyn:
They are safe in my "wishbook" corner on my hard drive (Buttermere still up on the web). I am hoping that SJD does not join them -- or Armadillo! Nothing about that recently.
Murph
~KarenR
Sun, Mar 19, 2000 (23:29)
#1824
Away all day and quite the ruckus. Am glad that those intitial dozen posts can be discarded. Casting HG as MD is about as perfect as casting Gabby Hayes for Rhett Butler...since we're in a GWTW mode. ;-)
I also agree with Mari that Hugh is NOT and cannot be a Daniel. It would require acting, which is beyond his capabilities. Daniel is not a stammering bumbler and, most importantly, as Heide said, one does not LUST after Hugh. He does "feel-sorry-for. Teddy Bear-type roles."
For a country that has so many good actors, is this the best they can do? Makes me ill.
To quote another of Hughie's former leading ladies (but in a different movie), "Big mistake; huge." gotta go shopping
~KarenR
Sun, Mar 19, 2000 (23:31)
#1825
...however, if they ever filmed the second book, I'd pay to see Colin punch Hugh's lights out and toss him down the stairs. ;-)
~lafn
Sun, Mar 19, 2000 (23:38)
#1826
(Murph)They are safe in my "wishbook" corner on my hard drive (Buttermere still up on the web). I am hoping that SJD does not join them -- or Armadillo
Oh Murph...you are a trouper!!Mari with candles, you with BJ in the hard drive...anybody have joss sticks handy?
~Arami
Mon, Mar 20, 2000 (00:28)
#1827
He does "feel-sorry-for. Teddy Bear-type roles."
Huge Grunt doesn't even remind me of a teddy bear's ear and the only person he makes me feel sorry for is myself.
And if there is anyone out there who thinks Huge is admirable, let her speak (sensibly and to the point) now - or forever keep her mouth shut. (Divine didn't and look what happened.)
~Passionata
Mon, Mar 20, 2000 (01:50)
#1828
I LOVE Hugh Grant. He is adorable. The lust factor is 100% in Four Weddings and a Funeral. Just admit it!.
~Arami
Mon, Mar 20, 2000 (02:18)
#1829
LOL! I'll reserve my judgement...
~KarenR
Mon, Mar 20, 2000 (04:11)
#1830
The more I think about Hugh Grant being in the movie - in any role - the worse it gets. If he's in it, then the movie is labeled a Hugh Grant film; the critics will phone it in. It'll be so formulaic. They'd be better off without him. Then the movie might stand a chance of being viewed on its own merits.
~patas
Mon, Mar 20, 2000 (13:54)
#1831
(bethan)... although I know you don't have to be an ax murderer in real life to play an ax murderer, she does come over in recent interviews as very happily
Smug married. Needs a bit of angst.
I'm sure she was single before she was a Smug Married... But was she single long enough?
(Evelyn)Sunny California vs. an Islington flat?.....Sans TV, beach front and a pool?
With TV, books, a computer maybe, the British Museum and Dad's movie set?
(Bethan)I've just watched "Notting Hill" (on video, of course!). Must be the last person in the world to see it.
Nah! Unless I come a close second ;-)
But it was most certainly the luminous Julia Roberts who made it watchable and successful....otherwise it would have just been an extended British sitcom (Most of the British actors were familiar from sitcom work.) I know most
people love "Notting Hill" but I found myself sincerely hoping that BJD won't be "Notting Hill 2". In many ways, I think that Andrew Davies is a better writer than Richard Curtis...I hope his original screenplay hasn't been given too much of a face-lift. And I hope that Mark Darcy is rather sardonic and reserved (a grown-up), not a "boy in love"!
I agree with you, Bethan. Julia was the best thing in the movie, and Hugh Grant completely unconvincing, while other characters were just caricatures.
(MarianneC) If it comes to fisticuffs, I wonder who'll be first to step into the breech.
Count me in! ;-)
(Arami)And if there is anyone out there who thinks Huge is admirable, let her speak (sensibly and to the point) now - or forever keep her mouth shut. (Divine didn't and look what happened.)
ROTFLMAO!
(Passionata) I LOVE Hugh Grant. He is adorable. The lust factor is 100% in Four Weddings and a Funeral. Just admit it!.
And *that* is about the only Hugh Grant film that counts. Period. IMHO.
~EileenG
Mon, Mar 20, 2000 (15:47)
#1832
Ohh, ladies, ladies. I'm glad to be reading these posts in retrospect! You have to admit, there is a certain stream of consciousness logic to the Mirror's story: Working Title begats Richard Curtis begats Hugh Grant. But it is the Mirror, and a tabloid is a tabliod is a tabloid.
Ms Zellweger, who appeared in the Tom Cruise film Jerry Maguire, is best known in America as the girlfriend of comic Jim Carrey.
Ouch! There sure aren't many UK members of the RZ fan club. She did more than 'appear' in JM, she was the female lead. And 'best known as the girlfriend'--what an insult. She can stand on her own two feet (but not in really high heels).
US audiences will not be able to take the character in an undiluted form.
*groan* Puh-leez.
~lizbeth54
Mon, Mar 20, 2000 (20:16)
#1833
Hmmm, I slept on all this, because if I'd said what I was thinking yesterday, I might have regretted it! Like Mari and Karen, I'm not exactly overjoyed at the prospect of HG's involvement, especially as I have, by some strange malignant quirk of fate, literally just watched "Notting Hill" . If he says "yes", he'll get top billing or co-starring, and it immediately becomes "From the team who gave you "Notting Hill" and "4 Weddings", HG and RZ (or vice versa) star in..., and there'll be CF tucked away neatly with the supporting cast. (and if he says "no" it's also not good PR..."HG joins the growing list of British stars who have turned down parts in BJD..)
H-o-kay, now for some positive thinking (this is why I slept on it!) For better or for worse HG's involvement guarantees more publicity, and ensures a nationwide multiplex release and probably more coverage in the US. HG is not relegated to art-houses...he'a a movie star.And so all those movie going audiences who only think of CF as the cuckolded husband or the illtempered "baddie" will finally get to see him as a romantic lead ( I hope!!)
Final thought, less positive. How come it's big news that HG has been offered a part in BJD and is "undecided" but absolutely there's no news about CF being offered the romantic lead role...(and one with which he's been associated for nearly 2 years). Are WT sending out offers one at a time?
~KarenR
Mon, Mar 20, 2000 (20:29)
#1834
(Bethan) How come it's big news that HG has been offered a part in BJD
Two possibilities: (1) the item was placed by HG's publicist (remember, the Mirror blurb said that HG had thrown his hat into the ring) and (2) WT is sending his name out to see what the reaction is, i.e., testing for a response. Nobody, but nobody, with half a brain is going to object to CF playing MD. It's not the least controversial, whereas HG.
Does anybody know if Divine B has a passport? ;-)
~CherylB
Mon, Mar 20, 2000 (21:14)
#1835
RE: Hugh Grant playing a villain, actually he did play a rather nasty character in the film "An Awfully Big Adventure". Grant also played an unsympathetic character in "Maurice".
~EileenG
Mon, Mar 20, 2000 (21:18)
#1836
(Karen) Does anybody know if Divine B has a passport?
Let's call her and ask. *dialing* "Divine? Divine, put that banana down and pick up the phone!"
~lafn
Mon, Mar 20, 2000 (23:03)
#1837
Bethan I'm proud of your postive attitude.
I slept on it too..and IMO we all had illusions of BJD being a P&P deja vu "all over again."....
"BJD starring...Ms"British Newcomer" AND Colin Firth".
That one would have gone to the Art House, like you said.
This way...yeah he gets 3rd billing, but it does go to the cineplexes.
And he does get the girl (I hope!)
AND, v. important, it makes money. His last two films sadly have not.
He cannot stand more films in his CV that have not succeeded.
Am I the only one looking out for his career here?
~LauraMM
Mon, Mar 20, 2000 (23:29)
#1838
Hugh would be a good Daniel Cleaver. Anyone here seen An Awfully Big Adventure? He was pretty nasty in that. When I first read the post about HG playing BJ's guy, Daniel Cleaver came to mind, because in the first book, MD and BJ AREN'T together!!!!
I like Hugh Grant. He can be lovable and nasty at the same time. Cut him some slack, he'll do a great job (if he does indeed get it), and Colin Firth will play Mark Darcy. (The stars have aligned just right tonight, and my migraine has subsided).
Okay, the psychic has spoken;) Please, ladies, don't panic. Colin Firth WILL play MD. I feel it in my achy bones.
~CherylB
Tue, Mar 21, 2000 (00:30)
#1839
I saw "An Awfully Big Adventure".
~KJArt
Tue, Mar 21, 2000 (02:48)
#1840
(Passionata)...Four Weddings and a Funeral ...
(Gi).. and *that* is about the only Hugh Grant film that counts. Period. IMHO.
I think I was the only person in the US who saw ... Ummm ...What was it called? Something like .. "The Englishman who Went up a Hill and came down a Mountain" ... (I think). Anyway, it was one of those art house jobbies, and I rather enjoyed it, I am not ashamed to admit.
Speaking in Humble Opinion mode, I think, Hugh Grant can do a very creditable job, but he's always cast in these "cutsie, embarrassed Englishman" parts and little else. It makes him and his production companies lots of money, but he's had little chance to expand beyond that.
IF he decides to become part of this project (and in my etc., he won't) I think it would count more on the plus side than the negative. He at least goes all out to publicise his stuff, which may very well be why he's such top box office, because he's good at that. If he did it for BJD then that many more would see it and ODB. The Public might COME for Hughie, but who makes the last impression in the plot, eh? They'd leave tingling with an eyefull of something far better!! IMHO. ;-)
So by all means let HG go in as Daniel with ODB as Mark. Let HG draw the crowds. It will only help ODB in the long run, humble-opinion-wise. ;-D KJ
~KarenR
Tue, Mar 21, 2000 (04:17)
#1841
KJ: I saw The Englishman, etc. movie. Rather nothing IMO.
And for those who saw that other HG movie, its success rather speaks directly to HG's ability to sell anything other than his customary bits.
(KJ) but he's always cast in these "cutsie, embarrassed Englishman" parts
Whoa! He has attempted to play outside that description and failed miserably. In fact, I remember reading last year that he had come to the realization that he shouldn't attempt that anymore. He said that he was aiming to do Cary Grant type roles.
~KarenR
Tue, Mar 21, 2000 (04:20)
#1842
On the Helen Fielding front, you can listen to her reading from The Edge of Reason at a NYC B&N and take questions from the audience. The audio program is about half an hour long, but you can take it in segments. Requires RealPlayer. Also, both online chat sessions are linked.
http://www.barnesandnoble.com/community/ra/fielding_ra.asp?userid=2U11I1VUPM&srefer=
~lizbeth54
Tue, Mar 21, 2000 (12:42)
#1843
As I was in an information gathering mood, I rang the BJD office and asked when there would be more news about casting. Reply "Hard to say. Who knows". So there's no news. "Absolutely not" Anything confirmed? "No". When will there be confirmation as you start shooting soon?" "Yes, the beginning of May. Two or three weeks maybe".
So, hold your breath..
~Moon
Tue, Mar 21, 2000 (13:05)
#1844
(KJart), I think I was the only person in the US who saw ... Ummm ...What was it called? Something like .. "The Englishman who Went up a Hill and came down a Mountain" ...
I saw that film. I liked it.
HG in the film would be good for ODB. The exposure would be great and the Darcy attraction would be there. He will end up with many new fans, poor Livia! ;-)
Thanks Bethan. The only reason I can imagine no news on casting yet is that they are trying to get stars for the ensemble cast and are negotiating a low base salary in exchange for gross profit. Actors love to be in good ensemble movies. Once again, that could only be good news for Colin.
~Moon
Tue, Mar 21, 2000 (13:12)
#1845
I forgot to mention that Dave Barry's syndicated article last Sunday was called, "Men are from Mars, Hugh Grant is from Venus." Very complimentary to HG. So apart from our group there are a lot of women out there that find him attractive.
~LauraMM
Tue, Mar 21, 2000 (13:25)
#1846
Karen, I own "An Awfully Big Adventure". Alan Rickman is in it also. It's not a bad movie, I'll send it to you. (I promise I will!) You can see how smarmy HG is.
The girl in the movie is the star. She was great!
~mari
Tue, Mar 21, 2000 (13:52)
#1847
(Bethan) When will there be confirmation as you start shooting soon?" "Yes, the beginning of May. Two or three weeks maybe".
I suppose it will take that long for Hughie to decide which role he wants to poach from Colin. :-(
Helen's books are bestsellers here--near top of the charts. The film has a sizable built-in audience already; no need for a big marquee name to get people in to see it. It's greed! I do agree that the addition of HG would make it much bigger--but it does nothing for Colin. HG would get all the attention.
Thanks for trying, Bethan. I appreciate your efforts.
~Moon
Tue, Mar 21, 2000 (15:17)
#1848
I strongly disagree, Mari. A high profile movie for Colin if he plays the hunk, MD, will get him noticed. Hugh will take the Daniel role because it is the bigger role. It's greed.
~patas
Tue, Mar 21, 2000 (15:26)
#1849
Firth: I also saw The Englishman who went up a Hill and came down a Mountain, and am afraid it did not make a lasting impression (but that may be Alzheimer...)
Second: if HG takes on Daniel, you can be sure Mark Darcy will be a very small part... IMHO.
~EileenG
Tue, Mar 21, 2000 (15:28)
#1850
I'm with Karen on the HG front. Saw The Sopran...oops, Mickey Blue Eyes a few weeks ago on PPV. Vintage Hugh--same character, different setting. He's at his best when delivering droll one-liners.
(Moon) The only reason I can imagine no news on casting yet is that they are trying to get stars for the ensemble cast and are negotiating a low base salary in exchange for gross profit
You think? I was always under the impression this method of payment was rare and reserved only for the biggest stars. Ben Affleck just did this for his new project and it made headlines of the 'wow, look what he was able to pull off' sort.
~KarenR
Tue, Mar 21, 2000 (15:44)
#1851
(Laura) I own "An Awfully Big Adventure". ..It's not a bad movie...You can see how smarmy HG is.
I remember the trailers. Has to do with a director and a play, right? This was a movie that bombed. However, it really doesn't matter if Hugh can play a smarmy character. My point is that he has figured out his commercial strengths (and so has everyone else) and the character of Daniel will be changed to suit our (American's) image of him. Daniel will be the likeable dopehead who oversleeps and stammers.
I'll send it to you. (I promise I will!)
No need. I can always rent it if I get desperate enough.
(Eileen) I was always under the impression this method of payment was rare and reserved only for the biggest stars
A percentage of the gross (revenue not profit) only goes to the big boys.
~lafn
Tue, Mar 21, 2000 (15:51)
#1852
KJart), I think I was the only person in the US who saw ... Ummm ...What was it called?Something like .. "The Englishman who Went up a Hill and
came down a Mountain
I liked it too. And Tara Fizgerald would have made a cute Bridget.
~~~~~
The film has a sizable built-in audience already; no need for a big marquee name to get people in to see it.
I respectfully disagree...the people who read books don't go to the movies.
They wait for the videos! It's that 17 to 30 crowd we want.
~mari
Tue, Mar 21, 2000 (17:54)
#1853
Ok already, I'm willing to give Hughie a *brief* cameo in the film.;-) Picture this original thought:
Bridget is walking down the street in her Notting Hill neighborhood on her way home from a shopping excursion. Hugh's character (call him "faceless man in the crowd") is walking down a perpendicular street. At the corner, they collide and he spills orange juice all over her. He stammers (what else?) that he is dreadfully sorry and does she want to come to his flat to change her clothes. Bridge calls him a pervert and tells him to sod off. End of encounter. End of his appearance in film.;-)
What, you think Richard Curtis could do better?;-)
~KarenR
Tue, Mar 21, 2000 (18:09)
#1854
LOL! Perfect way to fit Hugh into the film with as little damage as possible to the storyline. Suggest that Bridget walks off with Welshman in his underwear. ;-)
~LauraMM
Tue, Mar 21, 2000 (18:11)
#1855
What, you think Richard Curtis could do better?;-)
]
Nah, can't picture that scenario:) Can picture Bridget walking down street with double caf cap holding chocolate croissant in hand and spilling it all over some jerk just coming out of book store;)
~EileenG
Tue, Mar 21, 2000 (18:12)
#1856
Right. Don't forget that Bridget walks through all four seasons before bumping in to Hugh's character. After she tells him to sod off, she returns to her flat where Tom, a tall, scrawny gay man with Brian Glazer-like hair, answers the door in his underwear.
~Moon
Tue, Mar 21, 2000 (18:13)
#1857
Suggest that Bridget walks off with Welshman in his underwear. ;-)
I was thinking more of a Scot in his kilt. ;-)
~KarenR
Tue, Mar 21, 2000 (18:13)
#1858
The pregnant woman (during the 4 seasons sequence) to be played by Magda.
~mari
Tue, Mar 21, 2000 (19:09)
#1859
(Karen) The pregnant woman (during the 4 seasons sequence) to be played by Magda.
To the tune of "Ain't no sunshine when she's . . . in the potty! I told you in the potty!"
~CherylB
Tue, Mar 21, 2000 (21:01)
#1860
(KJart), I think I was the only person in the US who saw ... Ummm ...What was it called? Something like .. "The Englishman who Went up a Hill and came down a Mountain" ...
I saw it as well, I thought it charming, nothing great -- but gentle fun. I agree with Laura, HG was good at being smarmy and ill-tempered in "An Awfully Big Adventure".
~EileenG
Tue, Mar 21, 2000 (21:18)
#1861
Englishman has been roaming the cable channels for awhile. I think I saw An Awfully Big Adventure...no, wait, that was Pee Wee's Big Adventure.
When were these movies made (Themoviewiththetitlethat'stoolong and AABA)? Before or after that debacle in which Hugh played a doctor?
~CherylB
Tue, Mar 21, 2000 (21:24)
#1862
Before. Both films were made roughly about the time of "Four Weddings and a Funeral".
~KarenR
Tue, Mar 21, 2000 (21:25)
#1863
All were made after 4 Weddings (1994) and before Extreme[ly Bad] Measures (1996). Am hoping to catch Lair of the White Worm one of these days. Usually plays on the Sci-Fi channel and have seen bits while surfing the channels. Is this another of those outstanding HG movies you like, Laura? ;-)
~LauraMM
Tue, Mar 21, 2000 (21:33)
#1864
Is this another of those outstanding HG movies you like, Laura? ;-)
]
Never saw it;)
However, he does play Liszt or Chopin in one movie and he's quite good (Judy Davis plays George Sand) Emma Thompson is in there as well oh AND Bernadette Peters! Ah, I remember Impromptu! Julian Sands plays Liszt, HG does Chopin (George Sands boy toy), until he succumbs to TB.
~EileenG
Tue, Mar 21, 2000 (21:37)
#1865
(Karen) Usually plays on the Sci-Fi channel
Oooh, on Mystery Science Theater 3000?
~KarenR
Tue, Mar 21, 2000 (22:02)
#1866
Oh rats! AABA was on Bravo twice last month. However, themoviewiththeridiculouslylongtitle is on Encore's Love Stories channel this Sunday at 8:00 pm. Good thing, I don't get that station; otherwise it'd be difficult choosing between it and the Oscar telecast. ;-)
~CherylB
Tue, Mar 21, 2000 (22:11)
#1867
"An Awfully Big Adventure" was actually made before "Four Weddings and a Funeral"; however, at least in the US, it was released after. It seems hard to believe, (to me anyway), that he did have a career before "Four Weddings and a Funeral", and for a bit after. He was in "Maurice", "White Mischief", "Impromptu", "Bitter Moon", and "Sirens". The last 2 were released in the same year as "Four Weddings and a Funeral". Grant was also in "Sense and Sensibilty", "The Madness of King George", and "Restoration". So his resume isn't quite putrid, and he can give a credible and cretitable performance when he chooses. It's just that paying customers seem to want to see him do that stammering, upper-class twit with the lock of hair falling in his eyes, over and over again.
~Moon
Tue, Mar 21, 2000 (23:20)
#1868
True, Cheryl. Those scripts were good at least. Lucky him!
However, he does play Liszt or Chopin in one movie and he's quite good (Judy Davis plays George Sand) Emma Thompson is in there as well oh AND Bernadette Peters! Ah, I remember Impromptu! Julian Sands plays Liszt, HG does Chopin (George Sands boy toy), until he succumbs to TB.
Was he Chopin??? I loved that movie and have been thinking of renting it again. You Liszt and Lake Como...I recommend renting it.
~Arami
Tue, Mar 21, 2000 (23:45)
#1869
he does play Liszt or Chopin in one movie and he's quite good
Is he, really? I've never heard of this film - and am completely baffled how I could miss it, considering the subject. Does anyone know, has it been shown in the UK at all?
Chopin (George Sands boy toy)
Is that what Chopin is famous for? Well, well... ;-P
~Jana2
Wed, Mar 22, 2000 (01:50)
#1870
(Arami) Is that what Chopin is famous for? Well, well... ;-P
There's some lovely music in the film as well ;-). I had forgotten that HG starred in this. I quite enjoyed it. I'm not sure if it played in the UK or not, but if it's available for rent it's worth a look.
(Karen) Oh rats! AABA was on Bravo twice last month.
Coincidentally, I actually happened to watch this last month. I thought the acting was very good all the way around including HG in a type of role he doesn't often play. I liked the movie but didn't love it. It was too full of unlikable characters that were hard to warm up to IMHO. I thought the young heroine definitely worthy of sympathy, but her situation was so poignantly sad I had trouble enjoying watching it.
Sorry this isn't very BJD related unless HG in fact joins the cast!
~KJArt
Wed, Mar 22, 2000 (02:11)
#1871
(Karen) ...speaks directly to HG's ability to sell anything...
IF HG joins the cast, he can at the least donate this. Can you picture ODB eager, (or even comfortable) with the scenario of trading bon mots and off-color jokes with the David Letterman types?
Whereas HG is highly proficient at it and seems to enjoy doing that sort of thing.
~KJArt
Wed, Mar 22, 2000 (04:01)
#1872
I know, I know, enough, already. But...
Did a little research. TEWWUAHACDAM and AADA were both made (1995) just after Four Weddings (1994).
And HG was born September 9, 1960. Eerie.
~KarenR
Wed, Mar 22, 2000 (04:33)
#1873
He had one line at the beginning of White Mischief and then was never seen again. Strange, I used think this was a good movie and then watched it again a few months ago.
I've always thought he and Emma were miscast in S&S. Loved Rickman, Winslet and Wise though. ;-)
~Allison2
Wed, Mar 22, 2000 (12:01)
#1874
And HG was born September 9, 1960. Eerie.
Yes, they are practically twins. HG as Daniel would be a great idea IMO. The fact that they are so close in age and yet in real life, lead apparently such different lives have such different attitudes to fame, would make a really interesting angle for publicists. Art mirroring life and all that. But (BIG but) HG might not find the comparison flattering and CF would not push himself sufficiently to grab his share of the headlines. He might also think such comparisons were tempting fate....!
~LauraMM
Wed, Mar 22, 2000 (12:45)
#1875
An Awfully Big Adventure is a Beryl Bainbridge story. It's quite good. Alan Rickman is wonderful. Oh and the actress, what is her name, Georgina Cates (she's married to Skeet Ulrich), is a find!!! (she's coming up the ranks in America, albeit slowly.)
Hugh Grant was BRILLIANT in Maurice!!! (as some of you know, MY FAVE MOVIE!!!!), James Wilby who played Maurice would be a good Daniel too. He can play smarmy (think Howard's End!).
I don't always see HG playing the Cary Grant-type. In Maurice, he was very relaxed as Clive Durham, not one flutter of the eyelids! I can see great potential for HG as Daniel Cleaver. CF is a definite must for Mark Darcy, the part was written JUST FOR HIM. He'd be a fool to pass it up, even if it is a small role. Okay, just my two cents worth;)
~KarenR
Wed, Mar 22, 2000 (13:59)
#1876
(Laura) James Wilby who played Maurice would be a good Daniel too. He can play smarmy (think Howard's End!).
Think Dutch Girls!! (Also, the new movie Cotton Mary - at least from what's shown in the trailers)
I don't always see HG playing the Cary Grant-type.
This was a recent career revelation that came out in the press during Notting Hill. It's not always the suave, debonair Englishman, but also the screwball comedies.
~LauraMM
Wed, Mar 22, 2000 (14:28)
#1877
(Karen) Think Dutch Girls!!
I always forget that one! Haven't seen trailers for Cotton Mary.
For some reason, I just pictured Daniel as blonde. Hmmm...
~CherylB
Wed, Mar 22, 2000 (21:27)
#1878
(KJArt) Did a little research. TEWWUAHACDAM and AADA were both made (1995) just after Four Weddings (1994).
As William Burroughs noted, "Language is a virus," that and my propensity for stating things as clearly as mud. What I meant to say is that "An Awfully Big Adventure" was released in 1995, the year after "Four Weddings and a Funeral", but it was shot before "Four Weddings..." -- that's what my research indicated. Shot first, released after, which is not uncommon for movies. Example: MLSF which was made before SIL, but was released later.
Submitted for your approval: Why not Greg Wise as Daniel?
~LauraMM
Wed, Mar 22, 2000 (21:30)
#1879
Why not Greg Wise as Daniel?
]
Good question, why not?
~KarenR
Wed, Mar 22, 2000 (22:38)
#1880
Dark hair. IMO Daniel needs to contrast with the dark-haired Mark Darcy.
~LauraMM
Thu, Mar 23, 2000 (01:30)
#1881
They could always lighten his hair (a novel thought, indeed). Sam West would be a good Daniel. He's cute, can be likable and hateable at the same time (think Persuasion;)) hee hee;)
~Allison2
Thu, Mar 23, 2000 (08:15)
#1882
Submitted for your approval: Why not Greg Wise as Daniel?
Argghhhh! Sorry but he is the most wooden actor I know. Okay, Hugh Grant is not a thespian great but he does have charm of a sort but Greg Wise really cannot act. Have seen him live on the stage and he just has no life in him. Sorry - IMNSHO.
~amw
Thu, Mar 23, 2000 (10:16)
#1883
I am glad you said what I was thinking Allison, HG is the lesser of the two evils. (OT GW is to be seen in the forthcoming Madame Bovery, which I think k has already been shown on US TV, anyone see it).I also didn't like him in S&S., in fact I didn't particulary like S&S, none of the characters were as appealing, sympathetic or endearing as those in P&P, one really felt you knew the Bennets, the Darcy's etc and they seemed so real unlike the characters in S&S, who I really couldn't care less about. (I seem to have digressed, sorry).
~Moon
Thu, Mar 23, 2000 (12:53)
#1884
I would prefer HG to GW too. Daniel should be blond and GW with blond hair does not cut it.
The S&S casting I thought was good except for HG and ET as well. You just did not care for those two characters.
A very sexual Mme Bovary was shown here. The casting was alright, the script was the problem.
~lafn
Thu, Mar 23, 2000 (15:25)
#1885
(Ann) GW is to beseen in the forthcoming Madame Bovary, which I think k has already been shown on US TV,anyone see it).
I did....Pretty sexy stuff.GW was v. good in part of Rodolphe.
Though one wondered why she would leave Hugh Bonneville for GW.
(Moon)A very sexual Mme Bovary was shown here. The casting was alright, the script was the problem.
Pathetic.Poor Flaubert must have been rolling in his grave.
~Donna
Sat, Mar 25, 2000 (18:17)
#1886
All they have to do is get someone (if not CF) who can out act out shine Hugh Grant 10 fold. Someone like Daniel Day Lewis, RFinnes,Tom Hanks ect. You get the the idea right? He would who be demolished. LOL
Donna who is really sick of Hugh Grant
PS Four Wedding's is the only good picture he has made.IMHO
~Donna
Sat, Mar 25, 2000 (18:18)
#1887
Correction:
He would be demolshed.
Donna
~Donna
Sat, Mar 25, 2000 (18:19)
#1888
Correction:
He would be demolished.
Donna
~patas
Sat, Mar 25, 2000 (19:05)
#1889
(Donna)All they have to do is get someone (if not CF) who can out act out shine Hugh Grant 10 fold. Someone like Daniel Day Lewis, RFinnes,Tom Hanks ect.
I don't even want to consider this :-(
~Donna
Sat, Mar 25, 2000 (19:51)
#1890
You might have too. Of course CF would be the best.
Donna
~KarenR
Sat, Mar 25, 2000 (20:12)
#1891
You know how many actors shy away from roles too closely associated with others? Even though Colin has not played the role, everyone knows it was inspired by his portrayal of Mr. Darcy. It's sort of like undertaking to be Rhett Butler in a sequel. Most wouldn't want the inevitable comparisons in the press.
I wonder if this will work in Colin's favor. ;-)
~lizbeth54
Sun, Mar 26, 2000 (00:10)
#1892
It's rather unfortunate that I've just seen "Notting Hill" for the first time...my images of BJD keep merging with those of NH.
I can imagine a scene where Hugh Grant, playing Hugh Grant/Will Thacker/Mark Darcy/you name it, bumps into cappucino carrying BJ, after having attention diverted by glimpse of the lovely Rebecca played by Julia Roberts look-a-like. Suffering from the pangs of disappointed love, BJ rushes for solace to trendy non-profit making bookshop where she encounters Colin Firth (playing Colin Firth, but with stuck-on moustache to provide "unattractive" foil to gorgeous Hughie). CF is stuffing book down front of trousers. BJ is consumed with lust. Brief sexually explicit cameo follows, featuring stand-up shag (background music as in TEP). Fleeting glimpse of naked buttocks earns movie an 18 rating and huge publicity, vastly boosting popularity with 16 year olds. CF is never seen again in movie. Name appears as Rupert Everett in credits.
You never know...!!
~mari
Sun, Mar 26, 2000 (05:23)
#1893
Here it is; thanks to Anne R. for spotting:
Hugh joins Bridget's singletons on screen
Film Unlimited
Vanessa Thorpe, Arts Correspondent
Sunday March 26, 2000
Hugh Grant is to spend his summer filming in Notting Hill - again. And it is
all due to the film project that is closest to the heart of many a single
woman.
Bridget Jones' Diary, based on the bestselling novel by Helen Fielding, is
due to begin filming in London this summer and this weekend casting
directors are finalising deals with its two leading male stars.
The film is being made by the team behind two of Britain's biggest cinematic
hits, Notting Hill and Four Weddings and a Funeral.
It was confirmed last month that the Texan actress Renee Zellweger, star of
Jerry Maguire, would play the role of Bridget, but until now question marks
have hung over the romantic interest: who will play Daniel Cleaver, the cad,
and Mark Darcy, the brooding and proud hero of the diaries?
This week the film's producers are expected to announce that Grant will take
the part of the sexually persuasive, yet emotionally unsatisfactory, Daniel.
The actor worked with Jones co-screenwriter, Richard Curtis, on both Notting
Hill and Four Weddings and a Funeral.
The part of Darcy has gone to the man who was in Fielding's mind when she
first created her hero. Colin Firth, who played Darcy in the BBC adaptation
of Jane Austen's Pride and Prejudice, is to play the role in a pay-off to
Fielding's in-joke.
The film will be shot around Notting Hill and is not to be Americanised in
any way, according to producers Working Title. The loss of Jones's trademark
phraseology, for instance, 'fuckwittage' and 'v.g', would have dulled her
distinctive voice.
~lizbeth54
Sun, Mar 26, 2000 (08:12)
#1894
The part of Darcy has gone to the man who was in Fielding's mind when she
first created her hero. Colin Firth, who played Darcy in the BBC adaptation
of Jane Austen's Pride and Prejudice, is to play the role in a pay-off to
Fielding's in-joke.
E-e-e-k....right at the end. I was almost having heart failure. I thought HG was playing the lead. Although it seems that he is. But, deep breath, must be thankful for small mercies...CF is playing MD. But he deserves an award for "the guy who has his thunder stolen most times"!!
Thanks Anne R!
~lizbeth54
Sun, Mar 26, 2000 (08:19)
#1895
It's very good news!!
~amw
Sun, Mar 26, 2000 (09:38)
#1896
Wonderful news, thanks Anne & Mari but I shall still keep everything crossed until it is confirmed by Working Titles!!!
~Elena
Sun, Mar 26, 2000 (09:49)
#1897
Oh My God, I almost can�t believe it. Hope this news is accurate?!?!
~KarenR
Sun, Mar 26, 2000 (14:33)
#1898
Dateline: Roughly the end of April ;-)
Hooray!! A shame the article focused on HG, but at least it's implied that Colin is one of "its two leading male stars." Sounds very equal.
Thanks Anne and Mari for posting. :-)
~Moon
Sun, Mar 26, 2000 (15:28)
#1899
Finally! The moment we have been waiting for! Thank you, Mari!
I will be in London in July!!! Allison, Ann, Tracy, Jana, how about lunch or tea in Notting Hill?
~heide
Sun, Mar 26, 2000 (16:58)
#1900
Exciting news. Just to see his name in print is exciting. I'm keeping my fingers you're not disappointed but this finally looks promising.
(Karen) I wonder if this will work in Colin's favor. ;-)
I've been saying this for months; no, at this point it's years. But of course I hope I'm wrong. ;-)
~lafn
Sun, Mar 26, 2000 (17:08)
#1901
Grrreat News..thanks AnnR. and Mari.
After the interview piece on the Working Title guys in yesterday's Telegraph it was a given for HG to be in it...they are thick friends.
(Moon)I will be in London in July!!! Allison, Ann, Tracy, Jana, how about lunch or tea in Notting Hill?
Mari, Karen and I know Bridget's neighborhood well and can recommend "192" for lunch....:-)
~Sylvana
Sun, Mar 26, 2000 (19:25)
#1902
Ohmygosh! I can't believe it's finally true! I think it's great news. For once ODB gets to play the romantic hero--not the cad, cuckold, baddie or nephew of dubious sexual inclination. AND in a film that we can expect to see in our local cineplex. We will not have to drive across three states to a remote art house, fly across the state of Texas, or assemble tour groups to other continents (as much fun as all these things may be). I must be dreaming. Someone please pinch me.
~patas
Sun, Mar 26, 2000 (20:30)
#1903
Yah Hoo!!
Thank you AnneR and Mari. I am delighted. Who wants to party? :-D
~lizbeth54
Sun, Mar 26, 2000 (21:00)
#1904
LOL! Gi
It is great news, the more I think about it, the better it gets...and I genuinely like the Hugh Grant casting. It will be marvellous to see Mr Darcy on the Big Screen. And he'll get to smile and kiss the girl!
~catheyp
Sun, Mar 26, 2000 (21:02)
#1905
Thank you ladies for this good news. I don't care what happens at work today - I am in a good mood.
~lafn
Sun, Mar 26, 2000 (23:24)
#1906
Like Gi says "Let's Party!!"
I think this calls for a Drool Celebration ..in honor of....
"A movie that won't be relegated to an art house"...(pl. God!)
C'mon...we deserve it...we've moped around for weeks...
Board Host, Laura....waddaya say?
~LauraMM
Sun, Mar 26, 2000 (23:32)
#1907
YEAH!!!!!!!!!! YEAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! YEAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I still think HG is an inspired choice for DC!!!!! YEAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! YEAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! YEAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I told you that CF would play MD!!!!!!!!! YEAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! YEAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (Now all I have to do is see High Fidelity, then BJD and I'm golden for the rest of the year!!!!!!
Oh yah, YEAHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
~lafn
Sun, Mar 26, 2000 (23:38)
#1908
Hold the Bubbly.....
...Just thinkin'.....maybe we should wait til it's officially announced by the gods of Working Title before we have a party, uh?
~LauraMM
Sun, Mar 26, 2000 (23:40)
#1909
Darn, Evelyn, I just started partying! Pizza and Guinness, it doesn't get better than that!!! (and it's OSCAR NIGHT!!! waiting to see if Annette Bening pops tonight;))
~KJArt
Sun, Mar 26, 2000 (23:53)
#1910
**Hee hee hee**Titter titter titter**chuckle chuckle**Guffaw**Whoop! Whoop!**Snicker snicker**Heh heh heh Heheheheh**
**Whew!** That's better! (Sorry about that ... I'm OK, I'm done now!)
And bless HG. At least he doesn't hold up everybody by taking forever to make up his mind! 8-D KJ
~Arami
Mon, Mar 27, 2000 (00:24)
#1911
Wow. Regardless of whatever anyone may think of HG, this is surely promising to be really something. Those two playing off against each other's foil... Sit back and wait. Impatiently. Wow.
~Brown32
Mon, Mar 27, 2000 (00:41)
#1912
I haven't read the BJD book in a year, but have just finished Edge of Reason and loved it - mainly because I get to picture CF as MD in some pretty intimate scenes.
The first time you see Mark D in BJD, as I recall, is in front of a bookcase at his parent's home wearing a pretty terrible sweater. What fun all we "in the knows" will have seeing him play Darcy haughtily observing the crowd.
GREAT news! But Evelyn, you are right, let's wait for official word before going crazy.
Murph
~KJArt
Mon, Mar 27, 2000 (02:40)
#1913
This week the film's producers are expected to announce ...
Yeh, it's that "are expected to announce" that makes me a little nervous.
Please! no last minute glitches!
(Karen) I wonder if this will work in Colin's favor. ;-) \...\ (Heide) I've been saying this for months; no, at this point it's years. But of course I hope I'm wrong. ;-)
The fact is he is not being asked to reprise Mr. Fitzwilliam Darcy, but to embody Mr. Mark Darcy ... and knowing ODB, he will set about creating an entirely different individual, with only echos of his predecessor to make a point of the "in-joke". He is very good at making things work in his favor.
As for comparisons, no one can prevent people who are walking into the theatre expecting to see "Mr. (F.) Darcy", and being disappointed, from pointing out their unhappiness by same. But it is their own expectations that disappoint, not ODB, who will be doing his job (with relish, I daresay)(catsup and mustard too, if he pleases! *Hee hee*) 8-D
~KarenR
Mon, Mar 27, 2000 (06:20)
#1914
(KJ) The fact is he is not being asked to reprise Mr. Fitzwilliam Darcy, but to embody Mr. Mark Darcy
Never thought this was case, but won't bother trying to explain what I meant. Who cares! Too happy that this is finally going to be be done.
Have put up the Bucket page for BJD:
http://www.spring.net/karenr/mdbro/bjd.html
Let's definitely do the party as soon as the official word is sent out. :-)
~Jana2
Mon, Mar 27, 2000 (08:30)
#1915
Karen, beautiful page for BJD! I'm holding my breath and hoping the Working Title guys give the official word soon. Hmmmm, starting to turn blue here....
~Allison2
Mon, Mar 27, 2000 (11:20)
#1916
This si really exciting news! The more I think about it the better it seems. Surely it must be true? The only problem is we are going away to Canada for almost two weeks and so I will miss any news. Keep it all for me, won't you? Will try and buy British newspapers but may not have much luck....
~Brown32
Mon, Mar 27, 2000 (12:28)
#1917
Karen:
As I said at 129, a terrific page! I just love the look of it.
Murph
~Moon
Mon, Mar 27, 2000 (13:31)
#1918
Great job, Karen! Now we will have to speculate on the rest of the cast. ;-)
~KarenR
Mon, Mar 27, 2000 (14:14)
#1919
(Moon) Now we will have to speculate on the rest of the cast. ;-)
Same as we've been doing for about 2 years. ;-)
Thank you all. *blushing*
~EileenG
Mon, Mar 27, 2000 (14:53)
#1920
(Evelyn) Just thinkin'.....maybe we should wait til it's officially announced by the gods of Working Title before we have a party, uh?
Aha--a voice of reason. If the story is true, I would think it would be reported in various places (that's what happened when Zellweger's casting was announced). Ann, Bethan, Allison, et.al, we're counting on your sharp eyes.
If it is true--sorry to rain on the parade, but I can't help feeling a bit disappointed. ODB will never, I mean never, lose his Darcy image no matter what else he's done/will do.
(KJArt) The fact is he is not being asked to reprise Mr. Fitzwilliam Darcy, but to embody Mr. Mark Darcy ... and knowing ODB, he will set about creating an entirely different individual, with only echos of his predecessor to make a point of the "in-joke".
I know we've talked about this before and I still disagree (unless the screenplay differs significantly from the book, which it certainly might). To me, MD is an updated FD--but my own NSHO doesn't matter. What does matter is the hype. I don't think the role is big enough for CF to create an entirely different character.
Having said all that, I never could see anybody else in the MD role. I read both BJD and EOR with the mental image of CF as MD. I hope that the screenplay takes the Darcy character to a different level (it must be a good script if CF agreed to take the role) so the British press doesn't permenently stamp the Darcy label on CF's forehead at the expense of his other work.
~amw
Mon, Mar 27, 2000 (15:04)
#1921
Good points Eillen, I to have my resevations buth there is just no one else who could play MD.
~amw
Mon, Mar 27, 2000 (15:07)
#1922
(too)
or who I would want to watch playing Mark Darcy, sorry Eileen of course, my
fingers are all over the place thinking of Mark Darcy clad only in a towel!!
~amw
Mon, Mar 27, 2000 (15:08)
#1923
Good points Eillen, I to have my resevations buth there is just no one else who could play MD.
~EileenG
Mon, Mar 27, 2000 (15:55)
#1924
(Ann) thinking of Mark Darcy clad only in a towel!!
Happy thought, indeed; sadly, that's from the second book. One can daydream, though. That was such a funny scene, wasn't it? "Sinjun"
~lafn
Mon, Mar 27, 2000 (17:04)
#1925
The debut of the "BJD Page on the Bucket".....
First Wave of the party...
~~~~~~
(Eileen)but I can't help feeling a bit disappointed. ODB will never,
I mean never, lose his Darcy image no matter what else he's
done/will do.
Mr. Darcy will always be his tour d'force. Up to now he's done nothing better.
By taking this role IMO he has come to that realization and is willing to "deal with it". That's known as "growing -up";-)
~EileenG
Mon, Mar 27, 2000 (17:19)
#1926
That's known as "growing -up";-)
No kidding? ;-P
~SusanMC
Mon, Mar 27, 2000 (18:26)
#1927
Great BJD page, Karen! Can't wait to see this expand as more details emerge.
Wonder if the contracts the principal stars sign will include a commitment to do the sequel. Seems like that's usually the case. If so, more cause for celebration!:-)
~patas
Mon, Mar 27, 2000 (21:56)
#1928
(SusanMC)Wonder if the contracts the principal stars sign will include a commitment to do the sequel.
Happy thought indeed!
~Arami
Tue, Mar 28, 2000 (00:00)
#1929
Mr. Darcy will always be his tour d'force. Up to now he's done nothing better.
Surely Tumbledown was his best piece overall.
~lafn
Tue, Mar 28, 2000 (01:13)
#1930
Surely Tumbledown was his best piece overall.
Agree. I mean't the role that brought him the most public attention world-wide.
~heide
Tue, Mar 28, 2000 (02:16)
#1931
(KJ) The fact is he is not being asked to reprise Mr. Fitzwilliam Darcy,
but to embody Mr. Mark Darcy
(Karen) Never thought this was case, but won't bother trying to explain what I
meant.
Me too and I wasn't going to bother explaining either. But then Eileen did it for me...
ODB will never, I mean never, lose his Darcy image no matter what else
he's done/will do.
It's the critics who can't say Colin Firth without saying Mr. Darcy in the same breath. And I don't want them to see this as Colin trying to regain some fleeting fame because his post Darcy career has not lived up to their expectations.
(Evelyn) By taking this role IMO he has come to that realization and is willing to "deal with it". That's known as "growing -up";-)
We know he can deal with it and I applaud him for having the wonderful sense of humor to take on this role. I just hope that everyone else can see why he's doing it...if he indeed is. ;-) No matter how we belittle the critics, they are important. These are only my reservations about this role and of course only MHO. I'm still very happy that he'll be in such a visible project.
(Arami) Regardless of whatever anyone may think of HG, this is surely promising to be really something. Those two playing off against each other's
foil...
What will really be interesting is what angle the publicity will take. Will this be a Zellweger/Grant focus or will they play on the Darcy/Darcy image? You're right, girls, just the fact that HG is in it (we think) really creates a buzz about this film.
~Brown32
Tue, Mar 28, 2000 (02:52)
#1932
From the World News Network:
Story Filed: Sunday, March 19, 2000 8:13 PM EST
(MAR. 19) WENN - FIFTH - INTERNATIONAL MUSIC NEWS - FASCINATING FACT: HUGH GRANT is the new favourite to play BRIDGET JONES' other half in the forthcoming movie BRIDGET JONES' DIARY. COLIN FIRTH was believed to have already landed the role of MARK DARCY but insiders reckon Firth will now play one of Jones' pals.
********************************
This was posted at the Firth list. Note that the date is earlier than the Observer story, so maybe the facts were confirmed after this was written. One of the worst things, IMO, would be for Hugh to play Darcy and Colin to stand next to him playing someone else. -- like Tom!
Murph
~Moon
Tue, Mar 28, 2000 (13:22)
#1933
Ladies please! Colin is MD and HG is Daniel.
Why would HG want a role that was written for another? In the UK everyone knows Colin is Mr. Darcy and that is that.
~patas
Tue, Mar 28, 2000 (18:05)
#1934
I would be very disappointed if Colin played *any* other character in BJD, except the one that was written for him. I don't think I could deal with the indignity.
~Elena
Tue, Mar 28, 2000 (19:08)
#1935
COLIN FIRTH was believed to have already landed the role of MARK DARCY but insiders reckon Firth will now play one of Jones' pals.
Oh f*** what a mess! Almost dropped my coffee cup on the keyboard when I read this. It simply cannot be true, it would be nothing else but idiotic. But if it is true I swear I won�t watch that movie, I won�t touch it with a stick.....and to think of it, why would Colin ever accept a role as one of Jone�s pals, (probably the gay one?!?) when there is a great role written for him in the book? He would be crazy to do anything else in BJD but Mark Darcy.
~EileenG
Tue, Mar 28, 2000 (19:42)
#1936
March 19? Isn't this the same piece which had you ladies ready to jump out windows the weekend before last? There's something very familiar about that last line.
Regardless, I was hoping for more articles to back up the Observer story...otherwise I'm not convinced it's true.
~lizbeth54
Tue, Mar 28, 2000 (19:58)
#1937
This is a re-cycled version of the tabloid Sunday Mail "report". They get everything wrong. The Telegraph and Observer are quality papers. Yahoo has indexed the Observer news.
The BJD production office told me last Tuesday that news of casting would be out in about 2 weeks. This weekend perhaps?
~lizbeth54
Tue, Mar 28, 2000 (20:00)
#1938
Sorry...Sunday Mirror....even more tabloid.
~KJArt
Tue, Mar 28, 2000 (21:00)
#1939
(Eileen) Isn't this the same piece which had you ladies ready to jump out windows the weekend before last? There's something very familiar about that last line.
Yes it is...You'd think because it raised such a brouhaha then, that they would remember it. It was posted by Marianne late Saturday, giving everyone nightmares, but Murph came to our rescue Sunday (the 19th) with the Hugh is considering Daniel but only 50-50 about it article from the Telegraph. A week later (the 25th) Mari posted the article confirming the CF/HG casting, after which we proceeded to dissect the pros and cons of their working together.
Ah, how soon we forget.
~Brown32
Wed, Mar 29, 2000 (00:32)
#1940
Yes, that Mirror thing was before The Observer story, and old hat. I'm sorry I reposted something that was obviously wrong.
I'm glad to read the Observer article was indexed by Yahoo. I have good feelings. Let's do some Ommmmmmmms for this weekend.
Murph
~Tracy
Wed, Mar 29, 2000 (18:26)
#1941
What is the World coming to, you go away for a few days out of the eyeshot of these wonderful pages and everything is all in a tizzy (to use a quaint English phrase).
Murph - will certainly be Ommmmming with great gusto!
~Brown32
Thu, Mar 30, 2000 (22:34)
#1942
Yea! Another mention of CF as Mark Darcy -- and on a very well respected film site:
http://www.upcomingmovies.com/bridgetjonesdiary.html
Murph
~mpiatt
Thu, Mar 30, 2000 (22:43)
#1943
Don't get too excited, I'm afraid. Actually, *I* gave them the link to www.filmsunlimited.com. So, this is not confirmation. The BJD page was up, but there was really erroneous info. about RZ, and how she'd have to wear a lot of makeup and padding for the gaining 70 lbs. thing. I tried to give a gentle nudge in the right direction there, and he did correct it. Also, the male leads info. was not there until I provided the link (which was graciously provided on RoP).
I just wish we'd get some further confirmation, from an entirely different source!
~Brown32
Thu, Mar 30, 2000 (22:50)
#1944
OH darn! I thought it was new. Sorry all.
Murph
~KarenR
Thu, Mar 30, 2000 (23:05)
#1945
How funny! :-) What goes around, comes around.
Hi Meredith, I see you figured it out. Welcome.
~KarenR
Thu, Mar 30, 2000 (23:18)
#1946
Haven't done one of these for a while and it's new:
Meredith
~heide
Fri, Mar 31, 2000 (01:06)
#1947
(Meredith) The BJD page was up, but there was really erroneous info. about RZ, and how she'd have to wear a lot of makeup and padding for the gaining 70
lbs. thing.
Oh how funny. Poor Bridget imagines herself to be overweight and immediately a man shoots her weight up an extra 70 pounds.
Meredith. Why don't you stay awhile?
~heide
Fri, Mar 31, 2000 (01:09)
#1948
Whoops! That was supposed to be -
H-E-O
~heide
Fri, Mar 31, 2000 (01:10)
#1949
Ew Yuck...Remind me never to use yellow again.
Back to Bridget...
~lafn
Fri, Mar 31, 2000 (01:17)
#1950
Hi Meredith...good to have you on board.
Cute new welcome pics ...thank you Drool hosts:-)
~mari
Fri, Mar 31, 2000 (02:37)
#1951
Welcome, Meredith! Enjoy yourself here.
I like the new welcome graphics, too; makes we want to leave and come back.;-)
~mari
Fri, Mar 31, 2000 (02:39)
#1952
Ooops, should be makes *me* . . .
~KarenR
Fri, Mar 31, 2000 (04:06)
#1953
Cute one, Heide. :-)
I emailed Greg to correct a few of his comments, like the ones about Sharon Maguire, Cate Blanchett and the weight thing. Said his source was Carrie's page.
~KarenR
Fri, Mar 31, 2000 (04:50)
#1954
The Guardian has again mentioned Hugh in BJD in Friday's paper in an article I've posted in its entirety on 127. Here's the relevant last paragraph:
It takes an Oscar ceremony to bring out our natural sense of superiority, to polish up our sense of ourselves as the plucky little heroes holding out for standards in the face of insurmountable vulgarisation and rot. But it's never far from the surface. As I recall, the last really good cause for a bit of a What Have the Americans Done for Us (other than ruin our culture with their mocha-choca latte outlets) was the news that American actress Renee Zellwegger had been chosen to play our Bridget Jones! In our Notting Hill! With our Hugh Grant! Don't you just love being so much better than everyone else?
~~~~~~~
Actually, you can have "your" Hugh Grant. ;-p
~mpiatt
Fri, Mar 31, 2000 (12:22)
#1955
(Karen)I emailed Greg to correct a few of his comments, like the ones about Sharon Maguire, Cate Blanchett and the weight thing.
Poor guy must have had a full mailbox .
Gosh! Thanks for such a warm welcome. Quite unexpected and enjoyable! I feel v. welcome!
I have to admit, I'm struggling here with trying to find where to "login" and just get the "new" Drool stuff, but I'll figure it out.
So...Any CF news this AM. I may expire from the anticipation...
~Moon
Fri, Mar 31, 2000 (13:48)
#1956
So...Any CF news this AM. I may expire from the anticipation...
LOL! That is always our sentiment. Welcome Meredith!
~heide
Fri, Mar 31, 2000 (13:55)
#1957
If you haven't already, bookmark this page, Meredith:
http://www.spring.net/yapp-bin/restricted/browse/drool/all/new
From there you can see just the topics that have had new responses since you last logged on. Of course for you and other new people, almost everything will show up as new. If you want to explore a topic but don't want to load the whole thing, look and see how many responses are in a topic and then change the address above to (eg) Topic 98 has over 1600 postings right now but if you only want to look at the last 100 or so, type in
http://www.spring.net/yapp-bin/restricted/read/drool/98.1500
and you can do the same for any topic - just change your last #s to the topic.response # you want to go back to. Is that convoluted enough?
Can only assume the article you quoted above, Karen, contained that famous Brit irony Americans can't understand. ;-)
~mpiatt
Fri, Mar 31, 2000 (14:10)
#1958
Heide-Thanks so much for the tips. I'm getting there...
~lafn
Fri, Mar 31, 2000 (14:43)
#1959
...other than ruin our culture with their mocha-choca latte outlets)
So, they don't have to go to Starbuck's...why don't they open up Tea Shops;-)
I like tea more,anyway
~EileenG
Fri, Mar 31, 2000 (14:52)
#1960
(Heide) Can only assume the article you quoted above, Karen, contained that famous Brit irony Americans can't understand. ;-)
That must be it. ;-)
Welcome Meredith, with a big thanks for nipping that bit of misinformation in the bud.
(Karen) I emailed Greg to correct a few of his comments, like the ones about Sharon Maguire, Cate Blanchett and the weight thing. Said his source was Carrie's page.
Oh, dear. Isn't that a fan page? Where did she get her information? Sounds like it's a game of telephone or whispering down the wind..."he said that she said that..."
~Brown32
Fri, Mar 31, 2000 (18:44)
#1961
Welcome Meredith, and yes, thanks a bunch for setting me straight. It is kind of scary when you find out that film web sites are getting their information from fan sites. I always try to keep mine as truthful as possible, and quote the source. On the other hand, if I hadn't read your post, I would still think Greg's news was new. Hard to keep on top of what is close to official word and what is not.
Back to those OHMMMMMMMMs again.
Murph
~winter
Fri, Mar 31, 2000 (19:15)
#1962
HI EVERYONE!!!
I'm writing this from EasyEverything, an Internet cafe in London (on High St. Kensington). Can you believe I get 60 mins. online for only �1? This is, quite possibly, the only good deal I've gotten so far since arriving into town three days ago.
Am staying in Holland Park, a short walk away from BJLand! I'll be there first thing tomorrow morning, as am determined to find rare-but-affordable wedding presents for some friends of mine getting married in the summer. The weather is cold, but no matter, I'm having a great time.
Welcome to the boards, Meredith! Kick back and make yerself comfy.
~amw
Fri, Mar 31, 2000 (20:01)
#1963
Hi Winter, Glad you are enjoying your time in the UK, I think the weather should improve this weekend!! (famous last words) and welcome Meredith, I'm afraid there wasn't anything in the Baz Column today, he is away in LA, having covered the Oscars, no doubt.
~EileenG
Fri, Mar 31, 2000 (20:48)
#1964
(Murph) It is kind of scary when you find out that film web sites are getting their information from fan sites
Well, everyone's anxious for the scoop. Yet if a film site's info ('well respected' or not) isn't sourced, that should probably be noted (IMO).
Speaking of scoops, I'm going away for a few days and we all know what happens when I'm away: big CF news. OK, there wasn't the last time I was away, but 2 out of 3 ain't bad...
Winter, I have it on good authority those little oil burners make great gifts. You can even test it first to see if it takes in milk!
~Arami
Fri, Mar 31, 2000 (23:53)
#1965
his source was Carrie's page.
Oh, dear. Isn't that a fan page? Where did she get her information? Sounds like it's a game of telephone or whispering down the wind..."he said that she said that..."
Sadly, it is difficult - if not impossible - to know which media or sites are a reliable source of information. That's why it is important to know and always attribute one's sources: that way it may be easier to trace errors.
~mpiatt
Sun, Apr 2, 2000 (01:08)
#1966
Murph--please don't thank me. I just didn't want us all to get "overwrought" as we are like to do :-) (We do not wish to exite our anticipation.)
To all--I can't thank you enough (again) for the warm welcome. I feel so special, but I fear it will turn my head!
To think, I had not even watched P&P2, or read any JA until 2/99. The rest, as they say, is history. What a wasted life until then!
~KarenR
Mon, Apr 3, 2000 (14:52)
#1967
The following blurb was in The Telegraph on Saturday (4/1/00):
Phew! Hugh
Handsome Hugh Grant has graciously agreed to appear in the film of Bridget Jones's Diary. "They've been pestering me about it for It's all agreed, though I haven't signed anything."
~LauraMM
Mon, Apr 3, 2000 (15:55)
#1968
It's quite amazing how he's agreed, but didn't say what role! Though we DO KNOW that he'll be Tom;) (j/k) Daniel Cleaver;)
~Arami
Tue, Apr 4, 2000 (00:24)
#1969
In the Express it's said he will play "the cad".
~KarenR
Tue, Apr 4, 2000 (12:47)
#1970
From Empire:
Grant Talks Up Bridget Jones
03/04/2000
Following the cheesy romcom antics of Four Weddings and a Funeraland Notting Hill, it appears that Hugh Grant is trying to shed his soppy, soft-centred image to play more hard-edged roles.
The actor told the Express that he is eyeing up a role in the forthcoming film of Bridget Jones�s Diary, the screen adaptation of Helen Fielding�s bestselling novel which follows a thitysomething publishing exec on her quest for a new man.
�Richard Curtis has done an amazing rewrite of the book,� explained Grant at a recent party in London, hinting that he may be pursuing the role of ne�er-do-well Daniel Cleaver: �If I do it, I�ll definitely play the cad.�
~~~~~~~
"Richard Curtis has done an amazing rewrite of the book"
Hmm, we know what that means. ;-)
ne�er-do-well Daniel Cleaver
Is that how they view him? Sheesh, not the term I would use.
~catheyp
Tue, Apr 4, 2000 (21:16)
#1971
Surely the rewrite wouldn't mean Daniel getting the girl instead of Mark Darcy! Please tell me I'm being silly, please ;-)
~Brown32
Tue, Apr 4, 2000 (21:33)
#1972
Thanks, Karen, for the BJD/Grant news. If it is OK with you, I have added it to my news page - credit for finding it there too!
Murph
~KarenR
Tue, Apr 4, 2000 (21:44)
#1973
Of course, Empire was just repeating what a tabloid (the Express) had printed.
(Cathey) Please tell me I'm being silly, please ;-)
OK, you're being silly. ;-) Naw, a cad is a cad is a cad. BTW, what island was Curtis going to? Bali? Go check it out, Cathey.
~mari
Wed, Apr 5, 2000 (00:09)
#1974
"Richard Curtis has done an amazing rewrite of the book"
Ew. Undoubtedly, Daniel's role will be beefed up considerably for this screen version of Four Notting Hill Funerals.:-( Hughie doesn't do supporting roles, and if as he's said they've been chasing him to do this, you'd better believe they'll make it worth his while, role-wise. Plus he's the Working Title poster boy, can't argue with success and all that. Yeah, this will be 'amazing' alright.:-(
Cathey, better to be silly than to be hopelessly paranoid like me.;-)
Of course, if they beef up Mark's role also, then I'll think it's brilliant.;-)
~KarenR
Wed, Apr 5, 2000 (01:33)
#1975
~KarenR
Wed, Apr 5, 2000 (02:18)
#1976
~KarenR
Wed, Apr 5, 2000 (02:18)
#1977
As the tabloid makes its way into the more respected arms of the media, here's the how the Press Association wrote the same:
Hugh Grant aims to play it tough
Hugh Grant could be trying to shed his soppy Englishman image to play more hard-edged roles, it is reported. [notice source unnamed]
The star of Four Weddings and a Funeral and Notting Hill says he is eyeing up a role in the forthcoming film of Bridget Jones's Diary, the screen adaptation of Helen Fielding's bestselling novel which follows a thitysomething publishing executive on her quest for a new man.
The Empire website reports Grant as saying: "Richard Curtis has done an amazing rewrite of the book. If I do it, I'll definitely play the cad."
~~~~~
LOL! They can report what's being reported on by Empire, even though Empire got it from The Express.
Richard Curtis' rewrite now has Richard Finch's character played by Simon Callow. ;-)
~lizbeth54
Wed, Apr 5, 2000 (23:22)
#1978
Just caught a glimpse of HG on the TV News....he has longish hair at the moment, rather greasy looking, down over the collar (okay, I'm biased!) But it's all down to the power of celebrity. HG is a celebrity, Colin ain't. (Hughie was attending the first night of "The Graduate" with Kathleen Turner, which has received massive publicity and sold out since she appeared naked on stage at the preview. Why exactly the British public are so excited at this prospect, beats me!)
The papers have also been full of the "news" that Liz Hurley visited a Sex Shop and made several purchases! Again, all idle tittle tattle, but the end product is that HG continues to be news, and papers will focus on him rather than the very private and discrete CF.
BTW what has happened to Andrew Davies' screenplay? He's been writing original and adapted screenplays for over 20 years now, and has the reputation for turning in the perfect scripts, not a comma out of place. Why the massive re-write? Why bring in Richard Curtis? BJD was a hugely successful and funny book, inspired by Pride and Prejudice, book and TV series. It doesn't need a Notting Hill makeover!!
~KarenR
Thu, Apr 6, 2000 (15:28)
#1979
test
~KarenR
Thu, Apr 6, 2000 (15:38)
#1980
Apparently, we are back in business!! Yeah!!
From today's Hollywood Reporter (am reposting what's on Springfolks):
Grant making entry in 'Diary'
Hugh Grant is in negotiations to join Renee Zellweger in Working Title Films' "Bridget Jones' Diary" for Universal Pictures and Miramax Films. The project is slated to start shooting May 1 in London, with Sharon Maguire directing. The project reteams Grant with "Notting Hill" screenwriter Richard Curtis and Working Title co-chairmen Tim Bevan and Eric Fellner. (Also taking screenwriting credit are Helen Fielding and Andrew Davies.) Grant first teamed with Curtis and Working Title on the 1994 hit comedy "Four Weddings and a Funeral" for now-defunct PolyGram Filmed Entertainment. Another male lead is yet to be cast for "Diary," the adaptation of Helen Fielding's best-selling novel about a thirtysomething single woman living in London. Curtis penned the script for "Diary."
Universal and Miramax have partnered on "Diary," with Miramax handling domestic distribution and Universal distributing internationally. Universal and Miramax are also splitting rights on Working Title's "Captain Corelli's Mandolin" starring Nicolas Cage and Penelope Cruz, with Miramax taking foreign and Universal domestic.
For "Diary," Canal Plus will handle some international territories under its 50/50 co-financing deal with Working Title and Universal.
Grant most recently starred opposite Jeanne Tripplehorn in the comedy-romance "Mickey Blue Eyes" for Castle Rock and Warner Bros. and recently wrapped work on Woody Allen's "Small Time Crooks." He is repped by CAA.
["another lead" who shall forever be nameless.]
Same bit picked up by Teletext:
Hugh Grant to be in Bridget Jones movie
Hugh Grant is expected to join the cast of the Bridget Jones movie opposite Texan actress Renee Zellweger in the eponymous role.
If he signs up he'll be teaming up again with Notting Hill screenwriter Richard Curtis. The two men also worked together on Four Weddings and a Funeral.
Original author Helen Fielding has opted out of the project in protest at the casting of Zellweger.
[Can't believe they tacked on that last thing again!]
~patas
Thu, Apr 6, 2000 (18:14)
#1981
(KarenR)Another male lead is yet to be cast for "Diary,"(...)
["another lead" who shall forever be nameless.]
Arrrgh! >-(
~lizbeth54
Thu, Apr 6, 2000 (19:41)
#1982
Another male lead is yet to be cast for "Diary,"
Oh, for God's sake, that really is the ******** limit. It's a Hugh Grant movie, he's the co-star ("opposite" RZ), This is a small �5million movie and it should be Colin's. HG has got the lead in "About a boy". Why does he need this?????
~lizbeth54
Thu, Apr 6, 2000 (19:44)
#1983
has yet to be cast
So they're still thinking about who should play Mark Darcy? Why hasn't Colin signed?
~amw
Thu, Apr 6, 2000 (19:48)
#1984
Perhaps he doesn't like the idea of playing second fiddle to HG, either. Perhaps he doesn't like the new script, he only has two lines!! perhaps. If the part isn't right for him I hope he doesn't do it, sorry everyone.
~KarenR
Thu, Apr 6, 2000 (19:57)
#1985
(AnnW) If the part isn't right for him
It is him. ;-)
Let's not get nuts here. This just shows the differences in style between HG and CF. One craves publicity (and evidently so does his partner, parading around in sex shops on Hollywood Blvd.) and the other does his utmost to quash it.
~Moon
Thu, Apr 6, 2000 (23:07)
#1986
Why hasn't Colin signed?
Because he probably heard about HFs boycot of RZ and is really thinking it over??? GROW UP COLIN!!! SIGN THE BLOODY PAPERS!!!
I agree Karen, the part is him and the role was created for him. Everyone knows that including the script wrtiters and the film company.
I repeat that the kind of publicity this movie will get because it also stars HG is only the very best news for Colin. He will be noticed in a big way. Please note that the article stated the other male lead role. Sorry AnnW, but he must do this.
~lafn
Fri, Apr 7, 2000 (00:30)
#1987
IMO this is a publicity ploy from Working Title...who wants to trickle the stuff out drip by drip....He'll sign, he's no dummy.
~patas
Fri, Apr 7, 2000 (12:52)
#1988
Perhaps we should not discuss this at all anymore until there's definite news? Or is this worse? Everytime I get to this topic my heart rate soars ;-/
~mari
Fri, Apr 7, 2000 (15:00)
#1989
(Gi) Perhaps we should not discuss this at all anymore until there's definite news? Or is this worse? Everytime I get to this topic my heart rate soars ;-/
I know how you feel, Gi. It's like passing the scene of an accident: you know you're supposed to remain oblivious and keep moving, but you just can't stop yourself from looking!;-)
~patas
Sat, Apr 8, 2000 (09:57)
#1990
(Mari)I know how you feel, Gi. It's like passing the scene of an accident: you know you're supposed to remain
oblivious and keep moving, but you just can't stop yourself from looking!;-)
Hummmm... I wonder was that what I meant? %P
~mari
Sat, Apr 8, 2000 (11:25)
#1991
More from the gag me department (thanks to Rai for spotting):
Scottish Daily Record & Sunday Mail Ltd.
Daily Record
April 7, 2000, Friday
HEADLINE: OTR..OFF THE RECORD: DATE WITH BRIDGET FOR HUGH
BODY:
MOVIE heart-throb Hugh Grant is to star in the big-screen version of
bestseller Bridget Jones's Diary.
Hugh will appear alongside US actress Renee Zellweger in the film.
Renee, girlfriend of funnyman Jim Carrey, will play the book's heroine -
thirty-something publishing company employee Bridget who is desperate to
find love and success.
Hugh will play the object of her desire - handsome company executive Daniel
Cleaver.
The film will see Hugh teaming up again with screen-writer Richard Curtis,
who penned his previous hits Notting Hill and the 1994 smash-hit Four
Weddings and a Funeral.
A film insider said yesterday: "Hugh is the ideal actor for the role and
he's hoping the movie will be as successful as Four Weddings and Notting
Hill."
Fans of the critically-acclaimed Helen Fielding book hit the roof when
American Renee was cast in the title role. They claimed the part should have
gone to a British actress.
But the insider said: "They'll be pleased Hugh's got a role in the film."
The movie is scheduled to start shooting on location in London on May 1.
~lizbeth54
Sat, Apr 8, 2000 (14:00)
#1992
Hugh will play the object of her desire - handsome company executive Daniel
Cleaver.
I'm gritting my teeth and saying nothing!!!!
A film insider said yesterday: "Hugh is the ideal actor for the role and
he's hoping the movie will be as successful as Four Weddings and Notting
Hill."
This is the (only?) good thing about the HG/Working Title/Richard Curtis connection. BJD will be promoted as a follow up to two worldwide smashes and should draw in the multiplex crowd...which actually considerably outnumbers the readers of the book. "Notting Hill" took �10 million in its first weekend in the UK. And Mark Darcy can't be a cameo role. There has to be some dramatic balance.
~KarenR
Sat, Apr 8, 2000 (14:18)
#1993
Hugh will play the object of her desire
Technically, it's not untrue. Daniel is that for over half the book.
...but my overall reaction is bleech
(Bethan) And Mark Darcy can't be a cameo role.
Calm down, Bethan. Most of the other articles referred to him as the other "male lead" - far from a cameo and certainly not a supporting role.
~LauraMM
Sat, Apr 8, 2000 (19:14)
#1994
Can I say something? I know that the idea of Mark Darcy going to anyone other than Colin Firth is basically sacrileg; HOWEVER, have you thought that HE will BE Mark Darcy and is holding out just to drive you ladies crazy? He's probably reading this board right now, laughing wickedly, saying, "if they only knew, hahahahahahahaha!" (of course in a cackle-type of laugh, possibly studying for the role of the Warlock in the new updated "Wizard of Oz"...)
So where am I going with this?
I am confident that Colin Firth will play Mark Darcy. I am not panicking, I LOVE the idea of Hugh Grant as Daniel Cleaver. Heck, we'll have dual bday parties for them come Sept.! Just calm down, the news will come out soon. Have faith, please.
Now back to our regularly scheduled programming.
~LauraMM
Sat, Apr 8, 2000 (19:14)
#1995
Can I say something? I know that the idea of Mark Darcy going to anyone other than Colin Firth is basically sacrileg; HOWEVER, have you thought that HE will BE Mark Darcy and is holding out just to drive you ladies crazy? He's probably reading this board right now, laughing wickedly, saying, "if they only knew, hahahahahahahaha!" (of course in a cackle-type of laugh, possibly studying for the role of the Warlock in the new updated "Wizard of Oz"...)
So where am I going with this?
I am confident that Colin Firth will play Mark Darcy. I am not panicking, I LOVE the idea of Hugh Grant as Daniel Cleaver. Heck, we'll have dual bday parties for them come Sept.! Just calm down, the news will come out soon. Have faith, please.
Now back to our regularly scheduled programming.
~Moon
Sat, Apr 8, 2000 (23:27)
#1996
HOWEVER, have you thought that HE will BE Mark Darcy and is holding out just to drive you ladies crazy? He's probably reading this board right now, laughing wickedly, saying, "if they only knew, hahahahahahahaha!"
Evil, evil, man! ;-))
~LauraMM
Sun, Apr 9, 2000 (01:13)
#1997
(Mari) Evil, evil, man! ;-))
Who ever said he was sweet??? HEE HEE:) My mantra is, if you want to know what my mantra is:
COLIN FIRTH WILL BE MARK DARCY
COLIN FIRTH WILL BE MARK DARCY
COLIN FIRTH WILL BE MARK DARCY
ANYONE ELSE CANNOT BE MARK DARCY
I WILL KILL ANYONE ELSE WHO IS MARK DARCY.
You'd be surprised how that works;)
~LauraMM
Sun, Apr 9, 2000 (02:20)
#1998
Sorry, Moon:(
~KarenR
Sun, Apr 9, 2000 (04:01)
#1999
Very long article in The Observer, mentions BJD, DQ, and RV:
http://www.newsunlimited.co.uk/observer/life/story/0,3879,157249,00.html