~terry
Wed, Jul 24, 1996 (11:49)
seed
InContext Spider -- InContext Spider is dramatically different from
other HTML Editors. This is obvious from the very beginning --
once you get into this unique web editor, you might just wonder if
you really are using an HTML Editor. The radically different
Logical Editor is what will likely catch and divert your attention
first. This is a logical representation of a web document with icons
(trees, branches, and leaves to represent data relationships, for
example) that makes sense once you take the time to understand it;
however, it can be quite daunting for new users. The WYSIWYG
editor, on the other hand, is extremely cut and dry with simple text
and image implementation. Advanced features like tables, forms,
background images, and centering are missing in both the web
editor and the web browser that comes in the commercial version.
Overall, I think InContext Spider is quite counterintuitive for
developing web documents. HTML Editors should be designed to
make developing web documents as easy as possible, especially for
novice users. InContext Spider seems to make this task much
harder than it really is. The toolbar icons lack detailed explanations
-- something I've grown accustomed to, especially in HTML
Editors. The amazing absence of critical features like these are
typical of the entire program, unfortunately. While extended use of
Spider does reveal some latent power buried deep within the
counterintuitive interface, many users will never get this far. Still,
for anyone desiring to invest the time and energy into discovering
the hidden features, Spider could indeed become a viable HTML
editor.
The evaluation release available on the 'net consists of everything in
the commercial package except for the spelling checker and Spider
Mosaic, a web browser based on the Spyglass Enhanced Mosaic
product. I was able to review the commercial package as well as the
evaluation release; however, the commercial version didn't impress
me much more than did the evaluation release. The Spider Mosaic
client lacks many of the same features as the web editor, including
centering, tables, and background images. If you want a decent web
browser, this most certainly isn't it -- try Netscape or Internet
Explorer instead. If you want a solid, easy to use HTML Editor
with a spelling checker, this most certainly isn't it, either -- try
HotDog or WebEdit. If you're looking for a program with a very
cool icon and logo, well, you're in luck -- this is one of the few
areas of InContext Spider that actually impressed me.
Pros: Excellent icon and logo -- very cool
Cons: Counterintuitive interface, not easy to use, lacks critical
features found in other editors
New: One-button publishing, improved interface and tools menu,
more
Version Reviewed: 1.2
Date of Review: 6/23/96 Reviewer: Forrest Stroud
~kermit
Thu, Sep 5, 1996 (12:41)
#1
Another area or design flaw; It is designed to work within the 16bit Arena;
No long file names, no way to adjust the html code generated; This package
is ok for small projects, that _one_ person can manage in their head. If you are
using either NT, Win95 or a Unix server, the limits of this environment are
overwhelmings
Compared to the WebAnalyse software that they have, it's depressing