~KitchenManager
Sun, Apr 19, 1998 (00:41)
seed
What exists as "food" that should have never
been considered as such...
~KitchenManager
Sun, Apr 19, 1998 (00:43)
#1
Potted meat food product
and
pasteurized, processed American cheese food product
~terry
Sun, Apr 19, 1998 (10:09)
#2
Are talking spam William?
~KitchenManager
Sun, Apr 19, 1998 (10:28)
#3
Some could be...
Otherwise,
Vienna sausage should not be considered food, either.
~autumn
Sun, Apr 19, 1998 (18:14)
#4
Cottonseed oil. I don't eat cotton, so why would I consume one of its by-products?
~stacey
Mon, Apr 20, 1998 (01:02)
#5
amen!
~KitchenManager
Thu, May 14, 1998 (00:27)
#6
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -- A
food fight between consumer
groups and Proctor and Gamble
Co. over the labeling of snack
foods made with a fat substitute
goes before the Food and Drug Administration next
month, the FDA said Tuesday.
It said it would hold a public meeting to review
new medical studies about complaints that
Olestra, a food additive made by the company,
causes cramps and mild diarrhea in a small number
of consumers.
The fat substitute was launched last month in a
variety of U.S. chips and salty snack foods.
Proctor and Gamble, which spent some $500
million to develop the food
additive, wants the FDA to relax its requirement
that foods with the additive must carry a warning
label about possible digestive effects and
nutrient loss.
Olestra gives foods the taste derived from fat,
but the substance is not absorbed by the body.
The Center for Science in the Public Interest
claimed its study of 2,000 consumers showed
Olestra caused abdominal cramping and mild
diarrhea. It opened a toll-free telephone line
for consumers to report adverse effects.
The company maintains that its studies show the
rate of gastrointestinal problems is the same for
consumers who eat chips made with or without
Olestra.
It is also asking the FDA for permission to use
Olestra in other foods such as ice cream, onion
rings and cooking oil, which would open up huge
new markets.
The FDA's food advisory committee said it would
meet June 15-16 for scientists to review new
gastrointestinal studies from Proctor and Gamble
and others.
The panel will consider the agency's earlier
finding that the additive is safe, and will make
recommendations on food labeling requirements.
P&G has said it expects the food additive to
generate sales of $400 million by 2000.
~stacey
Thu, May 14, 1998 (17:52)
#7
In a recent report published in the Westword (Colorado's equivalent of the Chronicle) Olestra sideeffects were given such appropo names as 'anal seepage' and 'fecal emergency'
sounds just yummy, eh?!?!
~autumn
Thu, May 14, 1998 (20:10)
#8
You don't say? Pass the chips... :-)
~CotC
Sat, May 16, 1998 (11:56)
#9
From personal experience, flatulence of biblical proportions...
But, re the Topic: Chicken Fried Scrambled Eggs.
~KitchenManager
Sat, May 16, 1998 (14:03)
#10
gotta agree with you on that one
~autumn
Sun, May 17, 1998 (23:40)
#11
What the hell is that?
Cracklins.
~CotC
Mon, May 18, 1998 (13:06)
#12
Mmmmmmm!... craklins!
Orange Jell-o with shredded carots on top of it.
Black Pudding.
Coconut.
Snails.
Okra in any form.
Peas.
Oysters/liver (much the same thing, really)
~stacey
Mon, May 18, 1998 (18:18)
#13
I love oysters...
smoked, fried, raw...
yummy!
There is a Thai black pudding that is actually reddish black grains that are sweet and puff up like tapioca... not bad at all!
~KitchenManager
Wed, May 20, 1998 (00:46)
#14
Thomas meant blood pudding, btw (in case you didn't know *wink*)
Autumn- Chicken fried scrambled eggs are scrambled egg patties
that have beed breaded and deep fried...
~autumn
Thu, May 21, 1998 (22:06)
#15
I think I'm gonna puke (then all I'll be able to keep down is orange jello w/carrot strips on top)
Oysters are ambrosia around here...they have been over-harvested from the Chesapeake for so long that there are limits on the catch. Raw w/cocktail sauce--slurp!
~CotC
Mon, Jun 1, 1998 (16:24)
#16
They still jus' ain't nuthin' like a BIG bowl of cold oatmeal with lard on it...:-)
~riette
Mon, Jun 1, 1998 (17:10)
#17
Tell me, Thomas H. Smith, what does the Rev. in front of your name refer
to . . . a higher kind of profession, or an abbreviation to do with taste in food . . . like, say
rev-olting?!
Having said that, when I'm depressed I live on melted cheese, ketchup and golden syrup sandwiches.
~autumn
Mon, Jun 1, 1998 (22:38)
#18
Here it comes again...
~riette
Tue, Jun 2, 1998 (02:18)
#19
What?
You being attacked by a lettuce?
~autumn
Tue, Jun 2, 1998 (10:29)
#20
(*spew* *barf* *technicolor yawn*)
~CotC
Tue, Jun 2, 1998 (13:18)
#21
The Rev. indicates my DD in Neuro-husbandry. :-)
~riette
Tue, Jun 2, 1998 (13:54)
#22
Your DD?
You mean your Deaf Dumbness in Neuro-husbandry?!?!
How weird . . .
~KitchenManager
Wed, Jun 3, 1998 (15:50)
#23
actually, the weird hasn't got here yet...
~stacey
Wed, Jun 3, 1998 (16:10)
#24
huh???
~CotC
Tue, Jun 9, 1998 (12:26)
#25
My Defensive Drollness...
~riette
Tue, Jun 9, 1998 (14:23)
#26
Oh.
Well, that's not so bad then, is it?
~KitchenManager
Thu, Jun 11, 1998 (12:15)
#27
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Citing possible severe side effects and risk of
cancer, a food watchdog group pressed the U.S. Food
and Drug Administration on Wednesday to either pull
the fat substitute, olestra, from the market or
require more prominent, strongly worded labels about
potential problems.
The nonprofit Center for Science in the Public
Interest (CSPI) marshaled scientists and unhappy
consumers for a Washington news conference, getting
a jump on FDA meetings next week to review the
product.
The CSPI also filed petitions with the Federal Trade
Commission, charging that olestra advertising
misleads because it doesn't disclose side effects.
Olestra, sold as the brand Olean, is a synthetic
chemical made of sugar and vegetable oil that passes
through the body undigested.
Labels on foods made with olestra say the
zero-calorie fake fat can cause unpleasant
gastrointestinal effects, including cramps and
diarrhea, and can block absorption of certain
nutrients.
But CSPI says those warnings aren't enough. Citing a
handful of consumers who sought emergency-room
treatment for those effects, CSPI said olestra is a
"gamble with health."
Regina McGrath of Hannastown, Pennsylvania, said
that after eating a dozen potato chips, she went to
a hospital emergency room where doctors gave her
intravenous morphine for pain that was "worse than
childbirth."
The FTC had no comment.
Manufacturer defends its product
Manufacturer Procter &
Gamble and Frito-Lay,
which makes
olestra-laden WOW!
chips, vigorously
defended olestra.
Proctor and Gamble
spokesman Bryan
McCleary said tens of
millions of people
have consumed foods
made with olestra
since it came on the
market in 1996, with
relatively few complaints about digestive side
effects.
"This is a safe product; it's fully approved by the
FDA," he said.
Tens of millions of people have eaten over 500
million servings of olestra-made chips, the
companies said. Only about one in 50,000 people
report any complaint, and the vast majority are mild
stomach upset, company spokesmen said.
Carotenoid depletion a concern
Concerns about possible cancer risk are relatively
new and are linked to the way olestra passes through
the body without being digested.
Dr. Walter Willett of the Harvard School of Public
Health said olestra takes with it several important
fat-soluable vitamins and cancer-fighting nutrients
called carotenoids, nutrients considered one
component in preventing cancer and heart disease.
He predicted that if people consume olestra long
enough, there might be thousands of illnesses from
carotenoid depletion. Extra vitamins are added to
olestra, but Willett said its effects on carotenoids
are dramatic.
"Even the amount of olestra in a small, 1-ounce bag
of potato chips will lower blood carotenoids by over
50 percent if consumed on a daily basis," he said.
Studies show that a high intake of carotenoids also
helps protect people from degenerative eye diseases.
Carotenoids are found in red, yellow and orange
vegetables.
The FDA maintains olestra is safe, but that concerns
will be publicly debated next week when its
independent food advisory committee spends three
days reexamining the product, a routine procedure
now that it is widely sold.
The panel will look at 6,700 side-effect reports
filed with the FDA, as well as olestra's nutrient
impact.
~autumn
Fri, Jun 12, 1998 (13:36)
#28
frightening!
~jgross5
Fri, Jun 12, 1998 (21:17)
#29
if something positive comes of this, I'll be able to stop
operating on myself.
but i'll miss being able to show my colostomy bag to new friends
when they take me out to eat (and draw cartoons on restaurant napkins)
~riette
Sat, Jun 13, 1998 (02:24)
#30
May I compliment you by saying that you are particularly weird today?
~stacey
Tue, Jun 16, 1998 (13:37)
#31
my favorite reported olestra side-effects...
anal seepage
fecal emergency
(no thank you)
~riette
Wed, Jun 17, 1998 (02:39)
#32
$hit!
~autumn
Wed, Jun 17, 1998 (22:20)
#33
LOL!
~TIM
Sun, Nov 22, 1998 (04:46)
#34
Riette, you have such a way with words!! You said with one word, what stacy said
in three phrases.
~riette
Mon, Nov 23, 1998 (01:48)
#35
I know - I can't help it; one of my many gifts (amongst which grace and elegance don't count).
~TIM
Mon, Nov 23, 1998 (01:53)
#36
I'm sure, in the right context, you also posess those in abundance!
~riette
Mon, Nov 23, 1998 (07:59)
#37
Yes, in a-bun-dance! No, I'll leave those things to you!
~TIM
Mon, Nov 23, 1998 (11:45)
#38
A-BUN-DANCE. Is that any relation to a rain dance, Riette?
~riette
Tue, Nov 24, 1998 (01:34)
#39
ha-ha! No. Perhaps. A person who looks like a bun, dancing (in the rain?).
~TIM
Tue, Nov 24, 1998 (01:45)
#40
Wow!! I wonder what kind of results you would get with that?
~riette
Wed, Nov 25, 1998 (02:07)
#41
The same kind of result as I got the time I danced my nude raindance in front of a guy - he RAN!!!
~TIM
Wed, Nov 25, 1998 (10:18)
#42
Actually, Riette, I thought that you might get it to rain hamburgers.
~riette
Wed, Nov 25, 1998 (11:37)
#43
God and the angels protesting?
~TIM
Wed, Nov 25, 1998 (13:21)
#44
Perhaps they did not like dinner that night. Or they might have sensitive ears.
~riette
Thu, Nov 26, 1998 (02:07)
#45
OOPS - have I been swearing too much again?!
~TIM
Thu, Nov 26, 1998 (02:43)
#46
No, Riette. You don't ever swear too much. I simply meant that a proper rain dance is very noisy.
~riette
Thu, Nov 26, 1998 (11:07)
#47
You have no IDEA! ha-ha!
~TIM
Thu, Nov 26, 1998 (17:50)
#48
Riette, I have an idea, but it's just an idea. When you get here, you will have to show me.
~riette
Fri, Nov 27, 1998 (01:55)
#49
Only if it should rain.
~TIM
Fri, Nov 27, 1998 (02:01)
#50
Riette, you could do it inside.
~riette
Fri, Nov 27, 1998 (16:14)
#51
And where will I get the rain from?
~TIM
Fri, Nov 27, 1998 (16:24)
#52
Riette, you don't get rain. It happens.
~riette
Sat, Nov 28, 1998 (01:34)
#53
Outside, yes. But how does it 'just happen' inside? I have to stand under the shower??
~TIM
Sat, Nov 28, 1998 (01:43)
#54
Riette, You must have faith. Ask anyone that lives where it rains a lot. The trick is not so much getting it to rain inside, It's keeping it from raining inside all the time!!
~riette
Sat, Nov 28, 1998 (15:48)
#55
Ha-ha! That makes sense! Then you'd better pray that your roof leaks, 'cos I'm not doing any kind of raindance without rain!
~TIM
Sat, Nov 28, 1998 (15:53)
#56
OK Riette, if neccessary, we'll manufacture rain.
~riette
Sun, Nov 29, 1998 (02:10)
#57
It's got to be real - artificial rain makes me very shy.
~TIM
Sun, Nov 29, 1998 (02:15)
#58
Define "Artificial" Riette, please.
~riette
Mon, Nov 30, 1998 (02:01)
#59
Rain that comes from sources other than clouds. That's about as clearly as I am willing to define it without your laughing like that again!
~TIM
Mon, Nov 30, 1998 (02:13)
#60
HNNMMM Clouds. No problem, Riette.
~riette
Mon, Nov 30, 1998 (02:13)
#61
Dare I ask what you have in mind?
~TIM
Mon, Nov 30, 1998 (02:13)
#62
Clouds, Riette, different kinds of clouds.
~riette
Tue, Dec 1, 1998 (01:50)
#63
Coloured ones too?
~MarciaH
Sat, Jul 3, 1999 (01:09)
#64
Jellyfish Salad
~MarciaH
Sat, Jul 3, 1999 (01:31)
#65
Sorry to interrupt the rain dance, but if you eliminate Spam and Vienna Sausages Hawaii will starve. That is gourmet food over here - along with Velveeta cheese!
~KitchenManager
Sat, Jul 3, 1999 (02:23)
#66
I now have a reason not to visit the islands...
~MarciaH
Sat, Jul 3, 1999 (15:23)
#67
Now I am most unhappy.
~MarciaH
Sat, Jul 3, 1999 (15:26)
#68
OT, Food that comes in cans with nozzles attached. (spray cheese?! whipped whatever, etc)
~KitchenManager
Sat, Jul 3, 1999 (16:45)
#69
you'll confuse people here...for those who don't know,
OT means on topic...
~MarciaH
Sat, Jul 3, 1999 (19:48)
#70
Sorry....(...*flog*....*bash*......) I shall try to remember to write out my words next time, thus eliminating this problem.
~KitchenManager
Sat, Jul 3, 1999 (23:31)
#71
nah...once we know, we'll use them too...and
make up new ones!!!
some of us are like that, you know...
~autumn
Sun, Jul 4, 1999 (01:35)
#72
We're good like that you know!
As a vegetarian, I know I should find the concept of jellyfish salad offensive, but I can't help but think it's hardly an animal. It's like one step above an amoeba. How weird is that?
~KitchenManager
Sun, Jul 4, 1999 (02:16)
#73
*silence*
~MarciaH
Sun, Jul 4, 1999 (03:03)
#74
An amoeba is not an animal? Are we talking souls or concept of animal, veggie and mineral? Justify away, Dear! That is how we survive! I'll even offer to help; I am sure the *silent* wer would also!
~aschuth
Mon, Jul 5, 1999 (05:41)
#75
If you're on that level, Marcia, you'll surely cause some heartbreak - how about the bakteria in cheese, bread dough and the like? They are, after all, alive.
If "no soul" qualifies what we can eat, I'm sure staff around this madhouse (superstar, of course) could come up with a list long enough to seriously feed the whole wide world on a diet of
ARTISTS WITHOUT SOUL .
De nada.
~MarciaH
Mon, Jul 5, 1999 (14:28)
#76
Oh no, Alex, that was entirely tongue-in-cheek. I am a devoutly carniverous omnivor and I need to be to survive. I was just questioning how far the others were willing to go in the attempt to prevent infliction of pain on fellow animals. Funny how we can cause mass extinction of humans in the name of defending what is "right" (name any war) but we dare not eat a humanely killed animal. I do not understand - but that is surely another topic in here somewhere, which has also degenerated into a sex thera
y session...
~aschuth
Mon, Jul 5, 1999 (14:52)
#77
What? SEX? Where? *Looking around* What? Where?
(Marcia, but what Are we going to do with all the e.g. musicians without soul, we surely can't let them go to waste like that!)
~stacey
Mon, Jul 5, 1999 (16:11)
#78
OT... (thanks Marcia!)
the jellyfish salad didn't 'look' offensive to me...
is it the taste or the texture that you believe pigeonholed it into this category?
~MarciaH
Mon, Jul 5, 1999 (17:15)
#79
Alex,(*also looking around*) I have not seen any...but always hoping...!
Haven't a clue about using those superfluous musicians there. Perhaps wer could whip a tasty sauce for them and they could be served. What I am still afraid of is if they will feel pain. Pain is the paramount question in the minds of the truly whacked-out!
(quite welcome, m'dear!) As to the Jellyfish - I do not know anyone who has tasted it, but this weekend's Little League games should give me ample opportunity of meeting someone who can shed some light as to taste and texture. I put them in this category since, when offered by me at a party in Drool, they were so offended they relegated the salad to a distant table where the poi and Spam were housed. I though it might be universal, but now I am most curious!
~riette
Tue, Jul 13, 1999 (13:50)
#80
The thing that sounds offensive about eating a jellyfish (even in salad) is that it is going to be a salty sort of jelly. That's the weird thing.
~MarciaH
Tue, Jul 13, 1999 (18:34)
#81
...and gray. I don't think I eat much that is gray and rubbery...
~riette
Wed, Jul 14, 1999 (14:17)
#82
I guess it would be good practise to chew on a used condom beforehand!
~MarciaH
Sat, Jul 24, 1999 (20:07)
#83
Are they gray???
~riette
Sun, Jul 25, 1999 (02:32)
#84
Only when having been used properly!
~MarciaH
Sun, Jul 25, 1999 (15:25)
#85
...Oh!....Ree, I have so many questions...I lead a very sheltered life...but that is definitely way Off topic!
~riette
Sun, Jul 25, 1999 (16:55)
#86
Well, not exactly. I defenitely categorize gray used condoms under 'Food that should not be' - don't you??
~KitchenManager
Sun, Jul 25, 1999 (23:48)
#87
if I showed up at a dinner party where they were served,
or found one in my salad at a restaurant, yes, I would...
~MarciaH
Sun, Jul 25, 1999 (23:54)
#88
This is happy news, indeed...
~riette
Mon, Jul 26, 1999 (03:43)
#89
Indeed! After all, it would take ages and ages to chew such a thing into a state where it can be swallowed.
~MarciaH
Mon, Jul 26, 1999 (12:41)
#90
I also imagine that the nutritive value is somewhere around nil unless you count the filler...
~autumn
Fri, Jul 30, 1999 (00:24)
#91
Ewwwwww!!!!!!!!1
~MarciaH
Fri, Jul 30, 1999 (17:46)
#92
Sorry, but I was trying to bring it back on topic...*lol*
~aschuth
Thu, Aug 5, 1999 (05:03)
#93
You girls never cease to amaze me - boldly stomp where men and angels would fear to tread...
~MarciaH
Thu, Aug 5, 1999 (11:49)
#94
Oh! You mean this can be read by just *anyone*...?! Oooops!
~WERoland
Sun, Aug 28, 2005 (16:51)
#95
Yep, however, it seems few are willing to continue in such a thread...
~MarciaH
Sat, Oct 1, 2005 (19:47)
#96
I was considering adding CFS but...
of course we want to continue the conversation ! NO matter how trivial