from the old server
Response 2 of 2: Marcia (MarciaH) * Wed, Jan 26, 2000 (19:34) * 161 lines
This article was forwarded to me by Maggie. I thought it important enough to create a Topic for it if necessary. Then I
found this one which speaks indirectly to the root of the problem. Please read this and comment.
The National Capital Chapter of the US National
Committee for UNIFEM is supporting UNIFEM's promotion
of Women's Human Rights through the Mali project '98
to Eradicate Female Genital Mutilation (FGM).
Approximately 94 percent of women aged 15 to 49 in
Mali have undergone FGM. Fear that their daughters
will remain unmarried is paramount among
justifications for the continuation of this practice,
despite the fact that excision sometimes leads to
serious injury and infection of the vagina, rectum,
bladder, and urethra leading to lifelong disabilities,
and in some cases death from bleeding during childbirth.
Background
Despite the increasing recognition of the critical
role played by women in the economic development of
developing countries, the practice of Female Genital
Mutilation--the removal of some of a girl's genitalia
-- continues to be practiced widely in parts of
Africa, Asia and the Middle East. The consequences of
the practice are grave for the girls affected.
Female genital mutilation often causes injury and
infection which lead to lifelong disabilities. It can
cause painful urination, tetanus, death from bleeding,
and difficulties in childbirth which ultimately
endanger the lives of both the child and the mother.
FGM is most often done by women, who carry on the
practice for a variety of social, religious,
traditional, economic and esthetic reasons. FGM is
part of a rite of passage into womanhood at which the
initiate is taught the roles expected of a wife, lover
and mother. In some societies a woman who has not
undergone the rite is considered unprepared for
marriage. Religion is used to justify the practice of
FGM in certain Islamic countries which portray FGM as
an obligation for Muslim purification.
There are global movements to eradicate the practice
of FGM in Africa. However, FGM is a complex issue
rooted in long-standing cultural values. Organizations
that are working to eliminate the practice must also
search for and develop appropriate alternative
strategies that will eliminate the harmful and
dangerous aspects while respecting cultural norms and values.
An alternative practice should take into account the
ability of the female population involved to make
informed decisions. This will result in systemic
change and empower women by showing them viable
alternatives to gender-specific roles and values.
FGM violates two important UN conventions on human
rights: the practice is an infraction of the
Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of
Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW); it also violates
the Convention against Torture and other Cruel,
Inhumane or Degrading Treatment or Punishment.
What is being done in Mali
There are locally led movements committed to totally
eradicating FGM through education of its harmful effects.
In June 1997 two events occurred towards this goal:
1. In a moving public ceremony, women practitioners of
excision from the Mopti region banded together and
voluntarily handed over their excision knives.
2. The Mali government committed to the total
eradication of FGM.
These two events are of the utmost importance. When
abandoning the practice of excision the women of the
Mopti region gave up their main livelihood in
anticipation of a promised alternative. This
powerfully demonstrates their dedication to the total
eradication of FGM. These women are now traveling in
Mali to educate their sisters about the dangers of
continuing this practice. Also, the government's
resolve to end the practice gives legitimacy to all
current efforts and requests for assistance.
The Women of Mali need your support!
Mali Project '98, with your support, will have an
immense positive impact on the lives of girls and
women in Mali. The support of the world's women is
needed to build the momentum necessary to end female
genital mutilation. Mali is our first step.
Your support of this project will directly assist the
Association for the Progress and the Defense of the
Rights of Malian Women (APDF), a local, non-partisan,
non-governmental organization (NGO), to implement an
intensive educational campaign in cooperation with the
former excision practitioners. Your contributions are
earmarked for this project and are tax-deductible.
What your contribution can provide:
$100
1. Training of one former excisioner:
to become a strong advocate for the eradication of FGM;
in alternative income generating skills.
2. Training of one opinion leader:
to become a strong advocate for the eradication of FGM.
3. The dissemination of 200 brochures or 240 cassettes
in local languages: to educate the general public about the dangers of FGM.
4. Grand Prize for creative "anti-FGM" slogan and
artwork in competition for high school students:
to be used in a nationwide information campaign
$50
1. The dissemination of 100 brochures or 120 cassettes
in local languages:
to educate the general public about the dangers of FGM.
2. One First Place Prize for creative "anti-FGM"
slogan or artwork competition in high schools:
to be used in a nationwide information campaign.
$30
1. The dissemination of 60 brochures or 75 cassettes in local languages:
to educate the general public about the dangers of FGM.
Video clip
An eight-minute video clip from "Rights of Passage"
sensitively and powerfully depicts FGM in Burkina
Faso, West Africa. The video can be ordered for US$10,
which will cover the cost of mailing and dubbing.
To order the video clip:
Please make checks payable to:
National Capital Chapter, US Committee, UNIFEM
Send orders to:
Sheryl J. Swed
President
National Capital Chapter
US National Committee for UNIFEM
4422 Washington Blvd.
Arlington, Virginia 22201
To make a donation to to the Mali Project:
Please make checks payable to:
National Capital Chapter, US Committee, UNIFEM
Send to:
Nancy B. Leidenfrost
Treasurer
National Capital Chapter
US National Committee for UNIFEM
235 South River Clubhouse Road
Hardwood, MD 20776
Footnotes
1. Source: Population Briefs Volume 3, Number 2, Spring, 1997.
United Nations Development Fund for Women
304 East 45th Street, 6th floor
New York, NY 10017
Tel: 212/906-6400 Fax: 212/906-6705
Website:
http://www.unifem.undp.org
Gopher:
gopher://gopher.undp.org/1/unifem
e-mail:
unifem@undp.org
Comments and suggestions:
webmaster.unifem@undp.org
Response 3 of 3: Marcia (MarciaH) * Thu, Jan 27, 2000 (14:57) * 453 lines
There is a lot on the net about this issue. This is
from an Amnesty International site
http://www.amnesty.org/ailib/intcam/femgen/fgml.htm
WHAT IS FEMALE GENITAL MUTILATION?
The different types of mutilation
Female genital mutilation (FGM) is the term used to
refer to the removal of part, or all, of the female
genitalia. The most severe form is infibulation, also
known as pharaonic circumcision. An estimated 15% of
all mutilations in Africa are infibulations. The
procedure consists of clitoridectomy (where all, or
part of, the clitoris is removed), excision (removal
of all, or part of, the labia minora), and cutting of
the labia majora to create raw surfaces, which are
then stitched or held together in order to form a
cover over the vagina when they heal. A small hole is
left to allow urine and menstrual blood to escape. In
some less conventional forms of infibulation, less
tissue is removed and a larger opening is left.
The vast majority (85%) of genital mutilations
performed in Africa consist of clitoridectomy or
excision. The least radical procedure consists of the
removal of the clitoral hood.
In some traditions a ceremony is held, but no
mutilation of the genitals occurs. The ritual may
include holding a knife next to the genitals, pricking
the clitoris, cutting some pubic hair, or light
scarification in the genital or upper thigh area.
The procedures followed
The type of mutilation practised, the age at which it
is carried out, and the way in which it is done varies
according to a variety of factors, including the woman
or girl's ethnic group, what country they are living
in, whether in a rural or urban area and their
socio-economic provenance.
The procedure is carried out at a variety of ages,
ranging from shortly after birth to some time during
the first pregnancy, but most commonly occurs between
the ages of four and eight. According to the World
Health Organization, the average age is falling. This
indicates that the practice is decreasingly associated
with initiation into adulthood, and this is believed
to be particularly the case in urban areas.
Some girls undergo genital mutilation alone, but
mutilation is more often undergone as a group of, for
example, sisters, other close female relatives or
neighbours. Where FGM is carried out as part of an
initiation ceremony, as is the case in societies in
eastern, central and western Africa, it is more likely
to be carried out on all the girls in the community
who belong to a particular age group.
The procedure may be carried out in the girl's home,
or the home of a relative or neighbour, in a health
centre, or, especially if associated with initiation,
at a specially designated site, such as a particular
tree or river. The person performing the mutilation
may be an older woman, a traditional midwife or
healer, a barber, or a qualified midwife or doctor.
Girls undergoing the procedure have varying degrees of
knowledge about what will happen to them. Sometimes
the event is associated with festivities and gifts.
Girls are exhorted to be brave. Where the mutilation
is part of an initiation rite, the festivities may be
major events for the community. Usually only women are
allowed to be present.
Sometimes a trained midwife will be available to give
a local anaesthetic. In some cultures, girls will be
told to sit beforehand in cold water, to numb the area
and reduce the likelihood of bleeding. More commonly,
however, no steps are taken to reduce the pain. The
girl is immobilized, held, usually by older women,
with her legs open. Mutilation may be carried out
using broken glass, a tin lid, scissors, a razor blade
or some other cutting instrument. When infibulation
takes place, thorns or stitches may be used to hold
the two sides of the labia majora together, and the
legs may be bound together for up to 40 days.
Antiseptic powder may be applied, or, more usually,
pastes - containing herbs, milk, eggs, ashes or dung -
which are believed to facilitate healing. The girl may
be taken to a specially designated place to recover
where, if the mutilation has been carried out as part
of an initiation ceremony, traditional teaching is
imparted. For the very rich, the mutilation procedure
may be performed by a qualified doctor in hospital
under local or general anaesthetic.
Geographical distribution of female genital mutilation
An estimated 135 million of the world's girls and
women have undergone genital mutilation, and two
million girls a year are at risk of mutilation -
approximately 6,000 per day. It is practised
extensively in Africa and is common in some countries
in the Middle East. It also occurs, mainly among
immigrant communities, in parts of Asia and the
Pacific, North and Latin America and Europe.
FGM is reportedly practised in more than 28 African
countries (see FGM in Africa: Information by Country
(ACT 77/07/97)). There are no figures to indicate how
common FGM is in Asia. It has been reported among
Muslim populations in Indonesia, Sri Lanka and
Malaysia, although very little is known about the
practice in these countries. In India, a small Muslim
sect, the Daudi Bohra, practise clitoridectomy.
In the Middle East, FGM is practised in Egypt, Oman,
Yemen and the United Arab Emirates.
There have been reports of FGM among certain
indigenous groups in central and south America, but
little information is available.
In industrialized countries, genital mutilation occurs
predominantly among immigrants from countries where
mutilation is practised. It has been reported in
Australia, Canada, Denmark, France, Italy, the
Netherlands, Sweden, the UK and USA. Girls or girl
infants living in industrialized countries are
sometimes operated on illegally by doctors from their
own community who are resident there. More frequently,
traditional practitioners are brought into the country
or girls are sent abroad to be mutilated. No figures
are available on how common the practise is among the
populations of industrialized countries.
The physical and psychological effects of female
genital mutilation
Physical effects
The effects of genital mutilation can lead to death.
At the time the mutilation is carried out, pain,
shock, haemorrhage and damage to the organs
surrounding the clitoris and labia can occur.
Afterwards urine may be retained and serious infection
develop. Use of the same instrument on several girls
without sterilization can cause the spread of HIV.
More commonly, the chronic infections, intermittent
bleeding, abscesses and small benign tumours of the
nerve which can result from clitoridectomy and
excision cause discomfort and extreme pain.
Infibulation can have even more serious long-term
effects: chronic urinary tract infections, stones in
the bladder and urethra, kidney damage, reproductive
tract infections resulting from obstructed menstrual
flow, pelvic infections, infertility, excessive scar
tissue, keloids (raised, irregularly shaped,
progressively enlarging scars) and dermoid cysts.
First sexual intercourse can only take place after
gradual and painful dilation of the opening left after
mutilation. In some cases, cutting is necessary before
intercourse can take place. In one study carried out
in Sudan, 15% of women interviewed reported that
cutting was necessary before penetration could be
achieved.1 Some new wives are seriously damaged by
unskilful cutting carried out by their husbands. A
possible additional problem resulting from all types
of female genital mutilation is that lasting damage to
the genital area can increase the risk of HIV
transmission during intercourse.
During childbirth, existing scar tissue on excised
women may tear. Infibulated women, whose genitals have
been tightly closed, have to be cut to allow the baby
to emerge. If no attendant is present to do this,
perineal tears or obstructed labour can occur. After
giving birth, women are often reinfibulated to make
them "tight" for their husbands. The constant cutting
and restitching of a women's genitals with each birth
can result in tough scar tissue in the genital area.
The secrecy surrounding FGM, and the protection of
those who carry it out, make collecting data about
complications resulting from mutilation difficult.
When problems do occur these are rarely attributed to
the person who performed the mutilation. They are more
likely to be blamed on the girl's alleged
"promiscuity" or the fact that sacrifices or rituals
were not carried out properly by the parents. Most
information is collected retrospectively, often a long
time after the event. This means that one has to rely
on the accuracy of the woman's memory, her own
assessment of the severity of any resulting
complications, and her perception of whether any
health problems were associated with mutilation.
Some data on the short and long-term medical effects
of FGM, including those associated with pregnancy,
have been collected in hospital or clinic-based
studies, and this has been useful in acquiring a
knowledge of the range of health problems that can
result. However, the incidence of these problems, and
of deaths as a result of mutilation, cannot be
reliably estimated. Supporters of the practice claim
that major complications and problems are rare, while
opponents of the practice claim that they are
frequent.
Effects on sexuality
Genital mutilation can make first intercourse an
ordeal for women. It can be extremely painful, and
even dangerous, if the woman has to be cut open; for
some women, intercourse remains painful. Even where
this is not the case, the importance of the clitoris
in experiencing sexual pleasure and orgasm suggests
that mutilation involving partial or complete
clitoridectomy would adversely affect sexual
fulfilment. Clinical considerations and the majority
of studies on women's enjoyment of sex suggest that
genital mutilation does impair a women's enjoyment.
However, one study found that 90% of the infibulated
women interviewed reported experiencing orgasm.2 The
mechanisms involved in sexual enjoyment and orgasm are
still not fully understood, but it is thought that
compensatory processes, some of them psychological,
may mitigate some of the effects of removal of the
clitoris and other sensitive parts of the genitals.
Psychological effects
The psychological effects of FGM are more difficult to
investigate scientifically than the physical ones. A
small number of clinical cases of psychological
illness related to genital mutilation have been
reported.3 Despite the lack of scientific evidence,
personal accounts of mutilation reveal feelings of
anxiety, terror, humiliation and betrayal, all of
which would be likely to have long-term negative
effects. Some experts suggest that the shock and
trauma of the operation may contribute to the
behaviour described as "calmer" and "docile",
considered positive in societies that practise female
genital mutilation.
Festivities, presents and special attention at the
time of mutilation may mitigate some of the trauma
experienced, but the most important psychological
effect on a woman who has survived is the feeling that
she is acceptable to her society, having upheld the
traditions of her culture and made herself eligible
for marriage, often the only role available to her. It
is possible that a woman who did not undergo genital
mutilation could suffer psychological problems as a
result of rejection by the society. Where the
FGM-practising community is in a minority, women are
thought to be particularly vulnerable to psychological
problems, caught as they are between the social norms
of their own community and those of the majority
culture.
Why FGM is practised
Cultural identity
Custom and tradition are by far the most frequently
cited reasons for FGM. Along with other physical or
behavioural characteristics, FGM defines who is in the
group. This is most obvious where mutilation is
carried out as part of the initiation into adulthood.
Jomo Kenyatta, the late President of Kenya, argued
that FGM was inherent in the initiation which is in
itself an essential part of being Kikuyu, to such an
extent that "abolition... will destroy the tribal
system".5 A study in Sierra Leone reported a similar
feeling about the social and political cohesion
promoted by the Bundo and Sande secret societies, who
carry out initiation mutilations and teaching.
Many people in FGM-practising societies, especially
traditional rural communities, regard FGM as so normal
that they cannot imagine a woman who has not undergone
mutilation. Others are quoted as saying that only
outsiders or foreigners are not genitally mutilated. A
girl cannot be considered an adult in a FGM-practising
society unless she has undergone FGM.
"Of course I shall have them circumcised exactly as
their parents, grandparents and sisters were
circumcised. This is our custom."
An Egyptian woman, talking about her young daughters 4
Gender identity
FGM is often deemed necessary in order for a girl to
be considered a complete woman, and the practice marks
the divergence of the sexes in terms of their future
roles in life and marriage.
The removal of the clitoris and labia ' viewed by some
as the "male parts" of a woman's body ' is thought to
enhance the girl's femininity, often synonymous with
docility and obedience.
It is possible that the trauma of mutilation may have
this effect on a girl's personality. If mutilation is
part of an initiation rite, then it is accompanied by
explicit teaching about the woman's role in her
society. "We are circumcised and insist on
circumcising our daughters so that there is no mixing
between male and female... An uncircumcised woman is
put to shame by her husband, who calls her 'you with
the clitoris'. People say she is like a man. Her organ
would prick the man..."
An Egyptian woman 6
Control of women's sexuality and reproductive
functions
In many societies, an important reason given for FGM
is the belief that it reduces a woman's desire for
sex, therefore reducing the chance of sex outside
marriage. The ability of unmutilated women to be
faithful through their own choice is doubted. In many
FGM-practising societies, it is extremely difficult,
if not impossible, for a woman to marry if she has not
undergone mutilation. In the case of infibulation, a
woman is "sewn up" and "opened" only for her husband.
Societies that practise infibulation are strongly
patriarchal. Preventing women from indulging in
"illegitimate" sex, and protecting them from unwilling
sexual relations, are vital because the honour of the
whole family is seen to be dependent on it.
Infibulation does not, however, provide a guarantee
against "illegitimate" sex, as a woman can be "opened"
and "closed" again.
In some cultures, enhancement of the man's sexual
pleasure is a reason cited for mutilation. Anecdotal
accounts, however, suggest that men prefer unmutilated
women as sexual partners. "Circumcision makes women
clean, promotes virginity and chastity and guards
young girls from sexual frustration by deadening their
sexual appetite."
Mrs Njeri, a defender of female genital mutilation in
Kenya7
Beliefs about hygiene, aesthetics and health
Cleanliness and hygiene feature consistently as
justifications for FGM. Popular terms for mutilation
are synonymous with purification (tahara in Egypt,
tahur in Sudan), or cleansing (sili-ji among the
Bambarra, an ethnic group in Mali). In some
FGM-practising societies, unmutilated women are
regarded as unclean and are not allowed to handle food
and water.
Testimony
"I was genitally mutilated at the age of ten. I was
told by my late grandmother that they were taking me
down to the river to perform a certain ceremony, and
afterwards I would be given a lot of food to eat. As
an innocent child, I was led like a sheep to be
slaughtered.
Once I entered the secret bush, I was taken to a very
dark room and undressed. I was blindfolded and
stripped naked. I was then carried by two strong women
to the site for the operation. I was forced to lie
flat on my back by four strong women, two holding
tight to each leg. Another woman sat on my chest to
prevent my upper body from moving. A piece of cloth
was forced in my mouth to stop me screaming. I was
then shaved.
When the operation began, I put up a big fight. The
pain was terrible and unbearable. During this fight, I
was badly cut and lost blood. All those who took part
in the operation were half-drunk with alcohol. Others
were dancing and singing, and worst of all, had
stripped naked.
I was genitally mutilated with a blunt penknife.
After the operation, no one was allowed to aid me to
walk. The stuff they put on my wound stank and was
painful. These were terrible times for me. Each time I
wanted to urinate, I was forced to stand upright. The
urine would spread over the wound and would cause
fresh pain all over again. Sometimes I had to force
myself not to urinate for fear of the terrible pain. I
was not given any anaesthetic in the operation to
reduce my pain, nor any antibiotics to fight against
infection. Afterwards, I haemorrhaged and became
anaemic. This was attributed to witchcraft. I suffered
for a long time from acute vaginal infections."
Hannah Koroma, Sierra Leone
Connected with this is the perception in
FGM-practising communities that women's unmutilated
genitals are ugly and bulky. In some cultures, there
is a belief that a woman's genitals can grow and
become unwieldy, hanging down between her legs, unless
the clitoris is excised. Some groups believe that a
woman's clitoris is dangerous and that if it touches a
man's penis he will die. Others believe that if the
baby's head touches the clitoris during childbirth,
the baby will die.
Ideas about the health benefits of FGM are not unique
to Africa. In 19th Century England, there were debates
as to whether clitoridectomy could cure women of
"illnesses" such as hysteria and "excessive"
masturbation. Clitoridectomy continued to be practised
for these reasons until well into this century in the
USA. However, health benefits are not the most
frequently cited reason for mutilation in societies
where it is still practised; where they are, it is
more likely to be because mutilation is part of an
initiation where women are taught to be strong and
uncomplaining about illness. Some societies where FGM
is practised believe that it enhances fertility, the
more extreme believing that an unmutilated woman
cannot conceive. In some cultures it is believed that
clitoridectomy makes childbirth safer.
Religion
FGM predates Islam and is not practised by the
majority of Muslims, but has acquired a religious
dimension. Where it is practised by Muslims, religion
is frequently cited as a reason. Many of those who
oppose mutilation deny that there is any link between
the practise and religion, but Islamic leaders are not
unanimous on the subject. The Qur'an does not contain
any call for FGM, but a few hadith (sayings attributed
to the Prophet Muhammad) refer to it. In one case, in
answer to a question put to him by 'Um 'Attiyah (a
practitioner of FGM), the Prophet is quoted as saying
"reduce but do not destroy". Mutilation has persisted
among some converts to Christianity. Christian
missionaries have tried to discourage the practice,
but found it to be too deep rooted. In some cases, in
order to keep converts, they have ignored and even
condoned the practice.
FGM was practised by the Falasha (Ethiopian Jews), but
it is not known if the practise has persisted
following their emigration to Israel. The remainder of
the FGM-practising community follow traditional
Animist religions.
Resp 4 of 4: Maggie (sociolingo) Tue, Feb 1, 2000 (13:03) 10 lines
Not sure if this the right place but:
For a recent (March 1999) analysis of the 1994 genocide in Rwanda see
the 807 page report by Alison Des Forges, _Leave None to Tell the Story:
Genocide in Rwanda_ (Human Rights Watch, March 1999) available online at
http://www.hrw.org/reports/1999/rwanda/
Resp 5 of 6: Marcia (MarciaH) Tue, Feb 1, 2000 (16:59) 1 lines
Thanks Maggie..it is as good as any place you could post it.
Resp 6 of 6: Paul Terry Walhus (terry) Wed, Feb 2, 2000 (07:09) 2 lines
You'll want to repost it at the new site, as this old site is going down soon.