~terry
Sat, Aug 9, 1997 (06:52)
seed
The Spring as a virtual community is free. Always has been.
Hope it always will be.
But there are businesses and groups that could use the
technology evolved here on the Spring to develop both inhouse and
customer communications. Professors at universities could use the
Spring as an instructive device and a place for seminars. Or for
distance education.
A good example of this is Virtual Online University which is one
of the projects of Bryan Venable (spif@spring.com), our sometimes
springeur. Their fees are very reasonable and they make special
payment arrangements to those in need.
I can also see the potential for vcs in the primary and secondary
school areas with more and more home computers. And the
potential for homeschooling is tremendous.
~terry
Sat, Aug 9, 1997 (07:13)
#1
Continuing with Bryan's stuff, you can check out Athena Prep
Academy at http://www.athena.edu.
The key to having a successful VC as business is to entice folks
to use it, the infrastructure part is very workable as we have
shown on the Spring with our evolving conferencing interface. You
need a good mix of folks who can keep conversations going and stir
up ideas.
Now, we're talking about "niche communities". An example of this
is the recently formed 'bronte' conference here which has a nice
mix of folks who are passionately interested in talking about the
Bronte sisters. I believe this is a good model for other niche
communities forming. We have a 'cars' conference that is
multilingual composed of folks who are fervent about a particular
make/model of car.
Keys to success of business vc's are good hosting, management
interest in the public areas, well thought out policies, and a lot
of nurturing. It would also help to have a team of crack
designers and professional hosts.
Another area that is largely untapped is technical support,
oftentimes customers can support each other via a conferencing
environment. A good evolving example of this is our 'apps'
conferencing that provides forums for about 350 software companies
and is linked to all the reviews that Forrest Stroud writes on his
renowned software review site at http://www.stroud.com. And this
is 24x7 support, hard to pay for that level of support isn't it?
~terry
Thu, Sep 3, 1998 (04:10)
#2
credit a mysterious Kerri for this research:
BUILDING COMMUNITY FOR BUSINESS SITES
Tipster, "Online Communities and E-Commerce,"
Webcentric, 12/2/97. Online communities help create
repeat visits and can improve customer intimacy and add
to E-Commerce sales. Six insights for creating "lasting bonds."
http://www.webcentricman.com/html/i_tip_ec_community_1297.html
Laura Miller, "Building Online Communities (that Sell),"
Manufacturing Marketplace, 3/24/98. Michael Barrett of
GeoCities discusses his firm's model to attract
segmented groups, and then form them with a combination
of encouragement and economic factors.
Sees communities as providing low-cost content for business sites.
http://www.manufacturing.net/dc/mm040398v.htm
Matt Carkci, "Be a Destination," NetProfit, 4/5/98. To
bring people to your site without high costs,
recommends becoming a destination site by forming an
online community, and by developing content appreciate
customers of your niche market.
http://www.netprofit-mag.com/issues/980405/980405.htm
Kevin Jones, "Community Gives Rise To Commerce,"
Inter@ctive Week, 5/11/98. Business-to-business
companies Tradecompass and Questlink Technology are
adding e-commerce capabilities to their sites to take
advantage of the information-exchange communities
they have built up over the past year.
http://www.zdnet.com/intweek/printhigh/51198/extra511.html
~terry
Tue, Jan 12, 1999 (06:30)
#3
There was an article in the Wall Street Journal (January 6th (page B6)
on virtual communities.
It's a survey of community web sites. The hype lead quotes Media Metrix
research as saying "Community sites are one of the fastest-growing
categories of WEb sites".
They present 5 categories of such sites:
- Web-Page Building
- Chat and Message Boards
- Your own VIP Room: The Virtual Velvet Rope (for private web page
sections and chat rooms, doesn't really consider private conferences)
- Content and Services (mentioning Excite, Yahoo, MSN, Moms ONline and
SeniorNet)
- Shopping and cashing in (sites that let you set up links to online
sellers and Xoom.)
~ratthing
Tue, Jan 12, 1999 (13:44)
#4
terry thanks for pointing out that article. i have been interested
in different ways to categorize the new interactive web sites and
this should help.
~KitchenManager
Wed, Jan 13, 1999 (18:09)
#5
Terry:
Who would you like to see The Spring be more like?
Generally speaking of look, feel, services offered, etc...
~terry
Thu, Jan 14, 1999 (05:52)
#6
I'd like to see more users! More users=more content and at some point it
means we get off the launching pad. We need more interesting sub pages
that folks can visit and clearer navigation.
~ratthing
Thu, Jan 14, 1999 (09:49)
#7
terry, have you ever considered using another conferencing tool besides
yapp? i really really like Caucus (http://screenporch.com). it is
super simple for users and presents a very nice UI.
another option, that i am very seriously considering, is to rewrite the
interface we use here on the spring.
~terry
Thu, Jan 14, 1999 (14:22)
#8
We used Caucus here for about two years. It's still in the archives.
~ratthing
Thu, Jan 14, 1999 (15:27)
#9
no way!!! i didnt know that. so any thoughts on going back to it?
~terry
Fri, Jan 15, 1999 (05:50)
#10
Well, it's very expensive and Yapp seems to be very stable. It would be a
major change. But we did use it for the first couple of years we were
online. It was a whole different era with different players. You can
read the stuff from this period in the "archives" on the Spring's main
page. ECHO uses Caucus, and one of the first conferencing systems I
participated in, MetaNet, used it. It has some interesting features, but
I've come to like Yapp better. Of course, I haven't looked at the latest
incarnation of Caucus with the web interface. I think we could customize
Yapp with scripts to do the features that Caucus has, and both are linear
as opposed to threaded conferencing.
~ratthing
Fri, Jan 15, 1999 (10:01)
#11
that brings up a coupla good points. first, the latest version of caucus
has an absolutely gorgeous web interface. it is really easy to use
too. you can see it by going to screenporch's web site and surfing
thru their demo setup.
one potentially bad thing about caucus is that the telnet interface
sucks rocks. that may not be such a problem since only 3 or 4 of
us telnet in, but still.
anyway, if you like yapp better terry, then i agree with you, since
you da man. i think we definitely need to work on upgrading the
UI for yapp.
~KitchenManager
Fri, Jan 15, 1999 (10:02)
#12
telnet, web or both, Ray?
~terry
Fri, Jan 15, 1999 (10:32)
#13
Caucus does both. ECHO has been pretty successful with it.
I'll give it another look and see what the costs would be, both in terms
of programming, relearning and actual dollar costs.
~ratthing
Fri, Jan 15, 1999 (16:06)
#14
me, i telnet in about 95% of the time. when i do web, it is generally to
cut and paste info into the science conf, which i need to so soon here.
terry, i will be very glad to be your caucus admin, free of charge. i know
a lot about the system, and can pop up to cedar creek when i have to.
~terry
Sat, Jan 16, 1999 (18:59)
#15
Or, Austin. What's their demo website? caucus.com?
~ratthing
Sat, Jan 16, 1999 (21:34)
#16
http://screenporch.com
~wer
Sun, Jan 17, 1999 (23:09)
#17
what I meant, Ray, was which Yapp interface do you think needs
more work, telnet or web?
~terry
Mon, Jan 18, 1999 (08:24)
#18
Well, telnet is so limited to a few folks, but it's so awesome. The world
at large is web crazy.
~ratthing
Mon, Jan 18, 1999 (09:58)
#19
web, definitely. i've been reading the admin guide that comes with
Yapp (admin_guide.ps) to decided where we should begin.
~terry
Mon, Jan 18, 1999 (10:14)
#20
How did you read that postscript file, what did you use?
~ratthing
Mon, Jan 18, 1999 (11:07)
#21
i use ghostscript on Linux. you should be able to snarf a copy
of ghostscript for you boxen, terry. it allows you to not only
view a document in an X window, but also to print it to a non
postscript printer.
~wer
Mon, Jan 18, 1999 (22:31)
#22
well, the web interface (and re-arranging it) is what I'm
most familiar with, and Kaylene is great about answering
questions...in fact, she has scripts for me to install here,
but the only way I know how to do so causes bugs in some of
them...
what do you have in mind?
~wer
Mon, Jan 18, 1999 (22:45)
#23
hey, Ray, can you "translate" that document into plain
text and put it up on it's own page(s) somewhere around
here and give me the url and/or just convert it to a text
file and put it up on here somewhere so I can ftp it here?
I've never gotten to read that documentation, if it's the
one I'm thinking of...
~ratthing
Mon, Jan 18, 1999 (23:00)
#24
there is no easy way to translate a ps file into anything readable, wer.
let me take a look around and see if i can locate a converter.
if you are on a windows box, i believe there is a port of ghostscript
for windows.
the admin guide file is titled "Yapp 3.0.13 Administration Guide." it is
about 40 pages long and has the following sections:
1. introduction
2. getting started
3. user administration
4. conference administration
5. configuring the look and feel of the bbs
6. log files
7. troubleshooting
Appendix. Man pages
if you guys want, i can snail mail a copy of the document to you.
~terry
Tue, Jan 19, 1999 (08:31)
#25
That would be very cool. Put me on that snail mail list.
If you could get it in to Adobe Acrobat format so we could put it on the
website, that would be awesome. Then it would really be world readanble
and intact in the format it was intended.
~KitchenManager
Fri, Jan 22, 1999 (10:00)
#26
I'd love to have a hardcopy, Ray!
~terry
Fri, Jan 22, 1999 (13:21)
#27
This is that topic I couldn't find the other day.
http://www.acquireedknowledge.com is the program that helps with pdf
creation. That clipping of Daniels is still sitting next to my computer
at home.
~KitchenManager
Sat, Jan 23, 1999 (13:50)
#28
Ray:
What do you think are the biggest negatives with the Yapp web interface?
~ratthing
Sat, Jan 23, 1999 (20:15)
#29
the only negative aspect of it is that it is not laid out well. there
is either too much stuff on one page or not enough. also it just doesnt
look real purdy.
this is all just my own useless opinion, of course. on the plus side,
yapp is very fast and easy to maintain and use.
~KitchenManager
Sun, Jan 24, 1999 (13:33)
#30
cool...what you mentioned is relatively easy to change...
~KitchenManager
Sun, Jan 24, 1999 (13:43)
#31
which page(s) do you think are laid out poorly?
~ratthing
Wed, Jan 27, 1999 (10:45)
#32
the main menu page and the conference home pages mostly.
~KitchenManager
Wed, Jan 27, 1999 (15:00)
#33
main and browse, gotcha...what are your recommendations?
~ratthing
Wed, Jan 27, 1999 (20:43)
#34
hmm, thats a good question...
how bout http://screenporch.com for starters?
~visitor
Wed, Jan 27, 1999 (23:24)
#35
I can make main look like that,
no problem!
~ratthing
Thu, Feb 7, 2036 (03:24)
#36
http://www.tripod.com/explore/computers_internet/yourlife/columns/macdonald/980402.html
a good article on virtual communities.
~terry
Wed, Feb 3, 1999 (14:12)
#37
Great, I'll check it out.